The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20190295 Ver 1_20190295_2019030611�I��JW E T LA N D S y��& WATERS� INC US Army Corps of Engineers Asheville Regulatory Field Office 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801 NC DWR, 401 Buffer and Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 February 27, 2019 �� .� �I�� 1 RE: Proposed WT Harris Blvd. Road Widening (NWP 14 Verification Request) Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC To Whom it may concern: Attached please find a Pre-Construction Notification for a road widening project in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC. Project details are included with the PCN and attachments. Please contact us with questions or if additional information is necessary to review the project. Sincerely, �� Tamp Bandy £� O2 F W ATFqOG � y > � o � Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑x Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes x❑No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? 401 Certification: ❑ Yes ❑x No ❑Yes x❑ No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank �x Yes ❑ No or in-lieu fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counlies. If yes, answer 1h � Yes 0 No below. th. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concem (AEC)7 ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Roadway Improvements to WT Harris Blvd 2b. County: Mecklenburg 2c. Nearest municipaliry / town: Charlotte 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT right-of-way 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): 3d. Streetaddress: 3e. City, state, zip: 3f. Telephone no.: 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Applicant Infortnation (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: Dennis Hall 4c. Business name Innkeeper Motor Lodge, Inc (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4741 South Main Street 4e. City, state, zip: Winston-Salem, NC 27127 4f. Telephone no.: 336-788-9444 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: dennis.hall@dalyseven.com 5. AgentlConsultant Information (If applicable) Sa. Name: (consultant) Tamp Bandy 5b. Business name Wetlands & Waters, Inc. (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 4108 LB Propst Drive Sd. City, state, zip: Conover, NC 28613 5e. Telephone no.: 8283023437 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: jtampbandy@gmail.com Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A (NCDOT right of way) 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.34834 Longitude: -80.86248 tc. Property size: n/a acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Dixon Branch 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C 2c. River basin: Catawba 03050101 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the viciniry of the project at the time of this application: WT Harris Blvd is an existing Slane roadway located near I-4851 I-77 and North lakes Mall in Mecklenburg County. The projecl area has been heavily developed with mixed use commercial and residential slrudures. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: n/a 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: -30 in project area 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: This work will incrementally contribute to the widening of WT Harcis Boulevard to a six-lane facility as included in the Charlotle Regional Transportadon Planning Organization's (CRTPO's) 2040 Metropolitan accommodate bike and pedestrian facildies along the corridor. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: This sVeet improvement work will incrementally contribute to the widening of WT Harzis Boulevard to a six-lane faciliry as included in the Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization's (CRTPO's) 2040 MeVopolitan Transportation Plan (Amended 2016). 4. Jurisdictional Determinatfons 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream detertninations by the 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ro eCt includin all rior hases in the ast? CommeniS: likely for prior permits 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type � preliminary ❑ Final of determination was made? 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: NCD07 Name (if known): unknown Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. Unknown dates. Would have been completetl for original WT Hartis Blvd construaion. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Sb. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. Original permits for WT Harris Blvd construction. Additional permitting in 2009 for culvert axlension on north side. NCDW� 09-0902 (Corps AID unknown) 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑x Yes ❑ No 6b. If yes, explain. This appears to be final proposed widenirg per attached Metropolitan Transportation Plan (Amended 2016) for #129 - WT Hanis Blvd Page 3 of 10 PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 7. Impacts Summary 7a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ WeUands x❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction fVea of number Corps (404,10) or impact Permanent (P) or DWQ (401, other) (acres) Tem ra T W1 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No W2 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No W3 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - W4 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No W5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - W6 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No 2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact number intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction sVeam length Pertnanent (P) or width (linear Temporary (T) (feet feet) S1 - 1 3-boz cuNert extension Dixon Branch PER Corps 10 19 S2 - Choose one - S3 - Chaose one - - S4 - Choose one S5 - Choose one - - S6 - Choose one 3h. Total stream and tributary Impacts 19 3i. Comments: Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or type Tem ora T 01 - Choose one Choose O2 - Choose one Choose - 03 - Choose one Choose 04 - Choose one Choose 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland purpose of pond (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 Choose one P2 Choose one 5f. Total: 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes � No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse � Tar-Pamlico � Catawba � Randleman ❑ Other: 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2 number — mitigation impact impact Permanent (P) or required? (square (square Tem orar T feet feet g� - Yes/No B2 _ Yes/No B3 _ Yes/No B4 - Yes/No B5 - Yes/No gg - Yes/No 6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 10 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Utilize maximum allowable / practicable headwall height and side-slopes 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. The current design incorporates NCDOT approved construction techniques, and is assessed to be the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative the meets minimum design and safety standards. r 2. Com ensato Miti ation for Im acts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑X Yes � No - � impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑X Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? � Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Com lete if Usin a Miti ation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Type: Choose one Quantity: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type:'Choose one Quantity: Type: Choose one Quantity: 3c. Comments: 4. Com lete if Makin a Pa ment to In-lieu Fee Pro ram 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑X Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 19 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: wat'm' 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: proposed 1:1 ratio (see attached NCSAM) . 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires � Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes x0 No within one of the NC Ri arian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. � Yes � No 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? o�o 2b. Does this ro'ect re uire a Stormwater Mana ement Plan? ❑x Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local overnmenYs 'urisdiction is this ro'ect? ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): � USMP � Water Supply Watershed � Other: NCDOT Phase II 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been �Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): � Session Law 2006-246 Q Othef: NCDOT Phase II 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been � Yes x❑ No attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? � Yes � No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? � Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑x No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑x No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes x❑ No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑Yes ❑x No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in �Yes � No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. It does not appear that future culvert extensions are proposed. All appropriate sediment and erosion control measures are to be utilized to prevent downstream water quality degradation 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. n/a Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 5. Endangered Speeies and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. WIII this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑X No habitat? 5b. Have you checked wRh the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No impacts? Sc. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. - 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Hatiitat? 6. Esaential Fish Habitat (Corps Requfrement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑x No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat7 7. Historic or Prehistoric Culturel Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes Ox No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resourcesl Previous requests uGlized review ot NCDOT database / NCDOT Historic Architedure Group and National qegister of Historic Place searches and were authrozed as r uested. The current im act is in a revious road location. 8. Flood Zone DesignaUoe (Corps Requirement) Sa. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? Ox Yes ❑ No Sb. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Conffiruction approved thraugh NCDOT and CDOT processes Sc. What source(s) did you use to make the Floodplain determination? FEMA online firmette ..�C�llliGf lCl� ,W Z✓��%n ApplicanUAgenYs Printed Name plicanVAg Ys Signature Date (Agent signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the a licant is rovidetl. Page 10 of 10 �I Z g � W eoi„ Z �o°n � Z Foun W - �� KnowwhaC� IOw. �a�� 6efore you dig. �Z / � ��,`�,,,_ r =� u�oy„�/K/n y� � . ';i =;.i.� -.s��¢: � U W z � w � as�z �� x �� yz � s � � � a �� p�z O� �.,°� U a a Y3 � W .'�W, z WT HARRIS BLVD PI.AN AND PROFILE IS BL Z � — PEN90N5 IIRna zi�sns Ca0 ill£ Ifi-003 6NSEPWG PROJECT N0: i6-003 �Escnrn er: �ou RENENED 9T: dlN DAIE: OECEMBEH I5. ]011 C6. „\ , ; ��- � � �, ��.,, w _, �,o.�. a� _ \,�� ;��'i`,- m.��.�a,.�.,o,.^,„, d.,.,a�.o...�.�.a..�XP�µ:E,.^.. I.004TIONMAP ., � ��•�� — ro..�a..�a 4.,a. .o�.,�..,o ., �, m� "°' .�n.,. ��..e,ad�, a,.,�,. ��.�...a.. e.� , G' . u,oE,., ,�, w,.z..a...� .a�aa.�,., .w,...� � . �s�.w,�,aa�,oab '..ao�, ,a,.a..o�,� '” d„ .. �m..o°; fg� o� �, :��„P' F�u w. k,� ....� �.��,-....,. �� __�,_ _ _ � I. ___._.,. � _ - ._.._.,,._. _ hl��l'.I� �. \I: .. V�f�l —� —' — - � . ^ � • ,� • - ;� � � --- - . ,�. � .-- , : � -- ---' _ - ---- „ --- - - _,_ :- � -:. . .u. . � x <�, e� � . o. : �¢� - _ --.-. . __ t/ . . .. L6856 Sf - - � - 03B AC _ �� --- M^��a�� " .�w�'��.� ��""�. suu. �ctn�� pa. <<,�� . . . . _ w.moiuo"e ,�a. o�.c.� �,.o � ° � �r1� F �c5�j2FS wwu� x[r��u �� SIl1TSIlOTT[RA1S � :.-�. �'� � sosioN � ov n<o�. �tcrni _-- �u,a � +< on �� - � ac � ./�' �."_�. ":-� � ER Cb w � � ' -. � �x '. , �- ��' � , 0 3 � �� _ - - ��d�� . _ .,�- . . \\ \ i'�c� .�..�.... : \ _ - %.' tx. ce az , �''_ �.. - � ,.v'�Sr�. �t.�no SF . � • •_ , _��..+"_" - _ _ ._.. �� ': ..-? a1e, M . � `� �J - - �.:..-'� _ a _. • ' - � �. - c ..=_�s � _ ' �� --_�_,,,,.� i , i ; .. . � � _ � - � � � , , �� 3 � __ .. j�-�.. . ._=-�--4=nar-'e---^"`"" �.�' _ � ,_. � eby • e � �, ,�c I _ � 1 ;,,,.� .:.- � � _ -. .s- ,. , � � _� .... , �.� .�- ; _ � _. ... . ..,..-.: . ' ,. J,. . . . . ,� . . �-_� ,, .. __. .. , �. , . . . . - .-'_'•_ � . / - ��\ 1� . ,.F.. f �l, ir __ • _ . � � Y . . -� " _ ��--r�'.-i. . __ _ - u i i t .... .:.. �. . '..^ ".__ a " -^'� 7 ,...» � '._ x. . " �, t�' .�i� -'-'_''"s' '_ " , , ,. __ - -�� -_ - _ , - ___ ,�, y'—'�`'' , y ,.w r � �» µ �r�' �. . .�/� .� �Ay `� �. � �� — — -y 7- 6 `� '� �,� . . me t. _ ., � � ' ti 0 � �.� � � � � " � '.i, � � � 4 � � ...w�� ° � �� • � . � ��ii� ,��'� �.. ' V � .�. �` � �� .,rc, �� `♦ rc. . .below w.(. d �\` � ) � �C.d��abeloreyoudg. � � _ .W. ��,� �..,..�o�w...�, �' ) . .. .:. ( �..e. � a,-" ..',✓ EROSION CON'LROL ANll GRAIJ W G YI,AN W I"I�H DRAINAGE AREA MAP ' N i U � � w w z � z < < w , 9 F''.� y�� ,, CI� �� :,�.�� —�. v; �' i � � c _ c ' �_ zx z : zxk �° �ZLL G��- F � � = �G y s 6 Y x I 2 \VI iIANRIS dLVU h.ROSIOh CONI MOI. SGItAUIN( PI.Ap' & DNAI�AGIS nitt.�etnv �__v _ � C6.2 ,__ ---' _--_ I __ i —A� — :__�� P�= ��-______\ __J'' � I ' __---��E R�W-pER GIS ��--'— � _;__�' � /'' ' `1�1� -- ' ` '�- ' � '/ � � \\=t-----�� _-�-"� --; �—�� ~�\ s111 �" —�'" = `'--""� —'"� -------------�s��------- � ---- ___.__ I -____ EX. CB /J2 --,r�— - .s-�=--- - i —_�---- ,_,__- -�in�;�25.�a� - xti �...1r= �r++�=�� '�� "'ll / �-- \ __ � � INV OUT (CI //4): 721.35 �l � EXISTING VARYING SIZE TRIPLE � \ _--- �� 7� INV W(CI #3): 721.52' � �1 . BOX STORM CULVERT � \ - - TOP OF CULVERT: t714.25 EX. CI � A __--- --- _.--'-� � LX. CB �4 INV IN (CI y1): 721.49' �� _ � 'EXISTING GROUND LEVEL: t730.50 -- ------ - � ------'--�� 1�,656 .JF � �9 �� --------------- _� -------- � ------- � � — 0.38 AC — , ------- ' _, ---------------- -�\ --- \ _ a —�= �.�� — � �s: --+,.�. � -- ��\ I� _ �,�_ — \ Ex. CB //1 ' '_ EX.�`Gb�.g�_l._-�--__ �.. _ � — �� — �� \ RIM: 726.64' �� i��a�s �- _ — — �� ,V WT' HARRIS BOULEVARD � INV OUT: 723.55� _ ��= �'� �: �=� � � ��= \ / E%. VARIAHLE PUBI.IC R�W � _ � � �� : i � � e �- � EX. C B # � � � — — — �� `� ,= � —= '"� 12,140 SF _ _ - - - - _ — — \ .' `.� � __==:'�i 0.28 AC- - � � � � � � ...—��-.— -- _ �� r� �� —__ � L �'�� `� � ��------- - - " = ---__ -_____ =��t.��w ��t-i � ,_=r��'y <�`��' I 1 _ � - - ---.-^=--------------_' __� _.-- ==�==-- -----__— �\ —_��\ �..`� �� _--_= _ —_==''_' `�� EX. CB #1 - - -r - - - �� — •• __ �� ..�—=-- �— -__— - " - - - - - � �,, 10;73�5 SF � � ,� .�.. ..�. 1 —. �_ = �— � � ----_=-_=__�_—_�,�—__— �, t� --- � � ��. 0.25 AC � „�. --�—�` "� � �- - - - � � � \\ �\\ �� \� �� °^'� '°°' �� REFER TO ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS �� - 1 �� \� �� \\ \ \ � �, „�,. � � "" �-r----__�____^ PLAN AND ROADWAY PLAN AND � � \ �� m �°' `�' � ----PROEL�S FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT � �,m„ `L� .� -�*c\ �" �� CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL HIGH HAZARD SILT — I � GRADING. 5E�S'WEETS.C�6.3_C6.4. .o ,�-� `` ;G.- .a" r . �' ".e i \\ �\\ ��\ �\ � FENCDEBAILI �/CROP�CLDSM 30068)S YP. — '_--- _--= --_--- =:`': ./` I `\ \� " \ — --_--- J -� � �� 1 ---- --P- � ♦ � /' �� _ I — � �� - — � i---___ ♦ ° � „ � � -- ---�� --��` �� ----- �� °" , — i— — — —i � �� ♦ — a . / `1 \ \\ �' \\\\ \ __— '_ � ._ .. ��a1�T_i-`��-1 �—Xi / � ` � � _�� __�_ ___ _ _ ��uL_oe, a� X —X_—_—x___.—%��_ 1 ' ._.� l� �� — '_—_" "'_-.__�__� �_ � �___�_�______�_ ^_�� / � _ _ �-- _�c--'__ \ ^-»�-�___._� _A-_--� a__-__.^ �l - _ _ __-_ __ / __� _� -,_�_-- . �___ _ __ - __ __ �CONIRACTOR TO INSTALL HIGH __ __---__---.- ��. . .. �� -��_�_,� --=L �� d- - -- x��.�Y,� Y � __ __ __ __ __ __ _ HAZARD SILT FENCE PER DETAIL __ -=„ _ -- -x �y� - ----- - - - - - -- 7/C7.2 (CLDSM 30.06B), T1P. - .� i�- �-- � - .�..��_ _ ----- - - - -- ---- - -. " � i �' � - l —` � -- -_'-- - ^' - -�--- _ -- -- -- � -_-----_'----h'0-_ -�- / I � ° /� / ��"�— � ' / ' ----- --- - --------- ' .n � _- _ -__ _ - - - -__ ' J �/ �^-- �� k /L-�� r r ' / -' _- .-- i __ / � / / -_ _ __ __ - _---_ --' y = _ -- _- _ ` _--- -_ -E �+ --- _.�''^�/� '/ >eE� -l�cl�! � // . i � � � � ,,. �'• � ' _ �� -- ��----J � �� ' r �� ' � - � .a.. ~ i � � °'m �". C i i i` �' �.� p.: �� `t- i�_ .��'gF.� i„�-' �� f s / � m ' ```�. _ � _ --_.- �oFi i�� i�'��,- � =�� II I..�. +.,� � � � � � , V ��' - _ �� p f N f 1 � . � ,n 715� � �oc � � f s � I i�, CZ� � v � 1 , v �. � _ m �°- � I --F� v s — , � , � � I II I '- � �' Q� � � � 1 \ � � � � �� ,\ i � � � 710'�� ` � \ � �oE�� 'CONTRACTfdf�TO COMPLETE FILL WITHOUT I II I. 9 � � � �y 1 J r \ ` \ � ti I --' �\ � � \ � , � \\�� x � �� -- CLOjItQG ANY EXISi1NG LANES AND WI'fHOUT \ \ .- ��\ \ \�� 1 � l ��i � � �oE� I II f, � � � � � � p �X _,. �,,X��,�. � \ V �� D, \ \ � � � \ �� \�OS� ��j � � � ,� � ,,[715TURBING EXISTING GUARDRAIL PRIOR TO I II I � t E f �� \�� t--- \ �-�E� � �, „%ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS. a I ! ! 1 %� / r �. \� y � ,. \ \\ � \ � \ �� _ . ,/� � I II I . I t ! \ _ � ♦,O . � \� r"^ , J� \ \ � � ' � � � � �� `C � � '°.�,. g. _. • � >PE�'� � � � �� i x a ' DENUDED \ � � � \� • \ \ � I \ �`�,�'' � / Q � I II I. i �MITS, TYP. � � � � \ PR. TO'M1� BOW: 71 0 \\ \ � \ � �� •>\ � \�\ \ \ - �'r�� \ \ � ,,.�.�� ! \ � �' � \ �� O � � \�� I � �" pR. TOW BOW: 709.03 \ �� i CONTRACTOR TO RAISE EXIS�� SANITARY I II I ` � � ! � i I \ PR. GL: 711.H0 \ \ � � � ��\ � �" � \ � � a I II I� � � I � \ \ �`� ,� PR. TOW: 715.30' � \\_\,�� ,oE� \ ��pR. GL: 709.00 �� i SEWER MH RIM TO BE 2'-IfBOVE PROPOSED a 1 � i ( I � \ \ � ` PR. GL: 714.50��♦ � \ �. \ % \ PR. TOW: 715.30 \ \ \ PR. TOW: 715.00 � \ \ ' is.� � GRADE AT APPROXIM�TELY 720.00'. SEE I II I°.� I I I � � � � � � \ \ �^ \ • � -� � � �� \ � � \ � ��1.-� � CLT WATER�E'TAIL 5 C7.70. pa � 1j41 � � I ! c�'�i � � �� PR. GL•\714J0 \\ \ \ �\ � �\ \\��\ � � . �\\ PR. GL: 714.10 � � ED , � ,,, `�.�,� � �-' � I I f>' � � � � � � � � � � � > '�/ • �� Cu � � �J �,. � /', �� I � kONTRr�C�R k0 INS LL HIGH I�AZARD S1dT � REFER TO STRUCTURA� � �, � � �\ \XhQE� �\\�� \` \\ � \ ��,g ' ��/� � � FENCE BELqW 40CATION O�F R�20POSED`RETAININ�' PLANS FOR PROPOSED� \ � � ♦ . � � � V� -'��, _/�� S, � � � � � \ \ �� . � F"' I I�. WAL� P�R D�IL 7/C7:8�CLDSM 3�0.066) �\ HEADWALL MOD�FICATIONS. �hQE�h \\�� \ �\�\ � \O\�� \ \ �\ �\ �� 5 7/-� �SSMH MONAC��N�OAb1 �f� �I I 9 i l �\ � � ) � � \ � \ \ � � \ ��\\� \ � � \ \ \ � RIM: 710.53' � I � � 1 CECIL S�ANDY CLA LOAM � � pE l � / � \ � \ � \ �� s� = � ��_ HYDROLOGIC "B/D" II �I 4.. . I � � / � caoz � ;(� J,,- � . � � � � � � ��6Q`�� \ �- �I I.�� HYbROLOGI �"B" �"� ��E ( CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL t18 LF TRIPLE �� \\ �\ �� - CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL HIGH HAZARD SILT II'I I. I`, J /! 1 � oc�� BOX SLO ERTO MATCH EXSTNG SLOPE\��\� \\ �.��"� � \ WALLEPERLDETAIOLC7/C7.2 (CLDSMo30.068)TAINING � ' \ t oc � , � i � ' \ � � _ ��s=�"� \ � \� e�� ' � � _ o�,�y� _ EX_R/W ��$ / __ J� I � L�'� -'� \' \ � \� �� \ � \` EXISTING DIXON BRANCH � � I I. I _-OE_- �__� _—t__—t_--I --�_� \ \ � � \� \ � u r I -oe - - � -.ss - \ � \ , � EROSION CONTROL AND GRADING PLAN WI� .C�.,�...iar^ � m r�x. � -_..r, � r �. -. o�s .,.k ry �, _. �o NW� r,.w., .:r. vn dr. m'w,' ,'4, l" t_ v:z:' k-Z. 9 Y..3t'd+."✓"k9 � /� � � �� ■■�■�■■�■■■■■■■ ■■■.��4�� ■■■■■ ��/■■■.■. ■■■■�� i�� i■i'i■�ri■ ■■■�■��■■■■ ■■�■�■■�■��■�■�■ ■��■■■■■■�■�■■ ��■�■�■�■■■�F�� ■�■■■■��■■■�■�■ ■■■■�■■■■■��■■■ ■��■■■��■��■�■ ■��■■■■�■■■��■ F��■��■■■■�F�' � ■■■■■■■■�':�•��._.•�.�. .. � ■■■��■'. • . • �� . ■■��■�■ ■��.�.��1� ■■��■■■■ �.I��■ �i�\��I�!��t1��0 ■�■1�� 1 1�� ■ � � ■■■�■r� �,�� ■��■ ■�� i �� i �� ■■ ■■�■�ri��i�� i�i�i■��r�■■ dn��■�ir■ i��i■■ �o ■�■■n��i�■ i�iii�i■ ■■ ■■��N■� i �� ■i � �� ■��■■ ■��■il� I � I ■I I1� I ��■■ ■�■�■1� �■ I�I I I■ ��■ Fl��ll l I■ I■I I1� I �■■Q��' ■■■��\�II■��Il1�1 ■■■ ■■■��I��i�i�i� ■�■ ■■■■��L,��i ��■ ■■�■■��■�■■� o � ■��■��tQZ�] Cz ENGINEERING MC� ENGINEERING, INC. 27 1 O 6EN CRAIG DR., STE. 400 CHARLOrrE, NC 2H262 PHONE 704.570.9797 -CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO ENSURE SOIL STABILITY BEFORE BEGINNING DREDGING OPERATIONS. -PROPOSED CULVERT EXTENSION, HEADWALLAND WINGWALL DESIGN TO BG COMPL�TED BY STRUCTURALENGINEER -NO LIVE WNCRETE EXPOSURE IS TO OCCUR DURING CULVERT MODIFICATIONS INSTALLATION -NO DREDGING IS TO OCCUR WITAIN CREEK BANK SCALE: HORZ i"=4o', VERT DIXON BRANCH CULVERT EXTENSION SIDE VIEW HIS-TREYBURN W.T. HARRIS BLVD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS EXH 1.O .,. ... f�.c^tcrsvo-llc Iy „ca �c a� ',�^. w .�. �,c��, ry m r �M A �71 G S' x Fi _ v° li'rr�G�j '} r " = � 9hrq� _ '�. � pry lopbr � Westoour��c � i.�. ��i i6 � q:,' I/ * �'4 �M1 r Croft ,�y< a z< d >'' 3 HtAiJiYS ��i° ��. ��JI�L� !R;,Vit1' _ ,S rf F� H � .1�'^�_'f . ;._ �Z �-I =�c a . . - '`'i� �.� tl►'�q o- 0 � � 0 � Bing - _L�� `� WETLANDH Sc �WATERB, INC. Figure 1: Site Vicinity Map 2i �. � - � Project location q'_ f:�3lk.,.,..nPa'0 Innkeeper Motor Lodge, Inc. � Charlotte ou��y Mecklenburg State: NC F aVlong): 35.3483, -80.8625 AID / unknown / tbd nRnn - -� - '� ,,, � � N�, [r,lnkc Afj/ . . :� 7 � _ ._. .._. ..: tt. �;,`, � � 2500fee1 500 m OO 20�9 HERE, OO OpenSireelMap Improvements to WT Harris Blvd N;A (NC DOT right-of-way) 02-18-19 /,: � �f, /,,/ /, / 2� j. ti� r Y ^ �P Cr • O � � 7'��'�' . � . r 1 � j 7 ' S � � � 1 � 8 J i� i Existing Triple-box Culvert g� 0 0 . `,.. ,r' Q - . . , _yc �.�. I `� � ^ �`� Perennial Tributary Waters of the US N- �� 50.0 m � � WETL.4NDB 6c �/ Owner I i l WATERB, INC. Develo er Figure 2: Approximate Depiction T�W,;, Charlotte of Aquatic Resources Coordinates (�aVLong): , � �. . � . � . � � � O O O O � O lii�.,�n Frun.li � �rc.u•:.;ia . Q. �> � o 4�` O � 0 i �� `. �` .. � ; '� -a_,:,. .�O . �`1 -' ` • �: . . � � 1 ��.. ♦ � ` 1 ♦� � •�� :y _- .� . � ��, .. . t ` � �� (�", 9'.^3 >� `; Project Area �' � �' D 1 t � .O 1 i i'' ! �,ry o� ��sdor.=_ L�e�t��^h�rg Ca�rty, Nor.h �srol na j . Ci!yo`Chero:te hteckle�6�-3Ce��ry "Wetland Sketch provided for illustrative purposes for prelimina�y planning use only. Not in[ended to be relied upon for exact location, dimensions, or orien[ation. All findings and assessments made by wetland consultants regarding limits of jurisdiction or permitting requirements are subject m verification by [he US Army Corps ot Engineers and other appropriate state and local authorities. Innkeeper Motor Lodge, Inc. ; o""ry Mecklenburg State: NC f 35.3483, -80.8625 A�� unknown / tbd nann Roadway Improvements to WT Harris Blvd NiA (NC DOT righbof-way) graphic 02-18-19 ----- - --_ _. .__ _- _ . � Polaris 3G Map — Mecklenbur� �'� untv, No�th Car��lrna ��_ =�� w�"� 3 �,, - ,. R. : � � �� `� t�=,. �� ,; �1 � e�� , . ' (�� F � ° ' �� i, �.,F 7/ u5' �r " w�$ ��a .�� ' + �� `; , �ir � . , v � ? t � Z �#� k � � y� fi i �', � f . � �� :r��.�,'-� � A. � I I � � t1.r' v ,.r f /` � � � i a4 ' ` i �'r, i r � p (j�y � ' � � Y � �� ._ i� �� 6 4 f�� AF^` �x t �`� � � ! � ' � q+�k! � �-f:i k � i � I �� 'F� ' � �' t M � .- � �F � � s: �' � ' � . . . � v� 4 �t k'� .. �'�"x n , � . . , � '��:� `�ie"s f" �, S� , ,l M;;. ' 24� � .�,y�� fi� + � y'� �' ' w � A g`i � I , "� � .a .�: i'� % � - I �. •. s ' w. �p' �, ,. . � ♦ . i �� . ' j . ' � . �' d.��g � a _ � `' ' ` . �a � q � � �� °� �� '�"�� .io`�� 'ti� "�' . ��`,�� '�;se� �,d . _ ,.��'� �� s V �. ! ' �, - .,� �)�� t �. r��i . . ... a ' �� ' � ' �,�� i � � ., : � � �� it , _. .,f � ♦ � �� , �'`it r y .. .S . � I an, ��4�� .r � Y A � . �Y d . � OYYY ,Y�� " � �� ,� T, A� ' rb � {m�.'�r� `*' �. . . ' [e� ' '� \ YlX _ e a � � �} R C Rn �< �, � � .0 } �?m i � .4 „�,- � a � �, , � "'.x. �t.� e ; �.�� . , e ..�.. . _ . , . , i. �" f fn. ._m i. i `�� r. �. �' � �� r .�"� � � � ,, � O .. �, . ; .� � i �� a�� f � �� ,� � �'b � . . .F g� r . ' • �` � ,S' +•Y � X . �� v; � � " � . � � ' �'�i � ��'r� N ��" '� ` ' ♦ . 'd" a*,�`"� Q 0 � r , y 'o � � � � �� . � � �� J,. �,,: 6, F�'.hi w ♦ � ' ,.ia � '� �'ne Y�..� . ^ .:.3# r� �. � ! � �� 'y',. '�.e a +� ,�♦ 1 . �.*. i , + .` �. � ;� ai � 'i �^ �,�.:� f �� v, � � �' ' � � ,y.,., � � , � � �"rv��s x �i t� � � � °' . ��1. . ,�} /� . i � � �" � h � r �n.:_ p'�.+ � I ,3 �, V � } ' � . �� „� �,� �}'��, � t� t�S�l�� " �" � � .!� �� '�a �� ,'p�i'' j hA� ��` r . . .. a`4 ' �` � �' �"�. " "� � '� . ,a ' .y�� t � k / �' � ox � �4�" rM �� 5� j •� r y� :i� 5 �,,, ft� �. � � �� , -' . �, � ��y.. � . -s��r a � .�„� �. 7i'� .r� �R4+�,` �Ir r. � �p',,�Y �a. � +�p .. q' d �l.d� 4 1� = � d ^ � e �% . ] 3 p � ' ! 0 '". �� _ � � � p � .... �°g �� ,o� p0 e .R�rMF x +�.i ' �,p i r s' y qµ tj ��ht �e ^t� oi ? a ] � � ^ 0 0 OQSi � 0 (1) f 4ilr n :'� � ' € . `r"�' ,jSf�,��.'�r I �'� �Y�f'�.+'.�ty'�' i .�d, - � aiF ' �� "ui r�� t '1.,��a� � . c �•a°' �JS � V �: :.k� � r r, '.? �� r !'� ,e '}� � s; .. � . . �� ,y�. �sF i�'a �; �,�° : a i ? �� ,f� �' �� :�' ."� ",� � � ,�. � 'ti ..�i. A��_< r.��" �'._d'. r: :�.'' 'P: �`K: y� �r- � __ �"_� . "�4 d ylhis mau u �. .,�:'. n �,= d fo' Ihe i �..:.9 : •� �.,�', . '. r.� .. fJ. . 1 �..-: � � . . .. . i � . � ; � � '_. . ...irveys. Planlmet�c maP�. acd o[her pub'.ic n=coNsancl data�• Users o� Uis map or repurt are hereby no!iLm tial Inu afor�mr.nuunea puu i� pcmary �fvr�,l�.a � s�„r«� snoula bc �:.�nsultec ui vvn�i alicn. +;tecldenburg County and rts mapping coniramors assume no legal responsbili�� for ihe information contained herein. � � �� WETLANDB & �. �WATERB, INc. Ovmer/ Innkeeper Motor Lodge, IIIC. Namel Roadway Improvements to WT Harris Blvd Develo er Ci �/ ount : State: Tax T w� Charlotte Y Mecklenburg N(�, P�N S N/A (NC DOT righPof-way) Figure 3: County GIS Cooidinates(LaVLong): AID/ scale: oate: 35.3483, -80.8625 �R��. unknown / tbd graphic 02-18-19 V � � xrl4 � �� , I t� � 9oa , �`� • � i4 + � . - �i �� . . '� `1119 � . � , ' - � . � - � /� `� . ' � � � � '-,�, � _ ., � �; �` l ,I \ ,•y y�•r�. ; \ �6i ' �i \ � � I� � '� I' �v�� ' I + +� l .� ,- , 1 � � ,l � • � � ��- � Q,¢/ ��, � � - l � ,. _' ' ; ' � -,� , • - � � . / ,� / / ��j �`� �_. BM ,� - � �� , � �, � ", �N' �� _ - � .�. • �'Y� �� is77A ' � � i � ' � j � � , � � � � ♦ •�1� � ��-. \' +�nSCreek . � � ' ( / r �SU� � ra ��' .`�Z �,�, �., \ i � ,. � i � t •A ` �� t--"�� . �� +=�z _ � �� _ .,� ��A• �• � �� ; �'�_ �,f ,� -'!`^ -� 1 . .�, � � .�. �-: � - i � \ �, : ,/ i � �,'� 7 � � . �` � ;/a _ , �'; • '\ � _ � ` ;� �. ,�,�� , //f � _' � �� _� q� • I i�� V� �/. � ;- ) � \ / °` �✓ 'r 1 � /^. ., � n.^ L'l I i;,� � � R • � • �'; � �� , , � . �, �� u� i ../�'si �, �� 1 . �!' � � ✓ � � ��; � � � , p �:� �� 1 � ` � � "' ,, _ �drgizcHAP�,° _ n'� j �, , • `��, � 1 �'• � �� ,'• ' • � -_-'� ; � � '�i r, � � a � (� �.. � . . . ' _. o � , , .� ° �� j��r�.•.r 8t14 � � �( I �`• J � 1�' � �� !' �>� qt13 � '�-. �. � � � � � � �j �.;a � 7 _ / ��,' .,, �� `< � j( � "�''/�u04 ,� /'. i./ .- 7�� -L�1 . � �" �-�' �.�� _ . �� .- !-�r'� � � � .p '. i � �� ' ;' r��. � � " „ / I �=�I � i i. \ � � '. __ _— �ly . . . - . _ � i b; ��i/ 1 sN -- �-� � � � J "� , `.J; 69 '—'—� i. ��. �.�. �� , - p i_ . � r� /;- � 1 _ . .� V�' �. ��'� � ,�,'C� ..f� �_ � .��'� _ C'i,rpe� . � .� ' ' �i� � S i � . � `� ` , \ '. ' --- . - [i1..__'�i - ' ' �. �, ' ._. ��'? � i �"r'�� . f � �. _ . , _ . , , �� ,, _ � � , , `' �1�' �-- ' �/ ... , �' �. �� . ' � - 1,}s '- / �� ' t �, f� l-� E' °��—� �� _�� -, i 3 J � �i � � �- � � i' � ' , ��, �� . � � -�� . � " � � �, � � �i��( � �� • i.1"" � � i - � S/"% � � � � � ' - � . �� -� a ,i ) 1 V �� ; -r � �— � ��, y� � .� , s ," ,,' � �� , � ,� _ . � ' �, /"{ : � � ,� l ��-r � �. � , � � � ; r �� ( ��j��i_\ 'i�' �� , . � � ,•e$ ,�/%� ��1 .f� � �� , � =� �' r �� , _ . � � , \ �- / . , _, — : v ' • I 7 � �y � ' � � \\ _ —\ . 1 `x , r � ��. /� (� 1�� " y �� ( �i i • I - � r , �/ -�'i t �'l'� � _. � I , f � � A .. � -. � �) � f. ��V Aa. _ � � a I�` y ��, ( „' ��.�, 1� <s �� . � . . „, . . . . , , ., _ ;,, ; , , ,. � , ti ; <.. �N o o.s Mi o s000 Fc Map provided by MyTopo.com �r�y http:/Imap-pass.mytopo.com/mapslprint_myropo.asp?print=20&scale=25&layer-DRG&layer-HILLSHADE&Iat=35.34815060812951581on=-80.86244017453403&orient=l&res=144 � WETLANDB & 1��WATERH, INC. Owner/ Innkeeper Motor Lodge, IIIC. Namet Roadway Improvements to WT Harris Blvd Develo er City / ounry�. State: Taz N,'A (NC DOT ri h y Town: Charlotte Mecklenburg NC PIN s: g t-ot-wa ) Figure4:USGSTopoQuad Coordinates(LavLong): 35.3483,-80.8625 A�� unknown/tbd Sca�e oate: 02_18_�g nann Soil Map—Mecklenburg County, North Carolina web so�i survey National Gooperative Soil Survey .. .-.. si2as� st2a�o st2aso , .. � �' ��;,: �� `� g: %� � ,�5 # �. � �— � A� �. _�� a�.. r.; � r p � ` � � * � .. '.t� �� ". K�� '�1 ��.p . �,� �� 1� . � ��s� � � �, . 4 � F. , k ::N, ... �, . �♦ . ♦, r > ' � y ,� ♦ I , � t � ♦ �Srdt �, � ,,♦ � ': 'F . � I ♦.. Y �/ � . r� .! � . . . �. � �. � . I ° ♦ � I � ♦ � _ �T � � y �" F _.. �i � M 4 SOiI Mr.ip`i��- . �.� I 1, � . ��3/�� '� � WETLANDH Bc .i 1 WATERB, INC. Figure 5: Soil Survey �.�. �. I �.♦ y� . ar R`. .. . 'r:, � ,,....� � . . � ♦ ♦ �'. „ .+ . . � � ♦ � u♦ I 'i + � t � ♦ , � j � ♦ .�� 1 ' � J. , t .::��, .;. .�. �♦ _ . . � F. � Su 5'r.� � � ! tl� �,<d�l�i$ '�� Map Unit Symbol M pU iN e $ Cealsa-ay.layivan 2toP €i percPnlslopes. notlera�ely � eroaetl Cecil sanay clay loam 8 to 15 perm t lopes motlere[ey eroded '� "" � � � ' '+ -�� Mona�n loam, 0 to 2 perwnl � � , ... .. �,. � � ' �� slop s hequan�ly0ootlatl . � r � �}0'k �... _ ... . <.� . �..r � .� —....... � i. • � .�, . .�. ,.. 512`LO St25Al 512Sn1 Map S�le: I',937 b pnnted on A landuape (1P' x 8.5") she[.t. t:�i>� Natural Resources N — --- � � ��M`tes -- a ic zo no.... m � Conservation Service � -----. __ .. ..__— _—� a as so ieo rro MdP P'�R��n', Web Mert'afor Cnmcrmordina[es�. WGS&! Edge Ga: UiNI Zw�e 1]N WGSd4 imerl Innkeeper Motor Lodge, IIIC. Namee� Roadway Improvements to WT Harris Blvd ielo er y� Charlotte ounry: Mecklenburg state: NC IN s: NIA (NC DOT righbof-way) m: rdinates (LaULong): 35.3483, -80.8625 AID / Unknown / tbd Scale: Date: 02-18-19 nann �� r+s . � ��. -� t��+ � National Wetlands Inve �`�,� , s, ... ►a �""'.ms, ICi� ., "'� � , . x t �v � . �� V � �� ,� �` � � �� n��.w � $ � � k. � ,Y �.. u �� , �w�� t � \L �x" \ � �\ .��4�' .,�.. ' ��\ . . � n�� .� . A, eo. @R: y, , 7 !k � a � � �^ -i ' �� *`� ' � �* � �{� � t �i�;/�+�. a°.�.` , , fiy� � � '�` '' :� , s. fh ,� 1 �` � .i�i "5�{ ".ir'^� "` . t i3''�"4. Yaa. ".. 1:5,845 0 o.os o.i o.2 mi �� i i� � r � i�— 0 0.075 0.15 0,3 km N�.lon I�� .0 1. I. r y WN'n TI ., ;e p�Jucotl Oy �he N ll mapper � # \ ��/'.... WE"fLANDB 6c .i 1 WATERB, INC. Figure 6: National Wetland Inventory .�y�pR•. �i � .v �"'"�� e � �z� ♦ * , /. � �/ - " Y� � S.'�'�,,. i, � � P ,, ii`° � L� 3- � . ,. _ �. � ,� ��* y> �� ,� �9.�`. ��..3�a 4 °' �=' � .. F,� ��. .' �°� k > �i�A � � � �� b � n '�Y �+�� r �� r r �, m� : 4 �"r; g� Aj a, 9: sa a ^ �,� � � � '@`� .b ts�s $ D�t�'�� RR # � � �'�pa ". � �� ,y� �.. � �� ,�� a.i� �$ �. � � � t � �, ��g �adt� •. � �4r '� �� +�" � �. e �� y ��'��'4 �M� �- � '.,R� � � 3sx � �g �� a�.� . ,g .. y � x�,'� �A�1K �w ;!� � .r ^�.ti" °� ' i'��,� ib. ' * �. _� -.. =r ��., ��, ! �� ° "�� - � ,>, . .��-� � "�- � i � �.. � - . . . �' ID e � �/�� ? �, i ♦� / • . , "ss �''b. 4� a��w t� ' T b 4 W .�� t. � �1 � � .4X t"'�}L"�'�"k� � �� § ��. Ic�m. F•n,uary n, 20�9 Thisr n y�r�i�•. .I � eor� IicUSfisl a.. .;.�r- � Servicc is nol respon � e�or the accurary or curre �Iness o( �ne WeUands �_� Freshwater Emergent Wetland � Lake base tlala shown on this map. All wetlands related dala should I ESWarine and Marine Deepwater be used in accordance wilh ihe layer metadala found on ihe � Q Freshwater Forestetl/Shrub Wetlantl � Other �Ve�lands Mapper web site. j i Estuarine and Marine Wetlantl n Freshwater Pond n Riverine wner/ Innkeeper Motor Lodge, IfiC. Name? Roadway Improvements to WT Harris Blvd velo er Y� Charlotte ounry: Mecklenbur State: NC Tax N/A (NC DOT right-of-way) nn: g PW s : rcdinates (LaVLong): 35.348$, -80.8625 ��R^�. unknown / tbd Scale: Date: 02_� $_� 9 National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette w FEM,� N '��. �a />r3 .�� ,, � � � + - � �� a � �� . ' .$ x d ♦ �4r � �'' "� �. a. p�§'`��i'i �w-� � „ k dp2/1� *' ��'`f�.'� �$�R a e y, p��l a a * ♦ w $,�� y t " p�p ��S ��". �� '�TE L . .HP�.'1ENT vREh', Xs r� .,�,�y.� �'K' .� �� FL [ ., ��. = a��''4 �' Y „�` �. I Y,":''rI`A"P y.,'��^ `' ��V ^,y, . .`�" �� y �� itEN� JF� h NP�.IEIJT:iRE�y �"�� _# *. d� �el�/�� a� �w { . y��$� , * � � � :.a � .� 'i �, �fi �.. .',ie �4 ,,g^�#��, �^ �Y .. ` /. . ""•, ��. �V� j � J+ � �k, �f � � '°'t� �� AYf'. '�'_+. .. � tiTa.TE �=�'-1� F II'�.'�.H I ,I.L,., „.r •,,.,r � �� p .�F,E:, ��F t II J II.1��1 I- I �'D FIt1 - p . �,� ` �� I �� r . �� y � . .. _ °r9o; "- � �" . �i � � • I r ' {g � 1 r reY r H,+� � r'�F � t:-� �`MI ♦�� '�"� � "� ��NMr �` � e+�� ' � � �" �� ., i � � � �� . la_. ' � � �' � � � � �� `, ' Y "� _ ^ka . e x . 4. # '� ;� . � � �� . � � j � '�y -� _ + ��, T a � � I. � a ��Md � � q � ��l, .. � � � � , µ i a� ,f ;��r g K' k �� I : � f 1� .: $ �� . '�.�� ;* :z � ",1',i('? (a�`� ?71 _ .._ . � .. .. w ri' � ' On ,� 1�v t�.�. a `� � '�' � j, � � p. , ��_ , � p� �. �F �R 1W � 73y� '� y ` /� �'�"�� j ,, �� `�� %s �:!. �y, � "�� '��' `� % ` - � $ �� t K� �. ��'� J` r, , �� E/PJ� F.'f� :,� HI.IFPIT F.�Q�rr +f� . 4� i � t ..r�� '"-� �i�'+r9�j,�G'�, d��/d,�/�� - y �•. �'�'��. � � 11` \� ,+.�., r i A�p . r�dt� � ��ffi'��,A ��b• t`�r �e �.� : '� •�TAI-EEN F ifIEfIT��F� �� '��` � � ° � �`*'�� r r� . C �/.Y}�i %�/%�, *�( +�(�$ 5 � r . ..� �j r +� , . � ' � �iqrr� 3 � � �. �ldf.x'� - ^�"/� e� � �� f �;'' �,p � �y / +�' �a � � ,�y+ .'�,"�, �� p ��.A' ��'f � TE EN�F � � .� IE�IJ�T ��_��'�� _ $ � o r � I " .r ! J�r' ./\ ` � ib d � p c� �� al�� 4�* p� f� .. �a �. .r �-x � � T.vTC CN F t, I � f>s � i , ,� � ff/�'/� i�- ^:i,{l.p- 'F*'f �'��,,��t,��r . �r �, e o. �� . � '� ��`es d i. " • �/�;' ""r.I°• r/ N.B�{ 'd5.� � . ¢ !' a � �'�_.. �,ad,.._t, k�_�� ..,_'_._. ��,.� : s p` .,r�. ., Ail T E� IL �JF e�.�i�� 4 � ! - i�c cT�., n...... Feet 1:0^,000 0 750 500 1,000 1,500 2.000 �� WEf1..HNOH dc .i �WATERB, Inlc. �vmer/ Innkeeper Motor Lodge, Inc. Developer Fi ure 7: FEMA Ma in c'��'� Charlotte ounry: Mecklenbur State: NC 9 PP� 9 Taw� s 35.3483,-80.8625 I""" unknown/tbd nann Legend SEE f15 NEGOP! fOP UEIPI�ED LEGEN� 4N0IN[�EX MAP FOP fIPM pqNEL IAYOIIi SPECIALFLOOD HPZAPD AREAS OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD Wlthout 0gse PIooE Elevetlon (BF� A99 w ch aFE or oeptn zone ae no, ae, ve, nn Pegule[ory PlooEway 0 2 o Annual CM1ance FIooJ Mazertl lreas o� 1°ro annual chanre flooe w tM1 arera�e tl¢pIh les• [�an one foo[ O� WI@ Cl2lnage areas oi I �nen one sQuare mlle �o�. x FUWreCo tlfonsl%Annual � � ChanceFlootlHaza�tl � .x Amawt�q tluce4Fl otlRlsktlue�o Levee.Se No�ei � Area w Ih Flootl RiSk Cue �o Leveezo�<o �o sca[[ J A of M nimal FlooO Haza�O 10 e x Q Eff ctivelOMRs OTHER AFEAS Area of UnOetermineU ilooa Haxartl r,,,� o GENERAL -- CM1annelCUlvert,or5torm5ewer STRUCTURES i�i � Levee DiMe mFlooOwall � CrossSecuonswlt�l%AnnualCM1ance — Wate� Sudace Elevatlon .a� Coastaliransttt .._. ,. B Flood Elevatlan Llne (BiE) � C 't f 51utly lu Is0lctlon BounOary --- C tal Transect Basel ne OiHEfl _ _ p�of��eeaul'ne FEATIIRES ._ . HytlrograpNc Feawre o gl[al �ala Avalable n NODgtalDataAvala0le � MAPPANELS Ilnmappei rn o a niayea o� me maP s a� aPa�o: ma�e po' t I �etl by �M1e usei antl tloes mt represent tM1 ❑ nve propetry loca�lon TM1' p pf [F FEMA sstantla�Es to� f�e use oi ag[ In E p t t> ot -e seescneeaoe�ow. TM1 b apshowncom0��eswitM1FEMASCasemap � �an0a as ih fl m M1azarE bformafon -s ae' etl el ctly f om ibe [M1 tltaf e NFHL web se Ices p cvitletl bY �MA TM1Is map po letl on 2. ll'2019 t 123248 PM tl tloes no[ il t chang s r a a ts b p t t tM1 eate ano [ .TMNFHL ntl R t' f f y M1angeor n . .. �,..n.nnr . n � ... r . ih" p' g s tlttM1 naor ttM1etollow�ngmap elements tlo not appea . Ease ap imagery, flootl zone labels, legenQ scale Lar, map creatlon aate, communlry laentiflers, FIqM pznel numbeq anE FIRM effe<tive Cate. Map imagesfor unmappea ana unmoaernlxea areas wnnot Ge usea �or re6uiat<ry ovraoses. Roadway Improvements to WT Harris Blvd N/A (NC DOT right-of-way) 02-18-19 ROY COOPER covema Bn=.; � : �,: �: �.: � � _ �;�: v MICHAEL 5. REGtW s��r�� February 25, 2019 TIM BAuMGAk'T�NER Din'r Dennis Hall Innkeeper Motor Lodge, Inc. 4741 South Main Street Winston-Salem, NC 27127 Expiretion oi Acceptance: 8/26/2019 Project: WT Harris Blvd Roadway Improvements (EA-18088) County: Mecklenburg The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that paRicipation in the DMS in- iieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for projed impads. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will be approved. You must also comply with all other state, fetleral or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11. This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not trensferable. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404 PermiU407 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicanYs responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice wiil be issued based on the required mitigation in that permft and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in-lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website. Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below. ___ _ _ _ i - — j River Basin - Impact Location - Impact Type Impact QuanGty (8-digit HUC) _ . — __- I __ -- Catawba 03050101 Warm Stream 19 Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In-Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in-lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Wilfiams at (919) 707-8915. Sincerely, � ��_ n �-i. ( �- � James. � Stanfill AsseCManagement Supervisor cc: Tamp Bandy, agent :_F,�EQ� �:.� - _ ��,.. NorthCaroiinaDrp�rlmzrlofEm . Urvisicn.�fMltiydtlaiSeMirs L17 W �ones5neet', 1652Mei1Sc�vi<rlr�nr��: Ft;.Irigt�Nonh(:erulinaLiti�Y�1652 u1Qi0/857b NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1 USACE AID #: NCDWR #: INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangie, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant. NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area). PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION: 1. Project name (if any): WT Harris Widening 2. Date of evaluation: 02/18/19 3. ApplicanUowner name: Innkeeper Motor Lodge, Inc. 4. Assessor name/organization: 5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body 7. River basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: W&W. Inc. Dixon Branch 8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.34832 -80.86249 STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations) 9. Site number (show on attached map): T1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 20 11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 1 ❑Unable to assess channel depth. 12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 12 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No 14. Feature type: �Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION: 15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) � Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0) 16. Estimated geomorphic �Al � l valley shape (skip for Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) ❑B (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope) 17. Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1(< 0.1 miz) ❑Size 2(0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) �Size 3(0.5 to < 5 mi2) ❑Size 4(>_ 5 mi2) for Tidal Marsh Stream) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: 18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? �Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area. ❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V) ❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters ❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters ❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) ❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area. List species: ❑Designated Criticai Habitat (list species) 19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes �No 1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams) �A Water throughout assessment reach. ❑B No flow, water in pools only. ❑C No water in assessment reach. 2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric ❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams, beaver dams). �B NotA 3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric ❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert). �B NotA 4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric �A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these disturbances). ❑B NotA 5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap). �A < 10% of channel unstable ❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable ❑C > 25% of channel unstable 6. Streamaide Area Interaction — streamside area metric Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Rfght Bank (RB). LB RB ❑A ❑A Little or no evidence oi conditions that adversely affect reference interaction ❑B ❑8 Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradadon, dredging) that adversely affect reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constric6on, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching]) �C �C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affed reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access [euamples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption of flood tlows through streamside area) or too much floodplaiNintertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an intersVeam divide 7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric Check all that apply. ❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam) �B cessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone) ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem ❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors) ❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch" section. ❑F Livestock with access to sUeam or intertidal zone ❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone ❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, buming, regular mowing, destruction, etc) �1 Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section) �J Little to no stressors 8. Recent Weather— watershed metric (skip fo� Tidal Marsh Streams) For Size 1 or 2 streams, Dt drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought. ❑A Drought conditions �nd no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours ❑B Drought conditions �nd rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours �C No drought conditions 9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric ❑Yes �No Is sVeam is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition). 70. Natural ln-stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric 10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of sVessors include excessive sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rep], recent dredging, and snagging) (evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then akip to Metric 12) 10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 CoasWl Plain streams) ❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses �„ ❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) �� ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation ❑B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent `� ❑H Low-tide refugia (pools) vegetation t ❑I Sand bottom �C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) �� ❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh ❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots �� ❑K Little or no habitat in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter �E Little or no habitat •""'•••••"•""""*""'•"'*'•REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS"""""""""""*""""' 11. Bedform and Subslrate — assessment reach metrie (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams) 11a. ❑Yes ❑No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plafn streams) 11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es). ❑A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c) �B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d) ❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 72, Aquatic Life) 11 c. In ritfle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach —whether or not submerged. Check at leaat one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coaatal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _> 10�40%, Abundant (A) _> 40-70%, Predominant (P) _> 70%. Cumulative percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach. NP R C A P ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Q Bedrock/saprolite � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64-256mm) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm) ❑ O ❑ O ❑ Silt/Gay (< 0.062 mm) ❑ ❑ ❑ p ❑ Detritus ❑ Q ❑ ❑ 0 Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.) 11d. �Yes �No Are pools flled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams) 12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) 12a. �Yes ❑No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual? If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other: 12b. ❑Yes �No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13. 1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams. ❑ ❑Adult frogs ❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles ❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) ❑ ❑Beetles � ❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T) ❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula) ❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp) ❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae ❑ ❑Dipterans ❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E) ❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae) ❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae ❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea) ❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula) ❑ ❑Other fish ❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles ❑ ❑Snails ❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P) ❑ ❑Tipulid larvae ❑ ❑Worms/leeches 13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types) Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff. LB RB ❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area ❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area �C �C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes) 14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types) Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area. LB RB ❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep ❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep �C �C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep 15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach. LB RB ❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area? �N �N 16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams) Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach. �A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges) ❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins) ❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam, weir) ❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage) �E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present) ❑F None of the above 17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Check all that apply. ❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation) ❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit) �C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed) �D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach ❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge ❑F None of the above 18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider aspect. Consider "leaf-on" condition. ❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes) ❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees) �C Stream shading is gone or largely absent 19. Buffer Width — sGeamside area metric (skip for 7idal Marsh Streams) Consider "vegetated buffeP' and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out to the flrst break. vegetatad wooded LB RB LB RB �A �A ❑A ❑A z 100 feet wide or eMends to the edge of the watershed ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide ❑E ❑E �E �E < 10 feet wide or no trees 20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("VegeWted" Buffer Width�. LB RB ❑A ❑A Mature forest ❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure �C �C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide ❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs ❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation 21. 8uffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Check all appropriate boxes for le(t bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet). If �q111/IM i1�sw� Mr�ori Oeellrs on dtlnt brik. elnelc ha� and tldp to Metrk Yl: � Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet LB RB LB RB LB RB ❑A ❑A �A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use) 22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width). LB RB ❑A �A Medium to high stem density ❑B ❑B Low stem density �C �C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground 23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide. LB RB �A ❑A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent. ❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent. �C �C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent. 24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to assessment reach habitat. LB RB ❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower sVata composed of naGve species, with non-naGve invasive species absent or sparse. �B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcuHing or clearing gl communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the e�ected strata Qr communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees. �C �C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted stands of noncharacteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation. 25. Conductivity— assessment reaeh metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams) 25a. ❑Yes �No Was conductivity measurement recorded? If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other: 25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter). ❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E z 230 Notes/Sketch: Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1 Stream Site Name WT Harris Widening Date of Assessment 02/18/19 Stream Category Pa3 Assessor Name/Organization W&W, Inc. Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) � Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Function Class Rating Summary (1) Hydrology (2) Baseflow (2) Flood Flow (3) Streamside Area Attenuation (4) Floodplain Access (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer (4) Microtopography (3) Stream Stability (4) Channel Stability (4) Sediment Transport (4) Stream Geomorphology (2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction (2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow (2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability (3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability Tidal Marsh Stream (1) Water Quality (2) Baseflow (2) Streamside Area Vegetation (3) Upland Pollutant Filtration (3) Thermoregulation (2) Indicators of Stressors (2) Aquatic Life Tolerance (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration (1) Habitat (2) In-stream Habitat (3) Baseflow (3) Substrate (3) Stream Stability (3) In-stream Habitat (2) Stream-side Habitat (3) Stream-side Habitat (3) Thermoregulation (2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat (3) Flow Restriction (3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability (4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability (4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology (3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat (2) Intertidal Zone Overall NO NO NO Perennial USACE/ All Streams MEDIUM MEDIUM MEDIUM LOW LOW LOW LOW HIGH HIGH HIGH MEDIUM NA NA NA NA NA LOW MEDIUM LOW LOW LOW NO LOW NA LOW MEDIUM MEDIUM HIGH MEDIUM LOW LOW LOW LOW NA NA NA NA NA NA NA LOW NCDWR Intermittent �'F�� NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Governor Coleen H. Suliins Director Dee Freeman Secretary September 30, 2009 DWQ# 09-0902 Mecklenburg County Mr. Barry Moose, P.E. NCDOT Division 10 i 16 West Main Street Albemarle, NC 28Q01 APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions Dear Mr. Moose: You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed beiow, to permanently impact 23 linear feet (i� (for culvert extension) of Dixon Branch, a perennial stream, as described in your application received by the,Division of Water Quality_(DWQ) on August 18, 2009, and additional information received�on Sepf_em,ber 15, 2009�' The location of the•project is W,T. Harris Boulevard in Mecklenburg Courity. After reviewing your application; we have'deterrriined that this project_is co'vered by�VVater Quality -` , .,. : . ,,; ;. General�Certification�Numbe�s 3704. Please'nofe thiat you should get any other federal, state or local pe�mits before proceeding with your, projecf, including those required by (buf not limited to) Sedimenf arid Erosidn Control, Non-Discharge, an�d Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the associated 404 permit unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification. This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design ihat you described in your application (unless modified below}. Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ in writing and you may be required to submit a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this CeRification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or if total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear.feet, compensatory mitigation rriay be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h)(6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the conditions listed in the attached certification and those listed below: 1. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams and wetlands must be below the elevation of the streambed by one (1) {oot for ail culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow for low flow passage of water and aquatic life, as well as prevent headcutting of the streams. The design and placement of culverts and other structures including temporary erosion control measures shall be installed in such a manner that the original '� stream profiles are not aitered'(i e., the depth of the channel must not be reduced by a widening of the , . . ='�sfrearribed)' Existing stream dimensions (including pattern and profile)�are to�be�maintained above and' � - .., .,, �, .•,- . �. -�"below"locations of�each'culvert. The applicant may be.reguired to,provide evidence that,the�equilibnam has ,,,....... ,, .,,... . .,,•; ; .. ,.,. =,. :. -, ;-. �. •..,. i-;..� ' . beemmamtainetf; if'requested in wnting by the'DWQ.' . _ . _ ,_ . . . . , _ _.... -: _ . . �: ... . . . .. , -. • . . :�� . � - • �r100RSVIdE fZCgI0fl2� �KKB Lootbn: 610 East Center Ave.. Suite 301 hlao2sville, NC 28115 Phone: (iO4) 6 63-1 69 9 1 Fax: (7C4) 563L0401Customer Senice: 1-877023�6748 InremeC www.n�wateryuaGty.org pn Equal Opportuniry I APrtmative �±c6on F�cC�� -��7�'�'110: Posi Cansumer paFer NorthCazolina JVatura!!� Mr. Barry Moose, P.E. Page Two Ef this condition is unabfe.ta be met due to bedrock or other.limiting features encauntered during construciion, piease cantact #he DWQ�for guidance on how to proceed �and to determine whether. o�:no#�a m_adification�to � this certification will be reguired. •-- - � ..�. • , .. .. 2� . Fiooclplain benches must be reconstructed on the upstream side .of fhe culvert extension, in orde� fo maintain the naturai stream dimension. � 3. The use of riprap above the normal high water mark shall be minimized. Any riprap placed for stream stabilizafion shall be placed in stream channels in such a manner that it does not impede aquatic life passage, In addition, riprap assaciated with the adjacent starmwater difch must be remaved from the stream. Riprap must be properly keyed into the stormwater ditch to prevent migration into the stream. 4. Stream impacts to Qixon Branch {509 linear feet} were previously authorized by NCDVVQ under an lndividual Permit (IP) issued Eo NCDOT. Mitigation was required and provided through the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program {EEP) under the IP. NCDWQ requires mifigation far impacts to streams which exceed 15d linear feet. The impacfs proposed in this Pre-Construction Notification result in a cumulative total of 532 linear feet. Therefore, compensatory mitigation for 23 linear fee# of impact to streams is required. We understand that you have chosen to perform compensatory mitigation for impacts to streams #hrough the � EEP, and thai EEP has agreed to implement the mitigafion for #he project. EEP has indicated in a letfer dated August 25, 2009, that they will assume responsibility for satisfying the Federal Clean Water Act compensatory mitigation requirements for fhe above referenced project, in accordance with the Tri-Party MOA signed on July 22, 2�03, and the Dual-Party MOA signed on Aprii 12,.200.4-, ;:� -, : 5. �„ Heavy equipment sY�all,be:operated: from-the.b.anks, rather..than,in ,the, stream chanrie! �,intiorder minimize �• sedimentafion and�reduce the introduction of other polfutants.into.-the stream.. � � i . . . .. . . . . , . . . . . . _. ... . . . .� :.' ', • .. � .:�� :, • .�_•:. ,•�• �--_ ..- - , -, ' . _ ;i j . . . .-;. . ,,. . • 6. No rock, sand or other materials shafl be dredged from the stream channef except where authorized by this ce�tification. � � 7. Temporary dewatering sites must be restored to pre-existing conditions unless more natural geomorphic canditions can be provided. 8. ff concrete is used during construction, a dry work area should be maintained to prevent direct cantact between curing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete should not be,discharged to, surface waiers due to the potential.for,elevated pH and, Possible.aquatic,_life^and fish, ki{ls,. 9. All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted in a dry work area. Approved BMP measures from the most current version of the NCDOT Construction and Maintenance Activities manual such as sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams and other diversian structures shafl be used to prevent excavatian in flowing water. . 10. The dimension, pattern and profile of the stream above and befow the crossing should not be modified. Disturbed floodplains and streams should be restored to naturai geomorphic conditions. ,: �- .. . ., . . . . . . -. , . . . ,,. -.t , - -- . . . 11, All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters musi be regula�ly inspecfed� and maintained to :_, � h , prevent coniaminaiEon ai stream waters from fUels, lubricanfs, hydraulic fluids, or other #oxic materialsj - . •- , : ,• . , . . . . . . , . - . . . . ,_... 1�2. All_fiil slopes~located in jurisdictional wetlands shali be.placed at slopes no flafter than 3:1,�unless otherwise authorized by this ceriification. � � • � Mr. Barry Moose, P. E. Page Three 13. Discharging hycfroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in or adjacent to surface'waters is prohibited. ' �'� �� ' ' ' '�' ' - .' � ' : �' ,�'' '� "- _' .•��,. . ., .. ... 14. A copy of this Wafer Quality Cer�ificaiion shall be posteci on the construction site at all times. In addition, the Watsr Quality Certification and afl subsequent modiiicatians, if any, shail be maintained with the Division Engineer and the on-site project manager. 15. Native riparian vegetation must be re-established within the construcfion fimits of the praject by the end of the growing season folfowing compfetion of construction. 16. Sediment and erosion control measures shafl not be placed in wetlands orwafers to the maximum exient practicable. If placemeni of sedimenk and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidabfe, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within 30 days after the Division of Land Resources has released the project. ' 17. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full comp(iance with al! specifications governing the proper design, installatian and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to proteci surface waters standards: a. The erosion and sediment confrol measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the /Vorth �Carolina Sedimenf and Erosron Control Plannrng and Design Manual. � �� ' � b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures � must be such that they equal, or exceed, #he�requiremenfs specified in the most �ecent•version of � the Norfh Carolina Sedimenf anc! Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associa#ed with the project. .� ' c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designecf, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version af the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual. d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with �the reclamation in accordance with the requirements of the Sedimeniation Pollution Control Act. 18. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) and its contractors and/or agents shal( not excavate, fill or perform mechanized land clearing at any tirne in the construction or mainter�ance of this project within waters and/or wetlands, except as authorized by this Cer#ification, or any modiiication to this Certification (e.g., no work shall occur outside of the footprint of the plans provided). In addi�ion, there sha11 be no excavation from or waste disposal into jurisdictional wetlands or waters associated with this Certification without appropriate modificatioR. lf this occurs, compensatory mitigation may be required since it is a direct impact from road construction activities. . 19. Upon completion of #he project, the NCDOT Division Engineer shall complete and return the enclosed "Cer#ificate of Compfetion" form to notify DWQ when all work inc(uded in the 401 Certification has been completed.. Pleas� include photographs upstream and do4vnsiream af the strucfure to document correcf installatian. ' . . . � �- . - • � . � . . • ... . . .-. . � 20. Continuing Compliance. NCDOT shall conduct iis activities in a manner so as not to contravene any state water quality standard [including any requiremenfs for compliance with section 303�d) of the Clean Water ActJ and any other appropriate requirements of state and federaf law. � N1r. Barry Moose, P.E. Page Four If DWQ determines that such standarcls or laws are not being me# (including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved use) or that state ar federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessar,� to assure compliance, DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to include conditions appropriate to assure compliance with such standards and requirements in aecordance with 15 A NCAC 2H.0507(d). 8efore codifying the certification, DWQ shall nofsfy NCDOT and the USACE, provide public notice in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503, and provide oppor#unity for public hearing in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.05a4. Any new or revised conditians shall be provided to NCDOT in writing, shafl be provided to the USACE for reference in any permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall also become concfitions of the 404 Permit for the project. If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certificatian, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act wi#hin 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms to Chapter 1506 of the North Carolina General Statutes to tha Of#ice of Administrative Hear+ngs, 6714 Maik Senrice Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This Certification and its conditions are final and binding unless. you ask for a hearing. This leiter completes the review by the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Acf. If you have any questions, please telephone Polly L.espinasse in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663- 1699. Sincerefy, �-• t�� / r �, ,� ��--1 for Coleen H. Su�lins Attachments cc: Steve Lund, USACE Asf�eville Field Office Sonia Gregory, DWQ Wetlands Unit File Copy . . . � :':� : .�. � . ::. . ' _ . ' . , '