980001_Inspection_20190213

A w g QS Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - 0 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 93 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
!c e
%j) Arrival Time: 4 'j3 Departure Time: IC O. County: t 1
Date of Visit: Q )) 51 Region: Q6ZO
Farm Name: 5 ha I I l r1Q+0(1 S f11 i I I.S N V r5 C r'! Owner Email:
v
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address: ""�� �
Physical Address: 75 0 k . )j n,...1 A) 111 IJ �(C! / 01 O.0 C'_ I e.5-c1 e I A,(°
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Par Yey StQ5 Certification Number: Act jpi I$'�
Back-up Operator: �Jo_ Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer _ Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder 3elccro 1.21(j Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca'aci Poi. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish •La ers -_ Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars II Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other •Turke Poults
I 'Other I El Other -_
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes iZINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ,'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Q - 01 (Date of Inspection: a //2/J 7
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 'Piti jyyN a Sri
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): -- h 9Ci
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes tl No n N A n NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? n Yes 4No n NA El NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? n Yes 'No n N i\ n NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require n Yes No n N;1 ❑ NI
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? n Yes lZfNo El NA El NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes .No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? n Yes No ❑ NA El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? n Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check n Yes IA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. n Yes IA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall El Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes to ElNA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: c'$ - Q ( Date of Inspection: L/i )1 17
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste applicationequipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ElNE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below. a c 1 b►.��
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes _EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 171 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 7[(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes It No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes Ef No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes pj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
ti-► I LOCO Sg 90 0003s l , % 1 00044 =Oda '7
1 -�3-II 1.4.7000359 1 � I 0 . 09
a -ae-1 $ Lc)cr0 l sw l ► , le 8 0 .0
- I - tv 00 iti0S o 00 l = I , 0 8`
q - ia - l1 WOO <<-1'11 0 .11 p. la-
- ab -It 30 co, dap,p0A 31/'ticct',�
9-
ettith04.11 I I _, 5 a / o elr
(� hn��' me id a'n 1) / /31 l a I
A nn,�a �' c� e ,)cc ! T WINK YOU
Reviewer/Inspector Name: act f\E' P r & Phone: 93 7 9 /a3c
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: qapN1 ,(N
Q42`,{�(LCiI Date: )i3 I / 9
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015