20061427 Ver 1_More Info Received_20060913

"`"' of WAT~9
moo`' pti
~ r
O `C
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross lr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 6, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
City of Sanford '
Attn: Vic Czar
PO Box 3729
Sanford, North Carolina 27330
Subject Property: Sewer Improvement
Lack ofApplicant/Agent Signature
® REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
^ PERMITTING FEE MISSING/INCORRECT
^ RETURN OF APPLICATION PACKAGE
Dear Mr. Czar:
DWQ Project # 06-1427
Lee County
;,
' ` s . ~.
;,
~y_
On September 5, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received yow for the above referenced
project. The DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate
information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your
application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we
receive five copies of the additional information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of
your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506. This project has been placed on hold as
incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the following information so that
we may continue to review yow project.
Additional Information Requested:
^ Water Quality Certification, See I. Processing, Item 2.. Please state which Permit
(Nationwide, Regional or General) number you intend to use. You may want to contact the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) to determine which permit they will allow you to
use.
^ DWQ requires the name of an individual shown as "Owner/Applicant" to set up the project.
^ The PCN Application failed to contain the Applicant/Agent's Signature and Date. See last
page of application. (Agent's signatwe is valid only if an authorization letter from applicant is
provided).
^ Water Body information not stated. See III Project Information, Item 7.
^ Incorrect and/or missing wetland, intermittent-perennial stream and/or buffer impacts.
DWQ is unable to review this project without noted or corrected impacts reflected.
NQjthCarolina
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit ~ atllrQ tJ
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] /Internet: htt~L/h~4.enr,state.rlc us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

^ Lack of permitting fee. Please note that beginning January 1, 1999, the N.C. General
Assembly passed legislation requiring payment of a fee for a11401 applications. The fee for
applications is $200 for projects impacting less than an acre of wetland and less than 150
linear feet of streams. For projects impacting one or more acres of wetland or 150 or more
feet of streams, the fee is $475.
^ Incorrect permitting fee amount. Please see above item. Your check # for $
is herein enclosed for fee correction. DWQ does not retain any payment unless it is in the
correct amount.
^ A request for a modification of an issued permit requires re-submission of five (5) application
sets and appropriate fee. We have herein returned your modification request.
^ Application was missing pages or sections of information. See Other section below.
® The last page of the application was not signed/dated by the applicant/agent. Please supply one
(1) original and four (4) copies to initiate the review and approval process. Note: the agent's
signature is only valid if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.
^ OTHER:
Please contact the DWQ within three weeks of the date of this letter to verify that you have received this
letter and that you remain interested in continuing to pursue permitting of your project and will be
providing the DWQ the requested information at a later date. Please contact this office in writing. If we
do not hear from you within three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project
and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be awaze that any impacts requested within your application aze not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Mr. Ian McMillan or Ms. Cyndi Kazoly at 919-733-
1786 if you have any questions regazding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
~~
Cyn i Kazoly, Supervis
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBKIIjd
Enclosures: Last page of PCN permitting application
cc: ECS Cazolinas, LLP, Tom Rouse, 9001 Glenwood Ave., Raleigh, NC 27617-7505
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 061427COSan fordSewer(Lee)_Hold_Sig oa to re pact

~~: n
P. O. BOX 3729
PUBLCI WORKS DEPARTMENT
CTY OF SANFORD
TELEPHONE [phone]
FAX [phone] North Carolina 27331-3729 or 919-775-8231
September 12, 2006
Ms. Jean Manuele, Supervisor
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Reference: Authorization to Si Submit PCN ADplication Form
Sanford Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Sanford, North Carolina
ECS Project #14223
Dear Ms. Manuele:
As applicant for the referenced project, I hereby authorize Tom Rouse, Environmental Scientist
with ECS Carolinas, LLP of Raleigh, NC, to sign and submit the attached Pre-Construction
Notification (PCN) Application Form. Please contact me if you need additional information.
Sincerely,
Victor I. Czar, P.E.
City Engineer

XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The ~roiect itself is a sewage disposal system It will carry wastewater to the City of Sanford
wastewater treatment plant -
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No ® _
I`` ,
~.. ~~ ..
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No ® ~~ a
" ~~
o -~ ,
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ) ~.,'
~~~~~` , ~~G,b
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) resr~'1L~r ~d~}tional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No~'~;r,y
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http•//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: The
proiect is a proposed sanitarx sewer improvement installation. _
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature ` Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13