810009_Complete File - Historical_20190213

10 Routine O Complaint ® Follow-up ofDWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review MOther
=Facility Number l Cl
Farm Status: registered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection LY2"24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(ex:1.25 for 1 hr .15 min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection (includes travel and nrocessinr<)
❑ Not Operational) Date Last Operated: ..................................................................�...................................................................................
Farm Name: .... A& - a ��.�t.�l �.....,�:�.1+ �.................................................................. county: ..;t+.1.����.�G�4�............................................
Land Owner Name:.... l+N..N..r ..............., ..? � cta2 t. t�..........................�..7............I Phone No:..x!��F�:. J�..`...95":75. .............................
Facility Conctact. ,� AV....V. [vA.t�.t`� `k�� �1 ............. Title: ..6.4219.47 2..................... Phone No:.;70M.`.AYLAIIS.......
iVYailing Address:...�� .1... . 1.t! 3....... :................................................ b 2&...../..LL........................................ .'MOLY.......
Onsite Representative: ..pfZmay.... /Ml. a.�.`�......................................................... Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator: .................................................. .............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude �•��«
Longitude
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water `? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes [NNo
❑ Yes Iff No
❑ Yes %No
❑ Yes allo 91,1,
IJA
❑ YesNo
-���G
[I Yes
156 No
❑ Yes
%( No
❑ Yes
® No
Continue/d on back

Facility Number:....(.............`........
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
�, No
❑Yes
E__ hl f
❑ Yes
[2- No
❑ Yes
No
10
Structure 5 Structure 6
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type;IzLAZ.................. .............................................. .............................................. ..............................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
id Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
C�Eor Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes F No
❑ Yes " No
❑ Yes J% No
❑ Yes PUNo
❑ Yes ¢No
❑ Yes O No
❑ Yes fig No
❑ Yes r—
❑ Yes ❑-No -,12/,,
❑ Yes �T� ��Or
Yes B -No -1/
fI �l r
WAlrc7i ©wci lypz_
Reviewer/Inspector Namegum
�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: t • _ Date: • /jf
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Q iality Section, Facility Assessment Unit —7--` 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,.
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Asheville Regional Office
IDEHNR
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 18, 1997
Mr. Danny Murray
1561 Depriest Road
Bostic, North Carolina 28018
Subject: Removal of Registration
Murray's Dairy
.Rutherford County
Dear Mr. Murray:
You are being removed from the registration list at your
request. Your request is granted due to the fact your dairy is
below the threshold of 100 confined cattle. At any point in the
future.should you increase above the threshold number or your
operation meet the requirements of NCAC 2H .0200 you are required
to notify and re -register with the Division of Water Quality..
Enclosed, for your records, is a copy of the confirmation for
removal of registration for your dairy. This document was faxed to
Ms. Sue Homewood, in'Raleigh on July 17, 1997.-
Thank
997.
Thank you for your time and assistance durin my visit to your
operation•on July 16, 1997. If I can be of assistance please, do
hesitate to contact me at 704-251-6208.
Sincerely,
Roger C. Edwards
Wastewater Consultant
xc: Donald Morrison, Soil & Water Conservation
Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin PlaceN���A FAX [phone]
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 �� An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-251-6208 50% recycles/ 100% post -consumer paper

OFERflTI01�lS B�flh -.-- .
(p ICFs - WG! Fax : [phone] Jul 10 '97 10:55 P. 02i02 _
to`-40yneU�ood �
e
r V51-31fif /
CONFMNIATION FOR REMOVAL OF REGISTRATION
This is to confirm that the following farra does not meet the 2H .0200 registration
requirements. Please imactivate this facility on the registration database.
Facility Number.
Farm Name: t R t1 ES TR ✓
Owner. DAN gM u R R A �z
ff�� rr
Mailing Address: m'/- r n RI 5T
. County: Pu ER
This Facility is:
pasture only (no confinement)
dry litter poultry operation
out ofbusiness/no animals ou site
closed out per MRCS standards
below the threshold (less than 250 -swine, 100-coaRned Garde, 7S-horse3, 1000 -thew or
3000-poultcy wirh a liquid animal wase m=nemeas system)
Comments:
The owner is fully aware that should the number of animals increase beyond the threshold
limit or the operation meets the 2H .0200 registration requirements for.any reason, the
owner will be required to notify and re -register with, the Division of Water Quality.
Si pature: Date: %
Agency:
Please return completed form to: DEHNR DWQ
Water Quality Section
Compliance Group
F.4. Sox 29535
Raleigh, NC 27526-0535
RR -3197

OPERJ�TIONS ERANCH - WQ Fax:[phone] Jul 10 '97 10:55 P. 02/02
CONFIRMATION FOR RE1bxO AL OF REGTSTRA.TION
This is to confirm that the following farm does not meet the 2H .4200 registration
requirements. Please imactiVate this facility on the registration database.
Facility Number. % C
Farm. Name: AAIA R R i4 V _5 A.r R ✓
Owner. D AW& !/M_ a. R R A \%
Mailing Address: /,V-1
County:UTII
This Facility is:
pasture only (no confinement)
dry litter poultry operation
out of business/no animals ou site
closed out per MRCS standards
✓ below the threshold {cess thio zso-swino, too-confted cattle, 7S -hors -'g, 2000 -sheep or
30,000 -poultry with a liquid animal waste management system}
Corr cnts•
The owner is fully aware that should the number of anirraIs increasc beyond the threshold
limit or the operation meets the 2H -0200 registration requirements for.any reason, the
owner will be required to notify and re -register with the Division of Water Quality.
Signature: . non Date: y
Agency: i (�
Please return completed form to: DEE NR-DWQ
Water Quality Stiction .
Compliance Group
P,G- Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Post -it" Fax Note 7671 DateRR-3197
-7 1 Paool
rFa
From
coDept. Co.
ne#Phone #
-
� u:

tate of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
ivision of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Danny Murray
Murray's Dairy
1561 Depriest Rd
Bostic NC 28018 .
Dear Danny Murray..
August 5, 1997
1
AUG 6 1997
Subject: Removal of Registration _ -;'-
Facility Number 81-9
Rutherford County
. This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H.0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number -of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level.
Threshold numbers of animals which require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine 250
Confined Cattle 100
Horses 75
Sheep 1,000
Poultry with a liquid waste system 30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
.rm
cc: c,-ki eville Water -Quality -Regional -Office
Rutherford Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

- ro
ANIMAL ' WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
_OPERATOR IN CHARGE
DESIGNATION FORM
II
o (14 have - � re
u rel n utm Berl' oT a mi Yr ds 4o
Meet Sb iZ/7 �e�}u�nevne►�`�s
ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:
McFadden Farms-
Facility
armsFacility ID Number: 9--8 County: Rutherford
OPERATOR IN CHARGE .
Home Mailing Address
City State Zip
Certificate # Social Security #
Work Phone Home Phone
Signature Date
OWNER _r
Mailing Address �-_ - City -
State � . Zips•, : 'O - Telephone#y;aC�S : �5'��_ -- .-
r.. Jam- /
Signature D :tf, .
Please Mail to: VVTCSOCC
---of Water Quality
c 29535
SIN C. 27626-0535
VL"A `0`-tt
1
h
r}
JAN 1 51997
,
,1!J)I,LjIY SFCTIQII
:fir nCr

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ` •
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary EDIEHNFZ
Steve W. Tedder; Chairman December 5, 1996
Danny Murray
Murray's
Rt. 1
Bostic NC 28018
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Murray's
Facility ID #: 81-9
Rutherford County
Dear Mr. Murray:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification.as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
/qe'b-�Steve er
FOR
Enclosures
cc: Asheville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System `}` : "" Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/10°k post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.Y1`9
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: Yu IV' -2-.t .1995
Time: 1 g l5
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address: 15/. r b L 6 C-R L5 � Road R65 ire-, XI -C
County: R«�-�tc2Rd
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: AI Aly M a RR \/ Phone: ZOV R y5~ 85g
Physical Address/Location: kw- h v ERr57 20.4d
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle k�
Design Capacity: - 7 5 Number of Animals on Site: 70
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 35 —21—' 0-5-" Longitude: (_' 7 ' 15 Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does die Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? QESsbr No Is the cover crop adequate? x&r No
Crop(s) being utilized: A~5cu6
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? e or No
100 Feet from Wells? or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or&
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes oh(9
Is animal waste disclharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man=made devices? Yes oro. If Yes, Please Explain.
Does thelacility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: Pnd aj Ilk- Dtiopcvla r.s 2ece
all
s
Inspdbtor Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Sii4atule
Use Attachments if Needed.

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. I/- `I
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: J 2-f , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Own(
Mailing Address:
County: _1fLA d,
Integrator:
On Site Representative:
Physical Address/Location:
Phone:
Phone: 2 1:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 75 Number of Animals on Site: in
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No .
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized;
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?Z'e or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or, No
Is'the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? 1�
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map lue Line? Yes o No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or®o If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes o Na
Additional Comments:
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
e
Signature
Use Attachments if Needed.

i Iiil
. Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. Yl
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 2- .1995
Time! iills
Farm Name/Owner: A` u ZRAY i5 /-h&r -
Mailing Address: / 51, I Ro A d R 0S /z -z Al C
7
County: RU4--1tc2jfn7 fZ
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: A NgV M u RA Phone: 70 -'1 -A'16 -V5 g
Physical Address/Location: /_SI
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 7 5 Number of Animals on Site: 7 O
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number:' ACNEW
Latitude: 3S -1 t3_5" Longitude: -!&L_° 1 1" Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? es r No Is the cover crop adequate? &r No
Crop(s) being utilized, ^�rlcug
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? -Dor No
100 Feet from Wells? es r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or(&
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or&
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes oro. If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
sDrav irrigated on sneciiic acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Insp for Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
I
SijAatuje
Use Attachments if Needed.