250006_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qua

INSPECTIONS,
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
25D006 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS250D06
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason far Visit:
Routine County:
Craven Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
04/25/2017 EntryTime: 01:20 pm Exit Time: 2:20 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
David Stacks Farm LLC
Owner Email:
Owner:
David Stocks Farm LLC
Phone:
252-526-9938
Mailing Address:
3031 Kiipatrick Rd
Kinston NC 28501
Physical Address:
310 St John's Rd
Grifton NC 25530
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35' 22' 12" Longitude:
77' 18' 09"
Farm location: 320 St.
Johns Road, Craven County, 114 mile east of Pitt County line
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Faison D Smith Operator Certification Number. 18150
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Rep rose ntative.(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Geno Kennedy Phone:
On -site representative Geno Kennedy Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility : David Stocks Farm LLl' Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 04/25/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Calibration complete 3-11-16
Waste Analysis 3-13-17 2.42
11-21-16 1.48
7-27-16 1.58
Soil Test due 2018
21y1.7" of Rainfall recorded for whole month of October 2016. Freeboard level matches. No way facility did not get rainfall from
Hurricane Matthew. Last recorded irrigation event was August 27, 2016. Later facility provided me with additional irrigation and
rainfall records.
Sludge Survey 8-18-16 Thick-4.25'
LTZ-3.75'
Pump intake-4.3' ) 49% Sludge Ratio
Crop yield complete
15)Pastures need maintenance - weeds & wild grasses
page: 2

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LL[ Facility Number 250006
Inspection Date: 04/25/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,448 1,999
Total Design Capacity: 2,448
Total SSLW: 330.480
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 19A 28.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility : David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 04/25/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State {gallons}?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
■ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility : David Stocks Farm LL( Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 44/25/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Qverseed
Crop Type 3 Corn, Wheat. Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Altavista
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design ar wettable acre
❑
■ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
24. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
0
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
Stocking?
❑
page' 5

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility : David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 04/25/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
[]
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
■ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fait to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ M
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspectien with on -site representative?
❑
M ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
page: 6

►/
It
■
❑
❑
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soit and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:
25DO06
Facility Status: Active Permit:
AWS25OW6
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County. Craven
Region:
Washington
bate of visit:
0+111212016 Entry Time:
02:00 Pm Exit Time: 3:30 pm
Incident #
Farm Name:
David Stocks Farm LLC
Owner Email:
Owner:
David Stocks Farm LLC
Phone:
252-526-9938
Mailing Address: 3031 Kilpatrick Rd Kinston NC 28501
Physical Address: 310 St John's Rd Griffon NC 28530
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant Integrator. Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm- Latitude: 35` 22' 12"
Farm location: 320 St. Johns Road, Craven County, 114 mile east of Pitt County line
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Reoords and Documents
Longitude: 77' 18' 09"
Waste Cal, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Faison D Smith operator Certification Number: 18150
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Geno Kennedy Phone:
On -site representative Geno Kennedy Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility : David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 04/12/16 Inpsection Type; Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Calibration complete 3-11-16
Sludge Survey 8-25-15 Thick-4.25'
LTZ-3.75'
Pump intake-4.5' ) 49% Sludge Ratio
Waste Analysis 12-15-15 2.07
8-26-15 2-01
5-1-15 1.73 } need to get new waste analysis
Soil Test 4-14-15 w/ highest lime 0 tons
Cu & Zn values w/in range
'Make sure to record daily rainfall
15)Continue maintenance on Bermuda fields
7jmow lagoon bank
30)Failed to notify Division wlin 24 of high freeboard occurence
page: 2

a
Permit:
AVVS250006
Owner - Facility :
David Stocks Farm LL{
Facility Number:
250006
Inspection Date:
04/12/16
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,448 2,073
Total Design Capacity: 2A48
Total SSLW: 330,48D
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 19.40 j 30.50
page: 3

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility : David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 04/12/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
yes
No No Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M []
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 []
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
11
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
yss No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
[]
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0
❑ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes NQ Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10OA/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
[]
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

0
Permit: AWS250006
Owner - Facility : David Stocks Farm LLC Faci#ity Number: 250006
Inspection pate: 04/12/16
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
raa No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain bverseed
Crop Type 3
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type t
Altavista
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan[CAWMP]?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
[]
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
■ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
[]
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
n&
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
N ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
[]
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ [!
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
[]
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility : David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 04/12/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ N
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Cl
E ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑N
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na He
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
■
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
0
❑ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑0
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 6

Type of Visit: * Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: i Routine D Complaint Q Follow-up 0 Referral Q Emergency ❑ Other p Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ,.. Departure Time: County: Cr-kxwu.
Farm Name: _r�r.'Lo , CA %"&S _T'Y ram. �_L c Owner Email:
Owner Name: 'W d 5�- LS W - L- _c Phone:
Mailing Address: 3 o 5) h ` f o�'"' A C4 , . Sf a r• �J C A So l
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: C11erw Nktor'01 Title:
Onsite Representative: �&A Q
Certified Operator:
Sack -up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: M�!y kv ,
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region: LL,-' tz()
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Da' Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyEl Calf
Feeder to Finish
Da' Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
❑ Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D . P,ault . Ca aci pop,
Non -Doi
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layer
Beef Feeder
113eef
01
Boars
Pullets
Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Dischar,zes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
[:]Yes EYNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [�
❑ Yes LJto
[DNA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: ']S_ (� Date of Inspection:
�t -
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes E?<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): ;r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
No
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[`]
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
[] NE
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
5/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 2[/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 1:1�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Types}: �1 L..] , S -5G
13. Soil Type(s): _ A Oc- U',s� 4nN-
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [�io ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes E6o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
� o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
[] Yes
E5 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
Io
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [—]Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers D Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes l No ❑ N ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fait to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No I ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facili Nu ber: ..5 - le 113ate of Inspection. ,1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No L NA [] NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours andlor document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ LagoonlStorage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
0 Yes [D] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ENo
❑ Yes 6VI"Ilo
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other:comments.
Use drawings of facility to better. ex lain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Cx`z 3. 8
P,f,_..e --L4.0
q-2.� - iLl 1• Q �
�o;l 1'es� C�- �15 ��►- urca o�Y �i �e �
Gi Gt•-5 "}lp
ar
G
� �. n�i VI � L,�,r1t pY� � v 7w.+� G � t L � S 'C'� 1r1'ti �1N� Sry1p_,�JI � Y r.�—� �►� �oL
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: 1�1 \4 1 —15 1 \4I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: `9 '' 10 w 5
Page 3 of 3 --.1 21412014

lk
Division of Water Resources
❑ division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
250006 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS250006
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine County:
Craven Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
0611212014 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 10:30 am Incident #
Farm Name:
David Stocks Farm LLC
Owner Email:
Owner:
David Stocks Farm LLC
Phone:
252-526-9938
Mailing Address:
3031 Kilpatrick Rd
Kinston NC 28501
Physical Address:
310 St John's Rd
Grifton NC 28530
Facility Status:
❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35` 22' 12" Longitude:
77° 18' 09"
Farm location: 320 St.
Johns Road, Craven County, 114 mile east of Pitt County line
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Faison D Smith Operator Certification Number: 18150
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): !Jame Title Phone
24 hour contact name Geno Kennedy Phone:
On -site representative Geno Kennedy Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(sy:
Inspection Summary
page: 1

Permit: AWS250006 owner - Facility : David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 06I12114 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Calibration complete 6-6-14 } 139 GPM and 107 GPM
Sludge Survey 8-22-13 Thick-4.16'
LTZ-3.84'
Pump intake-5 ] 48% Sludge Ratio
Waste Analysis
3-10-14 1.71
12-11-13
2.17
8-21-13
.71
4-30-13
2.31
Soil Test due 2015
21) No lagoon level recorded first week in June
7) Lagoon bank overgrown with vegetation - need to mow send me pic
15)Bermuda fields need maintenance -weed control
-no small grain planted 201312014
"No crop yield for Bermuda 2013 - if crop not removed need to deduct PAN
page: 2

Permit: AVVS250006 Owner- Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number 250006
Inspection Date: 06/12/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2.448 0
Total Design Capacity: 2.448
Total SSLW: 330,480
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 19.40 29.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility : David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250OO6
Inspection Date: 06/12/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑M
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
m ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na Na
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.1 large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0
❑ ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
■ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Re
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility : David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number.
Inspection Date: 06/12/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
250006
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na He
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Altavista
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
N ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
■ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
r9j No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
[]
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page:
5

il
Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility : David Stocks Farm LL( Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 06/12/14 Inpsection Type Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Ne Ne
Crop yields?
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ 0
❑
(NPDES onlyy?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facifity out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
M ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ 0
❑
Other Issues
Ygs
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
■ ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon I Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑
❑
page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250QQ6 Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AWS250006 ! _! Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washing
Date of Visit: 09/19/2013 Entry Time: 02:00, PM _ Exit Time: 03:00PM Incident #:
Farm Name: David Stocks Farm LLC Owner Email:
6 M. I R I WOW I. 17,ll
I ;�llr�r�_rrr��ci�xi�:n3:�ra7:t "11'�[:L'iR r
Phone: [phone]
Physical Address: 310 St John's Rd rifton NG 28530
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant a Not Compliant Integrator: MuMhv_Brown LLC _
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'22'12" Longitude: 77°1B'09"
Farm location: 320 St. Johns Road, Craven County, 114 mite east of Pitt County line
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Faison D Smith
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 18150
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Geno Kennedy Phone:
On -site representative Geno Kennedy Phone:
Primary Inspector. Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250006 Owner • Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 09/1912013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Calibration complete 12-20-12
Sludge Survey 8-22-13 Thick-4.16'
LTZ-3.84'
Pump intake-5.0' } 48% Sludge Ratio
Waste Analysis 8-21-13 .71
4-30-13 2.31
1-17-13 1.26
Soil Test 10-8-12 wl highest lime 1 ton } need lime
Cu & Zn values whn range
15)Bermuda fields need immediate attention & maintenance
Need to update irrigation records - several event not listed
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number. 250006
Inspection Date: 09/19/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,448 2,600
Total Design Capacity: 2,448
Total SSL.W: 330,480
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 19.40 31.0(
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250006 owner • Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Rate: 0911912013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d.-Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than 0111111111113 ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.ed large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
Cl
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks}
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AW5250006 Owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC
Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 09/19/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN ;P 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
Cl
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Altavista
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Anima[ Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18_ Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Cl
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC
Inspection Date: 09/19/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 250006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Waste Application?
■
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
Cl
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
124 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
24. Did the facility fait to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Cl
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
Cl
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC
Inspection Data: 09/19/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
FacilityNumber : 250006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Otherlssues Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
❑
❑
■
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑
Cl
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
In
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit orCAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

i
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number, 250006 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS2500Q6 — I_I Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/141ZO12_ Entry Time: 10:30 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM_ Incident #:
Farm Name: David Stgcks Farm LLC Owner Email:
Owner: David Stocks Farm LLC _ Phone: [phone]
�k Farrrr_rr.I- ti 11MM309
Physical Address: 310 St John's Rd Grifton NC 28530
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'22'12" Longitude: 77°18'09"
Farm location: 320 St. Johns Road, Craven County, 114 mile east of Pitt County line
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Faison D Smith
Operator Certification Number: 18150
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Gen❑ Kennedy
Phone:
On -site representative Geno Kennedy
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250006 Owner • Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 08/14/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Calibration due 2012
Sludge Survey B-10-11 Thick-4.06'
LTZ-3.94'
Pump intake-4.25') 46% Sludge Ratio
*Mow lagoon & cut trees at base - will check in 30 days
Waste Anaylsis 6-6-12 1.42
2-6-12 1.91
10-10-11 1.59
Soil Test 12-7-11 wl highest lime 1.1 tons} need lime
Cu &Zn values Win range
*Level in lagoon not corresponding wl rainfall & irrigation - drop in early July wl no irrigation & 1 inch rain at end of June. - Also in
March Rainfall wl no increase in lagoon.
-Need to update crop yield } 2011 Soybean, Corn, and Bermuda
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC
Inspection Date: 0611412012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 250006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,448 2,678
Total Design Capacity: 2,448
Total SSLW: 330,480
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 19.40 21.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 08114/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
Discharge originated at
Structure Cl
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
0
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
Cl
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC
Inspection date: OW1412012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number:
Reason for Visit:
250006
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 2
Coastal
Bermuda
Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Altavista
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
OMDU
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
!!
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WLIP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250006 Owner • Facility. David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number : 250006
Inspection Date: 08/14/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
21 If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the pennit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■
❑
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AW5250006 Owner - Facility: David stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 08/14/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Otherissues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
M. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Rev iewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
11
El
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 2500% _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS20QO ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ — Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/1912011 Entry Time:11700 AM Exit Time: 12700 PM Incident M.
Farm Name: David Stocks Farm LLC Owner Email:
Owner: David Stocks FprM LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3031 Nnston NC 2BS'31
Physical Address: 310 St Jghn's Rd Grifton NC 28530
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy _Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'22'12" — Longitude: 77'18'09'
Farm location. 320 St. Johns Road, Craven County, 114 mile east of Pitt County line
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Faison D Smith
Secondary OICtsj:
Operator Certification Number: 18150
On -Site Representative{s}: Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Geno Kennedy Phone:
On -site representative Geno Kennedy Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250l106 Owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number. 250006
Inspection Date: 08119/2011 Inspection Type: Complianoe Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis 8-13-11 2.8
2-17-11 2.2
Soil Test 10-25-10 wl highest lime 1.1 tons) need lime
Cu & Zn values wlin range
Sludge Survey 9-28-10 Thick-4,18'
LTZ-3.82'
Pump intakeA.0') 48% Sludge Ratio
Calibration complete 2012
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
Need to update sm, grain overseed for crop yield - need to put month & day
15)Weed management for coastal bermuda
7) need to mow vegetation on inside of lagoon bank
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250006 Owner- Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC
Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 08119/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,448 2,430
Total Design Capacity: 2,448
Total SSLW: 330,480
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY
19,40 33.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250006 owner • Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 08/19/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? Cl ■ ❑ Cl
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
110
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the opera#ion?
Cl ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ ■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.I large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc-)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
■❑❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
■
■
■
■
Page: 4

Permit: AWS26OW Ow wr - Facility_ David $locks Farm t_iC Firellity No t►bor : 264008
Inspdction Da>e: 48119/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance in"CtiaR Reason for Visit: Routine
) a5au A ifcatiga Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
is PAN n IiM/10 ibs.? ❑
❑
'total phosphMs?
Faiiura to incorporate manure/sludge into 13are soil? ❑
outsde of acceptabie crag window?
Fvidem,e of wired drift? ❑
Application outside Of application area?
Crap Type R
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crap Type 5
Crop Type 6
soil Type t
soil Type 2
soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Sail Type 5
soil "Type 13
4 4, Do the receivinO Orrips differ from these designated in the Certified Animal Waste min age- t
pian(GAWMpY?
75. Does the reCeivistg crofs attdJor tasxt apPiiration site need 'srstprovefnent?
16, Oid the facility fail to secure andlor operate pef the irrigation design Of v ahle Gore det�rmir�atran'
f7. t)ae5 the facility lack ade,4u,3te acreage for land application?
18, is there a lads of property operating waste application: equipment?
tecords 8T Doc ulIgealtss
19. Did the facility fail W nave Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily avaiFa�le?
4. Does the facility fall) to Ytave all COMPonerds of the CAV4Mp readily availat?le?
as, check the apprapr'sate box yellow.
p?
small Gra o ovem tl
Caastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Corn,vmeat• soybeans
Attavista
Nr—�CI
aC)C)sQ
❑00 ❑
❑00 ❑
[]■❑ n
Yes INa NA
❑■fir
❑ ■ Q U
Ak
Page: S

Permit: AWS250006 Owner • Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC
Facility Number. 250006
Inspection pate: 08/19/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■ ❑ Q Q
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
Cl
Stocking?
0
Crop yields? ■
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑
Sludge Survey ❑
22. did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ ❑ Q
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ■ Q ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate ❑ ■ Cl ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
Page: 6

• Permit: AVVS250006 Owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number. 250006
Inspection Date: 08/19/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andfor document and report
❑ ■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ ❑
110
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑ ■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

■ Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency I�I
Facility Number: 250006 Facility Status: Active , Permit: AWS25QQZ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date -
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Graven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 11/18/2010 Entry Time: 11:15 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: David Stocks Farm LLC Owner Email:
Owner: David Stocks Farm LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3031 Kilpatrick Rd Kin§ton NC 28501
Physical Address: 3l Q S1 John's R j Griffon NC 28530
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant Integrator: Murohy-Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'22'12" _ Longitude: 77'18'09"_
Farm location: 320 St. Johns Road, Craven County, 114 mile east of Pitt County line
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certifled Operator: Faison D Smith Operator Certification Number: 18150
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Geno Kennedy Phone:
On -site representative Geno Kennedy Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250006 owner- Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 11/18/2010 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
New CQC in records, but Permit not in records - get permit
Waste Analysis 10-22-10 1.1
7-6-1 0 1.8
3-5-10 1.8
'Wheat not planted at facility - irrigated on wheat
-irrigation from 8-5-10 to 10-12-10 with approx 40lbs of PAN aaplied per field (PAN rate 125 for Wheat)
Calibration complete 11-15-10 } less than 10% variance
Sludge Survey 8-28-10 Thick-0.18'
LTZ-3.82'
Pump intake-4' )48% Sludge Ratio
Soil Test 10-25-10 with highest lime 1.1 tons } apply lime
Cu and Zn values within range
Freeboard and Rainfall complete and correspond with irrigation
15) Contact State Agronomist about Bermuda Sprayfield
Crop yield complete - soybeans not picked yet
`Mow vegetation on lagoon bank
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250006 Owner- Facility: David Stocks Farm L!_C
Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 1111812010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
W swine - Feeder to Finish 2,448 2,460
Total Design Capacity: 2,448
Total SSLW: 330,480
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard observed Freeboard
lagoon PRIMARY 19,40 29.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250006 owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 11/1812010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discha es & Stream Im acts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 1101111
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immedr+ate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large trees, severe
❑
01311
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number. 250006
Inspection Data: 11/1812010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Ap llication Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
0utside of acceptable crop window? ■
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Altavista
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
■
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250006 owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC
Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 11/18/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visk: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Ratnfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form [NPDES only]?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
Cl
■
Cl
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? Cl ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ Cl ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page. 6

Permit: AW5250006 Owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 1111812010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues Yes No NA NE
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? Q ■ ❑
32, Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewrinspection with on -site representative? 00130
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
7MMEMKII
Page: 7

NCDENR
North Carolina department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
January 29, 2010
David Stocks Farm LLC
David Stocks Farm LLC Farm
3031 Kilpatrick Road
Kinston NC 28501
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS250006
David Stocks Farm LLC Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Craven County
Dear David Stocks Farm LLC:
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge survey information on January
19, 2010. With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement
for the lagoon at the David Stocks Farm LLC Farm. Due to the amount of treatment volume
available, and the rate of sludge accumulation for the lagoon, DWQ feels that an extension is not
appropriate at this time.
The next sludge survey for the lagoon at this facility should be performed before December 31,
2010. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please call me at [phone] if you have
any questions.
Sincerely,
r
J.R. Joshi
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Washington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Permit File AWS250006
r
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd., Ralegh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] � FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877.623-5748
intemet www.nmaterquality.arg
'
FEB - 1 2010
NoAhCarolina
Naturally
An E-qual 4pporlun4l Affirmative Action Eraployer

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency ��ff
Facility Number: 250006 Facility Status: Permit: AVVS250006 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliangg Inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RZnf, _ County: QLgv n I Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/17/2009 Entry Time. iL30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: David Stocks Farm LLB Owner Email:
A=M BFMGI&l M@33*TiiiT4K
Mailing Address: 3031 Kilpatrick Rd _ _ „ Kinston NC 28501
Physical Address_ 31 Q St Jghn'sRd Grifton NC 2853Q
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Ali[Rhy-Brown, LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'22'12_' Longitude: 77°18'09"
Farm location: 320 St. Johns Road, Craven County, 114 mile east of Pitt County line
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Faison D Smith Operator Certification Number: 18150
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Geno Kennedy Phone:
On -site representative Geno Kennedy Phone:
Primary Inspector. Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250006 Owner- Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 09/17/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
'Need to get lagoon level down for winter
Waste Analysis 7-20-09 1.9
4-15-09 2.5
12-30-08 2.1
15) Work on Bermuda Stand
Soil test 1-29-09 with highest lime .3 tons
Sludge Survey 10-31-08 Thick-4.30'
LTZ-3.70'
Pump intake-5' } sludge ratio 49%
Calbration 6-30-08 } next one due 2010
Rainfall and Freeboard records complete and correspond with irrigation
Crop yield complete - update for com
`Need to keep stocking records
7) Leaky riser - need to fix - ground saturated
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250006 owner- Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 09/17/2009 Inspection Type: Comp#iance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 2,448 2,806
Total Design Capacity: 2,448
Total SSLW: 330,480
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�agoon PRIMARY 19.40 27.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250006 Owner- Facility; David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Data: 0911712009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason far Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field Cl
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ Cl ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
1101111
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
■
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
B. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
❑
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks}
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
❑
❑
Cl
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
Cl
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page. 4

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC
Inspection Date: 09/17/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250006
Rea san for VisIt: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
Q
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
Q
Crop Type 1
Cam (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Altavista
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250006 Owner • Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC
Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 09117=09 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and documents
You
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
Cl
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
❑
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortat4y rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page. 6

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC
Facility Number. 250006
Inspection hate: 09/17/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
❑ther Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
■
❑
❑
33. floes facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■
❑
❑
Page: 7

0
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 250006 Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AWS250006 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compjiance lnspcclioa Inactive or Closed date:
Reason for Visit: Routinp _ County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0912512008 Entry Time* 11:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: [2avid Stocks Farm LLC Owner Email:
Owner: David Stocks Farm LLC Phone: -526-9
Mailing Address: 34=31 Kilpatrick fad Kinston NC 28501
Physical Address: 310 St John's Rd Grifton NC 28530
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy Family Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°22'12= Longitude: 27°18'09"
Farm location: 320 St. Johns Road, Craven County, 114 mile east of Pitt County line
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Faison D Smith Operator Certification Number. 18150
Secondary OlCjsj:
On -Site Representativejs]: Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Geno Kennedy Phone -
On -site representative Geno Kennedy Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AW5250006 Owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250005
Inspection pate: 0M5l2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit; Routine
Inspection Summary:
COG and Permit 2009
Waste Analysis 6-16-08 3.0
2-26-08 2.4
Calibration 6-30-08 } Next one due 2010
'Need to manage sprayfields weeds
`No current waste analysis for September irrigation - taking sample today
•Irrigaton on com outside crop window (2125 to 6/30) - irrigation occured in July and August 1st
'Need to update crop yield for com, hay, soybeans
"Sludge survey due by end of year
'Need to take soil samples before end of year
'Lagoon high going into winter - need to prepare better over summer months
'Update freeboard levels - missed a week in JulY
'Need to email me sotcking records
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number : 250006
Inspection Date: 0M512008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 19.40 27.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250006 Owner- Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection Date: 0912512DDS Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No rut NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure
Q
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWO)
Cl ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ Q
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■ ❑ Cl
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
8. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
©■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0 ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No INA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
© ■ 0 ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals [Cu, Zn, etc]?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250006 Owner- Facility: David Slocks Farm LLC
Inspection Date: 091 M008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number. 250006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Applicartion
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manuWsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of +Hind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 4
Soybean, vuheat
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soi! Type 1
Altarista
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
r ❑ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure andfor operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
© f ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AW5250u06 Owner - Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number; 250006
Inspection Data: 09r2512008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Vlalt; Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ■
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ■
Transfers? ❑
Rainfall? ❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly? ❑
Waste Analysis? ❑
Annual soil analysis? ❑
Crop yields? ■
Stocking? ❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain breaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to Calibrate waste application equipment as required by the pem}it? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-oomphance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours ancilor document and report those ❑ ■ © ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page' 6

Permit: AWS25DO06 Owner- Facility: David Stocks Farm LLC Facility Number. 250006
Inspection Date: 09125f2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ In ❑
32. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

M Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250006 Fa ility Status: Active -- Permit: AWS250006 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Complianoll3agollon Inactive or Closed Date'
Reason for Visit: Elo4ne . • Comly: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06101I2OU7 Entry Time, Q§-ag6_ Ex1t Time: Incident is
Farm Name: David Stacks Farm LLC Owner Email:
e . 4 71r1
4� .r
Physical Address: C,_rif6an NC 28530
Facility Status: ❑ Cmvaant ❑ Not Cornpliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
LatiitUde' Longitude' Tr j g'i 5'
Farm location: 320 St. Johns Road, Craven County, 114 mile east of Pitt County line
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Oparstor Certification Number.
Secondary 01C(s):
Onsite Re presentative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Geno Kennedy Phone:
On -sloe representative Geno Kennedy Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspeovisy:
Page: 1

Permit AWS25MW Chimer- Facility: David St)dw Farm LLC
Facility Number: 25400f
Inspection Date: OW12007 Inspection Type: CwVfianoe Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection summary:
Facility needs a COC and 2009 Permit wilt► updated Wt1P--New Owner,
Waste Analysis 5-15-06 1.8
7-20-06 1.3
3-20-07 2.6
11-21-061.7
Sludge Survey 9-7-06 Thick-4d18' LTZ-4,28'
Calibration 9-21-06
Freeboard and Rainfall complete
Soil Test 11-29-061.9T of lime added
Cu & Zn values within range
Update corn irrigation
Possible discharge at comer cf hog house #2. Discharge did not leave property and was
contained.
Crop yield needs to be updated & wheat needs to be cut_
Needs weed management plan ASW'.
Need to remove all trees around the lagoon. Cut at the base of the tree.
Page: 2

Pemdt AWS250006 Owner- Facility: David St x*s Farm LLC Facility Humbw : ZSOOl]6
Inspection Gate: 0601AW Inspei.Om Type: ComPlianm ingXKtoon Roason far Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Scene - FeWer W FlMh 2,440 J 2,207
Total Design Capacity: 2,448
Toted SSLW: 330,480
Waste Struduros
Type Identitler Closed pate Start Data Vesigrod. Freeboard Observed Freeboard
goon PRIMARY 19.409. OD
Page: 3 .

r ,
Permit: AWS25ODDS Owner - Fac ly: David Stocks Fans LLC Facility Number: 250006
Inspection date: 06101r&M inspection Type: Compliance lrw4wetion Reason for Visit- Routine
Dischames & Stream Impacts
Yes No MA NE
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge mach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. floes discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection Stem & Treatment
yes No NA NE
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats bo the integrity of any of the structures observed (l.eJ large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
& Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (hot applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any park of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altemafives that need maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ 130
if yes. check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

0
Permit: AWS250DOG Owner - Facility: David Stoclts Farm LLG
Fadltty Number _ 250006
inspection pate. owir2ou Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Appfi_cation
Yea No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/101bs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate rnanurels€edge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Small Grain Qverseed
Crop Type 2
Sem► Aa Grass
Crop Type 3
Corn (Grais)
Crop Type 4
Soybean, Most
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 5
Soil Type 1 Altavista
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soll Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMPJ?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Hoes the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ 130
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP7 ❑
Page: 5

Permit AVVS'250M Owner- Faculty: David Stodm Farm LLC
Facility Numim : 250DOG
Inspecilorn Date: OW112tk]T inspection Type: Cwnpliance IrgxKtion
Masson for Visit Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections7
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weeldy Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
inspections after' 1 inch rainfall & rrxmtty?
❑
Waste Analysis?
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields? ■
Sk)cking? ❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on Irrigation equipment (NPCES only)7 ❑ ■ 110
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25_ Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fall to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Q ■ ❑
Yes Fin MA MF
28. Were any additbnal problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 0000
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlar docurnent and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
nxxtallty rates that exceed nonnal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quaW concem? if yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative Immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250DOB Owner - Fadtity: David Sbd% Fart LLC
Inspecton Date: 06101l2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Irtspecbon
Other Issues
31. aid the facility tail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewertinspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Dees facility require a fallow -up visit by same agency?
Faciitty Number: 250006
Reason for Visit: Rottthe
Page: 7

It
u
Division of Water Duality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 250006 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS25, 0�06 — ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven _ _ Region: Washington_
Date of Visit: 08,[01/2005 Entry Time: 08:00 AM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Faye Causey Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Edwin W Causey
Mailing Address: PO Box 717 Avden NC 28513
Phone: [phone]
Physical Address: 310 St John's Rd _ Qditon NC 28530
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy Family Farms
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°22'10" Longitude: 77'18'15"
Farm location: 320 St. Johns Road, Craven County, 1/4 mile east of Pitt County line
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Edwin W Causey Operator Certification Number: 19950
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Ed Causey Phone,
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
6-13-05 = 2.4
1-18-05 = 1.5
10-22-05 = 1.3
Soil test 10 28 04
Everything looks good.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility: Edwin W Causey Facility Number. 250006
Inspection Date: 08/01/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,448 2,400
Total Design Capacity: 2,448
Total SSLW: 330,480
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 19.40 38.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility: Edwin W Causey Facility Number. 250006
Inspection date: 0810112005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
17ischargp.s & Stream lmjal cts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ M ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR) ❑ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
0000
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
0000
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
0000
Yes
No NA
NF
Waste Collection, Stnraae & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe erosion, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or 0000
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? {Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks ❑ ❑ ❑
and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
0000
improvement?
Yes
No NA NE
Waste AdOlicatton
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑ ❑
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
moo
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Cam, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 4
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250006 Owner - Facility: Edwin W Causey
Inspection Date: 08/01/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number. 250006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Crop Type 5
Yes
No NA
NF
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Altavista
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Sail Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving craps differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? [IN
❑
❑
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
00
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
0 ❑
❑
17. Does the facility tack adequate acreage for land application?
❑0
❑
❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
Yes
0 ❑
No NA
❑
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Wup?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
Cl
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
N ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
N100
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
moo
Page: 4

0
Permit: AWS250006 owner - Facility: Edwin W Causey
Inspection Date: 08/01/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
:ords and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 250006
Reason for Visit: Routine
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
29. aid the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality
rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air quality
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32, Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss revi ewfinspe ct i on with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a fallow -up visit by some agency?
001111
Page: 5

t �
�..v-fs' .�S'',3:_ �f• r-: �s,�" ri1':�c��p ��* KG �i:dr . •+r' .�..'�7-t i?'vi'. '..r4, 'tik J'?"d.n n "kr• - _ .r�...-
_ .•qr; a y r• 'a'..�'•'� r„� �s ST-•.
of.=�Va'fer ab +� �.__.!--
_ i�r.�.� .�. . 7 �!R" �`�....�... ti',��
and'�ateruert�aii a�_
- ':'s: xi� - S . "k •: _..ham - _`.•d. � ��
- �,e��._ : rw . - r S¢�.s • u� - ram."+�-- .
;_�,;.,.:..:......... _ •. ....:�_...,.��.;_...,::'�: =.--.a...a.,w�,..:. FrF?�i:;;, J. .�r;�.r,:..rNai-:�, x.>:.,� .,�.l�-;":w.'":r.;:,-.:.,��, i'�I:a:�=:°.. - - - - >,`rtk� :�.�r+-:
Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection ❑ Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation D Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit @ Routine 0 Complaint Q Follow up D Referral p Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 25 date of Visit: 7-29-2QR4 Time: 1430
NNot Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 'Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..............
Farm Name: F&yx.C&uscy..lFArm................................. ................... ...... ......................... .. County: C1'AYCR......................... ............ 5 ....
OwnerName:Ed............... ....... ..................... CR.Uscy........................................... "!:nne .......
Mailing Address: 1'Q. 4�.T.1T AySicI-VC.......................... _.......... 3i t3............
FacilityContact: ...... ............................... ...... ............... _...... ......... Title: ..................... ............................ Phone No:
Onsite Representative: No.. j3jc.-------•..............................................................................w Integrator: r4jjXVhy.jjMjIy..FA.C.n0.5i... ...... ............................
Certified Operator: EdW.1m.W............................... Qua................ Operator Certification Number: 199,5.Q...........................
Location of Farm:
Farm location: 320 St" Johns Road, Craven County, 114 mile east of Pitt County line AL
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Worse Latitude 35 ' 22 ffl K Longitude 77 "F 18 15 K
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Layer
I I
I
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
2448
JEI Non -Layer
I
JEI Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
2,448
El Gilts
Total SSLW
331f,480
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [3No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ SpiIlway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................... ............... ...........................
Freeboard (inches): 44"
ran7/n3
Continued

Facility Number: 25—G Date of Inspection 7-29-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ElYes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenanceJimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload. ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc > 3000
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N N❑
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? -
18_ Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
N No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ Yes
N No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comuierits`(refer,to;question'#): Explain aay YES answers and/or -any. recommendations or any other, co_mments:'
Use drawings of facility to:better,_ eiplain'situations.- {use additional pages as necessary]:. Field Copy El Final Notes
Left a message of date and time on answering machine on 7-28-04 about this inspection. No one was onsite for the
inspection. The lagoon and spray fields were inspected.
The inside walls of the lagoon need to be shrubbed
The spray fields need weed control.
DWQ did not receive a return call
According to the NCDA database:
Sail analysis dated 12-5-03 & 10-27-04
Waste analysis 7-3-03 = 2.0 lbs
11-18-03 = 1.5 lbs
1-29-04 = 1.7 lbs
5-17-04 = 2.1 lbs ,(RPT # W09580)
7-6-04 = 1.41bs (R.PT # W00228)
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B. Ha4l6w- 17
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r
Date:
12172A3 Continued-

M k
Facility Number: 25-6 Date of inspection 7-29-2004
Reguired
Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard .❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NPDES Permitted Facilities -
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
❑ No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After F' Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
113
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
12112103

Facility Number 25 - Ofi Date: 1231D4 Time: 1 830 Time On Farm: 45 WaRG
Farm Name Faye Causey Farm _ - County Craven
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address P❑ Box 717 Ayden NC_ 28513
Onsite
Representative Permission given to review records and enter farm Integrator MurphyLmurphy Brown
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
® Operation Review
❑ Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
❑ Technical Assistance
❑ Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
IN Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
0 Routine
D Response to DWQIDENR referral
• Response to DSWCISWCD referral
Q Response to complaintllocal referral
Q Requested by producer/integrator
a Fallow -up
Q Emergency
0 Other...
Design Current Design Current
Canar_ity Panulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
2448
7
Capac, Po ulation
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5• Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ®no
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 1 27
CROP TYPES lCoastal Bermuda -graze ISmall grain o 1corn Soybeans Wheat
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES AaA
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
1 Facility Number 25 - _ 06 Date: 2/23/04 I
PARAMETER
fl R Wagtp cnill Ipnvinn citp
Q No assistance provided/requested
47 ......._ _. _ __.___..__ .. 03110I03 . .

❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% R 10 lbs.
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 Ibs.
❑ 16, Hydraulic overloading
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
N 18. Late/missing waste analysis
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
[123. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
Regulatory Referrals
] Referred to DWQ Date:
] Referred to NCDA Date:
] Other... Date:
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
MADE BY OPERATION
"1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
I hUHNIUAL Abbib I ANUh Neeaea
F'roylifea
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
❑
❑
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
30. 21-1.0200 re -certification
❑
❑
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PeA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
33. Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
43. Irrigation system design/installation
❑
❑
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
47. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluation/recommendations
❑
❑
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsolling, aeration, etc.
❑
❑
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
58. Crop/forage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
Facility Number 25 - 06 Date: 1 2/23104
COMMENTS'
48 03/10/03

Naste analysis dated 1/29/04 nitrogen is 1.7 lbs
11/18/03 nitrogen is 1.5 Ibs
Soil test dated 1215/03 Cu, Zn and ph within guidelines.
Nheat crop in good condition.
8. There is not a current waste analysis to cover irrigation events on coastal bermuda graze for 914103, 915103 and 916103.
haste analysis must be taken 60 days before160 days after irrigation events.
here is not a current waste analysis to cover irrigation events on soybeans for 915103 and 916103.
RR2 records were available for review.
_agoon level is recorded weekly with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation event.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST Martin McLawhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 123104 Entered By: IMartin McLawhorn
49 03/10/03

Mich" F. Easley
Governor
Wiliam G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
To: Producer
From: Daphne B. Cullom
-62CAIVW--�
Environmental Specialist
Washington. Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance inspection
Year 2002
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility
by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it with all other
documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the
farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2110217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runo$
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented
ap The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste
level far waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hour storm
event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
9 An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and at least
within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen,
Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
cp Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
ip The following retards are required_ off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wastelsoil analysis and land irrigation records.
These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible farm for a minimum of three years-
9 Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land gMlicmtiou rates exceed the Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN)rate for the receiviniz crop or result in runoff during any given application.
ip All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet can be
another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilisation structure, or other suitable outlets.
(p It is sug&est rat a r en to keep crop yield information for fitture use to update your waste management plan- You well
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-94&- 481, ext.
321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: WaRO
DBC Files
943 Washington Square Mail Washington, NC 27889 252-946-WI (Telephone) 252-94"215 (Fax)

wY
}
L
of Visit Q Compliance Inspection 4 Operation Review D Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *@ Routine O Complaint Q Follow asp ❑ Emergency Notification ❑ Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number ZS Date or Visit: 9-25-20M Time: 2:11
O Not O erational O Below Threshold
B Permitted ® Certified © Conditionalty Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: „... „.,
FarmName: .................... ..... .............m ....._.._..__.. CnuntY: UaxM................... .... ..... .............. 1'.Y.�M... .....
Owner Name: Ed.. ..... ................................. Caesey... .............. ....... Phone Na: =424 :4UR..........................
Mailing Address: Pi] Bps .7)17..._..... --- - ._........._.............._. ........ .... 28513.............
Facility Contact: ......... ............... ........... _... .................................... .. Title: ............. ......................... _._. _..., ... Phone No: .......................................... »...
»
Onsite Representative: ........... .............. ....... ............ Integrator: M►trplly. Fai7y..:417m«.................---._.....-• ......
Certified Operator: EdXJU.................................. Operator Certification Number. 19M, ............ -............ ..
Location of Farm:
Farm location: 320 St. Johns Road, Craven County,114 mfie east of Pitt County fine AL
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35+ 22 Itl u Longitude 77 + 18 15 u
::.. :.::....... ...::. ..:::::::
::::..... ": ::::::::::::.:::. CIIrreIIt::
::.:.-.. .., Design.
:::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::Dell
; n: '::::.CII......... :::;:;; :::::::::-::::': ::::-::::
:,,............------....-
':Des ;::`: :Current.:::,,
...............................::........
::::•.........::::------- ------ -...... I......
.:.::::
.0
.--.....-..--.... ---
a a .; o on .:::.. ----- ----
Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
;;:
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
2448
10 Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farm w to Feeder
Other
w to Finish
Farm'
T es " 'Ca' �ac�„
Z 448
Gilts
:� of ai S
330,480
:.
Boars
El
1 t :-' ... Subsurface Drains Present jjp Lagoon Area ILSpray Reid Areu
No Liauid Waste
Dischartes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-u3ade9 ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If dischatge is observed, [rid it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhuiu?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ties, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment i
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structtu•e 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .............................................. ........... .............. ........... ...... ..........
FTeeboard (inches)- ............... 45.... ... .......... ............................

v�ra•v�
Facility Number: 25-6
Date of Inspection 9__S72o02_
.5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (id trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DW¢)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimpravement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintmanccJimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste A lication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reuuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
El Yes ®No
REM -AM
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes % No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
15. Irrigating at the time of the inspection. 2 sprinklers/noMcs in harvested corn field & 8 sprinklers in coastal bermuda field. Sprinkler
adjacent to farm path had pouding water adjacent to path - not flowing to ditch.
Please submit records of the CAWMP to the DWQ-WaRO for review to complete this inspection.
WMP records rcvd. in the WaRO on 11-18-2002. CAWMP records were reviewed and no violations were noted. D. Cullom,
7/2003.
r
Reviewerlluspector Name
Raviade.l�nvnor+n. Pi—.+.t 6
. Q'X�A^_ 'n.*.. - l ;L--T ! ce,

- 9 ct �0 46 r 00, y- t+t p EE
.r.. -
- D«tstnn of Water ualit
=,...
aDi�tstnnrOfSail and�Water Eonservation-.;.
k
,Other Agency �-�M:=-
_..
Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection ® Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ® Routine ❑ Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other p Denied Access
Date of Visit: 4I251211U2 Time: 1Gl1lf
Facility Number
p of Operaltional p Below Threshold
■ Permitted M Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Faye Causey Farm
County: Craven .................. ............................. .W..&RQ........
Owner Name: Ed Causey Phone No: 252-524-4578
Mailing Address: P..O.Sox.'I.1T........ ....__............... ...........................•----............................ Ayden.f5CL......... ................... .......................... ...... 2,8513 ..............
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title:.................................. Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Ed..Cansey.................................................................................. Integrator: Murpfry..Fami1y.Farms........... -- .......
..................
Certified Operator:Edwiu.W Causey.............................................. Operator Certification Number: 1995.0.............................
Location of Farm:
N Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude Longitude ©• ®° ©°
Design - Current- - ;_., -Design` ;-Current, _'; Design-., '*Current
:.
Swine ' - Capacity_ Population ` -Poultry ' - _ - Capacity.... Population: Cattle Capacity `P©pulation.
Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
p Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Soars
-Number of Lagoons: p u sur ace rains resent p agoon rea p pray ie rea
--= "_Holding=Ponds l Solid Traps: ... No Liquid Waste Managernem System - r
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes R No
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify ❑WQ) [3 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? `
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Ij Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
identifier:
Freeboardinches 3.3.......................---.............................................................--..----..................---..----.......................

aci t y, um er: 25_6 Date of Inspection
5.. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, ;severe erosion, Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? p Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes R No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
p Yes
R No
Waste Application
1
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N No
1 1. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
p Yes
M No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
p Yes
N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
N N❑
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
®No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other permit readily available?
p Yes
N N❑
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WLTP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes
®No
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP`?
❑ Yes
®No
In No violations or deficiencies were noted uring this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit
xt+tnents: re er�ta;.qucst�u :�- xp a�n�any answers an or'any�rceommeo attans''or�any�other�comrnents. _ -�, �.�;:;,'':� �':
µ
[1se�draw�ngs of faeRlity��o�Ifettexp i situations. (use'additiorial pages'as'necessa�' "`"y -' ~^
-� ; , ,,• ;�_ � „ -. .,�:-�.: �-� Fteld Cap ❑ Final Nvtes
_
*Soil test dated 12/10/01 lime was applied at rate of i 2 ton per acre for 2001. Cu and Zn within. guidelines.
*Spray fields appear to be in good condition.
*Remember to take soil test for 2002 and follow lime requirements.
*Lagoon level is recorded weekly.
*Remember to remove SIG overseed by May 1 (PAN 50 Ibs)
*Waste analysis dated 3/28/02 nitrogen is 3.O 1bs11000 gallons
11/15/01 nitrogen is 2.2 lbs11000 gallons `
8/27/01 nitrogen is 2.7 lbs/1000 gallons
Mn....._........... ................
tewerlInsp to Name 1NarttnflVlcLawhorn �:,:<-�x�:-:::._..-..___.. _ _ _ :;:_�' ..,...� _ i
EReviewer/hrispector
Signature: Date:

05103101
Conlinued
Date of inspection
ace um er: 25_6
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below
O Yes
ONO
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
Yes
R No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
C] Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
13 Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fans) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
p Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes
p No
..:...
.....
..
*Records are complete and balanced. ..
*Farm is well. maintained.
i
V
rho.

, .A .kF '�:s.'.', .�'.. ... S I t � .,.�,.,i�. z` ,s:-,.x �: ;fp'i _ 'tip ___ .... ..v+w....•�..... .... ". '.•:..{::r'g•.S "..`.+ - ...�.: .zin, S
N
�:.. ,#.
' ...ii�'s::'??^ '�" :i' ',t :,• :.1'{ tip,€ .� ��. ! �; s;€, �h..= ��. �: sj,, �'ti
it
p y
-'l.:tn4:.;..f.{{ <'!' 4 .S.P 'S, i�•, i'".� 1t F` .'J'!.� :.1 - •Y+`.hl�, � i
�'+'1.. 1 �• 7j � ;4:'�?"[u'.i I Ali" • �� �.
g i� ,?� �♦'ryg. -13� I j{ � 't � n_ ��i .,�i� I: §l°.� /.k�1�F}' ��:. .fj'„,�
;i t:E..!•: . ''.1 `Ly w,:R;^s.��'; •.�. 11 7 J _ ;#': •. :I 1\ t >> 1. ..
J.
�: ,, }�.,,•� E .:��1 ,S� i; : ' `•g ; ! ' /:''` it e.:� ;. :.i�•��� ! :r:.. �
,
i
,
.:. .,. .. is
�94iF }�,`wti' 'I .I'i: .� V- 6... '• r%.. ........ 4. �i ^`w ', .mow..-�g.esc���� '�x S
:.k5f 4. i'•�j::is,;.i.�f.: S} _ •' a
ii • r a �' . i}.`.. ;z. _ .:. LI�
`� ,i, Nr'��'":,.�'•.�� '1?ii-r.fi
f/ � ` �.;• 4: ��C
t !jj 4 q♦f' �! i� „€��;
' �' ..I ��. .�' t fi" fd, . gip•., .. ' i �: _ r<- fC
t , . ►' _ FLL
o FSe �` ,rF,s� f1. t• .!"� �� :.,:�ryu...lti.;°w�+ -vw: .;�,,lL' ,�,, �, ,s; �1.: ��' , �.s ?�, ,x• �jyl, �•� � � !�� .c>�{': �'Y❑ L7
._,•r k S• s°6� .✓ s •�57, �r��ya.• �`3': , . •»:.i:>..",��.,. ;' is, _� ,a .�.. ..s .'`r. 1[7 a)
40
L.,.;.: { .�;:, .
i,: ';i `s .}1,i.yr i',•-, `.�},_•.: al <:i, i t' i O C
R�l
'l El.. F ''' n,'S"'€'p "!"' .r C •t_ '.a "'Ll€.7a CL
ca
r" . ;�,- ' p yt ;.1p:. • _. .f
ac.r is4�.,v .'1 : -„�: , S ,} i Q j �. [=, L./ 4 k, { yrY: !' • `:Y: A3' i` r. •tik Q
. •1 � � .. yam° `i : '1 F,.A .; � 'ti.�. I � :� :I 3'. �' .�.•i;..'
+,'.:, .� �,�. ..... , ` 1 r:7. '" ',.f � '''ttt;:t�> '°e�3, �� V H �^,•-� r �' f. a f �//J7 ::
•,7 �r k� �` '�«��� T.��� �1'�`^,/ •f �ir E` f��c �' _ .ry Jf;l'S'y'4.
• � •, r�� '� �� ���'^•# •E. ,�yF,. •..:y� ]i �. . � s •, \ �� ��•, [ n ? day.• f ! .�'°F, s
na<.. �: 17 �.� Ii� `,,.7 ' ? .. • =y: ': .^�.Z,Q; .i..{. S � .:.�.. �'." 'kr .
,
c �
i i 3
E 7 �0 :. 1 �• !: 1 —
.�:. [mil ttk.' � � n❑ 4Fcq
• "� 11 �' fi'` �O r a�• �:f '�y �' ' =�y. ''; ,u � ' f` ,1 r; .., ii .0 ° � w �
cq
co
I _
i
Z
y
>�:. ;:j : �.�:.' '.� . .�: €' ` •:y :� lit. 'i.•., .,. .•� e,�.f! .1'F-- ; "p ` tkVca
•
1.
€ is ,'� � �;� �! 4 �` ""'il.; '1 tiz _ y•:: k: �' _j.r" (J'� F � m �
14
,
a

I
;Arm
i
A�o 6-
2%
9:. iz
x
I
A

Q�oF W A TF9�G
v
A �
To: Producer
From: Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject:: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2001
W "-t7
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced
facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep in
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2110217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
qr The maximum vatste level in lagoonslstorage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/Zxage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard-
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
ep The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum ofthree years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
'lablefiiitrogen`fPAMrate-fm-&L- erei it arum _ _ cati .
q) All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate rapacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
Can be another Vegetated cliannel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
it is s tr ested- not a requiremen to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan.
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Eliminadon System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
"rank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-
6481, exL 321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: Jhrm
DBC Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 {telephone] 252-945-9215 (Fax)

L
of Visit 0 Compliance inspection ❑ Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
i Reason for Visit *Routine Q Complaint Q Follow up ❑ Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 25 ,a Y ( Date of Visit: Time:2:i11 wn Printed on: 7f2/2001
O Not O rational Q Below Threshold
M Permitted a Certified 0 Conditionally Certified U Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...............
Farm Maine: Faye.Cal&1w1:.Fum... -........... .................... ............ •-............................. ...
County: cmv..ca............................................. WY.ARQ........
0,krner Name: Ed ................ ............................ Cate y...................................... ........... ._ Phone No: 251-52.4: EIR......._..........._..------..............................
MailingAddress: P.QB9a.717 ............. ........... ---.._.............................................. ........... AYden-KC�.......................... _................ ................. 22513..............
FacilityContact: .......... ....... .................................... ..................... Title: ........................................ ........................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative- EdCAwvy...................... ......... ....................... ....................... Integrator:Nu.Mby..F.atnily.F.i.......... .......... •.............
Certified Operator: Ed.wb..................................... iKAm=........ ._................................. Operator Certitication Number: 12950 ............................
Location of Farm:
Farm location: 320 St. Johns Road, Craven County, lla mile east of Pitt County line
® Swine ❑ Poultry []Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 •1 22 i1 lU I Longitude ` 77 • I, _ i8 �'__ 5
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
1
10 Layer
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
2448
2448
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
2,448
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
330A
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Fietsl Areu
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discbarge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray yield ❑ Other
a. If discharge is obscrn-ed. was the con►vyance roan -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is obsem L did it reach Water of the State? (If►cs. notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If dischargc is observed. what is the Usti hated flow in sallmiu?
d. Does discharge bypass a iagoou ;-stein? (If vest uotif. DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
�k:ss3c• �'�sl€cj�tic::{ .�, -; i°:��:irnn•:►t
4. Is storage capacity (freehoard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Q Yes 9 No
struculty I Struciure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure j Structure G
ldentii`ier:........................................................ .... ................. _..... _..... ............ ..................... ................ ..... _............
Froeboard0-oche,)................43..................................................................... .......

05103101
Facility Number: 2.5-6 Date of Inspection 64-2001 Printed on: 71M001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public healih or environmental threat, notify DW Q)
7. Do any of the structures need mamtenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require mamtenancefunprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
YWA to Arm icefior.
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Cotton Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is peuded for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. 1s there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Rl'quired.Records &_Df3L'umeiits
17. Fail to have Certificatc of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
I& Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP. checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Re-viewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
Cl Yes No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. {
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): [] Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
*Soil analysis 2/2001.
*Waste analysis 4-30-01,16 lbs./1000 gals.
*Irrigation records complete with a nitrogen balance.
*Freeboard levels maintained per General Permit.
*Coastal Bermuda. Corn & Wheat receiving crops are all thriving.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne B. Cullom
V,
Re-viewer/Inspector
Date: —] - 7_ -p t

05103101 Continued
Facility Number. 25-6 Date of inspection 6-S-2DOi Printed on: 7/2/2001
•, r
Odor 1. slues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes OR No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
!Reason for Visit D Routine 0 Complaint Q Follow up D Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
bate of Visit: 12/1/2000 Tim1ti:00
e: Printed on: 1215/2OOO
25 ti
tD Not ❑ erational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..............
Farm Name: Faye..Ca.uscy-Farm ................................................................................. County: CrAY.e.A............................................... W. ARQ........
OwnerName: Ed ............................................. Causey.................................. .......... ............ Phone No. 252.-524-4518 ..........................................................
FacilityContact:..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: F.Q.fl8..717............................................................................................. Aydca.N.0 ............................................................... 215.0 .............
Onsite Representative:.lfd.CaluS.qyfd..CAU,5.qy ..................... ................... ..... .................. Integrator: l►Murphy..1.almily.farju5.....................................
Certified Opera tor:Ed.W.Im..W.............................. CAI].SCY.............. ............................... Operator Certification Numher: 1.99.5.Q ...... ........... ............
Location of Farm:
Farm location: 320 St. Johns Road, Craven County, 114 mile east of Pitt County line
�i
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle []Horse Latitude 35 • 22 ° 10 u Longitude 77 a IS 4 15 K
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Panulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
2448
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
EE
Design Current Design, ,Current ,
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca ac> -P-o�iulati
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity ` 2,448
Total SSLW 3309480
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present Yn Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes OR No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑yes ❑ Na
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [I No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .................................... .................................... ...................................
Freeboard (inches): 42

S/00 Continued on buck
Facility Plumber: 2S—G I)ate of Inspection 121I1200o Printed on: 12/5/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Bermuda Small Grain Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N N❑
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
ND,'Violations:or deficiencies -were noted "duringthis Visit.;-You:will receive no further :.
. � corres otidence abou# this.visit..: : : ' : :: :: :: : ' : : : ::: : : : ::: : : :: : : : :
II need a new waste sample.
lJ
Reviewer/Inspector Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
n_..._.,._..n.. _+ c:..__�.._...

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: . _ . Date: 510pJ
Facility Number: 25-6 Date of Inspection 1 12/1/2000 Printed on: 12/5/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
A�

4P Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
_
10 Other A ea -
iType of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit 0 Routine a Complaint D Follow up D Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility :~lumber Date ur Visit: 2- f - JU Time: �C7 Printed on. 7/21/2000
Q Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
[� Permitted © Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name:......... e C„.� fp. W1 County: .......... cf'rvC^.....................................................
�............... .............................
Owner Name:.......••....... �.., Ll............. {. ^.? .1y
1.......................
,.........................................
Phone No: ....... ........... .....................................................................
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ,,,,, C �/.,... Integrator:
..........f.................... ...f'�...............
Certified Operator ............................ :^ W ["7g Operator Certification Number:..---.----.----.---...................---.
Location of Farm:
❑ Surine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �� 0« Longitude
_- - - Design. Current Design Current Design Current
Swi>ae: Ca Population Poultry Capacity Population td
ci e: Population
-_ Wean to Feeder Layer Dairy
:.:.
, Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean =
"'"' ❑ Other
` Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish Total loge Capacity
-- Gilts
143
Boars Total SS W-
- ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
5....:._
Ntuid�bex ni L►gcions
..... v.
_. Pts nds I Slid Traps
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E§ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flaw in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes M No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes tQ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ spillway ❑ Yes 7ANo
Structure. I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:......... ........?........................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 4 L
5/00 Continued on back

Facility Number: 2S Date of Inspection r1p Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ (rees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
Vj No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
1% No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
(A No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
M No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings'?
❑ Yes
(A No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'?
❑ Yes
0 No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
CA No
12. Crop type ijC'r,� . 6 �� r n I., V-Vn45
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
Is No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
I.No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
1A No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[SNo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
MNo
18,
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Yes
No
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, e(c.)
❑
19
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
5d No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
UNo
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
JZ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
[A No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Rcviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
% No
pia �i6laiicjtis:or• itelicienues w•�re n6ted- d(Wing tbis;visiti - Yoo will-r. eboiyQ do fuirthte
corres �en�e: aN ' f this''sit. - . .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.m:;.` _ `#
Use drawings aaf f cility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necesary s)
11 need 0, ^ew V nn0e- Sw — de
AL
Reviewer/Inspector Name ' •tn - _' '"' ``:
_.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: j2`l -aJ 5/00

Facility Number: rj — & Date of luspection 7f--47Q Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes giNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes tffNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ®'No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes IffNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes allo
32. Do the (lush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
AL
5100

of Visit a Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up Q Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Bate of Visit: i-1t-211IXf "funs: tin
Facility Number 25 b
Q Not Operational a Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered pate Last Operated or Above Threshold
Farm Name: F4.e.Cartsey:.1~AM........... .......... ...................... .........._.................... ............ County: crat: n.............................................. W.'aWo........
O►ynerName: Ed........ ................caaer........................................................ Phone No: T.S-52.44S.M.........................................................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
MailingAddress: P!`] b ox..7.l.T............................................................................................. A dent.NYC............................................................... 28513 .............
Onsite Representative: Ed Caw.0.................. .... ..................... Integrator. Murptt F F.w nix...........
Certified Operator:.Et{."jn..W................................ CAUUY ................ Operator Certification Number:. 199ELO .............................
Location of Farm:
Farm location: 320 St, Johns Road, Craven County,114 mile east of Pitt County line
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 * 22 4 10 i+ Longitude 77 • 18 15
�1
Design -Current
Design current
Design Current
Swine Capacity ulation
Poultry
Ca achy. Po ulation . Cattle -
Ca aeitv . Po ulatim
❑ Wean to Feeder
ID I,aycr
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
2448
2448
❑ Non -Layer
10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
TotalDesign 'Capacity
2,445
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
330,480
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Donn Are © Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps . ❑ No Liquid Waste Management Svstem
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originalcd at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray- Field ❑ Other
a, If dischar+ac is obsc:rt'ed, p as the conveyance man-inado9 ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is obsen•ed. did it reach Water of the State? (ifyes, notiN DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed_ Ni hat is the estiniatcd flow in gal/min'!
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon systein? (Ifyes_ notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freehoard plus storm storage) less than adequate`? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Stnu;turL 4 Structure b
Identities": .......... prijw ry.......... ............................
Freeboard(inches)-................4G.................................................... .................. .................. ....................................

5100
Continued an hack
Facility Number: 25-6 Date of Inspection 7-11-20110
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11, is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ 1lydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Corn., Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) "This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & DoLuments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
®No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Is facility not in compliance: with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a activeh• certified operator in charge"
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge_ freeboard problems_ over application)
El Yes
®No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewhiispection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
2C
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
Nti violations or "deficiencies were noted:during this visit: You will'recei�e 'na further _
correspondence about this visit.. _ ..
Lagoon levels records complete
Last soils report dated 12-10-99 - minimal lime needed
Waste plan dated 10-12-99 with an overall PAN deficit of 576 Ibs.
%t waste analysis dated 5-15-00 at 2.1 lbs/1000 gal. Previous reports dated 3-16-00 at 2.5 and 1-19-00 at 1.0 lbs/1000 gal.
Entire farm has an underground solid set system. Work completed in 1999 by Crockett Irrigation.
HM records arc complete and balanced
Lagoon mowed allowing for visual inspection
'rI
Rev iewer/Inspector Name

Routine
Of
I Facility Number Z5 6 I
0 Registered ® Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted
ow -up of DSWC review Q Other t
Date of Inspection 9-3D-1998
Time of Inspection 14:35 24 hr. (hh:mm)
113 Not 0 rational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Faye.Camy..katm........... ................. County: lGxa.►' n........ ............. ..... ---------- W&KO...----.
Owner Name: Fed .......... -- ................. -----•---•---- c u cy .................... .............. Phone No: 524-4528._...... --............
Facility Contact: .........„........... ........ ..._...... ................. .......... Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: PQ.>llimx 7zli..............................-----------------............................................ Cxxidk nAc.................... ............ T,8 m.............
Onsite Representative. P plj�iglavq tfR.l�l&if &>fe.Yl�. r,. 161t4ey�. - ,....... Integrator: nM
Certified Operator: Edrjn.W............................. At"i................. ....-..._..._...•-....• Ope
rator Certification uru et:. .................. _.........
Location of Farm:
Latitude 35 0 2Z4.l8 K Longitude 77 a 18 6 15
Design Current
Swine CauacitV Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
2400
2350
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer Fo
Dairy
❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total design Capacity 2,400
Total SSLW 324,OOO
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds. 1 JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management S stem
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?.
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaYmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
717 i 197
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No

c.untLnueu On MCA
Facility Number: 25-6Date of Inspection 9-30-I99$
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (LAgoonsHolding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Freeboard (fl):........... ... 3.2...............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Stricture 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
15. Crop type _...Caastali&mmuda. amu..... ___. lcra.L:iila &. raixt.1............................ i�L l t._............. ........................ .... ................. ..... .......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities ❑nlv
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
.No vitilatio'ns ur'deficien' 6e' s were_r�vtetl'du ii this.visi& -You -will: receive no further • . -
corresPbndence about this: ,visit:-
.......................
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
oina eats {refer-ta i;uestiao #} Eaplair':anyaYES. weii in-dlo'r any recommendations or any ether - mments.
Use drawings of faeiiiity to better eaplam situations:_{use. additional pages as necessary}:
16. Waste Utilization Plan needs to be amended to include row crops/ receiving crops with field acreage and recommended PAN rates.
19. Unknown.
20. I will contact Mr. Causey to follow-up and gather the information needed to complete this inspection.
22. Irrigation records should match Waste Utilization Plan, acreage, each field, & lbs. of Nitrogen per acre.
about
1
Certified Animal
Reviewerllnspector Name ;Daphne B. Cullom

IReviewer/Inspector Signature: _ , _ Date:
Facility Number: 2S—fi Date of Inspection 9-30-199$
9-3D-1998

nt13 Division o€ Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
ivision of Water Quality
..^a,a..m.--,^,rm"."."g"�,�°„�..,�•�; •. -•a-xs'^ .^'z�+_ .�...-a-:.xa;� .:R!:..: �:2�.., �„„
...r it
uutine O Cllmnlaint 0 Follow-un of ❑WO inspection 0 Follow• -up of ❑SWC review O Other
©ate of Inspection 19-�56 8
Facility Number S
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered M/Certified 13 Applied for Permit © Permitted 10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ....QQ? 'aca--..i1s1:.4.2'i ey................................ County: ..Cram ....... .....Q-
OwnerName: ........ . .......... ....................... .............`�:...:?.�!...e................................... Pt►[�ne'ti'o:.. .��.................................................. . ..............
FacilityContact:............................................................................. Title: ........................ ..................... ................... Phone No:
MailingAddress: .:D? x................................................................. ..............................................�� . { ......
53ior1-4 ViSi� 3lt� C3
On -site Representative:.. NL {..:....�. rlr l�..r�...... .. Integrator... L -
Certified Operator ?t .--GL-?--,•--•-........ &__A] .... Operator Certification N€tmher•. i G0
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0• ®4 1 ❑ `S Longitude ©' ` "
---------- ------------ ----- ---- - - - -
Design:.' . Current Design Current . Desigti Curren#
Capacity Pnpeilation Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population.
❑ can to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
c�M
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder-
0 Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
7Numlzer._41Agoaris./.Holding:P©nds 10 Subsurface Drains Present 10 Lagoon Area 10 Spray liield Area
I0 No liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes �Vo
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 63 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was theconveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gailmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes @40
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes B<0
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes [ _No
m ai me nanceli mprove ment?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 91 o E
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ►-o
7/25197

Facility' N umber:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes Go
Structures (Lagoons il©lding Ponds, F€ush Piss etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1
Identifier:
Freeboard (it): ......4q - {! .:........
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes i o
Structure 6
❑ Yes N
, _ o
El2 Yes <o
❑ Yes 2
❑ Yes GKIa
Waste_!Ippliration
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes 9 � �o
(If in excess of
WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 1 1(
15. Crop type t , ,.�].Qt .K rll ... � ........................... L� .IIs...Aa�.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? 'Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
i'o
I & Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
21KO1
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? n
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
9'Y,s
❑ No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative'?
❑ Yes
a No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?/es
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
M'No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
2.1 'o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑Igo
0, No.violatio'ns or deficiencies were noted during' this'visit.- .Yoit4ill receive no further
Ofre Ondeince ahaut this. visit:• : ' .
r.
Comments.(refer to.gnestion #):- Explaiin any. YES answers andlor any recommendations:or any otl>er.cornerieiiits
Use drawk: of:facthty.ta better explain situattons. {use additional pages as necessary}:.
�a . a� �, ► I : rrz i �
,ro BPS vJ1 -9- L aCGLtx.�. I rLuz�4 t oAS a CcCo
� � l
Y"Q._ c o "J s .s` v\-av 0 Aka--t-CL 0,�0. � -�-t�(t Z- M � i v
Y l t71.v� i
IJ L4�"
S `t `tot a l9 e, 7125197
Li �3
Reviewer/Inspector Name t
.....
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Facility Number: (o Date of Inspection -gyp 8
Addiitia�`tl `Co�mrl!nents and/or Drawings: ��••
Alj;r1 Vk- L� O�}.i ' LJ p i JL 6 L� C�Tt� JA-
1 j
moo. -; ;�[
O-.u- C]L
, " k, 'A q-&-Q- c e- c
(\A-,D ►r ►60 LO
7/25/97

Longitude ©� ®� ©66
I* Kounne 0 t-ompiaint 0 ronow-up or uwt! inspection 0 ronow-up or unowt: review 0 utner
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered ■ Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted in Notperationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Fayx.Causey.Farm.................................................................. County: Craven WaRO
OwnerName: Ed ............................................ Caumy..................... -................................. Phone No: 524457A...............--- ............................ I ......... ..........
FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title:.......---.....---............................................. Phone No:...............
Mailing Address: P.Q.Sax.77.n............................................................................................. lGri ftcaNC..----....................................................... 28530 ..............
Onsite Representative-. Ed.Cautse.......................................................... Inte rator:Muu .Fanxil F,ar7mS......................................
Certified Operator:EdwinLX ............................. Caused!.............................................. Operator Certification Number: l9.9SQ.......................... ...
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©`©& ®L&
Swine' -- - _ CapacityF PnpulaI
:.. -
Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to mis
0 arrow to Wean
p Farrow to ee er
13 Farrow to Fmi
p Gilts
p Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes 0 No
p Yes B No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No

ac uaa er: 25_b
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes ® No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus stone storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier.................................... ................
Freeboard (ft): 3.25
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes N No
Structure 5 Structure 6
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
13 Yes N No
Yes N No
Yes ® No
15. Crop type ......... -----------Concin.............................. Cate.4Silage.&.CVAW....... ... ........... --... snyheans.......................................... trabacco......................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
19. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Dnly
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
. oviu ions.or crencies-were.no a during visit., nnw.i ..receive no further. .
: :::::.........::.. • - hisy...... i�debtS.
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
N Yes E3 No
R Yes p No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
R Yes E3 No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
13 Yes 13 Na
Reviewer/Inspector Name ar unn � -� � � t - _
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

� 2` 3 � � � � �1•S e---- = 3CatU
7.0
AaL'•4 2 d
Z, p

I
n
DSWC Animal Feedlot` 0' `eration Review;
r
z .... >_
DW Anilinal Feedlot Q erationSite'Ins ection° o n.
LO Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DW2 ins ection Q Follow-uR of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection ly 4
Facility Number --
Time of inspection �c] 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ AppIied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
Xf Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated :..............._...... _....__.
Farm Name: ....... _ Fa , �_�dN % s°? ...... Fw r �""' _ ._. __....._....... County:.....-.. ��+r ......�_ «.._ �
Land Owner Name: �� TCokw st Phone No: 52 ~ 4 ?
--...... _ ......�_.�__ __..... _... ........._....... _._..... ..... ........... .._.............. ....
Facility Conctact:............ _....6A u ...-------- _------ ---
- Title: ......... Phone No:
Mailing Address: ..
Onsite Representative: .....
__.J� . . .............. ...... _----- _.---- _
integrator: ......__.......... ...... — ...... —._..
Certified Operator: .. _ ...._..
.... _..
' '...... __............. _._.... _..--........... m....
Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude ram' �° " Longitude ' 4 «
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
S►v�ne: n�:.=:m., -.:.,.,
....�..
�rnt `
. pYurrnesi n rren to
eCaci %Paulatiaf
n`a.c.a3Caft
-T« ,Ca .lati�%
❑ Wean to Feeder =:❑ La er » ❑ Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish 2 n Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
_:...:
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder wTtitatDes n Ca `ac3! g ;
. p :
�A:: Y~am
Farrow to Finish..'P _~
::.
p tiW
Total SS
�:.
r..
Other `
ice- ..:'».'.-
r Subsurface Drains Present
:Number itf:Gagoans ! Hvlding`Ponds; ❑
Lagoon Area S ra Fie
Lag Po p Y ld Area
«
i. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galltnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/97
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ Yes
XNo
Continued on hack

F�teity Number: .............
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes XNo
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ONo
StrmAvres jl,aeoons and/or olding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes $No
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
3.25
14. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes IoNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes XNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes JZNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
XNo
Waste
Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
VNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ..._.' , hut,: Civr• Le,,be�,t
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a Iack of adequate acreage for Iand application?
❑ Yes
NrNo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
)dYes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
)dYes
❑ No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
XNo
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
gNo
For_Certitied
Facilltica OU Y
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
XNo
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
)(Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
XYes
❑ No
Goniments {refer to tluestton #) 'Explain any YES'"' veers and/or.any recommendations or any. other:comments::`' .Use drawings of.facility. to:better explain situations: (use additional pages. as necessary):
. ..
14. 9;s 4 Crabs awe .;11 /A f6e< . �eQ� -6 Q_A_r C4,'1>Q- p4.. &t rr z+ 4
f"ev -f; ..o .
is, Ft y�& out
l9. cqn r-.-� reeei/L
," I l �► c '
Z3. Va.rt. o(er�d,►� R.L ��rr���.�#R.+er,� ��n � ,�-u.�'" i a7� , Mo �e � + roan g+►.
vad -if. 0_�te
;;,,, ::'fix: ,''`.•
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �.� Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97