070012_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS.
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 070012 Facility Status: Active Permit: ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Beaufort Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0510712007 __ Entry Time: 11.0)f AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: MarkKeyzer Hog Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Mark C Keyzer Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 91 Vreugdenhil Rd I Pantego NC 278609742
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35"36'02" Longitude:76°47'12"
264 East of Washington for 9 miles and turn onto 32 North for 2.5 miles and turn onto Terra Ceia Rd, and the farm is on the left.
Question Areas:
M Waste Collection $ Treatment JW Other issues
Certified Operator: Mark C Keyzer Operator Certification Number: 21606
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Mark Keyzer Phone:
Primary Inspector: Martene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
inspection Summary:
I spoke with Mark on the phone and confirmed that he is in the state buyout program with the second appraisal on his farm coming
any day.
He said that he has not done any irrigating this year and that there were no animals on site since July 2006. He gave me verbal
permission to stop and look at lagoons when in the area.
I will not be doing a full inspection of the records since he will be soon closing.
Page: 1

3
Permit: AWS070012 Owner - Facility: Mark C Keyzer
Inspection Date: 05/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Waste Structures
Facility Number: 070012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
FINAL
06/01/91
19.50
agoon
PRIMARY
agoon
SOLID TRAP
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
❑
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management
❑
❑
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
❑
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
❑
❑
❑
improvement?
You
Nn
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 01300
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
■ ■ ■ ■
Page: 2

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number.
070012
Facility Status: Active_ Permit: AWS070012
�I
LI Denied Access
Inspection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive or Closed Date.
Reason for Visit:
Routine
_ County:
Region: Washington
Date of Visit:
Q§I2612006
Entry Time:09.30AM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name:
Mark Keyzer Hogfarm
owner Email:
Owner:
Mark C Keyzer
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address:
91 Vreuadenhil Rd Pantego NC
276609742
Physical Address:
Facility Status:
❑ Compliant
❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 55°36'02"
Longitude: 7 °47'12"
264 East of Washington for 9 miles and turn onto 32 North for 2.5 miles and turn onto Terra Ceia Rd. and the farm is on the left
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
© Records and Documents. Other Issues
Certified Operator: Mark C Keyzer Operator Certification Number: 21606
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Mark Keyzer Phone:
24 hour contact name Mark Keyzer Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil test pulled June 20, 2006
Waste analyses
6-20-06= .18
4-06-06 = 0.73
Don't forget the sludge survey's and equipment caliberation by Sept. 30, 2006
Note: lagoon no. 2 has a huge grass matt, however this facility has been accepted in the NCDS&WC buyout program and this will be
addressed then.
Page: t

Permit: AWS070012 Owner - Facility: Mark C Keyzer
Inspection Date: 06126/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 070012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,500 L 1,100
Total Design Capacity: 1,500
Total SSLW: 202,500
Waste Structures
Tvpe Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
FINAL
06/01/91
1950.
26,00
agoon
PRIMARY
18.00
agoon
SOLID TRAP
18,00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS070012 Owner - Facility: Mark C Keyzer
Facility Number : 070012
Inspection Date: O612612006 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Cl
0011
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

S
Permit: AWS070012 owner - Facility; Mark C Keyzer
Inspection Date: 06/26/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 070012
Reason for Visit: Rautine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Fescue
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Smali Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan{CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16, Did the facility,fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAW MP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

1
Permit: AW5070012 owner - Facility: Mark C Keyxer Facility Number: 070012
inspection Date: 06/26/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
Cl
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after a 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
morta[ity rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS070012 Owner - Facility: Mark C Keyzer
Facility Nurnber : 070012
Inspection Date: 0612612006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
^6k­ Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fai$ to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
11000
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 070012 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS070012 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ _ _ County: Beaufort Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 04/19/2005 Entry Time: 03.00 PM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Marts Keyzer Hoe Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Maroc C. Keyzer
Mailing Address: 91 VreMadenhil Rd Panteao NC 27860
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Phone: [phone]
Integrator: Bunting Farms
Latitude: 35°36'02" Longitude: 76°47'12"
264 East of Washington for 9 miles and turn onto 32 North for 2.5 miles and turn onto Terra Ceia Rd. and the farm is on the left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts ® Waste Collection & Treatment ® Waste Application
0 Records and Documents ® Other Issues
Certified Operator: Mark C Keyzer
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 21606
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Mark Keyzer Phone:
24 hour contact name Mark Keyzer Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
Soil test 3-24-05 - lime was needed —don't forget to apply.
the lagoon level and rainfall are recorded weekly
the irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Waste analysis:
3-2-05 = 0.96
9-29-04 = 0.22
5-19-04 = 0.34
Page: 1

Permit: AWS070012 owner - Facility; Mark C Keyzer Facility Number: 070012
Inspection Date: 04/19/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start pate Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon FINAL 19.00 22.00
Page: 2

J.
Permit: AWS070012 Owner - Facility: Mark C Keyzer Facility Number: 070012
Inspection Date: 04/19/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
DisrhaLges & Stream Imp
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Yes
110110
No IAA-
NE
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑
Yes
N ❑
No NA
❑
NF
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe erosion,
Cl
0 ❑
❑
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑
E ❑
❑
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? {Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks
❑
❑
❑
and/or wet stacks]
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
0 ❑
❑
improvement?
Yes
No NA
UF
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement?
❑
N ❑
❑
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
❑
❑
It yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 101Io110 lbs. ?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small
Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Page: 3

Permit: AWS070012 owner -Facility: Mark C Keyzer Facility Number: 070012
Inspection Date: 04/19/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Crop Type 6
Sail Type 1
Sail Type 2
Soil Type 3
Sail Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAW MP)?
❑
s ❑
❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑
Yes
❑
No NA
❑
Nli
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all oomponants of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does retard keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after a 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ E
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous lass assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ 0
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AW5070012 Owner - Facility: Mark C Keyzer
Inspection Date: 04/19/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 070012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the Facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality
rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewrnspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes No NA NF
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑a
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ E ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
Mark Keyser
Mark Keyser Hog Farm
91 Vreugdenhil Rd.
Pantego NC 27860
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS070012
Mark Keyser Hog Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Beaufort County
Dear Mark Keyser:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on March 18, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Mark
Keyser, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS070012 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Mark Keyser Hog Farm, located in Beaufort County, with an animal capacity of
no greater than an annual average of 1500 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land as specified
in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorised and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pU careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
.. '�r: i:. •: is i�' , � s
.i ] .
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit tOCT ) 5 2004
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
North Carolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]ntemet: h2o. en r. state. nc. 0 s
An Equal OpportunitylA�irmative Action Employer — 50% Recyded110% Post Con sum;Vatmrallffer Paper

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per MRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this CDC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Washington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG 100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Washington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Beaufort County Health Department
Beaufort County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AW S070012
APS Central Files

Divtston of Water Qua It
€'"
r DtV15taII.af Sail O and.Wat`e'rCarisei�+ation
;''
��`�`�=�� `"`'
�•�
h r:.
O.Ot e A
.
. ......::..:`..:.:•::.r.
gensy..,... .. ..
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit o Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number tI7 12 Date of Visit: F 6/18/2004 'rime: 10:00
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:...........
Farm dame: MArk.My.zcjr..king.&rm................................ ................. County: RcAj.fAtrL......................................... W.P R0.......
Owner Name: MArk ....--- xeYzrj ........... Phone No: 52-94 - 5&..........
Mailing Address: 9.L.Yremgdgjlhli.F1............................................................. ..... r8xk1fQ..NC.................... :................. ................... 1 GQ.. .........
FacilityContact: .................. ....................... ................... Title: ............... -................... -............................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: ................. __ ........................... . ....................................................... Iintegrator: llunting.Farms......................................................
Certified Operator:f!'Ia1'-k..0. ............................... Kaze>r.............................................. Operator Certification Number:1974£t........ .............
Location of Farm:
264 East of Washington for 9 miles and turn onto 32 North for 2.5 miles and turn onto Terra Ceia Rd. and the farm is on the
® Swine ❑Poultry El Cattle El Horse Latitude 35 36 i.86 °& Longitude 76 • 47 • 12.57 "
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry Capacity
Population Cattle
Capacity Population ,
❑ Wean to Feeder
JEI Layer
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
1500
1150
ID Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
1,500
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
202,500
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 4
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made`? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2, is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) Less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...........Solids ........... ......... Frimaq......... ....... 5erarxdaq...... ............. Final ............ ........-.........................-............... I ........ ...........
Freeboard (inches): 30 25 25 25
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 07-12
Date of Inspection 6/18/2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ,
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Froxen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Fescue (Hay) Rye
Soybeans
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
Waste report: 5/19/04 with 0.34 lbs NI1000 gal.
12/4/03 with 0.09 lbs N/1000 gal.
Don't forget to take 2004 soils analysis.
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
,y.,.... n'ar„„.:.:--'V77::: ..:, •. ";'': ...at.A�kr: �a:�g... .. .. _:: 'yc: .
;S: answers and/or.. any4recom_me_ndations.;or; aoy other comments:. _
.
ns..,. ,, ;addit o al iiages as,necessary
,.�:.e _ )�` Meld Copy El Final Notes
Soybeans are currently being planted in Field I behind rye grass.
Mr. Keyxer did not feel comfortable with the low Nitrogen rate from his December 4, 2003 sample so he used a higher Nitrogen rate
of 0.24 lbs N/1000 gal. on his Fescue and Rye grass. Still over 115 lbs N/ac defiant.
.. ---
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott ns n
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: t7t{
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: D7-12 Date of Inspection 611$12004
Required Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
1s facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
* Mr. Keyzer is interested in having a cover crop without having to harvest it. Discuss with Jack Long the revision one to the #
Seventh Guidance Memo allowing up to 30 lbs N/acre on non -harvested cover crop.
Need to transfer May and June applications (3) on rye to this years soybean 1RR-2 form.
Mr. Keyser is also interested in a primitive accretion system on his final stage lagoon to help evaporate water off the top of his
lagoon. I will bring this up for discussion at our next animal meeting.
Need to have a Plan of Action drawn up by yourself and Technical Specialist, Jack Long, to address the sludge build up in the
first 3 stages of lagoons. There is sludge at the surface of 42 and #3.
12112103

OF Mchael F. Easley
Q
Governor
William G. Rosa, Jr., Secretary
> Department of Environment and Natural Resources
`f:`- .; • Kerr T. Stevens
.n'
Division of Water Quality
To: Producer
Firom: Scott Vinson
Environmental ngineer
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2003
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced
facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this Inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP}•
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H 0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation` s waste management system is being operated property under the direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a renunder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
(p The nivdin nn waste level in lagoonslstorage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a inin�
maximumwaste-level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
cp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the tine of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
q Soli analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
qp The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wastelsoil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
rninirntun of three years.
cp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWNT. In no shall ]and aptcation rates exceed the Plant
Avgzilable Nitrogen CPANI rate for the receiving crop or It in runoff_during any g y n lication.
(p All grassed watem2ys shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
cp It is sagested not a zegti Mertt. to keep crop yield information for future u>.se to update your waste management plan
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
(p The OIC has the duties to ensure that waste is applied in accordance with the CAWMP and General Permit by properly
managing, supervising, and documenting daily operation and maintenance. The OIC also has the responsibility to certify
monitoring and reporting information. The failure of an OIC to perform his/her duties can result in a letter of reprimand,
suspension, of certification. or revocation of certificates.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact meat 252-946-
6481, ext. 208 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: WaRO Files
SAV Files
943 Washington Square Mail Washington, NC 27889 252-948-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

(Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection ❑ Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
I Reason for Visit @ Routine ❑ Complaint ❑ Follow up ❑ Emergency Notification ❑ Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 7 12 Hate of Visit: 09l11I21- Time; 1 12:55
t O Q Noerational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: XairkKcyzer..Hog.Fnx.ml..................................................... ..................... County: fleAtufArt........................................... WARQ.......
OwnerName: Mark . ...................................... Kunr....................................................... Phone No: 2S-9.4-3,858.......................................---..........---....
Mailing Address: 91.Yxgmgdembti1.ti,do .............................. .. EgjfttCgR..NC..... ..................................................... UAW .............
FacilityContact:....................................................... Title: ..................................................... I.......... Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative: Mor.k.Kcyzcr............................................................................. Integrator: RuatW&FArms...--.--- ...................
Certified Operator:],!'Ia.k.C.,................................ Kcyzer........................................ ...... Operator Certification Number:12.7.44t...
Location of Farm:
M4 East of Washington for 9 miles and turn onto 32 North for 2.5 miles and turn onto Terra Ceia Rd. and the farm is on the
left.
N Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 a 35 6 1.86 f6 Longitude 76 'F 47 12.57 u
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current'
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
I
I❑
Dairy
N Feeder to Finish
1500
1125
JE1 Nun -Layer
I
1
1[3 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
-
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total.Design Capacity
I,500
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
202,500
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 4 JE1 Subsurface Drains Present JE1 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ...........Solids ........... ......... Primary .......... .......S>rnoaadary....... ............ Final ............ ...................................
❑ Yes N No
ElYes ❑ No
❑ Yes [INo
?
[:I Yes. N No
[3Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Structure b
Freeboard (inches): 18 25 26 25
05103/dl
Continued

Facility Number: 7-12
Date of Inspection 09/11/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures ou-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste AmAication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑Yes ®No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Pernut or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
tie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
-20. Is facility. not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria'in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewerflnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No -
El Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
E] No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
......_ - - -
Ex lain
Comments: ref0. tw uestion.#): any:YE answers an recommendations:or.'any:nr any afher.:comments:x'-:Yw:=::
Use drawin s of facility-to.better.explain:situations::(use additional. pages as necessary):El Field Copy El Final Notes
T. ter. -
* Waste dated 5/19/03 with 0.25 ibsN/1000 gal.
+
Waste dated 4/21/03 with 3.3 lbsN/1000 gal.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott:%ins n Entered by: PortiaYPeaden'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101
Continued

Facility Number- 7-12 Date of Inspection 09/11/2003
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe frorn the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blades), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the [lush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Soils dated 4/24/03 with 1 1bN/1000 sq. ft. for crop type lawn. Need to make sure to list proper code on next year's soil
analysis for Fescue and for soybeans.
Need to make sure to get the waste analysis to cover irrigation events from Aug. through Sept. on soybeans.
Waste dated 1/23/03 with 0.361bsN11000 gal.
Waste dated 7/18/02 with 0.21 lbsN/1000 gal.
19. Need to go back and change or modify some of the waste analysis (column 9) on the IRR2 forms for soybeans, Fescue
and ryegrass crops. No over application noted.
15. Need to spray for weeds in Fescue fields. Weeds starting to become a problem.
arm_was depopulated from January 2003 through April 15, 2003.--
7. Need a copy of COC and General Permit. -
05103101

ca.Ilej y0'a_rk 04 t d fa !a
C itte L
�.Divisr� ter C�uality - -- -
s-_
.ry....:�:�.-.....,"��.��: �' _ � il:. r:ct:..�Fr.i,Cn.l:ow�ilY7a�a.. f:..waura.a4. n.�. ,_. ,. : _ " � _ ^ • _ �a..�.
[Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit 0 Routine ❑ Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification ❑ Other p Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Z11$�Z�d2 Time: 10:I5 am
p of pera . ti;nal p Below Threshold
p Permitted ■ Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered
Farm Name: Mark Keyzer Hog Farm
Owner Name: Marls
Keyzer
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County:&aiutorx............................................ 1N.JM0.......
Phone No: 252-943-3858
Mailing Address: 9.1..Y.7rtu9dCnWLRd............................................................................. PantCg0..NC... .................................................. ...... Z7.86h... ...........
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Mark.Keyzer............................................................................. Integrator: Runtinglar... ............ ..... .... ......................... __
Certified Operator: AAark.0. ................................ Key -Ur ...................................... Operator Certification Number: 19.746...... .............. .........
Location of Farm:
264 East of Washington For 9 miles and turn onto 32 Northor 2.5 miles and turn ontoTerra Ceia Rd. and the arm is on he
left.
® Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude Longitude
esign ~ . urren ;- _ r esign arren Design. -,.. Current
Swine. Poult Cattle
,- . Capacity.= Population ' _ i 3 Capacity .Population .= .,. _ Capacity .Population
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
p Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
Number of Lagoons _ ❑ u sur ace rains Presentp Lagoon Area p pray �e rea
- Holding Pondi 1 Solid -Traps o Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes R No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? r p Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes 13 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes H No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...... Salids. Tsap............... Primaxy.................Seeoadary....... ............ k isaL.......... ...................
Freeboard (inches): ................1.9...............................21.......................... ...2.1........... ..... .... .... 24................

e
acE Number: Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees.. Severe erosion,
la Yes
N No
` seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
p Yes
® No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N No
8, Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
9, Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
p Yes
N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
p Yes
p No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Fescue (Hay) Rye Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
p Yes
N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
®No
Required Records & Documents
IT Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
p Yes
®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
N Yes
p No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
H No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
H No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
H No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
® Yes
p No
p No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
.......:-... _ en '.:.:. ........ __ <. ....�.w.-... -.-... .....g. .. W. ...._ _.. ....ww........... ... ..--... �...._._- ...�. �._-.-o- .................2..........w.........w..... ...._.....q .......-,-...:..:....r.__.. ... ;;,.........N::::.M..4^<z.:.:...«.ti':.�:.....�.:..
aat o. ,a. Y�othermmcammentsr; µ:;:;<
e er. u Ex Iam'an arf w dl •'an -r mm n i ns.or. n .: Comments.(r f
es#ton,#)...,......-. p Y.�....5......-s. ers $n..ar y. eco..
.btp-q.. . , � --:� _....e -
[]se drawings of facilitywto°better.explainPsituatians�(use addit�onal'pages as necessary}: � µ
�. Field Ca Final Notes
* Waste analysis last dated 5/18/01 with 0.291bs N/1000 gals.
19. Irrigation events from 814/01 through 11/4/01 (5 events total) do not have a current waste analysis for fescue
crop.
Irrigation events on rye crop from 11/16/01 through 11/25/01 (4 events ----field 2) did not have a current waste
ample.
* Mr. Keyzer used the last waste analysis dated 5/19/01 to balance the PAN with no overapplication and a PAN
s
balance left of 176 lb/ac for fescue and ? for the rye crop (overseed). (SEE PAGE 3)
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott xinson,..,. ': w::.::.:::::....... .:: :........
ntered bTAnnT.ynda[Ig;
Reviewer[Inspector Signature: Date:

05103101
Continued
Facility Number: 7_12 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26,
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
Yes
13 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27,
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
p Yes
® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
p Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
p Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
p Yes
® No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes
p No
Need to call Jack Long to verify (1-5.) 1001bs Nlacre for rye overseed. Mr. Keyzer needs to recalculate 1RR2.
or rye crop. Also ask Jack Long to include an overseed crop in the "new"
WUPryit seems to have been left out.
ATE: It was included in the "old" plan.
* Soil analysis dated (not available). Mr. Keyzer will fax copy of soils test
done in 2001 to the office.
* Keep an eye on the back flush tank so as not to overflow into the stormwater diversion ditch.
Y
,
'
f
e
y.0
. Fti

I
• .`r Tf ���.— "..fin _ - '.. H x .y�� %.: ( `� F' 1 � �i i
. ..� �.ex°�. �'-•.t= �:"6•'r. N' •�}=�''v-:i'II�`�^.x�.. „,w:•' � �' �y �e'i � ' I�1� ,
m -36_ l[
a, ^
ijzr
r r.
w
o
�- - wJ�
.-..n:` �-.- —z .yam•• .. -- -.
�
F. � 3
fz
ti
x...
� • . _ ... _^...j .,:.:. .,c�'� - - __ _ _ F(; it Y;
BM
t}
°�....._ .. P _
h
r _
m
2
�r Acre—..-.�.a-- *"
Li
}
,
r
I
T
i
kir
Vc m.
'pw
L
"a
y _
-
w
4
j
...
...--_._.. ...
9
%F
r
is
..
t _
1
,
T if -
_
5 al
t
Name: PINETOWN
Location: 0350 35' 57.7• N
076- 48' 14.1' W
Date: 10/23/102
Caption: Keyxer Farm
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet
Maptech. Inc-

3 � +
r •
w; sa�� f.ry:''. ._�, �� w. y•.lr'_.'""'.r"'F�� • � ~, `� ~� �µr � � ��,,. w,,.-��...
N
• f
r-
�a
A [ 1

Facility Number 7 t2 Date of Visit: 6116120UD Time: 13:45 Printed on: 6/21/2000
fl Not Operational Q Below Threshold
0 Permitted ® Certified E3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......... •-•.............
Farm Name: lY Ark.Keyzgjr.URg.IFar m.......................................................................... County: BCAUjg.rj ........................................... W�ARQ.......
OwnerName: IYIaEk....................................... K.IGy.ZC1C.................................. ...................... Phone No: ...........................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title: .............................................................. •• phone No: ............................
Mailing Address: 91..Y..rCMgjjg.Q AU.Rd,............................................................. .. F.aAXtzR..,E C...----••---- ......................... ............. 218A ...-- ........
Onsite Representative: M&r.k,.KeyzCr................. ..................................................... Integrator: UjjD.tjUg.FgLrM5 ......................................................
Certified Operator:Mar.k..C,......................... War- Operator Certification Number:Zl#.QA .............................
Location of Farm:
��4.Easy.m�W'i'.as4iaAgtsA�..fax.�.m�iltrs.�amd.tuxm.a�ata.3.�.�YQrath.fmr.�.S.notifies.mnd.�ux�t.Q.atm.T�exxa.��exa.��.�r�rl.t�r�.f;�txm.�.ntl..tk��e ±
10....
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Norse Latitude 35 36 T.86 Longitude 76 • 47 12.57 u
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify ❑WQ) ❑ Yes []No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ....... Secondary........ ..........Primary[ .......... ............. ... ••............. ............................. ...
Structure 5
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Freeboard (inches). 22 29

Continued on back
Facility Number: 7-12 Date of Inspection Printed on: 6121/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
1 io.yioiatioris,or -deficieneies,were -n-oted :during this vi5it:: Y'uti will'receive no further'.'.
cor-respondence about this.visit. . : ::: : ::: :: ::: .:..:. . __ .. _ . . _
new plan has just been completed. The farm is in the General Permit process.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Reviewer/Inspector Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall I

LReviewer/Inspector Signature: hate: i
Facility Number: 7-12 Date of Inspection 6/16/2000 Printed on: 6/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
® No
28.
is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes [:)No
.&i

r Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number J Date of Inspection - g- va
Time of Inspection 13 ' 4 TA hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered JEJ Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .... K r Re• r »,
�. ..... ! Zt......................................I....................... County:.............. �Ca.................................... .......................
OwnerName:.... ...................... G'k........ r..................................................... Phone No:.........-
Facility Contact:
Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:. .................................... ................................................................................ .....
Onsite Representative: ?41.'k............ K�t./...........................--•--- Integrator:........!"a e r
..................................................................
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
Latitude F-9-9-1 • ` . ��a " Longitude © 0 ©` &°
. ..- - — -- - - -
`Design Current Design Current`-
...:. - .� - '... . _ .. _: .: • � _.- .: _: _. :. r: esign �;. urrenA ..^
V"ne Pot = Cattle
5- Capacif PoP ulation r3' Capacity.:' Papuladiin -_ _.- Capacity `Population ".;
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
15"00
1050
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Nmnber of Lagoons' Y z:: ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area :
._
,.: x. ..
- = Holding Ponds I Solid Traps - [:—)No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharzes & Stream ImRacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 6JNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If ycs, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Dos discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Il• yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
}ti
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ spillway ❑ Yes RNo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 5ec
Freeboard (inches): ........................... 2q
...
.. ---- •..........................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes , fg No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on Lack

1
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste A lication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
❑ Yes
19 No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
19 No
❑ Yes
E9 No
❑ Yes
91 No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records &_Document~
17.. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ict irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20- Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
INO.• i¢1atiQt s.or d. fieiencies were nQte(-id�H;ipg ��is.visit: - Y:otr Wfl i.- eeeKie iits further
caries nridence: abanit. this 'visit.
_ _ ..
mts (refer to uestton #): E lain ain ;YES"ans ominegda vas oir.any-ether
_ x . y
mm
iwuags_of: €acrltty ta; better: explain situations: use adiiitit nal: pages'a-s iaecessary �� ��`�
a -
R' New r� o, %A, -6t fctr M ►s 1 -t
❑ Yes D9 No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ej No
❑ Yes JR No
❑Yes [I No
❑ Yes R) No
❑ Yes IR No
❑ Yes R? No
[:)Yes M No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes ® No
Reviewer/Inspector ame:�.; w', .. V ar
�..._
N
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 6j6 49J

1
Facility Number: Date of inspection
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27,
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
[] Yes
No
28,
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
�j No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
[ No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
R No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
RNo
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
ttiona . omments an or. rawings:.w
r�r
3/23/99