310353_HISTORICAL_20171231

14
2 ly
NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

Type of Visit: ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit,$'lroutine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: (Q 'J Arrival Time: Departure Time: d O County:_ Region:
Farm Name: GQYLw Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: p r. �v� �n t a
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: ) I U b 3
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Pop.
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity 114
Wean to Finish Layer
1[!Farrow
Cattle
DairyCow
DairyCalf
Dai Heifer
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
can to Feeder
Non -La er
Feeder to Finish
Z't09
to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Design Current
Dr, P,oult, Ca aci P.o ,
Lavers
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
jBeef Brood Cow
Gilts
Non -Layers
Boars
Pullets
Other
Other
Parke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ N NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes WNao"'
❑ NA 0 NE
[:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility, Number: 31 - W3 Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [] Yes C �No❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in)
.39
Structure 4
5. Are there any irrunediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
[:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes E?rNo NA ❑ NE
$. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? . ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12, Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑Yes Nc NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes��NoD NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes hio NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
io❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
1
o NA
❑
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
[] Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspectio;--No
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
ETNow❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 31- s Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
6<0 ❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑'No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
rNo[:]
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
a NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ffNo 0 NA
❑ Yes No❑ NA
❑ Yes D-vow❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments: =
Use drawings of facility -to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
�9_ a Co n�_ra(
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
✓ L tlI �p �.�- / 61
Phone: 1(9 71 6 7�s
Date: 6 (2 G 4 (' 7
21412015

.,i
� Ui`vi"sion of Water Resources
Facility Number I� - 3 f ®Division of Soil and Water Conservation
© Other Agency
type of Visit: Q-Co'mplia a Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: I / �[U� Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: e-
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: ) 14 b 1
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Design
Cattle Capacity
Current
Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
airy Cow
W n to Feeder
Nan -La er
Dairy Calf
eeder to Finish
i 4
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
I)r, P,oultr,
Layers
Ca aci P,o
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Othe I ITurkeyPoults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑Yes
❑No
❑NA
ONE
❑ Yes
9I�
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: `; - '� Date of Ins ection: 2—
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 5 %
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ]�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
Ef'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
E
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12, Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ffNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
CDN
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
EI�N o,
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ YesF]-N-o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
i
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[� o
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard Q W ste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I " Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

i
FaciliNumber: 13- Date of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ETN­o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes EjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No LJ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes rNo
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
]�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
,❑7lo
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
0 NA
❑ NE
Gomm eists.(refer:t©'question.#)::Explain any -YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use'draivings^of facili0jo4ettkegplain situations (use additional pages,=as.necessary).
2 �u s-<-d L^�o n� 5 Ci^a lGS � S on Sa f �e4.- S r
V/0 0/f
-- /nr t j 9n C
L9PV
Reviewer/Inspector Name: oa—'C &, . -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
L"PCfa4z
Phone: 19 7t-1 % 3 D
Date: �AU
21412015

' Di'vi-sion of Water Resources
C
ty Number - S Division of Soil and Water Conservation
t� Other Agency
Type of Visit: om ' nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason4 Viiif:" Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:/ Arrival Time: Departure Time: i O 30 County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: 00 AA P �� �¢ l n �� u
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: �G
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
I I 11-ayer I
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
DaiEy Cow
Wean to Feeder
I jNon-Layer I
Dairy Calf
eeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Design Current
a
D F $ouItr, Cacit P■o ,
Layers
Non -Layer
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
[-]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
I__I N -❑
NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: j - 3 jDate of inspection: tr 2 5
Waste Collection & Treatment
�
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
[:]Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ YesFI-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
]�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[—]Yes
6 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
r
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
Cj"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
E5'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
NrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
El Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
L'J�N;
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
�fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ W UP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
2l. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check t e appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes LJ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: 3 - 31,3Date of Inspection: /
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes U 'moo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No E NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Ef No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Z p7
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑Yes
L�rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). -
Fr'e(J.l(7a!( rwd 3 (&.Lz4t)�.sk *70t�k sI'd e 4'0,411 -C_
r•e f ! k,L �6� r\ q J 1 r f/ �i r� sr L✓. h A -.�3 ' 11� �E` d !- fO-C
G�f s ,gr.�(ys`s
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatw
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 1 <I 7 rV 7301�
Date: 2
21412015

Type of Visit: I.Jarcompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: I-ergoutine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: eparture Time: County Region: �J I
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Alp
Title:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: L9ti(p-s
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pap.
Layer
C►attle
Dairy Cow
Design
C*apacity
C►urrent
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
I
INon-Layer
Ell
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Design C►urrent
D P,ouI C_a aci P,o P.
Daig Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
ILayers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Boars
Qther
Other
-
Discharzes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
r
❑ Yes,.;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E�`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E5No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes JEJ'Tlo
❑ Yes f:fNo
❑ Yes -rfNo
❑NA ONE
❑ NA ❑ NE
0 NA 0 NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

f
Facility Number: Date of Ins ection:
It
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
Zr No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Struce 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): c2 (�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
; 'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
;2'Po
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
TT
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
37No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
D Yes
j��No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
T
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes E2-Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? T
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 2"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes '�no ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.))
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable [] Yes �' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination? T
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes %To ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP [:]Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[ja Yes
JVNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Waste Analysis ElSoil Analysis
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard tAI'
ElWaste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[:]Yes
L?(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[—]Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

IFaciHty Number: 113ate of Inspection: 2
24. Did thefacility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permi . ❑ Yes L2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes O-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ,EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ;]`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes J�5'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 12!r"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Jallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes )ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes �lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 01140 ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawines of facilitv.to better explain situations (use additional uaees as necessarv).
q01 //V ,slime. lea_ c9ew
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
U5-e-A ql1q,)(3
CA'Y1aI�)15 foC (narcG�
Cv2sle �ffti�f�s�s
A C C-d'
Phone: `
Date: %
//:j
2 41201

Facility0 4-
Number: 3 - I� Date of Inspection: O ��
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Other Issues
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers anchor any additional recommendations or any other comments.,,.,_;ri
;;...°.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).-"
Lad K Da° J .
►,Jeed 4'C3
r ao tie
)'.5 '
a100it _-T p
-Fac ms .
�(d11AZ
t l�� � ate 1^s1peCA ,
. Awl DirVb6" 5- 4l is 03�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Or
",.j
s e-R'z
Phone: —7
Date: D
21412011

_ ;. is .P *'.r _.>•.. °�`P w it
ivision of Water ua ty
,1
Ea�
clllty'Number' J DtvWon of Soil and Water Conservation
a w« 'a
-Q Otber Agency
Type of Visit ompliance Inspection Operation Review Structure Evaluation Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County. Region:
Farm Name: X4 Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: —Zalz,Integrator: � Z!�
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: e = 6 0 « Longitude: = o = ,
�.b aDesi u Current
Design Current .-� g ,
5wme
cttyPopulation WetPcsultr� a aci Po ulahon"Cattel
C P ty p „-� Capacity o ulation
.,�... � _...d - ._.... ....y�:..a ve-.�_�,�.. _. _.�.: ..._ .gip
❑Wean to Finish ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder e ❑ Non -Layer I I ❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish ;, ❑Dai Heifer
El Farrow to Wean I "` 2 El D Cow
„ Dry,Poultry ��
❑ Farrow to Feeder "`" " "'"` ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Layers ❑ Beef Stocker
El Gilts ❑Non -La ers ❑ Beef Feeder
❑
❑ Pullets Boars �. > El Beef Brood Cowl
.» ❑ Turke s...
El Turkey Poults z
❑ Other El Other
Numberotructures�
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104
Continued

Facuity Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ElNE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes P/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 94o ElNA- ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ElYes 0�
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) WXo
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ElYes [:]'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
It. Is there evidence of incorrect application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs [:]Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes '�]Ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
P10
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
XNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #)• Explain any YES answers and/or any frecom µ 'x 3 mendations or. any oilier comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use: additional pages as necessary) = ` _
yS�.f
_ _ w
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewertinspector Signature: Date: ZZZ4:2t
Pa e 2 _r3 1 /28/04 Continued
6

Facility Number- Date of Inspection
Re uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes L2"hTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes Po ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ W UP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Xyes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard Vwaste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield y120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 ° Rain Inspections Xweather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. id the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
RYes WKNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
/Y' es ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes &No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments and/.or Drawings:.
d
f �s C�
71 Me,/
4✓al r /n vech"� A�-W 06FAix1a"? A
�
H
Page 3 of 3
7 7n:ein,r

Faciilify Number'- �
'Division of Water Quality
Type of Visit J2 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Qltoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: f Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: �j Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Phvsical Address:
F'aeility Contact: Title: i1�
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: 142711,6
�2y7
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = 6 = 1 =66 Longitude: 0 ° = ' = "
Design Current Design �uFfen�411, Desi ti Current
Swine" Capacity opulation Wet P©tiltry Capacity Population ; Cattle ..+ Capacci�#y aPopu_lat on
❑ Wean to Finish PEI La er❑Dai Cow
❑Wean to Feeder Non -La er ❑Dai Calf
r ❑ Feeder to Finish _ K ❑ DairyHeifer
❑ Farrow to Wean D Poul Y El Dry Cow
tw, , _ .
` ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish `. ❑ Layers ❑ Beef Stocker
= ❑ Non -Layers
❑Gilts
n ❑ Pullets ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars Turkeys ❑ Beef Brood Cowl i
._ . ❑ _
Other.. 4.. FEIOther
Turke Poults
❑ Other N r4f
b um Structures-
Discharp_es & Stream impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
E2'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
0N0
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes, ,eNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes 6No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes N
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes ❑'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes j_Xo-
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes �J*o
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes 12N
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu,
Zn, etc.)
[]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or I0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus [:)Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes (6No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes V�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer #o question ft Eiplain any YES answers and/or any.recommendations,organy other, coEttments 7
Use drawings of facility to better, explain situations use additional pages as necessary)'
it s
Reviewer/Inspector Name I- 'I Phone: 7
"11-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
1248104 Continued

F
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
((([
[INA
ElNE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
[IYes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Desi gn ❑ Maps
p [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
' ❑ Annual
Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
- 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
ElNA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
�[J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
j/jj/
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
ElYes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
P�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
,.. ��-ram_ �•r_-�.:.Q.���.,;w=-.:�..�
- �-_.,:.,..��h,.
.�-
�
d i�G c ����� Ze e�
12128104

Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Referral O Emergency 0 Outer ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: I &71ol-!6 &'A Arrival Time:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
70—a Departure Time: County:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator: � W
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: = o = 6 Longitude: = 0 0
Design Current Design
itte Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity
Current
Population
Design Current
C►attle Capacity Population
Wean to Finish
rEl
❑ La er
❑ Dai Cow
❑ Dai Calf
Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -La er
Feeder to Finish
❑ DairyHeifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
ElNon-Layers
❑ Dry Cow
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Pullets
❑ Boars
❑ Turkeys
O#her ❑Turkey Pouets
❑ Other ❑ Other
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures:
EJ
Discharp_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes F No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes El No El NA El NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes dt ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
TWaste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes _'No El NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ?_'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes Z—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes KrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes fi3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [/ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yesj2f�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes F.:!f1No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes 7 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes PIVo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ZNNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name I fjfjt { Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: , — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes (?No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 1!1"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ ❑ Maps
Design
g p El Other
21, Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and t" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes '[XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes JRNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes UNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes P(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? El Yes 91 El NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or DrawIngs;.e,_.;:.�, a
AL
A -If " ,
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Division of Water Quality
11'acility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
IType of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: / Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
i
Owner Email:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: "W
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at; ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Longitude: = ° = ' 0
Design Current -
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If ye"s, n4- DWQ)
r:
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?�
3. Were there any.adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
I
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: ti —` Date of Inspection13 ;�17
i
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Apolication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN [:IPAN > 10% or ] O lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13.
Soil type(s)
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other co:ments,./
C
"7
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

facility Number: — Date of Inspection 7
✓ Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
El Yes
El No
❑NA
[I NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
1 AL
12128104

Type of Visit compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 9.Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: yll-lnlDeparture Time: County:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: /
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region: L7A J1I`L7
Latitude: = o = 6 = Longitude: [= o = 4
Design C►urrent
Design
Current Design C►urrent
Swine
Capacity Population Wet Poultry
Capacity
Population C*attle C►apacity Population
❑ an to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ DaiEj Cow
❑ an to Feeder
❑Non -La -Layer
ElDai Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dry Poultry
❑ Daia Heifer -
❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
El Beef Feeder
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
El Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
❑ turkeys
Other
❑ Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
El NA
❑NE
El Yes
El No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Yes
El No
El NA
El NE
121128104
Continued

Facility Nymber:. - Date of Inspection G
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
AL
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name - - — - — - — — - Phone: [/
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number:l L Date of Inspection
i%
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists El Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
2rRainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
pleo 16W sew4e, rcarkG40
3136ldro
`
a S' -�e
12c6o-w s
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit )Mompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit eRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: f Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:!/r- U
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
D—cie-A"d F --_ - -___ - ___.0
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: [= o = 6 = u Longitude: = o = I
Design
Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capra ty
Population
_. Wet Poultry Opacity P,opula ion.
_ Cattl2 ems: C-aapacity
Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑Dai Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
JEJ Non -Layer I
Calf
91 Feeder to Finish
yon��
`
❑Dai Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ElNon-Dai
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
ElBeef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑ Other
Number of Structures: ED
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
12No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
,2Mo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
N
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

FacilityNumber: Date of Inspection 7 /
Wagre Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes 2NO
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ yes , /�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes ;3"No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes J2,No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
El Yes No
El NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ yes ,KNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes 2No
[]NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
1 l . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes Z No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) C4�' o W rl
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes E?No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ;eTNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ;�rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
mments:{refer to question #) Egplam any YESanswers::and/oraanyr�ecommedons or any othermments. ti
Usejdrawiags of facility to better eaplam situations {use additional`pagescas��necess
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
12128104
Continued

Facility N!�Tber:S Date of Inspection
Re4tired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes )eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [:]Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 9Yes ArNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ,Crop Yield Z 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ?TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ;TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No
ZINA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ZrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA , iE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
�,�
❑ Yes 2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes Z/ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes ,❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ;3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional'Comments and/oir Drawings:'LO
re- cor c-�) qJ eldi A, 17,4) o�_C*,r I" rcoex4:�tl I RYGY, I ftnPe
/ j , spe
s n ooc\ 5 hSQPt �e coo rd,5 Fa 5
12128104

(Type of Visit 2FCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency
Facility Number 3 mate of Visit:
Permitted Ce • ed 0 Condition-dly Certified 0 Registered
Farm Name. (;,�WMe74 ✓r���,.5�
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
O Other
r
r Time
❑ Denied Access
10 Not Operational O Below Threshold 1
Date -Last Opemjmg�2r Above hold:
Phone No:
Facility Contact: / ________ Title: Phone No:
Oesite Representative: �/Pl��� ._ . .. Integrator: L/Je
Certified Operator: _ _�� . _ ....... _ .. Operator Certification umber:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 " Longitude • 4
Discharges 8 Stream
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IVINo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d_ Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes Q(No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes Otto
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ___ _
Freeboard (inches):
12112103 Continued

t
Facility Number:. — Date of Inspection S fo
5. Are there any immediate thi-eats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes �No
• seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ;3NO
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes eNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes�'1�10
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes P No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 0*0
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ANo
❑ Excessive/Pounding ❑ PAN /❑ Hydraulic Overload
%❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type L� bj'Y7 . -5�r. c// -�l��)
13. Do the receiving crops differ4ith those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes gNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ,07No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ,Or'No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ETNo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ,0-90
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �o
Odor Issues
a Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attar below ❑ Yes ,"No
liquid Ievel of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ,0No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ;2090
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes Eno `
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comma a ,(refer to gaeshoa #) Explain any YF3 anxvrers ard/ar anq . _ or az y oth_i Cum=euis.
._
[Jse drawmrgs of ysto betr�sduahuons. {use sdditiot� as wry) �] Field C $, opy ❑Final Notes
ow
.
',C-k7C7
Reviewer/Lmspector Name
ReviewerAnspector Signature: e Date: z-
12112103 /1 Continued

Facility Number -
Date of Inspection U �'
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage &. General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes,_eNo
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ,ET110
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ;24aste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/mspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Faca3ities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
3I. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
,OTes ❑ No
❑ Yes -E'No
❑ Yes ,ONo
❑ Yes 'EMO
❑ Yes .ET14o
❑ Yes j2No
❑ Yes 'E"o
❑ Yes'ONO
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Forma ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this Visit You will receive no further correspondence about this visit
'z 3 o c v��d/dc.� 7-5i- tie s'r�i Q� l y�sJS l
'Ooe
Ga"' j L3/aV d� 1�26/ "
�u'00�s�-
t
ahc� ys/s /J, 3,1)
7LqI4�-e. 7,Wa��?
Ql7Q''�
AA
/�dS
121IM3

Facility Number 'l I
Date of Visit: Time: E�
Not O erational Below Threshold
M Permitted C�eJrtified 0 Conditionallv Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: rA��f41/ �•rr Countv: l'o „__,
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Aklh"� Integrator• „///v
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' �• I�u Longitude 0' 01
Svrtne 1�... Ca ac�ty PCurrent' I)esrgrt Current Design : Current n
Ga acity: Po Matron Pou o ularioa . .Cattle �...=Ga acitvaPa Mahon
❑ Wean to Feeder Layer a
Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer []Non -Dairy -'
❑ Farrow to Wean i
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Tot91 Des>ga Ca aci'
�❑
` - Gilts
P
❑
Boars i Total SSLW i
..
lvuaaber of Lagoons x ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ S rav Field Area
H�sldm `Ponds i So1id Tra s—
g p Q ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System x
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: t
Freeboard (inches): 50
❑ Yes [glgO
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes EJ o
❑ Yes 91-No
❑ Yes M'No
Structure 6
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — 3 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, El Yes Mlqo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes E3-wo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) ,�
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? El Yes Ll ,; o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes R;iNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevationmarkings? El Yes l.._l 'No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? . ❑ Yes 3tN'oo
11_ Is there evidence of over application? ElExcessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ElYes E3110
12. Crop type G
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes M-No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 0-56—
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ( t]- -90
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [ -N-0
Renuired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ yes
U3'no
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
R'176
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑_<0
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21_
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
M-no
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
El Yes
�}
MITo
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
E! No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
C1,lo
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
[9-No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Catrtinents (refer to'question #I) Expiatn airy,,, poswers and/or. any reeomatendstitsrts:or soy other comments, -
iise drawings of facal, tty to -better eitpWn sittratzotis: (nse additional pages as necessary) = [j ..
_ ; Field Copv ❑ Final Notes
e.-o -__K g Z"PV L �O�t
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/InspectorSignature: Date: Z'—
O5103101 1 r Continued

Facility Dumber: — Date of Inspection /% Z
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atior below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there anv dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (Le. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
24. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Additional Corn the n€stand/or=Drawings: _.
❑ Yes 23--na
❑ Yes 9�t°m
❑ Yes 9-Ka
❑ Yes C3yo
❑ Yes 5 o
❑ Yes El -No
❑ Yes 2_.
05103101

$4 C
r1 D vision of Water Quality s r rsf{
ODivision of Soil and�Water Conserrration
�, !Y". J T,i♦ fbt-.
01Jtl1er Agency r ti_iW
qz r
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2 2& 1 Tirne: ® Printed on: 7/21/2000
Facility Number �
Not O erational 0 Below Tbreshold
Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified (3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .......................
Farm Name: ...... Ko rule cc..... " r �tt............................................... County P u 1r ti
........................................... r............................................ .
Owner Name:... .................................
G n T
....�4 rtine r - ��----�-t-�'�.:...................................... Phone No:................................
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:
Mailing Address: ...................................
Onsite Representative: ,,.2Pn-rKfl.... _
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
yrp �J
integrator:.......A.
..... .....................
Operator Certification Number:......
A6
swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 �� �� Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Po elation
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish Z Q 0 ❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons §gSubsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagn-n Area. Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps FM —No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If dischar�=e is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if dischar�,c is observed. what is the estirnatcd flaw in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'' (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
StMCtlrrC I Structure 2 Structure Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ............... I...................
Freeboard (inches): 2' I
5100
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes $ No
❑ Yes( No
❑ Yes 99No
❑ Yes tff No
❑ Yes 1P No
❑ Yes fil No
Structure 6
Continued on back

JlFacility-Rumber:'3 I— 353 Date of Inspection l v Printed on: 1/9/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes IgNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes R No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
VNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
RNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
J6 No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
A No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
$ No
12. Crop type C p ✓`+n i�1i �l'r
.�0 &e.a k1r
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
'UNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ONO
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
IN No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
4-*iO3ati00s.or• ftrcaen' •vt re pbted fi ring �his:visit;- YoU wdi-teceiye 0 fui-th"
corres' otideii& about. this 'visit:
❑ Yes -ONO
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes ETNo
❑ Yes $No
❑ Yes 'JINo
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes PfNo
❑ Yes 0 No
Comments (refer to question-#)- 'Explain any.YFS answers i or any recom�uki"trons or'an�y nt�rcompateittb.
Use drata mpn of facility to better -explain situations (use_additional pages as nece~ssa y)
�� 1=�y at'10� reGOrL�S are ive�l
I
RAvc Wlgj4e P kpi wf� e� bused on irr?�4��'an G�es�'�h/f,RJe AG''e1
Reviewer/Inspector Name g ;s
,y. u ..„�_. y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z D Sapp

Facffi j Number: j — 3,s3 Date of Inspection ZS 0 Printed on: 1/9/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 1$ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes Wo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes )EJ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 0 No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ONo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes XNo
5100

:- Divrsion of. Svil sail Water' Conservation =Operation RevEew §
Y,
- O'U�v�ston of $oil an-
ter,Qnallty ,COmpllaIICe I115ptCtlOns M r v x a a r
O Other=Agency Operation Revrew�
URoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number 3 Date of Inspection —5— 3
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
XPermitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered © Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .....j'r! ` .......1.s..................... County:..............t--��t1..
�f ....... ....... .... '.... ............
Owner Name:........... ...........
............ .............
Facility Contact:
Title:.............
Mailing Address:
D ...........
Onsite Representative:..... ..................... .'........................................................
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:..,,.
Phone No:
Integrator:.... .............
Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Latitude �� �� �« Longitude =0 =' =«
Design', �-Current, Design ` Current" _=Design Current
Swine- , C*acity: Pooblation illation Poultry Capacity, Population Cattle . .Ca acity Po` elation
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other _
❑ Farrow to Finish Total -Degign- Capacity,
❑ Gilts
❑Boars =r Total SSLW`=
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No
Discharge orieinated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes kNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ro
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes O�No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: nn
Freeboard (inches): ..........3`-'
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes )No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: 31 — `3 3 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type j,a s
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15.. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a tack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes Na
ElYes No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes k No
❑ Yes , rNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes O(No
❑ Yes k No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes 1No
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes kfNo
❑ Yes ONo
. ...]
.. yi. . .jr. . .deficiencies were n Ced d ring �his'visit:....will i-e. . . . �. Iu...
r6rrespondeike. abo' if this visit.
C other. tomments:4
Use drawings of:facility. to, better:explaiii situations' (use'additional pages as neeessary) 7 _-
1 AG tomIC-IL,1
Reviewer/Inspector Name _ '
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: N�%Zzz� Date:

•�
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection Ciu
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
(rNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
' 1
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
*No
28_
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
�No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
�'No
1
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
�'No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
O'No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
E�(No
Monal Comments -and/or Drawings: a-
A6

µ. Q Division of Soil and=Water'Conseivation -Operation Review ,
z _
Division of Soil and---,WaterrConservation Compliance Inspection
47
Division of Water alp fispection w
- Qu ty , Comphance I, i zF
El
Other Agency Operation
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWO inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number T Date of Inspection _> I J111
Time of Inspection EG G 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted 0 Certified Q Conditionally Certified © Registered [3 Not O era€ional Date Last Operated:
.......................
Farm Name: ..._. G+��2 YG f .... C.ounty.......... 1 I'1........................................................ ........... ............................... " UU/'/ Owner Name:._ ........................................ Phone No. B Ss
.... ...._...
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone'No:................................................... �1
MailingAddress: .............................................. ................!. "......................................
Onsite Representative: ........... ................................................
Certified Operator: ......................................
...................... ............................................................ .....
Integrator:......
`'....'.............................
Operator Certification Number:.,.,
Latitude Longitude • �° �
_Design Current :`_ ; _ Design: —Current Design Current -
Capacity Population Poultry --Capacity Population '" Cattle
Capacity Population--_.
❑ Wean to Feeder Layer -'` ❑ Dairy
Weeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer - ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean _ -:
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Tota1.SSLW
~. �Numberof.Lagoons n, JEISubsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding=Ponds / Soii&Traps No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes 4No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
Wo
❑ Yes
[YNo
❑ Yes [YNo
Structure 6
❑ Yes E�No
Continued on back
3/23/99

Facility Number:'-31 — 3 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
O No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
_MNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenarice/improvement?
❑ Yes
9No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
0 No
Waste Application
10- Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
MNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
ZNo
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
J�fNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
4 No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
O No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
gr Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
�No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[XNo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
kNo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
qNo
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
21 No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
gNo
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
JkNo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
El Yes
Wo
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
XNo
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
APo
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
"No
0_ vMaligiis;or defcie;ncies were noted during s;visit: Yoir ;will receive do t'urther
icorresponcience. a)baiif this visit.:
Comments`(refer to que§ on #},.;Explain':any YES answers andlor:any recommendateons or.any other comments:
p_
Use drawings of facility_ to better: explau-situations (nse additional pages as necessary)
Cat-.�--•�r�. �e�t--�� �-�. t...�c►--� �-�eY,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
AL
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:, Date:
3/23/99

Facility Number: '� -rZ�3 Date of Inspection
r
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes r ' 40
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes XNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes O(No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? El Yes nLNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 2fNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes RNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? Cl Yes XNo
tion Comments an or. rawrngsc' >: y s
W_
Y_
3/23/99

13 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
® Division of Water Quality
O Routine- •O Com faint O Follow-u 'of DWins action O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number 353 t
Time of Inspection to : ct,7_1 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered E,Certified 0 Applied for Pertnit © Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:..
Farm Name: County:...... �t�...............................................................
Y-,.t............................................................................ - _ _
OwnerName:.:............................�YLi�jL........1�PXkM�--...................................... Phone No:... .........................................
FacilityContact: ...................................:.......................................... Title:................ ....... Phone No:....................
Mailing Address: .... 320......... {�i! i...... ??!5-....:..:.........................I..................... ............... .......... .......... .2 ........
Onsite Representative:....,.T�Qr...... .
t-&r!s.. .............................. Integrator: ......!�.L
Certified Operator.........................................................................................................I...... Operator Certification Number;.........................................
[vocation of Farm:
..........!� .. :.. c�.c :�............:. a....... Rl...t ?`1. �.......: ..rn i l�� ..... a..: ITS..1 .�a ..............................
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude Longitude �• �� �"
.`. Design., £urrent Design Current
Swine ":Gapacity.Population Potiliry Capacity'Population C
y ❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
L
❑ Farrow. to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
a ❑ Boars
N
ttle
Dairy
Non-Dair
ID Other k
Total Design C.
Total
city.
LW ,
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
5. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes Ep No
❑ Yes q No
❑ Yes [� No
❑ Yes 1P No
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes [P No
Continued on back

Facility Number: 11 — 351
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
0 C
Structures {La tgoons .floldine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
.......
Freeboard(fl): .......... Z-1 ................ ........... . ....................... ............ ... .................... ................. 1.11111 ............ ............ .......................
.....................................
10-
Is seepage observed from any of the structures'?
0 Yes
0 No
I L
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of anv of the structures observed'?
JA Yes
[C No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
[9 Yes
El No
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public r health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
t4.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
El Yes
No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type .............. .... W,11� ............ sajt�. ... ........................... . ...........................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
Yes
El No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
IX No
19.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Q3 No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ONo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
21. - Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
El Yes
No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
129 Yes
El No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
El Yes
P No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
E3 Yes
ONo
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
E3 Yes
'_1 No
No violation's or'defi'cieincie's w'ere',no'te'd during th is.- visit. X6H.W411 receive no further
correspondence about this.Visit.,,
c6mftfents�.(i4ier to.que'stion4): Explain any YESanswers and/or any recorrinieiidationsorany,'pih'ercomments
Use drawings of.facility to better explain situations `(rise additional pages'as necessary):
Crv_StO,, 600 6 e_ AN � aJ ►-"tedd. &_vc opus
On li(\Y%, wfdi L"Oor, dkv,(- so,(\ SkOV13 6, ,We�- .1
cor�, /.4�1/ sa/Lea, roi4loo' "3 - W Up C-�(( S 04-r/ SUMW-Qy— a_MML-,V,-k ,
�
22. mu� (,_�j �O Ic'-st c-0--r,(WktJ/%Oy60,. I-aloom �CSj��- S�JOL//� 642
r •sIs 'Skedo L?
L'P JOLkj.
7/25/97
' ReviewerflnspectorName
Reviewer/Inspector Signature- ALI— Date:
— z Oj_9

;i f.
s
_
DSWC Anginal Feedlot Operatioa Review
m..,,$
'WQ Anial Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
`
® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-uR of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection NA 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status- ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
Certified ❑ Permitted I or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑/ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ...... . ... . ...... . ......... .... . ..........
Farm Name: i�� �!^.A y �� �r.� Fr✓. 3... _.... _ ...._ ....... County:
.7....._........_...,
Land Owner Name: ....... Phone No:
Facility Conctact:.... —.... -......... ................. _............. ...... _ ...`. J... Title: ............ ...... ....... Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative:.
Certified Operator: .....,:!°!!+!1.� , E ... l�oYY� Operator Certification Number: q�, . ....
Location of Farm:
Latitude =• OG i y U u Longitude
TVpe of Operation and Design Capacity
Design Cu-
EN,Design Current r. DesignCurrent
Swine Point : Cattle,
W; Ca aci , .Po Mahon3'#,. 3 . Ca aci Po ulatioii Ca aciPa Mahon
£k
❑ Wean to Feeder �❑ Layer ! ❑ D
Feeder to Finish A4# <1 Non a er ❑ Non Dairy
EJ Farrow to Wean n a
Farrow to Feeder Tatal9DeS19n Capac1r
sa
Farrow to Finish �SSE
❑ Other. TO U aI�W
Number of Lagoons/ Holding Ponds Y Subsurface Drains Present _
ry
Him
10 Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenancelimprovement?
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes E9 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
& No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
Ej No
❑ Yes
ffiNo
Continued on back

Facility Number:.. a...._. —_ eJ...
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laggons. and/or Holding nd
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
10 No
❑ Yes
Qg No
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ Yes
® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes
10 No
® Yes
❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type W»l. �'!7C.. c� y ✓iY x� j r► tr�ar.. fx .r..!!!�! r� �_.........__....� ._.... ...............� ....
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
91 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes to No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes RtNo
❑ Yes 10 No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes C3No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes -0 No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes El No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes RNo
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes [H No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? Yes ❑ No
Comments {refer to question #l) Explain any YES answers-'and/or;mend
;any recomapons or any other comments
Use drav�nngs;of1factliry to,better explain situattons '(use addihonal:pages as necessary}
a �- e.o_,L . u E , s a— c e 6 wee.,,. a r e,o ,�, t.�-w� 5,p .. �. 4
a►--d v-
o�-side dI L7cL-1.
F; 11 aria r enr e�J: g 4 L VJ-e �r o i t o Y. t o �s c v► ; v, v`a.�r- (� a o t3 .� u i 1. e,V �-q e
a -r �-a o n , a g a o •rt w a (1 . .1 !V
2-4 • KA{ 0. � e S t] --k C1 -ZA d h v .•.1 �S O to ; Y .r i� Q , �t 0 V e c-O YA s Go "-O-E
F n
r e,,t h V ,'% b &.- S L N VVid, yl c j r+n �'M E. p 1..&.vn .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
cc: Division of Water Oualitv. Water Oualitv Section. Facility Assessm
t Unit
4/30/97

•
•
-Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. — 3
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: — , 1995 p
Time:'3
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address:
County: _ J
Integrator. f �i
On Site Representative: _
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine t.-/ - Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certifica�i'on Number: ACE A. 6 DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ° ' J?, Longitude: �J!j _° t 11Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yoe or No Actual Freeboard: _�' —Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o Was any erosion observed? Yes orCO)
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? 'e or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Y e or No
100 Feet from Wells? Oe or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or l�a
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system; or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or To If Yes, Please Explain. .
Does the facilitimaintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray. irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes orG
Additional Comments:
Inspector Name Signature
cc. Facility Assessrneni Unit _ Use Attachments if Neede(`
r

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

Water Resources
ENVMONMENTAL QUALITY
Rebecca H. Ward
Homestead Farms, Inc., #2
134 Williams Road
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Dear Rebecca H. Ward:
PAT MCCRORY
'�+OY$Yi Or
RECEIVEDINCDENRO
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
AUG 10 2016 Secre,arr
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
August 8 2016 Water QualityRe tonal %:recor
Operations Section
l Office
Wilmington Reg
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310355
Homestead Farms, Inc., #2
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin County .
In accordance with your Notification of Change of Ownership received July 28, 2016, we are hereby
forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Rebecca H. Ward, authorizing the operation
of the subject animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) for Homestead Farms, inc., 42, located in Duplin County, with a swine animal capacity of no
greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: 2448 Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
This COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2019, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS310355 dated October 1, 2014. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified
in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and
maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility.
Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity Or increase in number of animals
authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and
must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit carefully. Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
State of North Carolina _ I Fnvironmentat Quality I Water Resources
1636 Mail service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
oingn?6161 '

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances, (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separaiion'shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon,
storage pond, or any wetted area of a. spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Program for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition 11.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You may
find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Newport/Morehead City, NC
National Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at:
ht_tp://www.weather.gov/mhxl
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office, The Regional Office staff
may be reached at 910-796-7215. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General
Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for S. Jay Zimmerman, P.G.
Director, Division of Water Resources
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Duplin County Health Department
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (Permit No. AWS310355)
Smithfield Hog Production

Ag7mm
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Jolanda Lanier
Triple J Farms, Inc
1547 Old Camp Rd.
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Dear JoIanda Lanier:
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P. E.
Director
March 26, 2013
John E. Skvada, III
Secretary
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310355
Triple J Farms, Inc
Animal Waste Management System
Duplin County
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge survey information on March 6,
2013. With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement for
the lagoon at the Triple J Farms, Inc facility. Due to the amount of treatment volume available,
the Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until December 31, 2016.
The next sludge survey for the lagoon at this facility should be performed before December 31,
201.6. Please retain this letter and keep it with your farm records for reference. Thank you for
your attention to this matter.
Please call me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Permit File AWS310355
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: 91"07-64641 FAX: [phone]TAX: 9IM07-6496
Internet: www.ncwalergual'ft.ora
An Equal Opportunity 1 Atfirmative Action Emptoyer
NorthCarofina
'Natl�!'til, f

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
02-05-2007
This plan has been prepared for:
Triple JFarms Inc.
Jolanda Lanier
1547 Old Camp Rd
Rose Hill, NC 28458
910-532-2747
This plan has been developed by:
Billy W Houston
Duplin Soil & Water Conservation
PO Box 219
Kenansville, NC 28349
910-296-2120
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste ponagement that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
- J6 7
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: 0
Technical Specialist Signature Date
RECEIVED
FEB A 7 2007
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-05-2007 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 2,269,296 gals/year by a 2,448
animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
5227
Incorporated
8976
Injected
9885
Irrigated
5681
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN .
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
5,681
5800
-119
2,316,6301
-47,334
Noi--------- - -------------------------- - -- -------------------------- ---- ------ -- ------ --- -------------------------------------------------
e: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-05-2007 Source Page Page 1 of I

Narrative
This WUP has been upated using an existing wetted acres plan completed by by Star Jackson.
Fields #4 & #5 have been added to allow grazing to be done on this facility.
Ms Lanier has access to an AerWay system which will be used to apply the waste on the above listed
fields.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
713734 Database Version 3.1 Dace Printed: 02-05-2007 Narrative Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are
also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if
the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
Ll
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
Removal
(lbs/acre)
Applied
(Ibs/acre)
328
1
4.82
4.82
Low
NIA
Autryville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
NIA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7
N/A
328
2
8.48
8.48
Low
NIA
Autryville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
NIA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7
NIA
328
3
3.74
3.74
Low
NIA
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
NIA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
8
N/A
328
4
I'M
1.30
Low
NIA
Autryville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
NIA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7
NIA
328
5
3.76
3.761
Low
NIA
Autryville
Small Grain Overseed 1
1.0 Tons
15
NIA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
1 5.5 Tons
7
N/A
PLAN TOTALS: 22.10 22.10
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 2/5/2007
PCs Page Page 1 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

. _i " �.� ,
- 4!gyp: -�:-
C
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
< 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
— 2 &
nutrient leaching below the root zone. I
<= 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples
are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term NO -Till (778),
> 10
and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
a fi
''Rating'-
J.- P Ma ageMent.Recommen ation
0-25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
25-50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 2/5/2007
PCS Page Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper tinting of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
'rract
field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Pcriod
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Rcq'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied 1
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gat/A
Tuns
1000 gals
tons
328
l
S7
Autryville
4,82
4.82
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
96.31
0.00
328
1
S7
Autryville
4.82
4.82
liybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
V1-9130
*206
0
0
Irrig.
206
82.29
0.00
396.78
0.00
328
2
S7
Autryville
8.48
8.48
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
169.34
0.00
328
2
S7
Autryville
8.48
8.48
liybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
M-9/30
•206
0
0
Irrig.
206
82.29
0.00
097.69
0.00
328
3
S7
Norfolk
3.74
3.74
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
74.68
0.00
328
3
S7
Norfolk
3,74
3.74
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5'I'ons
3/1-9/30
0244
0
0
Irrig.
244
97.46
0.00
304.42
0.00
328
4
S7
Autryville
1.30
1.30
Small Grain Overseed
LO Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19,97
0,00
25.96
0.00
328
4
S7
Autryville
1.30
1.30
liybrid Bermudagrass Pastore
5.5 Tons
3/1.9/30
•206
0
0
Irrig,
206
82.29
0.00
106.97
0.00
328
5
S7
Autryville
3.76
3.76
Small Grain OVCTSeed
1.07ons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
75.10
0.00
328
5
S7
Autryville
3.76
3.76
1lybrid Bermudagrass Pasturc
5.5 Tons
3/1-9130
*206
0
ll
Irrig.
206
82.29
0.00
309.39
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
2,316.63
Sam
'total Produced, 1000 gallons
2,269.30
Balance, 1000 gallons
47.33
Total Applied, tons
jg.
0.06
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: t. In the tract column, symbol means ]cased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/5/2007
W UT Page Page 1 of 1

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils, If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
328
1
Autryville
0.60
1.0
328
2
Autryville
0.60
1.0
328
3
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
328
4
Autryville
0.60
1.0
328
5
AutryvilIe
0.60
1.0
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 2/5/2007 IAF Page Page I of I
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan
developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan.
Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The
quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount_ However, the quantity of other
nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized
to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so
as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,
additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
Q
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
328
1
Req'd Nutrients
50
120
80
0
0
0
2
1
Acres I
App. Period
4.82
10/1-3/31
Supplied By.
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
Oi
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
RYE Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
10-03-06
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
15 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-93
-12
6
0
1
-2
-1
Tract
Field
328
2
Req'd Nutrients
50
150
110
0
0
0
2
2
Acres
App. Period
8.48
10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
-
ma
r sx—
y'
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RY@ Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
10-03-06
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
15 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-123
-42
6
0
1
-2
-2
Field
ETApp
328
3
Req'd Nutrients
50
150
1I0
0
0
0
2
2
. Period
3.74
10/1 3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
10-03-06
Manure
50
27
68
61
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
15 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-123
42
6
0
1
-2
-2
Tract
Field
328
4
Req'd Nutrients
50
90
100
0
0
0
2
1
Acres I
App. Period
1.30
14/1-3/31
SupP1[ed By
e
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
10-03-06
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
P Removal
jZting
15 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-63
-32
6
0
1
-2
-]
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/5/2007 NM Page Page 1 of 3

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
A
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
328
5
Req'd Nutrients
50
90
100
0
0
0
2
I
Acres
I App. Period
3.76
1011-3/31
Supplied By:
q_
=
. ' _
smm
_ w
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryvilie
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE
Sample Date
1 1.0 Tons
1 10-03-06
Manure
50
27
68
6
01
1
01
p
P Removal
I Rating
1 15 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
1 0
-63
-321
61
0
1
-2
-i
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/5/2007 NM Page Page 2 of 3

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
328
1
Req'd Nutrients
*206
120
170
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
4.82
3/1-9/30
Supplied By:'MM
ANWINW,M
=
"
CROP
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryvilte
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I sample
Date
5.5 Tons
10-03-06
Manure
206
112
282
251
1
5
1F
0
P Removal
Rating
7 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-8
112
25
1
5
1
0
Tract
Field
328
2
Req'd Nutrients
*206
150
210
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
8.4$
3/1-9/30
Supplied By:
� -
M�-�""
= �
-
CROP
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Bate
5.5 Tons
10-03-06
Manure
2061
112
282
25
1
5
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
7 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-38
72
25
1
5
1
0
ract
F
Field
328
3
Req'd Nutrients
*244
150
210
0
0
0
0
0
es I
App. Period
3.74
3/1-9/30
Supplied By:
SWAN
�
N
TW
9
0`i
CROP
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
6.5 Tons
10-03-06
Manure
244
133
334
30
1
6
1
0
P Removal
Rating
8 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-17
124
30
1
6
1
0
Tract Field
328
4
Req'd Nutrients
*206
90
190
4
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
1.30
3/1-9/30
Supplied By:
fi . E
"
._.
dz
` 4-4
�.
"
CROP
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE 'Sample
Date
5.5 Tons
10-03-06
Manure
206
112
282
25
1
5
1
0
P Removal
I Rating.
7 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
22
92
25
1
5
1
0
Tract
Field
328
5
Req'd Nutrients
*206
90
190
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
3.76
3/1-9/30
Supplied By:
_�
w
art$
CROP
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
5.5 Tons 1
10-03-06
Manure
206
112
282
25
1
51
1
0
P Removal
Rating
7 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
22
92
25
l
5
1
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/5/2007 NM Page Page 3 of 3

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of
copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth.
Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and
zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we
can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of
lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pl-i in the optimum range for crop production .
Required Soil Test Values
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Recom.
(tonstacre)
Cu-t
Copper Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc Recommendation
328
1
Small Grain Overseed
5.0
1.1
t5
None
20
None
328
l
l lybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.0
0.0
15
None
20
None
328
2
Small Grain Overseed
4.8
2.3
10
None
25
None
328
2
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.8
0.0
10
None
25
None
328
3
Small Grain Overseed
4.8
2.3
10
None
25
None
328
3
hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.8
0.0
to
None
25
None
328
4
Small Grain Overseed
4.6
0.8
19
None
40
None
328
4
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.6
1 0.01
19
1 None
40
None
328
5
Small Grain Oversecd
4.6
0.8
19
None
40
None
328
5
Flybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.6
0.0
19
None
40
None
-. -.- ..---- ------ -------- ------------------------------
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-05-2007 STV Page Page 1 of I

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. if this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
' Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
[so
13.16
30.69
61.38
92.07
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
15.34
30.69
46.03
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
28.77
57.54
86.31
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-05-2007 Sludge Page Page 1 of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than'the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. if available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
I Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
70
1
2
56
1
3
100
1
4
130
1
5
159
1
6
159
1
7
158
1
8
157
1
9
157
1
10
133
1
11
114
1
12
94
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ - -- • -- -
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-05-2007 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ----- - ----- ------------
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/5/2007 Specification Page 1

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/5/2007 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments; berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary; to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas -should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22.1 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------•------- -------------------------------------------------------- p --
713734 . Database Version 3-1 Date Printed: 2/5/2007 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 4, 5
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-05-2007 Crop Note Page Page i of 2

The following crop note applies to field(s): 3
Bermudagrass: CP, MineraI Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply I80 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 4, 5
Bermudagrass: CP, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- ------------
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-05-2007 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 2

31-355
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
02-05-2007
This plan has been prepared for:
Triple JFarms Inc.
Jolanda Lanier
1547 Old Camp Rd
Rose Hill, NC 28458
910-532-2747
This plan has been developed by:
Billy W Houston
Duplin Soil & Water Conservation
PO Box 219
Kenansville, NC 28349
910-295-2120
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only APR v
APR � � z0as
Owner/Nlanager/Producer Agreement B)
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and mainten rocedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization p a for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
j - 5 —6 7
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: 0
Technical Specialist Signature Date
-------- - ---- -------------------------------------------- - -- - - - --- -- -- - -- - - - - - ------------------- ---------- - ----- ----- - -- --------------------------- - -- -
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-05-2007 Cover Page 1
RECEIVED / DENR I DWQ
AQIAFFR'PR0Tr-r-n0 N gFCTION
APR 0 6 7nnq

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 2,269,296 gals/year by a 2,448
animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
5227
Incorporated
8976
Injected
9885
Irrigated
5681
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
j 5,681
5800
-119
2,316,630
47,334
Note: ---------- I-n --so -- urce-- ----I-D-, --S -----e--ns --s-- tan -- d- - ard -sour------e-,-- U---m----eans---- u-ser----de---- --ned--sourc--- -- e. ----------------------------------------------------------------
macfi
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-05-2007 Source Page Page 1 of 1

Narrative
This WUP has been upated using an existing wetted acres plan completed by by Star Jackson.
Fields #4 & #5 have been added to allow grazing to be done on this facility.
Ms Lanier has access to an AerWay system which will be used to apply the waste on the above listed
fields-
--- ---------------------------- ---- -
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-05-2007 Narrative Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are
also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if
the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Pl
Total
Useable
Plat
Removal
(lbslacre)
A
Applied
(lbs/acre)
Tract
Field
Acres
Acres
Rating
Li
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
328
1
4.82
4.82
Low
N/A
Autryville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
NIA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Ton
7
NIA
328
2
8.48
8.48
Low
NIA
Autyville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
NIA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7
N/A
328
3
3.74
3.74
Low
NIA
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
NIA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
8
NIA
328
4
1.30
L30
Low
NIA
Autryville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
NIA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7
NIA
328
5
1 3.71
3.76
Low
NIA
Autry�'ille
jSmall Grain Overseed
I 1.0 Tons
15
NIA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
1 5.5 Tons
7
NIA
PLAN TOTALS: 22.10 22.10
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 2/5/2007
PCS Page Page 1 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

r LI B
F
FatentiaCLeachrng
:-4 W'GU_iw "
rA4
_
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
>_ 2 &
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<— 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and.improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples
> 10
are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778),
and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
��
z �:� ,
PLRT Index
�Rattng
P Management Recommendation
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
25 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 215l2007
PCS Page Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
lU
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Rey'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrienrA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
tons
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
328
1
S7
Autryville
4,82
4.82
Small Grain Overseed
1.0'1'ons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
50
19.97
0.00
963 11
0.00
328
1
S7
Autryville
4.82
4.82
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9/30
*206
0
0
Irrig.
206
82.29
0.00
396.78
0.00
328
2
S7
Autryville
8,48
8.49
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0,
0
brig.
50
1997,
0.00
169.34
0.00
328
2
S7
Autryville.
8.48
8.48
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 'runs
3/1-9/30
*206
0 1
0
h-rig.
206
82.29
0.00
697.69
0,00
328
3
S7
Norfolk
3,74
3.74
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
I Oh-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0,00
74.68
0.00
328
3
S7
Norfolk
3,74
3.74
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
3l1-9130
*244
0
0
Irrig.
244
97,46
0,00
364.42
0.00
328
4
S7
Autryville
1.30
1.30
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 'rons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
25.96
0,00
328
4
S7
Autryville
1.30
1.30
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9130
*206
0
0
Irrig.
206
82.29
0.00
106.97
0,00
328
5
S7
Autryville
3.76
3.76
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
101[-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
75.10
of
328
5
S7
Autryville
3.76
3.76
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1.9/30
*206
0
0 1
Irrig.
I 206
82.29
OAO
309.39
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
2,316.63
jA!rr
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2,269.30+�
Balance, 1000 gallons
-47.33
etiN'i°irk
rv?s
Total Applied, tarts
0,00
Total Produced, tonsl`t{
0.00
Balance, tons
lP� {,
1,t ail
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/5/2007
WUT Page Page 1 of 1

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
328
1
Autryville
0.60
1.0
328
2
Autryville
0.60
1.0
328
3
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
328
4
Autryville
0.60
1.0
328
5
Autryville
0.60
1.0
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 2/5/2007 IAF Page Page 1 of I
NOTE: Symbol " means user entered data.

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan
developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan.
Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The
quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other
nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized
to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so
as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,
additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
328
1
Req'd Nutrients
50
120
80
0
0
0
2
1
Acres I
App, Period
4.82
10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
E` R
21M
- =
` ;0.._.
,.
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample
Date
1.0 Tons
10-03-06
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
l
0
0
val
bating
15 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-93
-12
6
0
1
-2
-1
E
Field
328
2
Req'd Nutrients
50
150
110
0
0
0
2
2
App. Period
9.48
10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
",i
�
- . ;
-1
1.
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
10-03-06
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
15 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-123
-42
6
0
l
-2
-2
Tract
Field
328
3
Req'd Nutrients
50
150
110
0
0
0
2
2
Acres App. Period
3.74
1011-3/31
Supplied By:
-.
A
=-
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
10-03-06
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
15 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-123
A2
6
0
l
-2
-2
Tract
Field
328
4
Req'd Nutrients
50
90
100
0
0
0
2
1
Acres
App. Period
1.30
1011-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
1.0 Tons 10-03-06
Manure
50
27
68
6
01
1
0
14
P Removal Rating
15 lbs/ac. Low
BALANCE
0
-63
-32
6
0
1
-2
1
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/5/2007 NM Page Page 1 of 3

Nutrient Management Reconunendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(lbs1A)
P205
(ibs1A)
K20
(Ibs/A)
Mg
(lbs1A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
328
5
Req'd Nutrients
50
90
100
0
0
0
2
1
Acres
App. Period
3.76
1011-3131
Supplied B :
_
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
AutDTille
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Hate
1.0 Tons
10-03-06
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
15 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
1 0
-63
-321
6
0
1
-2
-1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 215l2007 NNIR Page Page 2 of 3

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
]
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
328
1
Req'd Nutrients
*206
120
170
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
4.82
311-9/30
Supplied By:
;x
�
too :.- -
`' yIAMR
CROP
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
utryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample
Date
5.5 Tons
10-03-06
Manure
206
112
282
25
1
5
1
0
va]Rating
7 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-8
112
25
1
5
1
0
E
Field
328
2
Req'd Nutrients
*206
150
210
0
0
0
0
0
App. Period
8.48
3/1-9130
Supplied By:
% M
2-
ow
CROP
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Pasture ICommercial
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Fert.1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryvilie
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample
Date
5.5 Tons
10-03-06
Manure
206
112
282
25
1
5
1
0
val
RAcres
Rating
7 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-38
72
25
1
5
1
0
Field
328
3
Req'd Nutrients
*244
150
210
0
0
0
0
0
App. Period
3.74
3/1-9130
Supplied By'
NMI—
a
0,4
CROP
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
RYE Sample
Date
6.5 Tons
10-03-0-6
Manure
244
133
334
30
1
6
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
8 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-17
124
30
1
6
1
0
Tract
Field
328
4
Req'd Nutrients
*206
90
190
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
Period
1.30
311-9/30
Supplied B
-`
� �IT�
=
CROP
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
5.5 Tons
10-03-06
Manure
206
112
282
25
]
5
1
0
P Removal
Rating
7 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
22
92
25
1
5
1
0
Tract
Field
328
5
Req'd Nutrients
*206
90
190
0
0
0
0
0
Acres A Period
App.
3.76
3l1-9/30
Supplied
PP y:
-
UP
w
tk,.._. ,,.
rr -.m
:.
- --
_M
CROP
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
5.5 Tons
10-03-06
Manurel
2061
112
282
25
1
5
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
7 lbslac_
Low
BALANCE
0
22
92
25
1
5
1
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/5/2007 NMR Page Page 3 of 3

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of
copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth.
Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and
zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we
can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of time recommendations for each crap based'on the most recent soil sample. Application of
lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production .
Required Soil Test Values
Tract
Field
Crop
pit
Lime Rerom.
(tons/acre)
Cu-1
Copper Recommendation
Znd
Zinc Recommendation
328
1
Small Grain Overseed
5.0
1.1
15
None
20
None
328
1
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.0
0.0
15
None
20
None
328
2
Small Grain Overseed
4.8
2.3
10
None
25
None
328
2
Hybrid Berntudagrass Pasture
4.8
0.0
to
None
25
None
328
3
Small Grain Overseed
4.8
2.3
10
None
25
None
328
3
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.8
0.0
10
None
25
None
328
4
Small Grain Overseed
4.6
0.8
19
None
40
None
328
1 4
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.6
0.0
19
None
40 7
None
328
5
Small Grain Overseed
4.6
0.8
19
None
40
None
328
1 5
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.6
0.0
19
None
40
None
----------------• ---- • ---- ------ ------------------------------
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-05-2007 STV Page Page I of 1

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
30.69
61.38
92.07
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
15.34
30.69
46.03
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
28.77
57.54
96.31
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-05-2007 Sludge Page Page 1 of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent cAzth the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
70
1
2
56
1
3
100
1
4
130
1
5
159
1
6
159
1
7
158
1
8
157
I
9
157
1
10
133
1
11
114
1
1 12
94
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------• --------------------------
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-05-2007 Capacity Page Page 1 of I

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must -be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
--------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/5/2007 Specification Page 1

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 11 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/5/2007 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments; berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures. should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
------------------------------------- ----- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
713734 Database Version 3-1 Date Printed: 2/5/2007 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to fields): 3
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 4, 5
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil; medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 112 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 112" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-05-2007 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 2

The following crop note applies to field(s): 3
Bermudagrass: CP, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs I" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced i' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lblac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 4, 5
Bermudagrass: CP, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs I" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal): Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tiftori 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced I' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lblac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts -
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
713734 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-05-2007 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 2

09%06/2006 WED 10:29 FAX [phone] WRLNMI ---+ DWQ Wilmington
Q 002/005
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 31-3a5 County: Duplin
Facility Name: Triple J Farms
Certified Operator Name: Jolanda Lanier Operator Number: 19666
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in -the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
1
N
17
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP. '
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 9/7/2006
1 hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Triple J Farms, Inc Phone
k Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date:
Facility Owner/Manage ignature)
910-532-2747
9/6/2006

09/06/2006 WED 10:29 FAX [phone] WRLNK1 4-� DWQ Wilmington
Q 003/005
11. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID: Lagoon 1
line m = 337.5 lb PAN
2. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5. Structure ID:
line rn =
lb PAN
6. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines 1 +2+3+4+5+6= 337.5 lb PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q_ crop
r. acres
s. remaining 1RR
2 PAN balance
(lblacre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
Lanier
1
Small Grain
4.82
50.00
241.1
Sept -April
Lanier
2
Small Grain
8.48
50.00
424.0
Sept -April
Lanier
3
Small Grain
3.74
50.00
187.0
Sept -April
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column Q = 852.0 lb. PAN
IV_ FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = 337.5 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00

09/06/2006 WED 10:29 FAX [phone] WRLNM1 4�-+ DW9 Wilmington
121004/005
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) _
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _
852.0 lb. PAN
-515 Ib. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed_ Updated sample is not yet available on the NCDA website.
PoA (30 day) 2/21100

09/06/2006 WED 10:29 FAX [phone] WRLNMl 4- DWQ Wilmington
r
Q 005/005
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/identifier (ID): La oon 1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 17.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.01 inches
c, line b - line a (inches in red zone) =. 2.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 63000 ftZ
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3 78540 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 80705 ft3
h. current herd #.F---24-4-81 certified herd # 2448
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 80705 ft'
certified herd #
1. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 dayslline f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
1. current waste analysis dated 1 6/7/2006
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00
®ft3
36750 ft3
146427 gallons
1.50 ibs/1000 gal.
337.5 ibs. PAN

11/22/2006 WED 10:38 FAX [phone] WRLNMI DWQ Wilmington
l5
Mu
_ - lyra. .. OW. ]�l�
Murpli}r i3iown UC
PO Box 856
2922 Hwy 24 West
Warsaw, NC 29398
Prone (91.0) 293-3434
Fax [phone]
Fax Transmiltai Sheet
- u ).\4W%
Fax: - --- - — — . Peres.
Phone: ate.
❑Urgent. ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please R.ecycia
Z001/005

11/22/2006 WED 10:38 FAX [phone] WRLNMI —a DWQ Wilmington
Q 002/005
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 31-355 County: Duplin
Facility Name: Triple J Farms
Certified Operator Name:
Jolanda Lanier
Operator Number:
19666
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon Name/ID: 1
Spillway(Y or N): N
Level(inches): 18
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balarice is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled Is reflected in section 111 tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
"Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
'if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 11124/2006
hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Triple J Farms, Inc Phone: [phone]
�j Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date: 11/24/2006
Facility Owner/Manager (s ture)
c

11/22/2006 WED 10:39 FAX [phone] WRLIMl --- DWQ Wilmington Q 003/005
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: Lagoon 1
line m = 118.8 ib PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure 1D:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines +2+3+4+5+6= 118.8 lb PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o, tract #
p. field #
CI. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IR t
2 PAN balance
(Ib/aare)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r X s
u. application window'
Lanier
1
Small Grain
4.82
40.00
192.9
Sept -April
Lanier
2
Small Grain
8.48
40.00
339.2
Sept -April
Lanier
3
Small Grain
3.74
40.00
149.6
Se t-A ril
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops, during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column Q = 681.6 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 118.8 lb. PAN
PeA (30 Day) 2/21/00

11/22/2006 WED 10:39 FAA 9102933138 WRLNMI DWQ Wilmington
I21004/005
X. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) _
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x)
681.6 lb. PAN
-563 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
Maul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
r-JAKtSAItVt-:
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed. updated sample is not yet available on the NCDA website.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

11/22/2006 WED 10:39 FAX [phone] WRLNNI DWQ Wilmington IM005/005
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/identifier (ID): Lagoon 1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 63000 ft2
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallons/W 39270 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 80705 ft3
In. current herd # F 2-4-4--81 certified herd # 2448
actual waste. produced = current herd # x line g
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j, excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 9/25/2006
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
- 80705 W
®ft3
36750 ft3
146427 gallons
0.64 ibs11000 gal.
118.8 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121 /00

09/06/2006 WED 10:28 FAX [phone] WRLNMi �-- DWQ Wilmington Q 001/005
u 1�:� M n� Ow"
LLC
y
Murphy Brown LLC
PO Box 856
2822 Hwy 24 West
Warsaw, NC 28398
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Fax Transmittal Sheet
� 1 G
1 �� :i•0m• 1 YL
Fax: - — — — Pages:
Phone: Date.•
Re: CC
❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle
40

Postal
4
(Domestic Mail
tr
rrf rr
E3
d
irr'l Postage
ru
S Certified Fee
r•
r79 Ratum Receipt Fee
ru (E;d=nt Required)
C Restricted Delivery Fee
d. (EnClorsement Required]
CS
Q Total Postage & Feea
`A
C3 N �teasa Pnnt Clearlj
.
r3 S 1, 4pt. Pp go
O ---�
M1 ctye,ZIP+4 ,
3f 1
COMPLETE•N
COMPLETE THIS SECTIONON DEILIVERY
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete -4:v
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
A. Received by Print Clearly) B. Date of Deliv
1
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
C. ig lure
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
,
x l 1
❑ Agent
or on the front if space permits.
v(�(�U
❑ Addressee
t' f . Article Addressed to:
D. Is ivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below-, ❑ No
3.rveype
❑Express
rtified Mail Mail
d
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ insured Mail ❑ C-O.D.
f
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee)
❑ Yes
2. Article Number (Copy ham service label)
PForm 3811, Juiy, 1999 Domestic Retum Receipt
102595-00-M-0952

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
Ir WA
and Natural Resources
•
Wilmington. Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
NCDENR
Sherri Evans -Stanton, Acting Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NCW rH CAROLINA pEPARrmE: r of
EwvmommEKr AND r4.%ru SAL RESoURCES
Division of Water Quality
January 10, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7000.0600 0023 4230 0�$.--1—
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Jolanda Lanier
Triple J Farms, Inc.
1547 Old Camp Road
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Triple J Farms, Inc.
Facility Number. 31-355
Duplin County
Dear Ms. Lanier
This'ls to notify Ms. Jolanda Lanier, who holds a non -discharge permit for an animal waste disposal
system pursuantto 15A NCAC 2H .0200 and North Carolina G.S.143.215.1, of deficiency of Animal Waste
Permit AWS 310355.
On November 14, 2000, I inspected your animal operation and the animal waste management
system serving this operation. The following deficiency was noted during the inspection:
1. Cover Crop Needs Improvement (inadequate Coverage, Weeds)
During the.inspection, it was observed that all of your spray fields need extensive weed control and.more
adequate coverage of the crops listed in your waste utilization plan. Over -seeding had not been done at
the time of inspection, however I did suggest better removal of old crop before over -seeding, allowing
healthier growth conditions for the aver -seed.
If a majority of your annual cover crop fails or has inadequate coverage, then you must immediately contact
a technical specialist for guidance as to your available options including re -planting. If your crop has areas
of poor coverage, then waste application should be minimized in these areas. It is recommended that a
separate soil sample be taken from this area indicating a problem area on the paperwork fora more thorough
soil analysis to be completed to find possible source of a problem. Fields lacking a cover crop for whatever
reason should not have waste applied to them until a crop is established.
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28WS5 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affiimrative Action Employer 50°% recycled110'% post -consumer paper

Ms. Jolanda Lanier
January 10, 2001
Page 2
For all crops, especially grassed pastures or hay fields, soil pH must be maintained for the proper health of
the crop and uptake of nutrients from application. Lime must be applied according to the rate indicated on
your annual soil analysis when the amount is equal to or greater than 1.0 ton/acre. In no instance, should
more than 1.5 tons/acre be applied during any year. It takes approximately 4-6 months for lime to work
throughout the root zone; thus lime should be applied at the appropriate time for it to be available to the next
primary summer crop cycle.
Grassed fields must be harvested to avoid disease, control weed growth, and remove applied nutrients.
Bermuda fields should be cut for hay at a height of 16-20 inches and soil pH maintained at 6-6.5. Pastures
may need to be cut for hay periodically if grazing herd cannot keep up with growth or mowed periodically for
control of weeds. Herbicide may need to be applied periodically for control of broadleaf weeds or volunteer
grasses. Grassed fields may need to be re -sprigged or re -seeded periodically in areas to maintain an
adequate cover.
To correct these deficiencies, please submit a detailed Plan of Action to the Wilmington
Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality that describes the actions to be taken to address these
deficiencies of Animal Waste Permit AWS 310355.
The proposed written plan of action must be received by this office within fifteen (15) working
days of the receipt of this notice. Upon approval and implementation of the plan, you must notify this
office when the corrective actions are complete. Contact your Service Company, county Soil & Water
district office, or county extension office for any assistance they may be able to provide. .
If the deficiencies are not corrected, the Division of Water Quality may issue a Notice of
Violation and pursue additional actions including civil penalties, injunctive relief, or revocation of your
Animal Waste Permit AWS310355.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contact either
Stonewall Mathis or myself at [phone].
Sincerely,
"/& *W�
Greer Moore
Environmental Specialist
cc: Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation
Star Maready, Duplin County Cooperative Extension
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy Family Farms, Inc.
DWQ Non -Discharge Operations Branch File
D_WQ- r rrii on:J�imalTtffes,3:1=359
S:IWQSIIanier31-355NOD

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
Jolanda Lanier
Triple J Farms, Inc
1547 Old Camp Road
Rose Hill NC 28458
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310355
Triple J Farms, Inc
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin County
Dear Jolanda Lanier:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Swine Waste Operation General
Permit AWG100000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on January 30, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Jolanda
Lanier, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS310355 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Triple J Farms, Inc, located in Duplin County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 2448 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
M�DENR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet http:/lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or -more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is trade within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. if you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Duplin County Health Department
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS310355
NDPU Files

I a
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: JOLANDA LANIER
Location: 1547 OLD CAMP RD
ROSE HILL NC 28458
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
Number of Animals: 2448.00 hogs
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients.can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown
and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on -saturated soils, when it is raining, or
when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may
result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must.be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
2448 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 4651.2 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2448 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 5630.4 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will .be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
328
1
AUB
BH
5.5
275
4.822
1326.05
I
+APR-
328
I�1
1SG
11 150
I
14.822�241.1
APR
328
2
BH
5.5
JAUB
I
127S
1
18.47912331.72
+APR-
OCT
328
SG
1
�-2
I
150
1
18.4791423.95
+SEP-
APR
328
3
BH
6.1
INOA
I
1305
13.73911140.39
+APR-
OCT
328.
SG
1
1-3 1
I
150
13.739�186.95
+SEP-
END
I
TOTALI5650.17
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
+ - Dates shown reflect optimum uptake periods for nutrients. Waste
appilcation may begin up to thirty(30) days prior to planting or
green -up of forages, and Extend past optimum dates shown if
plant growth, pumping conditions, and PAN loading rates permit.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETER-';TTNING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
+ - Dates shown reflect optimum uptake periods for nutrients. Waste
application may begin up to thirty(30) days prior to planting or
green -up of forages, and extend past.optimum dates shown if
plant growth, pumping conditions, and PAN loading rates permit.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of.four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best. results.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
�* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
SG
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
TONS
AC
50
50
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
* w
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
WETTABLE
_ACRES
17.04
LBS AW N USED
5650.17
0
0
17.04
5650.17
* BALANCE
--19.77
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 905.76 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 4528.8
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 15.096 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 36.2304 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 2596 depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
T I I
Tract Field I Soil Type
1
328 1 1 I AUB
1
328 12 1 AUB
328
328
328
328
NOA
I
I (Application RatelApplic. Amount
crop 1 (in/hr) (inches)
! I I
1 BH .5 1 *1
� I
I BH I .5 I *1
i
BH
I
1 SG
I
I SG
I SG
1 .50
.5
.5
5
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown is ti.- tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
THIS WUP IS WRITTEN BASED ON A WETTED ACRES FOOTPRINT COMPLETED BY STAR MAREADY
OF THE EXTENSION SERVICE.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an _.se of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10.tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil :incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after Octobe-r 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See. Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands.by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16_ Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leak--,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate � determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:TRIPLE J FARMS(31-356)
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: JOLANDA LANIER.
(Please print) J
Signature: /1 Date: —/` �,
Name of Manag. , (If different from owner) :
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print) BILLY W. HOUSTON
Affiliation:DUPLIN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Phone No. 910-296-2120
Address (Agency): PO BOX 219
KENANSVILLE NC 28349
Signature: 8 Date:
61 OF
Page: 13

State of North Carolina ITO
Department of Environment
4, 0
and Natural Resources r_ ;-
MAR 0 7 'U"
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary - - --=— NCDENR
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
March 5, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Jolanda Lanier
Triple J Farms, Inc
1547 Old Camp Road
Rose Hill NC 28458
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Triple J Farms, Inc
Facility Number 31-355
Duplin County
Dear Jolanda Lanier:
A letter dated January 15, 1999 was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part of your
plan.
An evaluation by Stoney Mathis on l ] /] 7/99 was made to review the actual number of acres at your
facility that receive animal waste during land application. The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of
the following two results as indicated by the box marked with an "X".
Category 1:
❑ The evaluation of your facility could not be completed due to a lack of information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in providing Stoney Mathis the necessary
information to potentially exempt your facility from undergoing a complete wettable acre
determination. Please submit this information to Stoney Mathis, at 127 Cardinal Drive
Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405-3845, within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. If you
have any questions please contact Stoney Mathis at [phone]. If within 90 days you
are unable to provide Stoney Mathis with the information you are automatically
required to complete a Wettable Acre Determination as described by Category 2
below, within 180 days of receipt of this letter.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%a recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Category 2:
Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct .
Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DW© within the next
180 days. If the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWQ will be forced to take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit revocation,
an&or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form. Please
note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWQ and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Murphy Family Farms

3 J -.3!,�
RF, EIVED
JAN 2 3 2001
MURPHY
F A M' 1• L Y" F A R M S
lanuary.22, 2001
Greer Moore
NCDENR
Wilmington Regional Office
127 N. Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
Ms. Moore,
I am writing this letter on behalf of Ms. 7olanda Lanier, owner of Triple 7 Farms, facility # 31-355, in
response to the Notice of Deficiency issued by your office on 1/10/01.
In your letter you pointed out that the cover crop needed improvement on this farm. To address this
concern, Ms. Lanier has agreed to do the following:
1. Apply lime as soon as possible to the fields indicated as deficient in the most recent round of soil
analysis.
2. Begin a regular spraying program for competitive weed growth. The spraying regime will begin after
green up of the bermuda crop as needed.
3. Insure timely harvest of bermuda/small grain growth in a manner consistent with the CAWMP for the
facility.
1 hope that the measures outlined will correct the deficiencies noted. If there are any questions or concerns,
please let me know.
Sincerely,
Kraig Westerbeek
Murphy Farms
Post Office Box 759, Rose Hill, North Carolina 28458, [phone], FAX [phone]

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 31 - 355 County: hn ,
Facility Name: TP)l Dle T raRm S ,
Certified Operator Name: To LanQR Operator # K1146
Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
fowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Lagoon Name/Identifier (ID): 31-355
Spillway (Yes or No): ND
Level (inches): Iq
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations _of one or more structures._
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
q Y
Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and I)auled is reflected in section Ill tables. Included within this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving .crop information.
Contact and secure- approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to transfer of waste
to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
- if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: a , /,/,I/)
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached Plan
of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and correct.
Phone: q 10- 532-a'741-?
Fa,qility OwnerlManager (print) .
r
Date: d'l�
ility Owner/M'anak er (signature)
PoA CoverPage 2/21/00

IF
T PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 31- 355
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
A . current liquid level according to marker I �
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) =
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
inches
19 inches
rJ" inches
ri3i-.g.ft2
e. line c x line d x 7.48 gallons = g2569 gallons
12 ft3 -I. q $ = I q ,15 &9
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design I Sy days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design _ Z(Z 18 _ ft3
h. actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = Zb2 8 ft3
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i +i) x 7.48 x 30days =
line f
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 5 5 q9
m. (lines e + k) x line I =
1 000
q Z50 -t- 14592(p
I Ubo x if.( -
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE
N ! A ft3
3to `7 5D ft3
05 7 2 (o gallons
a -a Ib11000 gal.
8!LI lb PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00 1

. J
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. structure ID: 31' 355 line m = 85q lb PAN
2. structure ID:
3. structure ID:
4. structure ID:
5. structure ID:
line m = lb PAN
line m = lb PAN
line m =
line m =
lb PAN
lb PAN
6. structure ID: line m = lb PAN
n. lines l + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 Ib PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CAN NOT BE APPLIES DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining
"IRR-2 PAN
balance
(lb/acre)
l•�
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE
FOR FIELD
(Ibs.)
column r x s
s
U.
application
window'
a
I
3
I o
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available receiving
crops during 30 day drawn down period
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) ' Ib. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00 2

IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) lb. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -- .6 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here
including pump and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd
reduction options, recalculate new PAN based on new information. If new fields are to be
included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these fields to the PAN balance table and
recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to another permitted
facility provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
NARRATIVE:
1
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00 3

d �v
Revised Apri120, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number I - Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Represent t1ve9 ayi 1-an Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
InspectorlReviewer's Name: 5�rnrdhts
Date of site visit: 1) `t �} lq
Date of most recent WUP: 1
Annual farm PAN deficit: Z. so pounds
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption - El E2 E3 E4
Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on P1 P2 P3 .
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Par I exemption-)
El Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and Dz D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and sinned by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating paameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and sinned by a WUP.
E='. 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NO T E:75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11- F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Par lil).
PART 11. 75% Rule. Eligibility Checklist and .Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Det-rminaiion.required.because.oper-.bon failsune of fhe.elia_ibility
requirements listedhelow:
_ Fz Lack.of c.mage_.whichTesultedlnzve-:,--zpplicationmf-vasiew=-ter=(PAN) on:spray-
field(s) accordingfoTrm'slasttwo--vewrs 3Di:Tmaabon32--oLde.-.
F2 UnclearjIleaible,-or lock of informaaon/map.
- F3 Obvious -field -limitations -(numerous" ches;aailure-:Io:deductTequired __ -
buiter/setbackmcreage;-.or25%-ofto►al acrraoeadentineddn-LAWMP-:includes
small ;-irregulariy-shaped fields - fields-lessthan-5 acres7or.�velers-Dr.iessthan
2 acres7or.'stationarysi3dnklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits 7iield(s)'s acreage -in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage 25 noted in t;mhl= in Mar` 111

Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number l / - 3�S
Part Ill. Field bv Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
xumlae
a»i
�rEro�ia��=
COMMENT
�
T-32g
4«I i5,10 12 �bs
S3
Z
F;Ree)6 z3
q
rl=LiJ NUMIit r_K - nyoram, puu,zone, or:poinr numgerS may oe L'seo in place orneid numoers nependino on CAWMP
and .type of irrigation -system.- ]f pulls, etc. crossmoretnan one field, inspectodreviewerwill have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; -otherwis_e operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMHER2 - must be clearly delineated on rnaP.
COMMENTS' - back-up fie€ds with CAWMP a' Feamoe:.exceedina75% of its ta',a€_acres and having -received less than 500,
of its annual PAN as -documented in the farm's7previous--t+vo years' (1997 & 1998) of irrioaflon-records,-cannot serve -as -the
sole basis -for requiring a WADe erminaiion:_Bp-ck-upfrelds-must-be-noted inthe=mme its=riion end rnusibe ac=essib€e
by irrigation system_
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations -
9
P1 Plan-lacks.followinainformation;
P2 Plan TeVision-may_sabsfy_7S% rule based on adequate ove cif PAN deficit -and by
adiastino all field mcreaae#o below 75% use rate
F3 Other (iehn process of installing new irricabon system):

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Jolanda Lanier
Triple J Farms, Inc
1547 Old Camp Road
Rose Hill NC 28458
Dear Jolanda Lanier:
T
/ • W'A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-355
Duplin County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i_e. 1RR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincere]
X
4 . -
Kerr T. Stevens, Direct r
Division of Water Quality
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Jolanda Lanier
Triple J Farms, Inc
1547 Old Camp Road
Rose Hill NC 28458
Dear Jolanda Lanier:
0 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 8, 1999
Subject: Conditional Approval
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-355
Duplin County
Our records indicate that your facility was conditionally certified in order to fulfill the requirements of
completion of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan Certification. This letter is to inform you of your
unresolved conditional approval status. Any facility receiving a conditional approval must notify Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) in writing within 15 days after the date that the work needed to resolve the conditional certification
has been completed. Any failure to notify DWQ as required, subjects the owner to an enforcement action. As of
December 7, 1999, we have no record of any information from you, advising us of the status of your conditional
approval. Therefore, please fill out the attached form and have your technical specialist and landowner sign the form
in the appropriate areas.
The completed form must be submitted to this office on or before 45 days of receipt of this letter. Please be
advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability for failure to
provide DWQ with proper notification of your conditional certification status or possible failure to comply with the
requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste management plan by December 31, 1997.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]
extension 571.
Sincerely,Z4%
O
X.
Sonya L. Avant
Environmental Engineer
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of,North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality AUG 2 5
,fames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
August 21, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RE E PT REQUESTED
Jool�Lanier
Triple J Farms, Inc
1547 Old Camp Rd
Rose Hill NC 28458
Farm Number: 31 - 355
Dear Jolanda Lanier:
i
CDENR
NORTH CARouNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND N/crURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Triple J Farms, Inc, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. -In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who faills to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call at [phone] extension or Dave
Holsinger with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
S ' erely,
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 23, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETM CEIP REQUESTED
Te avis
D&D Farms
281 Bumcoat Rd.
Pink Hill NC 28572
Farm Number: 31- 335
Dear Jeff Davis:
0FX;W'A
/ • •
NCDENR
NORTH C.AROUNA DOW"MENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND N/QuRAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that D&D Farms, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC, must apply for
coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter,, your farm has
six 60 da s to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance
with Chap er 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or
operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department SHALL NOT
OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be returned
within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Faihire to submit the application as required may also
subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated
following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call at [phone] extension or Dave
Holsinger with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of, Environment RECEIVED 1 • •
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality JAN 0 5 199$
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor BY:
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary CDENR
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 29, 1998
Jolanda Lanier
Triple J Farms, Inc
1547 Old Camp Rd
Rose Hill NC 28458
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310355
Triple J Farms, Inc
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin County,
Dear Jolanda Lanier:
In accordance with your application received on November 3, 1998, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Jolanda Lanier, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from Triple J Farms, Inc., located in Duplin County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than 2448 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS310355
Triple J Farms, Inc
Page 2
If any parts, requirements, -or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Dianne Thomas at [phone] ext. 364.
Sincerely,
A_ Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
CC' (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County_ Health Department
`Wilmington Regional Office; Water Quality Section
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File -- Central
Permit File - NDPU

� �Yr 5 h'; •! O
4 rl{:?:. DYf� �y 1'.'h 4 — ,} �, _ � e6II rr ��..� �' ' • YS
Cs
A.
t^ W i, �. D, A r.f.�w,,,. •� � ad
�. _ ryI f :OO,BL
=1', ll'6pr >< ! r! .I ; a. _I-•9 .SO/y •.`� ' .°°o o°SL
LLI
16
_ � fir' I6I �� 5� TY`' , , �✓i �� �� `9 f! �'/
t^ •' y 5 a! ` o �' '• '�t ODD v Q �� � •4n � � �
o,
px jr tv VV � p r L
r� J u
yI C ,
,.�. � �_ � ��•? C �'� _ -_ � '� by �^ � � a. ^� ,� :ti. + , r,/� .

State of North Carolina RECEIVED
Department of Environment and Natural ResX'i' esuA�11YSEG�ION
Division of Water Quality N0q p 31998
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
t (THIS FORM MAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGI L Dischp pslmitung
General --Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste- W per-atiions- -- -- --.-
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
I.1 Facility Name: Triple J Farms, Inc
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Jolanda Lanier
1.3 Mailing address. 1547 Old Camp Rd
City, State: Rose Hill NC _ Zip: 28458
Telephone Number (include area code): 910-532-2747
1.4 County where facility is located:
1.5 Facility Location.fDirections from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): On west side of SR 1100, approximately 0.25 miles
south of intersection with SR 1003. -
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if, different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Murphy Family.Farms
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/93
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 31 (county number); 355 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: no Swine operation
F-e—ed—er to Finish
2448- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; =no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum numb _ecr_for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. -of Animals-- - Type'of Poultry No: of Animals Type of Cattle:_ No` of-Ahirials7'_
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer _ 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer ~ 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
0 Turkey
No. of Animals`
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 31 - 355

3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 25.30 Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 21.43
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable): !
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO {please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or O please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's -land application areas were sited?
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
itam
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal .
Waste Operations;.
3.2 Two copies`of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
Feld locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
r3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
-3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection,.etc.)
—3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
—3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
—3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for -every crop shown in the WUP.
,3 3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
-3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
--3:3.-10 A -site schematic. -- -
•r3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.,
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.1-3'0d6T Control -Clecklist wi►li`chosen best management practices noted.
---3.3.14 Mortality:Control Ch cklist�witli'tliE'selecte`d-method noted.
--3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
—3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal. _. _ _. _ .
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 31 - 355

Facility Number: 31 - 355
Facility Name: Triple J Farms, Inc
4. APj
C
NT' CE FI
1, this applichas been ry me is acc rate an
applicatioompleted and that if all
package will be u ed to me as i mpiet
Signature
i��D �N
V-01
1
- — 1000\awg��t�9
iN, e10
�. (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
>;., (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
n to to t1fe b st o m knowledge. 1 understand that if all required parts of this
ired supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
ru Date / 6 --26 -9
5. MAN4YER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for _(Facility name listed in question L I )
has been reviewed by:me and is accurate and complete to the best of my kfiowledgc. 1 undctstand that if ali required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROL_ INA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
,
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98
Page 3 of 4 31 - 355

ANZAAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN CERTIFICATION FOR EXISTING FEEDLOTS
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at the address on the
reverse side of.this form.
Name of faFm-{Plea`se print)
Mailing Address: 1_��t7 6Id fin, Vj
Re.s e- 4111 N c a q 14 9C - Phone No.: 9i0 - g3 :: " 1'7 Y -7 —
County �(of farm): ob 1 t
Fargo location: Latitude and Longitude: ya qV 17•�I L o9' a7' {required). Aso, please attach a
copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.) : Sw : n e
Design capacity (number of animals) : ;2 q w g -_
Average size of operation (12 month population avg.): 2,44 9 _
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres) : 'al,
Technical Specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant
to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the existing animal waste management system for the farm named
above has an animal waste management plan that meets the operation and maintenance standards and
specifications of the Division of Environmental Management and the USDA - Soil Conservation Service
and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001 - .0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum criteria have been
verified by me or other designated technical specialists and are included in the plan as applicable: minimum
separations (buffers); adequate quantity and amount of land for waste.0till zation (or use of third party);_
access or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of applications; application
rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe
than the 25 - year, 24 - hour ctnrm . _.
✓1 When check BILLY W:`HOUSTON `r'.: itions/exceptions.
DUPLIIV.S.& W CONSER. DIST
Name of Technical Sped. pO BQ3{-277- KENANSVILLE NG-
Affiliation (Agency):.TELEPHONE[phone]
Address (Agency): Phone No.: 910 --.9>3 11_z a
Signature: 1,k Date: QI I 1 -7 194 E -
7
Owner/Mariager Agreement
I (we), understand the operation and maintenance.procedures- established in .the -.approved animal waste_
management plan-for1the farm named above and -will -implement the- se -procedures:- I :(we) :know{,that-any= s,�-3. --
expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system. or construction' -of -new"
facilities will. re a new. certification [o.be submitted to the Divisiori:of;Envi'rorimental Managements �c.�ta .:�.
before;�the,new aniinaisiare;stocked. -I (we) also riderstanditha :there musts:be no,rdischarge.of:ariimalrwaste�
from this system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or through ..1
runoff from a storm event less severe that the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed at the
farm and:atthe I e. of. the -local •Soil-and-Wate_r;ConservationrDi`strict --
43 �+ f� +s'S _�. 3:.' :7: __J .��s i..i.;ia �. 'Ca..r :S=i�':.)lF •�:.,.:_
Name of La Owner (Please rint . 3'b '
Signature: Dat6: :1-• �F - g S _
Name of Man r, if differe ram w er (Please print): .
Signature: Date:..
Note- A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management.within 60 days of a title transfer.
DEM USE ONLY: ACE#

SC h11C■Itll�sle K■■■ �C:PI CNCC CC®SCCCCai Ca
■■
am
��■■H Ion -a0®■e ■®�in
® ®�s �ee®N��Ce■®60 02
®®: ®�aJ: :® 11®a■A
11C Igo
INNER ■■1 neI C IEMMmee� a
e©°OWN � :i�i ■1 a�®■■em aCo■IN.
■ ■M■■®
■ee®l®i410M■
9 W��i EWEIII
� _■:C:■C0Me
CC:C■ ■r�:
■■-
.=e�rsa�a�' E '�a CiC C
■■®■�■ 11011■® no
ON NMI w
MINSWE Mir
C
HOW E. MIR
r■q�© 1■■�M0: �� o ■
et1■o1 �� 8■ ■ ■
on■■rn S® ■ e ■iC
IN Oro
ran
®■HIS
■irti�►a C6■■■■■ a 'A C�il
e®®■B ■®■■gin No a M
oom
man
® log C■a man
N&I is
taw
■ °ee�®�a� eC■�C®'� I��e �
®Is[�I�fll p®Him�!!1� In il a
e02%:E,e■®ol 1 ■
« eais�enna�raut �n�arr mm . , eyarm�rner

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Produder: JOLANDA D. IANIER
Location: 1547 OLD CAMP RD
ROSE BILL NC 28458
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
Number of Animals: 2448.00 hogs
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1.- Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply - v
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration -
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and '
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
°-• eroding at- 5 or more tons per acre -annual-ly,---but-hess- than-
14 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter _
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
-- `downwind odor -problems: -
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
2448 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 4651.2 tons
AMOUNT'OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2448 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 5630.4 lbs. PAN/year
Applying theaboveamount'ofwaste is a big job. You should plan time;_
and have appropriate equipment'to`apply the waste in a timely manner­�,�
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
.--the crop- to- be grown; ---soil type--and--surface--application-. --�-- --
Page: 2

f
ANIMAL WASTE IITILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
328
1
NOA
BH
6.1
305
0
12.6
3843
I
APR-SEP
328 �1 I --I
50
� 6
�G
I
10
� I
11SEP--NOV
328 2 BNB BH
4.5 0
1 I
1225
I
15.23 11176.75
APR-SEP
328 SG
1 0
1-2 1
I
150
15.23 1261.5
'SEP-NOV
END
I
TOTAL15911.25
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The -applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan.-..
only addresses nitrogen. s
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted', fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season-(i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand- of.-
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is.the normal situation, you are encouraged to -cut the small.'--
grain earlier-. You- may want to "consider 'halrvestirig- -hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time -small grain is planted in the fall.
=;a;
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermud'agr'ass show d ~be grazed or 'mowed to a
height of about two .inches_ before drilling for .best results.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
SG
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
TONS
AC
50
50
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
**
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
WETTABLE
—ACRES
17.83
LBS AW N USED
5911.25
0
0
17.83
5911.25
* BALANCE
-280.85
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 905.76 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 4528.8
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 15.096 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 36.2304 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could -vary by 251 depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION ,-, ' x, P
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial -soil-moisture...content, soil..structure.,-_soils
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity -of the soil at'.the "'
time of irrigation nor should the plant avai-lable nitrogen applied exceed —
.the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE 'UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
(inches)
328
1
NOA
BH
.50
*1.0
328
2
BNB
BH
.75
*1.0
328
` 1
SG
.5
*1
328
-2
SG
.5
*1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25'year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard_ except in the event of the 25 year 24-hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader ui eqpment is operated properly to apply the-- _
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure'to apply :
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION --
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
31 - 35 S
Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
JOLANDA D . LANIER
1547 OLD CAMP RD
ROSE HILL NC 28458
910-532-2757
Existing Feeder -to Finish Swine
2448.00 hogs
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
AUG 18 1997
--The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste.is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be gown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4.` Do not -apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or_forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If.
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typicalnutrientcontent for this type -of -facility. Acreage
-requirements _should .be base_ d on the —waste - analysis -report_ from your _-- -
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adapted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
2448 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hags/year = 4651.2 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2448 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 5630.4 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

•1
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
- **
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED.
or
------_-
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
328
1.
NOA
BH
6.1
305
0
12.6
3843
I
APR-SEP
328 �1
328 12
328 I-2
END
SG 1 150 10_ 12.6 630
SEP-NOV
BH 4.55 1225-'10--_ 5.23 1-1176-.75
I I APR-SEP
II SG 11 150 10 15.23 1261.5
SEP-NOV
TOTAL15911.25
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)-
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
APPLY
RESID.1
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL..O
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall..
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
SG
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
TONS
AC
50
50
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
WETTABLE
_ACRES
17.83
LBS AW N USED
5911.25
0
0
17.83
5911.25
* BALANCE
-280.85
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in'each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for -periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 905.76 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 4528.8
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 15.096 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 36.2304 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are•only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 251i.depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
_
(inches)
328
1
NOA
BH
.50
*1.0
328
2
BNB
BH
.75
*1.0
328
1
SG
.5
*1
328
-2- - -
- SG
- .5
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make -this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 7

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED_ SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift,�manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a.landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall -be applied to meet,. but not -exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland.' When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted =ops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the -crap or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or. after October 1, 1995),
- shal-1 -not be- applied closer. than -25 feet- to _perennial waters. -'-'(See Standard -3'93 - Filter Strips).-. -
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown-facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage.or discharge.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible -markers shall- be installed. to mark -the--top and
bottom elevations of -the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records.for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 10

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:TRIPLE J. FARMS INC.
Owner/Manager. Agreement
I (we)'understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the'farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require anew certification, to be submitted to the
-North Carolina.Division-of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are -stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge -of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Faeilit Owner: JOLANDA D. LANIER
(Please print)
Signature: Date: YZ y Z `! 7
Name of Mandg#r(If different from owner) :
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)JOHNNY L. LANIER
Affiliation:DUPLIN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Phone No. 910-296-2120
Address (Agency): PO BOX 277
KENANSVILLE NC 28349
Signature: ` Date:
Page: 11

M
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B.-Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Joseph Lanier
Triple J Farms, Inc
1547 Old Camp Rd
Rose Hill NC 28458
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Triple J Farms, Inc
Facility ID#: 31-355
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Lanier:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., ireetor
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, 1�y�
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 N)Nf An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 - 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

ftEGISZRATION- FORM- FOR ANIMAL FEEDLT OPERAT fNS
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resour6es
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
if the animal waste management system for your feedlot operation -is designed to serve
more than or equal to 100 head of cattle, 75 horses, 250 swine, 1,000 sheep, or 30,000
birds that are served by a liquid waste system, then this form must be filled out and
mailed by December 31, 1993 pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H. 0217 (c) in order to be deemed
permitted by DEM. Please print clearly.IL
Farm Name:
y
Mailing Adress:
County-
Owner(s) Name:
Manager(s) Name:
Lessee Name.
Farm
as sped as possible: road am , direction, milepost, etc.):
Latitude/Longitude if Known:
Design capacity of animal waste mana ementXsstem (Number and type of confined
animal(s)): gy � x �p S
Average animal population on the farm (Number and type of.animal(s) raised)--
�3�
Year Production Began: ASCS Tract No.:
Type of Waste Management System Used: r4j L
n
A&es Available for Land App
Owner(s) Signature(s):
31--35(D
Zia
DATE.

�Icte cl- Nlcr;h Ccrciirc
Deper; ment cf '-nvircrlment,
�eciih cnc ,Ncturci t,esourc�ss
Civisicn cf E-vircrurenici i'vicncl-erneni
Jones S. runt, Jr., Goverr ier
Jcnci,ncn 8, HicwCs Cecretcry
A. Pres;cn howcrc, Jr., P.E., Dir2c;or
January 21, 1994
Joseph Lanier
Rt. 1 Box 321-F
Rose Hill NC 28458
Dear Mr. Lanier:
This is to inform you that your completed registration form required by the recently
modified nondischarge. rule has been received by the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM), Water Quality Section,
On December 10, 1992 the Environmental Management Commission adopted a water
quality rule which governs animal waste management systems. The goal of the rule is for
animal operations to be managed such that animal waste is not discharged to surface waters
of the state. The rule allows animal waste systems to be "deemed permitted" if certain
minimum criteria.are met (15A NCAC 2H .0217). By submitting this registration you have
met one of the criteria for being deemed permitted.
We would like to remind you that existing feedlots which meet the size thresholds
listed in the rule, and any new or expanded feedlots constructed between February 1, 1993'
and December 31; 1993 must submit a signed certification form to DEM by December_•31
1997. New or expanded feedlots constructed after December 31, 1993 must obtain signed
certification before animals are stocked on the farm. Certification of an approved animal
waste management plan can be obtained after the Soil and Water Conservation Commission
adopts rules later this year.
.We appreciate you providing us with this information. If you have any question about
the new nondischarge rule, please contact David Harding at [phone].
Sincerely,
P.O. Box 29535, Rdeigh, North Carolina 27626-M35 Telephone [phone]' FAX [phone]
An Fqucl oppatm1h/Afriurnawe Action Employer ffl%recycled/ 10% past -consumer paper _

REGISTRATION FORM FOR AJI` AL FEEDLOT
5 .
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resoutp_hs
Division of Environmental Management"
Water Quality Section
T '=
if the animal waste management system for your feedlot operation is
designed to serve more than or equal to 100 head of cattle;'`
horses, 250 swine, 1, C00 sheep, or 301000 Mils that are Gervef? by
a liquid waste system, then this form must be filled out and mailed
by December 31, 1993 pursuant to '_SA'NCAC 2H.0217 (c) in order to be
deemed permitted by DEM. Please print clearly.
Farm Name: u U
Mailing Address,
County
Owners) Name:
Manager (s) Name:
Lessee Name:
Phone No.
Farm Location (Be as specific as possible: road names, direction,
milepost, etc .) : Q; A of Sew-'poa4- /od3 - --on : zc — Paz Poo- —
Latitude/Longitude if known:
Design capacity of animal waste maq,agment•system (Number and type
of confined animal (s)) : fQ �i' (��Sky aloyey5
Average animal population on" the farm .(Number and type of animal (s)
raised) §1 1 g Tom LQaS A�MJ& f 6:/71s
7
0 .. " "„" 3Z
Year Production Began: /99 3_ ASCS Tract No,n
Type of waste Management System i3sed:
Acres Available for La
Owner (s) Signature (s) :
�� 15116
1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 • •
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
ry ID EE"
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 22, 1993
6,,erA)
Joey Lanier
Rt. 1 Box 321-F
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Dear Mr. Lanier,
This is to inform you that your completed registration form required by the recently
modified nondischarge rule has been received by the Division of Environmental Management
(DEW, Water Quality Section.
On December 10, 1992 the Environmental Management Commission adopted a water
quality rule which governs animal waste management systems. The goal of the rule is for animal
operations to be managed such that animal waste is not discharged to surface waters of the state.
The rule allows animal waste systems to be "deemed permitted" if certain minimum criteria are
met (15A NCAC 2H .0217). By submitting this registration you have met one of the criteria for
being deemed permitted
.We would like to remind you that existing feedlots which meet the size thresholds listed
in the rule, and any new or expanded feedlots constructed between February -1, 1993 and
December 31, 1993 must submit a signed certification form to DEM by December 31, 1997.
New or expanded feedlots constructed after December 31, 1993 must obtain signed certification
before animals are stocked on the farm. Certification of an approved animal waste
management --plan can be obtained after the Soil and Water Conservation Commission adopts
rules later this year.
We appreciate you providing us with this information, if you have any question about
the new nondischarge rule, please contact David Harding at [phone].
Sincerely,
/c Steve Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North CaroBna 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -cons Qner paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention: )a(S
Facility No. 31
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: � ! , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: __4O r i
Mailing Address: 01 `72d . c'3 CS y _`6
County: -
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone: 3 d - D T'�
Physical Address/Location: mac- I I Q ,) bg Co ,,ec,,
Swine Type of Operation: Poultry J'att�e�"
Design Capacity: a`( ``f Number of Animals on Site: Z (14'B
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon ufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Ye or No Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches
• Was any seepage observed from th>es
s)? Yes or� Was any erosion ob ed?. Yes or No
Is adequate land available for sprallo Is the cover crop adequate. Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:5�
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Y�e or No
of �� .0 100 Feet from Wells? es or No
Ye
)or
the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? or No �',�°9
animal waste Iand applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch,,flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or Go If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with c ver crop)? Yes
Additional Comments: K-A _S 4\ , c W P• s n �`+' �� ^ r
...� Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Signature
Use Attachments if Needed.

TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width ==
315.0 200.0 63000.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
Length * Width =
0.0 0.0 0.0 square feet
TOTAL DA 63000.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
:jjj. Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure in CF/LB SSLW 0.00156
Volume = 330480 Lbs. SSLW * CF of Waste/Lb./Day 180 days
Volume = 80705 cubic feet
5P. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flesh system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallons
- - - - - - - per^ CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation.
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
--'- Volume = 7.0 in * 'DA %T1��'inches per' foot
Volume = 36750.0 cubic feet

5D. Volume of 25 year — 84 hour storm
Volume = 7.5 inches l 1E inches per foot DA
Volume = 39375.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REDUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 80705 cubic feet
50. 0 cubic feet
5C. 36750 cubic feet
5D. 39375 cubic- feet
TOTAL 156830 cl-ibic feet
6. SUMMARY
Total r-egUir'ed volume 487310 cubic- feet
Total design volume avail. 49L:789 cubic feet
Min. req. treatment volUme plus sludge accumulation 330480 cubic fe
et -
At elev. 44.6 feet ; Volume is 331344 cubic feet (end pumping)
Total design volume less 25yr-24hr storm is 453414 cubic feet
At eiev. 46.8 feet ; Volume is 451562 cubic feet (start pumping)
Seasonal high water- table elevation 4Z.0 &-e feet
7. -DESIGNED BY: � APPROVED BY:
DATE: g12gf9Z DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FLAN
------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment with minimum odor,
control. The time reguir,ed for the planned fluid level to be
r eached may var-v due to soil conditions, flushing oiler atien , �►id
the amount of fresh water added to the system.
Land application of waste water, is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center~ pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent runoff from the field or damage
to crops.
The following items are to be cE-Lrr-ied aut:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre —
charged to 1>2' its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start —up. Fire —charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent. at all times.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment B)
before land application.
3. Begin PUMP --out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches eleva—
tion 46.8 as marked by permanent markers. Stop pump —out when
the fluid level reaches elevation 44.6 or before fluid depth is
less than 6 feet deep (this prevents the loss of favorable
bacteria) .
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1)'inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.4
inch per hour.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation -should be fertilized as -needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded.areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. - All ---surface runoff i's` to' be' -diverted from the lagoon to 'stabl-e-•- - - ­
outlets.
D. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ•--
mental.Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

l 1
1
= SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
----------------------------------------------------------
Clenring:
All trees and brush shall be removed from the construction area
before any excavating or fill is started. Stumps will be removed
within the area of the foundation of the embankment and fill areas
and all excavated areas. All stumps and roots exceeding one (1)
inch in diameter shall be removed to a minimum depth of one (1)
foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The
foundation area shall be loosened thoroughly before placement of
embankment material.
Cut-off Trench:
A out -off trench (when specified) shall be installed as shown in
the plans.
Con st react i on:
-------------
Construction of excavated and earthfill areas shall be performed to -
the neat lines and grades as planned. Deviations from this will
require prior, approval of the SCS. Earthfill shall not be placed
in standing water and reasonable compaction of the fills shall be
performed by the construction equipment or sheeps-foot roller during
placement. The embankment of the lagoon shall be installed using
the more impervious materials. Construction of fill heights shall
include ten (10) percent for settlement. To protect against seepage,
when areas -of -unsuitable- matortal-areencounteried,, they -will need-t-o
be excavated a minimum of one (1) foot below grade and backfilled and
compacted with a suitable material (ie-CL,SC,CH).- Refer to the soils
investigati-an information Tn-the--plans for special considerations."
Precautions should be taken during construction to prevent excessive
erosion and'sedimentation.
-;Iy- JHG >=1g,5T L4-S r►r1 1 - To gE p�r�RGl3 T S'4C�G��t ED
WITH 6t)i-rAgLE 6C MATE►211%• �E7 PBoTToM_ off- TH& L_,1Gc�oN
Vegetation: ON THE .N0PTk .,51DE- WILL ALSO -KAEUD 1`0---SE 0,JEP,,caT
d- 8AC_K.F 1L_LGD WITH 6c
All exposed embankment and other bare constructed areas shall -be
seeded to the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after
const ruct i on.

GELDING RECOMMENI:iAT IONS
-----------------------
AREA TO BE SEEDED: 4.0 ACRES
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED:
0 LBS. FESCUE GRASS @ 60 LBS./ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER I'll TO NOVEMBER 30
0 LBS. ' PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS @ 60 LBS. /ACRE
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1)
SELDING DATES: MARC'r•l 15 TO TUNE 30
YZ LBS. HULLED BERMUDA GRASS 1I1 8 LBS. /AC.-*PF-FH�kijF�'r
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS) V EG0TATIVE GpVE{�,'
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO 3ULY 31
0 LBS. RYE GRAIN @ 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
160 LSS. RYE%GRASS @ 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER 1 TO MARCH 30
LBS.
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
4000 LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)
8 TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
400 PALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED. -
APPLY LIME ,AND'FERTILIZER THEN DISK TOIPREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL` OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS-IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
----------------------
Owner~s na+ne--:Joseph Lanier
Mail flddress-: Rose Hsi 11. NC
Type of produc:ction t-knit-----:Topping
COOAli U y : 1JUpl iTi
Type of waste facility ----- :Anaerobic Lagoon
Yol_ir animal waste management facility has been designed for a
given storage capacity. When the waste reaches the designed
level, it must be land applied at a specified -rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients
in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the`fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
ane encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of -the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates -and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
- _ - ---land -eroding--at -greater than- 5- t-ons-per-acre per- year.- Do not --
apply waste on saturated sails or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to _.
surface waters__ Wind. conditions_ should -also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of nutrients for crap production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should 'be'applied to a growing crop or
not more than .30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements may be more or less based an the waste analysis
report from your waste management facility.
The design of your waste management facility is based on the
following:
Amount of Waste Prod�_cced Per Year:
----------------------------------
c446 animals x 1.9 tons wastetanimal/yr= 4651 tons
total waste

Page
=Amount -o'f Pl-ant- Av'a`3=lable Nitrogen- Pr--oduced Per Yea=r,-:-
-----------------------------------------------------
`448 animals x 3. 3;0 l bs. Nyan i mallyear = 5630 lbs. i yr
Available N
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should
plan time and have approp-riate egl_;ipment to apply the waste in
a timely manner. Your facility is designed for 180 days of
storage. Therefore, it will need to be pumped every 6
months.
Tract Field Soil Crop Yield Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month to
No. No. Type Code Per Ac. Used Apply
328 L BnS 6 7 Tons 400 14.7 5872 MAR-AUG
3�8 ;i BT)B 6 7 Tons 400 4.3 1704 MAR-AUG
328 4 BnB 6 7 Tons `400 2.3 920 MAR-AUG
328 3 AuB 6 7 Tons 400 1.0 400 FEAR-AUG
328 1 NoA 6 7 Tons 400 3.0 1212 MAR-AUG
Total 25.3 10108
Available Nitrogen 5630
Surplus Or Deficit -4478
Crop codes: 1=Cereal grain; `-Corn; 3=Fescue; 4=Range Gr. Bermuda
5=Control Grazed Bermuda; 6=Hayland Bermuda
Narrative of Operation:
-----------------------
Seed A permanent grass filter strip along all ditches that
-receive- animal-wast-e--_ _
Call the Soil and Water Conservation District Office after you
receive waste analysis report to obtain.the amount per acr-e to
apply and the irrigation application rate prior to applying _
waste.
Prepared by:MJ {
Iame� Title Date
Concurred in by:
Prdducer Date
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)

sly
Iv -
v-4
AST•" "Now Iva
1
IL
NOR
C, ovrr ' a,
STAIN
wo my
53
N 'A�k V,
:% I 1`4_ fit
nQ
♦ TVAN, Z 1`1 MCI
Cr
�f�"4L
k4li
3• low.
mi
00 M4
4 coal
RAW V >I, _.
Q
................... ..................
yr
Z.4tr F,ii f 4VT r1r)
41:
vuva
Mir
Air, T
Je
A
.7
%ck,
N, up
4a
Aw
lots,
-.1 4 1
�.A 1,
ply
fwltl 111v
1_1�1'1 wm`_;wlilol�
I
-I. CIO -,
171A
'I kZ, ;it

U. S. Department of Agr `lture
Soil Conservation Servicz
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
NC-ENG-34
September I980
File Code: 210
- Landowner- 4un Coty. D I IRL IK
-� —
Community or Group No. R-1 q Conservation' Plan No.�
Estimated Depth .of Water to Top of. Dam . I-L,' Ft. Length of Flood Pool Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation ._.
Evaluation by -reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
. from sudden' dam fa 1 ure.- ^
Est. -.El ev: :Est... evation
. , Kind of : Improvements : � of :Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope: ., Land Use','':'- - Improvements' Above' f:Floodwater::�Above
flood Plain: ,"F.lood Plain
Ft: Ft. Ft. Ft.
2
3. .
Describe potential for loss,of life and damlge'3to existing or probable -futurer downstream
improvements from a sudden'�breach I�olyE -�� AFMpX'1 MA`ML'�l Goo`- F90m j-�e Iloo.
APMM' t 000" �' FRDM LITTLE RF_#VF_'R D
Hazard Classification of'Dam b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
L.A600N =
Dam Classification {L, II, Ii IV, V}
Dy—fsa� "'—'��/�-{-ti SL -- Date_ gI2 42
Date

t,>T S
SCS-ENG-538 _ U_ S. O&ARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rcv. S-70 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
FAF-XiER'S NAME ` COUNTY —
DATE q/7-9lqZ
PHOTO SHEET NO. WORK
CROPL.AND-ACRFS PASTURE ACRES
•as • •s s•COONIST
OF •e•• • •• :s• ,. .
MEMO■■■■■■MINE■■■MEMO
MEN®■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■NEO■E■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
q■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MINIM
■
■■■■■
■■■EE■■■E■MENEME®
ARE
..!■!Oi®iM
■ice
c�!!■!®1El■!a!®1®!®:®�®!®!®�®
�■®,®i®1■i■;■
! •
�I®i01®1OlM!®!®I®I®®I®I®i®[®
1�©;■i■I■■i■�!�
�I■i®IEIEI■!®I■I®!®COI®I■!®1®
�®!®i■!■I■i■'�■I�I�!'�i®f
®I®i■I®i®[®I®!®1®I®1®!®

VVIr
��. ��` d s/~i
f I a is t.,vFa..'✓ ,
�Q. 1 I � `_ I \
:` ,
`1S1 r���e�Y f+s •
.1
�1� 7 � ��
1 Iln
t��
. � •. 'btr�C + (• @@�'
,' �A"�� !
«F.: J.,
\ '.>
•`�
.•✓'�
� S. i
! : '� !..'. N
\. .•r ��
��� ! J
�O$.�"tt! � '�ly�
�..� - n , a' <+lf i-,+
,-�
4r N_ r: `i 1 }}// f'/
- i )5 l.L. \y'
`w'r.// '�t�'* :1 r a:
t3 I, ' u. �/.' -'T i 1
.c'y. s s' �}y..r '.s;. �S �R drn
i •�z '(si•.s:. �:t. ;w-�•_&• ` r �.:.
'�
r, r, '� ,a�.• yr ��i`
>jV'/ � k
r � ';,; ,4 #'� �:x 'w F7
-�'._.: rd. r�ir.�y„ r S
�h •s., {, '� � ,{,. �s d,
tf 1�z .vs 7 i•!Zs :. rf'��• y
Y,A ,'.
3'r,-'u }i :r°� _ y Ww^•A.'l'r. �' �
�� e� =.4 ,� `�+iLKi �,�
� t�3, .w• r ;�.�` :G
rx� S�S',I::�'� s 4
^ \ y }t,� "" ,d-^ '�
- •��
,,}. � �
l.. • C"'-Ji '�}
\f ! ,-z�!
�, V1f,.
_a �7nf '� +: ` a,
i-e3 . L
�
- r I i I
r {
) / •6 1
q
= \ f
6..f� �d�
_ r-�
t,
^1-�: 11 '[ r i
.: `;i a vp s. 1,
+^:-!�,•�;� .�.,, � '� `' � Lr'
Ab
Fv ..K' ri'S (.. p. 4 v^fc_ rr R',
q - �r .i x 3,rr�lr .�: ,
,, '-e �': `�, rJ'�1 n�„ky,
V "y,�� :.J;,.a,� 'd,�^".S'
:;L'�'t" ^"^ ir_ T_i:. .. '3•:'�i
: �;t..: ';;t , `.�.+ -.� '
\ `� ' �� ��'�4r'V -
� � I. k
.�^''+! I � i . ><
-tf',:'eY
�..� r n i.
q .,'iris r' ''ti' S •t �
1_�+': �, a: � � a
�'Ji'
'� \ %� i
' µ 5 . j \
;7
;;;3"v .R.' j,' i •' `h
.r
.,"ya`<t'!..
✓r. A;'
'.
'1�
tk.l
"' --.7 -
;'Y.. ♦ i--
r. r:[ /•
4 ,� `
/ ?��: -
'1
} rd s i'
S l R
,E, J i
_'i :.I� yK.+
�x°.• r i4•(-:ir 1.. _�
jJ}!(( ..r 1-�f7S,y''�"�`
�
�>"79+ .•S W".
; n:S: a1a�e_ ..1 F 'ill
��I:�.t'i -;` `rJ�' I, " s
:: �"`' I
�
f a �..'yr1}N
�, \ . 1.5 3jr j �. Y y�..
:a.
-.; ' •i:t�.� .S%
i•'�'.m
_ :I r �
_ ,,��'x,.
4 ,'�� c.
�ll.'1'.
:. - .V.l
� '1
.ate rj �a=;� •�_\l r.x-
=-'3. rs �
+'�
! .rye i.0 .t'r
'�"r' �}:Y1r.. �� is, �.r,�._ :'s-�
_•iU ':�"sav�a
'q
'+ -
=Se.. '
:r'v. \,\ 1,
. tt--- ,. U : Ir
,.r,l Er ��'
r': :;' K � 3
_ !`- I !M
::1
S'S, >,�i', `w�'•'-�''.
Y,} �`. x-se:
� �J
- t
.a .4
-r n - '.J'.R. 8 ,':�,
x., _
\• . _
'\ I I
i', .-` 1;r.,, 1V_.y -.��
'r°J'� '� ! +�,
// —.// � `
! s a
�
µ��
I•�•f J y f�'' Y =R
4:'Y
a _� _ i/l(Ij� `..t
.' li ,j 5\
� 1 \ � 1 _
�i' �f 1 S
�,
:, ,r
rll ~� � ^�`` F • F
�., r,••�lN\S \�_ '`�`/ �
c:.. 11 � 4� �'f�
4 ! y� Y r 1, "! Jy�'
1y�.`. �' � }i\I.4 r '�� \���.-.:
'-4`i� •1[;,..
-0 -
d�:�5 :-[� �.Y
-
J, 3'� .0 `•- - �7
ri,; wsl4� t a. l!.''
i.
J,5 ��
l �5
//
�'
'f /
` ,.' � / ' (J J
,lam '!�
_� ._-.
li.. 4":5' l �� 1
•'" c--•_,.�:� .�
4( J C -
/�� .mil .�•• �"c' ` -,5 A
.' _��.��f `
�. �!•.v •.r a
�S ' r J - ! ' n t ryr. r.., q �:�.f.�
J tr', `x ! c*`tiy�1� ',y'-
9�Rtl 'Itt
{ i.-=' J
'-3 �� 4
y4 L -F
' !•
•ih.. 17�.
IA- I .1 •'
•
f��J
I- !~ //
i.,
lr rl /! Y -C'� I r f
��, -
•
`),
- �,� ' is � �
,'_� - '
�\.'��
>v i'1 ',\\"-.r/`
�'�•-
� L`�---"_"1� % � ���
•
C'I J' .'' r�' �>%
.a. �i � ,li� >i- ` _".�<� \\.i'_:_'"
f
�
\ _ 1
f��� ; �
•••���TTT ��;
C
y f
��• � ;
� �=_ =1 ' i
`,- �S � � � ; f •, � :,`
I,
//j �1 .:1,'
, --
JI � -V � � �
- •f� �
\.:/
� 4
F l I
,
$y
} f
�4,�
� �
`� l
�
_.✓ li��_-_ _ �'\
� �_
@`: .� l' i r
@� "1r
�, r!
"+`
l�+� •
e� //- �, � t
d
j,`� 4 1�1 r � r �
�_ � �\
:� `i/f',l '�
�'-��j;,(
a�/ ��@r.
'-. \ \
`J'a�_:'��. -'4\
'J
� `",.'• '�-_� -- '
,r.'. � �•'�
IlJ � 4y'.'L'"ty
I .� �� `_ ! f
1 -�� �" i i i
i
'. r I� Vim!
:.�.y-':I �� .�..\, r. \_.._
IV��
rk,, 'j�
'S r' " '- m _ `1
I FJ'' n�'i� U..�
4 1
Y 4�.: C!'%� s E -� �
-�?^,-�.r -�.1 � S � �
.. fA, 1�
- •\.I. , \1 ` \�
t; } t_ -1 ? ~�(i�'1
✓` p\✓ !
�•�,
�.
( //
/ .I I�JV �` �\ % �
s ��,- f
I 4 �' / '\�_ � -
eft ! i
\ } _ j' i`i �`
�t,.-,,�'•�
°�
- ��� ' . �ti �
!'
^,� �,� ,"
r.?;';Jt r h` �. �, s\
y.'Al
��J .�`��� �/r`ti
- >✓. ♦
r yI 9
ysY•�.T•I',
J1 _ { j �'.���-N.
��,.,
~� ,'
:ti' /i
'.�,.E'.,;`� �' 1 ��;.1\,
IV
r' � � 3r]''"�F '
'�'-/ -}.
.i I r,
~'!
jt'o`�'•�
+;
/h J
{�I
- ! );
f - 11
4; I,luz ,,' ' •k
Lam./';�. ;,., �_
� `� /�- \ � �
, �/ • '
-1. r 'Y�
r ' �•
y I �. I�•—•
� _ -' �y T � I s, �'�'
Nk
111
--�'1� 1 ��
j rl�r ��s r '"'„/�� 1`F\
r. r \
\,
I T5 \ .. 1' \ \
ttJ � ,;5x".,4 • r.: �\!J �� �r t
l/ �s
�� i// �~,.
'.i_..
1.. a� w,
,�'
L'• •„��rr'l +yin! - J - !`�
s ri !�, }
.� . .1 .l s
rD' �\. \ ! 1�\I� s„a
J
•: , rr �»
.A��r'-'��^'t �} �I �n\�
1 - jl j
� .•, �,
;• 1 i It �-!1. ��l
•'if I �, � \' �' '•4f �
J ' g i
��'.'� {
�f. rt`'I
D1A�fsCS•,1n +Y,F �7a
F� -.:_
rr•�:r5 w
�y. �
o
', s "l.�i dP:;l, �'
.,'/ .i .ii `•
, �o��'
1 � fir` _
r
jjj n -
� •
.. rr s ♦ s
P T .:
� e . � u i
1'- �
, YYS� �, �+SL r� � ! �•'
�_>_GY
l � it
�
ry.'l•
u. r -' N.
/;, e k. 1
+� t .�
r;; € a\} , ! r
� I 5 .s t.T�
�5,` y
\ �
-� 17- .
k'. 1 s;�..:T
-';Y-'-. _W�� f �.is �\
f5t L.;'Mf
>Pt '� i ,I�
C'•'.; \\I 55 '
it r.t t
J{1 (r_r-•
�!'.`! r:
� y
.. 3 is
n,'"3. �•1`1 t,'.�'"�,5;" M4 ; -�P%
�.-.e,' -�'
�ur7� �i•i:.n"^*r' '�'''-J
, S,, .':+• '={�. i:' _,
1. ".-?"s�'-r.''�,
>a 1 �
�;
. - _ �_ Cp" - I - f
�,I/ r.. ...P' �^Ix 6�
,I .� ,�
'» I- 4- a�� rl, ;.. •J 4 ./� J�v'((��+�'.[,��:� , ()/- '\ I Iq
( p•c 'J 9 .r\ ��-�'/ 2`,IJ �1 ( }
�7 � � +� I r V
r
'r`%.. ♦ "'f"y:-T� "�'+ ar'' ":,�.:.
o
•,5 'u - - `4C"!t'•.r1H'F°- .Ia
p7- 2 N ap ,`Mw1 ,, $}�;
nr :r t :s� t �
-'+r'• 1 S.~ t •�, e:,-
i � �_j •�':.f[.� ;(
`l'.d.� ` �!
,f "I!\`. —.` I {`,y` Jrl! �\ '"�
f `�' r\)_ \ l4,ri: � - f / V i 'i
1` �Vt ' � `, I
u,
"� '" t �-�'
,z
�: ',�{�
t- c� +n'Es"
Y _ � e r.3.ti vS%�l°,.R.? �°.1,
} �+ -
r �`c t �'s•1�,,,��
:< ,{ �k n •.5
e"V \ �r�•r`E.SJ
_T '•s '`�+,. {
1 t,s .,vs ` �,
A, ,5
i � \ fk' ���C]1.;I'^�' '�'w^.
\�5��1� J -�... ' ml
�} (lam'" j �-;,J';- `
jI,f�
\ �� _- L��.( rM1i�`' (. f i ,.-�
5 a ^d _ \ � }11�, m � `�j J `Ir�4i�� i 1 ! L:. ���.
} •'"'� C � 4 .• 't••.i �J r i 'r, ( I!
� ` rr..', �(y C,,

: 5 '

United States Soil
Department of Conservation P. 0. BOX 277
Agriculture Service KENANSVILLE, NC 28349
TELEPHONE [phone]
TO:
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN
PRODUCER Mr. cTofr ah_ N_ . cyg ej_
LOCATION OF SITE Oq ,SR /L00 )MIJIt Sw dl—_ 1044nnji111
SIZE OF PROPOSED OPERATION
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON? YES ✓ N0 SOIL CLASS. & B
DISTANCE FROM THE LAGOON SITE TO NEAREST RESIDENCE OTHER THAN LANDOWNER OR HIS
TENANT Aauiiuj _0) .rr_,:led on Eaaf hsor �►►�y�opNxiwa�►jy /Odo'
NUMBER OF HOUSES WITHIN 2000 FEET OF LAGOON SITE �-
ACREAGE/CROP REQUIRED PTO PUMP EFFLUENT 11f & 1 Gcw-ht!
DOES LANDOWNER HAVE ENOUGH ACREAGE YES ✓ NO
IF NO, DOES LANDOWNER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE ACREAGE? YES NO
WILL FACILITY INVOLVE ALTERING WETLANDS? YES NO
IF THE ABOVE QUESTION CONCERNING -WETLANDS IS -CHECKED "YES-, THE LANDOWNER IS
HEREBY ADVISED THAT THIS CONSTRUCTION MAY REQUIRE PERMITS. FROM THE ARMY-CORP OF
ENGINEERS. " IT IS THE -LANDOWNERS RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF -.-PERMITSARE"''
NECESSARY AND TO. OBTAfiN-THE- REQUIRED -PERMITS� THE -ARMY- CORP -REPRESENTATIVE--FOR---
DUPLIN COUNTY IS:
-- - -.---JEFF...RICHTER,-
-- US --ARMY-; CORP 0F_-ENGI;NEERS - -- - - -
_ P. 0. '•BOX 1890 -
' -WILMIHGTON, � NC 28402-
TELEPHONE.[phone]_. _ - --
LANDOWNER IS RESPONSIBLE TO DETERMINE IF ANY -LOCAL OR STATE ZONING ORDINANCES
. AFFECT" THE LOCATION -OF - THIS "FACILITY:` FACILITY.- --
DOES .,
DOES SITE MEET SCS CRITERIA "FOR WASTE- TREATMENT' FACILITIES? ''YES ✓ HO
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS .14360101 w►vij' % no closer +An—lajft- 10'. ar
owwrd Mr. �,anier, raa3tir o�sotncb b� erPnbltJkcl. �0.•roiOwNtr Y
I3t rb .. a rk a ' :� r o co,vr+'�'r� w i o o+'^ r►�rou� o0e►t�Y+y.
No visible, s�gNs o. c.v1+vra1 Pesovrbcj p. apt b4 t1+i� ,s� •
THIS APPROVAL IS VALID FOR 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE SIGNED. IF DESIGN HAS NOT BEEN
COMPLETED WITHIN THIS PERIOD SITE WILL BE RE-EVALUATED AT THE TIME OF DESIGN TO
ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH SCS STANDARDS. LAGOON WILL HAVE TO BE 750 FEET FROM ANY
RESIDENCE OTHER THAN APPLICANT'S AT TIME OF DESIGN.
The Sol Conservation Service
VIs an agency of the
Department of ApricuRure SIGNATURE Q DATE 4--Ir-'q 9—

US Department of Agriculture NC -CPA 16
-Soil -Conservation -Service- — _= - _ - - - _ = 4-92--- -
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Land User/owner JC6FPN LAN I E:F, _ County All P U k I
Location/Tract & Field_ NumberT32.8 1=� z_ Acreage 19-�1
Prepared by L1V 1 A W Aj?,jQ0E-S -- C()QPT__g Date -1 /ZQ 1 QZ
Brief Description of Planned Practice/RMS/Project Measure:
LA&oofA, cRiTICAI_ AREA _-5Fj=_Dad -�L PA61DEE PLAMT1Nib
Environmental Factors and Resources to Identify :and Evaluate J
1. Is wetland included in the planning area: (References: NCPM;
190=GM 410.26; Hydric soils list; Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the U.S.; National Wetlands Inventory. Maps;
N%FSAM.
V No
}1
`S -
Yes - If. yes,
-- Identify types present
-- Attach environmental evaluation showing what effect
_ planned assistance will have on r�retl"and and how this
assistance is within policy
--- Have needed permits (CAMA, DEM, Corps, etc.) been
obtained by the landuser? _ - _
-- Make -sll :pufit;the landowner
violation of Swampbuster'
2•. Endangered and/or threatened species: (References:-190.-GM
410.22; Technical Guide Section I--i_(13)" and' Section I-vii
No Yes
-- Identify species whoserange and habitat needs indicate
they might occur in planning area
-- Identify on map any designated critical habitat "

3. Is a'designated natural or scenic area included 'in the planning. -
urea or will planned act o ss ii`pact _ on an adj C,enit natural or
scenic area? (References: 190-GM 410.23 and .24)
J No
.Yes - If yes, encourage landuser to corisult with concerned
agencies, societies, and individuals ;to Art Ve.:at .
mutually satisfactory land, iise afi$ tred tinerit'"`"
4 . Does -the :planning area include the 100-year fio6d pl-aih.
(References: NCPM; 190-GM 410.25; HUD Flood plain inapi�t)
No
Yes - If yes,
-- Is the assisted action likely to have sign-fidant
adverse effects on existingnaturAl and bene-ficiai
values in the flood plain! `
-- Is there a practical alternative 6-uts de- the ,fid6d•
Plain?
-- Has the flood plain been. iUscd for a1ricultut-di
production.. -for at least .3 of tie last :jieairs:?,_
5.. 'Is. an arcbxaeological or historical rl. site, ldc-atein -tie p afro ig
area:? (References:. NCPM; 420-GM' 40'1; -Xat onail; Register 61-
Historic Places)
Yes: - If yes,. have- steps been taken to- ei M&d the`
protection of this area?`
- - 6-- .- Are. there -any -pr- me-,. unique,--dr locally.= xmpoZ'l-rarit farmland's- in -
the. operating unit? (Referelices--:' SI -M`
x - - '. y • . gn$i.Aa
Yes - If.�yes,,- identify _'o6 a:- s"oi3s map: or 1ec e11 .
T .. Will, the,. action -resu 't ' in= srig?
• - • - - No:. - --- - -- - -•Yes°� -- .. .. � - _.. _ _,..,._� --• -- - - ..._... _. - -
8'k Ws11 thee- action-`resu-It ri swampbusting?: - .
Yes=
9=.1 Is'. there- a; potential! for.- caner-oversy?-' Flom' whbi?'AbJO j M I W 'LAM'D.
No: Y�es�

r'.
— 10 - Are- permits-required?/Shoul-d'-the_person contact -permit --agencies?-
--
V/No Yes}
When an- environmental factor or resource is identified on the
site, the user will refer to the appropriate reference for policy
and document the. appropriate action in the notes portion of this
form.
NOTES, DOCUMENTATION, FOLLOW—UP
�i
R

11nure from Pits PSWCD 1
LIVESTOCK WASTE SAMPLING, ANALYSIS, AND CALCULATION OF LAND APPLICATION RATES
• I. SAMPLE COLLECTION
A. Liquid Manure Slurry - -- - _- -- - - -- -
I. Under -slotted -floor pit
a. Use a length of 1/2" conduit open on one end and that can be
easily sealed on the other end (e.g., by placing one's thumb
over the end of the conduit).
b. With both ends of the conduit open, extend it into the manure
to the pit floor.
c. Seal the upper end of the conduit trapping the manure that has
entered the lower end, remove and empty into a bucket or container.
c. Collect samples from at least 5 locations or at least enough
for a total of 1 quart of slurry.
e. Thoroughly mix this slurry and empty approximately 1/2 pint
into sample container.
2. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. Make .sure the manure has been welt mixed or homogenized with a
liquid manure chopper -agitator pump or propeller agitator.
b. Take samples from approximately 5 locations in the pit, from the
agitator pump, or from the manure spreader and place.in a bucket.
C. Thoroughly mix and empty l/2 pint into sample container.
II. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER -
A. Place the sample .for analysis into a-fleA ble or expandable container that
can be sealed.- The container should. -be -rinsed- clean with- water - and- free --
of any residues but should not•be chlorinated or treated in any other way.
Dry litter may also be placed. in a sealed plastic bag such -as a_-freezer_.bag,...-
-S_ The sample should be refrigerated-,• iced` or cooled; if possible, or trans
.fermd 'to the lab�immedlateiy _
C. Hand -delivery is the.most reliable way of.sample`transfer, but - it can also.'
be ma lad.
D. If mailed, sample container -should first, be protected with a. packing•,mater�i,al _
such as newspaper,`then'.boxed or packaged with wrapping paper and taped':'`
E. The NCDA Plant Analysis Lab -provides this service for a nominal fee of
$4 per sample which should be.forwarded-along -with the sample.

PSWCD 1
1. Address: N. C. Department of Agriculture
Plant Analysis Lab
—Agronomic Div-ision �---- - � —
Slue Ridge Road Center
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
F. Request that as a minimum the following analyses be performed:
1. Total nitrogen (TKN)
2. Ammonia nitrogen (NFI N)
3. Total phosphorus (TP
4. Potassium .(K)
5. Dry litter samples should also include a total solids (TS) analysis.
G. Other analyses performed at no extra cost by NCDA include trace minerals.

PSWCD 2
I. SAMPLE COLLECTION
B. Lagoon Liquid
1. Ceihect approximately 1%2 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from the
inflow pipe to the flush tanks.
2. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or Iess) on the end of a 10-15
foot long pole.
b. Extend 'the bottle 10-15 feet away from the bank edge.
c. Brush away any floating scum or debris so it is not collected
with sample.
d. Submerge the bottle within 1 foot of the liquid surface.
e. Repeat at approximately 5 locations around the lagoon, place
into a bucket, thoroughly mix, and empty 1 pint into sample
container.
3. From a multi --stage lagoon system collect sample from lagoon that
is going to be irrigated from. _
II. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place the sample for analysis into a flexible or expandable container that
can be sealed. The container'. should -be rinsed clean -with water and free
of any residues but should no� be chlorinated or treated -in any other way.
Dry litter may also be placed �i6. a sealed plastic bag such as a freezer bag.
B. The sample should be refrigerated; iced 'or coaled, if'possible, or trans-
ferred -to the lab immediately.
-Cl.- -Hand--delivery is" the most reliable way. of -'sample -transfer, but it can also
- -- - be -mailed-: -
D. If.. -mailed, sample container, should .firs,t,be protected with a-packing_material
sack as. news Paper, then bpxe&or.pacicaged-with,wrappi��9 paper an taped.
= E: The:NCQA= Plant Analysis -Lab provides`°this°ser:v.ice ,for;a. nominal fee of
;$4'per sample which should be, forwarded-along.with- the -sample.
1. Address: N. C. Department of Agriculture
Plant-;.Analysis�-Lab�_.
Agronomic Division ,
Blue Ridge Road .dike_
- - Raleigh; NC- 27611
713
.".ttn:- ,Qr., ;°ay. CampbeI l

- PSWCD 2
F. Request that as a minimum the following analyses be performed
1. Total nitrogen (TKH)
-2.--_:Ammonia=-ni°trogen---Wt-! 3 W°)
3. Total phosphorus
4. Potassium (K)
5. Dry litter samples should also include a total solids (TS) analysis.
G. Other analyses performed at no extra cost by NCDA include trace minerals.

'. . •iPl-Mt-FOyXsI01D I INCH
„1 O7H IINE HEAVV,
ter/
%
I ..
■ ■
■
■■aa®�
■■■.■Ws■■■M®®
■®av�
®�aa
� �
as
■
aaa.®.®®®®®®■■■a
�..�.�!®�I■�I®®®iA®®®®■■
a
aaaa��a®S00®a®®®da®a
■■®
®®.
®■■®■■®_ON
PIN
B
a
e■a■■■■aa1®®a®aa■f■
■■XH■■■e■■®■a■E■%�ea
■■
seas'..■®®�����
®■
Name
ME ®■mom1�
M
®
.. a!!IEEE
■■
s■
■■
■a
a■
■
n ..
■�
a
�_g
■
ii■■�■�®®®ia®■®
■�
�I'r
®■
I
a
o■°
a
_��NEW
.■®a.
as
�:®®C:S�
as
■a
®■�
■■
■®tea
., ■
■■
aslow1010
ON
a
a
�'
�®
aaa■m■■■■.�
INN
■
_
■�
_
■
■
"aiaa�
m
WE
a
WIMMM
■
mom
aC
C
_ all
ea®
sRN
PUNEMS1
■■®®C
..
ram®
aasso
MMaao
o
�
.laa
■:�■ru..�■��11rr:_>�fs,!�r»r:r�.�.n��p
S m
"�"■

SWINE FARM WASTE MANAGEMENT ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST
Source
Cause
BMP's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead
Swine production
egetative or wooded buffers;
eecmmended best management
practi s;
od judgment and common sense
Animal body surfaces
Dirty manure -covered animals
(} Dry.floors
ff , Floor surfaces
Wet manure covered floors
floors;
('
/Igsted
{ aterers located over slotted floors;-
{ seders at high and of solid floors;
{seer a a manure buildup from floors;
( derfloor ventilation for drying
Manure -collection pits
Urine
(,kllraquent manure removal by flush;pit
r harge,or scrape
Parital micorbial decom osition.
_ Un erfloor_ventilation
Ventilationexhaust fans
Volatile gases;
t Fan iritenance;
Dust
( ficien movement
Indoor surfaces
Dust
(ashdown between groups of animals
{ } Feed additives;
[ } Feeder covers;
() Feed delivery downspout extenders to
feeder covers
Flush tanks
Agitation of recycled lagoon
( ) Flush tank covers
liquid whiles tanks are filling
f ) Extend fill lines to near bottom of
tanks wi anti -siphon vents ,
Flush alleys
Agitation during wastewater
(nderfloor flush with underfloor
conveyanance
ventilation '
Pit recharge points
Agitation of recycled lagoon
{ ) Extend rechard lines.to near bottom of
liquid while pits are filling
pits with anti,siphon vents
Lift stations
Agitation during sump tank filling
() Sump tank covers
and drawdown
Outside drain collection
Agitation during wastewater
{ } Box covers
or junction boxes
conveyance
End of drainpipes at lagoon
Agitation during wastewater
(► Extend discharge point of pipes
undefneath lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces Volatile gas emissions j }dsro r lagoon liquid capacity
Biological mixing ( ct lagoon startup procedures
Agitation {)�Zinim surface area -to -volume ratio
) agitation when pumping
( ) Mechanical aeration
[ I Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler nozzles High pressure agitation Wrrn a on dry days with little or no wind
Wind draft { in um recommended operation pressure
{ ump intake near lagoon liquid surface
( ) Pump from second -stage lagoon
AMOC--November 11, 1996

- Storage tank or basin
Partial microbial decomposition
I } Bottom or midlevel loading
surface
Mixing while filling
{ } Tank covers
Agitation when emptying
f } Basin surface mats of solids
(} Proven biological additives or oxidants
- N —Settling basin surface
Partial micobial decomposition
O Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
.
Mixing while filling
level
j `
g' A station when emptying
(}.Rem va settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge
Agitation,wheri spreading
( ,' njection of slurry/sludges
::-spreader outlets
Volatile gas emissions
ash residual manure from spreader after use
.{) Proven biological additives or oxidants
-Uncovered manure, slurry
,, Volatile.gas_emissions while drying
{ o' fection of slurry/sludges
or sludge on field surfaces
;a
Soil' orporation within 48 hours,"
Dread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
-
(} Prove,�>ological additives or oxidants
Dead animals
Dead animal disposal
pits
Carcass decomposition ( _ oper disposition of carcasses
Carcass decomposition () Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits.
(► Proper location/construction of disposal pits
Incinerators Incomplete combustion (} Second slack burners
..Standing water around Improper drainage U,2Y*._de and landscape such that water drains
facilities Microbial decomposition of away fr facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto public Poorly maintained access roads ( arm access road maintenance
roads from farm access
Additional Information: Available From:
Swine Manure Management; 0200, Rule/BMP Packet
NCSU-County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources -and Remedies, EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU-BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge --Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 128-88
NCSU-BAE '
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Fiuse-Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-88
NCSU-BAE
Lagoon Desig and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
NCSU-BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU-BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; -PIH-33
NCSU-Swine Extension
Environmental Assuranc Program: NPPC Manual
NC Pork Produces Assoc
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor -Task Force
NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
The issues checked ( ) pertain to this operation. The landowner/integrator agrees to use sound judgment in applying
odor control measures as practical.
I certify the aforementioned odor control Best Managment Pr;
AMOC--November 11, 1996

INSECT CONTROL CHECKLIST FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS
Source Cause SMP's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
(Liqui�stems)
' Flush Gutters Accumulation of solids lush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated
salds om putters as designed.
ave bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge'
Lagoons and flits Crusted Solids ( aintain lagoons, settling basins and
N pits where pest breeding is apparent to
minimize the crusting of solids to adepth
of no rri" a than 6-8 inches over more than .
30 f surface.
Excessive Vegetative Decaying vegetation EWaintain vegetative control along banks of
Growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent -
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
(Dry Systems)
Feeders Feed Spillage {) Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the accumulation
of decaying wastage.
O Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g. 7-10 day
interval during summer; 15-30 day interval during winter).
Feed Storage Accumulations of feed residues
Animal Holding Areas Accumulations of animal wastes
and feed wastage
AMIC--November 11, 1996
() Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
insuring drainage away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products).
(} Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed.
() Eliminate low area that trap moisture along fences
and other locations where waste accumulates and
and disturbance by animals is minimal. '
O Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e. inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids as needed).

Dry Manure Handling Accumulations of animal wastes { } Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g. 7-10 day
Systems interval during summer; 15-30 days interval during
winter) where manure is loaded for land application
or disposal.
( ) Provide for adequate drainage around manure stockpiles.
( ) inspect for and remove or break-up accumulated wastes
in filter -stripes around stockpiles and manure handling
areas. as.needed. - .... _ .., . _... _ .. _
Theiissi.ies`UF ricked'{ ):pertain -to this operation. The landvnerlintegrator agrees to. use sound judgment in applying
insect control measures as practical.
certify the aforementioned insect control Best Management Practices have been reviewed with me.
(Landowner Signalbre) `
&C'G� 7'C
(Farm Name)
(Facility Number)
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7fi13,.North Carolina -State University, Raleigh,.NC
27695-7613.
AMIC—November 11, 1996

MORTALITY MANAGEMENT METHODS
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
{ a Burial three _feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours
.-after knowledge of the _death. The burial beat least 300 feet from
any -flowing steam or=.public body of water.
(LT Rendering at a rendering.plant licensed under G. S: 106-168.7
(. y Complete incineration
{ ) In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and
design approved by the Department of Agriculture.
( y Any method which in the professional opinion of the State
Veterinarian would make possible the salvage of part of a dead
animal's value without endangering human or animal health.' (Written
approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached)

• ' EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY (DWQ)
EMERGENCY MANAGEMNET SERVICES (EMS)
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SWCD)
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS)
COOPERATIVE EXTERSION SERVICE (CES)
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave you property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every
effort to ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible
location for all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should
take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may ore may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed belwo.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that cause the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed
to flowing leaks -possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch from the embankment to catch all
seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. -If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill
' holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
1

2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage notes, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours call your DWQ regional office; Phone - -. After
hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility number, telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2
above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of
the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been
under taken, and the seriousness of the sitution.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone number.
c. -Instruct EMS to contact local Helath Department.
d. Contact CEs, phone number - , local SWCD office phone number - -, and local
NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -.
4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's Department and explain you
problem to them and ask the person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair or problem to minimize off -
site damage.
a.
b.
C.
Contractors Name:
Contractors Address:
Contractors Phone:
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting
Engineer, etc.)
a. Name:
b. Phone:
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and, reassess the waste managment plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
2

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE PLAN
Proper lagoon liquid management should be a year-round priority. It is especially
important to manage levels so that you do not have problems during extended rainy and
wet periods.
Maximum storage capacity should be available in the Iagoon for periods when the
receiving crop is dormant (such as wintertime for bermudagrass) or when there are
extended rainy spells such as the thunderstorm season in the summertime. This means
that at the first signs of plant growth in the later winter/early spring, irrigation according to
a farm waste management plan should be done whenever the land is dry enough to
receive lagoon liquid. This will make storage space available in the lagoon for future wet
periods. In the late summer/early fall the lagoon should be pumped down to the low
marker (see Figure 2-1) to allow for winter storage. Every effort should be made to
maintain the lagoon close to the minimum liquid level as long as the weather and waste
utilization plan will allow it.
Waiting until the lagoon has reached its maximum storage capacity before starting to
irrigate does not leave room for storing excess water during extended wet periods.
Overflow from the lagoon for any reason except a 25-year, 24-hour storm is a violation of
state law and subject to penalty action. `
The routine maintenance of a lagoon involves the following:
Maintenance of a vegetative cover for the dam.
Fescue or common bermudagrass are the most common vegetative
covers. The vegetation should be fertilized each year, if needed, to
maintain a vigorous stand. The amount of fertilizer applied should be
based on a soils test, but in the event that it is not practical to obtain
a soils test each year, the lagoon embankment and surrounding areas
should be fertilized with 800 pounds per acre of 10-10-10, or
equivalent.
Brush and trees on the embankment must be controlled. This may be
done by mowing, spraying, grazing, chopping, or a combination of
these practices. This should be done at least once a year and
possibly twice in years that weather conditions are favorable for
heavy vegetative growth.
NOTE: If vegetation is controlled by spraying, the herbicide must not be allowed to enter
the lagoon water. Such chemicals could harm the bacteria in the lagoon that are treating
the waste.
Maintenance inspections of the entire lagoon should be made during the initial filling of
the lagoon and at least monthly and after major rainfall and storm events. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
Waste Inlet Pipes, Recycling Pipes, and Overflow Pipes ---Nook for:
I . separation of joints
2. cracks or breaks
3. accumulation of salts or minerals
4. overall condition of pipes

Lagoon surface ---look for:
1, undesirable vegetative growth
2. floating or lodged debris
Embankment ---look for:
1. settlement, cracking, or "jug" holes
2. side slope stability ---slumps or bulges
3. wet or damp areas on the back slope
4. erosion due to lack of vegetation or as a result of wave action
5. rodent damage
Larger lagoons may be subject to liner damage due to wave action caused by strong
winds. These waves can erode the lagoon sidewalls, thereby weakening the lagoon dam.
A good stand of vegetation will reduce the potential damage caused by wave action. If
wave action causes serious damage to a lagoon sidewall, baffles in the lagoon may be
used to reduce the wave impacts.
Any of these features could lead to erosion and weakening of the dam. If your lagoon has
any of these features, you should call an appropriate expert familiar with design and
construction of waste lagoons. You may need to provide a temporary fix if there is a threat
of a waste discharge. However, a permanent solution should be reviewed by the
technical expert. Any digging into a lagoon dam with heavy equipment is a serious
undertaking with potentially serious consequences and should not be conducted unless
recommended by an appropriate technical expert.
Transfer Pumps ---check for proper operation of:
1. recycling pumps
2. irrigation pumps
Check for leaks, loose fittings, and overall pump operation. An unusually loud or grinding
noise, or a large amount of vibration, may indicate that the pump is in need or repair or
replacement.
NOTE: Pumping systems should be inspected and operated frequently enough so that you
are not completely "surprised" by equipment failure. You should perform your pumping
system maintenance at a time when your lagoon is at its low level. This will allow some
safety time should major repairs be required. Having a nearly full lagoon is not the time
to think about switching, repairing , or borrowing pumps. Probably, if your lagoon is full,
your neighbor's lagoon is full also. You should consider maintaining an inventory of spare
parts or pumps.
Surface water diversion features are designed to carry all surface
drainage waters (such as rainfall runoff, roof drainage, gutter outlets,
aE►u parking lot runoff) away from your lagoon and other waste
treatment or storage structures. The only water that should be
coming from your lagoon is that which comes from your flushing
(washing) system pipes and the rainfall that hits the lagoon directly.
You should inspect your diversion system for the following:
1. adequate vegetation
2. diversion capacity
3. ridge berm height

Identified problems should be corrected promptly. It is advisable to inspect your system
during or immediately following a heavy rain. If technical assistance is needed to
determine proper solutions, consult with appropriate experts.
You should record the level of the lagoon just prior to when rain is predicted, and then
record the level again 4 to 6 hours after the rain (assumes there is no pumping). This will
give you an idea of how much your lagoon level will rise with a certain rainfall amount
(you must also be recording your rainfall for this to work). Knowing this should help in
planning irrigation applications and storage. If your lagoon rises excessively, you may
have an inflow problem from a surface water diversion or there may be seepage into the
lagoon from the surrounding land.
Lagoon Operation
Startup:
Immediately after construction establish a complete sod cover on bare soil
surfaces to avoid erosion.
2. Fill new lagoon design treatment volume at least half full of water before
`waste loading begins, taking care not to erode lining or bank slopes.
3. Drainpipes into the lagoon should have a flexible pipe extender on the
end of the pipe to discharge near the bottom of the lagoon during initial
filling or another means of slowing the incoming water to avoid erosion of
the lining.
4. When possible, begin loading new lagoons in the spring to maximize
bacterial establishment (due to warmer weather).
5. It is recommended that a new lagoon be seeded with sludge from a healthy
working swine lagoon in the amount of 0.25 percent of the full lagoon
liquid volume. This seeding should occour at least two weeks prior to the
addition of wastewater.
6. Maintain a periodic check on the lagoon liquid pH. If the pH falls below
7.0, add agricultural lime at the rate of 1 pound per 1000 cubic feet of
lagoon liquid volume until the pH rises above 7.0. Optimum lagoon liquid
PH is between 7.5 and 8.0.
7. A dark color, lack of bubbling, and excessive odor signals inadequate
biological activity. Consultation with a technical specialist is recommended
if these conditions occur for prolonged periods, especially during the warm
season.
Loading:
The more frequently and regularly that wastewater is added to a lagoon,. the better the
lagoon will function. Flush systems that wash waste into the lagoon several times daily are
optimum for treatment. Pit recharge systems, in which one or more buildings are drained
and recharged each day, also work well.

• Practice water conservation ---minimize building water usage and
spillage from leaking waterers, broken pipes and washdown_ through
proper maintenance and water conservation.
Management:
Minimize feed wastage and spillage by keeping feeders adjusted. This
will reduce the amount of solids entering the lagoon
Maintain lagoon liquid level between the permanent storage level and
the full temporary storage level.
Place visible markers or stakes on the lagoon bank to show the
minimum liquid level and the maximum liquid lever (Figure 2-1).
Start irrigating at the earliest possible date in the spring based on
nutrient requirements and soil moisture so that temporary storage
will be maximized for the summer thunderstorm season. Similarly,
irrigate in the late summer/early fall to provide maximum lagoon
storage for the winter.
The lagoon liquid level. should never be closer than 1 foot to the lowest
point of the dam or embankment.
Do not pump the Iagoon liquid level lower that the permanent storage
level unless you are removing sludge.
Locate float pump intakes approximately 18 inches underneath the liquid
surface and as far away from the drainpipe inlets as possible.
Prevent additions of bedding materials, long-stemmed forage or vegetation,
molded feed, plastic syringes, or other foreign materials into the lagoon.
Frequently remove solids from catch basins at end of confinement houses or
wherever they are installed.
Maintain strict vegetation, rodent, and varmint control near lagoon edges.
Do not allow trees or large bushes to grow on lagoon dam or embankment.
Remove sludgd from the lagoon either when the sludge storage capacity is
full or before it fills 50 percent of the permanent storage volume.
If animal production is co be terminated, the,owner is responsible for
- - obtaining and -implementing a closure plan �6-eliminate�the possibility
pollutant discharge.
Sludge Removal:
Rate of Neon sludge buildup can be reduced by:

proper lagoon sizing,
mechanical solids=separation of flushed waste,
gravity settling of flushed waste solids in an appropriately designed basin, or
minimizing feed wastage and spillage.
Lagoon sludge that is removed annually rather than stored long term will:
have more nutrients,
have more odor, and
require more land to properly use the nutrients.
Removal techniques:
Hire a custom applicator.
Mix the sludge and lagoon liquid with a chopper -agitator impeller
pump through large -bore sprinkler irrigation system onto nearby cropland;
and soil incorporate.
Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland ot-
forageland; mix remaining sludge; pump into liquid sludge applicator; haul
and spread onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or
forageland; dredge sludge from lagoon with dragline or sludge barge; berm
an area beside lagoon to receive the sludge so that liquids can drain back
into lagoon; allow sludge to dewater; haul and spread. with manure spreader
onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Regardless of the method, you must have the sludge material analyzed for waste
constituents gust as you would your lagoon water. - The sludge will contain different
nutrient and metal values from the liquid. The application of the sludge to fields will be
limited by these nutrients as well as any previous waste applications to that field and crop
requirement. Waste application rates will be discussed in detail in Chapter 3.
When removing sludge, you must also pay attention to the liner to prevent damage. Close
attention by the pumper or drag -line operator will ensure that the lagoon liner remains
intact. If you see soil material or the synthetic liner material being disturbed,.you should
stop the activity immediately and not resume until you are sure.that the sludge can be
removed without liner injury. If the liner is damaged it must be repaired as soon as
possible.
Sludge removed from the lagoon has a much higher phosphorus and heavy metal content
than liquid. Because of this it should probably be applied to.land with low. phosphorus • -
and metal levels, as indicated by a soil test, and incorporated to reduce the chance of
erosion. Note that if the sludge is applied to fields with very high soil -test phosphorus, it
should be applied only at rates equal to the crop removal of phosphorus. As. with other
wastes, always have your lagoon sludge analyzed -for its nutrient value.
The application .of sludge will increase the amount of odor at the waste application site.
Extra precaution should be used to observe the wind direction and other conditions which
could increase the concern of neighbors.
r

Possible Causes of Lagoon Failure
Lagoon failures result in the unplanned discharge of wastewater from the structure. Types
of failures include leakage through the bottom or sides, overtopping, and breach of the
dam. Assuming proper design and construction, the owner has the responsibility for
ensuring structure safety. Items which may lead to lagoon failures include:
Modification of the lagoon structure ---an example is the placement of a pipe
in the dam without proper design and construction. (Consult an expert in
lagoon design before placing any pipes in dams.)
Lagoon liquid levels ---high levels are a safety risk.
Failure to inspect and maintain the dam.
Excess surface water flowing into the lagoon.
Liner integrity ---protect from inlet pipe scouring, damage during sludge
removal, or rupture from lowering lagoon liquid level below groundwater
table. `
NOTE: If lagoon water is allowed to overtop the dam, the moving water will soon cause
gullies to form in the dam. Once this damage starts, it can quickly cause a large discharge
of wastewater and possible dam failure.
r

System Calibration
Information presented in manufacturer's charts are based on average operation
conditions with relatively new equipment. Discharge rates and application rates
change over time as equipment gets older and components wear. In particular,
pump wear tends to reduce operating pressure and flow. With continued use,
nozzle wear results in an increase in the nozzle opening which will increase the
discharge rate while decreasing the wetted diameter.
You should be aware that operating the system differently than assumed in the
design will alter the application rate, diameter of coverage, and subsequently the
application uniformity. For example, operating the system with excessive pressure
results in smaller droplets, greater potential for drift, and accelerates wear of the
sprinkler nozzle. Clogging of nozzles can result in pressure increase. Plugged
intakes or crystallization of mainlines will reduce operating pressure. Operating
below design pressure greatly reduces the coverage diameter and application
uniformity.
For the above reason, you should calibrate your equipment on a regular basis to
ensure proper application rates and uniformity. Calibration at least once every
three years is recommended. Calibration involves collecting and measuring flow at
several locations in the application area. Any number of containers can be used to
collect flow and determine the application rate. Rain gauges work best because
they already have a graduated scale from which to read the application amount
without having to perform additional calculations. However, pans, plastic buckets,
jars, or anything with a uniform opening and cross-section can be used provided
the liquid collected can be easily transferred to a scaled container for measuring.
For stationary sprinklers, collection containers should be located randomly
throughout the application area at several distances from sprinklers. For traveling
guns, sprinklers should be located along a transect perpendicular to the direction
of pull. Set out collection containers 25 feet apart along the transect on both
sides of the gun cart. You should compute the average application rate for all
nonuniformity of the application. On a windless day, variation between containers
of more than 30 percent is cause for concern. You should contact your irrigation
dealer or technical specialist for assistance.
`Reprinted for Certification Training for Operations of Animal Waste Management Systems Manual

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1.y Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, -
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When, animal waste is to be applied on .acres subject to -
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grasslairid,'the-waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather'
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not°to exceed -the soil,
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters _g and in a method which ,does ,nat _cause drift -from-
..-
theTsite durinapplication. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9.'Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways -that discharges directly into water -courses,____
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site. -
16. Domestic and industrial waste -from washdown-.facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,'shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover_ of _appropriate vegetation .will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and.
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered .
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion,'leakage or discharge.
Page: 9

r
WASTE TTTILIZATION 'PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18.'If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of, _
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three -(3)
__years. Waste application_ records for .all.- other- waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations. -
Page: 10

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name,of Farm:TRIPLE J. FARMS INC.
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facilit Owner: JOLANDA D. LANIER
(Please print) Q
I�
Signature:
Name of Mangq¢r (If different from owner)
Signature:. Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (please print)JOHNNY L. LANIER
Af£iliation:DUPLIN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Phone No, 910-295-2120 "
Address .(Agency): PO BOX 277
KENANSVILLE NC 28349
Signature: �� ` Date:
Page: 11

a
N

r
�.r:ryrt
a

AF22
• �` �'' FCed1FA,,r j
READY
AA AS Ac AD AE
AF
AG
AH
9Head (wean to feeder)====_______=__-===µ-==}
\pd
10Storage volume for sludge acc3_tm. (cu.'i-t. >_- >
0
11-lr,eatmerit Volume (min. 1 cu. ft. per 1b. )===>
1
TO CLEAR
DESIGN:
121nside top length===========================>
204
\cd
131n5ide tap width===______________ __________>
317
14Top of dike at elevation==--=--=--=====-===-)
48- 60
TO QUIT
W/O SAVE:
\q
16Side Slopes====_____________________________)
2.8
1725 year- - 24 hour rairrfai1===----====-==-=--)
7.5
TO GOTO
SEEDING:
18Bottom of lagoon at elevation===============>
36-20
\sr
19Total regUir-ed volume==============) 48933.0
4OTotal design volume available======) 5312696
TO PRINT
SPECS:
21Design end pumping elevation================>
44.60
\pC-
22Min. required treatment volume=====> 330480
23Tr-•mt. vol. at end Pumping avail. === > .360370
TO PRINT
O & M:
24Design start pumping elev.==================)
46.80
\po
S'5Min. required perm. + temp. volume=> 49 2'378
�6Design vol. at start pumping avail.> 484302
TO GOTO
WASTE U:
SPREADSHEET I No mail 1
111:36am
Tue May 4
F1-=Quit FE =Help F3=Menu F4=Cancel F5=Edit F6=Macro
F7=Goto
A bv i f f c ons f G k
S l�fg3 . �a�goaH faokr J°�d,
S►•►a(�_ ar�4- oK_ _N_W 4arMc� ofdrJrG -
ACd1 f° fit rCJ 11aytd fa �CtGP Jvr�A4v
Wa-�[r o✓�' d� ati.k��- lagooln. /jlir �..Q.l�cr _ _ ---. - -- -'-
$0.10� /1L W1D�/� torFPl67c datOs ��� a��•�P` GDA�'rgafor .
coyI.,+t! 7'3arJh lead;"
Shl 13

r-�
United States
Sail
_
Department of
Conservation
`
Agriculture
Service
OPERATOR: _ QQ� J.AKJ1PlZ
Please review the attached plan and specifications carefully. Retain
this plan for your use and records. It is strongly recommended that you,
your contractor, -and Soil Conservation Service personnel are in agreement
as to how the waste lagoon is to be constructed. The Soil Conservation
Service personnel will meet with ail concerned parties and walk over the
site to explain all flags and markings. It is important that everyone
understand what is expected so that final construction meets plans and
specification and the job can be certified for payment (if cost -sharing
is involved).
The pad dimensions and grades are the best estimate_ The BUILDER or
CONTRACTOR is RESPONSIBLE for final layout and design of the pads. The
Soii Conservation Service personnel will assist 7n a limited capacity,
as its major concern is the proper design and construction of the waste
treatment lagoon.
a
The actual. amount of material required for pads and'dam may vary from the
estimates. The design will attempt to balance cuts and fills as close as
possible. If additional material is required after construction is complete
on the lagoon, the -contractor and owner will negotiate on the price and
location of borrow area.
} cu.ft. cu. ds.
NOTE: Design Requirement: yg2189 = 113Z��Y
Estimate of Excavation: cu.ft. = .lje.SGq cu.yds.
Estimate of Pad E Dike: cu.ft. = - I IL#g2cu yds.
y+ :J.p Ration
'Job_ Class
Date'
Designed By 64f US
NaaVe
Des i gti-Approval_
Name
Date
O The Soo Conservation Service
is an agency at the
Qevaninent of Agriculture

Operator:Wayne\Joseph LanieCoLinty: Duplin
Date: 09/2--0 32
Distance to nearest residence (ether-- than owner)
1000.17' feet
1. Sl-EAD'`r- S HTE LIFE WEIGHT
* sows (farrow to finish) x
1417 lbs. = 0 1bs
* sc.ws t a-r-r-ow to 'Feeder) x
�_� 1b5. -- 17 lbs
E448 head (finishing only) x
1ST lbs. - � 0480 lbs
O sows (farrow to wean) x
433 lbs. = 0 lbs
O head (wean to feeder,) x
30 lbs. = 0 1bs
TOTAL STEADY SI-AI-E LIVE WEIGHT
(SSLW) 330480 l bs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 330460 lbs. SSLW x Treatment Volume (CF) / lb. SSLW
Treatment Volume (CF) /lb. SSLI�=
1 CF/lb. SSLW
Volume = 3,,0480 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0.0 `cubic feet
Not computed at landowner's request
Sludge will be removed as needed.
4. TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME
Inside top length 315.0 feet ;
Inside top width 200.0 feet
Top of dike at elevation 48.5
feet
Freeboard 1.0 feet ; Side slopes
3.0 : 1 (Inside lagoon)
Total design lagoon liquid level at
elevation 47.5 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation 36.5
feet
Seasonal high water table elevation
0.0 feet
Total design' volume usingSramoidal
formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDES
LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH _
3.0 3.0 3.0 '3.0
309-0 - 194.0 11.0 -
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
309.0 194.0 59946.0
(AREA OF. TOR), .
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
243.0 128.0 31104.0
(AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH WIDTH * 4
276. 0 161.0 177744.0
( AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4 )
CU. FT. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION)
+ AREA BOTTOM] DEPTH/6
59946. 0 177744.0
31104.0 1.8
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIQUID
LEVEL = 492789 CU. FT.