250014_HISTORICAL_20171231

Z 14
NURTH UARULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

HISTORICAL
HISTORICAL
HISTORICAL

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
t and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Robert Dail
1930 Spring Garden Rd
New Bern NC 28560
Dear Robert Dail;
1 � �
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL REsouRCES
May 17, 2000
Subject: Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
DailOs Swine Farm
Facility Number 25-14
Craven County
During the 1999 session, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law directing the North
Carolina Department of Environment of Natural Resources (DENR) to develop an inventory and
ranking of all inactive lagoons and storage ponds in the State. In order to meet this directive, a
representative of DENR has recently evaluated the inactive lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) on your
property. Inactive lagoons and storage ponds were defined by the Statute as structures which were
previously used to store animal waste but have not received waste for at least one year.
The information collected on your property is contained in the attached field data sheets. Using
this field data, staff ranked your inactive waste structures as high, medium or low according to its
potential risk for polluting surface ,and/or groundwater. Your waste structure(s) was ranked as
follows:
Structure Number Surface Area (Acresl Rankin
1 1.83 Medium
This ranking is based in part on the conditions existing on the day of the site visit. Changes in
these conditions or the collection and evaluation of additional data may modify the ranking of your
waste structure(s) in the future.
Information on your facility along with over 1000 others contained in the inventory has been
provided to the General Assembly. During this year's session, the General Assembly will consider
additional requirements for future management of these structures which may include requiring
proper closure of inactive lagoons and storage ponds according to current or alternative standards.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] Fax [252] 946-9215
An Equal opportunity Afrumative Action Employer 50% recycied/10% post -consumer paper

Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Regardless of their ranking, owners of all waste lagoons and storage ponds have certain
management responsibilities_ These include taking appropriate actions to eliminate current
discharges, prevent future discharges and to insure the stability of their structures. Staff of the
Division of Water Quality will be in contact with owners of all inactive structures that have been
determined to pose a serious environmental risk, based on its ranking and/or additional field data
collected by the Department.
All liquids and waste removed from these structures must be land applied at a rate not to exceed
the agronomic needs of the receiving crops. Any major modifications made to the dike walls or
structure must be done in accordance with current standards and under the direction of a technical
specialist designated for structural design. Your local Soil and Water Conservation District is an
excellent source for information and guidance related to proper waste application practices, structure
operation and maintenance, and other related animal waste management standards and/or
requirements.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility and liability for
any past or future discharges from your lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) or for any violations of
surface water or groundwater quality standards.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this process. If you have questions concerning
your inactive structures, please contact the staff of either in the Division of Water Quality or the
Division of Soil and Water Conservation in the Washington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
ROGER THORPE FOR
JIM MULLIGAN
Jim Mulligan
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Craven County Soil and Water Conservation District Office
Facility File

of Visit p Compliance Inspection D operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit d Routine Q Complaint Q Fallow up n Emergency Notification p other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 25 14
13 Permitted ® Certified l] Conditionally Certified © Registered Date of Visit I 2t29/2000
/ Not Operational Q Below Threshold I Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ;�-
FarmName:......................................................................................
Owner Name: Robot ..............................••---•
Facility Contact:
Title:
County: Craycla ................. ---........................... .W.HRO......--
Phone No: M-U19008...............•.......•.....
Phone No:
Mailing Address: 19QU.Sprjng. Ggrdela.Rd.................................. ,~ .eflx. ZI35f6R..............
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Location of Farm:
xtlalxs.Ykf;S]t.��.tlte.a>xt�r e�tiA�.bet����a. iC .�9Q1.�rtd NCS t.1 �......................................... ................................................. .................................
M Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
twine Uapacity ro utatrors
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 2700 Q
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 2,700
Total SSLW 364,500
Number of Lagoons 3 Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes El No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State`? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
1 Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes OR No
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/Inspector Name Mai"
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 5/12/2000

Facility Number 25 — 14 Lagoon Number .1............ Lagoon Identifier �t.Xear..�f..farm..................................
E Q Active Q Inactive Latitude F357 13 17
Waste Last Added,1-.1.-9&..............................
Determined by: ® Owner ❑ Estimated
Surface Area (acres): 1. 3................. I......
Embankment Height (feet): 4..........................
Longitude M 11 05
By GPS or Map? ®GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: L022916A
Distance to Stream: Q <250 feet Q 250 feet - 1000 feet QQ >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ❑ Field Measurement ® Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? Q Yes Q No
Intervening Stream? Q Yes *No
Distance to WS or HQW (miles): 0 < 5 Q 5 - 10 pp > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? Q Yes *No O Unknown
Spillway Q Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
Inspection data 2/29/2000
appearance of Q Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid a Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
0 Lagoon Liquid Clear
Q Lagoon Empty Freeboard [inches]: 8.0
embankment condition D Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
Q Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
(0 Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage Q Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
Q Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
❑ No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
Q No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
# Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment fail to make contact
and/or Sprayffeld Q Yes © No p Unknown with representative Yes Q No
unavailable
comments Lagoon walls appear to be in good condition.
J

■ ._
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 31, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECIM REQUESTED
Robert ]email
Dail's Swine Farm
Rt 6 Box 287-C
Kinston NC 28501
Farm Number: 25 -14
Dear Robert Dail:
A
iWA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
EN"RQNMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a N M � 0 W �
AUG - 3 1998
WASHINGION REGIONAL OFFICE
Qwa�
You are hereby notified that Dail's Swine Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has six 60days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
he returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. if any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Carl Dunn with the Washington Regional Office at [phone].
e. cerely,
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P. .
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Washington Regional Office (w/o encl_)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5G% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number: 2�S — J
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on'site which need to be properly closed? Yes ❑ No
Structures (Lagoons,11olding Ponds, Flush fits, etc.)
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? KYes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure. 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
.................
uV o
........................ .............
t..................................................................
Freeboard (f):...............3 ...L..............
41.
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes [ZNo
11. Is erasion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes CKNo
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
JR Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
xYes
❑ No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
f '
15.
Crop type ................ . !'^st........cre................................. .................. ............... .................. .,................ .................................
15.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
q No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Y❑ No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
)SI No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
)a No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
P Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
EffNo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
)d No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
RNo
25,
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[]- No violations or deficiencies were noted during this:visit:� You_ :will receive no ftirtlier
correspOndeizce about this:visit:•: :
;., ........_,W .. _.
Comments:trefet-:.ta question #�: Expiaur,auy:YES hnswers o nidlor `auy recomnrendatiails' or ii" orb ec"cal inaniettts
... ....:aria.. '
Use.:drawitn 5:of.facrhtrta. better rx lain srtuattnus use'addtttonal; ii es as°frecessa u �~�
i,
14 V KA 0,., ►r ,tic.• t,,acv. w� 4w C)t •
7/25/97
_» _.._.
Reviewer/Inspector Dame : • .:. �.:; ..... ..;',:
r:3'ii
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

.. ;�— :T „r••..�=` ^ � .._ a ��,y-,.v S'.H t - - a..'W". ri`a� rv_ - ..�: .• .� ._ r y� ... mow- •yy ..i ... .n .. ...
Facility Number: 25 — f +
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? [%Yes ❑ No
Structures (I,goons,fiolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? KYes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: r p �� 0.) r t
... cu................................•.............. k�................ .................................. ........ ......................................................................
•r
Freeboard (ft): ................3........ .....
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
F'No
1 1.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑'No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovernent?
Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
►],Yes
❑ No
Waste
Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
0 No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
r•
15.
�a� • V - �., % ..........................
Crop type .................. .............
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Ye/❑ No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
© No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
El No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
lg No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement.)
E Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
'RJ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certitie3kAWMP?
❑ Yes
0 No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
El Yes
❑ No
0 No'viOlutions'or deficiencies. were nate'd•du6ng this:visit..You 'wili reeei've na further
Orrespondence about this:visit: ' :
C0 . MMeats.. er:to:queshon;#) :Explain anyiYES'answers antllor;any reconut ndatr<ans'.or any: atJffer coiitmenis, b
,
Use. dr"s of factlrt .to:ltetter a &iifsituatt�ns' use addthonal'
,v h P 5 4, o. �y ��.. ! 4M1 a -d ,,l 4 wj old.
;
7/25/97
r
lNameP
Reviewe r ns ectnr Name .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Robert Dail
Dail's Swine Farm
Rt 6 Box 287-C
Kinston NC 28501
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Dail's Swine Farm
Facility ID#: 25-14
Craven County
Dear Mr. Dail:
RECEIVED
WASHINGTON OFFICE
NOV 1 9 1996
QEM-
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Si2Preston
AHoward, Jr., . .,Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Washington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
rW
P,O. Box 27687, 1 * FAX [phone]
Raleigh. North Carolina 2761 1-7687 rf An Equal Opportunity/ATfirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: 11 - -Z 6 , 1995
Time: l .00 FA
Design Capacity: No. of Animals on Site:
DEM Cert if ica Aion No .: ACE DE§ Certification No.: ACNEW
Latitude: .i�� Longitude: qrY 1L JJW Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freebo d of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 my Yes v No
Actual Freeboard: Ft d — y Inch
was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o <NDO
Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes ar No
Is the cover crop adequat ? Yes v No
Crop(s) toeing utilized:
— I I L /kin n5L 0 11A
Does the facility meet SC rnimum setback criteria
200 Ft from Dwellings? Yes or No 100 Ft from Wells? Yes)or No
Is the ATrimal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Slue Line Stream?
Yes or No
Is animal wasteland applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes or/Ho
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state -man-made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes v No
If Yes, please explain:
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manu
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes a Ho
0
Inspector Name I Signature
cc: Facility Assessment unit
Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet

DEM
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Page Two
Comments:
KWAAE
W
��r7��r[�:T.��it'�■ ���t � l�t.rT�f1�!'►+;L-'�►ri r^[iT

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment.
Health and Natural Resources A
a;h-
James
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MA12
Water Quality Section
August 1, 1995
Mr. Robert Dail
1930 Spring Garden Rd.
New Bern, North Carolina 28560
Subject: Dail's Swine Farm
Animal Waste Lagoon
Facility No. 25-14
Craven County
Dear Mr. Dail:
On July 25, 1995 staff from the Washington Regional Office of
the Division of Environmental Management inspected the lagoon
serving your animal feeding operation. It was observed that the
lagoon had an insufficient amount of freeboard, water level in
relation to the lowest point of your dike wall. You should maintain
a minimum of nineteen inches of freeboard in the lagoon. This
letter is written to bring your attention to this situation and to
ask you to, begin spray irrigating wastewater or take the
appropriate action necessary to reduce the level of your lagoon(s)
immediately. Please note that a buffer of twenty-five feet must
be maintained while spray irrigating from any drainage system
(ditch, Swale, canal, stream, etc.).
Please be aware that it is a violation of North Carolina
General Statutes to discharge wastewater to the surface waters
(farm ditches, creeks streams, etc) of the State without a permit.
The Division of Environmental Management has the authority to levy
a fine of not more than $10,000 per day for the unpermitted
discharge of wastewater into the surface waters of the State. At
some point in the future, staff will reinspect your facility.
Lagoon dikes should be mowed so they can be visually inspected.
If you have any questions in regard to this letter I can be
contacted at [phone].
Sincerely,
(�t&6 ►VL
Daphne Cullom
Environmental Technician
cc: Dianne Wilburn
t#tO files
1421 Carolina Avenue. Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

OPERATIONS RWU - WQ Fax : [phone]
Jul 24 '95 1?:29 P. 13116
VM& MA, VIVI 9ULUoL 1 . UL/UJ
r
V157 aw"awt—n 0*605 M W7 1,.2%1m
Mic Rcqdm ImmoOft AWnLion
SITJa V1WA11M leRCoRsx
eVWMMMM
►gem. Vta 6 17-. 4 - Y. ; • fif Pho= - 9-
FbMM
do slca R�xc ut tva: PhD=
PhMad
N'c— 3-
�uiii>�$ hddrw�;
Type atop melon: •SWIM L--- play Csltle --
DWP C npnWty; aZ-00 Number ofM"h an She: P _ -
LAtd04B: j§-_.* - I,3 ' , IS ,• Ada; 77--° 11 3 «
Type of lmpcdk= Qnmld _ . _._ Am dtrr
c3ftls Yca ar MQ
bm the Arum! Woo Up= liava =Md=t tional»d o! 1 Bw f 2$ yw !14 how d ww *von(
(aPPmxhwely 1 Foot 4. 7 }noboa) Y" or 4i)
For fmildia" wh'h rnam daft ow 136=l ,ocw o"Uss rL Ulu Imam' D=bmd Under 1W
ovwMMU peeCtm,,
W" aq GNPW vbswvw fart; the lapm(>l)! Yes opi Wa4 BMW MV90a of dw darn?: Yco o rq�)
Is adoquWe Illlld waf ble Mr Ind Wi Wko? Yes or Nq h the Qw" clop WKeatc? Yet tw No
Ad4ilie,gW CDmmr%a
r 63,e
Fax to (919) 715-wo
siv=ww of p4cnt
A-7CFI i

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
Health and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Mr. Robert Dail
1930 Spring Garden Road
New Bern, North Carolina 28560
IVA
f*•
C�EHNF=?L
Division of Soil & Water Conservation
May 6, 1997 _
WASHNG70EfMD
N OFF ice
MAY 0 7 1997
SUBJECT: Operation Review Summary and Corrective Action Recommendation IQ E N,
Dail's Swine Farm Facility No. 25-14
Craven County
Dear Mr. Dail:
On April 18, an Operation Review was conducted at the Dail's Swine Farm Operation in Craven County. This
Review, undertaken in accordance with G.S, 143-215.10D, is one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock
operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality may conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was determined that waste was not being discharged to the waters of the State, and that a
portion of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal system were maintained and operated under
the responsible charge of a certified operator. The remaining portion has been abandoned. Please see first item
listed below. A copy of the completed review form is enclosed for your information. The :'c1L,1.r:
questions, and management deficiencies were discovered and noted for corrective action or response:
• It was noted that the two of the swine houses and their respective lagoons have been out of operation for some
time and there are no plans to reopen this portion of the facility. These lagoons (one closest to the state road
and the middle structure) have been partially filled and need to be maintained to avoid potential discharge.
Contact the Craven Soil & Water Conservation District for technical assistance that will ensure the waste
lagoons are properly closed. I have attached the current Natural Resource Conservation Service standard for
the Closure of Abandoned Waste Treatment Lagoons and a copy of the Lagoon Closure Report Form for your
information. Once these structures are closed, the Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) and certification can be
revised to reflect the farm's actual design capacity.
■ Concrete at corner of the occupied swine house has been undermined by rodents and is leaking animal waste to
the middle lagoon. Mr. Daughety has agreed to repair this item by July 1, 1997.
■ Reshape, stabilize, and vegetate areas around lagoon and swine houses as documented in the review report.
• Install maximum and minimum pumping marker in the lagoon.
• Irrigation system not fully installed as shown in WUP. System requirements may change based on any WUP
revision. Ensure the acreage documented on the land application field maps and the WUP for the farm is for
wettable or usable acres as opposed to total acres.
■ Planning to reseed irrigation fields and remove old stump pile.
• Records lacked calibration information for spray irrigation equipment. Contact your Technical Specialist or the
manufacturer to obtain this information.
• Though not required at the time of the review, the farm will need to obtain an emergency action plan as well as
❑dor, insect, and mortality checklists in preparation for obtaining general permit. Your Technical Specialist can
provide these checklists.
■ A revisit will be scheduled sometime the first week of June 1997 to ascertain the farm's status.
r
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Robert Dail
May 6, 1997
Page 2
Even though no animals were in the abandoned portions of the facility at the time of review, excess rainfall
exceeding evaporation will cause the structures to periodically discharge if they are not properly pumped and
managed through a waste management plan or decommissioned through a closure plan. You are strongly
encouraged to contact your certified technical specialist for assistance as soon as possible. Your decision to close
this portion of the operation will require technical resources which are in high demand this year. You may want to
also contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District Office since they may be able to provide you with
additional technical and/or financial assistance to implement corrective best management practices.
Please remember that in order for your facility to be in compliance with environmental regulations, animal waste
cannot be discharged into waters of the State, and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal
systems must be properly sized, maintained and operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review. Please do
not hesitate to call me at [phone] if you have any questions, concerns, or need additional information.
Sincerely;
n
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Mr. Tommy Daughety, Operator
Craven Soil and Water Conservation District
Division of Water Quality - WARO
DSWC WARO Files

Yv 1 plm
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard Jr., P.E., Director
July 24, 1997
Mr, Robert Dail
Rt 6 Box 287-C
Kinston, NC 28501
Subject: Lagoon Closure
Facility Number 25-14
Dail's Swine Farm
Craven County
Dear Mr. Dail:
A&I71rA
00
�EHNFX.XA
On June 27, 1997, Carl Dunn from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of
Water Quality conducted an inspection of the Dail intensive livestock operation for compliance
with proper lagoon closure. Proper lagoon closure is the responsibility of the land owner,
however it is the responsibility of a technical specialist to certify that the lagoon has been
properly closed and to complete and submit the appropriate forms to DWQ. The filling of a
lagoon prior to proper removal of sludge is an unacceptable form of closure. Improperly
closed lagoons could lead to possible civil penalties. In your case, you have partially filled in
your lagoon before removal of sludge, which, as previously stated is unacceptable. You are
advised to contact a technical specialist at your local NRCS office to determine an acceptable
method of closure for your lagoon. This method must include the assurance that the partially
filled portion of your lagoon meets NRCS Technical Standard Number 998.
Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection. If you have any questions in regard
to this letter I can be contacted at [phone] ext. 208.
Sincerely,
Carl Dunn
Environmental Engineer
cc: WaRO Files
DSWC - WaRO
Craven County NRCS
Compliance/Enforcement Group
Central Files
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
I ffl:!;VA
E--�>EHNF==?L
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
WASHN� pN OMCE
June 19, 1997
Mr. Robert Dail la t* U.
1930 Spring Garden Road
New Bern, North Carolina 28560
SUBJECT: Follow-up operation Review Summary and Corrective Action Recommendation
Dail's Swine Farm Facility No. 25-14
Craven County
Dear Mr. Dail:
On June 5'h, an Operation Review follow-up visit was conducted at the Dail's Swine Farm operation in
Craven County. This second visit was scheduled to determine what corrective actions had been
implemented following the initial Review and to discuss proper lagoon closure for a portion of the facility,
The Division of Water Quality may conduct a separate site 'inspection later this year.
Concurrent with the first visit, it was determined that waste was not being discharged to waters of the
State, and that the active portion of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal system
remains under the responsible charge of a certified operator. A copy of the completed review form is
enclosed for your information. The following observances, questions, and management deficiencies still
require some type of corrective action or response:
• Farm's certification and Waste Utilization Plan (W[UP) need to be revised to reflect actual production
design status at the farm. According to our discussion, the design will likely be limited to the amount
of waste the spray irrigation system can accommodate.
■ A closure plan is required for the abandoned waste structures at the site. All dumping and filling
activities should be ceased until representatives from the Craven Soil &. Water District, Division of
Water Quality, and Division of Soil & Water Conservation can determine the requirements to achieve
proper closure. A meeting will be scheduled within the next two weeks to assess the situation. In the
meantime, contact the Craven District and register for lagoon closure technical assistance.
• Repair eroded area along new dike wall where discharge pipe routed from the swine house. Reshape,
stabilize, and maintain vegetation around waste structures in accordance with operation and
Maintenance Plan.
• Records lacked calibration information for spray irrigation equipment. Contact your Technical
Specialist or the manufacturer to obtain this information.
• Trough not required at the time of the review, the farm will need to obtain an emergency action plan as
well as odor, insect, and mortality checklists in preparation for obtaining general permit. Your
Technical Specialist can provide these checklists.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

It
Mr. Robert Dail
June 18, 1997
Page 2
Please remember that in order for your facility to be in compliance with environmental regulations, animal
waste cannot be discharged into waters of the State, and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and
disposal systems must be properly sized, maintained and operated under the responsible charge of a
certified operator.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at [phone] if you have any questions, concerns, or need additional
information.
Sincerely;
Scott Jones
Environmental Specialist 11
cc: Mr. Tommy Daughety, Operator
Craven Soil and Water Conservation District
Division of Water Quality - WARO
DSWC WARD Files

p Routine p Complatont p Follow-up of DWQ inspection 9 Follaw-up of USWC review p other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status: o Registered p Applied for Permit
N Certified p Permitted
in Not 0perattona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Dail's Swine Farm County: Craven ............................................... .W..a.RQ........
Owner Name: Roher.L................................. Dad ............................ ................................. . Phone No: 9I9-521,2tlb.3 .......... ......................... --...... ..........
Facility Contact: ..T.otm y...Daugh,ety.........................................Title: operator............................................ Phone No: 919.-5S9-S:18a.............. .........
Mailing Address: Rt.G..Box.28.T.-C........................ .......... ................................. ................. 1S,insxon..NC-.........................---.......................- 2850.1....... ---
Onsite Representative: Raherl.Dail,.Tommy.IIa.ughety......................................... Integrator: Cargill. ............................................... ..................
......
Certified Operator:.T.iwtz u.B.---------------------------- Datioety ......................................... Operator Certification Number:1707................... -..........
Location of Farm:
-Wi
Latitude ©+ ©° ©" Longitude ©■ �� �°
Type of Operatkon ':Design' Current '_ _ Design F .., :Current Design Current
Swine = Capacity::=Populatton T -Poultry - Capacity Population= Cattle Capacity Population
® pyp Wean to Feeder Layer
on-ayer gu
Feeder to Fin —is
Non -Dairy
p Farrow to Wean
p Farrow io ee er
Natal Design rapacity
p Farrow to Finis
Other TotaISSLW -
m
v
M
Nt>mbere f I:agi o Holding'Ppads.. ' p u sur ace rains resent p agooRArea 13 pray ie rea
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes H No
I
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify D WQ) p Yes N No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? Not Applicable
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ®Na
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
4130/97 maintenance/improvement?

Facility Number: 25_14
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
�1
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
closesL.tsa.5B f2� ........ middle.-1.f3........ .......1 e ar..l..fZ2.k......................----.-
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...... CjaasuLRe=dar.Gxass.... ..
Yes
® No
® Yes
p No
p Yes
❑ No
Structure 5
..............................................
Structure 6
.........
p Yes
H No
® Yes
p No
17 Yes
H No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
R No
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
and/or.. any recommenuationsor: any
p Yes H No
® Yes p No
p Yes ®No
N Yes p No
® Yes p No
p Yes H N❑
Yes N No
® Yes p No
i] Yes ® No
o subsurface drains are present at the tarm according to Mr. Dail. This is a tollow-up visit tar a review that was conducted �
I18/97. jhe following items still need to be resolved.
items 17, 19; & 20. , Farm's certification and Waste Utilization Plan need to be revised to reflect what is actually being produced at
e 'facility. '•According to our discussion the design population -will be limited based on available spray field. As of the date of this
review' there is a lack of irrigarion equiptrient an+3 acreage"for'the 2700 animals listed on the existing certification.
11: Eroded areas along -new lagoon dike_ wallneed to be repaired. See comments f nu 4/18/97 review.
Items 8 & 23. ' Closure plan needs to be obtained for two old lagoon. As discussed on site 6/05/97, no more material should be
dumped ill old lagoons until representatives from the Craven Soil & Water District, Division of Water Quality, -and Division of Soil
Water Conservation can detemunc requirements for proper closure. In the meantime, contact the Craven District and register for
hnical assistance to properly �lose'the lagoons. A revisit will be scheduled later this month with the aforementioned agencies.
_..
Reviewerllnspector Name Scott Jones..:w
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� r � _ ��� Date: Ci -7QOCI a

tc�
Division of Environmental Management
December 2, 1992
MEMORANDUM
TO: CAF❑ File
Washington Regional Office
FROM: Scott Jonessl c.—,-v� J�
Environmental Technician, WARO
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Robert Dail Swine Operation
Craven County
On November 17, 1992, Scott Jones, DEM Staff of the Washington
Regional Office, visited the Robert Dail Swine Operation. The
purpose of this visit was to determine whether or not the
aforementioned facility was in compliance with its CAFO Designation
effective July 12, 1990.
As a result of this inspection it has been found that the Leon
Calhoun Swine Operation was in compliance at the time of
inspection. However, there was strong evidence that periodic
discharges were occurring from the old lagoons. Periodic revisits
will be made to this operation over the next three months to better
ascertain the situation.
Currently, Mr. Dail is in the process of scaling back the operation
and shutting down two houses which are in poor repair.
Additionally, the operation has lost its contract buyer within the
past three months and the economic outlook for the facility is
uncertain. In the mean time a "new" house will continue to operate
and its effluent shall be sent to a new lagoon. The old houses are
served by individual lagoons. These lagoons are in the process of
being pumped over to the new lagoon and abandoned. Presently,
vegetation growth around these old lagoons makes it nearly
impossible to properly inspect.
msj/REVISIT/RAIL
921202
.

6�
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
State of North Carolina
Department of ErMronment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Govemor George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., secretary July 12, 1990 Director
KpSNING-roj �O FrGE
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 1JtiL 1 8 19SL.
aem
Mr. Robert F. Dail
1930 Spring Garden Road
New Bern, NC 28562
Subject: Designation
Concentrated Animal
Craven County
Dear Mr. Dail:
Feeding operation
This letter is to notify you that the Robert R. nail Swine
operation is hereby designated a concentrated animal
feeding operation in accordance with Title 15, North
Carolina Administrative Code 2N .0123, and adopted Federal
Regulations 40 CFR 122.23. The designation of your swine
facility was based on an inspection conducted on May
18, 1990 by members of the staff of the Washington
Regional office. This inspection showed that you had
established a concentrated animal feeding operation
requiring such designation based on the following facts:
1. The facility discharges wastewater into an unnamed
tributary of Stony Creek which is a Class "C, Swp,
NSW" stream and is located in the Neuse River
Basin.
2. The facility maintains approximately 3000 Swine.
3. The animal waste is discharged directly from the
facility's lagoons to unnamed tributaries to Stony
Branch.
Poffiudon fterdtdm Pays
P.Q. Box 27687, RalelgK North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opporhailty Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Robert F. Dail -2-
it
A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit is required for discharges of waste to the surface
waters of the State.
However, if you can permanently eliminate the discharge by
implementing changes within sixty (60) days of your
receipt of this notice, including, but not limited to,
modifications to lagoons and the implementation of a final
waste disposal plan, a permit application will not be
required. if compliance has been achieved, you must
notify us in writing within sixty (60) days describing, in
detail, the changes or modifications you made.
If the discharge of waste to the surface waters of the
State is not permanently eliminated within sixty (60) days
of receipt of this notice, an NPDES permit application
must be submitted within that time.
Permit applications should be submitted, in duplicate, to
the Director, Division of Environmental Management, P.O.
Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611. Assistance, if desired, can
be obtained by contacting Mr. Roger Thorpe, Water Quality
Supervisor, PO Box 1507, Washington N.C. 27889, phone
number 919/946-6481. The applications should be
accompanied by construction plans for the non -discharging
animal waste management system.
For your information, the following items are
enclosed:
1. ❑ne copy of the Federal Register - Concentrated
Animal Feeding operations, 40 CFR 122.23.
2. Three copies of NPDES Discharge Permit application
- short Form B.
If you need advice or technical assistance with regard to
managing animal waste, you should contact your county
extension chairman or North Carolina State University's
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering at
(919)-737-2675.
If you wish to contest this Designation, you must request
an administrative hearing within thirty (30) days of your
receipt of this Notice. This request must be in the form
of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150E of the
North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office
of Administrative Hearings, Post office Drawer 11666,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604. A copy of the Petition
should be filed with this office.

Mr. Robert F. Dail -3--
If you do not request an administrative hearing, this
Designation will become final in thirty (30) days.
A copy of this letter is being sent to Mr. Andy Metts,
District Conservationist, for information and to aid them
in providing cooperative assistance. Should you have any
questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact us.
sincerely,
George T. Everett
Director
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Roger Thorpe
Mr. Andy Metts

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
May 20, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Tedder
water Quality Section chief
THROUGH: Jim Mulligan, Regional Supervisor
Washington Regional office
THROUGH: Roger K. Thorpe, Water Quality Supervisor
Washington Regional office
From: Dick Denton, Environmental Tech.
Water Quality Section, WARD
SUBJECT: Concentrated Animal. Feeding operation
Mr. Robert F. Dail Swine Operation
Craven County
INTRODUCTION:
The purpose of this memo is to request that the Robert F.
Dail Swine facility be designated as a Concentrated Animal
Feeding operation. A summary of the investigation
conducted on May 18, 1990 by Dick Denton DEM, is enclosed
as follows:
Date of the inspection:
May 18, 1990
NAME OF THE PROPERTY OWNER:
Mr. Robert F. Dail
Name of operator:
same

0
Address:
1930 Spring Garden Rd.
New Bern NC 28562
Phone Number:
633-0602
Description of Facility Location:
The facility is located off SR 1401 approximately 1 mile
north from the intersection of SR 1401 and 1425.
Type of operation (Examples: •farrow to finish, topping,
dairy, swine, cattle, chickens -layers or broilers, turkey
production, ets.):
The facility is a farrow to finish pig operation.
Number and type of animals units:
The facility houses approximately 3000 animals which
includes sows, feeder pigs, and topping hogs.
Length of Time Animals Have been, Are, or Will Be Stabled,
or Confined and Fed or Maintained in Any 12 Month Period:
The animals are housed greater than 9 months during
any 12 month period.
Are Crops, Vegetation Forage Growth, or Post -Harvest
Residues Sustained in the Normal Growing season over Any
Portion of the Lot or Facility?
No crops are grown on any portion of the lot or the animal
facility.
Description of other Animal operations in Immediate
vicinity ❑r Proximity to Same or Other surface Waters:
No other animal operations were noticed in the immediate
area.
Proximity of Facility to Neighboring Houses, Wells, etc.:
The nearest home and well is approximately 500 feet from
the facility.
Approximate Depth ❑f Groundwater Table in the Area of the
Facility or discharge:
The seasonal high water table appeared to be approximately
7 feet.

Proximity of Facility to Surface waters (provide name and
class of surface waters):
The facility is located approximately 1.0 mile from Stony
Branch, "Class C Swp, NSW" creek and located in the Neuse
River.
Are Pollutants Discharged into the waters of the state?
If so, How? (directly or by man-made ditch, flushing
system, or. other similar man-made device):
Small ditches have been dug from the lagoons to a network
of ditches which eventually drain into Stony Branch.
The lagoons overflow into the small ditches and
thereby discharge to the surface waters of the state.
Do or Have Discharges occurred in Response to a Storm
Event of Less Than a 25-year, 24-hour Intensity? (if yes,
include a brief listings of incidents and suspected
causes.):
Discharges occur regardless of rainfall events. The
facility uses fresh water to wash the sloped Concrete
floors in the animal houses. The wash water flows
from the houses to the lagoons. The lagoons are
presently full. Any wastewater or rain which goes
into the lagoon will cause the lagoon to discharge to
the ditches.
Type of waste Management (Examples: type of confinement,
free stall barns, sheltered or limited shelter dirt lots,
paved or dirt open lots, swine houses, pasture: type of
waste handling -direct spreading in solid form, slotted
floors with lagoon or pit, single or multi -cell lagoon,
aerated lagoon, land application of liquid manure, spray
irrigation, contractor disposal, etc.)
The facility utilizes sloped concrete floors with flush
gutters, and fresh water which drains into three (3)
lagoons. Two of the lagoons discharge via small
ditches which have been dug from the lagoon to a
network of ditches which discharge to Stony
Branch.
Condition of Waste Management Facility (rate as poor -good,
no discharge, sufficient freeboard in lagoon, etc.
Include weather conditions during inspection.)
The condition of the waste management facility is
rated as poor.

Animal Waste Discharge (including photos and witness
names, addressed, telephone numbers and statements of
fact) .
No photos.
Water Quality Assessment: (Include description of
sampling, field measurements, visual observations and
slope and vegetative cover of land adjacent to water,
extent of,rainfall and other factor relative to the
likelihood or frequency of discharge of animal wastes and
process wastewaters).
No Field measurements were taken.
Recommendations Made to owner/operator:
Mr. Dail was advised to contact his local SCS
representative to develop a comprehensive waste -management
program and to eliminate the present discharges to the
surface waters.
Recommendations for Further DEM Actions: (Re -inspect,
designate)
The Regional Office recommends that the Robert F. ]ail
Swine Operation be designated as a Concentrated
animalFfeeding operation.
Other comments:
NONE

CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
r 1.�
17,
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Frnrironmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Govemor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Mr. Robert F. Dail
1930 Spring Garden Road
New Bern, NC 28562
Subject: Designation
Concentrated Animal Feeding operation
Craven County
Dear Mr. Dail:
George T Everett, PhD.
Director
This letter is to notify you that the Robert R. Dail Swine
operation is hereby designated a concentrated animal
feeding operation in accordance with Title 15, North
Carolina Administrative Code 2H .0123, and adopted Federal
Regulations 40 CFR 122.23. The designation of your swine
facility was based on an inspection conducted on March 18,
1990 by members of the staff of the Washington Regional
Office. This inspection showed that you had established a
concentrated animal feeding operation requiring such
designation based on the following facts:
1. The facility discharges wastewater into an unnamed
tributary of Stony Creek which is a Class "C, Swp,
NSW" stream and is located in the Neuse River
Basin.
2. The facility maintains approximately 3000 Swine.
3. The animal waste is discharged directly from the
facility'-s lagoons to unnamed tributaries to Stony
Branch.
Pollutioe Pmven&m Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, [North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity AtTimuove Action Employer

Mr. Robert F. Dail -2-
A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination'System (NPDES)
permit is required for discharges of waste to the surface
waters of the State.
However, if you can permanently eliminate the discharge by
implementing changes within sixty (60) days of your
receipt of this notice, including, but not limited to,
modifications to lagoons and the implementation of a final
waste disposal plan, a permit application will not be
required. If compliance has been achieved, you must
notify us in writ'writina within sixty (60) days describing, in
detail, the -changes or modifications you made.
If the discharge of waste to the surface waters of the
State is not permanently eliminated within sixty (60) days
of receipt of this notice, an NPDES permit application
must be submitted within that time.
Permit applications should be submitted, in duplicate, to
the Director, Division of Environmental Management, P.O.
Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611. Assistance, if desired, can
be obtained by contacting Mr. Roger Thorpe, Water Quality
Supervisor, Po Box 1507, Washington N.C. 27889, phone
number 919/946-6481. The applications should be
accompanied by construction plans for the non -discharging
animal waste management system.
For your information, the following items are
enclosed:
1. one copy of the Federal Register - concentrated
Animal Feeding operations, 40 CFR 122.23.
2. Three copies of NPDES Discharge Permit application
- short Form B.
If you need advice or technical assistance with regard to
managing animal waste, you should contact your county
extension chairman or North Carolina State University's
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering at
(919)-737-2675.
If you wish to contest this Designation, you must request
an administrative hearing within thirty (30) days of your
receipt of this Notice. This request must be in the form
of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the office
of Administrative Hearings, Post office Drawer 11666,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604. A copy of the Petition
should be filed with this office.

Mr. Robert F. Dail -3-
If you do not request an administrative hearing, this
Designation will become final in thirty (30) days.
A copy of this letter is being sent to Mr. Andy Metts,
District Conservationist, for information and to aid them
in providing cooperative assistance. Should you have any
questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact us -
sincerely,
George T. Everett
Director
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Roger Thorpe
Mr. Andy Metts