090153_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

State of North Carolina j ;:T,
Department of Environment — --- and Natural Resources �►
Division of Water Quality NOV 6 2001��
Michael F. Easley, Governor; --
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary _,__' _ . N C D EN R
'
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director ►tet CAROLINA oEPArrMEmT OF
ENviRONMENT AND NAruRAL RESO cEs
November 2, 2001
Mr. Don Butler, Director CERTIFIED MAIL
Government Relations & Public Affairs RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED
Murphy -Brown LLC
Post Office Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for
Making an Outlet to Waters of the
State without a Permit and Violation
of the General Permit
Farm # 9-153
Bladen County
File No. DV 01-010
Dear Mr. Butler:
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Farm #29 and Farm #93 in
the amount of S 14,423.88 which includes $923.88 in investigative costs. Attached is a copy of
the assessment document explaining this penalty.
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality. Any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement
action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (do not include tivaiver form).
Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for
any continuing or new violation(s).
Alailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St_
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh. NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity /Afftrtnarire Action Employer
50% recvcled / 10% post -consumer paper
http: //h2o. enr.state. nc. its

Please submit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
2_ Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment
letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative
hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in
dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B -282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation:
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident:
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must
request an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original petition
with the:

Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
AND
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Dan Oakley
NCDENR
Office of General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within jhLrty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect
the penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations
which occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr_ Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539 or
Mr. Jeff Poupart at [phone], ext. 527.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey O_ Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
ATTACHTMENTS
cc: �aul_Rawls, Fayetteville Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
John Hasty, FRO w/ attachments
File # DV 01-010 w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/ attachments

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
COUNTY OF BLADEN
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMLNISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. N/A ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV 01-010
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $14,423.88 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated,
October 31, 2001 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the
civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated
matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of , 2001.
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BLADEN
IN THE MATTER OF )
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA LLC )
FOR MAKING AN OUTLET TO THE )
WATERS OF THE STATE OF )
NORTH CAROLINA )
WITHOUT A PERMIT }
AND VIOLATIONS OF THE )
NON -DISCHARGE GENERAL PERMIT )
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
File No. DV 01-010
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Actin- pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Jeffrey
O. Poupart, Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit of the Division
of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Brown's of Carolina LLC is a limited liability company organized under the laws
of the State of Delaware.
B. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. merged with and into Brown's of Carolina LLC on May
1, 2001.
C. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. owns and operates Farm #29 and Farm #93, a swine
operation located along SR 1172 in Bladen County.
D. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. was reissued Certificate of Coverage AWS090153
under General Permit AWG 100000 for Farm #29 and Farm #93 on June 26, 1996,
effective June 26, 1996, with an expiration date of April 30, 2003_ This permit
does not allow the discharge of waste to waters of the State.
E. On March 29, 2001, DWQ staff observed a discharge of wastewater at Farm #29
and Farm #93 from a sprayfield to an adjacent canal which is an unnamed
tributary of Brown Marsh Swamp, which are Class C Sw waters of the State
within the Lumber River Basin.
F. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. had no valid permit for the above-described activity.

G. Condition No. V. 3. of the General Permit states in part that "The maximum waste
level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). At a minimum, maximum waste
level for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate
storage to contain the 25 -year, 24-hour storm event plus an additional one (1) foot
of structural freeboard."
H. The 25 -year, 24-hour storm event for the facility's location is between seven (7)
and eight (8) inches according to National Weather Service, Technical Paper 40,
Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States, 1961.
I. Based on a 25 -year, 24 --hour storm event of seven (7) inches and one foot of
required structural freeboard, the waste level in the lagoon for Farm #29 shall not
exceed nineteen (19) inches.
J. On March 29, 2001, DWQ staff observed that the waste level of the lagoon for
Farm #29 was thirteen (13) inches, which exceeded the level specified in the
CAWINIP.
K. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $923.88.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A
pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. An unnamed tributary to Brown Marsh Swamp constitutes waters of the State
within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.1 pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
C. The above-cited discharge constituted making an outlet to waters of the State for
purposes of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1), for which a permit is required by G.S. 143-
215.1.
D. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than
twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a
person who is required but fails to apply for or to secure a permit required by G.S.
143-215.1.
E. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
F. The above-cited failure to maintain the liquid Ievel in the lagoon at the level
specified in the CAWMP violated Condition No. V. 3. of the General Permit.

G. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. may be assessed civil penalties pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.5A(a)(2) which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who
violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of
a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1.
H. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Brown's of
Carolina, Inc_ pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B -282.1(b)(8).
I. The Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit,
Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality, has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Brown's of Carolina LLC is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
S 12.000.00 for making an outlet to the waters of the State without a
permit as required by G.S. 143-215.1.
$ 1.500.00 for violating Condition No. V. 3. of the General Permit by
failing to maintain the liquid level in the lagoon at the level
specified in the CAW -MP
$ 923.88
$ 14.423.88
Enforcement costs
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.5A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G.S.143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;

(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State];;.
rcement procedures.
3IOcrol
(Date) Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement
Division of Water Quality

Division of Water Quality
May 18, 2001
M //
TO: Jeff Poupart, Supervisor, Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Water Quality Section
From: John Hasty, Environmental Specialist
Fayetteville Regional Office
Through: Paul Rawls&—
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Subject: McQueen Farm Enforcement, Facility No. 09-36
Please find enclosed the enforcement package for the unpermitted discharge of
swine waste from the McQueen Farm in Bladen County.
If you have any questions or require any further or additional information, please
advise.
John C. Hasty, Jr.
Enclosure

0
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF BLADEN
IN THE MATTER OF )
McQUEEN FARMS, INC.
}
FOR VIOLATIONS OF PERMIT )
15A NCAC 2H.0217 )
)
File No. DD
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.6A, I,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the
following:
1. FINDINGS OF FACT.-
A.
ACT:
A. McQueen Farms, Inc. operates a concentrated animal operation in
Bladen County.
B_ The McQueen Farms, Inc. Swine Farm was Permitted as a nondischarge
facility on May 19, 1997, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217.
C. On April .4, 2001, DWQ staff observed a discharge of wastewater by the
McQueen Farms, Inc. Swine Farm from one of its application fields to
an adjacent canal which borders the field to allow drain tile to drain the
field.
D. The McQueen Farms, Inc. Swine Farm had no valid permit for the
above described activity.
E. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter
totaled $ 707.32 -

Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. McQueen Farms, .Inc. is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A
pursuant to G -S. 143-212(4)-
B. A . permit for this animal waste management system is required in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 and G.S. 143-215.1.
C. The canal constitutes waters of the State within the meaning of G.S.
143-215.1 pursuant to G.S_ 143-212(6).
D. The above-cited discharge is a violation of the nondischarge permit.
E. McQueen Farms, Inc. may be assessed civil penalties in this matter
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of
not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation
may be assessed against a person for failing to act in accordance with
the terms, conditions or requirement of a permit required by G.S. 143-
215.1.
F. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against
McQueen Farms, Inc_ pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-
282. 1 (b)(8).
G. The Director, of the Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation
provided for by G.S. 143-215.6A(h), has the authority to assess civil
penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I
make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, McQueen Farms, Inc. is hereby assessed a civil penalty of
4.9
for discharging waste to the waters of the State in
violation of 15 A N C A C 2H. 0217.
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is
the maximum penalty authorized by G.S. 143 - 215.6A.
$ 707,32_ Enforcement Costs
percent of

$ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty
I have considered the factors listed in G.S.143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1)
The degree and extent of harm to the natural
resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violation,
(2)
The duration and gravity of the violation,
(3)
The effect on ground or surface water. quantity or
quality or on air quality;
(4)
The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5)
The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6)
Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally;
(7)
The prior record of the violator in complying or
failing to comply with programs over which the
Environmental Management Commission has regulatory
•
authority; and
(8)
The cost to the State of the enforcement
procedures.
(Date)
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality

ANI -MAL TI N E
I
1. Date of Inspection(s): 4-4-01_
2. Regional Office: Eayetteville_Division of W tgr ty
3.1 Name of Owner Of Property: Mc ,Veen Farm_ Inc. (Copy of Deed gAtnhed)
4. Name of Operator: Mr. Mich=l Lin ' t
5. Address: P O. Box 2979
Eli th o 283 3
6` Phone Number: [phone]
7. Description of Facility Location_ Map excerpt attached.
Facility is located _ n the northwest side of SR 1166 acznro�cinately Z.5 5 miles south of HAWY
211 jnd south of ClarktolL NC.
8. Date this facility began operation: The farm has been in full operation sine 124-94
9. Date of last expansion: The facility has not gxnanded since original construction.
10. Has the facility registered with DWQ? YES Y NO,
If YES, date of registration:
11. Does the facility have an approved Animal Waste Management Plan?
YES X NO _ Is one required? YES X NO _
Date Approved: 6-21-99
12. Has this facility received a CAFO Designation? YES_X_ NO_
If YES, date issued:
13. Type of Operation: 4.000 Farrow to Wean and 2.000 F gow to Viler Uperation
14. Number and type of livestock: There wre pproximately 6.000 Sows and�heir offspring
pEeagnt at the timr, gf the 'ns i
15. Length of time animals have been, are, or will be stabled, or confined and fed or maintained
in any 12 month period. Twelve (12) months.

2
16. Are crops, pasture, or post harvest residues sustained in the normal growing season over any
portion of the lot or facility? Yes the farm was designed to have annroxim lely 163 acres
of IaAn on which IQ j1pplj+ waste. ]Me Bert fzed wasteroanagernent pian_calls for bermuda hay
Wong n application
silex The farm has approximately 180 acre5&vailable.
17. Type of Waste Management System: Swine are kept in total Qm&ement free stall barns with
is otted floors over flushingip ts. Waste is flushed as needed from floor pits into a waste
m Ihe la&Qon sy9gm is composedf 1 n frgm which
Fin through buried irrigation 2ioes to, hydrantsandsnravd on the fields via atraveling
gun 5yst=.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Description of other animal operations in immediate vicinity and proximity to same or other
surface waters: There�re no other swine fatms in the immediate vacinity.
Proximity of facility to neighboring houses, wells, etc.: There -are a number of residences in
closer t f
Approximate depth of ground water table in the area of the facility or discharge: ???
Proximity of facility to surface waters: There gre canWs that run around the perimeter of the
faun and a creek on thr, south edge of the farm at the Columbus Count line.
Aminal waste discharged. YU
Witnesses:
John HasM DM-Fayetteyjlle Regional Office (910)_486-1541.
Bob Heath D WQ-Fayetteville regip-nal Office [phone],
Are pollutants discharged in the waters of the State?
YE
Do or have discharges occurred in response to a storm event less severe than the 25 -year,
hour storm? YES
What is the degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to public health,
or to private property resulting from the violation?: N&ne Qbserygd-
SampigR I
S&mple Logation. 4-4-01 Coliform. ftoYIQOmI dBQD TK
mg/L mg/L
Discharue Point 30.000 110 85
DogTstream 2%000 200 54

***PLEASE SEE ATTACHED COMPLETE LAB RESULTS FOR
MORE INFORMATION***
26What is the duration and gravity of the violation?: The iwwign sAue-Ig the
observation• wndiag that wasQbseirved dudng amutine ovmof MadenCounw
breached a small berm that bad bmn QQnstrugled and entering the ditch whichtInfir.
to a canW adjacent to tbefield, The jDspegjgrs feft that this discoLored watgr held agme
this suspicion.1 t• " f gteyated Icycls ► 1 L
dawnlk
27. Water Quality Assessment: There wgc&_no impacts noted in the canal that ns parallel to
the alt &ation_field_
28. What is the cost of rectifying the damage?: The writer observed no areas that cleanup
activities would be recommended. Any cleanup could cause advcrse iacic life
e onal, 1here has o =ort of t e
inveiszation.
29. What is the amount of money saved by noncompliance?: NQne.
30. Was the violation committed willfully or intentionally?: YES — NO -,,X—
Explain:
31. What is the prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply -with programs
over which Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority?: This
had twodischarges st Butler Branch in JullyA f 1999 which reaulted
in theftrmittee having to pump water and waste frorn the b nh and a1212jyit to the
application field by a,5cpir, contragigr. It should be noted that these_twp discharges werg
never assessed by DWO, It aj2pearsThat the enforcement packages were Inst In jouary
0-00 -M-sQueenF for h e inghes of fr=bQu_d in one 0
n t 1999 N i Vi l i n f r f '1 r �n
than the rcQuir&d fimeboard, In April 1997 a Notice of Violation -was sued for failure, to
drsiannte an opfrator in charge.
32. What is the cost to the State for the enforcement procedures?:
Regional costs are as follows -
Mileage: $0.23 per mile for 120 miles: $ 27.60
Fecal Coliform ($46.80 per sample) x 3 140.40
BOD Samples ($18.11 per sample) x 3 54.33
Nutrient Samples ( $65.05 per sample). X 3 195.15

Copies (Bladen Co.' Court House)
John Hasty @ $19.77 per hour
2 hours -Drive time
2 hour Investigation
5 hours Report developement
9 hours total $ 177.93
Bob Heath @ $20.01 per hour
2 hours -Drive time
2 hour Investigstion
4 hours 1gW $ 80.04
Paul Rawls @ $31.87
1 hour supervisory review $ 31.87
TOTAL ^$707.32
33. Type or general nature of business: Swine. Farrow toWean and Farrow to Feeder
Operation
34. What is the violator's degree of cooperation or recalcitrance:
Staff from the -McQueen Farm have been cooperative.
35. Are there any Mitigating Circumstances?: _MQ
36. Assessment Factors:
a. IWC: N/A
b. Receiving Stream: Canal/Ditch
C_ Damage Yes — No_. (Unknown/None Reported)
If YES; include report from Wildlife Resources Commission.
37. Include a copy of any Dcfiignation letter sigutd-by the Direct.
38. Recommendations Made to Owner/Operator: Stop the flow waste to thCh from the
field.
39. Recommendations for further DWQ Action:
- Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent (Forwarded Aprit 18, 2001
- Enforcement Action
- Evaluate low areas of the application fields_an�ill as needs.
-Cease using"star " pulls from Any -hydrant.
40. Other Comments: As mentionedr iou I thi5 sitevisit was due to observations

-Blois T I illoliff-T-RMA
q4
I HOW! =U-Numm-
MY, kff W. MUM

A
w
w
H
z
0
x
w
d
H
O
A
O
z
a
H
w
z �
3 �
o
z
w
w
a

4
tilt.-+cam
spa lv----.a".ti
' `LSc sem.
�F-'I `ySSC.• ir%�}!y -t i "� 1 �_� '!1'.���'k���'�•�-'+�r' w
J {{ {
'; �'Li , l r1€y r t��r_Y � ��-#. yy��'T'f�� fq• ,� s."Y +il+yt'}.,-, Y" '�'+��':ii r �� � .,��
'� � ' s !�; {�/`%Prt�l. T��� ��+�'k"� ti '!�f'�d,+c^��,`�.��rj'pZ—�s7►� t m � f��, ��'f R _ � :� �
y3;,fi
�t7 �F. - �'!k'R 7� --���� -j�� �li _�� .�N: �IrriY'. ll }.w1•. � tl.-��i�: :'1: ��'.r..�i. l�—r .g

Kim
IIN Y-y7'/�.� �*�c, xy�fi`� ;'�.��,'i�.�'e�ti�•r.�. - - �R 3 � �r
�s'j-9'^
Mil
+ ° ,� 1 r — # y� i4 � 1, ••.,°- '
�y"
p, i .it+� s 7 i -...rte -: — ,�` 7• —
f�`'�� ::FR �Z In

XA-

I
'-T-
..
7 7
W ATw.IS
toy.,
�X'jl
AN

m

,v'�r �;:
g"m

I
T.,
io
t - . .4.
10 -

W_ �
UP
lot'
Iml
, 4.1
,s
I
'Mono imp

El
RON
MCI
,Sw,w'.
SMA
Ile
Ve7
AR xc%�
I

North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Fayetteville Regional Office NCDEI�R
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
April 18, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. McQueen Campbell
P. O. Box 2654
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
Subject: Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent
McQueen Farm, Inc.
Facility No" 09-36 Permit No. AWS 090036
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Campbell:
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non discharge permit for the
subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217, you have been found to
be in violation of your 2H .0217 Permit"
On April 4, 2001, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
performed a routine fly over of Bladen County and the McQueen south of Clarkton. The flight
revealed what appeared to be "ponding" of animal waste in the application fields at this farm.
Upon further investigation, it was found that over application (hydraulic overloading) had caused
the "ponding" observed from the air. Upon further investigation, it was noticed that some
discolored water was also "ponding" at the mouth of a finger ditch perpendicular to the airstrip at
this farm. It was found that the waste had eroded through a berm at the end of the finger ditch and
this discolored water was entering the canal adjacent to the airstrip. Owing to the discoloration of
the water observed, the inspectors felt that samples should be taken to disprove or confirm our
suspicion that there may be waste water mixed in with the rain water. The samples showed
elevated fecal coliform in the source and the downstream samples.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following item be addressed:
Evaluate the irrigation fields at the farm before irrigation to determine if the soils are too
wet to irrigate.
225 GREEN STREET - SUITE 714 / SYSTEL BUILDING / FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] WW1k'.£NR.S"i'A 1'E.NC'.l'SIl N32r
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFI MAT1VE ACTION EMPLOYER -- 50% RECYCLED/10% POST CONSUMER PAPER
DENR TOLL FREE HOTLINE: [phone]

Mr. Campbell
10-27-99
Page 2
2. Please provide this office with the freeboard records, any rainfall records, irrigation
records and a copy of the certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) for this
farm.
3. Consult with a technical specialist to evaluate the low area in the bermuda field adjacent
to the airstrip. It appears that waste stays "ponded" in this area regularly.
4. Please provide this office with a plan on how you intend to alleviate the problem of waste
ponding in this particular area.
5. Address the waterway, or "linger" ditch, to reduce the possibility of waste getting to the
canal adjacent to the airstrip.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing its General Permit
and being required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the Division
of Water Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00 per day per
violation.
You are also hereby notified that the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality is considering sending a recommendation for enforcement action to the Director of the
Division of Water Quality. The Recommendation concerns the over application of swine waste to
cause significant ponding which is a violation of your CAWMP.
If you have an explanation for this violation that you wish to present; please respond to this
office by May 2, 2001. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action is still
deemed appropriate, your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the. enforcement
package for his consideration.

Mr. Campbell
4-18-2001
Page 3
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either
myself or Mr. John Hasty, Environmental Specialist, at [phone].
PR/jch
cc: Sonya Avant -Compliance Group
Sam Warren -Bladen Co. NRCS
Trent Allen-DSWC Fayetteville Office
Glenn Davis -Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Central Files -Raleigh
Sincerely,
:l
Paul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor

Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
t
Facaity Number �09 36 Date of Visit: 4-4-2001 Time: 15:30
b • - .� �n �. 0 Not OlMmtional 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted B Cert'�ied [3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold- -------------------
Farm Name: Ms eu.FRCmJ -- ---_-___ ----------------------- County: DWeo------------------- -- FRO- ----
Owner Name: ]Kcl to= .............................. CamphcR....................................... ........ Phone No: (Sll.(ll 9a-050 .............. .........................................
Mailing Address: PL? Bax.2Q2P------------------------------•-----•-------•------------------- FJizj4WtUQ-flit NC--------•-----------•--------...__ . Z._. ....
Facility Contact: ---•----- ..------ .,_.___-_-•Title:.---------------__._..r._._..._ Phone No: __�._�r___._._•--_-_--
Onsite Representative .............................. ... Integrator. 8tjmn's..tti'.QuuU o[a,1=..-........._..-..
Certified Operator: Kkbsel............... ..-....... PUIYiE�e.-..--•--•-..--..,.........--•-- Operator CertHkation Number.
Location of Farm:
2S miles south on NC 211 on SR 1166
19 Swine [I Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude `;� � • L 28 E` 15 " Longitude jF 78 i • F —60--1�
Design . Current ": Design_ Current.: Desige :.::Cnrnnt
Naber trf;lLag6rihs 1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑
Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
HoghiiPonds f Sohd;Traps.: ❑ No IJi uid Waste Mana ement S stem
Discharges & St,.reM Impacts .
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon [I Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
N Yes [3 No
N Yes ❑ No
© Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes to No
❑ Yes [K No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes CK No

Facility Number: 09-36
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of inspection44-2001
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..... .................
Freeboard(inches): ._.....�._2.4._.._.._................ �7_....._.... .............. ._...... _......
..- -
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvernent?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Anlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/unprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ® Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ® Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Docs the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16_ Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17. Are rock outcrops present?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayf eld boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ On-site ❑ Off-site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
0 No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑Yes
❑ No
25. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
0 Yes
0 No

vrivuvr
;' I Fac8ity Number.' 09-36 1 Date of Inspection 4-0-2t)O1
30. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32 Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover?
Printed on: 4/18/2001
p Yes 0 No
0 Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 0 No
'13 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
0 Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Suring a routine fly -over of Bladen County, irrigation at this farm was observed as was excessive ponding in the application fields. +
Jpon arrival, the ponding in the field was vo*ed by myself and Bob Heath_ The fields were wet from recent rains and the waste water that
tad been applied had migrated to low spots in the field. There were two specific "ponds" with about six to eight inches of waste in each.
There was also ponding noticed notice around the perimeter of the field from a previous application event. The irrigation equipement had
peen turned off prior to our arrival. There was also ponding noticed at the end of a "finger" ditch in the spray field next to the landing strip at
he farm. The water in this area looked suspicious (very dark looking) and it had eroded through a berm around the end of the ditch
waterway) and was flowing through the waterway and into a canal alongside the landing strip which had two to three feet of flowing water.
iamples were collected of the "suspicious" water and sent to the lab for testing. The samples collected showed elevated fecal coMf'orin
Dlonies in the source and the downstream samples. It appeared to the inpectors that this was from a previous irrigation event of some days
K:
Reviewer/Inspector Name Boh t"it iolt8 Has
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

r
i
; >w a
McQueen Farms, Inc,
SR 1166 & SR 1165 • P.O. Box 2654 • Elizabethtown, NC 28337
Fax Cover Sheet
Date: OL 12-01
To: Mr. Paul Rawls
NCDEHNR - DWQ
[phone] Fax
From: McQueen Campbell
[phone] x222 - Phone
Subject: McQueen Farms, Inc. April 5, 2001 Incidence
,Number of Pages Including This Cover Sheet: 3
Comments:
Mr. Rawls,
This is a faxed copy of the letter that we are required to submit.:,I,will mail you an
original. If you have any further questions or comments please give me a call.
Thank you in advance for your time.
McQueen Campbell

b4/IL/201d1 1b: 13
April 10, 2001
Mr. Paul Rawls
9188628759 SOUTHERN FURNITURE PAGE 02
McQueen Farms, Inc.
SR 11.66 & SR 1168 • P.O. Box 2979 . Elizabethtown, INC 28337
Regional Supervisor
NCDEIL R-DWQ
225 Green Street,. Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Mr. Rawls:
On Thursday April 5, 20011 received a call from Mr. John Hasty concerning potential ponding
due to over application at our farm on Page Road south of Clarkton, NC. Mr. Hasty informed me
that he was flying over our farm and noticed ponding in our field in two places. He also
informed me that he had contacted Sonya Barber who helps us with our wastewater management_
I immediately notified my farm manager Mike Linville and had him to go and check out the
areas that Mr. Hasty had mentioned. I also had him to check the: ditches/waterways where Mr.
Hasty had taken water samples. Mike Linville called me back to let me know that we had not
pumped around the area that Mr. Hasty had mentioned and where the rainwater typically ponded
since February 2001. He also checked all ditches around the perimeter of the farm to insure that
nothing unusual was in thern. After checking out everything that N r. Hasty had mentioned,
Mike Linville didn't notice any wastewater ponding, but did notice the ponding of rainwater that
usually happened after we have a good rain.
I called Mr. Hasty back to confirm that we were checking the correct areas. I found out after
talking with Mr. Hasty again that the waterways/ditches that he took water samples from were
waterways/ditches that we had dug in the past 3 to 4 years. The first ditch next to the landing
strip was dug approximately 3 to 4 years ago when we installed drain tile because there was no
ditch to connect the drain tile to. The second waterway or finger ditch was dug to relieve the
rainwater ponding that occurs when we have a good rain. This was dug within the past 2 years.
Both of these ditches are well inside our property lines and by design will not allow any potential
wastewater from the spray fields to ever leave our property or these ditches. I informed Mr.
Hasty of this because these ditches should not be considered waters of the state since I had them
dug to merely help the farmer who was farming our fields. When I put the landing strip in, it had
a waterway on each side of it_ We simply increased the depth of the waterway on the filed side
of the landing strip to allow the drain tile from the field to have a place to release the rainwater.
It was previously to shallow to accorm-nodate the drain tile. If you walk towards the hog houses

t
b4I11/3bk71 1b: E3 9108628759 SOUTHERN FURNITURE PAGE 03
a -.raw
McQueen Farms, Inc.
5R 1166 & SR 1168 • P.O. Box 2979 • Elizabethtown, NC 283.37
from where Mr. Hasty took the water samples you will eventually walk, out of the ditch that we
had dug into a "V" shaped waterway. It is very important to note that the places where Mr.
Hasty took the water samples from was at least 200 feet from the closest real ditch. Whether the
water that Mr. Hasty checked was wastewater or rainwater it was located in ditches that we had
dug and it never left our property and got into any water of the states.
I have talked with Sonya Barber and Mike Linville again and made them both aware that we
should have not been pumping with the ground in the state that it was in. We had received a
good rain three or four days prior to the time that Mr. Hasty had flown over and I think that we
simply thought the ground was ready for us to pump. I have directed them to be much more
conservative in the future and never take a chance with pumping when the ground might be too
saturated to take our pumping. Per Mr. Hasty, our lagoon levels were in good shape at 24" and
27" and I think with the good weather we were having we were simply trying to maintain the
good standings of our lagoon levels. I can assure you that we will be taking a much more
conservative approach to the ground conditions that we pump on.
I thank you for your time and efforts in your investigation and I hope you will call on me at
anytime if I can be of further assistance.
Z
tfully,
D. McQueen Campbell, III
Owner
cc. John Hasty - DWQ
Mike Linville - Farm Manager
Sonya Barber
Sam Warren - NRCS

E
Division of Environmental Management
11(wLteol'L
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RZCORD
For Investigation of
gIczeleel- CO'AIZ�,
Samples
collected and DMI forma completed
by:
Received by
Date Time
b Only
Station.
No.
INa.
Location
Date
Time
of
Bottles
1Lab'No.
Station
0/
3, 5
7
v
L�
4,0 L-LQ�k-,�
-ai
3: ss
z
Rel u ' he�jby( mire) -
c
d by S
gnature)
�Sa
e / Time
Rec
by
Rel
Rec
by
Rel
Rec
by (Lab)
j
Method of
Shipment:
Security
Seal b1:
a and Condition: Lock b
Broken by:
en b
r III ITCV nuTV
Lab No.
From Through
No.
Containers
Anal i- elin wishejby
Received by
Date Time
1� 9600

WATER QUALITY CHEMISTRY LAB
John,
We received a COC today for the investigation of McQueen Farm.
The following areas were not completed on the COC form:
I . Samples collected and DMI forms completed by:
2. Method of Shipment:
3. Sealed by:
I understand that these are minor errors, and.the samples will still be treated
as COC. We need to pay close attention to all areas that have to be
addressed on the COC form. Oversights can break the COC.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact
Donna.Saunders(c�c�,ncmail.net.or Dana. Satterwhite @ncmail.net 919-733-
3908.
Thank you,
Donna Saunders
Cc: Dana Satterwhite
Joy Goodwin

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
817 Castle Hayne Street Fayetteville, NC 28303 Phone [phone]
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Fax [phone] Is.
PAGE / _ OF
WENT NAMEaADDRESS:Poa
r�
1 Z S (5/",/C._+«i,✓` ,UL
��t Ac. xG /� �!
Ac.
Date
PROJECTIIDCAT{ON:
'
�r �il ll
2 O
g
D
T
T
L
E
8
Date
'TYPE
OF ANALYSIS
- -ol
71 ds
PRESERVATION CODE
YA' u ,
y o Z
MEMO
PC Ilnqulshed by: (Sign I
Date
Time
Relinquished by. ($ nature)
Date
Time
3
CODE: A = <4•C ONLY
B = HNO3 (ph<2) + <40C
C = H2304 (ph<2) + <4•C
D = NaOH + -WC
E = ZN Aoswe + <41C
F _
CONTACT k.� G�k
Relinquished by: iSggnature)
Date
Time
Retinquished by. iSignaturej
Date
Time
51
s
PHONE. �/
e/d G - l� ( l
MUPLER:
'_ / %/ _
DATE! METHOD OF SHIPMENT:
LAS ID #
SAMPLE
TYPE
DATE
TIME
COMPGRAB
pN
t].O.
Tt7MP'C
RLQ
CNt.ORINE
RellnquisheC .15t tura
Date
Time
Rolf ulshed by:iSI atur
Date
Time
- -ol
71 ds
--. 2
YA' u ,
y o Z
MEMO
PC Ilnqulshed by: (Sign I
Date
Time
Relinquished by. ($ nature)
Date
Time
3
4
Relinquished by: iSggnature)
Date
Time
Retinquished by. iSignaturej
Date
Time
51
s
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: iggnature)
Date
—fate
ITIme
8
ITIme
Comments or Special Hazards:

®Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION NC 411
817 CASTLE RAYNE STREET NC #37714
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28303 USDA #3787
[phone] / [phone] (FAX)
http://www.microbac.com
CHEMISTRY • MICROBIOLOGY • FOOD SAFETY • CONSUMER PRODUCTS
WATER • AIR • WASTES -'FOOD • PHARMACEUTICALS • NUTRACEUTICALS
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CLIENT: NC DENR - DWQ
ADDRESS: Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
CONTACT PERSON: Mr. Paul Rawls
ACCOUNT NUMBER: #KN003
SAMPLE ID: 1_ Source - #01WE42383
2. Downstream - ID #01WD42384
3. Upstream - ID #01WU42385
4.
DATE RECD: 04/04/01 SAMPLED: 04/04/01
SAMPLED BY: J. Hastv
DELIVERED BY: J_ Hasty
SAMPLE CODE: WW, Grab
REFERENCE: McQueen Campbell
DATA REVIEWED BY:
DATE REPORTED: 04/11/0
}++++++a+++*+++a++aa++++++-+a+a++++#aa++*++*+++++++++++++++++*++#++++#+a#+a+**+*a++*+*#+*+
-ANALYSIS METHOD I 2 3 4
##++**++*++**a+*++++*+**#a+#+a:F++++++++*+i++*+++*+*1-}+a+f#y*++*+++++++++++++**++++++++++*+
COLIFORM, FECAL (per 100 ml)
COMMENTS: C = Less than
7 = Greater than
SM18 9222D 30000 20000 99
PAGES 2 OF 2
The data and other information contained on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the MEMBER
samples) analyzed and is rendered upon the condition that it is not to be reproduced wholly or in part for
advertising or other purposes without written approval From the laboratory.
USDA-EPA-MOSH Testing Food Sanitakm Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research

lab Numbcr
I11VISION (1f M APER OCALITY
Ilatr Raciscd :
415/21R)i
'1 i nlc Received '.
t he'111i1111. 1.116111 Alrl1 , Ill'111rr r f Is Alrr t]Il llltls
Received By
DS
Ifata Kll'it",:
Alt.
[laic ltepoltcd'.
$1112001
I srl'A 11 lII :\I11,R
I'Rf!-7Rf11�
_
Residuc, loulAyj mg I. _
I4111.I4 Ii.151N .'
AN11i1}:\i
Sl REAM
O HYMEN]
Illa'nitt-It) Fkll Rrl;innal Ull irCLJ<:I
)pll'L I;1 \'Cf 1• I CIIANNOI t'US101))'
I.AKI'
INPLE!L'N i'
till— .
1 1.11 Rli1 \V) %1 11 111
1:51'llAll l"
t,lI Ills d E unil>
1 III lliesrl Ran F
Cd -Cadmium 1027
f fil,1.1 ( ]s11i11S II:\till
: idir, IL' l`ll 3 I14 - --_ 1111: I--
�Y
rill almit', to i`I I ti 3 s l3 Ills' I.
��
,111.J111111, 111 'i 1+ } ? l I;1 111 P, 1
,--,.
lab Numbcr
I W 1992
Ilatr Raciscd :
415/21R)i
'1 i nlc Received '.
9:30 A NI
Received By
DS
Ifata Kll'it",:
Alt.
[laic ltepoltcd'.
$1112001
]',sim,l lyd 1s[II1 R:, 11 c,- tilnli,m i 11r ;11i.1u: l'I'til IIPAF,I Al l'Cllll.liN I'.\hpl
Srd til;urinalyd: Porelar As:
Simin1a Marr With,{,yAnm:dell haleI:ndi}}lmnllddi finlcBuRin lime End nrptll-1W,DR, 171111 T-111C'I')pe-:1.11,1, Cmmposito-T.S,B S�nIP]e1)pe
a{a,1n1111 n3S5 ,.. ----
.X
POD 310 7.7 111F; I
1.2
COP IIw1h ltd mr. I
N
l'hl .I taprr 3::u1r u,n- I.
6,0
(.'sdilntnt 7.11- Fetal 31(1[, 141111111
N
C III 'nll Nil 1111.1131;{1.1 IiIlllul
28
C11111urm udr Prc.11 11615 .- I011nd
X
Cohlnlul' I-ef;lijlrc+31673 1001111
_
Residuc, loulAyj mg I. _
_
V.datile501 al,'1.
�.
I mrd 3111 nu: I
_
id,'+idur ♦u,i'r rni; 11 ?}U inr. I
-__
1r,11dtllc 133 III ; 1.
Iistd :-Irl ms; I.
Him' Win ral&Acid !?xnar]ablet)r
t,lI Ills d E unil>
1 III lliesrl Ran F
Cd -Cadmium 1027
__�._.-
: idir, IL' l`ll 3 I14 - --_ 1111: I--
�Y
rill almit', to i`I I ti 3 s l3 Ills' I.
��
,111.J111111, 111 'i 1+ } ? l I;1 111 P, 1
,--,.
Illi, I,ViI ITIS; I
_
I 1111,01tV' ,s. Nit'
�-
t�nldnr nl Int.J lUl.• In:1 m}c ,
1 11x1 s11 \ I �
X I
1:111nIIdeY4l1 ;'I.
1.2
.. .n
I ri 32: 17 11 ; I.
N
l'hl .I taprr 3::u1r u,n- I.
6,0
m ?L
N
NCI2 plus NV3.n N 630
28
Clw, (I'll I 93 ltll= r.u.
X
CIp111r >li i.h F: c.u,
0.67
Cyanide 720 111E.'1.
Cls ilochlocine Pesticides
P Iwniklc Y31 ., .-.. 111, 1.
�.
F nnn.ddrhs dr 71.\FU nut"I
l ilr.l u' dial l hh ii/• uyt I
-__
I I d I dticss lural 900 ISIg'I
Slrrilie Cont, 93 umhns/11112
Him' Win ral&Acid !?xnar]ablet)r
1.114:\ti ]F.'1.11 rn}; I
1 III lliesrl Ran F
Cd -Cadmium 1027
�ldl,llf"'4` III; 1
�Y
�llilnit' :-13 IIII; 1.
1;(`14'11
l,ulnul,E 11s:uu1
_
I lrynralt'111 l'Iunnuum a `'I.
Ni-Nicl,rl1067
X I
N113 as N 610
1.2
nl 'L
N
I KN an N 623
6,0
m ?L
N
NCI2 plus NV3.n N 630
28
_m/l,
X
P: Iolal as 1, 663
0.67
mg.f1.
Cls ilochlocine Pesticides
1'04 as V 70507
Or ano lltos porus Peslicides
mg/l.
11: llissulscd as V666
Acid llcrbicidrs
m 11.
K•Putassium
Him' Win ral&Acid !?xnar]ablet)r
mg/l.
1 III lliesrl Ran F
Cd -Cadmium 1027
u /L
Pur able Rr mics (VOA botsle se 'd
C1-Chromium:Iotsl1031
a /L
Cu. Cupla'r 1042
11R/I-
Ni-Nicl,rl1067
T
ug/l.
_
Pit- lead 11151
a 'I.
'lm• Zinc 11192
_
u r I-
V-1'd1l,10iunl
11L. L—
.hl:.
A g.Shcrl 111; 7
ul;. L
Al. Aluminum 1105
t1g. t.
Be. &'Icllium IUII
LIS'
I!Ca'
_
Ca.Calcium Yld
Co. C(A)a11 IU37
a d.
FC' hon 11115
ug, 1.
l.i-Lithium 1132
u /L
M •Magnesium 927
m /1.
Mtn -plan nese 1055
u /L
Na. Sodium929
mg/ L
Arscnie loll IO2
UR/l.
St. Scicnium1147
u!L
Il - Mercury 71900
u /L
Ba -Barium
u /L
Cls ilochlocine Pesticides
Or ano lltos porus Peslicides
Acid llcrbicidrs
Him' Win ral&Acid !?xnar]ablet)r
nirs
1 III lliesrl Ran F
Pur able Rr mics (VOA botsle se 'd
I I'll Gasnlioc Range
IIII V BTEX Gasoline Ran
E'heln lanklon
MAY 2001 j

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY 1:11
-LD -LAB I:ORM (DMI)
COUN"FY ,N�%j,"r s/
PRIORITY
SAMPLE TYPE
0
RIVER BASIN /, /,
A161DIFNT �
❑
3
REPORT TO: ARO" Fh MRO RRO WaRO WIRO WSRO TS
QA
ST IE'
,EFFLUENT
AT IIM
11I�
COMPLIANCE LOJ
LAKE
INFLUENT
Other
CIIAIN
Colllotm: Tribe Fecal 1161.; /100110
-.. 7
--
OI' CUSTODY
Zn-Zlnc 1092 ug/1
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Shipped hy: OilCnurler'-Staff, Other
EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
82244 431
CULI.LCFORIS):.�ii'�r Al/
L.. 4
Fl x eJ 510 neg/1
...� �-
- ..
STATION LOCATION: [.!
` s� % C.
J/�JF�i✓ r'iF�C'�`�
Estimated BOD Range; 0.5i5.25/25.65/40-130 or 100 plus
_7
Phytoplankton
Fixed 540 m4j/1
❑
/4,e,/ft
pl! 403 units
J
Seed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes No ❑
REMARK S: r'r/—S C /�L�
*`' L✓� f7e
/¢��%/�fi/%C//✓ i
bar Leh If.. "N1.Y
Lab Number:
Date Received: Time;
Recd by; _ From- _Sus- ourler'liand Del
DATA ENTRY BY; CK:
DATE RCPORTED;
S!l"J/ Uatr, Orpkn lyry�/mm/dad!) Time I1c¢In Date lirrd Time End Depth UM oil DBM Value Type Composite Sample Type
!4 l t A 11 L T S B _.C,. ,G GNXX
I
Chloride 940 mg/l
BODS 310 mg/I
Chi a: TO 32217 trg/I
COD Illgh 340 mg/i
2
11henphytin a 32213 u9/1
--
3
—
COD Lo, 335 ntg/l
+1
Iig-Mercury 71900 ug/l
Collform; MF Feral 31616 /IO0m1
r
--
—
Cofifnrm: MF Total 31504 /IOthui
(r
Sulfide 745 mg/1
Colllotm: Tribe Fecal 1161.; /100110
-.. 7
pli 4.5 roll 8.3
F.cal tilrep 310;7;4 /IOtlrnl
Zn-Zlnc 1092 ug/1
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Tura1 51x1 .._.,._�. -�-----nr.ME--
Volatile 505 mull
q
Ag -Sliver 1077 uR/1
82244 431
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/l
Fl x eJ 510 neg/1
...� �-
.» -
I(eslJne: Suslrended 5311 m±l/1
'
12
--
'A Vniaille .535 -' -------- m±1/1
13
Phytoplankton
Fixed 540 m4j/1
14
480
pl! 403 units
J
36
Acidity to pli 4.5 436 mull
10
35
Acidity to PH 8.3 4350 mg/1
14
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mull
_..18
Alkallnity to p11 4.5 410
I rl
TOC 610 mg/1
. 2fi
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/l
6
Chi a: TO 32217 trg/I
Chl n: Corr 32209 119/1
x
11henphytin a 32213 u9/1
--
Color: TrIM 1tl 1'f -Co
Color:(plf� -- ► R1 A1)[1I1
S mg/1
Color: pit 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyaolde 720
Fluoride 951 mg/l
1'nrtnaldehyde 71880 mg/1
(crease and 0115 55r, mg/I
Ilardness Tnta19O(1 �mull
Specific Cond. 95 UMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/1
Phenols 327;10 ug/1
hFl
Iig-Mercury 71900 ug/l
CdCadmlunr 1027 rrg/I
Sulfate 945 mg/I
Sulfide 745 mg/1
NI -Nickel 1067 ugA
I'b-Lead 1051 1st)/1
pli 4.5 roll 8.3
Zn-Zlnc 1092 ug/1
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
NH3 as N 610 mg/I 11
6
TKN as N 625 mg/1
NO2 Plus NO3 as N 630 mg/I
x
P: Total as 1' 665 mg/l
Sarnpting Polnl %
PO4 as P 70507 j
P; Uls+nlw+d as P 666
S mg/1
I} mg/l
hFl
Iig-Mercury 71900 ug/l
CdCadmlunr 1027 rrg/I
Cr-Chromlum:Total 1034 ugA
CmCopl+er 1042 uu/1
NI -Nickel 1067 ugA
I'b-Lead 1051 1st)/1
pli 4.5 roll 8.3
Zn-Zlnc 1092 ug/1
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Ill
Acid Extractable Organics
Ag -Sliver 1077 uR/1
82244 431
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/l
Purgeabie Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Be. -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Sallnity
Cn-Calcium 916 TngA
Wind f)lrectian 0)'g)
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Turbidity Severity
Fe -Iron 1045 uq/l
LI-Lfthlum 1132 ug/1
6
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/1
Mn -Manganese 1055 ug/I
Acidity
Na -Sodium 929 mg/I
Sarnpting Polnl %
Araertic:Total 1002 ug/I
WaleT Temperature
Se-Seleniurn 1147 ug/l
hFl
Iig-Mercury 71900 ug/l
Orylanor.hloritte Pesticides
Ortlanoplwsllrnrus Pesticides
Acid I IerbicIdea
pli 4.5 roll 8.3
2
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Ill
Acid Extractable Organics
giro
82244 431
B2243 JR2242
Purgeabie Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
v
Sallnity
Preclpllion On/day)
Wind f)lrectian 0)'g)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity MIH
Phytoplankton
6
D.O.
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
Sarnpting Polnl %
Conductance at 25 C
WaleT Temperature
mg/1
hFl
pli 8 3 Af 4.5
pli 4.5 roll 8.3
2
94
Ill
300 _I,
Cloud Cover T
giro
82244 431
B2243 JR2242
20
v
Sallnity
Preclpllion On/day)
Wind f)lrectian 0)'g)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity MIH
4ean Stream Depth It.
Stream Width fl.
480
45
32
36
1351 _�
1350
35
64
14

S I 1 }
E 't,# AY201NI DIVISION' (]f' 11',11 I:li (?11,11,1'1.1'
1 1
� ; � 1'Urmi.ln I-ehurnlmy Rapur1111'Iltrr (Jnehly
IV SAh1I'LEJYl'li
-- — ..
t rtl'v 15 UI .\I slti ) r -,y
� I'Rltllll l Y
Date Received:
4/512001
_
IrIYr.ItltstilV: `f ).' '�
❑�\M1IImt.'I � QA
F STREAM
EFFTUEN1
1(12.11!11 'Itl FRIM Rrr,innal !)Rite _
0 COMPUA�NCli CIIAINOF-C:U510[71'
LAKE
INFLUENT
Inhrr :
I'.\I IiIIGF,NI-1" VStiI111)
1:5117ARY
Ko,iriuc: Iotal 500 In."L
Or atlochlerine Pesticides
l I11.LF'111111tti1 : 11:1ti l Y
_
fired 5111 "rprl.
_
It, Dor Sus IrnalCel 5311 1111. S.
[-ah Nu mbef !
1 W 1990
Date Received:
4/512001
Time Rcmivcd :
9:30 AM
Received ny
Data R eased :
175
sj.-2-10+
AR
Date Reported:
511/2001
Is ley lnlyd 1101, Haller, F.nr:uiun: DISCHARGE PAIN 1- NICQUE17N FARM
Srrd: l:IdwBnurd: Rrnrnr Ms:
tiulirul x Hate 1trKin lyy rnnn!dd1 pnlr I:nd l�yhnnlyddl '1 irnr 1k><il, fimr Find nrplil • DNI, pll, UUIf Vnlue 1) pc - A, 11, L Compasitti f, 5, A Semple l)pe
I 20 10)(11 0515
C
KID 318 110 mF:1.
m /L
CVII Iliph 3m mg I.
��
4-"111 r,ts 335 "Ir, l
X NO2 Vim NO3 as N 630
C-0iIm m. All' I ceal 31616 ')410 rn1
m !L
Colflorm. AIF total 31541 100"11
24
ColilorIII: Iutr feral 31515 r 100"11
1104 as P 70507
Coliftnm- Fccai Sere, 31673 INIH
m /L
Ko,iriuc: Iotal 500 In."L
Or atlochlerine Pesticides
VOIJ C 505 111c1.
_
fired 5111 "rprl.
_
It, Dor Sus IrnalCel 5311 1111. S.
Acid Iletbicidn
V-4mi1v 533 nl ;'t.
Cr-Chromium:Total IO34
I'md mill _ Inp. I
u /L
I'll Int 8.5 units
_
P1 "nolo
Ni -Nickel 1067
JUH.m'r.i5 ,up I.
_
SullldC 715 III. I,
('141113'1 EX Gasoline Range
:�IseFurill a^I^If �I 5.11+1 ul>; I
%m zinc If192
I S Ir' r,SO
118/L
I url nlur in ., N 1 1)
(),Wm III I "I.0 I1111• Y -- IN) 11111
x NIDasN610
Cllkxldc 910 VI : L
m /L
C IIS a: I r e 3221' lip, - I.
135
0111 a. Cnl l 32219 u , L
X NO2 Vim NO3 as N 630
Nhc<!Ihtmla3:213 Ur, 1.
m !L
Color I IIle 80 C.U.
24
Calor: (p] I ) 83 PII= C.U.
1104 as P 70507
Colin: 101 7 6 82 CAL
m /L
Cr anldc- 720 111 i L
Or atlochlerine Pesticides
Fhiondc• 951 m :'l.
K -Potassium
T,rrrnIddchcde %IRR) mg!L
m 1L
(IiCasr and OIIs 556 nil! 'F
Acid Iletbicidn
I1.11dncss I n1.d 91}U m.: I.
Cr-Chromium:Total IO34
tiivrilic'Cnn,! v5 ___ omhosicitQ
u /L
MItAS 182"0 m-, I
_
P1 "nolo
Ni -Nickel 1067
JUH.m'r.i5 ,up I.
_
SullldC 715 III. I,
('141113'1 EX Gasoline Range
1Lnnu
%m zinc If192
l.nulin ,F I.y;nin ug 1.
118/L
lle"n alcol (_Illlllmnitl 111.- I
a /t -
x NIDasN610
711
m /L
X I KN an N 625
135
In/I.
X NO2 Vim NO3 as N 630
0.59
m !L
P: I otal as P665
24
m I.
1104 as P 70507
u L
m /L
P: Dissolved as P 666
Or atlochlerine Pesticides
m 1L
K -Potassium
m 1L
Cd -Cadmium 1027
Acid Iletbicidn
a /L
Cr-Chromium:Total IO34
u /L
Cu - Co er 10.12
U10,
Ni -Nickel 1067
Pur able Ot nia (VOA boole re 'd)
a •'1.
I'b. Lead 1051
('141113'1 EX Gasoline Range
a /L
%m zinc If192
118/L
V-\r.m.,dnun
a /t -
A', Sil�,r Inil
u 1,
At-Altiminu,n 1105
n :I.
Ile-11colliuln 1012
a il-
GI, L.11litlrll 916
Ill /l.
CD-Cubalt 1037
u (L
Iron 1015
ug/i.
LI:e•
,
Li -Lithium 1132
u IL
M • Magnesium 927
m /L
hln•hlan mese 1055
a /L
No -Sodium 929
m /L
Amenicluial1002
u /L
Se. Selenlum 1147
It /L
11 • MCFCu 71900
u L
ea tlarium
u /L
Or atlochlerine Pesticides
Or an hoes horul Pesticides
Acid Iletbicidn
Maw/ NetitrahFAcid Vim ractabicOe anis
1 -PI I Diesel Range
Pur able Ot nia (VOA boole re 'd)
l'i'lt Gasoline Range
('141113'1 EX Gasoline Range
PhylopJanklon

DIVISION OF ENVIRONI%IENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DNII)
COt}NTY 11t �.rr/Pied -
,R PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPE
r
ftlVlJt BASIN id-
❑AMBIENT
❑
❑
®
REPORTfi
REPORT TO: AFRO IRO RRO WeRU WIRD WSRO
TS
QA
STREAM
EFFLUENT
AT BM
6
COMPLIANCE CHAIN
LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
Other
❑
OF CUJT, D,Y r,
EMERGENCY "
1 1... I �••4
❑.ES�A4Y
—
—
Cloud Cover 7L
Shipped by: Bus Cnurl¢r all, Other
9
f� f f' ��
r Gt i,; �1w
10
Wind Velocity MAI
Fixed 510 mg/1
1 1
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/1
For Lab tlso ONLV
Lab Number:
Date Recelved: C.J Time: • r
Recd Ca
_� j From: Bu uri -Nand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK. _
DATE REPORTED:
COLLEC:TOR(.9):&0&"Ll�-iy - L .1✓ �y
STATION LOCATION;
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-13u nr 100 plus
Seed: Yes (_1 NOL` Chlorluated: Yes El No El REMARKS: r t �i[_a+. �i�4�1�����. �e tis.✓ J,
•Srntie.n 1/ 1
Dn1rt Begin Ny/mnt/dd) Time I1egln Dnle find Time EnJ Depth DM DB DBM Value Type
A H L
1
oride. 940 mg/i
I501t5 310 mg/t
2
r
COD high 340 mg/l
Acidity
ophylln a 32213 ug/I
Color: 'Tole Rfl- - Pt -Co
CnIO01111 ) 83 ADMI
COD LOw 335 ulg/I
- 1
i
Color: 1111 7.6 R2 ADM]
Cc)lifnTM: MF Fecal 31616 /10011
Cyanide 720 - mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Cd -Cadmium 1027 ugA
pit: 1olnl 31504 /10011
CTChromlum:Tota11034 ugA
6
Cnlilorm: I uhe Fecal 31665 /100110
7
_
Cn111nrrw Fec.nl Strep 31673 /10011
--
8
Sulfide 745 mg/I
Residue; Total rim mg/I
—
—
Cloud Cover 7L
Volatile 505 mg/l
9
Wind Direction a)eg)
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/I
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
10
Wind Velocity MAI
Fixed 510 mg/1
1 1
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/1
Realdne; Suspended 530 mg/I
12
32
- �Volatile 535- mg/I
13
1350
Fixed 540 mg/1
64
4 -
pit 403 units
15
Acidity to p11 4.5 436 mg/I
16
Acidity to pit 8.3 435 1"g/1
17
HlR
Alkatinity to pit 8.3 415 mg/I
-
AMallnity to pit 4.5 410 mg/t
19
—
TOC 680 mg/1
Turbidity 76 NTU
Zn
X
oride. 940 mg/i
Nater Temperature fC
a: Tri 32217 ug/l
r
e: Corr 32209 ug/I
Acidity
ophylln a 32213 ug/I
Color: 'Tole Rfl- - Pt -Co
CnIO01111 ) 83 ADMI
1': Dissolved as P 666 mg/l
Color: 1111 7.6 R2 ADM]
Cyanide 720 - mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Cd -Cadmium 1027 ugA
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/l
Grease nod Otis 556 mg/l
Hardness Total 900 mg/1
Specific Card. 95 uMhos/cm2
MHAS 38260 -� mg/I
CTChromlum:Tota11034 ugA
2
Cu -Copper 1042 ug/l
Phenols 32730 ug/1
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/l
Sulfate 945 mg/I
Pb -Lead 1051 ug/I
Sulfide 745 mg/I
Zn -Zinc 1092 ug/I
—
—
Cloud Cover 7L
Salinity
Ag•Sllver 1077 ug/I
Wind Direction a)eg)
X
N113 as N 610 mg/I
Nater Temperature fC
TKN as N 625 mg/I
pll
NO2 plus NO3 us N 630 mg/I
P: Total as P 665 m9/1
Acidity
I104 ns 1' 711507 S mg/I
1': Dissolved as P 666 mg/l
Cd -Cadmium 1027 ugA
pit 4.5 pit 8.3
CTChromlum:Tota11034 ugA
2
Cu -Copper 1042 ug/l
10
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/l
400 1•
Pb -Lead 1051 ug/I
82243 182242
Zn -Zinc 1092 ug/I
—
—
Cloud Cover 7L
Salinity
Ag•Sllver 1077 ug/I
Wind Direction a)eg)
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/I
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity MAI
Ca-Calclum 916 mg/l
Stream Width ft.
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/1
4HO -
Fe-tron 1045 USA
Composite Sample. Type
T �S H C G GNXX
LI -Lithium 1132 ug/I
Mg-Magneslum 927 mg/I
Mn -Manganese 1055 ug/l
Na -Sodium 929 mg/I
Arsenic.Totat 1002 un/1
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/l
110 -Mercury 71900 119/1
Organochlorine Pesfleldes -
Orgarwplwsphorua Pesticides
Acid Ilerbicides
Rase/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
S;unpling Point
Conductance at 25 C
Nater Temperature fC
D.O. mgA
pll
�Alkalinity
Acidity
Alf Temperature (C)
p!1 8,3 pit 4.5
pit 4.5 pit 8.3
2
94
10
300 �•
400 1•
82244 431
82243 182242
20
—
—
Cloud Cover 7L
Salinity
_
Preclphlmi (lrJ,lay)�
Wind Direction a)eg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity MAI
eon Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
4HO -
4;
32
36 --
351
1350
35
64
4 -
v-

I w 1991
1 laic RecOved i 415/20()4
1 hme Receivcd: 9:39 AM
Received By ! DS
41� —5 s1ol
.,s R eased :
A
Date Reported 5/1/2001
Vo ...... Ird lll.)II PUIttL'i.: SlAi'll. : POWNSI REAM MCQUELN I ARM
Srr 1: Chlori mi trio:
Dw Firgill 1)yIn,'101. IIa1r l:nd time ""Kill lime End Orplh - Otto, 1)14, MIM I.i lie - A. 11.L CrmpvIl4C-7.5.13 I Simple Type
26O W0Ti n .330 1 1 1 —1
DIVISION M' 1{';%'I I.Aj oP,%j,j,j,),
3BA
-
I1155
Il. -M- 1 .1".-1. , 111 —1 I N'I'll l Q—oil)
54
CldiLnnr NI F I VIM 3150.1 Inllvnl
A iscnic, I utal IU02
Colilorm wLcFecal 3lr,15 100IIII
MNIVI 1: 1 It Pl:
Colift)) in: Fecal Strep 31673 11101111
JILAI)EN
I1KlQI(1L I
29
5115
IM K14 HASIN;
ANIIII17NI
SIRUAM
EFFLUENt'
10j'UR4 10 [7RO kuponal (.It lice
El COMPI.IANCE. ED C'HAl11(Il-(_LJSli,)jlY
I AKE
E-1 INFLUENF
011- ;
E-1 ESH R(':GNCY VISI I It)
LSIUARY
N—fit, 1.•1111 i '.41'.1, 111,: 1
I II I I )iuwl Ran w
A, w
01.1 1 UI OR(SI IIAS IY
11,11.sliml,, In PI I S.3 415
Pu igable Otgalucs (VOA bottle r[ 'd)
INPAin4vtopil 1.5410 mF, 1
i 0C ('1W lug
I w 1991
1 laic RecOved i 415/20()4
1 hme Receivcd: 9:39 AM
Received By ! DS
41� —5 s1ol
.,s R eased :
A
Date Reported 5/1/2001
Vo ...... Ird lll.)II PUIttL'i.: SlAi'll. : POWNSI REAM MCQUELN I ARM
Srr 1: Chlori mi trio:
Dw Firgill 1)yIn,'101. IIa1r l:nd time ""Kill lime End Orplh - Otto, 1)14, MIM I.i lie - A. 11.L CrmpvIl4C-7.5.13 I Simple Type
26O W0Ti n .330 1 1 1 —1
( 0)111F% IS:
I v 200 I
3BA
-
I1155
Chl"1111. Nil Ir"'ll 3111(,
54
CldiLnnr NI F I VIM 3150.1 Inllvnl
A iscnic, I utal IU02
Colilorm wLcFecal 3lr,15 100IIII
A it
Colift)) in: Fecal Strep 31673 11101111
x
Residue:I (tal 518) I
29
5115
Otpnuchlorint Pesticides
I INed 710
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Ir.m. if, nl1;I
V.11,1611: 33i 1111; I
Avid I lubiddirs;
I,,j Sit,
IA:wl 1:
Ilia' l Nrwt.iI& Acid EINUALtiltlIC(lo}mics
N—fit, 1.•1111 i '.41'.1, 111,: 1
I II I I )iuwl Ran w
A, w
11,11.sliml,, In PI I S.3 415
Pu igable Otgalucs (VOA bottle r[ 'd)
INPAin4vtopil 1.5410 mF, 1
i 0C ('1W lug
Im t,iditv 76 N 1
1COl Hill 111 1 ('1.11 1 tibi: 100 ml 5
( 0)111F% IS:
X
011ikiiiii, Q-10 Ilip'l.
3BA
nirlt.
I1155
-I -J
I K 14 .,., N
54
1 ltic XI I VAI.
A iscnic, I utal IU02
(:Om: CAL
A it
Color Illt 7.6 82 tri U,
x
C,arudc 720
29
IlIgIl.
Otpnuchlorint Pesticides
Ing, 1.
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Ir.m. if, nl1;I
11,!.11 111"1 111j! I
Avid I lubiddirs;
Cqwd is U1111111s, c1112
IA:wl 1:
Ilia' l Nrwt.iI& Acid EINUALtiltlIC(lo}mics
Ini
I II I I )iuwl Ran w
Cd. Cadmium 1027
SillfidC `43 Ilig 1.
Pu igable Otgalucs (VOA bottle r[ 'd)
Ofiltl
I annin &- L iErii it
llcsma;cnt Chromium LIE 1.
up'lL,
X
N; as N 6111
3BA
nirlt.
I1155
-I -J
I K 14 .,., N
54
111r, 1.
A iscnic, I utal IU02
M 1-1 111.4, NI N 1,451
A it
Mgr I
x
P: 10111M P61`5
29
IlIgIl.
Otpnuchlorint Pesticides
III) I. as V 7007
Organophosphorus Pesticides
nip.11.
P: DISSIY1rCd a5 I' 06
Avid I lubiddirs;
ing/1-
K-Putassium
Ilia' l Nrwt.iI& Acid EINUALtiltlIC(lo}mics
Ini
I II I I )iuwl Ran w
Cd. Cadmium 1027
ug/L
Pu igable Otgalucs (VOA bottle r[ 'd)
Cf -C11101:141111 IM01 10.1
t1gi1.
Cu. Oq,mr I IW.1
up'lL,
WNi,kcl 141,7
IIrA
Pb- L v,id MS I
ng, 1.
Vil. V.itlk' 10-?!
llgll�
V. 1'.1 11.1dil pill
LIg'l.
Ag -SO -I 1077
M-! L
At. Almilimmi I 105
up I.
14C. FICI011om 11112
11 9 -IL
A - , Icium 916
mg/L
Co -Cobalt 1037
ug/l-
re- linn 1045
U L,
Li -Lithium 1132
ug/1.
Nor.- Mapw%itlili 927
tnjl,, 1.
I1155
U,/1.
N.1- S4KNIIII 929
IlIg/ 1.
A iscnic, I utal IU02
tly L
Se. Sclenlisin 1147
ug/L
lig- Metcuty 11900
ug/L I
Ba -Barium
up./L
Otpnuchlorint Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Avid I lubiddirs;
Ilia' l Nrwt.iI& Acid EINUALtiltlIC(lo}mics
I II I I )iuwl Ran w
Pu igable Otgalucs (VOA bottle r[ 'd)
I IM 1. Gasoline Range
14,111/131 EX G as cifine Range
n
MA
Y-8
D W Q

DIVISION 01= ENVIRONMENTAL NTAL MANAGEMENT WATER Q(JA[,i'r)' FIE
CUUNlY -2-/14Jr- PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN L,:.'".6-* _
REPORT TO: AR[1t7Ff�MRO RRO WaRG WIRO WSRO TS D AMBIENT ❑ QA
ATROther ❑COMPLIANCE: .CHAIN
(I
OF CUSTODY
❑ EML'RGF:NCY
Shipped hy: Rus (!-L nurlei,'Staff. Other
COLLECTORIS): ,t;'-�.e� �f/�I� ,% ,JG, 41
listlmated BOD Range: 0-Si5-25/25-65/40.130 or 100 plus -
Seed: Yes 0 No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes EJ No ❑
Sietion //
)-E,AB FORM WN'll)
SAMPLE TYP[
❑ STRLAM EFFLUENT
❑ LAK�i z ? + ❑ INF1.UIENT
❑ ESTUARY
K'nr lah [iso n?j1 V
Lab Number;
[late Received: Titus.
Recd b ; L From- Bu Courier land del
DATA ENTRY BY; CK:
DATE REPORTED:
STATION LOCATION:)C,J,
Chlnrlde 940 nrg/1
II(IDS 310 mo/I
Chl n: TO 32217 ug/1
-119/1
REMARKS 1-�/— AO"
COD High 340 mg /1
2
Phr.ophytin a 32213 ug/1
C,n I.,+: T air -Rn ----------- I'I-t:n
(:nl001011 ) 83 ADMI
Na-Sadlum 929
Colur: pill 7.6 R2 ADMI
Av%rnlc:T'otal 1002
COD Low 335 mg/I
flair [groin (yy/turn/dd) Time Regin (late F"d Time End Depth UM DR
— l
Chlnrlde 940 nrg/1
II(IDS 310 mo/I
Chl n: TO 32217 ug/1
-119/1
Mg -Magnesium 927
COD High 340 mg /1
2
Phr.ophytin a 32213 ug/1
C,n I.,+: T air -Rn ----------- I'I-t:n
(:nl001011 ) 83 ADMI
Na-Sadlum 929
Colur: pill 7.6 R2 ADMI
Av%rnlc:T'otal 1002
COD Low 335 mg/I
Se-9elenlum 1147
Fluorktr 951 mQ/I
Colllorm: MF Fecal 31616 /100.1
l otmaide}ryde 71880 mg/l
Organochl0rfne Pesticides
Cnlllrnnn: 11117'1nlnl 31504 �- MO. 14111
�r
_...
Cullforur 'lube Fecal 3161. /IOlhnl
- 7
-
Co[lform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100mI
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/i
9
Turhhtity severity
Volatile 505 mqA
I11
Ca -Calcium 916 mq/l
Fixed 510 mg/I
l 1
32
11e51dae: Suspended 530 mq/1
12
-
- Volatile 535 - mq/I
1 a
-
Fiscd 540 mg/l
l l
--
1311 103 - units
-�
--
Acidity to pit 4.5 436 1ng/1
Avidity to pit R.3 435
-
Alkallntly to pit 8.3 415 rag/I
17
IR
----
Alkallnlly In p11 4.5 410 m+t/1
p?
I'(IC 680 mg/I
�
20
furl+Idlty 76 NTO
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sullatr. 9.15 — -- rngA
Sulfide 745 - mg/I
le Type Composite Sample Type
A 11 I. T s n : C G GNXX
Chlnrlde 940 nrg/1
v
Chl n: TO 32217 ug/1
-119/1
Mg -Magnesium 927
Chi A: Corr 32209
-
_
Phr.ophytin a 32213 ug/1
C,n I.,+: T air -Rn ----------- I'I-t:n
(:nl001011 ) 83 ADMI
Na-Sadlum 929
Colur: pill 7.6 R2 ADMI
Av%rnlc:T'otal 1002
Cyanide 720 m0/I
Se-9elenlum 1147
Fluorktr 951 mQ/I
1I9 -Mercury 71900
l otmaide}ryde 71880 mg/l
Organochl0rfne Pesticides
Grease and Oils 556 mg/1
Or pnoplxls;dwrus Pesticides
hardness Total 900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95� uMhOs/cm2
MLiAS 38260�� mR/1
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sullatr. 9.15 — -- rngA
Sulfide 745 - mg/I
le Type Composite Sample Type
A 11 I. T s n : C G GNXX
t I Acid herbicides
Hasa/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acld Extractable Organics
I I I'urgeabte Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
I Phytoplankion
Smnplinri Point %
Nli3 as N 610 mg/I
v
TKN as N 625 mg/l
Mg -Magnesium 927
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/l
Mn -Manganese 1055
P: Total ns P 665
Na-Sadlum 929
—mg/l
11104 as I' 70.07
P: Dlssntvrd as 1' 666 rnQ/1
Av%rnlc:T'otal 1002
un/l
Se-9elenlum 1147
Cd -Cadmium 1027 ug/t
1I9 -Mercury 71900
CrChromtum:Total10..34 ugA
Organochl0rfne Pesticides
CtiCopper 1042 ug/I
Or pnoplxls;dwrus Pesticides
Ni-Nicke[ 1067 uq/1
4(11}
Pb -Lead 1051 no/[
82243 182242
Zu-Zinc 1092 ug/I
W11A Ill"+ctiun 0)rul
A9-Sllver 1077 ug/I
Turhhtity severity
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Re•Reryllium 1012 u9/I
Stream WWtb fl.
Ca -Calcium 916 mq/l
4R0 _-
CwCi,balt 14137 ug/I
32
Fe -Iron 1045 119/1
t I Acid herbicides
Hasa/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acld Extractable Organics
I I I'urgeabte Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
I Phytoplankion
Smnplinri Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Ll-Ll/hlum 1132
USA
Mg -Magnesium 927
mg/l
Mn -Manganese 1055
u9/1
Na-Sadlum 929
mg/I
Av%rnlc:T'otal 1002
un/l
Se-9elenlum 1147
ttg/t
1I9 -Mercury 71900
ug/I
Organochl0rfne Pesticides
74
Or pnoplxls;dwrus Pesticides
3MI _I •
Cloud r:nver 'R
t I Acid herbicides
Hasa/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acld Extractable Organics
I I I'urgeabte Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
I Phytoplankion
Smnplinri Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Tempenturp IC
D.O. mnA
JAI
Alkalinity
Acldlty
Air Temperature 10
1418.3 pill 4.5
PH 4.5 pli 8.3
2
74
to _
i'reClpltlnn 0n/dAyi
3MI _I •
Cloud r:nver 'R
4(11}
82244_ 431
82243 182242
20
W11A Ill"+ctiun 0)rul
Srma11, Il„W'S"w"ity
Turhhtity severity
Wind Velocity M/11 can Stream [3rpih It.
Stream WWtb fl.
. . ............--
4R0 _-
45
32
L-311-4-1--11351
1350
35 64
14
1 v
IPM 1 14evised 10/86

McQueen Farms, Inc.
SR 1166 & SR 1168 • P.O. Box 2979 • Elizabethtown, NC 28337
April 10, 2001
Mr. Paul Rawls
Regional Supervisor
NCDEHNR-D WQ
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Mr. Rawls.,
o
19 r f
N -FR-t
APR 26 2N
` DVVQ
On Thursday April 5, 2001 1 received a call from Mr. John Hasty concerning potential ponding
due to over application at our farm on Page Road south of Clarkton, NC. Mr. Hasty informed me
that he was flying over our farm and noticed ponding in our field in two places. He also
informed me that he had contacted Sonya Barber who helps us with our wastewater management.
I immediately notified my farm manager Mike Linville and had him to go and check out the
areas that Mr. Hasty had mentioned. 1 also had him to check the ditches/waterways where Mr.
Hasty had taken water samples. Mike Linville called me back to let me know that we had not
pumped around the area that Mr. Hasty had mentioned and where the rainwater typically ponded
since February 2001. He also checked all ditches around the perimeter of the farm to insure that
nothing unusual was in them. After checking out everything that Mr. Hasty had mentioned,
Mike Linville didn't notice any wastewater ponding, but did notice the ponding of rainwater that
usually happened after we have a good rain.
I called Mr. Hasty back to confirm that we were checking the correct areas. i found out after
talking with Mr. Hasty again that the waterways/ditches that he took water samples from were
waterways/ditches that we had dug in the past 3 to 4 years. The first ditch next to the landing
strip was dug approximately 3 to 4 years ago when we installed drain tile because there was no
ditch to connect the drain tile to. The second waterway or finger ditch was dug to relieve the
rainwater ponding that occurs when we have agood rain. This was dug within the past 2 years.
Both of these ditches are well inside our property lines and by design will not allow any potential
wastewater from the spray fields to ever leave our property or these ditches. I informed Mr.
Hasty of this because these ditches should not be considered waters of the state since I had them
dug to merely help the farmer who was farming our fields. When I put the landing strip in, it had
a waterway on each side of it. We simply increased the depth of the waterway on the filed side
of the landing strip to allow the drain tile from the field to have a place to release the rainwater.
It was previously to shallow to accommodate the drain tile. If you walk towards the hog houses

51 ski McQueen Farms, Inc.
SR 1166 & SR 1168 • P.O. Box 2979 • Elizabethtown, NC 28337
from where Mr. Hasty took the water samples you will eventually walk out of the ditch that we
had dug into a "V" shaped waterway. It is very important to note that the places where Mr.
Hasty took the water samples from was at least 200 feet from the closest real ditch. Whether the
water that Mr. Hasty checked was wastewater or rainwater it was located in ditches that we had
dug and it never left our property and got into any water of the states.
I have talked with Sonya Barber and Mike Linville again and made them both aware that we
should have not been pumping with the ground in the state that it was in. We had received a
good rain three or four days prior to the time that Mr. Hasty had flown over and I think that we
simply thought the ground was ready for us to pump. I have directed them to be much more
conservative in the future and never take a chance with pumping when the ground might be too
saturated to take our pumping. Per Mr. Hasty, our lagoon levels were in good shape at 24" and
27" and I think with the good weather we were having we were simply trying to maintain the
good standings of our lagoon levels. I can assure you that we will be taking a much more
conservative approach to the ground conditions that we pump on.
I thank you for your time and efforts in your investigation and I hope you will call on me at
anytime if I can be of further assistance.
Respectfully,
D. McQueen Campbell, III
Owner
cc. John Hasty - DWQ
Mike Linville - Farm Manager
Sonya Barber
Sam Warren - NRCS

eneraL Fac i t nforma�ton
Facility Number i 09 36
Count
laden
Owner
McQueen (Campbell
Manager
i
i
Address
PO Box 2979
Elizabethtown NC8337
miles south on NC 211 on SR 1166
Certified Operator in Charge
Backup Certified Operator
Certified
Farm Name
McQueen Farm Inc.
Phone Number
[phone]
Lessee
Region
originally registered as 2 separate facilities (09-87 deleted) per new cert. form.
Inactive opera 10 Lagoon Closed Date inactivated or closed o..
Type of Operation
IN Swine E3 Poultry [3 Cattle ❑ Sheep ❑ Horses E3 Goats (3 None
Design Capacity
Total 6,000 Swine
SSLW 2,776,000 Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds 1 J Lagoon Total Capacity fe
Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
0 No Liquid Waste Management System
4,100,942
O ARO
O MRO
O WARO
O WSRO
—'s
FRO
O RRO
O WIRD
E76
originally registered as 2 separate facilities (09-87 deleted) per new cert. form.
Inactive opera 10 Lagoon Closed Date inactivated or closed o..
Type of Operation
IN Swine E3 Poultry [3 Cattle ❑ Sheep ❑ Horses E3 Goats (3 None
Design Capacity
Total 6,000 Swine
SSLW 2,776,000 Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds 1 J Lagoon Total Capacity fe
Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
0 No Liquid Waste Management System
4,100,942

Latitude
34.4708 34.4708
34 28 15 34 28 15
Longitude
78.7333
78 43 6fl
M AWn12/14/1994
AvailAcres
180
' y` .163
y`
Jimmy R Vinson
Brawn's of Carolina, [nc.
U�`'`�
Request to be removed 13 Removal Confirmation Recieved
......................... ........................ ................... ................................. -.... •-
Comments
Regional DWQ Staff
78.'1333
78 11 43 11 60

Facility Number
...'Regioh
Regional Supervisor
1.
regional
4• •rt Date
Original Issue Date
voide
Engineer Gert. Date
rescinded

I 1173
n Farms,Inc.Mc uee
SR 1166 & SR 1168 • P.O. Box 2979 • Elizabethtown, NC 28337
May 2, 2001
Mr. Paul Rawls
Regional Supervisor
NCDEHNR-DWQ
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Mr. Rawls:
7 2001
i
(TWO - -
SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Permit No. AWS 090036
Facility No. 09 — 36
Bladen County
In response to your Notice Of Violation dated April 18, 2001, this letter will address the areas
and actions that we have taken and/or plan to take in the future to correct the violations
mentioned in your letter.
Item 1. 1 have addressed this issue with each of our certified sprayers to make them aware of the
importance of their detern-iination of the suitability of the soild prior to spraying to insure that we
will not spray at anytime when the ground or soil appears to be too wet.
Item 2. 1 have included with this response the records that you have requested. Please let me
know if you need additional information.
Item 3. 1 am working at this time to arrange for our local person from Soil and Conservation to
help me evaluate the field and make recommendations. Our local Soil and Conservation person,
Sam Warren, has taken another job and currently his position has not been filled. I am trying to
find who can help me in the interim and will move as quickly as I can arrange for someone to
help us from that office. As far as the "waste staying ponded", I do not agree with your
assessment that waste has ever ponded in this area. After a heavy rain, this area typically ponds,
but only of rain water. Anytime that it has ever ponded with rainwater, we stay away from that
area so there will never be any waste in the area that ponds. However; when we do pump in that
area and it rains after we pump there is a possibility that from the prior pumping the water that
ponds could have waste ingredients. We have never pumped when the rainwater has ponded and

Mr. Paul Rawls
May 2, 2001
Page 2
waste has never ponded in that area from spraying. The soil is obviously heavier in this one area
and while it may be dry to day, if it rains tomorrow it could pond. If we just pumped in this area,
when it was dry and not ponding, the ponded that results from the rainwater might have waste
ingredients from the previous pumping.
Item 4. As I mentioned in Item 3 above, I have requested the assistance of our local Soil and
Conservation office to make recommendations to eliminate the rainwater ponding in this area. I
will communicate these findings with your office to let you know their recommendations. Prior
to their recommendations we will do what we have always done and stay away from this area
whenever it has rainwater ponding or even has the possibility of rainwater ponding. We have
stayed clear of this area in the past, but will make an even greater effort to stay away unless we
are sure without a doubt that no rainwater ponding is likely to occur in the near future. The least
we will do is to add dirt to this area to bring it up to the same grade as the other area around it so
the rainwater will not pond in this area. We will more than likely wait for the Soil and
Conservation recommendation before doing anything, but that his what we have decided without
their input.
Item 5. We will build a larger burro around the end of the finger ditch to prevent waste water
from having the possibility of entering the ditch adjacent to the airstrip. We will also leave
ourselves more of a buffer when pumping to insure that we do not get anywhere near the mouth
of the finger ditch to help prevent any waste water in the finger ditch. We had this finger ditch
dug to allow for the rainwater to exit the field in a better manner. We will bring this issue up
with the Soil and Conservations specialist to get their opinion on how the best way is to handle
this as well. We were simply trying to improve the soil conditions by adding this small finger
ditch and if need be we can have it covered up to avoid any potential future problems.
I hope you have found each action above to be appropriate for correcting the items mentioned in
your Notice of Violation letter. If you have any additional recommendations or comments they
would be greatly appreciated.
I would also greatly appreciate your consideration in not recommending an enforecement action
in this incident. As I mentioned in my initial response, I found out that the waterways/ditches
that Mr. Hasty took water samples from were waterways/ditches that we had dug in the past 3 to
4 years. The first ditch next to the landing strip was dug approximately 3 to 4 years ago when we
installed drain tile because there was no ditch to connect the drain tile to. The second waterway
or finger ditch was dug to relieve the rainwater ponding that occurs when we have a good rain.
This was dug within the past 2 years. Both of these ditches are well inside our property lines and
by design will not allow any potential wastewater from the spray fields to ever leave our property
or these ditches. I informed Mr. Hasty of this because these ditches should not be considered

Mr. Paul Rawls
May 2, 2001
Page 3
waters of the state since I had them dug to merely help the farmer who was farming our fields.
When 1 put the landing strip in, it had a waterway on each side of it. We simply increased the
depth of the waterway on the filed side of the landing strip to allow the drain the from the field to
have a place to release the rainwater. It was previously to shallow to accommodate the drain tile.
If you walk towards the hog houses from where Mr. Hasty took the water samples you will
eventually walk out of the ditch that we had dug into a "V" shaped waterway. It is very
important to note that the places where Mr. Hasty took the water samples from was at least 200
feet from the closest real ditch. Whether the water that Mr. Hasty checked was wastewater or
rainwater it was located in ditches that we had dug and it never left our property and got into any
water of the states. Also it is very possible that the rainwater ponding that you observed at our
farm could have occurred after we had pumped on this area when it was dry. If the soil held any
waste water and the rainfall came the next day their might be some ingredients of waste water in
this area. We will work to insure that this doesn't ocurr again, but it is tough to know exactly
when it will and will not rain in the future.
I want to emphasize to you and your staff my commitment to not only adhere to our General
Permit conditions, but also to be proactive in maintaining and operating our waste water systems
in an environmentally friendly manner. My concern for the farm and the environment go deeper
than most operators, because I live in the community where our farm is located. I never have or
will expect others to live in or around conditions that I would not live in or around myself. My
family owns and operates other businesses in Bladen and surrounding counties and we have our
reputation at stake in these areas. We always place much stricter requirements on our operations
than most would place because we want everyone to be pleased with our facilities and the
manner in which they are operated.
I thank you and your office for its time and efforts in assisting us with the compliance of the
above conditions. 1 can assure you that all of our efforts will be given to insure that these
measures are adhered to in the future.
President
cc. Sonya Barber — Farm Consultant
Mike Linville - Farm Manager
Glenn Davis - Brown's of Carolina

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Grower(s):
McQueen Campbell
Farm Name:
McQueen I McQueen If
County:
Bladen
Farm Type:
Far -Feed FarWean
Farm Capacity:
2000 4000
Storage Structure:
Anaerobic Lagoon
Storage Period:
180 days
Application Method:
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the arnount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
-afore each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be groom and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shad be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per arae per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
/'", problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexlole so as to acooIII odaai#e changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, ft3, tons, etc.):
2000 animals X 4015 gal/animal/year = 8,030,000 gallons
4000 animals X 10585 gal/animal/year = **-*'-`"""" - gallons
5E+07 gallons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
2000 animals X 6.50 lbs/animal/year =
4000 animals X 5.40 lbslanimaYyear =
13,000 lbs
21,600 lbs
Total 34600 lbs
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
Page: 2

The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type, and surface application.
Tract
Field
Soil
Type
Crop
Code
Yield
/Ac
lbs N
hmnit
Acres
Lbs IVAc
Residual
Lbs N
/Ac
I lbs N
Required
Time to
Appy
1831
1A
BuA
C
5.5
50.00
8.0
275.0
12200-00
Mar -Oct
1831
-1A
i BuA
K
50.00
8.0
50.0
400.00
S -April
1831
1 B
j Gm
D
120.0
1.25
6.0
20.0
130.0
780.00
Mar -July
=1831
2A
Tr
C
4.5
50.00
20.4
225.0
4590.00
Mar -Oct
1831
-2A
Tr
K
50.00
20.4
50.0
1020.00
SApril
1831
213
Tr
N
55.0
2.40
38.0
132.0
5016.00
S -April
1831
2B
Tr
O
33.0
4.00
38.0
132.0
5016.00
Jun -S
1831
4
BuA
C
5.5
50.00
37.4
275.0
10285.00
Mar-Od
1831
-4
BuA
K
50.00
37.4
50.0
1870.00
S Apn7
1831
3
Tr,Gm
D
120.0
1.25
30.0
20.0
1130.0
3900.00
Mar -July
Total 35077.00
Available N 34600.00
*Difference -477.00
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer
annuals.
*A negative number reflects the total lbs of additional nitrogen needed to achieve yields on
acreage listed in chart_ A positive number means additional acreage is required to utilize the
nitrogen produced by the farm.
NOTE:
This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must' be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
Page: 3

P'1,
r
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definitely interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utiked. Rather than putting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
The following legend explains the crop codes listed in the table above:
Crop Code Cro
A
Barley
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
D
Com - Grain
E
Com - Silage
F
Cotton
G
Fescue - Grazed
H
Fescue - Hay
I
Oats
J
Rye
K
Small Grain - Grazed
L
Small Grain - Hay
M
Grain Sorghum
N
Wheat
O
Soybean
Lbs N utilized 1 unit yield
1.6 lbs N / bushel
50 lbs N / ton
50 lbs N 1 ton
1.25 lbs N / bushel
12 lbs N / ton
0.12 lbs N / lbs lint
50 lbs N / ton
50 lbs N 1 ton
1.3 lbs N I bushel
2.4 lbs N / bushel
50 lbs N / acre
50 lbs N 1 acre
2.5 lbs N / cwt
2.4 lbs N I bushel
4.0 lbs N I bushel
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
Page: 4

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
r�' The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately i pounds of plant available nitrogen per animal per year in the
sludge based on the appfication method Wed earlier.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 10000.00
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 33.33 acres of land. If you apply
the sludge to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 80.00 acres of land.
Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and land needed. Actual requirements
could vary by 256 depending on your sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and
applications.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is fimited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop_
r ;f surface imgation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is Installed to property
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
r
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil
Type
Crop
Application Rate
in/hr
Application Amount
* inches
1831
1A
BuA
C
0.60
I 1.00
1831
-r1A
BuA
K
0.60
1.00
1831
-1B
Gm
N
0.40
1.00
1831
1B
Gm
O
0.40
1.00
1831
2A
Tr
C
0.45
0.95
1831
-2A 1
Tr
K
0.45
0.95
1831
-21B
Tr
N
0.45
0.95
1831
2B
Tr
O
0.45
I 0.95
1831
4
BuA
C
0.60
I 1.00
1831
-4
BuA
K
0.60
1.00
j 1831
3
Tr,Gm
D
0.40
0.95
Page: 5

*This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
ro"'' of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsiabiliiy of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and arnounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
Additional Comments:
Page: 6

r -
F--.
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm:
Owrw/Manager Agreement:
Vwe understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. 1/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Ow
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner): M F ke L. no.
Please Print
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist:
Affiliation:
Signature:
Address:
9 "Am',
Sonya J. Barber
Harvest Net, Inc.
P.O. Box 32
Council, NC 28398
(91 0) 645-6758
Date
111911,
Date
Page: 7

"Of
f 44
e
c.V
C6
cis
a
•�
"Of
f 44

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 07 # Sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay
Acres Covered 5.38
Lbs N Required 225
Year 2001 Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-2A Lbs N to Apply 225
Date Start Stop N11000
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons Lagoon gal
Lbs N In to
In/Ac Lbs N to Apply Apply
03/14101
7:30:00 AM 1:30:00 PM F 50 205 738A0
2 1.8D 0.51 24.75
200.21
4.12
04/03/01
7:00:00 AM 1:00:00 PM 50 205 73800
2 -- 1.80 0.51 24.79
175.43
3.61
F
F F— i __-__— 0.00
175.43
(-- F— -6-.o —o
175.43
I
(� ��— �— 0.00
175.43
I
� �- 1 0.00
175.43
F— I _ -`
F— F— F0.00
175.43
i -
F— r~---- F— D.DQ
175.43
F--�
--._
F— F— r _._.. ___. 0.00
175.43
I
�
F—
F —o
��
I--
F
0.00
175.43
I

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant Q$ # Sprinklers I
Crop Ber Hay Acres Covered 6.74
Year 2001
Lbs N Required 225
Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-2A Lbs N to Apply 225
Date Start
Time
Stop
Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal
In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
03/19/01 7:00:00 AM
12:00:00 PM 50 205 61500
i 1.80
0.34 16.52
20$.48
4.29
-
F-- i - p
1
- 0.00
208.4$
F—
1 _.__.__--._. � F 0
F
F-- F--
,_- 0.00
F—
2D8.48
--- � 1 p
F— 0.00
208.48
�—
D�~_,—
20$.48
�-
� 0.00
� -� �
I 0 —
F 0.00
20$.48
--
F—
F--
F—
F. � r— F 0 --
F-- F—
r— O.OD
208.48
- �
r F— 0
�— .__- — r--
F-- 0.00
F—
—F—
208.48
F--
I— F-0—
F I
F-- 0.00
208.4$
�-
F_.
� �
Fp
1
F—
0.00
1208.48
i .-__—

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant og # Sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay acres Covered 6.74
Lbs N Required 225
Year 2001 Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-2A Lbs N to Apply 225
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
04/02/01
7:00:00 AM 1:00:00 PM 50 205 738x0
r - 2 -- 1.80 0.40 19.44
205.56
4.23
F— � °
� � �–� a.00
205.56
� �______ � a _
F-- Fa.00
20.56
F--
F--
F— �._._ —--___
F--F6.662o5.5s
r
�i
F-- F—o—
F_—_. F_._._— 0.00
2x5.56
F—
� �_— a �
F—�
�
a.ao
zo5.5s

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 09 # sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay Acres Covered 6.74
Year 2001 Lbs N Required 225
Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-2A Lbs N to Apply 225
Date Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
NM000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
03!22!01 7:30:00 AM 12:30:00 PM 50 205 61500
2 F 1.80 0.34 16.52
208.4$
4.29
F ....p _ - .
F— i___- F— O.OD._—
._ _ I
_._,_-. __. - �.�— 0.00
208.48
F _ -
F—[---6--r---F—
F— F6--o--o-
0.00
-0
I
0.00
20$.46
IF
O. Da
208.48
r_-..
F ---
0
F- F-- 0.00
208.48
F— F— F� -
F F— OAO
208.4$
I--
� F F— F-0—
F F
� — __
�
� _ p _.
_+_-
r— F—
r ._
0.00
208.4$
F—

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 10A # Sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay Acres Covered 6.21
Lbs N Required 225
Year 2001 Lbs N Residual
Field
1831-4 Lbs N to Apply 225
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
103/23/01
6:30:00 AM 1:30:00 PM [ 50 205 86100
F 2 1.80 0.51 24.79
200.21
4.12
03126/01
6:30:00 AM 11:00:00 AM 50 205 55350-2
1.80 U.33 16.04
184.18
3.79
F —o
F F— F--
0.00
184.18
�-
F °
—0-00-
.a0
184.18
—0
p ._ _..__.-_
�— �— 0.00
184.18
F
I '
(�
F— F—
.0 .__
F—_-_ —0.00
F—
'! $4.18
F—
F—___ j
0.00
184.18
F_�.-_ —

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 10 B # sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay Acres Covered 3.98
Lbs N Required 275
Year 2001
Lbs N Residual
Field 1831,4 Lbs N to Apply 275
Date Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
03/22/01 7:30:00 AM 12:30:D0 �'M 50 205
61500
2 —
1.80 0.57 27.70
247.30
5.09
L_._
-- - � 0
0.00.247.30
F_,-____
0
F 0.00
247.3D
- p
{�
i — O.OD
247.30
Ff
(�
�- — � � OAO
247.30
� --
-
�
F— F r 0 —
� F F— 0-00
247.30
0
0.00
247.30
�0 �
r~ � � 0.00
247.30
._- p
[-6
�� I
0.00
247.30

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 11A # Sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay Acres Covered 4.89
Lbs N Required 275
Year 2401 Lbs N Residual
Field
1831-4 Lbs N to Apply 275
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal
InlAc Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
03/14/01
7:30:00 AM 1:30:00 PM 50 205 73800
�2 1.80
0.56 27.22
247.78
5.10
F-6—
v
� F
F-- FO -0-0247.78
I -
F F—
r— 0.00
247.78
(— I 0
F
�- -- 0.00
247.78
I
F— F
F.__._ 0.00
247.78
(� F—I V
I��I����
F— �
� � 0.00
247.78
O.00
247.78
F—
F -
247.7$
�' F—
i 0.00
247.78
F—
p -��
F—
F—F-0.00
247.78

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 11B # Sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay Acres Covered 5.1
Lbs N Required 275
Year 2001 Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-4 Lbs N to Apply 275
Date Start Stop N11000
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
103107/01 7:00:00 AM 1200:00 PM
50 205
(
61500
2 i 1.80 0.44 21.38
253.62
5.22
03/19/01 7:D0:00 AM 12:QO:OD PM 5Q 205
61500 2 i 1.$0 0.44 21.38
232.23
4.78
I-- F— I
O.QQ
232.23
p 0.00
23223
F
0 I I 0.00
23223
D
I— I
-- �
0 ,� � -- � 0.00
23223-
r.��
0 0.00
1232.23
r.__
0 F-- 0.00
232.23
--
p __-_ F—-000-
232.23
r____

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 12A # Sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay Acres Covered 4
Lbs N Required 225
Year 2001 Lbs N Residual
Field 1831,4 Lbs N to Apply 225
Date Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
03/23/01 6:30:00 AM 1:30:00 PM 50 205 86100
1 1.80 0.79 38.39
186.61
3.84
F-- r p �
� �`___._. F-0 —00
1 186.61
Q
� F—
0QO
F—F6-0-0-
186.61
�� ��r o.as
186.61
�— I F-- �. -_ °
�.___–__-. �_ aDo
F—
186.61
I
F— r - - r __- 0.00
186.61
F-..�
F— 0.00
186.61
-
�______-__ F— F 0
F F— F-- Q.DD
186.61
-- 0 -
F 0.00
��
F
F—
�.�__.-p. _�
�._ �_-__. _.
��
6.00
186.61

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 12B # Sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay Acres Covered 4.75
Year 2001 Lbs N Required 225
Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-4- Lbs N to Apply 225
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal
In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
04/18/01
9:00:00 AM 12:00:00 PM F 50 M536900
i 2 81
i 0.29 14.09
21 D 91
4.34
004/19/01
9:45:00 AM 1:00:00 PNI 50 205 39975i
0.31 15.07
195.84
4.03
1.80
I-- F —0
O.OD
195.84
F -
F
-_-
0
0.00
195.$4
-__�_.__..--- F-0
F--0.00
195.84
F —
!� -
1�
-_—_--
I — _.- _-
6.00
F 195.84
�-
�- -- 0 -
f 0.00
195.84
r_.
f
- -- I- —� f— 0
195.84
F O.OD
^
195.84
0.00
i
�
F-0
�-
0.00
195.84
F--
� j

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 13A # Sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay
Acres Covered 2.38
Lbs N Required 225
Year 20Q1 Lbs N Residual
Field
1831-4 Lbs N to Apply 225
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In1Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
in to
Apply
04/20/01
6:45:00 AM 9:45:00 AM F 205 36900
F 2 1.80 0.57 27.70
F4-16
�
F—F0.00
197.30
F-
` � F— F 0 -- -
F— 10.00
197.30
� � � _- 0.00
197.30
F—._ _
I�
0.00
197.30
F
F---
I r F-- 0.00
197.30
�-
�_--
F- D
F F— � 0.00
197.30
r-
0 -
F-- F-0
r—._.___- [-- F 0.00
197.30
[-
F--6—
Fp
F
I-
0.00
197.30
F--

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 13B # Sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay acres Covered 4.56
Year 2001 Lbs N Required 225
Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-4 Lbs N to Apply 225
Date Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N/1000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
03/27/01 6:30:00 AM 112:30.00 PM 50 205 738D0
~ 2 -- 1.80
I 0.60 29.16
195.84
4.03
F p- —
F I F� - 0A0
155-64
F—
r Q —
� F— F— 0-00
195.84
F.-^—
0
I F._,-____- 0.00
195.84
- F— F— —o
F-__-__ �� �� 600
�-�— 0.00
195.84
�—
F� 6
-
f O.OD
195.8 4
- 0
F— 0. DO
195.84
r-,--
- I i F— F —0
195.84
F.
0.00
0
0.00
195.84

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 138 # Sprinklers 1
Crop Rye Hay Acres Covered 5.5
Year 2000 Lbs N Required 50
Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-4 Lbs N to Apply 50
Date
start
Time
Stop
Time PSI GPM
Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal
In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
11/01100
7:00:00 AM
F1:30:00 PM 50 205
79950Fr
0.54 24.79
25.21
0.55
02/26/01
8:00:00 AM
12:30:00 PM50 205
I 2 I 1.70
0.37 16.98
8.23
0.18
55350
�—
F--F—F--Q.00
823
��
I
I
-� f �
Fp
- 0.00
8.23
� —
I F
1 0
0.00
8.23
F
0-
F— 0.00
8.23
!i
r
0.00
8.23
F
0
F -0.0D
823
��
F_
F—
0
r
I--
F FO.00
8.23

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 14 # Sprinklers 4
Crop Wheat
Acres Covered 6.89
Lbs N Required 88
Year 2000 Lbs N Residual
Field
1831-3 Lbs N to Apply 88
Date
start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
11/28/00
7:00:00 AM 11:30:00 AM 50 205 55350
1.70 0.30 13.77
74.23
1 1.62
11/30/00
7:00:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 50 205 61500
2 1.70 0.33 11 15 5
59.08
129
01/11/01
9:30:00 AM 2:00:00 PM 50 205 55350
1.70 0.30 13.77
45.31
0.99
02/01/01
7:00:00 AM 1:00:00 PM 50 205 73800
2 1.76 0.40 18.36
F26.95.59
04/02/01
7:00:00 AM 1:00:00 PM 50 205 73800
F 1.80 0.40 19.44
7.51
0.15
1
F- F- r__.-�._._._ 0.00
7.51
I F- I p
00 0
7.51
F 0
F- F- 0.00
7.51
0
F -F 0.00
7.51
I
�_�-_.._
�
F_ --
0.00
7.51

17)
................ ...... ...........
...............
........ . ... -
7
........... ...........
........ ........
............ ...... ................. ....... ...... ........
N i
61
........ ..... ........ ........ ....... ......
. ............ ...... ........ ...
........ ........ .......
....................... .... .... ....... ....
..............................
..........•. ........ ........ ......... ........

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 20 # Sprinklers 1
Crop Wheat Acres Covered 6.73
Lbs N Required 112
Year 2000 Lbs N Residual
Field
1834-1
Lbs N to Apply 112
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI
GPM Gallons
N/1000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
02/09/01
7:00:00 AM 112:30:00 PM 50
205 67650
—1- - 2.20
0.37 21.98
90.02
1.52
02/16/01
8:00:00 AM 12:30:00 PM 50
- 2.20 0.30 17.82
7220
1.22
205 55350
102/20/01
7:00:00 AM 1 1:30:00 PM 50
205 79950
I f 1 — 2.20 0.44 26.14
46.07
0.78
�p
F
F--�F—�0.00
46.07
� 0.0 0
46.07
F_
�
� F-6—
F— F— F— 0.00
46.07
I
I
�
.__°_
F— F--°_—
F- - F— a.00
—a
oa o
46.07
r -~-
46.07

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 21 # sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay acres Covered 4.8
Lbs N Required 275
Year 2001 Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-1A Lbs N to Apply 275
Date
Start Stop
Time Time
PSI GPM Gallons
Nil 000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
10310$!01
700:00 AM '12:00:00 PM
r --6Q 205 rF61500
2 1.80 0.47 22.84
252.16
5.19
!04/18101
9:00:00 AM 12:00:00 PM
{-2 i.60 0.2$ 13.61
238.55
4.91
50 205 36900
1041 191 D1
9:45:00 AM
I 1:00:00 PM
F 2— 1.80 0.31 15.07
223.48
F4.60
50 1 205 I 39975
-
F--
{
F-�_-_.—
�--- 1 0
k � O.DO
223.46
F—
�_— F— ;� p
� F-0.00
Fr—�
I � p
F— F— O.OD
223.48
F—
I
0
-- ~
0
F— 0.00
223.48
F~` _
F— F-- F 0
i4— 1--0 00
223.48
F—
F0
F--
— 1 0.00
223.48

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 22 # Sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay
Acres Covered 4.42
Lbs N Required 275
Year 2001 Lbs N Residual
Field
1831-1A Lbs N to Apply 275
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal
In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
03/26/01
6:30:00 AM I 11:00:00 AM 50 205 55350-2
1.B0
0.46 122.36
252.64
5.20
6:30:00 AM 12:30:00 PM 50 205 73800
r2-~ 1-80
0-61 29.65
223.D0
4.59
03017101
04/20/01
6:45:00 AM 9:45:00 AM 50 205 36900
[2 1.80
0.31 15.07
207.93
4.28
0
F— I
F— F0.00
207-93
r
v
� — 0.00
207.93
-
� F-
F— F— F— F —0
F—
207.93
�f
0
F—
F 0-00
207.93
I _ 0
I— 0.00
207.93
F�
I � F— F Q
1
0.00
207.93
-
F
...-_.
0.00
1207 9
I--

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 02 # Sprinklers 1
Crop Wheat acres Covered 6.8
Year 2000 Lbs N Required 88
Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-2B Lbs N to Apply 88
Date Start Stop
Time Time
PSI GPM Gallons
N/1 000
Lagoon gat In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
41/45/01 11:OD:DO AM 2:DD:D4 pM
50 245 36900
F 2 1.74 0.2D 9.18
78"82
I 1.72
F— r p
F— U.OQ
78.62
1.33
F
1-1
4
(�_� F__–
{
!-
7 -- F-
7 - 4
0.44
78.82
-�_—
! 6
F— O.OD
78.82
7
Q f
0.40
7$.82
D.00
78.82
F—
' I II
-"00
78 82
�_

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 03 # Sprinklers 1
Crop Wheat
Acres Covered fi•8
Lbs N Required 88
Year 2000 Lbs N Residual
Field
1831-2B Lbs N to Apply 88
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
12/27/00
7 30:00 AM 1:30:00 PM 50 205 73800
�2 - 1.70 fl.40 18.36
69.64
1.52
01/10/01
10:00:00 AM 1:30:00 PM 50 205 43050
#
1-70 0.23 F 1056
59.08
1.29
01/16/01
7:00:00 AM 1:30:00 PM 50 205 79950
2 1.70 0.43 19.74
39.35
0.86
1--0
F— 0-00
39-35
0.66
I
�-- F—( p0.00
�I
39.35
-_
F— F-__-__-_ 0.00
39.35
F—F r ___.- p
F__ r - -- 0.00
39.35
f _ � F— �__.- ,Q _
r--� -- � ��-- i 0.00
139.35
F—
F 0
F— r_ 0.00
39-35
F_--
r--- - —
._
r
r--_ _
�� F 0-00
39.35

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 04 # Sprinklers 1
Crop wheat Acres Covered 6.8
Year 2000 Lbs N Required 88
Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-2B Lbs N to Apply 88
Date
Start
Time
Stop
Time PSI
GPM
Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal
In/Ac
Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
12/07/00
1
7:45:00 AM
12:30:00 PM 50
205
j 58425
1 2 1.70
0.32
14.69
73.31
1.6D
�0110�3/ 10
9:30:00 AM
2:OO:DO PM 50
205
55350
1.7D
0.30
1.30
13.77
59.54
01/15/01
F 830:00 AM
2730:00 PM F50
2D5
73800
2 1.70
18.36
41.18
0.90
0.40
02/02/01
7:00:00 AM
12:3D.00 PM € 50
205
; 67650
I 2 1.7D
0.37
16.98
24.20
0.53
02/08/01
960:00 AM
205
1 2.20
19.01
5.19
0.09
j 2:20:00 PM 50
1 0.32
! 59450
I
J
10.00
5.19
�-
I
...-
I-
F-
O.oO
r-
r._-�
.-.. _._
5.19
O.Do
5.19
F-
I
F--
I D
F-l
F-1
0-00
'r-51-9
F-

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 05 # Sprinklers 1
Crop Wheat acres Covered 6-8
Lbs N Required 88
Year 2000 Lbs N Residual
Field
1831-2B Lbs N to Apply 88
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N/1000
Lagoon gal
In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Appiy
In to
Apply
12/06/00
7:30:40 AM 11:00:00 AM 50 205 43050
2 1.70
0.23 10.56
77.44
1.69
12/13/00
1 7:00:00 AM 12:30:00 PM 50`205 67650
F- 2 1.70
0.37 16.98
60.46
1.32
01/11/01
9:30:00 AM 2:00:00 PM 5Q 205 55350
1.70
0.30
€ 1 7%
46.69
1.02
7:30:00 AM 2:00:00 PM 50 205 79950
F2 — 1.70
0.43 19.74
26.95
0.59
101/31/01
102/01/01
7:00:00 AM 1:00:00 PM 50 205 73800
F 2 1.70
0.40 18.36
8.59
Q.19
..� . 0
` �._-.._
� 0.00
8.59
-____._—
F—
F
__-
r
F.
0.00
8.59
F�

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant Qg # Sprinklers 1
Crop Wheat Acres Covered 6.8
Year 2000 Lbs N Required 88
Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-2B Lbs N to Apply 88
Date
Start
Time
Stop
Time
PSI
GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal
In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
11128!00
7:00:00 AM
11:30:00 AM
50
F265 -F-55356----1
2 1.70
0.30 13.77
74.23
I 61 2
11!30!00
50
205 r 61500
2 1.70
59.08
129
T00:00 AM
120000 PM
0.33 i 15.15
102/05/01
9:00:00 AM
1:30:00 PM
r 50
205 1 55350
I 1
r 2.20
r 0.30 117.82
141.26
I 0.69
19.28
0.32
102109/01
700:00 AM
1 0.37 21 98
12:30:00 PM
5U
205 67650
.20
F-1- -F-2-
Oi_/21lD1
50
265 55350
1- 2.20
0.30 17.$2
1.46
0.02
7:00:00 AM
i 11:30:00 AM
-_-
F- IF- . p _,
I
0.00
1.46
I
i
0.00
1.46
_ --
��
F600
1.46
F-
FA
F-
F
F-
F-
F- r 0
1.46
�~
F- 0.00
F--
__-
F- r-
I__ i
F-
F4.00
1.46

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 07 # Sprinklers 1
Crop Rye Hay Acres Covered 6.8
Lbs N Required 50
Year 2000 Lbs N Residual
Field
1831-2A Lbs N to Apply 50
Date
start Stop
Time Time Psi GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
11/07/00
7:30:00 AM 11:30:00 AM 50 205 49200
�~
Fl -70 I 0.27 12.39
37.61
� 0.82
11/08/00
6:45:00 AM 11:00:00 AM 50 205 52275
F 2 1.70 028 12-85
24.75
0.54
01/25/01
8:00:00 AM 2:30:00 PM 50 205 79950FO
19.74
5.02
0.11
F— F —6
� �-.-_-_ �--__-.._ o.oQ
5.02
—..� 0.00
5.02
.._._.-_
[-1 QF—�
� �_ 0.00
5.02
�WI
I F—r O.OQ
5.02
F— F.___ -� 0.00
5.02
F—.—
F
F
F—
F .F--
0.00
5A2
F—

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant pg # Sprinklers 1
Crop Rye Hay Acres Covered 6.8
Year 2000 Lbs N Required 50
Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-2A Lbs N to Apply 50
Date
Start Stop
Time Time
PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal
In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N In to
to Apply Apply
11102/00
7:30:00 AM 12:30:00 PM
50 205
1il500
2 1.70
0.33 15.15
34.85
0.76
111 0061 0
7:00:00 AM 11:00:00 AM
1 0 27 12.39
22.46
0.49
5D 205
4920D
2 1.70
1011117101
50 1 205 73800
0.40 18.36
4.10
1 7:00:00 AM 1:00:00 PM
0.09
2
I 1.70
°
_- O. DO
4.10
F—
F—
F --F—
- °.0°
F—
4.10
�—
�
#f
D
�
� 0.00
4.10
� --
F
4-16
f
10.00
I
F-- F- °
r________ _ � 0.00
1
4.10
F
�f
0
; --
10.00
4.10--

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 09 # Sprinklers I
Crop Rye Hay acres Covered fi•8
Lbs N Required 50
Year 2000 Lbs N Residual
Field
1831-2A Lbs N to Apply 50
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N/1000
Lagoon gal
In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
11/10/00
6:30:00 AM 12:30:00 PM 50 205 73800
_ 1.70
#
D.40 18.36
31.64
0.69
7:30:00 AM 11:30:00 AM
f 50 205 49200
f 2 — 1.70
027 12.39
19.25
D.42
01/29/01
7:00:00 AM 12:30:00 PM 50 205 67650
2 ! 1.70
0.37 16.98
2.26
0.05
01 /0/3 01
°_-_-
�_ �
�-__-_- a.ao
2.26
�—
��
0 `
F-0.00
2.26
� - - f -

McQueen Farms
N11000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Waste
Irrigation
Report
Hydrant
1 QA
# Sprinklers 1
Crop
Rye Hay
Acres Covered fi•8
0.10
Lbs N Required 50
Year
2000
Lbs N Residual
Field
1831-4
Lbs N to Apply 50
Date Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
11/10/00 6:30:00 AM 12:30:00 PM r 50 205 73800
2 1.70 0.40 1$.3fi
31.64
0.69
102/22/01 7:00:00 AM 11:30:00 PM F 50 205 79950
1 2.20 0.43 [ 25.546.10
0.10
0
F F-- 0.00
i F— F-- I
F F— 0.00
fi.1 D
F—
_
0.00
6.10
F-- r— F 0
F— � _ _— F-- Fo.00
8.10
—F-0
[— � 0
F �_—__ � .0.00
6.10
f
iD
� ���o.o0
6.10
�
�- F - � � � �
� 1 r_-_. D_DD
6.10
�-----

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 10B # Sprinklers 1
Crop Rye Hay acres Covered 3.8
Lbs N Required 50
Year 2000 Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-4 Lbs N to Apply 50
Date Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
11/07/00 7:30:00 AM 11:30:00 AM 54 205
I 49200
I 1.70 0.47 21.57
2$.43
0.62
1114$100 6:45:00 AM 11:00:00 AM i '- 205 Fii275
2 1.70 0.50 22.95
5.48
0.12
I
0.00
5.48
I 0
--�
F—
F—! '"
F— I_-_—_ 0.00
5.48
r- —6
0.00
5.48
�-
F— f 0
F F— F— 0.00
5.48
_�. F—
F-- F--__._ F-- 0.40
5.48
F�
4 F— [—
F_-- F— Fi 0.00
5.48
F-
0
0. Q4
5.48

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 11A # Sprinklers 1
Crop Rye Hay Acres Covered 5.5
Lbs N Required 50
Year 2000 Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-4 Lbs N to Apply 50
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In/AC Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
11I06100
7:00:00 AM 111:00:00 AM �50 205 49200
( 2 71 0 0.33 15.15
34.85
D.7fi
11/09/00
6:30:00 AM 111:30:00 AM 50 205 I 61500
I 1.70 0.40 18.36
16.49 .10.36
0227101
7:30:00 AM 10:30:00 AM 50 205
36900
r 2 1.7D 025 11-48
5.D2
0.11
1
i`—_-- F— I
F— 0.00
5.02
_.—.__. i `"
F—
F— F— 1 0.00
F-- D.00
F— F—
5.02
I— F °
D.oD
5.02
F_
I— F-0—
F—
0.00
5.02
F�
�– i -- 0
F 0.00
5.02
r._---
F—D
!--I
i
D_DD
5.D2
r

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 11B # Sprinklers 1
Crop Rye Hay acres Covered 5.1
Lbs N Required 50
Year 2000 Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-4 Lbs N to Apply 50
Date Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
11/02/00 7:30:00 AM 12:30:00 PM 50 205 61500
F 2 1.70 0_�L5 20.66
29.34
Q.fi4
F— F— r0
F--2.20 F- 0.00
29.34
0.49
F— 0
F- O.OD
29.34
-_
F— F— I 0
F 0.00
29.34
I I F—1 V
1 0.00
29.34
F— I� _
F— I__-_ __._. D_00
29.34
� F—I Q �
�� F F—
0.00
29.34
F_-_ o--_-
F— F— F— o.oa
29.34
F—
I—
F __°—___._.__
F—
F—
F— --
a.Qo
Fig---m

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 12A # Sprinklers 1
Crop Rye Hay Acres Covered 4.8
Lbs N Required 50
Year 2000 Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-4 Lbs N to apply 50
Date Start
Time
Stop
Time PSI GPM
Gallons
NPI 000
Lagoon gat In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
11101100 700:00 AM
` 1:30:00 PM �50 i 205
I 79950
�2 1-70 Q.61 28.00
22.00
0.48
02127!01 7:30:00 AM
10:3000 AM 50 1205
I 2 1.70 0.28 12.85
9.15
0-20
36900
-_-_-___ I—
�-.._-_
� � �_._-_ 0.00
9.15
F__-
_ _ �
—OF—[—F
[— F
-- �
F-0 F 10.00
9.15
F
� � I
i �� F-0.00 -
9.15
�-
r
F---6---
`"
1
I_6
I F-0-00
9.15
F—�
� �
� Q
Fo.00
9.9 5
F—
F-
0 —
IF
i 0.00
9-15
F___�
#
I
F --I
1 0.00
9.15
"'

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 12B # Sprinklers 9
Crop Rye Hay acres Covered 5.5
Lbs N Required 50
Year 2000 Lbs N Residual
Field 1 831 -4 Lbs N to Apply 50
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N/1000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
0221101
1 7:00:00 AM 1 1.30:00 PM 50 205 79950
I ' — 2.20 0.54 32.08
17.92
0.30
02/26/01
1 8:00:00 AM 12:30:00 PM r 5U 205 55350
2 1.70 0.37 16.98
0.94
0.02
0
F-- F—
F 0.00
0.94
C�
F— F-- �._. p_�
F— � I 0.00
0.94
11
I
I , F— I
F-- 0.00
0.94
r
F— �-- �° _..__
F— � _..._� �----- 0.00
0.94

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 13A # Sprinkiers 1
Crop Rye Hay Acres Covered 4.8
Year 2000 Lbs N Required 50
Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-4 Lbs N to Apply 50
Date
Start Stop
Time Time
PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
11/09/00
�fi 30:00 AM 1130:00 AM
50 205 S1 S00
I 2 1.70 F 0.47 21.57
l 28.43
0.62
02/22101
50 205 55350
1 2.20 0.42 24.95
7:00:00 AM 11:30:00 AM
3.48
0.06
!�
� � I - 0
F-- F �.__ 0.00
3.48
--
1 �
F— F— p —
I F— 0.00
p
0.00
3.48
__— � _ I 00 0
3.48
�—
�F— F—� 00 Q
3.4$
�
( 0
F—~__ F— 0.00
3.48

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant is # Sprinklers 1
Crop wheat Acres Covered 6.5
Lbs N Required 88
Year 2000 Lbs N Residua!
Field
1831-3 Lbs N to Apply 88
Date
Start
Time
Stop
Time PSI GPM Gallons
N/1000
Lagoon gal In/Ac
Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
12/06/00
7:30:00 AM
11:00:00 AM 50 205 43
I050 2 1.70 0.24
11.02
76.98
1.68
12/13/00
7:00:00 AM
12:30:00 PM 5D 205 67fi5D--
2 - - 1.70 0.38
17.44
59.54
1.30
01/15/01
8:30:00 AM
2:30:00 PM 5D 205 l 7 083 4
I - 1.70 0.42
19.28
4D.26
0.88
01/17/01
7:00:00 AM
1:00:00 PM 50 205 73800
F i-70 0.42
19.28
2D.99
0.46
04/03/01
7:00:00 AM
1:00:00 PM 5D 205 73800
� � 2 1.80 0.42
2D.41
0-57
0.01
�
�_
I � F -- [-n-r.-
F-
0.00
0.57
F
�
��_
r- F- F--
0.00
0.57
F- I
F- � -~.-_- F
0.00
0-57
F�
I
r -�_.-_ FF-
0.00
0.57
F_
F-
F--
___
F-0-
F- F
F-
.0.00
0.57

McQueen Farms
Start
Time
Waste
Irrigation
Report
Hydrant
16
# Sprinklers 1
Crop
Wheat
Acres Covered 6.5
I -' 205 58425
2- - 1.70
Lbs N Required 88
Year
2000
Lbs N Residual
Field
1831-3
Lbs N to Apply 88
Date
Start
Time
Stop
Time
PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal
In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
112/07100
7:45:00 AM
12:30:00 PM
I -' 205 58425
2- - 1.70
0.33 15.15
72.85
1.59
01/03101
9:30:00 AM
2:00:00 PM
50 205 55350
i 2 1.70
0.30 13.77
59-08
1.29
x2:30.00 PM
r -662D5 79950
2 -� 1.70
0.45 20.6fi
F6 -
.02!02101
D112510i
00:00 AM
38.43
02!021O
7:00:00 AM
50 205 67650
0.38 17.44
20.99
I 0.46
112:30.00 PM
- 2 - 1.70
-- -- - 0 `
� � 2.20
r 0.00
24.99
0.35
1- 0
20.99
I 0.00
F --F---
I i
i
F- I-�a _- --
�_.�-- �_ �_�
r
20.99
�-
,�i __- 0 -
F- 0.00
20.99
F-
F__-
F- # 0
F- F
F` O.OD
20.99
F 1 0
[- 1
�
F- 0.00
20.99

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 17 # Sprinklers 1
Crop Wheat Acres Covered 5.7
Lbs N Required 88
Year 2000 Lbs N Residual
Field
1831-3 Lbs N to Apply 88
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal
In/AC Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
12/27/00
7:30:00 AM 1:30:00 PM 50 205 73800
�2 -- 1.70
0.48 22.03
65.97
01/05/01
11:00:00 AM 2:00:00 PM 50 205 36900
1.70
0.24 11.02
54.95
120
01/31/01
7:30:00 AM 2:00:00 PM 50 205 79950
- 2 1.70
0-52 23.87
31.08
0.68
02/05/101
1 9:00:00 AM 1.30:00 PM 56 205
r 55350
F 1 2.20
0.36 21-38
9.70
0.16
i _
f - 0.00
9.70
I '"
� � -_-__ --
r 0.00
9.70
F—
f . __— p
F
F— [—
F— 0.00
9.70
0.00
9.70
r
!
� F— F— I --._,--_ 0
F— F—
F— 0-00
9.70
(� --- p
� j
�
0.00
9.70

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant is # Sprinklers 1
Crop Wheat Acres Covered 4.6
Lbs N Required 88
Year 2000 Lbs N Residual
Field 1831-3 Lbs N to Apply 88
Date
Start
Stop
I �-__.._— � F -6
F-- r 0.00
5.41
N11000
�----- i —r 0
- I— O.OD
Lbs N
In to
� F— � �..0
Time
Time
PSI
GPM
Gallons
Lagoon
gal
In/Ac
Lbs N
to Apply
Apply
01116101
17:00-.00AM-
1:30:00 PM
50
205
79950
2
1.70
0.64
29.3$
5$.62
1.2$
01/29/01
x 7:30:00 AM
1:30:00 PM
50
1.70
0.59
27A$
31.54
0.69
205
73$00
�-
F1 --
� a �d
F A I
nnnnQ
o• -in -nn naa
n;r--naim
r ,)n,F
zrvmn—
i 11 n
F
p �- - F— F—D.00 5.41 F�� .
I ��� 0.00 5.41
-66-
--F-
I �-__.._— � F -6
F-- r 0.00
5.41
�----- i —r 0
- I— O.OD
5.41
� F— � �..0
F-- �_ � 0.00
5.41
r
F— F F-- D_DO
�p —
�,- 0.00
5.41
r_

McQueen Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 19 # Sprinklers I
Crop Wheat
Acres Covered 4.6
Lbs N Required 88
Year 2000 Lbs N Residual
Field
1831-3 Lbs N to Apply 88
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
01/10/01
1.10:00:00 AM 1 1:30:00 PM 50 205 43050
�2 - '1.70 0.34 15.61
72.39
1.58
01/30/01
7:00:00 AM 12:30:00 PM 50 205 67650
i 1.70 0.54 24.79
47.61
1.04
02/16/01
8:00:00 AM 12:30:00 PM 50 205 I
55350
I - 1.70 0.44 20.20
27.41
0.60
02/20/01
9:00:00 AM 1:30:00 PM �50 205 55350
� 2 1.70
0.44 20.20
7.22
0.16
l
F F -F- 0.00
7.22
F -
I- p-
F 0.00
7.22
F- �-- � ._-�__. _- ( 0.00
7.22
F - F - F 0
0.00
1
7.22
F-
F-0-
V
F �--~
F
0.00
7.22
F�

Division of Water Quality
May 18, 2001
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jeff Poupart, Supervisor, Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Water Quality Section
From: John Hasty, Environmental Specialist
A4 --
Fayetteville Regional Office
Through: Paul Rawl
Water Quali Regional Supervisor
Subject: Brown's of Carolina, Inc. Farm # 29 & #93 Enforcement, Facility No. 09-153
Please find enclosed the enforcement package for the unpermitted discharge of
swine waste from the Brown's of Carolina #29 Farm in Bladen County.
If you have any questions or require any further or additional information, please
advise.
John C. Hasty, Jr.
Enclosure

1
ANIMAL OPERATION INSPECTION FORM
1. Date of Inspection(s): 3-29-01
2. Regional Office: FUetteville, Division of Water Quality
3. Name of Owner Of Property: Brown's of Carolina #29 & # 93 (_Cony of Deed attached)
4. Name of Operator: Mrjohna Cain.1
S. Address: P- Q. Box 487
)yarsaw_ NC 28398-0487
6_ Phone Number: [phone]
7. Description of Facility Location. Map excerpt attached.
Qu thr, _east side of Highway 131. approximately three and one half miles south _ of
BladenbQrQ.,NC,
8. Date -this facility began operation: The farm has been in operationinc-19-95.
9. Date of last expansion: The facilityx in s n h
it c9mhined vyith BOC # 93_ j, 16-000 Feeder to Figish operation.
10. Has the facility registered with DWQ? YES _ NOX
If YES, date of registration: ?
11. Does the facility have an approved Animal Waste Management Plan?
YES X NO _ Is one required? YES X NO
Date Approved: _
12. Has this facility received a CAFO Designation? YES_ NO_ NIA X
If YES, date issued:
13. Type of Operation: FaaQw to Wean O eR ratian
I4. Number and type of livestock: There were approximately 4.000 Sows and their offspring
prgsent at the time of the inspectign. .
15. Length of time animals have been, are, or will be stabled, or confined and fed or maintained
in any 12 month period. Twelve (12) months.

2
16. Are crops, pasture, or post harvest residues sustained in the normal growing season over any
portion of the lot or facility? Yes, the farm was dr, .gned to have anyrxim atdy 238.3 acre
of te. Th em nt plan calls
soybms and wheat to be grown on applipatim sites,The farm has approximately 260 acres
n which to irrigate -
17. Type of Waste Management System: Swine are kept in total confinement free stall-b-arns wilt
slottgd flQors over flushing nits. Waste is flushed as needed from floor Rits into a wgg
lagoon system. The lagoon system is compQsed of one (ii) lagoon from which waste can be
pmmned through bud9d irrigation cines to hydL=s and apraved on the fields via a linear
system.
18. Description of other animal operations in immediate vicinity and proximity to same or other
surface waters: There is a Preg= operation aonroximaly �/z mile from the entranre_to_ these
farms on SR 1172_
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Proximity of facility to neighboring houses, wells, etc.: There is no rC5idQncC
Proximity to the farm.
Approximate depth of ground water table in the area of the facility or discharge: rile
Proximity of facility to surface waters: There is a large canal that runs parallel_ to The
apiication field and grosses the highway al the entrance xo this site..
Animal waste discharged. YES
Witnesses -
John Hasty. D -F vill 1 (9 10) 486-1541
Paul Rawls_ DWQ-Fayeneville region ice [phone].
Are pollutants discharged in the waters of the State?
YES.
Do or have discharges occurred in response to a storm event less severe than the 25 -year,
hour storm? YES
What is the degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to public health,
or to private property resulting from the violation?: None observed -or rep.Qq Kd
Sample Results:
RM I M 074 MOM sj` 1
Source
Coliform, Fecal/1_20nil
21,000
BOD TKN
no value 5.7

Sample Location (3-29-01) Coliform, Fecal/ I00m1 BD TKN
Discharge Point 12,727 BI 7.99
Downstream 2-400 3_8 1-0
U stp ream 200 :!�2 0.9
***PLEASE SEE ATTACHED COMPLETE LAB RESULTS FOR
MORE INFORMATION***
26, Wbat is the duration and gravity of • •n?: The inspectioli wits a fQllow! dut tQ-high
freeboards at thcw sito. Afigr checking the level of Ih!t Brown's # 29 Farm la&QQn. water
was noticed, slamding in the application field where a trayeling-gam icd. U12o
-r inyro-tiszation1 • were concerned that there wg wgge 3ygicr1 fidd
elevatedand entering an adju&nt ditch. IrbRgtiQn hild been performed within the past day and ther
was -waste ponding in the field and migyating to and mixing -with -t -he water standing at Ih
edge of tbc ditqk The inspectors examined the -water flo3yine into the ditch and detennine
that there wa� a necd to sampl5-, du!Q to the diagglo tion of the water, The samples showed
, fecal colifonnentering the ditch and -also in the 1 { and • c_I{
This qQgfirmed the ins cion that waste was railing the field due to the saturated
conditions of wn field. Let it be notedthat there was still a fight rain at The time
12f 1he inspectijo-n.
27. Water Quality Assessment: There r no dead fish noted in the "nal that runsparallel
Ihg.gpplication field"
28" What is the cost of rectifying the damage?: The writer observed no areas that cleanup
asaiviligs would recommended- An lean -up QQljld cause adverse, impacts-tois lift
in the canal.There has been no report of downstream impacts outside the g_o_2f investigation,
29. What is the amount of money saved by noncompliance?: T n level at thia fasjli!3�
dangerously close h freeboard f this t 13 ingbgs), jhc cost to Brown's
f Carofina woWd haveingmgcd sufficigntLy had Ibc level gotten into the
clue.t t -h?, lizni ations ofthp,5gtUrgled irrigation fields and the fact_that Brow m's mi
had to relocate the waste from this structure had the level gone up (i.e. pimp and haul).
30. Was the violation committed willfully or intentionally?: YES _ NO X
Explain:

rd
31. What is the prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority?: Over licat*
has b= 1y at this sitc, Alw—high frcontributed fact thatirrigation
beingerformed-on saturated fields.
32. What is the cost to the State for the enforcement procedures?:
Regional costs are as follows:
33
34
35
36
Mileage: $0.23 per mile for 80 miles:
$ 18.40
Fecal Coliform ($46.80 per sample) x 4
187.20
BOD Samples ( $18.11 per sample) X 4
72.44
Nutrient Samples ( $65.05 per sample) X 4
260.20
Copies (Bladen Co. Court House)
John Hasty @ $19.77 per hour
2 hours -Drive time
I hour Investigation
5 hours Report developement
8 hours total
$ 158.16
Paul Rawls @ $31.87 per hour
2 hours -Drive time
1 hour Investigstion
I hour (Supervisory review)
4 hours total
$ 127.48
TOTAL8$ 23.88
Type or general nature of business: Swine, Farrow to Wean Operation
What is the violator's degree of cooperation or recalcitrance:
Staff from Brown's of Carina have been cooperative.
Are there any Mitigating Circumstances?: NO
Assessment Factors:
a. IWC:
b. Receiving Stream : Urinamed tributary to Brown MaEsh Swamp Class "C -SV'
Waters.
C. Damage Yes _ No X (Based on observations at the time of the investigation.)
If YES, include report from Wildlife Resources Commission.

37. Include a copy of any Dcaignation letter signed h the Director.
38. Recommendations Made to Owner/Operator: Stoptthe flow of waste -to the ditch from th
field
39. Recommendations for further DWQ Action:
- Notice of i Ia i i f Intenet (Forwarded ril 18. 20 l
- Enforcemgnl Action
•1 Other Comments-• • previously- M • olloymp due to the t__1
firee•a. d.at t es
- ._?, sijg� (Note& This farm was combined mdth Brown's of •
Finishinp, Qpgaliom in June of 19971-Tbe-=Iication fields were saturated due to =got rain
events • : thr, • - sly . • level was gxtremely'h (13 inches). It should also
the fields a tayeling �un had been brought in to 1pj-md lower the lagQon. Not a& were thp
fields saturated but lbr. usigm wu ngt being usd as designcd. 3yhicb added to the pQtential
for overapWsation an run off in this arca of

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF BLADEN
File No. DD
IN THE MATTER OF )
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC_ )
FARMS #29 & #93 }
FINDINGS AND DECISION
FOR . VIOLATIONS OF PERMIT } AND ASSESSMENT OF
15A NCAC 2H.0217 } CIVIL PENALTIES
}
Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G -S.) 143 -215.6A, 1,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the
following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. operates a concentrated animal operation in
Bladen County.
B. The Brown's of Carolina # 29 and 993 Swine Farm was Permitted as a
nondischarge facility on July 16, 1997, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H
.0217.
C. On March 29, 2001, DWQ staff observed a discharge of wastewater by
the Brown's of Carolina #29 Swine Farm from one of its application
fields to an adjacent canal which is an unnamed tributary of Brown
Marsh Swamp, which are Class "C - SW" waters of the State within the
Lumber River Basin.
D. The Brown's of Carolina Swine Farm had no valid permit for the above
described activity_
E. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter
totaled $ 823.88 .

Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
H. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-
215.6A pursuant to G -S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit for this animal waste management system is required in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 and G.S. 143-215.1.
C. The unnamed tributary of Brown Marsh Swamp constitutes waters of
the State within the meaning of G -S. 143-215.1 pursuant to G.S. 143-
212(6).
D. The above-cited discharge is a violation of the nondischarge permit.
E. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. may be assessed civil penalties in this matter
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of
not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation
may be assessed against a person for failing to act in accordance with
the terms, conditions or requirement of a permit required by G.S. 143-
215.1.
F. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against
Brown's of Carolina, Inc. pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S.
143B -282.1(b)(8).
G. The Director, of the Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation
provided for by G.S. 143-215.6A(h), has the authority to assess civil
penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings 'of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I
make the following:
III_ DECISION:
Accordingly, Brown's of Carolina, Inc. is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
H
for discharging waste to the waters of the State in
violation of 15A NCAC 2H. 0217-
$ TOTAL CP;M PENALTY, which is
the maximum penalty authorized by G.S. 143 - 215.6A.
percent of

$ 823.88 Enforcement Costs
$ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G -S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty
I have considered the factors listed in G_S.143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1)
The degree and extent of harm to the natural
resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violation;
(2)
The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3)
The effect on ground or surface water quantity or
quality or on air quality;
(4)
The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5)
The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6)
Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally;
(7)
The prior record of the violator in complying or
failing to comply with programs over which the
Environmental Management Commission has regulatory
authority; and
(8)
The cost to the State of the enforcement
procedures.
(Date)
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality

J
iType of Visit ® Compliance inspection O Operation review O Lagoon Evaluation I
for Visit O Routine O Complaint ® Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3-29-2D01 Tiune: 15:00
Facility Number 09 153
Not O rational Q Below Threshold
N Permitted M Certified U Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ---_ -----.-.......
Farm Name: F IAfE2l.&F_S�IU�#4---------------------_.-__------------ County: DiodelR------------------------ -FBQ------
Owner Name: xt .Inc. ..... _....... . Phone No:914:2x-1800........................................ ................ ..
Mailing Address: PQ Do.L481------------•--•--•--•------- -•------------------- - 'a n I.YC-----------------•-----•--------•-----------
FacilityContact:----._.-------------._.-•---------__._..Title:.-------------------•----------- PhoneNo:._------------•----------
Onsite Representative: .............................. Integrator: By�not'.n%Cazull�ua.Inc,................ ...-............
Certified Operator. R,+ob� t,_._----•--•--_.._.....� D.[int......_.._.........._...._.._....... Operator Certification Number.
Location of Fang:
5R # 1172 and Hwy 131 near Bladenboro `-`.-.�--_..�__.�...�_.__...__-----.._._W...w...�.,_..-....._.__...._......-... --
JAA&
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude FOO Longitude ;- 78 451- F 00 --1�
Number of Lagoons 3 ❑Subsurface Drains Present C3 Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds l Solid Traps ❑ No Li iiid Waste Mana FnSystem
Djffharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon [I Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b_ If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is then: evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
N Yes
'Des[gn Ceirreo#
..
❑ Yes
Design Current
Design, Curreat
Swine
-.
Ca act I'o elation
:' Poul#r3 . ..
:
Ca ar' P alatiop Cattle ::
Ca acit - :Pa ulat�on:.
❑ Wean to Feeder
Layer
:.
❑ Dairy
N Feeds -r to Finish
10000
❑ Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
4000
-
❑ Farrow to Feeder
: 10 Other
❑ Farrow to Finish.Total
Destg :Gapac ly
2a,a00
❑ Gilts
Total SStiW-
7
3,892,x00
❑Boars
Number of Lagoons 3 ❑Subsurface Drains Present C3 Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds l Solid Traps ❑ No Li iiid Waste Mana FnSystem
Djffharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon [I Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b_ If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is then: evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
N Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
N No
N Yes
❑ No
10 oal
Der minute
❑ Yes CK No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No

Facility Numher: 09-153
Waste Collection 4 Treatment
Date of Inspection 3-29-20©1
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ............13............ ..... .... ................. .... .....................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
$. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancel mprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
1 I . Is there evidence of over application? ® Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ® Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [] No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
13_ Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pendcd for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ NO
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
0 Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0 No
17. Are rock outcrops present?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfteld boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ On-site Q Off-site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP; checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑Yes
❑ N°
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
25_ Did Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
[] No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Odor Issues
28_ Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
0 Yes
0 No
A

Vl/6•/1 V/
• Facility Number. o4-153 Date of Inspection 3-24-20[11
30. Is there any evidc nee of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, andlor public property)
3 i. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentttemporary cover?
Printed on: 4/182001
0 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [j No
❑ Yes ❑ No
�[ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no farther correspondence about this visit.
RevieweriInspector Name Joha Hasty/Pat�l Rawls
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Nosh Carolina,
Department of Environment and Natural Resources I
Division of Water Quality 1h
Fayetteville Regional Office NCDENR
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director April 18, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. David Nordine
Brown's of Carolina
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
P. O. Box 497
Warsaw_ NC 28398
Subject: Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent
Brown's of Carolina Farm # 29
Facility No. 09-1 53 Permit No. AWS 09015 3
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Nordine:
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non discharge permit for the subject animal
waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, you have been found to be in violation of your 2H
.0217 Permit.
On March 29, 2001, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
performed a lagoon level follow up visit of the Brown's of Carolina 429 Farm in Bladen County. During the
visit, wrater was noticed ponded in the edge of the spray field next to a ditch at the front of the farm- There
was also what appeared to be waste water mixed with rain water ponded throughout the field. Upon further
investigation it was apparent that there was waste water in the spray field and it was and had migrated to the
water next to the ditch. There was a flow of this mixture entering the ditch at a flow of about ten gallons per
minute. Samples were collected to see if there was in fact waste mixed with water that was getting into the
ditch_ The samples showed elevated fecal coliform in the source, the ditch and the doamstream samples.
It appeared that the fields were too wet to have been irrigated on, thus the hydraulic overload which
allowed the waste to pond and eventually flow toward and into the ditch. The lagoon level at this site was and
had been dangerously high, thus the reason for the visit. The level of the lagoon on that day was
approximately thirteen to fourteen inches.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following item(s) be addressed:
1. Irrigation should not be performed on saturated fields.
2. Immediately lower the level in the lagoon to the required freeboard.
225 GREEN STREET - SUITE 714 / SYSTEL BUILDING I FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] W W W.ELV .SI-AT[.NC'.US!l=N
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 1 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- 5001. RECYCLED/] 0% POST CONSUMER PAPER
DENR TOLL FREE HOTLINE: [phone]

Mr. Nordine
4-18-2001
Page 2
3. Please provide irrigation records for the farm for the past twelve months including PAN balances.
4. Please provide rainfall records for the past twelve months if available.
5. Please provide this office with a copy of the freeboard records for this farm.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing its General Permit and being
required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the Division of Water
Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00 per day per violation.
You are hereby notified that the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality is
considering sending recommendation for enforcement to the Director of the Division of Water Quality. The
recommendation concerns the hydraulic overload of the field in question which allowed waste to be
discharged to waters of the State.
If you have an explanation for this violation that you %wish to present, please respond to this office by
May 2.2001. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action is still deemed appropriate,
your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his consideration.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either myself or Mr.
John Hasty, Environmental Specialist, at (9l0) 486-1541.
PR/ich
cc: Sonya Avant -Compliance Group
Sam Warren -Bladen Co. NRCS
Trent Allen-DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files -Raleigh
Sincerely
tLf
,aul E_ Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor

Mn uu r-uul FRI, U:J,uu F11 imuwii Jut' Uf1NUL111n
BROWN'S
....oPmftu=%,OF CAROLINA
FaX
01 Ulf Mo I Qu
M Hwy 24 East
PO BOX 487
Wamaw, NC 283984X87
910-295-18M
910 -286 -9186 -Fax
To: Paul Rawls rrwm Kevin Weston
Pam 91048&0707 Poem I
Phmm 910.488`1541 Daft 04AM1
Rec Freeboard Levels — Fayetteville Region CC;
21
E3 Ur9wd 0 For Rarkm 13 Rome Gommw* 13 Ree" Reply -w,13 PW=w Recycle
a conwnenbL Here are the d* frwhoard levels for the Brown's of Carolina company farms in the
FayeftewlVe Region for the past week. These readings are for farms that are v4hn the 25 yr/24 hr down
elevations.
Farm #
Mar 30
Mw 31
Apr I
Apr 2
Apr3
Apr4
Apr 5
Apr 8
#w
13"
13"
130
13"
IT
IT
IT
13"
#29
14"
14"
14*
14"
14"
UD
114"
14"
#30
18"
18"
18"r
I B"
Igo
1 7-
1 7-
asu
160
16'
16"
16"
1 r
17"
MB
20r
20'
20"
24"
20r
20"
2(r
20r
V. U1/U1

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
817 C&S1Ie Hayne Stmet Fayetteville, NC 28303 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PAGE— --f OF/
CUEW MAW &ADDRESS
.QVC
2 z rGrrtr ,-
PO 0Q$ECT/LOCATION:
Fit i 1"O L -i 11 5 Z 9
*OF
B
D
T
T
L
t:
s
Received W. ( Ignature)
TYPE OF ANALYSIS
Tlme
PRESERVATION CODE
r
e
C
.4
3'
2
i4 /
d yo
R t toned ta(r isW+►atun)Py
Dap
Time
Rmr4vd W f$19 -run)
Date
Time
CODE: A = <4'C ONLY
t3 - HNO3 (p11� + <44C
C a H2404 WK2) + 44%
D e. NsOH + <4eC
E a xN Acetite + 4eC
f ea
CONTACT peRaoN:_ ff
1 L t. L GLS
L{ / 5--t(
1 �1..a` cL+..l 1 _s
TH ! iI1LR}10D OF E/UHMENT;
s ��� U, 1,: � le
LAS IDA
SAMPLE TYPE
DATE
TIME
Cover
GRAB
'pN
D.O.
TElIP `C
tltt4�
6
Reirnqurshed bY• (S+gnatutnl
Darta
Time
Received by-. (Signature)
Date
Time
7
8
r
if
et
c.l
�y !YJi
�
Comments or Special Hazards:
pate
Time
Received W. ( Ignature)
Date
Tlme
r7Zr3y ;-ZT
1
3--2q-of
3'
2
i4 /
d yo
R t toned ta(r isW+►atun)Py
Dap
Time
Rmr4vd W f$19 -run)
Date
Time
3
4
Rettnqutsfted py (Slpnatunl
Data
Time
Received Dr. (Signaturel
Date
Time
5
6
Reirnqurshed bY• (S+gnatutnl
Darta
Time
Received by-. (Signature)
Date
Time
7
8
Comments or Special Hazards:

f
Division of Environmental Management
CAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
For Investigation of 4 ( c�c`c; /;`, --�� -r,,f —!
Samples collected and DHI forms
Completed
by: +
Relinquished bv
Received by
Lab ofil
Lab -No.
Station.
No.
Station Location
I �r
B D
/
Date
Time
No. of
Bottles
41
7
Is
{
Relinqui
ed -by
at�rre)•
=by(Sigpature)
Date J
CI
Time
eY/
Rec
by
e1
Rec
by
Rel
Rec
by (Lab)
J
Method of Shipment:
lJC'`� -• r'
Secu ty
Seal
ZMe and Condition: Lock
by: `nttr+` ,zs-�.
by
Broken byZf
en by:
1!
1
IAB USE ONLY
Lab No .
From Throusthl
Na.
Containera
Analysis
Relinquished bv
Received by
Datel Time
til z '
I �r
B D
'r
Ij
*0%/ �' s
L

®Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
817 CASTLE RAYNE STREET
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28303
[phone] / [phone] (FAX)
NC #11
NC #37714
USDA #3787
http://www.microbac.com
CHEMISTRY • MICROBIOLOGY • FOOD SAFETY • CUNSUNIER PRODUCTS
WATER • AIR • WASTES • FOOD • PHARMACEUTICALS • N i-r-RACEUTICALS �
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CLIENT: NC DENR - DWQ
ADDRESS: Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
CONTACT PERSON: Mr. Paul Rawls
ACCOUNT NUMBER: #KN003
SAMPLE ID: 1. Upstream - ID #01WU32231
2. Source - #01WE32232
3. Discharge Point - ID #01WE32233
4. Downstream - ID #01WE32234
DATE REC'D: 03/29/01 SAMPLED: 03/29/01
SAMPLED BY: P. Rawls
DELIVERED BY: J. Hasty
SAMPLE CODE: WW, Grab
REFERENCE: Brown's #29
DATA REVIEWED BY:
DATE REPORTED: 04/03/0
A LkLxs Is zP&IrHOD 1 2 3 4
++iiia+a++iiiaaa+s+ra+s+aaata++a+aa+a+ai++++aaaakaa+L+a+aaa++aaa+aa++aa++aa+aa+aa+aa+aa+faaa
COLIFORM, FECAL (per 100 ml) SM18 9222D 200 21000 12727 2400
COb24ENrPS: < = Less than
> = Greater than
PAGE I OF 1
The dila and other information contained on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the M E M B E R
sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon; the condition that it is not to be reproduced wholly or in part for
advertising or other purposes without written approval from the laboratory.
USDA -EPA -NIOSH Testing Food SanitaVon Consulting Chen -tical and Microbiologicat Analyses and Research

DIVISION OF WATF.1t Q11AL11l•
1lr til3ln •2 11111: I
0111... ills'1Ill nl:'I.
j t'llrrnialy Lnl,nrelnry
RryLn7/\1'hlrl yurrliq
1'ItI .I Ili 421' u: I.
Na -Sodium 929 n /L
:.lSl.no1:,`,
`\; w,
Ir ill'Ir II 111111 .I .)2'1) 11+. I-
Se- Selenium 1147 u /L
Cc,4dfa 1.l AI I' I ol•1} 31 591 . IlHhnl
III% I'R K ksi:S
Pint
-•---�'" n'Rin �•S
OASIRRAAI
COm.I,II1 K3 +11= cu.
I I
EFFLVIiNC
FI l:1'11nS [tl 4KO Kc i1.n,IL LlllilcC(NI'l IANCIf
CHAINiJI"L'UGlUU1'
0 I.AKF
� INPLUPNJ
Illhrl : Cl lihl4'R(ilifr'C1'
—
—_
P:S1Ur1K1'
i'Iulnidc 451 ns :I_
(m I F.rlitlttsl : k.\11'I,S
�1'ISIIII)
I�
t
Lab Nu111bcs 1 W 1$53
Dale Received: 3/30/ 2001
I! me Recoiled: 9:05 AM
Received By 11hiW
Uala Rcsed : AR
Date Reported: 5/1/2001
La 1.ulnrdh(111R:nlKr: tilnHrruLnroHinll: L'I'S IKIiAIli
Srrd: f hlnl iu:urd: Rrulal Ahs
Station n Ilalr Ikein fh 3lrnmsddl IIMr Lnll I))flnnh•dlll Iirnr IlrFin 'lime End I WIWI - 1111, Olt. 111111 1•alur'I'171r -,1, II, L Cnnymaile-l', 5, fl Sample'T�pr
2ULIIU324 Ila i -
11111\II�� Ih:
1lr til3ln •2 11111: I
0111... ills'1Ill nl:'I.
Y-.�-
l'nII lirr:ll sIII 1111: I
1'ItI .I Ili 421' u: I.
Na -Sodium 929 n /L
__
11.111111(11 111 h[l1�th'.1131f'/1 111(]1 III
Ir ill'Ir II 111111 .I .)2'1) 11+. I-
Se- Selenium 1147 u /L
Cc,4dfa 1.l AI I' I ol•1} 31 591 . IlHhnl
Color, 1 rvc Ru CA
_
C'Itihaln lulrI'cc'a13i1)15 IKIIIII
COm.I,II1 K3 +11= cu.
I I
--
L:,Iidolnl. f-1'PalSilep31673 1001111
�
Color 2H 7.6 K2 cu.
ResiPWt•: $001 5(h) nil
Uva nick %20 1.t'/L
—
—_
— \,,1,1111'. 5113 Ing L
i'Iulnidc 451 ns :I_
II,cd ?III Inl; I
; 1 V I mF'I.
Hetillue• tiuh'rndrJ 3311] Inl: I
Llnr.ne and(11k 5;6 m+!I.
Vnl.11dciJ5 1.q: I_
ILITIfI'SS 11.1,119(10 mg, L
I rt(.J 511) 1.q: I_
95 lushly/cm2
--
I'lt.ln1 5.2 Ilmlh
hlls,1S3-S:W1 nt;II_
1 Idm, I. - I•I I I , i*„ nn•• I
11wn rit )::311 1111; I.
Aodill to III I K.3 d3] III, I
Suli.nc• 413 Imp, L
AB.af rim- v, I11I1 K,3 -113 Ing I.
Sullidc 7.15 mR.A.
AlUhnilt'Io+il4.idlU m;•1.
Rulon
_
ILIC 11;Ct1 alt. l_
Iannin.F Li•nm a 1.
Iultnditr:6 KIl7
11'.5 awlenl Chromium
_
i itlilol m I nt.11 11111' •.' I(III tldt
11111\II�� Ih:
LkLithium 1132 USM.
h1 ; h1a 1lcsiuln 927
Y-.�-
ill f/•M llll,'.Tn['S[: 13(55 _ 11/1,
Na -Sodium 929 n /L
Arsenic:l'otal 1002 u /L
Se- Selenium 1147 u /L
HR- Muctay 71900 u /L
Ba_Barium u /L
Oreanochlorinc Pesticides
O_farlolhosphoms 11c5licides T
Acid Herbicides
Base/NeuitaMAcid Eximclable Or anics
I I'H Uirscl Range
Pur cable Organics (VOA boule R •d)
I PH Gasoline Range
1PH/13'l[X Gasoline RamSe
Phvlo lankton

Estimated ROD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION:
Seed: Yee ❑ No ❑ Chlorloaled: Yes ❑ No ❑ REMARIIS: !
Lab Number:
Date Received: D Time: Q
Recd b : From: Ruaour1er land Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
Srr ltun !/ D.1vfleHln�(yy/o+rn/dd) Time Itegln Dale E-od
---- —_ _-- --�--- - - - - .1 L_:.=.—L•� I '� ' l ..�L l
.--�-fj.._-.-._-... ......_r.
rrtllr r VIC.l.v-Lftu VOItM U)MII
�j..
Type
I I t.
COUNTY
[ �GC1( 1I
PRIORITY
-�
SAMPLE TYPE
Chlurlde 940 "19/1
NI 13 ar N 61u rrrg/I
Ti 18.3 pi 1 4.5
LI•Lfthlum 1132 USA
COU lilgh :140 mg/1
Chi a: 'Fri 32217 ug/1
TKN ss N 625 log/1
RfVFIt Sr15lN 1
❑AMIIIENT
❑
QA
❑ STREAM
❑
ErFLULNT
REPORT TO: ARCS Rq MRO 8110 WaRO WINOW5R0'f5
AT IIM-
Other
Shipped hv: flus
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
❑COMPLIANCE
❑EMERGFNCY
�X
CHAIN
OF CUSTODY
❑ LAKE
❑LSTUARY
❑
INFENT
LU
r)urlel, Staff, Other
:16
Cu100pl1-- —) H3 ADMI
P: Dlssulved as P 666 rug/l
Se-Seleulum 1147 1,19/1
CoUlunn: fecal %[rep 31673 /10011
Color. pU 7.6 H2 AUMI
Estimated ROD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION:
Seed: Yee ❑ No ❑ Chlorloaled: Yes ❑ No ❑ REMARIIS: !
Lab Number:
Date Received: D Time: Q
Recd b : From: Ruaour1er land Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
Srr ltun !/ D.1vfleHln�(yy/o+rn/dd) Time Itegln Dale E-od
---- —_ _-- --�--- - - - - .1 L_:.=.—L•� I '� ' l ..�L l
fime fnd !)eptih
bM 1lB qUM ]nA
Type
I I t.
Com poaite
T' S 11
Sample type
C �Ci1 G N X X
�J
.-
—1
- 3
4
r
--(1
-7
-_.1.0
- I I
. ..��`
:1
-S
I r1
16 -
l7
IN
1 rT
LU
-�
lJ0D5 :IID--�---- rng/I
Chlurlde 940 "19/1
NI 13 ar N 61u rrrg/I
Ti 18.3 pi 1 4.5
LI•Lfthlum 1132 USA
COU lilgh :140 mg/1
Chi a: 'Fri 32217 ug/1
TKN ss N 625 log/1
Mq-Magnesium 927 mg/1
4(111 •
COU Low 335 roll/I
Chl a: Corr 32209 ug/1
NO2 plus NO3 as N 63o mg/l
Mn -Manganese 1055 ug/t
LL
Coliforrn: MF Fecal 31616 /iOUm!
PheoplLytin a 32213 ug/I
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
Na -Sodium 929 mg/!
Colllotrn: b1F 'Total 315U4 /1()01rd
ufor: 'Tole BO Pt -Co
PO4 as P 70507 mg/l
Arsenic -,Total 1002 ug/I
—
--
Culllorm: 'fubp Feral :11615 /10111111
:16
Cu100pl1-- —) H3 ADMI
P: Dlssulved as P 666 rug/l
Se-Seleulum 1147 1,19/1
CoUlunn: fecal %[rep 31673 /10011
Color. pU 7.6 H2 AUMI
119 -Mercury 71900 ug/I
rlesldue:'Total 500 n19/1
Volatile 505 1911
Cyanide 720 rng/1
I-hlnride951 _ mg/t
Furmaldehyde 7[HH0 ~mg/1
Cd -Cadmium 1027 ug/1
Cr-Chrumium:Tutaf 1034 ug/r
Organochlorine Pesticides
UrgaltophoeglMims Pesrk:ides
-�-
---
----
--
--
Fixed 510 ma/1
Cu -Copper 1042 ug/I
Itesidur: tiuspendpd 531) mg/I
------ Volatile 535-- -�--__.._..----rng/I
---.----
Fixed 640 mg/I
pll 40:1 uults
Acldliy to Ot 4.5 436 mg/1
Acidity to pli H.3 435 -� rn9/1�
rrvdar and ()Its 556 1119/1
lfarduess 'I'o4al`100 nrg/I
Spri-01c Grid. 95 uDlhns; cm 2
MESAS 3H260 rug/I
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Ni -Nickel 1067 u9/1
Acid lierbickles —
1'b -Lead 1051 1r9/1
7.n--LhVe 1092 up/1
Ilasr/ Neutral I:xtrsclabie 019boics
Acid Extractable {hganicc
Ag -Sliver 1077 ug/1
Sulfate 945 --- IngA
AI-Alumiaum 1105 ug/I
Pulgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'dl
Alkallnity to pll 8.3 4t5 ui l%I
Alkallnity to fill 4.5 410 1119/1
tiullidc 745 1119/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/1
—
Ca-Carcfurn 916 mg/I
TOC 660 — 19/1
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
furlrtdlty 71]i - -- � NTU
Fe -Iron 1045 agA
Phytopinnkton
Satn(j1i4i9 Pulnt
Col,duelauee at 25 C
Water lern1wranue in
U.O. o1!V1
I41
Alkalinfly
Acidify
Air Temperature ICI
Ti 18.3 pi 1 4.5
pi l 4.5 141 8.3
2
94
10
3(TOI •
Cloud Cover x
4(111 •
8'1244 43t
82243 JnZ42
20
Salinity 'S
I'reclplltun OlVddy)
Wlud I)tn•ctluu Oleg)
Sireatn Flow Severtly
'Turbidity Severily
Wlnd Velocity MAI em Stream Depth It.
Stream Width It.
480
45
132
:16
11351
1350
1 35 64
14
DM1,11r6wd IMHh

MAY
1 -ab Number :
DIVISION' Uh 1VATER QUALITY
Date Received :
3/30/2001
'Sime Received:
[. ur mi,u} I,a ��ralm, Rrpnrt 1 R -a lrr t3uatir5
Received By
li#IW
LL_..._�
s j3J� r
AR
SAMULUIT
5/112001
['MIN IY BLADEiNr
r._.
1'IIIVK[Cl'
Iia nuddch5 dr'I&8U
m0 I.
R111:R 111,SIN:
1l, , MMI.Nf O QA
❑ STREAM
ITT UE41'
Fi 1:1'nRf ltl 1 FKIJ RcF,innal [7fCiu'El
Cr-11.11'I.UANCP_ ('IIAIN (71r CU5I U1?l"
ED LAKE
WF[.UliN l
nfnrr
l:NP ";1 NCY 5'ItiS111)
PStUAR1
;11„1•.1 I`l1 5 3 a:= nl};
_
Aliallllill lu 'll S 2 417 til; I.
t tll.Ll.I'IIrItISV : II,ItiII'
��' 1
lammn,k 1.1;ni'l
ca- Calvium 9$6 III+/1.
�
.
1 -ab Number :
1 W 1$56
Date Received :
3/30/2001
'Sime Received:
9:05 AM
Received By
li#IW
Dataeleased
s j3J� r
AR
Pale Repotted :
5/112001
]'•rima Ird IIl1 It PI Nfati+9l Lura6nn: IIOWNS[Ri�Ahl
Srrd: e'Mlarinalyd: itrnlae w4:
Stnlinn a 1W, Brein I,}hnnUdlSl Uale 1:0,11(,."m mddl 'iinle 1Segin Iime Find t)rpd, • MI. UII, DIM\'.luc'1'+pr - A. 11. L {:ornpmire-l', S.6 S.mple 1) pr
2!;Offl33� 02x1}
y
I{I lU 3111 3 8 nls I
C10 Irl 32:17
_
I Irlrl,.14 11, rrlL, I
4 n111,In 611 I I,.,I binln HUrul
_ Mn.Mang:ux•xr• InS;
l'nLhmn, 641 Irtal AISgI �_ ItNhnE
C,dnl I •It 1 S3 •13=
l.0111n111 IIIIt•Ie'4'.11 ?1f.11 1n01n1
wool. ill 'h S2
l'rdilnnn Icc.11 tier,?Iv73 ,"Ilrihnl
C..Inldc 7:11
total 5Ul1 m; I.
1'Illnndl'Q:I
1'nl,udr- 5115 m ; I.
Iia nuddch5 dr'I&8U
m0 I.
ioc.1SC and O'k : (,
141'}Icllll' SSIS at'lldl'd : ?II 111 I,
81101 t, 1„tai 14%1
of r1.
ti, %ilic coral 95
Fiord 311) mg,
M IIA5 453rD?
III? 6.3 unnc
a,.,lu', r• III .I' I, r. m1; I
-I. --
"u1611c 915
;11„1•.1 I`l1 5 3 a:= nl};
_
Aliallllill lu 'll S 2 417 til; I.
Imran
AlWlinin, In 'll .1 110 Ing i.
lammn,k 1.1;ni'l
ca- Calvium 9$6 III+/1.
ilr,,n',Ilenl l,:hr,gniuln
i urbldm :' N'I V
_
t',+hl,nnl Intal ]uta' ".1U11m1c
t ill if 1.115:
_ Chlnlilic`>nI
(lip -I.
C10 Irl 32:17
lig I
_ Mn.Mang:ux•xr• InS;
NI t, 41n NI li,n N 011
t'. 41q.d o, Ilm's mg, I.
C,dnl I •It 1 S3 •13=
rr.0
wool. ill 'h S2
1•.51,
C..Inldc 7:11
PI 1.
1'Illnndl'Q:I
nr F,'I.
Iia nuddch5 dr'I&8U
Ing,
ioc.1SC and O'k : (,
II1EA.
81101 t, 1„tai 14%1
of r1.
ti, %ilic coral 95
Iunllo%i[,n2
M IIA5 453rD?
nlF • 1.
1' -Vanadium ail.
"u1611c 915
Ing; 1.
Sulrlde"15
m '1.
Imran
Be- lkr Ilium 1012 us. (.
lammn,k 1.1;ni'l
ca- Calvium 9$6 III+/1.
ilr,,n',Ilenl l,:hr,gniuln
u','Z.
_
I'e-hunlUlS a rl.
[.i -Lithium 1132
N113 as N 610 0.37 In /1.
.\'
f RN an N 625 1 0 m ,'1.
_ Mn.Mang:ux•xr• InS;
NI t, 41n NI li,n N 011
t'. 41q.d o, Ilm's mg, I.
_
1'04 a5 i' 70507 mil.
Amnica'oial IOU
P: 111stllleol ac P 666 nl 11.
Sc -Selenium 1147
F.-Pl/Ia511t1r11 I!1 !L
II II Macury 71900
Cd- Cadmium 1027 a /L
Rd_Batium
Cr-Chu,miunl:lbtal 1034
qr arlochlarine Pesticides
Cu- Copfwi 1042 1IFI
Oigawphoilpliorw Pesticides
Ni NiOxl 106; ug—I_
_
1'11- Lod "051 ug., L
_
-).n-7.tne 4(192 Is /L
1' -Vanadium ail.
I;ase/Neulral&Acid Extractable Ur
Ar-Slhcr UI77 u, I.
I11]I Dincl Ran5c
AI-Alunlillum 1103 og I_
Be- lkr Ilium 1012 us. (.
Pw caU[c qr anics (VUA UaOle rc 'd)
ca- Calvium 9$6 III+/1.
Co -cobalt 1037 ug, 1.
_
I'e-hunlUlS a rl.
[.i -Lithium 1132
a /L
Mg- Ma nmium 927
mg., L
_ Mn.Mang:ux•xr• InS;
u�il
MI. 1-I 1119211
mil.
Amnica'oial IOU
a /l.
Sc -Selenium 1147
111
II II Macury 71900
u iL
Rd_Batium
a /L
qr arlochlarine Pesticides
Oigawphoilpliorw Pesticides
Acid Ilcrbicidcs
I;ase/Neulral&Acid Extractable Ur
nits
I11]I Dincl Ran5c
Pw caU[c qr anics (VUA UaOle rc 'd)
TPI] Gasoline Range
1'111/B1 EX Gasoline Range
Ph to lankton

DIVISION. OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DMI)
COUNTY
4 Ct.C� t,' t
PIiIURiTY
i t: i
'SAMPLE TYPE.
-.-�Volaiilc 535'--. _
---Flxr.dSof}
R ItA51N
C ���
LIAMBICNT
1
❑ QA
❑ STRFAM
❑ EFFLUENT'
ftl?PI)!I7 TO: Ali(}
EP
�RU MRO NRO WaRO WIRD WSRD 'TS
AT Jim
Other ._._,
1 1 !
Stream Flow Severity
❑COMPLIANCE
❑
FMERGF:NCY
W CHAIN
017 CUSTODY
❑ LAKE
11 ESTUARY
❑ iNFLUENT
I
For I -ah 11— ONI V
Lab Number:
Dale Recelved: Ime:
Recd b : From: Ru ourle Hand Def
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
Sir ppe,v. s .nurler- all, Ot te.r DATI: REPORTED:
d fn
COLLECTOR IS): f -4ct
r
Estimated ROD ftange0-5/5-25/2x'65140-1STATION LOCATION: 30 or 1 ,los-------------•--•• ----•••--_-•-
5PPd: Yes ❑ Nn(�^Chlnrinnlcd: Yes ❑ No ❑ RLMARAS: (3
Stallnil //
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
COD 111911 340
COD Low 335
Cnllfnrm: hIF Fecal 31616
Coliform: Ml: 'TOW 31504
Coliforne Tube Fecal 31615
Cn{llnrm: Fecal Strep 31673
S
Chlorlde 940 Ing/I
Residue: Total 500
Volatile 505
Fixed 510
. 1-`
---"--
HP%WLIC: Suspended 530
- 12
-13---'-
---
-.-�Volaiilc 535'--. _
---Flxr.dSof}
Color:(pll ] 83 ADMI
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/I
Color: plf 7.6 82 ADMI
1
----
-W
pill 403
Acidity to p14 -1.5 436
1-r
-
16
'
Stream Flow Severity
Acidity to pll 9,3 435
17
Ag -Silver 1077 trg/I
Alkall,tily to pli 8.3 415
IR
All alinity 10 1,11 4.5 410
45
32
6841
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
1350
rurhidlly 76
Date. Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date f nd Tlme End Depth UM DR DBM Value Typc L r
mposite Sample 1'yp
A H T 5 B C GNXX
l r %LJ t ci 1-ot �
mg/I
mg/i
my/t
/100m1
/lUOm!
/lOtlml
/IDUmI
mg/1
Sampling Point %
Chlorlde 940 Ing/I
Ch1 a: TTI 32217 u9/1
TKN as N 625 mg/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/ 1
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/I
P: Total as P 665 mg/f
Phenphytin a 32213 ug/I
1'04 ns P 70507 mq/1
Color: True. RO Pt -Co
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/1
Color:(pll ] 83 ADMI
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/I
Color: plf 7.6 82 ADMI
Cd -Cadmium 1027 ug/l
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Cr-Climulum:Total1034 uEtA
Salinity %
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
Cloud Cuver %
Hardness Total900 mg/l
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MRAS 38260 mg/1
Phenols 32730- ug/I
Stream Flow Severity
_ -
Acid Ilerhlcitles
Sulfate 945 mg/1
Ag -Silver 1077 trg/I
Sulfide 745 mg/1
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/f
Be-Berylltum 1012 uq/I
("n -Calcium 916
C -Coball 1037 ug/I
45
Sampling Point %
NH3 as N 610 mg/!
Nater Temperature IC
TKN as N 625 mg/I
pi I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/I
P: Total as P 665 mg/f
Acidity
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
1'04 ns P 70507 mq/1
2
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/1
10
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/I
4001 a
Cd -Cadmium 1027 ug/l
H___
Cr-Climulum:Total1034 uEtA
Salinity %
CnCnpper 1042 ug/l
NI -Nickel 1067 ugll
Pb -Lead 1051 u9/1
Cloud Cuver %
Zn -Zinc 1092 ug/1
Stream Flow Severity
_ -
Acid Ilerhlcitles
Wind Velocity MAI
Ag -Silver 1077 trg/I
Siteam Width G.
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/f
Be-Berylltum 1012 uq/I
("n -Calcium 916
C -Coball 1037 ug/I
45
32
Fe -Iron 1045 u9/1
Sampling Point %
Li-Lllhlum 1132 ug/I
Nater Temperature IC
Mg-Magnealum 927 mg/l
pi I
Mn -Manganese 1055 ug/1
Acidity
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
Na-Sodlum 929 mg/l
2
Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/I
10
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/I
4001 a
Hg -Mercury 71900 ug/l
H___
Orgnnochlorine Pesticides
Salinity %
Organophasplwrtls Pesticides
Cloud Cuver %
Wha1 Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
_ -
Acid Ilerhlcitles
Wind Velocity MAI
Mean Stream Dep(h It.
Siteam Width G.
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extraclabie Organics
45
32
3G
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
1350
35
64 14
Phylnplanktnn
Sampling Point %
Conduclance at 25 C
Nater Temperature IC
D.O. m9A
pi I
Allcnlinily
14183 pH 4.5
Acidity
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
Air Temperature (C)
2
94
10
300 1 .
4001 a
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Frecipillon On/day)
Cloud Cuver %
Wha1 Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity MAI
Mean Stream Dep(h It.
Siteam Width G.
—�
480
45
32
3G
1351
1350
35
64 14
w

I kU kcgimal Ullice
KA11'I S
DIVISION (}P W 1'Lit QUALITY
Che,nko., Lnhnrsfnl-r Itrpml l i\'At,, Q...hlr
AMfIIENS F-1 LA
COMPLIANCI: l'11AINU! CU$1UU}'
❑ Ph1P.k771:NC}' 1'I5ll 11)
Slalim, Lnraiinm SUUIICP
Rrmm L.:
w 5nn41�l.L.IyP1:
1 W 1854
SiR1iAAl
� EPPLUE:NT
LAKE
� INIAMEN 1-
ESIUAR}'
14h1W
AR
2
Lab Numlrr
1 W 1854
Dale Received:
3/30/2001
1 Ime Received:
9',95 AM
Received By
Uata eased ;
14h1W
AR
Date Repultcd :
5/1/2001
♦I:a 0111 r, 1W IlrFin 13,lnl,nlddl -- 1W, h"i 4y); m;ddY lin,, 11,gh. 'I ime Find Ilrplh • UAL bll, t711A1 1'dur 131,r. A, If, L Campn7Nr=l. 5, rz I Samp1r 'irpe
20010329 .u.�- 11::5
\
11, 'I, 110--�� � No Vulm' ury; I
.-
l'hl .I t,k 32211 uY', l
Y
lfd.rf'm132211, vl,,•l
1�•1161m A11 Ir, .I Ill,lr, lo,lnd
PIk'�, 11111111.1 32:_13 11 �i1.
t"nhlrnm A!! Il�tal 31511.1 --- 104111~
Culm I lur Au C.11.
c'olilcuu loft I Cca1 31515 - 1001111
Colm (1,1L I S3 ,11= C.U.
Cr�lllnr:n fu;;d Sticr 31673 Itwhod
_
Kesi,tur InoalilyJ nip 1.
_
--
I -i NO 51LI m1; I_
l'ormAldekde 71830 Ing:1.
i:r,ldur ::1�r�udrd :311 1111: I
Cit%iseandl!ilr5i0 mgl
V"I'mir 53I mg I—
Ilardism 1,-4j1900 mrl.
I I, Cd 540 mr. I.
5 •ifir Cond 95 11mhos/cni2
:111 4 O 0.9 111,11,
1.1I1AS 38260 n1g'L
triI, rll 1 - 1;1
I'hr mdc 127)0 tip S.
---------
S_.I?5 011: I
�u0alc945 mg -1.
AII_illnlm topll A?415 reF1
Suflide X45 mg, L
A IS,rl�ur. ll, plI454111 I_
Onnm
�_m�
I[11r m' I.
--
I luludrr. ;u N I t
I icaacnlvnt Clummium u0� 1_
4'1'11110111 I lu,11 111!"' . ICC till,
__
l'hlrn illy 0.111 �_ nll:: i- -
.-
l'hl .I t,k 32211 uY', l
Y
lfd.rf'm132211, vl,,•l
_
PIk'�, 11111111.1 32:_13 11 �i1.
_
Culm I lur Au C.11.
Colm (1,1L I S3 ,11= C.U.
(:0vT 1,11 7 6 92 C. Lt.
Cvauidc 720 m !1_
I1Puri(ic 951 m %L
l'ormAldekde 71830 Ing:1.
Cit%iseandl!ilr5i0 mgl
_
Ilardism 1,-4j1900 mrl.
5 •ifir Cond 95 11mhos/cni2
1.1I1AS 38260 n1g'L
_
I'hr mdc 127)0 tip S.
---------
�u0alc945 mg -1.
Suflide X45 mg, L
_
Onnm
I dnnin S 1.1 nnl u i L
I icaacnlvnt Clummium u0� 1_
N113 ns N 610 5.6 1,,l;/I.
S
I KN au N 1,25 5.7 III&T
Y
N021du5N113,1s N 00 0,91 mgi1.
P:'ll,ld4 as 1' 6fi T 1118/1.
_
1104 ns P 70507 _m,/L_
1': Dissolved as P 666 m /1.
!:•!'otassium r1, /L
Cd -Cadmium 1027 a /L
O-Chiomiunc S orli IC34 ug, L
Cu -Cu xt 1042 a /L
Ni -Nickel IMI up, L
Pb- lead 1051 ug/1.
Zn, Zinc 1092 ug/I_
V -Vanadium is !L
A;-Sibrl 1077 us L
Al -Aluminum IICS u ,'L
ik• 11milium 1012 us/1-
_
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/l,
Co. Cohah1037 ug/ L
fe- Iran 1045 U/1,

DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL NIANAGi NICNT WATCR QUALITY FIELD -LAB P0Iti•1 (DP11)
COUNTY
Chi a: Trl 32217 ug/I
PRIORITY
❑AMBIENT ❑ QA
SAMPLE.T.ype
j
❑ STREAM
�
•.
❑ EFFLUENT
RIVER BASIN
REPORT TO: ARO
� MHO RRO WaRO W)RO WSRO TS
AT M
ATR
Other .
j�
CHAIN
r Or CUSTODY
11 EMERGENCY
LAKE
❑ESTUARY
11INFLUENT
--�
Shipped by: Bus nude Staff, Other
COLLECTOR ISy: L�C �+2JI
Estimated BOD Range; 0.5/5-25/25-65/40-I30 or 100 plus^ STATION LOCATION: SC1s�_CC
Ssed: Yes ❑ No❑ Chlorinated: Yet ❑ No ❑ REMARKS: C
For Lab Use ONLY
Lab Number:
Detc Received ime
Recd b From; Bu our Band Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED;
Strllun // !)ate Begin (vy/moadd) Tlnte Begin Ilale latJ JTime Cnd Depth DM DO DIIM Value Type Composite IS"Cle
Typt L,� LcyA It L T S R G GNXK
—1
Chloride 940 mg/1
HODS 310 mg/I
Chi a: Trl 32217 ug/I
;At
COU 11194 340 mg/I
2
Yheophytin a 32213 ug/1
3
COD Low 335 n1g/I
llatdness Toinl9U0 11lg/1
Speciilc l_'r+nd, 95 uMhus/cm2
h111AS :18260 1119A
Phenols 32731?---- ug/I
CuUlorm: MF f=ecal 31616 /100ml
4
yullate 9.15 -- mg/I
94
rt
--...i+Rnlllulln:
Acid I lerikides
t.�-1111ar111; hll: Total 31504 /10nntl
87141 431
Ph -Lead 1051 uF/l
'1u6.+ Feral 31615 /I0011)t
7.11-Vitc 1092 u9/1
Acid Extractable Organics
Culllnrw: i:rcdl .slffcp 3167:1-- /100ntl
7
Ag -Silver 1077 ug/1
�ug/l
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
K
earn Stream Depth It.
llr .0,111c. 'I utal 51111 ill 1/1
Ca -Calcium 916 1ng/l
45
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Phytoplanktan
Pe -Iron 1045 u9/1
1350
3s
Fixed 510 mg/1
4
F k
Hesldue: tiuspendeJ 530 rng/I
—
12
— - Voralile 5535 mg/]
— —
t,l
—
— Fix -1 540 n19/1
pit 403-------��� unlfs
AcWtty 1n 141 4.5 436 1,111/1
ACldlty to pit 8.3 435 mall
-17
—
AlkaHnity to pit 8.3 415
_ ]t)
Aikatinity It) pit 4.5 410 1+11/1
TOC 680--- — m q/1
Sampling Puiut %
Chloride 940 mg/1
%yater Teinp.eratum ICI
Chi a: Trl 32217 ug/I
;At
Chi e: Corr 32209 ug/I
Acidity
Yheophytin a 32213 ug/1
LaIOF: True 80 Pt•Co
t tdolAp li- - 11{;l� AW -11
Cului : pll 7.t+ 82--- ADMI
Cyanide 72ft - W T —1119/1
F-Innri.le 951, -- mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 1119A
Grea1•e and Olis 5S6 mg/1
P: Dluulved an 1' 666 Tutt/I
llatdness Toinl9U0 11lg/1
Speciilc l_'r+nd, 95 uMhus/cm2
h111AS :18260 1119A
Phenols 32731?---- ug/I
pit 4.5 pit 8.3
Cd-Cadmluln 1027 vel/I
Cr-Chrumium:Tutat IQ34 ugA
yullate 9.15 -- mg/I
94
Sullide 745 1110/1
Acid I lerikides
Ni -Nickel 1067 ug/i
87141 431
Ph -Lead 1051 uF/l
Rase/ Neulral Extractable Otganlcs
7.11-Vitc 1092 u9/1
Sampling Puiut %
N113 at N 610 mg/I
%yater Teinp.eratum ICI
TKN as N 625 mg/1
;At
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/l
Acidity
I': Total a■ P 665 mg/I
1104 as P 70507 Ing/1
P: Dluulved an 1' 666 Tutt/I
Org[tun(:hiorina Pctticldes
-_
pit 4.5 pit 8.3
Cd-Cadmluln 1027 vel/I
Cr-Chrumium:Tutat IQ34 ugA
2
94
Cu-Cnp;wt 1042 ug/l
Acid I lerikides
Ni -Nickel 1067 ug/i
87141 431
Ph -Lead 1051 uF/l
Rase/ Neulral Extractable Otganlcs
7.11-Vitc 1092 u9/1
Acid Extractable Organics
Preclpitlort (It/lay)
1VIrwl thirc'tloa (Deg)
Ag -Silver 1077 ug/1
�ug/l
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
AI -Aluminum 1105
earn Stream Depth It.
Be-Betyllium 1012 ug/1
Ca -Calcium 916 1ng/l
45
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Phytoplanktan
Pe -Iron 1045 u9/1
Sampling Puiut %
LI-Lithlum 1132 ug/1
%yater Teinp.eratum ICI
Mg-Magneaium 927 mg/1
;At
Mn -Manganese 1055 ug/l
Acidity
Ne -Sodium 929 mg/1
Areenlci lutel 1002 ug/1
Se-Selenlum 1147 u0/1
Hg-Mcmury 71900 u9/1
Org[tun(:hiorina Pctticldes
-_
pit 4.5 pit 8.3
Organopl"Iwnus Pesikides
2
94
Ill
Acid I lerikides
4110 .
87141 431
82243 102242
Rase/ Neulral Extractable Otganlcs
—
Acid Extractable Organics
Preclpitlort (It/lay)
1VIrwl thirc'tloa (Deg)
Stream F)nw Severtly
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Wind Velocily MAI
earn Stream Depth It.
Scream Witt It.
480
45
32
Phytoplanktan
Sampling Puiut %
Conductance at 25 C
%yater Teinp.eratum ICI
D.O. ulg/1
;At
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature 11C)
1418.3 pl1 4.5
pit 4.5 pit 8.3
2
94
Ill
3ip.__�-'
Cloud Cover R
4110 .
87141 431
82243 102242
20
—
Salinity %
Preclpitlort (It/lay)
1VIrwl thirc'tloa (Deg)
Stream F)nw Severtly
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocily MAI
earn Stream Depth It.
Scream Witt It.
480
45
32
36
9351
1350
3s
64
4

1 -
i 1` � ('hrmislr3 Lntmrnl nr) Itrlr urtlil nlrr fJuaFiN
S i' _IU7i7I1"
IUs'I'.N
I] IN QA SIRU1IM BF
Fl, U1:NC
ItcrnRl lu IRU Rcl;ionalI'Mice L_J CUAIFI.IANCI: L_J CILAINUI'CUS1 )P3. LAKE: INFLUENT 513161
ur1, 1•r : El P.I,WR(iI:KCY vi.siI III ED IiSr l;All1'
11]1.1 1('ItlRlll I1 '111'1 S I—
I ,rrn.rlyd stilt+ n:rncr: �sati„n I I,�ad1,n: I sitit'ISARIiF. VOIN
�rrd' f'hhn mnlvd: Itrinarkrt
�I nfir a, rr Bntr 11rli 11 lysllnmh1111 IM1r 1:11,1 Is24nnddsl) lima Ik lin limn I:ud Url,llr • D.M. 1)[1,l
It, Ultm Volur,rtic • A. It. I. Cnmpamp
nsl le -T, S. I) $le 'I3pc
2001032'1
Lab Number
I W 1855
Date Received:
3/30/2001
lime Received :
9:05 AM
Received By
IIMW
Da1d :
AR
Dale Rr•porled :
5/112001
\_
HUI 1310 B B mv, 1.
_
_
t-1111 IIiIa13111 � I
.0 NU2 ,kls 4173 .1s N v30
(111.1 lr,r137,NY) u; 1-
1'. Coral as P665
t'elprrnn Ail- Irt;113161h . ItNIuN
PUI as F' 70507
t:rdillnu, ,11P [nlal 31501 IIYI!wl
_
L:01"rrlr luFc I ccal 31615 • 111Un11
K-Polassiurn
Iilomi IctA Suc 31673 :IUO:10)[111IYrs
Cd- Cadntiunt 1027
'due: r�11,115PI) 111g.1.
Cr-Clrrornijitu -I bias 103.1
— "Wilc 505 I.
ut,
Cu -Cu 'cr 1912
I ill makiv.11 de -,I8S11 111L,1.
—�
licsi�tur Sus xnded 5 3U . w , I
Pb- I -cad 1051
�'nlrrlilr X35 toy;•
_')M'i111iCrn1,1.45...,.-„-...
uulhos;

I)IVIS ION ()1: 1'NVIIIUNdli'For Lab Use ONLY
Lab Number:
3757
Elate Reeel/v{ed�Q1Q� 3I� Tlme:0�[/�
Recd bx�//j/) I From: Bot ourie Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTOf11S1: .� tt i„}��� � � j
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION; �7j�� (� f \ C� tiy\
Seed: Yes ❑ No❑ Chlorinated: Yes El No REMARKS:
Slallan !/ Date Begin (yV/mm/dd) Tim e Regln Dale End Tlme Eind Depth DM DU Dam value Type Composite Sample Ty e
J 7 CI ' S A li L T S R C G GNAX
1 /
N1 AL MANAG4-MI.NZ WA ILII Q U A L I I I
FIL-LD-LA l3 FUIRM 11)M I
Chl a: TO 32217 ug/1
r1
Clot e: Corr 32209 ug; I
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
�
COUNTY
I ` k
PR10111TY
SAMPLE. TYPE
COD Low 335 m1T/1
CVai ide 720 1119/1
I'binride 9Sl
1:ormattlehyde 71880 1119/1
Crease and 011% 556 rng/I
I lnrdnetiw '1'ufnl 441 U..��—'-- rng/1
Spet'lilc C."Id-'15y--� uhSllus/cm2
MBAS :18260 ----�_-� lug/I
Phenols 32730- ------ ug/I
rr f(
410
C011100n1: Ml -'Fecal 31616 /100m1
Sulfate 945 �- Ing/I
_—
Sultide745 nag/I
— r
E1EVI31 SIN
.
❑AMBIENT
❑
Culllunrl: 't'ut/4! Fecal 31615 /I OOmI
❑
❑
'r TO:
REPOfI'1 T(1: ARO R4 MRO Ill(O 1VaAU WIRO W5R{1 TS
Ca -Calcium 916 nr0/I
QA
Cu-Coball 1037 ug/l
STREAM
EFFLUENT
AT I1M�-
❑COMPl.1ANCE
UCIIAIN
Phytoplanklan
LAKE
1:1 INFLUENT
Other
❑
OF CUSTony
❑ ESTUARY
i
�I
Shipped by: Bus
aurle Stafl, Other
EMERGENCY
12
,
13
- -'-
1'lxa•J 540....-
I r4
loll 40'1 units
Lab Number:
3757
Elate Reeel/v{ed�Q1Q� 3I� Tlme:0�[/�
Recd bx�//j/) I From: Bot ourie Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTOf11S1: .� tt i„}��� � � j
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION; �7j�� (� f \ C� tiy\
Seed: Yes ❑ No❑ Chlorinated: Yes El No REMARKS:
Slallan !/ Date Begin (yV/mm/dd) Tim e Regln Dale End Tlme Eind Depth DM DU Dam value Type Composite Sample Ty e
J 7 CI ' S A li L T S R C G GNAX
1 /
Sdrnpling Pu11r1 q ICanduclance at 25 ClWaier Temperature K1. D.O. m•rlh IJill
2 94 10 3110 ��' 4f10
-�F - Salinity 74 1'rerlpilion fln/daV) Cloud CnVer `L Wind Dlterllan 0leg)
480 ----- 45 32 i6 -_.—
Chloride 940 mg/I
HODS 310 mg/1
Chl a: TO 32217 ug/1
Clot e: Corr 32209 ug; I
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
COI) 1119h 340 rng/I
1
Culurlplr ) 83 Aphll
Culur: pit 7.6 82 ADM]
COD Low 335 m1T/1
CVai ide 720 1119/1
I'binride 9Sl
1:ormattlehyde 71880 1119/1
Crease and 011% 556 rng/I
I lnrdnetiw '1'ufnl 441 U..��—'-- rng/1
Spet'lilc C."Id-'15y--� uhSllus/cm2
MBAS :18260 ----�_-� lug/I
Phenols 32730- ------ ug/I
4
C011100n1: Ml -'Fecal 31616 /100m1
Sulfate 945 �- Ing/I
_—
Sultide745 nag/I
— r
-
Ci lilotrn: MF Total 3150.1 /IOOrtII
(�
(lase/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Culllunrl: 't'ut/4! Fecal 31615 /I OOmI
Acid Fxlraclable 0iflanits
Be-Berylllurn 1012 ug/I
Culllorm: Fecal Strep 3I673 /11001ni
Ca -Calcium 916 nr0/I
Purgeable Organics IVDA bottle reg'd)
Cu-Coball 1037 ug/l
it
Fe -Iron 1045 u9/1
ItesldueY otal 500 Rlg/l
-� Vala FI SU6 mg/i
r1
Phytoplanklan
--10
-
--- 1'iaeJ 5111 nig/1
Residare: Suspended 530 1n.1/I
12
Vr,lnlllr �i 3:i rn!1/t
-- "--
13
- -'-
1'lxa•J 540....-
I r4
loll 40'1 units
Ar. IdIIV to 141 4.5 436
_.16
�
Aridity to I,11 8.3 435 n,g/I
17
Alkalinity to pll 8.3 415 4r1g/I
1�
Alkalinity to pll 4.5 4143 mg/I
1 rl
TOC 680 togJl
--20
_
Turbidity 76 N'T'lJ
Sdrnpling Pu11r1 q ICanduclance at 25 ClWaier Temperature K1. D.O. m•rlh IJill
2 94 10 3110 ��' 4f10
-�F - Salinity 74 1'rerlpilion fln/daV) Cloud CnVer `L Wind Dlterllan 0leg)
480 ----- 45 32 i6 -_.—
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chl a: TO 32217 ug/1
Clot e: Corr 32209 ug; I
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
Color. True BU Pt•Cu
Culurlplr ) 83 Aphll
Culur: pit 7.6 82 ADM]
CVai ide 720 1119/1
I'binride 9Sl
1:ormattlehyde 71880 1119/1
Crease and 011% 556 rng/I
I lnrdnetiw '1'ufnl 441 U..��—'-- rng/1
Spet'lilc C."Id-'15y--� uhSllus/cm2
MBAS :18260 ----�_-� lug/I
Phenols 32730- ------ ug/I
4
0lg41wpamll,nrus Pesticides
Sulfate 945 �- Ing/I
_—
Sultide745 nag/I
Arid Itechicklex
Ag -Sliver 1077 -T ug/1
(lase/ Neutral Extractable Organics
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Sdrnpling Pu11r1 q ICanduclance at 25 ClWaier Temperature K1. D.O. m•rlh IJill
2 94 10 3110 ��' 4f10
-�F - Salinity 74 1'rerlpilion fln/daV) Cloud CnVer `L Wind Dlterllan 0leg)
480 ----- 45 32 i6 -_.—
Alkalinity Acidity �AirTemperature10
lo
1 8.3 pli 4.5 11 4.5 p11 8.3
431 182243 82242 20
Flow Severtly Turbidity Severlly I Wind VelocityM/II dean Stream Depth 11. $trcam Width It.
351 11350
4
Nil3 as N 610 1110/1
TKN as N 625 mg/1
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 Ing/1
P: Total as P 665 mg/l
PO4 as P 70$07 mg/l
P: Dlssuived as P 666 1n9/1
Se-Seleolum 1147 ug/I
Cd-C4dmium 1027 ug/1
Cr-Chru3niurnJotal1034 rrgA
Organuchlorine Pesticides
Cu-Coprwi 1042 ug/1
0lg41wpamll,nrus Pesticides
Ni•Nlckel 1067 ug/1
I'h-Lead 1051 ug/I
'!.n-'Ltnc 1092 ug/1
Arid Itechicklex
Ag -Sliver 1077 -T ug/1
(lase/ Neutral Extractable Organics
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Acid Fxlraclable 0iflanits
Be-Berylllurn 1012 ug/I
Ca -Calcium 916 nr0/I
Purgeable Organics IVDA bottle reg'd)
Cu-Coball 1037 ug/l
Fe -Iron 1045 u9/1
Alkalinity Acidity �AirTemperature10
lo
1 8.3 pli 4.5 11 4.5 p11 8.3
431 182243 82242 20
Flow Severtly Turbidity Severlly I Wind VelocityM/II dean Stream Depth 11. $trcam Width It.
351 11350
4
LI-1-11hium 1172 ug/1
Mq Magneetum 927 mg/I
Mn -Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-5udlum 929 mg/1
AraenlC:Totat 1002 ug/1
Se-Seleolum 1147 ug/I
Hg -Mercury, 71900 ug/l
Organuchlorine Pesticides
0lg41wpamll,nrus Pesticides
Arid Itechicklex
(lase/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Fxlraclable 0iflanits
Purgeable Organics IVDA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplanklan
Alkalinity Acidity �AirTemperature10
lo
1 8.3 pli 4.5 11 4.5 p11 8.3
431 182243 82242 20
Flow Severtly Turbidity Severlly I Wind VelocityM/II dean Stream Depth 11. $trcam Width It.
351 11350
4

QF,CAROLi[Az
May 1, 2001
Mr. Paul Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Division of Water Quality FAY8
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street - Suit 714
Fayetteville, N.C. 28301-5043
Subject: Response to Notice of Violation 1 Notice of IntentBrown's of Carolina faun #� 29
Facility No. 09-153 Permit No. AWS 090153
Dear Mr. Rawls,
I am writing in response to your Notice of Violation I Notice of Intent on Brown's of Carolina
Farm # 29. We are strongly committed to environmental stewardship. It is neither our practice nor intent
to exceed the hydraulic capacity of any irrigation field. In an effort to remediate the event you have
described we have worked to broaden our staffs understanding of hydraulic loading and its potential
effects. As a high priority, we are also currently investigating the purchase and/or lease of adjacent
properties for the purpose of increasing our application area, reducing the probability of hydraulic
overload.
Over the past several weeks given the benefit of improved weather conditions we have
significantly improved the lagoon level at farm # 29. Currently the freeboard level is 25".
I have enclosed at your request the following information:
- Irrigation records for the past twelve months including PAN balance.
- Freeboard records for the past twelve months.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either myself
or David Nordin, at [phone].
B Regards,
Robert O. Britt
Division Manager
maxROWN'S 07 CARQLNk Itis'
17 1

B OWN'S Running Lagoon Level & Rainfall Report
r OF CAROLINA Farm Name: 29
nate Lagoon Level
01/06/20
22
01/13/20
23
01/20/20
21
01/27/20
21
02/03/20
21
02/10/20
20
02/17/20
19
02/24/20
18
03/03/20
18
03/10/20
17
03/17/210
16
03/21/20-
14
03/24/20
15
03/31/20
14
04/07/20
15
Pa Ie 36
TuesCiay, Agri! ] U, 2001 b "

BRO1WN Running Lagoon Level & Rainfall Report
OF CAROLINA Farm Name: 29
Date Lagoon Level °
1/1/00
19
1 /8100
18
l/15100
20
1/22/00
20
129/00
17
2/5/00
15
2/12100
14
2/19/00
12
2/26/00
15
314/00
20
X11/00
24
3(18/00
22
3/25100
20
4/1/00
20
4/8M
24
4/ 15/00
24
4/22100
25
4/29/00
26
5/6/00
29
5/ 13(00
29
5120/00
24
5/27/00
22
613/00
23
6/10/00
18
6/17/00
18
6124100
19
7/ 1/00
19
7/8/00
20
7/1 -EWOO
22
7/22/00
23
7/29(00
22
8/5!00
21
8/12100
21
8/19(00
22
8/26/00
2I
9/5/00
15
9/9(00
15
9/19100
13
9/23(00
14
9130/00
21
10(7/00
21
10/14/00
21
1.0/21 /00
21
10/28/00
22
11/4100
2 6
11/11/00
26
11/18/00
25
1 1 /25/00
23
1212/00
22
121WOO
21
12/16/00
22
12/23/00
22
12/30/00
21
600101100567
Wecinecd3y, January 0.3, 2oo
Page 34

rir s 4��` .� -• �"�. - y -+�" - .1 z a� �;,a� ^�' ;a. �- $... r,�r ,i, �4, � 5 ra��r §S�j�'r t. iY�' T �jf" `3.y, a {, ,L. ��`,C� � ,ext- 1 ��
MATO
rYl`� :�.. '. � E r v,.+.'v ,�►' , � � �' v�, `?� •'4 Yt-rl}. r� t'S t y�g.t'�.d;r
-C.� �R& •T�. ",F�i Ebl p 1, �. � ti � d`v �, k1i' ; �+; �. ; � r i h � : G-. t� s a vtnf-'TvY�y { p+t.�rr' s-
1l�.„tr;•f
°.S',.<<�`f3T�
yy' ��. � • - t i y {�" ,� �,�'4 `�-i +�. � ?�. yMf �:+; � ;Y+k �"'� °� i�.�r�. �...YL � .A��'. ��� �:'`. cfi
will,�Y-0 :r .e "f r,+ ,x: ` o •➢ t•f .,�;n.�.�.. :. a .}.;,F �4 w.
f �' +� .. .X- r'{ y[ _.{ � t � r�1`y. � r °� p: � r " �• 1 Y �� ��, �� ''� �3;�?�i....f� �'�;t �+I � T'�9'-fr'
''I>�' tE °f s 1''�� ,� ttl. ,w,4 sF x, a Y .y ,y•. 1 ° "°r' �' N-,}. 1 �� 'F yr. r4�,:4 �.aM� �
�' _ 'a'. X'" � 5 � �✓_� r'•" p,�14 vii �•�L n
a� '��y• T,r�T •,�. rr:: � .a, 1 r'�-� f �• r+ .F.. l ' .�f. r '�F 'rK w,•<�'sl, 4Y�,'�� r_. Jir.��i,.'lMT4Y ,''.t i$ �t, 'r �s�' Mfl �'
.X•IM q,. F t �� u .. .t f -y' i'. '>.T.,.�1.',Ft - �. •,I
ggi .'ti. y p• t T r,� I ' $ w. "c h �?, a F, r°r Y� ,rte, It r 3s,•�%l
• +,a�yf,, _ ,� �1 'r' � r �.F' �f'��:"'i ..�jye�, �3 =1-: ,. �. .:�+� i%!r.'F -r�--f^"'� r' �; ,* F',•. 0
^:i,. �ih�,
xr : � } +'� !i � S- 7• � �, �. ,w .� s t , �; � �� � x &�'€ r ti� n,r, : r~f '� f;L"�Y �
;�s•-,1�5 i 1 �( 'r "af ct �y"`'�` �� 7��x� � „' . h . ,�- �, .F,_ .�?`�il i^!'} +,,,:t^rt .ra'F '��{^ ,�-,� ' l�Sq'jft,'.:, �: 'S+ 4 SO
.r+1.i�*;�:� �r 4.� � ,:}U . ra.. t ��,9., a.+.�' k tii, � i rl : yy .,�:. � .,,#'' � .'l'4'in�y�;y�,a"t �' d ,,;: •t" ,fi'��er���",„j i•t.,�sfti7f�`:??' O
F 'N r +! _ t'A ,� `k.• § r�-. !3 y 8 _ -.,�:, on
-a'r.,: �- °� !s��,X' y� �iY. �, �4 �' a •'+�f'• d., tra dam, ',Fi - r... F
y��.% ,5:
F r t . �AYI'. y Nf i ,'Y a M 3 i.. ri•--'r. a ,v. °u
f "4 •t .-Sf yyY +:ry �(� ty .. M1vi �f , ,s..1S,� �' q: •��. 1 ♦A,� .ry'��f ;�_.1- i -I' f�Y-,�.�•. �t. r.
ni x�'- - tax •rs
:da;`&M.
�i '
<rr rd ,f -i t1 ��C�'�'titi<ar<.�_��.�...,_tl,S.-,�'a.k34�i�...9e,:'.�lY:',"t°wYi�.�-.'IOAc.C•.�r�.°�, �,n.l.,..ar.,rs:�>�dsfS..0
f -•£yy,, >"1 1 .!} x,T�l F'}� A�'at:%iy,P �- a,'i �'t
H.F p_4?'
" .v .
�
.' .�
RJ.r
y
"":(qt��Y
s. yI{Lui i ..}d, yiii. ?=.1... f.S,gie+-_a.Yi. 1i'°�fr
F.
1��G)1'..xrK
rf�+Yi.'
ihFr�taJ,
.t'�s'�,t♦C�,
b�i �hrt.yr
,•'�,"�r4,
-y ".t"a.b4.T�'.::PIriS•Y:,'.y
rr
'r_-,:a-L:a;.' ; .• ,.i -
t
:yI-
,•a,jr'tN:J-
. y:.
7``I .-Sy.5iAF:r.}y�!AR'».rtn, Y:�3,�
`.Y.•..Yt-6,' V":..F„'.
�
6;+.1 - '''
a.iiy't%.nra $
XMr}}ivy?}7piQ;121;C
a`n"r.7s-v`�l..ei.Nr•xh
L�t�,, ,t
lopal
s'.��..hL•A.�r;,,,t.Y,, 'V•1
'fxT-_f$;,+,:�4
5'I',{
r
,
1'
j•r=ir+. ti
' . F ;W v
tows
+� AFL =Af ;Sl
ter{; 7I lif } ilii
aw�r.v+�,
��y`.��' �,� fN h l d.�S.y��•tib.4� '�1'��,�lnrr��` I}+��1 :'�
1.�..
4 r ! �ry
S�. j�k{j� r'�� e. 'k�i�FN^�'r4'� siarA=tFlYtl `{,F .^. e,�e•
t
+NaE I�
�t� + 7'k
e4���4y�:ZK���ukri°t �t't�
_ x 6.
r c
3F K
S.
A 4j
is 3 �✓ i3 :.h*�3fi �' r
nw
'pjj
to
�°•r✓ E.r-•�� �r ��ar
1"r r It rLa s� r x�i �tuWP ��r Ss. r4` k 6 i
AS
� K } Af J
� i • , ��,�p t� d't �' "ltd Yit�� t•�r iruyz� S 2 ^�e
f f b ti ai �'� .2 • i ' `i ° .,r, -y y4 r+,� 'W r � 3ru r ^
s' � k �'qG �1
9"� ;x?I,y}�,,. •r F} asp,+•{ 3�`f } tT i k t {,,, 1 � � y�
} a 14rr}S i. 4 i " °at: cv
�' -l-yi � � • AF y �`SS �+r 1 f'�k' v� �.f�trsc.'>t� '. y.,� },�,. r v�
rsf`x 'liYle;'fir +lYtJ3 rr ? t I r
c4 <�x 3 F r ,k: .y•Y'yj" j��ag� a ,
AIR
. �u4$ +4v.ajY .PCSh? ti =i t i
T, N :

BROWNS- Nitrogen Balance Report / Irrigation Scheduler 05/02/2001
OF CAROLINA �
Farm Name: 29,93 Complex: 26
Remaining Gallons to be Inches to be Total Gallons to
Recommended Total of PAN PAN to be Applied per Applied per be Applied per _
Hydrant Crop PAN/Acre Applied/Acre Applied/Acre Acre Acre Hydrant
01
WHEAT
129
86.67
42.33
21,163
0.78
171,840
02
WHEAT
129
98.52
30.48
15,239
0.56
123,740
03
WHEAT
129
131.83
(2.83)
0
0.00
0
04
WHEAT
129
141.54
(12.54)
0
0.00
0
05
WHEAT
129
86.64
42.36
21,182
0.78
135,355
06
WHEAT
129
81.01
47.99
23,993
0.88
153,315
07
WHEAT
129
109.24
19.76
13,172
0.49
83,645
08
WHEAT
129
98.10
30.90
20,602
0.76
130,823
09
WHEAT
129
55.76
73.24
36,622
1.35
401,015
10
WHEAT
129
91.94
37.06
18,532
0.68
86,545
11
WHEAT
129
97.80
31.20
12,482
0.46
180,612
12
WHEAT
129
81.93
47.07
18,829
0.69
272,452
13
WHEAT
129
80.30
48.70
19,481
0.72
281,887
14
WHEAT
129
92.55
36.45
14,582
0.54
211,000
15
WHEAT
129
101.26
27.74
12,061
0.44
170,057
16
WHEAT
129
102.74
26.26
10,506
0.39
148,133
17
WHEAT
129
56.41
72.59
29,035
1.07
409,397
18
WHEAT
129
26.84
102.16
40,866
1.50
450,748
19
WHEAT
129
53.53
75.47
30,189
1.11
332,987
20
WHEAT
129
81.49
47.51
20,655
0.76
412,481
21
WHEAT
129
69.91
59.09
34,761
1.28
111,582
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Pagel

r' l8fl(: 1V N Hydrant: 01 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: WMR FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA ' Field Size Ac.: 8.12 Certification #
Field No. ( } Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10894 785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28898-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129 [phone] -
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume per Acre Analysis PAN PAN Applied PAN Applied/Acre
nyarant iotas volume: soivuu
Total pp le cre: 86.67
wednesdayr May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 7
03/12/200
10:45 AM
2:30 PM
225
1
220
49500
6,096
2
99-00 1
12.19
03/14/200
815 AM
9:45 AM
90
1
220
19800
2,438
2
39.60
4.88
04/23/200
12:00 PM
1:30 PM
90
1
392
35280
4,345
2
70.56
8.69
04/23/200
4:25 PM
6:20 PM
115
1
392
45080
5,552
2
90.16
11.10
04/24/200
9:50 AM
10:30 AM
40
1
392
15680
1,931
2
31.36
3.86
04/24/200
3:00 PM
5:45 PM
165
1
392
64680
7,966
2
129.36
15.93
04/24/200
6:15 AM
7:30 AM
75
1
392
29400
3,621
2
58.80
7.24
04/27/200
10:00 AM
11:20 AM
80
1
372
29760
3,665
2
59.52
7.33
04/28/200
2:35 PM
5:15 PM
160
1
392
62720
7,724
2
125.44
15.45
nyarant iotas volume: soivuu
Total pp le cre: 86.67
wednesdayr May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 7

BROWN'S : Hydrant: 02 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: WMR FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No. Field Size(Ac,): 8.12 Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10894 785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129 [phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Analysis PAN I -AN Arollea PAN Applied/Acre
myaranz iozai Woiume: 4uuuuu Total PAN Applied/Acre- 98.62
wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Paget
03/141200
1:30 PM
5:15 PM
225
1
220
49500
6,096
2
99.00
12.19
03/28/200
1:00 PM
2130 PM
90
1
214
19260
2,372
2
38.52
4.74
04/21/200
2:40 PM
3:50 PM
70
1
392
27440
3,379
2
54.88
6.76
04/23/200
10:40 AM
12:00 PM
'80
1
392
31360
3,862
2
62.72
7.72
04/23/200
2:30 PM
3:50 PM
80
1
392
31360
3,862
2
62.72
7.72
04/24/200
11:05 AM
12:50 PM
105
1
392
41160
5,069
2
82.32
10.14
04/24/200
2:10 PM
3:00 PM
50
1
392
19600
2,414
2
39.20
4.83
04/27/200
1215 PM
2:50 PM
155
1
392
60760
7,483
2
121.52
14.97
04/27/200
2:50 PM
4:20 PM
90
1
392
35280
4,345
2
70.56
8.69
04/28/200
9:30 AM
10:40 AM
70
1
392
27440
3,379
2
54.88
6.76
04/28/200
10:40 AM
1:05 PM
145
1
392
56840
7,000
2
113.68
14.00
myaranz iozai Woiume: 4uuuuu Total PAN Applied/Acre- 98.62
wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Paget

BROWN + Hydrant: 03 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
`� '
OF CAROLINA Field No. Field Size(Ac.): 5.53 Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
24 East
Tract No. 1089,4 waaw NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129 [phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume volume Per mure Analysis PAN FAN ApplieoPAN AppliedlAcre
nyarani i oEai volume: so4ouu Total PAN AppliedlAcre: 131.83
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 3
01/26/200
3:30 PM
4:50 PM
80
1
344
27520
4,976
2
55.04
9.95
01/29/200
10:30 AM
11:40 AM
70
1
344
24080
4,354
2
48.16
8.71
02/01/200
9:30 AM
12:15 PM
165
1
372
61380
11,099
2
122.76
22.20
02/01/200
1:20 PM
3:05 PM
105
1
344
36120
6,532
2
72.24
13.06
02/27/200
11:45 AM
1;00 PM
75
1
344
25800
4,665
2
51.60
9.33
02/27/200
5:10 PM
6:20 PM
70
1
344
24080
4,354
2
48.16
8.71
04/121200
10:15 AM
11:35 AM
80
1
344
27520
4,976
2
55.04
9.95
04/13/200
11:00 AM
12:05 PM
65
1
344
22360
4,043
2
44.72
8.09
04/18/200
11:50 AM
1:40 PM
110
1
392
43120
7,797
2
86.24
15.59
04/18/200
100 PM
6:05 PM
185
1
392
72520
13,114
2
145.04
26.23
nyarani i oEai volume: so4ouu Total PAN AppliedlAcre: 131.83
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 3

B ROV11N S'.
Hydrant: 04 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
•SOF CAROLINA Field NO.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 5.53
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes 9prinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Analysis PAN PAN AppliedPAN ApplledlAcre
Hydrant o a Volume: 391360
Total pp ie cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page
01/29/200
2:15
27- 5-0—RM
35
1
344
12040
2,177
2
24.08
4.35
04/07/200
10:20 AM
12:10 PM
110
1
344
37840
6,843
2
75.68
13.69
04/07/200
2:00 PM
2:50 PM
50
1
344
17200
3,110
2
34.40
6.22
04/09/200
10:05 AM
10:50 AM
45
1
344
15480
2,799
2
30.96
5.60
04/09/200
10:50 AM
12:00 PM
70
1
344
24080
4,354
2
48.16
8.71
04/09/200
12:00 PM
1:30 PM
90
1
344
30960
5,599
2
61.92
11.20
04/09/200
3:35 PM
5:35 PM
120
1
344
41280
7,465
2
82.56
14.93
04/11/200
9:35 -AM
12:00 PM
• 145
1
344
49880
9,020
2
99.76
18.04
04/11/200
12:00 PM
1:15 PM
75
1
344
25800
4,665
2
51.60
9.33
04/16/200
12:40 PM
4:20 PM
220
1
372
81840
14,799
2
163.68
29.60
04/16/200
5:35 PM
6:45 PM
70
1
392
27440
4,962
2
54.88
9.92
04/17/200
1215 PM
1:35 PM
80
1
344
27520
4,976
2
55.04
9.95
Hydrant o a Volume: 391360
Total pp ie cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page

WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
BROWN'S Hydrant: 05 Crop Type:
OF CAROLINA Field No. Field Size(Ac.). 6.39 Certification #
Remit Ta: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Tract No. 10894 Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129 [phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Vamfld Pel Arle Analysis PxN VAN AppliedPAN Applied/Acre
nyurani i oral volume: c►oovv Total PAN Applied/Acre: 86.64
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 5
01/05/200
1:00 PM
5-:00 PM
240
1
344
&2560
12,920
2---f6-5T.2—
2 .8
01/06/200
10:00 AM
11:10 AM
70
1
372
26040
4,075
2
52.08
8.15
01/11/200
10:05 AM
12:15 PM
130
1
372
48360
7,568
2
96.72
15.14
01/11/200
3:05 PM
4:05 PM
60
1
392
23520
3,681
2
47.04
7.36
04/10/200
12:30 PM
1:30 PM
60
1
344
20640
3,230
2
41.28
6.46
04/13/200
4:25 PM
6:20 PM
115
1
344
39560
6,191
2
79.12
12.38
04/14/200
9:55 AM
11:40 AM
105
1
344
36120
5,653
2
7224
11.31
nyurani i oral volume: c►oovv Total PAN Applied/Acre: 86.64
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 5

--` BRAWN S`
Hydrant: os Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: FH FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 6.39
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398.8487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume volume per mcre Analysis PAN PAN ApplleclPAN AppliedlAcre
Hydrant Total Volume: 258840
Total PAN pp ie cre: 81.01
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 6
01/03/200
2:
5:35 PM
205
1
392
80360
12,5
6
.1
01/04/200
3:15 PM
5:30 PM
135
1
344
46440
7,268
2
92.88
14.54
01/06/200
11:45 AM
1:35 PM
110
1
392
43120
6,748
2
86.24
13.50
01110/200
3:00 PM
5:25 PM
145
1
344
49880
7,806
2
99.76
15.61
01/11/200
4:35 PM
5:00 PM
25
1
392
9800
1,534
2
19.60
3.07
01/18/200
1:50 PM
3:15 PM
85
1
344
29240
4,576
2
58.48
9.15
Hydrant Total Volume: 258840
Total PAN pp ie cre: 81.01
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 6

Hydrant: 07 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 6.35'
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Analysis PAN PAN AppliedPAN Applied/Acre
Rydrant Totalvolume.,
Total PAN pp ie cre: 109.24
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operators Signature Page 7
20
:1
6:40 PM
205
1
344
70520
11-.106
1.5
105.78
16.66
10/30/200
11.50 AM
3:45 PM
235
1
344
80840
12,731
1.5
121.26
19.10
10/31/200
12:35 PM
4:30 PM
235
1
344
80840
12,731
1.5
121.26
1910
11/01/200
1:50 PM
5:40 PM
230
1
344
79120
12,460
1.5
118.68
18.69
11/02/200
2:25 PM
5:40 PM
195
1
259
50505
7,954
1.5
75.76
11.93
11/03/200
3:15 PM
3:50 PM
35
1
259
9065
1,428
1.5
13.60
2.14
11/03/200
3:50 PM
5:35 PM
105
1
259
27195
4,283
1.5
40.79
6.42
11/04/200
9:45 AM
10:35 AM
50
1
314
15700
2,472
1.5
23.55
3.71
11/04/200
10:35 AM
1:10 PM
155
1
314
1 48670
7,665
1.5
73.00
11.50
Rydrant Totalvolume.,
Total PAN pp ie cre: 109.24
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operators Signature Page 7

BROWNS
Hydrant: 08 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field 5ize(Ac.): 6.35
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinriefs. Flow Rate Total Volume 751MM9 per Ave Analysis PAN FIAN AppliedPAN Applied/Acre
Hydrant Total Volume: 415277
Total pp ie cre: 98.10
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 8
10/27/200
10:30 AM
12:0797
1
259
2 123
3,956
1.
3
10/28/200
9:30 AM
1:25 PM
235
1
344
80840
12,731
1.5
121,26
19.10
10/30/200
4:25 PM
5:45 PM
80
1
344
27520
4,334
1.5
41.28
6.50
10/31/200
8:25 AM
11:10 AM
165
1
344
56760
8,939
1.5
85.14
13.41
11/01/200
8:40 AM
12:40 PM
240
1
344
82560
13,002
1.5
123.84
19.50
11/02/200
9:40 AM
1:30 PM
230
1
259
59570
9,381
1.5
89.36
14.07
11/06/200
12:05 PM
4:06 PM
241
1
344
82904
13,056
1.5
124.36
19.58
Hydrant Total Volume: 415277
Total pp ie cre: 98.10
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 8

Hydrant: 09 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
-SOF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 10.95
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume v UIUMU Per mcre 7nalysis PAN VAN AppliedPAN Applied/Acre
Hydrant Total Volume: 305260
Total pp le cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operatoes Signature Page 9
'02/20/200
3:1
60
1
1000
4
2
.0
02/20/200
3:30 PM
4:15 PM
45
1
100
4500
411
2
9.00
0.82
02/21/200
3:40 PM
4:40 PM
60
1
100
6000
548
2
12.00
1.10
02/21/200
3:45 PM
4:00 PM
15
1
100
1500
137
2
3.00
0.27
02/21/200
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
60
1
100
6000
548
2
12,00
1.10
03/12/200
12:30 PM
3:30 PM
180
1
124
22320
2,038
2
44.64
4.08
04/05/200
11:30 AM
12:20 PM
50
1
255
12750
1,164
2
25.50
2.33
04/05/200
6:05 AM
7:05 AM
60
1
256
15360
1,403
2
30.72
2,81
04/06/200
2:50 PM
3:20 PM
30
1
115
3450
315
2
6.90
0.63
04/06/200
3:25 PM
3:55 PM
30
1
115
3450
315
2
6.90
0.63
04/06/200
4:00 PM
4:30 PM
30
1
115
3450
315
2
6.90
0.63
04/06/200
5:45 PM
6:15 PM
30
1
115
3450
315
2
6.90
0.63
04/06/200
6:20 AM
6:50 AM
30
1
115
3450
315
2
6.90
0.63
04/06/200
6:55 AM
7:25 AM
30
1
115
3450
315
2
6.90
0.63
04106/200
7:30 AM
8:00 AM
30
1
115
3450
315
2
6.90
0.63
04/10/200
5:20 AM
6:10 AM
50
1
256
12800
1,169
2
25.60
2.34
04110/200
3:30 PM
4:30 PM
60
1
256
15360
1,403
2
30.72
2.81
04/10/200
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
60
1
256
15360
1,403
2
30.72
2.81
04/11/200
515 PM
6:15 PM
60
1
256
15360
1,403
2
30.72
2.81
04/12/200
4:55 PM
6:00 PM
65
1
344
22360
2,042
2
44.72
4.08
04/12/200
3:40 PM
4:35 PM
55
1
256
14080
1,286
2
28.16
2.57
04/13/200
3:10 PM
4:00 PM
50
1
256
12800
1,169
2
25.60
2.34
04/19/200
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
60
1
256
15360
1,403
2
30.72
2.81
04/19/200
3:25 PM
4:30 PM
65
1
256
16640
1,520
2
33.28
3.04
04/20/200
10:35 AM
11:35 AM
60
1
256
15360
1,403
2
30.72
2.81
04/20/200
12:05 PM
1:05 PM
60
1
256
15360
1,403
2
30.72
2.81
04/20/200
3:00 PM
5:20 PM
140
1
256
35840
3,273
2
71.68
6.55
Hydrant Total Volume: 305260
Total pp le cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operatoes Signature Page 9

apawr Hydrant: 10 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
.= N s��,
--.. OF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 4.67
Recommender! PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes SprinPlers Flow Rate Total Volume volume per Acre Analysis PAN FANAppliedPAN Applied/Acre
Hydrant Total Volume: 214670
Total pp ie cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 10
021271200
3:15 PU---374--5--PM
30
1
115
3450
739
-6.90
1,48
02/27/200
3:16 PM
4:16 PM
60
1
115
6900
1,478
2
13.80
2.96
02/27/200
3:17 PM
4:17 PM
60
1
115
6900
1,478
2
13.80
2.96
04/06/200
2:25 PM
2:55 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/06/200
3:00 PM
3:30 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/06/200
3:35 PM
4:05 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/06/200
4:10 PM
4:40 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/06/200
5:15 PM
5:55 PM
40
1
115
4600
985
2
920
1.97
04/06/200
6:00 PM
6:30 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/06/200
6:35 AM
7:05 AM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/06/200
7:10 AM
7:40 AM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/07/200
2:20 PM
2:50 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/09/200
4:55 PM
5:25 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/09/200
4:20 PM
4:50 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/09/200
3:35 PM
415 PM
40
1
115
4600
985
2
9.20
1.97
04/091200
12:25 PM
12:55 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/09/200
11:50 AM
12:20 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/09/200
11:15 AM
11:45 AM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/09/200
10:40 AM
11:10 AM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/10/200
12:50 PM
1:10 PM
20
1
115
2300
493
2
4.60
0.99
04/11/200
2:35 PM
140 PM
65
1
344
22360
4,788
2
44.72
9.58
04/11/200
3:40 PM
4:45 PM
65
1
344
22360
4,788
2
44.72
9.58
04/11/200
12:25 PM
12:55 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/11/200
11:30 AM
12:00 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/12/200
11:35 AM
1:55 PM
140
1
344
48160
10,313
2
96.32
20.63
04/131200
12:45 PM
2:35 PM
110
1
344
37840
8,103
2
75.68
16.21
Hydrant Total Volume: 214670
Total pp ie cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 10

Hydrant: 11 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: TV FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No. Field Size(Ac.): 14.47 Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract Na. 10894 las Hwy 24 East
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129 Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: [phone]
Date Start Time E=nd Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Analysis PAN PAN AppliedPAN Applied/Acre
riyorani I oral volume: 000u4u Total PAN Applied/Acre: 97.80
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 11
D31-2-772009:00
AM
4:1
435
1
440
191400
13,227
2.5
476.50
3. 7
03/28/200
9:40 AM
11:40 AM
120
1
407
48840
3,375
2.5
122.10
8.44
04/09/200
12:50 PM
6:00 PM
310
1
440
136400
9,426
2.5
341.00
23.57
04/09/200
6:00 AM
7:50 AM
110
1
440
48400
3,345
2.5
121,00
8.36
04/10/200
9:00 AM
12:15 PM
195
1
470
91650
6,334
2,5
229.13
15.83
04!121200
5:00 PM
6:45 PM
105
1
470
49350
3,411
2.5
123.38
8.53
riyorani I oral volume: 000u4u Total PAN Applied/Acre: 97.80
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 11

r-" BROWN"S' Hydrant: 12 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA ' Field No. Field Size(Ac.): 14.47 Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract Na. 10894 785 Hwy 24 East
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129 910) 296 1800398-0487
Date Stan`. Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume volume per Fkcre Analysis PAN PAN AppliedPAN Applied/Acre
Hydrant Total Volume: 496380 Total PAN Applied1Acre7___1TW:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 12
103/28/200
:00
3:2
40
1
407
569803,9382.5
142.459.841
04/10/200
1:00 PM
4:00 PM
180
1
470
84600
5,847
2.5
211.50
14.62
04/10/200
5:45 PM
6:15 PM
30
1
470
14100
974
2.5
35.25
2.44
04/11/200
9:30 AM
10:00 AM
30
1
470
14100
974
2.5
35.25
2.44
04/12/200
2:30 PM
4:15 PM
105
1
470
49350
3,411
2.5
123.38
8.53
04/13/200
10:45 AM
4:00 PM
315
1
440
138600
9,578
2.3
318.78
22.03
04/13/200
4:45 PM
6:45 PM
120
1
470
56400
3,898
2.3
129.72
8.96
04/14/200
9:45 AM
10:50 AM
65
1
470
30550
2,111
2.3
70.27
4.86
04/16/200
1:00 PM
1:40 PM
40
1
470
18800
1,299
2.3
43.24
2.99
04/16/200
4:45 PM
5:55 PM
70
1
470
32900
2,274
2.3
75.67
5.23
Hydrant Total Volume: 496380 Total PAN Applied1Acre7___1TW:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 12

-"BROWN'S Hydrant: 13 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: TV FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA i Field No. Field Size(Ac.): 14.47 Certification # Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Tract No. 10894 Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129 [phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume VQJUFFIU per AM Analysis PAN PAN ApplieciPAN Applied/Acre
Hydrant I otal Volume: 4t%,5*bS Total PAN Applied/Acre: 130.30
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operators Signature Page 13
03/19/2001
:00
5 PM
195
1
407
-79365
5,485
2.5
198.41
04/11/200
11:00 AM
2:15 PM
195
1
470
91650
6,334
2.5
229.13
15.63
04/12/200
11:00 AM
1:45 PM
165
1
470
77550
5,359
2.5
193.88
13.40
04/17/200
11:30 AM
2:20 PM
170
1
470
79900
5,522
2.3
183.77
12.70
04/18/200
11:00 AM
1:30 PM
150
1
470
70500
4,872
2.3
162.15
11.21
04/18/200
2:30 PM
5:30 PM
180
1
470
84600
5,847
2.3
194.58
13.45
Hydrant I otal Volume: 4t%,5*bS Total PAN Applied/Acre: 130.30
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operators Signature Page 13

-/��BROVIIN S`,
Hydrant: 14 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: WMR FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 14.47
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To-, Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
1910) 296-1800
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume volulne per Acre Analysis PAN PAN AppliedPAN Applled/Acre
RyUrant TotalVolume: 570440
Total pp ie cre: 92.53
Wednesday, May 02, 2001. Operator's Signature Page 14
31412
:00 PM
6:0 PM
60
1
20
13200
92
2
26,40
1,82
03/19/200
10:50 AM
12:00 PM
70
1
407
28490
1,969
2.5
71.22
4.92
04/11/200
2:45 PM
5:00 PM
135
1
470
63450
4,385
2.5
158.63
10.96
04/11/200
5:00 PM
7:15 PM
135
1
470
63450
4,385
2.5
158.63
10.96
04119/200
1:00 PM
4:15 PM
195
1
470
91650
6,334
2.3
210.79
14.57
04/20/200
10:45 AM
1:30 PM
165
1
470
77550
5,359
2.3
178.36
12.33
04/20/200
3:30 PM
6:00 PM
150
1
470
70500
4,872
2.3
162.15
11.21
04/211200
9:15 AM
12:00 PM
165
1
470
77550
5,359
2.3
178,36
12.33
04/21/200
12:35 PM
3:35 PM
180
1
470
84600
5,847
2.3
194.58
13.45
RyUrant TotalVolume: 570440
Total pp ie cre: 92.53
Wednesday, May 02, 2001. Operator's Signature Page 14

Hydrant: 15 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
BROWN 8` Certification #
OF CAROLINA Field No. Field Size(Ac.): 14.10
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Tract No. 10894 Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129 [phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume v MIMI per Acre Analysis PAN PAN AppliedPAN Applied/Acre
"yorant I otal voiume: tioibut) Total PAN Applied/Acre: 101.26
Wednesday, May 02, 2001.Operators Signature Page 15
920
1.0 PM
180
1
-407
7326024.4
8.83
01/26/200
3:07 PM
6:00 PM
173
1
407
70411
4,994
2.3
161.95
11.49
01/27/200
9:00 AM
9:30 AM
30
1
407
12210
866
2.3
28.08
1.99
01/31/200
10:35 AM
12:15 PM
100
1
407
40700
2,887
2.3
93.61
6.64
02/01/200
12:45 PM
2:07 PM
82
1
407
33374
2,367
2.3
76.76
5.44
02/20/200
12:30 PM
5:00 PM
270
1
392
105840
7,506
2
211.68
15.01
02/27/200
4:50 PM
6:30 PM
100
1
407
40700
2,887
2.3
93.61
6.64
03/09/200
11:30 AM
1:20 PM
110
1
407
44770
3,175
2.3
102.97
7.30
03/09/200
3:00 PM
3:45 PM
45
1
407
18315
1,299
2.3
42.12
2.99
03/12/200
8:30 AM
11:30 AM
180
1
407
73260
5,196
2.3
168.50
11.95
03/12/200
2:00 PM
100 PM
60
1
500
30000
2,128
2.3
69.00
4.89
03/14/200
8:30 AM
10:38 AM
128
1
407
52096
3,695
2.3
119.82
8.50
04/23/200
3:30 PM
5:35 PM
125
1
470
58750
4,167
2.3
135.13
9.58
"yorant I otal voiume: tioibut) Total PAN Applied/Acre: 101.26
Wednesday, May 02, 2001.Operators Signature Page 15

BROWN S--1.
Hydrant: 16
Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: TV
FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA !
Field No.
Field Size(Ac.): 14.10 Certification #
45
4,1
1-r--99.02
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10894
11/04/200
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93
Facility #:
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
[phone]
47655
3,380
1.7
81.01
Date Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume
na ysis PAR VAN APP11e0PAN Applied/Acre
myorant I oiai volume: twoi ars Total PAN Applied/Acre: 102.74
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 16
1/03T2-00
2A5 PV---5-.3-0--PM165
1
353
45
4,1
1-r--99.02
7.02
11/04/200
9:25 AM
11:40 AM
135
1
353
47655
3,380
1.7
81.01
5.75
11/08/200
2:45 PM
5:30 PM
165
1
470
77550
5,500
1.7
131.84
9.35
11/09/200
2A0 PM
3:25 PM
45
1
470
21150
1,500
1.7
35.95
2.55
11/09/200
9:15 AM
9:45 AM
30
1
440
13200
936
1.7
22.44
1.59
01/26/200
12:15 PM
2:40 PM
145
1
407
59015
4,185
2.3
135.73
9.63
01/27/200
10:00 AM
2:05 PM
245
1
407
99715
7,072
2.3
229.34
16.27
01/29/200
4:00 PM
6:00 PM
120
1
407
48840
3,464
2.3
112.33
7.97
01/31/200
9:15 AM
10:10 AM
55
1
407
22385
1,588
2.3
51.49
3.65
02/01/200
2:20 PM
5:00 PM
160
1
407
65120
4,618
2.3
149.78
10.62
02/02/200
12:45 PM
1:20 PM
35
1
407
14245
1,010
2.3
32.76
2.32
02/21/200
11:25 AM
12:10 PM
45
1
392
17640
1,251
2
35.28
2.50
02/21/200
3:20 PM
6:09 PM
169
1
392
66248
4,698
2
132.50
9.40
04/05/200
9:15 AM
11:45 AM
150
1
185
27750
1,968
2.5
69.38
4.92
04/24/200
3:00 PM
5:00 PM
120
1
470
56400
4,000
2.3
129.72
9.20
myorant I oiai volume: twoi ars Total PAN Applied/Acre: 102.74
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 16

-I",BR(')INN 51,,
Hydrant: 17 Crop Type: WH=AT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10694
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 14.10
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Analysis PAN FAN APP11e0PAN AppliedlAcre
Hydrant Total Volume: 349095
Total PAN pp ie cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 17
11/08/200
12:05 PM
1:50 PM
105
1
407
42735-
3.091
-----1.7
72.65
5.15
01/29/200
10:20 AM
3:20 PM
300
1
407
122100
8,660
2.3
280.83
19.92
02/27/200
12:40 PM
4:30 PM
230
1
407
93610
6,639
2.3
215.30
15.27
04/05/200
12:50 PM
3:25 PM
155
1
185
28675
2,034
2.5
71.69
5.08
04/05/200
3:55 PM
6:30 PM
155
1
185
28675
2,034
2.5
71.69
5.08
04/05/200
6:45 AM
7:15 AM
30
1
185
5550
394
2.5
13.88
0.98
04/06/200
9:00 AM
11:30 AM
150
1
185
27750
1,968
2.5
69.38
4.92
Hydrant Total Volume: 349095
Total PAN pp ie cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 17

BROWNS Hydrant: 18 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: TV FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No. Field SizejAc.): 11.03 Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Tract No. 10894 Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129 [phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume volume per Acre Analysis pplied PAN ApplledlAcre
Myorant i ocai volume: liS4uu Total PAN AppliedlAcre: 26.84
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 �.. Operator's Signature ..r Page 18
04/06/200
12!0 PW ---T-50
PM
230
1
185
42550
3,858.38
9 .64
04/06/200
4:35 PM
7:20 PM
165
1
185
30525
2,767
2.5
76.31
6.92
04/07/200
9:30 AM
10:15 AM
45
1
185
8325
755
2.5
20.81
1.89
04/09/200
9:20 AM
12:40 PM
200
1
185
37000
3,354
2.5
92.50
8.39
Myorant i ocai volume: liS4uu Total PAN AppliedlAcre: 26.84
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 �.. Operator's Signature ..r Page 18

-"" BRaUVRI S�`
Hydrant: 19 Crop Type. WHEAT Operator: WMR FORM !RR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 11.03
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes 9prinKlers Flow Rate Total Volume Analysis PAN PAN AppliedPAN Applied/Acre
Rydrant TotalVolume: 239275
Total pp iie cre: .
Wednesday, May 02, 200:1 Operator's Signature page 19
0
1:00
-12:15 PM
75
1
255
19125
34
2.3
43.99
3.99
03/111200
10:45 AM
12:15 PM
90
1
220
19800
1,795
2.3
45.54
4.13
03/27/200
5:20 PM
8:30 PM
190
1
275
52250
4,737
2.5
130.63
11.84
03/28/200
4:15 PM
6:10 PM
115
1
275
31625
2,867
2.5
79.06
7.17
03/28/200
7:00 AM
7:30 AM
30
1
275
8250
748
2.5
20.63
1.87
04/03/200
5:10 PM
6:15 PM
65
1
185
12025
1,090
2.5
30.06
2.73
04/04/200
11:00 AM
1:45 PM
165
1
185
30525
2,767
2.5
76.31
6.92
04104/200
3:55 PM
6:45 PM
170
1
185
31450
2,851
2.5
78.63
7.13
04/07/200
11:20 AM
2:25 PM
185
1
185
34225
3,103
2.5
85.56
7.76
Rydrant TotalVolume: 239275
Total pp iie cre: .
Wednesday, May 02, 200:1 Operator's Signature page 19

BRAWN'S Hydrant: 20 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 19.97
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Analysis PAN VAN AppheaPAN Applied/Acre
Hydrant ota Volume:
Total pp le cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 20
10/13/200
:40 PM
2:34 PM
54
1
353
19062
955
1.7
32.41
10/13/200
2:34 PM
5:15 PM
161
1
353
56833
2,846
1.7
96.62
4.84
10/13/200
5:15 PM
7:00 PM
105
1
353
37065
1,856
1.7
63.01
3.16
10/14/200
9:15 AM
10:10 AM
55
1
353
19415
972
1.7
33.01
1.65
10/14/200
10:10 AM
1:05 PM
175
1
353
61775
3,093
1.7
105.02
5.26
10/14/200
1:40 PM
4:34 PM
174
1
353
61422
3,076
1.7
104.42
5.23
10/15/200
9:40 AM
12:30 PM
170
1
353
60010
3,005
1.7
102.02
5.11
10/16/200
9:30 AM
12:10 PM
160
1
353
56480
2,828
1.7
96.02
4.81
10/16/200
12:55 PM
1:15 PM
20
1
353
7060
354
1.7
12.00
0.60
10/161200
1:15 PM
4:00 PM
165
1
353
58245
2,917
1.7
99.02
4.96
10/16/200
4:00 PM
6:25 PM
145
1
353
51185
2,563
1.7
87.01
4.36
10/17/200
10:00 AM
12:50 PM
170
1
288
48960
2,452
1.7
83.23
4.17
10/17/200
1:30 PM
4:10 PM
160
1
353
56480
2,828
1.7
96.02
4.81
10/17/200
9:30 AM
10:00 AM
30
1
288
8640
433
1.7
14.69
0.74
10/23/200
9:45 AM
12:40 PM
175
1
353
61775
3,093
1.7
105.02
5.26
10/23/200
1:25 PM
4:15 PM
170
1
353
60010
3,005
1.7
102.02
5.11
10/23/200
4:15 PM
6:50 PM
155
1
353
54715
2,740
1.7
93.02
4.66
10/24/200
2:05 PM
4:45 PM
160
1
353
56480
2,828
1.7
96.02
4.81
10/24/200
9:50 AM
1:00 PM
190
1
353
67070
3,359
1.7
114.02
5.71
01/26/200
12:25 PM
1:25 PM
60
1
103
6180
309
2.3
14.21
0.71
01126/200
1:30 PM
2:30 PM
60
1
103
6180
309
2.3
14.21
0.71
01/26/200
3:15 PM
4:06 PM
51
1
103
5253
263
2.3
12.08
0.61
01/26/200
4:09 PM
4:50 PM
41
1
103
4223
211
2.3
9.71
0.49
01/29/200
10:30 AM
11:30 AM
60
1
103
6180
309
2,3
14.21
0.71
01129/200
11:52 AM
12:52 PM
60
1
103
6180
309
2.3
14.21
0.71
01/31/200
10:25 AM
11:25 AM
60
1
103
6180
309
2.3
14.21
0.71
Hydrant ota Volume:
Total pp le cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 20

_i JBRD �rS Hydrant: 21 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA ' Field NO.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 3.21
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes 6prinklers Flow Rate Total Volume 761111110 per Acre Xnalysis PAN fAN AppileaPAN Applied/Acre
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 21
10/14/200
3: 5 PM
4:25 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5,10
1.59
10/14/200
3:20 PM
3:50 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/14/200
2:45 PM
3:15 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/14/200
2:05 PM
2:35 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/14/200
12:20 PM
12:50 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/14/200
11:45 AM
12:15 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/14/200
11:05 AM
11:35 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/15/200
10:40 AM
11:10 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/15/200
10:05 AM
10:35 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/15/200
11:50 AM
12:20 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/151200
1115 AM
11:45 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/16/200
4:10 PM
4:40 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5,10
1.59
10/16/200
3:35 PM
4:05 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/16/200
3:00 PM
3:30 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/16/200
2:25 PM
2:55 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/16/200
1:50 PM
2:20 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/16/200
11:40 AM
12:10 PM
30
1
104
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10116/200
11:05 AM
11:35 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/16/200
10:30 AM
11:00 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/16/200
9:55 AM
10:25 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/17/200
2:25 PM
2:55 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10117/200
1:50 PM
2:20 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/17/200
12:05 PM
12:35 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/17/200
11:34 AM
12:00 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/17/200
10:55 AM
11:25 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/17/200
10:20 AM
10:50 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/171200
9:45 AM
10:15 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/231200
4:00 PM
4:30 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/23/200
3:25 PM
3:55 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/23/200
2:50 PM
3:20 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/23/200
2:15 PM
2:45 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/231200
1:40 PM
2:10 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/231200
11:55 AM
12:25 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/23/200
11:20 AM
11:50 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/23/200
10:45 AM
11:15 AM
.30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/23/200
1010 AM
10:40 AM
30
1
140
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1,59
10/24/200
4:05 PM
4:35 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/24/200
3:30 PM
4:00 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10124/200
2:55 PM
3:25 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 21

_ BROWN'S,,
Hydrant: 21 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No. Field Size(Ac.): 3.21 Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, inc.
Tract No. 10894 785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: . Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129 [phone]
nyarant i otai voiume: -i,scuuu Total PAN Applied/Acre:
Wedrnesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature � Page 22
10/24/200
2:20 PM
2:50 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1,59
10/24/200
12:25 PM
12:55 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/24/200
11:50 AM
12:20 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/24/200
11:15 AM
11:45 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/24/200
10:40 AM
11:10 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5,10
1.59
nyarant i otai voiume: -i,scuuu Total PAN Applied/Acre:
Wedrnesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature � Page 22

cD
I—
CD
0
r
0
T—
C)
0
CD
SPJOO.;) I z mi
doi 0 j;)wLun s 000z

�BR,,- N'S"-, Hydrant: 01 Crop Type: SOYBEANS Operator: GH FORM !RR -2
OF GAriOLINA Field No. Field Size(Ac.): 8.12 Certification
Remit To; Brawn's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract NO. 10894 786 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: Recommended PAN (tbs./Acre): 200 [phone]
Dale Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume per Acre Ana"Is PAN PAN Applied PAN Applied/Acre
7/5100
9:30 AM
12:30 PM
180
1
500
90000
11,084
144.00
17.73
7110100
9:00 AM
1 1
3:00 PM
380
1
500
180000
1
22,167
r-1.6
1.8
288.00
35.47
7/12100
9:00 AM
3:00 PM
360
1
500
180000
22,167
1.6
288.00
35.47
Hydrant Total Volume: 450000
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 88.67
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operators Signature Pagel

-'BR�,
WS'
Hydrant: 02
Crop Type: SOYBEANS Operator: GH
FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA
Field No.
Field Size(Ac,j: 8.12 Certification #
8,313
1.6
108.00
13.30
Remlt Ta: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
717100
7:30 AM
Tract No. 10894
60
786 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 2es9e-0497
Farm Name:
29993
Facility #:
Recommended PAN lbs.lAcre: 180
{ j
[phone]
Date
Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers flow Rate Total Volume Votume per Xcre
Analysis PAN PAN XpplieaPAN Appiied1Acre
r4�
Hydrant Total Volume: 600000 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 118.23
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operators Signature Page 2
715100
1:00 PM
115 PM
135
1 1500
67500
8,313
1.6
108.00
13.30
717100
7:30 AM
8:30 AM
60
1 1
500
30000
3,695
1.6
48.00
5.91
718/00
8.30 AM
3:00 PM
390
1
500
195000
24,015
1.6
312.00
38.42
7110100
7:30 AM
8:30 AM
60
1
500
30000
3,695
1.6
48.00
5.91
7110100
3:30 PM
6:00 PM
150
1
500
75000
9,236
1.6
120.00
14.78
7111100
8:15 AM
3:00 PM
405
1
500
202500
24,938
1.6
324.00
39.90
r4�
Hydrant Total Volume: 600000 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 118.23
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operators Signature Page 2

�BR JN'S',, Hydrant: 03 Crop Type: SOYBEANS
OF CAROLINA
Field No. Field Size(Ac.): 5.53
Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
786 H 24 East
Tract No. 10894 . "ry
Recommended PAN lbs./Acre : 180 Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: [phone]
Dale Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume per Fre Analysts PAN PXN Applied PAN Applied/Acre
W
0
0
4
IV
to
Hydrant Total Volume: 304000
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 95.33
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operator's Signature Page 3
7/21100
2:40 PM
4:05 PM
85
1
500
42500
7,685
1.6
68.00
12.30
7/21/00
4:05 PM
5:30 PM
85
1
500
42500
7,685
1.6
68.00
12.30
7/22/00
12:00 PM
12:30 PM
30
1
500
15000
2,712
1.6
24.00
4.34
8/16/00
1:00 PM
3:30 PM
150
1
500
75000
13,562
1.8
135.00
24.41
8/17/00
2:55 PM
4:00 PM
65
1
500
32500
5,877
1.8
58.50
10.58
8117/00
4:00 PM
5:10 PM
70
1
500
35000
6,329
1.8
63.00
11.39
8/18/00
3:16 PM
4:11 PM
55
1
500
27500
4,973
1.8
49.50
8.95
8118/00
411 PM
5:19 PM
68
1
1 500
1 34000
6,148
1.6
1 61.20
11.07
W
0
0
4
IV
to
Hydrant Total Volume: 304000
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 95.33
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operator's Signature Page 3

` BRAN
' '
S`
Hydrant: d4
H
Crop Type: SOYBEANS Operator: EH
p
FORM IRR -2
- OF CAROLINA
Field No.
Field Size(Ac.): 6.53 Certification
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
1.6
118.00
Tract No. 10894
786 Hwy 24 f=ast
Warsaw, NC 28388-0487
Farm Name:
29,93
Facility M
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 180
[phone]
Date
Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume per rcre
Analysis PAN PAN ApplieffPAN Applied/Acre
—1�
0
0
0
0
0
4
W
0
Hydrant Total Volume: 316500 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 96.96
Friday, November 10, 2001) OperetuesSignature Page
7121100
9:45 AM
12:10 PM
145
1
500
72500
13,110
1.6
118.00
20.98
7122100
8:00 AM
9:40 AM
100
1
500
50000
9,042
1.6
80.00
14.47
7122100
9:40 AM
11:10 AM
90
1
500
45000
8,137
1.6
72.00
13.02
8/17/00
11:00 AM
12:18 PM
78
1
500
39000
7,052
1.8
70.20
12.69
8117100
12:18 PM
1:30 PM
72
1
500
36000
6,510
1.8
64.80
11.72
8/18100
11:30'AM
12:45 PM
75
1
500
37500
8,781
1.8
67.50
12.21
8118100
12:45 PM
1:58 PM
73
1
500
36500
8,600
1.8
1 65.70
11.88
—1�
0
0
0
0
0
4
W
0
Hydrant Total Volume: 316500 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 96.96
Friday, November 10, 2001) OperetuesSignature Page

03
Friday, November 10, 2000 Cperstof s Signature Page 5
Hydrant: 07
Crop Type: SOYBEANS
Operator: EH
FORM IRR -2
OF �.,AOLINA
Field No.
Field Size Ac. 6.36'
e )'
Certification #
Rernh To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10894
786 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name:
29,93
Facility #:
R
Recommended PAN Ibs.lAcre : 280
{
[phone]
Date
Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow Rale Total Volume
Volume per Am
Analysis PAN PANApplied PAN Applied/Acre
9/26100
11:40 AM
1 12:15 PMJ 35
1 1 110 1 3850
1 606 1
1.8 1 6.93 1 1.09
Hydrant Total Volume: 3860
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 1.09
03
Friday, November 10, 2000 Cperstof s Signature Page 5

BRk JN'S.,
Hydrant: 08
Crop Type: SOYBEANS Operator: EH
FORM IRR -2 -
150
Field No.
Field Size(Ac.): 6.35 Certification #
75000
11,611
1.8
135.00
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10894
9125100
785 Hwy 24 East
Farm Name: 29193
Facility #:
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 200
Warsaw, NC 28388-0487
[phone]
Dale Start Time
End Time 'total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume per Acre
Analysis PAN PAR AppNaPAN Applied/Acre
,i1
Hydrant Total Volume: 568350 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 163.66
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operator's Signature Page
9122100
9:30 AM
12:00 PM
150
1
500
75000
11,611
1.8
135.00
21.26
9125100
1:55 PM
5:00 PM
185
1
110
20350 1
3,205
1.8
36.63
5.77
1012100
11:30 AM
12:20 PM
50
1
500
25000
3,937
1.7
42.50
6.69
10/2100
4:00 PM
5:30 PM
90
1
500
45000
7,087
1.7
76.50
12.05
10/3/00
9A0 AM
12:02 PM
172
1 1
500
86000
13,543
1.7
146.20
23.02
10/3/00
2:15 PM
5:42 PM
207
1
500
103500
16,299
1.7
175.95
27.71
10/4/00
10:50 AM
12:17 PM
87
1
500
43500
6,850
1.7
73.95
11.65
10/4/00
4:45 PM
6:40 PM
115
1
500
57500
9,055
1.7
97.75
15.39
1015/00
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
60
1
500
30000
4,724
1.7
51.00
8.03
10/6100
10:20 AM
1:05 PM
165
1
1 500
1 82500
12,992
1.7
1 140.25
1 22.09
,i1
Hydrant Total Volume: 568350 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 163.66
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operator's Signature Page

00
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operatot'sSignature Page
M,&,
Hydrant: 15 -
Crop Type: SOYBEANS
Operator: GH
FORM IRR -2
r"BR
�OF �;AROLINA
Field No.
Field Size(Ac.): 14.10
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10894
Tse Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487 '
Farm Name:
29,93
Facility #:
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 180
?./Acreecommen
(
1910j 296-1800
Date
Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow Rate
Total Volume
o ume per Xcre
Analysis PAN PXNXpplied PAN Applied/Acre
713100
10:45 AM
2:15 PM
210
1
500
105000
7,447
2.1
220.50
15.154
7/8/00
7:30 AM
2:00 PM
1 390
1
500
195000
13,830 1
2.1
1 409,50
29.04
Hydrant Total Volume:
300000
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 44.68
00
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operatot'sSignature Page

"BRA
Hydrant:
16
Crop Type: SOYBEANS
Operator: GH
FORM IRR -2
.JN'&-
OF CAROLINA
Field No.
Field Size(Ac.): 14.10
Certification #
Remo To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
"
Tract No. 0894
786 Hwy 24 Past
Warsaw, IVC 28388-0467
Farm Name:
29,93
Facility #:
Recommended PAN lbs./Acre : 180
R )
[phone]
Date
Start Time
End Time
Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow Rate
Total Volume
Volume per Acre
Analysis PAN PAN AppliedPAN Applied/Acre
7/3100
2:50 PM
5:00 PM
130
1
500
65000
4,610
2.1
136.50
9.68
7/5100
7:30 AM
11:00 AM
210
1
500
105000
7,447
2.1
220.50
15.64
717100
10:30 AM
5:00 PM
390
1
500 1
195000
13,830
2.1
409.50
29.04
7/8100
2:20 PM
3:00 PM
40
1
500
20000
1,418
2.1
42.00
2.98
7/10/00
8:30 AM
2:30 PM
360
1
500
180000
12,765
2.1
378.00
26.81
7112100
8:30 AM
2:30 PM
360
1
500
180000
12,766
2.1
378.00
26"81
Hydrant Total Volume:
745000
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 110.96
;r:
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operatoes Signature Page

BR (i�NfS''
715100
12:00 PM
FARM IRR -2
Hydrant: 'I7
Crop Type, SOYBEANS Operator: GH
OF ��ROLINA
Field No.
Field Size(Ac.): 14.10 Certification #
2.1 1
283.50
20.11
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
717!00
Tract No. 10894
10:00 AM
786 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28388-0487
Farm Name: 29,93
Facility #:
Recommended PAN lbs.lAcre : 180
R ( )
19101 296-1800
Date Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flaw Rate Total Volume Volume per Acre
Analysis PAN Applied PAN Applied/Acre
0
0
0
0
0
4
W
cn
Hydrant Total Volume: 520000 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 77.46
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operator's Signature Page
715100
12:00 PM
4:30 PM
270.
1
500
135000
9,574
2.1 1
283.50
20.11
717!00
7:30 AM
10:00 AM
150
1
500
75000
.5,319
2.1
157.50
11.17
7110100
3:00 PM
6:00 PM
180
1
500
90000
6,383
2.1
189.00
13.40
7111100
7:40 AM
12:00 PM
260
1
500
130000
9,220
2.1
273.00
19.36
7111100
2:30 PM
5:30 PM
180
1
500
90000
8,383
2.1
189.00
13.40
0
0
0
0
0
4
W
cn
Hydrant Total Volume: 520000 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 77.46
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operator's Signature Page

"BR
/N'S',,
Hydrant: 18
Crop Type: SOYBEANS
Operator: EH
FORM IRR -2
0 �..�AOLINA
Field No.
Field Size(Ac.): 11.03
Certification #
Recoil To -.'Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10894
705 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw,0)NC 28389-0187
Farm Name:
29,93
Facility #:
Recommended PAN (lbsJAcrej: 180
l i z898 -180G
Date
Start Time
End Tlme Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume
Volume per Acre
AnaWts PAN' PAR Applied PAN Applied/Acre
9115100
2:14 PM
3:30 PM'
78
1 500
1 38000
3,445
2.1
79.80
7.23
9115/00
4:00 PM
5:10 PM
70,
1 500
35000
3,173
2.1
1 73.50
1 6.66
Hydrant Total Volume: 73000
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 13.90
R
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operator's Signature Page 10

BR
-
/N'S,
I I• I • IIS ���I���
Crop Type: SOYBEANS
i
FARM IRR -2
Hydrant: 19
Operator: EH
�-
CSF �.. riOLINA
Field No.
Field Size(Ac.): 11.02
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.'
Tract No. 10894
786 Hwy 24 East
Farm Name:
29,93
Facility #:
Recommended PAN.(Ibs.lAcre): 180
Warsaw, NC 28398-0!87
[phone]
Date
Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow Rate
Total Wume
Volurne per Acre
Analysis -PAN PAN AppliedPAN Applied/Acre
9115100
10:00 AM
1:37 PM
217
1 500 1
108500
9,846
2.1 227.85
20.68
9116100
9:30 AM
1 2:08 PM
278
1 500
139000
12,613
2.1 291.90
1 26.49
Hydrant Total Volume:
2147500
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 47.16
1
Friday, November 10, 2000 OperaWs Signature Page 11

Friday, November 10, 2000 Operators Slpnature Pape 12
,FINIS\'
Hydrant:
20
Crop Type: SOYBEANS
Operator: EH
FORM !RR -2
OF CAROL.INA
Field No.
Field Sixe(Ac.):
19.97
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10894
705 Hwy 24 East
Farm Name:
29,93
Facility #:
Recommended
PAN (lbs./Acre): 180
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
1910) 296-1900
Date
Start Time
End Time
.Total Minutes
Sprinklers
Plow Rate
Total Volume
Volume per Acre
Analysis PAN PA14 Applied PAN AppliedlAcre
9128100
9:35 AM'
1:15 PM
220
' 1
500
110000
5,508
2.1
231.00
11.57
9129100
9:30 AM
11:35 AM
125
1
500
62500
3,130
2.1
131.25
6.57
9/29100
3:40 PM
5:15 PM
95
1
500
47500
2,379
2.1
99.75
4.99
9/30/00
9:25 AM
12:35 PM
190
1
500
95000
4,757
2.1
199.50
9.99
1012/00
11:50 AM
12:40 PM
50
1
Soo
25000
1,252
2.1
52.50
2.63
10/2/00
4:00 PM
5:35 PM
95
1
500
47500
2,379
2.1
99.75
4.99
1012100
11:50 AM
12:40 PM
50
1
500
25000
1,252
1.7
42.50
2.13
1012100
4:00 PM
5:35 PM
95
1
500
47500
2,379
1.7
80.75
4.04
1013100
10:00 AM
12:05 PM
125
1
500
62500
3,130
2.1
131.25
6.57
1013/00
2:15 PM
4:35 PM
140
1
500
70000
3,505
2.1
147.00
7.36
1013/00
4:35 PM
5:40 PM
65
1
500
32500
1,627
2.1
68.25
3.42
10/3100
10:00 AM
12:05 PM
125
1
500
62500
3,130
1.7
106.25
5.32
1013/00
215 PM
4:35 PM
140
1
500
70000
3,505
1.7
119.00
5.96
1013100
4:35 PM
5:40 PM
65
1
500
32500
1,627
1.7
55.25
2.77
10/4/00
10:45 AM
12:15 PM
90
1
500
45000
2,253
2.1
94.50
4.73
1014/00
1:45 PM
4:15 PM
150
1
500
75000
3,756
2.1
157.50
7.89
10/4100
10:45 AM
12:15 PM
90
1
500
45000
2,253
1.7
76.50
3.83
10/4/00
1:45 PM
4:15 PM
150
1
500
75000
3,756
1.7
127.50
6.38
1015100
10:05 AM
11:05 AM
60
1
500
30000
1,502
2.1
63.00
3.15
10/5100
2:20 PM
4:05 PM
105
1
500
52500
2,629
1
52.50
2.63
1015100
4:05 PM
6:35 PM
150
1
500
75000
3,756
2.1
157.50
7.89
1015100
10:05 AM
11:05 AM
60
1
500
30000
1,502
1.7
51.00
2.55
10/5/00
2:20 PM
4.05 PM
105
1
500
52500
2,629
1.7
89.25
4.47
1015100
4:05 PM
6:35 PM
150
1
500
75000
3,756
1.7
127.50
6.38
10/6100
10:15 AM
1:00 PM
165
1
500
82500
4,131
2.1
173.25
8.68
1016100
2:35 PM
5.40 PM
185
1
500
92500
4,632
2.1
194.25
9.73
10/6100
10A5 AM
1:00 PM
165
1
500
82500
4,131
1.7
140.25
7.02
10/6100
2:35 PM
5:40 PM
185
1
500
92500
4,632
1.7
157.25
7.87
1017100
9:15 AM
11:05 AM
110
1
500
55000
2,754
2.1
115.50
5.76
o
1017100
9:15 AM
11:05 AM
110
1
500
55000
2,754
1.7
93.50
4.68
0
Hydrant Total Volume:
1805000
Total
PAN Applied/Acre: 172.00
J
C)
O
W
co
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operators Slpnature Pape 12

BR VMS,,
Hydrant: 29
Crop Type: SOYBEANS Operator: GH
FORM IRR -2
` OF �HROLINA
Field No.
Field SizetAc.j: 4.14 Certification #
3300
797
2.1
6.93
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No, 10894
713100
• 785 Hwy 24 East
Farm Name: 29,93
Facility #:
Recommended PAN Ibs./Acre : 180
t
Warsaw, NC 2,8398.0487
1910) 280-1800
Date Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume oturrie per Xcre
Analysis PAN PAN ApplidPAN Applied/Acre
M
Hydrant Total Volume: 105950 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 53.74
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operators Signature Page 13
7/3/00
1:00 PM
130 PM
30
1
110
3300
797
2.1
6.93
1.67
713100
1:30 PM
2:15 PM
45
1
110
4950
1,196
2.1
10.40
2.51
7/3/00
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
60
1
110
6600
1,594
2.1
13.86
3.35
7/3100
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
60
1
110
6600
1,594
2.1
13.86
3.35
7/5/00
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
60
2
110
13200
3,188
2.1
27.72
6.70
7/7/00
10:00 AM
10:30 AM
30
2
110
6600
1,594
2.1
13.86
3.35
717/00
4:30 PM
5:00 PM
30
2
110
6600
1,594
2.1
13.86
3.35
7110100
2:30 PM
3:00 PM
30
2
110
6600
1,594
2.1
13.86
3.35
9128/00
12:10 PM
1:00 PM
50
1
100
5000
1,208
2.1
10.50
2.54
9128100
1:00 PM
1:30 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9128/00
2:30 PM
3:00 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9/28/00
3:05 PM
3:35 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9126100
3:45 PM
4:15 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9128100
4:25 PM
4:55 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9128/00
5:15 PM
5:45 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9128/00
5:55 PM
6:25 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9/29/00
9:55 AM
10:25 AM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9129/00
10:55 AM
11:25 AM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9/29/00
11:30 AM
12:00 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9/29100
12:15 PM
12:45 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9/29/00
2:05 PM
2:20 PM
15
1
100
1500
362
2.1
3.15
0.76
9/29/00
2:35 PM
3:05 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9/29/00
3:15 PM
3:45 PM
30
1
1013
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9130100
10:30 AM
11:00 AM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9130100
11:30 AM
12:00 PMl
30
1
1 100
1 3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
M
Hydrant Total Volume: 105950 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 53.74
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operators Signature Page 13

Tract 4 0438 0643
That certain tract or parcel of land containing 139.0 acres,
more or less, lying and being in Abbotts Township, Bladen
County, North Carolina, as shown that certain map or plat of
survey entitled "BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC., Dewey Bridger
Tract", prepared by Cape Fear Surveying, M. Shelton Bordeaux,
Re `stered Land Surveyor, and being recorded in Plat Cabinet
'(o , Page 4 2 (� , in the Off ice of the Register of Deeds
.of Bladen County, to which reference is hereby made fora more
+c/,,,�O-m,P2
lete and accurate description of the property herein.
There is also conveyed herewith a right-of-way easement for
:ingress, egress and regress from Secondary Road 2772 to the
tract or parcel of land hereinabove described as shown on said
plat of survey, said easement to run with the land.
All that certain tract of land, together with the
appurtenances thereunto belonging, situated in Bladen
County,North Carolina, containing 208.35 acres as shown
on a certain plat entitled N'The Darden Farm', Property
of Brown's of Carolina, Inc.", dated February 15, 1996,
made by Stuar% Gooden, R.S., L-875, and duly of record in
the Office of the Reister of Deeds of Bladen County, in
Plat Cabinet - 3 at Page 135 4 together
with three non-exclusive right-of-way easements for
ingress and egress and underground utilities -(installed
in such a way as to not interfere with maintenance and
clean out of any ditches which they may cross) as shown
on said plat and described as follows:
1. An easement 60' in width running (yin an
easterly direction from N. C. Highway 131 to
the land hereby conveyed.
2. An easement 40' in width running in a
southerly direction from the eastern end of
the first described easement along, and
adjacent to the western boundary of the land
hereby conveyed.
3. An easement 30' in width running 2068.36 feet
in a northerly direction from the land hereby
conveyed to other lands of the Grantee.

f
Division of Water Quality
May 18, 2001
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jeff Poupart, Supervisor, Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Water Quality Section
From: John Hasty, Environmental Specialist
0 ---
Fayetteville Regional Office
Through: Paul Rawl
Water Quali Regional Supervisor
Subject: Brown's of Carolina, Inc. Farm # 29 & #93 Enforcement, Facility No. 09-153
Please find enclosed the enforcement package for the unpermitted discharge of
swine waste from the Brown's of Carolina #29 Farm in Bladen County.
If you have any questions or require any further or additional information, please
advise.
John C. Hasty, Jr.
Enclosure

ANIMAL OPERATION ,INSPE!TIQN ., FORM
1. Date of Inspection(s): -29-01
2. Regional Office: Fayetteville, Division Qf Water Quality
3. Name of Owner Of Property: Bromm's of Carolina #29 & # 93ACopy of Deed attached
4. Name of Operator: Mr. Joh= Cain. OIC
5. Address: P. 0. Box 487
Wusaw. NC 28398-0487
6. Phone Number: &101296-1800
7. Description of Facility Location_ Map excerpt attached.
On the east side of Highway 131, approximatglly thr!�c nndd_gne half miles south of
Bladenboro_ NC.
8. Date this facility began operation: The farm has been in operation sime.2-,19-95.
9. Date of last expansion: The facility has not expanded since ori&al con5trQction. althoush
i w in h B # 93 16.000 Feeder to Finish rat" n
10_ Has the facility registered with DWQ? YES _ NOX_
If YES, date of registration:
11. Does the facility have an approved Animal Waste Management Plan?
YES X NO _ Is one required? YES X NO
Date Approved:
12_ Has this facility received a CAFO Designation? YES_ NO_ NIA X
If YES, date issued.-
13.
ssued:
13. Type of Operation: JEijrrow to Wean Operation
14. Number and type of livestock: There were approximately 4.000 Sows and their offspring
presentim f the ion.
15. Length of time animals have been, are, or will be stabled, or confined and fed or maintained
in any 12 month period. Twelve (12) months.
If

2
16. Are crops, pasture, or post harvest residues sustained in the normal growing season over any
portion of the lot or facility? Yes_ the farm was designed to have apDroximat�y 238 acres
f JaIld on ch -to apply waste. Thfor com
soybeans and wheat to begrown on applic tion sites.The fain has approximately 260_ c_r_es
on which Ig irrigate
17. Type of Waste Management System: Swine are kept in -total confinement free stall barri$. At
slotted floors over flushing pits, Waste is flushedas needed from floor piJ5 into _a waste
lagoon system. 1hr, lae� oon system is composed of one „(1) IauQQn from which waste can be
ouma.ed _throup-h buried irrigation nines to hvdrants and sprayed on the fields. via a linear
18. Description of other animal operations in immediate vicinity and proximity to same or other
surface waters: There is a ft9aggpmfigp approximately'/Z mile from the_ rWce to these
fum5 on R 117
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Proximity of facility to neighboring houses, wells, etc.: There is no residence in close
proxiini to the faun.
Approximate depth of ground water table in the area of the facility or discharge: Unknown.
Proximity of facility to surface waters: Thqre is a IgEge canal that runs1 1 to the
aplication field and crosses the highway at the entrance to this site..
Animal waste discharged. YES
Witnesses:
John Hasty, DWQ-FaysttevilleRegional 910 86-1541
I!aul Rawls. DWQ-FgyQttp3jllg rein (9 10) 486-1541
Are pollutants discharged in the waters of the State?
Do or have discharges occurred in response to a storm event less severe than the 25 -year,
hour storm? YES
What is the degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to public health,
or to private property resulting from the violation?: None obsery r re
SgmPIe Rg51!lts:
Sample Location (3-29-01
Some
Coliform, FecaU100m1
21,000
BOD !KN
no value 5.7

Sample Location (3-29-Ol Coliform. FQg1k 100ml BOD TKN
Discharge Point 12.727 $_8 7-9
DQwn5tr?,grq 2 400 3.8 1.00
Upstream 200 :52 -Q-9
***PLEASE SEE ATTACHED COMPLETE LAB RESULTS FOR
MORE INFORMATION"*
*
26. What is the duration and gravity of f .1• The _I }e •.!_ e A•1l• 1 •!_!
fteeboards at these sites. After Oesling the level o the Brown's # 29 Farm lagggm water
was noliggd standing1• • 1wherg a tmvdiag gun 3mas. positioned,1•S
further investigatign jpwWgra wem concrmed that thekc was waste water exiting, the field
/ -entering adjacentditch. Irrigation had beenpf •.!1! .! ..l. 1 1 1g dU and
eda of the ditch. The inspcgors eNam�cd tbc water floyAng, into the ditch and determm'ed
that- there- was need / • sample due to discoloration of the water. 1es shoyyed
ebated. &W golifor–m-in the -water entering the ditch and W5Q in the ditch and downstream.
This confirmed the ifl5 icion thjt yjagste was exiting the field due to the saturated
conditions of the appfication fiel�- Let it be noted that therc 3yas 9iU it li&W rain at the tim
of 1 i' •
27. Water Quality Assessment- There were no dead fish noted in the canal that runs parallel to
the application field.
28. What is the cost of rectifying the damage?: The writer observed no areas that g1ranu
activities would be, rpzQmm,gnd�e AM gleanup could cause adverse iimpacJ5 to aquatic llf
in the al ere has been no =ort of downstream bpad5 owWe investigation -
29.
v i ti n_
29. What is the amount of money saved by noncompliance?: The lagggn level at this facility was
dangerou 1 close to the structural fi-eeboardi t 13 ' cost to Brown's
of Carolina,wW¢ havin
,cientiv hadthe level gotten into _uctural. freeboazd
due to the limitations of the satrateA irrigation fields and the _fact that Brown's might have
had to relocate the waste from this structure had the level gone up (i.e. pump and haul.)-
30.
aul
30. Was the violation committed willfully or intentionally?: YES _ NO X
Explain:

4
31. What is the prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority?: OveranolicatiQn
has been noted previously Al this sate. Aj Q,, high freebQ rds contributed to fact that irrigation
was beingW[formed on saturated fields.
32. What is the cost to the State for the enforcement procedures?:
Regional costs are as follows:
33
34
35
36
Mileage: $0.23 per mile for 80 miles:
$ 18.40
Fecal Coliform ($46.80 per sample) x 4
187.20
BOD Samples ( $18.11 per sample) X 4
72.44
Nutrient Samples ( $65.05 per sample) X 4
260.20
Copies (Bladen Co. Court House)
John Hasty @ $19.77 per hour
2 hours -Drive time
1 hour Investigation
5 hours Report developement
8 hours total
$ 158.16
Paul Rawls @ $31.87 per hour
2 hours -Drive time
1 hour Investigstion
1 hour (Supervisory review)
4 hours to
$ 127.48
T TAL8� 23.88
Type or general nature of business: Swine_ Farrow to Wean O eration
What is the violator's degree of cooperation or recalcitrance:
Staff from Brown's of Carolina have been coop_Pr�giye
Are there any Mitigating Circumstances?: NO
Assessment Factors:
a_ IVC:
b. Receiving Stream : Unnamed tributgU to BEQwn Maj5h Swamp 1 "C -SW"
Waters.
C. Damage Yes _ No X (Based on observations at the time of the investigation.)
If YES, include report from Wildlife Resources Commission.

37, Incli,deacopy of any Dcignation letter signed by the DiMlo -
38. Recommendations Made to Owner/Operator: Ston the flow of waste to the ditch Horn the
39. Recommendations for further DWQ Action:
Ngti rr, s2f Violation/Notice-of Intent (forwarded April 18, 2001)
- Enforcement • Zion
fields40, Other Comments: Aa menlioned previously, Ihe in5peclipu was a followup du "Al
gm wgs co, bined. with Brown's of Cardli #9i
cymts durina lhis time and-th-t-freeboard ley -el icas extremely high (13 inches), It should al
be noted that this appfication field iS set up for a linear system- but due to the cQnditign5
the • mm hadbeen1 • •in to f towerlagoon, Not only w
fidd§ mWWgd but the 5ystcm was not being uzed as dr,5igncd. which added to the
for overappliggtiQ0ginoffin thj5 @xrgoffield,

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF BLADEN
File No. DD
1N THE MATTER OF )
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC. )
FARMS 429 & #93 )
FINDINGS AND DECISION
FOR VIOLATIONS OF PERMIT ) AND ASSESSMENT OF
15A NCAC 2H.0217 ) CIVIL PENALTIES
)
)
Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.6A, I,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the
following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. operates a concentrated animal operation in
Bladen County.
B. The Brown's of Carolina # 29 and # 93 Swine Farm was Permitted as a
nondischarge facility on July 16, 1997, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H
.0217.
C. On March 29, 2001, DWQ staff observed a discharge of wastewater by
the Brown's of Carolina #29 Swine Farm from one of its application
fields to an adjacent canal which is an unnamed tributary of Brown
Marsh Swamp, which are Class "C -SW" waters of the State within the
Lumber River Basin.
D. The Brown's of Carolina Swine Farm had no valid permit for the above
described activity.
E_ The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter
totaled $ 823.88 .
t
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF BLADEN
File No. DD
1N THE MATTER OF )
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC. )
FARMS 429 & #93 )
FINDINGS AND DECISION
FOR VIOLATIONS OF PERMIT ) AND ASSESSMENT OF
15A NCAC 2H.0217 ) CIVIL PENALTIES
)
)
Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.6A, I,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the
following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. operates a concentrated animal operation in
Bladen County.
B. The Brown's of Carolina # 29 and # 93 Swine Farm was Permitted as a
nondischarge facility on July 16, 1997, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H
.0217.
C. On March 29, 2001, DWQ staff observed a discharge of wastewater by
the Brown's of Carolina #29 Swine Farm from one of its application
fields to an adjacent canal which is an unnamed tributary of Brown
Marsh Swamp, which are Class "C -SW" waters of the State within the
Lumber River Basin.
D. The Brown's of Carolina Swine Farm had no valid permit for the above
described activity.
E_ The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter
totaled $ 823.88 .

I
"
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
Ii. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW_
A. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-
215.6A pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit for this animal waste management system is required in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and G.S. 143-215.1.
C. The unnamed tributary of Brown Marsh Swamp constitutes waters of
the State within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.1 pursuant to G.S. 143-
212(6).
D. The above-cited discharge is a violation of the nondischarge permit.
E. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. may be assessed civil penalties in this matter
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of
not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation
may be assessed against a person for failing to act in accordance with
the terms, conditions or requirement of a permit required by G.S. 143-
215.1.
F. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against
Brown's of Carolina, Inc_ pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S.
143B-282. I(b)(8).
G. The Director, of the Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation
provided for by G.S. I43-215.6A(h), has the authority to assess civil
penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I
make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Brown's of Carolina, Inc. is hereby - assessed a civil penalty of:
;I
for discharging waste to the waters of the State in
violation of 15A NCAC 2H. 0217_
$ TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is percent of
the maximum penalty authorized by G.S. 143 - 215.6A.

4
$ 823.88 Enforcement Costs
$ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty
I have considered the factors listed in G.S.143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1)
The degree and extent of harm to the natural
resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violation;
(2)
The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3)
The effect on ground or surface water quantity or
quality or on air quality;
(4)
The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5)
The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6)
Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally;
(7)
The prior record of the violator in complying or
failing to comply with programs over which the
Environmental Management Commission has regulatory
authority; and
(8)
The cost to the State of the enforcement
procedures.
(Date)
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality

rA
of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit O Routine O Complaint ® Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other © Denied Access
I-"" -. ,a-
Facility Number Q9 153 Date of Visit: 3 29 -20tH Time:
FoNotOperational o Below Threshold
E Permitted M Certified Q Conditionally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: --------_-.-_---.._
Farm Name: hR�n .&I gr1 #? - ----- --- ----- --------._--------- County: Blatdco---- ------------------FRO ..----
OwnerName: ..... . ........................................ ... ................... Phone No: M-29firAw............ ..................................... ........
Mailing Address: P -Q JtL.462.--------------------------.....-.--.-..--•-----•-- ---•-------------wanaw-b1C------------------- -------- -•-------------- =98.. --------
Facility Contact:------------._._.__-----------------•---Title:..--------------•---------•----- Phone No: .---------------------._..
Onsite Representative: B xtwn'.&.of.CAm1Wa,nc.................___..........r
Certified operator: Rob�t7t___..�.._......--•--•--• Raw .............................. ._ Operator Certification Number: �S�TQ._.._.._...._. _.---
Location of Faroe:
SR # 1172 and Hwy 13 k near Bladenboro
M Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �00Longitude =� S • F '45-4 F 00--1�
Number Ofoohs 3 ❑ Subsurrace Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
:. ...
Holding Pends !Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Mana ement System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1- Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify D WQ)
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
M Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes M No
M Yes ❑ No
10 Pal ver minute
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes ❑ No
- :Des n : Current
Des n :: 'Current..
Des n . Current-
:Sw�ne ..-
Capacity: Population
:: Poultry
.. , .
Ca ac P tilation....Cattle'...
:Ca ac•....Po ulrrgon r
❑ Wean to Feeder
Layer
IIJ Dairy
M Feeder to Finish
16000
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
M Farrow to Wean
4000
_
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
:. .:
... Total Desjgt�:Capacity .:
20,000
...
❑ Gilts
....
Total SSLW
3,892,000
[I Boars
Number Ofoohs 3 ❑ Subsurrace Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
:. ...
Holding Pends !Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Mana ement System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1- Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify D WQ)
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
M Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes M No
M Yes ❑ No
10 Pal ver minute
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes ❑ No

Facility Number: 09-153
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of t©spectioo 3-29-21141
G
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........ _.
Freeboard(inches): ............ 1,3............ ....................... ................. ........ ........................... ..........................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public hearth or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
T Do any of the structures need maintenancermprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement'?
9. Do any stuen res lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste ApRlicatkm
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ® Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ® Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[]No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
[]No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
[]No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement`?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Are rock outcrops present?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ On-site ❑ Off-site
Reeguired
Records & Documents
19.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, traps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
22,
is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Yes
[I No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
25.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
26.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
27.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Odor Issues
28.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
❑ No
i

Vl/ 4 LJV!
f
Facility Numbera 04_153Date of Inspection 3-29-2001
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33_ Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover!
wrravw�w
Printed on: 4118/2001
❑ Yes 0 No
p Yes ❑ No
0 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes Q No
:Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
xse uruwmusa w �esrer,eipta� guaars. base neeessar)
.,.: .......... _ .; ' ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
I . Paul and myself were at this site to follow-up on the level of the lagoon. We observed what appeared to be waste standing at the edge of
ie field next to where a reel had been set up. Upon further investigation, the water in the field appeared to be wastewater mixed with rain
,ater. This water in the field was traveling into a pooled area next to a ditch behind the irrigation reel. It was felt by both of us that this area
so umtained waste and it was flowing into the ditch. Samples were collected and showed elevated fecal coliform numbers in the source, at
to discharge point and downstream. The field conditions were sucb that irrigation should not have occured until they had more time to dry
at. There had been recent rains in the area.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Soh HastylPaul Rawls
ReviewerfInspector Signature: Date:
..&i

nuns uaroaria
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
A4
tii'•�
Division of Water Quality �
Fayetteville Regional Office NCDENR
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director April 18, 2041
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. David Nordine
Brown's of Carolina
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
P. O. Box 497
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject: NQtt ct Qf ViQlation[Notice of Intent
Brown's of Carolina Faun # 29
Facility No. 09-153 Permit No. AWS 09013
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Nordine:
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non discharge permit for the subject animal
waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 21-1,0217, you have been found to be in violation of your 2H
.0217 Permit.
On March 29, 2001, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
performed a lagoon level follow up visit of the Brown's of Carolina 429 Farm in Bladen County. During the
visit, water was noticed ponded in the edge of the spray field next to a ditch at the front of the farm. There
was also what appeared to be waste water mixed with rain water ponded throughout the field. Upon further
investigation it was apparent that there was waste water in the spray field and it was and had migrated to the
water next to the ditch_ There was a flow of this mixture entering the ditch at a flow of about ten gallons per
minute. Samples were collected to see if there was in fact waste mixed with water that Nvas getting into the
ditch. The samples showed elevated fecal coliform in the source, the ditch and the downstream samples.
It appeared that the fields were too wet to have been irrigated on, thus the hydraulic overload which
allowed the waste to pond and eventually flow toward and into the ditch. The lagoon level at this site was and
had been dangerously high, thus the reason for the visit. The level of the lagoon on that day was
approximately thirteen to fourteen inches.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following item(s) be addressed:
1. Irrigation should not be performed on saturated fields.
2. Immediately lower the level in the lagoon to the required freeboard.
225 GREEN STREET - SUITE 714 / SYSTEL BUILDING / FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] W WW.L.NK.STA-I1-N :S/ FE`Z'
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- 5001, RECYCLED/10% POST CONSUMER PAPER
DENR TOLL FREE HOTLINE: [phone]

Mr. Nordine
4-18-2001
Page 2
3. Please provide irrigation records for the farm for the past twelve months including PAN balances.
4. Please provide rainfall records for the past twelve months if available.
5_ Please provide this office with a copy of the freeboard records for this farm_
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing its General Permit and being
required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the Division of Water
Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00 per day per violation.
You are hereby notified that the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality is
considering sending recommendation for enforcement to the Director of the Division of Water Quality. The
recommendation concerns the hydraulic overload of the field in question which allowed waste to be
discharged to waters of the State.
If you have an explanation for this violation that you wish to present, please respond to this office by
May 2. 2001. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action is still deemed appropriate,
your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his consideration.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either myself or ltrlr.
John Hasty, Environmental Specialist, at [phone].
PR/Jch
cc: Sonya Avant -Compliance Group
Sam Warren -Bladen Co. NRCS
Trent Allen-DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files -Raleigh
Sincerel
f
�aul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor

ni n uv cuu 1 r n i uoUU ri l UKUWN JUr UhKUL 1 NH
f
f
��'�BROWN'S�
-f OF CAROLINA J
Fax
7IULtjOnlbb
785 Hwy 24 EBSt
PO BOX 4197
Wamaw, NC 2839840487
910-296.1800
1-80"71-6328
910.296-6188 -Fax
Ta Paul Rants p1m Kevin Weston
Pew 9104860707 Poem 1 �� p
Phmm 910AW1541 Data 04/06101
Rae Freeboard Levels — Fayetteville Region CCs
❑ Urgem ® For Rewhim ❑ Plea" C4wnmwd 0 Memo Reply ', k 0 Ply R]lalw
4.
e Comnewi : Here are the free bw d levels for the Brown`s of Carolina company %awns in t*
l=ayetteville Region for the past week. These readings are for farms that are within the 25 yd24 hr storm
elervabons.
Farm #
Mar 30
lMlar 31
Apr 1
Apr 2
Apr 3
Apr 4
Apr S
Apr 6
#w
13"
13"
13"
13'
13"
13"
13"
13"
#29
141
14"
14"
14"
14"
14'
14
14"
#30
1 a"
is"
18"
18"
18"
1Tf.
`17"
17-
#93A
16"
16"
16"
16"
17"
1 T
.18"
19"
093B
20"
2Cr
2Q"
2(Y
20"
20"
20"
20'
r. U1/U1
c01� 3a ✓
V 7
r

FAYETTEVIL.LE DIVISION
S 17 Castle Hayne Street Fayeiteville, NC 28303 Phone (910) W-1920
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PAGE ___�___ OF— _Lr_—
HAW & ADM"&
AIC- D9N I'n E II
2 5—G�/Cr_w S7 •
F �/J _, ✓1 IJ f�
/T�
PID 0 QHECT1LOCATION:
�wll 5 �Z 9
9o+:
e
o
T
T
L
¢
s
Received W. (gnsNre)
TYPE OF
ANALYSIS
1
3--2q- ar
PRESERVATION CODE
�
e
C
s}
C_
-ia4 govt
f �o
R IaH,ed Wr- (319040"1
Dab
me
ecnved W. (Signature)
Dan
Time
3
CODE: A■<4'CONLY
B- HNO3 t h- + <44C
C s H2SO4 + c4 C
D a NeOH + 4'C
E s ZN Acetaf e + -WC
F sm
rcr vExsolt f
7 o L 41�S
PtOoNe
TE t METHOD DF ZHip M,.
ue
LAB IDS!
SAMPLE rME
DATE
TIME
comp
GRAB
pH
t]O
TFa1P'C
FIZL
Rehnqueshed Cir. ( ognaWmi
Date
Time
Received C)r, (Signature}
Den
Time
7
B
oL
Reiinqu 31g fr)
pap
Time
Received W. (gnsNre)
Date
me
1
3--2q- ar
S'' o1
0 -d, 2
-ia4 govt
f �o
R IaH,ed Wr- (319040"1
Dab
me
ecnved W. (Signature)
Dan
Time
3
4
Relinquished W. Isignatuml
Data
Time
Received Cir. (Signature)
Date
Time
5
6
Rehnqueshed Cir. ( ognaWmi
Date
Time
Received C)r, (Signature}
Den
Time
7
B
Cwwnwts or Special Hazards:

Y �
Division of Environmental ?Management
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
For Investigation of f_ _�.� `� 4- "fill L
Samples collected and DKI farms
completed by: T�'j<
<i
Lab Only
Lab'No.
Station.
No.
Station Location
/
Date
Time
No. of
Battles
36
1
W!
C'.i. j -4 r=
v _Id*'
�: Z
41
7
.,
C�
1
rr
n
1
I
f
I
Relinqui
_ 'ed,by(i
"atgrce) //
SAceive by(Si
Lei
tire) :
Date J Time
a
eY!
Rec by
/
Rel
Rec by
Rel
Rec by (Lab)
Method of Shipment:
Security
Seal
a and Condition: Lock
b: t 5 !ti.
b
Broken b
en b :
a n
/
T 13t n4ty nwTY
IAb No.
From Throu h
No.
Coatainers
Analysis
1604D
Relinquished by
Received by
Dat_ Time
36
1
W!
r
v _Id*'
�: Z
I
1
I
f
LlL1J
2

® Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
817 CASTLE HAYNE STREET
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28303
[phone] / [phone] (FAX)
NC #11
NC #37714
USDA #3787
http://www.microbac.com
�u CHEMISTRY • MICROBIOLOGY • FOOD SAFETY • CONSUMER PRODUCTS
WATER • AIR • WASTES • FOOD - PHARMACEUTICALS • NUTRACEUTICALS J
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CLIENT: NC DENR - DWQ
ADDRESS: Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, HC 28301
CONTACT PERSON: Mr. Paul Rawls
ACCOUNT NUMBER: #KNO03
SAMPLE ID: 1. Upstream - ID #O1WU32231
2. Source - #01WE32232
3. Discharge Point - ID #01WE32233
4. Downstream - ID #01WE32234
DATE RECD: 03/29/01 SAMPLED: 03/29/01
SAMPLED BY: P. Rawls
DELIVERED BY: J. Hasty
SAMPLE CODE: WW, Grab
REFERENCE: Brown's #29
DATA REVIEWED BY: --i�!�ae�
DATE REPORTED: 04/03/0
+++++++++++++*+-r++++#r++++;++++++++++f+++++++++;+++a+-a++y+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ANALYSIS HL"THOD 1 2 3 4
+++s+++++i+++++i+Y+++++i+++++++++++1+++++++++++++iL+1ii++i+i++L+++++++i+i++ii+++++++++++++
COLIFORM, FECAL (per 100 ml) SM18 9222D 200 21000 12727 2400
COb4mS: < = Less than
> = Greater than
PAGE 1 OF 1
1
i part
The data and other information contained on this, and other accompanying documents. represene only the M E SIE B E R
samples) analyzed and is rendered upon the condition that it is not to be reproduced wholly or In part for
adve, ising or other purposes without written approval from the laboratory.
USDA -EPA -NIC -SH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research

1
!)IV151(jN i1F 1Y,1"fF;K QII,r1,1 h1'
i
I � [ Lralith y LAb.a rlarr W1 I ! l{'.Irr Ijua1i11
I CHIN IV IILADFN i{ rl'= rl L• I,I It_lKU Y
IMTI(B%SIN; '„„r �_ --�—A h'MA1 QA S1KF:ANI EFITU1:N1'
'tr.k'nktiYtl IK{7 KegionalUllisr CI)\41'ILWCIi CI MEN OFL:ljSl(JUY' 0 I.AKF E] 1NPLUEN1'
Ii NII:kGISti(;Y' 1'!511' II1 F,5111.\k Y
1 01.1 (11.1 1,('I llli(5) llq N'I'ti
!ab Number 1 W 1853
DaleRcteivrd! 3/30/2001
Z'ime Received: 9M AFI
Received by IIMW
5�3 01
Data R2srd AR
Dale Reported: 5/1/2001
I ,lim7.1"1 Will i4,,,er: Slating, L-mir 1: 01'51 REAM
Frrd: 1 ldm inalyd: Itr,llal M:
Nlah"ll4 1salelirgirr1,.,7n,mJd1 0110 1.10 liner It gill '1nnrF.m11 llrplb-1r6L1)11,MINI 1'xlut'I'1pr•,1.11,1, ';nnq,nsiletil',S,II Sxmple"Ype
20110321) 11.15 -
1 il\IMI'♦ I?
C'Id�aidr '1iP rug � E.
Ate- Kta i"ium 927
_
AIn-maltganrsr IHSS
1'hcl„htfill ali213 lig 1.
CO"r: 1 roc &I C.U.
Cv11x',!Ell 183 'Ili C.U.
Colin', pli 7.6 6: c -u_
_
Cyanide 7211
!'Iunlidr of I
1 rn ln.dd, its dr IN.SU m): I
i
(;rl'.Icr,110 I,)H, 551 111!!'!_
I I,mIlw%; l uta! `7110 111g, L
ti rti'dii Cnnd, 93 uu,hns/('1112
Al jIA1, 3S2h0 lug! L
4'Ilrn.-lsJ_:}rr 11R !.
Sll ll.11t' J i.i Ing i.
Suilidv 715 In : 1.
Butlrll
_
I Rhin! & 1.1,nin US!.
llcNmaicil( Chromium u !I.
Li -Lithium 11.12 a /L
Ate- Kta i"ium 927
_
AIn-maltganrsr IHSS
Na- Sodium 929 m /L
Assenic;'I'mlal 1002 ug/ L
Se- Selenium 1147 -11 L
110- mercury 71900 u /L
Ba ©avium u IL
Organochlorine Pesticides
i7t anuphos,itotUsPestictdcs.
Acid liefticim
Oasc/NclllraI&ACid IixlractableOr nics
1 I'll hescl Ram ,c
pmr cable O1 nice VOA boltle ie 'dy
I PI Gasoline Range
_
1 PII/A'I>;X Gasoline Ran
Ph o lankkon

Lab Number:
hale Received: D Time: Q
Recd by:IYAW I From: flue our er land Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
[TATE REPORTED:
Eetlmated 801) Range: 0-5/$-25/25.65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION:
Seed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yea ❑ No ❑ FILMARKSc
titariun IJ Usty Begin lyy/nnn/ddl Time 1ie91n llnte find lime lint Depth DM DR DIIM Value Type Compuslle Sample �Type
.• I A 11 1. T S It C �J GNXX
- 1 - I10i15 JI 0 --�— - Ing/I
-------..-• -....• _ r• r, r a_,a
a{uf1L11 1 r'ti.LU'LHU 1-VI1M tlJI%l I)
COUNTY
L odc f I
PRIORITY
❑AMIRENT
❑ QA
SAMPLE TYPE
❑ STREAM
U,
❑ EFFLUENT
- / i" -
HIV" BASINv [ I rI
--
RL"PUf{'C 'C(]: ARO IIO MII[f R}{O WeKU WINO WSI{O 'CS
AT ISM
Other
Shipped by: flue
COD Low 335 m!I/I
❑COMPLIANCECHAIN
13 EMERGENCY
� OF CUSTODY
❑ LAKE
❑ ESTUARY
❑ INFLUENT
�
Uurle>, Stall, Other
Lab Number:
hale Received: D Time: Q
Recd by:IYAW I From: flue our er land Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
[TATE REPORTED:
Eetlmated 801) Range: 0-5/$-25/25.65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION:
Seed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yea ❑ No ❑ FILMARKSc
titariun IJ Usty Begin lyy/nnn/ddl Time 1ie91n llnte find lime lint Depth DM DR DIIM Value Type Compuslle Sample �Type
.• I A 11 1. T S It C �J GNXX
- 1 - I10i15 JI 0 --�— - Ing/I
Residue; 7nlal 12910
�t)--
Chlurlde 940 mg/I
- COU High 340 mg/I
— fixed Slit
Chi a: 'Crl 32217 ug/1
Iteilduc Suspended 5:111
. [�`
------ Vniallly 5'15 - --
1,1-,.._._.__._.i-bred
COD Low 335 m!I/I
-
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
— Colifurin: MI: Fecal 31616 /1001n1
Aeldily to gdi 4.5 436
-
- --
Ir11eophyl111 a 72213 uy/1
n
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415
1fl
Alkalinity to pll 4.5 410
'turbidity Severity
CnluT: 'T'rue fill I'1-Cn
CUIoI:(Illl-- -) 8;1 ADMI
r1 Culiform: MF Total 31504 /I00m1
Turbidity lir —�-
-^ f, Cul(futrn: 'lube I-ecal 3161S /1001111
Ag -Silver 1077 r u9/1
- - --U911
45
-7 — Culllorrrl: I:ecal Sirep 31673 /lOUrrt1
A, Irl I lerllkides
1351
Color: pit 7.6 82 All1111.
8
Residue; 7nlal 12910
�t)--
----Volatile 5Wk
lt)
— fixed Slit
I ----
Iteilduc Suspended 5:111
. [�`
------ Vniallly 5'15 - --
1,1-,.._._.__._.i-bred
5411--_T_
-
pll 4U:{
rt
--IG -
Aeldily to gdi 4.5 436
-
- --
Arldlly to pll 11.3 4'15
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415
1fl
Alkalinity to pll 4.5 410
'turbidity Severity
IOC 680 - —
-'111
Turbidity lir —�-
Ag -Silver 1077 r u9/1
- - --U911
+ my/1
N113 an N 610 trap/I
Waler Temg.etature
Cyanide 720
flunri.le 951 - —
Formaldehyde 71880
C... -e and Oil% 556
Herduu�s 'I'nlal'tUgt
Spar.IFic C-0. 95 --
MHAS 314260
Phenols :12731! -�
$ullnre 944...--�--
Y--
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/I
'tU/1
Acgdtly
pit 4.5 pit 8,3
rn!I/l
-- rng/I
2
ptg/l-
uults
rn11/I
�my/I
ill - )t
P: Dissolved as Y 666 1119/1
Sulfide 74S
Sarnpiing PUlnt X
N113 an N 610 trap/I
Waler Temg.etature
TKN as N 625 mg/l
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/I
Acgdtly
pit 4.5 pit 8,3
P: Total as P 665 mg/l
2
PO4 as 11 70507 mg/I
Na -Sodium 929 mg/I
P: Dissolved as Y 666 1119/1
4[111_-_ •
Arsenic;'Coldl 1002 USIA
82243 182242
CdCadnrlurn 1027 _ u 9
Sa-Selettluin 1147 = ug/I
Cr-Chturnlurrl:Tola110:34 ug/1
III ed- Spit lull 011/dey)�
CuCuPlwr 1042 ug/I
Wlnd hiryrtlun k)eg)
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/1
I'b-Lead 1051 Un/I
'turbidity Severity
7.n-Ylnc 1092 1.0/1
0manoph"itimis Pelitk ides
Stream Wkith It.
Ag -Silver 1077 r u9/1
- - --U911
45
A1 -Aluminum 1105
Ue-HI!rylliurn 1012 USIA
A, Irl I lerllkides
1351
Ca-C'alriuur 916 mu/1
35
Cu-Coball 1037 ug/I
4
Fe -Iron 1045 ug/I
Sarnpiing PUlnt X
LI-Lllhlunl 1132 ug/t
Waler Temg.etature
U.O. ru±g/1
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/I
__... Alkalini4y
pit 8.3 pit 4,5
Acgdtly
pit 4.5 pit 8,3
Mn -Manganese 1055 ug/I
2
94
Na -Sodium 929 mg/I
300 .
4[111_-_ •
Arsenic;'Coldl 1002 USIA
82243 182242
20 `
Sa-Selettluin 1147 = ug/I
Sallnily 'a
III ed- Spit lull 011/dey)�
Hp -Mercury 71900 ug/1
Wlnd hiryrtlun k)eg)
Oroirnuchlorine Pesticides
'turbidity Severity
Wind Velocily MAI
0manoph"itimis Pelitk ides
Stream Wkith It.
480
45
32.
A, Irl I lerllkides
1351
1350
35
64
4
Base/ NruUal k:atraclable (1rgl.nlu
Acid Eximclable Olganles
Purgeable Organics (VOA buitle reg'd)
phytoplankton
Sarnpiing PUlnt X
Conductance al 25 C
Waler Temg.etature
U.O. ru±g/1
tot -
__... Alkalini4y
pit 8.3 pit 4,5
Acgdtly
pit 4.5 pit 8,3
Air Temperatune (C)
2
94
10
300 .
4[111_-_ •
82244 431
82243 182242
20 `
Sallnily 'a
III ed- Spit lull 011/dey)�
��
Cloud Covet %
Wlnd hiryrtlun k)eg)
Strealn I°gnw SevedlY
'turbidity Severity
Wind Velocily MAI
4ean Stream Ueplh 11.
Stream Wkith It.
480
45
32.
36
1351
1350
35
64
4
11MI'ltevised 111.140, �- ---

F�i AV
MAY DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Noy SAM111:1)(PE
MIN I V NIJI:N T
Hl'i I It R%SIN: A M 81 NI E] QA 0 SCREAM 0 IETFLUFNI-
I'Ru kVgi -II'd L Illice CI IWII IN CITAIN(WCUSIODY Ej LA K 1--. El INFLUENT
rhhrr ED I:NII-R(;I.WY VISIT W j VSILJARY
Lab Number :
1WI856
VAtc Received 7
3/30/2001
Time Received
9:05 AM
Received By
111MW
Dataveleawd
5 3f ar
AR
Date Reported
5/1/2001
F,fi ;,I. d I It I IF It.. "L,: tilminn I.ucnfinut 11OWNSHWAKI
SLr Gun 0 lin le Itgill 10.1, I"I'l j.,.—t...jddj III It ItcRiF I III h"I Il'I'th - ONI, OR. MINI Vslut 9.1 pie - A. 11, 1, cv-PI s, u SAmple U)PC
IOU10329 11240
111119MMIMM
f1(11 1 3 VI 38 ITIP'. T
Ito III IZ,'1-
-----------
X
i Old""11 MIT lvu,13151s1
0lll,r I I IIt- SO
C.IkILIIIII 1111i'l—It3iffli
Odof 1101 X1 pjI=
( ,111 It It In I c•ca I S I
I Color 1,11 6 IQ
It Qi d I I c 4111.11500 1.
C'arilde 720
51); 1
I lu"11A. 031
til' -d 5111 mg I
imiimldclstdv "ISSO
R'-sidlit. Stmn&d 5Y0 riqL
Cliv.),caild 0111 jib
V -0.1111c 533 uIrl
11,11,111051 II'l,11000
Pined 540 n1g.11-
SIX-Ok C')Il,l 95
rR 1113 ro 3 urliL%
NI I%AS 3R2t-U
11IF '1.
Base/ NeutralSiAcid ExinctableUrgaitics
ug" I.
Still ale 9I;
"'JUIllul, i) At R A I i Tig
SUM& -, 45
AI.Ainil, In pI 14.5 1. IU IT:)!
Ronin
I I )c , ,S(l IlIg
I IIIIIIII& I ir.11111
I M11111 -6 N I u
IlVkJ4.IICTII ClIrkIIIIIATTI
11,111a u; I Ijiltsh
111119MMIMM
X
N113is N CO
Ito III IZ,'1-
lip, I
X
I I: N AM N 6-5
0lll,r I I IIt- SO
Ing, I.
Odof 1101 X1 pjI=
--ILAI
c,it
I Color 1,11 6 IQ
11
C'arilde 720
n1 !I.
I lu"11A. 031
mg L
imiimldclstdv "ISSO
111L I
Cliv.),caild 0111 jib
111F, ;.
11,11,111051 II'l,11000
111g: L
SIX-Ok C')Il,l 95
Unflins,ciD2
NI I%AS 3R2t-U
11IF '1.
Base/ NeutralSiAcid ExinctableUrgaitics
ug" I.
Still ale 9I;
ing, L
SUM& -, 45
Ing- L
Ronin
Cu. Ckppet IG -32
I IIIIIIII& I ir.11111
tigl.
IlVkJ4.IICTII ClIrkIIIIIATTI
Ni -Nickel 1067
tig1l,
X
N113is N CO
0.37
Mg! t
X
I I: N AM N 6-5
1,0
Ing, I.
ArIcniclotal LD02
P I "Ital as V 1.115
I Sc- Selenium 1147
Ult/1.
H& Mcrc-uty 71900
PO4.11 11 7115[17
Ba-Daritim
ug/L
OrEanmhluritw Pesticides
P I liswilcd 15 P (166
Oipwphos phums Pesticides
K-VOWSSIVIII
Acid Herbicid"
Cd. Cadmium 1027
Base/ NeutralSiAcid ExinctableUrgaitics
ug" I.
14'11 1 lirsel Range
cr-ClIT(Imitillu I ural 1034
tig., 1.
Putgeable Organics (VOA boulc icq'd)
Cu. Ckppet IG -32
tigl.
Ni -Nickel 1067
tig1l,
Ilb- I rill 1051
URI L
?.n. Zinc 10Q2
tig/t.
VA'aiiadiuni
Ug/ L
T\ ft- Sih k r 11177 7
ur, 1.
Ab Akmiritwi 1103
Ijg; 1.
RC- UMIlidill 1012
ugl.
Ca- Calcium 916
nig 'I.
Cu- Cobalt 1037
ug, L
Fc- Iran 10.15
LIF/L
Li'Lilhium 1132
US4.
Nig, MaMesium 927
Mg! t
IIIS5
IIUlL
Na. St Oittin 92Y
Ing, I.
ArIcniclotal LD02
ug/l,
I Sc- Selenium 1147
Ult/1.
H& Mcrc-uty 71900
ug/L
Ba-Daritim
ug/L
OrEanmhluritw Pesticides
Oipwphos phums Pesticides
Acid Herbicid"
Base/ NeutralSiAcid ExinctableUrgaitics
14'11 1 lirsel Range
Putgeable Organics (VOA boulc icq'd)
1PH Gasoline Range
11 PH/H LEX Gasoline Range
Phytoplankton

DIVISION. OF
IENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY
FIELD -LAB FORA( (DM1)
COUN'iY
— --—
VCS CI 1' V
PRIUI;ITY
❑AMFi1LNT
rt
El QA
SAMPLE TYPE.
❑ STREAM
~j
�' r
EFFLU
KIVI_!i BASINT
(( (`1 _
(� `'>�
REPORT TO: ARU
M
' RO RRO waRO wIF10 wSRO 'rS
AT ItMj�
Other
!
L1COMPLIANCI,CHAIN
❑
EMERGENCY
OF
OF CUSTODY
LAKE,
ESTUARY
❑ INFLUENT
} I
5lrlpped .v: Rus A�errl Ot tr•.rCOLLEC'F0R(S): f
l:glimated 1101) Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or I rlus
Seed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Chloflnaled: Yea ❑ No
Statlnn 1
Fnr L.h Ila. r1hiLV
STATION LOCATION:
REMARKS:W — o
Date Begin (yy/min/dd) Time Begin Dale End
Lab Number:
Datc Recelved: Ime:
Recd by:� From: Bu Quilt Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DA11: REPORTED:
Time EndiDepth DHl D11 DBM(Value Type
A H L
Chloride 940 mg/l
BODS 310 mg/I
Chi o: TTI 32217 ug/l
Mn -Manganese 1055 ug/l
Chl a: Corr 32209 ug/I
No -Sodium 929 mg/I
Pheophylin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True Bit "^ PI -Co
COD 1119h 340 mg/I
Cnlo1:(PI 1 ) 83 ADhll
Se-Selenlum 1147 ug/I
Color: pil 7.6 82 ADPtI
Cyanide 720 mg/l
f'lunride 451 mg/I
I--orrnaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
Hardness Toial90(1 mg/l
Specific Cond. 95 uMh2
os/cm
M11AS 38260 W mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/I
.T
Cd -Cadmium 1027 ug/1
Cr-Chrundumirotal1034 ug/l
COD Low 335 my/1
Cu -supper 1042 ug/I
NI-Nlckel 1067 ug/I
Ph -Lend 1051 u9/1
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100m1
Zn -Zinc 1092 ug/I
Sulfide 745 mg/l
Arid Herbicides
(.101foTnu MF Total 315114 /lonml
rr
�-
6
94
Coliform: Tulle Fecal 31615 /1001o!
3()0_j*
_.--
Fe -lion 1045 ug/i
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /LOOmI
7
20
Hesldlte: Total 500 mg/1
H
Cloud Cover %
Wind DlTectinn (Deg)
Stream How Severity
Volatile .505 mg/I
wind Velocity M/It can Stream Depth 11.
Stream width ft.
-- --- Fixed 510 mg/I
45
-
IT
1,351
1350
- I
_....
RcsLlue: SusPendr.d 530
12
' --
Volatile 535 --- mg/!
13
--
---Fixed 540 rng/I
I I
pH 403 units
A,141ty to pli 4.5 436 tug/I
Ac.idltV to PH 8.3 435 mg/l
16--
_.17
�-
Alkallnlly In pll 8.3 415 mg/i
.. Ill
All nllntly r„ 1,11 4.5 410
�.
1 r)
1 OC 680. nIq/l
Turhldlty 76 NTL]
20
Lab Number:
Datc Recelved: Ime:
Recd by:� From: Bu Quilt Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DA11: REPORTED:
Time EndiDepth DHl D11 DBM(Value Type
A H L
Composite I Sampl"T
ylp�j
T 5 B C 1,7 GNXX
Chloride 940 mg/l
Chi o: TTI 32217 ug/l
Mn -Manganese 1055 ug/l
Chl a: Corr 32209 ug/I
No -Sodium 929 mg/I
Pheophylin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True Bit "^ PI -Co
Arsenlc:Total 1002 ug/!
Cnlo1:(PI 1 ) 83 ADhll
Se-Selenlum 1147 ug/I
Color: pil 7.6 82 ADPtI
Cyanide 720 mg/l
f'lunride 451 mg/I
I--orrnaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
Hardness Toial90(1 mg/l
Specific Cond. 95 uMh2
os/cm
M11AS 38260 W mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/I
lig-Mercury 71900 ug/I
Cd -Cadmium 1027 ug/1
Cr-Chrundumirotal1034 ug/l
Organochiodne Pesticides
Cu -supper 1042 ug/I
NI-Nlckel 1067 ug/I
Ph -Lend 1051 u9/1
Sulfate 945 m9A
Zn -Zinc 1092 ug/I
Sulfide 745 mg/l
Arid Herbicides
1018.3 PH 4.5
Ag-511ver 1077 ug/I
Composite I Sampl"T
ylp�j
T 5 B C 1,7 GNXX
NH3 as N 610 mg/I
TNN as N 625 mg/I
Mn -Manganese 1055 ug/l
NO2 Pius NO3 as N 630 mg/1
P: Total as P 665 mg/I
No -Sodium 929 mg/I
1104 ns P 70507 m!t/I
Arsenlc:Total 1002 ug/!
P: tAgsnived as P 666 mg/1
Se-Selenlum 1147 ug/I
D,O. m0
lig-Mercury 71900 ug/I
Cd -Cadmium 1027 ug/1
Cr-Chrundumirotal1034 ug/l
Organochiodne Pesticides
Cu -supper 1042 ug/I
NI-Nlckel 1067 ug/I
Ph -Lend 1051 u9/1
Zn -Zinc 1092 ug/I
Arid Herbicides
1018.3 PH 4.5
Ag-511ver 1077 ug/I
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/I
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/i
94
Cad:alr'lnur 916 rrrg/1
Cr+-Coball 1037 un/1
3()0_j*
_.--
Fe -lion 1045 ug/i
Composite I Sampl"T
ylp�j
T 5 B C 1,7 GNXX
Li-Lithlum 1132 ug/I
Mg,iagnesium 927 mg/I
Mn -Manganese 1055 ug/l
Alkalinity
No -Sodium 929 mg/I
Air Temperature (C)
Arsenlc:Total 1002 ug/!
Conductance at 25 C
Se-Selenlum 1147 ug/I
D,O. m0
lig-Mercury 71900 ug/I
Organochiodne Pesticides
Organophacplmrus Pesticides
Arid Herbicides
1018.3 PH 4.5
pit 4.5 pH 8.3
Base/ Neutral EKlraclable Organics
94
Acid Extractahle Organics
3()0_j*
_.--
400 a
82244 431
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
20
Salinity
PTeclpition f!n/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind DlTectinn (Deg)
Stream How Severity
Phytoptanklon
Alkalinity
Air Temperature (C)
Sampling Point C
Conductance at 25 C
Water Tempemture (C
D,O. m0
Irl l
Acidity
1018.3 PH 4.5
pit 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
3()0_j*
_.--
400 a
82244 431
82243 ^ 182242
20
Salinity
PTeclpition f!n/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind DlTectinn (Deg)
Stream How Severity
TurbldltV Severity
wind Velocity M/It can Stream Depth 11.
Stream width ft.
480
45
32
36
1,351
1350
35 64
4

DIVISION OF NVATIA QuALITY
I W 1854
Date Received:
3/30/2001
lime Received
9.05 AAI
Received By
Data eased :
1fmw
AR
Dair Reported:
El
III NI) 11 LA
2.1
herr #:"It (? th"'Wdd I
El AN11k I E k4 I
o!%
E] SIREAM
EFFLUENT -
(111010 14) 1 KU Rq*,iowl UlIct, � COMPLIANCL
ON (-PA1N0VCUS1()1)v
LAKE KE
INITUEN I'
W.I. ,
ESrUARN'
III I.Ij J(Iltj�l RA%VIS
Lab Number
I W 1854
Date Received:
3/30/2001
lime Received
9.05 AAI
Received By
Data eased :
1fmw
AR
Dair Reported:
5/1/2001
'li'...md 110P IL."u.
"'L111,111 Ln(:16011: SoURU.
Itrmm I":
D.IC 11'ri., (yy)
2.1
herr #:"It (? th"'Wdd I
f Find
Perill - 11M. DIL tPICNI
Vidur h it;-%, 1$. 1,
co-i-o-ite- r, s. a
Sao -ple Tyj�
rj" V;.hp.
I
g. I
N
NIO.i, N Mo 5.6
I N. �' ,I,, " In
1,, 1,
1
C111.1 11132213
N
I KN m N 1125 5,7 1.
N1 6- Ala rresitun 927 IngA.
C111" t)'I. I
x
N01 l4w Nt It as N In D 91 mgr l-
hop-Manewsc 1055 CL
11; 1 ol.11 as 11 M5 In /l.
Na- ScAkilti 929 n1 /L
1.11 T, 13 15111
INIIII!
E)IIIII lturli()
(7j].
V(74 ji 11 705117 in /L
AisrMcl'otal 1W2 kIB/L
1 '01111 1 Q1 w Ie i CC,%l 3141.5
114 1
Colm, Ild )_83 EH=
c. u.
V: Dissolked as P666 mg/L
Se. Scicnium 1147 ug/L
I -_ 1 a I IS 1, v 1, 31673
10111111
'::olor. 1;1 7.6 92
c.n.
K -Potassium mg/L
116- Melcury- 71900 ug/L
mr, I.
C%atfidc 720
IIIE'L
_Cd- Cadmin III 1027 77 ua/L
lRa-Datium u
(
I luudde 951
mg.l.
CI -Chromium Iola( -1034 Ilgill-
Organuchlorine Prslicides
F11(A 5111
1
1'orma Wc llcde 580
1111.
C11 -Co x1 10 12 uo/L
olp"opimpholus Pesticides
_K'
I
(;w.i5c and (.)ik iN
mg'L
Ni-Ni(W 1067 ur/j.
mg I
lljlllmcss I(q.114no
m,'L
Pt, Lead 1051 Lig/L
Acid 11cibicides
I i•.cd 540
mr. L
Specific C(,nd 95
tLmho%/cm2
7-11- Zinc 1092
1111 103
0,8
unn>
WHA!, 3826f)
211g. I-
IV-Vanadnmi
ttasc/NetpIrj1&AclJ
I
[IS
A,-Sillcl 1077 u1.
s
1 FIE I Dicscl Range
1
Intl I
"'1111.1w 943
Isig. L
Al. AltinlinIM) 11W u 1
lo I A 3 115
mr. I
solli'le -,45
1-
fir, Urrvilium 1012 ug/L
Pur able Otganics (VOA bcoule rc'd)
I'll 1 3 119
Ing 1.
holon
C.1, Calcium 916 ms"I
I P11 Gasoline Range
'k
Ing
I dnoill & Lignill
Co- CobAlt 1037 mg/L
rptuBl LX Gasoline Range
I IrIF.,111, -.6
N I I,'
11TOITim ro
C.
ur, I-
—1
1045 us/ 1,
Phooplankton
t
H

DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DMO
COUNTY
cx
1
1 + �
)
PRIORITY
SAMPLE T.Y�E
• '. ' +�
RIVER BASIN
(( �e'I
S C
❑AMBIENT ❑[�
❑
E]
REPORT TO: ARO
"II'd MRO RRO WaRO WIRD WSRO TS
LI-1-Ith{um 1132 u9/1
STREAM
EFFLUENT
AT AM
Other
❑COMPLIANCE L�j CHAIN
❑ LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
TKN as N 625 mg/1
J `
OHF
F CUSTODY
❑EMERGENCY
❑ESTUARY
Shipped by: Bus(R__
ude � Stall, Other
Chl a: Corr 32209 ug/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 m9A
Mn -Manganese 1055 ugA
3
COLLECTOR I51: � rt-4�1 �
Estimated BOD Range: 0.5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: 'Sr,,, �C
Ssed: Yes EJNo[--JChlorinated- Yes 11Nu ❑ REMARKS:QC C
Station // tllare Begin (yy/mm/dd) Tlme !login
Date lied Time End Uepth UM [)II DItM Value Type
Composite Sample Type
I A It 1.
T S A C G GNXX
1
BOLLS 310 mg/I
Chloride 940 mg/1
Nlt3 as N 610 Ing/I
LI-1-Ith{um 1132 u9/1
2
COU 10911 340 mg/l
chi a. Trl 32217 ug/1
.7[
` \
TKN as N 625 mg/1
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/I
COI) L 335 targ/1
Chl a: Corr 32209 ug/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 m9A
Mn -Manganese 1055 ugA
3
Colllonn: MI' Fecal 31616 /10011
Pheophytin a 32213 uq/1
P: Total as P 665 mg/I
Na-Sodlun+ 929 mg/I
4
Collfnna: MF Total 31504 /100mI
CuEur: '1'nlr. &U Pt•Co
1104 as P 70507 n+q/1
Arson{cil'olal I1102 upll
rI
P: Ufisulved ai P 666 Ing/1
Se-Sclenlum 1147 u0/I
1,
Culnu+rn: Tube I'ccnt 31615 /11)(Iruf
C"hw(pil- H3 AUhli
Culll<Irnv Fccal tilrup 3103 /IOnml
Culu,: pil 7.6 82 ADMI
-_._-
T
Hp -Mercury 71900 USA
Cd -Cadmium 1027 +rq/)
Orgunuchlurine Pesllchies
K
Itesidue; Inlal SAKI n'q/1
Cyanide 7211 Ing/1
-- ��
---'-Volallle 509 nrq/11'lnn64c951'
mg/l
Ct-Chruu+lum:Tutal 1034 uq/I
Organoph"Julrusi'estk:kies -'
Fixed 510 ulvl
CuCup1mu1042 u!1/1
I°urmaldehyde 7L8H0W erg/I
Ni -Nickel 1067 04/1
Acid Itetbk:kies
L 1
llealdue: Suspended 530 Ing/1
Grea,,e and Oils 556 mg/I
' 12
---_-_- Volatile 57S�_— mgl{
1{arducss Total 1100 mg/1
1'b-Leed 1051 uel/I
--�-1
------�
FIxe1540 mg/!
SpecilicCund.9`..-- uMh0&/cm2
'In --Linc 1092 ug/I
1laae/Neutral iixtraclableOrganic■
I
pll 401--- -- units
MBAS 38260 � - nt9/I
Acid Extractable Organics
�1 rr
Acidity to 141 4.5 436 erg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Ag -Silver 1077 ug/1
16
Ac[dity to pit 8.3 435 rnyll
Sulfate 445 �— m9/1
Af-Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Purgeable Organics (VOA boggle reg'd)
F 17
—
I
Alkalinity ro pit 81 415 mu/I
Suilide 745— ---- mg/I
Be-Dwylllum 1012 ug/1
1H
Alkalinity to pit 4.5 410 nIg/I
Ca -Calcium 916 mit/1
Cu-Col'all 1037 ug/1
- It1
Y
'I 0C; 6Ift1 urlg/I
-
1=e -Iron 1045 ug/I
Phytoplankton
Z�)
Turbidity 76 -- N'1'U
Sanphnp Pu1ul %
2 194
uclanev at 25 CILVdIer TempetatureICJ 11.O, mO
Sag{niry X
300
1'recipitlon GnMay) Cloud Cuvel 7C
g4! Alkalinity Acidity Air Temperature iC)
ill 18.3 pit 4.5 pit 4.5 pi18.3
49KI L' 822411 431 82243 _92242 20
Wlrwl DirecIlon Oleg) Steam Flow Severity Turbidity Severity Wind Velocity M/It rean Stream Deplh It. Stream Wk1th It.
----- — - -- —� 480 145 32 —136 11151 J 1350 _.._.... 135 f 64 14 -- ----�

f�
! �,���'„ �CCIi 4 u[�•r5[c),ui�\►,�rl:rttl[Ir�1.rr�
fIhrwiwrLr,Lnr erns Itrlwrtlrielrr f)ualir?
rnr\ I \ lar..\!1l:N I '�--•--ff - -:,-r.. -�; f:R1C»t1 F}'
(2A SIRLAAI CFFI-UI:NI'
ItI:P(aRr lfl IRU Ilf-gional 011irc CClh1I'I•IANC.1 h• I CHAINOFCL'S1(113Y I.AKL INFLUENT
4111— - LNIl:k(;I;\C)' PIsII rll 1751UAR1•
[arilr1 lrX,151'15 I J
Lab Number :
1 W 1853
Date Received:
3130/2001
'lime Received:
9:05 AM
Rereivtd By
IIMW
llaraKekased :
5131,01
AR
Date Reported:
511/2001
f ,lin5.,l,,l lel rlr lt,rr, l., 5111131111 l,r,r alinrr; IrItiC'k1AlCl il�, 1'11iN1
_ rr.l [ldur inarrd: Rr markt
�l atl�n n Hatt Ilr,gin (,+l 04fal flare 1:nd f?s'nnn 1117 I ime It, um'1 err+r 4;1111 Pr1ah • P.M. UII, 1111,11 \'al ue '1 syrt • A, II, I. Cnnrywslsai', 5, 11 Snmplt type
20VI01329
\
1011E 3111 88 my I.
m /L
t 11.160, 311, ml1 I
_
Chl,l l:,m 3221111
S NO2 plus '403.lsN030
t-.ad"1111 MF I ulM 31616 . Inurnl
_
�'rddrrrur NIF 11)1al315,y1 • 10x1111
_
Cuhlrmfl: mtv 1 real 31615 109+111
1104 as P 70597
Culd,nnr Iccak SRr 31673 1011111
mg/l.
Kcsidtuc I r,tal 500 m ' • 1-
_
Organochlorine Pesticides
InIAli1c 503 m . I.
K,11massimn
I m', 5 1 U mF: L
--
Itrsl,iur $us TMIPd 530
_
1'ulatilr 5?,i nii;� I
Cr-Claomium:'I-ufal 1034
1nrJ 510
_—
LII _Irr.-- 72 T Iunls
\ r!, •.. r. 1'I! 1 ? I'., rant
----
h, 111 ;' b• •I k N ? J i_+ — Inr1 i.
Su 11,21c 4113
.\b ,dunn I.r pll F 3 -Ili 11,11 1.
Solfibe 7.15 111 ;' 1.
\Ital•nir, 6. pl1 -la J 117 uq; L
Rnron
10 K' •.SI; r 11w I
I.mniII & 1 i pin
10031111+11 :U \ I l;
Ilr.aalaient C'innmium ug- L
Coli lin ul In1al I Ube '. 1011 [ills
t fl\1\II 11?
S N113 as N 610
Chlmidc OW ml:rl.
m /L
Ch1 a Ill 3:21-,
_
Chl,l l:,m 3221111
S NO2 plus '403.lsN030
1'hcnphplin a 32.213 1 L
_
C-ufnrr1c R0 c.0
_
Cn4ar� 11117 83 llt= ear.
1104 as P 70597
Colo: 1,11 7.6 8: c,v,
mg/l.
Cc, m& 720 m %L
_
Organochlorine Pesticides
Ihroridc 7j 1 111F., 1.
K,11massimn
Pnnoalrich, de 718311 m •.'1_
m /1.
c CLI%v acrd uds 556 trip L
_
11:11dnrss 'Iulal'Hlri mr, 1.
Cr-Claomium:'I-ufal 1034
:;Ir.,ifiv CnnJ IJ5 _ umhas/c1u«
_
MllAti ]X260 rnl;� I
-_
I'hrn„Fs ?27)11
Ni-Niclsl1067
Su 11,21c 4113
_
Solfibe 7.15 111 ;' 1.
Rnron
711. %int' 11)92
I.mniII & 1 i pin
ug/l.
Ilr.aalaient C'innmium ug- L
a ,/L
S N113 as N 610
6.8
m /L
1KN,mN(125
7.4
m,/I•
S NO2 plus '403.lsN030
0.87
mg/l.
I': l ('lal as 1' 663
Se. Selenium 1147
nl i L
1104 as P 70597
tea/L
mg/l.
P: t)issohcd as 1' 666
_
Organochlorine Pesticides
Mit/l,
K,11massimn
m /1.
Cd. Cadmium 1027
Acid Herbicides
u /L
Cr-Claomium:'I-ufal 1034
USA.
L
Cu. Corr ;012
_
I I'I I t)icscl Han w
a /L
Ni-Niclsl1067
u il.
I'b. Lead 1051
ug/l.
711. %int' 11)92
Ph tU lankton
ug/l.
KVanaJrum
a ,/L
_
,11;- titlsr'r Illi i
-
tr •%I.
Al. Aluminual 1195
Ile- hcn'llium 1012
ug/l.
Ca•C,1c6um916
m iL
C'n•GIpa111032
u /L
he -hon 1945
ug/l.
Li -Lithium 1132
u /L
N1 • Ata ,nesium 927
m /L
Mn-Millsattew 1055
ug/I.
Na. Sodium 929
m /L
Asscnic:'CUtat 1002
u /L
Se. Selenium 1147
vg/ L
11g• Mercury 71900
tea/L
8a -Barium
ug/L_
_
Organochlorine Pesticides
Or Ano has hones Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Uasc/NeumiNFLAcid Lalractablc Ur
uics
_
I I'I I t)icscl Han w
Pur able Or nice VOA bottle re 'd)
IPH Gasoline Rarigc
1P IMI EX Gasoline Range
Ph tU lankton

UIVIQION OI- FNV11{ONPot- N1'AIh A 1 =N For Lab Use ONLY
Lab Number:
Date Receiv/ed� Time:
Recd by,,A �j I From:But{�ouric hand pet
DATA ENTRY HY-. CK:
DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTOR(S); ._... (1_ S,� k ;>
Psllmated HOD Range; 0.5/5.25/25-65/40.130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION; }��, (� t-� c1 '1 y1 T -
Strad: Yes ❑ Nu❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ NO ❑ REMARKS:
Station /7
NA(,LhiE_
T
W 11 1 "It
Q I J A L I I I r11 LIJ
LA,11 FORM k
PI I I
[ .1 I, C?.77 1 JAI
COUNTY
4 )�("i(4
PRIORITY
A f1 L T S A C G GNKX
Chl a: Corr 32209 ug/I
SAMPLE TYPE
Cnlllorm: MI' Fecal 31616 /100rnl
Organuchlorine Pesticides
RIVITt BASIN f
❑AMBIENT
❑ QA
❑ STREAM
❑
EFFLUENT
REPORT TCI! ARO RO1 MRO 11110 WeRO WIRD WSRO TS
AT nM
Other
Shipped by: Rus
P: Dissolved as I' 666 +ng/k
11COMPLIANCEaCIlA1N
❑
EMERGENCY
OF CUSTOIIY '
❑ LAKE
❑ ESTUARY
❑
INFLUENT
\1
nurle Stall, Other
Cd-Cm4mivan 1027 ugA
q
_ tU
-!'
12
1 ;]
(1
1 -- -
- 16
_ 17
~~Volatile 50!1 Ing/I
CrChrn,nium:Tula11034 ug/1
1'ixr.d 5111 Ing/i
Residue, Suspended 5:10 mg/1
iilllaiill' 1.1�11111/I
'11mvd n11 540 /1
pll 40 1 unite
Acidity t0 ptl 4.5 436 Y--- —1119/1
Cu-Cuppvr 1042 ug/1
NI-Nkket 1067 ug/1
1111-Lrad 1051 MIA
7.11 -'Linc 1092 n9/1
Lab Number:
Date Receiv/ed� Time:
Recd by,,A �j I From:But{�ouric hand pet
DATA ENTRY HY-. CK:
DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTOR(S); ._... (1_ S,� k ;>
Psllmated HOD Range; 0.5/5.25/25-65/40.130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION; }��, (� t-� c1 '1 y1 T -
Strad: Yes ❑ Nu❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ NO ❑ REMARKS:
Station /7
Dnle�+Reg{n (yy/mm/1ddl
Tlme fiegln
Dale End
Tlme End Aaplh UM U13 13RM
Value Type Composite Semple Ty e
N113 as N 610 Ing/I
TKN as N 625 my/I
[ .1 I, C?.77 1 JAI
I �1• 7 S�
1 1
COD Low 335 mg/I
A f1 L T S A C G GNKX
1 /
2
W DS 310 mg/1
COD 1119h 340 mg/I
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/1
Chloride 940 mg/I
Mn -Manganese 1055 ug/l
N113 as N 610 Ing/I
TKN as N 625 my/I
Na -Sodium 929 mg/1
Chi a: Trl 32217 ug/I
n
r
T(1
.�
81
COD Low 335 mg/I
Se-Sele,rlum 1147 ug/1
Chl a: Corr 32209 ug/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 m9/1
P: TolAl as P 665 mg/I
Cnlllorm: MI' Fecal 31616 /100rnl
Organuchlorine Pesticides
I'heophytin a 32213 ug/I
Cul+l0ltn: MF Total 3150'i /100nII
Color: True BO Pt -Co
PO4 as P 70507 mg/I
Culifunur 'Pular !'er:al :I16I5 /100m1
IC
Colo r,lplh J y;t AUh{1
P: Dissolved as I' 666 +ng/k
C011fona: Fecat Strep 31673 /100n11
Acid EmFac.table Orflanics
Culot: pit 7.6 82 ADM]
Residue: Tn1al 500 1119/1
Purgeable Utganics (VOA battle reg'd)
Cyanide. 720 mg/1
1'hlnri.ie951 myll
I-urmaldehyde 718HU 1119/1
Gweabr dnd 011% 5561- nig/t
F1.f11111,•4Y roi,il 1Po(t 11111/1
Spnc.Illr: Cund. V. 2
uhlhas; cm
MIIAS 314260 x119/1
Phenols :1273(! ._. uU/1
Cd-Cm4mivan 1027 ugA
q
_ tU
-!'
12
1 ;]
(1
1 -- -
- 16
_ 17
~~Volatile 50!1 Ing/I
CrChrn,nium:Tula11034 ug/1
1'ixr.d 5111 Ing/i
Residue, Suspended 5:10 mg/1
iilllaiill' 1.1�11111/I
'11mvd n11 540 /1
pll 40 1 unite
Acidity t0 ptl 4.5 436 Y--- —1119/1
Cu-Cuppvr 1042 ug/1
NI-Nkket 1067 ug/1
1111-Lrad 1051 MIA
7.11 -'Linc 1092 n9/1
Ag -Silver 1077 ug/I
Aridity to pll 11.3 435 1119/1
Sullate v'15 mg/1
Al -Aluminum 1105 tog/]
Alkalinity to pit 8.3 415 11,9/1
Sulfide 745 nig/I
He-Ocrylllurn 1012 ug/I
Alkalinity to pit 4.5 41t)
Ca-CAlctuIn 916 m0/]
Y-18
I ( --
�alg/1
TOC 6110 mg/1
-- —
Cu -Cobalt 1037 ug/!
20
Sel11plin9 POiul
Turbidity 76 N -1U
Fe -Iron 1045 ug/I
m
g Conductanev al 25 C Water Temperature
U.O.
ntgl 141
�pll 8.3
Ally
pli 4.
III] 4.5 p11 4.5
Acidity �AirItmperatum(C) '
pit 8.3
{m • A2244 431 82243 82242 120
2 94 IU �1. —� 4110 _
Salfniry '4 F'rerlpitluu 01Vtlayl Cloud Cuvn x Wind 1lirrrthm p)e91 S1n:am 1 low Srvtrtty 'Il,rbldlly Severity Wlnd Velocity M/11 Mean Strum Depth It. jr Slrarm Width If.
4fl0
-- 45�— 6 _.
13.50
4
LI -Lithium 1132 ugA
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/1
Mn -Manganese 1055 ug/l
Na -Sodium 929 mg/1
Arsenlc;Total 1002 ug/l
Se-Sele,rlum 1147 ug/1
lig-Mertury 71900 ug/I
Organuchlorine Pesticides
Organopi,txl{tlrlrus Pesticides
Acid ilerbicideu T
Rase../ Neutral Fottraciable O111anlcs
Acid EmFac.table Orflanics
Purgeable Utganics (VOA battle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Acidity �AirItmperatum(C) '
pit 8.3
{m • A2244 431 82243 82242 120
2 94 IU �1. —� 4110 _
Salfniry '4 F'rerlpitluu 01Vtlayl Cloud Cuvn x Wind 1lirrrthm p)e91 S1n:am 1 low Srvtrtty 'Il,rbldlly Severity Wlnd Velocity M/11 Mean Strum Depth It. jr Slrarm Width If.
4fl0
-- 45�— 6 _.
13.50
4

Y SBRG.1si�S
s s
_ _.�FCARQLNA=
May 1, 2001
Mr. Paul Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Division of Water Quality FAY8
Fayetteville Regional Office
RO
225 Green Street - Suit 714
FavetteviIle, N.C. 28301-5043 Subject: Response to Notice of Violation / Notice of Intent
Brown's of Carolina farm 4 29Facility No. 09-153 Permit No. AWS 090153
Dear Mr. Rawls,
I am writing in response to your Notice of Violation / Notice of Intent on Brown's of Carolina
Farm #f 29. We are strongly committed to environmental stewardship. It is neither our practice nor intent
to exceed the hydraulic capacity of any irrigation field. In an effort to remediate the event you have
described we have worked to broaden our staffs understanding of hydraulic loading and its potential
effects. As a high priority, we are also currently investigating the purchase and/or lease of adjacent
properties for the purpose of increasing our application area, reducing the probability of hydraulic
overload.
Over the past several weeks given the benefit of improved weather conditions we have
significantly improved the lagoon level at faun # 29. Currently the freeboard level is 25".
I have enclosed at your request the following infonnation:
- Irrigation records for the past twelve months including PAN balance.
- Freeboard records for the past twelve months.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either myself
or David Nordin, at [phone].
B Regards,
Robert O. Britt
Division Manager
iNC
F:. _ F 0 PCX stiff _ '0.r - ti. =.v%'. ^

BROWN'S Running Lagoon Level & Rainfall Report
r
ORM CAROLINA
Farm Name: 29
Date Lag40n LCVel
01/06/20
22
01/13/20
23
01/20/20
21
01/27/20
21
02/03/20
21
02/10/20
20
02/17/20
19
02/24/20
18
03/03/20
18
03/1 OY20
17
03/17/20
16
03/21/20
14
03/24/20
Is
03/31/20
14
04/07/20
15
Page. 36
Tuesday, April 10, 2001

BROWN'S
OF CAROLINA
Running Lagoon Level & Rainfall Report
Farm Name: 29
Date Lagoon Level
1/1/00
19
1/8/00
18
1/15/00
20
1/22/00
20
1/29100
17
2/5/00
15
2/12100
14
2/19/00
12
2/26100
15
3/400
20
3111/00
24
3118100
22
3/25/00
20
41/00
20
4/8/W
24
4/1 -EVOO
24
4/22/00
25
4/29100
26
516/00
29
5/ l 3/00
29
5%20/00
24
527/00
22
613100
23
6/10100
is
6/17/00
18
624100
19
711100
19
7/8/00
20
7/15100
22
7/22/00
23
7/29100
22
8/5100
21
8/12/00
21
8/19100
22
8/26100
21
915100
is
9/9100
15
9/19/00
13
9/23100
14
9/30100
21
1017/00
21
10(14/00
21
10/21/00
21
10/28/00
22
1114/00
26
1 1/1 1100
26
11/18/00
25
1 1/2-5100
23
12/2/00
22
12/9/00
21
12/16(00
22
12/23/00
22
12/30100
21
B00101100561
Wednesday, January o3, 2go1
Page 34

AllRz 91'i"fAy
'jo
I V-SAA74M i al r�
"i'VeNMANN"Mi
A
itA
�t
IM
R -amam
'A
A.1 i
M4,
74.
:.«r.4k, :F alr= .IH,.:-rj � r" s t��. •.T i' J Y "k:" '•��.:f.,� , i ! va1+*�'i- dd s:rr ',� , sr , ,,. g, r. P � Y 's..r .'
�Jy- rl y.i i<�:• l . Y� fi:{.it ),� „n. ,3 1 yxx.. rf�':`r-,'Y.}. -:(.-' L, ��' ,e' '�.1i5 r 'f i,'.IriStlr��. ��Y� ," ,-T � x��S"!R� Wr�•r,i:t' ., .�8.,t.t .^�y.�.r. l. :l''i.i.r Sn.-,._�,L.r,�•w`.✓.yF.. e yy�''�s '..:,�i!,°1.,.�Fl+[. i�e,•�i'r "-'. a• -.,. .. � �}:'`0.34_;�1y! }.,;Yr..R.or.,•'�•1.fj,.'.,G �,r-,..�lf',9�.4,?
11,14
"IMOD,4 X�, Nab .11MI,r.
g" 4g,
Im
;PY
WAS
'ixs 64
Mi wm,.�
MI, WX�.,,c
J" 'i. �ECa.: �^ i r� rL.Tr � 1 ;�i, i° ,I'�•. `'F�....1��'' VAUUM
4a

BROWN'S Nitrogen Balance Report 1 Irrigation Scheduler 05'02'2001
OF CAROLINA '
Farm Name: 29,93 Complex: 26
Remaining Gallons to be Inches to be Total Gallons to
Recommended Total of PAN PAN to be Applied per Applied per be Applied per
Hydrant Crop PAN/Acre Applied/Acre Applied/Acre Acre Acre Hydrant
01
WHEAT
129
86.67
42.33
21,163
0.78
171,840
02
WHEAT
129
98.52
30.48
15,239
0.56
123,740
03
WHEAT
129
131.83
(2.83)
0
0.00
0
04
WHEAT
129
141.54
(12.54)
0
0.00
0
05
WHEAT
129
86.64
42.36
21,182
0.78
135,355
06
WHEAT
129
81.01
47.99
23,993
0.88
153,315
07
WHEAT
129
109.24
19.76
13,172
0.49
83,645
08
WHEAT
129
98.10
30.90
20,602
0.76
130,823
09
WHEAT
129
55.76
73.24
36,622
1.35
401,015
10
WHEAT
129
91.94
37.06
18,532
0.68
86,545
11
WHEAT
129
97.80
31.20
12,482
0.46
180,612
12
WHEAT
129
81.93
47.07
18,829
0.69
272,452
13
WHEAT
129
80.30
48.70
19,481
0.72
281,887
14
WHEAT
129
92.55
36.45
14,582
0.54
211,000
15
WHEAT
129
101.26
27.74
12,061
0.44
170,057
16
WHEAT
129
102.74
26.26
10,506
0.39
148,133
17
WHEAT
129
56.41
72.59
29,035
1.07
409,397
18
WHEAT
129
26.84
102.16
40,866
1.50
450,748
19
WHEAT
129
53.53
75.47
30,189
1.11
332,987
20
WHEAT
129
81.49
47.51
20,655
0.76
412,481
21
WHEAT
129
69.91
59.09
34,761
1.28
111,582
Vlednesday, 3.1ay 02, 2001 Page 1

BROWN'S', Hydrant: 01 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: WMR FORM ERR -2
OF CAROLINA I Field No. Field Size(Ac.): 8.12 Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Tract No. 10894 Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129 [phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume per Acre Analysis PAN PAN Applied PAN Applled/Acre
nyurane i 01ai vuiume: as i truu
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 86.67
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 1
03/12/200
10:45 AM
2:30 PM
225
1
220
49500
6,096
2
99.00
12.19
03/14/200
815 AM
9:45 AM
90
1
220
19800
2,438
2
39.60
4.88
04/23/200
12:00 PM
1:30 PM
90
1
392
35280
4,345
2
70.56
8.69
04/23/200
4:25 PM
6:20 PM
115
1
392
45080
5,552
2
90.16
11.10
04/24/200
9:50 AM
10:30 AM
40
1
392
15680
1,931
2
31.36
3.86
04/24/200
3:00 PM
5:45 PM
165
1
392
64680
7,966
2
129.36
15.93
04/24/200
6:15 AM
7:30 AM
75
1
392
29400
3,621
2
58.80
7.24
04/27/200
10:00 AM
11:20 AM
80
1
372
29760
3,665
2
59.52
7.33
04/28/200
2:35 PM
5:15 PM
160
1
392
62720
7,724
2
125.44
15.45
nyurane i 01ai vuiume: as i truu
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 86.67
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 1

-'BRawrv,s,-
Hydrant: 02 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: WMR FORM IRR -2
..SOF CAROLINA Field No.
�../ Tract No. 10894
Farm Name. 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 8.12
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume volume per Acre Analysis PAN FANAppliedPAN ApplledlAcre
Hydrant Total Volume: 400000
Total pp ie cre:
wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 2
03/147200
:30 PM
5:15 PM
225220
4 500
6,096
2
9.12-1-9
03/28/200
1:00 PM
2:30 PM
90
1
214
19260
2,372
2
38.52
4.74
04/21/200
2:40 PM
3:50 PM
70
1
392
27440
3,379
2
54.88
6.76
04/23/200
10:40 AM
12:00 PM
80
1
392
31360
3,862
2
62.72
7.72
04/23/200
2:30 PM
150 PM
80
1
392
31360
3,862
2
62.72
7.72
04/24/200
11:05 AM
12:50 PM
105
1
392
41160
5,069
2
82.32
10.14
04/24/200
2:10 PM
3:00 PM
50
1
392
19600
2,414
2
39.20
4.83
04/27/200
12:15 PM
2:50 PM
155
1
392
60760
7,483
2
121.52
14.97
04/27/200
2:50 PM
4:20 PM
90
1
392
35280
4,345
2
70.56
8.69
04/28/200
9:30 AM
10:40 AM
70
1
392
27440
3,379
2
54.88
6.76
04/28/200
10:40 AM
1:05 PM
145
1
392
56840
7,000
2
113.68
14.00
Hydrant Total Volume: 400000
Total pp ie cre:
wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 2

BROWN'S,. Hydrant: 03 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
,•. OF CAROLINA Field No. Field Size(Ac.): 5.53 Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10894 785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129 [phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes 9prinrlers Flow Rate Total Volume ITINAnalysis PAN HAN AppiseclPAN AppliedlAcre
Ryarant TotalVolume: 364500 Totalpp ie cre: 131.83
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 3
01/261200
3:
4:50 PM
80
1
344
27520
4,976
2
.04
9.95
01/29/200
10:30 AM
11:40 AM
70
1
344
24080
4,354
2
48.16
8.71
02/01/200
9:30 AM
12:15 PM
165
1
372
61380
11,099
2
122.76
22.20
02/011200
1:20 PM
3:05 PM
105
1
344
36120
6,532
2
72.24
13.06
02/27/200
11:45 AM
1:00 PM
75
1
344
25800
4,665
2
51.60
9.33
02/27/200
5:10 PM
6:20 PM
70
1
344
24080
4,354
2
48.16
8.71
04/12/200
10:15 AM
11:35 AM
80
1
344
27520
4,976
2
55.04
9.95
04/13/200
11:00 AM
12:05 PM
65
1
344
22360
4,043
2
44.72
8.09
04/18/200
11:50 AM
1:40 PM
110
1
392
43120
7,797
2
86.24
15.59
04/18/200
3:00 PM
6:05 PM
185
1
392
72520
13,114
2
145.04
26.23
Ryarant TotalVolume: 364500 Totalpp ie cre: 131.83
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 3

Hydrant: 04 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
--�OF CAROLINAField Size Ac.: 5.53 Certification #
Field No. Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Tract No. 10894 Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129 [phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flaw Rate Total Volume Volume peu mcre Analysis PAN VAN AppliedPAN Applied/Acre
Mytlrant total Volume: JUIJbV Total PAN AppliedfAcre: 141.54
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operators Signature Page
129
2:15 PM
2:50 PM
35
1
344
--12040
----2-J77
2
24.08
4.35
04/07/200
10:20 AM
12:10 PM
110
1
344
37840
6,843
2
75.68
13.69
04/07/200
2:00 PM
2:50 PM
50
1
344
17200
3,110
2
34.40
6.22
04/09/200
10:05 AM
10:50 AM
45
1
344
15480
2,799
2
30.96
5.60
04/09/200
10:50 AM
12:00 PM
70
1
344
24080
4,354
2
48.16
8.71
04/09/200
12:00 PM
1:30 PM
90
1
344
30960
5,599
2
61.92
11.20
04/09/200
3:35 PM
5:35 PM
120
1
344
41280
7,465
2
82.56
14.93
04/11/200
9:35. AM
12:00 PM
145
1
344
49880
9,020
2
99.76
18.04
04/11/200
12:00 PM
1:15 PM
75
1
344
25800
4,665
2
51.60
9.33
04/16/200
12:40 PM
4:20 PM
220
1
372
81840
14,799
2
163.68
29.60
04/16/200
5:35 PM
6:45 PM
70
1
392
27440
4,962
2
54.88
9.92
04/17/200
12:15 PM
1:35 PM
80
1
344
27520
4,976
2
55.04
9.95
Mytlrant total Volume: JUIJbV Total PAN AppliedfAcre: 141.54
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operators Signature Page

-�?gRowry s,.
Hydrant: 05 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
I
OF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 6.39
Recommended PAN (Ibs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
1910)296-1800
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume volume Per Acre Analysis PAN PAN APpliellPAN Applied/Acre
y ran Tot-a]o uV -i me: 276800
Total pp ie cre: 86.621
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 5
01/0572W
--1`00M
0 PM
240
1
344
82560
12,920
2
165.12
25.84
01/06/200
10:00 AM
11:10 AM
70
1
372
26040
4,075
2
52.08
8.15
01/11/200
10:05 AM
12:15 PM
130
1
372
48360
7,568
2
96,72
15.14
01/11/200
3:05 PM
4:05 PM
60
1
392 i
23520
3,681
2
47.04
7.36
04/10/200
12:30 PM
1:30 PM
60
1
344
20640
3,230
2
41.28
6.46
04/13/200
4:25 PM
6:20 PM
115
1
344
39560
6,191
2
79.12
12.38
04/14/200
9:55 AM
11:40 AM
105
1
344
36120
5,653
2
72.24
11.31
y ran Tot-a]o uV -i me: 276800
Total pp ie cre: 86.621
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 5

Hydrant: 06 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA 1� Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 6.39
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes SponPlers Flow Rate Total Volume vulume per fAcre Analysis PAN PANAPPileCtPAN Applied/Acre
Hydrant Total Volume: 258840
Total pp le cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operators Signature Page 6
01/03/200
2:10 PM
5:35 PM
205
1
392
90360
12,576
2
160.72
25.15
01104!200
315 PM
5:30 PM
135
1
344
46440
7,268
2
92.88
14.54
01/06/200
11:45 AM
1:35 PM
110
1
392
43120
6,748
2
86.24
13.50
01110!200
3:00 PM
5:25 PM
145
1
344
49880
7,806
2
99.76
15.61
01/11/200
4:35 PM
5:00 PM
25
1
392
9800
1,534
2
19.60
3.07
01/18/200
1:50 PM
3:15 PM
85
1
344
29240
4,576
2
58.48
9.15
Hydrant Total Volume: 258840
Total pp le cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operators Signature Page 6

Hydrant: 07 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
■•SOF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 6.35'
Recommended PAN (tbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate 'total Volume Volume pet hkGre Analysis PAN PAN PpplieclPAN AppliedlAcre
Hydrant o a o ume:
Total pp le cre: 109.2217
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 7
10/277200
3:
6:40 PM
205
1
344
70520
11,106
1.5
105.78
10/30/200
11:50 AM
3:45 PM
235
1
344
80840
12,731
1.5
121.26
19.10
10/31/200
12:35 PM
4:30 PM
235
1
344
80840
12,731
1"5
121.26
19.10
11/01/200
1:50 PM
5:40 PM
230
1
344
79120
12,460
1.5
118.68
18.69
11/02/200
2:25 PM
5:40 PM
195
1
259
50505
7,954
1.5
75.76
11.93
11/03/200
3:15 PM
3:50 PM
35
1
259
9065
1,428
1.5
13.60
2.14
11/03/200
150 PM
5:35 PM
105
1
259
27195
4,283
1.5
40.79
6.42
11/04/200
9:45 AM
10:35 AM
50
1
314
15700
2,472
1.5
23.55
3.71
11104/200
10:35 AM
1:10 PM
155
1
314
48670
7,665
1.5
73.00
11.50
Hydrant o a o ume:
Total pp le cre: 109.2217
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 7

--�RRCaWN S`,,
Hydrant: 08 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No. Field Size(Ac.): 6.35 Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Tract NO. 10894 Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129 [phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume Per Acre Analysis PAR PAN APPHeaPAN Applied/Acre
myorant i otai voiume. 4 iacr r Total PAN Applied/Acre: 98.10
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 8
TOM -77200
10:30 AM
2:0
9
23
3,956
1.5
37.68
10/28/200
9:30 AM
1:25 PM
235
1
344
80840
12,731
1.5
121,26
19.10
10/30/200
4:25 PM
5:45 PM
80
1
344
27520
4,334
1.5
41.28
6.50
10/31/200
8:25 AM
11:10 AM
165
1
344
56760
8,939
1.5
85.14
13.41
11/01/200
8:40 AM
12:40 PM
240
1
344
82560
13,002
1.5
123.84
19.50
11/02/200
9:40 AM
1:30 PM
230
1
259
59570
9,381
1.5
89.36
14.07
11/06/200
12:05 PM
4:06 PM
241
1
344
82904
13,056
1.5
124.36
19.58
myorant i otai voiume. 4 iacr r Total PAN Applied/Acre: 98.10
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 8

Hydrant: 09 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
._,�-.. OF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 10.95
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes b prinklers Flow Rate Total Volume na ysis PAN VAN ApplieciPAN Applled/Acre
Hydrant ota a ume:
Total PAN pp ie cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 9
02/20/200
3:15 PM
415
60
1
0
6000
548
2
12.00
1.10
02/201200
3:30 PM
4:15 PM
45
1
100
4500
411
2
9.00
0.82
02/21/200
3:40 PM
4:40 PM
60
1
100
6000
548
2
12.00
1.10
02/21/200
3:45 PM
4:00 PM
15
1
100
1500
137
2
3.00
0.27
02/21/200
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
60
1
100
6000
548
2
12.00
1.10
03/12/200
12:30 PM
3:30 PM
180
1
124
22320
2,038
2
44.64
4.08
04/05/200
11:30 AM
12:20 PM
50
1
255
12750
1,164
2
25.50
2.33
04/05/200
6:05 AM
7:05 AM
60
1
256
15360
1,403
2
30.72
2.81
04/06/200
2:50 PM
3:20 PM
30
1
115
3450
315
2
6.90
0.63
04/06/200
3:25 PM
3:55 PM
30
1
115
3450
315
2
6.90
0.63
04/06/200
4:00 PM
4:30 PM
30
1
115
3450
315
2
6.90
0.63
04/06/200
5:45 PM
6:15 PM
30
1
115
3450
315
2
6.90
0.63
04/06/200
6:20 AM
6:50 AM
30
1
115
3450
315
2
6.90
0.63
04/06/200
6:55 AM
7:25 AM
30
1
115
3450
315
2
6.90
0.63
04/06/200
7:30 AM
8:00 AM
30
1
115
3450
315
2
6.90
0.63
04/10/200
5:20 AM
6:10 AM
50
1
256
12800
1,169
2
25.60
2.34
04/10/200
3:30 PM
4:30 PM
60
1
256
15360
1,403
2
30.72
2.81
04/10/200
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
60
1
256
15360
1,403
2
30.72
2.81
04/111200
515 PM
6:15 PM
60
1
256
15360
1,403
2
30.72
2.81
04/12/200
4:55 PM
6:00 PM
65
1
344
22360
2,042
2
44.72
4.08
04112/200
3:40 PM
4:35 PM
55
1
256
14080
1,286
2
28.16
2.57
04/13/200
3:10 PM
4:00 PM
50
1
256
12800
1,169
2
25.60
2.34
04/191200
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
60
1
256
15360
1,403
2
30.72
2.81
04/19/200
3:25 PM
4:30 PM
65
1
256
16640
1,520
2
33.28
3.04
04/20/200
10:35 AM
11:35 AM
60
1
256
15360
1,403
2
30.72
2.81
04/20/200
12:05 PM
1:05 PM
60
1
256
15360
1,403
2
30.72
2.81
04/20/200
3:00 PM
5:20 PM
140
1
256
35840
3,273
2
71.68
6.55
Hydrant ota a ume:
Total PAN pp ie cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 9

BRbW V S`,.
Hydrant: 10 Crop Type: WHi=AT Operator: EH FORM IRR
-2
OF CAROLINA Field No. Field Size(Ac.): 4.67 Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10894 785 Hwy 24 EastWarsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129 [phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume vallIMM per Acre Analysis Applied
PAN Applied/Acre
Hydrant TotalV616M Total PAN AppliedfAcre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 10
02/27/200
3:15 PM
3:45 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
02/27/200
316 PM
4:16 PM
60
1
115
6900
1,478
2
13.80
2,96
02/27/200
3:17 PM
4:17 PM
60
1
115
6900
1,478
2
13.80
2.96
04/06/200
2:25 PM
2:55 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/06/200
3:00 PM
3:30 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/06/200
3:35 PM
4:05 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/06/200
4:10 PM
4:40 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/06/200
5:15 PM
5:55 PM
40
1
115
4600
985
2
9.20
1.97
04/06/200
6:00 PM
6:30 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/06/200
6:35 AM
7:05 AM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6,90
1.48
04/06/200
710 AM
7:40 AM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/07/200
2:20 PM
2:50 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/09/200
4:55 PM
5:25 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/09/200
4:20 PM
4:50 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/09/200
3:35 PM
4:15 PM
40
1
115
4600
985
2
9.20
1.97
04/09/200
12:25 PM
12:55 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/09/200
11:50 AM
12:20 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/09/200
11:15 AM
11:45 AM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/09/200
10:40 AM
11:10 AM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/10/200
12:50 PM
1:10 PM
20
1
115
2300
493
2
4.60
0.99
04/11/200
2:35 PM
140 PM
65
1
344
22360
4,788
2
44.72
9.58
04/111200
3:40 PM
4:45 PM
65
1
344
22360
4,788
2
44.72
9.58
04/11/200
12:25 PM
12:55 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/11/200
11:30 AM
12:00 PM
30
1
115
3450
739
2
6.90
1.48
04/12/200
11:35 AM
1:55 PM
140
1
344
48160
10,313
2
96.32
20.63
04/13/200
12A5 PM
2:35 PM
110
1
344
37640
8,103
2
75.68
16.21
Hydrant TotalV616M Total PAN AppliedfAcre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 10

BRQVIIN1S Hydrant: 11 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: TV FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 14.47
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
{910) 296-1800
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume volurne per mcre Analysis PAN F'AN APPIlea PAN Applied/Acre
y rantota Volum�fi6040
Total pp ie cre: 97.80
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page t f
03/27/200
9:00 AM
415 PM
435
1
440
191400
13,227
2.
33,07
03/28/200
9:40 AM
11:40 AM
120
1
407
48840
3,375
2.5
122.10
8.44
04/09/200
12:50 PM
6:00 PM
310
1
440
136400
9,426
2.5
341.00
23.57
04/09/200
6:00 AM
7:50 AM
110
1
440
48400
3,345
2.5
121.00
8.36
04/101200
9:00 AM
12:15 PM
195
1
470
91650
6,334
2.5
229.13
15.83
04/12/200
5:00 PM
6:45 PM
105
1
470
49350
3,411
2.5
123.38
8.53
y rantota Volum�fi6040
Total pp ie cre: 97.80
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page t f

Bi3OXAjKj1g,. Hydrant: 12 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 14.47
Recommended PAN (Ibs.lAcre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes 9prinklers Flow Rate Total Volume volume per i6kcre Analysis PAN PANAPPIleCiPAN Applied/Acre
y ran Total o ume: 496380
Total pp le cre: 81.93
viednesday, May 02, 2001 �� Operator's Signature Page 12
03/28/200
0 PM
320
407
56980
3,938
2.5
142.45
9.84
04/10/200
1:00 PM
4:00 PM
180
1
470
84600
5,847
2.5
211.50
14.62
04/10/200
5:45 PM
6:15 PM
30
1
470
14100
974
2.5
35.25
2.44
04/11/200
9:30 AM
10:00 AM
30
1
470
14100
974
2.5
35.25
2.44
04/12/200
2:30 PM
4:15 PM
105
1
470
49350
3,411
2.5
123.38
8.53
04/13/200
10:45 AM
4:00 PM
315
1
440
138600
9,578
2.3
318.78
22.03
04/13/200
4:45 PM
6:45 PM
120
1
470
56400
3,898
2.3
129.72
8.96
04/14/200
9:45 AM
10:50 AM
65
1
470
30550
2,111
2.3
70.27
4.86
04/16/200
1:00 PM
1:40 PM
40
1
470
18800
1,299
2.3
43.24
2.99
04/16/200
4:45 PM
5:55 PM
70
1
470
32900
2,274
2.3
75.67
5.23
y ran Total o ume: 496380
Total pp le cre: 81.93
viednesday, May 02, 2001 �� Operator's Signature Page 12

" BRr)UUN S`
Hydrant: 13 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: TV FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 14.47
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To-. Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume volume per licre Analysis PAN PAN AppliedPAN Applied/Acre
Hy2rant TotalVolume:
Total PAN pp ie cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 13
03119/200
:00
95
1
407
793652.5
196.41
13.71
04/11/200
11:00 AM
2:15 PM
195
1
470
91650
6,334
2.5
229.13
15.83
04/12/200
11:00 AM
1:45 PM
165
1
470
77550
5,359
2.5
193.88
13.40
04/17/200
11:30 AM
2:20 PM
170
1
470
79900
5,522
2.3
183.77
12.70
04/18/200
11:00 AM
11,30 PM
150
1
470
70500
4,872
2.3
162.15
11.21
04/18/200
2:30 PM
5:30 PM
180
1
470
84600,
5,847
2.3
194.58
13.45
Hy2rant TotalVolume:
Total PAN pp ie cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 13

gs
Hydrant: 14 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: WMR FORM IRR -2
pr)
OF CAROLINA i Field No,
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 f=acility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 14.47
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes SprinMers Flow Rate Total Volume voirme per Acre Analysis PAN HAN AppliedPAN Applied/Acre
Hydrant ota Volume; 570440
Total pp a cre: 92.55
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 14
03/14/200
5:00
6:00 PM
60
1
220
13200
912
2
26.40
1.82
03/19/200
10:50 AM
12:00 PM
70
1
407
28490
1,969
2.5
71.22
4.92
04/11/200
2:45 PM
5:00 PM
135
1
470
63450
4,385
2.5
158.63
10.96
04/11/200
5:00 PM
7:15 PM
135
1
470
63450
4,385
2.5
158.63
10.96
04/19/200
1:00 PM
4:15 PM
195
1
470
91650
6,334
2,3
210.79
14.57
04/20/200
10:45 AM
1:30 PM
165
1
470
77550
5,359
2.3
178.36
12.33
04/20/200
3:30 PM
6:00 PM
150
1
470
70500
4,872
2.3
162.15
11.21
04/21/200
9:15 AM
12:00 PM
165
1
470
77550
5,359
2.3
178.36
12.33
04/21/200
12:35 PM
3:35 PM
180
1
470
84600
5,847
2.3
194.58
13.45
Hydrant ota Volume; 570440
Total pp a cre: 92.55
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 14

B Nu Hydrant: 15 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator; EH FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No..10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field 5ize(Ac.): 14.10
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume volumu P12F Acre Analysis PAN VAN APPlIeUPAN Applied/Acre
TTy-a-r-anT TotalVolume:
Total pp a cre: 101.26
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 15
11/09/200
10: 30 AM
1:30 PM
180
1
407
732
4
8.83
01/26/200
107 PM
6:00 PM
173
1
407
70411
4,994
2.3
161.95
11.49
01/27/200
9:00 AM
9:30 AM
30
1
407
12210
866
2.3
28.08
1.99
01/31/200
10:35 AM
12:15 PM
100
1
407
40700
2,887
2.3
93.61
6.64
02/01/200
12:45 PM
2:07 PM
82
1
407
33374
2,367
2.3
76.76
5.44
02/20/200
12:30 PM
5:00 PM
270
1
392
105840
7,506
2
211.68
15.01
02/27/200
4:50 PM
6:30 PM
100
1
407
40700
2,887
2.3
93.61
6.64
03/091200
11:30 AM
1:20 PM
110
1
407
44770
3,175
2.3
102.97
7.30
03/09/200
3:00 PM
3:45 PM
45
1
407
18315
1,299
2.3
42.12
2.99
03/121200
8:30 AM
11:30 AM
180
1
407
73260
5,196
2.3
168.50
11.95
03/12/200
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
60
1
500
30000
2,128
2.3
69.00
4.89
03/14/200
8:30 AM
10:38 AM
128
1
407
52096
3,695
2.3
119.82
8.50
04/23/200
3:30 PM
5:35 PM
125
1
470
58750
4,167
2.3
135.13
9.58
TTy-a-r-anT TotalVolume:
Total pp a cre: 101.26
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 15

,, 'BQOAA1N- -",Hydrant: 16 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: TV FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 14.10
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes SprinkleFs Flow Rate Total Volume V0101119 mef Acrena ysis PAN VAN Appite(IPAN Applled./Acre
Hydrant o a Volume: 695158
Total pp a cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 16
3
2:45 PM
5:30 PM
165
1
353
58245
4,131
17
99.02---.02
11/04/200
9:25 AM
11:40 AM
135
1
353
47655
3,380
1.7
81.01
5.75
11/08/200
2:45 PM
5:30 PM
165
1
470
77550
5,500
1.7
131.84
9.35
11/09/200
2:40 PM
3:25 PM
45
1
470
21150
1,500
1.7
35.95
2.55
11109/200
9:15 AM
9:45 AM
30
1
440
13200
936
1.7
22.44
1.59
01126/200
12:15 PM
2:40 PM
145
1
407
59015
4,185
2.3
135.73
9.63
01/27/200
10:00 AM
2:05 PM
245
1
407
99715
7,072
2.3
229.34
16.27
01/29/200
4:00 PM
6:00 PM
120
1
407
48840
3,464
2.3
112.33
7.97
01/31/200
9:15 AM
10:10 AM
55
1
407
22385
1,588
2.3
51.49
3.65
02/011200
2:20 PM
5:00 PM
160
1
407
65120
4,618
2.3
149.78
10.62
02/02/200
12:45 PM
1:20 PM
35
1
407
14245
1,010
2.3
32.76
2.32
02/21/200
11:25 AM
12:10 PM
45
1
392
17640
1,251
2
35.28
2.50
02/21/200
3:20 PM
6:09 PM
169
1
392
66248
4,698
2
132.50
9.40
04/05/200
9:15 AM
11:45 AM
150
1
185
27750
1,968
2.5
69.38
4,92
04/24/200
3:00 PM
5:00 PM
120
1
470
56400
4,000
2.3
129,72
9.20
Hydrant o a Volume: 695158
Total pp a cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 16

PmrmAmICZ�, Hydrant: 17 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
;,—•..O F CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 14.10
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume volume per Acrena ysis PAN PAN AppliedPAN Applied/Acre
Hydrant Total Volume: -349095
Total pp le cre:
Wecinesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 17
0
:05 PM
-1--50 PM
105
1
407
42735
3,0315
01/29/200
10:20 AM
3:20 PM
300
1
407
122100
8,660
2.3
280.83
19.92
02/27/200
12:40 PM
4:30 PM
230
1
407
93610
6,639
2.3
215.30
15.27
04/05/200
12:50 PM
3:25 PM
155
1
185
28675
2,034
2.5
71.69
5.08
04/05/200
3:55 PM
6:30 PM
155
1
185
28675
2,034
2.5
71.69
5.08
04/05/200
6:45 AM
7:15 AM
30
1
185
5550
394
2.5
13.88
0.98
04/06/200
9:00 AM
11:30 AM
150
1
185
27750
1,968
2.5
69.38
4.92
Hydrant Total Volume: -349095
Total pp le cre:
Wecinesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 17

BROWNS Hydrant: 18 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: TV FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Meld NO. Field Size(Ac.): 11.03 Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
T7a5 Hwy 24 East
Tract No. 10894
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129 [phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume VUJUMe Per i6kCra Analysis PAN FAN AppiedPAN Applied/Acre
"yorant i ozai volume: -i Io%vu Total PAN -ret —26-.W
wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 18
04/06/200
:00 PM
3:50 PM
230
1
185
42550
3,858
2.5
9.
04/06/200
4:35 PM
7:20 PM
165
1
185
30525
2,767
2.5
76.31
6.92
04/07/200
9:30 AM
10:15 AM
45
1
185
8325
755
2.5
20.81
1.89
04/09/200
9:20 AM
12:40 PM
200
1
185
37000
3,354
2.5
92.50
8.39
"yorant i ozai volume: -i Io%vu Total PAN -ret —26-.W
wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 18

[[** Hydrant: 19 Crap Type: WHEAT Operator: WMR FORM IRR -2
BROWN'S `' Certification #
OF CAROLINA Field No. Field Size(Ac.): 11.03
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Tract No. 10894 Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129 [phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinrlers Flow Rate Total Volume VDIUM12 per Acre Analysis PAN FAN APpIleaPAN Applied/Acre
myorant i otar volume: Asvzro Total PAN Applied/Acre: 53.53
Wednesday, may 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 19
03/10/200
:00 AM
12:5
75
1 1
255912
4
23
43,99
3,99
03/11/200
10:45 AM
12:15 PM
90
1
220
19800
1,795
2.3
45.54
4.13
03/27/200
5:20 PM
8:30 PM
190
1
275
52250
4,737
2.5
130.63
11.84
03/28/200
4:15 PM
6:10 PM
115
1
275
31625
2,867
2.5
79.06
7.17
03/28/200
7:00 AM
7:30 AM
30
1
275
8250
748
2.5
20.63
1.87
04/03/200
510 PM
6:15 PM
65
1
185
12025
1,090
2.5
30.06
2.73
04/04/200
11:00 AM
1:45 PM
165
1
185
30525
2,767
2.5
76.31
6.92
04/04/200
3:55 PM
6:45 PM
170
1
185
31450
2,851
2.5
78.63
7.13
04/07/200
11:20 AM
2:25 PM
185
1
185
34225
3,103
2.5
85.56
7.76
myorant i otar volume: Asvzro Total PAN Applied/Acre: 53.53
Wednesday, may 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 19

gpnVUKI,5` Hydrant: 20 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 19.97
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
1910) 296-1800
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes 9prinklers Flow Rate Total Volume volUlne Pei Acre Analysis PAN FAN APPIleaPAN Applied/Acre
Hydrant o a Volume: 943058
Total pp le cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 20
10/13/200
:40 PM
2:34 PM
54
1
53
19062
955
1.7
32.41
1.62
10/13/200
2:34 PM
5:15 PM
161
1
353
56833
2,846
1.7
96.62
4.84
10/13/200
5:15 PM
7:00 PM
105
1
353
37065
1,856
1.7
63.01
3.16
10/14/200
9:15 AM
1010 AM
55
1
353
19415
972
1.7
33.01
1.65
10/14/200
10:10 AM
1:05 PM
175
1
353
61775
3,093
1.7
105.02
5.26
10/14/200
1:40 PM
4:34 PM
174
1
353
61422
3,076
1.7
104.42
5.23
10/15/200
9:40 AM
12:30 PM
170
1
353
60010
3,005
1.7
102.02
5.11
10/16/200
9:30 AM
12:10 PM
160
1
353
56480
2,828
1.7
96.02
4.81
10/16/200
12:55 PM
1:15 PM
20
1
353
7060
354
1.7
12.00
0.60
10/16/200
1:15 PM
4:00 PM
165
1
353
58245
2,917
1.7
99.02
4.96
10/16/200
4:00 PM
6:25 PM
145
1
353
51185
2,563
1.7
87.01
4.36
10/17/200
10:00 AM
12:50 PM
170
1
288
48960
2,452
1.7
83.23
4.17
10/17/200
1:30 PM
4:10 PM
160
1
353
56480
2,828
1.7
96.02
4.81
10/17/200
9:30 AM
10:00 AM
30
1
288
8640
433
1.7
14.69
0.74
10/23/200
9:45 AM
12:40 PM
175
1
353
61775
3,093
1.7
105.02
5.26
10/23/200
1:25 PM
415 PM
170
1
353
60010
3,005
1.7
102.02
5.11
10/23/200
4:15 PM
6:50 PM
155
1
353
54715
2,740
1.7
93.02
4.66
10/24/200
2:05 PM
4:45 PM
160
1
353
56480
2,828
1.7
96.02
4.81
10/24/200
9:50 AM
1:00 PM
190
1
353
67070
3,359
1.7
114.02
5.71
01/26/200
12:25 PM
1:25 PM
60
1
103
6180
309
2.3
14.21
0.71
01/26/200
1:30 PM
2'.30 PM
60
1
103
6180
309
2.3
14.21
0.71
01/26/200
315 PM
4:06 PM
51
1
103
5253
263
2.3
12.08
0.61
01126/200
4:09 PM
4:50 PM
41
1
103
4223
211
2.3
9.71
0.49
01/29/200
10:30 AM
11:30 AM
60
1
103
6180
309
2.3
14.21
0.71
01/29/200
11:52 AM
12:52 PM
60
1
103
6180
309
2.3
14.21
0.71
01/31/200
10:25 AM
11:25 AM
60
1
103
6180
309
2.3
14.21
0.71
Hydrant o a Volume: 943058
Total pp le cre:
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 20

Hydrant: 21 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No.
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #:
Field Size(Ac.): 3.21
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129
Certification #
Remit To; Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
[phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume volume per tkure Analysis PAN VAN AppliedPAN Applied/Acre
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 21
41200
155 PM
4:25 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/14/200
3:20 PM
3:50 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/14/200
2:45 PM
315 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/14/200
2:05 PM
2:35 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/14/200
12:20 PM
12:50 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/14/200
11:45 AM
12:15 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/141200
11:05 AM
11:35 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/151200
10:40 AM
11:10 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/15/200
10:05 AM
10:35 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/15/200
11:50 AM
12:20 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/15/200
1115 AM
11:45 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/161200
4:10 PM
4:40 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/16/200
3:35 PM
4:05 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/16/200
3:00 PM
3:30 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/16/200
2:25 PM
2:55 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/16/200
1:50 PM
2:20 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/16/200
11:40 AM
12:10 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/16/200
11:05 AM
11:35 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/16/200
10:30 AM
11:00 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/16/200
9:55 AM
10:25 AM
.30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/17/200
2:25 PM
2:55 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/17/200
1:50 PM
2:20 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/17/200
12:05 PM
12:35 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/17/200
11:30 AM
12:00 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/17/200
10:55 AM
11:25 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/17/200
10:20 AM
10:50 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/17/200
9:45 AM
10:15 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/23/200
4:00 PM
4:30 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/23/200
3:25 PM
3:55 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/23/200
2:50 PM
3:20 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/23/200
2:15 PM
2:45 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/23/200
1:40 PM
2:10 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/23/200
11:55 AM
12:25 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10123/200
11:20 AM
11:50 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/231200
10:45 AM
11:15 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/231200
1010 AM
10:40 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/24/200
4:05 PM
4:35 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/24/200
3:30 PM
4:00 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10124/200
2:55 PM
3:25 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
Wednesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 21

BROWN S,,,
Hydrant: 21 Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA Field No. Field Size(Ac.): 3.21 Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Tract No. 10894 Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 129 [phone]
myorani i oui volume: -iscuuu Total PAN Applied/Acre: 69.91
wF�dnesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Rage 22
10/24/200
2:20 PM
2:50 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/24/200
12:25 PM
12:55 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/24/200
11:50 AM
12:20 PM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
10/24/200
11:15 AM
11:45 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1 1.7
5.10
1.59
10/24/200
10:40 AM
11:10 AM
30
1
100
3000
935
1.7
5.10
1.59
myorani i oui volume: -iscuuu Total PAN Applied/Acre: 69.91
wF�dnesday, May 02, 2001 Operator's Signature Rage 22

s pioo.;) N z WWI
doi 0 J;)WLun s 000z

BR,- N's Hydrant: 01 Crop Type: SOYBEANS
OF CHriOLINA Field No. Field Size(Ac.): 8.12
Tract No. 10894
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 200
Operator: GH FORM IRR -2
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina. Inc.
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
1910) 296-1800
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers f=low Rate Total Volume Volume per Acre Analysis PAN PAN Applied PAN Applied/Acre
0
0
0
j
Q
0
4
IV
4
Hydrant Total Volume: 450000
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 88.67
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operat&sSignature Pagel
715100
9:30 AM
12:30 PM18
0
1
500
90000
11,084
1.6
144.00
17.73
7110100
9:00 AM
1
3:00 PM
1
360
1
500
180000
22,167
1.6
288.00
35.47
7112100
9:00 AM
3:00 PM
360
1
500
180000
22,187
1.6
288.00
35.47
0
0
0
j
Q
0
4
IV
4
Hydrant Total Volume: 450000
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 88.67
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operat&sSignature Pagel

BRI,
'N'S'
Hydrant: 02
Crop Type: SOYBEANS Operator: GH
FORM IRR -2
OF CHNOLINACertification
Field No.
Field Size(Ac.): 8.12 #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
1.6
108.00
Tract No. 10894
786 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Farm Name:
2993
Facility #:
Recomended PAN (lbs./Acre): 180
m
[phone]
Date
Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow Rale Total Volume Volume per Acre
Analysis PAN PAR Applied PAN AppliedlAcre
1
0
0
0
0
0
N
00
Hydrant Total Volume: 500000
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 118.23
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operators Signature Page 2
715100
1:00 PM
3:15 PM
135
1
500
67500
8,313
1.6
108.00
13.30
717100
7:30 AM
8:30 AM
80
1
500
30000
3,695
1.6
48.00
5.91
718100
8:30 AM
3:00 PM
390
1
500
195000
24,015
1.6
312.00
38.42
7110100
7:30 AM
8:30 AM
60
1
500
30000
3,895
1.6
48.00
5.91
7110100
3:30 PM
6:00 PM
150
1
500
75000
9,236
1.6
120.00
14.78
7/11100
8:15 AM
3:00 PM
405
1
500
1 202500
24,938
1.6
324.00
39.90
1
0
0
0
0
0
N
00
Hydrant Total Volume: 500000
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 118.23
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operators Signature Page 2

BRI
IN'S
Hydrant: 03
Crop Type: SOYBEANS Operator. EH
F%JFXIVI iRR—G
OF VAROLINA
Field No.
Field Size(Ac.): 5.53 Certification #
7,685
1.6
68.00
12.30
Remit To: Brown's o/ Carolina, Inc.
7/21/00
4:05 PM
Tract No. 10894
85
768 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28388-0487
Farm Name:
29,93
Facility #:
Recommended PAN [Ibs./Acre : 180
R 1
[phone]
Date
Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume per Acre
Analysis PAN PAN Applied PAN Applied/Acre
co
C)
0
j
0
a
ti
Iu
cs
Hydrant Total Volume: 304000 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 95.33
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operators Signature Page 3
7121/00
2:40 PM
4:05 PM
85
1
500
42500
7,685
1.6
68.00
12.30
7/21/00
4:05 PM
5:30 PM
85
1
500
42500
7,685
1.6
68.00
12.30
7/22100
92:00 PM
12:30 PM
30
1
500
15000
2,712
1.6
24.00
4.34
8116100
1:00 PM
3:30 PM
150
1
500
75000
13,562
1.8
135.00
24.41
8117100
2:55 PM
4:00 PM
65
1
500
32500
5,877
1.8
58.50
10.58
8117100
4:00 PM
5:10 PM
70
1
500
35000
6,329
1.8
63.00
11.39
8118100
3:16 PM
4:11 PM
55
1
500
27500
4,973
1.8
49.50
8.95
8118100
4:11 PM
5:19 PM
68
1
1 500
1 34000
6,148
1.8
61.20
11.07
co
C)
0
j
0
a
ti
Iu
cs
Hydrant Total Volume: 304000 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 95.33
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operators Signature Page 3

BR(-
N'S`.
Hydrant: 04
Crop Type: SOYBEANS Operator: EH
FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA
Field No.
Field Size(Ac.): 5.53 Certification #
13,110
1.6
116.00
20.98
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, inc.
7122100
8:00 AM
Tract No, 10$94
100
706 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NG 70389-0487
Farm Name:
29,93
Facility #:
Recommended PAN lbs./Acre : 180
( 1
1810)296-1900
Date
Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume o ume per Acre
Analysis PAN PAN Applied PAN Applied/Acre
!J
C)
0
1
CD
..i
CD
Q
4
W
O
Hydrant Total Volume: 316500 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 96.86
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operators Signature Page 4
7121100
9:45 AM
12:10 PM
145
1
500
72500
13,110
1.6
116.00
20.98
7122100
8:00 AM
9:40 AM
100
1
500
50000
9,042
1.6
80.00
14.47
7122100
9:40 AM
11:10 AM
90
1
500
45000
8,137
1.6
72.00
13.02
8117100
11:00 AM
1218 PM
78
1
500
39000
7,052
1.8
70.20
12.69
8/17/00
1218 PM
1:30 PM
72
1
500
36000
8,510
1.8
64.80
11.72
8118100
11:30'AM
12:45 PM
75
1
500
37500
8,781
1.8
87.50
12.21
8/18/00
12:45 PM
1:58 PM
73
1
500
1 38500
6,600
1.8
65.70
11.88
!J
C)
0
1
CD
..i
CD
Q
4
W
O
Hydrant Total Volume: 316500 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 96.86
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operators Signature Page 4

�. BR INS', Hydrant: 07 Crop Type: SOYBEANS Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
OF �.,ROLlNA Field No. Field Size(Ac.); 6.36' Certification #
RemH To: brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10894 766 Hwy 24 East
Recommended PAN Warsaw, NC 18388-0487
lbs./Acre: 200
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: ' [phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rale
Total Volume
Volume per Acre Analysis PAN PAN Appli
PAN' AppliedlAcre
9/26/00 1 11:40 AM 1 1215 PM1 35 1 1 1 110 1
3850
606 1 1.8 1 6.93
1 1.09
Hydrant Total Volume:
3850
Total PAN Applied/Acre:
1.09
IA
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operator's Signature Page 5

10
0
0
0
3
CD
CD
y
W
to
Hydrant Total Volume: 568350 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 183.66
Vriday, November 10, 2000 Operator's Signature Page 6
Hydrant: 08
Crop Type: SOYBEANS Operator: EH
FORM IRR -2
OF CAAOi,INA
Field No.
Field Size(Ac.J: 6.35 Certification #
75000
11,811
1.8
135.00
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10894
9125100
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 21139"87Farm
Name: 29,93
Facility #:
Recommended PAN (Ibs.lAcre]: 200
[phone]
Date Start Time
End Timm Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume per Acre
Analysis PAN PAN AppliedPAN Applied/Acre
10
0
0
0
3
CD
CD
y
W
to
Hydrant Total Volume: 568350 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 183.66
Vriday, November 10, 2000 Operator's Signature Page 6
9122100
9:30 AM
12:00 PM
150
1
500
75000
11,811
1.8
135.00
21.26
9125100
1:55 PM
5:00 PM
185
1
110
20350
3,205
1.8
36.63
5.77
1012100
11:30 AM
12:20 PM
50
1
500
25000
3,937
1.7
42.50
6.69
1012100
4:00 PM
5:30 PM
90
1
500
45000
7,087
1.7
76.50
12.05
1013100
910 AM
12:02 PM
172
1
500
86000
13,543
1.7
146.20
23.02
1013100
2:15 PM
5:42 PM
207
1
500
103500
16,299
1.7
175.95
27.71
1014100
10:50 AM
12:17 PM
87
1
500
43500
6,850
1.7
73.95
11.65
10/4/00
4:45 PM
6:40 PM
115
1
500
57500
9,055
1.7
97.75
15.39
1015100
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
60
1
500
30000
4,724
1.7
51.00
8.03
10/9100
10:20 AM
1:05 PM
165
1
500
1 82500
12,992
1.7
140.25
22.09
10
0
0
0
3
CD
CD
y
W
to
Hydrant Total Volume: 568350 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 183.66
Vriday, November 10, 2000 Operator's Signature Page 6

BR
M'S',
Hydrant: I&
Crop Type: SOYBEANS
Operator: GH
FORM IRR -2
�-
DF CAROLINA
Field No.
Field Sipe{Ac.j: 14.10
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10894
786 Hwy 24 East
Farm Name:
29993
Facility #:
Recommended PAN (Ibs./Acre ) : 180
Warsaw, NC 28388.0487
18101288-1800
Date
Start Time
tend Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow Rate
Total Volume
Murne per Xcre
Analysis PAN 15AN AppliedPAN AppliedlAcre
7/3/00
10:45 AM
2:15 PM
210
1
500
105000
7,447
2.1
220.50
15.84
718/00
7:30 AM
2:00 PM
390
1
500
195000
13,830
2.1
409.50
29.04
Hydrant Total Volume:
300000
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 44.68
IA
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operatoes Signature Page

'
Hydrant: "l$
v
Crop Type: SOYBEANS Operator: GH
p yp
FORM IRR -2
OF CAROLINA
Field No.
Field Size(Ac.): 14.10 Certification #
210
717/00
10:30 AM
5:00 PM
Remit To; Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
718100
Tract No. 10894
3:00 PM
786 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28399-0487
Farm Name: 29,93
Facility #:
ecommene
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre); 180
(910) 2e6-1800
Date Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow state Total Volume'Volume per Acre
Analysis PAN PAN XpPli;aPAN Applied/Acre I
.•
0
0
CD3
Q
713100
2:50 PM
5:00 PM
130
715100
7:30 AM
11:00 AM
210
717/00
10:30 AM
5:00 PM
390
718100
2:20 PM
3:00 PM
40
7110/00
8:30 AM
2:30 PM
380
7112100
8:30 AM
2:30 PM
360
1
500
65000
1
500
105000
1
500
195000
1
500
20000
1
500
180000
1
500
180000
Hydrant Total Volume: 745000
4,610
2.1
136.50
9.68
7,447
2.1
220.50
15.64
13,830
2.1
409.50
29.04
1,418
2.1
42.00
2.98
12,766
2.1
378.00
26.81
12,766
2.1
378.00
26.81
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 110.96
Friday, November 10, 2000 operaloes Signature Page 8

BR VNrs',--
Hydrant: 17
crop Type: SOYBEANS Operator: GH
FORM IRR -2
OF uHROLINA
Field No.
Field Size(Ac.): 14.10 Certification #
135000
9,574
2.1
283.50
Remit To: Brawn'* of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10894
717100
786 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28399-087
Farm Name: 29,93
Facility #:
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre): 180
(810) 2964800
Date Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flaw Rate Total Volume Volume per Acre
Analysis PAN PAR App i PAN Applied/Acre
F
0
0
C?
0
0
V
W
Cff
Hydrant Total Volume: 520000 Total PAN Applied/Acre' 77.45
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operators Signature Page
715100
12:00 PM
4:30 PM
270
1
500
135000
9,574
2.1
283.50
20.11
717100
7:30 AM
10.00 AM
150
1
500
75000
5,319
2.1
157.50
14.17
7110100
3:00 PM
6:00 PM
180
1
500
90000
6,383
2.1
189.00
13.40
7/11100
7:40 AM
12:00 PM
260
1
500
130000
9,220
2.1
273.00
19.36
7/11100
2:30 PM
5:30 PM
180
1
500
90000
6,383
2.1
189.00
13.40
F
0
0
C?
0
0
V
W
Cff
Hydrant Total Volume: 520000 Total PAN Applied/Acre' 77.45
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operators Signature Page

/N'S�,
Hydrant: 18
Crop Type: SOYBEANS Operator: EH
FORM IRR -2
,--"BR,
" OF V.,ApLINA
Field No.
Field Size(Ac.): 11.03 Certification #
'
1 73.50
8.88
Hydrant Total Volume:
Remit Ta: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Total
Tract No. 10894
13.90
785"24 East
Warsaw, NC 283884487
Farm Name: 29193
Facility #:
Reco
Recommended PAN IbsJAcre : 180
i
1910) 296-1800
Date Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow. Rate ,Total Volume Volume per Acre
Analysis PAN PAN AP ed PAN Applied/Acre
9115100 I 2:14 PM3:30 PM 78
9115100 4:00 PM I 5:10 PM 70
7i!
1 500
38000
3,445 2.1
79-80
7.23
1 1 500
35000
3,173 2.1
1 73.50
8.88
Hydrant Total Volume:
73000
Total
PAN Applied/Acre:
13.90
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operators Signature PROS 10

BRt
IN'S`
Hydrant: 19
Crop Type: SOYBEANS
FORM IRR -2
Operator: EH
'f OF V,,riOLINA
Field No.
Field Size(Ac.): 11,02
Certification #
Ren* To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.'
Tract No. 10894
786 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28998-0467
Farm Name:
29,93
Facility #:
Recommended PAN( ) IbsJAcre : 180
(9101296-1800
Date
Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow Rate
Total Volume
Volume per.Ar-re
Analysls,PAN PAN XppliaPAN AppiledlAcre =
9/15100
40:00 AM
1:37 PM 217
1
1
500
108500
9,846
2.1
1 227.85
1 20.68
9116100
9:30 AM
2:08 PM 278
1
500
139000
12,613 1
2.1
291.90 -
26.49
Hydrant Total Volume:
247500
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 47.16
,i.
0
0
0
a
0
0
La
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operators Signature _ Page t

"BR mWS`
�" OF CAROLINA
Hydrant: 20
Field No.
Crop Type: SOYBEANS
Field Size(Ac.): 19.97
Operator: EH FORM IRR -2
Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
786 24 East
Tract No. 10894
Recommended PAN (lbs./Acre)- 180 Warsaw, NC 28388-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: [phone]
Date Start Time End Time .Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume per Acre Analysis PAN FXN AppileaPAN Applied/Acre
0
a
0
0
CD
V
W
00
Hydrant Total Volume: 1805000
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 172.00
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operator's Signature Page 12
9128100
9:35 AM'
1:15 PM
220
1
500
110000
5,508
2.1
231.00
11.57
9129/00
9:30 AM
11:35 AM
125
1
500
62500
3,130
2.1
131.25
6.57
9/29100
3:40 PM
5:15 PM
95
1
500
47500
2,379
2.1
99.75
4.99
9/30100
9:25 AM
12.35 PM
190
1
500
95000
4,757
2.1
199.50
9.99
10/2/00
11:50 AM
12:40 PM
50
1
S00
25000
1,252
2.1
1 52.50
2.63
10/2/00
4:00 PM
5:35 PM
95
1
500
47500
2,379
2.1
99.75
4.99
10/2/00
11:50 AM
12:40 PM
50
1
500
25000
1,252
1.7
42.50
2.13
1012/00
4:00 PM
5:35 PM
95
1
500
47500
2,379
1.7
80.75
4.04
9013100
10:00 AM
12:05 PM
125
1
500
62500
3,130
2.1
131.25
6.57
1013/00
2:15 PM
4:35 PM
140
1
500
70000
3,505
2.1
147.00
7.36
1013/00
4:35 PM
5:40 PM
65
1
500
32500
1,627
2.1
68.25
3.42
10/3100
10:00 AM
12.05 PM
125
1
500
62500
3,130
1.7
106.25
5.32
10/3/00
2:15 PM
4:35 PM
140
1
500
70000
3,505
1.7
119.00
5.96
10/3/00
4:35 PM
5:40 PM
65
1
500
32500
1,627
1.7
55.25
2.77
10/4/00
10:45 AM
1215 PM
90
1
500
45000
2,253
2.1
94.50
4.73
1014100
1:45 PM
4:15 PM
150
1
500
75000
3,756
2.1
157.50
7.89
10/4100
10:45 AM
12:15 PM
90
1
500
45000
2,253
1.7
78.50
3.83
1014100
1:45 PM
4:15 PM
150
1
500
75000
3,756
1.7
127.50
6.38
1015100
10:05 AM
11:05 AM
60
1
500
30000
1,502
2.1
63.00
3.15
1015100
2:20 PM
4:05 PM
105
1
500
52500
2,629
1
52.50
2.63
1015100
4:05 PM
6:35 PM
150
1
500
75000
3,756
2.1
157.50
7.89
10/5/00
10:05 AM
11:05 AM
60
1
500
30000
1,502
1.7
51.00
2.55
10/5100
2:20 PM
4:05 PM
105
1
500
52500
2,629
1.7
89.25
4.47
10/5/00
4:05 PM
6:35 PM
150
1
500
75000
3,756
1.7
127.50
6.38
1016100
10.15 AM
1:00 PM
165
1
500
82500
4,131
2.1
173.25
8.68
10/6/00
2:35 PM
5:40 PM
185
1
500
92500
4,632
2.1
194.25
9.73
1016/00
10:15 AM
1:00 PM
165
1
500
62500
4,131
1.7
140.25
7.02
1016/00
2:35 PM
5:40 PM
185
1
500
92500
4,632
1.7
157.25
7.87
1017100
9:15 AM
11:05 AM
110
1
500
55000
2,754
2.1
115.50
5.78
0
10/7100
9:15 AM
11.05 AMI
110
1
1 500
1 55000
2,754
1.7
93.50
4.68
0
a
0
0
CD
V
W
00
Hydrant Total Volume: 1805000
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 172.00
Friday, November 10, 2000 Operator's Signature Page 12

�BR Hydrant: 21 Crop Type: SOYBEANS Operator: GH FORM IRR -2
"� QF t.,HROLINA
1w Field No, Field Size(Ac.): 4.14 Certification #
Remit 70: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10894 786 Hwy 24 EastWarsaw, NC 28388-0487
Farm Name: 29,93 Facility #: Recommended PAN (tbs./Acre): 180 [phone]
Date Start Time End Time Total Minutes Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volurne Volume per Acre Analysis PAN PXN ApprMPAM Applied/Acre '
713100
1:00 PM
1:30 PM
30
1
110
3300
797
2.1
6.93
1.67
713100
1:30 PM
2:15 PM
45
1
110
4950
1,196
2.1
10.40
2.51
713100
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
60
1
110
6600
1,594
2.1
13.86
3.35
713100
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
60
1
110
6600
1,594
2.1
13.86
3.35
715100
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
60
2
110
13200
3,188
2.1
27.72
6.70
7/7/00
10:00 AM
10:30 AM
30
2
110
6600
1,594
2.1
13.86
3.35
717100
4:30 PM
5:00 PM
30
2
110
6600
1,594
2.1
13.86
3.35
7110/00
2:30 PM
3:00 PM
30
2
110
6600
1,594
2.1
13.86
3.35
9/28/00
12:10 PM
1:00 PM
50
1
100
5000
1,208
2.1
10.50
2.54
9128/00
1:00 PM
1:30 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9128/00
2:30 PM
3:00 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9128100
3:05 PM
3:35 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9128100
3:45 PM
4:15 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9128100
4:25 PM
4:55 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9/28/00
5.15 PM
5:45 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9/28/00
5:55 PM
6:25 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9129/00
9:55 AM
10:25 AM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9129/00
10:55 AM
11:25 AM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9/29100
11:30 AM
12:00 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9/29/00
12:15 PM
12:45 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9129100
2:05 PM
2:20 PM
15
1
100
1500
362
2.1
3.15
0.76
9/29100
2:35 PM
3:05 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9/29/00
3:15 PM
3:45 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9130/00
10:30 AM
11:00 AM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
9/30100
11:30 AM
12:00 PM
30
1
100
3000
725
2.1
6.30
1.52
Hydrant Total Volume: 106950 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 53.74
Friday, November 10, 2000 OperatoreSignature Page 13

Tract 4
0438 0643
That certain tract or parcel of land containing 139.0 acres,
more or less, lying and being in Abbotts Township, Bladen
County, North Carolina, as shown that certain map or plat of
survey entitled "BROS-IN'S OF CP.ROLINA, INC., Dewey Bridger
Tract"', prepared by Cape Fear surveying, M. Shelton Bordeaux,
Re stered hand Surveyor, and being recorded in Plat Cabinet
— 126 Page 126 in the office of the Register of Deeds
V11.of Bladen County, to which reference is hereby made for a more
'comp and accurate description of the property herein.
There is also conveyed herewith a right-of-way easement for
:ingress, egress and regress from secondary Road 1772 to the
tract or parcel of land hereinabove described as shown on said
plat of survey, said easement to run with the land.
All that certain tract of land, together with the
appurtenances thereunto belonging, situated in Bladen
County,. North Carolina, containing 208.35 acres as shown
on a certain plat entitled "'The Darden Farm', Property
of Brown's of Carolina, Inc_", dated February 15, 1996,
made by Stuart. GoDden, R.S., b-805, and duly of record in
th* Office of the Re inter of Deeds of Bladen County, in
Plat Cabinet - 3 at Page k3-5-4- , together'
with three non-exclusive right-of-way easements for
ingress and egress and underground utilities (installed
in such a way as to not interfere with maintenance and
clean out of any ditches which they may cross) as shown
on said plat and described as follows:
I. An easement 60' in width running (in an
easterly direction from N.C. Highway 131 to
the land hereby conveyed.
2. An easement 40' in width running in a
southerly direction from the eastern end of
the first described easement along, and
adjacent to the western boundary of the land
hereby conveyed.
3. An easement 30' in width running 2068.36 feet
in a northerly direction from the land hereby
conveyed to other lands of the Grantee.

MOORE
.ND MAYNARD
rORNEYS AT LAW
URTHOUS! DRiv[
.AhCTFFTOWN.N G
RMT
aBLo
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
WARRANTY DEED
THIS WARRANTY DEED made this the 4th day of November, 1993, by and
between the following: McQUEEN FARMS, INC., a North Caroti a
Corporation, hereinafter referred to as Grantor to D.M. CAMPBELL, JR.
and DALLAS M. CAMPBELL, III, hereinafter referred to as Grantees.
W I T N E S S E T H:
That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN
($10.00) DOLLARS, and other good and valuable considerations to them in
hand paid by the Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged,
has given, granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents
do give, grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the Grantees, as
joint tenants with right of survivorship, premises in Abbotts Township,
Bladen County, North Carolina, and more particularly described as
follows:
BEGINNING at a nail, said nail being located in the center
line of State Road 1166, and said nail being South 71
degrees 48 minutes 35 seconds West 538.24 feet from an
existing nail located at the intersection of the center
lines of State Road 1166 and 1168, and said nail being a
corner of, or in the line of the Nellie C. Martin property,
described in Deed Book 291, Page 208, Bladen County
Registry, thence from said beginning point as above located,
South 71 degrees 56 minutes 25 seconds West 61.05 feet to a
nail, said nail being located in the center line of State
Rbad 1166, thence leaving said roadway North 01 degrees 31
minutes 35 seconds West 82.10 feet to an iron stake set,
thence North,18 degrees 25 minutes 35 seconds West, 17.95
feet to an iron stake set, thence with a ditch, and the
Martin line, South 73 degrees 52 minutes 15 seconds West
545.18 feet to an existing iron stake, said existing iron
stake being a corner of the Martin tract and the James L.
Chauncey land, described in Deed Book 269, Page 410, Bladen
County Registry, and continuing with the Chauncey line, and
the ditch, South 75 degrees 44 minutes 50 seconds West 640.9
feet to an existing iron pipe, said existing iron pipe being
a corner of the Chauncey tract, and said existing iron pipe
being located in the line of Carlton Boswell, the Boswell
tract being described in Deed Book 312, Page 5, Bladen
County Registry, thence with the Boswell line, and the Billy
Creech line, the Creech property being described in Deed
Book 255, Page 307, Bladen County Registry, North 30 degrees
58 minutes to seconds West 781.41 feet to an existing axle,
thence with the Lula L. Taylor line, the Taylor property
being described in Deed Book 119, Page 545; Bladen County
Registry, Porth 30 degrees 50 minutes West 1,937 feet to an
existing axle, thence continuing with the Taylor line, and
with the ditch, South 20 degrees 3 minutes 50 seconds West
1,615.15 feet to an iron stake set, said iron stake set
being a corner of the Lula L. Taylor tract and the Mary R.
Greyard tract as described in Deed Book 187, Page 414,
Bladen County Registry, thence with the Greyard line South
28 degrees 2 minutes West 870.40 feet to an existing iron
stake, said existing iron stake being a corner of the
Greyard Tract, thence, continuing with the Greyard line,
North 3 degrees 8 minutes 15 seconds West 926.88 feet to an
Prepared by: Alan I. Maynard

existing iron stake, said existing iron stake being a corner
of the Greyard tract, being located in a ditch, thence
continuing with the Greyard line, and with the ditch North
62 degrees 57 minutes 5 seconds West 1,079.75 feet to an
existing iron stake, said existing iron stake being a corner
of the Greyard tract, and being in the line of Herman H.
Robinson, Jr., described in Deed Book 187, Page 414, Bladen
County Registry, thence with the Robinson line, and
continuing with the ditch, North 9 degrees 10 minutes 5
seconds West 1,023.6 feet to an existing iron stake, thence
North 21 degrees 11 minutes 5 seconds East 92.9 feet to an
iron stake set, said iron stake set being located the
following courses and distances from an existing concrete
monument, North 89 degrees 33 minutes 50 seconds East 89.37
feet, thence South 21 degrees 11 minutes 5 seconds West 15.4
feet to the iron stake set, thence from the iron stake set,
and with the Woodland Farms, Inc, line, as described in Deed
281, Page 164, Bladen County Registry, North 89 degrees 33
minutes 50 seconds East 226.91 feet to an existing concrete
monument, thence continuing with the Woodland Farms, Inc.
line, and with the ditch, North 34 degrees 9 minutes 40
seconds East 2,071 feet to a concrete monument, said
concrete monument being located in an electric power line
right-of-way, and being a corner of the Woodland Farms, Inc.
tract, thence continuing with the woodland Farms, Inc. line
South 64 degrees 48 minutes East 1,379.94 feet to an
existing iron pipe, thence with the Greene Transport Corp.
line, as described in Deed Book 284, Page 697, Bladen County
Registry, and with a ditch, South 31 degrees 56 minutes Fast
3,975.6 feet to an existing axle, thence South 75 degrees 44
minutes 25 seconds west 32.9 feet to an existing axle,
thence South 1 degree 31 minutes 35 seconds East 78 feet to
a nail, being the point and place of beginning, and being
216.58 acres, more or less, as shown on the plat by Clarence
Hall, Jr., Registered Surveyor, dated May 8, 1992, said map
being recorded in the records of the Bladen County Register
of Deeds and is incorporated herein by reference for a more
accurate description of the above-described property.
NOiI£: It is the intention of this deed that D.M. Campbell,
Jr. and Dallas M. Campbell, III, own the above-described
property as joint tenants, with right of survivorship.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises, with all the
appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in any wise appertaining, unto the
Grantees, as joint tenants, with right of survivorship, in fee simple
forever.
And the Grantor covenant that it is seized of said premises in fee
and have the right to convey the same in fee simple; that said premises
are free from encumbrances; and that it will warrant and defend the
title to the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN TESTIMONY WHEEMF, McQueen Farms, Inc., a corporation, has
caused this deed to be signed in its corporate name by its President and
attested by its Secretary, and sealed with its corporate seal, the day
and year first above written. /
MCQUEEN F ,
,�,�` BY:

State of North Carolina
Department of Envirom
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
NOV ` 6 2001
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Mr. Don Butler, Director
Government Relations & Public Affairs
Murphy -Brown LLC
Post Office Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
SUBJECT:
Dear Mr. Butler:
EL
NCDENR
NoRrm GROuNA DEaARrMeNr of
&MRONMENT AND NA3 URAL RESCURCE5
November 2, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Assessment of Civil Penalties for
Making an Outlet to Waters of the
State without a Permit and Violation
of the General Permit
Farm # 9-153
Bladen County
File No. DV 01-010
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Farm #29 and Farm #93 in
the amount of 514,423.88 which includes $923.88 in investigative costs. Attached is a copy of
the assessment document explaining this penalty. 4
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality. Any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement
action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form).
Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for
any continuing or new violation(s).
,Mailing address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Ralei!h. North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01 -01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Oppornunin•/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recYcled / 10% post -consumer paper
http://`h2o.enr.srate.nc.us

Please subrnit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
K'
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment
letter_ Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative
hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in
dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B -282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
1•
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must
request an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original petition
with the:

Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
AND
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Dan Oakley
NCDENR
Office of General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within Lhirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect
the penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations
which occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539 or
Mr. Jeff Poupart at [phone], ext. 527.
Sincerely,
O
Jeffrey . Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Paul Rawls, Fayetteville Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
inn Hasty, FRO w/ attachments
File # DV 01-010 w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/ attachments

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COINMSSION
COUNTY OF BLADEN
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL. PENALTIES AGAINST
PERMIT NO. NIA
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV OI -010
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $14,423.88 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated,
October 31, 2001 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the
civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated
matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of , 2001.
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BLADEN
IN THE MATTER OF
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA LLC
FOR MAKING AN OUTLET TO THE
WATERS OF THE STATE OF
NORTH CAROLINA
WITHOUT A PERMIT
AND VIOLATIONS OF THE
NON -DISCHARGE GENERAL PERMIT
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
File No. DV 01-010
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Jeffrey
O. Poupart, Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit of the Division
of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
I. Fr,IDINGS OF FACT:
A. Brown's of Carolina LLC is a limited liability company organized under the laws
of the State of Delaware.
B. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. merged with and into Brown's of Carolina LLC on May
1, 2001.
C. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. owns and operates Farm #29 and Farm #93, a swine
operation located along SR 1172 in Bladen County.
D. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. was reissued Certificate of Coverage AWS090153
under General Permit AWG 100000 for Farm #29 and Farm #93 on June 26, 1996,
effective June 26, 1996, with an expiration date of April 30, 2003. This permit
does not allow the discharge of waste to waters of the State.
E. On March 29, 2001, DWQ staff observed a discharge of wastewater at Farm #29
and Farm #93 from a sprayfield to an adjacent canal which is an unnamed
tributary of Brown Marsh Swamp, which are Class C Sw waters of the State
within the Lumber River Basin.
F. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. had no valid permit for the above-described activity_

G. Condition No. V_ 3. of the General Permit states in part that "The maximum waste
level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). At a minimum, maximum waste
level for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate
storage to contain the 25 -year, 24-hour storm event plus an additional one (1) foot
of structural freeboard."
H. The 25 -year, 24-hour storm event for the facility's location is between seven (7)
and eight (8) inches according to National Weather Service, Technical Paper 40,
Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States, 1961.
I. Based on a 25 -year, 24-hour storm event of seven (7) inches and one foot of
required structural freeboard, the waste level in the lagoon for Farm #29 shall not
exceed nineteen (19) inches.
J. On March 29, 2001, DWQ staff observed that the waste level of the lagoon for
Farm #29 was thirteen (13) inches, which exceeded the level specified in the
CAWMP.
K. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $923.88.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
H. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A
pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. An unnamed tributary to Brown Marsh Swamp constitutes waters of the State
within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.1 pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
C. The above-cited discharge constituted making an outlet to waters of the State for
purposes of G.S. 143-215.I(a)(1), for which a permit is required by G.S. 143-
215.1.
D. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than
twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a
person who is required but fails to apply for or to secure a permit required by G.S.
143-215.1.
E. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
F_ The above-cited failure to maintain the liquid level in the lagoon at the level
specified in the CAWNIP violated Condition No. V. 3. of the General Permit.

G. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. may be assessed civil penalties pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2) which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five
thousand dollars (525,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who
violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of
a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1.
H. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Brown's of
Carolina, Inc. pursuant to G.S_ 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B -282.1(b)(8).
I. The Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit,
Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality, has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Brown's of Carolina LLC is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ I2.000.00 for making an outlet to the waters of the State without a
permit as required by G.S. 143-215.1.
$ 1,500.00 for violating Condition No. V. 3. of the General Permit by
failing to maintain the liquid level in the lagoon at the level
specified in the CAWMP
$ 923.88
$ 14.423.88
Enforcement costs
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G -S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G.S.14313-282.I(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on around or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;

(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
31 Oc' Ol
(Date)re . Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement
Division of Water Quality

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Mr. Kraig Westerbeek
Director of Environmental Compliance
Murphy -Brown LLC
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Dear Mr. Westerbeek:
O"r
0 •
NCDENR
NORTH CARouNA DEPARTMENT of
ENvIRoN { ENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
December I8, 2001
2 0 200
I
RE: Remission Request
Brown's #29 & 93
Farm # 9-153
Bladen County
File # DV 01-010
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your request for remission of the civil penalty levied
against the subject facility. This request will be reviewed at the next scheduled conference in
January 2002, and you will be notified about the Division's decision concerning remission. If
you have any questions, please call me at [phone], ext. 539.
Sincerely,
Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement
cc: Paul Rawls, Fayetteville Regional Supervisor w/attachment
7+ahasty;RO w/attachment
Cn Hentral Files
File # D V 0 1 -0 10 w/ 3 attachments
1llailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Oppornueit}•/Afjirrnatire Action Employer
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
http_ //h2o. enr, state. ne. its
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh. NC 27699-1617

Murphy -Brown LLc
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Mr. Lewis,
PO Drawer 856
2822 Hwy. 24 West
Warsaw, NC 28398
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
0fe a roc;
1°n-Dis�ha ge C mnli. CION
nce a.
The following letter is intended to serve as a written request for remission or mitigation of the
penalties assessed for permit violations as outlined in File No. DV 01-010. While we agree with the
Findings of Fact as presented in tate case, we feel that extenuating circumstances surrounding these findings
indicate that this violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident, and that our personnel took prompt
and appropriate action to prevent continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation -
On March 29, 2001, DWQ staff visited this farm during a substantial rain event. To our
knowledge, no one on the farm was contacted prior to the visit, and no one was present during the
inspection of the spray fields in question. It has been indicated to us that samples were taken of runoff
from the spray field into an adjacent ditch, however, we can not verify the location of these sample points,
nor were we present to replicate the sampling, as is our normal protocol. Brown's of Carolina staff were
made aware of the visit only after the inspectors were leaving the facility_ Upon knowledge of the findings
of the inspectors, a team was dispatched to asses the situation and work to contain any effluent that may
have readied the ditch. As stated earlier, DWQ staff visited the farm during a rain event. Irrigation was
not occurring at the time of the inspection, but had occurred 24 hours before the rain event began. During
this irrigation event, less than the recommended application rate was applied due to wetter than normal soil _
conditions. Despite this, the rain event of March 29, 2001 caused over saturated soil conditions, flushing
water from the field and into the adjacent ditch. The events as described demonstrate that if there was any
escape of wastewater, it was inadvertent, or accidental. In addition, the ditch in question was blocked upon
first knowledge of the event, minimizing any environmental impact.
During the same inspection, it was noted by DWQ staff that the freeboard level of Farm #29 was
13". This should have been of no surprise to the inspectors, since Brown's of Carolina had submitted a
Plan of Action form for this lagoon on March 2, 2001. In addition to this PoA, our records indicate that
Brown's personnel were in constant contact with the DWQ's Fayetteville Regional office with regards to
the status of freeboard levels on this farm. While this contact does not relieve Brown's of Carolina from its
freeboard obligations, it does indicate that there was a concerted effort to work with DWQ on the issue.
We would like for you to also take into consideration that substantial improvements have been
made to this farms waste management system since March of this year. Additional land has been acquired
for spray irrigation. Spray fields have been re -graded, and ditches have been cleaned out to improve
drainage. Freeboard records indicate that levels have steadily improved daring the Summer and Fall_
Recent inspections from DWQ and SWCC have documented these improvements. Brown's of Carolina

has also implemented an 15014001 certified Environmental Management System on this and all other
company awned farms.
Finally, we rem that the Notice of Violation issued be re -issued to the Farm #29 site only.
There is eurrerdy a permit application pending to separate the; #29&93 facility into two separate facilities.
This request has been made to facilitate the installation of an innovative waste management technology to
be tested on farm #93. Since the alleged violations occurred on the farm #29 site, we fed that any
enforcement should be specific to this site
We once again ask that you redder the amort of the penalty imposed agaiasi this facility. If
throe are any fiuthe7 question or concerns, please feel frac to contact me at [phone].
of Environmental Compliance
Brown. LLC
Cc: Dave Nordin, Don Butler
12/4/01

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BLADEN _
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COIN IISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMEVISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. NIA ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV 01-010
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling S14,423.88 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated,
October 31. 2001 — , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the
civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated
matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the - — 30-` `` day of N oy �+�� _, 2001.
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

3�
State of North Carolina { _----
Department of Environment ` 0
and Natural Resources 2,D2 �►
Division of Water Quality ~A EL�
Michael F. Easley, Governor •-' : _ D
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
---N N
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director NORTH cARouNA DEPARTMENT of
ENVIRONMENT AND NAruRAL RESOURCES
Mr. Kraig Westerbeek
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Post Office Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Dear Mr. Westerbeek:
March 7, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RE: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Brown's of Carolina Farm #29 and #93
Farm # 9-153
Bladen County
File No. DV 01-010
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(f), I considered the
information you submitted in support of your request for remission and did not find grounds to
modify the civil penalty assessment of $14,423.88.
There are two options available to you. You may pay the civil penalty assessment or you may
present your request for remission to the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission. If you choose to pay the penalty, please make your check
navable to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number.
Send payment within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Afailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opporaunin• /Affirmative Action Employer
50% recYcled / 10% post -consumer paper
http.-Ah2o. enr. state. nc- its
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St -
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission. You
or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation. A
representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions will render a final and binding decision in accordance with
NCGS 143B -282.1(c).
If you choose to present your request to the committee, please notify me at the address above
within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Your request will be scheduled on the agenda of the next
scheduled committee meeting and you will be notified of the date and time. If a response is not
received by the Division regarding this notice, your request will be automatically scheduled on the
agenda for an upcoming committee meeting.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you would like a receipt that your check was
received, please send it via certified mail. Please contact Steve Lewis at [phone], ext_ 539
if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
�tI
•TT/ a • - i
cc: Paul Rawls, Fayetteville Regional Supervisor
10Harty;'FRO
File # DV 01-010
Central Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environme MM
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality � ~#—
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory I Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Mr. Kraig Westerbeek
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Post Office Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Dear Mr. Westerbeek:
22002 • •
-NCDENR
Noffrr CARouNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND r` AuuRAL RESOURCES
March 7, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RE: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Brown's of Carolina Farm #29 and #93
Farm # 9-153
Bladen County
File No. DV 01-010
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(f), I considered the
information you submitted in support of your request for remission and did not find grounds to
modify the civil penalty assessment of 514,423.88.
There are two options available to you. You may pay the civil penalty assessment or you may
present your request for remission to the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission. If you choose to pay the penalty, please make your check
pavable to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number.
Send payment within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opporrunin-/Affrrmarive Action Employer
50% recycled / 10 17c post -consumer paper
http: //h2o. enr. slate. nc. us
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Ralei-h, NC 27699-1617

You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission. You
or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation. A
representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions will render a final and binding decision in accordance with
NCGS 143B -282.1(c).
If you choose to present your request to the committee, please notify me at the address above
within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Your request will be scheduled on the agenda of the next
scheduled committee meeting and you will be notified of the date and time. If a response is not
received by the Division regarding this notice, your request will be automatically scheduled on the
agenda for an upcoming committee meeting.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you would like a receipt that your check was
received, please send it via certified mail. Please contact Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539
if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
nG
cc: Ll apt Rawls-,% Fayetteville Regional Supervisor
John Hasty, FRO
File # DV 01-010
Central Files

MurphymBrown L
May 5, 2003
Paul Rawls
Division of Water Quality
Fayetteville Regional Supervisor
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5094
Re: NOVs for Inadequate Freeboard & Request for Information
Mr. Rawls,
Attached are packets of the requested information per farm. We request a time at your
convenience to review the information and answer any questions you may have.
A summary of actions taken include emergency water conservation measures such as
ceasing of soaking, washing, cooling etc., no gilt deliveries to sow farms when lagoon
level dropped below 19 inches, daily monitoring of lagoon levels, weekly monitoring of
water use, and installation of water conservation devices on all sites within the last two
years. Specifically, on BOC3730, an irrigation system addition is underway this week
and piping installations to expand or improve capability are planned this summer for
Owens Branch, Stafford and BOC341'7. At Lisbon 1&2, some applications were made
with an aerator/drag hose system that incorporated the water to reduce risk of ponding.
Please consider the following facts: Last June we requested from DWQ a variance to
draw down lagoon levels past stop pump, but only received a letter from NCDA in
October which was too late. While any one rain event may not have exceeded the 25-
year/24-hour storm, the frequency of one to six inches of rain every week since
Thanksgiving 2002 kept spray fields too wet to safely irrigate over. We believe this
weather pattern is more severe than the 25 -year event because it continued even after our
lagoon storage was utilized. We stored water as per lagoon design rather than risk runoff
and water quality impairment this past winter/spring. Also, we did not hesitate to contact
your staff as soon as a freeboard level exceeded the maximum and we continue to do our
part to maintain a productive relationship based on our mutual goal of protecting our
environment.
If there is anything that you require in addition to what I have attached please contact me
right away at 910-289-6439, ext.4589. Please call me when you are ready to review the
information. I request that these NOVs be rescinded upon review of the submitted
information. Thank you.
Sincerely,

Jo i
Director of Land and Nutrient Management
Murphy -Brown, LLC Rose Hill Division
Enc.
CC: DWQ Central Files
Jeff Turner
Kraig Westerbeek

MR 2 r poop +
State of North Carolina __
Department of Environment
and
t
and Natural Resources r. r .,._f
Division of Water Quality AN
Michael F. Easley, Governor NCDENR
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director �T" CAROUNA DEPARTMEMT Or
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL, RE5 YJRCE5
March 15, 2002
Mr. Kraig Westerbeek CERTIFIED MAIL
Murphy -Brown LLC RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(f)
Brown's #29 and #93
Bladen County
Case Number DV 01-010
Dear Mr. Westerbeek:
e..
Your request for remission has been placed on the agenda for the April 11, 2002 meeting bf the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. The
Committee will convene immediately following the close of the regularly scheduled business
meeting of the Environmental Management Commission in the Ground Floor Conference Room of
the Archdale Building, 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed directions). You
should arrive no later than 11:00 a.m.
The factors to be considered by the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions are whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B -282.1(b) were
wrongly applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation:
(c) the violation was inadvertent or the result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
:Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #5 2-0 1 -01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opporrunity l Aff rmurn•e Action Employer
50% recYcled / 10% post -consumer paper
h rrp://h2o_ enr. stale. nc. us

You or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation.
A representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may remit none of the penalty, a part of the penalty, or the
entire penalty. The entire amount of the penalty can only be remitted when the violator has not been
assessed civil penalties for previous violations, and when payment of the civil penalty will prevent
payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions.
You also have the option of paying the civil penalty of $14,423.88 if you decide not to request
remission. If you choose to pay the penalty, please call Steve Lewis at [phone], extension
539, so that we can remove the case from the schedule. Please make your check payable to the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number. Send payment
within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you are unable to attend on this date, Please notify us at least 10 working days in
advance and your bearing will be rescheduled. Exceptions to the 10 -day notice will be made in
the event of emergency situations. if you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free
to contact me at [phone], extension 539.
Sincerely,
Steven C. Lewis
cc: Paul Rawls, Fayetteville Regional Office
File DV O1-010

AGENDA ITEM: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Mu by-Brown LLC
Brown's of Carolina Farm #29 and #93
DV 01-010
Bladen Count
EXPLANATION: On October 31, 2001, Jeffrey O. Poupart,
Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and
Enforcement Unit of the Division of Water Quality,
assessed a civil penalty of $14,423.88 ($13,500.00
civil penalty and $923.88 investigative costs)
against Murphy -Brown _LLC for violation of G.S.
143-215.1.
On December 10, 2001, Murphy -Brown, LLC
requested remission and waived their right to an
administrative hearing and stipulated that the facts
were as alleged in the assessment document.
RECOVIIVIENDATION: The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in support of Murphy -Brown,
LLC' s request for remission of civil
penalties in accordance with G.S_ 143-
215.6A(f) and his delegation provided by the
secretary and did not find grounds to modify
the assessment.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
INTIchael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J- Thorpe, Ph -D., Acting Director
Mr. Don Butler, Director
Government Relations & Public Affairs
Murphy -Brown LLC
Post Office Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Dear Mr. Butler:
AIN2 A
;kf��X�
--0004
NCDENR
NORTH GRouw► DEPARTmumT or
Em"RONMEMr AHD NAruRAL RESOURCES
November 2, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL,
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
SUB.iECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for
Making an Outlet to Waters of the
State without a Permit and Violation
of the General Permit
Farre # 9-153
Bladen County
File No. DV 01-010
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Farm #29 and Farm #93 in
the amount of S 14.423.88 which includes S923.88 in investigative costs. Attached is a copy of
the assessment document explaining this penalty.
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality. Any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement
action, including an additional penalty_
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
I _ Submit payment of the penalty:
Payrnent should be made directly to the order of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form).
Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for
any continuing or new violation(s).
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Sen -ice Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleizh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Cotuier;#52-01-01 Raleish, INC 27699-16I7
.4n Equal Opporniniry lAffirmatire Acrion Employer
504c ren sled /10% post -consumer paper
hr:p_//h2o.enr.sra1e.nc_us

Please submit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDEti`R
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request_
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment
letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative
hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in
dispute_ You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143)B-282.I(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation:
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident.
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
ivlr_ Steve Lewis
NCDE,N-R
DNVQ
1617 -Mail Service Center
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617
!'
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment. you must
request an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written
petition to the Office of :administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original petition
with the:

Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
AND
Mail or nand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Dan Oakley
NCDENR
Office of General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect
the penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations
which occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact -,Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539 or
Nit. Jeff Poupart at [phone], ext. 527.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey O. Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement unit
ATTACIL1vfENTS
cc: Paul Rawls, FayetteviIIe Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
John Hasty, FRO w/ attachments
mile # DVO1-010 w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/ attachments

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
CO,vLtiIISSION
COUNTY OF BLADEN
LSI THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. N/A ) STTPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV 01-010
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $1-4423-88 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated,
October 31, 2001 _, the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the
civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated
matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of , 2001.
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
TELEPHOINE

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BLADEN
IN THE MATTER OF )
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA LLC )
FOR MAKING AN OUTLET TO THE )
WATERS OF THE STATE OF )
NORTH CAROLINA )
WITHOUT A PERMIT )
AND VIOLATIONS OF THE )
NON -DISCHARGE GENERAL PERMIT )
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
File No. DV 01-010
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Jeffrey
O. Poupart. Supervisor of the lion -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit of the Division
of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
I. FLti`DLNGS OF FACT:
A. Brown's of Carolina LLC is a limited liability company organized under the laws
of the State of Delaware_
B. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. merged with and into Brown's of Carolina LLC on \+lay
1, ?001.
C_ Brow-n's of Carolina. Inc. owns and operates Farm #29 and Farm #93, a swine
operation located along SR 1172 in Bladen County.
D. Brow's of Carolina- Inc. was reissued Certificate of Coverage AWS0901S3
under General Permit AWG 100000 for Farm #29 and Farm #93 on June 26, 1996,
effective June 26, 1996, with an expiration date of April 30, 2003. This permit
does not allow the discharge of waste to waters of the State.
E. On March 29, 2001.'DWQ staff observed a discharge of wastewater at Farm #29
and Farm #93 from a sprayfield to an adjacent canal which is an unnamed
tributary of Brown Marsh Swamp, which are Class C Sw waters of the State
within the Lumber River Basin_
F_ Brow-n's of Carolina. Inc. had no valid permit for the above-described activity.

G. Condition No. V. 3. of the General Permit states in part that `"The maximum waste
level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). At a minimum, maximum waste
level for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate
storage to contain the 25 -year, 24-hour storm event plus an additional one (1) foot
of structural freeboard."
H. The 25 -year, 24-hour storm event for the facility's location is between seven (7)
and eight (8) inches according to National Weather Service, Technical Paper 40,
Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States, 1961.
I. Based on a 25 -year, 24-hour storm event of seven (7) inches and one foot of
required structural freeboard, the waste level in the lagoon for Farm #29 shall not
exceed nineteen (19) inches.
J. On March 29, 2001, DWQ staff observed that the waste level of the lagoon for
Farm #29 was thirteen (13) inches, which exceeded the level specified in the
CAWMP.
K The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $923.88.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
H_ CONCLliSIONS OF LAW:
A. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A
pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. An unnamed tributary to Brown Marsh Swamp constitutes waters of the State
within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.1 pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
C. The above-cited dischar-e constituted making an outlet to waters of the State for
purposes of G -S. 143-215.1(a)(1), for which a permit is required by G.S. 143-
215.1.
D. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than
twenty-five thousand dollars (525,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a
person who is required but fails to apply for or to secure a permit required by G.S.
143-215.1.
E. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215.1-
F. The above-cited failure to maintain the liquid level in the lagoon at the level
specified in the CAWMP violated Condition No. V. 3. of the General Permit.

G. Brown's of Carolina, Inc. may be assessed civil penalties pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2) which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five
thousand dollars (525,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who
violates or fails to act in accordance with the terns, conditions, or requirements of
a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1.
H. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Brown's of
Carolina, Inc. pursuant to G.S_ 143-2153(a)(9) and G.S_ 143B-282. I (b)(8).
L The Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit,
Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of water Quality, has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following.
III_ DECISION:
Accordingly, Brown's of Carolina LLC is hereby assessed a civil penalty of_
5 I2.000.00 for making an outlet to the waters of the State without a
permit as required by G.S. 143-215.L
S 1.500.00 for violating Condition No. V. 3. of the General Permit by
failing to maintain the liquid level in the lagoon at the level
specified in the CAV IIP
S 923.88
S 14.423.88
Enforcement costs
TOTAL :-V`SOL`NT DUE
As required by G -S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G.S.143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;

(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures-
/ Ocr
rocedures_10cr Dl
(Date) e . Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement
Division of water Quality

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that wA can'retom the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Po B �rsl
k..a 7f1 L,
A.
Clearly). Date of Delivery
nB
pf d J> ::)y
C. S' airs V
X ❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
D_ Is different from item 17 ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
Q� p PO Certified Mail 13 Express Mail
O O ❑ Registered Qf-Retum Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2_ Article Number (Copy from service label]
to 'i (S US)
PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Retum Receipt 402595-00-M-0952
US: Poshal Seiiric�e "
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT
(Domestic i�V1ail.Qri►y; No tnsroanre Coverage Provided)
L't -
Total Postage 3 Fees S
O
{ Rec'.0,0, " Name ;] -- ^• -- - -
`
-17.1
-----------------------------------

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Mr. Kraig Westerbeek
Director of Environmental Compliance
Murphy -Brown LLC
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Dear Mr. Westerbeek:
• 14•
V
NCDENR
R
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE_ ouRces
December 18, 2001
RE: Remission Request
Brown's 429 & 93
Farm # 9-153
Bladen County
File # DV 01-010
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your request for remission of the civil penalty levied
against the subject facility. This request will be reviewed at the next scheduled conference in
January 2002, and you w-ilI be notified about the Division's decision concerning remission. if
you have any questions, please call me at [phone], ext. 539.
Sincerely,
Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement
cc: Paul Rawls, Fayetteville Regional Supervisor w/attachment
John Hasty, FRO w/attachment
Central Files
File # DV 01-0I0 w/ 3 attachments
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1617 Mail Senice Center Fax [phone]
Raleizh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier $52-01-01
,Air Equal Oppornrniry /.Affirmative Acrion Employer
50% recycled / 10�'c posr-consumer paper
hrrp_ //1:2o_ enr. srate_nc. us
Location:
512 N_ Salisbury St_
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Mr. Kraig Westerbeek
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Post Office Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Dear tiIr- Westerbeek:
1 •
�...+-.OWNPF W
NCDENRF
FN"ROMMErrr AND NMLn Q- F2ESOURCES
Marc h 7, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT -REQUESTED
RE: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Brown's of Carolina Farm #29 and #93
Farm # 9-153
Bladen County
File No. DV 01-010
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(f), I considered the
information you submitted in support of your request for remission and did not find grounds to
modify the civil penalty assessment of S14,423.88.
There are two options available to you. You may pay the civil penalty assessment or you may
present your request for remission to the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission. If you choose to pay the penalty, please make your check
avable to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number.
Send payment within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-I617
,hailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #321-01-01
An Equal Opporrunin-/.-1jfirnuniveAcrion Employer
50% rec vcled /10% post -consumer paper
htrp_ //Ir2o. en r. sta re_ n c_ as
Location:
512 ti_ Salisbury St.
Raleigh. NC 27699-1617

You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission. You
or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation. A
representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions will render a final and binding decision in accordance with
NCGS 143B -282.1(c).
If you choose to present your request to the committee, please notify me at the address above
within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Your request will be scheduled on the agenda of the next
scheduled conuTgnee meeting and you will be notified of the date and time. If a response is not
received by the Division regarding this notice, your request will- be automatically scheduled on the
agenda for an upcoming committee meeting.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you would like a receipt that your check was
received, please send it via certified mail. Please contact Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539
if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
cc: Paul Rawls, Fayetteville Regional Supervisor
John Hasty, FRO
Tile # DV 01-010
Central Files

- O/d
Postmark
Here
Z3 Total Postage d Fees ,
R S Mame lPfe 1 tta ccmplemd by mater)
1
S• StreaI. No r Pp Box No.Q lirector
w-------------------------------------------------
.. wre
a, a
F16 F(ym 3800. Febrimry r.,
Mr. Kraig Westerbeek
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Post Office Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
I
Dear llr. Westerbeek:
A 4
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND N/TURAI Re5ouRCEs
March 7, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Brown's of Carolina Faun #29 and #93
Farm u 9-153
Bladen County
File No. DV 01-010
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(f), I considered the
information you submitted in support of your request for remission and did not find grounds to
modify the civil penalty assessment of S 14,423.88.
There are two options available to you. You may pay the civil penalty assessment or you may
present your request for remission to the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission. If you choose to pay the penalty, please make vour check
payable to the Det3artment of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number.
Send payment within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
:flailing Address: Telephone [phone]
16I7 flail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An EquaI Opportunity l Affirniati:'e Action Employer
50�c recycled / 1017c post -consumer paper
htrp://112o. enr.stare.nc.us
Location:
513 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh. `C 27699-1617
L�l
Portage
—
Certr9ec Fee
7
Retum Receipt Fee
�n
(Encorsamem Required)
Resux,Retl Delivery Fee
(Fsroorsement Required)
- O/d
Postmark
Here
Z3 Total Postage d Fees ,
R S Mame lPfe 1 tta ccmplemd by mater)
1
S• StreaI. No r Pp Box No.Q lirector
w-------------------------------------------------
.. wre
a, a
F16 F(ym 3800. Febrimry r.,
Mr. Kraig Westerbeek
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Post Office Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
I
Dear llr. Westerbeek:
A 4
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND N/TURAI Re5ouRCEs
March 7, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Brown's of Carolina Faun #29 and #93
Farm u 9-153
Bladen County
File No. DV 01-010
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(f), I considered the
information you submitted in support of your request for remission and did not find grounds to
modify the civil penalty assessment of S 14,423.88.
There are two options available to you. You may pay the civil penalty assessment or you may
present your request for remission to the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission. If you choose to pay the penalty, please make vour check
payable to the Det3artment of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number.
Send payment within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
:flailing Address: Telephone [phone]
16I7 flail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An EquaI Opportunity l Affirniati:'e Action Employer
50�c recycled / 1017c post -consumer paper
htrp://112o. enr.stare.nc.us
Location:
513 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh. `C 27699-1617

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Mr. Kraig Westerbeek
Murphy -Brown LLC
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
SUBJECT
Dear Mr. Westerbeek:
March 15, 2002
1 • •
NCDENR
NORTH G1tiOUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(f)
Brown's #129 and #93
Bladen County
Case Number DV 01-010
Your request for remission has been placed on the agenda for the April 11, 2002 meeting of the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. The
Committee will convene immediately following the close of the regularly scheduled business
meeting of the Environmental Management Commission in the Ground Floor Conference Room of
the Archdale Building, 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed directions). You
should arrive no later than 11:00 a.m.
The factors to be considered by the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions are whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B -282.1(b) were
wrongly applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or the result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01 -01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / ]0�7c post -consumer paper
http_//h2o.enr.state_nc_its

You or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation.
A representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may remit none of the penalty, a part of the penalty, or the
entire penalty. The entire amount of the penalty can only be remitted when the violator has not been
assessed civil penalties for previous violations, and when payment of the civil penalty will prevent
payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions_
You also have the option of paying the civil penalty of $14,423.88 if you decide not to request
remission. If you choose to pay the penalty, please call Steve Lewis at [phone], extension
539, so that we can remove the case from the schedule. Please make your check payable to the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number. Send payment
within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you are unable to attend on this date, please notify us at least 10 working days in
advance and your hearing will be rescheduled. Exceptions to the 10 -day notice will be made in
the event of emergency situations. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free
to contact me at [phone], extension 539.
Sincerely,
._ =.�t/� ,tri►-�i
Steven C. Lewis
cc: Paul Rawls, Fayetteville Regional Office
File DV 01-010

North Carolina
Department of Environrnent and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Fayetteville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
=
11-4 Do Vi Wo UAN DOI W.3R6. 1_�
Mr. David Nordin
Brown's of Carolina
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
P. O. Box 497
Warsaw, NC 28398
April 18, 2001
Subject: Notice of VjolatiQnff-QIkr, of Intent
Brown's of Carolina Farm # 29
Facility No. 09-153 Permit No. AWS 090153
Bladcn County
Dear INr_ Nordine:
Adlifla
NCDENR
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non discharge permit for the subject animal
waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217, you have been found to be in violation of your 2H
.02I7 Permit-
On
ermit
On March 29, 2001. staff from the Fayette,,Ue Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
performed a lagoon level follow up visit of the Brown's of Carolina #29 Faun in Bladen County. During the
Visit, .rater was noticed ponded in the edge of the spray field next to a ditch at the front of the farm. There
was also «hat appeared to be waste water mixed with rain water ponded throughout the field. Upon further
investigation it was apparent that there was wastewater in the spray field and it was and had migrated to the
water nest to the ditch. There was a flow of this mixture entering the ditch at a floc of about ten gallons per
minute. Samples were collected to see if there was in fact waste Mixed with water that was getting into the
ditch- The samples showed elevated fecal coliform in the source, the ditch and the downstream samples.
It appeared that the fields were too wet to have been irrigated on, thus the hydraulic overload which
allowed the waste to pond and eventually flow- toward and into the ditch. The lagoon level at this site was and
had been dangerously high, thus the reason for the visit. The level of the lagoon on that day was
approximately thirteen to fourteen inches.
The Dis-ision of Water Quality requests that the following item(s) be addressed:
1. Irrigation should not be performed on saturated fields.
2. Immediately Iower the level in the lagoon to the required freeboard_
2_5 GLEN ST.%tEET - SliiTE 7l1 ! S1'STE:
PHONE [phone]
AN EQUAl- OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION E.NIPLOYER - 500'. R CYCLED/10% POST CONSUMER ?AFER
DEAR TOt_L F.RE-E HOTLINE: I-5%7$23-6743

Mr. Nordin
4-18-2001
Page 2
3. Please provide irrigation records for the farm for the past twelve months including PAN balances -
4. Please provide rainfall records for the past twelve months if available.
S. Please provide this officewith a copy of the freeboard records for this faraL
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing its General Permit and being
required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality- from taking
enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violation_ Furthermore, the Division of Water
Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than 525,040.00 per day per violation.
You are hereby notified that the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality is
considering sending recommendation for enforcement to the Director of the Division of Water Quality. The
recommendation concerns the hydraulic overload of the field in question which allowed waste to be
discharged to waters of the State.
Lf you have an explanation for this violation that you Nish to present, please respond to this office by
May 2. 2001. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action is still deemed appropriate,
your explanation -%,,M be forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his consideration.
if you have any questions concerning this matterr please do not hesitate to contact either myself or Mr.
John Haste, Environmental Specialist, at [phone].
PR1jch
cc: Sonya Avant- Cornp Li ance Group
Sam Warren -Bladen Co. FRCS
Trent Allen-DSWC FavetteAille Office
Central Files-Raleish
S incer-CN,
f
Paul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supen-isor

Type of Visit ® Compliance inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O FoRaw up O Emergency !Notification O Outer © Denied Access
Facility Number 09 153 Date of vie= X29-2001 T i5:00
S -• - 10 Not rational O Below Threshold
Permitted IM Certified 13 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Iast Operated or Above Threshold: __ _
Farm Name: County Bladea__------_---_. FRO ---
Owner Name: R -.IMC. .. Pbone P7o: 4111-22618i1(t -
Mailing Address:
FacffftyContact:_—._—_.�..__—..__..____.�....Tltk: _____._..».___PhoueNo:------___------
Onsite Representative: __ Integrator:Bm='q of rarnfin a, hr.
Certified Operator. RQiKrt w Operator Certification Number. 25ir?lA
Location of Farm:
$R # 1172 and Hwv 131 near Bladenboro
M Swine [3 Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude E ` f w�" Longitude �� • � 0
;... - Design - Current Design
.bWme 'Capacity Pe uiation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 16000
® Farrow to Wean 4000
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
Capacii
.
Current :-::: .: __ - eatgp
opulation"€s€:€C �-Ca�scrty 'Popttlatmu :==
Number et Lagm)rM 3 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Area 5pra� Field Arra
Holding Ponds ! Solid Traps
❑ No LjqtLid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operargon?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b, if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (Lt yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d_ Doxy discharge bypass a lagoon system' (If ves, notifti DWQ)
?- Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation"
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
CR No
® Yes
❑ NO
10 gal
Per mmtrte
❑Yes
NNO
❑ yes
$i No
❑ Yes
❑ No

ULUI/UI
Fncffl y Number. 09-153
Waste CoBectlon & Treatment
Date of Inspection 3`29-ZOEII
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 0 Spillway ❑ Yes © No
Structure l Structue 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier
Freeboard (inches):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe evsiion, ❑ Yes M No
seepage. ctc-)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste mmagement or
closure plan? (if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, sad the situation poses an © Yes ❑ No
immediate public he*ltb or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need r* rAintenmwerinprovemerri? ❑ Yes ONO
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste sttvwtureses require m c6mprcrvement? Yea 0 No
9- Do any stucurres lack adequate. gauged markers with required maaamum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? 0 Yes 0 No
Waste Aaolicatbm
10. Are there any buffers that need mprint nancerunprovement? 0 Yes 0 No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ® Excessive Ponding 0 PAN H Hydraulic Overload 0 Yes 0 No
12- Crop type
I3- Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Platt (CAVA, P)? 0 Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 Yes 0 No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acredetermination? 0 Yes 0 No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 0 Yes ❑ No
15- Does the receiving crop need improvement? © Yes Cs No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? 0 Yes ❑ No
17. Are rock outcrops present? 0 Yes C No
18. Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? Q Unknown 0 Yes 0 No
❑ On-site fl Off-site
Required Records & Documents
19- Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
20. Does, the facility fail to have all components of the Cc: tified Animal Waste Management Pian readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checkl6sts, design, maps, etc.)
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
22. Is facility not in compliancewith any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'
24. Fait to notify regional DW Q of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, fix-eboard problems, over application)
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
26. Dozy facility require a follow-up visit by same agency"
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AW -MP?
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attar below
liquid level of lagcxxi or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours.)
[:]Yes L—j No
❑ Yes ❑ No
0 Yes ❑ No
0 Yes 0 No
0 Yes ❑ No
0 Yes 0 No
Cj Yes [] No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes 0 NO
© Yes 0 No
[] Yes 0 No

01/01/01
I Facility Number: o9—im- Date of Inspection 3-29-21101
30. Is there any eviden= of wind drift during hind application? (i.c residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, andfor public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the Lagoon?
32- Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (Le. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shtnzess, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover"
34- Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe ora permznenVtcmporaxy cover?
Conauted
Printed on: 4118r2001
0 Yes
ONO
0 Yes
ONo
0 Yes
0 No
Dyes
El No
0 Yes
0 No
10 No viobdions or deficiencies were Do" during this vbIL You wM receive no fkrther correspondemwe about this visit.
0 Field Copy El Final Notes
I - Paul and myself were at this site to follow-up on the level of the lagoon- We observed what appeared to be waste standing at the edge of
te field next to where a reel had been sat up- Upon ffirther investigation, the water in the field appeared to be wastewater mixed with ran
ater. This water in the field was traveling into a pooled area next to a ditch behind the irrigation reel- It was felt by both of us that this area
so contained waste and it was flowing into the ditch- Samples were collected and showed elevated fecal coliform numbers in the source, at
c discharge point and downstream_Thefield conditions were such that irrigation should not have occured until they had more time to dry
3L There had been recent rams in the arca_
ReviewerfinspectorNsume
z: . . ..... ............. .........
ReAewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Murphy -Brown LLc
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Mr. Lewis,
PO Drzwer 856
2822 Hay. 24 West
W'a:saw, NC 28398
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
on_rrilsc�a ge car mAI, nCTlOPJ
&f
The following Ietter is intended to serve as a written request for remission or mitigation of the
penalties assessed for permit violations as outlined in File No. DV 01-010. While we agree with the
Findings of Fact as presented in the case, we feel that extenuating circumstances surrounding these findings
indicate that this violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident, and that our personnel took prompt
and appropriate action to prevent continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation_
On ?'vIarch 29, 2001, DWQ staff visited ibis flirm during a substantial rain event_ To our
knowledge, no one on the farm was con=( --ed prior to the visit, and no ane was present during the
inspection of the spray fields in question. It has been indicated to us that samples were taken of runoff
from the spray field into an adjacent ditch, however, we can not verify the location of these sample points,
nor were we present to replicate the sampling, as is our normal protocol. Brown's of Carolina staff were
made aware of the visit only after the inspectors were leaving the facility. upon knowledge of the findings
of the inspectors, a team was dispatched to asses the situation and work to contain any effluent that tnav
have reached the ditch. As stated earlier, DWQ staff visited the farm during a rain event. Irrigation was
not occurring at the time of the inspection, but had occurred 24 hours before the rain event began. During
this irrigation event, less than the recommended application rate was applied due to wetter than normal soil _
conditims. Despite this, the rain event of March 29, 200I caused over saturated soil conditions, flushing
water from the field and into the adjacent ditch. The events as described demonstrate that if there was any
escape of wastewater. it was inadvertent, or accidental_ In addition, the ditch in question was blocked upon
first knowledge of the event, minimizing any environmental impact-
During
mpact
During the same inspection, it was noted by DWQ staff that the freeboard level of Farm #29 was
I3". This should have beech of no surprise to the inspectors, since Brown's of Carolina had submitted a
Plan of Action form for this lagoon on March ? 2001. In additicar to this PoA, our records indicate that
Brown's personnel were in constant contact with the DWQ's Fayetteville Regional office with regards to
the status of freeboard levels on this farm. VobJe this contact does not relieve Brown's of Carolina from its
freeboard obligations, it does indicate that there was a concerted effort to work with DWQ an the Ls -we -
We would Bice for you to also take into consideration dsat substantial improvements have been
made to this farms waste management system since March of this year. Additional land has been acquired
for spray irrigation. Spray fields have been re -graded, and ditches have been cloned out to improve
drainage. Freeboard records indicate that levels have steadily improved during the Sommer and Fall.
Recent it s ecticns from DWQ and SWCC have documented these improvements. Brown's of Carolina

has also implememed an ISO 14001 certified Environmental Mamgemca System on this and all other
company owned farms.
Finally, we request that the Notice of Violation issued be re-issaw to she Farm 029 site only_
There is qtly a; it application peudmg to separate the #29&93 facility into two separate fadities
This request has beta made to facilitate the histallatim of an maavative waste aranagemcut technology to
be tested on farm #93. Since the allgpd violations occurred on the farm #29 site, we feel that aay
enforcement should be specific to this site.
We once again ask that you ruder the amount of the penalty imposed against this facility. If
there are any further question or concerns, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
of Environmental Compliance
Brown_ LLC
Cc: have Nordin, Don EkWer
1214/01

STATE OF NORTH CAROLDiA EN-VIRONMEN'TAL MANAGEMENT
CONDaSSION
COUNTY OF BLADEN
LY THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVU_ PENALTIES AGALNST ) ADMLNISTRATIVE NEARLNG AND
PER�NUT NO. N/A ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV O1 -0I0
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling 514,423.88 _ for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated,
October 31. 2001 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the
civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated
matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the 30-t~ day of /V 0 y �'�� t c� , 2001.
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

Ln
EK4D"N
NOV 27M
November 19, 2002
Mr. Paul Sherman
NC DENR
Fayetteville
Spill Report - Ekokan Treatment System on Brown's of Carolina Farm #3093,
Bladenboro, NC
The following report outlines the two (2) most probable sources for a spill that occurred
at Ekokan's Treatment System at Brown's of Carolina's Farm #3093 on Sunday,
November 17, 2002. It will also include the corrective measures that will be undertaken
to fix the problem and prevent gLny future spills. It is important to note that neither
Ekokan nor Murphy Brown personnel witnessed the spill occurring.
Most Probable Source #1 — Tank Cover Foam Leak
• The treatment vessels ("Biofilters") are covered due to foam production, which
results from the air being injected into the Biof lters.
• As a result, the Biofilters were each covered with a'/4" thick piece of sheet metal.
• The sheet metal covers do not fully prevent foam generated inside the tanks from
escaping and falling in and around the tanks.
• During the course of the weekend, the area of Bladen county was subject to important
rain downpours, which flooded the spill basin and the around the Biofilters.
• It is possible that the rain carried the foam condensate (red, treated wastewater) into
the ditches that are found on both sides of the treatment system and then carried into
the spill basin.
• Also, the important quantities of rain that fell on Bladen County caused an
accumulation of water in the area of the spill basin. The trap door that withholds the
liquid in the area of the spill basin did not retain 100% of the accumulated water and
reddish treated liquid. A certain volume made its way into the ditch that runs parallel
to the service road on the farm.
The Biofilter covers will be fixed by Bryant Electric Company, the system's general
contractor. They have already been alerted to the problem and they are scheduled to be on
site to repair the covers Friday and Saturday of this week (November 22 and November
23, 2002).
P.O. Box 5354, Cary, North Carolina 27512, USA
Tel_ [phone] Fax: [phone]

Most probable Source 42 — Lift Station
• During the weekend, the system was being fed continuously with lagoon effluent and
two houses were being flushed per day to supplement the microbial population with
more food.
• The valve allowing treated water discharge to the lagoon was partially closed (112
open), creating a flow restriction at the discharge point.
• The combination of flows (lagoon and raw house manure) coupled with the end pipe
restriction could have possibly surpassed the lift station's pumping capacity and
resulted in some overflow from the lift station.
• The house flushes were terminated at a distance (through modem connection to the
system) by the operator on Sunday.
During normal operation, the system's treated effluent valve remains fully open and no
lagoon influent is pumped into the separator vault (less concentrated influent is pumped
only during startup conditions). For the remainder of the acclimation period, no lagoon
water and house flushes will be performed unsupervised. This will allow the operator to
monitor any situations that could lend the system vulnerable to spills.
It is also worth nothing that the system is equipped with a float switch within the lift
station that signals when too much house manure is being pumped into the separator
basin (which communicates with the lift station chamber). Once the high level float
switch indicates a high level, the house flush is immediately stopped, until the lift station
pumps the volume down below high level. Only after the level decreases do the house
flushes continue. This protective measure ensures that no spills occur during normal
operation of the system.
In order to prevent any potential spill in the future, in addition to the spill tank that will
undergo improvement measures, we do intend to rise the top of the lift station tank and
equip it with an overflow pipe leading to the first chamber of the TR Separator.
As a result of the spill that occurred, Ekokan has placed the system in recirculation mode,
in order to prevent bacterial loss that has been achieved since the system was placed on
line, August 17, 2002. Once the minor problems are repaired, the Division of Water
Quality will be called to inspect the changes and they will instruct Ekokan as to restarting
the full operation of the innovative wastewater treatment system.
Report Prepared by:
Philippe Kantardjieff
Ekokan System Operator

N:9:rt
$1
November 22, 2002
Paul Sherman
Division of Water Quality
NC Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
225 Green St., Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Re: Accidental discharge on 11/18/02
BOC Farm 3093
Facility # 9 -153
Bladen County
Mr. Paul Sherman,
slim
1
The Ekokan site on Brown's of Carolina Farm 3093 had an accidental
wastewater discharge on November 18, 2002, resulting in wastewater entering a
ditch on the farm site. This spill was caused by an innovative technology (the
Ekokan) system. Murphy -Brown, LLC Management has made Dr. Mike Williams'
Innovative Technology team at NCSU aware of this incident
The farm manager followed the Brown's of Carolina EMS contact protocol
and reported the incident to the Land and Nutrient management department.
Personnel were dispatched to contain and begin remediating the discharge. The
Fayetteville regional office was notified at the same time. Rainfall from the
weekend added to the amount of water to be cleaned up.
A plugged culvert pipe on one end of the ditch helped contain the
discharge in one direction from the spill site and sediment build up in the ditch
contained the discharge in the other direction. Two pumps (130 gallons per
minute flow rate) were used for 7 hours on 11/18/02 to pump water back to the
lagoon. On 11119102, 1 pump was used for 30 minutes to pump back any
accumulation from the previous day. The 58,500 gallons pumped back into the
lagoon was done at an approximate cost of $441.70.
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC.
785 HWY 24 EAST - P.O. BOX 487 - WARSAW. N.G. 28398 • PHONE (91 D) 296-1800

BROWNgS
OF CAROLINA
Brown's of Carolina has complied with all of our regulatory responsibilities.
The company has made an exhaustive effort to respond quickly and
appropriately, and remediate the accidental discharge. If I can be of any further
help, please call me at 910-296-1800 ext. 238.
Sincerely,
David Nordin
Director of Land & Nutrient Management
Brown's of Carolina
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC.
785 HWY 24 EAST • P.O. BOX 487 • WARSAW, N.C. 28398 • PHONE [phone]

PrA
►
" 0� W A Tt�
9pG
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Q
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
September 18, 2003
CERTIFIED MA 1 L
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. John Bizic
P.O. Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Farm 029 & Farm #93
Facility No_ 9 -153
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Bizic:
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -discharge permit for the
subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, you have been found to
be in violation of your 2H.0217 Permit.
On September 16, 2003, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality were conducting an aerial flight and observed an irrigation event at the above named
facility. The application equipment appeared to be applying wastewater onto ponded areas in the
field. The subsequent follow-up visit revealed the presence of standing wastewater in barren
areas scattered over an approximate one acre portion of the field.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following items be addressed:
Avoid overapplication of waste either agronomically or hydraulically.
2. Inspect spray fields before and during irrigation to prevent application of waste onto
standing water and excessive ponding.
3. Modify application equipment or spray procedures to prevent the spraying of wastewater
onto areas of standing water or large barren portions of the spray field.
N. C. Division of Water Quality 225 Green Street -Suite 714 Fayetteville, North Carolina 25301 (910) 48(-1541 Fax[phone]
A-#
WD"C R
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

Mr. John Bizic
9-18-03
Page 2
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing its General
Permit and being required to obtain an individual non -discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from
taking enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the
Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than 525,000.00
per day per violation.
Please provide this office with a written response on or before October 3, 2003 as to the
actions taken or proposed to be taken to avoid this situation in the future. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Larry Baxley,
Environmental Specialist, or myself at [phone].
Sincerely,
Paul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
LCB:PR/Icb
cc: Keith Larick - Compliance Group
Chris Bordeaux - Bladen Co. NRCS
Trent Allen - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files - Raleigh
N. C. Division of Water Quality 225 Green Street -suite 714 Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301 [phone] Fax(910)48(,0707
APA
RUDENUR
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

1 4 illa't 'Ft -=4•y1` - : ----r t'» "i. - r , ,F -w -�Y '?'� * _ 5 _ ,` i .Lts'� f 3 1 -'_ ,...'r
z �� Yw ev1 5 + # rya '3%�O Dtvtseon of Sotl and R atervCiiuservatlon { ,� _ 2 f� J' _
-ieF- r' 3 .7- �� f � � }T Y J -4 L •$ .T / { 1 L 1
• .-k+ 2�f L i 6 / -_ df. - _ � i X F W "Lf - F �
^.• �-, -.i �, .b, ..S a3 C�. iA�h `• '`;.F -F ."Y ySV.W, kiY;�
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint •O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
I.aciiiry Number 9 153 date of\'iNit: Time:
0 9-1 6 21103 2:30
.� _...-.� ., .. 0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified D Registered Date last Operated or Ahove Threshold:
Farm Name: F;k1rM1t29.&.k'Afttl.#9,3.............................. ......... County: 13JA&v------------------------------------ FRQ--.--•--
O%vner Nante: - - - - - --- - - --- - - Brttvr�'s_Qf_C��QGtta�lne.-- - --- Phone No:-------
A7ailingAddress: PS2.1 flat.z 9............................................................................................. Rosr.-Hit,1NC................................ ................. ......... Z845.8 ..............
Facility Contact: ......................Title:.................................. ............ Phone No: ......................................
On%ite Representative:________________.______-._---------------------_-_--- Integrator: ](j[4Wt1'5afCatr4,litab.�s-----------------•
Certified Operator: G.arCY..Rtlktul....................... F' his flu........................................... Operator Certification Number: 2.65.$
.7
of Farm:
iR # 1172 and Hwy 131 near Bladenboro +
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Lathudc 34 • 30 00 Longitude 78 • 45 DO
Design. Current
wvtne CapacityCipacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 16000
®
Farrow to Wean 4000
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ harrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Ctiri'ent
Poultry Capacity population Cattle Ca. aci , 'Population:,-
Layer
o ulationLayer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 20,000
Total SSLW 3,$921000
Number of Lagoons L�' J ❑ Subsurface Drains Presen�tjEl Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Fietd Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream In1acts
1. is any discharge observed li-om any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, wLs the conveyance roan -made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If }'c5, nolilj• DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated floe in gaUtni0
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'.' (If yes. notify DlVQ)
2. Is there evidence ofpast discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? C3 Spillway
Structure I Stnicture ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure
❑ Yes OR No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): •_,._.._.._.._.._.._.._ ......................_.._.._..
A512i/D 1 17nntinuad

Facility Number: 9-153 Date of I nspection 09-[5-2443
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(!f any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ® Excessive Ponding []PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in etTect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative'?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer tv question #) Explain -any YES answers andior aoy�srecomtnendations,or ani other cariiiTteiats''
sed' s of t'acilrty to better &Plain situations (nse.additioiialpeges as necessary) ,'®Field Copy ❑Final Notes
Farm visited as the result of observations made during an aerial flight of a waste application event. The linear boom application
equipment was applying material to barren areas in the field that had standing water already present.Ground investigation revealed these
yeas to have water mixed with waste from the irrigation event.
w
Reviewer/inspector Name Larry.Baxley, Paul Sh'ermari
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
Natural Resources
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Murphy -Brown, LLC
PO Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398-0856
Subject:
April 27, 2010
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Farm 429 & Farm 493 Facility 909-153
A W 5090153
Bladen County
NOD -2010 -PC -05141 Incident no201000023
To Whom It Mav Concern:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
On December 26, 2009, staff of the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer Protection Section
(APS) were notified by Michael Norris of a high freeboard levels in the lagoon 130933A, 309338 and
57291. We wish to thank Mr. Norris for notifying DWQ of this incident.
As a result of this incident, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -discharge
permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 21' Section .1300, you have
been found to be in violation of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the Swine Waste
System General Permit No. AWG 100000 that you are covered to operate under, as follows:
Deficiency 1:
Failure to maintain waste levels in your lagoon/storage ponds in accordance with the facility's Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan in accordance with Condition V. 2. of Swine Waste System General
Permit No. AWG 100000.
On December 26, 2009 a lagoon/storage pond level was documented at 18.0 inches in lagoon 5729 and
lagoon 30933A was documented at l 8.5. A level of 19.5 inches is the maximum level allowed by your
permit and Certified Animal Waste Management Plan. Lagoon 30933B was documented at 30 inches.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Internet: wvvw.ncwater ualit .or
225 Green St.. Ste. 714 Phone: [phone]
Fayetteville, NC 28301 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
One
NohCarohna
Naturally"

Murphy -Brown, LLC
April 27, 2009
Page 2
A level of 31 inches is the maximum level allowed by your permit and Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan.
Required Corrective Action for Deficiency l:
DWQ has received a copy of your 30 Day Plan of Action (POA) for the high freeboard occurrence.
Take all necessary additional steps to insure lagoon levels remain in compliance with Section 2 of your
permit.
You are required to take any necessanr action to correct the above deficiency and to provide a
written response to this Notice within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Please include in your
response all corrective actions already taken and a schedule for completion of any corrective actions not
addressed.
If you have any questions concerning this notice, please contact me at (910)-433-3300.
Sincerely,
Steve GuNlon
Environmental Specialist
Fayetteville Regional Office
cc: Keith Larick CAFO Unit
Bladen County Soil and Water Conservation District
NCDSWC-FRO
FRO Compliance Animal Files

E3 DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
®DWQ Anlmal'Re dlot Operation Slte Inspection
-
,. ., s . s a �o- .; ` w . �'� <`- �. x� sa.,, - x.y,.,fi:......... ...s. � .. r ,. •:�._. r x«¢...'€ .?�s��"�fit...v:� xe aM ., y..;� -.._mow � � '�w'�S P tna¢� . �w
rg Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ ins ection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number V Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status* ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr I5 min)) Spent on Review
Certified ❑ Permitted lor Inspection includes travel and processing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated- �.. — ... �......... .... ........_._ .... _................
Farm Name: �2 C ..L. _e l_ .... County:....( _ .. .....
Land Owner Name:­Z7C�C✓•./� i S!'y—'//- '� ............. ..... Phone No: _. ... __ ....... _.... .._ .
Facility Conctact:..... ....... __....... ...... ...... .. Title: Phone No:
Mailing Address: _
Onsite Representative:....- �U-� Integrator:
Certified Operator:.....: ZV
!' .r�...�....._..............�t'� Operator Certification Number:... Z% -
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds El SU Drains Present _21.
a
L s r c E s.
F� ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
General
L Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes XNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes INo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes/XNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 11kNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes<No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes�No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes )<No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back
*Desk
Des' n F'Current ¢_" �Destgn` Currentx; n.,,*, Cu
- "'.'* `-' tient
x}Swine.,C.n
<.is4., :+6n\+..+.
. s
-a act Po Mahan A Poultry XCa actty Po elation:= Cattle :Ca acs Pa ulat,on:
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ La er
❑ Dairy
10 Feeder to Finish
OG
❑ Non -La
I0 Non Da
Farrow to Wean
t�
<£
171 Farrow to Feeder
,,
Farrow to Finishir
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds El SU Drains Present _21.
a
L s r c E s.
F� ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
General
L Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes XNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes INo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes/XNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 11kNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes<No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes�No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes )<No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

Facility Number
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ YesNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes�No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes �No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes ekNo
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
/i���
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes )g -No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes XNo
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
XYes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes ANo
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes *o
(If in excess of WMP, or/runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
�� \\
15.
Crop type—..sc'(f��rzf'`�.---- --I......... _....... _„....„„.........„....... ......... „....... _........ „....„....... ....... „....... ......... .... ..
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes P�o
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes �kNo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes <No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ANo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes No
21.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes No
Eor
Ce rti fled, Facilitits_On.ly
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ YesNo
lXNo
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes XNo
Comments (refer to question #/): Explain any YES answers and/or any; recommendations or any other comments:
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations: (use additional pages, as necessary): �-
�cs�.,�,5 � /+�6C✓ �t� �� /�+..�i�L�Y///� :3ZCC�%L �'t'`� U�/C�-r
/i���
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 7-/ fl- X;7
cc: Division of Water Quality,, Water Quality Section, Facility, Assessment Unit 4/30/97

1 ❑ DSWC- Animal. Feedlot Operation Review
® DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Slte inspection
O Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DNA'Q inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 7-1Y-97
Facility Number v Time of inspection �24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: E3 Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review Z r
® Certified ❑ Permitted lor Inspection includes travel and processing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: —13 L -42f7 County:
Land Owner Name:�"�-r� ''� Phone No:
Facility Conctaci: Title:
Mailing Address:..-
Onsite Representative:.
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
./Ij C_ z
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: Z1' 2-0 19
Latitude • 4 K Longitude • 6
of UUeration and
-, Design :' ., Current
�kNo
Design Current
IDesign Current ':_
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry ':
01
Cattle Ca acs Pa ulatltiti
Continued on back
❑ Wean to Feeder
I[I Layer
i�
Latitude • 4 K Longitude • 6
of UUeration and
-, Design :' ., Current
�kNo
Design Current
IDesign Current ':_
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry ':
Ca arity Po ulation
Cattle Ca acs Pa ulatltiti
Continued on back
❑ Wean to Feeder
I[I Layer
❑ Dairy -
Feeder to Finish ,-e�
❑ Non -Layer
10 Non -Da'
Farrow to Wean
p -
Farrow to Feeder
Total Design Caj aCdty
Farrow to Finishf
❑Other
Total SSL�Y
Number of Lagoons! Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ;
❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area f
r Hera
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (1f yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4134197 maintenancelimprovemert?
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes 'KNo
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes
�kNo
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ Yes
V No
❑ Yes
/)No
Continued on back

Facility Number: _ —..1 2.7-1
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ YesNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes)qNo
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes XNo
S ns and/
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes 14No
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes )S(No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes XNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
lyes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid levet markers?
❑ Yesj�No
`
M"Astc,9polica�tion
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes *o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
``
15. Crop type Scv!r
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes o
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes )<NO
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
ekNo
❑ Yes No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes No
For Certified Facilities Owl
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management PIan readily available?
❑ Yes�No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
13 Yes 'I�.` o
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes XNo
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
I Z -
i77
/�d�� �a•.-L Q/fit �c+ f'x.£u�„✓�>c._..cc�sro•..�
iC'�O
8
Reviewer/inspector Name �a '�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
71 W
KMIRAM WOR -122
Date: 7-/3em 97
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

LO Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection
O / S 3
Time of Inspection 9' 3 a 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time {in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
IN Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated
Farm Name: �.�%�,-~. 1.. _ ......... ....... .... —..... ' County: �.i✓ .. .. �._ .. _. _
Land Owner Name:_.i�vW.✓�....�f O�/%'! Phone No:C
...................
Facility Conctact:......Sv !} ...S,,�u�^ ..... . Title• lYr-L��— ,��,rl
ane No• ... ...._ .. r .. _ ....
Mailing Address: �r /�...f.!!r�� `,�. �[%G ZL. �.... ...... ... _.._ .... _ ..... .. ...
_...... W ---- - ......... .
..
1
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:....... ..... ........ ......... _ ., Operator Certification Number: .............. .......
Location of Farm:y ��>�,E�,�,,.� i'.4�y� W-��J�. �.�,e �.. a-✓ /2i�,(
Latitude ' C C�u Longitude 0 �• �K
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
es �.^i �
_ Dent n. t Gbrren# • f - Desi Current
Siv e' a ac - Po `ulatidn '' Poultry' �� Ca' achy Po `olatiu Cattle Ca acct 'x v ulat,on=
❑Ef
LDairy
410 to Feeder Non -Layer to Finish Non
Da
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder P Total Deslgn'Capaetty12
Farrow to Finish
51
Sax £ gT, �a
Numher of 1.>3goons`f Holding Ponds . ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
fi,n
�Y�x:.'� ❑Lagoon Area- ❑Spray Field Area'.
a .,.
x
Genera
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes KNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes WNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes
x1qNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ANo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑YesIo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes /11�No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes jjkNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
4/30/97 maintenancelimprovement? Continued on back

Facility Number:.. a`r._ —..1.� ._
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes gNo
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes No
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes No
Structures
(Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes PNO
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes *No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes )R -No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
I1'es [I No
`
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
/
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes �No
Waste APPlication
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑YesI(No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type . Com, � .... ....... ..._....... .....
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes ANO
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ANO
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Ayes ❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes AhTo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes h;(No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes INo
For
Cerfified-Eacilities Only
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Pian readily available?
❑ YesNo
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
Yes ❑ No
Comrrients'(refer to'question ff).: Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other 66thments:
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.'Nse.addiiionalpages as necessary): M :
� 4
Resiewer/Inspector lame f���' ��a= ;- .� �R 4VA-201
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ✓A� _ 1 Date: Z—A2 f 7
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

❑DSWC Animal, Feedlot Operation Review ;
® DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation SSiteinspection..
8 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection -Ib
Facility Number o / S 3
Time of Inspection p= 3 D 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (eY:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
IN Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel and processing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: /-;'Z' M. ?- ..^.-. County:--1✓�1��! -..
Land Owner Name:'�!`Js `"4G�/'"�� Phone No: /� �- U
Facility Conctact:Title:-�•r£-r one No::i
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: ''�`'✓ � .�L�r* �---- Integrator:���`�`��
Certified Operator: _ � S Operator Certification Number: _ ... .
Location of Farm:
Latitude C�•L�` o� Longitude �• �' �µ
of Utaeration and
Number of Lagoons /Holding Ponds JE1 Subsurface Drains Present
X. 10 Lag Area ❑ Spray Field Area
General
J. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
& If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes)q No
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes �ko
❑ Yes 11�10
❑ Yes INo
❑ Yes
No
Continued on back
Design ;Current
:: . Design "Current
Design Current
Swine Ca a6ty Po ulation
Poultry Ca acity Po ulation
.:_:
Cattle .. Ca aci -Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
P Layer1
10 Da
❑ Feeder to Finish
10 Non -Layer 1
10 Non -Dai
Farrow to Wean
4' -
Farrow to Feeder
Total Design Capacity
Farrow to Finish
" ''
k
❑ Other
L
Total SSLW'V
' x
-. . .
Number of Lagoons /Holding Ponds JE1 Subsurface Drains Present
X. 10 Lag Area ❑ Spray Field Area
General
J. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
& If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes)q No
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes �ko
❑ Yes 11�10
❑ Yes INo
❑ Yes
No
Continued on back

Facility Number:-
6. Is ftility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
gNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
XNa
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
Pq No
Structurgs(14agoons and1r Ifoidjrta Po s)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
ANO
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S
Structure 6
29"
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
�No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
)SkNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
��`Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
�No
Wasle Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes/t(No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering of the State, notify DWQ)
waters
15. Crop type Z..c� _
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
A No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
A$lo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Ayes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
A440
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
NNo
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
For Certified Eaciffiaes OnU
❑ Yes
kNo
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes XNo
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP7. ❑ Yes )d No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? Ayes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. —
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
p � 4
12-, i-�� �%, Wit` �,��c •� ai .0 f -� ��i� �jf...�...c-..s�
lr 7X�/9OILi
.� 7• //ice !U%✓� �"'�r/.f �/C /S C��.�.���il�i€- 7Z
ReviewerlInspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:. i� �� Date;7—let
cc: Division of Water Qualh),, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Jimmy Vinson
Farm #29 & Farm #93
PO Box 487
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Jimmy Vinson:
�-
A4�JR
Omsk
�EHNF I
REC E- D
July 16, 1997
,ilii 181991
FAYET I"Er; Ina
REG. OF"Fi 'E
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS090153
Farm #29 & Farm #93
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Bladen County
In accordance with your application received on June 23, 1997, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) to Farm No. 09-153, authorizing the operation of an animal waste collection,
treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with the State's General Permit (attached).
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of
animal waste from the Farm #29 & Farm #93, located in Bladen County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than 16000 Feeder to Finish and 4000 Farrow to Wean and the application to a minimum of 238.3
acres of land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2001. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of
wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data
and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater
than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
�A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Bladen County Health Department
Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Bladen County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT ED
Brown's of Carolina Inc
Farm #29
PO Box 487
Warsaw NC 28398
Farm Number: 09-153
Dear Brown's of Carolina Inc:
�EHNFlo
April 9, 1997 I'@E C Ei?��^i' .,
APR 0 9 1991
FFir'E-ii i;
R2ra. Qi 11�:�+
You are hereby notified that Farm #29, in accordance with G -S. 143-215.1 OC, must apply for
coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has
hirt 30 days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance
with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date.
Your application must be returned within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the
application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for
each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animai
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The
signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location map, and
two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the application
package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any question concerning this letter, please call Mike Lewandowski at [phone]
extension 362 or Ed Buchan with the Fayetteville Regional Office at [phone]
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Fayetteville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Ra6iti;�-,26 0535 Telephone [phone] FAX (9 ! 9) 733-0719
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 17, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
ATTN: GREG BROWN
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA # 29
P.O. BOX 487
WARSAW, NC 28398
ffl�.�TA
T 4111
A&
C) KE f10
!RV-CV'\1
d U,4 16 1997
F���U'e
p�tGE
Subject: Notice of Violation and
Assessment of Civil Penalty for
Violation of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(2).
Brown's of Carolina # 29
Facility #: 09-153
Bladen County
Case #: AL 97-004
Dear Mr. Brown:
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Brown's Of Carolina, Inc. in
the amount of 5500.00 and a Notice of Violation. This assessment is based upon the following
facts:
A permit for this animal waste management system is required in accordance with NCAC
2H .0217 and G.S. 143-215.1.
In accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, Brown's Of Carolina, Inc. was notified by
certified mail, which was received on April 10, 1997, of the requirement to apply for
coverage under an Animal Waste General Permit within thirty (30) days of receipt of the
notification (May 10, 1997).
No application from Brown's Of Carolina, Inc. has been received as of May 30, 1997.
In accordance with Chapter 626 of the 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996),
Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date
specified by the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the aniinal waste system after the
specified date. Therefore, the existing animal waste management system is being operated
in violation of G.S.143-215.I(a)(2).
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that Brown's Of Carolina, Inc.
violated or failed to act in accordance with the requirements of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(2). A civil
penalty of not more than 510,000 per day may be assessed against a person who is required but
fails to apply for or to secure a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1.
Based upon the above facts and conclusions of law, I hereby assess Brown's Of Carolina,
Inc. a $500.00 civil penalty for this violation of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(2) pursuant to the authority
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

delegated to me by North Carolina Environmental Management Commission Regulation 15 NCAC
2J .0003 and G.S. 143-215.6A(h).
If the aforementioned application is not received by the Division of Water Quality
Compliance Group office at the letterhead address within 10 days of your receipt of this notice,
you will be subject to further civil penalties of up to $10,000 for each day that the application is
late.
Within thirty days receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will not
foreclose enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s). Please submit
payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535
or
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a
detailed justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment letter.
Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such
a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing
and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in dispute. You must
execute and return to this office the attached waiver and stipulation form and a
detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B -282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief/DWQ
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535

OR
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must request
an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to
the Office'of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes. You must:
File your original petition with the:
Office of Administrative Hearings
P.O. Drawer 27447
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447
and
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Richard Whisnant
Office of General Counsel
NCDEHNR
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter being
referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect the
penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations which
occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone],
extension 581 or Katharine Keaton at [phone], extension 532.
Sincerely,
-g � ez)�
e)� A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Eayettevillp Regional Supervisor -w/ attachments.
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/attachments

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT )
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST )
PERMIT NO. )
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO.
Having been assessed civil penalties totalling for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality
dated, , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does
stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the
day of
F.V00-00-:4- ICS
TELEPHONE
SIGNATURE
19

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the
Division. Please review the information for completeness and make any corrections
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please
complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered.
Application Date:
I. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
A1212licants Initials
1. One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
2. Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
3. Two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does
not have a CAWMP, one must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Farm's name: Earm #2
2. Print Land Owner's name: Brown's of Carolina
3. Land Owner's Mailing address:
City: Warsaw NC , Zip: 28398
Telephone Number: 210-293-3600
4. County where farm is located: Bladen _
5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified):
6. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): GlennDavi
7. Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Brown's of Carolina _-
09 - 153
FORM. AWO-G-E 2126197 Page 1 of 3

III. OPERATION INFORMATION:
1. Farm No.: Q-153
2. Operation Description: Swine operation
Farrow to Wean
4000 - Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? 0 yes; E::I no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
Type of Swine No_ of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals . Type of Cattle No_ of Animals
Wean to Feeder Layer Dairy
Feeder to Finish Non -Layer Beef
Farrow to Wean (# sow) Turkey
Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
3. Acreage cleared and available for application: Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP):. 98.3
4. Number of Lagoons: ; Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3)
Number of Storage Ponds: ; Total Capacity:Cubic Feet (ft3)
5. Is animal waste being applied on any field which has subsurface drains? YES or NO (please circle one)
6. Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity of or under the lagoon? YES or NO (please circle one)
IV. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I, (Land Owner's name listed in question U.2), attest that
this application for (Farm name listed in question 11.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature
Date
V . MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (Complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question 11.6), attest that this
application for (Farm name listed in question 11.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM- AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 2 of 3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality .
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (2197)
Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Buncombe
Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cherokee
Polk
Clay
Rutherford
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Henderson
Yancey
Jackson
Duplin
Washington Regioud WQ Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Beaufort Jones
Bertie
Lenoir
Camden
Martin
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
Currituck
Per uimans
Dare
Pitt
Gates
Tyrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Duplin
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
3800 Barrett Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
Fax[phone]
Chatham
Nash
Durham
Northampton
Edgecombe
Orange
Franklin
Person
Granville
Vance
Halifax
Wake
Johnston
Warren
Lee
Wilson
0
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Wilmington Regional WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson
Moore
Alexander
Lincoln
Brunswick New Hanover
Bladen
Richmond
Cabarrus
Mecklenburg
Carteret Onslow
Cumberland
Robeson
Catawba
Rowan
Columbus Pender
Harnett
Sampson
Cleveland
' Stanly
Duplin
Hoke
Scotland
Gaston
Union
Montgomery
iredell
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alamance
Rockingham
Alleghany
Randolph
As;;
Stokes
Caswell
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
FORM: AWO-G-E 2197 Page 3 of 3

• r -
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
County:
Production Unit:
No. of Animal Units:
Type of Waste Facility:
Temporary Storage Period:
Animal Unit Equiv. Live Wt:
Lbs/Animal Unit /Year:
Lbs of Plant Avail. N:
Brown's of Carolina, Inc
Farm 29
Farm 93
Bladen
Crop
Farrow -Wean
Finishinc
4000
19200V
Anaerobic Lagoon
10894
180
Code
433
135
5.4
2.3
21600
44160
This waste utilization plan is based on the following fields, soil types, and crops. If this
information should change, please contact the Soil Conservation Service or Brown's of
Carolina, Inc. so that a new plan can be written .
Tract #
Field #
Soil
Crop
ld/Ac
lbs N/unit Acres
lbs N
Time to
Mar -Oct
10894
Type
Code
D
125
Required
Apply
10894
1A
Ex
B
4.5
50
55.00
12375
Mar -Oct
10894
2A
Ex
D
125
1.25
24.00
3750
Mar -July
10894
3
Ex
D
125
1.25
20.00
3125
Mar -July
10894
1A
Ex
K
1
100
58.00
5800
S -April
10894
2A
Ex
K
1
100
24.00
2400
S -April
10894
3
Ex
K
1
100
20.00
2000
S -April
10054
2
Na
D
120
1.25
50.00
7500
Mar -July
10054
14
Gh
D
130
1.25
68.00
11050
Mar -July
10054
3
Na
D
120
1.25
25.00
3750
Mar -July
10054
4
Na
D
120
1.25
30.00
4500
Mar -July
10054
2
Na
K
1
100
50.00
5000
S -April
10054
14
Gh
K
1
100
65.00
6500
S -April
10054
3
Na
K
1
100
25.00
2500
S -April
10054
4
Na
K
1
100
30.00
3000
S -April
Total 544
73250
Available N
65760
*Difference
-7490
A. Barley (1.6 Ib N/bu) I. Oats (1.3 lbs N/bu)
B. Bermuda Grazed (50 lbs N/ton) J. Rye (2.4 lbs N/bu)

C. Bermuda Hay (50 lbs N/ton) K. Sm. Grain Graze 00 lbs N/ )
D. Com Grain (1.25 lbs N/bu) Sm. Grain Hay (1 lbs
E. Com Silage (12 lbs N/ton) M. Grain Sorghum (2.5 lbs N/cwt)
nH.Fescue
o /lbs lint) N. Wheat (2.4 lbs N/bu)
cue Grazed (50 lbs Hay (50 lbs Nlton) 6A%�OQ`� �O e- ca -e� � � { I lel
" A negative number reflects the total number of lbs of additional N needed to achieve
yields on acreage shown in chart. A positive number means additional land is required
to utilize the N produced by the animals.
i5
tr%
This nutrient management plan has been specifically developed for this swine operation.
The plan is based on the soil es, crops to_berg own and method of appliafaitoA#er.
this articular o eration. a waste must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent----" �(le •
poll�7seto
�re
face a�amm&unt
wa er. he plant nutrients in the animal waste should ``"5T eL� �'C e -
be uce of commercialfertilizer required for the crops where the
waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are
encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to
be gr— own
Several factors are important in implementing this nutrient management plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environment-
ally safe manner. Alwa s aP21y waste based on the needs of the cro to
nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can u " Soil Robs
types are important as they have ifferent infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste o,, V -"A3 ►
shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than five tons per acre per year. Do not T^3 tet~
apply waste on saturated soils or on to land when the surface is frozen. Either of these 7
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of ��cos-ds
nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or not more than 30 days prior to planting. Soil incorporation
of waste will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this
type of facility. Annual acreage requirements may be more or less depending upon the
waste analysis report for your waste management facility.
Additional Comments:

Prepared by:
Concurred in by
Producer
S� i5 11��
Title: te: �� 4
J ��
Date: s s
I understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This
equipment must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from a is op j 25 -year 1 -day storm event. I als ce that the waste
11 be ap lied on the Ian acro ding to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates
ich produce no runoff. ase- 7
.a

.
vq
.

•�:r },fir 4�; r , J .. o' :. :f; /„`r��!- .'ii . ',`if”[
r• ,
1.
_ y� j, _ �y 173 ��j�r•- � „1
Jio
� I
,ei 1 ���,�r1"7 r '�T�• �� r• .rr�•'1':l,'�!rjr , .`'� ,
',r� r ,•r ' + � ��f i�� �1, Irl• ...��.``f��r�/
/gee
Go IF,
It
wi
ft, ir
�f 1 In .v rr. Li .. .. �l��y�•1,•� '�
:err : N /-� .S 1 •'If• .,�.' .y, ,� i �: �',
.. '.i ax �ri 7.� _:= ..f#: ,Er.�'! ra • .T '�-oC
vi
;� . •�0 (1 1 � rf�- ,� �y r�1``��-r-1r`�� � "Qri, �i � t' r a ' ��,t� `� �. ��
����� . i, li°�i+'r i �j 1.-��, - {;:,; .• `"r ..S -- :!r � •. � yMr:,� : -

GTRPTIUqS WANCH - WQ Fax:[phone] Jan 16 '97 9:57 P.03/05
• RECEIVED
• •• Upi1
FACILMES A.SSE&;MM UINT
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC. - FARM #29
4000 SOW FARROW TO WEAN
STATE ROUTE #1172 - BLADEN COUNTY
QBSP# 23-063-25-19
DIRECTIONS: FROM CLARKTON, TAKE HIGHWAY #211 WEST TOWARD
BLADENBORO. AFTER APPROXIMATELY 4.2 MILES, IN ABBOTTSBURG, TAKE A
LEFT ON STATE ROUTE #1003. AFTER APPROXIMATELY 0.4 MILES TAKE A
RIGHT ON STATE ROUTE #1172. FARM WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 2.0 MILES
ON LEFT.
MAILING ADDRESS: SHIPPING ADDRESS:
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, FARM 129
P.O. BOX 487 STATE ROUTE 01172
WARSAW, NC 28398 CLARTKON, NC 28433
[phone]
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA. INC.
303 EAST COLLEGE STRE£T • P.O. BO%487 . WARSAW. N. C. 20390-0407 . OFFICE' [phone] . FAX [phone]

OPERATIONS 9ZANM - WO Fax:[phone] Jan 16 '97 9:57 P.04/05
JTaTe OT worn ,,arciina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 • o
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E=., Director
ADDENDUM
CONDITIONS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS TO CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm:
Address: PD _ '9-ry 44Z 2Eu Ak Zbf,5,R _ county: ,eZfaEA1
Name of Land Owner (print): 1alais (VA-, C .
Signature (Land Owner):.-�---�
Name of Technical Specialist Ce
Signature (Technical Specialist). Date: `la 2's -
All statements below that are into ed b a uechrd6il e:ialist apply to the attached cerdfication:
The inigadon sy=m has not been installed or evaluated conceming nozzle size, spray pastem.
spacin;, pipe size, etc. It is the responsibi iry of rhe producer to obtain and operate die
system with the proper components and to supply the required maintenance to assure that no
runoff of pollutants occurs during operation and that the waste is applied az the approved rates.
By 3 - 30 �G (month/day/year) the producer should have an irrigation specialist, possibly
the dealer where the system was purchased, prepare an operation and maintenance plan for
the irrigation system so that the producer knows how to operate the equipment to meet die
non -discharge requirements.
The wam management plan for this operation is based on yields higher than what is now
recommended by NRCS, however, these yields are obtainable under high levels of
management and the farmer has supporting documentation to justify higher nitrogen
application rates.
All of the permaneru vegetation required by the waste management plan has not be=
established as of the date of this certification. The producer agrees to establish the
vebcration by (month/day/year), and to provide a temporary Small grain tzvp in
case same pumping is required prior to the establishment of the permanent veaeratiOm
The landowner is responsible for notifying DEM is writing that the stared work that has a compliance
dare has been camplcmd. This notification must be received by DEI within 15 days of the
compliance date(s) listed above. Please send verification of the properly compleced work to: DEM
Planaitte Branch, P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, NC- 27626.
revised: 6-15-95
P.O. Box 295.35. Pdaigh. Nort'n corc@na 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An -q-4cl OppcnunlyAFT7rmarive Action Employer 50% recycled/ IMP<W-GO1F-Mor pCpar

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WO Fax:[phone] Jan 16 '97 9:56 P.02/05
A -If' WL. S= C3.%" "KATION rCR MEN OR Z7AM= P_- i Ts
pl aass zstZ= tha oc=Vlated row to the Dio'--sion of�i-'Mar�a�taZ x��1Z�•-�•,t at
tYa add;esz ea t=4 reve:as a?.da of Chip fa r_
Nzme of fa_ -M (please p_� _t)
:✓t
Rcc.� ess •+ f
-;� VC Phone No.: /4
County:_-
Ta--= location: Latituaa assd Longitue-a f" / `� (required). Also,
please attac a copy of a eot_ -Qy road map With I cation. identified -
Ty -pe of Cneration (5 --rime. laye=, Ca? -t, etc.) .
nesig:. capacity (nu=L-e, of
I tre age size of aparat_an- (12 zsoaC:t.papulac.on: avg.) .p -�
XJertge acreage nee=•e= for ia: c application of Waste (acres) :
zziiv�eSlfi�z�zi axa as a��=�����sa�!!i#sa aziiia#aazazz�l�#a::alss#sss�li#.�##::aac���
Tec��` cal SpaCiali,C Ca_�id=C;tics
As a Mechnical specialist designated by the North Carolir..& Soil and Watex
Cons a_ ration Comaissior. pursu—r- to I5A NGC 6e .0005, 1 certify that the new or
exe-a-:ded a-.ima? waste ma-iage-er_t system as installed for the fa--= named above
has an ar. aZ waste mar�ge=ent plan chat aewts the design. cc :st=uc�?oa,
ope,at? on and mai nterartce snandards a_:td specifications of the Division of
Znvirar,mental Y.ar=genent and the USDA -Sail Cons ew-nation Service and/or the North
Ca=ali a Sad? -a-q 'Water Corsa,radar. Ccr;ssion pursuant to ISA NCAC 2t_02I7 amd
1SA NCAC 6i .0001-.0005. The fallowing e-lements and their car_espond=ng m1=;=;-
by
i ;=;-
by ma ar other designated technical specialists and
a -e iMC!Ud ed i_ the plaa as appl icable.. mis::saum separations (buffers) : liners or
e��?vala.-it far lagoons o, waste storage pones; Waste storage capacity; adequate
riUartitlj and amcuzlt of lamd for vzstg utilization (or use of tri_, par_v) : access
or azz.e=szip or prase; Waste application equipment; schecule for timing of
applications; aY�liGati^v+l races; loading rates; anA- the coatrol of the disc'h'arge
Of pal lutancs from sto=—�.rater ,Lnotf events less save=e trrA the 25 -yea=. 24-hour
storm.
o, rz 'L. & It 5- ac'_ � + y- (pleas P- Ztl ,iimmv R. Vinson .
Af=iliatics- roan ,s o 48 rolina, Inc.
Actress (gc�) : 2L1'S3w, 3600
Phone No. - - �-
S* gratu= •, �r Data.
iz ii3ay'YR#i�'�3{'Jl1la��lizii�!!ll,.7i3�'Jl�fa�a�la=a
C".r B� lva=aha_ f ■aaeLt
(we) under and the op -ytica and �aaintezance pracedt:res estabiis:.ed in the
approvee- anime,l waste mar_a5-, ere_^,t plat. for the farts naiaed above and will Lmple[aeat
these procedures. I (-.re) )Ci_esJ that arty additional Q,Cpans_oa to t_%e, existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will ;aYu<_re a r.e,_F cert'ification to be submitted to the ]Division of
wnvi_ar, ental Manasemeat before the nen animals are stocked. I (we) also
uade=stand that t:Lera =us= to ro discharge of a-nimal waste from this system to'
surface craters of the state a_ --her through a tuz-t-made conveyance or through
r_,noff from a sto= event less severe Cham the 2S -yea:, 24-hour storm_ The
aflnro.rea plan Will be filed &%z the far= a. -id at the office of the local Soil and
Fater CQnsewation Dist=ict .
Naga of T-prnd Dw=a= (P ease Print) I-
S
Signatt.i-M Date: -
N=0 of gar ;-' d:_ e.- f=ca Cwn'e; {P—lease prLwt) rfi
S Zg:'.F-tt� a - .DaLo z-_
:19ce: A C�_ zge in lands requires noGiflcaz_on or a new certification
(it tale ar,czoved plass is changed) to be suinsicted to the Div-isioa of
-_viYor� e -cal M2_-:aga_=ant Wjr_h;rr 50 days of a title transfer.
DE'•i QS ONT..`_' : AC�r7�F�Y. �yf. � C� Q
,
a 5J'

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
iIm 1".MU
Mr. Jimmy Vinson
Browns of Carolina
105 East College Street
P.O. Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Dear Mr. Vinson:
000% WOW
mwdmft�lk
EDEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
December 3, 1996
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Farm 29
Reg.# 09-153
Bladen County
On October 23, 1996, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of
Water Quality inspected the Browns of Carolina Company Farm # 28. The inspection
revealed that the lagoon serving this operation only had approximately 12 inches of freeboard
rather than the necessary 19 inches of freeboard and storage.
However, it has been noted by this office that the recent storm events have contributed
a great deal to the high freeboard levels in your lagoon and prevented you from land applying
the excess waste water at appropriate times. Therefore, it is all the more important for you
to lower your lagoon level as soon as possible in order to obtain the necessary storage volume
needed during the winter months. While it is essential to lower the lagoon level, it must be
done in such a manner that does not allow a discharge of waste to the waters of the State.
Failure to comply with these conditions can result in civil and/or criminal penalties or the
facility may be required to apply for an individual nondischarge permit.
Please notify this office within thirty days of receipt of this notice at the address
below and list what actions have been taken to lower the lagoon level. Please be advised that
this letter does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement actions for
past or future violations.
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, FayettevilleN��0 FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 914-486-1541 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Vinson
Page 2
1213196
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
either myself or Michael Wicker, P.E., Water Quality Regional Supervisor at 910-486-1541.
Sincerely,
Ed Buchan
Environmental Engineer
cc: Michael Wicker - WQ Regional Supervisor
Sam Warren - Bladen County NRCS
Chris Walling - DSWC, FRO
Enforcement Files
Facility Compliance Group - Central Office

Y Division of Environmental Management �`� " t 3
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Pisitation Rewrd
General Informatiom:
Farm Name: Lkr 03 County:
Owner Name: D G phone No• 3- 360g>
On Site Representative: Integrator-o� _.
Marling Address• P. o, %o LE
Physical AddressflAcation:
r
Latitude:_� I Longitude: I I
QReration_Desc iRtiom (based on design cbamcteristim)
e of Swire No. of An naU Type of Poultry No. of A ix=U Type of Cale No. of AM als
C3 Lays O Dairy
Newry O Non -Isla 0 Bad
o
otherType of LhwswcL- Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: (include in the Dmwings and Observations the frxboard of each lagoon)
Facility
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than I foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Yeses
No 0
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?:
Yes E3
Noj;i
Is erosion observed?:
Yrs 0
Nom
Is any discharge observed?
Yes O
N045-
omo
0Man -ado O Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Yes 0
No*
Does the cover crop need irnprovenx=?:
Yes 0 .
No 0
(list the apps which need improwment)
Crop ypA=W. !
Setback [feria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Yes 13
NoAk
Is a wall located within 100 feet of waste application?
Yes 0.
,NOA
Is aminal waste stockpiled within 100 fret of USGS BIue Line Stream?
Yes O
No'
'Is animal waste Iand applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
Yes 0
Nc*
AOI — janumT 174"6�-

1
Does the €acuity maintenance need imptvvesaent? Yes O No
b there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes D NoX
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes 0 No O
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the AninW Waste Management Pian on she? Yes D No O
Explain any Yes answw•
Signe: Date:_l
,
cc . Facility Aissemme tt Unit Use Attach VNe*W
Drawings or Qbservatigns:
- •.+/M7 -�J `•t r ... .. a�..,+�.-sir•. w.•�. rr. vas- -i �• �a`rr�*.p i.w�*W►r'�•r ar....v� ��..
• �� 13. _ �r . _ +Y�tar��: �.it•• w1 +�•�- '+� •,wl r'(: f w:.'��'�'. r��rrrM w r.� . .
AOI — Ianua! f I7mm '

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
long 11111111111110
:mow.
`r
M
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
December 3, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
' .._._
Mr. Jimmy Vinson
Browns of Carolina
105 East College Street
P.O. Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Farm 29
Reg.# 09-153
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Vinson:
On October 23, 1996, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of
Water Quality inspected the Browns of Carolina Company Farm # 28. The inspection
revealed that the lagoon serving this operation only had approximately 12 inches of freeboard
rather than the necessary 19 inches of freeboard and storage.
However, it has been noted by this office that the recent storm events have contributed
a great deal to the high freeboard levels in your lagoon and prevented you from land applying
the excess waste water at appropriate times. Therefore, it is all the more important for you
to lower your lagoon level as soon as possible in order to obtain the necessary storage volume
needed during the winter months. While it is essential to lower the lagoon level, it must be
done in such a manner that does not allow a discharge of waste to the waters of the State.
Failure to comply with these conditions can result in civil and/or criminal penalties or the
facility may be required to apply for an individual nondischarge permit.
Please notify this office within thirty days of receipt of this notice at the address
below and list what actions have been taken to lower the lagoon level. Please be advised that
this letter does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement actions for
past or future violations.
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, FayettevilleNIV
�y' FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Vinson
Page 2
1213196
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
either myself or Michael Wicker, P.E., Water Quality Regional Supervisor at 910-486-1541.
Sincerely,
�12 a 0)�"
Ed Buchan
Environmental Engineer
cc: Michael Wicker - WQ Regional Supervisor
Sam Warren - Bladen County MRCS
Chris walling - DSWC, FRO
Enforcement Files
Facility Compliance Group - Central Office

Farm N
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Dane: !o
Owner Name•, ?DC, - .;, Phoma No• 3 - 36 o c)
On Site RepraentaativLx- %* V% tegiator: S o C_
Mat7ing Addma: Ro -Sox t 99-7 _
2 8 301 - -
Physical Address.4- cad
s.
Latitvde•_.� I Longitude. I /
QMr-ation D c • (based on design cbamcterisda)
c ofSwine No. of Type of Paudvy No. of Ani nals Type of Castle No. of AnimaLs
VFSaw+�'d C3 1� 0 Daby
Nay o Nm -L"= o Beef
0 Food=
OrherType of Vmuock Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons:., I (iDclude in the Drawings and Observations the 5eeboard of cub lagoon)
Facility Inspection:
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1•foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
YesU2
No 0
Is seepage observed from the Iagoon?:
Yes O
Noj;�
Is erosion observed?:
Yes O
NOW
Is any discharge observed?
Yes CI
No$ -
O Man,=& a Not Mae-+rade
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Yes C)
NoX
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
Yes 0
No Q
Un the crops which need &*roves==)
Crop type., (ti ; _ / <1 o�A&-,;, Acreage: 7
Setback [:rfteria
.
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Yes 0
No�k
• Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Yes 13.
No
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes CI
No'
-Is animsI waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 fen of Blue Line Stxr=7
Yrs O
Nom
AOI — Januw7170%

AfnEqunamm
Does the facffity w ammunce Meed improvement? Yes ❑ No
Is there evidence of past d=harp from any part of the operation? Yes O NoX
Docs record keeping need improvemeat7 Yes © No O
�. Did the fhdHty faU to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? Yes O NOD
Explain any Yes answers•
SiDate: 123144
cc . Facility AssemmeW unit Use Aft=hmaw rNsedsd
Drawings or abservatao= _
`+fill •;J . . r� . . v w+.`•.�.-+wn �:•�•�r In •aa.. i �• A��•�Ctf .�sw+••r =•.'.
. `*��. i .• r� . - r•r•zs_•.i:.rrs�• �1 � •+• •y •RFa Ir: f �!•�t•'� «+•rn..w w - .
AOI— .T& uw7l7jW ,

BROwN9S
OF CAROLINA
December 30, 1996
Ed Buchan
Environmental Engineer
Division of Water Quality
Wachovia Building
Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Dear Mr. Buchan,
RECEIVED
JAN 6 19971
FAY-:TTE �l' LE
REG. 0FRCE
This letter is in response to the Notice of Deficiency for Brown's of Carolina, Inc. Farm 28
received on December 6. Due to the storm events in the summer, this lagoon has been high and
within the 19 inch freeboard. Since your inspection on October 23, irrigation equipment
installation has been complete and a winter cover has been established. We are utilizing every
available pumping opportunity to lower this lagoon level. It is, however, still within the
freeboard.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any additional questions.
2S' rely,�j�/wL4my R. Vinson
Environmental Resources, Mgr.
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC,
303 EAST COLLEGE STREET • PO. BOX 487 • WARSAW, N.C. 28398-0487 • OFFICE- [phone] • FAX: [phone]

BROWN'S
OF CAROLINA
Jannuary 5, 1996
Ed Buchan
Environmental Engineer
Division of Water Quality
Wachovia Building
Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Dear Mr. Buchan,
.JAN 7 1997,
FAV rt—vr j I
. CJ
WIN
This letter is in response to the Notice of Deficiency for Brown's of Carolina, Inc. Farm 29
received on December 6. Due to the storm events in the summer, this lagoon has been high and
within the 19 inch freeboard. Since your inspection on October 23, this lagoon has been lowered
to a level approximately two feet below the dike. The effluent was pumped to a lagoon on our
adjoining property for precharging as planned.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any additional questions.
Sincerely,
AM
ay on
Environmental Resources, Mgr.
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC.
303 EAST COLLEGE STREET - PO. BOX 487 • WARSAW, N.C. 28398-0487 - OFFICE: [phone] • FAX: [phone]

F,
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
:=I. 4
. T;M
Ihl,
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
December 3, 1996
Mr. Jimmy Vinson
Browns of Carolina
105 East College Street
P.O. Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Farm 29
Reg.# 09-153
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Vinson:
On October 23, 1996, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of
Water Quality inspected the Browns of Carolina Company Farm # 28. The inspection
revealed that the lagoon serving this operation only had approximately 12 inches of freeboard
rather than the necessary 19 inches of freeboard and storage.
However, it has been noted by this office that the recent storm events have contributed
a great deal to the high freeboard levels in your lagoon and prevented you from land applying
the excess waste water at appropriate times. Therefore, it is all the more important for you
to lower your lagoon level as soon as possible in order to obtain the necessary storage volume
needed during the winter months. While it is essential to lower the lagoon level, it must be
done in such a manner that does not allow a discharge of waste to the waters of the State.
Failure to comply with these conditions can result in civil and/or criminal penalties or the
facility may be required to apply for an individual nondischarge permit.
PIease notify this office within thirty days of receipt of this notice at the address
below and list what actions have been taken to lower the lagoon level. Please be advised that
this letter does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement actions for
Past or future violations.
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville�� 4 FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Vinson
Page 2
12/3196
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
either myself or Michael Wicker, P.E., Water Quality Regional Supervisor at 910-486-1541.
Sincerely,
Ed Buchan
Environmental Engineer
cc: Michael Wicker - WQ Regional Supervisor
Sam Warren - Bladen County NRCS
Chris Walling - DSWC, FRO
Enforcement Files
Facility Compliance Group - Central Office

Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: 10
Tune:
General Inforsngtjon:
Farm Name:_ _ 1"' a 63
Owner Name: D G _ Phone No: ),q3- 36 o c:�
On Site Representative: IntepMr.
Mailing Address:__ R�0 . CSa k 4/S�a 4
Physical Address/Loeation:
Latitude: 1 1 Lon 'rude: 1 1
Operation Descdp ion: (based on design characteristics)
np!e of Swine No. OfAm 11 Type of Pot+ltry No. of nimals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
�`n O 0 Layer 0 Dairy
Nmvery 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Few
OthcrType of Liv j=& Number of Anim4lx.
Number of Lagoons: I - - (include in the Drawings and Observations the f ceboard of each Lagoon)
Facility Ins 'on:
-No�k
Yes 0
Lagoon
Yes 0
No`p-
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than Ilfoot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Yeses
No 0
Is seepage observed from the. lagoon?:
Yes 0
No�
Is erosion observed?:
Yes 0
Nom
Is any discharge observed?
Yes 0
Not-
❑ Man-made O Not Man-made
Coyer 0 -op
Does the facility need more acmage for spraying?:
Yes 0
NoX
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
Yes 0
No ❑
(Un the Grope which need improvement)
Crop type: W ' % S o u k", A.,15' _ age: -7
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling Iocated withizi 200 feet of waste application?
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
7s animal waste land applied of spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
AOL — janaas7174M
Yes 0
-No�k
Yes 0
,Nose
Yes 0
No`p-
Yes 0
NdV

MQurtena�ce _ •
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes ❑ No
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes Q NoX
* Does record keeping need improvement? Yes 0 No a
�. Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Pias on site? Yes D No O
Explain any Yes answers;
signattue: - nate: 141231 y(c .
cc-F4airy Assesomw Unit Use Amc m as JyNee&d
Draj!jngs or ObseMfig=
• � .. ... + r,.. �y p.y. - �•.. r.. r•• ���. 2Y- wiri�rl7 �►.+!�W�+.�.wryrv.�.w� ��..
46,0 Ii r'
AOI — lanuw7 I7,I9%

--- .Z .' r � S - _ .,� .� �.,� �-. :. �•. r�, ��ez�i'�' �-� ; •�,�trz.�s.�.: h. `rM'.3�- - '�.
• f._ `��T°.ter; �.k.�i. i «�.� s�� � �rr�..-"'�'t'�.•'�s .
�ROWN's
Z FWAROLINA
Jannuary 5, 1996
Ed Buchan
Environmental Engineer
Division of Water Quality
Wachovia Building
Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Dear Mr. Buchan,
RECEIVED
JAN 7 1997r
FAy, t= :
RFC. C
This letter is in response to the Notice of Deficiency for Brown's of Carolina, Inc. Farm 29
received on December 6. Due to the storm events in the summer, this lagoon has been high and
within the 19 inch freeboard. Since your inspection on October 23, this lagoon has been lowered
to a level approximately two feet below the dike. The effluent was pumped to a lagoon on our
adjoining property for precharging as planned.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any additional questions.
Sincerely,
2Y R_ n
Environmental Resources, Mgr.
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC.
303 EAST COLLEGE STREET • P•O. BOX 487 • WARSAW, N.C. 28398-0487 • OFFICE: [phone] • FAX: [phone]

.,�-AMA I
Paul E. Rauls
DENR-DWQ
225 Green Street
Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
Dear Mr. Rauls:
3-19-99
F 221999
This letter is the follow-up to the "Notice of Violation" received by Greg Brown
dated February 26, 1999.
In that letter you asked that a response for each of the numbered items. Please
find the following items listed below:
Item 1. We have continued to work on the lagoon levels on the complex to lower
them to the desired level. This has proceeded, weather permitting, and will continue.
Item 2. The eroded area noted had only developed over the winter because of
reshaping that had taken place. This area would have been re -seeded and re-established as
soon as weather and seeding dates allow. This will be finished before April 30.
Item 3. As stated to Jeffery Brown at the time of inspection, these fields had been
graded, but as you may know, fill that is put in low area's will also settle. That is why it
takes 2-3 trips to work these area's out. Also that is why the surface drains were cut.
Item 4. The complex managers will be turning their lagoon levels in to the fanning
manager weekly. We are currently monitoring fresh water usage to prevent any un-
necessary waste. Closer monitoring should eliminate the high levels.
Item 5. These lagoons were designed in accordance with the current N.R.C. S.
specifications and approved by a consulting engineer.
Item 6. According to the records, our levels were in good shape when the crops
were harvested. Their when the rains came in January, our guys tried to be cautious and
got behind.
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC.
785 HWY 24 EAST • P.O. BOX 487 . WARSAW, M.C. 28398 - PHONE [phone]

s
Item 7. Brown's of Carolina has always worked with DENR-DWQ. We set our
goals of always following our permit conditions.
Item 8. Brown's of Carolina has an Environmental Committee set up with
members from different area's of our company. We will be constantly monitoring farms
where there have been problems.
Item 9. We have set up a detailed training plan for all our employees. All
employee's have to go through this training. DWQ also have been asked to participate in
this training.
Brown's of Carolina'regrets this incident and will do everything possible to make
sure it doesn't happen again. I appreciate the help and consideration from your staff.
If I can provide any additional information, please let me know.
Cc: Greg Brown
Glenn Davis
Sincerely yours,
J' minson

`7
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
h
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
X
FAYET-rEVILLE: REGIONAL OFFICE
715%
NC®ENR
,f,.--,.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Vl
February 26, 1999
.JAMES MHUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
y
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
r
WAYNE A4CDrVrfi
SECRETARY
Greg Brown
k .'
785 Hwy 24 East
P.O. Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
4 Z-.
-j
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Permit No. AWS 090153
Brown's of Carolina Farm #29 and #93
X,
Facility No. 09 - 153
Bladen County
Dear Mr, Brown.
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non discharge permit
for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, you have
been found to be in violation of your 2H .0217 Permit.
ZZ P
On February 8, 1999, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of
te v
X
Water Quality inspected the Brown's of Carolina Farms #29 and #93 swine facilities. This
office was informed on February 2, that two of the lagoons were in the emergency storage
level (15 inches and 18 inches), therefore a routine inspection was performed at the site.
It was observed that the freeboard levels in these lagoons at the time of the inspection were
16 inches and 18 inches. The surface water diversion ditch located between the houses
and the lagoon at farm #93b was eroded at one end. Some of the irrigation fields contained
low areas with standing storm water that needs to be addressed. A complete set of the
-A�
irrigation records were not available at the time of the inspection. This is a violation of
General Permit condition 111.5 issued to this facility on May 18, 1998 which states- 'Records,
including land application event(s) and removal of solids to an off-site location(s) records,
shall be maintained by the Permittee in chronological and legible form for a minimum of
three years. These records shall be maintained on forms provided ora roved by the DWQ
and shall be readily available for inspection.". Further investigation of the waste application
fields revealed that there was ponded waste in the field adjacent to Farm #29. Waste had
been applied to this field on the two previous days prior to the inspection.
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Brown's of Carolina Farms #29 and #93
February 26, 1999
Wastewater was then observed in the farm ditch located across the path from the field. It appeared that
wastewater had left the field in two different locations by means of a drainage trench that had been installed
at some previous time to drain the standing storm water from the low areas in the field. These trenches carded
water to drainage pipes which were installed under the road to drain the storm water into the farm ditch. Both
of these trenches were blocked by an earthen dam to prevent wastewater from leaving the field. However,
at some point before or after these earthen dams were constructed wastewater had entered the farm ditch by
means of the trenches. The ditch at hand discharged into a stream which appeared to run adjacent to the
property line. Jimmy Vinson, the on-site representative, blocked the ditch before entering the culvert under
the farm path to prevent the wastewater from discharging into the stream. It was then recommended to Mr.
Vinson to pump the wastewater from the ditch onto the application field directly adjacent to the ditch since the
soils appeared to be less saturated in the field. Based on the above, the inspector collected samples from the
ditch and the stream to verify whether or not wastewater had reached the steam (surface waters). Sample
results indicated the presence of waste in the ditch, however there was no evidence based on the sample
results that waste had reached surface waters.
This is the fourth incident that this office has on file that releases of wastewater has occurred at this
complex since September of last year. On all four occasions, wastewater has discharged into the farm ditches
on the complex, but did not reach surface waters. Three of the four incidents occurred on Farm #93, while the
most recent incident occurred on Farm #29. All but one of these incidents, were the result of what is viewed
as poor management practices by employees on the farm. The first incident transpired on September 25,
1998, as a result of an employee leaving the recharge pump running to fill the pit on one of the houses at 93a.
Wastewater left the dog house located at the back of the building, discharging into the ditch directly behind
the lagoon. This same type of incident occurred on January 2, 1999 on farm 93b. This discharge occurred
on Saturday and the Division of Water Quality was not notified until Monday morning, January 4. This is a
violation of General Permit condition 111.6 which states that "the Permittee shall report by telephone to the
appropriate Regional Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge
of any of the following events: (g) Any discharge that bypasses a lagoon/storage pond resulting in a discharge
to surface waters or that poses a serious threat to the environment. For any emergency situation which
requires immediate reporting after normal business hours, please contact the Division of Emergency
Management at 1-800-858-0368.". The second incident occurred on December 8, 1998 when a recycle line
was hit by an employee when mowing around the lagoon. This also resulted in a discharge of wastewater to
one of the farm ditches.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following items be performed:
1. Lower the lagoon level to the required freeboard on a suitable waste application field as soon as weather
permits and per the CAWMP.
2. Consult with a technical specialist in order to correct and prevent any future erosion at the end of the
surface water diversion ditch. A suitable grass cover needs to be established in this area.

Page 3
Brown's of Carolina Farm #29 and #93
February 26, 1999
3. Consult with a technical specialist or the local MRCS district for assistance in correcting the low areas in the
waste application fields so that these areas can be utilized for waste application on a more routine basis.
4. Please provide specific actions proposed to prevent future freeboard deficiencies at this facility, which are
not in compliance with the CAWMP or the General Permit.
5. Please provide a review of the adequacy of lagoon storage capacity to determine if more than the current
design standard is needed at the facility.
5. Provide a detailed explanation as to why the level of the lagoons had reached such high levels.
7. Adhere to all of the General Permit conditions.
8. Due to the events listed above, a more detailed and thorough inspection of the entire waste management
system'needs to be performed on a routine basis to prevent such incidents as listed above from occurring.
9. This office also strongly recommends that "all" staff associated with this farm be reminded or retrained in
waste management practices to prevent future discharges of wastewater.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility's General Permit being revoked and
being required to obtain an individual non -discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement
actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the Division of Water Quality has the
authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $10,000.00 per day per violation.
Please notify this office in writing on or before March 19, 1999 at the letterhead address as to the actions
taken or proposed to be taken to resolve these violations.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either Mr. Jeffery
Brown, Environmental Engineer or myself at [phone].
e___1 .
Paul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Sonya Avant - Compliance Group
Sam Warren - Bladen Co. NRCS
Audrey Oxendine - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files - Raleigh
I

�yDivision of Soil and Water:Conservation - Operation Review
Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality --Compliance Inspection _
Othcr..pgency -Operation Review _
® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DNVQ ins recliun 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number fj Date of Inspection a$ 79
Time. of Inspection I� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered JE3 Not Opera Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farin Name: ................... trYL.S--.. ..... � tiG.-......W ..�T3 County:
.... ...._�...
Owner Name: ,v.13.1.1...? ............................. PhoneNo: ........................................................ -..............................
Facility Contact: ................... 1bri!xtyt.9.....,.,.-- Title: .... -.................. Thune No:
klailingAddress: ............ R:a....... , .........�..1............................ ........................... .......(l`...JG...........................................
` ..
Onsite Representative: VeilIntegrator . 5 ........• .y
Certified Operator: ..................—p.n [:C................. ��.....---............... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude �` �' Longitude
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder JE1 Layer
EffFeeder to Finish ( Q^)p ❑ Non -Layer
(A Farrow to Wean a CIO p
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity op
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream ImeactS
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
❑ Yes Al No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon (� Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If dischar+ge is observed, was the conveyance ratan -made:!
❑ Yes KNO
li. ll' discharge is observed, did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters Waters of the State
!13 Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
�\
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon systent?
❑ Yes
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
/❑]N�o
{�Yes� 03
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than From a discharge?
-
❑ Yes 1Y No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storaue capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Yes E]No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
�l
) �5
Freeboard(inches):............... (...... ......... ................. � ......................-....-...................---.......................................................................................................
1/6/99 Continued on back

FacilityNumber: 97— S Date of inspection 5. Are Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes �No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need rnaintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
8- Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes 0 N
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 1*1 No
11. Is there evidence of over application?Wonding ❑ Nitrooen Yes ❑ No
12, Crop type ............. ...}...... ........................... .....................................................................
T
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those desig=nated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes � No
14. Docs the facility lack wettable acreage for land application! (footprint) ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ( No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 9No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes No
19- Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'? ❑ Yes ,� No
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes F,No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharfe, freeboard problems, over application) Cl Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative`? ❑ Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
113, Nn.vi(ilations.or deficiencieswere noted during thiS.visit:. Yau Will.receive no further.:.:
c-orrespatidefiee' b4t)f thfs visit.: • :
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments -= r z
Use drawings'of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pagesas_necessary):, r. f�
I. �C
u,.,WL.j fv (dl y� A.
t .6� rti w� CL r. a
�'A-t¢-
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: f r Date: a -r rr �-�_
.. - — 116199

r
Facility Number: Date of [nspection
�.
AddiE�onal.ComEneats anii/©r;�rawings: , ..>
f. 2l 4,J
-77e s4,vt�-L ddcA - 6
. Aa4ate-y-k.
nn II�� q
1. -f" io sd�
V--4S-yv 071 LaO O�� rod
CVQ^ • gy_
7/25197

E3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation -'Operation Review
r] Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
Other Agency - Operation Review
JoRoutine O Com plaint O Follow -u of DNV ins rction O l-ollo�%'-u p « f' [)SNI C review *Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection F!M24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered JE3 Not Operationaj OperationalDate Last Operated:
FarmName: D C�3 County: .................................................................................................................. /-`._.�.. I'r
................... .... ........
Owner Name: �� .. 4 1.... �� Phone No: a �}C_ "f.C1 t ) CD .........................
......... ..-.. ..._.....4.. �!?i '...............................................................................
Facility Contact: .-............... 1TY7/!.... V tTitle:.................................. Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: ti„ 7/ ...... V: r t Integrator:..... ,��'� i)���-.-d} Q :?r
.......
Certified Operator: ................................................... ........ ` .............................. Operator Certification Number:........................_.................
Location of Farm:
...... ............ ......... ........ .... ................................. ......................................................... t w
Latitude ' 4 44 Longitude ' 4 96
Swine
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
(� ❑Non -Layer
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 7j ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management Svstem
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If -discharge is observed- did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. If discharLe is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection R Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ........................................
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6
1/6/99 Continued on back

Facility Number. V -- Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6.` Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure pian?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any patt of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
12. Crop type.................................................................................................................................... ..............
0
❑ Yes ❑ No
13_ Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
I& Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23_ Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Cr
[:]Yes ❑No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
0- No:violations or. deiicienciees .%►:ere'notEd: dtirin ttiis.visit::'Y.oti ti►z�l:ret~eive no Mrtiier
eorrespot�idenee:abotit:this visit.:.'.'.'...'.'." '''''':-""'."'.'.'.,.-.:•.-:: ,.,.*....:•:-.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
m�rhr eec� C� Z A e- dd lwf (,i,� , -d,
[Ar'rvl , —:Z,. y.� 51at�c� C I r b�' elft S,� ,
1 , CrV_t " i
Ab euir e 114 It o�, %/,wzs c;ts'-rtr`c/f t, 4,
tA4-r'�7vyr / pI"
`C s bCtGrY6.l� 6O% r
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
I
1/6/99

December 5, 1998
DWQ
Wachovia Bldg. Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
Dear Jeffery:
RECE9VED
1 1 1999
FAYETTEViULE
REG. OFFICE
This letter is to report in writing the accidental discharge that accured on BOC 93
on Saturday afternoon 1-2-98. We reclaimed all the effluent from the adjoining ditch and
pumped back to the lagoon. This was completed by 8:00 PM Saturday night. This
happened by the farm manager leaving the recharge pump running to fill the pit. The
overflow either clogged or wasn't short enough. These problems have been corrected
and a timer has been installed to help alleviate any possible mistake in leaving the pump
running.
Thanks for your help and if you need any additional information please let me
know.
1�
Environmental Resource Manager
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC.
785 FfWY 24 EAST • P.O. SOX 487 - WARSAW, KC.28398 • PHONE [phone]

AN- 0-99 PRI 9:10 AM BROWN
785 Hwy 24 EaM
PO Bout 487
Wamaw, NC 2&3964467
Voke: (910) 2WwI Boo
Fax (910) 29&6166
FaX
Too
FAX NO. 9102961675
P. 2
BROWN'RECOVED 19 S
OF CAROLINA
1999
F%Y-r-TTZIvI LE
REG. QFFICE
Freer:
FAua 9)0-q2(0-0201 Pages:
Phone: Date:
Re! CC:
D Urgent G] For Review ❑ Please Comment 0 Please Reply O Please Recycle
0 Commentz
��� �-�a� s�/���� � n c'a✓rte -�
Vu to fie. 1, o 4C y z*- Ga ✓� /t

9:09 AM BROWN S
December S, 1998
�Raw�
DWQ
Wachovia Bldg. Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
Dear Jeffery: .
FAX NO. 9102961675
L52F
WN�sOLINA
This letter is to report in writing the accidental discharge that accured on BOC 93
on Saturday afternoon 1-2-98. We reclaimed all the effluent from the adjoining ditch and
pumped back to the lagoon. This was completed by 8:00 PM Saturday night. This
happened by the farm manager leaving the recharge pump running to fill the pit. The
overflow either clogged or wasn't short enough. These problems have been corrected
and a timer has been installed to help alleviate any possible mistake in leaving the pump
running.
Thanks for your help and if you need any additional information please let me
know.
rely,
Iimmy ins n
Environmental Resource Manager
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA. INC
785 HWY 24 EAST - P.O. BOX 687 - WARSAW, KC. 28390 • PHONE [phone]
P, 1

1 9
A

w
12-15-98
7efferery Brown
NCDENR-DWQ
Wachovia Building Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Dear ]efferery:
This letter is to confirm in writing the accidental discharge at farm 93 last week in
accordance with our permit.
The discharge was a result of a bush hog hitting a recycle line. When the line was cut on,
effluent was discharged. Most of it went back into the lagoon but a few gallons went toward an
adjacent ditch. Very little entered the ditch and none left the site.
As you know D.W,Q. was notified and visited the farm. Our people have been cautioned
to be more careful working around these structures and our aim is to have zero discharges.
Thanks for your cooperation in this manner.
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC.
785 HWY M EAST • P.O, BOX 407 • WARSAW, N.G. 28398 • PHONE [phone]
i SG9I9 �0I6 '4K XVJ ; IAHS Ad SE:l

G,AFO TELEPHONE LOG
Foyetteville Regional Office
COMPL ANT
REQUFST FOR INFORMATION
—THER
DATE/TIME % ~ ,�l -5 ! 25 /
DWQ CONTACT C
PERSON CONTACTING THE F.F O.
S
RETURN TELEPHONE NO.
ADDRESS
FART" I NAME:
. �
FARM OWNER �lcJZvY1 rneo I �!=�
COUNTY FACIL[7Y NO.
NARRATIVE:
,vi 5,v 'y -�j LL� L-�

GvAFO TELEPHONE LOG
Fayetteville Regional Office
_GOMPLAINT
_REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
�ER
DATE/TIME
DWQ CONTACT
PERSON CONTACTING THE F.R.O.-
FAR"
FARM
,
RETURN TELEPHONE NO.g(� ��.) SSG -/�
ADDRESS
V
COUNTY FACILITY NO
NARRATIVE:

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION NC #11
817 CASTLE RAYNE STREET NC #37714
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28303 USDA #3757
[phone] / [phone] (FAX)
AIR • FUEL • WATER • FOOD • WASTES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CLIENT: NC DEHNR
ADDRESS: Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
CONTACT PERSON: Mr. J. Brown
ACCOUNT NUMBER: #KN003
CERT #25423
DATE RECD: 02/08/99 SAMPLED: 02/08/99
SAMPLED BY: J. Brown
DELIVERED BY: J. Brown
SAMPLE CODE: WW, Streit, Grab
REFERENCE: BOC Farm #29
SAMPLE ID: 1. Upstream - ID #99WU2904
2. Discharge Point #1 - ID #99WE2905
3. Ditch between discharge points -- ID #99WPs2906
4. Discharge Point #2 - ID #99WE2907
5. Source - ID #99WE2908
6. Below discharge point #2 - ID #99WE2909
7. Entry to stream - ID #99WE2910
8. Downstream - ID #99WD2911
DATA REVIEWED BY:
DATE REPORTED: 02/10/99
nzA=,Ya18 2 3 4
**ii*iii***********}#}i***ii*i************#ii*****iiia*#i****a*****iiia*************}}}***
COLIFORM, FECAL (per 100 ml) SM18 9222D <1 45000 181800 40000
Fiaataaaa}iaa�aiiiiaii+aataaa}iiaasatitaatiaita+a+i}aaaaaaaaaaaiiiiiiiaasai}aiiititaaai}ii
AVALYSIS man 5 6 7 B
COLIFORM, FECAL (per 100 ml) SM15 9222D 210000 51000 18 27
< = Less than
> - Greater than
RECEIVED
FEB 1 1 1999
WLLE
PAGE 1 OF 1 REG. OFFICE
The data and other Intormation contained on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is M E M 8 E Ft
rendered upon the otmdttion that It Is not to be reproduced wholly or in pan for advenlsing or other purposes withmA written approval
from the laborsbxy. -
USDA -EPA -NIOSH Testing Food Saniffitlon Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Raseatch

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION Nr_ #11
817 CASTLE HA HE STREET Nr #37714
CAYETTEVILLE, HC. 28303 USDA #3787
[phone] i-[phone] (VAX)
AIR • FUEL • WATER • FOOD • WASTES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CERT #2542.3
CLTENT: NC DBHNR DATE RECD: 02/09/99 SAMPLED: 02/08/99
ADDRESS: Wachovia Building, Suite 714 -SAMPLED BY: J. Brown
Fauetteville, NC. 28301 DELIVE1tED �Y: J. Brown
CONTACT PERSON: Mr. J. Brown SAMPLE CODE: W54, Stream, Grab
ACCOUNT IRR4BER: #KNO03 REF'ERE14CE: SGC Farm #29
SAMPLES TD: 1. - upntrAam - TD #99WU2§04
2. Discharge Point #1. - ID #99WE2905
3. Ditch bretWr9n discharge points - IU 499WO2906
4. Discharge- j' int #2 _ !D #99WE2907
5. Soutcb -- ID!talo Y'E.2309
t
6. Belaw discharge print 42 - 10 #99'vIE2909 )
7. Entry to stream - ID #t99WE,2910'
8. downstream - ICS #99WD2911
DATA REVIEWED BY:
DATE REPORTED: 02./10/99
L k k I l L 1 1 1 i k 1 1 -1 l# 1 k i l L 1 1 L i 1 k 1 k i L i-1 i k# k L
AX" -f51.3 METHOD 1 2 3 4
+d-d•L L�i1•,F�-+k'L41,11.114.4.",+,1.4.44-J i L}.,*AV-k 4-4A*4+4- 4A. 4e* 6i•k tJ.6i 4, 1, 'k.
COLTPOP14, FECAL (per 100 ml) SM1.8 92:22D E1 45000 181.800 90000
1.1.1++4+.,i 4L -9 A. A+4 Is. .1+4-k+a L'&4k -Z"i. .L i4,4j :l++-L1.Li++i +4 b.Ll+44. 61 - -0ei{.++-i'4+}4r4.L++4. 4.1.
ANALYSIS METHOD 5 6 7 S
L+*+**++t}.,#*****++*+*++*++*4+*+++++*+*#*#*+*++*}*+*++4*4+**+1+*it;r 4- 4- *+++++**.)r¢#*k+**#}+i
COLIFORM, FECAL (per 100 ml! SM18 922217 110000 51003 18 27
If
L�.ss than
> = Grea"re.r than
2:GEI NF1
RECEIVED
FEB 1 1 19§9
FAYETTEMLLE
REG. OFFICE ,
i
The data and other irllurmstlon corMdnea on this. and ower aC=nPsnytng doa,merrm reprWerrtbnfy the sampia(s)-01)aed and is IIA E M B E R
rendered upon the concHon that It is not to be reproduced wholly or In part for adveftistnp or other purposes without written appmvai
from the laboratory.
USDA -EPA -NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemie! and Microbiological Analyses and Research

FAYET17EVILLE DMSION
817 Castle Hayne Street Fayetteville. NC 28303 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
A
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PAGE OF
ENT NAME SADOREss:
NCDchIIC — QGI) U(
e/�' $-{r-e e�
r-002 r t✓ �l l W C a? -30t
PO;
PROJECTILOCAT$ON:
8 oC Fw- v n a
MOF
e
O
T
L
E
S
Date
TYPE OF ANALYSIS
lRoffriquibAed
PRESERVATION CODE
\4
a
t(
1;
2
y 9 9
Iry
. Sigasture)
Date
Time
Received by. (Sign re)
Date
Time
3
CODE: A a -WC ONLY
8 = HNO3 (04Z + 4eC
C a H2SO4 (ph<4 + 44•C
D a Na0H + -WC
E - ZN AcelstDa + <CC
F a
ACT PERSM
PHONET
SAMPLER:
�C �� �CvZtJY1
DATE 1 METHOD OF SKIPMEWr
LAB 1D 0
SAMPLE TYPE
DAIS
TIME
COMP
ORM
PH
D.O.
TEW IC
REIL
CHLOROW
ubve- Esc cl6l k4l
Relinquished by: (Signatarei
Date
Time
Received by: (Signature(
Date
7
8
ITIme
l
�ni'2c�
q
o,Sc
Cn 4 s-frc.4,
f
t*
Relinqul hed (Signature
Date
Time
Receiv W. (Signature}
Date
Time
lRoffriquibAed
a-�
2
y 9 9
Iry
. Sigasture)
Date
Time
Received by. (Sign re)
Date
Time
3
4
Relinquished by; (Signature)
Date
Time
Received bY, (Signature]
Date
Time
J1
6
Relinquished by: (Signatarei
Date
Time
Received by: (Signature(
Date
7
8
ITIme
Comments or Special Hazards:

JA4E5:B. HUNT JR..
=yGOVERNOR -
HOLMAN'
ySECRETARY '
iCERR'T STEVEN9 k`
t1C''z a
I]IRECTOR
.#�; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
FAYETTE VILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 17, 2000
Greg Brown
785 Hwy 24 East
R.O. Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Permit No. AWS 090153
Brown's of Carolina Farm #29 and #93
Facility No. 09 - 153
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Brown:
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -discharge permit
for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, you have
been found to be in violation of your 2H .0217 Permit.
On February 29, 2000, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division
of Water Quality performed a routine fly -over of the Brown's of Carolina Farm #29 and
#93 in Bladen County. During the fly -over, it was observed that the facility was irrigating
and wastewater was ponding and appeared to be entering a ditch adjacent to the spray
field. A site visit was made to the facility on March 2, 2000 to confirm the findings of the
flight. Wastewater was observed in several places within field ditches at the BOC #93
site. Wastewater was also observed ponded in the spray field along with a ditch adjacent
to the farm path at Farm #29. The ditch had been blocked to prevent wastewater from
leaving the site, and wastewater was being removed from the ditch at the time of the
inspection. It was recommended to Roddy Hayes, the farm manager, to also reclaim the
wastewater from the ditch at the Farm #93 site. General Permit condition II.4 states that
"Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the Plant Available Nitrogen rate for the receiving crop or result
in runoff during any given application.". It was observed that some of the waste structures
at the facility were observed to be in the emergency storage level.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following items be addressed:
1. If not already accomplished, lower the lagoon levels to the required freeboard as
specified in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) and/or your
Permit in a manner that is consistent with your CAWMP and your Permit.
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714 / SYSTUL BLD. FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Brown's of Carolina Farm #29 & #93
April 17, 2000
2. Please provide specific actions proposed to prevent future freeboard violations at this facility, which are
not in compliance with the CAWMP or the General Permit.
3. Perform a more detailed and thorough inspection of the spray field conditions, before and during an
irrigation event, to prevent ponding and runoff of wastewater.
4. Provide a detailed explanation as to why the runoff from the application field occurred.
5. Comply with all conditions of the CAWMP and the General Permit.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility's General Permit being
revoked and being required to obtain an individual non -discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the Division of Water
Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than 525,000.00 per day per violation.
Please notify this office in writing on or before May 12, 2000 at the letterhead address as to the
actions taken or proposed to be taken to resolve these violations.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either Mr. Jeffery
Brown, Environmental Engineer or myself at [phone].
ely,
Paul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Sonya Avant - Compliance Group
Sam Warren - Bladen Co. NRCS
Trent Allen - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files - Raleigh

MAY -I5 -DD MOIL 4:57 PM BROWN S
85 Hwy 24 East
PO Bax 487
warSaW, NC 28398-0457
Voice- (91 a) 295'-1800
Fax- (SIC) 29"1 BB
Fcaix
Tow
FAX NO. 9102961675 P. 2
BROWN'S
OF CAROLINA
a 15-3
From:
Phone: _ E7atm
Rs: } CC:
❑ Urgent 0 For Review O Plemm Comment 0 Please Reply © Please Recycle
r�
i
0 Page 1

MAY -15-00 MON 4:58. FM BROWN S FAX NO. 9102961675 F. 3
BROWNS
OF CAROLINA
May 15, 2000
Paul Rawls
Reglonal Wafer Quality Sup&fy&e
DENR-DWQ
225 Green Street
Suite 714, Systel Bid_
Fayetteville. NC 28301-5043.'
Dear Mr. Rawls,
This letter is In response to the Notice of violation letter sent to 13rorvn's of
Ci-arollna, which was concerning'BOC t#29 & #93, dated April 17. 2000.
At this time. 1 would like to report the following information in response to the
five requests made In the letter you writ:
1. Brown's of Carolina Is happy to report that as of Saturday. May 13. 2000.
the lagoon levels at this facility are as follows:
130C 029 = 29 inches of freeboard
BOC *93A = 32 inches of freeboard
BOC #9313 = 32 inches of freeboard
2. Brown's of Carolina Is committed to maintaining 100% compliance on all
Of its facilities, AS part of our Comprehensive Environmental Assurance
system (CEAS), we have implemented a program to set and track
pumping volt une goals and scheduling pumping events based on crop
needs and storage capacity_ This dynamic and comprehensive
environmental management system will provide Increased assurance of
permit compliance as 11 pertains io freeboard I&MA.
3. Another component of our Ci^AS is the implementation of an irrigation
checkllst that Is filled out by the operator each time an (Mgation event
occurs. This checklist is a guide for our operators to follow before.
during, and after each application event to help our operators to
assessing the conditions In which they are operating and maldng the
proper adjustments,
4. As explanation for the runoff from this application field on this instance.
we Can only recognize one factor that can be attributed. The operator
performing thL,; application event made a poor judgement and decision as
to the moisture Conditions of this application field, and subsequently. did
not make the rooper adjustments to the irrigation equipment to roduce the
application rate to a more acceptable level for these conditions. The
proper application rate should have been determined. then the nozzle
size, retrieval speed, and pressure should have bccn adjusted to
compensate for the elevated field moisture conditions. FUrthCTmIOre. tho
;BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC.
785 HWY 24 EAST • P.D. BOX a87 • WARSAW, N.C. 28395 • PHONE [phone]

MAY -15-00 MQH 4 58 PM BROWNS
FAX NO. 9102961675 P. 4
proper application rate at that time may have been to not make that
particular application at all.
S. Based on the information discussed herein and present knowtedge of thf;
current state of this operation, i believe this facility to be in c ornphance
with the conditions of rhe CAwMP and the General Permit for this facility.
w$ bppredate your continued cooperation with compliance matters
pertaining to Brown's of Carolina facilities. Browns of Carolina Is committed
to exemplary environmental stewardship and environmental assurance on all
our production facilities. .
Ce",
us Simmons
Director of
Environmental Plaming
& Toctm cal Semces

'CDEN
-HUNT
. JAMES 8.
JR__`1
'.GOVERNOR
ILL HOLMAN
_
-:' SZeR ETARY
�- �.tiC •d`l`J
n
4
294^-':S:•...
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
August 21, 2000
CERTIFIEQ MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attention: Mr. Glen Davis
Brown's of Carolina
P.O. Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject:
NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND
RECOMMENDATION FOR ENFORCEMENT
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2H .0217
Brown's of Carolina Farm # 29 and -993
Facility No. 09-153 Permit No. AWS090153
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Davis:
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to
15A NCAC 2H .02 17, you have been found to be in violation of your 2H
.0217 Permit.
On August 8. 2000, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality conducted an annual inspection of your swine
farm located in Bladen County. During the inspection, a review of the waste
application records revealed that plant available nitrogen (PAN) had been
over applied on numerous pulls in excess of the CAWMP. Pulls #1, #2, #4,
45,#6,47,98., and 410 had over application amounts of 22, 52, 292, 140,
268, 100, 92, and 59 pounds respectively on the wheat crop.
2 0 e. 0.
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714 1 SYSTEL BLD. FAYET7EVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2 830 1-5 04 3
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN ERVAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Glen Davis
August 21, 2000
Page 2
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following items be addressed:
1. Follow the CAWMP in regards to the PAN to be applied to crops.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing its General
Permit and being required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from
taking enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the
Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00
per day per violation.
You are hereby notified that the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality is considering sending a recommendation for enforcement action to the Director of the
Division of Water Quality. The Recommendation concerns the failure of this farm to comply
with the plant available nitrogen rates (PAN) in the CAWMP for the specified crops (small
grain).
If you have an explanation for this violation that you wish to present, please respond to this
office by September 15, 2000. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action
is still deemed appropriate, you explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the
enforcement package for his consideration.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either
myself or Mr. John Hasty, Environmental Specialist, at [phone].
Paul I. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Sue Homewood - Compliance Group
Sam Warren - Bladen Co. NRCS
Trent Allen - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files - Raleigh

-�.PAM16'5 H. HUNT JR._-
.GOV£RNOR;�. s
'.BILL HOLMAN -
`StCRETARY
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMEN-r OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE:souROES
DIVISiON OF WATER QUALITY
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL.. OFFICE
August 21, 2000
-E FED MML
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attention: Mr, Glen Davis
Bros -ri's of Carolina
P -O. Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject:
NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND
RECOMMENDATION FOR ENFORCEMENT
Administrative Code I5A NCAC 2H.0217
Brown's of Carolina Farm # 29 and 493
Facility No. 09-153 Permit No. AWS090153
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Davis:
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to
15A NCAC 2H .0217, you have been found to be in '%Iolation of your 2H
.0217 Permit.
On August 8, 2000, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality conducted an annual inspection of your swine
farm located in Bladen County. During the inspection, a review of the waste
application records revealed that plant available nitrogen (PAN) had been
over applied on numerous pulls in excess of the CAWMP. Pulls #1, 92, 94,
#57 #6, #7, 48, and #10 had over application amounts of 22, 52, 292, 140,
268, 100, 92, and 59 pounds respectively on the wheat crop.
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714 / SYSTEL EILO. FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301,5043
PHONE [phone] F.AX 910-486-4707
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RELY CLEO/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Glen Davis
August 21, 2000
Page 2
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following items be addressed:
1. Follow the CAWMP in regards to the PAN to be applied to crops.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing its General
Permit and being required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from
taking enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the
Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00
per day per violation.
You are hereby notified that the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality is considering sending a recommendation for enforcement action to the Director of the
Division of Water Quality. The Recommendation concerns the failure of this farm to comply
with the plant available nitrogen rates (PAN) in the CAWMP for the specified crops (small
grain).
If you have an explanation for this violation that you wish to present, please respond to this
office by September 15 2000. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action
is still deemed appropriate, you explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the
enforcement package for his consideration.
Ifyou have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either
myself or Mr. John Hasty, Environmental Specialist, at [phone].
Sincery; ----
P
.__ .7
Paul L. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Sue Homewood - Compliance Group
Sam Warren - Bladen Co. MRCS
Trent Allen - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files - Raleigh

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 2, 2000
MEMORANDUM
TO: DWQ Files
Fayetteville Regional Office
FROM: Paul Rawls /0
RE: Brown's of Carolina Farms
Fayetteville Region
Attached letter faxed to Mr. Guss Simmons on September 28, 2000.
lbs

,r
�'GOV£RNOR
M1:L�
~'':SILL. HOLMAN'
­IS5 RETARY
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 27, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Guss Simmons
Brown's of Carolina, Incorporated
Post Office Box 487
Warsaw, North Carolina 28308
SUBJECT: Continuing High Freeboard Levels
Brown's of Carolina Swine Farms
Fayetteville Region
Dear Mr. Simmons:
This letter is to serve as follow-up to a discussion that was held with Mr. Glenn
Davis with Brown's of Carolina, John Hasty, Environmental Specialist, Division of
Water Quality and myself September 26, 2000 concerning high freeboard levels
at several of the Brown's of Carolina (BOC) swine farms located in the
Fayetteville Region.
The Water Quality Section of the Fayetteville Regional Office has performed a file
review of several of the BOC swine farms in this region and has confirmed that
freeboard problems continue to be a issue throughout the 2000 Spring and
Summer cropping window. These farms were also noted to have had freeboard
problems during previous years as well.
Our review identifies at a minimum farms 13, 28, 29 and 30 have had ongoing
problems and at last report freeboard levels remain less than that required. This is
particularly disturbing as weather patterns this year, especially during late spring
and summer, have been in my opinion somewhat normal. During our discussion
your staff relayed efforts to improve waste management and the desire of BOC to
comply with the rules and regulations pertaining to swine farms.
-continued-
2 0 1 4
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1 617
website: h2o.enr.state.nc.us PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
*sr
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 27, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Guss Simmons
Brown's of Carolina, Incorporated
Post Office Box 487
Warsaw, North Carolina 28308
SUBJECT: Continuing High Freeboard Levels
Brown's of Carolina Swine Farms
Fayetteville Region
Dear Mr. Simmons:
This letter is to serve as follow-up to a discussion that was held with Mr. Glenn
Davis with Brown's of Carolina, John Hasty, Environmental Specialist, Division of
Water Quality and myself September 26, 2000 concerning high freeboard levels
at several of the Brown's of Carolina (BOC) swine farms located in the
Fayetteville Region.
The Water Quality Section of the Fayetteville Regional Office has performed a file
review of several of the BOC swine farms in this region and has confirmed that
freeboard problems continue to be a issue throughout the 2000 Spring and
Summer cropping window. These farms were also noted to have had freeboard
problems during previous years as well.
Our review identifies at a minimum farms 13, 28, 29 and 30 have had ongoing
problems and at last report freeboard levels remain less than that required. This is
particularly disturbing as weather patterns this year, especially during late spring
and summer, have been in my opinion somewhat normal. During our discussion
your staff relayed efforts to improve waste management and the desire of BOC to
comply with the rules and regulations pertaining to swine farms.
-continued-
2 0 1 4
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1 617
website: h2o.enr.state.nc.us PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Simmons
September 27, 2000
Page 2 of 3
During the meeting I asked that BOC furnish the Fayetteville Regional office information on or
before October 4, 2000: (The following list may contain items not requested during the meeting)
- For each farm noted above please explain what events have lead to freeboard level
noncompliance this year and if BOC evaluated the reduction in the number of swine at
each farm as a means to maintain compliance prior to becoming noncompliant.
-It appears that the 30 day Plan of Action submitted 911100 for farm #28 will not be met. Please
explain why. If other BOC farms have not met or are projected at this time not to meet
other Plans of Action please provide similar explanations and information by October 4,
2000.
-Please provide all freeboard levels for the aforementioned farms for this year from 1/1/2000 to
present.
-Please provide the most up to date waste management plans for the aforementioned farms_
-Please provide all records pertaining to waste application for the aforementioned farms to include
waste analysis, waste application and nutrient balances for the farms noted during 2000.
-For the farms noted please also provide a detailed plan to ensure compliance with each waste
utilization plan for the remainder of this cropping cycle and the next cropping cycle
ending in early 2001.
-Please also provide any lease agreements for additional land that could potentially be used in
alleviating problems at the fauns noted.
It is also understood that waste was or is in the process of being pumped and hauled from farm
# 13 to farm # 14. PIease be advised that "prior" to pumping and hauling of waste from one farm to
another a detailed analysis should be performed to determine if the farm receiving the waste can
adequately accept the waste and that the certified waste management plan has been revised
accordingly. This office should be aware of such action prior to pumping and hauling and approve
such action prior to commencement of the activity. Further, such measures should be considered
prior to noncompliance not only as a remedy for high freeboard emergencies.
This letter is to also acknowledge receipt of a FAX from Mr. Kevin Weston today (7127100). The
FAX entitled "Detailed Plan of Action" outlined actions taken or are in process to address farm
428 problems. The FAX includes the section "2. Emergency Pump and Haul", in this section Mr.
Weston outlines that a pump and haul activity will be initiated to bring the freeboard level to a
compliant level. In a follow-up call to Mr. Weston today (7127100) it was discovered that details
of this pump and haul operation have not yet been finalized. As noted above a detailed analysis

'r r
Mr. Simmons
September 27, 2000
Page 3 of 3
should be performed to determine if the farm receiving the waste can adequately accept the waste
and the certified waste management plan is revised accordingly. This office should receive such
evaluation and revised plan prior to the initiation of the pump and haul process.
Please be advised that the receipt of this FAX does not absolve BOC from failing to meet
the 30 day POA for farm #28 submitted 911100.
The FAX outlines that "Animal Flow Manipulation" will be employed to also address farm #28
problems and that `'Brown's of Carolina has adopted a policy which states that "no animal will be
placed on any farm with less than compliant levels of freeboard". The FAX also indicates that "no
replacement breeding stock will be sent to the farm". Please provide how many head of stock
have not been sent to farm #28 as a result of this policy during 2000. The FAX further states that
BOC will maintain this policy until compliant freeboard levels are attained. I urge BOC to
consider expanding this policy not to restock animals until BOC has determined that the entire
waste utilization pian can be met throughout the current and if necessary the following crop cycle.
This office views the freeboard levels at these farms critical as we are still in hurricane season.
Brown's of Carolina should make every effort to lower lagoon levels to achieve compliance and
to avoid preventable environmental impact.
Please be advised that fitrnishing the requested information in no way absolves BOC of any
violation past or future and the compliance history of these and other BOC farms is under review
to determine what action, if any, should be initiated by this office.
If you have questions or comments regarding this letter please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Paul E. Rawls
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Coleen Sullins, DWQ
Dennis Ramsey, DWQ
DWQ FRO Files BOC Farms 13, 28,29,30
DWQ Central Files
69 -ts3

North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Fayetteville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Sherri Evans -Stanton, Acting Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
January 16, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Greg Brown
Brown's of Carolina
P. O. Box 497
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject: Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent
Brown's of Carolina Farm # 29 & # 93
Facility No. 09-153 Permit No. AWS 090153
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Brown:
NCDENR
Cod
S- 4-0
s�ev2 L�wr'S.
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non discharge permit for the
subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217, you have been found to
be in violation of your 2H.0217 Permit.
On November 13, 2000, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Soil and
Water performed a routine annual review of the Brown's of Carolina Farms #29 and #93 in
Bladen County. The review revealed that pull #7 had been over applied on by 41.67 pounds of
nitrogen on the wheat crop. This is in violation of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
for the farms and the General Permit- This was referred to the Division of Water Quality, as
required, by the Division of Soil and Water.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following item(s) be addressed:
Avoid over application of nitrogen to crops.
Failure to comply with the above condition(s) may result in the facility losing its General
Permit and being required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility. Please be
advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement
actions for this violation or any past or future violation.
225 GREEN STREET- SUITE 7141 SY5TEL BUILDING / FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28301-5043
PHONE[phone] FAX(9l0)486-0707 WWW.ENR.STATL.NQ tJS,1Nft/
AN EQUA1. OPPORTUNITY/ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- 50% RECYCLED/]00% POST CONSUMER PAPER
UENR TOLL FREE HOTLINE: [phone]

Mr. Broom
1-16-01
Page 2
You are hereby notified that based on the above information, the Division of Water Quality is
considering forwarding recommendation to the Director for consideration of enforcement for this
violation. Furthermore, the Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of
not more than $25,000.00 per day per violation.
If you have an explanation for this violation that you wish to present to this office, please
forward a detailed explanation, in writing, of the events noted and why you feel that this office
should not proceed with recommendation for enforcement. This response should received by this
office on or before Japaary_30, 2001.
Information provided to this office will be reviewed and if enforcement is still deemed
appropriate, your explanation forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his
consideration.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either
myself or Mr. John Hasty, Environmental Specialist, at [phone].
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Sonya Avant -Compliance Group
Sam Warren -Bladen Co. MRCS
Trent Allen-DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files -Raleigh

Facility Number 09 153 Date of Whit: 2-22-1000 Tuts: 3:35 Printed on: 112212007
O Not O rational OBelownreshoE3
O Permitted E Certified 13 Conditionally Certified D Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Fmm#29.&Fatcm.#9J---•-_......._......................... ............... __ County: ....�..._._.�._-....... ...... .FRO--
Owner
RO..—Owner Name: ....... _.__.. Blew'EE:AAMmvjft wLnr ... __._....... Phone No: 914-�44r1& __.__. _ r.__-•--•--•-_--•--__._....
Facility Contact: _ -- -- -- • -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Title: - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - Phone No: -_ -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- - -- --
MailingAddress: MRa 9$3........._ ....... .... ............... .......................................... ....k'lr iMMAC........ ............. _...... _. ...._ ..2.............
Onsite Representative: Bsedtly.H . ............._ .. � ___..__.....__ Integrator. I j=___ —
Certified Operator Radedck_% .. _ .. Rays -- _ .. -- .. -- _ -- -- -- -- Operator Certification Number: =92 _ -. — _ w _ _-
Location of Farm:
M # 1172 and Hwy 131 near Bladenboro
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude s • 4 " Longitude 78 • *
me
❑ Gilts : :......:::
❑ Boars Total SSLW 3,892,000
Ma6am 8c Strewn
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? Of yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
W$ste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .....--...QUA_....._... __......43k�__....._....- - ..2Q..- _..... ....--...._......._.._ ._�....� . _.._._....._.._.... _ _-....._.._
Freeboard (inches): -- - -- -- L2 - -- -- -- -- -- - -� 2. - _ . -- -- -- --� - -- -- - - -- -- .. _- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- • -- -- -- ; - -- -- -- -- -• -- --
.. C
.
...
:'Des Des Cr
n .:.... :. >...
aci.Po ulationPry
" :::.
.
,:Ca
Cad ::Po ton:
❑ Wean to Feeder
FO—Layer
Dairy
®Feeder to Finish
16000�
❑ Non -Layer
ms
Nan -Dairy
® Farrow to Wean
4000
.... ..,.
[] Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish.
Total [)q!9 E1 1r_BpacEty
20,000
me
❑ Gilts : :......:::
❑ Boars Total SSLW 3,892,000
Ma6am 8c Strewn
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? Of yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
W$ste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .....--...QUA_....._... __......43k�__....._....- - ..2Q..- _..... ....--...._......._.._ ._�....� . _.._._....._.._.... _ _-....._.._
Freeboard (inches): -- - -- -- L2 - -- -- -- -- -- - -� 2. - _ . -- -- -- --� - -- -- - - -- -- .. _- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- • -- -- -- ; - -- -- -- -- -• -- --

5100
Facility Number. 09-153 Date of Inspection 2-22-2000 Printed on:
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maiutenancefmiprove ment?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9- Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancefimprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12- Crop type
Confinned on aacx
1222001
[:)Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
[I Yes
❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes Q No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
l5. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
BggLuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iet WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc-)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22- Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25- Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[e visit was made to check lagoon levels. Lagoon 93B contains a spillway. Level was 12 inches below the spillway (total freeboard of
") Farm was pumping at time of site visit. The linear and two stationary guns were being used for waste application at farm 93. Three
itionary guns were being used for irrigation at farm 29. Wastewater was observe ponded in the portion of the field at farm 93 in which
two stationary guns were being used- Mr. Hayes was instructed to be careful and prevent wastewater from leaving the fields. Need to
mply with the CAW IP and the General Permit.
Vr
Reviewer/Inspector Name ::....

Revievver/Irwpector Signature: Date: 5/00
Facility Number. Date of Inspection 2-22-20x1 Printed on: 1/2212001
Odor Iss�e_s
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below 0 Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28_ Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, 0 Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 0 Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc_) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the Bush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthenporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

IType of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation 1
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification ® Other © Denied Access
Facility Number 09 153 Date of Visit: 3/2f2DOD Time: E== Printed on: 1222ooi
O Not O rational O Below Threshold
M Permitted M Certified Q Condtttonally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: --
Farm Name: FArmAVA.Farm County: Bla&n..... ......... FRO_—
OwnerOwner
Name:....... __._....�._._. _. �. _ 81[tp:aAi �atv�iupEa.Ltc,�.___...._ Phone No: 9�1��W�ll....._._,--•-- ----- _ _�.------
Facility Contact- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- __ ._ _ _ __ _ ._ -- -- _ Title:. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- _ ._ ._ _. _ Phone No:
Mailing Address: Q $.4Riw. ......._ _ ... ....... . .......... .._.
Onsite Representative- Rad,ft-H------ .. --------- _.......--........ Integrator:
Certified Operator. Rabdd W .. _ -- -- -- -- Hayem -- -- -- -- Operator Certification Number: 20292 --
Location of Farm:
3R # 1172 and Hwy 131 pear Bladenboro
® Swine ❑ Poultry
❑ Cattle
❑ Horse Latitude_j' ��
i W -_jK Longitudes
_.. -.
:.
Design
... :.:
::::Current Deaign ...:
Current:...
Design Cgrrent
........ ...:.
Svve;re _.
Ca ac
Poetry .... .. ..
Po matron .: Ca ac
Po uiatiidn .Cattle ...:
C.o....
` Poafir6n ...
p Wean to Feeder
Layer
LO Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
16000
::
p N on -Layer I
Non-l3airy
® Farrow to Wean
4000-
... . .
p Farrow to Feeder
Other
Farrow to Finish
:.:........
...
Tout nestgn Capacr<ey
': 20,000
ID Oilts
SSLW
3,892,000
❑ BoarsTotat
N6er of Lagoons 3 a ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Ares ©Spray Field Aree
]Hoidrag Poneie 1 Solid Traps' . ❑ No Li uid Waste Management System
Discharges A Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon M Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d_ Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
19 Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
NIA
p Yes ❑ No
C1 Yes p No
p Yes M No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes p No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:-....._#F'}3A......- ...._.._..#9� _........__..__ .2`�......- ..-._..... ...�..__ _ _ _ _.............._....._ _....._ ...._
Freeboard (inches): -- -- -.18-- -- - -- -- -- 24- -- -- -- -- -- -- --��-- -- -- -- - -- -- - -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- --

S/08
Facility Number. 09-153 Date of Inspection 31112000 Printed on:
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the strwtures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenaruoe/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste APPiIi` Wm
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelmprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? Cl Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
"/wakes
1l2212�t?0'1
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
Q No
® Yes
❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops diger with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reaahvd Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (tel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewedlnspector fail to discuss reviewfmspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You win receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes a No
[] Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes E$ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
1. / 11. A routine fly -over was conducted over the facility on 2/29/00. Wastewater was observed ponding in the spray field and appeared
be leaving the spray field. A site visit was made to the facility on 312/21300. Wastewater was observed in the ditch several places on the
93 farm (field that contained the linear irrigation system). Wastewater was also observed in the ditch at the #29 farm. Wastewater was
eing pumped out of the ditch at the time of the site visit by Roddy Hayes, the certified operator. Mr. Hayes was also informed that the
Wastewater in the ditches at the #93 facility would also need to be removed. Mr. Hayes was instructed to comply with the CAWMP and the
general Permit. The over application of wastewater was a violation of the CAWMP and the General Permit. Mr. Hayes stated that the di
tc
� the #29 facility had been blocked to prevent wastewater from entering the stream adjacent to the spray field.
qr
Reviewerlluspector Name .....

Revi er/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/00
t�
Facility Number: 09-153 Date of Inspection Printed on: 1/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes [] No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ©No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 13 No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes El No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i -e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes © No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes C) No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

Date of Visit &&2000 Time: 14:30 Printed on: 1222001
o Not rational Q Below Threshold
Permitted M Certified Q Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: - -- -- -- -. -- -•
Farm Name: F Z'1 &.Fates.t93.........---.............. ..._.................... ................. -- County: Bea ............... _ ._._ ..._.._.._. FRO ........
Owner Name:.... _._._._._....... B�t�tR0.A.�aa.Lis..--- -- --•-- Phone No:
Facility Contact- - -- -- -- ------------ ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Title:.._ ...- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- _ Phone No: --
MailingAddress: PO -AUX -497 ............... ........................................................ .... wanaw-pi~...---.........-•-•--....................................... ..._. ..
Onsite Representative: KeXiA !e lq.._._...M.._,............_._..._...._.._...___._._ Integrator. R=W.5
Certified Operator. xcedericli. .._ -- -- -- -- -- Hama -- -- -- _ -- -- _ -- _ -- Operator Certification Number. 2AM
Location of Farm:
R # 1172 and Hwy 131 near Bladenboro
® SvAne ❑ Pouttry
❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude i t • 6
L �" Longitude s • � E. __#u
.. ..
,::: Current .::: ... :.. Design
Current
:Dessgn ,Cu ent.:.:...
Ca :Po nlstian.... Parry.:. .......
C
,. Cantle...::`:......:
P uiatton....:
....
C Po
❑Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Daisy
]:ceder to Finish
16000
❑ Non -Layer
]EI
Non
®Farrow to Wean
4000
. .
_.
[IFarrow to Feeder
❑ Ot}ter.
..
Farrow to Finish
-
Total Dens n Ca aci
Cl
20,00(1 ::
:.:
0 Gilts
::: ..::
:......:: Totaf SSLW
3,892,000
:..
❑ soars
Dbcha=s & Std Imps+cts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c_ If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d- Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from arty part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Ceftfiffl & Treatment
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes CM No
❑ Yes Ci No
[] Yes ® No
0 Yes 19 No
❑ Yes M No
4_ Is storage capacity (freeboard pins storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes CR No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier: .. _...... �3 A... _...� . ... _.. _.. 4-H ... _.. _... - _.. 2Q .... ...... . ... ........ ... ... ....... ... ....._ _.. _.. _.. _... _.. _.. _........ _.. _.. _..
Freeboard (inches): _... -. _24-- -- -- -- - -- -- - 36� - -- -- - -- -- -- -20—
Date
.20--

5100
(.onzUtuw on Ilam
Facility Number. 09-153 Date of Inspection 8-&20f10 printed on:
122/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the strictures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
H No
seepage, etc.)
b. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, nottry DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need mamienancefrmprovement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Ayotication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancefnnprovement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding IN PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
19 Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Soybeans Wheat Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes IN No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes H No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acne determination? ❑ Yes H No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes H No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18_ Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie! WUP, checklists, design, snaps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further
corresuondence about this visit.
s look good at this site.
iuda in plan will be changed to soybeans and wheat
application on wheat crop Jan -March;
1-22 lbs, 412-52 lbs, #4-292 lbs, #5-140 lbs, 46-268 lbs, #7-100 lbs, #8-92 lbs, and #10-59 lbs.
Revlewer/lnspectorNume
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes H No
[] Yes CK No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes H No
1
T

R!!! ftedlnspector Signature: Date: s/pp
Facility Number.. 09-- in Date of Inspection 8-5-200Q printed on: 1rOJ2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe finm the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below CR Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes N No
28_ Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes N No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located new the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes CM No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e_ broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes H No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? CR Yes ❑ No

Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
for Visit O Routine O Complaint @ Fallow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facr�tty Number 09 1S3 Date of Visit: 9r15I1000 Tann: 4:0o Printed on: 1222001
0 Not O rational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certifled 13Conditlonally Certified M Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold- - -- -- -- ---- --
Tarte Name: E .......................... County: B18dien........... .............. FRU .........
Owner Name: _.. BaCaa�Phone No:
Facff ty Contact: qua Dub.. Title:. Phone No:
Matting Address: P!].B�a� 48I........,........ _.. ..........................._ . _....._.... l�'a�c LYS... .._.............-__.......... ............. ��........
Onsite Representative: _........ ......... M.._. v�.._...._.--•--•--•-- -- integrator. Rxuyj) :9.��la.�A�..._ .._�._ .....
Certified Operator:1kWcdclt_Rr. � _ _ _ _ Hayeat -- � _ _ � _ -- -- � � _. Operator Certd-rcation Number. T.112M _ _ _ — _ — --
Location of harm:
3R # 1172 and Hwy 131 near Bladenboro +
® Swine [I Poultry [I Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude':
3 j • �'
�" Longitude i 78 E • F445 i-
Des Current
:.
Des' n
: Curreat:
Des Curren#
ulatror,
1'...
❑ Wean to Feeder
Layer
Dairy
® Feeder to Finish 16000
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
® Farrow to Wean 4000
❑Farrow to Feeder
:: Otho
❑ Farrow to Finish
..
Desi n Ca alit
Total tY
p .
20,000
❑Gilts
Tnta1: SS.LW. .:
3,892,000
❑ Hoary:.....
imher of I a�s 3 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
No liquid waste
Discharges & 5tream 1ppact s
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Area ID Sorav Field Area
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
[:]Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IM No
❑ Yes M No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway CM Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): - -- -12 :.1-3' -- - - -- .....1G _ . _ -. -- -- --1$-- -- -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- - - --- - -- -- -- --

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection ® Operation Review O lagoon Evaluation !
for visit ® Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other [.3 Denied Access
Facility Number 09 i53 Date of Visit. 11 -i3 -200d Ttine: 9:00 Printed on: 1/222001
=Not rational O Below Threshold
Permitted M Certified CE Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold- - -- -- -- -- -- -•
FarmName: .................................................. ..... ... ... .............. County: Blatheu._.......................... ....... FRO ---------
Owner Name: ---.-__. _ BxuwI1:AAf -Csr olinajjw,_-_._--..- Phone No: 9.�.(c
Facility Contact: KeyjxLliyesMn -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Title: Fdaploy -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - Phone No: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
MailingAddress: PQBQX.4&.?............................................................ ........... ...... WA taxaW.KC.............................................._-
Onsite Representative: Xexip-Wc ttu.--...._...__.....___...._....._....... ......... _. Integer. &mmj.'A.utC�srttloia. � ...._......�.._ ._
Certified Operator: F&deddk.- _ -- _ -- -- -- -- Heys -- Operator Certification Number. 2 Z09
Location of Farm:
511 # 1172 and Hwy I3I near Bladenboro &
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 34 `�� �� Longitude t=' F 45 1 ®�
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon [I Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pari of the operation?
3_ Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes ($ No
❑ Yes No
n/a
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes IM No
❑ Yes N No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard pl>LS storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes JR No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): -- -- -- --z5-- - - -- - -- -- -- 2�- -- - -- - -- -- -- -�� -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- --
.:: ...,.: Des
Carseat ..::: .: _.
,Current . �
Des Current
Swine :"`:.::::: ::::...Ca acit :
Po fzlatioa:::::: Poultry.......
Ca `a _ -Population
ElWean to Feeder
❑ Layer
Dairy
IM Feeder to Finish 16000
: ❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
® Farrow to Wean 4000
[] Farrow to Feeder
❑ �e
::
.: ` .....
❑Farrow to Finish......
Total Desi
20,000jl�
❑ Gilts
......
--:: Total S5LW :
3,892,000
❑Boars.:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon [I Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pari of the operation?
3_ Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes ($ No
❑ Yes No
n/a
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes IM No
❑ Yes N No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard pl>LS storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes JR No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): -- -- -- --z5-- - - -- - -- -- -- 2�- -- - -- - -- -- -- -�� -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- --

5100 Cor finued on aagr
Facility Number. 09-153 Date of Inspection 11-13-2000 printed on: 122/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelmiprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste AR21iwatian
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/unprovement?
11. is there evidence of over application? D Excessive Ponding ® PAN D Hydraulic Overload
D Yes 9 No
D Yes 0 No
® Yes D No
® Yes D No
D Yes IN No
D Yes ® No
® Yes D No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? D Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crap need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
aired Rome& & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18_ Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(rel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis &. soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
D Yes D No
D Yes D No
D Yes D No
D Yes IN No
D Yes R No
D Yes ® No
D Yes ® No
D Yes ® No
D Yes ® No
D Yes ®No
N Yes D No
D Yes ® No
0 Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? D Yes ® No
- Need to mow inside slope of lagoon and outside slope of lagoon to toe of lagoon slope. Need to remove all foreign material from sow
B- Need to address air relief valve at finisher lagoon to prevent runoff into the ditch beside lagoon. Air relief valve is at hydrant hook-up.
Brown's of Carolina was working on problem at time of review. Need to address leak on flush line (refill line) on front of finisher house
#16.
1 I- Wheat was broadcasted over soybeans. Soybeans are still in the spray field. Over -Application was noted on hydrant #7 41.67 lbs.
aitogen over -applied per acre. Hydrant #7 covers 6.35 acres. Over -application was noted on wheat crop earlier this year by DWQ.
Over -Application greater than 10% of PAN in Waste Plan requires Notice of Referral to DWQ by DSWC.
Reviewergngwdor Name

- 1RevWer/Inapector SknatUm uDt..awr�r. S/001 1
1Facility Number. 09-193 Date of Inspection 1i-13-2040 printed on: 1=DO1
Num
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes D No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during lend application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt., D Yes IN No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? [ Yes ® No
30_ Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) D Yes M No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permaner►themporary cover? D Yes D No
Over -Application of waste to wheat requires Brown's of Carolina to notify DWQ according to General Permit Requirements.
Need to set a marker in finisher lagoon with heavy rainfall factor so that it can be read correctly (for the General Permit
)te: Soybeans needs to be harvested this week followed by wheat being re -planted due to poor stand being broadcasted_
)te: One of the liner irrigation systems broke into duc to ditch (little furrow) in the field. Brown's of Carolina will have linear
igation repaired this week.
Ae: Operator In Charge for farm site has changed to John S_ Cain, Sr. Operator License Number 23570. Need to send in change
Operator In Charge to Division of Water Quality c/o Beth Buffington Raleigh NC.

North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Fayetteville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Sherri Evans -Stanton, Acting Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
January 16, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Greg Brown
Brown's of Carolina
P. O. Box 497
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject: Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent
Broom's of Carolina Farm # 29 & # 93
Facility No. 09-153 Permit No. AWS 090153
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Brown:
e��
NCDENR
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non discharge permit for the
subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, you have been found to
be in violation of your 2H.0217 Permit.
On November 13, 2000, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Soil and
Water performed a routine annual review of the Brown's of Carolina Farms #29 and 993 in
Bladen County. The review revealed that pull #7 had been over applied on by 41.67 pounds of
nitrogen on the wheat crop. This is in violation of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
for the farms and the General Permit. This was referred to the Division of Water Quality, as
required, by the Division of Soil and Water.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following item(s) be addressed:
Avoid over application of nitrogen to crops.
Failure to comply with the above condition(s) may result in the facility losing its General
Permit and being required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility. Please be
advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement
actions for this violation or any past or future violation.
225 GREEN STREET - SUITE 714 / SYSTEL BUILDING / FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] WWW.•N1 R. ' ,AT -.NC.I lS!ENR/
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY; AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- 500/, RECYCLED/]0% POST CONSUMER PAPER
DENR TOLL FREE HOTLINE: [phone]

Mr. Brown
1-16-01
Page 2
You are hereby notified that based on the above information, the Division of Water Quality is
considering forwarding recommendation to the Director for consideration of enforcement for this
violation. Furthermore, the Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of
not more than $25,000.00 per day per violation.
If you have an explanation for this violation that you wish to present to this office, please
forward a detailed explanation, in writing, of the events noted and why you feel that this office
should not proceed with recommendation for enforcement. This response should received by this
office on or before January 30, 2401.
Information provided to this office will be reviewed and if enforcement is still deemed
appropriate, your explanation forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his
consideration.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either
myself or Mr. John Hasty, Environmental Specialist, at [phone].
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Sonya Avant -Compliance Group
Sam Warren -Bladen Co. NRCS
Trent Allen-DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files -Raleigh

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION
FAYE`fTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
December 5, 2000
Brown's of Carolina, Inc. /V
c/o Kevin Weston Spti�
PO Box 487
Warsaw, North Carolina 28398 1-16 r-�
Subject: Operational Review Notice of Referral for
Farm #29 & Farm #93, Facility Number 09-153
Dear Mr. Weston: l� "
On November 13, 2000, an operational review was conducted on Farms # 29 and
# 93, Facility Number 09-153 in Bladen County. This review, undertaken in
accordance with G. S. 143-215.1OD, is one of two routine site visits scheduled
for all subject animal operations in 2000. The Division of Water Quality will
conduct a second compliance inspection.
During the operational review, the following items were noted:
• Need to address air relief valve at finisher lagoon to prevent runoff into
the ditch beside lagoon. Need to address leak on flush line (refill line) on
front of finisher house #16.
• Wheat was broadcasted over soybeans. Soybeans are still in the spray
field. The wheat on hydrant #7 was over -applied on by 41.67 lbs.
nitrogen per acre. Over application was noted on the wheat crop earlier
this year by DWQ-
• Over -Application of waste to wheat requires Brown's of Carolina to
notify DWQ according to General Permit Requirements.
• Need to set a marker in finisher lagoon with heavy rainfall factor so that
it can be read correctly (for General Permit Requirements).
• Soybeans need to be harvested this week followed by wheat being re-
planted due to poor stand being broadcasted.
• One of the linear irrigation systems broke into due to ditch (little furrow)
in the field. mi
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714 1 SYSTEL BLD. FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE: [phone] FAX. [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED / 10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
DENiR TOLL FREE HOTLINE: [phone]

Mr. Weston
December 5, 2000
Page 2
• Operator in charge for farm site needs to be changed to John S. Cain, Sr.
Operator License Number 23570. Need to send in change form of
Operator In Charge to Division of Water Quality c/o Beth Buffington in
Raleigh, NC.
It was for these reasons that your operation was referred to the Division of Water Quality for further
investigation and possible enforcement action. G.S. 143-215.10E requires me to notify the Division
of Water Quality and the owner/operator of these observed violations.
Please review the enclosed inspection report and comment sections for site findings and corrective
actions as discussed.
On behalf of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation, I appreciate your cooperation with this
operational review. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 910486-1541 if you have any questions,
concerns or need additional information concerning this operational review. Questions concerning
your operation's Plan of Action should be directed at your technical specialist or the Division of
Water Quality. '
Sincerely,
del
Scott Faircloth
Environmental Specialist
cc: -Paul Rawls, Division of Water Quality
Carroll Pierce, Division of Soil & Water Conservation
Bladen Soil & Water Conservation District
DSWC Regional Office Files

Ij
O Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Wate'r'Conservation'
OOther Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 09 153 Date of Visit: 11-13-2000 Time. 9.00 Printed on: 12/512000
Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered pate Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......................
Farm Name: ........................... ..... County: Uladell............................................... EiO ............
Otivtter Name:................................................... -............. Phone No: 91Qrz�fi:a.COQ...........................
Facility Contact: Ke.N'AF1.Y.U5tQlz................................................ Title: E.t ViQY.V9........................................... Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: kQ.U.9.X-48.7.................................... ..... warswy..NK ........................................................... 28.39.8 .............
Onsite Representative:)heyltl.�i'G.StlPtt.................................
Certified Operator:R dexAsk ............................... tia3'V5......
Location of Farm-.
iR # 1172 and Hwy 131 near Bladenboro
Integrator: r.43►M's.9.f.. .rQlilAajAC.................................
Operator Certification Number:2.0209 ............................
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 34 • 3000 Longitude 78 ' 45 00
Design Current
Swine CanaeitV Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 16000
® Farrow to Wean 4000
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I IDairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 20,000
Total SSLW 3,892,000
Number of Lagoons 3 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present I ALagoon Area ill Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If ves. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in'oal,rnin•?
d. Does disclian,e bypass a lagoon system? (If -yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
\ aste Collection & Treatment
4- Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ........... ..Srtw.............. ............. 93A ....... .-................. 93B. ............. .................................... ........ .-..-.......................
Freeboard (inches). 25 26 26
5100
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
nla
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
f1
Continued t. , -G` f

L: acilit�-Numf er: 09--153 Date of Inspection I1-13-2UOU Printed on: 1215/2000
5. Are there any immnediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed`? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes [-]No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
corres ondence about this visit.
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
sow lagoon.
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
H. .
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ® PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
® Yes
❑ No
12.
Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
Over -Application greater than 10% of PAN in Waste Plan requires Notice of Referral to DWQ by DSWC.
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWN P)?
❑ Yes
® No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
❑ Yes
® No
16_
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available'?
❑ Yes
®No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Is facility hot in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
® Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
13 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this. visit. You will receive_ no further
corres ondence about this visit.
Comments (referto question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
7- Need to mow inside slope of lagoon and outside slope of lagoon to toe of lagoon slope. Need to remove all foreign material from
+
sow lagoon.
8- Need to address air relief valve at finisher lagoon to prevent runoff into the ditch beside lagoon. Air relief valve is at hydrant
hook-up. Brown's of Carolina was \working on problem at time of review. Need to address leak on flush line (refill line) on front of
finisher house # 16.
11- Wheat was broadcasted over soybeans. Soybeans are still in the spray field. Over -Application was noted on hydrant #7 41.67 lbs.
nitogen over -applied per acre. Hydrant #7 covers 6.35 acres. Over -application was noted on wheat crop earlier this year by DWQ.
Over -Application greater than 10% of PAN in Waste Plan requires Notice of Referral to DWQ by DSWC.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott ai h
Revie,,verlInspector Signature: Qh ' Date: 5100

F361* Nurrtber: .09-1 Date of Inspection 11-13-2000 Printed on: 12/5/2000
()dor Issues
+
Note: Need to set a marker in finisher lagoon with heavy rainfall factor so that it can be read correctly (for the General Permit
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
irrigation repaired this week.
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments an or Drawings:
22- Over -Application of waste to wheat requires Brown's of Carolina to notify DWQ according to General Permit Requirements.
+
Note: Need to set a marker in finisher lagoon with heavy rainfall factor so that it can be read correctly (for the General Permit
Requirements).
Note: Soybeans needs to be harvested this week followed by wheat being re -planted due to poor stand being broadcasted.
Note: One of the liner irrigation systems broke into due to ditch (little furrow) in the field. Brown's of Carolina will have linear
irrigation repaired this week.
Note: Operator In Charge for farm site has changed to John S. Cain, Sr. Operator License Number 23570. Need to send in change
form of Operator In Charge to Division of Water Quality c/o Beth Buffington Raleigh NC.
5100

NOV-16'2000 THU 03.13 PH
785 H" 24 East
PO BM 487
Wamaw, N 2&398-W7
VoM, [phone]
Fair (910) 20"l66
FaX
BROWN'SOFCAROLINA
"A
9102966166
NOV 1 6 2000
P, 01
�N-
WMAft%hpf lot 1~
OWN
I' -111100F CAROLINA
To: Paul Rawls From KrAn Wbston
FAM [phone] p"em 1
Phone: [phone] Deft November 16, 2000
Pie: PAN Overapplication CC: 'M
13 Urgent M For Review C3 pk"We comment cl pleff" R"Ov. D Pkmwe Rwayelle
0 commenta.-
This Fax is to notify DVVQ of the Fayetteville RaWonal Mice of a PAN overapplication St SOC #29 &
93, facility # 9-153- This overapplication occurred an hydrant *7 on wheat. The overapplication amount
is 41-137 lbsJac,
0 Pagel
.a&
401,11
W.,

■ 1 111 MON 09:30 •
■
i■■
E_
BROWN'SOFOAROLINA
j BROWN'S
OF CAROLINA
FaX
9102966166
765 Hwy 24 East
PO Bar 487
Warsaw, NC 2838$.0487
910"29e•160Q
1-600871-6328
910-29"1 61S — Fan
VO =
Wp
T'" _ �,� k� �., Fran■ /> lev..w AJCfr w i
�d
ph� 11A
Ra cca
P. 01
0 Nrg�t ❑ For RaM w ❑ Plewa■ Comment ❑ Plumm Reply Q Plsws RaayeiE
• Cwrwmr.t=

NOV-27-2000 MON 09:30 AM BROWN`SOPCAROLINA 9102966166 P. 02
BRaW N'S
OF CAROLINA
November 22, 2000
Mr. Paul Rawls
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
N C Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
225 Green Street, Suite 714 / Systel Bldg.
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Dear Mr. Rawls,
This letter is in reference to a Fax that was sent to your office last week concerning a PAN
overapplication at BOC #29&93, Facility # 9-153 in Bladen County. This letter will serve as awrimm
report of the occurrence, as is required by the General Perrnit for this facility.
As stated in the Fax, an overapplication occurred on hydrant #7 on wheat. The amonax over was
41.67 lbs. N/ac. The General Permit states that this report shall outline the actions taken or proposed to be
taken to correct the problem. This is where I would Iike your thoughts and suggestions as to what needs to
be done to correct the situation, so I would like to discuss the situation with you over the phone before a
definite decision is made as to corrective actions needed_
I look forward to hearing from you_ My number is [phone] ext. 238. If I happen to miss
your call, feel free to discuss this with Gus Simmons_
Sind,
Kevin Weston
Environmental Compliance
Manager
ec_ Greg Brown
Gus Simmons
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC.
785 HWY 24 EAST • P.O. BOX 487 . WARSAW, N.C. 28398 - PHONE [phone]

TELEPHONE NOTES
FROM: PA UI_ RA HIS
DATE. November 27, 2000
SUBJECT.- BROWN'S OF CAROLINA SWINE FARM 29-93
I received a call from Gus Simmons today.
He wanted to discuss the over application of PAN on Brown's of Carolina Farm
(BOC) 2993
Mr. Simmons indicated that the farm had over applied by +/- 40 lbs. on one field
He indicated that the event was inadvertent and this staff had failed to total all the
applications.
He wanted to know what BOC could do to reconcile this problem and I informed him
that nothing would absolve the violation.
I did however mention that other farms had volunteered to not apply waste to field
that had over application during the next year. But I informed him that that does not
absolve the violation either.
I informed him that probably the best thing to do is to continue to educate staff on the
importance of proper waste management
He also indicated that all BOC farms had good freeboard on this dates
CC. WQ CA FO File, ROC 2993

r
?CDENR
. BILL HOLMAN
`$ECRETARY
H ti lr
a -
yx'
- grry n
:tL
atF
1
:�T
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER 4QUALITY
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFK:E
August 21, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attention: Mr. Glen Davis
Brown's of Carolina
P.O. Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject:
NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND
RECOMMENDATION FOR ENFORCEMENT
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2H .0217
Brown's of Carolina Farm # 28
Facility No. 09-155 Permit No. AWS090155
Bladen County
Dear Mr_ Davis:
You are hereby notified that, having; been permitted to have a non
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to
15A NCAC 214 .0217, you have been found to be in violation of your 2H
.0217 Permit.
On August 9, 2000, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality conducted an annual inspection of your swine
farm located in Bladen County. During; the inspection, a review of the waste
application records revealed that plant available nitrogen (PAN) had been
over applied on numerous pulls in excess of the CAWMP. Pulls #16a, 416b,
and 417b had over application amounts of 22, 36, and 16 pounds
respectively on the wheat crop. Pulls #1, 43, #4, 47, #8a, #9, and #10 had
over application amounts of 21, 16, 57, 91, 13, 20 and 110 pounds
respectively on the small grain crop.
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 716 1 SYSTEL HLD- FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 29301-50.43
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 5O% RECYCLED/10% Pos-r-CONSUMER PAPER

I'VIr. Glen Davis
August 2152000
Page 2
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following items be addressed:
Follow the CAWMP in regards to the PAN to be applied to crops.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing its General
Permit and being required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the faciliiv.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from
taking enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the
Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00
per day per violation.
You are hereby notified that the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality is considering sending a recommendation for enforcement action to the Director of the
Division of Water Quality. The Recommendation concerns the failure of this farm to comply
with the plant available nitrogen rates (PAN) in the CAWMP for the specified crops (small
grain).
If you have an explanation for this violation that you wish to present, please respond to this
office by September 15, 2000. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action
is still deemed appropriate, you explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the
enforcement package for his consideration.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either
myself or Mr. John Hasty, Environmental Specialist, at [phone].
Sincerely,
Paul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Sue Homewood - Compliance Group
Sam Warren - Bladen Co. NRCS
Trent Allen - DS WC Fayetteville Office
Central Files - Raleigh

North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources ` a
Division of Water Quality
Fayetteville Regional Office NCDENR
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director April 18, 2001
CERT_[]EIED MAIL
RELM RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. David Nordine
Broom's of Carolina
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
P. O. Box 497
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject: Notice of ViQlation/NQtice of Intent
Brown's of Carolina Farm # 29
Facility No. 09-153 Permit No. AWS 090153
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Nordin:
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non discharge permit for the subject animal
waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, you have been found to be in violation of your 2H
.0217 Permit.
On March 29, 2001; staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
performed a lagoon level follow up visit of the Brown's of Carolina 429 Farm in Bladen County. During the
visit, water was noticed ponded in the edge of the spray field next to a ditch at the front of the farm.. There
was also what appeared to be waste water mixed with rain water ponded throughout the field. Upon further
investigation it was apparent that there was waste water in the spray field and it was and had migrated to the
water next to the ditch. There was a flow of this mixture entering the ditch at a flow of about ten gallons per
minute. Samples were collected to see if there was in fact waste mixed with water that was getting into the
ditch. The samples showed elevated fecal coliform in the source, the ditch and the downstream samples.
It appeared that the fields were too wet to have been irrigated on, thus the hydraulic overload which
allowed the waste to pond and eventually flow toward and into the ditch. The lagoon level at this site was and
had been dangerously high, thus the reason for the visit. The level of the lagoon on that day was
approximately thirteen to fourteen inches.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following items) be addressed:
1. Irrigation should not be performed on saturated fields:
2. Immediately lower the level in the lagoon to the required freeboard.
225 GREEN STREET - SUITE 714 / SYSTEL BUILDING / FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28301.5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] W. - r / 'N
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 505% RECYCLED/10% POST CONSUMER PAPER
DENR TOLL FREE HOTLINE: [phone]

Mr. Nordine
4-18-2001
Page 2
3. Please provide irrigation records for the farm for the past twelve months including PAN balances.
4. Please provide rainfall records for the past twelve months if available.
5. Please provide this office with a copy of the freeboard records for this farm.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing its General Permit and being
required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the Division of Water
Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00 per day per violation_
You are hereby notified that the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality is
considering sending recommendation for enforcement to the Director of the Division of Water Quality. The
recommendation concerns the hydraulic overload of the field in question which allowed waste to be
discharged to waters of the State.
If you have an explanation for this violation that you wish to present, please respond to this office by
May 2. 2001. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action is still deemed appropriate,
your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his consideration.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either myself or Mr.
John Hasty, Environmental Specialist, at [phone].
PRljch
cc. Sonya Avant -Compliance Group
Sam Wanen-Bladen Co. NRCS
Trent Allen-DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files -Raleigh
SincereI
i
L/ f
11�
aul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor

ANORTH CAROLINA 0EPARTMENT Or
All, 51SIVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WDENA 225 GREEN STREET - SUITE 714
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28301-5043
7099 3400 0011 1134 4601
ro V.
MR DAVID NORDINE
4A
lft%w F0 Box 497
WARSAW NC 28398
14 ft 15 s ek -U43 I

North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources ` 5
Division of Water Quality
Fayetteville Regional Office NCDENR
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
February 12, 2001
ERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Greg Brown
P.O.Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject: Notice of Violattion/Notigp, of Intent
Brown's of Carolina Farm # 93
Facilitv No. 09-153 Permit No. AWS090153
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Brown:
You are herebv notified that, having been permitted to have a non discharge permit for the subject animal
waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H _0217, you have been found to be in violation of your 2H
.0217 Permit.
On February 8, 2 00 1, stall' from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
performed an inspection of the Brown's of Carolina Farm # 93 located in Bladen Countv. The inspection
revealed that the freeboard Ievel of the lagoon was less than the minimum required in the General Permit for
this facilitv-_ The General Permit condition 111.6.e. states: " The Permittee shall report by telephone to the
appropriate Regional Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first.knowledge
of the occurrence of any of the following events_ e. Failure to maintain storage capacity in a
lagoon/storage pond greater than or equal to that required in Condition V(3) of this General Permit."
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following item(s) be addressed:
1. Submit a high freeboard plan of action for the facility.
2. Lower the lagoon to the minimum required by your CAWMP.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing its General Permit and being
required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that the Division of Water Quality is sending this to the Director for consideration of
enforcement for this violation. Furthermore, the Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy a civil
penalty of not more than $10,000.00 per day per violation.
225 GREEN STREET - SUITE 714 / SYSTEL BUILDING / FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] WWW. _. TA -.N •.0 ! " i
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 500/6 RECYCLED/10% POST CONSUMER PAPER
DENR TOLL FREE HOTLINE: [phone]

Mr. Brown
2-12-01
Page 2
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either myself or Mr.
John Hasty, Environmental Specialist, at [phone].
/'S in erely,
Paul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
PR/jh
cc. Sonya Avant -Compliance Group
Sam Warren -Bladen Co. NRCS
Trent Allen-DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files -Raleigh

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
January 15, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ekokan, LLC
Attn: Ms_ Alexandra Kantardjieff
P.O. Box 5354
Cary, NC 27512
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Brown's of Carolina Farm ##93
Permit No. AW1090153
Facility No. 09-153
Bladen County
Dear Ms. Kantardjieff:
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non discharge permit for the subject
animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, you have been found to be in violation
of your 2H .0217 permit.
On November 18, 2002 a representative of Brown's of Carolina informed the Fayetteville Regional
Office of the Division of Water Quality that a discharge of wastewater had occurred from the innovative
treatment system at the above referenced facility. Representatives from the Fayetteville Regional Office
visited the facility to investigate the discharge and review the remediation efforts. The discharge
occurred due to an overflow of the influent pump station adjacent to the solid separation chamber. We
were informed that the high water alarm in the pump station was activated during the weekend. The
discharged waste water traveled to an adjacent storm tinter diversion ditch and into a constructed
containment basin. There was an indication that an unknown amount of waste water escaped the
containment basin and entered the down gradient ditch_ No evidence of waste was discovered
downstream of the facility.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following items be addressed:
1. Respond to all system alarms with physical inspection of the treatment system. The operator's log
should include these inspections.
225 GREEN STREF T- SUITE: 7141 SYSTEL BUILDING! FAYETTEVILLE. NC: 2,S301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] "AV%V FNR.STATE_NC.L1S ENR:
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 1 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 90% RECYCLED'10% POST CO NSUME•R PAPER
DENR TALI_ FREE HOTLINE: [phone]

1 "
Ms. Kantardjieff
1-15-03
Page 2
Please be advised that this letter does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions for this incident or any past or future violation_ Furthermore, the Division of Water
Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00 per day per violation.
Please provide this office with a written response on or before January 31, 2003. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Paul Sherman, Environmental
Engineer, or myself at (910) 4$6-1541 _
S
inc
ere,
PR:mps Paul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Cc: Non Discharge Compliance Unit
Chris Bordeaux -Bladen Co. NRCS
Trent Allen-DSWC Fayetteville Office
David Nordin -Brown's of Carolina, LLC
Central Files -Raleigh

O•�
EK4DKAN
February 7, 2003
Paul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Systel Building
Fayetteville, NC 28301-8043
Dear Mr. Rawls,
FEB 1 0 2003
This is a response to your letter dated January 15, 2003. We will address the November
18'h, 2002 discharge that occurred at our animal waste disposal system (permit
2H.0217), the corrective measures taken to ensure no future spills, and our response to
Ekokan's treatment status alarms.
As stated above, a discharge occurred at our innovative animal wastewater treatment
facility, located in Bladenboro. This was possibly due to a combination of events:
Torrential rains preceding the events
An overflow of the influent pumping station adjacent to the solid separation
chamber.
At the time, the system was being fed from both the hog houses and the lagoon (a
mixture of the two). This procedure allowed the operator to slowly increase influent
concentrations and avoid toxic shock to the bacterial population within the treatment
vessels.
The small volume (we estimate), traveled to an adjacent storm water diversion ditch
and into a containment basin. This basin, build by the Construction Division of
Brown's of Carolina, was put in place to collect spills originating from Ekokan's
system. It also allows for the collected waters to be examined and then pumped back
into the lagoon.
On November 18, 2002, the containment basin did not function as designed. A mixture
composed largely of rainwater and wastewater escaped the containment basin through a
leaky gate valve. This needs to be corrected. In addition, to better protect the site more
vegetation is necessary around the site.
Subsequently to the incident, representatives from both the Division of Water Quality's
P.O. Box 5354, Cary, North Carolina 27512, USA
TeL [phone] Fax: [phone]

EK4DKAN
Fayetteville office (Mr. Paul Sherman) and from Cavanaugh and Associates (Mr. Jason
Wilson, Ms Amy Breitenwisher and Mr. Todd Bennett) visited the site and concluded
that the following corrective measures would need to be implemented, in order to
resume operation of Ekokan's animal waste treatment facility:
• Increase the height of the lift station
• Properly seal the tank covers
• Extend the auger's solids hopper
• Seal air leaks originating around air pipes atop vessel covers
• Repair any "possible" leaks from green pipe feeding influent to separator
Our contractors increased the height of the lift station by 18". The tank covers were
bolted onto the tank ledges. The auger's solids hopper was extended by 10" -in the`front
and 12" in the rear. Welding the air pipe to the vessel covers sealed the air leaks.
Finally, after inspection, no leaks were deemed originating from the green raw influent
pipe.
After effectively completing all the above-mentioned corrections, personnel from both
DWQ and Cavanaugh (refer above for names) visited the site to attest to the integrity of
the completed work. A notice was then issued stating that the system could be placed
back into operation.
It is essential to note that a representative from Ekokan (operator) is on-site 7 days a
week collecting vital operating data for future installations. Also, he ensures that the
system its properly functioning.
Finally, we will address all system alarms and how Ekokan responds to them. First,
let's rename "alarms" and call them "indicators". Second, it is very important to note
that a system "indicator" does not predict or warn of an upcoming spill. For Ekokan's
system, there are two types of "indicators". The first designates a malfunction for a
piece of mechanical equipment, for example, blower, valve, pump, separator.
(Malfunction Indicator). The second type of "indicator" denotes a specific parameter
excess or shortage, for example, water level in equalization tank, water level in lift
station, dissolved oxygen in the biofilters, etc. (Operation Indicators).
There are two main differences between both types of indicators, the frequency at
which they happen and the impact/response on and by the system. A malfunction
indicator, triggered by an equipment breakdown, does not happen frequently. In
addition, the system cannot fix the problem and the indicator cannot be removed until
the operator or a technician fixes the equipment.
On the other hand, and operation indicator, triggered by a change in the system's
operating conditions, is always followed by a programmed response from the dedicated
computer serving the process.
P.O. Box 5354, Cary, North Carolina 27512, USA
Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]

EK4PKAN
For example, a high water level in the lift station is reached. The system immediately
recognizes the indicator and shuts off the house flush valve (stopping influent from
entering the system). The system then, only resumes house flushing until after the
operation indicator has been cleared (water level drops in lift station).
Now that the lift station height has been increased beyond that of the separator, no
wastewater can be discharged from the lift station. Any and all excess wastewater will
be discharged from the overflow in the Separator's first chamber.
Therefore, given the above mentioned, we feel it is unnecessary to log all operation
indicators in the operator's logbook. Presently the operator logs all malfunction
indicators (valve breakdown, blower breakdown, etc.) in the operator's observations -
sheet. Any necessary corrective actions to remedy the break down are taken
immediately.
We hope that this letter has been of value in answering all questions relating to our
System's operation and the spill that occurred on November 187h, 2002. We extend
our sincerest thanks for your assistance with these matters and invite you to contact us
should you have any additional questions.
Very truly yours
�Vaw4A4014
Alexandra Kantardjieff
Ekokan LLC
Cc-. David Nordeen, Brown's of Carolina, LLC
Philippe Kantardjieff, Ekokan
P.O. Box 5354, Cary, North Carolina 27512, USA
Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]

4
murphyBrOINMUC
October 2, 2003
Mr. Paul Rawls
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
225 Green Street — Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
RE: BOC 7729 & 3093 Farm 9-53 NOV
Dear Mr. Rawls
t
3 2003
In response to your letter of September 18, 2003, following are our planned or completed actions
and information for the items noted:
1) We irrigated using the linear machine September 16tt' on field 1 from 8:30 AM to 11:30
AM. We applied 0.4 inches and ended with a balance of approximately 60 pounds of
nitrogen left on the soybeans. We were compliant with hydraulic and agronomic loading
limits. A low area, approximately 20' by 10', and a couple of smaller depressions held the
irrigated water that the inspectors noted at approximately 2 P.M.
2) The OIC was on-site during the application and performed an inspection of the spray
field prior to beginning. He found overall field conditions to be sufficiently dry and saw no
standing water. For this application and as a matter of routine he speeds the linear up to
maximum speed and eases the pressure to reduce flow when passing over waterways
and/or low areas that are typically not as dry as the majority of the field.
3) Field drainage improvement is planned to reduce low areas and traffic ruts. This will
include sub soiling and leveling as well as waterway shaping and installation of two to
four water control structures. Of course, to protect the soybeans we will perform this work
after harvest this fall. Weather has worsened drainage and caused the low spots that
recently hurt the crop in spots. Please understand, as good row crop farmers, we
evaluate drainage improvement needs during each crop, but must wait until harvest to
work the land. Good crop land retains moisture, but as irrigators we must re -grade
portions of the fields annually to eliminate poorly drained spots.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
John Bizi
Director of land and Nutrient Management
Murphy -Brown Rose Hill Division
Cc:Kraig Westerbeek
Scott Webster
Mark Pahl
DWQ Central Files

0� W A TE
9QG
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
G. Ross Jr., Secretary
William
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
`O�
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Rater Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of water Quality
September 18, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. John Bizic
P.O. Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Farm 429 & Farm 493
Facility No. 9 -153
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Bizic:
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -discharge permit for the
subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, you have been found to
be in violation of your 21-1,0217 Permit.
On September 16, 2003, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality were conducting an aerial flight and obsern°ed an irrigation event at the above named
facility_ The application equipment appeared to be applying wastewater onto ponded areas in the
field. The subsequent follow-up visit revealed the presence of standing wastewater in barren
areas scattered over an approximate one acre portion of the field_
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following items be addressed:
1. Avoid overapplication of waste either agronomically or hvdraulically_
2. Inspect spray fields before and during irrigation to prevent application of waste onto
standing water and excessive ponding.
3. Modify application equipment or spray procedures to prevent the spraying of wastewater
onto areas of standing water or large barren portions of the spray field.
AQNt
iUb
N. C. Division of % ater Quality 22:5 Green Street -Suite 714 Fayetteville, North Carolina 23301 (9101486-1541 Fax[phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

Mr. John Bizic
9-18-03
Page 2
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing its General
Permit and being required to obtain an individual non -discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from
taking enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the
Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00
per day per violation.
Please provide this office with a written response on or before October 3, 2003 as to the
actions taken or proposed to be taken to avoid this situation in the future. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Larry Baxley,
Environmental Specialist, or myself at [phone].
Sincerely,
<___ W" r��
Paul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
LCB:PR/lcb
cc: Keith Larick - Compliance Group
Chris Bordeaux - Bladen Co. NRCS
Trent Allen - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files - Raleigh
A*a
NR
N. C. Division of water Quality 225 Green Street -Smite 714 Favetteville, North Carolina 28301 [phone] Fax[phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6749

of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
1 pate of Vint: 09-1t%2003 Time: 2:30
Facility Number 9153 1
0 1`ot 4 erational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [r Conditionally Certified (3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
harm Name: F.airm#29A.FarmA9.3................. County: BjaA.en .................................... FRO---.--.---
.
Owner Name: •______________________ rv►r s_ofCataalina�lnc.---_-_- . Phone No: 91Q244X&Qfl------------------------------
I►IaIIIng Address: PQ..83ox..7.59................................................................ .... BQS.v..trials.NC...................................... .................... Z8.45.8 ..............
Faci€ity Contact: ........................................... Title: ............................. . Phone No:
Onsite Representative: _-_ -------------------_-_--- Integrator: 1€C!?�lO.S�if�olQliUA,CUs.----------------•
Certified Operator:(;Arx.RttbCr1....................... Jr;A 7SeaM........................................... Operator Certification Number: 2.6557 ............................
Location of farm:
SR # 1172 and Hwy 131 near Bladenboro +
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 34 • 107i0 Longitude 78 • 45 00
Design Current
Swine r.an2ritv Pniiniarinn
❑ Wean to feeder
® Feeder to Finish 16000
® Farrow to Wean 4000
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 3 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray FieldArea
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps I JE1 No Liquid NN'aste Illanagement System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originaied at: [—]Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharcle is observed, Nvas the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach «'ater of the State? (If yes, notity DWQ)
El Yes ❑ No
c. IfdischanTe is observed. what is the estimated fhm in gaUmin"'
d. Lacs dischargEl Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
%Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Struclure Stru(:ttlrQ a Structure 5 Structure G
Identities ...........................
I-rechoard (inches): ........................... ...........................
77-7-7
0S/113/01 1 nnrinued
Design Current
Design Current
Pooltr`
Capacity Population Cattle
Ca achy - Po ulatiou, _;
❑ Laver
JE1 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
I I
JE] Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design CapacityE:
20,000
Total SSLW
3,$92,000
Number of Lagoons 3 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray FieldArea
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps I JE1 No Liquid NN'aste Illanagement System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originaied at: [—]Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharcle is observed, Nvas the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach «'ater of the State? (If yes, notity DWQ)
El Yes ❑ No
c. IfdischanTe is observed. what is the estimated fhm in gaUmin"'
d. Lacs dischargEl Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
%Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Struclure Stru(:ttlrQ a Structure 5 Structure G
Identities ...........................
I-rechoard (inches): ........................... ...........................
77-7-7
0S/113/01 1 nnrinued

Facility Number: 9-153 Dote of Inspection 09-16-2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement'?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
14. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'?
11. Is there evidence ofover application? ® Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
® Yes
❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16.
is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Rectuired
Records & documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
1$.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
(ie/ W UP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24-
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comr`itients (refer t6_'questi6n #) Expla►n any YES answers and/or any,recomiitendatEons or.any othe'r-comme"ntsc
Use drmr rings_of facility to bitter exp (nse:addehonal pages as tiecessary) '® Field Copy ❑Final Notes
...r VAS .: Y: - �a... ... .,-.. r`.. .vt 1
=arm visited as the result of observations made during an aerial Flight of waste application event. The linear boom application I".
,quipment was applying material to barren areas in the field that had standing water already present.Ground investigation revealed these
treas to have water mixed with waste from the irrigation event.
Reviewer/Inspector Nameharry Baxley h . ; Paul Sherman
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
July 16, 2009
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Kraig Westerbeek
Murphy -Brown LLC
PO Box 856
Warsaw NC 28398-0856
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY NOD—a-4J'1—;VG-0(-`y2-
Farm #29 Farm #93
Facility No. 09-153
Permit No. AWS090153
Bladen County
Incident No. 200901821
Dear Mr. Westerbeek:
On June 12, 2009 you or staff from your farm notified the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division
of Water Quality, as required by General Permit condition 111.6.e that the freeboard level of the lagoon was less
than the minimum required by the General Permit. The liquid level of the lagoon 3093A was reported as 18
inches. The liquid level of the lagoon 3093B was reported as 30 inches. On June 17, 2009 you or.staff from
your farm notified the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality; that the liquid level of
lagoon 5729 was reported as 16 inches. General Permit condition V.3 states "The maximum waste level in
lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level
for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain the 25 -year; 24-
hour storm event plus as additional 1 foot of structural freeboard."
The Division of Water Quality will take no further action for this reported incident at this time.
However, if you have not done so, you are asked to please notify this office in writing within 15 days of receipt
of this letter as to what date the lagoon was lowered within the specified time frame in which the Plan of Action
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
225 Green St., Ste. 714
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301
Phone 910-A33-33001 FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.h20.enr.state.nc.us
An Ecu�i Opportunity l Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarohna
)Vatundly

Page 2
Mr. Westerbeek
,July 16, 2009
(POA) allotted. It will also close this event out within your file. 11' you have any questions concerning this
inatter, please do not hesitate to contact myself at [phone].
cc: APS Central Files
DS&:W FRO
FRO AP Files
Sincerely,
J
Steve Gunton
P

I
71"
V77-

18 4:51 pm
TT
18 4:51 pm

r

VIC!NITY YAP
NORTH CAROLINA
J.1.944 -v COUNTY
1, Cl',& F & Z7 C it j/,Z//, 4/k. rhor
rhla *.w w" dmwo kwicirr mw *Noww1odw fano" an acmw sue"w
,..w '"Aw ow mowvohim, Aod Aw dmctwvon —or~ m
B~S
lb.f a'" b-Affok".." A*( xwwywd &W 0 Q%m so brnken ""m
h, n nformed4m foumd ipp boots Jvfvlww-J, dwt This
-wwvpwwd in seccwdwww with G- 1 47-30 a &-m"dud.
mtw" ?TV *Vsd and mw Chit //,4,4 akr;r a,
4*mvj-,rvd*o Akx
SURVEYOR'.'
NORM CARI
DZ N QIllAfiY
;t J1 c 0- ,Iw- S-,.- " . a *.wv Punic f
dw covocy and.1how aAww"K corloy I%*
4p rn&WW lead -ur"Wyar, pw=vbwopy wpawlmd Wme rm &ts,*w
and #c*rsawApd&" ff" aswud4m of Ow fo#P#Wng fAtm~t.
M&mu 7W A4nd and of&md saw"p or mW, L4*4 dIw af
19
-122-
NOLWY
Afy Comm. imian a j�pjrw. /J ji-
"NOTARY
M03TH rAR(XIJVA
_d�� COUAMY
Tho A2mpoinv cardfkA"w *0�__
morwy AjbiAf, is cwtF69d to Ap Cmft-t nor inabnrrrtant .wt
ommn owl for and morammf in Piot soot /I) --
R -corded in 3 -ick s7f V ps- ',ot P9.
L
Ja -
're
,dA ' 311 P9-
fias
;r r a- I- 'o'
j r
e r I r 41�1
l4 enc e- //LL// -_,7r c e r 7,A;S
a F c:,m e x s j4 t -
f Aa- /Z:=(. ,:: ','� �r
ewpcHry OF
rOWNSHIP, ,9.8,8o1 -.r5 ou#v r r
w /'s incf � X1
S A r.,
zo&:
il vri r i t (I � I i I i I
NORTH CAROLINA
Mr MAP: z a i,
COMPANY
cLe. e/eat relzce hvla-)f,
5veveyeIr x.95$
4 e AA jAc, Wt, I V, c
13/- 19D 161111 DATE, -5-- a - 72 SURVE-YEO By: FIELD d000Ar
SCALE-'I"z -000' CRAWN BY- 1�f, 11q.
%-U?AW1Nt; 90.
C��CXZCD $ C4 OSURE 8Y:
7CEL:
,3".3'I3
-8A. /09.
694�
,31k- l 5- -q-
3 S , '
431C. /04, /--g.
Z, 90
�7 6 F A1,0
visiclivs
9 �.S A112 9
.: �/z C
-E
e. A IS %
lre-� 'a
a i. S. =
e x I's il
I,ro--L g
ewpcHry OF
rOWNSHIP, ,9.8,8o1 -.r5 ou#v r r
w /'s incf � X1
S A r.,
zo&:
il vri r i t (I � I i I i I
NORTH CAROLINA
Mr MAP: z a i,
COMPANY
cLe. e/eat relzce hvla-)f,
5veveyeIr x.95$
4 e AA jAc, Wt, I V, c
13/- 19D 161111 DATE, -5-- a - 72 SURVE-YEO By: FIELD d000Ar
SCALE-'I"z -000' CRAWN BY- 1�f, 11q.
%-U?AW1Nt; 90.
C��CXZCD $ C4 OSURE 8Y:
7CEL:
,3".3'I3

I/ i C IN i TY !,f IP
NO,'?D4 rAR01JW
coup v ry
1,
this rnap raft &~ uxidir my sup*reision tram ;rn actual` survey
match,coder my sup* j4Wd and oNtscrrptio" (&ccro'ed in
sea* '77
Pt,w-jBess ' that the retia (pfpFvc)s0on as col-
CuAa W4 by tar, M.* ji*d dqpw-udn*. T I
that
I" -houndwirs not surwy4d am howfp as broken !ines
n0atftd from information found in books referenced, that this
mW w8c propamd rn accordance with G- S. 47-30 as amended.
M&WM •wy head and seal this l dy of A *j
_Land Survivor
SURVEYOR
SEAL AL
NA
-V�64'• COUNT'
I.
_,jNoUwyPublic o1
ri%- County acrd Suoy &.foni*4,d, rgdfy d,,., -!!!-
a "sfared ;*qd S-fwy0r. 0wwv%WtY JPPv&Md before — dhs day
and acknowMaWd dv* &,vftw6qwt of the forgoing pnSrAjr7Wnr'
Wir "4 my An iciw xmr�w LY $WW, :-8
qha�d d .7 ft' of
My Caerwnisslan
Ik' 1.
SEAL
WRI'H CARCXM"
awk"Z— C40UNTY
A. A.'
Notary +blit, is cwrvfAvd to bw cor,wf- This wma..,r ,,w
pmwyiad forego "i7on andrer fd*d RUI &90*
P.S.-&W i I
-Amt Hog- of D*eds
--oreied ;n 60 -,k o r Maos- voi P9
Jt 3. is
A 5J
V 49 (21 7'0 -4.-V
�6
%-..-k29 31 1/ .4 iL, NV- W -zw-f
E1,3
ECA4
14
-;R
7 47
DETAIL
C NAL
A
ia-
UTxzj-
iwZVRRAL PAPKM
UARDOM TRACT
ski4 Eis ON ag'Vc OF �# rc*,-
W L INW WITH A1 OrI61EM ZWTCH
,low OR FOR'VERLY
AVERITTE LAND
for
J
ITT AN 4W7 -C"
I
'"Monoz DAPOIKM
-�W' ;-4,4
j_qS IN 01TCH
�- DIT -CH
OF DITC-Ai
cr
q0
�*Ai M -W PW MAIL W 0
Ll"brlw- Alac-PAL AVISLEVY,
-4-
OA
PK W& w 4
/xrc-) jjJJ
10,
VS
�;j5F- AW 301A P0, 74,5/, :J
Elm -00
ffal"15
�1�7
(APM.
5_3
f}.2,w aK. 4 Pig 77
'-1 W J30rcoq00,,j4rj3,,E 252-7's
4) J,
S09 SAT 09 AIL)
3, En
ASS
4
1'09-OnD 7"W'-
40
2) EIS
M' -W
A.
I 213, 79
AtA)p CAA AM�0 PAGW U>0a
J9 FOM
1-- is so i`Er T WOE R1.11W
Cop. 20 TO COR. I AND COM. I ro 2.
w et M --K DETAIQ
(MAMAL
S39* -5'I3 -W
Ho YES.-
I. FOR DEFDS "MWD FOR I -as 4gufp"ey SE!,,700K 171 PAOC 1514, 800K
'&�, PJPP,W 3W AAV WP VOOK MF,RW7Af 3L�
Z L3Wj FR --W COM. 2 -70 34, J -d TO 15 A, Wy ASSU4WEYE'D BY
STI-AiTT 4f--%CNUW?4( ML.A L-405, 4EE MAP 4100.97Aae
e::WA#'rSntV0W 00- CAMAL !4 PROPERTY LIPVC
AHO CENTEM OF 34P VWDE ORAWAATE EASEMENT
FCANAL
OF
3R,01s la CAROLIJ14A, §M(C.
WHY W1100J60, .;R. TRACT
TOWN3HIP.- p 07 7S,9 4, i RZ
200 loc 3TArE: MTH CAROUNA
tra
-SCA L E TAX MAP:
ccu,,Nne. r3L.AOEJY
PARCEL
'-VW-*.-zRQ#A-PACYFiC CORP.
a'". TRACT
%fP. CAB. A!00 PG. 1005
-w. 3Z4 PG. f9
'L xv.-1-6plm:
FCM - EXIST~ CCOOCRETE WVYLOWNT
efS E3<.5-r*YG *tON STAKE
Z'4p EX4-ryv's 4RON POIE
:SS WCW SMAKE SE' a'
E -- r EASFA0F111r L,'NE'
COMPANY
CAPE FEAR SURVEYING
-W4---LT0N &C-�YWAUX PtLS.
74AA�VELLS %9'C-W97ti1
IWE' '95 '3vRvrYk-D BY
FlEtD BOOK
SCALE, ORA WN 8Y:
CRAWING NO.
t,-HECKEO $ CLOSURE MIF

'`°-�'�.
n. �"" .. _ .-... ..
n
r" _
t� ! C! "J I T Y r3A .� w
i;7FTh CJlRQ�1NA
1, .it i_iUfV >_ RtJX _.certify ihat
thn mlp wac iJT�s�ri urWir fny sutxrvision from -0vr xrvat survey
madly ur.d�r my su}+efvi j�, dWrd ;xrd drtscnPtitar �xerakd in
8aok �; � . >stge ,�,„.�, that rhe Tatra pf precision as caf�
-�:---
cu,aled �Y iatin►.Ye aw4 deparhrnr :s ! / 'R�'Q42.Q.'►.—___......-.�
rtlar tie hRaarldMries npr sur�xYad an► .haws aur ,4rufren :fines
o+otted from ;nfarmatinri found en books refer4nced, chat this
map Twat pfwpanwf in acrprdenca with G. S. 47-30 as aryaended.
��e� ,�� and seat rhrt r � deY of
A.D., r9
f
�' �p.� _ /,�,�gy Land SurwYpr
�..
:3eAistraty,nrto._t-�`��+T_ .. __T _.. �.._._, _—..—_ _�
,,1 �•.,
StlRVEY(1R '^f�•�i• .d {?'•,a�`.+'i,
SEpL �� �� � �(�
'�'l
- '� -ic
�- ?.ice}'
,rcRr�•.c:Rnaocr.V.a `y-31:��.•'
- �i�E..._...�..
CQUNTY w„ft YTl'ii 71 w{��a
f '-�-�•� i."�� �1 , a filprary Pubfec of
rhe Counry ,tirtd $rtne aftx'es�xS, certify rnat A1. Sdf!��+sfL:�'l%�FAiNR',
a rcfyl's rereri land xlrmryor, Pe+'s+a+'eth ip0++� hufwa f!M dr;a clay
and atknowfedyed the ex�Crftigrr of the flXegpiny irarnrment.
Y'Yr rrrY haeeA aruf 7i'.'fCt iar' aea+ryu cv !►rr, Cnrt_�j�Jay 0I
—��.�.,.-r• 19�.
�►,r;� r�,a;�
MY ComrnesFfpn �x�f _ f �
��
;�� � ���
'' ��,`�`
�, SEAt � ry 3
i �� ���.
'' .. � •
NOATN AE11.tMr#
Tffe foragoiriy cwrtrficser ol�'eilff.t.�:L� _
Yoeary ovab:ir, ra rarified try be carryct. T'!n �.v6w+iwft +ae
presCn ted !pr-agratra r -an ar.d . rc1aA in P.+at 8oerk
Faye_ � Thin_ _��(�_, r3�—__st
xe-
.�hxssei pf 1 .ii�o4 �4=���Req of D�eda
-�.+,:rtr rrd ,n Ba ,k or �S?�aa.--_ _�__S✓oi. _ �� r'➢,
i,aM4-eae_.+:-v-raw?i�-i SF. xN. ...�-.. -�:... � _ .._ .�4y .. ......... ,:-..?'.�.. - :. .. 9 . W . ...... .. � ... _. --. - A _ .. .. � .. .. -� ..
� df f r� �"
3 z:1:t /
�+� }.:fun" ^- .�+ •� $G ! :`i ^Y �,. :9` M.,JY ;: J .. �... d j f i..
[j r� �
�� \�. 1AIaT' _. je —�,�� �8'��ry� � —f,i'_ _ —.,_._ .'ze:,.�i ;d�+ �^':.r �
r � � 1^j'. C ��t�
� E)4
3p t 7. rv)d� �%a-1'+`t.4 sc ty� � � h '
-ilert�.rT .iLi...Jai - f
Gfkni/lL �� , � �
�>��L
o � ;�:� = : w�• i
.��`
,��,.
��.
g
t7�+���� "�a���e�
r,�
if
��� k.f3 t31y �t4�C C3if' CITGh:
r! �F! LB+£ Y�!ia! mil. > 1]dri:I4
� ^.E q�W JR c J �.tirE.Li iLY
'4 � - f/
�i P.
.''t� �� °l ` �'` y
'� � � JAY .`�; , � �? _'
f � #i %M �� � t2
� � �
�_ ��
_ f
,_`� /
�� t � s try cx 1'�s�t
�wr�s�cTresry
'� , rs� ;N CFl i Gt-1
���
�.
�� �
t � o
`� � -"- �;``1
'�?r"'-'Q'FT-4"tC• —
�. } '-�
`� 1SS reV �61E
' E3F I�1TCFt
r r
r °�
f% � !r
f r�/�
i
itj[ y..f'1 }Fye 'j� '1`� �. �k§'� ,�T.�'T *. r's� r
1 �_��---_—._' Y Y _ _ ._.�---^��- -� -P-J—� rf "1 i'�I� i�E� ,i� i�a'�,�� 1. � Mi�LC�
--•rrvT���cc:T:c�fv ��rrr� , � I
�etrrlrf�E~� c�frCrf j � ��
-�. _ .>,:z� .�;�• -.art„- �,-�'`���j � �,�
ieG'� utEil dK. ,:309 ,+syr /7+i8 / � I
- � 7� IES' � �'y6-Dy� �` / 21 2 1,�'u�
``-+ / !
-�r�TO � J '° rr 9!w
17'��.. _yam,__ e.
i .N--�, _�_.”--.� 3� dA�p}�{riX. , qt ,��'ri"���RA� �ral�'�
4'G2"w 138. L'S �� _��Ala%�� ��!d"��."�
��s its ttir �►rc�r ��,®-fla�rax� 232.7E3 � � � � ,� �
'{ h rU
�� ----, � r � I l r� � � -� .
ccas-oraT°•w •- - t�- y
191, •� 9 r 4� Tv an ..... _ � a `� `._.�-�-•-�'. ____-_—.__- � . l
.-��._r�----�---_
� -
� �: i
7
� �
h`' fi
I � # �!'J. i91
,, �
-`
�' � � SE'E AeAP GdB. Aft7p AAt^.� :�?S
�% ,sNd? �SNJlC .�24 r?'l�' rs FCf�f
pfd,/ ��-,•°rs egs �E:£r EVd'�E piw III
L+.- _ .� E�tiSEfi.R�t4T
.3� ` �g -:ae� caR. xo ra cd�, r Ai�aa coAr. r ro t
�7�
�� t�E-E' c7�7,4rc,1
� ,, ;�
{�� �� 'At1fAL, j
i'�.j ".,,• `�Nr. r�'�"_. JF �stF�AL ?S P'RgPEri'YL' Lfe'iE'
R ��3 -wfiihl7'f'i�P Di' �(Y W140E W't,AiNr1G� EF.iSEA+I€A1T
-� , q;s
���''� •� t� "'�a3�`*l�R+t�/A-dRa�t�ll*i� +:[��>P. y�
`�-�� 7 � �� ."4eP, CAB. Ait30 F"G. r4i7�
t?ai s�� � � �« 1^-. �---�_-..,,� � f � � arc. .�;�a Pc. rs
:�lG 1ST sa? ;�4 i'�'�� -. � ��
148”. i#PC. 3 Pfi. 18
1►aS�!''di�r ���jjY'���a darr :fK :
J, F(?R i$ � Fatt4 i"Nfa �'[�'.-'Iq`Y SEE c+'f��3K !Td F3�1��' �r,d, Fi�%1?K' � G!”" C.i6if_+4i.
' /Ef:i f'Aaa� a"AR :E�t© r30L'K r�T Fh4CaE: S1
.T. L1M£.S F3� G�+P. P TYa 34, 3AB TO r3 AI 0�'wN ,ciS �L1{�Y�'YE=D Ei'Y /
STr„{pPr ichl. PA.i.:lR. �-r�{7Ef,uE'E: AAAf Y4'�30 � 1sr:.^l3.
3. ThH.S 1S # +'EY OPr s�%1 rh73T1NCi A4M � n�VO.
,;r ��:
��� � �M . tX!�7"lSM,R Cr7•NCtRET�E �1vr
jj11 er5 f,X;RSY?ilki �'ON S`r T.1iKE'
rS5 � MtC7Nr STI1lCE Sf T
-- -- ....�._ � .� `,�' ` ftp � �' �.,17J�]� ,
�_....,..__._..__ e.�w._,...., iQ�YIhf,�ti/P �:�rs�c:f�r� CC)+UrV'T�'� ��.a��nr..�
�� � _ aoa STAT': �`�J�7Tr! c:.4r'�i7�.rNA ..��
C ma.
��«aaer- � _ - - � r.w+wv.ww�w� �nsra'r.,r" - _ �.-�-...y_= . h,,.,�+.ue��ew�w�e
a'�"9i1i1llo!�l�I�;�lii�l�iill :16'11 Il�i�1�!EI�If1�tEtiljljfjltklll�Iltli}S
G'G14lP,�d fYY
ML �7-�,T,.T+RP�I •??Q+E!'t>af +?ti. 1+1;•+ , �, L-�� T
a-i.4f7P�Lr., ,�+�rt'rN ca..tq�C.>+!_�A.
r��._r� ��.�I,� �4�r•�-�� - �,���e�L°EY�'�1 r9Y �atse._��r�lE'LE) ��irtiC
;�.C�9L�`��'K•s ao' - �fT� l�'AJ BY •' � �[�.� J�iflNt; ? .