HomeMy WebLinkAbout20081106 Ver 3_RE_ U-3334 buffer site 2_20190301Carpenter,Kristi
From: Ridings, Rob
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2019 9:34 AM
To: Coggins, Tony C
Subject: RE: U-3334 buffer site 2
Chad,
Reviewing the email thread, I agree the hardship and site constraints make this
particular swale (buffer site 2) not a good fit. Your design change is acceptable for this
particular situation at this specific site. Include in your as-builds and I'll be good with it.
Thanks
Rob Ridings
Environmental Specialist
Transportation Permitting Branch (DOT Divisions 4-5)
Division of Water Resources, NC Department of Environmental Quality
919-707-3873 office (NEW number!)
rob.ridinqs(a�ncdenr.qov
From: Coggins, Tony C
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 11:41 AM
To: Ridings, Rob <rob.ridings@ncdenr.gov>
Subject: FW:
A hardship justification for removing a required grass swale on U-3334B. See attached
and email below.
Chad Coggins
Envi ron menta I Officer
NC Department of Transportation Div. 4
252 640 6427 office
252 717 8699 cell
509 Ward Boulevard
PO Box 3165
Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165
�
#�
��;
���
a������ �������,��s���������� �� ����� ������ ��`��,� ��������,�,� �,� ,��.������ �� ��`��
�'J����`� �°��������� ��.����� �������:�,� ��W�r ����� ���.� �� ���,����,���� �� �������� �:s�����,�.
II d��a�^Ikn����µc ..Il..�udd�^ir "���u.u.11..u.ulkn�^
.... .... .. .. .... .....
1
From: Beamer, Ryan L <rl_k�earn�er(�_n�dcrt.:.�ca.v>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 9:13 AM
To: Coggins, Tony C <tc�cr.��.%ns_..C,�_n_cdca.t.:.�crv>
Cc: Mclamb, Corey D«d_rn��larn�_k�_(c�_n�dca.t...�ca.v>; Beamer, Ryan L<rl_k�earn�er(c�_n�dcrt.:.�ca.v>
Subject: FW:
Chad,
This ditch has posed significant challenges in being able to construct per the plans. The
size and location of this ditch has been altered in order to construct around several
utility conflicts.
The first conflict being a 10" high-pressure natural gas line with a 50' easement. The
original location of this ditch was well within the 50' easement, requiring the ditch to be
moved closer to the PDE line, but still within the easement, in order for PNG to approve
the encroachment. Additionally, the ditch size was adjusted in order to provide as much
separation and undisturbed ground around the gas line as possible. By moving the ditch
closer to the PDE, it is also closer to an existing parking lot and buried electrical line,
which ultimately will make the ditch harder to maintain in the future.
The second conflict being a 16" water line that lies in close proximity to the BZ2 line of
the stream. This waterline crosses the ditch and the current elevations of the waterline
and ditch flow line do not work. The steepness of the ditch has been flattened in order
to provide cover over the existing waterline. Additionally, an earthen berm has been
constructed to protect the waterline but also to function as a tiered skimmer basin in
order to remain in compliance with the permits. There is a concern this berm could fail
long-term, resulting in a potential sediment loss. Due to the nearest waterline valves
being a mile or more apart, it will be very difficult to relocate the waterline due to the
size of the line, close proximity to the stream, close proximity to a private parking lot,
and close proximity to the 10" gas line/easement.
Additionally, there is a property owner who has serious safety concerns over the ditch.
During Right of Way acquisition, he was told this location would be piped and no ditch
would be there. He is afraid of people falling into the ditch and he being held liable.
Also, an existing drainage pipe from the parking lot will need to be connected. Currently,
this is difficult without the presence of a drainage structure due to slope and existing
condition of the pipe.
Overall, this ditch has been a hardship to construct for the project as well as a serious
concern for adjacent property owners. Eliminating this ditch and replacing with a pipe
section will allow for the best long-term solution for all parties involved.
Sincerely,
Ryan L. Beamer, P.E.
Resident Engineer
Smithfield Resident Engineer's Office
North Carolina Department of Transportation
919 209 1090 office
540 631 5064 mobile
rlbeamer(c�ncdot.qov
2861 US 70 Hwy. West
C.S. No.: 01-66-38
Smithfield, NC 27577
������
���� � � � ��
G# � �' �''#w
� � �K'
� ��:�
�
�x .�:;
��' �' ���.� :; ..
'�'�.�„'� ';, �:: s.
v� �
a������ �������,��s���������� �� ����� ������ ��`��,� ��������,�,� �,� ,��.������ �� ��`��
�'J����`� �°��������� ��.����� �������:�,� ��W�r ����� ���.� �� ���,����,���� �� �������� �:s�����,�.
From: Coggins, Tony C <tcccr.��i_ns(�_n�d_crt:.�crv>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 4:22 PM
To: Beamer, Ryan L <rl_k�earn�er(�_n�dcrt.:.�ca.v>
Cc: Mclamb, Corey D «d_rn��larn�_k�_(c�_n�dca.t...�ca.v>
Subject: FW:
Quick and dirty plan view revision. Just provide me justification for deleting ditch and I
will try to get approval
Chad Coggins
Envi ron menta I Officer
NC Department of Transportation Div. 4
252 640 6427 office
252 717 8699 cell
509 Ward Boulevard
PO Box 3165
Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165
�
�
x.� t
`. � .�° .
�� �.
a������ �������,��s���������� �� ����� ������ ��`��,� ��������,�,� �,� ,��.������ �� ��`��
�'J����`� �°��������� ��.����� �������:�,� ��W�r ����� ���.� �� ���,����,���� �� �������� �:s�����,�.
II d��a�^Ikn����µc ..Il..�udd�^ir "���u.u.11..u.ulkn�^
.... .... .. .. .... .....
3
From: Ethridge, Dennis R <dreth_rid�e_..C,�_n_cdca.t.:.�crv>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 3:16 PM
To: Coggins, Tony C <tc�cr.��.%ns_..C,�_n_cdca.t.:.�crv>
Subject:
Dennis Ethridge
Division Four DDC Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
252 640 6424 office
d.ir�tlh.iri_d.�u��dr�t.�
509 Ward Blvd.
P.O. Box 3165
Wilson, NC 27895
,�
�� �_, �
.. <ry�� �
� �� � x
�t . :
� �:
t
#a5' �x x=�
{ � x�t��
I rr�7all �:urrc,��u � � � � � � � � y I�c rli��;lu�e,rl �u �C�h•ih�rl
I i� ci��;e, Cu ai� rur°r7 �mii;, ;;e,i� cr i;, ;;u� ��;� �u Cmie, ,..,u� i�; ta�:ur�: ;, ..,aw ai� ir7a,
I�arti��,