310386_2018 inspection_20181009

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number ETD - EYE O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Comp . ce Inspection Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine p Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other p Denied Access
Date of Visit: Q —/ Arrival Time: Departure Time: Z U/ County: Region:
Farm Name: 13,-d GAL_ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish l_avci I Dair Cow
Wean to Feeder I jNon-La}er I I Dairy Calf
eeder to Finish V650 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Roars Pullets 3cef Brood Co��
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Io NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes PNo
NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 6— 4 —
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a El Yes o ❑ I ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t at,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ YesrrNo�Eoj
NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is ther vidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. IQ Y eS 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Exces sivee Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): 13 e r PA h. '� -A�
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 11 ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes rNo
NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ YesElNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections�Noj
Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes A ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

acili Number: Date of inspection:
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the ap hate box(es)below.
allure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o A ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes — o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#) Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
b�6�IAn ell, G•-4ZA, ,mil
lz�_J
y SC-e-0 zs
pn 54 ewe (.✓1�t � 1S 0 01 L-a'
(URA✓ (�k)S�P l9PV61-/ SiS s eVt (- 0 I9A6n-g -7- 4- 1�
L,�-tti c� I► � 3 - 23- R/ L( G P Ac L y-fe
�c e 7i LvnS� P r^ +� Y9r Gv'3. S �� �2c� 1 �� i rv , S2�cn
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: V Z67
�/ 1,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (3 4 S `�/ /( Date: /10— S X
Page 3 of 3 21412015