HomeMy WebLinkAboutSoil Stockpile Visual and PLM Analysis Results_20190304�.S DUKE
ENERGY.
March 04, 2019
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management
217 W Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27603
Attn: Ms. Elizabeth Werner
Re: Duke Energy Carolinas — Riverbend Steam Station, Gaston County
Soil Stockpile Visual and PLM Analysis
Dear Ms. Werner,
526 South Church St.
Charlotte, NC 28202
P.O. Box 1006
Mail Code EC13K
Charlotte, NC 28201-1006
In an email dated 02/01/2019, NCDEQ DWM approved the reuse of soil (to be reused within the
designated waste boundary) that was stockpiled in the ash stack area of Riverbend Steam Station on the
conditions that that it passed visual inspection and PLM analysis came back to be less than 50% ash. The
attached document (Table 1) provides the PLM results of the soil that passed visual inspection. Of the
material that passed visual inspection, 44 soil samples were collected and PLM analysis confirmed that the
material contained less than 50% ash.
The visual inspection and collection of the 44 soil samples were obtained through the following process:
Step 1: The soil stockpiles in the ash stack were divided into more manageable rows.
Step 2: Each row was spread out by an excavator in sections to a depth of approximately 1.5'-2.5'
and bucket teeth created additional rows in this material for visual inspection to take place.
Step 3: Wood Group visually inspected for ash. If the material passed visual inspection, representative
samples were collected for PLM analysis (44 samples total). The material that did not pass visual
inspection was removed and transported offsite.
Step 4: Once a row passed visual inspection and PLM samples were collected, it was moved to a new
location and labeled/designated in the case that it did not pass PLM analysis and had to be removed
and transported offsite.
Duke Energy plans to reuse the soil that passed visual inspection and PLM analysis for final countouring
within the ash basins/ash stack footprint.
This information is only being submitted electronically. If you have any questions pertaining to these results,
please contact Bristol Grohol and bristol.grohol@duke-energy.com.
Respectfully submitted,
/ � 0" 4, �
Bristol Grohol, EIT
Waste and Groundwater Programs
Attachments: Table 1: Riverbend Steam Station Soil Stockpiles in Ash Stack — Visual Classification and
PLM Results
cc (via e-mail): Eric Smith, NCDEQ
Steve Lanter, NCDEQ
Larry Frost, NCDEQ
Ed Mussler, NCDEQ
Benjamin Jackson, NCDEQ
David Giachin, NCDEQ
Chris Varner, Duke Energy
Ed Sullivan, Duke Energy
Riverbend Ash Basin Closure
Ash Stack Soil Stockpile Sampling - Field Log
Project 7810150536
Table 1: Riverbend Steam Station Soil Stockpiles in Ash Stack - Visual Classification and PLM Results
Sample ID
Soil Stockpile
Date Sampled or
Resampled
Sampled By
Visual Classification
PLM Result
(Area % Fly
Ash)
Duke Lab PLM Sample
No.
SS01
A
2/1/2019
S.Brewer
Dark brown silty clay
17%
2019003178
SS02
A
2/4/2019
V. Ojaruega
Dark brown and red silty clay
12%
2019003355
SS03
A
2/4/2019
V. Ojaruega
red brown and tan clay
21%
2019003356
SS04
A
2/4/2019
V. Ojaruega
Dark brown silty clay
16%
2019003357
SS05
B
2/5/2019
V. Ojaruega
Dark brown silt
12%
2019003708
SS06
B
2/5/2019
V. Ojaruega
Dark brown silty clay
7%
2019003709
SS07
B
2/5/2019
V. Ojaruega
Dark brown and grey silty clay
9%
2019003710
SS08
C
2/5/2019
V. Ojaruega
Dark brown and red clay
7%
2019003711
SS09
C
2/5/2019
V. Ojaruega
Dark brown silty clay
14%
2019003712
SS10
C
2/5/2019
V. Ojaruega
Dark brown silty clay
8%
2019003713
SS11
D
2/6/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
9%
2019004118
SS12
D
2/6/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
3%
2019004119
SS13
D
2/6/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
8%
2019004120
SS14
E
2/6/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
6%
2019004121
SS15
E
2/6/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
2%
2019004122
SS16
E
2/6/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
5%
2019004123
SS17
F
2/7/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
4%
201900218
SS18
F
2/7/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
9%
201900219
SS19
F
2/7/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
8%
201900220
SS20
F
2/7/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
5%
201900221
SS21
G
2/7/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
4%
201900222
SS22
G
2/7/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
6%
201900223
SS23
G
2/7/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
6%
201900224
SS24
H
2/7/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
4%
201900225
SS25
H
2/7/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
5%
201900226
SS26
H
2/7/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
8%
201900227
SS27
1
2/7/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
6%
201900228
SS28
1
2/7/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
6%
201900229
SS29
1
2/7/2019
A. Cottingham
Red Brown Sandy Silt
5%
201900230
SS30
J
2/8/2019
D. Jones
Dark Brown Silt
5%
2019004205
SS31
J
2/8/2019
D. Jones
Dark Brown Silt
10%
2019004206
SS32
1
2/8/2019
D. Jones
Dark Brown Silt
10%
2019004207
5533
K
2/8/2019
D. Jones
Dark Brown Silt
12%
2019004208
SS34
K
2/8/2019
D. Jones
Dark Brown Silt
15%
2019004209
SS35
K
2/8/2019
D. Jones
Dark Brown Silt
9%
2019004210
SS36
L
2/9/2019
D. Jones
Dark Brown Silt
8%
2019004211
SS37
L
2/9/2019
D. Jones
Dark Brown Silt
5%
2019004212
SS38
L
2/9/2019
D. Jones
Dark Brown Silt
4%
2019004213
SS39
M
2/11/2019
D. Jones
Red and Brown Silt
3%
2019004413
SS40
M
2/11/2019
D. Jones
Red and Brown Silt
4%
2019004414
SS41
M
2/11/2019
D. Jones
Red and Brown Silt
2%
2019004415
SS42
N
2/11/2019
D. Jones
Red and Brown Silt
13%
2019004416
SS43
N
2/11/2019
D. Jones
Red and Brown Silt
13%
2019004417
SS44
N
2/11/2019
D. Jones
Red and Brown Silt
16%
2019004418