090071_INSPECTIONS_20171231

Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
IM Division of Water Quality
19 Routine O Comnlaint O Fallow -un of l NVO inspection O Follow --un of I)SF1'C review O Other I
Date of Inspection
Facility Number 7
Time of Inspection : 6d 24 hr. (hh:mrn)
0 Registered B Certified © Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 0 Not O eratiorral Date Last Operated:..... ................ _
Fara} Namd:...! ACounty 4611.1*2�6..................................•...........
Owner Name:........ CX `// ....._........
!ES ...1Px . 'J.-•-- _----•------W .................. Phone No:
Facility Contact: .......... . ... Title: ............. ............... Phone No: ..............................
Mailing Address: _.3_ �. +�-._..!°/ .......<`3'�'�""`"."`� /C, p?.3.7.w ...._
/.. ,....y.� ... ......./.. ..
Onsite Representative:.. Integrator:_-
f,•¢S/ _._ . ....... ..�.....
_.
_._ .._.__... _. u,��_... ...
Certified Operator: ........... .... , tl..... ........... ...._ .............-......_. Operator Certification Number;.._1 rzZZ.......
Location of Farm:
_....__....._.... —.....
............ .... _ .._ .... .... ......... ............... ..... _........ ......
....`..._ .F ........._..... ............ �_....r .... .....
/ ............ .. ....1�t ... r._.. - .. ......... .•lam-�,. / r_,ll e, ._,t.,. ...............
Latitude ' 04 0" Longitude • 6 64
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
P'No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
allo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
KNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DR'Q)
❑ Yes
xNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
&114-
A Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
1jallo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
9No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
XIo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/bolding ponds) require
❑ Yes
RNo
mai ntenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
-0 No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
krNo
7/25/97
Continued
on back

Facility lumber:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? C1!pl Yes No
Structures (I.agoons,Holding Ponds. Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? J'Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Strut ture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 0
Identifier:
Use drawingsV of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
/0f � r
U
Freeboard(ft):.. 3 �r............d....,...................................................................
........ ............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
0 Yes
kNo
11. Is erosion or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
KNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
ry Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
7125197
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
el h > r
Reviewer/Inspector lame..
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
'o
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
P? No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .. �?�4!4 .041
. �....
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
XNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application'.
❑ Yes
XNo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
14 No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Xo
!�No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
IN -N, 0
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
XYes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
No
r�PTNo
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
El Yes
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
XNo
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit.- .Youmill receive no further
correspondence about this.v7sit: ;
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other co eh
;:sem
Use drawingsV of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
/0f � r
U
VO /Z M,;,
Aga
12-
f ��- - �a�- As ccs o.✓
_,7z
7125197
el h > r
Reviewer/Inspector lame..
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

r
/7/
Facility Number Date of Visit: 'f—�� Timc: Q
10 Not Operational OBelowThreshold
❑ Permitted ❑ Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated o oy Threshold
Farm Name: Count:
Owner Dame: �/•1 _ i� Phone No:
Mailing, address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �� Longitude C�' �• ��
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Laver I I j[] Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finis 1LJNon-Laver I I Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to'Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ goy Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons I I
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps I
Discharoes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any pan of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man -trade?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in eal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes. notifi, DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Raters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
J Spray Field Area
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): LAJ
03/03101 Continued

-�.� . yr .�,1p. w. .. r a-4.}v�/.^ .�..•r�.•+!"'+w1S,f+'y• y .•µ,y ".'µ"^'^�f^��+�4•.Mt.. Y-^'..+�+.�..w+��7+.T v�'Y'.. ., v�f r-^ -
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review goon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of X:isit_ �ts� Time: ' '%�
Facilih" Number E
Not O erationaf 0 Below Threshold
❑ Permitted 0 CerQti�fied ©C/onditionallc Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or. ov" Threshold:
Farm Name: — "/tP�l 4fly _ Counn•:
Owner Name: Phone No:or
Mailing Address:
Facilitv Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification number:
EgSwine O Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑Horse Latitude Longitude �' �• ��
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Ca achy Population Poultry Ca achy Population Cattle Ca acith• Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ LayeTDaij
El Feeder to Finish ❑ Non Laver FEI Non -Dain
❑ Farrow tc Wean
ElFarrow-to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finisb Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ soars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons L ❑ Subsurface Drains Present " l❑ Lagoon Area J❑ spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is anv discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Sprav Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? t, ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in eal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notifj, DWQ) El -yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste CC limon & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway. ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05/03/01 Continued

r /
(Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection —
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? „ ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
12
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
�] No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
,C mments (efer to question #} )~zpbun anv�$YES a �swer e�d/oi• any recominiendahons+orally other' mments. '` T �
Use�drawings o_ f fact�tty�to'better eii.platnksttaattons (use aildittoniil pages necessary) �
as ❑Field Cally ❑Final Notes
/f
Reviewer/Inspector Name-- H N.
Reviewer/inspectorSignature- Date: —�
05/03/01 Continued

� _. ^.'S :� \" 'y"'. '. 'i1' •` �, 'f', -y_. '•�" . q� may: ii �'n. ��. a ,.. ,r � .-. r. ". ,_ ...� ,�^c �:. .,-. - .—
t '
Re ty Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Aunlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Pian (CAWMP)?
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (icl irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Ycs ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
x Y tuativn answers and/or an recvmmeod FY1 ean� F eld CopYen ❑Fina %'
Use drawtngs ofactlity to betteroezphuo st R s. (use,agddtttonal pages as necessa 1 Notes
•
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: — L
05103101 " Continued

rDSWC Animal`Feedlot Operation Review z
®DWp Animal Feedlot Qperatlon Site Inspection
Fb CF
s� ♦,j a ;*,�,'�#,°,,�.�'krp ,y ��aoa�,�,{ o-'�do- �� -,�
a ,
ac's �,w, � �-� - xax* •��-".. ,, .,.. ��°.� w.�'," �"�. �mv.,:; .fir„,.. �.. --.: .......:. ,.��,..."�''
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hb:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours �;�
Farm Status: Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review I�
E] Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:.P_a�!£ . 7.._._ _ .... .......... County:..... .. _ ..., _..... �.....
t��.v,� .c� Phone No: �O1 6� �7
Land Owner Name: s .. .__ _._...._ .... . _ .. . 1.......
Facility Conctact: .
_ Cq.�.....� .._..._. Title:._......�._....................L ..._. Phone No:....�...._.....
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative:_.....�'!... �... Integrator
Certified Operator: _.... '�'`z� -- �Operator Certification Number:/e; 2 Z
Location of Farm:
Latitude • C�` ” Longitude
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
$Wlne� m°' DE_Sfgn Cetrrenthasx �' e5lgii CRirent , r Design Curent
Poul Patti Ca acsPo ulatton
,<, Ca ati Po aiation' . Ca� al : Po ulahon „
'.; ®Wean to Feeder 26'00❑ La"<. ❑
Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -La er Non -Dairy
M,
Farrow to Feeder -.0#a1�Design CapaC><ty� r
,10 Farrow to FinishK.
otat SSLW f
❑ Odler
' -,ice, v.,+•: i:n r - <'fik_ rrx-m xrx�s r�'"�.x 2. •:; .as ;C�^ a,4 nix '� >;° ;rt HitESSF\c `.56tnattw.�"i,,..'--
Number of Lagoons.!PHolding+onds ❑Subsurface Drains Present
� �� '���,% � � � �x� ��� �g Lagoon Area ❑ $pray Field Area � ,�
Qf,rieral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b- If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/3 019 7 mai ntenance/improvement?
❑ Yes J� o
❑ Yes k -No
❑ Yes O(No
❑ Yes �(No
❑ Yes
�No
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
Continued
on back

Facility Number:..
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
J9 No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
PfNo
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
No
Structures (bagoons an Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
Freeboard (ft): Strucwrre i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
2— .{2 S—y ....._.... _...._..... ..._ ...... _...........r..
...
... .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
Wo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
JR No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
bpes
[:]No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
, No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type _._. F'W1 _.'� .. ........ ..... _ _ ...... .. -- .
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
[:]Yes
No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[0 No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
P 'Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
KNo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
00 No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
Tallo
For Certified lEacilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments tofquest<on. Ez" laui an` YES answers`and/ot an recommeadations or another comtnents v
Y
Use drawings of faciliMoto better explain situations: {use adiithonal;pages as necessary} F
t :C
s r., '. .:;' $•F +;3.'. r+oc'i ,,a3h.,
��. 7/Zr Com.
r g`�L' e�i:� ' g xk �"
Reviewer/Inspector Namei ,� 'x ! �/z «,a.:<, ��. _:'"
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �1,..�—�5�� Date:
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30197

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility - No. dA -3
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANI)AAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Farm Name/Owner: ��enewall
Mailing Address: Z6a
County: c +s
Integrator:M„r A,. R-rMt
On Site Representative P.%L LrYjhaen�
Physical AddresvT=ation: Nw5
DATE: ,/Iv� o.5, 1995
Tune: 15,'07
Phone: _ (9 to � _ZN -0111)
b3,^ftm- ^-. 21 'Svi. rn 11 1
Type of Operation: - Swine _..x Poultry Cattle I,
Design Capacity: ;a[goo Number of Animals on Site: woe N r
DEM Certification Nu_ mber: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: "� 11 ” 4b" X.% • Longitude:_ C. In, v; --
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoonsufficient freeboard. of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) or No Actual Freeboard:�t. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the goon(s)? Yes or�Was any erosion observed? Yes or (Seepage Was
Is adequate land available for spray? ` Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate?' Yes or No Not Evaluated
Crop(s) being utilized: (Spray Field' or cover crop' was not evaluated
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellin� s? or No
100 Feet from Wells? or No
* Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or 1�*
* Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch ;'flushing •system, or-0ther
similar man-made devices'! Yes or*.,, :if Yes, Please Explain.
Does the'facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No(waste management records were not
Additional Comments:_ , , reviewed) _
his was, a very brief_ 4nspectiona more thorough inspection will be conducted in the future.
Please contactL_DEM should any 'condition -,arise that poses .a danger to surface waters.
.* This farm was not located on a USGS TOPO map to determine ?Blue Line" status.
If you have questions concerning this report please do -not hesitate to".contact the inspector
at [phone]. Please contact the inspector' if the -above information is incorrect.
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit > /S','a7 �Ar Use Attachment's if Needed.
J

Sits Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. - n - 71
DIMON OF ENVIRONNI EN TAL MANAGEMENT
AML4 L FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: dauaLR, 1995
Time• 15.07
Farm Name/owner: 66neum-aA y.zmt I.
Wailing Add. .: %
Integrator: mgr&4 ice«.:1.� �t.rrvs - _ Phone:_ ] - 229
On Site Represenes�entatiive• Photo: =
Physical Address/Location: w3. d.Q4k q1L1= k a}�
Type of Operation: Swine g Poultry Cattle I %J
Design Capacity: 2c oo _ Number of Animals on Site: r
DEM Certification Number. ACE DEM t�ftcation Numbs: ACNEW
Latitude.► • 40' 7L� - Longitude:�$ • 3°1',x'
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoonsuf%icient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) or No Actual Freeboard:_.J_K 'D inches
Was any seepage observed from the oon(s)? Yes or4QWas any erosion observed? Yes or &(Seepage Was
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate?' Yes or No Not Fvaluatec
Crop(s) being utilized:_ (Spray Field' or cover croR was not evaluated)_
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellin s? YA or No
100 Feet from Wells? or No
* Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Foes of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or Q*
* Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, "f Dther
similar man-made devices? Yes oro& If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste nwagement records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes os No(Wasts management records were not
Additional Comments:
This w or u h infl2ection Hill, be cgnducted in ure.
Please contactaEM should an 'condition- arise that poseil a danger to surface waters.
* This farm. was not located on a USGS TOPO map to determine ?Slue Line" status.
If you have uestions concerning this re ort please do not hesitate tor -.contact the in ector
at [phone]. Please contact the Inspector' if the above information is incorrect.
1
cc: Facility Assessment Unit f 5'p° 7 3" Use Attachments if Needed.

Ij 6
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
.lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
May 28, 1997
Mr. Charfes Hilton
P.O. Box 31
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
SUBJECT: Operation Review Corrective Action Recommendation
Beauregard Nursery Facility No. 09-70
Stonewall Nursery Facility No. 09-71
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Hilton,
IDEHNR
On May 27, an Operation Review was conducted of Beauregard and Stonewall Nurseries. This Review,
undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OD. is one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock operations
during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was determined that waste was not being discharged to the waters of the State, and the
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were operated under the responsible charge of a
certified operator. However, the following management deficiencies were discovered and noted for corrective action:
1. AiI farms. Overseeds should be removed before seeding to maturity. Seeding out will shade out
coastal which will stunting growth and cause it not to take up the full "N" application.
2. Stonewall Nursery. Overseeding with rye is a good practice in case you need to pump in the
winter. However, you need a "N" loading rate so you will not over apply.
3. Stonewall Nursery. One corner of the lagoon needs to be filled to prevent channelling of water
to the lagoon.
These management deficiencies need to be addressed and corrected. You are encouraged to contact your certified
technical specialist if additional assistance is needed. The following reviews and inspections will re-examined these
deficiencies to determine if corrective actions were implemented.
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville OW NV� FAX [phone]
10
North CnTolinn 28301-5043 C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

e %I
In order for your facility to remain in compliance with environmental regulations, animal waste cannot be
discharged into the waters of the State, and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems must
vrooerly maintained and ooerat d under the responsible charge of a certified operator.
Please remember that if you do not have a certified animal waste management plan, you are required to do so by
the end of this year. The plan must be certified by either a designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For
additional assistance with the plan, please contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District Office or local
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review. Please do
not hesitate to call me at 910-486-1541 ext. 224 if you have any questions, concerns or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Audrey D. Oxendine
Environmental Engineer I
cc: Sam Warren - Bladen Co. NRCS
Ed Buchan - FRO DWO Environmental Engineer
Murphy Family Farms
DSWC Regional Files

k
❑ DWQ Animal Feedlot Qpe -ation Site Inspection
>0 Routine O Complaint O Eoilow-up of DWO insnecriun O Firllnre-un of U5 ),VC revie,, O Other
Date of Inspection E_ _✓�!
Facility number
Time of Inspection Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status:...YYJL/�le_' Lo Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview
v or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: _^ .. _ � 11C lc•Cf �/ A11y',�
(hvae? t ame:.__`._
11Whag ,address-,
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _. A&IrI S_
AJ
Location of Farm:
County: __"VZ F'
Phone No:
Integrator: ,1 __--
Operator Certification itiutnber-.�•^_
Latiidde `Q6U Longitude . .4
rE—INdt,Operational Date Last Operated:
T,vpe sof Opiration and Design Capacity
-«'-`Y.L 4 , ..:-:': i'�. - T -�.
�ivitte >:�'IYtsmber - Poultry - Nnmher ::�� C>ttie :� — dMHE
Wean to Eecder (*1j ''` ❑ Laver I _ ❑ r"
❑ Fender co Finish j Noa-I3ve: I M ❑ Brei
_..
Farrow to Wean I "= ' "_ } t.- _ .
Farrow to Feeder f - _ ..... _ -,. w .
IM Farrow to Finish i ❑ Otiner Tape of Li•,cstock -� T
:_=Nrtmber otZagnans F'Halidii- Ponid ❑ Subsurface Drains Present :
❑ Lagoon T►rea ❑ spray Field :jirea
f
5.
i
General
1. Are there any buffers that tzeid mainteaancr'improvernc:it?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
z it'discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is obscrrcd, did it=ch Sur;acz Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharet is observed, what is the estimated flow in saUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon syste n? (If yes, norify DwQ
I Is there evidence of pasr discharge horn any part of the operation?
4. Was then- ani• ad^,'e;-se impacts to the '.eaters of the State other than from a dischar_ze?
F
Does any gar, of the waste manage -rte it systern (other than la¢oonsrholding ponds) require
ntainte:tanCM imor0vC -:rt'
❑ Yes L,No
❑ Yes VIi fo .
Cl Yes [vo
0 Yes 5�,vo
❑ Yes [M-,40
Yes Ryo
❑ Yes Z&No
ofYes ❑ :vo
Continued on hack-

w, I- !UU. tlL! 11V1 lII 1.:J 11; U I Ii KZ: -m 1111 UI1)r LippI IL::lU IU _%CLUULA. l.1I LC: lu
7. Did tfle Facility faii to have a ce:tiiied operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)? Q es NO
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds an site which nr_d to be propeny closed? Cl Yes K,\Io
L
5iruciures (Lagoons and/or lioldin2 Ponds)
9. Is srrucruml freeboard less than adequate? Q Yes )KNo
Frechoard (ft)' Lag ooa I Lzfmon ? Lagouu 3
Laiman 4�-
4Sa
lu-
14. Is seepage observed dam any of the strucn=?
Q Yes
XNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
Q Yes
ONO
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancel'unprovement?
jyes
Q No
(If any of questions 9-12 ivaz answered yes, 2nd the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Q Yews
X INC
ti'xste rUoiiention
14. Is there physical evidence of aver application?
Q Yes
Kfo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff en inn waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15_ Crop type 7AL
pq
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
❑ Yes
pi 1L40
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acrezze for laadapplication?
Q Yes
O'vo
13. Does the cover crop need improvement?
MYes
Q No
19. Is thema lack of available irrigation equipmem?
Q Yrs
o
06 .dirtiffed Facilities Oniv
24. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Amirnal. Waste Management Plan readily available?
Q Yes
9No
21. Does the facility fall to comply with the .Anim;d Waste Management Plan In any way?
Q Yes
�ZNa
Z_ Does record keying need improvement?
Yes
Q No
23. Does_ facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Q Yes
MNO
24_ Did Reviewedl specror fail to discuss reviewrumpection with owner or operator in charge?
Q Yes ANO
Cotiii}t-irits(refertri:guestior<�}:.;Eaglailr.arty YES arisratrsartifCor;any_rccamrtieadattonsar<_Z13XF fftz~caltt C t
q�. ItY
U5GQI3wtI!of faCttto'bexe:laurSY[uattotls=��scadd"ihopagesas ne °x �"
-Ify 4. 4
4Sa
lu-
Revie}verffnspector'arae-
Revi%verAnspector Signature: Date:
f7:,r.� .... nr-i{'. ,. r1. ,.�. IL rl.,.l?r. C.. F-rrilir. .-i.5w°Sm✓.'it Unit

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. _ Cel - I 1
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Time: t5 -o7
Farm Namelowner:_ 66ne�A1
n .�
']mailing Address: ' the C
County: A
Integrator: Moral.v Phone: (910) -8q tl 1
On Site Reprc�tat,ive: ! 1 Ph cl) 0,275 -a r_iL
Physical Address/Location: w �.3 _ fa ri.'Xes_ za4k %P— E*
Type of Operation: Swine—x— PoultryCattle
Design Capacity: 2tpoca Number of Animals on Site: r
DEM Certification Number. ACE DEM Certification Number. ACNEW
Latitude: 3A40' X1Longimde:-7$ °
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year. 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + I inches) or No Actual Freeboard: } 3 Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the oon(s)? Yes orlkMas any erosion observed? Yes or (Seepage Was
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate?' Yes or No Not Evaluated
Crops) being utilized: (Spray Field -or cover crop was not evaluated)
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellwi t�slor No
100 Feet from Wells? o
* Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or i&*
* Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, orbther
similar man-made devices? Yes or(& If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No(Waste management records were not
Additional Comments: revieXgd)
Ibis was a very brief inspection. a more thorouZh inspection will be conducted in the lure.
Please contactc_DEK should any 'condition--a-rise that poses a danger to surface waters. _
* This farm was not located on a USGS TOPO map to determine ?Blue Line" status.
If you have uestions concerning this report please do not hesitate to --.contact the inspector
at [phone]. Please contact the inspector'if the -above information is incorrect.
cc: Facility Assessment Unit - ) 5-,'o 7 � .41
Signature
Use Attachments if Needed.

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. _ M— 71
DIVISION OF ENYIRONNUES 'AL MANAGEMENT
AND AL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
'Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Addyes :—R 6 �� 1
County: (,.A. A
integrator:
On Site Representative:
Physical Addition: 14w
DATE: 1995
TSmc: 5''07
Phone: o %- 2 it)
Type of Operation: Swine ..� Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 2 6ast Number of Animals on Site: wM f4 orr
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Ladw&:3A • Aw �Lk - Longitude:,
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoonsufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + I inches)or No Actual Freeboard:—L.LFL M Inches
Was any seepage observed from the oon(s)? Yes oro i�Mas any erosion observed? Yes or &(Seepage Was
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate?' Yes or No Not Evaluatec
Crop(s) being utiHzed: (Spray Field' or cover crop was not _evaluated)_
Does the fatuity meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feel from Dwdlin s? � or No
100 Fent from Wells? or No
* Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Ye: or
* Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or4ther
similar man-made devices? Yes or(& If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No(Waste management records were not
Additional Comments: _ reviewed)
This was -a very brief inspections -a more thorough inspUtion will be condurted in the future.
Please contact�•DEM should an 'condition-- arise that poses a dan er to surface waters.
* This farm was not located on a USGS TOPO map to determine ?Blue Line" status.
If you have questions concerning this report please do not hesitate to --.contact the ins ector
at [phone], Please contact the inspector if the above information is incorrect.
cc: Fw%ty Assessment Unit - /5,,a7 j"r
Signature
Use Attachments if Needed.