250020_INSPECTIONS_20171231

2 v
NORTH CAROLINA �
Department of Enviro ol-IMItel QuBi

INSPECTIONS,
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

0
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
250020 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS250020
❑ Denied Access
Inssection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Craven Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
0412112017 Entry Time: 11:00 am
Exit Time: 12:00 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Tommy McCoy Livestock
Owner Email:
Owner:
Tommy L McCoy
Phone:
919-638-4892
Mailing Address: 3675 Hwy 55 W New Bern NC 28562
Physical Address: 295 Quinn Rd Cove City NC 28523
Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 14' 28" Longitude: 77' 17' 02"
5 miles N. of Cove City on SR 1256 (Wintergreen Rd.). 1 and 112 miles East on SR 1253 (Quinn Rd.). 25 miles from Kinston 24
miles from New Bern and 100 miles from Raleigh.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Tommy L McCoy Operator Certification Number: 16337
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis 2-14-17 .62
9-27-16 50
5-3-16 .81
Soil Test 1-25-17 wl highest time .5 tons
Cu & Zn values Win range
Sludge Survey 11-4-16 Thick-4.4'
LTZ-3.4'
Pump intake-3.2') 49% Sludge Ratio
Calibration due 2017
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
Crop yield compiete
Phone:
Rate:
page: 1

Permit: AW5250020 Owner - Facility : Tammy L McCoy Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Date: 04/21/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,629 1,900
Total Design Capacity: 2,629
Total SSLW: 354.915
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1
12/18/95
19.50
35.00
Lagoon
2
08/21196
19.50
page: 2

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility : Tommy L McCoy Facility Number:
250020
inspection hate: 04/21/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structu re
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
ME][]
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? {if yes, notify DWQy
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage &,Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed {I.e] large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[]
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility : Tommy L McCoy Facility Number: 250020
inspection Date: 04/21/17 inpsection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Leaf
Soil Type 3
Tarboro
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility : Tommy L McCoy Facllity Number: 250020
Inspection Date: 04/21/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ 0
❑
(NPDFS only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
M ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ 0
❑
Other Issues
Yes
Ng Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
M
contact a regional Air quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31, Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
M []
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

y
It
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number. 25DO20 Facility Status: Active Permit: AVVS250020 [] Denied Access
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
05/04/2016 Entry Time: 09:30 am
Farm Name:
Tammy McCoy Livestock
Owner:
Tommy L McCoy
Mailing Address:
3875 Hwy 55 W
Physical Address:
295 Quinn Rd
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Craven Region: Washington
Exit Time: 10:30 am Incident #
Owner Email:
New Bern NC 28562
Cove City NC 28523
Phone: [phone]
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 14' 28" Longitude: 77' 17' 02"
5 miles N. of Cove City on SR 1256 (Wintergreen Rd.). 1 and 112 miles East on SR 1253 (Quinn Rd.). 25 miles from Kinston 24
miles from New Bern and 100 miles from Raleigh.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Tommy L McCoy Operator Certification Number: 16337
Secondary OtC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Megan H Stilley
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis 2-1-16 .78
10-2-15 .62
5-28-15 1.05
Soil Test 10-1-15 wl highest lime .5 tons
Cu & Zn values wlin range
Sludge Survey 8-12-15 Thick-4.5'
LTZ-3.4'
Pump intake-3.4' } 50% Sludge Ratio
Calibration complete 8-12-15 wl 85 GPM
Freeboard & Rainfatl complete & correspond w1 irrigation
Crop yield complete - small grain cover removed - no deduction necessary
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

r Permit: AVVS250020 Owner - Facility : Tommy L McCoy Facility Number: 250020
Inspection pate: 05/04/16 lnpsection Type; Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,629 1,184
Total Design Capacity: 2,629
Total SSLW; 354,915
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1
12118/95
19,50
33-00
Lagoon
2 08/21/96
19-50
33.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility : Tommy L McCoy Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Date: 05/04116 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yea
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
01111
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes Np Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.1 large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks andlor wet stacks)
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
■ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na NN
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
[]
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility : Tommy L McCoy Facility Number:
250020
Inspection Date: 05/04/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes Na Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Leaf
Soil Type 3
Tarboro
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Sail Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ N ❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ []
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking`.?
❑
page: 4

1
Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility : Tommy L McCoy Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Date: 05/04/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na !ie
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
N ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
tNPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively oerUed operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ 0
❑
Daher Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document
❑
N ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DW4 of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon I Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
N ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Rev! ewe rllnspector fail to discuss rev iewh n s pe cti o n with on -site representative?
❑
E ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
page: 5

t
M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250020 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS250020
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County:
Craven Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 03/1712015 Entry Time: 11:00 am Exit Time: 12:00 pm Incident #
Farm Name: Tommy McCoy Livestock
Owner Email:
Owner: Tommy L McCoy
Phone:
919-638-4892
Mailing Address: 3675 Hwy 55 W
New Bern NC 28562
Physical Address: 295 Quinn Rd
Cove City NC 28523
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35' 14' 28" Longitude:
77' 17' 02"
5 miles N. of Cove City on SR 1256 (Wintergreen Rd.). 1 and 112 miles East on SR 1253 (Quinn Rd.). 25 miles from Kinston
24
miles from New Bern and 100 miles from Raleigh.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cot, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Tommy L McCoy Operator Certification Number: 16337
Secondary DIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone :
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis 2-4-15 .64
10-16-14 '50
6-13-14 '69
Soil test 11-24-14 wl highest lime .7 tons
Cu & Zn values wlin range
Sludge Survey 10-4-14 Thick-4.5'
LTZ-3.5'
Pump intake-2.99') 49% Sludge Ratio
Calibration 10.4-14 wl 90 GPM
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
Crop yield complete
page' 1

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility : Tammy L McCoy Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Date. 03/17/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2.629 1.883
Total Design Capacity: 2.629
Total SSLW: 354.915
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1
12/18/95
19.50
27.00
Lagoon
2 08121/96
19.50
page: 2

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility : Tommy L McCoy Facility Number:
250020
inspection Date: 03/17/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit
Routine
Discharges & Stream impacts
Yes
No Na Nei
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
E ❑
❑
Discharge originated at
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
N ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
[]
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
E]
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
N ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na He
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large
❑
■ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
E ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
N ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
N ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ E ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ E ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility : Tammy L McCoy Facility Number:
250020
Inspection Date: 03/17/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste ARplication
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Corn, wheat,
Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Leaf
Soil Type 3
Tarboro
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
N ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
N ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

S
r Permit. AWS250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Date: 03117/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
N ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ■
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 E]
[]
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
N ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ 0
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
N ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
■
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
E ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Type of Visit: A Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up Q Referral Q Emergency Q Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Gcc-� Region: bV0r
Farm Name: " Owner Email:
Owner Name: om �l L `C Phone:
Mailing Address: �j 1nj L_ rN j '�,eyr,'. N L
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
[ en I �G�l Title:
Onsite Representative: \D 1��•� �� ��
Certified Operator: i] r►lI-M 1
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Integrator: �— -
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pap.
Wean to Finish
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dai Caw
Wean to Feeder
EM
a er
Da' Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
ns
Design Current
D . P.ouit . Ca aci P,o .
Layers
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turkeys
Turke Puults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impact
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Q Nc ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yesr:k1a ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facifity Number: Date of Inspection: — ZE —
Waste Collecti6o & Treatment
No
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
O
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
iv
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat, notify DWQ
N
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
E
❑ NA
❑ NE
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
ElYes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
`E'`
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
016
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C,,5
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
VN9
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[;•? f
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
d
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
L_I N.
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
f j No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
EKo
❑ N ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: l:; - 3_ Date of insnection:
24, Did the facihly fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes F3/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey 0 Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of First survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [] No D<A ❑ NE
Other issues
2& Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA
04E
❑Yes Er -No ❑NA
❑NE
[:]Yes N❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Io
❑ Yes [�io
❑ Yes io
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any -other comments..:
Use drawings of facility to better explain. situations (use additional pages as necessary).
60� t
S
a V � � [ �W�r7g �et}}a�7sl.t- �-t✓iyW Q�4�,
11--13 i
ZV'\ ] (:L�s L.a1 i
SW - S,V,rV_n - 3
crop U, [ Cz., —
LLL�'� "J f[��* J�i�-- "`��� V'-'�^' � + `-' � 1 � j Y71J t- � � OIn.S r � � ��l�l[ a � � �'1+►�
��p b-v 0 Y\-Q.c"J i' `) C�[J��I C J� W ► L
Cot [ar r•c��nc w� + �'�'7[ot- ���-- ., .
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: c' ` ci 3�� I
Date: U
21412011

Division of Water [duality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 25002,0 Facility Status: Active _ Permit: 8WS250020 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ _ _ _ _ _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Wa§hinaton
Date of Visit: 09/09/2013 Entry Time: 01:00 PM Exit Time: 02:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Tommy Mggov Livestock Owner Email:
Owner: TGmm" McCoy
Mauling Address: a675 Hwy 55 W „ _ New Bern NC 2. 562
Physical Address: 295 Quinn Rd _ Cove City NC 28523,
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods In
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°14'28" Longitude: 7Z*17'02"
5 miles N. of Cove City on SR 1256 (Wintergreen Rd.). 1 and 1/2 miles East on SR 1253 (Quinn Rd.). 25 miles from Kinston 24 miles
from New Bern and 100 miles from Raleigh.
Question Areas:
a ❑ischrge & Stream Impacts
jj Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Tommy L McCoy
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
© Other issues
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
On -site representative Brent Mitchell
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
N Waste Application
Operator Certification Number: 16337
Title
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date:
Phone
Page: 1

Permit: AW5250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy Facility Number : 250020
Inspection Date: 0910912013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis 7-1-13 .75
4-22-13 .65
1-22-13 .68
Soil Test 8-21-13 wl highest lime 0 tons
Zn & Cu values wlin range
Sludge Survey 7-14-12 TM1 Thick-1.9'
LTZ-4.5'
Pump intake-3.1') 24% Sludge Ratio
TM2 Thick-3.7'
LTZ-4.3'
Pump intake-3.4') 39% Sludge Ratio
Calibration due 2013
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & Correspond wl irrigation
Crop yield complete
`Mow around lagoon bank'
15}Need to cut bermuda hay & manage weeds
Page: 2

Permit: AVVS250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Date: 09109/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,629 1,528
Total Design Capacity: 2,629
Total SSLW: 354,915
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon
1
12/18/95
19.5D
19,00
agoon
2
08121 /96
19.50
28.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS260020 Owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy
Inspection Date: 09/D9/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
Facility Number; 250020
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWD)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l Large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
B. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? {Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks}
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy Facility Number. 250020
Inspection Date: 09/09/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crap Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Small Grain Overseed
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Norfolk
Leaf
Tarboro
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ Cl
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AW5250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy
Inspection Date: 09/09/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 250020
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes
No NA
NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
Cl
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑
❑
boxes) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance
Page: 6

1 Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy
Inspection Date: 09/09/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
28. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 250020
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA ME
Q ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Yes No NA N E
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report Cl ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard probiems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? Cl ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
11
11
Page: 7

I.type of visit: W Uomptiance inspection V uperanon Keview V Structure Evaivanon V i ecnnicai Assistance I
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine C) Complaint Q Follow-up Q Referral Q Emergency Q Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Cr `f" Region: Wl��
Farm Name [ ;, A-\ 1�e ___A�111 Owner Email:
Owner Name: rr rv� y �— C C f Phone:
Mailing Address: :56�) S �1r� 55 � � ten_ Ne. a W
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �`'j t-'E� f\ —Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: ren� t��� ` Integrator: G
Certified Operator: o mr1 `j {j�1� _ Lor/ Certification Number:
T - -
Back-up Operator:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
) L3_21A
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Wet Poultry
ILayer
Nun -La er
Resign
Capacity
I
I
Current
Pop.
Design Current
Gable Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Daiiy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
i
Layers
Design
.1 aci
Current
P,o .
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
7Turkey
Beef Feeder
Boars
Other
WTurkeysOther ouets
Other
==M
Beef Brood Cow
I
Discharees and Stream Impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes OkNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [;'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters 0 Yes C3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

lFacility Number. - — Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
A. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
i_ tXo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
D1<0
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the wasie structures require
❑ Yes
io
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[v]'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [3/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): VDCI , S % i R '
13. Soil Type(s): Na('� AL t aaG
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? [:]Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes []�<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [;I -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records &_ Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the Facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [N
[:]Yes No
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ETNo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
LET 5-A ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 214120II Continued

Facili Number: 15 - C� I Date of lns eation: %— j
24. Dib the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 12f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ItiTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the Facility fait to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No [] NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [:]No QAA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [ 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA CIE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [Z/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ti10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 6 No• ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the Facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes El<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any.other comments:
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional panes as necessary). ..
57-11 - i-)�_
6o
.a('0
�. � • : Z n U� 5 1 '� ��
�TZ 3 ,�1'
Zo ] -3
C 0 P `►� A
7c, r
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
1 Lk> t -zu)Y s
0')�_ \�' 5�_A
Phone: q � t — S9 _
Date: 5—.29-
21412011

0
l
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 250020 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250020 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed pate:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
gton
Date of Visit: 0811 fi12011 _ Entry Time:07A5 AM___ Exit Time: 08:45 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: T-LLny MQQoy Livestock
Owner Email:
Owner: Tommy L McCoy
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3675 HM 55 W
New Bern SIC 285§2
Physical Address: 2�5 Quinn Ro
Cove City NC 2§523
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Maxwell Foods Inc_
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35°14'28- Longitude: =7'02" —
5 miles N. of Cove City on SR 1256 (Wintergreen Rd.). 1 and 112 miles East on SR 1253 (Quinn Rd.). 25 miles from Kinston 24 miles
from New Bern and 100 miles from Raleigh.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Tommy L McCoy
Operator Certification Number: 16337
Secondary 01C(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

permit: AWS260020 Owner • Facility: Tommy L McCoy
Inspection Date: 0811612011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inspection Summary:
*Need to get lagoon #1 level down before Fall
`No hogs stocked at lower houses by Old lagoon
"Continue to maintain Bermuda sprayfFelds
Waste Analysis 6-9-11 .10 1.2
3-3-11 02 .67 ) Just sent off new waste analysis
Soil Tst 11-29-10 wl highest lime 1.6 tons} need lime
Zn & Cu values wfin range
Sludge Survey 6-9-10 #1 Thick-2.1'
LTZ-12'
Pump intake-3.2' } 27% Sludge Ratio
#2 Thick-2.4'
LTZ-5H
Pump intake-3.6} 23% Sludge Ratio
Calibration due 2011
Freeboard & Rainfall complete
Crop yield complete
Facility Number. 250020
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy Facility Number : 250020
Inspection Date: 0811612011
Regulated Operations
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Design Capacity
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,629 1,577
Total Design Capacity: 2,629
Total SSLW: 354,915
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1
12/18/95
19.50
23.00
agoon
2
08/21/96
19.50
33.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250020 Owner • Facility: Tommy L McCoy Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Date: 08/16/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Im acts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity cf any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ Cl ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? {Not applicable to roofed pits,
Cl
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks}
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

0
Permit: AVVS250020 Owner • Facility: Tommy L McCoy
Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Rate: 08/16/2011 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for VIsIt: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/1 a lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crap Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Norfolk
Soil Type 2 Leaf
Soil Type 3 Tarboro
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWM P)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
I& Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Faculty: Tommy L McCoy Facility Number: 250020
Inspection pate: 0811612011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? 110011
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment �NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26- Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
boxes) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Page: 6

t
Permit: AW5250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy
Inspection Date: 08116/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250020
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31, Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Rev iewerllnspector fail to discuss rev iewli n spectio n with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
■
■
■
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
001111
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

I
E Division of Water quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250020 _ _ _ Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AWS250020 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Insoection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 121Q712010 Entry Time:01:0Q PM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Tommy M9Q9Y LiyOwner Email:
Owner: Tommy L McCov Phone: 1 -
Mailing Address: 3675 Hwy 55 W New Bern NO 28562
Physical Address: 295 Quinn Rd Cove City NC 28523
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°14'28" Longitude: 77°17'02"
5 miles N. of Cove City on SR 1256 (Wintergreen Rd.). 1 and 112 miles East on SR 1253 (Quinn Rd.). 25 miles from Kinston 24 miles
from New Bern and 100 miles from Raleigh.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment © Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Tommy L McCoy
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16337
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy
Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Data: 12107/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
New COC and Permit in records
Waste Analysis 9-3-10 .75
6-21-10 .92
3-26-10 .69
Soil Samples 2010 sent off, but not returned
`Bermuda crop window extended till Oct 18th
'Small grain not planted - no irrigation on small grain
Sludge Survey 6-9-10 Thick-2.1'
LTZ-0.2'
Pump intake-3.2' ) 27% Sludge Ratio
Calibration due 2011
Freeboard level for #2 reoorded incorrectly
Lagoon inudated beginning of October
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Date: 12/0712010
Regulated Operations
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Design Capacity
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,629 2,226
Total Design Capacity: 2,629
Total SSLW: 354,915
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1
12118195
19.50
28.00
agoon
2
08l21196
19.50
19.50
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Date: 12/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance marl -made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Q
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Cl
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
It yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AW5250020 owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy
Inspection Date: 12/0712010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250020
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Leaf
Soil Type 3
Tarboro
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan{CAWMP}?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
Cl
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
24. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy
Facility Number: 250020
Inspectlon Date: 12/0712010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after a 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? Cl
❑
IN
❑
24, Did the fa6lity fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fall to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6

Permit. AW5250020 Owner • Facility: Tommy L McCoy
Inspection Date: 1210712010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
A'L-- I_.._-
Facility Number: 250020
Reason for VlsIt: Routine
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
AREREn
Page. 7

A
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 250020 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250020 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 12/03/2009 Entry Time: 11:00 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Tommy McCoy Livestock Owner Email:
Owner: Tommy L McCoy Phone: [phone]$92
Mailing Address: 3675 HW 55 W New Bem NC 28562 _
Physical Address: 295 Quinn Rd Cove City NC 28523 _
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°14'28_' Longitude: 77°17'42"
5 miles N. of Cove City on SR 1256 (Wintergreen Rd.). 1 and 1/2 miles East on SR 1253 (Quinn Rd.). 25 miles from Kinston 24 miles
from New Bern and 1 DO miles from Raleigh.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other issues
Certified Operator: Tommy L McCoy Operator Certification Number: 16337
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy
Facility Number. 250020
Inspection Date: 12103/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Vlslt: Routine
Inspection Summary:
New COG and Permit in records
Waste Analysis 11-19-09 .86
9-11-09 . B2
7-9-09 .90
4-9-09 .74
Soil test 10-13-09 with highest lime 1 ton ) apply lime
Cu and Zn values within range
Sludge Survey 3-7-09 Thick-1.7'
LTZ-5.11'
Pump intake-2.7' } 20% Sludge Ratio
Calibration 6-24-09 with 92 GPM
Crop yield complete
Rainfall and Freeboard complete and correspond with irrigation
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy Facility Number. 250620
Inspection Date: 1210312009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q swine - Feeder to Finish 2,629 2,421
Total Design Capacity: 2,629
Total SSLW: 354,915
Waste Structures
Type Identifler Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1
12/18/95
19,50
29.00
agoon
2
08, 21196
19.50
21.00
Page: 3

Permit: AW5250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy Facility Number : 250020
Inspection Rate: 1210312009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Di5cha!ijes & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidenoe of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
Cl
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
fi. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? {Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks}
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Aplicp ation
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or complianoe altematives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

• Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy
Inspection Date: 12/03/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250020
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
[Pasture]
Crop Type 3
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Leaf
Soil Type 3
Tarboro
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan (CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250020 owner - Facility: Tommy L McCoy Facility Number : 250020
Inspection Data: 12/0312009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to instal! and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the pennit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
a
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
Cl
■
❑
Other issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250020 Owner- Facility: Tommy L McCoy
Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Date: 12/03/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Ws It: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ Cl ■
Quality representative immediately-
3 1. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ 11 0
Cl ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

14
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250020 Facility Status: Active Permit:
AWS250020 ✓ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance inspection inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: f raven
Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0810512008 Entry Time:08:00 AM Exit Time:
incident #:
Farm Name: Tommy McCoy Livestock _
Owner Email:
Owner: Tommy McCoy
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 295Qwnn Rd „ Cove City
NC 28523
Physical Address: 295-Qumn Rd Cove City
NC 28523
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Qoldshoro
Hog Farms Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: °14'28" Longitude: 77°17'02"
5 miles N. of Cove City on SR 1256 (Wintergreen Rd.). 1 and 112 miles East on SR 1253 (Quinn Rd.). 25 miles from Kinston 24 miles
from New Bem and 100 miles from Raleigh.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Tommy L McCoy Operator Certification Number: 16337
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title
Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

A
Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility: Tammy McCoy Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Date: 081051W008 Inspection Typo: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CDC and Permit 2009 in records
Waste Analysis 7-21-08 1.5
4-25-08 1.1
1-28-08 .99
Soil test 4-24-07 with highest lime .5 tons
Cu and Zn values within range
Calibration 9-7-07 ) 2008 complete, but not in records
Sludge survey 9-7-07 #2 Thick-1.3'
LTZ-6.9'
#1 Thick-1.4'
LTZ-4.5' I Going to cleanout lagoon this Fall
Freeboard and rainfall complete and correspond with irrigation
Crop yields complete thru 7-30-08
*New NRCS Sludge Standards
'Freeboard levels do not correspond with DWQ reading. Make sure to get accurate freeboard reading.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250020
Inspection Date: 08/05/2008
Reguiated Operations
Owner - Facility: Tommy McCoy
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Design Capacity
Facility Humber : 250020
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,629 2.682
Total Design Capacity: 2,629
Total SSLW: 354.915
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon
1
12/18/95
19.50
23.00
lagoon
2
08/21/96
19.50
26.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy McCoy Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Data: 08/05/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
Cl
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management Cl
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
T. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
Cl
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

0
Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy McCoy
Facility Humber : 250020
Inspection Date: 08/05/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
Q
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare sail?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
[i
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
[Hay]
Crop Type 3
Coastal Bermuda Grass
[Pasture]
Crop Type 4
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Leaf
Soil Type 3
Tarboro
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
Q
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. hoes the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
Q
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
Cl
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250020 Owner- Facility: Tommy McCoy
inspection Date: 08/05/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
WU P?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 250020
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑
❑
❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
28. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
.... _ .
V_
W_
ue
uG
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250020 Owner -Facility: Tommy McCoy Facility Number. 250020
Inspection Date: OalOW2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
rua.._ ...._ . Vex NA WA NS
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Page: 7

l
Ir
Division of Water (Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250020 Facility Status: Active Permit:
AW5250020 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Cgmoliano lnspfctioa Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven
_ Region: Washington
Date of Visit: Q910712007 Entry Time:07:00 AM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Tommy McCoy Livestock
Owner Email:
Owner: Dmmy McCoy
Phone: [phone] ,
Mailing Address: 295 Quinn Rd Qove Ci
y NC 28523
Physical Address: inn Rd Qove City
NC 28523
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
Longitude: 77° 16'45"
5 miles N. of Cove City on SR 1256 (Wintergreen Rd.). 1 and 112 miles East on SR 1253 (Quinn Rd.). 25 miles from Kinston 24 miles
from New Bern and 100 miles from Raleigh.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Tommy L McCoy Operator Certification Number: 16337
Secondary OIC(s):
Phone
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title
On -site representative Brent Mitchell
Phone:
24 hour contact name Tommy McCoy
Phone:
Primary inspector: Megan H 5tilley
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility; Tommy McCoy Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Date: 09/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
inspection Summary:
COC and Permit 2009
Waste Analysis 7-5-07 1.3
1-29-07 1.2
4-12-07 .74
Soil test 4-24-07 with higest lime .5 tons
Cu and Zn values within range
Irrigation records complete
Sludge Survey due 2007
Calibration 5-27-05 with 95 GPM) NEXT DUE 2008
Crop yield complete thru July 2007
(15)*Need weed management in sprayfields`
Pag e: 2

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy McCoy Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Date: 09/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,629 2,695
Total Design Capacity: 2,629
Total SSLW: 354,915
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1
12M 8/95
19.50
28,00
agoon
2
08/21/96
19.50
36.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250020 owner - Facility: Tommy McCoy Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Date: 09/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
Cl
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0110
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
0
D
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
Cl
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
Cl
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plans?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
Cl
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks]
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals {Cu, Zn, etc}?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy McCoy
Facility Number : 250020
Inspection Date: 09/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/101bs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
{Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 5
Crop "type 6
Soil Type 1 Norfolk
Soil Type 2 Leaf
Soil Type 3 Tarboro
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
■
❑
Cl
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
Cl
Cl
18, is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250020 Owner -Facility: Tommy McCoy
Facility Nurn ber : 250020
Inspection Date: 09/0712007 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the pemtiit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
......
V..
AI..
AIA
uc
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250020 Owner - Facility: Tommy McCoy
Inspection pate: 09/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250020
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Rev! ewe rllnspector fail to discuss rev iewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 250020 Facility Status: Active _ Permit: NCA225Q20 _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0} /1�00�_ Entry Time:10:30 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Tommy McCov Livestock
Owner: Tommy McCoy
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 295 Quinn R Cave City NC 28523
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Phone:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°21'34" Longitude: 77°16'45"
5 miles N. of Cove City on SR 1256 (Wintergreen Rd.). 1 and 112 miles East on sR 1253 (Quinn Rd.). 25 miles from Kinston 24 miles
from New Bern and 100 miles from Raleigh.
Question Areas:
Discharges & stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment ji Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Tommy L McCoy
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16337
On -Site Representative(s). Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Tommy McCoy Phone:
On -site representative Tommy McCoy Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: NCA225020 Owner - Facility: Tommy McCoy
Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Date: 09/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CCC and Permit 2007
W U P 12-2-04
Waste Analysis 7-13-06 .87
4-16-06 .71
2-7-06 .78
11-9-05 .43
Irrigating with one reel 11:10 am - 9-12-06
9:10 am - 9-19-06
PLAT 2-7-05 - With all fields recieving LOW
Soil Test 5-12-06 with highest lime 0 tons
Cu and Zn values within range
IRR-1 and IRR-2 complete - have a lot of PAN left over, irrigate before hurricane season to get lagoon down.
Sludge Survey extension on lagoon #2 (old) until 2008
Sludge Survey on #1 complete 4-17-05 Thick-2.3 LTZ-4.3' - Call Brent Mitchell for 2006
Calibrations complete 5-27-06
Crop yield complete
—Update WUP because no cows on pasture anymore —
Page: 2

Permit: NCA225020 Owner - Facility: Tommy McCoy
Inspection Date: 09/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 250020
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,629 2,500
Total Design Capacity: 2,629
Total SSLW: 354.915
Waste Structures
Toe Identifier
Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1
19.50
20.00
goon
2
F1211118195
2119fi
1950.
19.50
Page: 3

Permit: NCA225020 Owner - Facility: Tommy McCoy Facility Number. 250020
Inspection date: 0911212006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges 8 Strearn Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ n ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other fl
a. Was conveyance man-made? DEDU
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. hoes discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
n
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
MOD
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
Cl
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
5. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9_ Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
.-..._-_........._--------.
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
moo
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA225020 Owner - Facility: Tommy McCoy
Inspection bate: 09/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 250020
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste APPlication
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%110 lbs.?
Q
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 4
Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Leaf
Soil Type 3
Tarboro
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving craps differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16, Did the facility fall to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
Q
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n
n
1& Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
0
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA225020 Owner- Facility: Tommy McCoy Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Date: 09/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
n
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
■
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
■
❑
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
0
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6

Permit: NCA225020 Owner - Facility: Tommy McCoy
Inspection date: 09/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250020
Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concem? If yes, contact a regional Air
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n n n ■
Page: 7

S
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facillty Number: 250020 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA225020 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: graven __ Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/18/2005 Entry Time.10:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Tammy McCoy Livestock Owner Email:
Owner: Tommy McCoy
Mailing Address: 295 Quinn Rd Cove City NC 28523
Physical Address:
Phone: [phone]
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: _GoldsI?oro_Hoq Farms In
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'14_26" Longitude: 77°16'58"
5 miles N. of Cove City on SR 1256 (Wintergreen Rd.). 1 and 112 miles East on SR 1253 (Quinn Rd.). 25 miles from Kinston; 24
miles from New Bem and 100 miles from Raleiqh.
Question Areas:
Q Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
0 Records and Documents 0 Other Issues
Certified Operator: Tammy L McCoy
Operator Certification Number: 16337
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
On -site representative Tommy gave permission no one on site
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: Ibs N per 1000 gal.
6-3-05 = .73
3-23-05 = .98
2-3--05 = .97
sail test current
#1 1 observed (took Picture) of leak at a riser on my left just before new hog houses, it is not leaving the site, but should be repaired.
See note for #33 below.
#33 1 will stop by again to make sure the leak around the riser is repaired.
Please address the weed problem in the spray fields.
Page: 1

Permit: NCA225020 Owner -Facility. Tommy McCoy
Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Date: 07/18/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon
1
12/18/95
19.50
28.00
Lagoon
2
08/21/96
19.50
22.00
Page: 2

i
Permit: NCA225020 Owner -Facility. Tommy McCoy Facility Number. 250020
Inspection Date: 07/18/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Qjscharoe� & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Yes No NA
❑ ❑
NE.
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
E
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
NA
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ 0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ ❑
Yes No NA
❑
NF
Waste Collection. Storace & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe erosion,
❑ ❑
❑
seepage, etc.)?
B. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
0 ❑
❑
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks
❑ ❑
❑
and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ . ❑
❑
improvement?
Yes No NA
NIL
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ❑
11
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
Is PAN > 10"W10 lbs.?
❑
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda
Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda
Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 4
Page: 3

Permit: NM25020 Owner -Facility: Tommy McCoy Facility Number: 250020
Inspection Date: 07118r2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Armlicat0on Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14- Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)?
❑
❑
❑
15- Does the receiving crap andlor land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
1a bid the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the imigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
00
❑
❑
18- Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Documents
❑
Yes
0 ❑
No NA
❑
NE
Records ijnd
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below -
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
m ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
E ❑
❑
24- Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
m ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
m ❑
❑
26- Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA225020 Owner • Facility: Tommy McCoy
Inspection Date: 07/18/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
ords and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 250020
Reason for Visit: Routine
2S. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality
rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concem? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fall to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. aid Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ Cl ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ E ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review D Structure Evaluation Q Technlcal Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow up Q Referral Q Emergency Q Other 0 denied Access
Facility Number 25 ZQ Date of Visit: 11-Z¢2004 Time: 950
NNot Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 17 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..........................
Farm Name: ToM=-MF,CQY-JUxUtACk....................................................................... County. CrAyM........................................ _.... WARO.......
OwnerName: JQmW................................... mocay ........................................................ Phone No: 252.4,as.4892 ...........................................................
f Mailing Address: 193.. a fw.Rd....................................................................... . cur' Cxt?'..tic....................................................... 28.523 .......... ....
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative::1:Rmmy..XCCQy......................................................................... Integrator: �r.Rl sklRxR. x]mS-.---.................. ................
Certified Operator:Ium1 y.1.............................. rACC.ly................ .............................. Operator Certification Number: 16331..............................
Location of Farm:
miles N. of Cove City on SR 1256 (Wintergreen Rd.). 1 and 1/2 miles Past on SR 1253 (Quinn Rd.). 25 miles from Kinston;
4 miles from New Bern and 100 miles from Raleigh.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 14 26 u Longitude 77 • 16 58 "
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
capacity population
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Layer
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
2629
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
2,629
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
354,915
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons Z
Discharge & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity {freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:........................................................................................................................................... _.................
Freeboard (inches): 24" 311,
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 25-20
Date or inspection I1-24-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application?. If yes, check the appropriate box below. -
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN []Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc > 3000
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. �Docs the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
ONO
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
ONO
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe front the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes []No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed'of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes N No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes N No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes N No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Conitiaients (refer to. question #> Explain. amy YES answers and/or any recommendntions or. any other comments. -
Use drawings "of faeility. to better eiptain situations.:[use additional pages as necessary}: 0 Field Copy [I Final Notes
Records available i
Waste analysis: 11-16 -04 - 1.7 lbs
8-24-04 - 1.3 lbs
6-1-04 - 2.4 lbs
2-3-04 - 2.2 lbs
4-21-03 - 2.1 lbs
Soil analysis - 11-18-04 - need lime, 11-7-03, 11-18-02
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Irrigation events from 6-21-03 through 12-3-03 did not have a current waste analysis. This problem has been
grain o/s has been drilled and emerging
igation calibration completed 2-20-04 [cry 100 pm w. 0.77" ring
Reviewer/Inspector Name
B. Hjwdison
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 25-20 Date of Inspection 11-24-2004
Required
Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie! WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ® Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
19 No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes .
®No
- 28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
® Yes
❑ No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
® No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
®No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
[i
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
dditional Gompne and/6ruin
udge survey completed 2-10-04. lagoon 1 - 4.34' free of solids and 2.3 P of solids
lagoon 2 - 6.05' free of solids and 1.59' of solids
eeboard levels, rainfall, crop yields, mortality/stocking, weather codes and irrigation checks are recorded.
iggest to record lagoon integrity inspections after > 1.0" of rainfall and at least monthly checks.
)ts of geese on site.
ans to reseed the lagoon wall of the newest lagoon (lack of vegetation due to geese activity) in the spring.
iggest to include all options of graze or not in WUP. Consult with Technical Specialist
you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or me @ 252-948-3842
12112103

a OF W A rF'QQC� Michaei F. Ea Mey
Governor
5: ) r WMarn G- Ross Jr., 5eaetary
❑ t7gMdff t d Est and Natural Resatmu s
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.. Acling Director
Division of Water Quaw
To: Producer
From: Daphne B. CuIlom` —
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2002
Enclosed please find a dopy of the Compliance Site inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility
by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it with all other
documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Managem ent Plan (CAWMP); (2) the
farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion,.andlor runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions ofthe Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:-
(p The maximum waste level in lagoonslstorage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste
level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hour storm
event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as dose to the time of application as practical and at least
within 60 days (before or after) ofthe date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen,
Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crap as recommended by the soil analysis.
(p The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wastelsoil analysis and land irrigation records.
These retards should be maintained by the Facility ownerlmanager in chronological and legible form for a rninimmn of three years.
cp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP- In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available
_NrtrEgen (UN rate for the rec6vin�op or result in runoff during given application.
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate rapacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages- The outlet can be
another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
9 it is suggested not a Lquirement, to keep crop yield information far future use to update your waste management plan, You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection- If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946- M 1, eat_
32I or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: _,,WaRD
D13C Files
943 Washington Square Mal Washington, NG 27889 252-946-6489 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Facility Number Date of Visit: 111112DDZ Time: i1:Dll am
p of Operational p BelowThreshold
n Permitted E Certified p CondifionaIly Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ••---••••••••-------•••••
Farm Name: Sheridan McCoy Farm County: Craven ............................................... .24?ARQ--•--..
Owner Name: Sheridan McCoy Phone.No: 252-638-4892 (Tommy)
Mailing Address: 3120 antexgrt:een.Rnsd...__..-........... - ....... Cave.Ci1Y..NF......-.-....... ..... . ........... _.................. - 28523..............
FacilityContact- --- ............. _......----- ................................... - ............ Title: ............ ........ ...................... .................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Tauumy.3kCqy*-Genrgr-PettuS... ........ ......................... 1ntegrator:Cnidsbam-Hog-Eaxms.......... ........... ..............
Certified Operator: Tomm ---- McCoy ..........._............. Operator Certification Number: 1f33T........ ..... ...............
Location of Farm:
] miles iv. of cove l.ity on Nx 1z5d (wintergreen xa.). i ana itz miles -Last on ax 11:53 k%jumn xa.}. z5 mites trom Kinston; A
14 miles from New Bern and 100 miles from Raleigh.
N Swine ❑ Poultry p Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ©. ®� ®u Longitude
p Wean to Feeder
® Fee2er to mis
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Fee er
p Farrow to Finish
Gilts
p Boars
c�
Oth er
t�I n
p
yer
p
Non -Layer
...,_
µ;�„�r _ �Capaeity._PnpuIation':`
3 auyrc - - -
3 Non -Dairy
.r a
Capacitys; 2,529
Identifier:
354,915
Discharges
&Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? (3 Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? {If yes, notify DWQ} 0 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? {If yes, notify DWQ} p Yes p No
2_ Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ©Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 13 Yes ®Na
Waste Collection &Treatment •
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage} less than adequate? p Spillway [3 Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 •
.................. _-.......... .. ... -------............... .... ..............
Freeboard(inches): ... ........... n_..................... ....... 22............ .. ....... ...... ..... ........... ................... .... ....... ......................... .......

Y +� _ .• '�� ti •. -_ 'Lr ��.1 �' �.. �.�. ..r .._. r-^ .5�� .DJ.:µ '. - "
-41
lFacility Numtr:-:25=2E1.�Date'of Inspection_ -
F�� '. -� �-r : Yam., . ~-`�- -. ��"'-.•�;. - � . - a _ fed? ieJ trees severe erns
'5 `Are there any iiinxiediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures olisery {' ion,
• seepage, etc.)
Are there iffictures on -site which are not properly addressed and/oimanaged through a waste management or
closure plan?:. - ->r_ •=x:•..; r :.".,-'=; t -
` - - (If ally of quye estions 4. w_ as_answered s, and the situation poses an
` sF = immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ). =
7., Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ' • _. „' .
.. a- `y
S. Does any part of the waste managemenf system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement-
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
p Yes
® No
13 Yes
N No
Ll Yes
® No
13 Yes
® No
p Yes
B No
p Yes
® No
f
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload p Yes ® No
12. Crop type ' ".Coastal Bermuda (hay) Coastal Bermuda (pasture) - Small Grain Overseed
13: Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)? ❑ Yes w No
r 14. a) Does the facility lack"adequate acreage for land application?f ' " p Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? (3 Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
T 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
r '
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel W[TP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application) -
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes p No
p Yes ® No
.3Yes ®No
Yes ® No
13 Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
13 Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no further correspondence about this viSitr
egetation
on tront lagoon; continue efforts to monitor geese
Vaste analysis 1215101 - 2.01bs1I 000 gals; 6/18/01 •- 1.6 lbs11000 gals
oil analysis 8/15/01; no lime required.
reeboard levels recorded weekly.
-rigation records complete with nitrogen balance; no overapplication noted.
❑a
on
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector
Date: I- t B- O z

z
z❑
z
z
z
z
z
1
❑
®
®
®
IN
®
❑
a>_
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
a
Q
0
v
00
N
a
N
R � :' - .0 'a 7' Fy,y�.�p.., 1.: , • `•'.x' Iin fii i. ,.- y' 't `R�i h�yi 'i,'�h •-k f''a
i� r}. -� .. "F,_ '.•.• .. : r:ri ii.'A€w 'y • Y-i' , t;r,!.1 a ••;.iY•� ;s}" r:a� rz. I t , a:Yii�^�E'.. ?•lEa1.�.
L 44�� .A', ['�•a 't'- • •] ]Y Ic. j'F L�•r-.If y'3`�•j:l� ^ :'q? r j a.� vi �rY4x
.;: }, f:i[�'�T!+' °1r. "y.. ',ajy �. .'hi�J SI'.i f•••4.'Iri•F S'?iL'�ia S" `F.;'
.:}..R �_ •^•�i• 'S^, .`Ij Y.�•'.I rW.
y� 1p, •' s `•
k: li: .:,� �:v-�. .;[; •TAT 7�t+�
• ni:' y}i'.. !:?•:i-r`+?� '}. :: Z. �•t•, -,,• rr•- BiS,�:.:}�r•.l�k;?-: 11 +.,e`:.. .v �, 'g ,t..,F�,FF
.F•a��., ��•I - ':r.� �i Y� r �•ft � .r =�h�.:tfr ii. •si r .5;,}rl�Y .r�G: -�.gg S'I= L�y `.;�.., •<.�.Pl
]r,,�. Y, ;;���,_ • � � �. :.�}., jl.• t i � i b Y,. �.i•' F?I •n}.�• '!�;��. •G J �'i':. `� �t ..� �'.F :;[.'.J
nl° [� V 4'1
:'J1 . Rl Sj} ;'�',. '!.� '�1'.i.e "..r,7; F
J
i! .
.. rF;.:; ..,�.< ^Lt;: ,, y•.'+ .: I,,:•.:`• fY .r,,l;`•
� ,: _. •
'�'1r i�•.. �,.:y n, � _� .Y. s7 'r..:, ..{ •iP: F
�N• Ek F �.� ,, �+.," :.i . : I, sat"'y� �L 'ZJi's `'�[ r".jt� Jr;+` - {♦ Jv. !- ] i!`K p m fix` i ?,...� '
�; S "c ( �'j'' +:Fr =P' . f Z,1•
tr, �i 7� Y. �j�(�t{ .' k'��' . Tt .C'•nM��' . ]/ �! 10.�1SW �'•If'r R� s�, �I �� "� ,f�a;�: � 33. `' �CF ..?L ,.;• V1r i�yR1K•, ��} ¢[ y •"rl e ;': .'r: LTT. r .11`'.i F..E' rJj�j ''� {
••�:>_' r�y�E. .L •J'� >Fr '�.i.}. r�.•Y:'!_ • I, �• •t��`. � .S C. _14��EP-•• �.� :lk .'•'� �:s;=� 1. •il�'�`. F �-`C,N Li?Qi,,� �[f•1'P"1' .�,i
�•�� '%"tom•• ? :'f+
�-+,�'7 ,�fp[°' v: ,r.� 1. }•.'• 47':.:,.�'=!1'i-�' f'.ii yy� y;1
..� it}} r,.a:�•`4�t ,,{{� ' .
.��. M 1•n
.�.
y !'4;4�;,'p�f i��;. fx # • .,.i , � i': % ;,slSdF Si1� fy:+ t•::'';:sl'3. t`: �..'��' �'�,�, a"i.pi F,f',ti �PG . ' #; •�"4`' .•4 . ,'k
r • S�•?.}� . i F.-. e; .. �! . 1 - ;� 'ry , M1 r�+�d , 3 J }}jj�� y..e., L..' ,�i '� r •. •Yj S f'1l' 1 i ,<" Ij 7
.lri 44 ':.: •i �j �; '
s
,i Y: . ■SI. 3.. [; (' iv \, r- i�•�:f•:.; fi.A'!•r'Lif� Y'T."y .�i= L.i 1 •; t
I �•' "p '3'i r 'S .e:' 3 `i•�'Y• %,+I�'.»..
54c i�. F r:l ' sr.1 y;,'fs'QI. t" %t'•
�I.'e�ri �'�'t' • �c+fiPL +t i� � l:�i r+�! �7';i"l..t {: c; •riretrr!'�z�� �d.�„"ri ^nj}ram'-'�!''j -�;
•yi • tr�t.y +.�� i. �r.x:1" ' y.,, 2'!
_
its.: �•;,..ry s 4�' .7 sr. s':.�.i r . l �,• !s.. :`•..�� t <:.+
�;
e•. �.
x�^�•N' i, -�. ' �'• ��';:✓L�I 1 F - r`. i•1�r•;Wi• iar, ` � [ r -J �';� 5�� �
;,b• •�i.. � � = h �,. {. �•..;. : t•. L s p t,.r �' [,'� ? c �f �; 1,� ,y
r i±!:.::t':;;F' �.Kt 7:' n,;'..,. s, ii. a ,�: I• l y . i. {ti'•" .s arr,e�„%`"I
,�• 1`; �"';• ;ry,�al�j�y =. >:� ><�+i' ��.��, A `
�y. V"_-i.:.5: [ 4si:.`i +,i„•':�k � � y�� � .7,�•. Y a. p1Fi� I w.ny
J.3" cj;: 'jr,,dd-. 3y x IkY �r 7. '+i'• °.✓•'Y'JiNi �Vy ,i'Y 1..w ;� ,.{ 5 1+� a4', �
. il. F;e'.I' .y':i �-, • �'i 'is.:Qi.. .^i,• ,�Y:�;•'i. '6J CI-` a:.t:1 a li'i".yy �ii;l•..
i.�7t. y. r' 7•-. fj r �'d..s;+.•�•.- •r.i-`'i''y ..�'., r; !.i: ;a ...{°L;;_:� t':u:Y;,t �' "�'_• i�,: ,, r4�Z 'A
•Li�.S. �yyi gj�.r �*
• ,M'q' r
�b ':�. �7]� i; �ir{-r '�`�.,y •6�7 ]�'• i� i. '� ' 'cL�E�Q[ •Y T 4�i :i:., yf. y.��, +R'r.�e i-j W�.¢,�`` °1:YR
ti�yy^ :, yyrL .,•�, iriLi:i'$'!.R:IL;; ilY�l
r a',' r-'••�+,.• w:•�If,t,�ti J.:till'..,:. !!'N '•71:i:T4. •.} � i:.� ..,F.r.��-' F.. ��•i l.}:S�;Tr, inl y'if '.L.'.�'�•�S/W'i�f
� pc
r.;•.''.in _;.je; r::L'I's2'1�a=dit �,itl r..;;. F`r:7,r ,; �, te,,-• :,p:.; .p.': :'. f.eyis. ;t,^7Fitt•,[!;r ...;%v ywy ixi��. YG k�':'?.t ..'�S; ',^
H'. .i S,I
�i�2; " 3��y{'f�
�},,1 ��Swr�.: �:
•1 �'�}i1.' 5�i 4
�`�.:ii f�: iS.,.n f�• '�'�''I,•; r i'i
Q•'"S, 1e` ,. i S�• ''9'j t .. a. :3; �'Y • '' '1 j• 0=•'4 7!' e� . t: "Lt ni
•!-.M�}} �
'��, i 3r
t:'i Sai'rs,: ; f'•.. �t �;:
„q•.y5;."'"�".. rt' ;'Y a..'.y,E$-. Y.•? •i•,.•�.:-� . ••IX. ..r^,: rY: tr. ape".Q'�7 ."
-.1f'ii�"r..i �G.i�.. a'i"i y 3 a
:4'ar 4�r j�/�# 'i-i'i.;'� - F� � .ti• ri ,� ii:, �'•'� .rL �.��:� t.k1F' �'Ha,l� q'4t�
•ti�•*"i I"1''fka-:>i.'' `t ``'� `�n•r, „/. r
C�'h�. 4•)• 't���;jj S�[� 'f•'i ,i�.f 1� �,�'.: :`>:••''�•-,y].•- 'i•r �'°i'_�{y r �` `�Jf: �lk.
.¢6 ra .R.-+:,. i%r(}:�.J:y,7k. ,C•!.3eiy�.Y>i, i i`�i+?• >' �'L',� ,11St•'':'�Y, (r ,:•'.,.•'�'F^-� '�'�':e � rr �F ''a �■ f•
..�t5.
��
�'}' iF:G`'7ti%i.• rJi� •P"i7t � ��Hy'i� !?-: : �7. r ¢s•'7?. t¢ �•.,'.'�� H`f s = x w �. ��.'i' .� i,: a �,Y j R _ r� ]�
;,�,'E;��'.s:•-•�f�i.r�sk a„i�Fi- "���•' �r a,�,�� $� �: �•:�11' '^T�.��;,;. t;;,fi I..:��,�. ,{,' r %�...�' �..r� �a.
r i" r jr�.
y k;o-; ��,[� „.,Y.�•,;rr .,�",}}: r ir.: 1�.. ,�5: ,'r,• I?+'<3��,$``�F frlw�`'Tr-i � t�'ATr�•°i' rlp''r �a:`.:�•r•'R!' �r��Y` a � Y� r •3��
'.. _ ��C; �.�n
C
r
Ir { y ,T,
R* Qi�`,� 'v•�' • ' i ,"�r: ,.•� P ry7.
;�•„ l.. � 7`tt v�;�. '. t.=SF tt' ;� ,'..vi�{ R�t�. �;,�.4- 'i'%!'C. .5:.•L��. ,.,pV �a•1�.f'� ..�`�' .r��•, YS;J`�F :1�� •�w. a.
5'�
*•.1 y:7r .
v r 't! 1. .yV� y krr -•;{, d �:j
AX'I, r;s7
_irii' ..lk£:1.,
� _
a' ',.�F['(k,.•/• •.rs• 3, f..¢: `rl TFaT?y•;i'fA T.ryf':1'+r��'x :,i t;.�f- f,. ty�+[�.'. �i Q i` L"R:•
� _ . � rs,,I sa
? r yy V 3_
@,A.
�+
At'
IS.1.;+6 tiT:
Pi }�';iti �+�` �- +• .�' .
iir• s. _ Al k r><:L!£ .S'2•:• i-,.,�- T,-. 't3•.
_y :}lid i r: r Jy r-f: •.'�.7 dfL}] r Kt w r
�;M1j;,ii �1,: � { �': � • � �F�,r�',�:r ' i. ^� :;d e t � gyp [ •• '�•}rs };,'�•F�i';:+ �' ��>:=.`'•,.��" �i>p iill .f„, �s . p: z•�''i ��:�4'..i� -. � CE a rt9 � i
d�E � . ,P.. �##�� '
r.it��1r;:" .�i'i.�
' 1 : ��ti �• :nr�, �'1� P.i �'yE.J� .I i••... �'8 r i �d'r' f �:{ r.N . ,.Q. r�� ;#:�� �`�i. +rQ+[,�^. r, r':�rcF�.
t �...t,�, :fir,:' ,' 'i.S4 " % .f,�i; ' g'"ii!gii.a' r,cr,�'f +k�ra{. it-• j Hv,i.w�E} , �..
'Fm,r:, .,;:,: + t k l ,!. 5.i s%'.:'�i t jt,•
L7��'' Z - r•,• S •1 ;' +?.' � •p ••[ n,, Fi!'I!':"i' t .4N+'L �. 'M
1'� ?•:nf.7vtyy .S;� >; ';'SS"H;�' ;�>,.d. �� ,.f �,- b:.,.•r�'�'r'�^ .� �1•;:3_ i : ��;-�51 �
''1" '
.a_S 7 �1).� ,� a• i.Er}lr.,,*• m'tT�
.':�,�*•1 '�.1;!:. v�r1 ��'•.. o-,:•(t Y. :'. .,,�:- j a; 1r - Y.
• S. �y I Y,
y! « !F'i `• b}.�ir .fi"
af: r: °I:
i'l F.ii;,l1? �`:�i!r ��•
•�i• .� 1�.. ..:yS -e0 .:: �}•1 ;a-. _y�,i:. ?:4`Y�l�,e"N;."•'# iF ,J'/'
,'#'✓r-.t�'' ,, :,%'+e. .�[S'`Y`S�• ' 1� .i#iQr-ii��'. i < -•'Qj }�•
.p :�'` 'yy• �8,. ff.yy!;'Tn F's:t• ?},� ;..,,- 1'-iihje1'.:{:�•�S:i•L•f.9;y3'S f� NArk'I;�.� +3._�rr,�,: y{�{;`�;'r
rn r .+r.7•-°y'i. isi. r _ •.s• r.7^.::" .",}.1:,_...+'r;r:. : if:�. �.]! rI_� • �.ai.°, �:;a y.,�+#s'FS .�:.
Y E •- :[F`': yt:i•f5 ":ix.. .a'• .,a. ,a. n.. q;:. [��y�..;_ .+�,t ,.s tf nrr i'3
E�'�• ' ��i- 1 2;y{!•, •�S-'s. .�'}' :r �f'•.,. is^f,. :7"' ',y'i'i IS' r;pnv.7. r :{o ��r.''-�{uR' 'S. r •"'� f.
]rJji+W'�
�' "a<'. � ��.• .. is F.}Lr'k 7� . y•"' }•'44',, .. P r . � +Mp r � L'.^.I'fa'�'. f:.:a"., "i�r• •�i �'E �xi . '-• i,•=3
- � r �• '.4.r �S,R' J ,, ! lr�rl i- fit. .�,y x' ^ , i �i` f�.
. Y::b 'l�:I '�Ie_f. Y LT „I> �a =rYl 'C '� 3 '?6•' '. '�i, t
e:i t' �•.:;�.. •' 4W'�.?,. lv. i.i-• KSS .F:.CL`p'�i•t,l:�''i,Si'•-'^',L'l�yr.Ir! �.1 i'•,-f r5
_;:.
Q
•.•a
v "ti ..f4'P'1 r!, Si.q
.,,.t y r •, r,. 7.�,. ,., . �: V, `=.1..
��•k �' }r ! S 'Rrl�" .] i } ��C F] S. •k'. F' IF'.'is
•ti. v yt.'••
� 1,�.4 c` . G- � S;� � Iff�Y •, �-�,= 3."l�r-� s � a��'�'�I��,•.�r :.E:.: .,�'.: r :e�� " � • : �3. r •� 51.9
���.`'.•�
f',r.i'+gg{L,.,.}
:�":•t�>.kl•,3
• , ,-� R''•�.'� Yly.. r�
- °!A"• e_,�}•W:i �.�;�r,'a�„'�.'• , }}. �r ""4 I: k=:i3. '(la;i'!'„�J=y!Z�e.: {�x� ;r:r."t"v ". .11M `Y; tx'• ,t k� r' ...{1�;"^soy 5 ,., r t:is-y
r 7XrY•�di�rii•�r��.:,1�x�2A.1!R rfl j#;rJ:
r:!-°y} p�. rLR• •Ef., r s;' f.
_ .r�. � � s >' .�43r e5 ^r'•' "'p'y�.yarl i•- i''�,,4r ,•$.S.i;.y n �! '� i. � F `� 4'i'�
`r�'1:;, S:L.n`T" i : aij U� • a j7i 13j:'.. �i�`.yj, u{ t •'ye fin., ��,�r.s � �� 7 a J�. 3'•: �F�'�' • 'i I, r _ � �'+i
_ ..�h''�i c�� T . •i'' .� �,. �q
� .[f,.1 L•'.i. byl't ry / [ = Y ry j+ Z .�� ,.IN„I.: � 1�•'y�'•,� tlr� yN ,,���'(';l�J'1' ,�:•[4 "`�y' iy' r' t'l�Tt�•3 ' 'xd' Di
'� •- ri� .k�"r . f'+i'1r. '"?7 �. �.. �..r� �. � I "ir• %S'�
�p; '. `}f..�
_i r'4f'.-'{ +T"il
R w .iVT �:
ly{r
r�H�� +J ���Sr� Y'T.: [t�•'.k '� N 'ikt�N '.��� �.., •?;i3•r:il�r1'6SL�'G•:'1'i"g'�� �• i�f{L•. .. ��'[+ LF1�'�f�
.. i , • �; -'� f -!•i ., ��..,, •`~-'c•. Y.•.\., t� !'�; , F yy.� i• J d „`.1:• . J. g >1
■ ;tyr... t5.� �L fk� Str ,a[ E tom' ti�� r S �:,i�3fes : �T £-.,�A i�.,;E µ.L,1" 4- l::g�ji 70
!-r ,i7}''Y•.�,w.r-..i��, F ws J ?' c' F:• . ly
�-L.'k.isf�.•rF[ ,,l!r,T-.: �1,� -. f... iPL .r.�ra:.x'-'C�•-'SS";i.e :?�. ;,Ry,:�R�i•C'i'_'fi ii.", .l `•Y'�j:iaV,
<�y ['..['. L .["T, y.;�.i^t p.,liy'.:'•d �•9'ryi �.� .: �. �. 4 11 .'YSd,.•. .x. 1 ,�7 t•� c, f�. ':F ,�Y•
'[
';•i �"� h.1f1 "i
' +;}' ':Ib'.�d�.:i':k � �RigF i. 'A^ I�..1. � : 1 •: �. [ir :i•�•wl:
.!! ..L v5• .�. fl.`•!rx:1�:."-t . 7�t: = x ^'�y:}' ,.�}
'•.' kT-11r..w.+i.'".:. i O•,..5•},,:' , n
'",•:s,t i` �[•�r,:.•f� IE' J7'• i:l i iNrF ;k''+.?t ;.'? 'I5;:wt;,�3^.�l:r�f Zt<t_�,ir;711 i+f'':' '.}:[' �.'S ..' =... r'
":{•',
Enac��x.; j c•h #+G`��•.I:.. Yi�• .ya;rto-�;
:Y !:� . , � ;f � '�,,,a,1�• ��;wi �,s<} ��rr,' � •"�� '?�•f...n.} 7'��J[,' 1 r i., : t '•e � • �p�Ic:
,. '�,}. '?1.Tr��• .•k„1.. ;i yj% �'i•:, a�-: �`.+!:. .i'� `! .',1, f�i... i-„ P•>;
x..:7 . i;, , 7 � i'.iJ �. p 1 � J�''y ;i ?•�.^: .'7• a.. �.. f •y�Y� � �'' � )' 1
a Fy •{_.� 3�
�IR'� i ,�'.. i6'..�•y Y+M ,]. 2 .Y•: `' d... v, �, 5... �K.YL,..f�` .j ...•:i'i {: s•'.r :i .. *I i' k: el�i' La' r
.,3. , „ryx Ir I ,!
,.ti w ;,� r..r ¢�.?G��i: .a:: •�,",, -'y(+,, YIjM{.�,k.�.i:d• �.> i• ; , i ♦'=`^t!IJ _t 1. �:�J` I r
�L' ;•i��S•ri :i r�3F�7;;ii�: y'i 'rt�?� a4:� n � .�7�,... k��9r n:�,.�r.lt:�:£" ,:•..� -•�
ri':, :i • I y.. �. �.I:7-rr,s' `.•�4i^.!"1� • .•G.rr�r�F-1
,'•[f.N,i aT.''o;. . ir ' s K(r y�•���� . {� � I,��;..� ..ar:-..n,. +...�
g a' h5"� Z.1 �, ` R:!•; ? -5'. }r �'�i
r '{: :t SViF} �"�^°''''?Y,''+:•A
. L �� .� ..Sy: .. .i.:: .>r'::.r.'4'lj
lrr.•T", E ;•;P :r.,. + .f:t.
F 'e8�k••.yL L �g�-�.c. _ .,� r,i.. 3r w ri,'. I,;�s r..s�, � +t �.x; i. r:., rf •.. ��r; 3 1 •a,}�I1^•*G
� �� +�:. :� '.J .�'*G n� - :��' ? tia'�+1-, .rA • +� � r�':s +'s'° F:. • � 'i'^ ,'� ,C,', y. f.. rNO�}�'d.5r'�....� �+"".' y-
'..'.•�, ;,: • ;+•'•i' Pf r I... pC, wy,;.+ 1�,u tti'{' >J!..,w �1i �. r.'' ;r?" '7 �. r • rJ k ;..
L:i �'.b �'•-. r.-..,1'A l':. �{ y�' ... ]
r. ..f'i;'+,� .xk}? i'y^ •._ ; x tiE.SL� +jf �i: ::'Z'-'.1•r:rri�` ,i E�j.fVr.y �s,%y.. �- ��••s �5.
,•l`r.IL]
+' •l, . q� ,Fr^•:ki•: ,.�'',-� r.d -;:1, rEi:',.. .� R:• .3��
.i}y w�n,-i if' :4;�fi="S•,uu.• 1'(}feY; s o j..re�:..,e� `` ti!:. k:; .n.,fJ�1T.�;':
•�rrl'4 ''["li . ••� - ,j '•,',•` ��- i. i { i i� I; J '.'1%i kl. 1rat rzii'. y' •,M�.y H
��Feer,,+ .«c r}�� p 4 • i' {: :L; : Y�. �..• "rj��. i%:•:+�'�„, � �'",' r.
ft�+.: t. "A✓'?Y �'rli;': .i;4' �,i�1.1�.a •;l:r: .�b�..' •s�+ri i .c:.�•+•:F. �' a�•'i� . .i`.r• ; i'.,• .ra.?��-�.. *s�".-,"-, •'.�T: �r��'t•:S"."'V;JJ 1�.�Y'1 .I rF: L ,�'.'y'�7`
t!1P� '•;f . .;r,� . it•. ,.{ ::,•,s., �' ir,�. .' =i'"c, 1,..�.. � , .�� . P. 3 i�+:. ,:r +�. �` 1.., .S F ..S.i s � L_.�N•.. � :. {v,
z, .r Y • b �%�, N ,,:.�. . .; G.i(� °' i iN t�. r '`'�::. ri:•.... .yJ.="4i 1 `` :4+•i. ry A� 1. � i4 T
r,t,w �;�:,w' .6' }� !°..�.irl„ ��,;;c•r�r''f:� _ � .v'yr�P'�, � y�-•�A �1.'. tie:.:,.:: � ":�a °^ r�*'`-'i a��' `�"�' �7 '4
{��y�•y;..jryY~ - ,-,�„ :'�,� �.;?,: .:: �' •, _.i'.: F.s. k�-?K;' "�r y `@r,.,y :j,)rp.•'.Y . .. :ix�y ;i •'S?'si,�:. •r fry �; Spy,; ';!?y'E4: ,'!.- : �1 h.'Y:'.
+•Y'.-'ff i'4 �; `^,:�h:,rr .��j „✓' `Lis �' '1'..i.t 7.��` '. .. i'� .}ri IT.,I .R £. 4y ;ry! 1'.Y '.?tt,t i �.1'jl.•�
�.}, •:,y< I,.�, :� . I. ,Ya . k: ''Ire..,' hr.F�4 ' 9_ h '. f.t; 1°` �'.'�'S;QE
R i''„.' �•-I,�:r.s • r
¢
k.s;-,✓�Y.�} ..k, 4:'.
.G rr., ir•• it tiff 7'
: r :� ;� -., y�am',,, �
F{?.>. •:l'.. P.:�r.�Y.. '.V'T%:,sy-,�..-::ihj°rs''1�r , 'dr'V'1'".Fr q:,} ':�¢.:[ .>}'; ,,Rfx"?`6iy'';r '✓=$'�ti'i`i�.r. p'+,� r..Z
`i.. "k.I�y,:''..'Y • -�•+ . t:Ati.,•:. ..
iv'..
�ia`• �YC`:.kt t ••� 7 r`MY:.�,•
� •'.!,1 s�;�, ?;t
[
4 ,'-'•j..�. i�+,.rl ;y'. .�i: .] ..;h-•. ;,a�uyf,d . :�ro-:,^.r3 I tr +I.�-��..g
.�i �5.::;;i.;_ •} t•,•,^ - s�":.-. �i+r i a:i�t?:t: dr.rEE �r ? : t� r:::•"ti. :'Pi?,•;'t:'C•+
•]dr
-' ;%T1j� -fd,.iwLi
7 ,S', • ._ .-SriSYY'i! - i"i.�i .I. 4' - i!P' ..- 41

�r
-.t Yr•�3.�Irlr iat
I
z
n
1
Ul

r >e • DA�ainnvf WBtC=rhxr v. • 4. ' .t.0
=i''• F;� ,. :�W•
su7t- azx µ>s
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up ❑ Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
i Facflft�- Number Date of Visit: �14-ZOBl Time: Printed on: 6/15f2001
25 20
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ®Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: _ _ _.......
Farm Name: -----....... __ county: 1.rw.wx....... ... ---......... - ---- W!'ARO...
....
Owner Name: Phone No: 252-Q8r1 .._..... ... ... .........
Mailing Address: 32Q Rl�a�terQ,.c�lu RnsttL_ _.._ . �.. ___.. __ Cxzx.:ib:.IxC.:_......_._.._........_.......................... l 3� .............
FacilitF• Contact. Phone No:..... _ _................
OnsiteRepresentatire- --------_._.. _--- Introrator:G.Qld5hoj Bog.jEa=s........_.------......................
Certified Operator. T.atlnl�. _ _ .--- �� _ _._. Operator Certification Number: 16337,
Uicatinn of Farm:
'5 miles N, of Cove Cit► on SR 12.56 {Wintergreen Rd.}. I and 1/2 miles East on SR 1253 {Quinn Rd.). 25% miles from Kinston; 24 +
smiles from New Bern and 100 miles from Raleigh.
® Swine ❑poultry ❑Cattle El Horse L:itirude. 3ti 14 . �I 2 ., L,Fnritud•� I �` 16 - j 58 .
-:Design;'. Current Design Cnrrerrf:. Desi..-- Current.
Swine C ae itv Po elation Poulin C nett► Po oration Cattle Ca acitF Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
IN Feeder to Finish
2629
2629
❑ Farrow to Wean
'
L—] Farrow- to Feeder
❑ Farrow- to Finish
❑ Gilts
�❑ Boars
11DLaver ❑ DairF j I I 1
J❑ Non -Laver! I - E❑ Non -pain' I ' E
❑ Other -
Total Desirt Capacity 2.629
Total. SSLW 354.915
Number of Lagoons 1L3 Subsurface Drains Present 0 Lagoon Area Ej Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds l-.Soliid .Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Manatement Svstem
Discharges & Stream jmpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the convevaace man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b- If discharge is observed, did it reach Rater of the Stale? (If yes. notify IDWQ) [❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If dischm-ee i� nbc,_rn ed. what iti the estimated flow in gal/rniti"
d- Uoes discltar¢: fi�pas, a laeoov stetri? {if Vic;, votifr ilid� J L{ Yes Er'' No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IIR No
3. Were there and' adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? �j Yee Na
Waste Collection & Treatment
4- Is storage capacity (f=board pies storm storage) less than adequate? ;=l SpMw•av ! 1 Yes No
StFlicttire I Structtire 2 Structure = Strtie1mv 4 Strucnire ; Stricture 6
ldc.-ntiiier: . f3m_...... _.»---------- hack _. ..._.................. ............_»...._.._............................................_...»......_.._........_._.............._.....
Freeboard ;incite l: ........... ... ... .......... 29............... ...

1.-1«aaulN 4k
• Facilit►- Number. 25-20 Date of Juspedion 6-14-2t1D1 Printed cm: 6115C2001
5. Are there am immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (W trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes E. No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management or
GIOSIITe plan? El Yes 9- No
{]f amp of questions 4-6 was answered ryes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notif DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need mainte naneelmmprovemeant? ❑ Yes jg No
8. Does arr part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenanceirmprovement? ❑ Yes Z-i No
9. Do any strictures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes Z No
Waste application
10_ Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes X1 No
I I . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hvdraulic Overload [� Yes Z, No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
13 - Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA AW)?
?l Yes
Z. No
Id. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Li No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
F EE No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
Yeas
+ !! No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Y e %
se, No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Yes
ar No
Reouired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Z, No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
L�
{iel 'tll'. checklists. d: sip_ maps. etc..)_
Yeti
:? No
I9. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis &soil sample reports)
Yes
iyi• No
20. Is facility not incompliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7, Yes
[K No
21. Did the faciiits fail Io have a activ elr e,-rtiiied operator in :parse'
Yes
,` . No
22, Fail to notifv regional DWQ of emergency Situations as required by General Permit?
tie/ discharge. freeboard problems. over application)
Ye:
'- _" N o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review•Imspection with on -site representative?
f Yes
NO
24. Does facility require a follow -rip visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
IK� No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
JR. No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no further correspondence shout this visit.
.........T ,.. _.... �.
.m ..............._. ..�......... .....,....... a ,.., ..:._.. ,., .,...,. ;..� ,,�r.a..,m.:: • .... ,.,......,: a-:x:.:. —
m�srta=. xr�Er.t3o • uesi� i$im�an 'aiusvvers sundly zfl>isen tanx�ram other.ao" ��=-m-- - Com =�.S
mmcnfs_
._,.x•.�.... _,v..x.lxay........,..m.....:' ..............��...,.-...! .....:,n..,,.r:�.. Q_i_s. — -
_
-_....:+:,.w,..,........-:.. _._....... ..ems.'.: ..i :...... >=..r...,., ...•,-.. e aP3 ma
ores
__
...,..:....- .-.-,.....,....__. --..:.._—.-.�.-......_.0. .,.... ..—..._. �....-_. _ •--... e_-....__ ...y 4�.: _ :r fir. e: _
*Waste anah sis 2-12-01, 207 Ibs.J1000 gals. - Recent sample submitted to NCDA Lab for analysis.
*Sail analysis 3-29-ft planning to sample Fall 2001.
*Irrigation retards complete with a nitrogen balance. Correct IRR-2 form_r for Coastal Bermuda (March irrigation events),
"Freeboard leveLs adequate and maintained per the General Permit.
i
r
i
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne'B.CetiMm _...
Reviewer/Inspector Si2natu
Date:

051O31O1 Continued
Fadelit3 Number. 25 20 Dare of tiospection 6-I4-204I Printed on: 6/I 5)2D0'!
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the t building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Arc there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
2& 1s there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i_e. residue on neighboring vegetation_ asphalt_
roads, building structure, and/or public propeM)
29. 1s the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fam(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s). inoperable shuttcrs, ctc_)
31 _ Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32- Do the flush tanks lack- a submerged fill pipe or a permanentltemporwy cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 19 No
i] Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Yes E&I No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine Q Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 25 20 Dale of Visit: 1112012t]o[t Time: 10:U[f 1'rinted on. 11/22/2000
rO Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified C] Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
(Farm Name:.S1>.tKKid=.51r.Cmy.FArjn ............................. .. .... County: CruyjtIj .............................................. WARO.......
OwnerName: $ ttrt:ifs"..........-•----•............... MCC4y......................................................... Phone No: 252-fi3.-1636......................................._.................
Facility Contact:..............................................................................Title:..................... .................. Phone No:
Mailing Address: 3j2Q..W.jujcrgrcjcjl.A9Ad............................................................................................................ 28.52,3 ..............
Onsite Representative:.T.Qmmy..l! cC.9y............. .... ___ .......................... ................ Integrator: �rR1�t1S11i1CQ. 1Rg k�xm5c.......... ............................
Certified Operator:.TQ1l my ................................... l4r&.o.X................................ .............. Operator Certification Numberjo,3.3.7 .............................
Location of Farm:
miles N. of Cove City on SR 1256 (Wintergreen Rd.). 1 and 112 miles East on SR 1253 (Quinn Rd.). 25 miles from Kinston; +
4 miles from New Bern and 100 miles from Raleigh.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' l4 26 Longitude 77 • 16 58
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
2629
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current` `
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca pacity Po 1ilation
❑ Layer JE1 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 2,629
Total SSLW 354,915
Number of Lagoons 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Saud Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Strcam Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes.. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IN No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes IN No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
identifier. ............ Upprz........... ........... 1.ower............ ..................... .............. .................................... .................................... _ ..................................
F reboard (inches): 48 25

5100 Continued on back
Facility Number: 25—Zt7 Date of Inspection 111201200fl Printed on: 11/2212000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? N Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
Waste AP21ication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Bermuda Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP.
Rio •violations:or-deficiencies noted :during this visit:: You ►will receive no further
corres ondenee about thI .visit. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .... . .. . . . .
Need to try to establish vegetation on upper lagoon dike wall.
ver lagoon is capable of being pumped to upper lagoon.
ad to pull a new sample.
[I Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
AL
IV
IReviewer/]nspector Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall I I

Reviewerllnspector Signature: Date: 51001
Facility Number: 25-20 Date of Inspection 11/20/2000 Printed on: 11/22/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
r. i
SAW

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit ID Compiiance Inspection Q Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit i Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up D Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date nF�'isit: Time: I�: Rb Printed ow 7/21/2000
Facility Number '� 5 2. D
o Not O crational ❑ Below Threshold
Iff Permitted 0 Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: -•...--•...............
Farm Name: t 6, ...... FW �^ County- C e4 ve..
......... .......... ...............................................................
Owner Name:....................5. �''�'. �"' .............1",[.�� `/................... ....... Phone No: ......... ..........
Facility Contact:........................................................................ ...Title: Phone No:
MailingAddress: ...... .......... _ .......... ................................ ................... ........... ..................... .................. ............ ..... .... _... ........................................ ..........................
Onsite Representative: T.s,n " /............. Integrator:..............G ........................................................................
........................................... F
CertifiedOperator: ................... _ .............. .............. ............... __........................................ Operator Certification Number: ... ..................... ..................
Location of Farm:
ti
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �� �•� Longitude
Design Current
Swine C'anarity ' Pnnulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
®"Feeder to Finish
Z (�
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I =❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lavilon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream impaciti
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes %No
Discharge originated ar. ❑ Lagoon ❑ Sprav Field ❑ ❑ther
a- If discharge is obscn'ed. was the conveyance malt-niadc? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. if disehar-e is observed. did it reach Water of the State" (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
e. II' discharge is observed. what is the estianxlcd flow in gallrnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system' (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [21No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway [:]Yes No
Stl-ueturc l Structure ? Structure 3 Struclure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifies: ......11.l!!P ............ - -. —.JR` v..................
Freeboard (inches):
5/00 Continued on back

Facility Number: 25 —2.Q Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (icl trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improveient? Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes MNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings'? ❑ Yes JZ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes W No
12. Crop type ]der,..-1.
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)'? ❑ Yes JO No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
lb. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
203 Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewhrispection with on -site representative'?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�qV �*ial tiglis:or deficiencies were noted dii~ririg 4his:visit- Voit will-k&Ke do furthr: ;
corresoricllence. about this i�isit' .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Lowy•
a R� ea.
IS
Keen
-6
CA tee+• s� ,.
Q�.
c:a7 f --• pd 4o N ppqr J,,5o ,.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes [&No
❑ Yes ®.No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes [A No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes fS No
❑ Yes O No
❑ Yes LgNo
❑ Yes 4No
❑ Yes [a No
A.
Reviewer/Inspector Name C_-.GAr i 0 t.. V.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 9 — Date: f 1- 20 - 06 5100

Facility Number: ZS —2Q 1 Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or hielow ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blades), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 19 No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
5100
5100

Facility Number Dale of In"In-clion
Time of hisl)ection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
■ Permitted p Certified M Conditionally Certified C3 Registered 0 Not perationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:..Sieridait.McCay..Far.m.....---.... --............................................................ Courov: Craven WARO
Owner Name: Sheridan ........ - ..................... McCuy.............. ............... ............... .......... .. Phone No: 252:63S.10.6................ .... ................ ..... I ..............
..
Facility Contact; ...... ....... -...... ........... .............. ...................... ........... Titl�:-..................... ........... .......................... .. Phone No: ....................... ............ - ........
.......
A7ailing Address: 312fi.M'imt�ergxeen.Ruad..:............................................................... Cove.City..NC......::.......:.........................:.............. 2852.1 ..............
Onsite Representative: 1 tity.AkCoy'......................... ...... ... ...... Integrator: Gold.Sbarn.iiog.Farms...............
Certified Operator:TatmmyL............................. M cCoy;........................ .................... Operator Certification Number:1633.7..... .........................
Location of Farm:
.m cs....0 , ar:t:, ty.xttt. .tnt�rgx:eeta. .....an .r>au as. as .um. .u.tnut. .unn es. yarn. tnstan;
24.lnnilles.#rstm.�iesr.l3ertt amd .1 QA..nailes.irattt.Raleig�}},�
Fx`_..:. .:...:...............................................................
... r r
Latitude ©s ®� ®« Longitude ©■ ®
Desi n. Current Desi n �rrent ign' Current g g.
Swine Capacity, Population Poultry' ' Capacity, Population Cattle Capacity Population
13 Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
E3 Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder._
p Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
p Boars
p Other
Total Design _Capacity 2,629
Total SSLW 35 -915
V
Numher.of;Lagoons r1 2
JE3 Subsurface
Drains
Present
Id,Lagoon Area
p Spray ie yea
frolding Pon.00 Solid Traps
-....
f o
iquid Waste
,
anageme
- ystem
inscnarges az dream Lfnyacla
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? J r ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field ❑ Other
a, If discharge is observed, w•as the coneyance man-rhade? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Siat�? (If yes, notify I]WQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If dischar�,e is observed, what is the eliniated flow in gallmilf?'
d. Does dischargc bypass a lagoon system) (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse iinpacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes [3No
Waste Collection & Treatrttent
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway ❑ Yes p No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure d Structure 5� Structure b
I deft l i i'irr: ...............
Frecboard(inches): ....................................... ................. .............. ........................ ....................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, Yes p No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 ^. Continued on back

Facility Number: 25_Zll ILIIt, of 1 nN1wetioil 9/29/99
5. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
p Yes
❑ No
:
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DAQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
p Yes
p No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
[]Yes
p No
Waste A imlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? �.
p Yes
❑ No
1 t . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding p PAN
❑ Yes
p No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
Cl Yes
p No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?-:
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
p No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records _& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? �' .. "
❑Yes
p No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?_
(ie/ WUP,'checklists, design, maps, etc.)
Yes
p No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie1 irrigation, freeb1.oard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
,r..
p Yes
El No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
p No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in.crge?
p Yes
p No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ 0emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems-, Over application)
p Yes
p No
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspcetion:with on -site representative?
p Yes
❑ No
24. Does facility require afollow-up visit by same agency?';1, © Yes p No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? p Yes ❑ No
Nje�kr6}]
:.~rs.,notecl y'ring-!" yis.it.. au: �vill:reuei[�� no. further 6dek alboit( this.wisit.
Comments re.._er.to:`questions " :.. xp atn_any "answers an - or any>'ir&omrtich attons.or..any o &commentp-,
Use drawings of facility to lietterxplainisittiations: (use'additional;pages as necessary):,µ-
-.y.
kdequate-str=ture iAtegrity.
kllowable maximum lagoon level*. -.adequate - may opyerate at normal I$vels. t _
Storm impact to lagoon: structure inundated approxim ly one week. }" _
:1ood.water originated from Core Creek in Neuse
pumped•lagoon down•as water receded to stabili cture, Now. at 34 inches', Upstream Core ek is"in•drainage .
listrict and downstream is not. This worsened fla i ...
looses daraaged; in -process of repair; pumps'damage :. x;
rrigationlapplication system operable. SEE PAGF,;3
Reviewer/Ins ector Name {
p ,Carl'Dnnn'x.:- •w • .. .. _.. Entered by Arin Tyndall ''
Date:
ReyiewerllnspectorSignature: VV.

aci ity Number: 5_2Pale of I nspection
Odor Issues '
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below p Yes El No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ONO
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes El No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 0 Yes p No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes p No
31- Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes p No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes El No
- - - -
Fields are saturated but not ponded.
Records available and complete.
Current lagoon'levels: 34, 26
00+ animals lost; taken by Goldsboro Hog Farm recycle.
Farm is operable when buildings are repaired. Replace electrical pumps, lift and water pumps.
A sludge blanket 3 to 4
incises deep was depositedJn the cow pasture beside lagoon.
SEE ATTACHED DRAWING ON FIELD FORM.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
.lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 14, 1999
Mr. Tommy L. McCoy
Sheridan McCoy Farm
3675 Hwy 55 West
New Bern, North Carolina 28562
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Sheridan McCoy Farm
Facility No. #25-20
Craven County
Dear Mr. McCoy:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection (as it is
viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility by the Division of Water
Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm is complying with
requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 211.4217, Senate Bill 1217, the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan and/or General Permit; (2) determine whether the waste
utilization plan is based on total or actual wetted acres; (3) the farm operation's waste
management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator;
(4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or
runoff.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any
questions, please contact me at 252/946-6481, ext. 318 or your Technical Specialist.
Sincerely,
//r
Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Cc: LBH files
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

-
-
ofSd;ridWater Conservation --.Operation Rne►---
Division
:_-.-.:- -::. ::: -- - -..a._. ...... - -- - --e.
- --::.::: .. . .:::. _- :_:_ .• E
i
Div�sian of Soil and- ater onserratwn CompFianc� spectton
-
.n f water _ cum t•n..eenioDnis_afs n
[- - ....::.::❑theA e O
10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Folimi-up of DWg inspection 0 Folloa--sip of DSWC review 0 Other l
LFacility Number 25 20
Date of Inspection 5-13-99
___ Time of Inspection 948 24 hr. (hh:mm)
9 Permitted 1 Certified IN Conditionally Certified [2 Registered 10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:�._„,,,•_•-
Farm Name: „....... _......_.. Count►: Cra►els_...... ................. ._..._ '_AJ10
Ow•nerName. ShrAdan........_..-- ....... „. MsrCc► _._ ..._ . .__..._... _ - Phone No:..-
Faciljty Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Andress: { HR4F _._._....__-..„...._•-•• ..... —. _.. .13e1rtt C .._._..... _._._. _. ..... m562---_....
Onsite Representative: TRuuAn�'��A�.�r�Sl1C�e.P�Hl1<S—�.. ... _ -...-- Integrator: G?Id3b.9. -HQgjF 1�t�.... __. __........
Certified Operator: T.ommy.L..-................... Mccny.._......... ..... _-------_._- Operator Certification lumber: -----
Location of Farm-
V,i
Latitude ��' 14 i' ` 26 u Longitude 77 ' • i 16
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Ca achy Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Laver
1
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
2629
2629
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
2,629
❑ Gilts
=
= Total SSLW-
354,9�5
❑soars
Number of Lagoons - 2❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon A:ra ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds [Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
DischarL,c & Stream Imnac;N
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Dic;;harge on--inaled at: ❑ Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan-ruade?
b. If discharge is obsen'ed_ did it reach Water of the State? (If ves, notili- DN Q)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flo%k- in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon si-steni? (If yes. notiA• DWQ)
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
nla
111 ,<
2- Is there m idence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
�. Were there am adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? El Yes ®No
W2--te Collection d Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (fr=board plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Stricture 6
Identifier: ... Qid.............. .......----..Nem=--........... . ............................ .... ......................... ......... ... ........... ...................... ....
._...... -.._ ...
Freeboard (inches): ---- --_„
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 9 No
seepage- etc-)
;17 ;199 CanEnued on hark

Facility Number: 25-20 Date of Impection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
R No
- • - (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DW Q)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelnnprovement?
❑ Yes
R No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than Waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
® Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, ganged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
R No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need mainkmancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
R No
IL Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
R No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Qverseed
13- Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes
R No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
R No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? _
❑ Yes
No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? -
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
R No
Renuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) Y - ❑ Yes R No
19. Does retard keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ® Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes R No
21- Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No
22. Fail to notif}, regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes R No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes R No
25- Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes R No
:.'Nti, v-io'la'tion-s. vr,defkiencies were: doted'duriink flits •visit : Ydti * l: receive •no fturt�er : _
- correspondence about this visit. .... :.:.:.....:... :... .: .: :
Records available for review. Waste analysis: 1/98, 6/98, 3/99. 1999 soil analysis, WUP dated 9-9-97 with a deficit of .75 lbs A.
WUP dated 4-12-99 - based on irrigation design (45%) therefore on wetted acres- A determintion is not necessary.
ake sure to pull waste samples within 60 days of irrigation, suggest quarterly
8 - Small leak from collection box onto ground of House # 1. Make the necessary repairs and monitor regularly
19 - IRR 2 records are balanced out however the irrigation events in March should be deducted from 50 Ibs of N (small grain)
Use 265 Ibs for the bermuda crop on Tracts 2422 - pulls A4 & A5.
Extenders have been installed in the Rush tanks and the outlet pipe of the new lagoon. In process of instaIlimg extenders on the pipes of
old Iaaoon.
LA
Rmiewer/tas1 or Name - a _Y;yn$r
Rmiewer/insDector .
5irnnature: f1 Date:

3123/99
Facility dumber. 25-20 Bate of Inspection 5-13-99
Odor lssurs
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No-
mads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30_ Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks Iack a submerged fill pipe or a pernumenthempormy cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Commentsand/or Drawings:; -
Since.- _ - -__.- :;=��.x� _ "ie�r.- _ =r's- _-:.i=•�:.a- 'k.R-,�= �:_-::.�_ �-�F...,r-: � �"� � -� ;,,
last year, the vegetation on the wall (North end of new lagoon and down slope of new lagoon adjaomt to drive) has improve 1
greatly. The erosion has Iessen_ Continue your efforts on the North end_
Overall the facility is well managed and operated.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-94-6-6481, ext. 318.

°Ani Fee[l1Dt erati' tvVl M,- SWC mal Op an R le . »
..........
s
DW An>Emal Feedlot
Q=
a ,
4 eiration'Site Ins ection
................. «
10 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DW2 inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 2 2 0
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection "3[7 24 hr. (hh:mm)
gRegistered ❑ Applied for Permit
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
Farm Status:
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
_•-....... _...........__.. _ .. �....-_....... .. .... ._..... __..... ..... -._...._ ....
Farm Name: _... ... � �pr,.�, � .... !� ���!. .. �'..!^__...........�
.....- County :........ �'?!'�t^ __ .. »_...... .... M... _ .... �..
Land Owner Name: br'{'�!.
_ .. ....... _..... Phone No: _..—C 3g_.. 63_..._. _..._ ....._ ............. _.
Facility Conctact:......�''C..... .... Mz C4 ..
Title: Phone No:
.................................... ................... ....... ..-..... ......... .._.....
MailingAddress: ......._ ......... .... .......... ...
.... __....... ....... _...... ................... ................ ............... ....... ...... ..._... ..........................
Onsite Representative: ..... jsi...tl.SC-ly [ ....
........ _....... Integrator:
Certified Operator: �p'"' C .w.•. Operator Certification Number: . .......... ...... . ...... . .... _.
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude �• �:
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
:.Current:. •.,:. ;
..........
ign
5wtne ;<::::-:Foul[ _... «.; Ctittlea:ww
o ulatt ry::=;:u; a act latiori a a:.;
an z Po u ci'Pottl on
�,..ra .
C
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer KJ.DaiEZ
ff
Feeder to Finish 2000 )Qt7�^— ❑ Non -La er m` ❑ Nan -Dal
Farrow to Wean .,..:.. �....»..:: �.: _:<><;'.; • ......,.::,«:..: _
rr
Farrow to Feeder Total Des1 n Ca i i " »
__
.. n
Farrow to Finisb...«:....«. ,»•..«.,»�?�..»:. ��:». �»
�-Tt►taI-SSLW��' ��� °-;
,. tiler .,....,: .�..«..-.....,.x
%e '
«
... _ s. ❑
u;��.=Nutnber�ofC,a vhns'l�Haldin 'Ponds: Subsurface Drains Present
g g'. w �.u
;q� m
:. ;:•= N10 Lagoon Area S r ay Field Area
eral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUinin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 8 No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
f9 No
❑ Yes
M No
❑ Yes
IN No
❑ Yes
,N No
Continued
on back

Facility Number; ,2 5,„ —.•,, •.,,•._
R
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be property closed?
Structures Cj,aagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
-.. l.'.1....... ....... ------- ......... _.
Structure 4
❑ Yes 9Y No
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes 1A No
❑ Yes K No
Structure 5 Structure 6
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
19 No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
E9 No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
19 Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
A No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
ff No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the notify DWQ)
15.
/State,
Crop type fir= G_fli ...............�'i'"f� Grin^
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
[ff No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
9 No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
EgNo
19.
Is there a Iack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
9No
For
Cedfied Facilifles Only
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
Yes
❑ No
Gommetits-(refer to question . plain`any YES :'answers'and/or any reeommendations'or any. other_coi menu:
Llse:drawings of facility ta.better explain situatioris. (use additional pages as necessary):
o,_. 4 s d ,,,-+¢ �
.I r�l a fall ti rprerdS Ar4 �a�',� ,,,��iod a5' fer i)S%-,c
»
,:
Reviewer/Inspector Name-- _ .-�. Po��.;.. .�.. »�;� ��;�.:�k.......A,,,,fr;;.M �.:..N G-4�. ,:;.ii �Mn
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Seclion, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97