630003_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

RECEIVED
Animal Waste Management P n Cei ic�atioonn
{Please type or print all inform:uion that doe. not re
E�ttstin_Nei} . < or. : EYpande� : (please ci rcle. on
General Tnformation:
Name of Farm: N•G• h(y is FAP — D i x t r� PAP-m Facility i o: G3 3
Owner(s) -Name: N•G lPU&LI5 aRrn5� 1t,IC • —_Phone No: 410�g4
Mailinir Address: 2TO4- SPIES Roi;D, Rog_IBINs. NaR-rw CARoL-lN_9 Z?325 _
Farm Location: County Farm is located in:_ Ma_o&F. _—
Latitude and Longitude: 1 Integrator:
Please anach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific. road
names; directions. milepost, etc.): Nortrrl oN AwY Z 1rROM HWY Z4-Z`7 TuRvo RJGN7
at3 5_R.-! Z4 , TUrZO LF-FT oN 1637 FARMoN t..CF`r APPftg�i. MILE
Oaeration Descrifltion:
Type of Seine No. o Animals
Wean -to Feeder
r Feeder to Finish
%,Farrow to Wean SOta
Ct Farrow to Feeder
* Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
u Boars
Trae of Poultry Alo. of Animals
-1 Layer R��ECrF l
Palle t�:yQt�tfr ['�__ , �` ' •�K
APR OG 2009
Outer Type of Livesroct:
Type of C rule No. of Animals
J Dairy
Z Beef
Nrunher of Animals:
Acreage .available for Application: 2 5.0 Required Acreage:
Number of La;oons l Storage Ponds: 3 Tom] Capacity: d 30(n Cubic Feet {ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YE or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY F ELD (please circle one)
�kkx�isc,k!,�kkikNka,.�,kale��ekMN�k�+NaMM�iMr.?e„ca:Ma?+ik�kk�ekk►.aa;cis�a.;e,h+k�ss�,kacMxaasaFiea,.y.aaoFkt,.Misi,�;swr,<anxs*ir
Owner / _Manaaer agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we). understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved aninyal waste management plan for the farm named above and «-ill
implement these procedures. I (we) }mow that any expansion to the, existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
atoraQe system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there trust be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or applicadon system to surthce waters of the state zither directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, '_'-}-hour storm and there must not be run-off from tit
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Consmadon Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires- written -notification to. DEIA or a new• certification. (if.Tbe.approved . .
plan is changed) within 60 days ora po.eettra�nsferr..
Name of Land Owner_ - ,eU ", S
Signature: _ Pam` �^ _ _ Date: 12- .? 3 -
Name of Nlanager(if different froth o��rter): /t%� ,'Terra, k 144►'e-
Signature:_ Date:
A%','C -- Ad'gust t, 1997 1 �,

Technical Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to lf.a
NCAC 6F .0005, 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above lids an animal wasrr
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Matfaaeme
(DENT} as specified in lad. NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) andl�ir the
North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15,a NCAC 2H.0217 and 15.E VCAC 6F .0001-
.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WU'P, RC, I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
technically competent.
II. Certification of DesiC; n
A) Collection. Storage, Treatment Svstern
Check the appropriate box
A Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUp)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity: Storage capability cnnsistent xich waste, utilization
requirements.
I New. expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
.animal waste -storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to collection systems. Iagoons and ponds.
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist. (Please Print):_ kuta.FkT T TATE�32._ -
Affiliation _N_ CR S . _ Dale Work Completed:
Address (A-en6y):fiM WEST 1 N NES Q. S Ls . C. Phone No.: 104 - G37 -z400
Signature: Date:
$) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): g QGeZT T. PAiE. ZR • � __
AffiliadonNRCS - —Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): 6Q WI S SA ujiaU&Y Phone -Nro.:1o4 -437 - z.4go
S iLmature: Date:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
Facility without exterior Iots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Cl Facility with exterior Iots (RC)
tilethods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by `+RCS. -
Name of Technical Specialist (PIease Print): 14JII= T 'PATE Jit. .
.:kffliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): 00 1ni E . SALJ S130 �, C . Phone No.: 4 - 3 - 2 0
Signature:_
AWC -- August 1, 1997
0
2
!Z- 2 3

4 ,
I It
D). Application and Handling Equipment
Clack the appropriate bar
Exist'ng or ex , nding f cility with existing wn ste iVQljca6nn e ui men (WLP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates. a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
D New. e , nded. or existing fncility without existing waie applignijon eaui mint for spriv irriQ t'n . (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipmen( can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance ace
cuntained as part of the plan).
.:) ''ew. exunnded ter exittinz facility withow ey;ivjng wriye anplication eauinnient For land tnreadinQ not usinU
srrw irrigation (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are
.'contained as part of the plan).
Name,of Technical Specialist (Please Print): H UR5RX S PATE I TR
Affiliation N RCS _ Date Worlk Completed:
Address (
' Signature
fe No.: 704 - 63"7 - 2 400
• )z-Z3--3`1
E) Odor Control. Insect Control. 'Mortalitv_itan2eement and Emer2encv Action Plan (SD
SI. WUP. RC or I)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist. an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality btanagement Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Nfanaeement Practces to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
,Mortality Nlanagement Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by thi facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): T. _F-1A`rE .T .
Affiliation „„hi RCS Date Worm Completed:
Address (
SiL,nawre
Prone No.: -70 4-- 37. 2400
Date:_I Z •- F-3 -- I I
F) Written Notice of New or Ex anding Swine Farm
The folloWing signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded -
i (we) certifv that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified trail all adjoining property owners and ail property owners
.....-.who own property located across a public road. street. or highway From this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of vCGS 106-803. A copy of the notice and a list of the property m ners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Si,,nature• Date:
Name of Nlana;er (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997 3

Ill. Certification of Installation
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Installation r
New. errtanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal wane storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds. have be,,n installe,
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Nance of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
AMliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: - Date:
B) Land -application Site (WL;P)
Check rite appropriate box
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
:J Conditional approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
ve?emdon as specified in the plan by (monrhldaylyear); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteuulization plan.
2 Also check this box if appropriate i
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 d
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist {Please Print): .J .. PATES
Affiliation N RLS Date Work Completed:
Address
Signature
No.: 704 24M
-I?- Z 3--'� -7
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan.
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control. and will submit to DENI a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 13 calendar clays following the bate specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: - Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AAVC -- .august 1. 1997

`y. C) RunafF Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Mediods to minimize die run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots., no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Nora- Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Apoiication and HandlinZ Equipment Installation (WUP or I)
Check the appropriate block.
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and read: for sae:
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of die plait.
J Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in (lie plan has not been in;talkd but die owner
has proposed leasing or third parry application and has provided a signed conu ict: equipment specified in
die contract agrees with die requirements of the plan: required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan-
Z! Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in die plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (montlVdaylvear); there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):-1406F,.27T T. —PA-TE . J 2
Affiliation N RCVS Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency):6p Ih1EST IN NEs fir, SA LIS RVR f , �'. Phone No.: 7a 4 - 63-_- A&O
., — - - -
Signature
1Z_ 23-
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DENI a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in die conditional cMrtihcaiion. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEyi.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of 'Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and Mortnlity .Management (SD. SI. ` UP. RC or I)
lterhods to control odors and insects as.specified in the Plan have been installed and are ooeraaonal. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has*alsd•be-ii installed and is operadonal.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): N T 1. PATt TL .
Affiliation N { C S Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): (660 WEST 10 tJES ET. SA Ll S W kY N . � . Phone `1o.:7044(<,3� - 24ofl
Signature: y _ Date:
AWC -- .august 1, 1997

02/04/09 10;40 091DB471253 Moore SWCD W002
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: N.G-- 4Urrns — �� x i ~P".s
Location: .3&5 Ro'j , a -, N, G ,
Telephone: 'j j0 - c? Lf ,? - a,P 9 7
Type Operation: , �, +,:, Lj e
Number of Animals:
(Dalam �q s
The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of
surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the
-amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be
applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed, before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all
plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important In implementihg your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the
fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that It Is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
Alwaye apply Waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilLm. Soil types are important as they
have dderpnt infiltration rates, laaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5
f dons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to
10,tons per acre perryear. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when It Is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result ih runoff to surface waters which is not
allowed under DEM regulatlons. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nubienta for crop production and to reduce
the potential for polluton, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
not more then 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conperve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this
type ofifacility. Acreage. requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find Infbrmation on proper sampling techniques,
preparatlon, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2W.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

4'
02/04/90 10:51 109109471253 Moore 6WCD Q003
•41_ -• i'.
PLAN'
r
Amount of wasto pmdue d per year (pllons, ca.ftm tonsr etc.)
ariisnalsx . '��waete/a�nimai %Year = AC-•TNt /Year.
TMAL AMOIW OF WAM: gfa,1 &aaWA.STIJYEAR.
o • t o Punt /Aval[aiile N[ en Prtxltr Per "S�r$r .
�•'3ia�_ lbs. PAN/1000gals,-,at 9cvs-7RUg lls/ye&t= lbs.PAN/year.
[PAN fm= NCDA Ttst Report} or (PANS N.G Tecb. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above a mr= a f wam b a• blg job_ You chmild plan time and have appropriate eguipmtmt to apply the
waste is a timed, maser. TheMowing ntxeaga will be nestled for wane agplicaiion Based Ens Go crap to be grown and
surfim Rq �`.
- S4
m�,,
51) P-- -,
0 m,
, IMF
� W.,-,
1 1
Mml
1 MUM
cmp�
�,
WM46
on n4v
� :,AM,
'T1,isN is ariimai wasso vim. u ttom ate apmres e� aoamse�ia[ sa b7iur aio Rp,Pttoe, d,er must to aooQanti a ft HEmsba
K= The apg War b ta<ntioaoa datP and Kmar ba Ww9ppW VhM moeti 1. N ngai=mzM Bcetg in iM fl,a Camtal Z=Mmmmmed Aa wail
mgdm fi mm is aowa cazic=oDoubm ofNwds C rotma to taro m m1- mm2vm astplmftt an=0faft Ttb pM oab addr==NhmSm
�...._:--
..50
• 2.

Ir
02/04/99 10:52 I$61D0471253
Moore SWCD 19 004
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 2; ACRES WITH AGRUM1T OR LUNG TERM LEASE
(Agrematt with ar#aaew l mdmww must hp anacheip
(Aequfred onty (f dpmwor aloes not own adequate tmso
(See Required Spec(huWon 21)
TOTAL
See Boobute fi w T" 1.
TOTALS PROM ABOVE TABLED
ACRES
Table 1 10 1 q . Trf .
Table 2
Lbs. N UtH6
"DOTAL &
Amami ofNProduced _ _ 3 5 1
surolus or It q
NOTE: The Waste Ufflfzaflon Plan must contain proWslons for pedfodlc land
application of sludge of agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and
Wit require precautionary measures to prevent over appllcaflon of nuidents or
other elements.
3

4 02/04/99 10:53 9P9109471263 Moore SWCD Z006
WASTEUTILIZATION PLAN
See attached neap showing Oe fields to be used for the Wfflw Son of waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY HUMATION
man
TMT;UzznNOrHM IDWWAffMBNQTe"AMMEYOMaA=Ri,NVABM1 AMMAILTAMXWQLM MFMMYUrMRCRStMY.
Your Smik is designed for _120 days of t arary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every MONTHS. In no intones shwld the.
volume of waste b*$ stored al your strtretura =eed ', Ef eve t i on 83.3 (start Pump 'td a rk a r• )
Call the Ioaal Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Wader Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in doers fining the auwunt per acre to apply wed the propw application rate prior to
appiyft the waste.
TM are QZFO�ERAE ntablished in Bermuda in fields 1, 2 , and 3 for this
operation. Because of field shape, buffers, and irrigation system layout
there is approximately 10.9 acres of effective coverage under irrigation.
This operation has a three stage (hole) system with,180 days of temporary
storage. Effluent from the lower lagoon will be applied - to the Bermuda
by irrigation -using a traveling gun system. The landowner has a honey
wagon to apply waste in field number 2 and other areas not covered by
Irrigation in fields 1 and 3 if necessary. The fields will be over -
seeded in rye grain in the winter to help utilize the nutrients produced
and to fit the design storage period of this system. Sludge will need
to be removed from the system every 5-10 years. 'A waste analysis will
need to be run on - this material prior to application and a waste
utilization plan prepared for the sludge. Additional fields will
probably be needed for proper utilization.
4
TMT;UzznNOrHM IDWWAffMBNQTe"AMMEYOMaA=Ri,NVABM1 AMMAILTAMXWQLM MFMMYUrMRCRStMY.
Your Smik is designed for _120 days of t arary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every MONTHS. In no intones shwld the.
volume of waste b*$ stored al your strtretura =eed ', Ef eve t i on 83.3 (start Pump 'td a rk a r• )
Call the Ioaal Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Wader Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in doers fining the auwunt per acre to apply wed the propw application rate prior to
appiyft the waste.
TM are QZFO�ERAE ntablished in Bermuda in fields 1, 2 , and 3 for this
operation. Because of field shape, buffers, and irrigation system layout
there is approximately 10.9 acres of effective coverage under irrigation.
This operation has a three stage (hole) system with,180 days of temporary
storage. Effluent from the lower lagoon will be applied - to the Bermuda
by irrigation -using a traveling gun system. The landowner has a honey
wagon to apply waste in field number 2 and other areas not covered by
Irrigation in fields 1 and 3 if necessary. The fields will be over -
seeded in rye grain in the winter to help utilize the nutrients produced
and to fit the design storage period of this system. Sludge will need
to be removed from the system every 5-10 years. 'A waste analysis will
need to be run on - this material prior to application and a waste
utilization plan prepared for the sludge. Additional fields will
probably be needed for proper utilization.
4

DIXIE FARM. T.D. ## 63-003
r Technical Specialist Certification
!. As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005, 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Water Quality as specified in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements are
included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may sign each certification (SD,
SI, WUP, RC, I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically competent.
I. Certification of Design
A) Collection Storage, Treatment System
Check the approprio _._ .... _
❑ Existiu facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization requirements.
(SD)
or retrofitted facility New, expanded ettd faci
,.. , , _,,.. - .-
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B) Land Annlicatron Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_r.a *- y - r ra b a m l p E ,
Affiliation_Env-ironmental Fncjineeri ccY Seru_i_CesDate Work Com
Ad
Stc
C)
Check the appropriate Gov
❑ Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Ill
CA
�ANc1S
❑ Facility with exterior loLi (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): _" T
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency):
Phone No.:
Si -nature: Date:
AWC -- December a", 2000 2

III. Certification of Installation DIXIE FARM. I.D,# 63-003
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment Installation
New, ex anded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed in
accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: T _ _ Date: rrn+re�rrrr
,•�' o, ••Ess1a. /j.
B) Land Ap _licatinn Site (WUP) �,•0�� .•4
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste m�tagtmeni b1 t
r 9 � •
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry F . Graham P . E . r�,��s`'-MCI
f.
Affiliation Environmerrtal Engineering ServiceqDate Work Completed: -.
Address (Age rg 4Z6- alae7rdeprn, NC 28315 Phone No.:910-295-3252
Signature: �1 Date: 44' 17 ,- V
C) Runoff Controlk4rom Exte 'dr Lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified in
the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation - Date'Work Completed:
Address (Agency):
Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Application and Handling Equipment Installation (WUP or I)
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use; calibration
and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Cl Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner has
proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the
contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:_
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
AWC -- December 5, 2000

IRevised Agrmoniic Plan 1-W Dixie Paint - September 2001
I UPDATES AND REVISIONS TO THE AGRONOMIC PLAN FOR DIXIE FARM
i NOTES ABOUT THIS PROJECT:
Dixie Farm is a swine production facility owned by N.G. Purvis Farms, Inc. This facility has been in
swine production for many years. Dixie Farm currently has all of the proper technical specialist
certifications required for its Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). The owners of
Dixie Farm have recently decided to increase the scope of their agronomic plan by diversifying their
I crop growing options within the fields where they apply swine waste. This package discusses the
particulars of this diversified agronomic plan and its associated waste management details.
The details contained within this document will only be revisions to the portion of the existing CAWMP
that applies to crop production, or the agronomic section of the plan. The engineer will give some
background details associated with other aspects of the CAWMP but discussions and revisions will be
mainly confined to crop production at the farm. The other details and technical specialist certifications
associated with the CAWMP. are not being revised or recertified.
The reader should note that the farmer has the ultimate authority to manage his or her waste to best
suite his or her cropping patterns and weather conditions. This plan is only a guide, and should be
modified (within reason) to fit those needs from year to year. Maximums and minimums being
discussed should not be violated and precautions about off -site run-off of animal waste should be
strictly observed. As always the crops produced at a given farm where animal waste is applied shall
more or less balance with the nutrients produced. The exact numbers are expected to change some
I from year to year, butthebalance should be maintained.
The development of a CAWMP is a dynamic process. This means that one design decision will affect
the next decision, and that decision will affect the next, etc. Also, on -site situations will occasionally
require plan alterations or at least make them differ from those parameters presented in the written
document. Therefore, the reader should use this plan for guidance and for general standards more than
for exact "to the inch" measurements. The farmer/manager however should not grossly exceed the
minimum or maximum recommendations so as not to violate the intent of the recommendations. The
engineer has tried to weigh all factors in accordance with importance. Each intensive animal operation
and facility operates differently and must be evaluated on its own merit and the owner/operator's
willingness to maintain Best Management Practices or BMP's, It will be completely up to the farmer
and/or system(s) operator to operate the system in accordance with these plans, to protect the surface
water and groundwater of the State of North Carolina, and to adhere to all rules and regulations related
to animal waste utilization.
All specifications within this document are acceptable for use to satisfy the animal waste management
rules found in the publication titled NCDENR, Division of Environmental Water Quality, Title
15A:02H, Section .0200. The reader should refer to this State publication for regulatory details.
The design parameters contained in this document have been shown to be effective if performed in a
responsible manner by knowledgeable persons. It is impossible however to predict all future
operational, environmental, and legislative situations which could cause these plans to need modification
or be revised at a later date. When possible, this document follows the U.S. Natural Resources
Conversation Service (MRCS) design criteria and is not meant to contradict standard NRCS guidelines
or the design criteria of other organizations. Much of the information in this document was obtained
courtesy of the N,C. Cooperative Extension Service.

Revised Agronomic Plan for Dixie Fann - September 2001
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE REVISED CROPPING DETAILS FOR DIXIE FARM
PARAMETER
VALUES OR DATA
Farm Name and County
Dixie Farm
Moore Count
Number Of Animals and Type For The Existing CAWMP
806 Sows, Farrow to Wean
Waste Holding Capacity As Determined By NRCS
3 Lagoons widi a total of 304,306 cubic feet
(2,276,209 gallons) of capacity - Total .
Usable storage capacity of impoundment It 3 is equal
to 142,439 cubic feet (1,065,444) gallons
Average Irrigated Wastewater Based On Tliree Years Of
1,989,591 gallons per 12 months
Actual Farm Data
994,796 gallons per 6 montlis
165,799 gallons per 1 month
25 Year - 24 Hour Storm Event For Desi2 Per NRCS
6.5 inches
Maximum Estimated Available Days Of Storage (Months)
195 days 6,41 months
Average Plant Available Nitrogen Values Based On
From irrigation liquid = 1.77 lbs./1,000 gallons
3 Years Of Data
Plant Available Nitrogen (P.A,N) Estimated For Land
Total P.A.N. from irrigation: 3,522 pounds
Application
Calculated Sodium Absor ption Ratio
S.A.R. (irrigation water) = 3.43
Field Identifications Included In This Revised Plan
Field 1, Field 2, Field 3
Crops To Be Grown Under Wettable Acres
Option A: Bermudagrass Overseeded With Rye
Option B: Bermudagrass Overseeded With
Prairiegrass atua)
Predominate Soil T e Under Irrigation
Geor eville Gravel! Silt Loam
Realistic Yield Expectation (R.Y.E.) Ranges For
Bermudagrass : 3.3 to 3.5 tons/acre
Georgeville Soil Type, All Values Are Considered As
Rye Oversee& 2.25 tons/acre
Combination Crop Seasons Not Individual Crops.
Matua Grass Overseed: 5 tons/acre
Estimated Nitrogen Removal Potential By Harvested Crop
Bermudagrass / Rye : 3,485 pounds/year +/-
Combinations
Bermuda rass / Matua : 5,031 pounds/year +/-
Total Wettable Acres Under Irrigation Based On The
13.47 acres
Existing Plan
Crop Acres Not Under Irri *ation
2.83 acres +/-
Total Possible Crop Land Acres ReceivingAnimal Waste
16,30 acres +1-
Report Objectives
1. To describe the pertinent Dixie Farm site characteristics and operational features as presented by the
historical CAWMP.
2. To explain to the reader where the farm is located, what type of production is occurring, and
significant animal waste management practices, Descriptions and explanations about historical
wastewater production, lagoon storage capacities, etc. will be given for background.
3. To review the farm's manure application areas, soil types, irrigation acres, and plans for future crop
production.
4. To develop an agronomic report tailored to this farm. To list the crop production options, which
crops will receive animal waste, precautions associated with overseeding, Realistic Yield
2

{
1
Revised Agwomic Plan For Dixie Faun- Seplcnnlwr 2001
Expectations (R.Y.E.), Plant Available Nitrogen (P.A.N.) uptake by crop, some general cropping
patterns, and possible animal waste application windows.
5. To provide general guidance to the farmer and/or irrigation operator as to some fundamental
irrigation equations and principals so on -site waste application adjustments can be made as needed.
This will be largely illustrated by example and will include critical elements such as application
amounts, precipitation rates, gun cart travel speeds, and a general water balance discussion between
the irrigation routine and storage capabilities of the lagoon system. This package will not validate
existing irrigation equipment design or calibration.
6. To add emphasis to environmental concerns related to the protection of surface and groundwater at
and near the farm.
7. To provide a certifiable component revision to the existing CAWMP (including information
provided by others) that will offer alternatives to existing crop production.
GENERAL FARM DETAILS AND INFORMATION
General Site Information and Location
The Dixie Farm parcel is located in the northern part of Moore County approximately 8 miles north of
Carthage in a direct vector. Entrance to the farm is off Spivey Road (SR# 1637). The farm area is
approximately 88.5 acres, which consists of wood land, crop land, swine confinement houses, and
lagoons. Exhibits 1, 2, and 3 show various views of the property. The owner is N.G. Purvis Farms,
Inc.
The farm property is bordered by mostly wooded land or farm land with some residential dwellings
scattered around the immediate community. The swine houses and lagoons are bordered by trees and
the crop production fields. More will be said about regulatory set -backs later in this document.
Dixie Farm is a 806 sow farrow -to -wean operation. Swine effluent is stored and treated in an existing
lagoon system and is recycled into the houses to remove raw animal waste. Flushed out manure gravity
feeds back to the lagoon system. On occasion effluent is pumped from the lagoon system and land
applied via a spray irrigation system. The effluent is applied to farm grown crops at agronomic rates
and acts as a commercial fertilizer substitute. The swine population at this farm is not being increased
and there are no plans to increase the number of animals in the near future.
To the engineer's knowledge there have not been any swine effluent discharges at Dixie Farm.
Topography, Drainage, and Nearby Surface Waters
In general, the topography at and around Dixie Farm consists of rolling hills with all of the drainage
from the site going into several unnamed tributaries and then to Deep River. A USGS topo map of the
area can be seen as Exhibit 2 so the reviewer can get an overall view of the site. The USGS
topographic map containing this information is the Putnam Quadrangle (1974). Coordinates for this site
are approximately Longitude 79 degrees, 28 minutes, 37 seconds; Latitude 35 degrees, 27 minutes, 8
seconds.
Land slopes around the farm range from 2 to 15 percent. NRCS soil survey maps show irrigated field
slopes range from 2 to 8 percent. In general rainfall run-off flows away from or around the
confinement housing and the lagoon areas via pre -determined grass water ways and ditches. Most
3

.I Revised Agrmomie Man For Dixie Fam - s.ptoliber 2001
surface flowing water that might initially flow toward the lagoons is intercepted so this water is diverted
around the outside of the lagoons.
The lagoons and sprayfields at Dixie Farm should not be impacted by 100 year flooding. This opinion is
based on a review of the National Flood Insurance Program map number 37125C0050C, effective date
12-15-89.
Several small unnamed tributaries (intermittent streams) exist near the Dixie Farm spray fields and
lagoon areas. These tributaries eventually flow into Deep River. Based on maps of the area, Deep
River is approximately 3,700 feet from the nearest Dixie Farm spray field in a direct vector. See Exhibit
2 for a view of Deep River in relation to the farm property,
Deep River is a Class C-HQW water supply near Dixie Farm. A. Class C water supply's best usage for
which it must be protected is defined as "aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife,
secondary recreation, and agriculture". The HQW designation is a supplemental classification that
points to these waters as being critical to native trout, or primary nursery areas, or critical wildlife
habitat areas, etc. A HQW designation would require special protection from new construction sites,
sediment and erosion control permits for new construction sites, etc. Dixie Farm is not under any type
of construction at this time. No towns are known to get their water from Deep River immediately
down stream from the farm site.
The discharge of swine effluent to the surface waters of N.C. is prohibited. Therefore no effluent
should be allowed to make its way into the nearby streams and rivers. While no intensive animal
farming operation is immune from wastewater discharge accidents, adhering to the safety guidelines
within this document and the existing CAWMP and careful management should greatly minimize any
such accidents. A sudden dam breach causing a significant release of effluent is very unlikely but
existing dam evaluations are outside the scope of this EES work effort.
In a discharge event, the effluent would be very dilute prior to it reaching any public water supply
intake. While the effects of any such occurrence are serious, the engineer believes any major threat to a
drinking water supply is minimal and would not have dramatic and prolonged effects on the availability
of the drinking water supply. Municipal water intakes would be more than 10 miles away from the farm
(downstream). Stream aquatic life would be in jeopardy associated with any large and sudden release
of swine effluent especially if the discharge would occur at dry times when stream flows are small. The
extent of such an accident would depend on the quantity and quality of the effluent, plus the flow in the
river at the time of release.
Animal Waste Related Set -Backs Or Buffers
There are numerous regulations related to set -backs and buffers from intensive livestock operations.
Unfortunately these values are subject to sudden change due to legislation, making them hard to always
follow and predict. The engineer has made an attempt to list the appropriate set -backs below according
to the .0200 regulations, General Statue 106 (Senate Bill 1080), Senate Bill 1217, House Bill 515, etc.
as of this report date.
Tables 1 and 2 show various buffers or set -backs that apply to swine and dairy operations. Table 2
shows minimum distances from waste application areas. The reader should note that'the set -backs
shown are dependent on the time the farm was sited, adding an amount of uncertainty to the setbacks
that apply to a particular farm. Dixie Farm has been in business for many years (thought to be about
24 years). In other words, the swine facility was officially sited before 1995. The engineer cautions the
4

Revised Agronomic Plan For bixic Fann - Septanbo-T 2001
farmer to be especially careful to err on the side of safety when it comes to applying animal waste,
Wind conditions, neighbor activities, crop growth, temperatures, etc. may require that buffers be
increased. The grower must be particularly careful to avoid spray drift if irrigating on windy days.
TABLE 1
"FACILITY SET -BACKS" FOR NEW OR EXPANDING OPERATIONS
FACILITY SET -BACKS FROM --
SWINE
COWS
Residences farms existing before 4-15-87
300 feet
300 feet
Residences farms sited before 10-1-95
750 feet
750 feet
Residences farms sited after 10-1-95
1,500 feet
750 feet
Public use areas, churches, hospitals, schools, picnic
areas parks, etc. farms existing before 4-15-87
300 feet
300 feet
Public use areas, churches, hospitals, schools, picnic
areas, parks, etc, farms sited before 10-1-95
750 feet
750 feet
Public use areas, churches, hospitals, schools, picnic
areas arks, etc. farms sited after 10-1-95
2,500 feet
750 feet
Property lines
• Farms sited before 10-1-95
• Farms sited between 10-1-95 & 10-1-96
Farms sited after 10-1-96
100 feet?
100 feet
500 feet
100 feet?
100 feet?
100 feet?
Solid Blue Line Streams USGS Quad. Maps) +
100 feet
100 feet
Water wells serving_the farm property
100 feet
100 feet
Water wells not serving the farm property
500 feet
100 feet
100 year flood plain
Not Allowed
Not Allowed
? = This setback has not been confirmed, but it is considered a good recommendation.
Facilities would include the confinement houses, feed bins, lagoon, lagoon dams, etc. Access roads,
stormwater control devices (i.e. grass water ways), irrigation fields, piping, etc. are not part of the
facilities under the above set -back limitations according to the engineer's understanding, However the
grower should refer to legal counsel and/or regulatory agencies to confirm these opinions since there is
much regulatory confusion about such matters.
TABLE 2 APPEARS ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE IN ITS ENTIRETY
61

Revised Agrmurnic Plan For Dixie Finn - SeptcynUer 2001
TABLE 2
"WASTE APPLICATION SET -BACKS" FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS ( NEW AND EXISTING)
WASTE APPLICATION SET -BACKS FROM --
SWINE
COWS
Residences or occupied dwellings without variance
200 feet
200 feet
ermission.
Public use areas, churches, hospitals, schools, picnic
200 feet
200 feet
areas, 2arks, etc.
Any property line not owned by the farm (except as
No Specification (50 ft.
No Specification (25 f},
shown below)
recommended, more is
recommended, more is
better)
better)
Any property line with an occupied dwelling on that
adjacent property (unless given easement by owner).
• Farm sited before 10-1-95 ...........................
0 feet (more is better)
No Specification (25 ft.
• Farm sited between 10-1-95 & 8-27-97........
50 feet
recommended, more is
• Farm sited or expanded after 8-27-97 .........
75 feet
better)
• Spray fields put in place after 8-27-97 .........
75 feet
Public roads and ri it-of-wa s +
25 feet recommended?
25 feet recommended?
Shallow draina a ditches or grass water ways ++
0 ft (use extreme caution)
0 ft use extreme caution)
]Fri ation ditches or canals (flowina or usually full a@
25 ft (more is better)
25 ft (more is better
Perennial Streams (i.e. Solid Blue Line Streams from
USGS Quad. Maps) other than an irrigation ditch or
canal +++
4
+ Farms sited before 10-1-95 ..........................
25 feet (100 ft is better)
25 feet (100 feet is
• Farms sited between,.10-1-95 & 8-27-97.......
50 feet (100 ft is better)
better)
• Farm sited or expanded after 8-27-97 .........
75 feet (100 ft is better)
+ Spray fields 2ut in place after 8-27-97 ..........
75 feet (100 ft is better)
Water wells serving the farm 2roperty
100 feet
100 feet
Water wells not serving the farm property
100. feet
100 feet
104 year, flood plain
Allowed but use caution
Allowed but use caution
? = This setback has not been confirmed, but it is considered a good recommendation.
+ = Typical right -of ways from secondary roads in NC is 30 feet from the center line of the road. This means to stay 25
feet away from the right of way or a total of 55 feet from the center line of the road. The engineer would suggest a buffer
of at least 75 feet from public road right-of-ways if using big gun irrigation to avoid unpleasant accidents, especially in
windy conditions. 50 feet from center line is recommended if using a "honey wagon" to broadcast near public road right-
of-ways.
++ = A light application of effluent over grass water ways to maintain a good grass cover is acceptable. This is different
from deep groundwater lowering ditches or very steep waterways. Use good judgment and plan this type of activity away
from rain events. Do not irrigate in wet lands. Do not heavily apply waste in valleys which are subject to high rainfall run
off or in wet weather drainage ways. 100 feet'buffers from perennial water (i.e. blue line streams) are reconunended by
the engineer for all fields where waste is to be applied (if applicable). As a word of caution, it is the owners responsibility
to verify any set -backs that are close or questionable.
+++ = The first 25 feet next to perennial waters measured from the outer perimeter of animal waste application to an
adjacent perennial stream must be a riparian buffer. Riparian buffers must be permanent type vegetation. The other part of
the buffer can be in crops or some other suitable filter strip vegetation. A 100 feet buffer between animal waste
applications and a perennial stream may negate the need for a riparian buffer. Steep slopes between animal waste
application sites and the perennial stream may increase the buffer to more than 100 feet.
@ = Irrigation ditches are often connected to pererunial streams and may be considered part of the perennial stream. Such
ditches need a qualified technical specialist to evaluate their status.

Revised Agi-momic Plan For Dixic Fann - Septunber 2001
Miscellaneous Site Details
There are no dwellings, structures, or bridges between the anaerobic lagoon and the nearest creek or
branch.
In North Carolina the prevailing winds are typically from the south-west blowing to the north-east.
There are no high density residential developments, hospitals, schools, or parks immediately north east
of the Dixie Farm parcel but some individual dwellings do exist in the nearby community. The land
application of waste should not be inhibited by these nearby dwellings as long as all precautions and
safeguards are followed.
From limited observation, the engineer did not observe any unusual natural or archeological features at
this farm parcel where waste is to be applied. No endangered or threatened wildlife species were
noted.
Animal Populations and Related Information
Anaerobically treated swine effluent is the only type of animal waste scheduled for routine application
on the crops at Dixie Farm. Future sludge removal events will be scheduled as needed. Since sludge
applications will be site specific to the time, season, and quantity, its removal and associated land
application details are not part of this CAWMP.
TABLE 3
General Swine Farm Data For Dixie Farm
T e of facility
Farrow -to -Wean
Original farm siting
Before 1995
Number of head
806 sows
Average head weight
433 pounds / sow
Total SSLW
348,998 pounds.
Latest lagoon construction completed
Before 1995
Number of lagoons
3
Lagoon for storing excess water
A common second stage impoundment (called
impoundment # 3
I
Future expansion plans
None
A BRIEF REVIEW OF THE DIXIE FARM LAGOON SYSTEM.
General
Dixie Farm is an existing facility and has been using anaerobic lagoons for animal waste treatment and
storage for over 20 years. EES was not part of the original lagoon design or construction efforts at this
farm and does not have any of the original design documentation. The lagoon information referenced
within this document was obtained from others and is only being presented for background. For
brevity, only the pertinent design information about the lagoon system will be discussed herein.
This farm uses a multiple stage anaerobic lagoon system. Wastewater flushed from the confinement
houses goes directly into one of two first stage lagoons by gravity. Both first stage lagoons flow via
7

Revised Ag cn omic Plan For Dixie Dann - S���Innh�ti 20� I
gravity into a common second stage lagoon or storage impoundment. Eventually wastewater is
irrigated out of the storage impoundment on to growing crops.
In 1997 the NRCS evaluated the lagoon system at Dixie Farm. The'NRCS concluded that Dixie's
lagoon system was adequate for liquid storage but did not meet NRCS guidelines for waste treatment.
Table 4 summarizes their calculations. However, the reader should know that not all 3 lagoons are
emptied on a routine basis, All irrigation occurs out of impoundment # 3 (or sometimes referred to as
lagoon # 3) as per the environmental manager of Purvis Farms. Therefore the engineer will consider
lagoon # 3 to be a waste storage pond that can be pumped completely empty so its entire volume is
available for storage. Table 5 shows the calculated volume of the storage structure by itself based on
NRCS estimates.
TABLE 4
Estimated Wastewater Storage Volume For Dixie Farm Based On NRCS Calculations
Sum of all lagoons (for storage only) + 2,276,209 gallons (304,306 cu. ft.) +/-
+ This value assumes 100 % storage capacity in all three lagoons at Dixie. This storage is only available if all lagoons
are empty. The MRCS has estimated this is more or less one full year of storage at Dixie Faun using all 3 impoundments.
The engineer assumes this is the total lagoon capacity.
TABLE 5
Estimated Wastewater Storage Volume For Impoundment #E 3 At Dixie Farm Based On MRCS
Calculations
Waste Storage Impoundment # 3 ' 142,439 cu. ft. 1,065,444 gallons
+ This value assumes 100 % storage capacity inside the impoundment. This storage is only available if the pond is
empty. The engineer assumes this is the usable storage below the required freeboard and one 25 year - 24 hour storm
falling on all lagoon surfaces. This is thought to represent usable storage.
Actual Wastewater Irrigation Numbers From Dixie Farm
In 1997 the NRCS calculated annual wastewater volumes for Dixie Farm using book numbers. Since
that time Dixie Farm has accumulated data on actual irrigated volumes. The engineer will use the actual
irrigated volumes to determine annual wastewater generation.
Wastewater is typically pulled off of the top of impoundment # 3 and recycled to the confinement
buildings for re -use. Excess water accumulation will eventually be spray irrigated on crops. Naturally
the farmer will not desire to irrigate every day or every week. Likewise there will be time periods when
the weather will not permit responsible irrigation. This requires there to be storage volume built into
the lagoon system to give the farmer safety and flexibility in the irrigation routine. In North Carolina
the time period for this part of the design can vary between three and six months or occasionally less if
intensive waste management is used.
Table 6 shows a the actual annual irrigated volumes at Dixie Farm. This table is broken down for a 12
month wastewater generation volume, a 6 month wastewater generation volume, and a 1 month
wastewater generation volume. One could use these values to likewise estimate the storage volume
needed for various periods of the year. These values would include the excess wastes produced by the
animals, spillage or wasted water, clean-up water, and excess rainfall (less evaporation) directly into the
lagoon system. This does not include rainfall run-off water from outside the lagoon since it is usually
diverted by earthen embankments and grass water ways. The reader will note that Table 6 assumes an
equal amount of wastewater volume per unit of time. In the real world, wastewater volumes will
8

11 Revised : \gunumii Plan For Dihic Faun - Sept tinhur 2001
change from month to month depending on rainfall, temperature, evaporation, farming operations, etc.
However, for most swine operations, using average numbers for excess waste production is a
reasonably close approximation.
TABLE 6
Actual Annual IrriLyation Volumes For Dixie Farm Based On Farm Records
Year
RECORDED ANNUAL
VOLUME OF IRRIGATED
WATER
(Gallons)
ASSUMED 6 MONTHS OF
STORAGE NEEDED BASED ON
ACTUAL DATA - AVG. *
(Gallons)
ASSUMED I MONTH OF
STORAGE NEEDED BASED ON
ACTUAL DATA -AVG.
(Gallons)
1998
2,484,300 gallons
1,242,15U allons
207,025 gallons
1999
1,758.273 gallons
879,137 allons
146,523 gallons
2000
1,726,200 gallons
863,100 gallons
143.850 gallons
Average
1.989,591 gallons
994;796 gallons
165.799 gallons
* Assumes equal excess rainfall in all six month and one month periods of the year. These values do not include
any 25 year - 24 hour rainfalls.
Table 6 shows the actual wastewater irrigated based on farm records. One could speculate that this is
more or less the true average value of the wastewater being generated at the farm, less evaporation,
The reader will note that water conservation measures were implemented starting in 1999 that have
shown a reduced annual irrigation volume, Therefore the 1998 volume data may be higher than one
would anticipate today. For the readers information, the average yearly wastewater generation in Table
6 is about 32 % larger than the NRCS calculated book value. The engineer recommends a more
detailed month by month rainfall/wastewater/irrigation balance be used if the impoundments are covered
with an organic material or mat, such as with most dairy waste storage ponds. However, for most
swine operations the use of averages like in Table 6 are reasonable approximations.
TABLE 7
Estimated Days Of Waste Storage Available Based On Estimated Values
VOLUME OF WASTE
ASSUMED I MONTH OF
ASSUMED 1 DAY OF
DAYS OF STORAGE
STORAGE AVAILABLE IN
STORAGE NEEDED
STORAGE NEEDED
AVAILABLE IN
IMPOUNDMENT 4 3 +
BASED ON ACTUAL
BASED ON ACTUAL
IMPOUNDMENT # 3 +
DATA *
DATA*
1,065,444 Gallons
165,799 Gallons
5,450 Gallons
195 Days
+ This assumes the impoundment is empty.
* Assumes equal excess rainfall in all six month and one month periods of the year. These values do not include
any 25 year - 24 hour rainfalls.
High Water Markers for Liquid Levels
As required by regulation, the farmer shall install a permanent pole or metered stick or stakes inside the
lagoon or waste storage pond so the operator can gauge the current water level and volume inside the
lagoon. Water level markers and placements were designed by the NRCS and are not being revised
herein,
IF,

Revis;atl Agronomic Phi For Dixio Farni - Septonher 2001
NUTRIENT PRODUCTION FROM ANIMAL MANURE AND ITS USE ON CROPS
Once animal waste is collected and stored in a lagoon it starts going through chemical and biological
changes. Temporary waste storage ponds may also offer some nutrient breakdown but not to the extent
of lagoons since waste storage ponds are not specifically designed for treatment. Microbial digestion,
volatilization, etc. all contribute to nutrient reductions in the raw manure. Partially digested animal
manure contains considerable nitrogen as well as other macronutrients such as calcium, phosphorous,
potassium, etc. In addition the animal waste contains many micronutrients such as copper, zinc, iron,
etc. Currently only nitrogen is considered as the limiting nutrient factor for the land application of
animal waste, but in the future other nutrients may become the limiting components. The farmer must
perform annual soil tests for copper and zinc. Below the reader will find various nutrients discussed.
In 1997 the NRCS made note that the Dixie Farm lagoons did not meet the NRCS guidelines for lagoon
design. However, the engineer has noted that NCDA test analyses for Plant Available Nitrogen
(P.A.N.) demonstrate that relatively good anaerobic treatment of the animal waste is occurring inside
the Dixie Farm lagoons. More will be said below about P.A.N.
Nitrogen
Nitrogen is a fundamental part of all life on earth. It is used in relatively large amounts by most living
things. Nitrogen is the most abundant element in the atmosphere (in a gas form) but is relatively rare in
rocks, minerals, and soils. Atmospheric nitrogen is very stable and not readily plant available.
Organisms tend to use up nitrogen quickly in a natural setting, thus making it relatively scarce. Under
natural conditions nitrogen is often the limiting factor in plant production. Most plants respond more to
nitrogen applications than to other types -of nutrients.. Plants must have nitrogen in the inorganic form
(i.e. nitrate and ammonia ions) for assimilation. However we often find nitrogen in a gas form (i.e.
atmospheric N) or in organic form (i.e. like in animal waste), neither form being readily available to
plants. Organic nitrogen found in animal waste must first be converted to an inorganic form. Organic
nitrogen is most often converted to inorganic forms by microbial action. Nitrogen that is available in a
form plants can use is called Plant Available Nitrogen or P.A.N.
Nitrogen is essential in chlorophyll production and in the formation of amino acids and proteins. For
crop production, nitrogen can come from commercial fertilizer, nitrogen fixing bacteria (legumes), or
from organic matter like animal waste. Plant Available Nitrogen or P.A.N. in animal waste is usually
estimated by an equation. Many laboratories like NCDA provide P.A.N. estimations for the client when
they perform a waste analysis. P.A.N. can vary from waste sample to waste sample and is thus most
reliably estimated by using an average of actual test results. When using actual test data the engineer
uses the procedure described in the NC Cooperative Extension Publication AG-439-42. When actual
test data is not available, the designer can use standard design numbers (i.e, book values) such as those
issued by the N.C. Cooperative Extension Service, MRCS publications, etc. Book values are often used
if there are not at least 3 consecutive years of NCDA waste analyses to average.
As a word of caution, NCDA waste testing is only as reliable as the care with which the sample is
retrieved. Therefore the farmer should take extreme care to collect representative waste samples.
The same would be true for soil sampling. The reader can see Exhibit 9 for waste sampling instructions
and Exhibit 8 for soil sampling instructions.
Tables 8 and 9 show test data of the Dixie Farm stored liquid effluent (see Exhibit 5 for the NCDA test
reports). Table 9 summarizes total P.A.N. values produced at Dixie Farm. In the future the farmer
E

Revise-d Agronomic Plan For Dixie Farm - September 2001
must collect waste samples at least 60 days prior to the land application of animal waste to
accurately track nutrient levels. -
-
TABLE 8
AVERAGING SWINF, F,FFLUENT P.A.N. DATA
Farm I.D.
Type Of Sample
Date Of
Sample
Reported
P.A.N.
(lbs/1000 gal)
Irrigated
Book Value For
P.A.N.
(lbs/1000 gal)
Irrigated
Dixie
Li uid For Irri ation
3-26-98
1.7
1.66
Dixie
Li uid For Irri tion
6-22-98
1.6
1.66
Dixie
LigAid For Irrigation
9-24-98
0.82
1.66
Dixie
Liquid For Irrigation
2-10-99
1.5
1.66
Dixie
Liquid For lrri tion
4-26-99
2.2
1.66
Dixie
Liquid For Irrigation
7-1-99
1.6
1.66
Dixie
Liquid For Irrigation
9-23-99
1.1
1.66
Dixie
Liquid For Irrigation
3-2-00
1.7
1.66
Dixie
Liquid For Irrigation_
5-10-00
1.6
1.66
Dixie
Liquid For Irrigation
7-26-00
2.1
1.66
Dixie
Liquid For Irrigation
9-20-00
2.2
1.66
Dixie
Liquid For Irrigation
1-23-01
2.9
1.66
Dixie
Liquid For Irrigation
4-19-0I
2A
1.66
Dixie
Liquid For Irrigation
7-20-01
1.6
1,66
Averse
Liquid For Irrigation
*****
1.79
1.66
Avg. Without P.A.N. Values
<0.93 and >2.65 Ibs/l 000 gal. ++
Liquid For Irrigation
*****
1.77
++ Values more or less than 48% of the average P.A.N. value have been removed from the design value average based on
the NC Cooperative Extension Publication AG-439-42.
TABLE 9
ESTIMATED P.A.N. PRODUCTION ON DIXIE FARM _ ANNUAL TOTALS
WASTE
WASTE TYPE
P.A,N. PER UNIT FOR
NUMBER OF
TOTAL P.A.N.
SOURCE
AND
THIS TYPE WASTE
GALLONS
PRODUCTION
APPLICATION
From Table 8
PRODUCED
TECHNI UE
(Pounds/1000 gals)
ANNUALLY
(Pounds Per Year)
Lagoon System
Liquid / Irrigated
1.77 1
1,989,591 1
3,522
Copper And Zinc
Copper and zinc are trace metals (heavy metals) often found in animal type waste in small amounts.
Plants must have a limited amount of these metals in order to thrive. Copper is involved in plant
enzyme systems, protein synthesis, seed formation, chlorophyll production, etc. Zinc is involved in
starch formation, protein synthesis, root development, etc. If applied to soil in high quantities year after
year, copper and zinc can accumulate and may eventually reach high enough levels to become toxic to
plants (phytotoxic), Different plants have different tolerances for these metals. Harmful metal
accumulation levels will also depend on the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the soil. Tables 10 and
11 show these two metals and relative harmful levels. The land owner or operator should always try to
keep the heavy metal levels as low as possible. MRCS, DWQ, etc. recommends that no more than 1 /20

Revised Agronomic Plan I,or Dixie Pane - September 2001
of the lifetime metals allowance be applied in any one year, especially if the application is an on -going
event. Soil test data will show existing metal levels and the CEC of the soil. Soil tests for copper and
zinc must be taken at least annually. See Exhibits 8 and 14 for more details about copper and zinc. Also
see these metals discussed in the soils report section below.
TABLE W
RECOMMENDED CUMULATIVE LIMITS FOR METALS OF MAJOR CONCERN
APPLIED TO AGRICULTURAL CROP LAND
Soil Cation Exchange Ca aci , meq 1100 m +
<5
5to15
>I5
Metal
kg/ha
lb/ac
kg/ha
lblac
k a
lb/ac
Lead Pb)
560
500
1,120
1,000
2,240
2,000
Zinc (Zn)
280
250
560
500
1,120
1,000
Copper Cu)
140
125 1
280
250
560
500
Nickel i)
140
125
280
250
560
500
Cadmium (Cd)
4.4
10
9
20
17.8
+ Ref; USDA and EPA adopted guidelines, 1977. Soil should be maintained at a pH of about 6 for most crop types.
TABLE It
NCDA SOIL INDEX NUMBERS FOR COPPER AND ZINC #
METAL
SOIL TEST INDEX
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Copper
.300
Limit application on peanuts. Maintain soil pH > 6.0
500
Cease application on peanut land. Maintain soil pH > 6.0
2000
Caution: Seek alternative site all crops). Maintain soil pH > 6.0
3000
Cease 222lication all crops). Maintain soil pH > 6.0
Zinc
2000
Caution: Seek alternative site all cro s). Maintain soil pH > 6.0
3000
Cease application all crops). Maintain soil pH > 6.0
# This table was taken from the Seventh Guidance Memo .from the 1217 Interagency Group dated 1-9-01.
Phosphorus and Potassium
Phosphorus is found in various concentrations in all types of animal waste. Phosphorous is a key
element to ensure good crop health. Its effect on crop growth is not as dramatic as nitrogen or
potassium, but the lack of it can cause plant stunting, poor seed formation, and reduced crop yields.
Phosphorous levels in animal type waste will vary depending on many factors so testing will always be
required. Often the operator will land apply phosphorus in amounts beyond what can be taken up by
plants. High phosphorus levels are (typically) more of a problem for surface transport to streams than it
is a problem for plants. This is because the phosphorous strongly attaches itself to soil particles.
Therefore the operator must be very cautious about surface run-off and soil erosion from fields into
streams or creeks. Good buffer strips and erasion controls will help keep phosphorus from getting into
streams.
The reader should also note that recent studies have shown that phosphorous can be forced into the
groundwater (or washed to surface waters) if it is repeatedly applied to phosphorous saturated land. In
the near future the MRCS, DWQ and others will likely adopt more strict guidelines on phosphorous
12

Revised Agrmomic Plan For Dixic Farm - scptanhcr 2001
loadings. For now it is best to try and manage phosphorous loadings and minimize its off -site transport.
See Exhibits 8 and 14 for more details about phosphorus.
Potassium is also found in animal manure and is a very important element for plant growth. Plants use
potassium in quantities similar to their use of nitrogen, The lack of potassium can cause plant stress,
defoliation, or death. Potassium is less mobile in soil than nitrogen but more mobile than potassium.
Sandy soils tend to loose potassium more readily than clay soils. Maintaining good soil pH and organic
matter will help keep potassium from moving below the plant root zone. Potassium is not thought to be
as environmentally damaging as phosphorous. Good buffer strips and erosion controls will help keep
phosphorus from getting into streams from run-off. See Exhibits 8 and 14 for more details about
potassium.
Sodium
Sodium is a naturally occurring element in many soils and animal wastes. Excessive buildups of sodium
can cause water stress in growing plants. High sodium loadings onto a clay soil can cause clay particle
dispersion if it is not balanced with calcium or magnesium. Clay particle dispersion will cause the soil
surface to become hard and will severely restrict water infiltration and permeability.
High sodium content wastes, if land applied, can accumulate sodium in the soil profile and cause the
problems mentioned above. Scientists use an equation to evaluate the potential effect of sodium on a
soil that is called the Sodium Adsorption Ration or S.A.R. This ratio loops at a balance between
sodium, calcium and magnesium to see if'the ratios are out of balance. This equation is.-
0.5
S.A.R = (Na milli -equivalent) / [(0.5 x (Ca milli -equivalent + Mg milli -equivalent)]
FOR DIXIE FARM IRRIGATED LIQUIDS:
Data obtained from averaging NCDA test results (from Exhibit 5):
Sodium (Na) concentration is: (158 mg/L) / 23 = 6.87 milli -equivalents
Calcium (Ca) concentration is: (112 mg/L) / 20 = 5.6 milli -equivalents
Magnesium (Mg) concentration is: (29 mg/1)1 12 = 2.42 milli -equivalents
0.5
S.A.R. = (6.87) / [0.5 x (5.6 + 2.42)]
0.5
S.A.R. = 6.87 / [4.01]
S.A. R. = 3.43
Land applying a waste with a S.A.R. of 15 or less is usually safe to apply on most soils, Sandy soils
do not have as much of a problem with clay dispersion as do clay type soils thus high S.A.R. values are
not as critical, However, sodium can cause drought conditions for plants growing in sandy soils
regardless of clay dispersion. All things considered, sodium does not seem .to be a problem at this time
based on the Dixie Farm liquid waste analyses,
13

Revised Agonuinic Plan Por Dixie Fann - SelAcndkT 2001
Other Elements In The Waste
Exhibit 5 shows additional elements and compounds that were tested for by the NCDA lab. These other
elements are important but will not be discussed herein for brevity. Future test results should always be
viewed for elevations in heavy metals, sodium, etc.
SOILS AND NUTRIENT CONSIDERATIONS
Estimating Nutrient Application Rates
There is no more important task in the utilization of animal waste than to properly apply it on a
particular crop at rates which the plants can utilize. Over application can cause nutrients to be washed
off to surface water or leached into ground water, and under application can result in a poor crop
growth. Proper application amounts are known as "agronomic rates". The proper agronomic rates can
vary from season to season, by crop types, by soil types, by topography, by short term weather
conditions, by crop combinations, etc. These values are not to be confused with potential hydraulic
loadings. Hydraulic loadings will be discussed in another section. The key factor to remember is to not
apply nutrients to crops in excess of their ability to utilize these nutrients or in excess of the soil's water
(hydraulic) acceptance rates.
A soil survey map is attached as Exhibit 4, showing the Dixie Farm land. This map shows soil types
found around the proposed land application fields. Different soil types will have different crop yields
and different water acceptance rates as already discussed above.
The proper application of animal manure onto crops must be a well thought out and planned event.
Planning for the waste application must be done in advance of the need for the nutrients. In order to do
the job right the farmer must collect waste samples for analysis and soil samples for analysis in advance
of irrigation and/or broadcasting. If sludge or slurry is scheduled for removal it too should be sampled
and its nutrient values factored into the land application program. See Exhibits 8 and 9 for soil and
waste sampling instructions, Make sure you collect representative samples. If you are going to apply
slurry, make su_r_e your_sample_is taken as a slurry.
If long term waste analyses are available the farmer should take 3 to 5 years of data and use these
numbers for averaging P.A.N., Extremely high or low nutrient values should be questioned and
reasons sought. Any waste test data that has a value that is 48% higher or lower different than the raw
data's average should be eliminated from the average pool and the average taken again. See the NC
Cooperative Extension Service Publication titled "Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan", pub. # AG-439-42 (Exhibit 17) for additional instructions for this
averaging. Also, if farm water use records are available, these should likewise be averaged. Table 8
above was developed using the 48% rule for averaging and can be viewed as an example.
Dixie Farm Soil Testing Analysis
The latest soil tests available to the engineer were from 4-30-01. These can be seen as Exhibit 13. The
engineer is not positive of where the soil samples shown in Exhibit 13 were collected. In the future the
farmer should keep all records according to the field numbers within this document. It is a wise idea to
separate soil samples by field number when possible, especially if the soils are different or you grow
different crops between fields. While this soil report is only one "snap -shot" of the soil conditions, the
following basic comments can be made:
14

Revised Agronomic Plan For Dixic Fain - Sgrianber 2UOI
l . The soil tests show the fields sampled have a slightly low soil pH. These fields need lime. For most
crops the desired soil pH should be kept around 6 for mineral soils, around 5.5 for mineral -organic
soils, and around 5.0 for organic soils. Lime quantities are shown on each report segregated by soil
test. All soils'shown in Exhibit 13 were mineral type soils.
2. Land applied nutrients from animal waste are not 100 percent available to a crop in the first year.
Some of the nutrients applied this year will become available next year for next years crops.
Detailed discussions about nutrient mineralization and residuals are beyond the scope of this report.
Collect soil samples early enough to study the results before planting crops.
3. The nitrogen requirements shown on these reports are based on agronomic book values and are not
true test results. This means the farmer must go back to nitrogen records to look at possible
nitrogen applications for the upcoming growing season and compare the records to the
recommendations within the latest CAWMP,
4. The phosphorous index (P-I) and the potassium index (K-1) are measurements of the amount of
these minerals in the soil as compared to what plants typically need. In terms of crop utilization and
benefits, there is not a need for additional phosphorous or potassium (i.e, potash) on the Dixie harm
fields. In other words, the crops would not respond with increase health, yield, or growth by adding
more of these elements. It is likely that the farmer has been applying sufficient quantities of these
nutrients in the past. From Exhibit 13, sample numbers DXl and DX2 have a phosphorous index
(P-I) of greater than 150 and a potassium index (K-I) of greater than 100. This means there is
already phosphorous and potassium in these soils. All farm soils should be guarded from erosion to
prevent surface water impacts, especially if they have high phosphorous or potassium indexes.
When the P-1 or'K-I indexes greatly exceed 100 it is a good idea to minimize phosphorous and
potassium in. these fields when possible. If P-I values in a particular field continue to be greater than
300, this field and its waste application practices should be evaluated by a crop or soil specialist.
5. The copper index (Cu-I) and the zinc index (Zn-I) are measurements of the amount of these metals
in the soil as compared to what plants typically need. According to the soil report there is not a
need to add copper or zinc to the soils at the farm in terms of crop production. In fact future loading
of these metals should be minimized to avoid plant phytotoxicity problems since these metals are not
quickly removed by plants. The copper and zinc indexes are shown in the NCDA reports (Exhibit
13). Sample number DX1 shows particularly high levels in both the zinc index (Zn-I) and the
copper index (Cu-1). Sample number DX2 shows a lower index in both of these categories but still
above what the plants need. Thus zinc and copper should be closely monitored in these fields or
find crops that are zinc and copper tolerant. While some crops are more sensitive to metals than
are others, the farmer should try to keep the zinc and copper (Zn-I, and Cu-1) indexes below 700
(rule of thumb). See Table 1 I for a listing of soil index precautions related to copper and zinc.
6. Soil samples should be collected at least one time per year. Lime according to the new soil sample
test results.
7. Past soil test results should be kept by the operator and compared to new test results. Look for
trends or increasing levels of metals. When collecting soil samples, closely follow the soil sample
instructions found in Exhibit 8. Never use galvanized or metal buckets or galvanized tools when
collecting soil samples since these can cause the zinc levels to show artificially high.
Soils To Receive Waste
The soils information presented within this document was obtained from soil survey maps and through
conversations with the Moore County NRCS and the NC Cooperative Extension Service, Exhibit 4
15

IZeviwd Agnmiu mke Plan For Dixie Farm - Sei)tember 2001
shows the USDA/NRCS soil survey map for Dixie Farm (Moore County). This map shows a single
predominate soil type within the spray fields at Dixie Farm. The engineer finds this agrees with the
previously developed soil evaluation done by the NRCS. According to these sources the predominate
soil series at the Dixie Farm site is:
1. GeB. Georgeville Gravelly Silt Loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes.
Soil Name...................................................................
Georgeville Gravelly Silt Loam
Soil Index Number ......................................................
3
Soil Management Group (SMG).................................
113
Most Restrictive Permeability Zone .............................
0.6 in/hr. (approx.)
Maximum Long Duration Application Rate .................
Bare Soil = 0.30 in./Hr. (Avg.)
Maximum Long Duration Application Rate .................
On Crop = 0.40 In./Hr. (Avg.)
Maximum Short Duration Application Rate .................
On Crop 0.50 Inches/Hour
"Design" Moisture Use Rate (Maximum -Hay) .......1....
0.24 Inches/Day
Max. Fresh Water Irrigation During Peak ET -Hay .......
Every 5 to 6 Days
Application Amount Range For Animal Waste .............
0.30 to 0.75 inches + .
+ Approximate maximum irrigation in one cycle in Piedmont using animal waste- (Hay crop). Usually
irrigation application amounts will be 0.5 inches or less. Highest value assumes a 75% irrigation
efficiency and would only be possible in hot and dry weather conditions on slopes less than 8 %. Steeper
slopes or cool weather applications will require less intensive irrigation,
CROP PLANTING AND OTHER AGRONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS
General Cropping Descriptions
Discussions between the farmer(s) and the engineer were held to determine the farmer's desire -for
future crop selection. In general Dixie Farm has been growing bermudagrass in the warm seasons of the
year and small grain in the cool seasons of the year. The farmer would also like the flexibility of
switching from small grain to prairiegrass (matua) if he finds it is suitable for his operation. The reader
should understand that the exact mixture of crops to be grown on any field will depend on the farmer's
opinion. In other words the farmer may decide to plant a small field of matua grass and grow small
grain on other fields as a cool season combination. Or he may decide to plant all of the fields in matua
grass, or all in small grain if the matua grass does not perform. The engineer will not attempt to give all
possible combinations of crop patterns but will discuss the most likely combinations. A discussion on
the cropping patterns will appear below
The majority of the liquid animal waste will be surface applied via a spray irrigation system. The farmer
may eventually use a broadcast wagon to fertilize field fringes, but he would prefer to avoid this added
expense unless it becomes necessary. See Exhibit 3 for aerial photographs and field identifications.
Crops must be planted within 30 days or be actively growing (i.e, greening) within 30 days of a waste
application event.
Table 12 shows the various fields to receive animal waste as part of the Dixie Farm CAWMP. These
are the same field designations as developed by the MRCS under the old CAWMP. EES has reviewed
these fields with the farmer to make sure they are still in use as identified. The reader will note that each
of these fields is being irrigated with a hard hose traveler. The hard hose traveler gun cart in Fields I
16

•
Revised Agononue Plan For Dime Fam - Septen&t 2001
and 2 is retrieved from north to south. The hard hose traveler gun cart in Field 3 is retrieved from west
to east. The field sizes shown were estimated from aerial photographs,
The crops shown in Table 12 have been or can be grown for that particular field, The farmer has
flexibility in changing the crop combinations if needed, but records must be kept to show what was
grown on each field, how much yield was obtained, and how much waste applied. Changing a crop
combination does not mean changing crop types beyond those listed in Table 12, A revision to this
CAWMP will be needed if the crop types are altered.
Typically bermudagrass will be grown in warm weather on every field. Either small grain or matua
grass will be planted over the bermudagrass as a cool season crop. The small grain crop can be cereal
rye or rye grass. Dixie Farm can only take P.A.N. removal credits for crops harvested and removed
from the fields. Burning hay bales or other crops is not allowed.
TABLE 12
DATA FOR THE FIELDS UNDER IRRIGATION AT DIXIE FARM
Tract
Field
Field Areas
Wetted Acres
Soil Type
Crop Type To
Approx. Slopes
Number
Number
After Buffers
For Irrigation
Be Grown
In Fields
acres +
acres ++
1
1
5.30
4.71
Georgeville
Bermudagrass,
2 to 8 %
Small Grain or
Matua Grass
1
2
5.90
5.56
Georgeville
Bermudagrass,
2 to 8 %
'
Small Grain or
Matua Grass
1
3
5.10
3.20
Georgeville
Bermudagrass,
2 to 8 %
Small Grain or
Matua Grass
Total
*****
16,30
13.47
*****
*****
*****
+ Field acres were obtained from aerial photographs. Field shapes were approximated and thus these acres are
also approximated. Not all of these acres are under irrigation.
++ These wetted acres were taken from a wetted acre determination done by Brock Equipment Company, Bailey
NC. on behalf of N.G. Purvis Farms, Inc. Each of these wetted acres represent a single pull from a hard hose
traveler gun cart,
Hybrid Coastal Bermudagrass (for hay)
Coastal bermudagrass is the primary nitrogen removal crop at Dixie Farm, Typically, hybrid coastal
bermudagrass will yield more tonnage than common bermudagrass. Hybrid coastal bermudagrass
produces no seeds but spreads by rhizomes and stolons, Bermudagrass is a warm season crop and its
nutrient uptake is typically greatest in the months from May to August, however it may actively grow
from April to October, depending on temperatures. Climatic and nutrient conditions will alter growth
rates for bermudagrass. About 3 cuttings per year can be expected on most bermudagrass fields.
Rainfall and fresh water irrigation will also play an important role in bermudagrass yield and the
required cuttings.
Hybrid coastal bermudagrass tolerates acid soils reasonably well (pH 5 to 5.5), However it does
respond to liming. A soil pH of 6.0 or higher is recommended for improved growing conditions.
Commercial fertilizer should be applied in split applications, i.e, not all at one time. When using animal
17

Revised Agronomic Plan For I)iric Farm - S ptemlkr 2001
type waste as a fertilizer source applications will occur regularly over the growing season, Nitrogen
uptake predictions will be discussed below.
When establishing, sprig hybrid coastal bermudagrass at 5 to 15 bushels per acre in rows about 3 to 4
feet apart with sprigs 2 to 3 feet apart within the row. If sprigs are plentiful, the farmer can establish by
broadcasting 70 to 100 bushels per acre in late winter and disking in. One bushel will contain about
1,200 sprigs, Best planting dates in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain are between March I and March
31, Planting may also be possible between February 15 to May I if weather conditions are favorable.
If irrigated, some planting may spill over into July but this is not highly recommended. Sprig mortality is
lessened when ample soil moisture is present.
The typical yield for non -irrigated hybrid bermudagrass (as a sole crop) is from 3 to 6 tons per acre,
again depending on many factors, not the least of which is soil type. For a Georgeville soil, with slopes
from 2 to 8 percent, the R.Y.E. for non -irrigated coastal bermuda hay is about 4.8 tons per acre
(this value was obtained from the NCSU document called `Realistic Yield Expectations for Soils of
North Carolina"), However if bermudagrass is irrigated with fresh water its yield can be considerably
higher. If the coastal bermudagrass at this farm will be grazed by cattle, its R.Y.E. must be
reduced by 75% (per NRCS guidelines). The normal nitrogen uptake for hybrid coastal
bermudagrass is between 40 and 50 pounds of N per dry ton of hay.
If bermudagrass is overseeded with a cool season crop and the overseeded crop is not cut properly in
the spring, it can shade the greening bermudagrass and reduce the subsequent yields. Therefore it is
important to harvest the overseeded crop in time to encourage bermudagrass'greening. This is often
between April 7 and April 30 in most North Carolina coastal and piedmont counties. Harvesting dates
will depend on the type 6f overseeded crop being grown. I
If the bermudagrass is not being grazed, cut regularly and harvest the residual hay. This is important
when calculating crop nitrogen removal capabilities. Bermudagrass should be cut when it is 12 to 15
inches tall. Regular cutting every four to six weeks during the growing season can be expected
provided growing conditions are suitable. More or less frequent cutting may be necessary. if the
operator is not overseeding, bermudagrass should go into the winter season with 3 to 4 inches of
growth. If being overseeded, cut bermudagrass back to 3 inches before planting the winter crop. Do
not cut bermudagrass closer than 2 inches from the ground since this can damage the root system.
Cereal Rye and Annual Rye Grass
Planting a rye crop over bermudagrass affords extra flexibility to a waste management program in terms
of spray irrigation opportunities, This endeavor will also enhance nitrogen uptake on an annual basis,
provided the crop is harvested. Planting a crop like rye on top of bermudagrass is called "overseeding",
It is important to remember that overseeded crops must be managed correctly or they can have a
negative impact on a warm season hay crop like bermudagrass and be counter -productive to the grower.
Cereal rye is a winter annual small grain that looks similar to wheat, barley, and oats, Annual rye grass
is an annual grass that looks much like tall fescue. These two crops are similar in their nutrient uptakes
but require a little different management when overseeded onto bermudagrass.
Both cereal rye and annual rye grass should be planted between August 20 and October 31 in the
piedmont and between September 1 and November 15 in the coastal plain region. Planting by October
15 is recommended to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth. These crops have their most
vigorous growth in the spring, and moderate growth in the fall. If winter conditions are not too severe,
18

Itcvis d Aivonomiv Man For Dixi4 Vann - Scplaulav 200 V
some plant growth will likewise occur during December and January. Nitrogen uptake is greatest in the
spring, The fall nitrogen uptake for cereal rye is a little greater than annual rye grass. Be careful not to
plant rye too early in the season if planting over bermudagrass since the bermudagrass may tend to keep
growing and shade the emerging rye.
The most consistent rye stands are obtained from drilling seed into the soil. If overseeding into
bermudagrass sod, make the bermudagrass short (less than 3 inches tall) prior to planting. If drilling is
not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation with a
disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting should be 1.5 times the rate for
drilled seeds. Typical planting of rye is 100 pounds of seed per acre if drilling and 130 to 150 pounds
per acre if broadcasting.
If an overseeding onto bermudagrass will take place, the last application of animal type waste should be
applied to the bermudagrass prior to August 31. In general terms, when the small grain (overseeded on
bermuda) is to be harvested, an application of 50 lbslacre of Plant Available Nitrogen (P.A.N.) may be
applied between September 15 and November 30, not to exceed 30 pounds in November. An additional
50 Ibs/acre of P.A.N. may be applied from February to March, but do not exceed 25 pounds in early
February. If necessary a small amount of nitrogen (10 to 15 lbs/acre/month) can he applied in
December and January if called for in the agronomic portion of the waste utilization plan, however it is
best to avoid winter applications unless the winter weather is mild. Do not exceed the 50 pounds/acre
of P.A.N. for the fall applications, even if you apply some of this P.A.N. in December and January.
Winter applied nitrogen must be subtracted from fall and spring application totals to avoid the over
application of nitrogen. Total P.A.N. applications onto an overseeded rye crop should be limited to no
more than 100 pounds per growing season.
If a rye crop is to be grown by itself and harvested and is not overseeded onto a warm season crop like
bermudagrass, it is probably best to estimate nitrogen removal by R.Y.E. for the crop. The R.Y.E. for a
given mono -culture crop must be linked to soil type. The typical P.A.N. credit for a cereal rye (i.e.
small grain) crop is between 1.7 and 2.4 pounds per bushel of harvested crop. The typical P.A.N.
for rye cut for hay (i.e. cut in late boot stage) is between 40 and 60 pounds per ton of harvested
crop. The R.Y.E. for cereal rye grown on Georgeville Gravelly Silt Loam soil, 2 to 8 percent
slopes, was not shown in the RY.E. vs. Soil Type Tables, but is likely to be between 30 and 40
bushels per acre. The R.Y.E. for rye hay grown on the same soil type is likely 3 to 5 tons per
acre, depending on the slope of the field and erosion status of the soil. These values were obtained
from the NCSU document called "Realistic Yield Expectations for Soils of North Carolina" and/or
other Cooperative Extension Publications. Growing rye by itself at Dixie Farm is not planned at this
time.
If rye is overseeded on bermudagrass and will be grazed by cattle, the P.A.N. applications must
be reduced by 25 %, or a maximum application of 75 pounds P.A.N. per year. Cereal rye and
annual rye grass harvests are required prior to heading or April 7, which ever comes first. Harvesting
annual rye grass too late in the Spring can shade out bermudagrass, thus reducing the yield and nitrogen
uptake of the bermudagrass. However, in some Piedmont locations overseeded rye can usually be
harvested by April 15 without damage to bermudagrass. If grazing, allow cattle access to the rye before
bermudagrass emerges. If rye growth is harvested on time it should not significantly shade the bermuda
and reduce bermudagrass yields, if the bermuda is not overseeded it will continue to grow until cool
weather. Usually bermudagrass growth will slow and stop around the end of September.
19

Reviscd Aipmomic plan For Dixie i'ann - Scptonhar2001
If the rye will be planted on cultivated soil (i,e. not overseeded on bermudagrass), and will be grazed,
and the stubble reincorporated into the soil before planting of row crops, the total P.A.N. is
recommended not to exceed 60 pounds per year, but this will depend on the frequency of grazing. If
the rye is serving as a cover crop only, not to be harvested, the farmer can land apply waste on the crop
but no nitrogen removal credits can be taken, Without harvesting the farmer must only take credits for
the primary crop, not the rye crop.
If rye is not grazed, cut rye as needed and remove from the site. Usually this will only occur one time
for cereal rye but can occur multiple times for annual rye grass. Do not cut the rye closer than about
3 or 4 inches from the ground in order to not damage the emerging bermudagrass shoots or root
system. Short rye stubble should be left standing after cutting.
Prairiegrass (also known as Rescuegrass or Matua)
Prairiegrass (or Matua) is a cool season perennial crop that can grow up to 3 feet when in the seed head
stage of growth. Matua reportedly is excellent cattle feed and is suitable for grazing, hay, or silage.
This grass has an annual growth curve that is similar to fescue and annual ryegrass. From December to
February it can produce slightly more yield than tall fescue, if conditions are favorable. Its most
vigorous growth occurs in the spring, Its growth will exceed fescue in summer if moisture is available,
but in general its summer growth is slow and the stand usually gets thin. if the spring and early summer
months are cool, the matua grass can remain robust and stunt warm season crops like bermudagrass.
The reader should study Exhibit 15 to learn specific details about prairiegrass management.
The primary crop being grown at Dixie Farm is hybrid bermudagrass. However, Dixie Farm may plant
matua grass (in place of cereal rye) over the bermuda grass as a cool season crop. The use of any cool
season crop over bermudagrass requires careful management. Matua takes more management than
some other cool season crops since its growth will often overlap the greening of bermudagrass in late
spring or early summer. Even though it is winter -hardy, it is possible that the Prairiegrass will be
stunted or thinned in harsh cold weather since it has growth activity in winter months. A poor stand of
matua grass will lessen the amount of animal waste that can be applied.
September is the best month to plant prairiegrass. When overseeding onto bermudagrass make sure
there is sufficient moisture to germinate the seed and sustain the young matua seedlings. A late
September planting may help minimize competition between the young matua and the established
bermudagrass. Seeds may be drilled into sod, or broadcast into a prepared seedbed and then rolled
with a cuitipacker. Plant prairiegrass seeds at 30 to 35 pounds per acre when drilling and 35 to 40
pounds per acre when broadcasting and roiling. Drill seeds to a depth of 1/4 to 1/2 inch, but no deeper.
Seeds planted much deeper than 1/4 inch have increased difficulty germinating. Two direction drilling
or cross drilling is preferred. The bermudagrass sod needs to be 3 inches or less. Chemical stunting of
the bermudagrass in later summer or early fall is often necessary in order to allow matua }brass to get a
good start. Planting matua in November does not typically give the crop sufficient time to grow and
thus will not afford a good cover for animal waste application until the next spring. Prairiegrass does
best when the soil pH is 6 or higher and the P and K index is medium or higher. Prairiegrass is best
planted in well drained soils. Poorly drained soils will diminish yields as will droughty soils.
Harvest matua for hay or silage when it is in the late boot or early heading stage. Leave stubble 3 to 4
inches tall, especially in summer months. To minimize shading of bermudagrass, harvest prairiegrass at
boot to first signs of head in April and again in May.
20

Rcvised Agronomic Plan For Dixic Fann - September 2001
Matua will naturally reseed a stand if allowed to develop seed heads and disperse. Seed -set is usually
allowed anytime between May through August. It usually takes about 40 to 50 days of no grazing or
cutting to develop seed heads. Mature seed heads should be brown and dry and easily shattered as one
walks through the fields. Natural seeding can be tricky and can shade out bermudagrass. Timing is
critical. See more details about matua establishment in Exhibit 15.
The determination of how much P.A.N. to land apply to prairiegrass is not a simple task. This
determination will depend on prior nitrogen applications, crop establishment, stage of growth, weather,
etc. Therefore the reader must refer to Exhibit 15 for an explanation of the different situations related to
nitrogen applications, both with pure stands (Table I of Exhibit 15), and with matua overseeded onto
bermudagrass (Table 2 of Exhibit 15). The reader can also see specific recommendations for waste
applications later in this document,
If matua grass is overseeded on bermudagrass and will be grazed by cattle, the annual P.A.N.
applications must be reduced by 25 %. If grazing, allow cattle access to the prairiegrass when it is 8
to 12 inches high and let them graze until the stubble is 3 to 4 inches tall. If the bermuda is not
overseeded it will continue to grow until cool weather. Usually bermudagrass growth will slow and
stop around the end of September or early October.
TABLE 13
Tvnical Nitrogen Untake Months for Various Crons Grown In Piedmont N.C.
CROP
Jan
Feb
Mar
Aril
May
June
Jul
Oct
Nov
Dec
Sweet Corn (grain)*
N
N
N-L
-H
H
H-N
M-N
_Aug_Sept
N
N
N
N
N
Field Corn rain
N
N
N-M
L-H
M-H
H-N
M-N
N
N
N
N
N
Corn (silage)
N
N
N-L
L-H
M-H
H-N
M-N
N
N
N
N
N
Sorghum rain
N
N
I N
N-L
' M-H
H
I H
M
N
N
N
N
Sor um a
N
N
N
N-L
M-H
H
H
M
N
N
N
N
Winter Wheat
L-N
M-H
H
H
M-N
N
N
N
N-L
L
L-N
L-N
Rye (cereal or
rass
L-N
L-H
H
H-M
M-N
N
N
N
L-M
L-M
L-N
L-N
Prairiegrass
(Matua) - pure
stand
L-N
L-H
H
H-M
M-N
N
N
N
L-M I
L-M
L-N
L-N
Soybeans
N
N
N
N
N
L-M
M-H
H-M
L
N
N
N
Tall Fescue
L-N
M-H
H
H
M
L
L
M-N
M
M-L
L-N
L-N
Orchard grass
L-N
M-H
H
H
M
L
L
M-N
M
M-L
L-N
L-N
H b. Bermuda
N
N
N
N-L
L-M
H
H
M
L-N
N
N
N
Tobacco*
N
N
H
M-H
H
H
M-N
N
N
N
N
N
Sweet Potatoes *
N
N
N
N
N-L
M-H
H
H-M
M-N
N
N
N
Watennelons *
N
N
N
N-L
L-M
H
H
M-L
N
N
N
N
Cantaloupes *
N
N
N
N-L
L-M
H
H-M
M-N
N
N
N
N
Pearl Millet
N
N
N
N-L
M-H
H
H
H-M
L-N
N
N
N
N = No nitrogen application recommended under normal growing conditions.
L = Apply nitrogen in Low amounts for normal growing conditions. Low amounts are < 15 lbs/acre.
M = Apply nitrogen in Medium amounts for normal growing conditions. Medium amounts are < 25 lbs/acre.
H = Apply nitrogen in High amounts for normal growing conditions, High amounts are ? 50 lbs/acre.
* = These crops are grown for human consumption. Do not apply animal waste to these crops except at pre -
plant.
21

Revi,,A Agonoiniv Plan For pixie Farm - Sepleinber 2001
NOTE: Table 13 is a somewhat general chart and does not account for every situation. When the chart says L-N
for a month, it may be better to use None unless weather and crop growth permits. The nitrogen application on
crops will depend on the planting schedule and the harvest date of previous crops. Animal waste can not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting a crop or from crop emergence (i.e. greening). This table was taken
from data developed by NCSU, NRCS, and the NC Cooperative Extension Service and tempered with the
engineer's experience. Waste with high organic content may require fertilization in advance of Table 13 dates,
Likewise when, applying animal waste as preplant fertilizer it may be necessary to apply a High dose since it can
not be applied after crop emergence. See written explanations about each crop and the associated animal waste
recommendations.
TABLE 14
SUMMARIZED R.Y.E. FOR THE CROPS TO BE GROWN AT DIXIE FARM BASED ON
ALL SOILS BEING GEORGEVILLE GRAVELLY SILT LOAM
FIELD
CROP TO BE GROWN
R.Y.E. FOR INDIVIDUAL
SUGGESTED AVERAGE
NUMBER
CROPS ON THESE SOILS -
R.Y.E. FOR CROP
BOOK VALUES +
COMBINATIONS
Fields 1, 2, 1
OPTION 1
Bermudagrass alone = 4.8 tons/ac
OPTION 1
and 3, All
Bermudagrass Overseeded
Rye (hay) alone = 4.5 tonslac
Bermudagrass = 3.5 tonslac
Pulls
With Cereal Rye
Rye Ha = 2.25 tonslac
Fields 1, 2,
OPTION 2
Bermudagrass alone = 4.8 tonslac
OPTION 2
and 3, All
Bermudagrass Overseeded
Matua alone = 6 tonslac
Benmudagrass = 3.3 tonslac
Pulls
With Prairiegrass Matua
Matua = 5 tonslac
+ These values have been adjusted for field slope and erosion class. Yields could be more or less than those
given here. These,values have been chosen based on crop type, nitrogen availability,, etc. These are book values
and not actual historical yields.
General Crop Management Reminders
In order to maximize yield and provide high quality crops, soil samples and waste samples shall be
collected and the analysis incorporated into the desired nutrient application plan. See Exhibit 8 for soil
sampling details and Exhibit 9 for waste sample details. Soil samples shall be collected no less than one
time per year. Waste samples should be collected up to 6 times per year. Lime according to the NCDA
soil reports. Annually the farmer shall compare crop removal rates with nutrient application rates and
adjust nutrient applications accordingly. Do not over -apply nutrients to crops since that can result in
crop damage, environmental problems, and animal health problems when the crop is consumed. Consult
seed companies for exact planting and harvesting suggestions or your local Cooperative Extension
Service.
Exhibit 8 includes some information about plant tissue sampling. The farmer is encouraged to collect
plant tissue samples in advance of the need to fertilize and have them tested for nutrients. This is
especially useful if you think you have not applied enough nitrogen to a crop and it looks yellow or
stunted. Plant tissue sampling will help you better tune your waste application for the most productive
crop without over -applying nitrogen. Contact your local Cooperative Extension Service for more
details about plant tissue sampling.
It is suggested that the farm minimize the cutting of grasses and/or other crops in the buffer areas and
field borders. Taller grass allows for better sediment control and animal habitat in the borders
surrounding the fields This is especially important in or near drainage ways or ditches and in areas
22

Revi%cd Ayunumic Plan For Dixie Farm - STtonhcr 2001
where two hillsides converge. The farmer may elect to plant some other type of vegetation in this area
which requires minimal maintenance. Cut buffer zones as needed and minimize the use of commercial
fertilizers in these areas, See earlier comments about riparian buffers next to perennial streams.
Sometimes weeds will try to take over a field of grasses, especially if the grasses have been weakened
by drought or disease. Always control weed growth and strive for a mono -culture crop for a particular
growing season.
NUTRIENT AND ANIMAL WASTE APPLICATIONS
Waste Application Scheduling
IMPORTANT: An irrigation plan was developed for Dixie farm and certified in 1997 by the MRCS.
Subsequently the plan has had a wetted acre determination by Brock Irrigation Company, Exhibit 6
shows some of the data concerning the Dixie Farm irrigation capabilities. EES did not develop any of
this irrigation data but is including it in this package since it helps explain the land areas scheduled to
receive irrigation. EES is not certifying the irrigation at Dixie Farm since this has already been
accomplished. EES will not spend a large amount of time within this revised plan discussing technical
irrigation decisions since that was done by someone else. However, a few important concepts will be
discussed herein that pertain to irrigating animal waste.
Understanding the more technical points of irrigating or broadcasting animal waste is very important to
its proper utilization. Knowing soil/water relationships and plant/water relationships helps the farmer
decide when irrigation of broadcasting is appropriate. However, it would be much beyond the scope of
this revision to the Dixie Farm waste utilization plan to dwell on highly technical aspects of land
application. The key point to remember is that the soil must accept and plants must be able to utilize
the applied water/waste in order to avoid surface run-off or gravity drainage. Full plant utilization of
the water held within the root zone is needed to avoid draining nutrients below the root zone. Careful
observations of soil/plant and climatic relationships will help assure a successful irrigation program.
Exhibit 19 goes into more detail about irrigation planning.
TABLE 15
DDr _Days Needed Between Heavy Irrigation Events -(Typical for freshwater irrigation on medium body_soils
Month
Hay Crops
Vegetables
January
20
23
February
15
18
March
10
13
April
8
11
May
6
8
June
5
7
.July
5
7
August
6
8
September
8
10
October
10
13
November
15
18
December
20
23
23

Revised Agmomie Plan For Dixie Farm - Sentanivr 2001
Table 15 is a very general guide for fresh water irrigation, but may be helpful for wastewater irrigation
as well. On -site measurements and experience must be used to accurately schedule irrigation events.
Sandy soils may require less dry days between irrigation events. Small amounts of irrigation may be
possible without waiting for all the dry days shown. Plant available moisture and other soil/water
relationships will dictate actual times between irrigation events. If crops are not actively growing it is
better not to irrigate.
The operator must use good judgment when applying; waste onto crops. His or her judgment, tempered
with crop growth, crop health, rainfall, and other factors will be needed to make a workable application
schedule, The farmer must also adhere to lagoon and storage pond designs and suggested maximum
and minimum volumes. Always know your lagoon or pond level and available storage volume, A key
item to remember is to keep water'levels inside the liquid storage structures (i.e. where irrigation pump
is located) at manageable levels.
Due to the concerns over possible groundwater contamination occurrences, the owner is encouraged to
"spread out' the waste application volumes so as to not concentrate loadings in one place at one time.
Heavy effluent loadings can cause nitrogen to quickly leach below the plant root zone. Several light
applications per month is often better than one heavy application. Monitor soil moisture so that gravity
drainage below the plant root zone is more or less zero.
Irrigation Coverage
All fields at Dixie Farm will be irrigated. Table 16 summarizes the basic irrigation data as supplied by
others; Exhibit 6 lists some additional irrigation data, supplied for reference only.
TABLE 16
IRRIGATION FIELD DATA FOR DIXIIE FARM +
Field
Number
Field Size
After
Buffers
_(acres )+
Wetted Acres In
This Field ++
Acres Outside
Of Wetted
Acres
Typical Irrigation
Application Rate
++
Maximum
Application Per
Irrigation Cycle
+++
Field 1
5.3
4.71
0.59
0.34 inches / hour
0.75 inches
Field 2
5.9
5.56
0.34
0.34 inches / hour
0.75 inches
Field 3
5.1
3.20
1.90
0.34 inches / hour
0.75 inches
Totals
16.30
13.47
2.83
*********
*********
+ Field acres were obtained from aerial photographs. Field shapes were approximated and thus these acres are
also approximated. Not all of these acres are suitable for irrigation.
++ This information was supplied by Brock Irrigation Company, Inc. Also see Exhibit 6.
+++ This value will only be possible in warm, dry weather. Irrigated volumes will often be less, or between 0.3
and 0.5 inches per irrigation event.
Animal waste can only be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. The Dixie Farm
land should qualify given the proper crop covers are maintained. Erosion could easily become a
problem at this farm in the irrigated fields if crop covers are not maintained. It is vitally important
that the farmer pay close attention to irrigation schedules at this farm. Strong slopes will
encourage surface run off to occur, especially during rainfall events. Creeks immediately down -
slope from the irrigated fields could be impacted by the over application of effluent or by a
sudden rain storm shortly after irrigation.
24

Revised Agronomic Plain For Dixie Farm - SeTte-mb 7 2001
Field by Field Land Application Details
Below the reader will see Tables 17 through 22. Each table represents a different set of predicted
values related to animal waste application at Dixie Farm. ' These tables are of particular importance
since they give approximated waste application values specific to this farm. This animal waste
utilization plan has been revised to show reasonable waste application methodology and nitrogen
management, but it should be clearly understood that it is made to be changed as crop data and waste
test results change. This does not allow the farmer to change crop types beyond those shown in this
plan, but it does allow for the mixing of the listed crops. The farmer should use this plan as a guideline
for animal waste management and not get hung -up on the exact values presented below. Changes in
crop varieties beyond what is shown in this plan will require a revision to this plan prior to planting.
Tables 17 through 22 were developed with the following assumptions:
i . The farmer will accurately record crop type, waste application amount and type, waste test data,
and crop yield for each field receiving animal waste. Animal waste applications will be adjusted
according to crops being grown, types of waste applied, recent crop yields, and recent waste test
results,
2. The farmer will be able to take the actual crop yields by field number, the quantity of waste
applied, and use the P.A.N, uptake values given in this plan to calculate an annual P.A.N. removal for a
given field. This will be especially important since the waste analysis for a given waste type can change
from season to season.
3. The'farmer will be allowed to decide where to apply all animal waste sources. A combination of
animal waste sources (e.g. liquid and slurry) may be used on any field as long as nutrients are not
applied greater than agronomic rates. The farmer can not double count waste applications to any field
even if using different waste sources, (i.e. part dry waste and part liquid waste). Nitrogen applications
are cumulative. Only harvested crops are counted towards P.A.N. removal. Records for the application
of commercial fertilizer on waste receiving fields should be kept.
4. The annual P.A.N. available at this farm has been estimated in Table 9. Typically liquid waste
will be applied via the irrigation system when possible. Fringe areas outside of the irrigated areas can be
fertilized with liquid effluent or slurry via a broadcast wagon. Nutrient applications to fringe areas shall
be recorded on a separate record keeping sheet. All waste applications must be recorded and records
kept.
Explanation of Waste Application Tables --
TABLE 17
Table 17 shows expected crop yields and their related nitrogen uptake specifically for Dixie Farm. At
Dixie Farm the engineer is giving the farmer two options for crop combinations. Option 1 considers
bermudagrass as the primary warm season crop and rye to be overseeded as a cool season crop. This
particular option assumes this bermudagrass/rye combination is grown in all fields under irrigation.
Option 2 considers bermudagrass as the primary warm season crop and prairtegrass (matua) to be
overseeded as a cool season crop. This particular option assumes this bermudagrass/matua combination
is grown in all fields under irrigation. The reader will remember that the farmer may alter the acres of
crops being grown. For example, the farmer may grow a bermudagrass/rye combination in Fields 1 and
2 and bermudagrass/matua in Field 3. Or the farmer may grow bermudagrass only in Field 1 and one of
the combinations in Fields 2 and 3. Or any other combination of listed crops provided the intent of the
25

Revised Agronomic Plan For Dir'ic Farm - &pterubar 2001
nutrient utilization plan is met. Such diversity is allowed but will require same increased record keeping
and on -farm management. The engineer would recommend keeping the actual crop scheme as simple
as possible to facilitate record keeping and estimating P.A.N. removal.
The reader will note that the R.Y.E. for the bermuda and rye crops were taken from the NCSU
document called "Realistic Yield Expectations for Soils of North Carolina" and adjusted for field slope
and erosion. The R.Y.E. for the matua grass was taken from conversations with NCSU Crop Science
Cooperative Extension personnel and from recent published articles about this issue. All of the crops
are being grown on Georgeville soils.
The amount of nitrogen uptake estimated in Table 17 (i.e. 45 pounds of P,A.N. per ton of harvested
hay) was an average value taken from published ranges for this type of hay crop. The reader will note
that nitrogen uptake is often greater if a crop has an abundant amount of this element present in the soil.
This is called luxury uptake. Therefore the actual nitrogen uptake for these crops may be 50 pounds per
ton of hay, or more. Using 45 ounds of P, A.N. u take er ton is a conservative estimate.
In practice, if crop yields are reduced, either due to a lack of nitrogen or crop failure, this should be
recorded and the plan adjusted accordingly. Likewise, if crop yields are increased, the farmer may wish
to apply slightly more P.A.N. However, be careful not to apply too much P.A.N. The engineer does
not suggest applying supplemental fertilizer to the crops unless this is a significant income maker for the
farm or if the crops are performing poorly from the lack of nutrients. All of these crops are to be
removed as hay.
Table 17 shows each field and pull lane. This should help the farmer with record keeping and
corresponds to the Brock Equipment Company irrigation design. There are about 16.3 acres of crop
land at Dixie but all of it is not irrigated.
TABLE 17 APPEARS ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE IN ITS ENTIRETY
26

FARM NAME:
FARM OWNER(S):
FARM LOCATION:
DIXIE FARM
N.G. PURVIS FARMS, INC.
MOORE COUNTY, NC.
TABLE 17
CROP TYPES AND REALISTIC YIELD EXPECTATIONS
IRRIGATED FIELDS
REALISTIC NITROGEN
OPTION #, SOIL CROP YIELD UPTAKE HARVEST
FIELD #, TYPES YIELD EXPECTED (ESTM.) CROPPING
PULL # CROP (MAJOR) UNITS (R.Y.E.) + (LB/UIYR) PLANS
ix iflf is ii axxfi.a.. iaafiiaiaia iaafii aaaaa aaiaxiaaaai faaaxx aaax. axxlf aiixlw
OPTION 1 = BERMUDAGRASS OVERSEEDED WITH RYE (HARVESTED FOR HAY).
1 - F1 - P1
BERMUDAGRASS
GEORGE
T/AC/YR
3.5
45
CUT & REMOVE
1 -F1 - P1
RYE (OVERSEEDED)
GEORGE
TIACIYR
2.25
45
CUT & REMOVE
1 - F2 - P1
BERMUDAGRASS
GEORGE
T/AC/YR
3.5
45
CUT & REMOVE
1 - F2 - P1
RYE (OVERSEEDED)
GEORGE
T/AC/YR
2.25
45
CUT & REMOVE
1 - F3- P1
BERMUDAGRASS
GEORGE
TIACIYR
3.5
45
CUT & REMOVE
1 - F3- P1
RYE (OVERSEEDED)
GEORGE
T/ACNR
2.25
45
CUT & REMOVE
OPTION 2 = BERMUDAGRASS OVERSEEDED WITH MATUA GRASS (HARVESTED FOR HAY).
2 - F1 - P1
BERMUDAGRASS ;,
GEORGE
TIAC/YR
3.3
45
CUT & REMOVE
2 - F1 - P1
MATUA (OVERSEEDED)
GEORGE
T/AC/YR
5
45
CUT & REMOVE
2 - F2 - P1
BERMUDAGRASS
GEORGE
T/AC/YR
3.3
45
CUT & REMOVE
2 - F2 - PS
MATUA (OVERSEEDED)
GEORGE
TIAC/YR
5
45
CUT & REMOVE
2-F3-PI
BERMUDAGRASS
GEORGE
T/AC/YR
3.3
45
CUT & REMOVE
2- F3- P1
MATUA (OVERSEEDED)
GEORGE
TIAC/YR
5
45
CUT & REMOVE
+THESE R.Y.E. VALUES ARE BASED ON NCSU BOOK VALUES FOR THE SOIL TYPE INDICATED AND
ADJUSTED FOR SLOPE AND EROSION. IN THE REAL WORLD, R.Y.E. WILL CHANGE FROM YEAR TO YEAR
DEPENDING ON THE WEATHER, NITROGEN APPLICATIONS, FARMING SKILL, CROP DISEASE, ETC. WHEN
AVAILABLE, THE FARMER SHOULD USE ACTUAL YEARLY YIELD TO CALCULATE P.A.N. REMOVAL FROM HIS
FIELDS.
TIACIYR = TONS PER ACRE PER YEAR
BU/AC/YR = BUSHELS PER ACRE PER YEAR
PAGE 27
GEORGE = GEORGEVILLE SOIL TYPE
U = UNIT

Revised Agonomic Plan For Dixie Fam) - Nq)tunbo 2001
TABLE 18
Table 18 shows the wetted acres in each pull lane in each field. This table summarizes potential
nitrogen removal by crop (and option). The larger wetted acre pull lanes have more nitrogen removal
potential since they contain more acres, not because of a greater R.Y.E. At the bottom of Table 18 is a
summary of the total estimated P.A.N. removal potential for all wetted acres assuming the farmer plants
all irrigated acres in either Option 1 or Option 2. A summary of the calculated P.A.N. production at
Dixie Farm (in the liquid lagoon waste) is also given at the end of this table so a comparison can be
made.
First considering Option 1, please note that given all of the assumptions for RYE,, waste analyses
averages, wastewater generation, etc. the wetted acres under irrigation in this option (13.47 acres) are
sufficient to utilize about 99% of the P.A,N. generated. For all practical purposes Option 1 should
suffice to remove the generated nutrients if all crop yields and farm generated P.A.N. are as estimated.
Obviously in very poor crop years, the crop yields would be reduced and the farmer may have to land
apply waste in the fringe areas outside of the irrigation lanes in order to achieve the tons of hay to
balance with nutrients applied, However, since all conditions are estimated based on averages, and in
some instances conservative averages, the engineer feels as though Option I is viable. Option 1 is less
management intensive than Option 2.
Secondly considering Option 2; please note that given all of the assumptions for R.Y.E., waste analyses
averages, wastewater generation, etc. the wetted acres under irrigation in this option (13.47 acres) are
more than would be needed to utilize the estimated P.A.N. production. Table 18 shows Option 2 only
needs about 9.4 acres, or only about 70% of the wetted acres would be needed to utilize the P.A.N.
generated. Option 2 would offer some cushion against poor crop yields without having to resort to
applying waste in the fringe areas of fields. Option 2 will require more management than Option 1 and
will be slightly more expensive to maintain (i.e. higher seeding and maintenance costs).
This waste utilization document does not specifically address nitrogen application on germinating or
very young crops, Thus the farmer must use good judgment when planting and applying waste to
young crops. Young crops can not remove large quantities of nitrogen thus possibly requiring split
applications. Remember, do not apply animal waste directly to crops scheduled for human
consumption.
Some residual nitrogen carry-over from the organic fraction in animal waste and crop residue will be left
on the irrigated land from year to year. You might say there is a carry over of nitrogen so you may need
to apply less as the years go by. In sandy soils, nitrogen carry-over this tends to be less of a factor. Be
aware of this aspect and do not over apply nitrogen.
As one final point about Table 18, if Option 2 were used in every field, there may be a nitrogen shortage
that would decrease yields. While most farmers do not worry about a lack of nitrogen in animal waste,
it could reduce the R, Y.E. shown in this plan. Good record keeping. of crop yields, waste analysis, and
irrigation volume tracking will be the only way to accurately examine year to year balances.
TABLE 18 APPEARS ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE IN ITS ENTIRETY
28

FARM NAME: DIXIE FARM
FARM OWNER(S): N.G. PURVIS FARMS, INC.
FARM LOCATION: MOORE COUNTY, NC.
TOTAL WETTABLE ACRES IN THESE FIELDS = 13.47 ACRES (TOTAL CROP ACRES MAY EXCEED THIS VALUE)
TABLE 18
NITROGEN REMOVAL ESTIMATES BASED ON CROP TYPE
IRRIGATED (WETTED) ACRES
MAXIMUM EST.
ESTIMATED
TOTAL
P.A.N. REMOVAL
P.A.N.
FIELD
WETTED
POTENTIAL
REMOVALIACRE
NUMBER
...Fafaa
CROP
iaapiafai,a
ACRES +
a.aaa•aaiai
(LBSIYR)
ii faaiia.. i aia•fw
(LBSIACIYR)
ii aY • a ialiaaiai fi
OPTION 1= BERMUDAGRASS
OVERSEEDED
WITH RYE (HARVESTED FOR HAY).
1 - F1 - P1
BERMUDAGRASS
4.71
742
158
1 -F1 - P1
RYE (OVERSEEDED)
4.71
477
101
1 - F2 - P1
BERMUDAGRASS
5.56
876
158
1 - F2 - P1
RYE (OVERSEEDED)
5.56
563
101
1 - F3- P1
BERMUDAGRASS
3.2
504
158
1 - F3 - P1
RYE (OVERSEEDED)
3.2
324
101
OPTION 2 = BERMUDAGRASS OVERSEEDED WITH MATUA GRASS (HARVESTED FOR HAY).
2 - F1 - P1
BERMUDAGRASS
4,71
699
149
2-' F1 - P1
MATUA (OVERSEEDED)
4,71
1.060
2254E�—
2 - F2 - P1
BERMUDAGRASS
5.56
826
149
2- F2- P1
MATUA (OVERSEEDED)
5.56
1,251
225
2 - F3 - P1
BERMUDAGRASS
3.2
475
149
2 - F3 - P1
MATUA (OVERSEEDED)
3.2
720
225
TOTAL ESTIMATED P.A.N. PRODUCTION FROM ANIMAL WASTE = 3,622 POUNDS PER YEAR
TOTAL WETTED ACRES AT THIS FARM = 13.47 ACRES
OPTION 1 = BERMUDAGRASS OVERSEEDED WITH RYE (HARVESTED FOR HAY).
' AVG. P.A.N. REMOVAL PER WETTED ACRE FROM OPTION 1 = 259 POUNDSIACIYR
' MAX. P.A.N. REMOVAL FROM OPTION 1 (WETTED ACRES ONLY) = 3,485 POUNDS PER YEAR
MIN. ACRES NEEDED FOR OPTION 1 P.A.N. REMOVAL = 13.6 ACRES ++
OPTION 2 = BERMUDAGRASS OVERSEEDED WITH MATUA GRASS (HARVESTED FOR HAY).
a AVG. P.A.N. REMOVAL PER WETTED ACRE FROM OPTION 2= 374 POUNDSIACNR
• MAX. P.A.N. REMOVAL FROM OPTION 2 (WETTED ACRES ONLY) = 5,031 POUNDS PER YEAR
• MIN. ACRES NEEDED FOR OPTION 2 P.A.N. REMOVAL = 9.4 ACRES +++
+ = ADDITIONAL ACRES EXIST IN IRRIGATION FRINGE AREAS IF NEEDED TO UTILIZE ALL OF THE WASTE
PRODUCED AT THIS FARM.
++ OPTION 1 SHOWS THAT 100% OF ALL WETTED ACRES ARE NEEDED TO REMOVE FARM GENERATED P.A.N.
+++ OPTION 2 SHOWS THAT MORE THAN ENOUGH ACRES ARE UNDER IRRIGATION TO REMOVE FARM
GENERATED P.A.N.
PAGE 29

Revises! Agrmiomic Plan For Dixic f ann - SepLeinbcr 2001
TABLE 19
Table 19 shows possible irrigation windows for fields I through 3 under Option I only. It shows some
irrigation is possible every month if the right conditions are met. Irrigating every month of the year
would depend on the many factors already mentioned in this document. There must be a planted and/or
growing cool and warm season crop in order to irrigate every month of the year. December and
January irrigation is discouraged unless fall applications of nitrogen have been small. The reader should
carefully read all the precautions about year round nitrogen applications. Exhibit 15 offers many
suggestions on the rate of nitrogen application on overseeded crops.
The monthly nitrogen applications shown in Table 19 are only suggested and are close to the guidelines
referenced in Exhibit 15. This table also shows expected liquid amounts to land apply in a gallons per
acre column and in an inches per acres column. The reader will note that the largest one month
application of water for Option 1 is 0.94 inches. This much irrigation would likely occur in a split
application and would fall well below the maximum application of 0.75 inches per irrigation event.
Table 19 suggests there are 33 pounds of P.A.N. in the liquid waste that can not be used on the irrigated
fields. Then reader should ignore such a small value (given the assumptions madeL and. consider_ the
P.AN. generated equal to the P,A.N. removed in this Option.
The reader must realize that monthly application rates will vary according to many factors. Also, the
engineer has assumed that liquid effluent will be available to deliver these nitrogen quantities. If the
animal waste effluent is greatly lacking the needed nutrients, or lacking sufficient liquid quantities the
operator "could" occasionally need to supplement nutrients. However, use caution when applying
commercial fertilizers. Consider using slurry or separated solids instead of commercial fertilizer as it
becomes available. Annually look at nutrients like phosphorous and metals to make sure you are not
over applying this or other nutrients.
TABLE 19 APPEARS ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE IN ITS ENTIRETY
30

FARM NAME: DIXIE FARM
FARM OWNER(S): N.G. PURVIS FARMS, INC.
FARM LOCATION: MOORE COUNTY, NC.
TABLE 19
LONG TERM LIQUID EFFLUENT APPLICATION GUIDELINES ONCE CROPS ARE ESTABL
IRRIGATED (WETTED) ACRES
OPTION 1 = BERMUDAGRASS OVERSEEDED WITH RYE (HARVESTED FOR HAY).
SUGGESTED
TOTAL
TOT.AVG.
TOTAL
ACTIVELY
TOTAL
RATE OF
TOTAL N
GALLONS
GALLONS
MONTHLY
MONTH OF
FIELD ID
GROWING
WETTED
N APPLIC.
TO APPLY
OF EFF.
PER ACRE
INCHES
APPLICATION
f...... i... .kk.i..
NUMBERS
.........*..
CROPS
............
ACRES
kka{...#..f•
(LBSIAC)++
•i fkkk..ikki
(LBS)+
.k•ar....rrk
(GALS.)
rk...f... ..•
(GALIAC)
..... frkf •k
(INIAC)
•f. ikf.{•kkF
JANUARY+++
F1,F2,F3
RYE
13,47
0
0
0
0
0.00
FEBRUARY
F1,F2,F3
RYE
13.47
25
337
190,254
14.124
0.52
MARCH
F1,F2,F3
RYE
13.A7
26
35D
197,864
14,689
0.54
APRIL
F1,F2,F3
RYE
13,47
15
202
114,153
8,475
0.31
MAY
F1,F2,F3
RYE, BG
13.47
40
539
304,407
22,599
0.83
JUNE
F1,F2,F3
BERMUDA
13.47
45
606
342,458
25,424
0.94
JULY
F1,F2,F3
BERMUDA
13.47
45
606
342,458
25.424
0.94
AUGUST
F1,172,F3
BERMUDA
13,47
13
175
98,932
7,345
0.27
SEPTEMBER
F1,F2,F3
6G, RYE
13.47
15
202
114153
8,475
0.31
OCTOBER
F1,F2,F3
RYE
13,47
20
269
152,203
11,299
0,42
NOVEMBER
F1,F2,F3
RYE
13.47
15
202
114,153
8,475
0.31
DECEMBER+++
F1,F.2,F3
RYE
13,47
0
k...}......
0
...........
0
••.... r•fi#
0
•.. I ......
0.00
TOTAL
259
3,489
1,971,034
146,328
ESTIMATED TOTAL P.A.N.
PRODUCTION AT THIS FARM (LBS.) =
3,522
POUNDS
EXCESS (DEFICIT) P.A.N. CROPS CAN
REMOVE (IRRIGATION
ONLY) _
(33)
POUNDS
ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL
EFFLUENT
PRODUCED (GALLONS) =
1,989,591 GALLONS
EXCESS (DEFICIT) GALLONS OF IRRIGATION
WATER AVAILABLE
=
18,557 GALLONS
BG = BERMUDA GRASS, C = CORN, PM = PEARL MILLET,FG=FESCUE GRASS, WW= WINTER WHEAT
RYE = CEREAL RYE OR RYE GRASS, MATUA = PRAIRIEGRASS.
+= FARMER MUST ONLY APPLY EFFLUENT DURING CROP GROWING MONTHS. HOWEVER, NITROGEN
MAY BE APPLIED IN ALTERNATING MONTHS INSTEAD OF EVERY MONTH IF NECESSARY AS LONG AS
NITROGEN APPLICATIONS DO NOT EXCEED PROPER AGRONOMIC RATES. IF THE MAXIMUM NITROGEN
UPTAKE EXCEEDS AVAILABLE NITROGEN, COMMERCIAL NITROGEN MAY BE NEEDED OR USE EFFLUENT
FROM ANOTHER FARM OR WASTE SYSTEM. APPLICATION AMOUNTS WILL VARY FROM FARM TO FARM
AND FROM SEASON TO SEASON. THIS TABLE IS ONLY A GUIDEII
++ = THE TOTAL P.A.N. CAN NOT EXCEED THOSE VALUES IN TABLE 18 UNLESS THE FARMER
CAN DEMONSTRATE THAT CROP YIELDS MATCH P.A.N. UPTAKE.
+++=APPLICATIONS OF NITROGEN UP TO 15 LBS. P.A.N.IACREIMONTH ARE ACCEPTABLE IN DECEMBER AND
JANUARY IF FALL APPLICATIONS OF P,A.N. WERE LIGHT AND WINTER WEATHER CONDITIONS AND CROP
GROWTH ARE GOOD, IN GENERAL, IT IS BEST NOT TO IRRIGATE IN THSE MONTHS. ANIMAL WASTE
APPLICATIONS IN ON YOUNG OR EMERGING CROPS SHOULD BE DONE WITH CAUTION. SPLIT
NITROGEN APPLICATIONS WHEN POSSIBLE.
PAGE 31

Revised Agonomic Ylan For Dixic Fame - Sep[anl3'r 2001
TABLE 20
Table 20 shows possible irrigation windows for Fields 1 through 3 under Option 2 only. It shows some
irrigation every month is possible if crop and weather conditions are favorable (see foot notes at the end
of this table). Irrigating every month of the year would depend on the many factors already mentioned
in this document. There must be a planted and/or growing cool and warm season crop in order to
irrigate in every month of the year, December and January irrigation is discouraged unless fall
applications of nitrogen have been small. The reader should carefully read all the precautions about year
round nitrogen applications. Exhibit 15 offers many suggestions on the rate of nitrogen application on
overseeded crops.
The monthly nitrogen applications shown in Table 20 are only suggested and are close to the guidelines
referenced in Exhibit 15. This table also shows expected liquid amounts to land apply in a gallons per
acre column and in an inches per acres column. The reader will note that the largest one month
application of water for Option 2 is 1.04 inches. This would likely occur in a split application and
would fall well below the maximum application of 0.75 inches per irrigation event. Table 20 suggests
Option 2 would result in a nitrogen deficit of 1,516 pounds. This means the crops can remove more
nitrogen than is expected to exist in the liquid waste. If such a nitrogen deficit would exist, it could
reduce crop yields.
The reader must realize that monthly application rates will vary according to many factors. Also, the
engineer has assumed that liquid effluent will be available to deliver these nitrogen quantities. If the
animal waste effluent is greatly lacking the needed nutrients, or lacking sufficient liquid quantities the
operator "could" occasionally need to supplement nutrients. However, use caution when applying
commercial fertilizers: Consider using slurry or separated solids instead of commercial fertilizer as it
becomes available.
Option 2 assumes the yields of the crops will be as predicted even though the nitrogen needed for
maximum crop growth may not be available. The reader will note that most regulatory people wish for
the nitrogen and other nutrients from animal waste to be reduced prior to land applications. However,
as one may conclude from Option 2, the lack of P.A.N. will most likely reduce the R.Y.E. of the crops,
especially if Option 2 were to go on for several years in a row. The farmer might consider only
overseeding Fields 1 and 2 to better balance the nitrogen loadings, or he may wish to have the extra
crop capacity in case his P.A.N. values rise during the year. Because the ultimate outcome of a given
crop year is interrelated to the specific activities of that year, it is extremely important that the farmer
closely observe his/her farming details and input values. Good records are extremely important and a
good farmer will make adjustments as needed.
Annually look at nutrients like phosphorous and metals to make sure you are not over applying this or
other nutrients. Crop yields must be figured back into the nitrogen removal equation. The farmer may
wish, to adjust application amounts or reduce acreage to better balance nutrients with crop demand,
especially after reviewing last years cropping records. Always record yields removed from all acreage.
Also record fresh water irrigation events and the addition of commercial fertilizer. The reader should be
less concerned about "theoretical values" and more concerned with keeping good records to see what is
actually happening at their farm.
Below the reader will find an example of how to use Tables 19 and 20,
32

FARM NAME: DIXIE FARM
FARM OWNER(S): N.G. PURVIS FARMS, INC.
FARM LOCATION: MOORE COUNTY. NC,
TABLE 20
LONG TERM LIQUID EFFLUENT APPLICATION GUIDELINES ONCE CROPS ARE ESTABLISH[
IRRIGATED (WETTED) ACRES
OPTION 2 = BERMUDAGRASS OVERSEEDED WITH MATUA (HARVESTED FOR HAY),
SUGGESTED
TOTAL
TOT.AVG.
TOTAL
ACTIVELY
TOTAL
RATE OF
TOTAL N
GALLONS
GALLONS
MONTHLY
MONTH OF
FIELD ID
GROWING
WETTED
N APPLIC.
TO APPLY
OF EFF,
PER ACRE
INCHES
APPLICATION
..................
NUMBERS
............
CROPS
............
ACRES
r...s... ....
(LBS/AC)-
"...... r.
(LBS)+
...•••.•
(GALS.)
r...... .....
(GAUAC)
... r•r.r rear
(IN)AC)
....... *....
JANUARY+++
F1,F2,F3
MATUA
13.47
0
0
0
0
0.00
FEBRUARY
F1,F2,F3
MATUA
13.47
40
539
304,407
22,599
0.83
MARCH
F1,F2,F3
MATUA
13.47
45
606
342,458
25,424
0,94
APRIL
F1,F2,F3
MATUA
13.47
35
471
266,356
19,774
0.73
MAY
F1,F2,F3
MATUA, BG
13.47
45
606
342,458
25,424
0,94
JUNE
F1,F2,F3
BERMUDA
13,47
50
674
380,508
28,249
1.04
JULY
F1,F2,F3
BERMUDA
13.47
50
674
380,508
28,249
1.04
AUGUST
F1,F2,F3
BERMUDA
13,47
34
458
258,746
19,209
0.71
SEPTEMBER
F1,F2,F3
BG, MATUA
13.47
25
337
190.254
14,124
0.52
OCTOBER
F1,172,173
MATUA ,
13,47
30
404
228,306
16,949
0.62
NOVEMBER
F1,F2,F3
MATUA
13.47
20
269
152,203
11,299
0,42
DECEMBER +++
F1,F2,F3
r
MATUA
13.47
0
...........
0
r..r.......
0
...........
0
...........
0.00
TOTAL
374
5,038
2,846,203
211,299
ESTIMATED TOTAL P.A.N.
PRODUCTION AT THIS FARM (LBS.) =
3,522
POUNDS
EXCESS (DEFICIT) P.A.N. CROPS CAN
REMOVE (IRRIGATION ONLY) =
1,516
POUNDS
ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL
EFFLUENT PRODUCED (GALLONS)
=
1,969,591 GALLONS
EXCESS (DEFICIT) GALLONS OF IRRIGATION WATER AVAILABLE _
(856,612) GALLONS
BG = BERMUDA GRASS, C = CORN, PM = PEARL MILLET,FG=FESCUE GRASS, WW= WINTER WHEAT
RYE = CEREAL RYE OR RYE GRASS, MATUA = PRAIRIEGRASS.
+ = FARMER MUST ONLY APPLY EFFLUENT DURING CROP GROWING MONTHS. HOWEVER, NITROGEN
MAY BE APPLIED IN ALTERNATING MONTHS INSTEAD OF EVERY MONTH IF NECESSARY AS LONG AS
NITROGEN APPLICATIONS DO NOT EXCEED PROPER AGRONOMIC RATES. IF THE MAXIMUM NITROGEN
UPTAKE EXCEEDS AVAILABLE NITROGEN, COMMERCIAL NITROGEN MAY BE NEEDED OR USE EFFLUENT
FROM ANOTHER FARM OR WASTE SYSTEM. APPLICATION AMOUNTS WILL VARY FROM FARM TO FARM
AND FROM SEASON TO SEASON. THIS TABLE IS ONLY A GUIDE[?
++ = THE TOTAL P.A.N. CAN NOT EXCEED THOSE VALUES IN TABLE 18 UNLESS THE FARMER
CAN DEMONSTRATE THAT CROP YIELDS MATCH P.A.N. UPTAKE.
+++=APPLICATIONS OF NITROGEN UP TO 15 LBS. P.A.N,/ACRE/MONTH ARE ACCEPTABLE IN DECEMBER AND
JANUARY IF FALL APPLICATIONS OF P.A.N. WERE LIGHT AND WINTER WEATHER CONDITIONS AND CROP
GROWTH ARE GOOD, IN GENERAL, IT 1S BEST NOT TO IRRIGATE IN THSE MONTHS. ANIMAL WASTE
APPLICATIONS IN ON YOUNG OR EMERGING CROPS SHOULD BE DONE WITH CAUTION, SPLIT
NITROGEN APPLICATIONS WHEN POSSIBLE.
= THIS SHOULD BE A SPLIT APPLICATION WITH NOT MORE THAN 31) LBS. PANIAC APPLIED AT THE FIRST OF
THE MONTH.
PAGE 34

IRevised Agronomic Plan For Dixie Emil - SgAenher 2001
TABLE 21 (storage impoundment and irrigation water balance - Option 1)
It is very important to realize that the operator must use good judgment when applying effluent to
crops. His or her judgment, tempered with crop growth, crop health, rainfall, and other factors will be
needed to make a workable irrigation schedule. The farmer must also adhere to lagoon or storage pond
designs as well as maximum and minimum storage volumes. Always know your storage pond liquid
level and available storage volume (remember we do get hurricanes in NC). Lower water levels in
storage systems before the on -set of long wet seasons. A key item to remember is to keep water levels
inside the pond low enough to store at least one 25 year 24 hour storm before overflow (or 2 storms if
this is written into your CAWMP). Allowing for 2 such storms is better but not required for this pond
due to its age and since these structures are not being altered and the SSLW at the farm is not changing,
The 1977 NRCS evaluation allowed one storm. The engineer has assumed all pond surfaces will drain
into the storage pond during such a rainfall.
Table 21 shows an illustration of the annual water balance for the storage impoundment at Dixie Farm.
Ideally, Table 21 should show that about the same amount of wastewater was being irrigated as was
being generated each month. However in the real world, wastewater will need to be stored some
months and removed from storage in other months. If the storage pond gets near empty, the farmer will
simply reduce or stop irrigating until liquid levels build back. This table shows that the storage pond is
near empty by the month of July. Then it slowly builds back volume through out the next 6 months.
Heavy irrigation from in the Spring and Summer should again lower the pond volume. Actual
irrigation amounts and storage accumulation levels will vary from year to year. The storage volume in
impoundment # 3 can not exceed 1,065,444 gallons based on the estimates of the NRCS back in 1997.
The 1,065,444 gallon volume still allows room to store one 25 year 24 hour storm.
Table 21 is only an example to show how the volume in the pond tends to change from month to month.
It is not intended to accurately predict a monthly storage volume, but to only show that the storage
water will rise and fall over a 12 month period. Monthly variations in excess wastewater accumulation
(due to rainfall and/or animal waste) are omitted from this example. Instead monthly wastewater
generation is shown to be equal every month, but this is not highly accurate. A more accurate analysis
of seasonal rainfall alone would show some variations between months. However for uncovered
lagoons or ponds at hog facilities, using an average is the acceptable methodology. The engineer has
assumed a start volume of 600,000 gallons in January for this example, but this will change from year to
year. Table 21 assumes no irrigation occurs in December and January.
TABLE 21 APPEARS ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE IN ITS ENTIRETY
35

FARM NAME: DIXIE FARM
FARM OWNER(S): N.G. PURVIS FARMS, INC.
FARM LOCATION: MOORE COUNTY, NC.
TABLE 21
EXAMPLE WATER BALANCE FOR DIXIE FARM WASTE STORAGE IMPOUNDMENT
OPTION 1 = BERMUDAGRASS OVERSEEDED WITH RYE (HARVESTED FOR HAY).
EST. AVERAGE
EXCESS WASTEWATER
ALLOWABLE
WASTEWATER
ESTIMATED VOLUME
GENERATED
ESTIMATED
ACCUMULATION
OF LIQUID IN
AT END OF
AT DIXIE FARM
IRRIGATION
OR REDUCTION
STORAGE POND
THIS MONTH
...........
(GAL/MO)
..............
(GAL/MO)
..............
(GAVMO)
..............
(CUMULATIVE) #
..............
JANUARY
165,799
0
165,799
600,0D0
FEBRUARY
166,799
190,254
(24.455)
575,545
MARCH
165,799
197,864
(32,065)
543,480
APRIL
165,799
114,153
51,647
595,127
MAY
16S,799
304,407
(138,608)
466,519
J U N E
165,799
342,456
(176,658)
279,861
JULY
165,799
342,458
(176,658)
103,202
AUGUST
165.799
98,932
66,867
170,069
SEPTEMBER
185,799
114,153
51,647
221,716
OCTOBER
1.65,799
152,203
13,596
235.312
NOVEMB ER
165,799
114.153
51,647
286,959
DECEMBER
105,799
........•
0
•...... R.
165,799
•........ ....
452,758
TOTAL
1,989,591
1,971,034.
18,557
+ = THE AVERAGE MONTHLY WASTEWATER GENERATION DOES ACCOUNT FOR MONTHLY RAINFALL VARIATIONS AND
MONTHLY EVAPOTRANSPORATION VARIATIONS, THESE ARE ONLY ESTIMATES AND COULD VARY FROM MONTH
TO MONTH. THESE VALUES WERE DERIVED FROM ACTUAL IRRIGATION DATA AT DIXIE FARM.
# = IT IS ASSUMED THAT SOMETIME DURING THE YEAR THE WASTE STORAGE IMPOUNDMENT HERE WILL BE EMPTY.
OR ALMOST EMPTY. THIS IS AN EXAMPLE ONLY.
= A LARGE POSITIVE VALUE HERE INDICATES MORE ACRES MAY BE NEEDED IN ORDER TO ACCEPT ALL OF THE
WASTE BEING GENERATED AT OUR ASSUMED VALUES. A LARGE NEGATIVE VALUE INDICATES MORE THAN ENOUGH
LAND IS BEING IRRIGATED TO UTILIZE ALL OF THE EXPECTED P.A.N. GENERATION FROM THE LIQUID. THE FARMER
CAN NOT IRRIGATE MORE WASTE THAN 15 AVAILABLE, SO A NEGATIVE NUMBER INDICATES A LACK OF ANIMAL
WASTE AVAILABLE TO SUPPLY THE MAXIMUM CROP NUTRIENT UPTAKES PRESENTED ABOVE. LAND OUTSIDE
OF THE NORMAL WETTED ACRES MAY NEED TO BE USED TO TAKE EXCESS LIQUIDS.
PAGE 36

Revised Agronondo Plan For Dixie Fanu - Scptembix 2001
TABLE 22 (storage,impoundment and irrigation water balance - Option 2)
Table 22 is very similar to Table 21 and shows an illustration of the annual water balance for the storage
impoundment at Dixie Farm under Option 2 crop conditions. Ideally, Table 22 should show that about
the same amount of wastewater was being irrigated as was being generated each month, However in
the real world, wastewater will need to be stored some months and removed from storage in other
months. If the storage pond gets near empty, the farmer will simply reduce or stop irrigating until liquid
levels build back. This table shows that the storage pond is more or less empty from June to October
since the farmer can irrigate all of the generated water during this time. Then it slowly builds back
volume from November to January. Heavy irrigation from February through the spring and summer
would again lower the pond volume to low or empty status. Actual irrigation amounts and storage
accumulation levels will vary from year to year. The storage volume in impoundment # 3 can not
exceed 1,065,444 gallons based on the estimates of the NRCS back in 1997. The 1,065,444 gallon
volume still allows room to store one 25 year - 24 hour storm.
Table 21 is only an example to show how the volume in the pond tends to change from month to month.
It is not intended to accurately predict a monthly storage volume, but to only show that the storage
water will rise and fall over a 12 month period. Monthly variations in excess wastewater accumulation
(due to rainfall and/or animal waste) are omitted from this example. Instead monthly wastewater
generation is shown to be equal every month, but this is not highly accurate. A more accurate analysis
of such variables would show mare variations between months and seasons. However for uncovered
lagoons or ponds at hog facilities, using the same excess wastewater production each month as an
average is the acceptable methodology, The engineer has assumed a start volume of 600,000 gallons in
January for this example so the reader can compare the monthly values to Table 21. Table 22 assumes
no irrigation occurs in December and January.
TABLE 22 APPEARS ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE 1N ITS ENTIRETY
37

FARM NAME: DIXIE FARM
FARM OWNER(S): N.G. PURVIS FARMS, INC.
FARM LOCATION: MOORE COUNTY, NC.
TABLE 22
EXAMPLE WATER BALANCE FOR DIXIE FARM WASTE STORAGE IMPOUNDMENT
OPTION 2 = BERMUDAGRASS OVERSEEDED WITH MATUA (HARVESTED FOR HAY).
EST, AVERAGE
EXCESS WASTEWATER
ALLOWABLE
WASTEWATER
ESTIMATED VOLUME
GENERATED
ESTIMATED
ACCUMULATION
OF LIQUID IN
AT END OF
AT DIXIE FARM
IRRIGATION
OR REDUCTION
STORAGE POND
THIS MONTH
..Rfiii RR.R
(GAL/MO)
i/...RR.Rii...
(GALIMO)
Riiifivitiii#i
(GALIMO)
Fiiii RRiiiiiii
(CUMULATIVE) #
1ii.i RRRY..Rii
JANUARY
165,799
0
165,799
600,OD0
FEBRUARY
165,799
304,407
(138,608)
461,392
MARCH
165,799
342,458
(176,615B)
284,734
APRIL
165,799
266,356
(100,557)
184,177
MAY
166,799
342,458
(176, W8)
7,519
JU NE
165,799
360,508
(214.709)
0
J U LY
165,799
380,50E
(214, 709)
0
AUGUST
165,799
258,746
(92.947)
0
SEPTEMBER
165,799
190,254
(24,455)
0
OCTOBER
165,799
228,305
(62.506)
0
NOVEMB E R
165,799
152,203
13,596
13,596
DECEMBER
165,799
ii•i1i1RR
0
iiRiiiiiii
165,799
fiii •Ri iii Ri•
179,395
TOTAL
1.989,59;
2,846, 203
(856, 612)
+ = THE AVERAGE MONTHLY WASTEWATER GENERATION DOES ACCOUNT FOR MONTHLY RAINFALL VARIATIONS AND
MONTHLY EVAPOTRANSPORATION VARIATIONS. THESE ARE ONLY ESTIMATES AND COULD VARY FROM MONTH
TO MONTH. THESE VALUES WERE DERIVED FROM ACTUAL IRRIGATION DATA AT DIXIE FARM.
# = IT IS ASSUMED THAT SOMETIME DURING THE YEAR THE WASTE STORAGE IMPOUNDMENT HERE WILL BE EMPTY.
OR ALMOST EMPTY. THIS IS AN EXAMPLE ONLY.
= A LARGE POSITIVE VALUE HERE INDICATES MORE ACRES MAY BE NEEDED IN ORDER TO ACCEPT ALL OF THE
WASTE BEING GENERATED AT OUR ASSUMED VALUES. A LARGE NEGATIVE VALUE INDICATES MORE THAN ENOUGH
LAND IS BEING IRRIGATED TO UTILIZE ALL OF THE EXPECTED P.A.N. GENERATION FROM THE LIQUID. THE FARMER
CAN NOT IRRIGATE MORE WASTE THAN IS AVAILABLE, SO A NEGATIVE NUMBER INDICATES A LACK OF ANIMAL
WASTE AVAILABLE TO SUPPLY THE MAXIMUM CROP NUTRIENT UPTAKES PRESENTED ABOVE, LAND OUTSIDE
OF THE NORMAL WETTED ACRES MAY NEED TO BE USED TO TAKE EXCESS LIQUIDS,
PAGE 3B

N D 0 L P H C 0 U iN T Y C; 1! r1 T 1-1 A M C 0 U N
` IJ �
Lfkl J 11.11 LN Iwl V3 �+ V`� • �l- _ _-i•. F s. 1r.ir� ,I\l,,t. 1 ur.l --:-_.
u11 r I,1 .1 k Iwll 5 Ipe. I
.,It I ] ti: a,° • r f .'{ - Iw Asa w M�rd
M4 Ibl
f/ _i r" I •It f L144 Jae oen ,.
Ip, J � J� ��„ - V.11 , Ine 1.l11vh toil, I •' 11,e ,L, 'le le J 1111 G,•I,°ew'°
1121
� 1 v rr � Ini ? i ..r• '+I ' Lar I . } Ia° � ' ,.ri" ' Y.� ler. .)" !Y
t 411t 'Ui� r.1 -tWl y Y;. �1 LVi I•H r� r,,w w .. 10 Lln IN
1 ~ • : 1}
1I21 rV r.r. • `- a„ ti ., 4117 i .. al. +..f�` r_rut 't'/p�. I• I.a. v Tnl. GCK Q�
list
11U r°1 an .I/%I ..71 � Illi H. IluMele ,r -+. Y
y/I 1:41 V. I • A4c
o1 �
Itr.n`,.,- ,--I).m n. J
• •/ �tl•r IH.' Lb A I
• lip. - ,I i 1 a�1,•,lQ�n} nJJ .n C..' swi.°.
} L �'k rf le,i ,a• lyr b -1 / I.sa / N {yr} a er.r4 U. I—
'i ! } J 1.1 •`,-..-\ ,u, " \ ,n �lOIIINS I11J /�d J.• 10PI LaC-L A T � a/a ,.Jr , �' ^ I11 ' �r lel ) •lt, ���.
.J IN, 1 Inr, Nt 1�, ` Cn, '% �aN +�•� fir" I� ,.s1r " r / t; 1��� ..s �J
c--t`
.r �� 1 nl ^ ti 1J1� � . 1.. .i • lar / t.rL ...d
IBIIIr. Slave y n r 7
Lim
• � .• r .�•. uC it r.rl }'1 r
�,Iln J
I I'A1' S I. J .t, uI. . J
l'
r e �M LaC .11! a•/� �..... Ch. rJ I... Llri`Coa
L M I/LL t
S Wal If lrrC ) u 1f ° Lai
ttiMierplri• � ♦ M ,a
14
uei .I.r ..\ 1 ,+i
Lim a -Ali Y
z
Ull ° ra / s„y;, l,a '} t•y 'J '' ^ .e J'-'Y"iX1 till , •
un ]-. nil •,r1 U12
' 1191 LW
Ira 0. , an ~; Ir11 1, , CARTHAGE y �I'•. ,✓1A Jpl
t Q ulr ti` F1 L I tnN 3� :1 a ■
_ +», • �, ., .• r • u_t _ i{c sari
Ivl S 1,7 tire i �rfir, l!u LUl f R r/ORttt ` ;V'� �`* � , i s 7 3-IL � 'rr17
1.! I
ug,
arl J Y
f4f4f4rrr 1 11.. ,tH '-0 �p In
aA t+'1. . I Is
iij
IN .NI ? J• LU y t �' p,,,l.•M
I lrr tyMw• 1<•! � �• . IM7CrrN
J r y '} J,n X.rri, LL{I 9 f _ I.I IL9l
a41 ,.
S Liu nu
.Ia S■III.wIM E.IN >o ~ � Ierl � 1 � i � f
twlwl
lIart
II t!
e+, Ila } ' ,ltli•rin lT•I LIN Y I ti11 J I t�f• 1 I Lill tJ.ir \
t 1ai tiri AIL UU �!'UL ^ ar •
ill "
IA ��r J
r VIn IJa la,y� r41 'ln -' i
1 �y aJ
Ily tut I111 Ilir t�y ua N L I ?
V rl1, V n 1111 l..
11.1
1.� IIN
Exhibit 1
vicinity Map For Dixie Farm.
Moore County, N.C.
rity., Owner - N.G. Purvis Farms.
1 . I O 1 7 ] 1I•.ts
1
71 / •
Moore County

- . \ (' � PUTNAM QUADRANGLE
i _f z �'"� `y NORTH CAROLINA—MOORE CO.
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC
IA
73.
i'•�'.+ ��/ :tom _ ( �a, ifs � � , ' � -�. t �•� � - � ',I! � - _.•! ,f -- •\'1 " �'";
I .r. '��l`1 � � �` v>� !! ��' � I �J ��-• , •( e r it
J
1 `ell
. %�" � � - l i , `• 1 - � .-� Ill ,i � � • ' � ri
/ , I (+ � � f� ice~' �. ;,'° �'^' �.). - tit � � �� �• � T r
163,
n—ti._1`1
\ 'I�C .� yi \` .. V � \ { - ` ` o. � ,� r- rr�f �•.� ` i.�� _ � U
�tzz
r 3,� 1 ! r `✓ /� - 1 -�i \. r I lti I i _zI ---� I �Y .. I•. ...` - ;�':��I ` -�r� 1 ��/
6.
1139
,, ,,�� ) 1'i�/-�,? �lr �1. ''tr= �•---, ,� '�� �, ��j �.lrr,a,
!22-
'10_ ; - .l � ,% /'fir•
Exhibit 2
I (r USGS Topographic map of Dixie '?
P rkwoad J
I •' Farm. Owner N.G. Purvis Farms.
�.. J J...1 ...� Moore County, NC.
SCALE 1:24 000
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET
1 .5 0 ! KILOMETER
CONTOUR #NTERVAL 10 FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929

.
ro
Tali
NMI
PAO Anon

rgs..-r ✓ ,4�Y: . y _ - - Gj T..: f'y�i - _..x _.S "
-15
-�� �.��-' �,,.- �� -.�-�.�FY_ ,-',9 � 1 `:�"-:=`•�C,� ��� _k,�---..'ram'>""_'�:.; J.�. _ _ �''Y' �� __ ' .
Kn
Fres lip
'mow':.•-'r '-r �'Ys. �`= `.3'•v _ �'L t`4 _ .� r �_���
- � ♦j --ti, - ._ '(I."`! � _ ice]..-n-".`�-,.' � �� �!tsr?'�'" P �- +-�
x ax
'�' ix, - _ `,sue +•� _ - - a - _ ! � �-
_
ii-q •� � - jj� � � � - � - _�` � _ � � r c � ��~ �i - - rya � � � _ � -
'� � spy z _ � 9 -- � r '� -=� � � .>-.�. � �'.:^ �-�_ , _ - - _ ; � � - - - Y •
n
���`* e _ _ . < __ r � _ - �. __ a � _ 2�'i� s -•�`�• - �`a. � � air' - _
1
�
- -
� -
���; �— �• - _ - s.- j=ate � -- ti.. - - � `? �, �: - =.� - 1 � 1 1 � 1 1 1 / 1
�Y
+
y "Y

f0 8 0l
Animal Waste Management System Operator Designation Form
WPCSOCC
NCAC 15A 8F .0201
Facility/Farm Name: a 1 t Fa
Permit #: -hys0 (a n! U Facility ID#: &_- 4003 County: Noore-
Operator In Charge (OIC)
Name:
Oofe
First / Middl'K > / Last Jr, Sr, etc. p�
Cert Type / Number: / 7y / Work Phone:
Signature:�2a�Date:
" 1 certify that I agree to my designation as the Operator in Charge for the facility noted. I understand and will abide by the rules
and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities set forth in 15A NCAC 08F .0203 and failing to do so can result in Disciplinary
Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
Back-up Operator In Charge (Back-up OIC) (Optional)
First Middle Last Jr, Sr, etc.
Cert Type / Number: Work Phone: ( )
Signature: Date:
" I certify that I agree to my designation as Hack -up Operator in Charge for the facility noted. I understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities set forth in 15A NCAC 08F .0203 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary�Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
Owner/Permittee Name:
Phone #: Fax#:
Signature:
(Owner or agdrdrized agent)
``Mail or fax to:
r
Revised 912007
WPCSOCC
1618 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1618
Fax: [phone]
(Retain a copy of this form for your records)

i "4
W A
`? r
4
Mr. Tony Moore
N.G. Purvis Farms, Inc.
2504 Spies Road
Robbins, NC 27325-7213
Dear Mr. Moore:
RECEIVEDI Michael F. Easley, Governor
MAC 2' 3 2005 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Na h Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r�A�A�Ip�C� Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
March 21, 2005
Subject: Animal Permit Record Keeping Forms
General Permit Nos. NCA200000 & AWG 100000
The Animal Feeding Operations Permitting and Compliance Unit has conducted a review of the N.G. Purvis, Inc. record
keeping form submitted March 15, 2005. Based on our review, the following form has been approved for use in conjunction
with the requirements set forth in General Permit Numbers NCA200000 and AWG 100000.
1. N.G. Purvis Stocking Form
Please be aware that permittees are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in General Permit Numbers
NCA200000 and AWGI00000. Information required by the referenced permits must be included on forms provided by the
Division or approved by the Division. Please pay particular attention that all forms must include the facility name and
number. Any modifications to the approved forms must be submitted to the Division for review. Any oversights that
occurred in the review of the subject forms are still the responsibility of the permittee.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]. Thank you for your
cooperation.
Sincerely,
M. Paul erman, P.E.
AFO Unit Supervisor
Cc: PIiPS; Fayetteville -Regional Offic�e'w/-attachments
APS, Wilmington Regional Office w/ attachments
APS, Washington Regional Office w/ attachments
APS, Raleigh Regional Office w/ attachments
APS, Mooresville Regional Office w/ attachments
APS, Winston Salem Regional Office w/ attachments
APS, Asheville Regional Office w/ attachments
Division of Soil & Water Conservation — Central Office
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: http://h2o.cnr.state,ne.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmallve Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
NQ'` hCarolina
Natura!!r1

I
MAR-15-05 TUE 17:04 N G PURVIS FARMS FAX NO. 910 948 3213 P.02
AvLq0gg-5,�tjqkijj&nnd MortaliLy Record
Farm 0synerl: -&Q�f!jLr XU Farm In
1a C i I i LY N zuqlb-e-r - - -
D ate
static
51-6- V Jill
Mar
Begiluling
Tnvemmy
Gilts
Added
Full;
Mortality
Total Total
Sows
Average
Sows
Average
Mortality

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
October 1, 2004
N.G. Purvis Farms
Dixie Farms
2504 Spies Rd
Robbins NC 27325
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
OCT 15 2094
DENR-FAYEiTEVILLE REGIONAL OFRGE
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS630003
Dixie Farms
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Moore County
Dear N.G. Purvis Farms:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on March 6, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to N.G.
Purvis Farms, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG 100000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS630003 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Dixie Farms, located in Moore County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than an annual average of 806 Farrow to Wean swine and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to
Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary, they may
be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4
gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitorinfz conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit One
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
NorthCarolina
Phone; 919-733-3221 1 FAX; 919-715-05881 Intemel: h2o,enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper Xaturally

If your Waste Utilization:Plan,has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility. .
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General.Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
i:�
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Moore County Health Department
Moore County Soil and Water Conservation District
Pennit File AWS630003
APS Central Files

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
December 1, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
N G Purvis Farms Inc
Wet Creek Farm "„ r• .
2504 Spies Rd
Robbins, NC 273257213
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring NPDES General Permit
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation NPDES General Permits, which expire on
July 1, 2007. Due to changes in federal rules, facilities that do not discharge nor propose to discharge may choose whether or not to
retain coverage under an NPDES General Permit. Copies of the draft animal waste operation NPDES general permits and the State
Non -Discharge General Permits are available at htip://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/aps/afou/downtoads.htm or by writing or calling:
NCDENR — DWQ Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
In order to assure your continued coverage under one of these two types of general permits, you must submit an application for permit
coverage to the Division. Enclosed you will find a'Request for Certificate of Coverage Facility Currently Covered by an Expiring
NPDES General Permit.' The application form must be completed and returned by January 2, 2007_ Please note, you must include
two (2) copies of your most recent Waste Utilization_ Plan with the application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the draft general permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel free to contact the
Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at 919-733-3221.
Sincerely,
�a
Ted L. Bush, Jr., Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures): Moore County Soil and Water Conservation District
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files - 630001
N G Purvis Farms Inc
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Internet: www.ncwatuquality.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh. NC 27604
An Equal Opportun4lAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
Telephone:
Fax 1:
Fax 2:
Customer Service:
W�,"�hCarolina
(919) )Valurally
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]

Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number
Part 111. Field by Field Determination
of
75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'-'
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS'
FIELD NUMBER'
- hvdrant. Dull. zone. or point numbers may be used in Dlace of field numbers
denendino on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBER2 - must be clearly delineated on -map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres'Ead having received less -.than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous.two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records; -cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. _Back-upfeids-must -be noted in -the comment section and must,be:accessible,
by irrigation -system. -
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations -
P1 Plan lacks :following lnformation: ­
P2 Plan revision -may. satisfy75%rule.based_on-adequate-overall PAN deficit-Bnd:by
adjusting -all field zcreage to'.below75% use rate--.
P3 Other (ielin process of installing new irrigation -system):

Revised April 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number
Farm Name: Aikic�c,m5
On -Site Representative: Tj%4 > ar•e_
Inspector/Reviewer's Name::
Date of site visit:
Date of most recent WUP:
Annual farm PAN deficit: 1?9pounds
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
C/ OpDerafion not re ulred to secure WA
determination at this t1mg, based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on P1 P2 P3
Irrigation System(s) - circle # 1. hard -hose traveler; - 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w p en pipe; . stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
fi. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part II, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D�D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
VIE Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part II. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11- F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part III).
PART 11.75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below: .
F1 Lack of acreage which -resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on -spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years -of irrigation -records:
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious -field limitations .(numerous -.ditches; failure to deduct -required
buffer/setback acreage;-or.25%of total-acreage.identified in CAWMP includes::".
small,- irregularly shaped fields fields less -than -5 -acres *for travelers -or less.than
2 acres for stationary .sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective fields total acreage as noted in table in Part IH.

N.G. Purvis Farms
2504 Spies Rd.
Robbins, NC 27325
1-910-948-2297
May 16; 2000
Mr.. John Hasty
225 Green St. Suite 714
Fayetteville. NC 28301
FiECEii/ED
V ,ly 1 7 2000
FAYETTEVILLE
REG. OFFICE
Subject: Notice of deficiencies at our Wet Creek facility #63-01, Holly Ridge #63-06,
Deerfield #63-07, Indian Hills #63-08, Dixie #63-03.
Dear Mr. Hasty,
I am writing in regards to the lack of current soil samples for the facilities 63-01,
63-06, 63-07, 63-08. We have taken and sent off samples as of May 16, 2000. When
results of the samples are returned the appropriate applications of lime will be done.
Facility 63-03 needed the rye over seed cut, this was done on May 5, 2000. This
would have been done earlier but weather did not permit such. Freeboard levels are
now being recorded. On May 9, 2000 ,Terry Hall and Kevin William installed a
lagoon level marker.
Thank You,
Anthony Moore

Animal Waste N anagemen t Pian Certification
(Please tvoe or print all inlormatum dial does nc reuuire a sianature)=
E.Yistin_ `:.'or.':.ry >'or.... EY anted....:( l'ease circle.one
}
c,
a
GenefalInformation-
Name of Farm: N.G. PL)Rv is FARm — 'D i x i F__ FAR. _ ___ Facility tiro: _G3
Owners) dame: N - G- Pu Rv 15 FP Rrnr15 11,E C Phone No: 910 - 94-8- 22.9?
Ylailina :address: 2SO4 SPIES ROAD, i�00GIIN5, NoR-rw CAR.OLlNA ,_?_73Z5
Farm Locution: ° County Farm is located( in: _Moo RE_
Latitude and Longitude: 1 Intezrator:
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): NO rhl OrJ }jWY ZZ Frzoth NWY Z.4-Z7 , Tu_R TL1CrN7
oN 5. R . TU 2 LEFT 00 r (a 3 FARM ON L FT A PPitvi . `/2 MILE
Ooeration Descriation:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
:1 Wean to Feeder
J Feeder to Finish
XFarrow to Wean 130c-,
a Farrow to Feeder
rl Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
CI Boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals rope of C-rrrle
J Laver Dairy
Zi Pullets Z Beef
No. of Animals
Orher Type of Livesrock: • Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application: 25.b Required Acreage: IS-9
Numberof Lagoons 1 Storage Ponds: 3 Total Capacity: 304.30(Q Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
a�k�e�Mia�wMk���N�kx�+kMhkrek�N��k�ohM.iMie��.k+F;.�hN.k+kM4k�s��k�.Msa.ikra+i•>k��hMM,RiatMaryas;.M�k�M+i�M+;er:MM*��>eahK�
Owner / Manacer agreement .
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be undated upon changing.•I (eve) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in.the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the, existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there trust be no discharge' of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event foss severe than the 25-year, "_-I-hour storm and there must not be run-off from die
application of mitnal waste.. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants. from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by.the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (eve) know that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to tine Soil and Water Conservation District priur to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires -written •nodficadon.w.DEyI or a newt/ cerdfhcation.(if.fie.approLed . .
plan is changed) within 60 days of a jitle t�nsrer. n
Name of Land Owner • le S-
Signature: ` Date: z- .� 3
Name of Manager(if different from 14'1067re.
Signature: Date:
AWC -- .august 1. 1997

Technical Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Consmation Commission pursuant to 1=A
NCAC 6F .0005. I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal ~vast,
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Nku:aseme
(DENI) as specified in 15A NCAC 3H.0317 and the USDA -`Natural Resources Consen-adon Service WRCS) andlor th,.
North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 13A NCAC 2H.0317 and 15A NCAC bF .0001-
.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each catenory designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, 1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
Technically competent.
H.' Certification of Design
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment System
Check the approprlare box
Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity: ttomge capability consistent %vith ~haste . utiliz-ation
requirements.
.:.I `re%v. expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storase and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems. lagoons and ponds.
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Special'ist.(PleaSe Print): IAuRr-r_rcT ._PA7rC.jR
AffiliationLNRR,S - _ Date Work Completed:
ri
S
hone No.:'704- G37 - ZAO
ate:
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): A tIdER.T T. PAM- I fL
Affiliation N RCS Date Work.Completed:
Address (Agency): 600 WEST 1 N NG. ST , SALI513URY_ �1 C. Phone No.:701 437- ZA00
Sic'nature: Date:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Facility with exterior lots (RC)
.... Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Hda�u-r iPATS ,BIZ .
Affiliadon NRe S ., _ Dale Work Completed:
_address (Agency): goo WM I Sr.GAL S&I Phone No. 4- 3 - Z 0
S i2 nature: R I., Date: I Z - z
AWC -- Au-,,ust I. 1997 M

D). Application and Handling Eouinment
Check the appropriate ho.r
Existilt;_ nr_eYpandina Facility with existing -gste anglicatinn eauinme- 1 (wl:p or I)
,animal waste application equipment spc6fied in the plan has been ether field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to. accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates. a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are c-'mained as part of
the plan).
J New. expanded, nr existing facility without existing waste aopli nt•on zouinment rnr spray itg-n.[ion (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the wane management plan; (proposed, application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing or
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance ace
contained as pan of the plan).
D New. expanded, or exist' a 1ci ' v without xiging waste e lice inn ecuiarnent for soreoding not 'nu
s_MIV irrigntin,n. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
apolicatidits has been established; required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are
"Contained as pan of the plan),
Natne,of Technical Specialist (Please Print): y_0 RVP-r T. pATE .TR
Affiliation N (S Date Work` Completed:
Address (Agency): 1ni60A5•# S N• Phone No.:704 63-7 4ab
Imp
Signature: Date: 1
E) Odor Control. Insect Control. Mortality Ni lanagement and Emergency Action Plan (SD.
SI. WUP. RC or D
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Con&ol Checklist. an Insect
Control Checklist. a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated'with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Nlanagemem Practices to Control Insects have been selected and -included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Nlanagemem Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by thi, facility.
dame of Technical Specialist (Please Print):,- BF-Jz-r. 21 8ig "u-p .
Affiliation- ARCS' Date Worm Completed:.
Address
Sianamre
e No.:7a4-63Z•Z4-00
F)-Written Notice of New or Expanding Swine Farm
The follo%ring signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21. 1996. If the facility was built before June 21. 1996, when was it constructed or Iast
expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all.proptrty owners
who awn property located across a public road. street. or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of -the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attic h e d............... .
Name of Land Owner:
ISignature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
WC -- Au-ust 1, 1997 3

III. Certification o, f Installation
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Installation
New, eenanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited'to lagoons and ponds.'have been installer
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For esistina facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical. S pecialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No'. F
Signature: _ _ _ Date:
B) Land A iicntion Site (W P)
Check the. appropriate box
;14 The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
J Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan'has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (monthldaylyear); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteudlizauon plan.
Q Also check this box if'appropriaie ;
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 d-
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop. for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_gQBU '_ YJ
Affiliation N RtS Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency):
S ianature:_�
.Phone No.: 7p+ -b37- 240O
Date: le- 3-- 9 -1
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in M. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan.
and if appropriate to establish the interim. crop for erosion control. and will submit to DELI a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 1$ calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AIVC -- August I. 1997

C) Runoff Contrail from Exterar Lots. (RC)
Facility with exterior logs
Mediuds to minimize die run off of pollutants. from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as apecified
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots; no certifcatfori is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Comoleted:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) A olication and Handlinz Equipment Tnstallation (WUP or I)
Check the appropriare block.
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is oa site and read;,- for use:
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained'as part of die plan.
J animal waste application and handling equipment specified'in tfic plan has noc b4tn installed but die o%vner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a sinned contract: equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan: required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
._l Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specitied in die plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year): there is adequate
storase to hold the waste until the equipment IS (nstniled and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): POQF- �7 T ?A-M
Affiiiation_l RCS Date Work Completed:
Address
Signature
hone No.: 7o 4-(03-1- AkO
ate: 1Z 23 -R-j
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DELI a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in [tie conditional cercitication. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.-
,Name of Land Owner -
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: - - -„ _ _ - -� Date-
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and Mortality -Management, (SD. ST. WUP. RC or I)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and. are operational. Trip -
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has'af5d-beuin installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): N T T. ATE Jk'_
Affiliation N R.0 S Date
Address
Signature
Work Completed:
Phone vo.:70 -(a - 2400
Date: Z
.-k1vC -- August 1. 1997

IL
Fresh Water Pcod
,P`
•
oil
:' •+ }
4 Iwo an.
Wy L
,
�.., . - � ��rv; � •• } �� � :vim=4t, t � � _
a - t
♦ )% Y
a„
-Z' -: -
v
L
a.� t
_
Fs/v i.tM .CiF..Z^Ay' T... _!. - ...._ ..-r:'� .. -_. _ _ �..... 1..: .. _u "fir I � � - - ■■ ■
L

�14

State of North Carolina,
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
N.G. Purvis Farms
Dixie Farms
2504 Spies Rd
Robbins NC 27325
Attn: Anthony Moore
Dear Anthony Moore:
DENR-FRO
JLL y W
DW
June 25, 1999
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL_ RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS630003
Dixie Farms
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Moore County
In accordance with your application received on January 20, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to N.G. Purvis Farms, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Dixie Farms, located in Moore County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than 806 Farrow to Wean and the application to land as specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, Forth Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS630003
Dixie Farms
Page 2
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contaimd iia this&OC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contactin—g—the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
I
The subject farm is located in the Fayetteville Regional Offte'd.-The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincere ,
,,t— Kerr T. Stevens �~
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Moore County Health Department
Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Moore County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

. tistiii� lor'.r. .. w._m�l. dedee ire. P
General Tnforma' don -
;`lame of Farm: N.G. Po&4 t5 FAM -- Dixie FA izrn Facility NO: (a
Owner(5) vame: N.G. PtaRyi.5 FARMS, WC Phone No: 910-94a- 2z9?
Mailing Address: 2SO4 SPIES ROAD ROGAINS, NoR-rH CAR tr N Z7325
Farm Location: County Farm is locat.-d in: Moo R>-
Latitude and Loneitude: / lnteQrator
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): Nom" oN NWY 7_2. Eg%3r^ WWYZ4-z_-7,TuRtj_RJGjjT
coi S.R . I ��.�Tu9&-..L Le Fr oN t 63 7 FARM ON L1_Pr _ APPftT `/Z MILE
Oneration Descriotion:
Type of Swine No. o Animals
D Wean to Feeder _
D Feeder to Finish
)kFarrow to Wean SOfe -
J Farrow to Feeder
D Farrow to Finish
t1 Gibs
❑ Boars
Type of Poultn
D Layer
D Pullets
No. of Animals
Other Type of Livesroc,,:
Y
Type of Carrle A'o. of Animals
D Dairy R E D
D B dMTE QUAUTY SECTION
:dumber of AnjNs.• L 01999
Non -Da ttarge Permitting
Acreage Available for Application:_, 25•.0 _ _ Required Acreage: 15. -
Number of Lagoons 1 Storage Ponds : 3 Total Capacity, 3Q±t304n -Cubic Feet (0)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (pie-ase circle one)
ialtiit�MeRMM���iie�yetay'*Merit*�a�tkie�yeeR>NMM�[we.wkex.wtiekM�.+kajlt,`�k+Rxke�a::,aiatiiki.iateM�ix,Kai.itMtriai,,;aM�ktilEeMieie�>ras+i.i,ici..k
Owner / �-Ianager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correi t and will be updated upon changing. -1 (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste Management plan for the farm named above and Mll
implement these procedures. I (we) lmow that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to shave waters of the state zither directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe thaw the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
Conservation using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conse�tion Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation DistricL I (we) lmtow that any modification
MUSE be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Consen-ation District prior to
implemenM ion. A change in land ownership requires-writ'ten•notification w.DE:tiI or a new. certification (if.the,approved .
plan is chaneed) within via days of alitle tx; sfrr.
~Tame of Land Owner • Yell,,' S
Signature: ` Date: le-
Vame of Manager(if different from Owne:): %t'%e. i t1&_k /t'1041-,e
r � 5
Signature: —
�i
A%VC -- tigust 1. 1997 1 a
A 9�
F��C"�

Q). Apolication and Handling* Equipment
Check the appropriate box
K
J
X Existing nr_ xt~andino facility with existing �Lmu :tnnlicotion eoul±ment {W[T or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has bt= either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design chart and tables and is able to apply was.z as nec:ssary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the ara required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates. a schedule for timing of appiications has been
establisbed; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment gui {i once `re c.:ntaan:d as part of
the plan).
expanded. nr existing facility without existing w tas e a2plicntine_ eouipment for =pr. v in ig trion. (I)
,animal waste application equipment specified in the plant bas been designed to apple waste 2s necessa.ry to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can corer the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutient loading rates; a schedule for 6mino of
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjusment guidance are
contained as past of the plan).
.! Netv. expanded,. or exis;na dfacility without e!dstiny, tvnsre annliration eoui niznt_Cor. land screatiinp not usinv
Y
5rmy irrigjtinn (WUP or I)
Aninial waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained: caiibratiun and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Name,of Technical Specialist (Please Print): H L) RyR_7 T_ PAT E J P,
Affiliation H RCS Date Work- Completed:
Address (Agency): OC),\nFsy N1J FS St. SA u Phone No.: �0J - b37 -- 2 4Qo
Signature:9 49Date: )
E) Odor Control. insect Control. Mortality ManaZement an__d Emer�encv .-kcdQn_Plan (SD
SI. WUP. RC or T)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste 'Management Odor Control Checklist. an Insect
Control Cbecklist, a Mortality NManagemcnt Checklist and an Emer2encv Action Plan. Sources of bath odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best'Manasement Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
'loma i'ty'Management. Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by thi- facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 14 tl f3F.R.T T I"ATE ..1 k.. _
Af iliadon_ f,1 RCS_ _ Date Work Completed:
Address (
Si,_,rnaiure
Phone No.:'704--b37. 2400
Date: ! Z - 0-3-11
F) Written Notice of New or Expanding S%yine Farm
The folloti"no signature block is ordy to be used for new or expanding swine fzrTM that begin construction after Tune
21, 1996. If the facility was built before ,)une 21. 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (we) certify that 1 (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property ov.-ners and all property owners
w_ho awn propcm+ located across a public road. street- or highway from Ibis new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of vCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the: property owners notified is
—. attached...
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:,
Name of Nlana;er (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- .august 1, 1997 3

_ _..,a, w nuntntize the tun off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have be-n installed as specif
in the plan. -
For facilides without exterior lots, no certification is n ecessar .
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Aff-tliadon Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Application and Hnndlln2 Euuioment Installation (WUP or n
Check the appropriate block.
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is oa site and ready for u.;z.
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are conuined'as pan of the plan.
J Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has pro,.Yded a signed contract: equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plain: rtquired buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
..I Conditional approval: Animai waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year): there is adequate
stota;e to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
-accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (PIease Print): Pt1(3F.9z-f T _PA-TE , i .
Affiliation N RCS Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): tn) N N ST. SA US Phone \ro.: 70 4 -1e3-1 -14W
Signature: Date: 1 Z - Z3
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked. --•
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEVI a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within. 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plat and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DE.I. -
Name of Land Owner: '
Signature: Date:
- Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and Mortality .lananement (SD. SL WL`P. RC or 1)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. Tne
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has alsd*6cen installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (P1e:Lse Print): 14013EgT ___ ATE TR .
Affiliation N RCS Date Work Completed:
Address
S ignsturt
AWC -- August 1. 191)7
Phone No.:10 1 - `7 - Zoo
Date: - Z -- 1

' ItS e ► d 4 Y. JAI'
y /l
M LM 1y I�
Al
..
lift S•• lxll A
�
Lin
W-0 fO
10LwS 7a
E;s�•p
!!A �
7rr 1!!1 !Ux
ul
LLB I—"= *
'r Iris
!>E Ix!!
.f s
1
Is
Liu
is I sit
s]r L.'" o !9A
4'
y J
199 Zola
ROSINS
!
pop. I.V6
r
ff�+,
L�
f
r
Fqy J LtJ.4
UM
tole .
♦ tm
J J Lm
uu
FOA-OOd
33
'aa Irq
iatgryl+`� 21
`n
I lt'mOL
� :i11
� ♦wal.pry
�.rs-
s IAO ;.
w
►ii
i
f
I
- 3xlJ
New IvOleli
. Ixu
k i17+
GIYIeId011o ' �'�'/;..
w'--•
OL
J
I.7fe let;
r•.- y e
V
'r LOU
!i e '
f
L 1 ] Lin
1'Yx. Ify •t 1 'M
•• rd �
.trrr�
um e'H pH 0
P'S� 100
a Priest Nil \ ifa
a
J
Is
y
ylclt^d cOf
3s
r,CUIT AGE
7+I.f sol s e►SMA
I
t14
_^
KC STAT!
uW11
sc }
\ s
•• lyo. ffll Ind
7 f• ,g r Tali
forES7-
rIns afW
ILI
,'O
` 1
3
Lrs ''-Ttl !3..i• utp
,? Il4y ena.
�}
ev 11 i
II
V y
I�
O
lraoer
iL fist
HaG.ee WlahaeN C'4+
1ft2 y Yr.
Ireo
Har]ie
r
IY � G
lT12,J _ // _ /
m
Y :. I107
�-•_ 1111
/
IJU
�!
Ijsp
N r
W7:j
1 I r �.api
yt
is •i
!!p2 .w tr}I B I y
1�e1 imL
'1II
17ge 17}' iU1
am
311
Iln
uu t
f ,e7 �•71.+ J
lift
j
IARJ
v
li!4Sn
rsf
.•
+
74)
Lia
f leelrOed -
x'+
» r l a 1.4
f / eo►. IT I e0 Riavr
_, K)P.pip
q.
► 1{
-1.1
I T,ip 1715 + ► !�'� i
x.0 i
�; : Ch+e,� Fmeiyru v .,
— v SOYth. r- .+ I$,$
Inr A;.Fop
l�'I ,;. 'y {i >s
• '
ter, V(c#•�!.
.t
I-!.1! ��" ^--��'.�
Alurdelei e.ilie /�•
ley � � t
. i2t1
-
yj
Tayloi" 1" .I
` _•.�
!, Ias I.f !
��/
• � N:nnnrn
,

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: N.G. P-,Rvls FARMS - Dix,E FARMS
Location: 3G S S PI V E`f RoaD , CARTH AGE, N.C.
Telephone: 910 - 9 48 -- 229'7
Type Operation: FA RR -OW - 70 — W EAt-J
Number of Animals: S oi6 sows
(Design Capacity)
The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of
surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the
amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients,
can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the
fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they
have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5
tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10
tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not
allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce
the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this
type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques,
preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
21-1.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
1

' WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Amount of waste produced per year (gallons, cu.ft., tons, etc.)
906 animals x O. 12atn,waste/animaVyear = 9 (a.7 AC.-11%J Jyear.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF WASTE: E'17 9 2 , gallons of WASTE/YEAR.
Amount of Plant Availlible Nitrogen ffAM Produced Per Year
1. 3 G lbs. PAN/I 000 gals x 2 ,(, Z ?-.gals/year = 3 51 lbs. PAN/year.
AVERAGE OF WASTE ANALYSIS
(PAN from NCDA Test Report) or (PAN from N.C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the
waste in a timely manner. The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown
and surface application:
Table I: ACRES OWNED BYPRODUCER
Tract
Field
Soil
Lbs. N*
Lbs. N
Month of
#
#
Type
Crop
Per'Ac.
Acres
Utilized
Application
�tp
(RYE)
GeB
FEScuE
4.Sx50=?3S
8.5
1913
ov
F��-NFtiL
W°�y?t'°a
Z
(7e$
FeSr-UE
4.5x 0= 225
4.`3
967
Ft:6.- APraL-
t.Ap
\R�
3
G e ES
FESCUE
4.Sx50 = ZZE
2. 4
E40
sErr. - Nov.
Fee.- Ru-
O V E S E
wrr
F6
1 I_LET Fr
5T OF
Y
G eB
Mtt-i-cr
2.sx30- IZS
8.5
1063
AAY- Aury.
G e B
M I t-l.F-T
2. S x s o- 1Z.S
+ 3
537
/" AY - A uG.
1
-5
GeI3
/MIL ...ET
2.SX60 M5
2 4
300
MAY- AU ,
This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied. they must be accounted for. N must be based on
realistic vield expectation.
NOTE; The applicator is cautioned that F and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act
will require farmers in some eastern counties of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses
Nitrogen.
0)

.t
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attacheO
(Required only ifoperator does not own adequate land)
(See Required Specification 21)
Tract
#
meld
#
Soil
Type
Crop
Lbs. N*
Per Ac.
Acres
Lbs. N
Utilized
Month of
Application
* See Footnote for Table 1.
ACRES
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM ABOVE TABLES
Lbs. N Utilized
Table 1 10. q 19A1G A rC,0
'F.3 #oNry WAGotj J 320
Table 2
TOTAL 15. 2 5'3 2
Amount of N Produced 3 5 7 1
Surplus or elicit — 1749
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will
require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other
3

W A61 h U I ILILAIIUiN VLAiN
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
Field No.
Acres
Soil Type
Crop
Maximum
Application Rate
( InJHr.)
Maximum application
amount per irrigation
(Inches)
8.5
G e B
FETcuE AIL„�.�-r
O.40
0.75
3
2.4
e 13
Fo TA� E
0. 40
0. 75
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED 7 WASTE LS NOT BEINO APPL® BY IRRIGATION. HOWEVER. A SIMILAR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for 1 0 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every6 MONTHS. In no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation 83. 3 . (srac.7 POMP NAR, EK)
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
There are 25.0 acres established in fescue in fields 1,2, and 3 for this operation. Because
of field shape, buffers, and irrigation system layout there is approximately 10.9 acres of
effective coverage under irrigation. This operation has a three stage (hole) system with
180 days of temporary storage. Effluent from the lower lagoon will be applied to the
fescue by irrigation using a traveling gun system. The landowner has a honey wagon to
apply waste in field number 2 and other areas not covered by irrigation in fields 1 and 3 if
necessary. Foxtail Millet may be planted in May to give another window of opportunity
for application of effluent. Sludge will need to be removed from the system every 5-10
years. A waste analysis will need to be run on this material prior to application and a waste
utilization plan prepared for the sludge. Additional fields will probably be needed for
proper utilization.
4

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
Illegal discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day
by the Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he
shall provide NRCS with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a
landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land
for waste application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions,
and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RS)
or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be
no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used
where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers"
required by DEM. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim)
- Riparian Forest Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding. [See "Weather and Climate in North
Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.]
5

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(Continued)
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a maximum
operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in
addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion;
leakage, or discharge.
19.If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist
should be kept on site.
7

.1
r t ILA-d ry AL JLA_JJLA_Jri Y 1"1 `l A l jt-IiN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
NAME OF FARM: D I X I E FARM
OWNERIMANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above.' I (we) know that any expansion to the
existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction
of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24
hour storm. The approved plan will be filled on -site at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for
review by DEM upon request.
NAME OF FACILITY O R: N • G . Pu Rw i s FA Rm ,1 N C .
(Please print)
Signature: , Date: /-? -- _2�? --�%
Name of Manager (If different from owner): /41 pj r ,` no( o- i%i , _ /� 00_r
Signature: A&I, k. AeE5 Date: IZ/�
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please Print) N O BF-Ra J . -PATF..72,
Affiliation: N RC.S
Address (Agency): tin o�J EST I N N E S S T.
SALT SROM-4 1� . C .
Signature: i V Date: 1 Z— Z 3--9-
8

,so
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
PROTECT/FARM: N. G. PURV 15 FARMS - _D i x i E FARMS
DATE: 10/9 7
• A 4" X 4" treated post, painted white or a 4" diameter schedule 40 PVC pipe with cap
shall be placed at the maximum liquid level at elevation 83.3 . At no time should
the effluent level rise above the maximum liquid level marker.
• A visual inspection of the waste storage pond or lagoon will be performed at least
twice a year. The inspector should check the condition of the dam and the emergency
spillway. The inspector will need to look for signs of slope failure and seepage on the
back slope and at the toe of the dam. Also, a very close look will need to be made to
check for signs of damage due to varmint (ground hogs, muskrats, etc.) burrows. A
visual inspection should also be made after heavy rainfall events to ensure that the
structure is not experiencing erosion rills or gullies. Any problems found should be
brought to the attention of the technical specialist for repair recommendations.
• The waste storage pond or lagoon will need to be mowed twice a year. All eroded
areas shall be repaired and stabilized. Areas that do not have an adequate ground
cover shall be reseeded to provide a vegetative cover sufficient restrain erosion. The
dam and all constructed slopes will need to be fertilized annually with 500 pounds of
10-10-10 per acre or its equivalent.
• Maintain all waste handling equipment —pumping, loading, hauling, spreading, etc. —
in accordance with the manufacturers specifications.
All waste application shall be completed in accordance with the waste utilization
plan. The waste storage pond or lagoon will be pumped at the end of each design
storage period ( /8 0 days or 6 months) or as needed due to excess rainfall.
See the attached NC Agricultural Extension Service Agri -Waste Management
Publication by Dr. James C. Barker for information on sampling and testing of the
effluent.

..r
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PROJECT/FARM: -N.G. -PVizyiS FARrnS — Ulxl E FAi-MS
DATE: Id f 4 7
Contact the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources - Division of Water Quality - Fayetteville Regional Office at (910 486-
1541 if the problem occurs Monday through Friday between 8:00am and 5:00pm. If
the problem occurs outside of those hours contact the State of North Carolina
Department of Crime Control and Public Safety - Division of Emergency
Management - Raleigh at 1-800-662-7956 or [phone]. Provide the following
information:
FACILITY NAME: Di X I
LOCATION: 3 (O 5 GPI'
REGISTRATIONIPERNIIT If 6 3 - 3
If there is danger to human life, downstream residences, roads, etc. call 911 of the
M o o R E County Sheriff s Department at CART14 AG E
• Begin lowering the liquid level in the pond by applying waste water to nearby
irrigation fields if possible.
• Contact a contractor to begin repair of the problem to minimize off -site damage (list
the names and phone numbers of three below).
NAME
PHONE NUMBER
1
C
I - Gqo-29-7
2
To OD COAAmiNGS
Rio -q4$- 3018
3
KEV)r4 NEEDHA
4I0-464- 611E
• Contact the N1ooRE. Soil and Water Conservation District at
910 - W - 5183 .
• Contact the technical specialist who certified the waste storage pond. if this
specialist is no longer working or is not available, contact another technical specialist
who has design approval such as the Area Engineer.
NAME
PHONE NUMBER
UISTRiCT CONSERVA-rioMIST -N
910 - 947- 5183
SE P-P-Y
70 4- - 637 - z40 0
ANGE.LAR TtSS1JP
70¢- 637- 2.4-00

This plan will ba'implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing. or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surf=* waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every eriort to
ensure chat this does noc happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all amplove;s ac the facility. Tne following are some action items you should tale.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation. this may or may noc be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of d =m.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an act-pmble race.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate wane to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the appiication races for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:.
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems. houses. solid separators -action include:
a. Stoo recycle oumo.
b. Scoo Lm scion pump.
c. Make sure no siphon oc::srs.
d. Scoo all flows in the house. flush systems. or solid sepurZtors.
e. Repair all leaks prior to rescartin; pumps.
E: Leakage from basa or side%vali of lagoon. Often this iS sz_pale as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch awav from the embankmenc co catch all seepaze.
put in a submersible pump. and pump back co lagoon.
b. It holes are caused 'ov burrowing animals. trap or remove :animals and tail
holes and compact with a clav type soil.
e. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bosom as soon as possible.

or
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. anv damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills. or propery damage'?
d. Did the spill leave the properry-1
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. ,ate potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the prop-,* v)7
h. How much reached surface waters?

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Suul`ce Cause 11hiPs lu h1hlim ize Odur Sllc Sllecllic Prncllccs
I nrulslcad • S►►•iue pluduclitlln lOr Vcgeladve or wooded buffers;
03 Itecouunellticd vest 11I011a6ctucnl prucliccs;
1i puoditidgincid and common scuse
Animal body sullilcts a Dilly III attill c-cuvcrcd auilttals Gr Dry flours — - --
I-11411' Sill ItICCS • Wet Illtlllllle-Cl1YCIL'lI 11(m s F Sluticd flours;
19 �Vutcrcrs located over slotted flows;
❑ }%ccdcrs at itio cud ufsulid lluurs;
Sclnlic nunntrc. buildup lium Hours;
0 Undcrilour•velllilalloll for drying
nialultc cuticcttuu lilts • Uuuc; @V Frcqucal manure tcmuval by flusll, pit rccluuge.
■ Pallial Inlclutlial dectllnhosilion or scrape;
O Undcrlluur vcnlilaliwl
V¢Illilaliull exhaust Hills • Volatile gases; 7un maintenance;
Dust lY r icicnt air nluvcn►clll
Indoor stu f;tces Dust &J , lasllclowll bcl►vccn groups of alli1na15;
9 feed additives;
❑ I-ccdcr cuvcrs;
0 I-ecd delivery du►vitspout cxit:ndces lu feeder
covers
Flush lunks
• Agilaliun ufrccycled laguutt
❑
Fltlsh tack covers;
licluld while Inuks arc lilling
Cl
Exlcnd till lines to ncar boltum of tanks wille
allti-sipholl wills
Flush alleys
• Agilatiun during ►vastccvatcr
❑
Ulldcrlluor Ihlsh Willi undcrlloor vcutiluliull
cullvcyaucc
I'it Iccllalgc points
0 Agilaliun Of iecycictl lagowl
❑
Extend rccllntBe lines to ncar botluul of flits
liquid ►rhilc pits arc tilling
Willi 01111-sipllull vents
Lill slaliutls
Agilaliun dtwlllg stllllp lank
17
Sttlup I.mk cuvcrs
filling and dial►ado►tl1
oulsidc dlniu collection Agilaliun daring wastewater ❑ Liux cuvcrs
or juaclion boxes cunveynuce
Ah10C - Na+vcntbcr 1], 1996, Page 3

Swim Cause 1i1111 lu
(aid of dsai
laguull
Laguwi sus
at • Agilatiuu during wastewater
conveyance
• V0111111C gals Clllissl
• Willugical Mixing;
• Agilaliuu
❑ Exlcud discharge lwlul of pipes underneath
Inguuu liquid level
IW Pruper laguou liquid capacity;
IS Curted laguou startup procedures;
ar"Miuiulum surface arcs-lo-volume raliu;
Is!' 'Miuiuluul agitation rvhcsl 1n11nlling;
❑ MCCllatliCal acrnli011;
❑ Proven biological additives
lu igalioll spriuklur • high plcsslllC lugilalhill W"' It igalc uu dry days with little or nu %vind;
nuzzles 0 Wind MR IDS illbulutl rcculumucnded ullcraling pressulc;
Pump intake scar lagoon liquid surracc;
V-11"untp frum sccuild-slage Inguuu
Slut age lank or basin • I'allial uticlubial dccuulposiliosl; ❑ Bullulu or midlcvcl loading;
sill race • Mixilug while filling; ❑ "l•sulk covers;
• Agilalion whcu emptyhlg ❑ Basin surface orals of solids;
ecs
❑
i'lovus biological additives or oxidants
Sculling basill Sill race •
I'allllul illiciubiid dccwlill)USIlioll;
❑
Extend diniupllie outlets undmicalh liquid
•
Mixing while filling;
IVvCI; .
•
Agilaliun when culplyi ig
❑
Itcuion settled solids regularly
Mantle, slurry ur sludge •
Agilaliun when sptcading;
❑
Soil i ijccliun ofslurry/sludges;
slitcaldcr wallets .
Volatile gas cutissiulus
❑
Wash) residual manurc rrom Spreader alter use;
❑
!invest biological additives or oxidauls
Oicuve)ed manure, 0
VusalilC gals Clllissiulls while
❑
Soil iniccliun orslurry/sludges
slurry or sludge oil field
dlyillg
❑
Soil itcwrpuiatiun wilhin 4E Ins.;
surl'accs
❑
Spread In thin unlform layers fur ralild drying;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidwils
Dead animals
Carcass dcculupusiliwl
❑
Iliuperdispusiliuu orcarcasscs
Mail nniuml dispusad
Curcass decuutpusiliuli
❑
Cungllole covering of carcasses ill burial Ails;
Ails
O
Proper lucaliots/coustrucliwst of dispusal Ails
Incineialuls
hlcuulillcle conibusliwu
❑
Sccundary slack burners
AMOC - Nuvculbcr 11, 1996, l'agc ,l

C
Source Cause I1f111's lu h11uiudze Udur Sile Specific Pl-nt:lices
Slandhig tvalcr at um id lutptal•cr drailluge; 0- Grade aid hutdscnpe such 11w1 %voter distills '
facifilics • Mictuwal deeumpusmin, or away rroul racililics
wgiutic tttaUer '
Miumre Wicked unto 1'out iy utaintaiued access roads 0 bull access load Iluahlienauce
public roads fium hsut
iicccsx
Adt iliuttal inrminuliuu : Available Pluto :
Swine Munroe Munagenacul . 112UU ltule/llMP Puckcl NCSU. l_'trtnrty l utleusitalt t:eutcr --
Strine Ptuductiuu Dunn Potential Udur Suitt ces nod Itentcdics ; IrIIAL' Biel Shccl NCSU - IIAIs
Swinc I'luducliuu Facilily Muuurc Munugesimil: Pit Recharge - Lngoun Trealrncul ; EBAU 129-83 NCSU - I1A 1s
S1Y111c I'taducliuu Fucilily N'Inuntc Manugemmet: tlodedlanr Flush - Laguuo -limimmil ; U-IIAP, 129-38 NCSU - IIAfi
LciP1611 Utslgtt nod Manageutcnl rur Uveslock Mututtc Ti-cututcul and Slump; EBAU 103-33 NCSU - IIAH
CaUbraliun of Nluuttic and 11'nsimulcr Applicnliun laliiptncul ; EUAC. fact Sliccl NCSU - DAIi
Coulrulluag Odois iiout stviaiC liuildistks ; PII I-33 NCSU - Sivine U-Mcitsion
Divimumeutal Assurnucc Ptogi-am ; N1111C Manual NC Put I'suduccas Assoc
Opliuus Jur N-lastagiug Udur ; a iciped rtpau llic Stylue Odur Task Furcc NCSU Agtl Comtuutdcaliuus
Nuisaucc Cuuccnts in Animal N-Imittic Maungciticnl: Odurs and Fiics ; Pl10107. 1995 Courcrcttcc I'l-occediugs Fluridia Cuu1jetallve LExlcuslun
AMOC - " 4cnttler 11. 199G. 1'a9c 5

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
ISuarce Cnilse 111111's to Cuulrul 1113C[I5 Sile Spetilic 1'rnclices_-
blush liullcis Accwuululiun of solids 1'luslr syslein Is designed and upcialcd
sufficluilly to tcniuve accumulated solids liuin
,fedllcrs as desibucd. '
Itcmovc br idging u r accu in ulalcd sul ids at
LaCuuns told fits Citnsled Solids 5r Muintaiti isiguuus, sculing basins and pits wlicic �-
pest biecding is apparent to whiiruize Ilic
ciusliug ursulids to n depth of no more lhint 6 -
8 inches over more than 3U% of sw race.
liYccsslvc Vcgct:ltivc Ucc: ying vcgelatium CI Maintain vegetative cun[rol along btuiks of
OUwllr lagoons mutt other imponudnicnls IQ prevcut
accumulation ordccnying vegetative matter
slung walcr's edge un iutpoundiiiew's perluider.
Syslcias
Feeders feed Spilluge [9�' Design, operale and umiulain feed sysleuis (e.g.,
bunkers aid Iruughs) to whihnize the
urrilatiuu of decaying %YwInge.
IT Clean up spillage un n routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
clay Interval dot ing summer; 15�30 duy inlcrval
during whilcr).
Red Storage Aceuunilalions of fccd residues 11P14duce muisime accumulation wilbin and
mound iinmcdlatc perimeter or Red slurap
areas by insuring drainage away truer site
uudlor providing adequate coi l: inment (e.g.,
covered bin fur biewcr's grain and similar high
,,picistuic grain ptuducls).
Q" Irisirect I'or and reiuove ur break up accunnulatcJ
solids in liner sU ips mumnd feed sloingc as
needed.
.r .
AMIC - Nuvcmbcr 11. 1996, 1'uge I

Mortality Nfanaaement Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the around within 34 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from anv flowin;
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-163.7
Complete incineration
Z In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and desian-
approved by the Department of Agriculture
7 Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December- [S. 1996

Noe
lq
,[aQ. CO God '' a,. - ." �i`1: •�•.. ,t " �• c? � -
LL��
Gab •!, l ��� = / =9.v`` , TnE " t A
E, ? .KioF t. GeD tiLuau
GoF
iVaO.M.`A � +M r�r-./ 1: a�:.: `•�i.iieB
Gab
Get' _ : Rd- -Nad gj.. • '"'w': `�,y►H' ;,,:�,''.
fkaQ ' c�9 r� ¢r Gap, • a' r� r . ri,�
G.
kz• 's i '� -'1 •: 1`, t`0. C r .t' _ •,GOBS �B .Y r' ,re! -
.,
Gag
GeD
YGeD Nab'
GaB Gab !aw rti •;' �+.� - ?:s: y- G.
•' '.jt'i9�C`.. - �C '?. �� ii, �Pl�$-'s�i.:"'. ' f
��. .j, "'GeD' (._ ai+„t,+- r,�'D..Q,.� •K J .r�`.C. '�t,..�'R,,,'d'`.•' %'`�. NaD` `. ,
y �.. • 'YM'. L GA' f '� 'ti# •.LTA ,� , a r•;; I
r • M : � ' r '•.-ilal). � ^r, / ,1 19G�' if �d Hf�"�fJ'�
� - Nail •., �` �'-:. . �. - ��.
.• 14L, Gee
^,-`• •s ^ _ .� a,� ti � w � •'.:� GeD "i',•j• ��
Fr B „f Ga rY.-„Y ',: '� tom'^ .•. r • " •',x �y�r} , ► �'9
'r • ,.. Ga'i_ - Y'� .r �' ` _ ..GIB i•- ':1
� -�" 'GfB a. _ � , _'', ��.,, ♦e. . •,. � " �.`NQO :tom- 4�Y•�
.-dad• .,•,� - {��I}',3r r'� rC4 .
Nag MOB

f�r-f'%r :,� *' q �,' , * • ' '► Fi 1',� : a +; . w �..r r Z ++r� P �� + - , r
'",r o-r .. . ��jr ;,�'. rr'.. `-{ #, VM 'dti�14r;�'; T'q. } 1 •- 'if `•.'.vi
.> �. . '�y� ,n rP - yc. •,Y, r+C r , "fir � .;•�"�r r %/�
�( Se: e r i h„p; ''a�' �• +ice..,.f� r+,`/ "�!' t �3X v iP'i4 •JrJ1r'
rev
. i r _ ,� -{{ d .y :� r.. � �.�.`• . jM+- _',t +' � i.. - r '1x~d ++ , �. �,,. > +yr ~ r•�r?
wr
r j''� •� �'' +'��` �ti � : *��«w �/�-;'~r r• J41,
J �. r� `j!,•'J '41t1 f
[[ e 1�+ �,y
-.i' •� ' Sr� is i'� -. •t J,��„ die ''�w�.'•T, V.
<./�1����i'�� p�'
'M ? fM %' '�'►.prry, IMF �'•`�j�•,s�y-yp' !w3r �i� f �fw,sd-��yr�r��.r!
%. ��.,Y i' .'�. '' •u. • •.yam lC�' `��'� eM r ,p �� .�� �. 's�ti�y��y�sr`�t y �• � r,{T'�1�.*! '��
. r•, -7 �pl , "y j r 1 ! *' tY � .�.' R .'lf r,..aw �'� . 10
, , • P'". l
F' �����►�Fe•� � � �`.. < • f ° ."ui. *Tp yt -I.w }i�t e ��L+ Ar .'.� 1 �->'•.• - }t"• b ..
�;�"•�•` e - '�.M /Ti e,� � ' r 1 r:'} � � '' . Sri •` r, ' .�, t . - �i'�.`. n. ��� ,��f'�M.'• r
p. •..+ `�' i r •�,� �? �yi�•;_ � p t '�/ � r •prj�'' �. �?/rt's%Y.i`/r•
e! �: �i.i•Crt�Y -J:/'� •�� • .y-... -� yFj t�♦ ti t{ �I1I►►�__, ,
''� , �"�3: * •� t`�f p t5 r;': �' '�;a. -f-� .v°'e. �' I r � 'tr /� �y S , i
jo
WI w,�� - • "sjs � •r %� �,e�*J/► a4 -� '}-w
IV
r`.y'T�r y 9! .ae'�1' '! r j .+ h!' ,� .r r ' >� � y�l���.�,.•r�r - j''�'��� _•
Ak
43
(�.� . � I ,�� M} r r��� ' `lam �f'/,/ _ _ � . � A ••�•lTIITTTre i r w r �T3 a ti ��.
-� .,• rfii ++�� � -irk, f < >>' �• ,G! ` `. !!"�fi ����t .L'•;.
•+r*/,' 3. � ��.'��t .� 1 Y/r��7�vlr>r, ��r .. 4 r�" � - ';� r#
r« ,•fir MIN,
.
YJ .'� f• w1�-�iy'•°�401L� ,,►+�k•�!`f, w'.�♦r°� 's���r�, s r4r _�
CID!NPPP-
/�� rl� 'ri� p• is .�• e ' )4 r t�
-is • I� , ! r
or
'� * ,r1'i J'V•�r',�i•� �iri/f. ,•.,�"}: 1'Ari{/!'�.�.r�r�`,[ %Y (.4.,
4
ig No
t- , Y' .�"�r � • ��'� Ire..
" �r . r. •� 7'�f t r3 i�'+',�" � e. •fie
.'f "/• � ,i • � � •-i '/99j��► + :� g.r�.�i� r •'+ ^ti' i� � r . � if"�r`'3• �a �, ..Y
� ' c ��� s]� •�'tf , .r yr. > +Z�� • �I �� � . d� � .� � �.i .!� ± `�3�-,
+. ..a•Y' a� +fir. - r r !.e r- x+ 1 •h L :.. i IT•�i •!� SI
>� � - �> • � � h f r � ./r' n'� ,j '� �iy✓y,� Sf t�•
% !. `��~ fj% r �' i�r'��/4Y y"gip"i�•'"�r� t r/ Y"$ r' r�+i� �, • (�f) ye r/ «
i�
o-A 'r / i, ^� Jn r w ~ r' !'�J Nf T�'y1L w r<i ✓}':i'i.>1,�jVr•
.�` .G.. .✓ � r r �' . • y✓r * I, � �y��� . •r,"ter •a��rp: W �.,� i�� �" 'Y �,� s�
+���Jy'� >'"..�i.'�! '�AY .y��rf+'ije'' �' ��''� � •1 �.� �k'i'"g'#r���•`/'�}T!� �`'iL''•
� /• J.,�'�' • r ra�r=->•.,t ri+3[yti `�'f''��%1 �i �5/ it '.
i
�i�i -, �r i '��ii + r •. �� ;J���.r Amp"'.
, � erj
f�
• .
�• �,rw� / � ' .31r: '� .i 1 �r ,'� r pT'r r. ihS f

State of North Carolina.
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
N.G. Purvis Farms
Dixie Farms
2504 Spies Rd
Robbins NC 27325
Attn: Anthony Moore
Dear Anthony Moore:
DENR-FRO
JUL y Ws7
DWO
March 23, 1999
ffl,�W,A
IT 0
A&4 *2
om
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURcEs
Subject: Application No. AWS630003
Additional Information Request
Dixie Farms
Animal Waste Operation
Moore County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by April 22, 1999:
Please submit lagoon capacity documentation (design, as -built calculations, etc.). Be sure to include any
site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable.
Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) lists the Yield for Fescue as 4.5 tons per acre. This is higher than
currently recommended for Georpeville soil. Please contact your technical specialist to revise the Waste
Utilization Plan or provide justification that supports the increased yield as shown in the current WUP.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) lists the yield for Millet overseed on 2.5 tons per acre. This yield does
not seem to account for any reduction in yield of either crop due to overseeding. Please have a technical
specialist review you're the yield for Millet in your WUP.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be
signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter,
must be submitted on or before April 22, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with
15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
Sincerely,
r .ram
ue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

!4
WASTE OTTLIZATION PLAN
Producer: �,f ,cX-v+Q rm5 X is rrr�S
Location:'3(,, `� RoaoL �' ,��� N. C.
Telephone: q10 - cry $ ^ &0 77
Type Operation: -i:5arrn j _ +6 - OeQn
Number of Animals: A 0 'sow 5
(Design Gpacisy)
The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of
surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the
amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be
applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all
plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the
fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner_
Always apply Waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they
have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5
torts per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to
10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, -when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not
allowed under DEM. regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems. To maximize the Value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce
the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this
type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques,
preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
ULNR-F TO
9 W9
,, DW+,

V
WASTE -UTILIZATION PLAN
Amount of waste produced per year (gallons, cuSt., tons, etc.)
animals x . /0 ac-in waste/animal./year = (p , ac-in/year
TOTAL AMOUNT OF WASTE: 30 lr a 79c _ GALL .ONS WASTEfYEAR,
Amount of Plant Available Ni en Prodac6d Per Year
f Q
lbs. PAN/1000gals: x 7 ? gals. /year = l / lbs. PAN/year
AvAr� D L 0.5"t�ca`�,
J (PAN from NCDA Test Report) or (PAN from N.C, Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the
waste in a timely manner_ The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES 0 JVNED BY PROD UCER
Tract
Field
Soil
Lb& N*
Lbs- N
Month of
#
#
Type
Crop
Per Ac.
Acres
Utilized
Application
(RYE)
t✓13
a
-
�OQ
n 6eA
y
f,
�m a4hcr aoesves txh u oommtxtw tcruu= am applies+ thcy must be ao =wcd for. N cnty be Used an rea.listie
be ore: 9*, -d
while --ting the N raNii Bcg=mg gn t996 tbo Coastal 7.0oe i<ls=S=c=j Act will
r
+ to hsrs i r tn= ma-W-crnt plan that -Wm=r3
ail ns4 =tL 'This plain oa}y a6drev N MoSm

IV
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if dperator does not own adequate land)
(See Required Spec fcation 21)
Tract
#
Field
#
Soil
Type
Crop
Lbs. N*
Per Ac.
Acres
Lbs. N
Utilized
Month of
Application
* See Footnote for Table 1.
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM ABOVE TABLES
ACRES Lbs. N Utilized
Table 1 10.9 Zrr', cNed
J V
Table 2
TOTAL i 5, aC 5- Q
Amonnt of N Produced 3 17 1 p2
Irplus or Deficit `" to 'f 8
Este Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
•rdge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and
•tionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or
3

Y
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
See attached map showing lhefields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
Maximum
Fitld Na Acres Soil Type Crop Application Rate Maximum applicati
G njHr)
on
amount per irrigation
( Inches )
Li'G ' YX
i V 0
75

v
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
Illegal discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day
by the Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he
shall provide NRCS with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a
landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing himther the use of the land
for waste application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions,
and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RS)
or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be
no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used
where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to `Buffers"
required by DEM. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim)
- Riparian Forest Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or dishing after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
5. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding. [See "Weather and Climate in North
Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.]

v
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATION
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall not be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that no
more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should
be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop
on bare soil.
I L Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance
may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter
strips are present. [See Standard 393 - Filter Strips]
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist." Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
6

00
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
18.If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan " which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist
should be kept on site.
Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for
direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct
human consumption it should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall
be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be
required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate - determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitered
and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive
levels. Ph shall be adjusted for optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and
waste analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste application records for all
other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
NAME OF FARM: box,t � 4t r nm �
OWNER/MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization
plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24 hour
storm. The approved plan will be filled on -site at the farm office and at the office of
the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by
DEM upon request.
NAME OF FACILYT Y OWNER: cc rYl ar —
(PIC= Print)
Affiliation: u sa H
Address (Agency): �, V
Signature:
0
,-e5
Fj
✓j CQ__

Crotuer: Purvis farms Copiff To Cowity Extension Dirnor
Attn: Anthony Moore LISDA.NRCS-Moore
2504 Spies R(L
Robbins, NC 27325
Waste A nalysis R ®I t
IL-P
Moore County
n2le
I-aboratory Results (parts per million unless otlier-wise noted)
,fp/,* ID:
/),If% ly P K
2941 207 279
Ca
92 7
Afg S re
387 23 6 1.47
Of ZY1 Cu 11 A to
0 is 065 0.28 004
Cl Na Nr
110
Cd Pb
ife Cade:
Nwriews Availiblc fnr First Crop
Ibs/1000 gallons
Otlicr Elements
lbs11000gallons
'CHP11011:
Alildr(ation Afelbod N P205
IrrigAiUM I 1 0 36
K20
2.2
Ca Afg S
0.54 023 0 14
Fe AN Z11 C11 8 14 fo
0.01 T T T T
CI
Na N,
092
Of Pb
ne Lj%eiion 1.1
commendations:
f, al -T e te should
Jests =.0 able for the first crop,;Uc based estimates of m ne� ization'r-ates and prDject�'dloss fWlhe'applicalion method lls'ted.'� Concentrations o zinc and other ma s'2rc not excessive h la-z iould not:k-
-Ilk
r
"7*1ucti
nplelnWi" .1.�al)oraforyResu[Ls"(parts' per: 'llioo'*tinic5s'othervise'noted) 'i
nple ID: ma IV P x ca Afg S F& Aft? 711 Cu 8 Afo CI Aa St Cd Pb
420 76,8 694 878 26.2 24 3 2.37 0.32 0.83 0.67 0 36 225
51e CO*: Nutrients Available for First Crop Ibs/1000 gallons Other Elements Ibs1I000 galloni
Aloldication Afelbod N P ,, 0 5 1120 Ca mg S Fe At Z11 Cu 9 Mo C/ A'O Ni Cd Pb
CTV1011: Irrigilion 1 0 5.6 0,51 0.15 0.14 0.01 T 001 T T
ne Lngonn Lig.
-1-aboratoryRestilts (parts' per million tinless-ot-herviise noted)..,
11ple ID:
03M N P K Ca mg
S Fe M11 Zir Cu B Alo
CI Na NI
Cd Pb
R. IN. - 71
113 .1, 9 R 324 7S7 21 3
13 3 1 58 n 25 D 76 0 1.9 0 04
1 11)
Nutrients Available for First Cm2
Ihs/1000gallons
Other Elements
Ibs1IO00 gallons
Afelbod N P20S K20 Ca
Afg S Fe Ali? Z71 cu H MO
C/
1V/7 Nv
Cd Pb
icr/ ' l, 1::-x
Implion 0 50 067 2 6 044
0 12 008 001 T 001 T T
099
ine L-.guon L[q.
I

s igrO110MIC DM.srutt •130L) 1kctly u-eck Iioad1 .ILdcigh, l'sl, .:i6oi-o°tu) .(90).•73S-20)) UrW%CC. !'urtirs l•.tri b
.rt lc Info" , '
I -hormory Results (Farts per million unless --otherwise noted)
rrple10:
DAM N p F
Ca Afg
s Fc Afrr 7.11 Cu d Afo
203 51.0 307
83 5 31.2
19.9 1.64 0.18 0.69 0.28 009
rsle
Nutrients Available for First Crop
Ihs/1000 g211ons
5
Alelbard N /1205
K20 Ca
Afg s Fe AM Zrr Crr 1i
scrl'N!arr;
rficalinn
Irrigation 0.76 0 68
2.5 049
0.18 0,12 0.01 T T T T
Inc I.:°,non
nlp:r' rftfp;;r •.
Laboratory Results (parts per million -unless otltet• ise noted) "� -Rc" '• : y..F k `s`-.•i;-,° :y.�t,
"111l.
DAM N 1' A: Ca Afg
s Fe Afrt
Zrr Cu U
dw
224 704 322 943 34.4
27.1 2.00 0.28
1.01 0.27 0.07
sle 'C:
Nutrients Availahlc for first Crop
lbs/1000 gallons
Af)lrliCrrlion Afelbod N P205 K20 Ca
Mg s Fc Afn
Zrt Of !l
scrinr:;rr:
Irrig:nrtrn 0.94 26 0 55
0.20 0.16 0.01 T
001 T T
ine L:Pnon 1.19.
Y. :►^i.}'
r_":.e.l: .. .�:L}"�i[i::N!'`�Y. °'.'
:r.�. ?.:. ....Ca ...-. .... *'�
],��'' 11. .
C/
A'a A'r Cd , Pb
114
Other Elements lbs/1000gallor+r
NO Cl Na Ni Cd Pb
095
Afo Cl
Aro 0
Na Ni Cd Pb
145
Other Elements lbs/1OO' -lion:
AW A'i Cd Pb
12
r�:IIfD
=:i
Laboralog Results .(parts per million'iiniess'othery ise
rrjrl� il:;
0Af% N P A
Crr Afg
s Fe
Afn Zrr Cu B AID
Cl Na
Ni Cd Pb
245 66.8 250
91.1 33.7
29.0 3.12
0.42 0.94 0.61 0.15
106
:slc
'I.
Nutrients Available for First CroE
lbs/1000 gallons
Other Elements Ibs1100O a11bn
i
A/)/rlicalion Afelbnd N P205
r120 Ca
Afg s
Fe Afrt Zn Crr B Afu
Cl
No
Ni Cd Pb
+cr _ '.:
rr:
Irrigation 092 089
2.0 0.53
0.20 0.17
0.02 T 0.01 T T
0 88
ine I
•:oon Lf .
I4'.
.7aA ri I . �.. ° ... - • . ...`� .:I.-� �;�: > �i .... `}'�i.:...'C•°
. 7r • •I.ww:cQ.. � 1. r,G-r.{'• , if .. .. . ..
... '� • 4 ' N1'. - Y.,='t
p-� L11-9G

Aurultutttic Oivisiull -000 ltced y Creel( Road lUilei Alt, N(: 27G07-bgO) !W) 1J3-LG55
Rc curl No: WO1997 W --. • ��
Grower: Purvis farms
Cuptes 76. Cuunty Btensiun Director
AtUr: Awliony Muure
USDA-RCS-Moure
2504 Spics Rd,
e
Rubbins, NC 27325
.wste
A R
nalysxs etart litrtrr
nowMoore
County
L!'lufu.' r
Laboratory Results
arts per million utiless'otherwise uoted :` ;�` �; ,•.
: "�� b �c
ID,
N
P A Ca X2 S PC AM 7n
Cu
11
AN C! C
lWal 413 Al
83,8 705 135 27.0 46.5 798 0.60 1.41
1.30
u.6s
'ode:
1N -N
Af M /I M 11 Al Al At
Al
Al
Na Ni Cd Pb Al se Li ill
SS
C'•N
IJAf'.1G CCI% ALC A' al
OR -A'
254 7.97
rlfon:
igaon Lic
1/
uiteudatiuns:
Nutrients Available for first Crop lbs/1000 allaus
Other Elements
lbs11000gallorts'�4L
li�Aj Afelbod
N 11205 920
Ca. ' Alg S,7.,r Fe Ahl-,, : . - za .. Cu B Afo Cl
Na
Ni
Cd 1'b Al ' ; Sa'- CLi
1,1"': 5;6
0.79. 016027 ;.005 7 0O1w y,0.01 T
2.1
;tit
c Info"' ` =
Laboratory Results
tarts per tuilliun unlcss'utltcnvisc noted ��"'�'`."-w.'
`:4•.r��1c �tl
1D:
N
P A Ca Atq S 1•c Mft 7r1
Gil
B
Afo ll C
..,
lurid 245 Al
1100 344 101 26.5 21.2 4.97 U.24 032
u 44i
0.47
Cade:
IN -N
L At Al M Al A! Al Al
Al
Al
Na Ni C11 lib Al Se 1.1 211
AS
C: N
MIl:% CC'l-,W ALE(Algal)
UR-N
140 7 95
+,!foil:
quurr Lip
Al
uneudatious:
Nutrients Available for First Crop lbs11000 allows
Olher
Elements
lbs110O0 alloiis wtO.:4--
Ci Mallwd
N P 20 5 A 20 Ca Mg Al it .., Zn - -r �' Cu B Afo Cl
o1
Na
Ni
Cel l,b
21a.59
T0.
ao31rrliar,
VIM
,92
I Info.
Laboratu Results *arts er'miIlion •unless`utlierwise-noted .Z� *4, ' �
,'* 'may-
cr ID:
N
P K Ca Nq S Fe Mil
A
Crr 1;
Alu Cl C
1blal 357 Al
59.5 314 119 29.5 z6.6 5.42 0.18
0.61
u 3li (i I
„:
Code:
IN -N
Al Af M Al Al Al AlAt
Al 1.
UIC-N
Na Ali Cd 1'b Al .SO 1i
- -
/ill
J:1 CN
11A11% CCP% ALIT(A:gal)
132
785
""lox:
i u0n Lii
At
ntnendatious:
Nutrietits•Available for First Crop lbs/1000 alloats
Other Elcweuls
lbS11O00 allvrtsLX&-
.rlion`Afetbod ;'_
N P205 K-:O
'Ca `'�` S° lc `' Mat,�'s��Zrt� �" ':,Cu B Afo
CI
Nu Ni Cd
1'b Al
ytion ;.
1.3. 0.8a 2.5
J'`�741g
0.70 0.170`36 Oai ,a. i 7 YaTµ 7 .�� T'
,-f
1,1x'Ffr''
ci .. -
- -- �l. :•� bf1''`y .. ,..$�i4�.�1'. w`t- i._
._:yJ "ram•'

—.L--
LIAAgronomic Division
4300 Rectly Creck Road Raleigh, NC
27607-6465
919 733-Zb55 Grower:
Purvis Farnis
Ile ort No: W0199/W Ur,--
1121C info.
1.11inninftcsults (pi per million trnlcss otherwise noted
- --
'rltic 1D:
%le Code:
crlpllo►r:
is ki nnci Lia
N
1' 1;
Ca
At
S
PC AM
Z.0
Cu
Il
No Cl C'
lutrrl 245 M
IN •N
lal: r1'
sin 1 298 108 36.1 27.0 5 00 0.17 0110 0.25 n 16
t. M Al Al M Al Af Af Af I.
Nfr Ni Cd Nb AI SO l.i P11 SV CN
DIIN', CLY:'9lti ALF,(rl' rrl)
124 783
,il
,ommcodalinns:
Nutrients Available for first Crop
Ib.s11000 gallons
Other FIcmciits
lbs11000 allonvi .:�
?iattionAfethod
rigalion
A' 11:'05 K20
0.92 0.54 2.4
Of Mg S
U.63 0.2i _ -o.IG'
!'e
0.03
MI Zrc Cu.
r_ ,i. r, T T
11 . Mo
: T
Cl.
Na
Ni
Cd Pb Al '..,;Sa Y1 ,
n Ic info.
Laborilog Results iris per million trnlcss otherwise noted .,iti' ." =
+
- poi :• `
tplc ID:
N
P !i Crr Afq s
Te Mn
711
Cu
11
ritu Cl C.
Mlr,l ligo At
51.9 346 127 30-3 22.7
5.41 0.20
0.49
0.34
U,12
vMode.
IN -N
Iit m Al Af M
M At
Af
At
1.
A'n Ni Cd Pb Al
Sc _/i
IM
SY
C•N
_
OMIX, C.CIN Ab:(Kgal)_
rat,' ti"
156
769
crlplloaa:
rc La non Lie
M
:ommendatiniis:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
Ibs11000 gallons
Other Elcmenis
W11000- allonsW.
Iicalion Afelbod
M P 205 K 20
Ccr Mg S , To Mn Zrr'r , - • Crr
+'s" 11 _ . - Ma -
Cl
Na _
Ni Crl
Pb At':", Se Ll?
rrigal'ion
�{►.Cg 28
0.74 0.18 0.13 0.03 T '" T t�'*F.T
r
1
1.3
1

%gronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road RnIcigh, NC :27607-6465-- -"(919)-733-2655-'-,-,-t-.--,--.11�;-
Re )ort No: IVO06314 MW
Grotvcr.- Moore, Anthony
ColVes To: County Bunsion Director
2504 Spies Rd.
USDA -MRCS -Moore'
y
Robbins, NC 27325
A ly Rehort
===-
asLe
na sts
Moore County
Info.
Laborntog Results (parts
per million III) lcssY"WicicNiS6;' 01%
'D:
N
p K Ct7 Mq s Fe Mn Zn
cil B
Afo Cl c
,:I!
Wat 182 1.
117 3 327 73.5 38.0 20.6 4.11 0.09 0.24
0.18 0.15
IN -N
Af Af Af m Af Af 1, Af
L L
tdc:
WIN
.NO3
Nu Ni Of 111) Al Se I'l; pit
U C-N
DAf% C(,*/"% ALE
137 7.95
lot):
011-/V
0011 1.1g.
U'c'
Af
tendations:
Nutrients Avi i I abl c for Ti 000 gallons
Other Elcmcntsr-iv-
Ibs11000 galldhi.*'M
m Afelbod
/V P-'05 X 20
a, 68 0.63 2.6
2
ca - mg s 2 cv.
0.4 3 0.22 2•-0.02 'q
Na-.4-Lyi cd - Pb - Al� Zsa' Lk
AN
-
6r
4
r
U
n W "
Labaritory Results (parts per million-unicssf6therwisc" otcd)VW fttjPWZ -
�-- 'W -': I
ID.
N
p K Ca AR
s re Mn
Zn
Of Jf
mo cl c
7601 343 Af
76.2 785 89.6 27.9
28,2 6.10 0.27
0.53
0-79 0.73
IN -/V
Af I/ Af Af
Af m Af
Af
Af Af
,de:
-111114
.1V03
Nt, Ni* cd Pb
AI se U
PH
ss CAf
nen CCE96 ALF(Aqao
327
8.09
foil:
OR-N
Lig.
Urea
11/1
.00n
lendations:' - 1
Notrictils Auilible for -First Crop �.Wlb.0000 gallons
Other EIcments't%Y-,- Ibs1IOOO.kaIIdrd4Wp,
)nWelbod.-� /V-:. P,-Os K20
`6
in 1.0 .3
rc
Ca,-,,�'-- :AS CU i)le- WO
9 ' I
. 0. 6
0.52 1 9.16 -0 04 47 dl,
F
cl-
' � Na j"Ali Cd
2.7
Pb A

rurrururt arrviarurr t.ivu n�car �r l�n nrrnr
n.u�:ibu r��. raw r-ir evJ... 717 JJJ-uv+�� v, v.., ,.z..a,� n�ru��u
o.� ...� . ,.,,.
..�.✓.
rlc.lafo.. _
1,ahnrato Rcsnits ( arts per million nnlcss othemise noted)t N`.'p � -� �' .*.r.• � -.
n;�! � `^
Ile ID:
N
1'
K C" Mr s Fa Mn by
Ctr
11
MO
!,7 G
r Code:
tpffos:
Lagoon 1.19,
lulrrl 231 At
IN - IV
•N114
•NO3
Ol,'•,','
llren
490
At
333 72.6 25,6 18.2 4 34 0.12 0.25
Al At M M M L Af
0,19
1,
0.15
1.
•
Nn Ni rd Pb Al Se Li :11 SS C. t)At%
CCf'4e A1•F,(l' al)
,11
iiri+l:"itdatlons:
Nwrients Onflahle fnr.First-Crop
Other Plemcnts. :
•:- ',-:; ; lbs17000 gall6nAllaR.
:lfbir rothad.
("+ Y�-:
N P205 K-10 ' Cn •
0.titi 2.7 04:
..
Af 5 1e : Mn'+ 7ri�[s�,r�r Ctr` ,a �4 u'7Mor; rC`, 'L
0.15 0I1 003 T T��T^
�1 zYu1
- r *�tr�`�.• ts� �`i ;4�"r,.r: 3` t_`r� .�-v17 -i."
�. Na
'Ni
Cd A 'Pb
..,•�(�r`Y-
Al :;.Witl0R7
r� e.. .{dt.
i.abnrato RC5111t5 arts er millinn unless otherwise noted),I.:
. -
xc;; , '-` •.,."
•;,; " ;0M r
le 1D:
N
I' A'
CA
M
S
1•`e
Mn
711
CIr it
Afo Cl C
M
??r1n1 434 Af
72 2 117
R1.3
33.3
26.6
4.54
0.17
0.47
0 3R 0 14
1N •N
M rod
Af
Af
Af
M
M
Al
Af 1.
c Code:
•NI14
•Nn3
Nn Ni
("rl
Pll
Al
Sc
l.i
III
SS f,• N
l)M% CCE% ALE(+)' nl)
-lplfo>l:
OR-N
1 if;
7,67
Ligoon Li .
11rCn
if
mni ndations:
Nntrients Avidible for First Crop
..,,lbs/7000 n11RrLs _
Other Clements
lbs17000 allon:fAft"
allow Mclhod
'at one'
N 1` 20 S ti' 20
1.f 0.97 2.7
Cn A!q S
0.47 (3.19 0.16
To Ain Zn'
0.03. T : , T
C'a 9;
T T,
Afo
C!
,.
Nn Ni Cd
1.2fie
Pb Al
3lc`lnfo.�'''
Lihorifnry Restills arts per million unless otherwise noted
%'. x;;:` : •
P ,,; � , r ,
,-;:, ';:�.
1e 1D:
r• Code:
-fption:
Lagoon 1.19.
N
!' A' Ca Atq
s
PC Mn
7.n
L',r 1;
Ado Cl C.
Mull 364 At
IN •N
A'114
NO3
ni •N
llrcn
7K7 326 83.2 45.3 17.4 4.60 0.22 0.42 036 n III
Al At At !1 M At Af At Al 1.
Nn M L•rl 111r .11 S1 Ld p11 1`1 r:.�'
1);1f"", l,'G'Cnti :ll.r.(Kgnl)
I 155 71,
Al
-
mmendatinns:
Nnfrients Available for First Crop
lbs11000 gallorls
Other Clements
lbs/1Q00 Rllons:^
uflorr iNclblld
;gai one':•
N P ?O 5 !l ,-O
1.1 2 (,
Crr A1q s ! e Mrr . �' Zn r Crt
049 0.26 0.10 4.03 T "y :T "
D k, Mo
T:
Cl
Nn Ni
1.3
Cd Pb Al ' , se, Lr r
p' T,

A -mioitiic Division 4300 Reedy Creck Road -Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 919 ..733-2G55
lie tut•t No: W01485.ft%V
Grower: Moore, Anthony
Copies 7b. County Extension Director
2504 Spies Rd.
USDA-NRCS•Moorc "
FA
Robbins, NC 27325
fIA
D
7
[�i.J E. f�L � �Re- a / L I.arm: Purvis Farm
s Moore County
Imo:-
;%A
Laboratu Rcstills (pa is per'million unless"Otherwise noted),
ID.-
'ID.
N
1' a Ca Af + s re AM ztt
Cte 1f Af) Cl C -
.
t
l'utal 147 L
5U 4 315 71.2 3G 7 21.6 4.10 0.10 0.22
U.2U U 20
11V -N
Al At Af Al At At L L
L Al
agile:
-Nf14
`
•NU3
Nrr Ni C(I 1'b AI se Li ,11
ss C:N I)Af% CCE% ALE R al
125 7.47
4 lott.'
OR- N
i goon Lh .
Urm
At
tllend�[lols5: *t 2• ll". lj �l»%w?�cfNutrien[sfAvailabfe�fUrsl'lr5t'CfU
f 'r j— -"' tlbsllO D- allonS`
Ulher ElemeR[s -IbS110007 ill
�
�•.t$�� 0:42 �0,21
't(1y�T�ii,�
'•i ��T1!��ri�...
ton
0.5 0'�G7 �+ 053 40.02• .r7�� f �1�� J
ia
7 1 V••g7�cj; "j4p eY[.�'`i*r.Ri
*�'x4
.�. •. E.% .♦. ��+ l'f!
�'y,C�;� M-'.i i: .:�y�a U�t�1'i[.R..;.j.t�r.
-ilnfv7x%V9W—%kQ'-Laboratu
ltte•sulLs,(1)arty: cr,mi[lion 'iittfes's otloerwisc'nutccl 3 4 :g '%W: r•'�' '.-toe"
1D:
N
1' A' Ca Af s re Mil 7n
C,r
1f Alu
Cl C
Tulal 245 At
65.1 762 71.4 23.4 34.6 4.75 0.19 0.40
0.59
0.61
IN -N
Af 11 Af Af 11 Af At At
Al
Al
:ode:
-NI14
.NO3
Net N; Cd 1'b A] sc Li t11
S
C:N 11AM
CCIA ALE k al
293 7.98
tfotr:
OR-N
,goon Li .
Urert
N
ntcud:►iluu5:y':i''� r � :.';' .•
Nutrlct�[s`Av:iil:illlc for l'Ir$[ CfU 1':. -'J: -�_ Y rbsil0r�0 allays
other I.tcnienLs'�c:..
ILs/10001'u'llotrs.
i+i1 r
;onY felligrf t ' ' 14 05. � -10-1;�;Cn'��t' g r• '' S i., ire ti - Mry� a Ln Cse �.. Mom R Cl �r°r
i 0 87
.Nrr
"' 4- a
' : „Ni ts? ;Gd.^ 1.b
'',
i;
hlF a
K�.
n
•
i��ieii'
al ..., �t�y. *`�'����°�+� `� tJr'''x� �[��.,- r•_.,�y,�...s�e;�••+.
.. ..
- _{..~�+`�

1
itottttc Olvi-stntt. 4000 ltc(:dv Cr•ccic Ito.t(l,,Itsllcigll,rNC,r27.G07.-G4G5*(9.1.9)k7:33-2G,55�o-Groiver: Jkloorc,:Amliony 1{cl)urt No:.r1VO1455i*P9r2
ttlnfo.o'" '._ l,:thnrato Rest+lls(Pi
rrs ter.million'. nnless"otlter�isc:riateil
iplo ID: N
1' A Cn Aac 5 Fe All: :!at
Crr 1f Alo Cl C
Fr,lnl 175 1.
1;V -N
slc Code: WIN
-ND.i
c r iplion: (Al-N
c LaLoon 1.r llren
S2.9 351 700 26.2 21.3 4 19 0 18
I At At At At At At At
0 23
At
t1.19 0 15
1. 1.
Na Ni Cd Pb Al .Sc l.! pJl
SS C IVI)Af CCE% ALC(A+gaJ
_
135 7 M
M
rii>imcndations.T� . l ;ti #.�:1' '-`�►'i`•.: NtrEticnlc i�vali:thlc'for Fir5t'Cro ice,,' " llslroan
q4G
rrllnus , r
Other Elements lbs1l00O.'h115rs"
ltlln'ii+lQtborl P20 '',•.A E ��Yf ' '•,;/o ;'' etln rr,r, r" E! r11'°`� fo l
r Q 1-, „S �; �`1' . ;;.C�, » $ x t Z , .r. ., A 1', � G t+"
i On1i� t281 1&";mO121
. /s.. t'� ai7:i. ' f...?• . :i" ;l#'•w•"T;�
rr- ,+� rI
yrNn, a Nr `1`�lt•,, c Pb' sAI r
s.'.. S.}1.
r;...''
.l.abownry Rcsults arts •` ,
T�`t1
,lilt ID:
N
P A cn Afq s
Fc Ali?
7.r1
Cu
U
Alo cl c
lim
Trrlrrl 252 ,'1
65.2 35G 77.1 31.8 28.5
4,98 0 14
031
1) 27
0 I S
IN •N
At At Al At AS
At 1.
At
Al
L
to Code:
•Nlhl
W03
Na Ni Crl Pb Al
se 11
1,11
,S.S'
('h'
J1Af?K CCF% ALC(,lfnl)
136
, 61
c
rfptton:
ON-N
e Ligoon Llq
tlrcR
At
irvi endations: -
10trients rtvailablc for,first Crop ; ;.- •n'..
'lbs1100D allows=,4'
Other Elentcnis
lbs/100D allonssWr
itiTlrOrl°Mol6od,� r`r,• 1V-;s:P205 ,�••, 1120 ca.+" rh1�,H� S'r: >e Mrt`�s�::Zn
0.95 =0 87,rt,; 2.9 0.45-• , d 19"� . 0. 7�, a.0,3f T{ +.� :T
tr r'- 1 � ,w r .�.:,
Cu d _ Afa
T�.TP;;
.. ..
:Cl,
.r X'.,
Na
Ni..
Cd :1'L Al-'t"Se li #!
- �-•�rrF• �•r�c'.�.t. �
t Ic'lnfo:.k-'
Laboratory Resttlt5
11:1rts per million unlcsS'othcrwise noted)
Lam
ow-
tr Code:
rlptlon:
Ligoon Li
I
N
l' Il' Cl? MQ _
S !'r Ar,r
711
rrr It
Arrr CJ c
iM M i7 0 355 103 35 7 I n 5 ;' 0 27 21 (] 14
J;�' •h' Al if At A 1 Al It/ At t( J
-A'lld
nrl.i - h'rr N, Lil Ph Al Se l.r /,JI
1) tfu" CC:J:'gl .11 [(fignl)
(MIN 153 '15
1Jrc[! +t
�mntendations. •
Nntricnts Avlilabic for first Cro
. 44 lbs,11000rrllons
Olhcr Elemcnis
lbs1lOOOgdloneM
i ff0i1` ClI t N •t P205 1120
lgal !i ��grt•, ?l n0.71i 2.8
crr •%A9� , S Fe Akr �s:
0.(0 ' 021 '' :009 003 `` T+'s'i
Zn ;' Gu 11 AM
T ' 3' T
cl
Nn Ni
1 3
Cd Pb dl: t�': So' Lj
K,,;"
/ o -L� - /,�, 7

A �himicDivisiion"24300 )teed y Creek I o irdMilcigh-,NC427607 -64 65 (919) .7 3 312 65 5Ve4R�i'
Grower: Moorc, Anthony
Copies 70.- County Exiension Director
2504 Spies Rd.
USDAMCS-Moore
Robbins, NC 27325
A
Waste Analys
-hort r(iIIII.,
is R P,
Moore County
ft.al;6ratory Results' ba' ts,per.'i'llillio
I&
N
P
K Ca Mg- S Fe mn ZIT
Cu 8 Afo Cl C
Total 322 At
77.5
264 110 24.1 29.8 6.08 0.60 2.12
101 0.07
IN -jv
M
if if At H if At m
Af L
(,ode:
-NI14
-NO3
Na
Ni Cd Pb At so Li - PH
SS C:N VAR CCIN ALE ref'
98.4
7.74
,Ilion:
OR-N
.noon Lig.
Urea
m
i Yi —en da' L I 07-n-S
IIbniVM#*
n
Other-Ele i6i6WVVA? IUs/100t7T—alto-
Ab".n.
Lbffi� willi!IIIII!,
P4?93-
�1-1 2• L�6
1111 ��.6
.a b 0
ID:
N
P K Ca
At S r-C Mn Z?l
cu B Afo Cl C
7,0101 336 At
49.0 470 65.1
173 22.5 2.82 0.21 0.76
065 0.28
IN -N
if At At
At M At m m
if m
Code:
-.'v114
•IV03
Na N; Cd
Pb ,I I se Li all
SS C'-N DAM CCr.% ALB (Kgal)
186
7.82
lilion:
Ole-N
iRoon Liq.
Urea
11
nd Nu t rl eut?,Mai In b I e'forjFJrs0CibhVW9-,I
e a
ns
W.Y.1�4VAOAW�,Ibs/l 0007g�llo M=j"",
;Other, El cmi ;.W. lbi?1000: d
rla
?4?05 AV
'ClA M?e
it
�0' 3 ',� 638' 0.11 --0'0 N' iu M V
—01 0 &

aitoniic Division
`4300. Reedy Creek Road .R.zlci h <<NG 276t]7,�G4b5; y 9 1733=2(�55? `Grower: w.MooreLAntiion k z:: _ �"Re ort No:IW0261,4lF t�
liifo '��'Y,.t<
lalynratn Rcstrltc nrts' cr rniIIIon unIm'.otI emise noted r:�tkvp, %W54tM";(YM*
ID:
N
1' K Ca Afq c Fe Mrt Zn Crr fl AID Cl� C
ME
loft)/ 322 At
e
376 277 679 21.3 20.1 2.42 Ong 0.33 0.22 0 03
1N -N
L At At At M M L M At Vl.
Code:
.8114
Na Ni Cd rb Al se l.i pIl Ss CN D:tf CCE% ALE al
•,VQ3
,Won:
OR'N
104 7.76
a oon L1 .
llrca
At
NtiftIcnts'Avaitab1 for;PiH(CTC"° _ aQiQQa�" Ibs'/1060 aHorrt �
011lcr:ElemcntsV Ibs•"%.IOOO74WIO*ns
xa'''ll'u
�rbiid lV; 1;^X15lI'�0Y .yCa ,•:rMg ° z Fad . htn CuAfa`: ;wCl,�"
L 12 byy j0 W2.:tWU'o'.4 M h :a T T I
.`.... .Si ..iaA .'�' C
�xNa Ni Cd Pb 1
a:87
c nfoWfII:",
Liboratea Results, arts' Cr million tiitic'ss'other�visir noted f'S��!.4 �T�"h� i59'i :i :5, ~t it i i Llti ." kC ; r r i�jw
ID:
N
I' A Ga M s Fe Mn Zn
Crr
R Afo Cl C
Immol
Code:
piton:
r oon Liq
Mtid 441 At
IN -N
•N114
•Nn;
r1N.A'
llrert
436 259 93.2 20.2 13.3 2.58 0-16 0-59
At M M At I At At M
0.19
L
003
VL
-- Iva Ni Cd PI) Al ,Se Lr pit SS
CN DAt% _ CCI-N ALE(XkaQ
I M , ;
At
mendatlons; } n"` ,•....�:; -
Nutrients Available for First Cro ,°-. - . 1bs/1000 a11oris ,.
01hcr Flcmcnts ,rn&�� .:Ibs/10(70 rillorrs
alhod �� :;';I• ►V ; . P 205. , K 20 Gn +'. Mg r. '-t..Fc wy' 9,. n �' ; c u .=' } H..4 r w1 , . x cl . ';
- Afn Z C 11
I on ►, b.58: ii 2.1'' 0 �49 O:I2. b8' 3r 0 02' : ' �'n ,}n�T%x
.t�r. +]FwYx_.. ��..il' ^Ir2,.. .Ad.r�i �.': ✓,l'4 C'
:Na
0 84
r%ri
>>i ;� , �' Crf Pb 1 ;`3 4! s `Se I,'i
•�•!'•:'~ , 4lr� '4.'w..• ■
-Ilafo:#;>d"i;µr.:, '
Labnratng Results arts' cr million unless
ID:
N
P K Ca
Afq s
Fe Afn
Zvt
Crr
11
Afo Cl C
::ode:
rtlon:
lioon I.1
1'offrl 343 At
IN -N
N114
•NQ j
ORIN
llrca
409 224 66.1
t M At
20.3 24.8
M M
2.24 0.16
At Af
0.33
At
0.21
At
0.70
At
Net Ni Cd A Al so 1.1 rll Sc c A!
DAM CC1:'% .11F A al j
141 7 64
At
m `ddatlons:t �:-t:Yr, , ,�•
Nutrients Available.for,First Cro .fit ;.�1i 4 .
* Ibs/1000 allons ,
Other Elements.
:: i `".-ilbs/.1000kh110
�1 cli
n ferhbd :c. ;Ng;�,t� .P2[}5,.f � .. der i �t rRifit, -Mn, Zs '.a me.i B ,< _fo
0,55 t4
a r.._ _
CI
...
Na ."Ni Cd::, 'rilSe r
1.2
_ � �xs •�hi•l

eronomir Division 4300 Rectiv Creek Road Iialeiuh. NC 27607-6465 [phone] Grower: Purvis Farms r Report No: W03964 g 2
ian le Info.
Laboratory Results (pi ts per million unless otherwise noted
�ruple ID:
A
P R'
Ca
M + s
Fe
Mn Zrr
t:r,
8
,tlo Cl C '
1 oud
189 L
37 3 243
63 5
16.5 16.9
2.35
0.23 081
(t 19
0 37
M ,V
L M
M
Al M
Al
rtf Al
l
Al
usle Code:
-.V114
s 1
-X03
Na Ni
Crl
Pb Al
se
Li r!! •
i s
(: N
DM% CCF96 _.ALE(K al)
'scriplion:
O!;•N
92
PM
7 78one
La oan L�
Urea
ecommendatlons:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs11000 gallons
Other Elements
lbs11000 gallons
,phcdfionMelhod •
esai.,4Y i 1
irrigalion,,r
"i,
N
0.79
P205 K2O Ca Mg ; S
]
0 50 1:9 0 37 ` 0 ]0 0.10"
Fe
0.01
MnL Zn Cu 8 Ma Cl
Y A f X3F
T'{}'bl¢ T rr yy
Na
0.74
N; Gd
Pb
4i §
} "% '"" �•
�tti le Info: '
Laboratory Results (pa ts er million unless otherwise noted)g<-
le 1D:
N
P K Ca
M
s
Fe
Mn Zn
Cu
8
Mo Cl C
Iolal 266 At
41.7 275 64 2
164
19.6
1 71
0 12 0 37
0 10
0 3
IN _N
L Al if
At
M
M
L M
t'L
Al
'isle Code:
-.'1714
S
-,Vf)3
;ya Ni Cd
Pb
.Il
Se
b pH
SS
C N -
DM#; CCE% 4LE(Kgal)
97 4
' 76
I'scripliorr:
Old A'
.ine Ligoon Lig
Urca
m
ecommeudations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs11000 gallons
Other Elements
lbs/1000 alloirs ,
' ltcalionMelhod
frg do ir&
N P 20 5 K 20
1.1 0.56 2.2
Ca M S . Fe
0.37 0.10 0.11 0.01
AM .,
T;
Zn
T
Cu. 13 ; . °Mo'. ,. •; . Cl
T T
Na
0.81
Ni Gd
Pb ''- ; AI a : ¢ L
uri le!Info'.':
Laboratory Results arts per million unless otherwise noted
nt
N
P
K Cct
Mq
s
Fe Mn Zn
Cu 8
tfo Cl C
Tonal �06 .hf
4 5
215 91 y
246
9 87
298 0 16 045
1' 26 0 3-1
GV -N
1.
tf If
nr
1.
Af 1f AJ
tin 11
usle Code:
V114
-N0.3
Na
NI
P!/
S C, V
Drtf96 C'CL`J6 :UE K al)
91 2
779
9
."Tiplion:
OR-N
ine La oon Liq
ilrea
Al
Le6mi68dations.
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs11000 gallons
Other Elements
lbs11000 gallonsi.
•
'rli alit/ ' el rt;;; ;.
irr[gatl '"
_ . • P 2Q i, : ;.�K�O;���,a.Ca, .i.� Ig,y
'6.54' 1.9 053 014.
5� 1 e. - .
0.06 0-02
Mt�c e.�.rz. Cu .. r.B vq- y- cl
T' T T T `` F `'
Na A7 , .
0.76
Cd _. �G -
r� i

98
''CDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creels Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone] Report No: W05569
Grower: NG Purvis Farces Collies To County ExIension Director
A11w Anthony Moore USDA-NRCS-Moore `
2504 Spies Rd.
,,�djft Um Robbins, NC 27325
'1
ast
e ��yszs e�oYt 110 Box908 Moore
J V l7ri�rr NG nr=rvis Fan�is I'0 Rox 908
Carthane, NC 28327
1loore County
.3rn le In ' '
Laboratory Results arts per million unless othemise noted
„Un le ID:
N
P K Ca
M9
S
Fe
Mn
Zar Cu
B Afo Cl C
Tonal 392 A!
52.2 389 88.1
31.7
20
2.16
0.22
0.84 0.37 —
0 39
lh'-N
Af Af Af
M
Jf
Af
M
Af Af
Af
`e Code:
-NI14
LJ
•NO3
Na Ni Of
Pb
Al
Se
Li
pH SS
CN DM% CCE% ALE K nl
;escrlptlon:
OR-N
148
7.67
,vine Lagoon Li .
Urea
M
;ecornmeadations;.�t, c' x,` ,+T!S;^!.4k-Nutrient9
-Ma iIabIclor, First C r o
p
".;;Ills11000 kal ns ' ' :
Other Elem6dts'. " '- 1bs11006- iII16i &,
ai MaiGJ
l
g: S
0.5 2
im nfo.
(Labarato 4Itcsult5par "fs'- ert"mlllion vnie s otherwise oted.
ample LD:
i
;'rile Code:
1.5
,ascription:
.vine Lagoon Liq.
N
P K Ca Ate
S
Fe
Mn
Zn
Cu
B Mo Cl C
Total 224 Af
IN -N
-N114
-NO3
OR-N
Urea
59.9 262 75.5 42.6 23.2 1.01 0.15 0.29 0.04
M Af M H M L L M VL
0.56
M
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li PH SS
C-N DAf% CCE% ALE(K al)
148 7.77
M

North Camro Stale UNuversty is a W
grarl 1Jwwslly and a owvg Lwd nddutIon
of TTw Urrver3ty or North Carolina
Memorandum
North Carolina Certified Technical Specialists
Dr. Jim Green, Chairman.
NC State University Forage roduction Workgroup
Crop Management Practices for Select Forages
Used in Waste Management
Departrmnt of Crop Science
Cdlaga of Aghcuhurs and Lice 5cienea
Campus Box 7620
Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
919.515.2647
919.515.7959 (lax)
The following is a four -page summary of suggestions for management practices for some
forage crops that can be used in waste management plans. These suggestions are a result of
discussions within the NC State University Forage Production Workgroup, a group comprised
of NC State faculty and NRCS agency personnel with expertise with the crops.
i
There are limited documented research responses of some of these practices on the many soils
and environments where these crops are currently being grown. The Forage Production
Workgroup has taken the available data and used the combined experiences and realistic
estimates of key people to come up with suggestions that will allow farmers to incorporate
these crops and practices into waste management plans. As data become available to
substantiate or refute these suggestions, the Forage Production Workgroup will make
appropriate changes.
Bermuda Overseeded 14'ith Cereal Rye and Annual Ryegrass
Currently two types of "ryegrass" are being used for winter overseeding in fields used for
animal waste management. Cereal rye is a winter annual srnallgrain that looks similar to
wheat, barley and oats. Annual ryegrass is a winter annual grass that looks much like tall
fescue. Both of these grasses, when growing during the winter on bermuda sod, can have
significant impact on subsequent bermuda yields. In effect, the total yields from an acre
growing the combination of Bermuda with these winter annuals will usually yield between 1-2
tons more per acre than bermuda growing alone for the year. Therefore, the total amount of
PAN /acre for the year is about 100 lbs more than for bermuda alone. Although cereal rye and
annual ryegrass are suitable crops for overseeding, the management of the crops are different
and thus practices implemented are dependent on the crop selected.

J
North Carolna State Unwsnty ts a Department of Crop Science
VW unnre+sity ark a cortsduerri rttstriuran
of The Unrversty of North Caroina
Cdlegs of AgncuMure and Life Sciamm
Campus Box 7620
Aalaigh. NC 27695-7620
919,515.2647
919.515.7959 (lax)
Cereal Rye
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter
growth. The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling rye into short (less than 3
inches tall) bermudagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short
bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate
for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last
application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda prior to August 31. An
application of 50 lbs/acre of Plant Available N (PAN) may be applied between September 15
and October 30. An additional 50 lbs/acre of PAN may be applied in February -March, If rye
growth is harvested on time and does not significantly shade the bermuda, PAN rates for the
subsequent bermuda crop are based on realistic yields of bermuda. A harvest is required prior
to heading or April 7, which ever comes first. This is necessary to minimize the potential for
shading bermuda and reducing its yields. The PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda
overseeded with cereal rye must be reduced in accordance with MRCS Technical
Standard #590.
Annual Ryegrass
Annual ryegrass should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter
growth. The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into short (less than 3
inches tall) bermudagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short
bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate
for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last
application of animal waste is to be applied to the Bermuda prior to August 31. An
application of 50 lbs/acre of (PAN) may be applied between September 15 and October 30.
An additional 50 lbs/acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If additional PAN is
applied to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the Bermuda must be reduced by a
corresponding amount. This is necessary because ryegrass growth during April -May will
reduce bermuda yields and shorten the time bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is
required by heading or April 7, which ever comes first to prevent shading of emerging
bermuda during April -May period. To favor the production of the bermuda, additional
harvests of ryegrass will be required when the ryegrass canopy reaches 12 to 15 inches height.
The PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda overseeded with annual ryegrass must be
reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical Standard #590.

Noah CWna State u*arsty is a Ia. Department of Crop Science
grans unrversny and a oonsla ttf res OLAW
of Tha Unrversty or North Carolm
College of Agr4cut<ure and Llle Science
Campus Box 7620
Raleigh. NC 27695.7620
919.515.2647
919.515.7959 (fax)
Eastern Gamagrass
Limited data are available on the response of gamagrass to various levels of N and soil types
in North Carolina. However, until further data is collected, the following guidelines may
be used.
1. On sandy textured soils that are well drain or excessively well drained, gamagrass may
yield similar to hybrid bermudagrass at similar PAN rates.
2. On heavy textured soils that are poorly to somewhat poorly drained, gamagrass may yield
1.5-3 times more than hybrid bermuda.
Gamagrass establishes slowly and will not usually produce much harvestable forage during
the establishment year. It is best to allow the growth during the seedling year to accumulate
for most or all season; if it is to be harvested, it should be done after full seedhead formation
on a majority of the plants. Therefore, PAN for the seedling year should be modified
accordingly. Overseeding gamagrass with winter annuals is not currently advised because the
harvesting or grazing management of the winter annual crops during February -April would be
detrimental to the survival of gamagrass. Gamagrass should not normally be harvested or
grazed below 6-8 inches stubble.
Application rates are to be based on the realistic N rates that address the N needs per ton of
hay, a realistic yield and an appropriate application window. When harvested as hay in the 24-
36 inch stage of growth, the N rate ranges from 40-50 lbs/ton of dry matter. The PAN rate for
grazed systems must be reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical Standard #590.
The application window for gamagrass is slightly earlier than for bermuda; gamagrass starts
growing about 3-4 weeks earlier than Coastal bermudagrass and about 2-3 weeks earlier than
Tifton 44. Gamagrass is dormant from frost to March. The last application of PAN in the
summer should be prior to August 31.
Rescuegrass (i.e. Matua)
Rescuegrass is a cool season grass and makes most of its growth from March -June and
September -November. It should receive most of its N during the September -October and late
February through May months. Limited data are available for realistic yields of rescuegrass
on various soils and at various N levels in North Carolina. However, until further data is
collected the following suggestions may be useful.
1. On sandy, well drained to excessively drained soils, rescuegrass may yield 1.5- 3 times
fescue, assuming a uniform and dense stand of grass is present.

North CWdma Stale Unrysesty a a l Department of Crop Science
9raM lnrverssy and a coredAuenl rnlwpon
of The Uruveniy d North Carotna
College of Agnculture and Life Science
Campus Box 7620
Raleigh, NC 27696-7620
919.515.2647
919.515.7959 (fax)
2. On wet or poorly drained soils, rescuegrass may yield .75 -1.0 times as [much as fescue.
3. On soils where both are well adapted the yields of rescuegrass may be 1-1.5 times more
than fescue.
The above RYE estimates assume that stand density is maintained through natural reseeding
every year. Although rescuegrass is a "perennial" it does not maintain dense, satisfactory
stands unless it is allowed to reseed every year. Even under this management it is likely that
disease will affect one or more growths in some years.
Application rates are to be based on the realistic N rates that address the N needs per ton of
hay, a realistic yield and an appropriate application window. When harvested as hay, the N
rate is similar to other cool season grasses such as fescue, ranging from 40-50 lbs/ton.
Rescuegrass may also continue some growth in June -August if moisture is available. During
these off-seasons, rescuegrass should not receive more than about 25 lbs N/acre/month. Only
apply 25 lbs N/acre in June -August if the equivalent of I -inch of water can be applied at the
same time. If the crop does not respond with at least a 1000 lbs of growth within a 3-5 week
period do not make another application until the plants have had the opportunity to use the
previous application.

8 5.0
84.0
83.0
Z Rz.0
0
Q
LO
J
w 81.0
J2S
3 (START PUMP ) 164, 000 cu. FT
PUMP FORL 1 80 DAYS y 110, $GO GU. m
154, 000 cu. Fr.
- 11 0, 86O C-U-F7.
43, 140 c.o. FT:
too 120 140 1(00 180 200 2ZO
VOLUME IN C-U. FT.
24 0

i
N0P-T), CAROLINl-1 N . G. -PuRv15 FAPj-yvS , -Dw E , KooR.5, Co.
WrP tO/47
LowER.. LAGOOO 1 I
V O LL} rYI E. 70 5fio R.E. F o K z 51C. - Z 4 K ft S7oP,rn �-
LAGoarj -4 I — 7 31 cu- rr.
LAG aoN 1 Z - r 7 344 ca F7
LAG Do W 4 3 8 1 o?- cu•-F-1.
ToT)a L 3 Z, 177 cu. FT.
FP.o rn 5 U Kv E.Y Q V F-P-;:L )W E LE. V'.
OvEuLow ELEV. -- 85, (,
L.E,S5 1. 0 ' FREw)Arc D - I . Q _
84 . lc,
LESS 25YR. S70IFFlCrE - 1. 3
YaLumE TO S-mpz " 3'21 77 Cu. F7'.
STA RT Pu m P ELF-1/ . = g 3.3 2 to ,13 Sq. Fr.
f
usE 1.3
1 HIrsr-- ''o+JD5 Zo NOT HAS'F TZZgU,{-E(.) vOLUm e
To 13E Co�SIOESvr- 0 A5 A LAG<)(Jf\) +I EY DU HAVE,
V 0LUrnE. Ta 13E Cc1N5I E-REto A5 WASTE- S7-of2ACsC Food v%)liH
M,of. OF 3G,S TRY OF STo/-ACrE

i
• 1 1
NoRrA [AROLiIJA 111Cy PukviS FARsms -Di xrc — /IOOQ.E Cc.
START PUMP- S! 01> PuM P
I
OPC�A-r 1W - 80& Sou-)S F Ar kow 7v w-EAu
VOLUME 1 © $ToP-F- ZJ Yk I2q H,-` STOP-M
LAC�OOtii �.5 f 1 �
(12Lj2('. �DFT�� 6,75) cu.pr.
(iZrxJ f �7 11
1, 1575OFT ) _9.1OZ C�_�.'
3Z, 177 co,F-i,
SLJRFAC C
AREA AT 2,'%'
F'OH
70P o F DAB _ AC
. 6 A c
+( 4,3 ,5 a 0 5 Q F7T
/A C)
=►L �� � J l'� S Q �T ,
AF,6A JJffbE L. 7v 47ukC %'i yZ / 2 q it,2 -ST0 kkit + I' Fes; Z fi=::L`:;
25 v9- / 2-11 +ttZ STor2h
FT 1.2 use 1.3'
7-DP OF CAM ELE V = �.
. vs L .J , Q 1— ST A — 'D J /t" Z)
IA�'Jh}

N©1vrr4 CARoLWA NO PuZuo PA;trAS Moeree Co
)?EK 11l2F /,
SIZE WA57F
Sw1k)e- CST-r RATOO (o foow. s FA Rk0-J TO W E A �J
U �e D F A;tR 1 o Ff t Vr K
i Z-E Folk YEAR- F boil 0Ltl ST 4UI, Ak:)
l M AN l ]!2 F s WASTF- WA_TLR,
'^�_ ZU-Saul s x 1,376Ai-/oAg k ZkI nAY
135 LBIL) lv#T 7,kg6AL/co. Fr- - 172,811 Cv.FT
Z. MO M!h -PRECl?-tTAT+OM LESS t1AaflRATlwJ Ord PojJb Stjal:ACf
?ZEC1-P LAkf, CVAPotZ
:YAIQ - Dec. = L46.7H I, o"
4(, 7(o — 41- O
LAGooO'4I 5. 74" X
1Z, 42.+0 (S r-
,sQ FT1 = 59 co. r,
�12.i� I Fr
9A00.0 d-'Z(5.76, ,/32y4720sQ.Fr _ I5370 cu.a=r.
12 �,j I FT ) —
LA6000-03 f S.7(e ' )4,R57 SQ FTi``7
I ?- 1N FT ( /
1 J
2 2-5 YR— 2A Hz 'F>+iECI PITAT►OM CW 1P000b "SuAtF-Acf
25yp-- 2ys1p2= ('-S"
LA600A-)- 6•5 lZ, 42� sa �T} _ l0 73 1 Cu. FT.
Iz11�IF��� IY
l-AcSooN �+ 2.z("a , 0lZ0 SC? FT � 7,34 4 cu. Pr,
C ,11JIFT
LA Cloo 0 -43 4.5 )( lei9S7 SQ FT1 B#02 cu.PT,
(-12-iAJ/F r�J
-FO-FA L LIGuiD \/OLUM E 2 4 `l 0 67 co. r✓T..
Exr571UCI Vor-Oram;E 3Oq � CL), FT
EXTRA vol-L)Me , ,z39 Cu, FT.
V, rjrS 3E7-icM FAl kA6o*&)S o%

NGMT�4 CAazoj-)IJA N (i PwRuls FAKMS - M00RE CouJJT'/
REK
5izE LA(lootj ,DIXIE +
C P,E kATK)rJ - 8 C6 so�� FARizow To vtrlr A
(BoGSoufS�Cy '-v.�r/SouJ�= 3�i ,`��� CU. 1'7.
2. DETcZM) JE JRQ DAY STgRACI
A. MANURE.-F WANE WATER
Z
2_ _F#f A D x y, ..*).�-i y A 9 j T c x 1. 3 7 CPAijr-
NY) B A Ps Y s
135 Lg/ulUITS 7.q8 GAL /CU.r-r. = 85 zZ z ;U. pr.
3. NoRMAL P'RECIPiTA710IJ L,4S I \J A PC) RAr I VOU 01.) '1" r;�7 SUP-!ACt
PkEcl A1T,4r000
APAlL -
3.q3
M A `1
12
Sunk
l
Tu i-,[
73
AUG -
4.71
S f PT -
4. v 9
Z5. y C4
EYA POPATtOM
12Mo. /Y?
25, y4 i1— z.o. 5O ; u , 9 `l "
1 AGVOS,, la /" y. 9y '' ) (jZ,42-(,SQFT)— 5 1 15 CU. F r.
12 Ill /FT
Y,A000IJ"t q•9i'' Y ,02oSq F7 iJy 1 E.-1. Cu. FT
i2. r tit ! FT
L.AGoo(� &v'` 1�l,9 i ISQPT G) l47 cu. F r
[Z.ruIFT
C z5 eR. - 24 KZ i-r ATIoN 0&J Ir. C-1L-)ojo `_.JkF A C Z
L!5Yz-2gH1-Z - (o.r„
AGdo>L7 i rf G. � 12 Liz (o ZSOFT)- 73 1 c0. Fi.
,A GWQ 32, 7, ?4q cu.Fr.
(12-10 1.

it I a
NORTH 'CARot-iOA tJ6 Portu1t� FAPoi5 - MooP.-r- Cc)U+UT`1
'RE K
SIZE L.AGao►3 - D1xIC Z z
LAGoo+v -" 3 Iq,951-5Q SFr tBlo'Lco.l-r
f
915T 1 iUG VpLU Me I LNGoo �J,-)
LAG oo& I G(0 2oG CU. Fr.
1,AC� oo,U- Z. (ra34�8q cu. Fr
Ll9o8�)
TpTrA L U ©LUAJE IuEE .b 580, I Zq co. Fr
� ENptabo QDLufj E

in-2
Hydrant #►
e (wetted acres) _ (A)
Farm Owner
Owners Address
1 Po
� 0,
Owners Phone ff
Ij'p C,r,
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Crop Type
Vim
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (e)
Facility Number 3 � - le,223
Irrigation Operator I f
Irrigation Operators
Address
Operator's Phone M
From Waste Utilfaatiut Pion
Recommended PAN
Loading (btacre) _ (f3)
(7) (ell (9) (10) {14)
ant
e
Date
(mnlddlyr)
I ' flan
Waste Analysis
PAN'
(lb/1000 gat)
PAN Applied
Wacm)
(8) x (91
1000
Nitrogen
9alarree"
NBC*
(e) - (10)
Start
Time
End
Tttne
Tara!
Minutes
(3) - (2)
a of
3prWders
Operating
Flow
Rate
(galtrnln)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volure►e
por Acre
("Yscre)
0) / (A)
Crop Cycle Totals
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operators Signature � C C GC4x (tal( e-dK
Operator's Certification No. Y- (9- I -3
Waste Anaylsls or Equivalent. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events.
he value received by subtracting column (10) from (0). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event. V1409
iutrient source (ie. Lagoon/Storage Pond ID, commerical fertilizer, dry litter, etc.)

4-2
i A"
U Ay
Hydrant #�
(wetted acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owners Address
Owner's Phone #
P r_ <v
Fieldif
r
I !.`•T • f C,/
4,
`
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Crop Type
(1) (21 (3) (4) i5l to)
Facifity Number
Irrigation Operator 2�111
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operators Phone #
From 'Waste Utllizatlon Plan
Recommended PAN
Loading (Vacre) = (B)
M (81 (8) (10) (11)
nt
Date
(mml'ddryrl
I don
West@ Analysis
PAN'
(lb/I ow get)
PAN Applied
(Veen)
(81 K (0)
tow
Nitrogen
Balancs-
(Ib'acre)
(0) - (1o)
start
Time
End
Tina
Thal
Minutes
(3) - (2)
t of
sprinklers
Open"
Flow
hate
(iiuftin)
Total Vbkxrw
(Vilorrs)
(i) rr (5) : (4)
Volume
pe►Acrs
(gavacre)
(7) / (A)
l
q a
&Qe;,
e
'±
Ls
-0
�'3G
�o'.
1l3
�4
4" 1 oe
16 szgo
& 45
Crop Cycle ToWs
rl
n
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature /,JI
Operator's Certification No. [ [J
Vaste Anayisis or Equivalent. At a minimum, waste analysis Is required within 60 days of land application events.
* value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event. 3114/03
trident source (ie. Lagoon/Storage Pond ID, commerical fertilizer, dry Utter, etc.)

I1--A"91
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Hydran'
acres)
arm Own
is Addre
rs Phone
Cmp Type
(2D10^10—
(1) (2) (3) (4) f5} [81
Facility Number 1 -
irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operators phone 8
From Waste Utilization Plan
Recommended PAN
Loadln9 (lb/acre) _ (8)
(7) (a) (9) (10) (11}
C Q
Drte
(rr mkid"
3
Irri
anon
Waste Analysle
PAN-
(Ih11000 gal)
PAN Applled
(tb/acre)
(81 x (9
1000
NkMW
Balance"
(Ibhlc(e)
(S) - 00)
start
Time
End
Time
Tote)
Minutes
(3) - (2)
M of
Sprinklers
Operating
Flow
Rate
(gallmin)
Tote) Volume
(gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gavacre)
(7) / (A)
S. 4
7f - 762
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature _ Gc `" till
Operator's Certification No. S9
,naylsis or Equivalent. At a minimum, waste analysis Is required withln 60 days of land appllcation events.
received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.
source (ie. Lagoon/Storage Pond IO, commerical fertilizer, dry litter, etc.)
W14M

Hydrant tt
tied acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
wmers Address
wners Phone 0
U7a
V
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
1
Field it
l�a�
Crop Type
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Facility Number CP3 - 8943
Irrigation Operator f
Inlgatlon Operators
Address
operators Phone a
From Waste Utilization Plan
Recommended PAN /
Loading (Vacre) = (B) / D
(7) (a) (9) (10) (t t}
Data
(mnkddlyr)
I oadon
Waste Anefysis
PAN'
(b/1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(Vacre)
(a]x(@}
1000
Nitrogen
Balance"
(lb/acre)
M - 00)
Start
Time
End
Time
Total
Minutes
(3) - (2)
M of
5prinklm
Operating
Flow
Rate
(gaYmin)
Total Vokame
(gakm)
(e) x (5) x (4)
Vokwne
per Acre
(gaYaere)
(T) ! (A)
I bo
r
o:l
;1'L-t
IS6
eI
ao
({130
a
f 5a
alp
l5oa
8=ti-r
j�
2.8d
Rd
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Crop Cycle Total•
Operators Signature � 4, �,_
Operators Certification No. ! S d
,te Anaylsis or Equivalent. At a minimum, waste analysis Is required within 60 days of (and application events.
alue received by subtracting column (10) from (0). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.
ant source (le. Lagoon/Storage Pond ID, commerical fertilizer, dry litter, etc.)
W14M

M 1RR-2
Hydrant N
1 Size (wetted acres) _ (A)
Farm Owner
Owners Address
Owner's Phone N
Lagoon Liquid irrigation Fields Record
One Farm for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Crop Type
(1) 12) M (4) (5) (6)
Facility Number - AF223
Irrigation Operator a }L
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone tl
From West* Utilization Plan
Recommended PAN
Loading (lb/acre) - (0)
ZM—
(7) (a) (0) (10) 0 1)
'Nutrient
8oUrce
pate
(m rUcift l
Waste Anstysls
PAN"
(VI ODD gal)
PAN Applied
(hfacro)
M x to
1tx)0
Nitrogen
Balance"
(blacre)
M - (t0)
Start
Time
End
Time
Total
Minutes
(S) - (2)
M of
Sprinldsrs
Operating
Flow
Rate
(gam^)
Total Vokarw
(Oak")
(e) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gave=)
M / (A)
d
14 oo
S W4)
Ft Sa
7�-
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
,a'
Operatots Signature
Operator's Certification No. �pa l3
'DA Waste AnayLsis or Equivalent. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events.
)ter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.
iter nutrient source (is. Lagoon/Storage Pond ID, commerical fertilizer, dry litter, etc.)
811403

lv�
M IRA-2
Hydran
i Size (wetted acres)
Farm Owr
Owners Addre
Owner's Phonr
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Crop Type Cne
(1) (2) (3) (4) { (s)
Facility Number 1 Tfc;Z! 3
Irrigation Operatorf o
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone
From Waste Utilization Plan
Recommended PAN
Loading (Vacre) o (0)
(7) (e) (s) (to) (11y
%*Wd
kw=
Data
(mriv*lyq
Inioation
Waste Analysis
PAN'
(lb/1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(Vocre)
(81 x to
loon
Nitrogen
Balanw"
(Vacre)
M • (to)
Start
Tlms
End
Time
Total
Minutes
(3) - (2)
a of
Sprinklers
Opereting
Flow
bate
(gam)
Total volume
(gallons)
(e) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gavacre)
(7)1(A)
B� jO
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature Operators Signature Q�1-c9�.a �.
Certified Operator (Print) Operator's Certification No. ! UJ ,L
MA Waste Anaylsis or Equivalent. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of sand application events,
iter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each Irrigation event.
zter nutrient source (le. Lagoon/Storage Pond ID, commerical fertilizer, dry litter, etc.)
3(14/03

toll Inn-2
Hydran
ild Size (wetted acres) =
Farm Owr
Owner's Addre
Owner's Phom
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Crop Type (20
r�
1 2 3 4 3 6
Facility Number 1 O ? -3
Irrigation Operator '
Imgation Operator's
Address
Operators Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Recommended PAN
Loading (lb/acre) . (13)
(7) (B D 10 it)
"Nument
s4raCe
Date
(mr!Vd*1
Irrigation
waste Analysis
PAN'
(btl000 gat)
PAN Applied
(Nacre)
(8) x (M
tout)
Nitrogen
Balance—
(lhlacre)
W - (to}
Start
Time
Fnd
Time
Total
Minutes
(3) - (2)
I of
Sprinklers
Operating
Flow
Rate
(gaurnln)
Total volume
(gallons)
(6) x (M x (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gallacre)
(7) / (A)
l D
I
sp
3 ©Q
b��v
!• i '
Ill
9Y. T
-0
11 'ov
! 'So
10
i
210
add
098
1,
C7, r
0 7
crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operators Signature
Operator's Certification No. 17
ICDA Waste Anayisis or Equivalent. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events.
Inter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (0). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (1 t) following each irrigation event. 3/14/0,
Inter nutrient source (is. Lagoon/Storage Pond ID, commerical fertilizer, dry litter, etc.)

FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number -�
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
EXHIBIT E-2
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type r' Recommended PAN loading ?
J (Iblacre) = (B)
11S 121 1131 f41 f5l 161 (7) is] 191 1101 fill
[)are
mm
Irrigation
Waste AnalysisPAN
(IblIUODgaq
PAN Applied
(lblacre)
fal . 19)
1000
N&ogenBalance'
pblacre)
SlantTgne
end Time
al
Nprwllddlyf
ulles
(3) - (2)
/ of Sprinklers
Operating
Flaw Rate
(garlmin)
To ( volume
(gallons)
(g
(6) ■ (5) " (N)
V06NM
per Awe
(gauacre)
(7)
A
Crop Cycle Totals ( J
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No
1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B)_ Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cvcle
Facility Number -
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
EXHIBIT E-2
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN wading
J% Macte) = (a) -
ill 01 rat 141 r51 (61 171 r61 (91 rink flit
Dale
nvv ddryr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
(lW1000 gal)
PAN Applied
{Ibiacre)
M . (g)
1000
Nitrogen Balance'
(lbleve)
lei - 00)
Start Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
(3) - (2)
or Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
(gaud+)
Total volume
(gallons)
(6) = (5) • (4)
lum
volume
per Apo
{gallacle)
(7)
A
d ]'
die
rj
r- i
.• �
— =1 ' �.'�
�
��
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event,

FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Field #
Facility Number 12
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
EXHIBIT E-2
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN loading
(Vacre) = (B)
111 (21 (3) fql (5) r6I fil to] f81 Hal ftll
Date
mmlddtyr
irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN '
tlb11000 gal)
PAN Applied
(Iblacre)
(a) M (9)
1000
'Nitrogen Balance'
(Iblacre)
(g) _ 00)
Stag Time
End "erne
Total
AAinWes
(3) - (2)
0 of Sprinklets
,Operating
Flow Rate
(gal/rnin)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(6) • (5) ■ (4)
Volume
per were
(®allaue)
-a
A
Crop Cycle totals I
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
l NCUA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

)RM IRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number — -�- I -
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
EXHIBIT E-2
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
S6 . �� �/� Naas) = (s) J
111 (2) (3) (41 M r61 f71 lal fol (101 fill
Dale
mrDate r
Irrigailon
Waste Analysts PAN "
(1b11000 gal)
PAN Applied
(lb/acre)
1000
Nitrogen Balance
{ bla r }
Starr Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
(3) - (2)
Il of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
(gaVndn)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(e) " (5) . (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gallacre)
_(1
a
_
Cr-'_
"� �J
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
;ertitied Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No. {
]A Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
N the value received by subtracting column (10) from (9). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

)IRM IRR-7
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
-r
Tract# Field # Facility Number
Field Size (acres) = (A) ^.
Farm Owner Irrigallon Operator
Owner's Address Irrigation Operators
Address
Owner's Phone # Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
(Vacre) _ (B) / L1
(11 (21 (3) 141 M M at rat rat riot it It
EXHIBIT E-2
Date
rrhWddlyr
Irrigation
wasle An*" PAN `
(!lri00a pelj
PAN Applied
(tblacre)
(61 - 19)
1000
Nitrogen Balance'
(Wacre)
ref - t10)
Start Time
End Tune
TOW
MkMM
(3) - (2)
0 of Sprinklers
Opera"
Flow hate
(galtmfn)
Total Volume
(gal"
(B) „ (s) • (4)
Vofurme
per Acre
(gallacre)
I71
15,
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
,er(iried Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operators Certification No.
)A Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
!r the value received by subtracting column (1o) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation even(.

)RM IRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
lU�cu +'f Field #
y '
Facility Number - -
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
EXHIBIT E-2
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading % —
(rblacre) = (8)
ill (2) (3) (41 151 (fit 171 161 (9) flat fill
Date
mrnldd(yr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
(Ib170t]0 pan
PAN Applied
(lblacre)
tat " i9l
1000
Ndrogen Balance'
Nacre)
(e) • (10)
Slari Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
(3) - (2)
r of SF tinkles
Operating
Flow Rate
(gallmin)
Total Volume
(pallona)
(0) " (5) " (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gallacre)
JLL
A
�
C
Y•
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
;erlified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
]A Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
it the value received by subtracting column (10) from (H). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

)RM IRR-2
r
r
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
tJa ;- Field#
Facility Number I j
-
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operators
Address
Operator's Phone #
EXHIBIT E-2
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type 1 Reconxnended PAN loading
(bblacre) = (8)
ill f21 f3l M r51 M1 171 fel f91 fro! fill
Dale
mmlddyr
67ipalion
Waste Analysis PAN
(IW1g00 gef)
PAN Applied
(iblacre)
(g) M {g}
1000
Nitrogen Balance'
(Iblacfe)
(a) - (lo)
stall Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
(3) - (2)
N of 5plkiniers
Operating
Flow Rate
(gallmin)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(e) (5) ■ (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gallacre)
rll
A
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
',ertified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certlrrcation No. f fc s
r -
:)A Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
it the value received by subtracting column (10) from (13). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigalion event.

)RM IRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Fora) for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility number ['
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operators
Address
Opera(or's Phone #
EXHIBIT E-2
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
�L7 Macro) _ (B) J f�
(1) (2) (3) (4) 8 (7) (a)
Date
mrnJddlyr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
(Ib/100U h
PAN Applied
(lblacte)
le) • M
1000
Nitrogen Balance'
(lblacre)
(B) - (10)
Slert Time
End Tune
Total
t�Mnutes
(3) - (2)
N nr Sprinklers
p
Operating
Flow Rate
(gaunon)
Total
gl Volume
(
(6) + (5) (4)
Volume
per Aare
(gaNacre)
—9L
A
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
lertifted Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No. _ c
)A Waste Anayiysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
3r the value received by subtracting column (10) from (113). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

)RM IRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number —
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
(Vacre) = (®)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5 8 (7) a)
@)
EXHIBIT E-2
Date
mmrddryr
Irrigation
WasteAn*sis PAN'
(IbJ1000 t7a9
PAN Applied
(Ibracre)
-(a) M (9)
1000
Nitrogen Balance'
(Iblacre)
(B) - 00)
Stara Time
End Time
Total
Nnules
(3) - (Z)
0 of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Hate
(gallmin)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(6) • (5) ■ (4)
Volume
pet Acre
(gavacts)
(7)
a
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
'erlifed Operator (Print)
Operators Signature
Operator's Certification No. 7. ? ,
)A Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
�r the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

)RM IRR-2
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form, /for Each Field per Crop Cycle
iY,-W
EXHIBIT E-2
Tract # (Field # Facility Number
Field Size (acres) _ (A) ,
Farm Owner Irrigation Operator
Owner's Address Irrigation Operatora
Address
Owner's Phone # Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
DY �(lbraae) = (e)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (b) M IB) (D) (10) 111)
Dale
MnVddlyr
hripation
waste Anslysls PAN '
(Iwt000 pan
PAN Applied
(lb/acre)
(a) M 1D1
t onu
NNropen Balance'
(bhlacre)
(13) - (14)
Start Time
Er�d Tune
Total
Minlal
(3) - (2)
N of Sprinklers
Operating
Flown Rate
(Cal/min)(a)
Total VOW"
(papons}
" (5) " (4)
Voklme
per Aue
(pWacre)
—9L
r.
7*-
Crop Cycle Totals
,o ao o
7
Owner's Signature
'ertiried Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification 'hlo.
DA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
?r the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

)RM IRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number — � -
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
EXHIBIT E-2
From Waste Utilization Plan
crop Type Recommended PAN Goadlnq
Mlwre)1(8) `f
i11 (2) f31 (4) 151 fat M (81 (91 flol fill
Dale
mnVddlyr
lrrlgafOr1
Waste Analysis PAN'
{1G11000 ga[}
PAN Applied
(Iblecre)
e y g
1nt)0
Nitrogen Balance'
(w►acre)
(1%1 - (l0)
Start Time
Endlirne
n
Minutes
(3)_- ((y2t
$ or sprinkled
operalinig
Fkm Rrft
(gaumin)
To(g Volume
(gallons)
(0) " (5) ■ (4)
Volume
per Ace
(ga9far:rel
�L
�•7
'
..r a i®
/
rr
r
3
,z
_
�r
Crop Cycle Totals
1J = . 3075_
-Y=
Owner's Signature
;ertitied Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No. l Y
7A Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
3r the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

41
4
t4•
)RM 1RR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operators
Address
Operator's Phone #
EXHIBIT E-2
From Waste Utilization plan
Crop type Recommended PAN Loading
'0f/E'' ((btacre} _ (e}
(t) (2) (3) M (6) tin (7) (a) 191 1101 fill
Dale
RwvVddryr
In lgation
Waste Analysis PAN'
(Ibrt000 gal}
PAN Applied
(tblacre}
(a) • (9)
1000
Nitrogen Balance'
(lblaCre)
(e) - (10)
Smart Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
(3) - (2)
■ of 5 rinklers<
p
Operating
Flaw Rare
(gaUmin)
� 1111"Vokira
(g9ibes) }
(a)"(s). (4)
Volume
Per Acre
(pttVacre►
_(7.)_
A
3
?-5
"-
✓e
i
-
- 'OCR
r7
141
�fJ
4
C 4.4
=' 4Z
f'
1
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No. LIZ1^>
]A Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
3r the value received by subtracting column (10) from (81. Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

)RN1 1RR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cvcle
Facility Number - -
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operators
Address
Operator's Phone #
Fram Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Reeammended PAN Loadlrtp
(Nacre) _ (a)
(1) (2) (3) 4)v (5) (6 1) B)
(9)
EXHIBIT E-2
Date
rnmlde
Irritation
Waste Analysis PAN '
(ibl1000 pat}
PAN Applied
(B)acre)
1000
Nitrogen Balance'
( a r ))
Start Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
/ or Sprktkiers
Operating
Flow Rate
{lawman)
Total Volume
(gallons)
Volume
per Acre
(gawaere)
A
70
/ C
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
:ertified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
]A Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate. Technical Guide Section 633.
9r the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B), Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

)RM IRR-2
Traci #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Field WE -
Facility Number '—
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
(Vacre) = is)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (e) (7) (8)
19)
EXHIBIT E-2
11 a) 111)
Date
mmldeJyr
Facility Number '—
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
(Vacre) = is)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (e) (7) (8)
19)
EXHIBIT E-2
11 a) 111)
Date
mmldeJyr
hrigatiao
Waste Analysis PAN'
Ob110DO gal)
PAN Applied
(��91
I DOO
Nitrogen Balance'
(B s (10)
Start Time
End Time
TOM
1U [011
(3) • (2)
of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
(gallmin}
Total Volume
(gallons)
(a) ■ (5) ■ (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gallacre)
-i 1-.
A
- � =
� �a�
it . ��
� ra
� a
`� .�•�.�
���-=
_
<
r1
,~. ✓
, 40
r Y
A9
Crop Cycle Totals
-
Owner's Signature
>rlified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No. -
3A Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
�r the value received by subtracting column (10) from (13). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

David Allred Farm Weekly Lagoon Level Tracking
Date Lagoon l Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
-a -o 4
34
-l� oLL
3
-1 i �
d
4—q,o
{,
9 3
3
4,5
4 3a-a
d
-
5-j o
)(
44
q9
8
'
3
r"�
7 2 -0Y
s-� (-P
-
14 19
Lf 3
7-3 ®-n
6 1
3 7 ' `
1-i3
S-&-111/ a- '' 401, 43 '%

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone]
-
Report No: W06640 W
;rower.- Mired, David
copies To:
799 jasper R&
Robbins, NC 27325
E)
wste
f r. w«�w d.
naysis effort
Fern: 63- 2
2/26/04
Moore County
;am le Info.
Laboratory Results per million unless otherwise noted
aampl a ID:
N
P K Gu M9 S
Fig mn Zrt _
CU
B ;ilr0 c
fF
Total 645
91.1 611] 141 22.2 23.0
3.81] 0.54 i.55
0,96
1.12
IN -N
Waste Cade:
-N114
Na A', cd P6 Al
Se Li P11
.9
C.•N DM% CCE% ALE(K al)
U.S
-.)V 3
176
7.39
aescHption:
OR -A'
;trine Lagwn Li .
crerr
iecommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs11000 gallons
Other Elements lbs,11000 gallons
Ipplrciaian :1lelhod
N P-V5 K20 Ca Mg S Fe ,1fn Zn Cu
B 310 U
Na
Ni Cd P6 _41 Se Li
Irrigation
'_' 1.2 5.5 0.82 0.13 0.13 0.02 T 0.01 0.01
0.01
1.5
;ample info.
Laboratory Results
per million unless otherwise noted
;ample ID:
461
Waste Cade:
US
)escription:
;tvinc Upon Li .
t'
P K (:u it
S Fe ,1M 771
Cu B
Ma Cl C
Towl 582
tv -k
-IV114
-N 3
OR•N
f wu
(48.7 (198 ] i5 28 i 25.5 6.40 0.46 3.26 0.83 097
_
1'a Ni cd A At SO Li I1 SS C.-S
D.M% CC.E% .- I M al)
185 7.40
lecommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
dbs11000 gallons
Other Elements
lbs/1000 gallons
Ipplication .lfelhod
Irrigation
N P205 K20
2A 0.92 5.6
Ca Mg S Fe Mn
0.73 0.17 0.15 0.04 T
Zn Ca B dfa (1
0.02 0.01 0.01
Na Ni Cd
1.5
Pb Al Se Li

NCDA Agronomic Division
4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465
919 733-2655 Grower: Allred, David
Report No: 'WO664O _ft 2
Sam le info.
LaboratorV Results
is per million unless otherwise
noted
Sample ID:
N1
Waste Code:
ALS
Description:
,Su iiic L xm Li .
N
P K Ca
of
S Fe Mn zn
Cu B
MO CI t,
Total 413
IN -N
-NH4
-NO3
OR-N
Crut
63b 594 130 26.2 15.9 3.148 0.39 1.77 0.41 0.83
Na Ni (,d Pii :1l Se Li H S5' C;N
DMA CLF96 .4LF.(K trI)
152 7.34
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
!bs1IOOO gallons
-
Other Elements
lbs11000 allons
Application Metbod
lmption
N P205 K20
1.7 0.85 4.8
Ca Mg S Fe
0.76 0.15 009 002
Mn
T
Zn Cu B Mo (:l
0.01 T T
Na Ni
1.3
Cd A 3! 5e Lt

Date Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
l�
-3
40
314
G -J
3
8
-7
7
�- -as
" 7
gels
97
mixes
aA
V-
3 —105
d,Ce i
c23

Date Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
p
C`- a -
If
Pff/

44
-o 7,-
L9
-leg-��
fir/ -eIly
to -�-
9
Ct "r 19 `d if
q -r7 -0
9-8 _6 5
rf 's Lt
. /g I
3.- tiY

VCDA&C,S Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Web Site: www.acagr.com/agronoum/
Report No:
31143
Grower:
Allred, David L.
Copies To:
799 Jasper Rd.
NC 27311
E
'Robbins,
O"Aleir-
��
V V �l �1
IN
Farm:
4/5/2005 SERVING N.C. RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS
Moore County
Agronomist Comments
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N P205
K20
Mg
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
2449A
3 2004 1.0
1st Crop: Corn Grain 1T
120-160 40-60
0
0
0
0
.0 0
3
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0
80-100 40-60
0
0
0
0
.0 0
3
Pest Results
Soil Class Mf% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al(T)Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1 Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1 SS-1
NO3-N NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.71 1.07
6.2 74.0 L6 5.1 39 129 45.0 19.0
253 169
162
102
102
64
68
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N P205
K20
Mg
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
2449B
3 2004 1.0
1st Crap: Corn Grain AT
120-160 30-50
0
0
0
0
_0 0
3
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0
80-100 30-50
0
0
0
0
.0 0
3
rest Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI(I)Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1 Zn-A!
Cu-1
S-1 SS-1
NO3-N NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.76 1.01
7.9 85.0 1.2 5.7 44 115 53.0 24.0
386 249
242
121
121
68
48
0.2
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendadons
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N P205
KzO
Mg
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
1980
3 2004 1.0
1st Crop: Corn Grain 0
120-160 0
0
0
0
0
.0 0
3
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0
80-100 0
0
0
0
0
.0 0
3
rest Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K 1 Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI(I)Mn-Al(2)
Zn-1 Zn-A!
Cu-1
S 1 SS-1
NO3-N NH4-N
Na
MIN 1.43 0.99
14.9 90.0 1.5 6.1 525 215 60.0 23.0
166 115
108
03
943
375
43
0.1

NCDA
Division 4300 Reedy Creek iF*Wa
NC 27607-6W 919 733-2655
Report
No: W07263 W
Grower: Allred, David L.
Copies To.
799 Jasper Rd.
Robbins, NC 27325
as
ort
Farm: 63"2
3,22/05
Moore County
Sample info.
LAwatery Results pw miVian ohs ether+tviee need
Sample ID:
N
P
K Ca mg S
Fe Mn Zn
Cu
B
Mo Cl C
Total 260
52.3
565 132 23.0 17.4
3.62 0.32 1.39
0.42
0.98
NUR# 1
IN-N
Waste Code:
-NH4
Na
Ni Cd Pb Al
Se Li pH
SS
C.•N
DAM CCE% ALE
ALS
-NO3
148
7.53
DewHption.
OR-N
Swine Lagoon Li .
Urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients AvalbUc for First Crop
Agli00p allows
Odier Ehments
AS1100OAdkm
Metbod
N P205 R20 Ca
Ag . S Fe Mn Zn Cu
B Mo a
Na
AK Cd
A Al Se Li
Crription
1.1 0.70 4.5 0.77
0.13 0.10 0.02 T 0.01 T
0.01
1.2
Sam le Info.
Resldts
mt7lien Unless edwwise
noted
Sample LO.
NUR#6
Waste Code:
ALS
Descrlptios:
Swine Lagoon US.
N
P R Ca
mg S
Fe Mn
Zn
Cu B
Mo Cl C
Total 315
IN -N
AW4
-NO3
OR-N
Urea
51.4 556 127 25.0 20.1 4.41 0.36 1.29 0.36 0.95
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li PH SS C•N
DM% CCE% ALE l
143 7.22
Recmmendwens:
Nutrients Aubble for Fir tot
ffis1IOW aUous
Odw Elements
1 5/.'O o auomS
Meibod
lrription
N P2D5 K20
1.3 0.69 4.5
Ca Mg S Fe
0.74 0.15 0.12 0.03
Mn Zn
T 0.01
Cu B Ma
T 0.01
Cl
Na Ni Gd
1.2
Pb Al Se Li

NCDA Affonomic Division
4300
Creek Road RddRh, NC 27607-6465
919 733-2655 Grower: Allred David L.
Re rt No: W07263 P 2
Sam Info,
LobwAwy Results per miftiu unless odmvise
noted
sample M.
1F#3
Waste Code;
ALS
Descriplim
Swine Lagwn Li .
N
P K Ca
MR
S Fe Mn
7.7, Cu B
mo G C
Total 393
IN N
NH4
403
OR-N
Urea
813 647 123 21.1 19.8 3.86 0.37 095 0.67 1.23
Na Ni Cd A Al Se Li PH SS C.•N
DM% CCE% ALE a!
171 7.39
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs/Xp00 allons
Odier Elements
as/1000
Application Mdtbod
Irrigation
N P205
1.6 1.1
K20 Ca Mg S Fe
5.2 0.72 0.12 0.12 0.02
Ma
T
zit Cu B Ma
0.01 T 0.01
Cl
Na Ni
1.4
Cd A Al Se Li

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, , NC 27607-6465 919 733-2655
Report
No: W04936 W
Grower.- Allred, David
Copiev To:
799 jasper Rd.
Robbins, NC 27325
E)
Fr�An�cwsteAnalysis
epart
Farm:63-2
12/29/04
Moore County
Sample Info.
Ldwratory Results
per million unless otherwise noted
Sample 1D.
A'
P K Cd AfS
Fe Mn Zn
Cu
B
Afo C1 C
GNUR
Total 331
70.5 672 158 29.6 70.1
4.66 0.46 1.14
0.40
1.10
IN -N
Waste Code:
-NH4
Na Ali ("d Pb Al
Se Li pH
SS
C.-N
DM% CCE% ALE(Kgal)
ALS
-NO3
Description:
OR-N
189
7.67
Swine Lagoon Li .
Urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs11000 gallons
Other Elements
lbs11000gallons
Application Method
N P205 KA)
Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu
B 'WO C1
Na
Ni Cd
Pb Al Se Li
Irrigation
1.4 0.94 5.4
0.92 0.17 0.41 0.03 T 0.01 T
0.01
1.6
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results
per million unless otherwise
noted
Sample 1D.
N
P K Ca
Afg
S Fe Mn Zn
Cu B
A10 (:1 C
NUR6
Waste Code:
ALS
Description:
Sine L oon Li .
Total 458
IN -N
-NH4
-NO3
OR-N
Urea
82.5 858 126
29.3
29.3 5.79 0.45 1.79
0.92 1.29
Na Ni (;(1 A Al Se Li P11 SS C.N
DM% CCL% ALE(K a!
211 TO
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs11000 gallons
Other Elements
lbs11000 galmou
.41)1Vication Method
Irrigation
N P205 Z20
1.9 I.1 6.9
Ca Mg S Fe
0.74 0.17 0.17 0.03
Mn
T
Zn Cu B MO Cl
0.01 0.01 0.01
Na Ni Cd
1.8
Pb Al Se Li

NCDA Agronomic Division
4300 Reedy Creek Road Ralcio, NC 27607-6465
919 733-2655 Grower:
Allred David
Report No: W04936 Pg 2
Sample info.
Laboratory Results
N
per million unless edierwise noted
P K Ca M
S Fe .kill
Zn
Cu B
WO Cl (:
Sample ID:
TL
Waste Code:
Us
Description:
Swine L m Li .
Touil 889
IN -N
-NH4
-NO3
OR-N
Urea
157 1223 160 23A
28.2 4.09 0.47
1-44
1.17 2.17
Na Ni (.'d A Al Se Li pH SS CA,
D34% C(E% il£(K gal)
303 7.88
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs11000 allows
Other Elements
M11000 allows
Applscation.Melbod
Irrigation
N P205 K20
3.7 2.1 9.8
Ca Mg S Fe Mn
0.94 0.14 0.1( 0.02 T
Zn Cu B Mo
0.01 0.01 0.01
Cl
Na 2W
2.5
Cd Pb Al Se Li

NCDA Agronov-
Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Ralei�, NC. 27607-rS (N } 733-2655
-
Report No: W00732 W
Grmrrer: Allred, David
Copies To:
799jasper Rd.
Robbins, NC 27325
� L
E
W.,.AnaiysisRa4,1ortFarm:
l
6 3-2
26 04
Moore County
Sam Ie Info.
Laborat Results per million unless otherwise noted
Sample M.
N
P K (;a S
Fe Mn Zn
Cu
B Mo CI C
LEST
TOMI 207
87.4 800 U9 36.3 19.4
3.60 0.51 1.09
0.36
1.06
IN -N
Waste Cade.
-NN9
ALS
NO3
Na Ni cd A AJ
Se Li- PH
SS
C.•N DM% CCU ALE al
229
7.65
Description:
OR-N
Swine Lagoon Li .
Urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First_ Crop
Ak II000 allm
Otber Elements Ibs1IOOO galkw
Appkcafion
N P2U5 920 Ca M& S Fe Mn Zn Cu
8 Ma CI
Na
Ni Cd Pb Al Se Di
Irrigation
0.86 1.2 6.4 0.81 0.21 0.11 0.02 T 0.01 T
0.01
1.9
Sample info.
I."r2WV Results
per million unless otherwise
acted
Sample ID:
NUR6
Wrote Cole:
ALS
Description:
Swine L n Li .
N
P !w Ca
-qg S
Fe Mn
Zn
Cu B
MO CI C
Total -422
IN -N
-NH4
-NO3
OR-N
Urea
txl.7 82f) 167 451 18.0 5.99 0.58 3.73 0.64 1.00
Na Ni cd A Al Se Ii PH SS C.N
DMA6 CCE% ALE X
229 7.53
Recommendations:
Nutrients Amilable for First Cro
Ibs/1000 fanow
Other Elements
I&II000gagons
pl" ion Method
Irrigation
N P205 X20
1.8 1.2 6.6
Ca Mg S Fe
0.98 0.26 0.10 0.03
Mn In
T 0.02
ca B MO
T 0.01
CI
Na Ni Cd
1.9
Pb Al Se Li

NCDA Apronomir Division
4300 Reedy
Creek Road Raleigh,NC 27607-6465 91-'
733-2655 Grover. Alfred David
Re R No: W04332 P 2
Sample Info.
Lalwatory Results per million tudess odmvise noted
Sample ID:
N
P K Ca Afg
S Fe Mn 7n
Cn B
MO CC
TFLOO
Waste Code:
ALS
Description:
Swine Lagoon Li .
TOW
IN-N
-NH4
-NO3
OR-N
Urea
655
112 940 127 22.9 21 A 4.59 0.52 1.62
1.28 1.37
Na IvY Cd Pb A/ Se Li pH S,S C:N
DM% CCE% :4LF K a
215 8.10
Recommendations:
Nutrients AvaRable for First Crop
lbs11000 jailow
Other Elements
1bs11OOOgaUuxs
.4ppl"tionMethod
Irrigation
N P205
2.7 1.5
R20 Ca Mg S Fe 34n Zn
7.5 0.71 0.13 0.12 0.03 T 0.01
CU B Mo C1
0.01 0.01
Na Ni
1.8
Cd Ph A/ Se Li
Sample Info.
12krAtory
Results s per million unless otherwise noted
Sample LO.•
N
P K Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn
CU
B
310 CI L'
NUR4
Waste Code:
ASS
Description:
Seine Lagoon Sludge
Total
IN N
-NH4
-NO3
OR-N
Urea
739
614 M6 951 196 276 385 18.5 215
58.2
0.45
Na Ni t'd A Al Se Li 11 SS C-N
DAM C(-' % ALE K al)
240 679
Recommendations:
!Nutrients Available for First Crop 1bs11000 allons
Other Elements
lbs/1000 gaUons
:lpplicationMethod
Broadcast
N
2.8
P205 K.)O Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu B MO Cl
8.2 7.1 5.6 1.2 1.6 2.3 0.11 1.3 0.34 T
Na
2.0
Ni Cd
Pb Al Se Li
me waste product contains large amounts of zinc and copper. Application rate should be based on crop nitrogen requirement unless one of these elements is restrictive.
the soil al application sites and limit Vplication of the waste product as needed to avoid excess accumulation of these elements.
Monitor accumulation of zinc and copper in

SOIL & WATER
CONSERVATION
Moore Soil & Water Conservation District
P.O. Box 908, 707 Pinehuret Ave., Carthe9e, N.C. 28327 • Phone: [phone], ext. 3 • Fax:[phone]
March 28, 2005
Division of Soil & Water Conservation
Attn: Mr_ Danny Edwards
Environmental Specialist
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Systel Bid,
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Dear Mr. Edwards,
On March 16, 2005, we received a copy of a routine animal operation site visit for facility
number 63-2, Allred Farms. The report stated that an application violation had occurred
during November of 2004 on land planned for wheat, but never planted. The purpose for
this letter is to verify Mr. Allreds reasons for not planting wheat following the application
of waste in the required 30 day period.
On November 1, 2004, construction began on a new swine lagoon on Allred Farms. The
lagoon was planned to be installed in 1997, but due to the passage of House Bill 515, a
permit for construction was denied by James K. Leumas P.E., State Dam Safety
Engineer. Lagoon construction was in an area which served as the only access for
planting and harvest equipment to the cropland spray fields. Due to construction delays
from various reasons, an access road to the cropland was not installed until the 14th of
December, which is well past the recommended seeding date in piedmont soils. Mr.
Allred has a long term no till contract under the USDA Environmental Quality Incentives
Program on the spray fields. He plans to plant corn on the fields as soon as possible to
replace the planned wheat crop.
Through past experiences with Mr. Allred, we do not feel that the violation was intended,
but a combination of events beyond his control. Please feel free to give us a call if you
have any questions concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
Ke in Williams
District Conservationist
cc: Todd Bennett, Division o Water Qualit f
Tiatriii A IlrPrl %..� w w i Yia w. '7 w,s

Williams, Kevin - Carthage, NC
From: Hansard, Roger - Raleigh, NC
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 10:16 AM
To: Williams, Kevin - Carthage, NC
Subject: Nitrogen uptake
Kevin,
From the information I have available and a discussion with Dr. Jim Green, Professor in
the Crop Science Department at NCSU, I believe Poa annua takes up nitrogen at the same
rate that other frequently used cool season forages do. This belief is based on leaf
composition analysis and similar growth patterns. Our fertilization recommendation for
other cool season grasses such as Tall Fescue, Orchardgrass or Kentucky Bluegrass is 50
lbs, of nitrogen for each expected ton of dry matter accumulation (growth). Poa annua
does not produce a lot of forage (dry matter) each year. Typically where found in North
Carolina with a full stand and adequate fertilization it will produce about 500 lbs. of
dry matter annually. This would represent about 12-13 lbs. of nitrogen removal from the
soil when applied as fertilizer regardless of the source.
Roger Hansard
Water Quality Specialist

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: David Allred
Location: 5 miles North of Robbins, N.C. left side of N.C. Hwy. 705
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Wean -to -Feeder and Finishing
Number of Animals: 6953 wean -to -feeder and 2360 finishing
(Design Capacky)
The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of
surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the
amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be
applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all
plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the
fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they
have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5
tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to
10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not
allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce
the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this
type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques,
preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

WASTE UTIL-IZATION-PL-AN
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
6 9 53 animals x .0056 (ac.-in/animal/year) waste = __ 3 8.9 4 _ ac.-in. of waste/year.
2 3 G O animals x .028 (ac.-inJanimal/year) waste O?j ac.-in. of wastelyear.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF WASTE: I ©S. C) 2: ACRE -INCHES of WASTE/YEAR
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen AN) Produced Per Year
5-7 B i animals x 1 _lbs. PAN/animal/year = [0 4 q lbs. PAN/year.
l l 6 4- animals x I q lbs. PAN/animal/year = 2 21 z lbs. PAN/year.
Z 3 6 O animals x `7 lbs. PAN/animal/year = J 6 614, )lbs. PAN/year
TOTAL PAN PER YEAR 3 1, 8 5 5 LBS.
(PAN from N.C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the
waste in a timely manner. The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Table 1:.ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract
#
Field
#
Soil
Type
Crop
Lbs. N*
Per Ac.
Acres
Lbs. N
Utilized
Month of
Application
(RYE)
S EE. A
A CH ED
SH E E T
S
2

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land)
(See Required Specification 21)
Tract
#
Field
#
Soil
Type
Crop
Lbs. N*
Per Ac.
Acres
Lb3. N
Utilized
Month of
Application
* See Footnote for Table 1.
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM ABOVE TABLES
ACRES Lbs. N Ufilized
Table 1
102.2 r0,3571, o
Table 2 1 J3.7 25. 2(o7, V
TOTAL 2 5 5 9 A +- L (018.0
Amount of N Produced 31, BEE. 0
Surplus o elicit 94763,
WHEAT FOt_LOVQEf� -BY GRAIN] SORGuuM
3

Tract
#
Field
#
Soil
Type Crop
Lbs. N*
Per Ac.
Lbs. N
Acres Utilized
Month of
Application
50
Ge.$
\w
. (RYE)
40x2,4=9(.
89
OCT- Noy -
FEg- APPLI.
FESCOE
4)tso -zoo
IA-
2 so
sFPT.-Nbv.
F.- ApwL,
3
G- e,
IAEA7
40 x2.
4- 3
413
©c-T, -N Ov.
FES.-APR.1L
HEAT
45Kz.4=168
130
5
NAB
V`rHEAT
45x2.4=108
.Q
21G
EW
!_AND
7
Lq B
» EAT
40 x 2.4
19,0
1 S 2 4
2
L3B
HEAT
40x2.4= 4
2-7.0
z59Z
3
Go C
HEAT
35x2.4= 84
13 Q
109 z
545
?
Go C
H 'EAT
3 S x 2. 4= g.
1 3 .
1 o 4 2
2
H O B
W HF_PT
*5 xz.4= rog
7?_
3
L3 B
\4 H EaT
3.0
z g
! 02.2-
9,77L0

Tract
#
Field
#
Soil
Type Crop
Lbs. N*
Per Ac.
Lbs. N Month of
Acres Utilized. Application
218
�
fv0.�
SQY8EFINS
(RYE).
2-7x 4 = I0$� ?_• 270 MAX ULY
SoY6EAN3
127X 4- 8(04
3
GeB
SoYSOgNS
30x4- I2a 0 160
3
j� c,.Zi
So raEANS
2.7 x.4 = 10a 8, 0, 864
4-
SoY6ERO S
Zix 4 108 4,0 43 2
6
�aD
ISoyeEROS
27)t4= lO8 4,Z 454
505
'1
G e g
SOYe EaIJ S
30)(+ 120 6.2- 744
2
Nc,B
5oY3EANS
3Ox4 = Iz© 9.0 IOQyd
Ge.B
SoYf3ERN5
3Ox 4 =1z0 59 708
50(b
G _ B
So' [GEANS
30X.4= IZO 5.1 (n12
G� B
SOYBEANS
3ok4 = IZ0 $, Z 9184
SO
1
GoC_
SoYSEAtAS
20x4= SO 8-..0 480
?
Lg B
SOYBEANS
35x4 yf40 1 i.0 ?80
Z
NC,..B
SOYSEA0S
3dx4= !20 12.0 144a
e49
?
Ge B
SoYSEANS
30x4 = f z0 B, 4 1048
1
Cho.-j
SoY13EANs
z7x4 = f 2© 4$''
854-
2
Ge B
5oYBEFN5
30-04 =110
1199
1
GeB
Sor'BERtis
30 x4 = I ZQ 18. 2I (106
153.7 1 g, uz�,
Succ-r T?cjican 17 _iz - �....., 1, r%

Tract
#
Field
#
Soil
Type Crop'
Lbs. N*
Per Ac.
Lbs. N
Acres Utilized
Month of
Application
503
i
Ge 13
G 2 + N
SoRGHuAN
(RYIE)
60 75
9, 3
(q
MAY- Sur_Y
2
o. B
FI sCuE
50 = zoo
I , 4
2 0
sErr.- Nov.
i` E8. -A Piu
Ga SaRWAnn
�u0
�7s
4,3
�22
MaY -
:ruLy
5oR( IH U AN
5O 102. 5
1' Z
-7 5
SoRgI U
50
aNEW
125
LAND
'�
4
G �A,
aRGUUnn
45 56
2
LOB
Gag
5
Z�•
i5 2
3
G o C
GmRiN
SnRGHVM
5 G�. 5
�3" 0
g7
I
Go C
�o G� N1,
54 7. 5
! 3 . a877
2
N �, $
Gkp lw
So G
50 Gz. 5
�•
5 2
3
L
Grzr��N
SORGHU
4S 5L
3"
I s�
! i0v
J 02.2.
6 55Q,
GR,R IN SORGHUM = EO L 85./e U.
N1TR.dGEN RATE = 2. 5 Las/ CwT.

Tract
#
Field
#
Soil
Type Crop
Lbs. N* Lbs. IV
Per Ac. Acres Utilized
Montt, of
Aglication
2 i 8
�•�
Ca RN
(RYE)
Szxl,?.=194
246 APRIL JvLY
Zxr.z= 98.4 8.0 787 '
CORN
82. ,Z- 96.4 810 787
4-
9r,1?
CORN
82xr,2= 9g,4 4,a 394
rs aD
CaRN
a x1.z = �a.4 4.Z 413
5'05
I
GeB
C0PN
95x+,z = 114 G.2- 70i
2
No,B
CC)pi f
90x1.2-- IOB 9.0 �72.
3
GeB
C0Rn1
q5x+z- 1i9- -59 G7.3
s0�o
GeB
CcRh1
95k1.z = 114 5. 1 5B I
Z
GeB
Co(z-N
95xka = 1Iq a. a 93 5
513
?
GoC
CoP_tj
70x+.z= E34- 8_0 504
1
L8 B
CoRN
9Qx1,z = Io8 -7.0 75(
2-
H c.-B
cm�
90xl.7_= 108
12.0 1 z9 G
844
1
Ge B
CaR A
9 xr.2 = ]I+
9 S"8
1
N a1)
CORN
gz�l,2 - 98.4
8 Z 807
a54-
2
Ge B
CORN
95xr.z= I I +
254 asso
1199
1
GeB
Co1�.N
95x,.z- 114-
18.E 205�
SISr CT fl_..,r_., .- ." -

Tract
##
•Fleld
#
Soil
Type
Crop
Lbs. N*
Per Ac.
Acres
Lhs. N
Utc'iized
Month of
Application
G rj
SOR4HuNA
41
(RYE)
5 f
128 +MAY-,7uLY
2
}�TU
f~
G{2A10
so "Urn
41'
Si
��0
���
3
Ge B
50 AGMurn
�O
7S
600
IS aT)
o Ft H OM
41
5(
®'.0'
408
¢
cipSORGI-+0 M
41
T
�', Q
Z o4
6
A&D
GMRIt-1
5oRG4�UM
�-
5
4.Z
214
505,GeB
GRA,a
sot Hurh
60
465
2
NaB
So RGNUrn
50
6Z.5
4, 0
51a3
$ORG'r um
60
75
59
442
50 (0
1
GeB
So AcrHO rn
6Q
. -75
I
3 Z
Z
G: g
SoRGHUm
GO
75
8
CAI 5
1
G 0 C
SoRG vr�
54
�o?. S
..a
445
1
L 3 B
s� i'1�� rn
45
56
7' . O
3
2-
N G.B
GRAt nl
SaRGKum
50
62.5
12.0
750
849
7
GeB
s RG-Hum
60
75
630
G (RA 10
o GRU
41
Si
8• Z
41g
854
z
GeB
s R u rn
bd
5
25: 0
1875
I199
g
GKAI1J
so RG Rum
Go
75
18.0
135
GRAIN SORGHUM = 501.es./au.
NrTRoGF-N RATE ' 2.5L8s,f CWT•

Tract
#
Field
#
Soil
Type Crop
Lbs. N*
Per Ac.
Lbs. N
Acres Utilized
Month of
Application
503
1
Ge.$
SoYSEWaS
(RYE)
3ax4= ZO
9.3
111(o
mA,4-i,Ly
2
Na$
FESCUE
�x = �
1, 4
Z O
SEr�r. - N©�•
FE.-A PJL
3
Cie B
SoyBEANS
30y+= zo
SIG
MAY -.TUB..
4
t40.8
So s
30x4= 1zv
�
4
5
N &B
SoYaE.ANS
30x = 1 -0
�• C3
z40
NEW
LAND
Lq B
So 4EANS
3Sxq-= 4-0
!�•
2(0� Q
2
�- B
So n15
35n4 = 140
27. ©
3790
3
Go C
SaY(3EANS
20X4 = 0
13. 0
I01-0
Go C
5nY8SINS
204 = a O
r 3. Q
1040
�IA,
50YBFkWS
30x =120
1060
3
L B
SOYBEANS
-s q- 146
3.0
+ Z 0
f t�2.2
12 3 1b.0
C..--". •D—i-- I D—L i.. -'%—^ sores

Lbs. N*
Lbs. N
i
Month of
Tract
Field
Soil
#
#
Type
Crap
Per Ac.
Acres
Utilized
Application
'
(RYE)
:
Ge $
9gx1.2 = 114
9.3
064
JoLY
0. B
FESCOE
4x50 zoo
1
Seer. - o%t.
FEB. - Pay
3
G e, B
C�fZti]
45xI.2=114
4,3
490
APR..TUL
4
�a B
Cararl _
94Xi.z= lob
��
� zq
5
o. B
COP-N
9a x1,2= 108
2.0
E
LAND
1
L [3
CoRr�
goxl,z08
19,0
Zo52
{
2
L
CaR�j
�Oxf.2= f o8
27. O
z 9 I
3
Gc
Caps
545
i
Go C
Carr
70xf-2- 84
13,0
1 d9
2
NAB
CaRr�
90x1.Z-108
1 97z
3
L B
Ca
901Lr.Z = )OR
3.0
324
1oZ. z
10,�23,4
SMEE T
R�vtSEp 12,12�7rw, u-..

Tract
#
held
#
Soil
Type Crap
Lbs. N* Lbs. N Montb of
Per Ac. Acres Utilized Application
(RYE) OCT.- - N 0q.
Z.4=96.4 F e.—APRJL
xz.4=48. B.® -767
3
G e_B
H 4�R7
40 x Z. 4= 9(� 768
3
tSa-
uEi\,
41xz.4=9a.4 8.a 79
Q-
r.:D
1 4EAT
4lx2.4 = 78.4 4,0
�o
�aD
11JHEAT
41x2.4- Q8. 4.2 413
.SOS
1
G e B
A HF-AT
40 x RA 6.2 SI 5
2
Na,B
HERT
45xz,t-= Iob 9.0 9-7Z
3
Ge.B
AEAT
4oxz.4 = 96 s9 SG(.
50 ry
'�
G e B
m E P,-r
4 o x 9 �, 5.1 49 0
2
Ge B
W i,1E.RT
40 x2.4 = quo 8. 2. -79 7
513
7
G0C
1414ER7
35x�.4= 84 8.0 50`}"
?
Lg B
`7. O G 7
2_
N
NEAT
45x2., - 1Z,0
1Z9G
844
1
Ge B
V°1 4AEkT
4ox2.4= q6 6.4
So(.
1
N0.`D
vkF_PAT
41x2.4 =98.4 g. 2
ao7
85 y-
2
Ge. BI
H EFT
44x2,4-= 96 25 0.
zoo©
1199
1
G,. B
\4 H EAT
Ors x7.4 18,0
1728 .
IT3._7
15, d 16,

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
Field No.
Acres
Soil Type
Crop
Maximum
Application Rate
( In./Hr.)
Maximum application
amount per irrigation
Inches
T EOB
9 3
13. G
Ge
WHr-raT, SOYBEANS
c0aN,SORCrkUM
-
o.sa 0._75
z
1.4
FE5GUE
0. 40
o.$o - 0,7s
I
"T� 5
4,S
3•Z
�� II n
fV0.T?,
NH�iT, SOY N
caP'N,sOR1r4UM
040
Q � 75
IIJEW 1-AN-0
/I
4+0,�
T�
L 13
WHEA-T,SGY@EAr4S,
C.ORrJ SORGHUM
0.Z0
0.50--0.75
313,0
Go C
W HEAT, SoYSE.,K11Ms,
CQk.1J SOaGHunn
©35
0.50 `0 75
TMS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE 1S NOT BEING APALIED BY IRRIGATION, HOW EVER, A SIMILAR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for 1180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every (o MONTHS. In no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed the level of the start pump marker.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
The landowners facilities have the required volume for 180 days of temporary storage. Effluent
from the operation will be applied to approximately 266 acres of cropland. The landowner uses a
double crop rotation using wheat, corn, soybeans, and grain sorghum. The cropping sequence
that would use the least PAN would be wheat followed by grain sorghum. This is what is shown
in the summary of tables 1 and 2 on page 3 of this plan. The landowner will be applying effluent
with an irrigation system and with a honey wagon. On the fields that have irrigation, the honey
wagon will be used to cover the areas that the irrigation system does not cover to make
maximum use of the land available. Sludge will need to be removed from the system every 5-10
years. This plan does not cover sludge removal. When removal is needed, a waste analysis will
be run on this material and a waste utilization plan will be prepared.
4

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
Illegal discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day
by the Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he
shall provide NRCS with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a
landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land
for waste application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions,
and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict' the rate of
application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RS)
or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be
no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used
where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers"
required by DEM. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) _
- Riparian Forest Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding. [See "Weather and Climate in North
Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.]
W

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATION
T. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall not be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that no
more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should
be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop
on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance
may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter
strips are present. [See Standard 393 - Filter Strips]
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist." Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
0

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
18.If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist
should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for
direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct
human consumption it should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall
be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be
required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate - determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitered
and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive
levels. Ph shall be adjusted for optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and
waste analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste application records for all
other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
F7

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
NAME OF FARM: AL LMr> FA ems
OWNER/MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the
existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction
of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24
hour storm. The approved plan will be filled on -site at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for
review by DEM upon request.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: 'DAV 1D L • A LLRED
(Please print)
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please Print) N Q CQ ERLT T PAT E 4 9 .
Affiliation: N RCS
Address (Agency): (c0 0 WEST i N N E S 51
5AL1s C3UR,Y , N. C. 28 !44
Signature: W .. Date: (o - 8 - 19
8

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
source: Cause IIMI's to Miulalize odor Site Specific Practiecs
Fannslcad + Swine production rg \— Vegelalive or wooded buffers;
1!1 Recommended best management practices;
�A Good judgment and common sense
Animal body surfaces • fairly manure -coveted animals `fti7 Dry floors
flour sm Gres • We[ manure -cowered floors Slolted floors;
Walerers located over slolled floors;
C1 Feeders at high end of solid floors;
Scrape manure buildup from floors;
CI Unllerflanr venlilalion for drying
t.l.nraoe: cullcclioll pits • thine; 19 Frequent mauurc removal by flush, pil recharge,
r I':ulial microbial deconiposillon or scrape;
llndcrfloorvenlilaliou tNISNIN�. F,.Oc*$
Veillilaliurr CXl6i sl l;aau 0 Vol;rlilc gases; `q Ian ilia inlenancc;
Dust "6 I.fficienl air oaovenlcnl
Inituor snr f,lte
Ihist
T•1
waslydntivn between groups of animals;
t�ccd additives;
\f1
Fecdercovers;
'El
Feed delivery downspout cxlcndci.% In feeder
covers
1-11INIL r�uil. , J
Agitation of recycled lagoon
0
Flush lank covers;
liiiuid while larks are filling
Exlend fill lines to near bollonl oflaut:s wish
ailli-siphon vents
1'lu�h alleys
0 Ai;ilalion during Wastewater
Underfloor flush Willi undcrflucar ve:ulilalion FINISNING Ff4oks
conveyance
I'ir r1:4h.u1;C poiuls
• Agitation ofiecyeled lagoon
n
Extend recharge: lines to near honuarr ol,pils
liquid While pits arc filliuu
Willi anti -siphon vents
hit Suiriolls 0 Agilation during swop Durk n Sump hark covers
filling and drawdowu
(lulyillc +Irwin collccliun • Agitation ehrring waslc%valcr n llox covers
or junction huxes cunveyauce
Ahltlf: - November 11, 1996, rage 3

Source
Cause
lamps to Minimize Odor Silt Specific Practices '
End of drainpipes al
.
Agitation during wastewater
Extend discharge point of pipes undentcalli
lagoon
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surG)ces
•
Volatile gas emissions;
Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
•
biological mixing;
Correct lagoon startup procedures;
•
Agitation
\C]
""M
Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
l9
Minimum agitation when.plimping;
0
Mechanical aeration;
n
Proven biological additives
If igalion sprinkler
a
I ligh pressure agitation;
Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
tsnuh
.
Wind drift
'A
Miltinunn reco{nnlended operating pressure;
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
Pump frnln second -stage lagoon
Sl,aagu lank or kisin
0
Partial rnicrnbiai decomposition;
n
!lotion, or midlevel loading;
!.III Lice
•
Mixing while filling;
Cl
Tank covers;
Agitation when emplying
[y
Basin surface mats of solids;
CI
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Sct)ling b:luin sill I'aE:C
0
Partial ruicrubial deeoulposilion;
Cl
Extend drdiupipe outtels ))n(Icrnealh iilluid
•
Mixing While filling;
level;
•
Agitation when cnq)lying
n
Remove sellled solids regularly
Manure, slurry nr sludge
•
Agitation when spreading;
D
Soil injcclion of slnnyisludges;
spreader oulicts
.
Volatile gas emissions
�'p
Wash residual manure from spreader after usc;
l Jncuverc,l ruauillc, Volatile gas emissions while
shirr), or sludge oil field drying
sill J:Ices
Ocall Carcass Ilectunposilinn
I leaf :uluu:ll di:;posal Carcass [lecolllpUslllllu
11ib
IncinGl:+t,n; • IncunlplLtc canlblislinn
n Proven bioingical additives Or nxillanls
Cl Soil injcclion ofshlrry/sludges
I-] Soil incorporation within 48 hrs.;
Spread ill thin uniforn, layers for rapid drying;
n Proven biological additives or oxid:ulls
11roper lhsposllion of carcasses
fl Complew covering of carcasses in burial piss;
n Proper location/cnnstnlction ofdispnsal Ails
fl Secondary slack boilers
AMO( snlher 11. 1996, Page 4

Source Cause IIMI's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Praclices
Standing %vater around • improper drainage; Grade and landscape such that wafer drains
I�cii'tie' • Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
h1:uuire Irack-ed onto • Poorly maintained access roads farm access road maintenance
public roads front farm
access
Additional Information:
Swine Manure Managentepl ; 0100 I(uIdBMP Packet
Swine Production Dann Potential Odor Sources and Remedies ; FBAC Facl Sheet
Swine Prucluclion Facility Manure Management: Pit Rccllarge - Lagoon Treatment ; E61AE 129-88
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor flush - Lagoon Trealment ; ERA 129-88
1-agoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
Calibration of Manure anti Wastewater Application Egnipmenl ; CIlAC I -act Sheet
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; 11111-33
Etivirtmfnctoal Assurance Program ; NPI,C Manual
Dlitiuns for Managing Otlor ; a report from the Swine Odor Task force
Nuisance Concents in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; P110I07, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Available From :
NCSII, Gninly Extension Center
NCSII - RAE
NCSII - BA
NCSti - IIAIi
NCSi I - BA
NCSII - BA1;
NCSI I - Swine FXICnSitttl
NC Pall: Producers Assoc
NCSII Agri Cnnnnunicaliotts
Florida C'uoperative Extt:nsintt
Ah1(W - I luvcndbci 11. 1996. hige 5

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Suui cc fiuiisc 1111111's Io Cnn11'nl Insects Site Specific I'raclices
l:lllsll Chillers Accumulation of solids b Flush syslew is designer) and operaled
sufficiently In remove accun{nlaled solids front
\_ gulters as designed.
�l Remove bridging of accumlllilled solids ill
rliscl{arge
Lagoons and fits Cnisled Solids Maintain lagoons, sellling basins and pill where
pest breeding is apparent to n{in'imize Ike
cnlsling of solids to a depth of no more limit b -
8 inches over more than 30% of surface.
EACeSstve Vcgclalivc • Decaying vegelation "6I
Mailllaill vcgelativr cnalrnl along hanks of
[ it u�L dt
lagoons and [ether impoundments to prevent
acculnlllation ofdecaynlg vegetative mailer
along walees edge oil impountinietil's perillleh:r.
Dry Systems
Deed Spillage n
Design, operille and nrlinlain feud systuills (e.g.,
bunkers and (roughs) to minintize Ilic
accuuullalion of decaying waslage.
fl
Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer; I5-30 day interval
during wimer).
—Feed $Itbiaj le Accumulalions.if feed residues f_1
RCLIi1CC illoisiilre accinnulalion within and
around i inur diale pedincler of Iecd storage
areas by iiisuriug drainageaway from site
-
an(Vwr Ilrnviding;iduquale cun[ainulenl (e.g., —
cuvered bill for brewer's grain and similar high
moislure train producls).
n
Inspect for and rcino a or lu eak lip accimmi sled
solids in litter strips arrnuul feed slllrage as
llcedull.
ARIIV - t`luvcnncci 11, 096, Page l

Sisurrc -
Animid Ifoldin g Areas
b
Y - - Cause
Accumulations ofanimal wastes Q
DKIPs to Control Insects-
Sile Sllccifir !'r actiecs�
Eliminate low areas Illal rap maishtre along
and feed wastage
fences and other locations where waste
accnmulales and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
❑
Maintain fence rows and filler'slrips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
flry Unune I l:uulling
5ystetlls
Accumulations ofaniulal wastes fl
needed}_
Remove spillage an a routine basis c. 7 - 10
6.
day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
daring winter) where mamlre is loaded fur land
application or disposal.
[I
Provide for adequate drainage around nu mire
slockpiles.
1=1
Inspecl for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around slackpiles au11
Manure handlipig areas as needed.
For more inlclnuatiun contacl
Italeigh, NC, 27695-7613.
die Coollcralive Extension Service, Department of rntorltnlogy, Box 7613, North Carolina Slalc I h6ver5ity,
11. 1996,
l'age 2

fortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
=j Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 34 hours after
knowNdae of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water. `
,Q
Rendering at a rendering plant Iicensed under G.S. 106-I63.7
Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only, piacing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture `
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)

4 s
Incident Report
Report Number: 200603659
Incident Type: Complaint
Category: Animal
Incident Started: 11107/2006
County: Moore
City:
Farm #:
Responsible Party:
Owner:
Permit: AWS630002
Facility: Allred Farms
First Name: David
Middle Name: L
Last Name: Allred
Address 799 Jasper Rd
City/State/Zip: Robbins NC 2732572
Phone:
Material Category: Estimated City: UOM
On -Site Contact:
FirsttMidlLast Name:
Company Name:
Phone:
Pager/Mobile Phone: /
Reported By:
FirsYMid/Last Name:
Company Name:
Address:
City/State/Zip:
Phone:
Pager/Mobile Phone: 1
Chemical Name Reportable City. lbs. Reportable City. kgs.
DD:MM:SS Decimal Position Method:
Latitude: Position Accuracy:
Longitude: Position Datum:
Location of Incident: Application fields .5 mile from 705 on Jasper Rd. (34 miles north of Robbins)
Address: Jasper Rd
City/StateOp Robins NC 00000
Report Created 11/08/06 07:21 AM
Page 1

4 1.
Cau"10bservation:
Reported that sludge from swine lagoon being land applied to
field during rein. 6:30am to g:l)Oam on 41-7 farmer was
observed spreading sludge during rain. Caller also indicated that
materiel was seen getting Into the creek.
Action Taken:
Incident Questions:
Did the Material reach the Surface Water? Unknown
Surface Water Name?
Did the Spill result in a Fish Kill? Unknown
If the Spilt was from a storage tank indicate type.
Containment? Unknown
Cleanup Complete? Unknown
Water Supply Wells within 1500ft : Unknown
Directions:
Comments:
Conveyance:
Estimated Number of fish?
(Above Ground or Under Ground)
Groundwater Impacted : Unknown
Event Type Event Date due Date Comment
Incident closed
Requested Additional Information
Report Entered 2006-11-08 07:19:36
Referred to Regional Office - Primary Contact 2006-11-08 07:18:00
Report Created 11/08/06 07:21 AM Page 2

Incident Start
Report Received
Standard Agencies Notified:
Agency Name Phone
Other Agencies Notified:
Agency Name Phone
2006-11-07 04:40:00
2006-11-07 04:40:00
First Name M.I. Last Name Contact Date
First Name M.I. Last Name Contact Date
DWQ Information:
Report Taken By: Report Entered By: Regional Contact:
Stephen A Barnhardt Stephen A Barnhardt Ricky Revels
Phone:
DatelTime: 2006-11-07 04:40:00 PM 2006-11-08 07:19:36 AM 2006-11-08 07:18:00 AM
Referred Via: Phone
Did DWQ request an additional written report?
If yes, What additional Information Is needed?
Report Created 11/08/06 07:21 AM Page 3

Waste Structure Cleanout Plan
11-01-2006
This plan has been prepared for:
Allred Farms
David Allred
799 Jasper Rd,
Robbins, NC 27325
[phone]
This plan has been developed by:
Kevin Williams
NRCS/Moore SWCD
PO Box 908
Carthage, NC 28327
[phone] ext.
Developer
Type of Plan: Waste Structure CleanOut Plan
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this cleanout plan.
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
//- /- oL
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved 4
I
Technical pecialist Signature Dal
U
276520 Database Version 3,1 Date Printed: 1 l-61-2066 Cover Page 1

Narrative
This plan will cover the removal of sludge from lagoon 49. The sludge will be applied to the following:
Tract 545 Fields 1,2&3 and Tract 888 Fields 1,4&6. Following sludge application, all fields will be
planted (no till) in wheat.
....... -- ---. __......... ........ _..
Preview Database Version 3.1 pate Printed: 11-01-2006 Narrative Page Page 1 of 1

Waste Storage Cleanout Source Description
SOURCE: Lagoon # 9 Sludge Cleanout
Date Measured: 11-28-2005
Lagoon Dimensions: TOP - 140 X 93; BOTTOM - 103 X 70; SIDE SLOPES - 3:1
Sludge Depth: 4.00ft.; Sludge Volume: 404,189 gallons. Waste Sample #: W02681
Estimated Plant Available Nitrogen
Applic. Method
(1bs N11000 gallons)
Source Total Obs)
Broadcast
5.58
2256
Incorporated
6.65
2688
Injected
7.13
2880
Irrigated
5.23
2112
Maximum PAN
Available (lbs.) `
Actual PAN Applied
(Ibs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
2,256
3,240
-984
580,523
-176,334
* Maximum- PAN Available is calculated on the basis of the actual application methods) identified in the plan for this source.
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-01-2006 Desc. 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are
also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate, The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if
the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
Ll
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
Removal
(Ibs/acre)
Applicd
(lbsracre)
545
1
13.00
13.00
Medium
N/A
Goldston
Wheat, Grain
38 bu.
19
N/A
545
2
9.
9.
Low
N/A
Nason
Wheat, Grain
48 bu.
24
N/A
$45
3
3.
3.
Low
NIA
Li um
Wheat, Grain
48 bu.
24
N/A
888
1
7.11
7.11
Medium
2.0
Georgeville
Wheat, Grain
59 bu
30
NIA
888
4
12.01
12.01
Low
2.0
Geor eville
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
30
N/A
888
6
4.8
4.82
Medium
41 0
Nason
Wheat, Grain
48 bu.
24
N/A
PLAN TOTALS: 48.94 48.94
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
�= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<= 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples
> 10
are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778),
and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
PLAT Index
Rating
P Management Recammendatlon
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
25 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
100
Very High
Starter P application only
276529 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 11/1/2006
NOTE: Symbol • means user entered data.
PCs Page Page I of 1

Land Application Table: Lagoon # 9 Sludge Cleanout Source Type: Cleanout
Manure
PAN
PAN
Liquid
Req d
Applied
Manure
Crop
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
Applied
Applic.
Source
Total
Use.
PLAT
Applic.
low
Amount(inches)
0°�
Applic.
Tract
Field
ID
Soil Series
Acres
Acres
Rating
g
Crop
P
RYE
Period
Method
N
N
gal/Acre
545
1
U3
Goidston
13.00
13.00
Medium
Wheat, Grain
38 bu.
9/14/30
Broad.
91
60
10.75
0.40
545
2
U3
Nason
9.00
9.00
Low
Wheat, Grain
48 bu.
911-4/30
Broad.
93
61
10.93
0.40
545
3
U3
Lignum
3.00
3.00
Low
Wheat, Grain
48 bu.
9114/30
Broad.
93
61
10.93
0.40
888
1
U3
Georgeville
7.11
7.11
Medium
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4130
Broad.
114
75
13.44
0.49
888
4
U3
Georgeville
12.01
12.01
Low
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
Broad.
114
75
13.44
0.49
888
6
U3
Nason
4.82
1 4.82
Medium
Wheat, Grain
48 bu.
9/1 4/30
Broad.
93
61
10.93
0.40
Lagoon # 9 Sludge Cleanout Summary:
Source Volume Available:
Source Volume Applied
Excess Application Capacity:
NOTE: • indicates user defined value
404,189 gals.
580,523 gals.
4<3.6 %
276529 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: i 1/12006 LAT Page Page 1 of 1

Lagoon sludge often contains high concentrations of zinc and copper. High levels of these metals in soils can adversely affect plant growth. The following table provides a
conservative (maximum potential) estimate for increase in soil index values. * Due to inherit variability of waste and soil sampling, it is recommended that conservative soil
target levels be set for copper (e.g. Cu-I < 700-1000) and zinc (e.g. Zn-1 < 300 for land where peanuts may be grown; for other cropland Zn-I < 700-1000). Alternative
application sites should be selected if the following table indicates that concentrations of these metals may approach excessive levels. For maximum copper and zinc soil index
limits, see the NRCS Nutrient Management Standard (Code 590).
Estimated Soil Metal Concentrations
Tract
Field
Soil Sample
Crop
Source
11)
Applic,
Inches
Waste
Cu ppm
Waste
Zn ppm
Soil Test
Cu-I
Soil Test
Zn-I
Cu-1
Adj.
Zn-I
Adj.
Estimated New
Number
Date
Soil Cu-I
Soil Zn-I
545
1
2449C
07-06-05
Wheat, Grain
U3
0.40
46
71
404
363
117
90
521
453
545
2
545-2
07-13-05
Wheat, Grain
U3
0.40
46
71
685
725
117
90
802
815
545
3
545-3
07-13-05
Wes, Grain
U3
0.40
46
71
485
446
117
90
602
536
888
1
888-1
11-08-05
Wheat, Grain
U3
0.49
46
71
47
25
143
111
190
136
888
4
09637
11-08-05
Wheat, Grain
U3
0-49
46
71
73
44
143
111
216
155
888
1 6
1 09637
1 11-16-05
t, Grain
U3
1 0.40
46
71
15
73
117
90
274
163
......................... - - _ .. ­ ---- -- - -............................. --..-------------------- --- .------------------------------- ---..-..-----------------------------------------------
• NOTE: The equilibrated post application soil index may be less than the projected maximum value. Practical methodology for more precise estimation is not available.
276529 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-01-2006 Metals Page Page 1 of 1

GENERAL LAGOON CLEANOUT INFORMATION:
Cleanout Start Date: 10-30-2006
Cleanout End Date: 11-10-2006
276529 Date Printed: 11-01-2006 Info Page I

NCANAT Version: 1.87
PLAT Results For: Moore 11/6/2006 10:10:51 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
2006
County:
Moore
Producer Identifier:
ALLREDDA
Tract Number:
545
Field Number:
1
Soil Series:
GoC: Goldston very channery
silt loam, 2 to 15 percent
slopes
Crop:
Wheat (Grain) : Conservation
Tillage - high residue
BMPs:
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width =
50 ft.
Fertilizers:
Swine -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount:
11 1000 gal
Lb P205:
12.5 lb
Application Method:
All other surface
applications
Soil Loss:
1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance
50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
98
WV Factor (USER)
1.24
Soil Test 28" - 32"
8
WV Factor (DATABASE)
1.1
Artificial Drainage System:
NO
Hydrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 16
LEACHATE P — 3
SOURCE P = 23
TOTAL P RATING = 42 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Version: 1.87
PLAT Results For: Moore 11/6/2006 10:11:25 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2006
County: Moore
Producer Identifier: ALLREDA
Tract Number: 545
Field Number: 3
Soil Series: LgB: Lignum silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes
Crop; Wheat (Grain) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
BMPs: Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Fertilizers: Swine -Lagoon sludge
Yearly Applied Amount: 11 1000 gal
Lb P205: 12.5 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil Loss: 1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 58
WV Factor (USER) 1.18
Artificial Drainage System: NO
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 5
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 18
TOTAL P RATING = 23 (LOW)

NCANAT Version: 1.87
PLAT Results For: Moore 11/6/2006 10:11:56 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
2006
County:
Moore
Producer Identifier:
ALLREDA
Tract Number:
545
Field Number:
2
Soil Series:
NaB: Nason silt loam, 2 to 8
percent
slopes
Crop:
Wheat (Grain) : Conservation
Tillage
- high residue
BMPs:
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width =
75 ft.
Fertilizers:
Swine -Lagoon sludge
Yearly Applied Amount:
11 1000
gal
Lb P205:
12.5 lb
Application Method:
All other surface
applications
Soil Loss: 1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 35
WV Factor (USER) 1.13
Artificial Drainage System: NO
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P - 1
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 17
TOTAL P RATING = 18 (LOW)

NCANAT Version: 1.87
PLAT Results For: Moore 11/6/2006 10:12:37 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 411
WV Factor (USER)
Artificial Drainage System:
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 5
SOLUBLE P = 4
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 18
INPUTS
2005
Moore
David Allred
888
6
NaD: Nason silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Wheat (Grain) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 30 ft.
Swine -Lagoon sludge
Yearly Applied Amount: 11 1000 gal
Lb P205: 12.5 lb
Application Method: All other surface
2.8 t/ac/yr
10-19 ft
93
1.13
NO
GOOD
OUTPUTS
TOTAL P RATING = 27 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Version: 1.87
PLAT Results For: Moore 11/6/2006 10:13:01 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
2005
County:
Moore
Producer Identifier:
David Allred
Tract Number:
888
Field Number:
1
Soil Series:
GeB: Georgeville gravelly silt loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes
Crop:
Wheat (Grain) : Conservation
Tillage - high residue
BMPs:
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width =
50 ft.
Fertilizers:
Swine -Lagoon sludge
Yearly Applied Amount:
11 1000 gal
Lb P205:
12.5 lb
Application Method:
All other surface
applications
Soil Loss:
1.6 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance
20-29 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
0
WV Factor (USER)
1.14
Hydrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P - 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 9 (LOW)

NCANAT Version: 1.87
PLAT Results For: Moore 11/6/2006 10:13:27 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
2005
County:
Moore
Producer Identifier:
David Allred
Tract Number:
888
Field Number:
4
Soil Series:
GeB: Georgeville gravelly silt loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes
Crop:
Wheat (Grain) : Conservation
Tillage - high residue
BMPs:
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width =
50 ft.
Fertilizers:
Swine -Lagoon sludge
Yearly Applied Amount:
11 1000 gal
Lb P205:
12.5 lb
Application Method:
All other surface
applications
Soil Loss:
1.6 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance
30-49 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
23
WV Factor (USER)
1.08
Hydrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 9 (LOW)

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone] Report No: W02681 W
Grower: Allred, David L. Copies To.•
799 Jasper Rd
Robbins, NC 27325
wste nalysis eport Farm: s=--�- ):
10/ 9/06
Moore County
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results rtsper million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID.
N
P K Ca
W
S
Fe Mn Zn
CU 8 At
Cl C
31
Total 750
221 1051 241
69.6
58.4
68.9 6.13 17A
9.06 1.64
IN -N
Waste Code:
-NH4
ALS
-NO3
Na Ni Cd
Pb
At
Se Li jqH
SS C.N OM%
CCE% ALE(Kcal)
341
7.78
Description:
OR-N
Swine L n Li .
Urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbsllOOO_qallons
Other Elements 1011000
Tons
Application Method
N P20s K20
Ca Mg S Fe
Mn
Zn
CU 8 Mo CI
Na Ni Cd Pb
At Se Li
Broadcast
3.1 3.0 8.4
1 A 0.41 0.34 0.40
0.04
0.12
0.06 0.01
2.9
Soil Incorp
4.9 3.4 9.5
1.6 046 0.39 0.46
0.04
0.13
0.07 0.01
2.9
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results itsper million unless otherwise noted
Sample 10.
N
P K Ca
S
Fe Mn Zn
CU 8
Mo CI C
Total M
1651 1149 1424
1275 402
399 43.5 124
83.5 128
32
IN -N
Waste Code:
-NH4
ASS
-NO3
Na Ni Cd
Pb At
Se Li pH
SS C:N
DM% CCE% ALE K l
372
7.58
Description:
OR-N
Swine LaQoon Sludge
Urea
Recomff*ndations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs/1000_gallons
Other Elements
lbs11000_gallons
Application Method
N P205 K20
Ca Mg S Fe
Mn Zn CU
8 Mo Cl
Na Ni
Cd Pb At Se Li
Broadcast
8.0 22.1 9.2
8.3 7.5 2A 2.3
025 0.72 0.49
0.01
3.1
Soil lrxorp
10.5 25.2 10.4
9.5 8.5 2.7 2.7
0.29 0.82 0.56
0.01
3.1
i ne waste proauct contains large amounEs or nitrogen, pnosphorus, zinc, ano copper. i ne waste snouia oe app iea ai rates neeaea to meet crop nitrogen requirement unless one or me omen elements are more
restrictive. When sail test Pis very high and the site is vulnerable to phosphorus movement to nearby surface water, limit application of P to estimated crop removal of this element. Limit applications of zinc and copper
is necessary to avoid excess accumulation of these elements in the soil.
IGW.".Q, N OoLXA-11_ 3. 1 t $ • 0 . i � , I ;' jt
CWaA41-R, ? I7/A
Al Ph ca. m I
M/j Z N C L)
1� 9L3 5'34' HOP B la Via •3 a4,9 TO.1 if6, Zs

KDA&M Agmaomic Division
Phone: (g19)733-2655 Web Site: www.UCWXOM/agronomi!
a - r
_
..
Report No: 2"79.
Grower
Allred, David L.
Copies To.
799 Jasper Rd
—wk
}
S oil
Test R D ort
Robbins,
INC 27325
Farm.'
4,6,2006
SER1'ING N.C. RESIDENTS
FOR OVER 60 YEARS
Moore
County
Agronomist Comments
A
Fidd Idermation ':
AWW
Lime
itecom ndatioas
l
Sample No. Last
Crop
Mo Yr
TIA
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
T5451
7 2005
L0
isl Crop: Corn Grain
0
120-160
0
50-70
0 0
0
0
0
0
3
2nd Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
0
50-70
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V CEC
BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(l) Mn-AI(2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NO3-N NH4-N
Na
MIN' 0-41
1-24 5.3
85.0 08 5.3 98 41
62.0 ISO
189
141
134 201
201
176
37
0.1
Fidd Ia9wma#oa
Apl*d
Lime
Rccoumendadens
Sample 11o. Last Crop
ifo Yr
T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See note
T5452
7 2005
1.0
1st Crop: Corn Grain
0
120-160
50-70
90-110
0 0
0
0
'0
0
3
2nd Crop: SmaII Grains
0
80.100
50-70
90-110
0 0
0
0
O
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V CEC
BS% Ac p H P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(l)
Mn-AI(2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NW-N AWN
Na
MIN 0.22
1.13 6,9
860 to 5 3 35 22
58.0 25.0
339
231
224 179
179
132
63
0.4
Field hdormation
Applied
Time
9jecommottodaitions=
_
Sample U. Last
Crop
Mo Yr
T;A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
mg S
Ca
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
T5453
7 2005
1.0
1st Crap: Corn Grain
4T
120-160
0-20
80-100
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
2nd Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
0-20
80-100
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V CEC
BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mnd
Mn-A1(I)
Mn-AI(2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NO3-N NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.32
1-18 6.1
82.0 IA 5.1 58 25
57,0 23.0
220
149
142 134
134
100
58
0.2

11iCQAf}Li ftmosak Dirlsim Pfta (919) 33-2555 Web 5 + w.araW"mMVwwm&
acpwt iw: 97uo.
Grower.
Alfred, David L.
Copies To.
799 jasper Rd
S.� Vest
Robbins, NC 27325
oil lie art
Far
M F 4,2006
SERVING N.C. RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS
Moore County
Agroaamist Comments
A
Ffeld b1formafim
Afffied Lime
=
-
Sample No. last
Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P2O5 K20 Mg S
Cu Zn B Ma See Note
DEEPI
Is1 Crop: Sma11 Goa=
5T
W100 120-140 90-110 0 0
2 6 .0 10 3
2nd Crop:
0
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/Y CEC BS% Ac pH RI K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(I) Mn-AI(2) Za-I Za-AI
Cu-I S-I SS I NO3-N NH+-N Na
1►t1_w' 0.09
1.34 13.6 91.0 1.2 5.5 8 18
490 42.0
15 19 22 22
21 29 27

pop"
X, 0
Vol,
rr
A
P4

Waste Structure Cleanout Plan
11-21-2005
This plan has been prepared for:
Allred Farms
David Allred
799 Jasper Rd.
Robbins, NC 27325
[phone]
This plan has been developed by:
Jerry Hall
NRCS/Moore SWCD
PO Box 908
Carthage, NC 28327 1
[phone] ext.
evelop 'Signature
Type of Plan: Waste Structure CleanOut Plan
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this cleanout plan.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) pate
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By.
T"11"i", 5pe iulist Signature pate
349766 Database' Version 3.1 Date Printed; 11-21-2065 Cover Page i

Waste Storage Cleanout Source Description
SOURCE: Lagoon # 2 Sludge Cleanout
Date Measured: 07-13-2005
Lagoon Dimensions: TOP - 125 X 74; BOTTOM - 92 X 40; SIDE SLOPES - 2:1
Liquid Depth: 5.00ft.; Liquid Volume: 162,493 gallons. Waste Sample 4: W00492B
Total Depth: 5.00 ft.; Total Volume: 162,493 gallons
Estimated Plant Available Nitrogen
Applic. Method
fibs N/1000 gallons)
Source Total Obs)
Broadcast
4.41
717
Incorporated
7.10
1154
Injected
8.39
1363
Irrigated
3.66
594
Maximum PAN
Available (lbs.) ;
Actual PAN Applied
(lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
717
4,598
-3,881
1,042,584
-880,091
Maximum PAN Available is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-21-2005 Desc. I

SOURCE: Lagoon # 3 Sludge Cleanout
Date Measured; 07-13-2005
Lagoon Dimensions: TOP - 85 X 54; BOTTOM - 64 X 30; SIDE SLOPES - 3:1
Liquid Depth: 5.00ft.; Liquid Volume: 112,788 gallons. Waste Sample 4: W00492A
Total Depth: 5.00 ft.; Total Volume: 112,788 gallons
Estimated Plant Available Nitrogen
Applic. Method
(lbs N/1000 gallons)
Source Total (lbs)
Broadcast
5.20
586
Incorporated
8.36
943
Injected
9.88
1114
Irrigated
4.31
486
Maximum PAN
Available (lbs.)
Actual PAN Applied
(lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
586
1,369
-783
263,613
-150,825
+ Maximum PAN Available is calculated on the basis of the actual application methods) identified in the plan for this source.
Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 11-21-2005 Desc. 2

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are
also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if
the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Pl
Total
Useable
Plat
Removal
(lbsiacre)
A
Applied
(lbvacre)
Tract
Field
Acres
Acres
Rating
Ll
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
10491
2
26.00
24.80
Low
78.0
Goldston
Wheat, Grain
37 bu.
19
N/A
888
1
1 7.11
7.11
Medium
2.0
1 Georgeville
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
30
NIA
888
4
12.01
12.01
Low
2.0
Geor eville
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
30
N/A
888
6
4.82
4.82
Medium
41.0
Nason
Wheat, Grain
48 bu.
24
N/A
891
l
10.01
3.80
Low
N/A
Nason
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
25
NIA
891
3
8.2
8.25
Low
41.0
Nason
I Wheat, Grain
48 bu.
24
NIA
PLAN TOTALS: 68.25 60.79
Ll
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<= l0
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples
> 10
are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Lang -Term No -Till (778),
and edge•of-field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
PLAT Index
Rating
P Management Recommendation
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
25 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
100
Very High
Starter P application only
349766 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 11/21/2005
PCS Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol " means user entered data.

Land Application Table: Lagoon # 2 Sludge Cleanout Source Type: Cleanout
PAN
Manure
PAN
Liquid
Req'd
Applied
Manure
'
Crop(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
Applied
Applic
Source
Total
Use.
PLAT
Applic.
1000
Amount
A lic.
PP
Traci
Field
ID
Soil Series
Acres
Acres
Rating
Crop
RYE
Period
Method
N
N
g al/Acre
(incites)
10491
2
U l
Goldston
26.00
24.80
Low
Wheat, Grain
37 bu.
9/14/30
Broad.
89
20.18
0.74
888
1
U 1
Georgeville
7.11
7.11
Medium
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
Broad.
11471814]
25.95
0.95
888
6
U I
Nason
4.82
4.82
Medium
Wheat, Grain
48 bu.
9/1-4/30
Broad.
93
93
21.09
0.78
891
1
U1
Nason
10.06 1
3.80
Low
Wheat, Grain
50 bu-
9/14/30
Broad.
96
96
21.77
0.80
891
3
U!
Nason
8.25 1
8.25 1
Low
Wheat, Grain
48 bu.
9/14/30
Broad_ 1
93
93
21.09
0.78
Lagoon # 2 Sludge Cleanout Summary:
Source Volume Available:
Source Volume Applied
Excess Application Capacity:
162,493 gals.
1,042,584 gals.
541.6%
349766 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1 1212005 LAT Page Page I of 2

Land Application Table: Lagoon # 3 Sludge Cleanout Source Type: Cleanout
Manure
PAN
!'AN
Liquid
Req'd
Applied
Manure
Crop
Obs/A)
(lbs/A)
Applied
Applic.
Source
Total
Use.
PLAT
Applic.
1000
Amount
Applic
Tract
field
In
Sail Series
Acres
Acres
Rating
S
Crop
P
RYE
Period
Method
N
N
gal/Acre
(Inches)
888
4
U2
Georgevillc
12.01
12.01
Low
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/14/30
Broad.
114
1141
21.95
0.81
Laroon # 3 Sludre Cleanout Summary:
Source Volume Available:
Source Volume Applied
Excess Application Capacity
NOTE: * indicates user defined value
112,788 gals.
263,613 gals.
133.7
349766 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1 1/21/2005 LAT Page Page 2 of

Lagoon sludge often contains high concentrations of zinc and copper. High levels of these metals in soils can adversely affect plant growth. The following table provides a
conservative (maximum potential) estimate for increase in soil index values. * Due to inherit variability of waste and soil sampling, it is recommended that conservative soil
target levels be set for copper (e.g. Cu-1 c 700-1000) and zinc (e.g. Za-I < 300 for land where peanuts may be grown; for other cropland Zn-I <700-1000). Alternative
application sites shuuld be selected if the following table indicates that concentrations of these metals may approach excessive levels. For maximum copper and zinc soil index
limits, sec the NRCS Nutrient Management Standard (Code 590).
Estimated Soil Metal Concentrations
Tract
Field
Soil Sample
Crop
Source
ID
Applic.
Inches
Waste
Cu ppm
Waste
Zn ppm
Soil Test
Cu-I
Soil Test
Zn-I
Cu-I
Adj.
Zn-I
Adj.
Estimated New
Number
Date
Soil Cu-I
Soil Zn-I
10491
2
2449C
07-21-05
Wheat, Grain
UI
0.74
111
345
404
363
517
815
921
1,178
888
1
888-1
11-08-05
Wheat, Grain
Ul
0.95
111
345
47
25
664
1,047
711
1,072
888
4
09637
11-08-05
Wheat, Grain
U2
0.81
138
389
73
44
704
1,006
777
1,050
888
6
09637
11-16-05
Wheat, Grain
U1
0,78
111
345
157
73
545
859
702
932
891
1
891-1
11-16-05
Wheat, Grain
Ul
0.80
111
345
269
87
559
881
828
968
891
3
891-3
I 1-16-05
Wheal, Grain
U1 1
0.78
I H
345
117
73
545
859
662
932
---------------- ......------..........------.... ......--------. . .......... ---------- --- _ .--------..
* NOTE The equilibrated post application soil index may be less than the: projected maximum value. Practical methodology for more precise estimation is not available.
349766 Database Version 3.1 Date Punted: 11-21-2005 Metals Page Page 1 of 1

Narrative
This plan will cover the removal of sludge from the following: lagoons 2 and 3 (Nursery - 2804 Wean to
Feeder. Sludge will be applied to Tracts 10491 Field 2, Tract 888 Fields 1, 4 & 6 and Tract 891 Fields 1
& 3. Sludge will be applied and all fields seeded to Wheat. Application rates are based on Waste report
W00492
857608 Database Version 3. 1 Date Printed; 1 1-21-2005 Narrative Page Page l of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
857608 Database Version 3,1 Date Printed: 1 1/21/2005 Specification Pace I

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
lb. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
857608 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1 1/21/2005 Specification Pape 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
857608 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: l 1/21/2005 Specification Pape 3

GENERAL LAGOON CLEANOUT INFORMATION:
Cleanout Start Date: 11-18-2005 Cleanout End Date: 11-24-2005
349766 Date Printed: 11-21-2005 Info Page 1

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 3, 4, 6
Wheat: Piedmont
In the Piedmont, wheat should be planted from October 10-November 3. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot at
1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 Ibs/acre N at planting. Increase the N at
planting to 40 Ibs/acre in no -till wheat. Apply phosphorus and potash according to soil test
recommendations at this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential
for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2
Wheat: Piedmont
In the Piedmont, wheat should be planted from October 10-November 3. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot at
1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 Ibs/acre N at planting. Increase the N at
planting to 40 Ibs/acre in no -till wheat. Apply phosphorus and potash according to soil test
recommendations at this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential
for profitable wheat production.
349766 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-21-2005 Crop Note Page Page l of I

±� � �^� � �L �i .i ''+.t,�1t y, d, �- 1 v 7g �' +1 �,,,�v� r .',� �+r i , '•[v. •Y
d"" it ea/ •* +4' ♦ � y '�" .�w�, *+'.
IF
i � ,• fvt it �� �. .�� I �' i., • _ •t• �,�►''*�.•�,T, r°F4�{Js"'.e
A Al
David Allred
Lagoon •
w
f
w
'i
� M 1
t f.} y
_.; •fir � •� �•°" t.% tr9 '
Or
Ilk
if
'r��F
x
rP' � '' '� r 'lN;;,'��F „tom •n.; tt::, ,

NCANAT Version: 1.87
PLAT Results For: Moore 11/17/2005 12:02:02 PM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
slopes
Crop:
BMPs .
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV_Factor (USER)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 0
INPUTS
2005
Moore
David Allred
888
4
GeB: Georgeville gravelly silt loam, 2 to 8 percent
Wheat (Grain) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 50 ft.
Swine -Lagoon sludge
Yearly Applied Amount: 21.5 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 26.4 lb
Application Method: All other surface
1.6 t/ac/yr ty�yh A'21'00,tl W3
30-49 ft
23
1.08
GOOD
oo
OUTPUTS ag/,.s %e �, 3 �/Iioe // '�/✓ �' I
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 37
TOTAL P RATING = 37 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Version: 1.87
PLAT Results For: Moore
11/17/2005 12:41:57 PM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
slopes
Crop:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV —Factor (USER)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 3
SOLUBLE P - 1
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = i9
TOTAL P RATING = 23 (LOW)
INPUTS
2005
Moore
David Allred
891
1
GeB: Georgeville gravelly silt loam, 2 to 8 percent
Wheat (Grain) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Swine -Lagoon sludge
Yearly Applied Amount: 20.6 1000 gal
Lb P205: 10.9 lb
Application Method: All other surface
1.6 t/ac/yr
30-49 ft
51pB�LV Z
1.12
GOOD
OUTPUTS

NCANAT Version: 1.87
PLAT Results For: Moore
11/17/2005 11:45:48 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
slopes
Crop:
BMPs :
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (USER)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P =
SOLUBLE P
LEACHATE P
SOURCE P
INPUTS
2005
Moore
David Allred
888
1
GeB: Georgeville gravelly silt loam, 2 to 8 percent
Wheat (Grain) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 50 ft.
Swine -Lagoon sludge
Yearly Applied Amount: 25.3 1000 gal
Lb P205: 10.9 lb
Application Method: All other surface
1.6 t/ac/yr 'e ,�" # Z-►
20-29 ft _ ��}
1.14
GOOD
OUTPUTS
0
0
0
18
I TOTAL P RATING = 18 (LOW)

NCANAT Version: 1.87
PLAT Results For: Moore
11/17/2005 11:39:39 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (USER)
Artificial Drainage System:
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P - 5
SOLUBLE P = 4
LEACHATE P - 0
INPUTS
2005
Moore
David Allred
888
6
NaD: Nason silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Wheat (Grain) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 30 ft.
Swine --Lagoon sludge
Yearly Applied Amount: 20.6 1000 gal
Lb P205: 10.9 lb
Application Method: All other surface
2.8 t/ac/yr
10-19 ft,,_ Lj DOK�Z
93 �v
1.13NO
GOOD 1
o , t� �C 913
��
OUTPUTS
SOURCE P = 29
TOTAL P RATING = 38 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Version: 1.87
PLAT Results For: Moore 11/17/2005 12:49:29 PM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (USER)
Artificial Drainage System:
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 1
SOLUBLE P = 1
LEACHATE P - 0
SOURCE P - 29
INPUTS
2005
Moore
David Allred
891
3
NaD: Nason silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Wheat (Grain) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 30 ft.
Swine -Lagoon sludge
Yearly Applied Amount: 20.6 1000 gal
Lb P205: 10.9 lb
Application Method: All other surface
2.6 t/ac/yr �af.V-44- 7�k7-
16-19 ft ! r qq f r ?
1.12 a I d�
NO GOOD *&-3 �'�d° = y'3�'C—'
OUTPUTS
TOTAL P RATING = 31 (MEDIUM)

SOIL & WATER
CONSERVATION
Moore Soil & Water Conservation District
P.O. Box 908, 707 Pinehuret Ave., Carthage, N.G. 28327 • Phone. [phone], ext. 3 • Fax: [phone]
March 28, 2005
Division of Soil & Water Conservation
Attn: Mr. Danny Edwards
Environmental Specialist
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Systel Bid.
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Dear Mr. Edwards,
On March 16, 2005, we received a copy of a routine animal operation site visit for facility
number 63-2, Allred Farms. The report stated that an application violation had occurred
during November of 2004 on land planned for wheat, but never planted. The purpose for
this letter is to verify Mr. Allreds reasons for not planting wheat following the application
of waste in the required 30 day period.
On November 1, 2004, construction began on a new swine lagoon on Allred Farms. The
lagoon was planned to be installed in 1997, but due to the passage of House Bill 515, a
permit for construction was denied by James K. Leumas P.E., State Dam Safety
Engineer. Lagoon construction was in an area which served as the only access for
planting and harvest equipment to the cropland spray fields. Due to construction delays
from various reasons, an access road to the cropland was not installed until the 141h of
December, which is well past the recommended seeding date in piedmont soils. Mr.
Allred has a long term no till contract under the USDA Environmental Quality Incentives
Program on the spray fields. He plans to plant corn on the fields as soon as possible to
replace the planned wheat crop.
Through past experiences with Mr. Allred, we do not feel that the violation was intended,
but a combination of events beyond his control. Please feel free to give us a call if you
have any questions concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
Kevin Williams
District Conservationist
cc: Todd Bennett, Division o Water Qualit
David Allred

ritc<<�-'
,
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Secretary
Division of Soil & Water Conservation
Mr. David Allred
799 Jasper Road
Robbins, North Carolina 27325
SUBJECT: Operation Review Notice of Referral for
Allred Farms,
Facility Number 63-2,
Moore County
Dear Mr. Allred,
w'
T QIITll l.Ak,AL'.A DL:11111M'LNF C1F
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
On March 4, 2005, an operation review was conducted of Allred Farms, facility number 63-2,
in Moore County. This review, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OD, is one of two
routine site visits scheduled for all subject animal operations in 2005. Staff from the Division
of Water Quality will conduct a separate compliance inspection.
• During the review, it was noted that swine waste had been applied to three pulls in
November 2004 in which the crop (wheat) was never planted. You stated that you were
unable to plant the wheat due to the construction of the new lagoon which blocked
access to the field. The nitrogen application amounts are as follows:
Pull Number Nitrogen Applied Pounds per Acre
4 69
5 93
6 85
The allowable nitrogen rate on the wheat was 96 pounds of nitrogen per acre. Your
permit requires that the crop be planted within 30 days of the first nitrogen application.
It was for this reason that your operations were referred to the Division of Water Quality for
further investigation and possible enforcement action. G.S. 143-215.10E requires staff from
the Division of Soil and Water Conservation to notify the Division of Water Quality and the
owner/operator of these observed violations.
225 Green Street, Suite 7141 Systel Bld. Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone]
FAX [phone] An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. David Allred
March 14, 2005
Page 2
A copy of the operation review report is enclosed for your information. Site findings and
recommended corrective actions as discussed are noted in the comment sections.
Please remember that in order for your facility to remain in compliance with environmental
regulations, animal waste cannot be discharged into the waters of the State, and the animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems must be properly maintained and
operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator.
On behalf of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation, I appreciate your cooperation with
this operation review. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 910-486-1541 if you have any
questions, concerns or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Danny Edwards
Environmental Specialist
cc: Art Barnhardt, Division of Water Quality
Kevin Williams, Moore Soil & Water Conservation District
Jeremy Hill, Premium Standard Farms
Vernon Cox, Division of Soil & Water Conservation
225 Green Street, Suite 7141 Systel 81d. Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone]
FAX [phone] An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

❑ Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 630002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS630002 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Moore Region: Fayetteville
Date of Visit: 03/04/2005 Entry Time: 09:50 AM Exit Time: 12:07 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: All[go Flirms Owner Email:
Owner: David L Allred
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 799 Jasper Rd Robbins NC 273257263
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: pggwood Farms
Location of Faun: Latitude: 35.470000 Longitude: 79.646700
On the southwest side of Hwy 705 approx..4 mile northwest of its intersection with SR 1422, northwest of Robbins, NC.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts ® Waste Collection 8 Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: David L Allred Operator Certification Number: 18293
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(a): Name Title Phone
On -site representative David Allred Phone:
24 hour contact name David Allred Phone:
Primary Inspector: Danny Edwards Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS630002 Owner - Facility: David L Allred Faciiity Number : 630002
Inspection pate: 03/04/2005 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
7. Remove small woody saplings from primary lagoon @ lagoon 3. Establish grass on bare aras of lagoon dike.
9. Fix leaking air relief valve at pump hook up @ lagoon 1. Immediantly install earth berm below this air relief valve to prevent any
seepage from getting in ditch.
Take new waste sample soon.
36. Contact Moore Soil and Water Conservation for help dterming allowable nitrogen rate for each irrigation pull according to waste
plan.
21. Start using new record keeping forms per new permit to document weather code, irrigation inspections, etc. Start keeping crop
yield records, stocking records, rainfall and lagoon inspections.
11. Applied the following amount of nitrogen to wheat land in Nov. 2004:
Pull 4 = 69 pounds of N applied per acre
Pull 5 = 93 pounds of N applied per acre
Pull 7 = 85 pounds of N applied per acre
Allowable nitrogen rate was 96 pounds N per acre. Mr. Allred was unable to plant wheat due to new lagoon construction
blocking access to field. Notice of referral to DWQ.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS630002 Owner - Facility: David L Allred Facility Number: 630002
Inspection Date: 03/04/2005 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 2,360 0
■ Swine - Wean to Feeder 6,953 1,380
Total Design Capacity: 9,313
Total SSLW: 527.190
Waste Structures
Tvoe Identifier Closed Date Start Date Desioned Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Waste Pond
1
22.00
Waste Pond
2
20.00
Waste Pond
3
23.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS630002 Owner • Facility: David L Allred
Facility Number: 630002
Inspection Date: 03/04/2005 Inspection Typs: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
DiachaEgas k Stream Impacts Yes No NA NF
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
moo
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Cl
0
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse Impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collectinn StnragR & Treatment
❑
Yes
0
No
❑
NA
❑
NF
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe erosion,
❑
❑
❑
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑
.
❑
❑
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 Cl ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks ❑ M ❑ ❑
and/or wet stacks)
9. goes any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
M ❑ ❑ ❑
Improvement?
Yes No NA NE
Waste ApplirAtdon
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement?
❑ M ❑ ❑
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
to PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P2057
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
■
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3 Other
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Page: 4

Permit: AWS630002 Owner • Facility: David L Allred
Facility Number: 630002
Inspection Dab: 03/04/2005 Inspection Typo: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Georgeville
Soil Type 2
Nason
Soil Type 3
Lignum
Soil Type 4
Goldston
Soil Type 5
Sail Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops ditter from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)?
[IN ❑
❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ E ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ 0 ❑
Yea No NA
❑
NE
Records and Documents
18. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
[Is ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WLiP?
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
N ❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
■
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
Inspections after > 1 Inch rainfall & monthly?
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soli analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
0
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ 0
❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to Install and maintain a rainbreaker an irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ❑
0
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge surrey as required by the permit?
❑ ❑
❑
26, Did the facility fall to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ❑
❑
■
Page: 5

Permit: AWS630002 Owner - Facility: David l Allred Facility Number : 630002
Inspecdon Dete: 03/04/2005 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
other 158"An
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
Yeas
❑
No NA NE.
■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those mortality
❑
■ ❑ ❑
rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the Inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality
❑
. ❑ ❑
representative immediately.
31. Did the faclllty tail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Technical Assistance
❑
Yes
■ ❑ ❑
No NA NF
Needed Provided
34. Waste plan revision or amendment
❑
35. Waste plan conditional amendment
❑
36. Review or evaluate waste plan w/producer
■
37. Forms need (list In comment section)
❑
El
38. Missing components (list in comments)
❑
39. 2H.02DD re-oertification
❑
40. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (POA)
❑
41. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
42. Organize/computerization of records
❑
43. Sludge evaluation
❑
11
44. Sludge or Closure plan
❑
El
45. Sludge removal/closure procedures
❑
46. Waste structure evaluation
❑
47. Structure needs improvement
❑
48.Operation & maintenance improvements
❑
49. Marker checklcalibration
❑
Page: 6

Permit• AWS830002 Owner - Facility: David L Allred
Facility Number: 630002
Inspection Dste: 03104/2005 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Techninal Assistanna
50. Site evaluation
Yes No NA NE
❑
51. Irrigation calibration
❑
52. Irrigation system design/installation
❑
53. Secure Irrigation Information (maps, etc.)
❑
11
54. Operating Improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
55. Wettable acre determination
❑
56. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
57, Crop evaluation/recommendations
❑
58. Drainage work/evaluation
❑
59. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
❑
60. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
61. Buffer improvements
❑
02. Field measurements (GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
63. Mortality BMPs
❑
64. Waste operator education
❑
65. Operation & maintenance education
❑
66. Record keeping education
❑
67. Croptforage management education
❑
13
68. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
69, PLAT Assessment
❑
11
70, Other
❑
Page: 7

Permit: AWS630002 Owner - Facility: David L Allred
Inspection Date: 03/04/2005 Inspection Type: Operations Review
List Improvements made by Operation
Improvement t
Improvement 2
Improvement 3
Improvement
Improvement 5
Improvement 6
Facility Number: 630002
Reason for Visit: Routine
Ifl:-tta7►l�►`I
■
Installed new lagoon
Page: 8

Michael F, Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W Klimek. P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 2, 2005
Mr. David Allred
799 Jasper Road
Robbins, North Carolina 27325
Subject: REVIEW DETERMINATION
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 21-1.0217
Allred Farm
Facility No. 63-2
Moore County
Dear Mr. Allred:
On April 27, 2005, the Fayetteville Regional Office received your information per our request, dated April 5, 2005. After a
review of this information, the Office decided not to issue a NOV for spraying on fields #4, #5, and #6 without a proper
cover crop. We encourage you to coordinate with the representatives of the Moore Soil & Water Conservation District
during the construction of the new lagoon to avoid a similar problem in the future. If you have any questions concerning
this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Todd A. Bennett
Environmental Engineer
Aquifer Protection Section - Fayetteville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality/Aquifer Protection Section
qL7 225 Green Street, Suite 714, Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet http:Ngw.ehnr.state. nc.us
Customer Service: [phone]

\NAT Michael F. Easley, Governor
�O�pF �� William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0) Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
> r Division of Water Duality
April 5, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. David Allred
799 Jasper Road
Robbins, North Carolina 27325
Subject; REgUEST FOR INFORMATION
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2H .0217
Allred Farm
Facility No. 63-2
Moore County
Dear Mr. Allred:
On March 30, 2005, representatives of the DWQ met with you to inspect your facility in response to a referral from the
DSWC. The referral described the application of swine wastewater onto fields without a cover crop. After reviewing the
on -site records and the fields, it was confirmed that three pulls (#4, #5, and #7) received wastewater between November
15, 2004 and November 26, 2004, and no cover crop was ever planted. The fields received 69 ib PANIac, 93 lb PANIac,
and 85 lb PANIac, respectively. District conservationists were on -site to provide information regarding the construction of
a new lagoon and the events that led to wheat not being planted in the field.
Because of the extenuating circumstances involved with this situation, the Fayetteville Regional Office requests additional
information before considering whether or not to proceed with a NOV. Please submit the following items to this Office by
May 2, 2005:
1. Copies of all irrigation, lagoon -level, rainfall, and waste analysis records from January 1, 2004 to the present
2. A copy of the most recent W UP
3. A copy of the letter from the District Conservationist
4. A letter from a certified agronomist providing potential PAN -uptake information for the field's current weed cover
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Todd A. Bennett
Environmental Engineer
Aquifer Protection Section - Fayetteville Regional Office
'A Division of Water Quaiity/Aquifer Protection Section
NOD 110 225 Green Street, Suite 714. Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: http://gw.ehnr.state.nc.us
Customer Service. [phone]

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Secretary
Division of Soil & Water Conservation
Mr. David Allred
799 Jasper Road
Robbins, North Carolina 27325
SUBJECT: Operation Review Notice of Referral for
Allred Farms,
Facility Number 63-2,
Moore County
Dear Mr. Allred,
NCDENR
ENVIRQN M ENT AND NATURAL REsouRc E5
On March 4, 2005, an operation review was conducted of Allred Farms, facility number 63-2,
in Moore County. This review, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OD, is one of two
routine site visits scheduled for all subject animal operations in 2005. Staff from the Division
of Water Quality will conduct a separate compliance inspection.
• During the review, it was noted that swine waste had been applied to three pulls in
November 2004 in which the crop (wheat) was never planted. You stated that you were
unable to plant the wheat due to the construction of the new lagoon which blocked
access to the field. The nitrogen application amounts are as follows:
Pull Number Nitrogen Applied (Pounds per Acre)
4 69
5 93
6 85
The allowable nitrogen rate on the wheat was 96 pounds of nitrogen per acre. Your
permit requires that the crop be planted within 30 days of the first nitrogen application.
It was for this reason that your operations were referred to the Division of Water Quality for
further investigation and possible enforcement action. G.S. 143-215.10E requires staff from
the Division of Soil and Water Conservation to notify the Division of Water Quality and the
owner/operator of these observed violations.
225 Green Street, Suite 714 / Systel Bid. Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone]
FAX [phone] An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. David Allred
March 14, 2005
Page 2
A copy of the operation review report is enclosed for your information. Site findings and
recommended corrective actions as discussed are noted in the comment sections.
Please remember that in order for your facility to remain in compliance with environmental
regulations, animal waste cannot be discharged into the waters of the State, and the animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems must be properly maintained and
operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator.
On behalf of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation, I appreciate your cooperation with
this operation review. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 910-486-1541 if you have any
questions, concerns or need additional information.
Sincerely,
"! `a - '��
Danny Edwards
Environmental Specialist
cc: Art Barnhardt, Division of Water Quality
Kevin Williams, Moore Soil & Water Conservation District
Jeremy Hill, Premium Standard Farms
Vernon Cox, Division of Soil & Water Conservation
RECEIVED
MAR 15 2005
ON - FAW11IEVILtE FtH OML OM
225 Green Street, Suite 714 / Systel 81d. Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone]
FAX [phone] An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

❑ Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 630002 Facility Status. Active Permit: AWS630002 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Moore Region: Fayetteville
Date of Visit: Q3/0412005 Entry Time: 09750 AM Exit Time: 12:07 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Allred Farms Owner Email:
Owner: David L Allred Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 799 Jasper Rd 13obbins NC 27325Z2Q3
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator. Dogwood Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35,470000 Longitude: 79,646700
On the southwest side of Hwy 705 approx..4 mile northwest of its intersection with SR 1422, northwest of Robbins, NC.
Question Areas:
® Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues Technical Assistance
Certified Operator. David L Allred Operator Certification Number. 18293
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative David Allred Phone:
24 hour contact name David Allred Phone:
Primary Inspector: Danny Edwards Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Page: 1

Permit AWS630002 Owner - Facility: David L Allred Facility Number: 630002
Inspection Data: 03/04/2005 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit Routine
Inspection Summary:
7. Remove small woody saplings from primary lagoon @ lagoon 3. Establish grass on bare eras of lagoon dike.
9. Fix leaking air relief valve at pump hook up @ lagoon 1. Immediantly install earth berm below this air relief valve to prevent any
seepage from getting in ditch.
Take new waste sample soon.
36. Contact Moore Soil and Water Conservation for help dterming allowable nitrogen rate for each irrigation pull according to waste
plan.
21. Start using new record keeping forms per new permit to document weather code, irrigation inspections, etc. Start keeping crop
yield records, stocking records, rainfall and lagoon inspections.
11. Applied the following amount of nitrogen to wheat land in Nov. 2004:
Pull 4 = 69 pounds of N applied per acre
Pull S = 93 pounds of N applied per acre
Pull 7 = 86 pounds of N applied per acre
Allowable nitrogen rate was 96 pounds N per acre. Mr. Allred was unable to plant wheat due to new lagoon construction
blocking access to field. Notice of referral to DWQ.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS630002 Owner - Facility: David L Allred Facility Number: 630002
Inspection Date: 03/04/2005 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish
2,360
0
Swine - Wean to Feeder
6,953
1,380
Total Design Capacity: 9,313
Total SSLW: 527,190
Waste Structures
Twos Identifier Closed Date Start Date Desloned Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Waste Pond
1
22.00
Waste Pond
2
20.00
Waste Pond
3
23.00
Page- 3

Permit: AWS630002 Owner • Facility: David L Allred
Facility Number: 630002
Inspection Onto: 03/0412005 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Dischames A Stream Impacts Yea No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the Slate? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ M ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 0000
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse Impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
]Neste Cnlledign S_ torage & Treatment Yea Nn NA NF
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, Is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le) large trees, severe erosion, ❑ . ❑ ❑
seepage, eta)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management or ❑ M Cl ❑
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 00011
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks ❑ a ❑ ❑
andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ❑ ❑
Improvement?
Yes No NA NE
Waers Apniir-ation
10. Are there any required butlers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or Improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
11. Is there evidence of Incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 Ibs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manureisludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptabie crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3 Other
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Page: 4

Permit: AWS630D02 Owner - Facility: David L Allred Facility Number: 630002
lnspecdon Date: 03/04/2005 Inspection Type: Operation$ Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Georgeville
Soil Type 2
Nason
Soil Type 3
Lignum
Soil Type 4
Goldston
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated In the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)?
❑ E ❑
❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
[IN ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the Irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ❑
❑
16, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Uncurnantc
❑ ❑
Yes NA
❑
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
Nn
❑ 0 ❑
NF
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need Improvement?
0
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute Inspections?
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
StocJking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fall to install and maintain a rainbreaker on Irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
0
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fall to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
■
Page: 5

Permit: AWS630002 Owner - Facility: David L Allred Facility Number: 630002
Inspection Date: 03/04/2005 Inapseltion Type: Operations Review Reason for Vlslt: Routine
t]ther Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
Yes
00
No NA
❑
NE.
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality
❑
❑
El
that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the fatality pose an air quality concern? It yes, contact a regional Air Quality
❑
❑
❑
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fall to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
N ❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
TgChnical Assistance
❑
Yes
0 ❑
NA
❑
NF
Needed Provided
Ng
34. Waste plan revision or amendment
35. Waste plan conditional amendment
❑
Cl
36. Review or evaluate waste plan w/producer
37. Forms need (list in comment section)
❑
38. Missing components (list in comments)
❑
39. 2H.0200 re -certification
❑
11
40. Five 8 Thirty day Plans of Action (POA)
❑
41. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
D
42. Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
43. Sludge evaluation
❑
44. Sludge or Closure plan
❑
45. Sludge removaUclosure procedures
❑
48. Waste structure evaluation
❑
47. Structure needs improvement
❑
48. Operation 6 maintenance improvements
❑
49. Marker checklcalibration
❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS630002 Owner - Facility: David L Allred
Facility Number: 630002
Inspection Date: 03/04/2005 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
50. Site evaluation
Yes No NA NF
❑
51. Irrigation calibration
❑
52, Irrigation system designAnstalladon
❑
53. Secure Irrigation Information (maps, etc.)
❑
54. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
55. Wettable acre determination
❑
56. Evaluate WAD certiflcationfrechedcs
❑
57. Crop evaluallonlrecommendations
❑
56. Drainage work/evaluation
❑
59. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
❑
60. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
61. Buffer improvements
❑
62. Field measurements (GPS, surveying, eta)
❑
63. Mortality BMPs
❑
64, Waste operator education
❑
65. Operation & maintenance education
❑
66. Record keeping education
❑
13
67. Croptforage management education
❑
El
68. Soil and/or waste sampling education
Cl
69. PLAT Assessment
❑
70. Other
❑
Page: 7

o�
Permit: AWS630002 Owner - Facility: David L Allred Facility Number: 630002
Inspection Date: 03104/2005 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
List Improvements made by Operation
Improvement t
Improvement 2
Improvement 3
Improvement 4
Improvement 5
Improvement 6
Yes Un NA MF
13
Installed new lagoon
Page: 8

9
NC 22 HWY
NOTES:
*THIS SURVEY TO DETERMINE THE VOLUME
OF THE WASTE TREAMENT LAGOON(S) SHOWN HEREON,
THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY.
*THE FIELD WORK WAS DONE USING THE RADIAL
TOPOGRAPHY METHOD USING SMI SOFTWARE.
*THE VOLUMES WERE CALCULATED USING THE
PRISMODIAL METHOD USING EAGLEPOINT SOFTWARE.
*PORTIONS OF LAGOONS NOS. 1 AND 3 WERE INACCESSIBLE DUE TO
SLUDGE BUILDUP. THE VOLUME WAS CALCULATED FROM
A SURFACE DESIGNED TO APPROXIMATE THE BASIN
OF THE LAGOON.
WASTE TREAMENT LAGOON NO. 1
ELEVATION
CUBIC YARDS
C! 91C FEET
GALLONS
85.90 OVERFLOW EL.
2990.43 CY
80741.61
603 9.18
84.79 kNV. EL.
2452,09 CY
66206.43
495258.49
84.40
2272 57 CY
61359.39
459000.11
82.40
1426.00 CY
38502.00
288014.96
80.90
869.00 CY
12,3463.00
175515.43
rAu71QA� AC uTE
Lac00p0.) 1MC.1.1 �Tsfr� jiU.� 'y
WASTE TREATMENT LAGOON
SURVEY FOR:
N. G. PURVIS FARMS, INC.
DIXIE FARM
BENSALEM, TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
OCTOBER 28, 1996
50 0 50 150
VAUNLm
Scale 1" = 50 ft
MARK A. SMITH, RLS L-3346
P. 0. BOX 1443
228 SULLIVAN LANE 1
ROBBINS. N.C. 27325
i
It"'
6" Owi- OUTFLOw PIPE
/
1.1
LAGOON
SURFACE AREA =
AT OVERFLOW E
'00orlz
INV EL. 84.79'
j
1 �
I
i LAGOON NO. 2
SURFACE AREA = 32,020 SO. FT.
' AT OVERFLOW EL. = 85.55'
s
a
i
80.55
82
WASTE TREAMENT LAGOON NO. 2
ELEVATION
CUBIC YARDS
CUBIC FEET.
GALLONS
85.55 OVERFLOW EL.
8164.41 Y
220439.07
1648998.76
84.05
6467.27 CY
174616.29
306220.56
82.05
4457.73 CY
120358.71
900345.67
80.55
1 3142.64 CY
184851.28
1634731.65