070046_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qua!

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
September 22, 1997
Mr. Ronnie Huettmann
17076 Hwy 32 N
Pinetown, NC 27865
Subject: Annual Compliance Inspection
Facility Number 7-46
Beaufort County
Dear Mr. Huettmann:
5rATZ�
,pkL �
On August 27, 1997, Carl Dunn from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality conducted an inspection of your intensive livestock operation. This inspection is one of two
annual inspections as required by Senate Bill 1217. The Division of Soil and Water Conservation will
also conduct an inspection of your intensive livestock operation during the 1997 calender year.
The following comments are in regard to the inspection of facility 7-12.
* The freeboard was observed to be approximately 10.0 feet for your lagoons. You are advised
that you must maintain a freeboard of at least two feet for your lagoon.
* You are reminded that your lagoon and waste management system have been permitted
with the State through an individual nondischarge permit. Your farm is subject to all
terms and conditions within this individual permit.
Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection. If you have any questions in regard to this
letter I can be contacted at [phone] ext. 208.
Sincerely,
Carl Dunn
Environmental Engineer
cc:aRO Files
DSWC - WaRO
Beaufort County NRCS
Compliance/Enforcement Group
Central Files
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27989 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

►�,
A V
..::.:.,e.,... .... .............................. . ... ............... ... ..... ... ..................... I..... .................. ... ................... ... - ...
DSWC Animal Feedlot
Operation Review
.- '.Pis..`.- :: •x...��s•
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection n
10 Routine Q Complaint
Q Follow-up (if MV0 inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 7
Date of Inspection
21"z9%
Time of Inspection
?JF7 24 hr. (hh:mm)
JFRegistered © Certified
© Applied for Permit M Permitted
113 Not O erational I
Date Last Operated;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„
Faris] Name: C
........ .........
.S��Ik7n 4 ' ^,"n....
.... ..................... .......................
... County:........................................................'...
......................
OwnerName: ....... ............................
�A vMr e n.(� � /L�{w.�
............ WC I4,�.,H Phone No:....................................................................... ......n....... .. 27yl
Facility Contact: ....................................................
..........+cj�w+K.n ... Title:
..
...........
PhoneNo:
Mailing Address-�.... �7+�7f7 �7..32 � .... Pie f�> ��,-- � 7�6
... ....
.......
❑nsite Reprcwntatire:. RaHn"� ue u
......................... •-•..............................-------------------....... Integrator: .......... ........... ........ .. ... �..
Certified Operator........,ROV% ^?.e------- �'"@1-F•^° Operator Certification Number- -.xS6{. :........5 .----
Location of farm:
Latitude ]• & .4 Longitude • ' 0°'
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boar,;
0
'o
Design Current Design - Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity. Population
❑ Laver JE1 Dairy
❑ Non -Laver I I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number or Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds I❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need mairiteriancelimprovement:'
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ I..agoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the cony evance maul -made'
b. lfdisthar_c is o•bscrved, dial it reach Surface Water? (lf yes.. notify DLL Q)
c. If dischaErge is observed. what is the estimated flow in I-alfmin'
cl. Doe, discharge bypass a lagoon syste.m'? (If yes. notify DWQ)
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenanceliinprovement?
6, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design:?
❑ Yes KN❑
❑ Yes $ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes $N❑
❑ Yes Of No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Jnl No
Continued on back
7. Did the facility fail to ha-%•e a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97

t.
Facility Number: 7 -
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? D Yes' D9 No
Structures fLazoonsjloldingr Ponds, Flush Pitsgtc.).
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? El Yes WNo
Structure I -Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure- 4 Structure 5
Structure 0
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): .......... to ... ....... ............................ ....... ................ ....... . .......... ......................... ................................. ...
...................
................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
b—d No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
El Yes
&No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
El Yes
No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered ves, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat. notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structure~ lack adequate minimum or Max i rnu ni liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NVaste Applicat ion
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application'?
E]Yes
No
(If in excess of WMP, or run ffentering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15.
Cr ........... ...... .......... ­ ...................
op type ...
16.
Do the receiving crop-, differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
[3 Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application'?
0 Yes
IgNo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
0 Yes
14 NO
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment"
0 Yes
XNo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
1§ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
49 No
22.
Does record keepin., need improvement'!
❑ Yes
*hNo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Managemem Plan readily available?
C�
[I Yes
[I No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
El Yes
❑ No
25,
Were any additional problem,; noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
[I Yes
❑ No
0 No -violations- or deficiencies were -noted during this,visit.-You.Wi[I receive no ftirtlier
correspondence about this -visit:
Comments (refer to question #): Explain:anv YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other: comments.
Use draWings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as: necessary)-.:.:
V-�, -X43A 16�1
.4 2-50- Or A0,4 4- clv,� IA(red�—
A,
5iAby -6 'A ""S� C6,' 1W
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name NA
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 9- 2-7- -F7