WQ0000195_AROHistoricalFile_02042019

riVV
g
C71 12� 1w
OFFICE OF DIRECTOR OF
PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITIES
Town of Waynesville
June 8, 1992
Ms. Laura Kay Dechant
DEM, Groundwater Section
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
Re: Sludge Disposal Landfill (WQ 0000195)
Dear Ms. Dechant:
In response to your May 5,1992 correspondence, please find
enclosed the following:
1) S&ME, Inc. proposal dated May 20, 1992.
2) A blueline print of contour sheet 8616,03 showing
the water meter locations for all residences within
1500 1.f. of the landfill.
Requests for proposals were solicited from F&R, Law and S&ME
on May 6th. Based on our evaluation, S&ME, Inc., is responsive,
responsible and qualified to provide site assessment services
for the Town. We respectfully request your review and comments
on the proposal. A notice to proceed for Tasks A, B & C can be
issued as soon as DEM's review comments can be assimilated.
The Town's Wastewater Treatment Plant staff sampled the sludge
on May 13, 1992. The analysis results are not yet available.
The results of the survey for groundwater users is shown on the
enclosed contour map. All residences identified within the
radius area have water service from the Town's system. No
response from any area residents has been received in response
to the newspaper article in "The Mountaineer" May 15, 1992
(clipping enclosed).
Do not hesitate to contact me if further questions or comments arise.
Sincerely,
Prederick L. Baker, P.E.
Director of Public Works/Utilities
FLB:pm
cc:
Enc.
John Siler, Town Manager
Pamela Peebles, S&ME, Inc.
POB C-100, 106 SOUTH MAIN ST., WAYNESVILLE, NC 28786-0100 • PHONE [phone]

i
G'antammatiton me
require costly wor
ilignta LLIC211 allvwvu u,y 41G.JI.a w,
because of the years of stuff
that's been put in there by,,,
Dayco,". Mayor Henry Foy said,
this morning:' > ,:
The' unlined ,'dump, , which
closed ` after; more than two de-
cades' of operation when the
county opened its Francis Farm
landfill in the ; early ;1910s; i,
located between the US -23-74 By-''
pass and Howell Mill Road..
Waynesville has 'operated a`
sludge landfill on top of the old
solid waste fill since 1982.
So far, ' town employees have '
found no property owners `relying
on groundwater 'near the old;„
dump, 'said, Fred ,Baker, town
director of public works.
"We're not quite finished, but,
..: I'don't think that we're going
to turn upany groundwater us-
ers,", Baker'said this morning of
the CalhounRoad ' area, which
.uses "municipal water. "One per-
son may "not have"- a meter. We
just don't know yet."
' Two of, the - four .monitoring ,
wells'installed in 1982 began turn
,"ing up levels of chemical conta- ,
urination .in November 1989,0
Baker said. The town first
learned of, ( the higher -than:' '
allowed levels in June 1990.
ployees"ran more de
in January, 1991, but,
e results'- came back
raker said:
samples from Novem
unde
d another alarm,
ie ,town "back to. run:.
in January: This'time,
dated March 25 state
from the N.C. Division
nmental ;Management
ality '.1 Section , reported
ehtane, ,dicholoroethene,'
obenzene and.beniene in',..
from Well No.,2 and Well
the two downhill wells
ing the old landfill... ,
nk they can characterize
iemicals as industrial sol.=
Baker, said. "You cari .
.erize this "as- a, low level,
rination)4
it we're doing is. we've +got
est for proposals out to
firms to, assist us,'' Baker
They're due back on, May
feel like in a11` prob_abilit _
headed into a rernediation
t Wefeel�'it's probably,`
ed , rthe compliance
ary,"
her Baker, Foy nor Town
ger'. John Siler could yet
ate the cost of fixing the
11=leak,, but Baker said. a
is on to get an estimate
e the- town settles on ' its
year 1992,budgetduring the ,
six weeks.
e didn't ,. pay for this for
Siler said. "We're get -
ready to pay."
:anwhile, .Baker is also run._
tests to determine whether
,hemicalsin the, samples can
Bund in the sewage sludge the
i now buries at the site. -If no
Is are found, that would iso -
the old landfill as the pollu-
source.,
aker wouldn't comment on
,'s statement that the solvents
he dump came'from Dayco.. ,
groundwater contamination,
s also,,discovered' at Dayco's
Crymes Cove dump in 198$: .

SITE
ASSESSMENT AND
REMEDIATION
SERVICES
WAYNESVILLE
LANDFILL
HAYWOOD COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PROPOSAL
A. Background
B. Scope of Work and Related Services
C. Preliminary Schedule
D. Fees for Services
A. Statement of Qualifications
B. Organizational Chart detailing the Project Team
C. Resumes
D. A listing of projects of similar nature and scope
E. Contact persons for references

S&ME
May 20, 1992
Town of Waynesville
Office of Public Works/Utilities
P. 0, Box C-100
Waynesville, NC 28786-0100
Attention: Mr. Frederick L. Baker, P.E.
Director of Public Works/Utilities
1 64 Subject: Site Assessment and Remediation Services
Waynesville Landfill
71 Haywood County, North Carolina
S&ME Proposal No. 1404-92-222-P
Dear Mr. Baker:
S&ME, Inc., is pleased to provide this Proposal in response to your Request for Proposal dated
May 6, 1992, for performing a Site Assessment and recommending a Remediation Plan at the
subject site. This Proposal presents our recommendations regarding the Scope of Work and
related services, our qualifications in performing the work and understanding of the regulatory
requirements, a preliminary schedule, and a fee basis for our services. Please find attached our
"Statement of Qualifications" in Appendix A, which includes an organizational chart detailing
the project team, resumes, a listing of projects of similar nature and scope, and contact persons
for references.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
As part of the compliance monitoring program for the WaynesvilleALLandfill, water samples
previously obtained from the required monitoring wells on site yield/ 6d laboratory test results
indicating elevated concentrations of benzene compounds and specified chlorinated solvents.
Benzene is highly soluble in water. The specified chlorinated solvents are highly soluble in and
denser than water. Because of these properties, when chlorinated solvents encounter ground
water, they will dissolve in the aquifer as they migrate downward through the aquifer and
accumulate near the base of the aquifer where more impermeable geologic materials occur.
SWE, Inc. P.O. Box 1118 TCAS, 2153 Highway 75, Blountville, Tennessee 37617, [phone], Fax [phone]
Pycled
RecYcletl a -
Paper

Town of Waynesville
Mai May 21, 1992
Page 2
SCOPEOF WORK AND RELATED SERVICES
The work performed will consist of two (2) phases:
* Site Assessment to determine the extent of contamination
* Remediation Assessment to recommend control and elimination of contamination.
Site Assessment
A Site Assessment allows delineation of the extent of soil and ground water contamination and
determination of the most appropriate number and locations of additional monitoring wells. Data
collection prior to the site investigation would include: 1) a review of the local well locations
and depths as recorded in the office of the Ground Water Section, North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management; 2) a field survey to locate domestic ground water sources and
springs within 1,500 feet of the landfill; and 3) reconnaissance geologic field mapping to
determine the fracture pattern of the underlying bedrock in order to delineate the zone of well
head protection.
The site investigation will provide information necessary to delineate the existence of any
contaminant plume and evaluate remediation alternatives. The compliance monitoring wells in
which elevated concentrations of target compounds were detected are situated close to the
property boundary of the Waynesville Landfill. It is therefore preferable to limit the number
of well installations not only for cost considerations, but also to avoid unnecessary intrusion onto
privately owned properties. To accomplish delineation of the contaminant plume with a limited
number of additional monitoring wells, the Hydropunche, a field assessment tool for recovering
installed and no permanent
ed.
B use
of this tool no wells are Pe
leachate samples, would be us y
penetrations of the soil cover are made. The small diameter hole made during assessment
procedures would be grouted to the original ground surface. Leachate samples obtained would
7 be submitted for laboratory analysis to determine the concentrations of the same indicator
parameters as required for compliance monitoring well sampling. _S&ME, Inc., would -require
written authorization from the property owners prior to mobilization.
In addition to leachate sampling by use of the Hydropunch®, soil gas sampling would be
performed to aid in delineation of the contaminant plume because benzene and chlorinated
solvents, exhibit high vapor pressures, forming an envelope of soil gas around the contaminant

0
Town of Waynesville
May 21, 1992
Page 3
plume, thereby serving as ideal soil gas tracers in the unsaturated zone. The soil gas sampling
equipment allows collection of a soil gas sample directly into a container to be submitted for
laboratory analysis of constituents specified as exceeding allowable limits.
Data obtained from the, field_ survey, the Hydropunch® sampling results, the soil gas sampling
results, and reconnaissance geologic mapping will be used to determine the number and locations
of monitoring wells to be installed. Drilling logs obtained during: previous monitoring well
installation will facilitate delineation of the residuum composition and thickness, the aquifer
thickness, and the depth to bedrock. Permeability tests will be performed on the residuum to
aid in calculating the contaminant migration patterns. Tests performed on the monitoring wells
will provide data necessary to determine the aquifer characteristics: hydraulic conductivity,
storativity, and transmissivity. Compilation of the water levels from the wells will allow
determination of the hydraulic gradient of the aquifer.
Although it is expected that the shallow water table aquifer present extends only to bedrock and
that the bedrock serves as an aquitard to further downward migration of water, drilling logs may
reveal the presence of a fractured bedrock aquifer. Reconnaissance geologic mapping will
incorporate bedrock fracture measurements from outcrops with drilling information. A fracture
trace analysis will be performed if sufficient evidence indicates that the shallow water table
aquifer extends downward to connect with a fractured rock aquifer. Reconnaissance field data
and remote sensing data obtained through air -photo interpretation of black and white stereo
photos and through imagery interpretation of false -color infrared land photos from ERTS satellite
would be used along with any available geophysical survey data to perform a 'fracture trace
analysis. If necessary, this analysis would be considered regarding monitoring well placement
and would specify a well nest if contamination is suspected of migrating to the fractured rock
aquifer.
Remediation Assessment
It is anticipated by your office that delineation of the contaminant plume may place the facility
in assessment monitoring status, which would require development of a remediation plan. If
such a step is required, there are few alternative remediation measures. The remediation
measure detailed below is considered a preferred alternative because it is cost-effective and
because the contaminants are eliminated rather than simply moved elsewhere.

Town of Waynesville
May 21, 1992
Page 4
Laboratory analyses from monitoring well water samples will be interpreted for the preferred
alternative of placement of a pumping well to be installed for containment of the contaminant
plume and for remediation measures. With regard to the contaminants recently detected in water
sampled from monitoring wells within the Waynesville landfill, methanogenic biodegradation can
reduce the chlorinated solvents; aerobic biodegradation can effectively reduce aromatic
compounds and some chlorinated compounds. A two-phase remediation plan including
methanogenic biodegradation and aerobic biodegradation would eliminate the contaminants by
reducing them to carbon dioxide and water. The two-phase remediation is accomplished by
establishing an onsite facultative stabilization lagoon where both methanogenic and aerobic
biodegradation can occur.
Facultative stabilization lagoons are classified by the U.S. EPA as releasing 60 to 200 pounds
BODS per acre per day and as not containing or generating enough oxygen for the entire lagoon
to remain aerobic. The aerobic zone within the lagoon is restricted to the upper one meter
penetrated by sunlight; methanogenic bacteria capable of reducing chlorinated solvents
accumulate in the anaerobic zone at the base of the lagoon.
An in situ, closed -circulation remediation plan is considered the preferred alternative because
it allows control of the contaminant plume, provides onsite treatment, and eliminates the
contaminants rather than simply transferring the problem to another location. Installation of a
pumping well provides the mechanism for controlling and containing the contaminant plume by
facilitating the creation of a cone of depression in the aquifer. Because chlorinated solvents are
soluble in and denser than water, the pumping well screen must be positioned to include water
at the base of the aquifer. The aromatic compounds are soluble in water and would therefore
also be contained by the cone of depression. Water from the pumping well would be directed
�1
upg radient to the facultative stabilization lagoon and then through an infiltration gallery for
continued in situ treatment within the closed -circulation system.
Methanogenic biodegradation is performed by facilitating chlorinated hydrocarbon metabolism
by methanogenic bacterial populations already present under anaerobic conditions within benthic
sediments of the facultative stabilization lagoon. Methanogenic bacteria will consume both
„ chlorinated hydrocarbons and sulfur; ` therefore, successful methanogenic biodegradation is
accomplished by simply introducing sodium molybdate to inhibit the sulfate reduction pathway.
Aerobic biodegradation occurs within the upper one meter of lagoon water penetrated by
sunlight. To accomplish aerobic biodegradation, nutrient additions may be necessary to

Town of Waynesville
May 21, 1992
Page 5
stimulate growth of the existing bacterial populations capable of reducing hydrocarbons and
certain chlorinated solvents into carbon dioxide and water.. Agricultural fertilizer such as
15-30-15, manure, or sludge can provide the nutrients necessary to stimulate growth of bacterial
populations. Water from the facultative stabilization lagoon is directed through an infiltration
gallery which facilitates continued aerobic biodegradation by placing any remaining contaminants
in contact with the biofilm of bacteria established on the rock media within the infiltration
gallery. The migration direction of water passing through the infiltration gallery to the ground
is controlled by the cone of depression surrounding the pumping well to contain the remediated
water within the closed circulation system until completion of remediation has been confirmed.
Remediation by water detention in a facultative stabilization pond is advantageous because
bacterial metabolism eliminates contaminants, onsite treatment eliminates waste removal
considerations, water monitoring can be performed with minimal requirements for labor and
equipment, water quality adjustments can be performed effectively, and stabilization pond
maintenance is not labor-intensive. Bioremediation utilizing this methodology has demonstrated
a 90% to 100% reduction of contaminants within six months.
Biodegradation success is quantified through reduction of contaminant concentrations and
microscopic plate counts of bacterial population growth consistent with contaminant
concentration reductions. In addition to the indicator parameters required by the North Carolina
Solid Waste Management Division for compliance water quality monitoring, analysis of the
following additional process control parameters would be required to monitor water quality
conditions for enhanced growth of bacterial populations:
* temperature
* total Kjeldahl nitrogen
* dissolved nitrate
* alkalinity
* dissolved organic carbon
* biological oxygen demand
* total organic carbon
* redox potential
* benthic methane
* chemical oxygen demand
* dissolved oxygen
* dissolved phosphate
* dissolved sulfate
* microbial plate count
• dissolved ammonia
* biomass
* chloride ion
* conductivity
* benthic sulfur
* pH

Town of Waynesville
May 21, 1992
Page 6
Engineering controls for the facultative stabilization pond construction design include a
multilayer, impermeable liner system to contain pond water and contaminants introduced by the
pumping well. Hydraulic retention time is calculated using the influent chemical oxygen demand
(COD) concentration to determine the required flowrate per volume. Field pilot test results will
be consulted to determine the final process design of the facultative stabilization pond. Water
quality adjustments will be made in accordance with monitoring data, possibly including the
addition of nutrients for aerobic bacterial growth, the addition of hydrated calcitic lime if a
higher pH is required, and the addition of sodium molybdate to benthic sediments if sulfur is
present.
The work is subdivided into Tasks and Subtasks as follows:
TASK SIMTASK DESCRIPTION
A 1 Review of local well data supplied by the Ground Water Section, N.
C. Division of Environmental Management.
A 2 Field Survey of domestic ground water sources within 1,500 feet of the
landfill.
A 3 Reconnaissance Geologic field mapping.
B 1 Air -photo interpretation of stereo photos.
B 2 False -color imagery interpretation from ERTS satellite photos.
C 1 Soil gas sampling.
C 2 Hydropunch® sampling.
C 3 Analytical testing of soil gas and Hydropunch® samples.
C 4 Bedrock fracture trace analysis, if necessary.
C 5 Develop summary/site assessment report/remediation proposal to DEM.
D 1 Installation of additional monitoring wells, as required by DEM.

Town of Waynesville
May 21, 1992
Page 7
TASK SUBTASK DESCRIPTION
D 2 Analytical testing of water samples from additional monitoring wells.
E 1 Installation of pumping well for remediation.
E 2 Design facultative stabilization pond.
E 3 Construct facultative stabilization pond.
E 4 Field testing for final process design of facultative stabilization pond.
F 5 Maintenance of facultative stabilization pond and monitoring of water
from monitoring wells and pond.
F 6 Analytical testing of water samples from monitoring wells and pond.
F 7 Final remediation summary/closure report.
PRELUMNARY SCHEDULE
The following time -frames are presented for determining a preliminary schedule:
Task A ............
4 weeks
Task B ............
2 weeks
Task C ............
3 weeks
Task D ............
2 weeks
Task E ............
3 weeks
Task F ............
12 months
The time -frames for Tasks A, B, and C do not represent consecutive scheduling; that is, the total
scheduling for these tasks is projected to be 4 weeks. Tasks D and E can also be performed
concurrently, totalling 3 weeks. The time -frame for Task F depends on remediation monitoring
requirements imposed by DEM. Remediation by the recommended measures has been
demonstrated to be successful within six months.

Town of Waynesville
May 21, 1992
Page 8
FEES FOR SERVICES
Our fees for services are provided on a unit rate basis using the attached listings. To aid
us in
proper accounting of this project, we request that you execute and return one (1) copy of the
attached Agreement for Services.
*
* *
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. Please call for additional information or
clarification.
Very truly yours,
S&ME, INC.
C. C' T �Jr�
Pamela C. Peebles, Ph.D., R.G.
Project Manager
TN# 2529
Reviewed by:
James J. Belgeri, P.E., R.G.
Appalachian Branch Manager
TN #12430
PCP/dae/8
J. Russell Ashburn, P.E.
Project Coordinator

_-,
ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT RATE
FEE SCHEDULE - 1992
7
I.
ENGINEERING SERVICES
--
1.
Senior Registered Engineer: per hour .....................
....... . $80.00
2.
Senior Geologist: per hour .....................................
$70.00
J
3.
Senior Hydrogeologist: per hour ..................................
$70.00
4.
Registered Engineer: per hour ...................................
$60.00
5.
Project Manager: per hour ........... ......................
. .$60.00
6.
Project Geologist: per hour .......... ....... ..................
$55.00
7.
Project Hydrogeologist: per hour ..................................
$55.00
79
8.
Staff Engineer: per hour ........................................
$46.00
9.
Staff Geologist: per hour ...... ...........................
... $46.00
-��
10.
Environmental Specialist: per hour ................................
$37.00
11.
Drafting/Secretarial: per hour ................. .....
............ $20.00
r
12.
Mileage: per mile ...........................................
$0.30
13.
Expendables/Reproduction ............ ........ ..........
Cost + 15I
$45.00
Lj
14.
Field OVA or FID: per day ... ............... •
..............
',. �
15.
Combustible Gas Indicator: per day ................................
$25.00
16.
Tank Closure (In -Place):....... ... • ...........
. ....... cost + 15
17.
Laboratory Services ....... .... .... • . ......
. • • .... Cost + 15 %
18.
Per Diem, per day ..... .. ... ...... . ...........
.. . ... $60.00
F-11.9

DRILLING/WELL INSTALLATION
1992 UNIT RATES
A.
DRILLING RIGS
1.
GEOTECHNICAL RIG
71
a. Mobilization, per rig (local only) ...... ... ..
....... . $300.00
b. STB W/4 1/4" HSA's, per foot ......... .......
.... $8.75
c. STB W/6 1/4" HSA's, per foot ...... .. ..........
...$9.75
d. Auger Probes, per foot ........... ....... ........... $7.00
e. Hourly work ............ ... ............
....... $110.00
$150.00
f. Set up to Core, each .... ..... .............. • • •
g. Set Surface Casing, per foot ...... .... ..............
$3.50
h. HQWL Core, per foot ..... .. .. .... .....
.... . . $32.00
i. Grout Plant, per day .... ..........
......... $75.00
$300.00
j. HydroPunch Equipment (includes expendables), per day
..........
-k. Soil Gas Vapor Probe (includes expendables), per day ...........
200.00
L.
2.
ROTARY RIG
a. Mobilization, per rig ..........................
. $500.00
b. Hourly rate, well installation, decon., per hour ...............
. $135.00
c. O.B. & Rock Drilling, 6 -inch, per foot ....................
$18.00
d. Surface Casing, per foot ..............................
$8.50
3.
CREW SUBSISTENCE, PER RIG, PER DAY ... . ..
. .......$120.00
B.
ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT
1.
WATER TRUCK (local only)
a. Mobilization, per truck .. ... ....... ..............
$200.00
b. Daily Rate, per day ..... ..............
....... $125.00
2.
HIGH PRESSURE/TEMP CLEANER, per day ..................
$75.00
3.
GENERATOR ...... .. ........................$50.00
4.
PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT
a. LEVEL D, per man -day ....... .. ......
.......... $35.00
b. LEVEL C, per man -day ........... .................
. $55.00
$140.00
c. LEVEL B, per man -day .............................
�r
d. LEVEL A, per man -day .. ... .....................
. Quote
17
ii

C. MATERIAIS (ALL 2" PVC)
a.
Well Screen, per foot .... .........
........... . . $2.88
b.
Casing, per foot .....................................
$1.55
c.
Casing Caps, each ..................................
$5.10
d.
Casing Plugs, each ..................................
$5.10
e.
Manhole Cover (12" Dia), each .........................
$70.00
L
Keyed -alike Locks, each .......
....... $14.50
...........
$11.50
g.
Sand or Gravel Pack, per cubic ft . ............
..... .
h.
Bentonite Seal, per lb. ...... ........................
$1.25
i.
Cement Grout, per bag ...................
. ........ $8.50
j.
Volclay Grout, per bag ....... ...........
......... $29.50
1.
55 -Gallon Drums, each ....... ............
.. ......$50.00
k.
Pro Cover 6' X 5', each ....................
......... $95.00

E 813Q00 �� o E
V X 847.2\ � J
tee -
x
�
xze a 4. S
80
�
ti za3).7/
x
f i z728r
/ /
ti
P
nss
�x ' limf
1h 280 �.-�'�_`,
It,
-
ti ; v, 2826.0
Zest.,
*
/"� . ��
:
�- 2768.7
783.7
-'
—
Ir
loll Z
I.00t
ti / r�
�+�
\ `'. \ \\\` ♦ \♦. x
\\\ `�
CE ME TE K,
` Ci►'
27'3.0\, `„ .
\ �:-
IL I r
\
- e=t r2T09.j t\\ l
-- �jy, •y�\
i �!
i
/ CEMETERY �.
��' CJ \
�—' / // (
2
Drawn by:
NOTES:
Developed from L.andrnark Eng. Co. Sheet Nm SW 03
TRI—CITIES BRANCH, BLOUNTVILLE, TENNESSEE
MONTOi�ING. WELL LOCATION
WAYN'cS - LE LANDFILL
WAYN=S'NILLE, N.C.
MAP
Revised
Date 8-20-92
PROJECT NO.:
1404-92-222-A
DRAWING NO.:
Figure 2
Scale
Approved by:
1" - 200'

S&ME, INC.
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Spring 1992

SOO, FOR SWE,
INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
INTRODUCTION......................................................
1
SUMMARY OF SERVICES ................................................
g
STAFFING ..................... ...............................
..
g
LABORATORY FACILITIES................................................
10
DRILLING CAPABILITIES .......................................
.....
1.
10
COMPUTERIZATION...................................................
CORPORATE AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT PHILOSOPHY ........................
11
r-
r
r

SOQ FOR SWE, INC.
INTRODUCTION
S&ME, Inc. is a multi -disciplinary environmental and geotechnical engineering firm, offering professional
engineering and associated consulting services to both the public and private sectors. The two primary
service areas are:
1. environmental assessment and engineering
2. geotechnical engineering, and materials engineering and testing
The environmental services offered, use a broad range of evaluation, engineering, regulatory
knowledge, laboratory analysis and remediation to provide professional solutions and assure regulatory
compliance for clients. The geotechnical and materials engineering services provide clients with the
comprehensive range of siting, planning, design, construction and quality control disciplines required
for major construction projects.
S&ME, in March 1992, purchased a majority of the assets and hired most of the Westinghouse
Environmental and Geotechnical Services (Westinghouse) personnel located within the states of North
Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee and one location in Georgia. In general, S&ME is continuing
the services previously offered in these locations. The specific locations are: Raleigh, Wilmington,
Fayetteville, Charlotte, Greensboro and Asheville, North Carolina; Charleston and Spartanburg, South
Carolina; Knoxville and Tri -Cities, Tennessee; and Savannah, Georgia. The company is wholly owned
by its employees.
S&ME now offers the professional and geographic experience provided clients by an earlier -established
corporation of the same name. Said corporation was created in 1973 and rapidly expanded throughout
the Southeast. It was acquired by Westinghouse Electric Corporation in 1987. With the employee
purchase noted above, the highly regarded name of S&ME returned to the marketplace. More
importantly, many of the same, respected professionals who served the market under both the S&ME
and Westinghouse names now provide the services offered by the new corporation.
1
I
-a

SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Environmental Assessment and Engineering
The S&ME staff includes individuals recognized as leaders in the performance of Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous waste management and related services. Comprehensive
environmental services are provided with the technical ability, expertise, experience, state -of -the art
equipment and facilities to meet the varied needs of the marketplace. In addition, selected locations
are equipped with ambient monitoring devices and personal protective gear.. Specific environmental
assessment and engineering services provided by S&ME include:
♦ Underground storage tank programs
• Site assessment
• Remedial Action Plan
• Leak testing
• Cathodic protection
• Secondary containment system design and installation
• Monitoring and documentation of tank closures
• Ground water treatment
• Petroleum contaminated soil transportation and disposal coordination
• New tank installations
♦ Environmental and Ecological Assessments
• Wetland studies
• Real estate transaction site evaluations
• Environmental reviews and permit acquisition
• Environmental impact studies, audits, and assessments
♦ Geologic and Hydrogeologic Consulting Services
• Preparation of groundwater quality and resource evaluation plans
• Monitor well installation
• Waste quality sampling and evaluation under strict protocols
• Ground water modeling, including groundwater flow and contaminant transport
2

SOO. FOR S&ME, INC.
• Design and implementation of groundwater monitoring networks
• Drainage and dewatering studies
• Geophysical studies
• Soil and rock drilling
♦ Geologic and Environmental Engineering
• Feasibility studies and the design and implementation of site remediation
measures
• Preparation of closure plans and hazardous waste facility permitting
• Hazardous waste management compliance audits
• Design of treatment systems for wastewater, contaminated groundwater, and
soils
• Treatability studies
• Bioremediation
Design and Closure Plans for New and Existing Landfills and Lagoons
• Site assessments
• Conceptual design
• Permitting and regulatory liaison
• Environmental, geologic, hydrogeologic, and geotechnical characterization
• Geosynthetic and geotextile design and testing
♦ Land Application of Wastewater and Waste Treatment Plant Sludges and Effluents
• Non -hazardous treatment sludge land application
• Spray irrigation
• Waste utilization
• Land treatment/site investigation
♦ Industrial Hygiene
• Workplace air monitoring (vapors, gases, dusts, fumes)
• Environmental and occupational noise monitoring
• Ionizing and nonionizing radiation detection
• indoor air quality studies
3

SOO, FOR SWE, INC.
• toxicological evaluations
• written programs in hazard communication, medical monitoring, personal
protection equipment and community right -to -know
• small business retainer programs
• medical protocol development
• medical monitoring and surveillance
♦ Asbestos Evaluation and Consultation
• Asbestos survey/hazard analysis
• Bulk sample analysis
• Management planning
• Training
• Contract administration
• Design/specifications
• Public relations
• Site observation/consultation
Environmental Remediation
The S&ME staff is experienced in conducting on-site remediation, including contaminant cleanup,
containment, mitigation and disposal activities for hazardous wastes and other contaminated materials.
On-site remediation is provided as one of the final phases in a turnkey project or as a discrete part of
an overall project.
S&ME provides experienced and trained personnel, protocol, equipment and material resources capable
of remedying most hazardous waste situations. S&ME's approach is directed at developing safe,
technically -sound and cost-effective solutions. The company is prepared to provide the technical
expertise necessary to protect the health and safety of workers and local populations and comply with
regulations. Remediation services are provided from Raleigh. Specific services include:
♦ Emergency response
♦ Contaminated materials, drum and tank removal
♦ Facility decontamination and demolition
4

SOG FOR S&ME, INC.
♦ Ground water recovery and treatment systems
♦ Ground water remediation
♦ In-situ waste treatment (chemical and biological)
♦ Lagoon and landfill closure
♦ Sludge dewatering and solidification
♦ Wastewater treatment
♦ Waste transportation and disposal coordination
Geotechnical Enaineerin
S&ME provides a complete range of geotechnical engineering services. These services include
planning, field and laboratory investigations, design specifications and recommendations, quality
control, instrumentation and performance studies. Applications are for all types of buildings, airport
facilities, transportation systems, landfills, dams, and other civil and private projects. Every office of
S&ME offers geotechnical capabilities.
♦ Planning
S&ME can assist in providing subsurface data during the planning of a new or
expanding project. This data may be used by the land planner, developer,
government entity, civil engineer, architect or owner in identifying the best site for
a potential project, identifying the best facility location at a specific site, identifying
potential cost considerations, and estimating construction/grading requirements.
Services include:
• Preliminary geotechnical/geologic studies
• Literature search
• Aerial mapping and remote sensing
• Geophysical studies
• Development of a site rating system
• Determination of borrow availability (both on-site and off-site)
♦ Design
Geotechnical engineering is an important consideration in the design of a new or
expanding facility, and during remediation activities for a failed or distressed facility.
5

SOa FOR S&ME, INC.
S&ME's geotechnical design services generally include soil test borings, in situ
testing, laboratory testing and engineering analysis. Specific information and design
recommendations can include:
LA • Recommendations for foundation type, excavation and grading, soil stability,
and site preparation
` • Construction dewatering and draining systems
77 • Slope stability analysis and lateral earth pressure determinations
• Excavation, bracing and undercutting design
• Site grading specifications
• Pavement design
• Erosion sedimentation and flood potential evaluation
Materials Enaineerina And Testing
S&ME offers materials engineering, testing and inspection services applicable to the construction and
manufacturing industries. S&ME evaluates and then develops recommendations regarding both
existing structures and new construction. During construction, monitoring and quality control services
covers every phase of construction and the materials used. These services also provide solutions to
fabrication, and other materials problems, and include life -cycle analyses, corrosivity and other
determinations.
♦ Soils
S&ME provides engineering recommendations for monitoring and testing during
grading, site utility installation and subgrade preparation. This includes verification
of construction and confirmation of material acceptability and compaction by the
performing of appropriate laboratory and on-site tests. These services can make a
major contribution to a project's cost containment. SWE can:
• Analyze the suitability of site soils for structural fill
• Determine the need for moisture conditioning
• Suggest alterations of construction equipment and procedures
• Evaluate the need for drainage, undercutting stabilization or geotextiles or
geotextiles for solution of problem surface soils
• Provide an overview of earth grading activities
6
_

SOO FOR SWE, INC.
♦ Concrete
S&ME concrete services include complete inspection of concrete batching equipment,
trucks and curing procedures. S&ME develops mix designs and verifies compliance
with American Concrete Institute (ACI) and ASTM procedures and specifications.
S&ME can:
• Sample fresh concrete on site for air content, slump, temperature and unit
weight
• Make cylinders and beams for strength tests
• Evaluate and provide recommendations for special materials such as grouts,
epoxies, hardeners, high-density concrete, semi -light and lightweight concretes
• Observe concrete placement, and test the hardened end product
• Evaluate problems and recommend repairs, procedures and materials
♦ Metals and Nondestructive Testing INDT)
S&ME employs personnel who are certified in all major areas of materials testing and
inspection. These include certifications from the American Society of Nondestructive
Testing, the American Society of Steel Construction and the ASME Boiler and
Pressure Vessel Code. S&ME is qualified to:
• Inspect structural steel for plumbness, alignment verification and bolt tension
• Inspect shear studs, metal decking and shop fabrication
• Locate reinforcing steel in hardened concrete, using high -frequency radar,
magnetics and radiography
• Analyze failures
• Provide metallurgical and corrosion analysis
• Provide nondestructive testing, including radiographic, ultrasonic, infrared,
magnetic particle and liquid penetrant techniques
• Conduct welder's certifications, and safety inspections
• Provide fireproofing inspections
• Provide physical testing, including tensile, bend, hardness and impact
• Conduct strain gaging
• Determine thickness of metals, paints, etc.
♦ Asphalt
7

SOQ FOR S&ME, INC.
Asphalt services by S&ME are planned to ensure that an asphalt pavement system
is designed and constructed to perform as intended. Services include:
• Asphalt mix designs and verifications
• Batch plant control to assess aggregate gradation, asphalt content, bulk
specific gravity, stability and flow
• Field control to determine and monitor temperature, lift thickness and
compaction through nuclear -verified core samples
♦ Roof Engineering
S&ME provides professional design and construction recommendations for roof
construction, as well as full-time construction monitoring. Roof engineering services
include:
• Roof evaluation and assessment
• Nondestructive surveys
• Testing of existing roofs and those under construction
• Design, including roof plans, materials selection and technical specifications
• Construction contract administration
• Construction monitoring
• Computerized roof management system
• Maintenance programs
STAFFING
As noted in the introduction, S&ME employs a staff with many years of experience with the original
S&ME and continuing experience under Westinghouse. This staff consists of more than 100
professionals experienced in the various disciplines associated with environmental, hydrogeological,
geotechnical and materials engineering services. The accomplishments of senior personnel are
recognized in their professions. This total initial staff, including highly trained technical personnel,
exceeds 300.
Most of these employees possess extensive experience in:
• Geologic and hydrogeologic conditions impacting client problems and the selection
3

SOa FOR S&ME, INC.
of appropriate solutions in the areas to be served
• Working with area clients and are acquainted with the clients' personnel, operational
requirements and objectives
` • Federal, state and local codes and regulations and in working with regulatory and
inspection officials
• Serving clients ranging from smaller local business and professional companies to
Fortune 500 corporations and government units (including the military)
L4 • Local working practices and business relationships
LABORATORY FACILITIES
S&ME operates its own laboratory facilities providing testing services associated with geotechnical
engineering, asbestos, and construction materials.
The geotechnical operations of S&ME are supported by state-of-the-art soil testing capabilities. S&ME
L has 11 laboratories for the testing of noncontaminated soils and materials. The trained and certified
laboratory staff routinely perform physical properties testing of soil, rock, concrete, steel, asphalt, and
composite building materials. These testing services are performed in support of all project phases,
including site investigations and assessments, design and construction.
S&ME operates asbestos laboratories staffed with experienced personnel utilizing state-of-the-art
equipment. Clients are offered the following asbestos laboratory services:
• Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) for bulk sample analysis of asbestos materials such
as thermal insulation, ceiling tiles, fireproofing, and floor tile.
• Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) for fiber counting during air monitoring for
abatement activities or periodic surveillance.
The PLM laboratories are accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program
administered by the NIST. The PCM analysts participate in the Proficiency Analytical Testing (PAT)
Program administered by the American Industrial Hygiene Association.
S&ME's laboratory facilities are designed and operated to provide fast, reliable information to assure
4�

the meeting of clients' needs.
DRILLING CAPABILITIES
SOG FOR S&ME, INC.
S&ME offers complete in-house drilling services for soil boring and rock coring, field testing,and
installation of monitoring wells, extraction wells and piezometers. We have been providing (through
the original S&ME, Inc., and through Westinghouse) subsurface exploration drilling and testing services
for over 17 years in support of geotechnical and environmental projects. S&ME's environmental drilling
personnel have successfully completed the 40 -plus hour Health and Safety training course in
compliance with OSHA 29CFR 1919.120. In addition, they are enrolled in a medical monitoring
program and have met stringent corporate requirements to qualify for work on hazardous waste sites.
S&ME Owns and operates drill rigs mounted on a variety of carriers (trucks, all -terrain vehicles and
skids) and has the capability to advance boreholes through virtually any soil and/or rock condition.
Hole sizes up to 11 inches in diameter are available for specialized tests or well installation in soil, using
standard auger boring, wash boring or mud rotary techniques.
Rock drilling capabilities range from diamond coring to air rotary drilling. Tool selection includes
conventional and wire line equipment capable of cutting cores up to 2.4 inches in diameter. Core
barrels and bits are available from a wide inventory and are matched to specific site conditions and
core size requirements. S&ME also has compressors, packer equipment, and pump installation
capabilities. This lineup of equipment will allow for timely, cost-effective service.
COMPUTERIZATION
S&ME offices use computer-aided design systems and other computer facilities for design engineering,
hydrogeologic evaluations, report preparation and presentation of quality graphics. These computer-
aided design (CAD) systems are personal computer (PC) -based and operate on microstation commands
so they easily interface with larger VAX -based CAD systems. The PC-based systems can directly use
topographic mapping files prepared by aerial photographic methods, as well as graphic files from the
data evaluation programs. This equipment enhances the company's ability to provide highly accurate
information and design components for clients.
F
10
',

4
ORPORATE AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT PHILOSOPHY
SOa FOR S&ME, INC.
The S&ME organization operates as a decentralized system of cost centers. Consequently, corporate
administrative control is minimized and both branch management and specific technical teams are free
to take correct and timely actions to meet the objectives of their clients. Employees stress guality
responsive services in which they take a great deal of pride. Client satisfaction with the quality of
S&ME's work, results in a large percentage of services performed for repeat clients.
S&ME management strongly supports the concept that engineering and other technical services must
be directed by professionals with significant experience in disciplines that are relevant to these service
areas. Therefore, S&ME puts together multi -disciplinary teams, particularly for long-term projects, and
is sufficiently flexible in its organization to permit these teams to include staff from several branches.
This practice permits project managers to develop teams with the best possible matrix of skills and
experience to meet the needs of the individual project. As a result, S&ME continues its established
reputation for sound approaches and professional competence in a wide range of technically
demanding areas.
S&ME's stated mission is: To provide the best client service in our industry through responsiveness,
professionalism and positive employee attitudes.
11

F-1
i
n
La'
J. Russell Ashburn
PROJECT COORDINATOR
i
ILS;
Ann Borden
TECHNICAL RESOURCE
'LA
L
C. Thomas Oakes
DRILLING MANAGER
r�
r
F79
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
DETAILING PROJECT TEAM
Mr. Frederick L. Baker, P.E.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
WORKS/UTILITIES
Pamela C. Peebles, Ph.D.,R.G.
PROJECT MANAGER
Pamela C. Peebles, Ph.D.,R.G.
Douglas N. Cantrell, R.G.
FIELD GEOLOGY
James J. Belgeri, P.E., R.G.
Ken C. Davis, P.E.
SENIOR REVIEW
American Interplex
Laboratories
LABORATORY SERVICES

RESUME
J. RUSSELL ASHBURN III, P.E.
POSITION Geotechnical Engineer/Operations Manager
S&ME, Inc. (Formerly Westinghouse Environmental & Geotechnical
Services, Inc.
Geotechnical Services, Inc) -Asheville, NC
FIELDS OF
COMPETENCE: Geotechnical Investigation and Evaluation; Foundation Design Analyses
and Installation; Dam Design and Evaluation; Site Grading; Construction
Phase Testing; Asphalt and Concrete Mix Design; Pavement Evaluations
and Design
EDUCATION
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
1992 -Present
1989-1992
LLI
B.S.C.E.
B.S. Civil Engineering -
University of Tennessee, 1984
Manager - S&ME, Inc.
(formerly Westinghouse Environmental and
Geotechnical Services,Inc.)
Asheville, NC
Manager - Westinghouse Environmental &
Geotechnical Services, Inc.
Asheville, NC

PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE (con't)
1988-1989 Construction Services Manager,
Westinghouse Environmental &
Geotechnical Services, Inc.
Asheville, NC
1985-1988 Staff Engineer
Soil & Material Engineers, Inc.
Asheville, NC.
PROFESSIONAL
ME 4BERSHI PS AND
AWARDS
American Society of Civil Engineers
REGISTRATIONS
Registered Professional Engineer,
North Carolina, 1989, No. 15736
KEY PROJECTS & ASSIGNMENTS
Manager of the Asheville Office. Responsible for office operations and
staff of nine people.
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT - RUNWAY, TAXIWAY AND
PARKING REHABILITATION (numerous projects) - Project Engineer
Provide geotechnical evaluation for proposed runway, taxiway and apron
expansions for design. Also provided construction phase testing which
included bituminous concrete mix design, flexural Portland Cement
Concrete mix designs, California Bearing Ration (CBR) tests, Plat Bearing
Tests, standard and modified Proctor compaction testing and in-place field
densities for soil and crushed aggregate base course (CABC), bituminous
concrete plant inspection, field monitoring of bituminous concrete
placement, density testing of field cores, monitoring and testing of
Portland Cement concrete.

RESUME
J. Russell Ashburn, P.E.
Page Four
GROVE PARK INN - VANDERBILT WING - Asheville, North
Carolina Project Engineer for construction phase testing services. Testing
services included monitoring of pile and tie -back wall installation, steel
erection, built-up roof placement and concrete and soil testing.
REHABILITATION OF THE BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY - Project
Engineer PRA BLRI 2S15, Ill, Ull - Approximately 22 miles of Blue
Ridge Parkway from N.C. State Highway 191 just south of Asheville in
Buncombe County to N.C. State Highway 276.
Project Engineer for construction phase testing services. Testing services
included soil classification and compaction testing, sand equivalency
gradation and compaction tests on (CABG), pH and gradation testing on
stabilized topsoil, bituminous concrete plant inspections, and
roadway core densities.
Responsible for preparing proposals, developing exploration plans,
scheduling drilling and preparing geotechnical reports for senior
engineering review for projects in Western North Carolina.
Played active roles in a number of dam design and repair plans for
existing dams in the Western Carolina area.

JAMES J. BELGERI, P.E.
POSITION: Vice President, Manager - Appalachian Operations
S&ME, Inc.
1 (formerly Westinghouse Environmental and
Geotechnical Services, Inc.
EDUCATION: B. S. in Geological Engineering, University of
Missouri -Rolla, 1971
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE:
1986 - Present S&ME, Inc.
(formerly Westinghouse Environmental
and Geotechnical Services, Inc.)
as Tennessee District Manager
Responsible for technical competence, business development, profitability and
overall operations of four cost centers in the Tennessee and North Carolina.
1978-1986 S&ME, Inc. as Chief Engineer.
Responsible for technical capability and competence of Branch Office engaged
in collection of subsurface data and design recommendations. As Branch
Manager, responsible for operations, marketing and profitability of entire cost
center. Cost Center consists of 30 professional and technical personnel.
1973- 1978 Law Engineering Testing Company. -Project Engineer. Engaged in physical
17 and technical management of foundation and geologic studies. Projects
include nuclear and fossil fuel plant investigations.
1972-1973 Law Engineering Testing Company - Drilling Services Supervisor engaged in
technical direction and operations of personnel collecting subsurface data..
1971-1972 Law Engineering Testing Company - Geological Engineer engaged in
collection and interpretation of technical data including geologic mapping, air
photo interpretation, groundwater studies and foundation design.

JAMES J. BF-LGFM, P.E.
Page Two
KEY ASSIGNS:
Site Geologist - Landslide Investigation, Interstate Route I-40, Cocke County,
Tennessee. Interstate Highway Project No. I-40-8(16)120.
Site Geologist - Geologic and PSAR Studies, Clinch
River Breeder Reactor Plant, Roane County, Tennessee.
Project Geologist Landslide Investigation, Interstate Route I-75, Campbell
County, Tennessee. Interstate Highway Project No. I -75-E(75)120.
Project Engineer - Gulf Power Company Fossil Fuel Plant, Carryville,
Florida.
Project Engineer - Preliminary Investigation and site selection, Major
Manufacturing Facility, Aluminum Corporation of America (ALCOA), Meade
County, Kentucky.
Project Manager - Final Subsurface Investigation, No. 8 Blast Furnace, U. S.
Steel Corporation, Fairfield, Alabama.
Project Manager - Final Subsurface Investigation, Carbon Electrode Plant,
Union Carbide Corporation, Clarksville, Tennessee.
Senior Project Engineer - Multiphase Subsurface Investigation and
Construction Quality Control; Brown Printing Central; Franklin, Kentucky.
Project Manager - Multiple Coal Refuse and Strip Mine Spoil Investigation
for stability analysis and reclamation design; Projects located in Southwest
Virginia, Kentucky and Tennesee.
Project Manager - Preliminary and Final Subsurface Investigation, Nissan
Motor Manufacturing Company, Smyrna, Tennessee.
Project Manager - Multiple UST Investigations and Environmental
Assessments in Virginia, Kentucky and Tennessee.

-19
JAMES J. BELGERI, P.E.
Page Three
u
` KEY ASSIGNMENTS (Cont'd):
Project Manager - Multiple Drilling and Engineering Investigations of
Hazardous Waste Sites including development of Site Health and Safety Plans.
Contaminants included volatile organics, metals and PCB's.
i v
PROFESSIONAL
MIIVIBERSHIPS
American Society of Civil Engineers
Association of Engineering Geologists
National Society of Professional Engineers
REGISTRATIONS
Registered Professional Engineer
Alabama 11095
Tennessee 12430
Virginia 10193
Kentucky 11239
Registered Geologist: Georgia
J
r
1.
r,• v�
r

NAME AND TITLE
Ann M. Borden, PG
Senior Project Manager/Senior Geologist
EDUCATION
MBA, Finance, University of
St. Thomas, 1985
MS, Geology
University of Cincinnati, 1980
11
BS, Geology
u Northeastern University, 1977
BACKGROUND REGISTRATIONS
Joined S&ME in 1990 with Geologist, North Carolina, No. 307
10 years previous experience.*
E
EXPERIENCE
Expertise
Program implementation and management, regulatory liaison and negotiations, landfill siting and
permitting, contaminant hydrogeology, hydrogeological evaluations, hydrocarbon evaluations, and
Lai State and Federal UST Trust Fund assistance.
Key Assignments
L
Project Hydrogeologist for siting of a Municipal Solid Waste Landfill in Rockingham County, North
Carolina Acxi des include evaluating site suitability and preparing the hydrogeology portions of the
permit applications.
Project Hydrogelogist for a confidential regional municipal solid waste landfill in the Piedmont North
Carolina area Activities include the hydrogeological assessment of site suitability and preparation
of the permit application.
Project Hydrogeologist for site selection and site application of a municipal solid waste landfill in
Alamance County, North Carolina.
Project Manager for risk assessment at a hazardous waste landfill site. Activities include sod gas
and air quality assessment, followed by health risk analysis.
Project Director for an industrial electroplating site assessment. The site contains chemical drum
landfills and wastepits. Activities included installation of exploratory borings and monitor wells, soil
and ground water sampling, evaluation of hydrogeology, contaminant transport and report
preparation.
Senior Hydrogeologist with NCDEM for the technical review of Sandoz hazardous waste landfill
permit Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Activities included assessing the potential for
groundwater contamination from landfilling.
Assistant Chief of NCDEM Groundwater Section responsible for hydrogeological characterizations
at contaminated areas throughout North Carolina. Activities included assessing the completeness
of site characterizations by consultants hired by the private sector, as well as the investigations
performed by the Groundwater Section technical staff.
Project Hydrogeologist for remedial investigation of an existing solid waste landfill and hydrogeology
report for a new cell, Caswell County, North Carolina
77

Project Hydrogelogist/Project Manager for a new solid waste landfill at Camp Lejeune, North
Carolina. Scope includes hydrogeology for site application and design as well as determination of
existing on-site contaminants within the ground water.
Project Hydrogeologist for evaluating ground water conditions and recommendations for removing
perched water for a proposed new solid waste landfill cell at the Harnett County Landfill, Harnett
County, North Carolina
Project Hydrogelogist associated with siting studies and site appUcation for new cells at the two
current solid waste landfills in Wake County, North Carolina
Project Hydrogeologist (review) for monitoring well, installation, ground water sampling and data
evaluation at a ground water contaminated area of the existing solid waste landfill in Duplin County,
L�' North Carolina
µi PUBLICATIONS
Borden, A.M., 'The Clean-up Trust Funds and Proposed UST Reguiations,' North Carolina Bar
M Foundations Continuing Legal Education, Environmental Law Annual Meeting, 1990.
Borden, A.M., 'Clean-up of Contaminants: An Overview of North Carolina Regulations;
'Underground Storage Tanks: The impact of New and Existing Regulations," 1989.
Reisinger, 11, H.J., A.M. Borden, R.M. Owens, J.P. Mullenburg, and D.A. Pass, 'Applicability of Sol
Vapor Surveying as an Assessment Tod In the Eastern Piedmont; Conference on Ground Water
in the Piedmont of the Eastern United States, 1989.
* Includes on-going employment with Westinghouse and/or S&ME.

DOUGLAS N. CANTRELL, EIT, R.G.
POSITION: Project Geological Engineer
S&ME, Inc., Knoxville, Tennessee
FIELDS OF
COMPETENCE: Environmental Engineering• Groundwater quality assessments for
active and inactive facilities such as landfills and UST facilities.
Underground storage tank evaluations and site assessments from initial
site check through remediation and regulatory action.. Phase I and Phase
II Environmental Site Assessments to define past usage of property and
determine the presence and extent of any potential environmental
liabilities.
Geotechnical Engineering;, Site evaluation, subsurface investigation, soil
data analysis, geologic mapping, foundation design, soil and rock slope
design, pavement deisgn, and geotextile applications. Site evaluations
for landfill design and permitting including geotechnical and
hydrogeologic considerations. Experience includes drilling, in -field
permeability testing, monitor well and piezometer installation and
sampling, laboratory testing, evaluation, and reporting. Familiar with
conventional and remote sensing techniques of evaluation.
Material Testing, Construction inspection and material testing including
soil, concrete and asphalt construction. Performed testing and inspection
on construction of embankments, and landfill liners (soil), including site
reconnaissance, proofrolling, test pits, and compaciton testing using
conventional and nuclear methods. Performed inspection of driven
piling and frilled shaft foundaiton systems, and shallow foundations.
Performed testing and inspection of concrete structures including conrete
mix design, placement planning, coring, and conventional testing.

RESUME
DOUGLAS N. CANTRELL
PAGE TWO
KEY PROJECTS AND ASSIGNMENTS
Peformed Groundwater Quality Assessment for closed landfill (Old
Greeneville Landfill, 1992) including groundwater use survey, field
reconnaissance and remote sensing (satellite imaging) to identify surface
hydrologic features and grounwater resurgences. Included monitor well
linstallaiton and sampling, dye -tracing studies, and groundwater basin
identification and flow evaluation. Performed work in close conjunction
with local regulatory agency.
Peformed Phase I Environmental Site Assessment on Sears & Roebuck
Property, Knoxville Tennessee (and various other sites, 1991-1992) to
evaluate possible present or prior existence of significant contamination,
hazardous materials or hazardous waste at the site. Also performed
Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment on 50 -acre site for
Scientific Ecology Group in Oak Ridge, Tennessee (1992).
Project Engineer responsible for underground storage tank evaluation for
national funeral home chain (1990). Performed drilling, sampling,
decontamination, and evaluation of laboratory test results. Also
performed initial release reports with tentative corrective action/closure
plans as owner's representative to state regulatory agency. Completed
project (1992) as principal investigator, compiled summary of services
and prepared Corrective Action Plan and petition for closure.
Project Engineer responsible for quality control inspection and testing for
$30 million Newsprint Recycling Facility for Bowater, Inc., 1990.
Peformed concrete mix designs, preplanning, coordination, and
inspection for largest monolithic concrete pour in East Tennessee (3,000
cubic yards).

RESUME
DOUGLAS N. CANTRELL
PAGE THREE
Project Engineer on geotechnical investigation for $96 million Kimberly
Clark manufacturing plant in Loudon County, Tennessee, 1989. In
charge of primary engineering analysis and report preparation including
recommendations concerning shallow and deep foundation systems,
anticipated settlement, pavement and slope deisgn. Responsible for
quality control program during construction including fill placement,
embankment construction, concrete and asphalt placement. Also
performed inspection for pile driving and pier drilling operations.
Project Engineer in charge of rock slope investigation for 6.5 mile
extension of Interstate 181 in Unicoi County, Tennessee, 1989.
Responsible for logging of rock core, field geologic mapping, data
analysis, and report preparation including recommendations regarding
rock slope designs.
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION:
Registered Geologist, Tennessee (1991), #2060
E.I.T. Certification, Colorado (1987), #14835; Oklahoma(1987)#7942,
Tennessee (reciprocal 1989)
PADI Certified Open Water Diver, Oaklahoma (1985)
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS/AFFILIATIONS:
American Society of Civil Engineers
Association of Engineering Geologists
EDUCATION:
L,,
B.S., Geological Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, 1987
Hazardous Waste Site Health and Safety Training, Westinghouse
Environmental Services, 1989.
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks: Corrective Action Alternatives,
Georgia Tech, 1990.

RESUME
DOUGLAS N. CANTRELL
y' PAGE FOUR
L ' EMPLOY HISTORY:
1992 -
LnJ Present Project Geological Engineer
S&ME, Inc., Knoxville, Tennessee
Project Engineer responsible for operation of engineering and
environmental assessment activities. Peform Phase I and Phase H
Environmental Site Assessments (ESA), groundwater quality
assessments, and underground storage tanks evaluations from initial site
check through remediation. Pefrom hydrogeological evaluations of
active and inactive sites such as landfills and UST facilities. Also
perform engineering services on geotechnical and construction services
projects.
1990-1992 Construction Services Manager/Project Engineer
Westinghouse Environmental and Geotechnical Services Inc., Knoxville,
Tennessee.
Responsible for operation of construction services department including
proposal and budget preparations. Review of field and laboratory testing
including soil, concrete, and asphalt. Responsible for quality control
programs on all phases of construction projects including earthwork,
concrete and asphalt placement, and steel erection. Also perform
engineering services on geotechncal and environmental projects such as
subsurface investigations, UST assessments, Phase I Environmental Site
Assessments, and hydrogeological site evaluations.
1989-1990 Staff Geotechnical Engineer
Westinghouse Environmental and Geotechnical Services, Inc. Knoxville,
Tennessee.
Project Engineer engaged in collection and evaluation of field data
including subsurface investigations, site inspections, and geologic
mapping leading to design and construciton recommendations for
foundations, site preparation, and soil and rock slope design. Also
responsible for performing on-site construction inspection services
including foundation inspections and underground storage tank closure
monitoring.

RESUME
DOUGLAS N. CANTRELL
PAGE FIVE
1987-1989 Staff Geotechnical Engineer
Shepher Engineering Testing Company, Inc., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Project Engineer responsible for proposal preparation, technical
supervision of drilling activities, site inspection, and collection of field
data for report preparation including design and construction
recommendations for foundations, soil liners, and geotextile applications.
U14
F
e J
r�
LJ
L

MUME
KENNETH C. DAVIS, P.E.
POSITION: Senior Geotechnical Engineer
EDUCATION: B.S. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
Major: Agricultural Engineering
M.S. University of Tennessee
Major: Civil Engineering
Thesis: "Investigation of the Performance of Fabric
Filters Utilized in Subdrainage Applications"
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE:
1991 -Present S&ME, Inc.
(formerly Westinghouse Environmental and
G technical Services Inc )
1990-1991
eo ,
Tri -Cities, Tennessee
Senior Geotechnical Engineer responsible for conducting/reviewing
geotehnical explorations. Responsible for
implementing/developing/reviewing environmental assessment plans.
Evaluation/monitoring UST tank removals.
Westinghouse Environmental and Geotechnical Services, Inc.,
Tri -Cities, Tennessee
Engineering Department Manager responsible for management of
department operations.

RESUME
Kenneth C. Davis
Page Two
1985-1990
1982-1985
1981-1982
1978-1981
Westinghouse Environmental and Geotechnical Services, Inc.,
(formerly Soil & Material Engineers)
Tri -Cities, Tennessee
Department Manager/Staff Geotechnical Engineer
Construction Services Manager responsible for management of department
operations including promotion of work and supervision of engineering
technician (field and laboratory). Also, performing geotehnical
investigations and hazardous waste site studies.
A. L. Williams, Company
Knoxville, Tennessee
District Manager
Responsible for marketing various financial services products as well as
management and training other representatives. securities licensed
representative with First American National Securities.
Soil and Material Engineer, Inc.
Knoxville, Tennessee
Branch Manager
Responsible for operations, promotion of work, and engineering review.
Soil and Material Engineers, Inc.
Blountville, Tennessee
Positions include Construction Services Manager Responsible for
management of department operations including promotion of work and
supervision of engineering technicians. Also served as Staff Engineer
Responsible for subsurface investigations, inspection of geotehnical projects
and direction of testing programs.

RESUME
Kenneth C. Davis
Page Three
r.
KEy
,!
ASSIGNMENTS
Project Engineer - Bristol Regional Medical Center
Bristol, Tennessee
Geotechnical engineering for multi-story hospital complex evaluating rock
bearing foundations (i.e. caissons)
Project Engineer - Brown Printing Company
Franklin, Kentucky
Construction Quality Control including density testing and foundation (deep
pile inspection).
Project Engineer - Bristol Wastewater Treatment Plant
Bristol, Tennessee
Foundation inspection including pile installation and rock-bearing
L LJ
foundation. Analysis and treatment of various sink-hole formations.
Project Engineer - Harman Mining Company
Ld
Harman, Virginia
„
Coal Refuse Stability Studies.
uJ
Project Engineer - A. E. Staley Plant
Loudon, Tennessee
Construction Quality Control including supervision of pile foundations and
concrete/soil testing. Treatment of various sink-hole formations.
Supervision of field personnel.
L:
r
RRI
L
{

RESUME
Kenneth C. Davis
Page Four
Project Engineer - Foothills Mall
Maryville, Tennessee
Supervision of field personnel responsible for Quality Control during site
work development.
Project Engineer - Clinch River Breeder Reactor
Oak Ridge, Tennessee
Supervision and installation of various monitoring systems including
piezometers, vertical extensiometers and horizontal extensiometers.
Project Engineer CSX Railroad
Erwin, Tennessee
Geotechnical evaluation of slope stability for 70' embankment slope.
Project Engineer - Greeneville Landfill
Greene County, Tennessee
Geotechnical/Hydrogeological study for landfill site selections/evaluation.
Project Engineer - Various Multi -story Building Projects
East Tennessee
Responsibilities included project management and overview of field
technicians and staff engineers performing caisson inspections.
Project Engineer - Martin Marietta
Oak Ridge, Tennessee
Project management of field technicians conducting field density testing and
inspection of flexible membrane liners for various pond closures.
Project Engineer - Various Real Estate Environmental
Evaluations
East Tennessee and Southwest Virginia
Project management and implementation of real estate environmental
evaluation including site reconnaissance, review of chain of titles, and
review of regulatory records.

RESUME
Kenneth C. Davis
Page Five
SPECIALIZED
TRAINING:
Project Engineer - Assessments of Various Underground
Storage Tank Projects
East Tennessee and Southwest Virginia
Project management and implementation of assessments of underground
storage tank projects including preparation of Environmental Assessment
Plans (EAP), management and implementing EAP's, management and
sampling of underground storage tank removal per regulations.
Field Engineer - PCB Contamination Assessment.
Executed field work in accordance with work plan and served as site Health
and Safety Officer
Client: Hardaway Management Group; Nashville, Tennessee
Field Engineer - Organic Solvent Contamination Assessment.
Executed field sampling and direction of drilling (rock coring) in accordance
with a Site Health and Safety Plan.
Client: Confidential ( Site); Bristol, Tennessee.
Project Engineer - Hydrocarbon Contamination Assessments.
Multiple field and office assignments related to gasoline contamination.
Clients: Exxon Corporation
Volunteer Oil Company
Coastal Mart
Southern State Coop
Roadrunner Markets
OSHA, 40 -hour Hazardous Site Operations Training.
Conducted by S&ME, Inc. November, 1986.
Respirator Training and Fit Testing
Certification for Real Estate Environmental Assessment
PROFESSIONAL
REGISTRATION
Registered Professional Engineer - Tennessee, Kentucky and Virginia

CHARLES T. OAKES
POSITION Western Regional Drilling Manager
Branch Health & Safety Officer
S&ME, Inc.
(formerly Westinghouse Environmental and
Geotechnical Services, Inc.)
Blountville, Tennessee
EDUCATION
Business Administration
Central Virginia Community College
Lynchburg, Virginia
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
1988 to Western Regional Drilling Manager
Present Tri -Cities Drilling Branch Manager
Branch Health & Safety Officer
S&ME, Inc.
(formerly Westinghouse Environmental and
Geotechnical Services, Inc.
Tri -Cities, Tennessee
Responsible for technical direction and
operational capability of drilling services
for collection of subsurface data and
hazardous waste drilling and monitoring
well installation. As Western Regional
Drilling Manager, responsible for operations,
marketing and profitability of drilling cost
center in Tennessee.

RESUME
Charles T. Oakes
Page Two
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE (con't)
1982-1988
1978-1982
1977- 1978
1975-1977
Drilling Department Manager
Branch Health & Safety Officer
S&ME, Inc.
Tri -Cities Branch
Drilling services for soil sampling and geologic exploration. Origination
and implementation of Site Health and Safety Plans. Administration of
S&ME Medical Monitoring Plan.
Driller
Soil and Material Engineers, Inc.
Tri -Cities Branch
Drilling services for soil sampling and geologic exploration.
Driller
Southeastern Engineering and Drilling Company, Inc.
Drilling in geological exploration.
Drill Helper
Southern Maintenance Engineers
Drilling services in underground deep mines.
Project Drilling Manager
For all Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Drilling and well installation in North Carolina,
South Carolina and Virginia
Drilling Project Manager
Camp, Dresser & Mckee Inc./Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Hazardous Waste Drilling Project - Bruin Lagoon, Bruin, PA

RESUME
Charles T. Oakes
Page Three
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE (con't)
Drilling Services Supervisor
Westmoreland Coal Company - Big Stone Gap, Virginia
Under -ground drilling and draining of 2.5 million gallons of trapped
water in an abandoned coal mine.
Drilling Services Supervisor
Nissan Truck Assembly Plant - Smyrna, Tennessee
Final site investigation.
Drilling Services Supervisor
D.B. Wilson Dam Project - Centertown, Kentucky
Pre -drilling caisson locations.
Drilling Services Supervisor and Driller
Island Creek Coal Company - Williamson, West Virginia
Core drilling and pressure grouting mine shaft.
PROFESSIONAL
MEMBERSHIPS
CERTIFICATION
Driller
Harlan County Coal Company
Exploration core drilling to 1500 feet.
National Drilling Federation
National Water Well Association
South Carolina Well Driller #841
National Water Well Association, Certified #3075

POSITION:
EDUCATION:
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE:
PAMELA CROWSON PEEBLES, Ph. D.
Senior Geologist for S&ME,Inc.
Credential in Ground Water Science,
1990, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Ph.D. in Marine Geology, 1984,
Virginia Institute of Marine Science,
College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA
B.A. in Geology, 1972, College of William and Mary,
Williamsburg, VA
1992 -Present Senior Geologist for S&ME, Inc.
Duties: interpret geology from reconnaissance mapping and drilling
information; supervise drilling operations; perform environmental site
investigations at leaking underground fuel storage tank sites and landfill
sites; develop Corrective Action Plans and implement remediation
activities.
1985-1992 Geologist Senior for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Duties: interpret geology from reconnaissance mapping and drilling
information for use in determining bridge foundation recommendations;
analyze laboratory results of sediments in order to evaluate pavement
subgrade engineering characteristics; provide pavement design
recommendations for secondary, primary, and interstate routes; perform
ground water investigations to determine whether or not road construction
activities negatively impacted residential well water supplies; supervise
drilling operations and perform site investigations where leaking
underground fuel storage tanks have resulted in environmental pollution
at VDOT facilities; submit Site Characterization Reports and Corrective
Action Plans to the Virginia Water Control Board for sites where leaking
underground fuel storage tanks resulted in environmental pollution;
determine appropriate remediation measures where pollution cleanup is
necessary; instructed in-service workshops on ground water and
development of wetland mitigation sites.
L_

Resume
Pamela C. Peebles
Page Two
1984-1985 Aquarist/Marine Educator for the Mathematics and Science Center
(Richmond Public School System).
Duties: develop oceanography curriculum; teach oceanography lessons to
elementary and secondary school students; present in-service workshops to
elementary and secondary school teachers; maintain large aquarium system
and develop new exhibits for the aquarium exhibit area.
Adjunct Professor of Oceanography at Virginia Commonwealth University,
Richmond, Virginia.
1984 (Spring) Sea Grant intern for Dr. BettyJ. Diener, Secretary of the Department of
Commerce and Resources, Virginia
1983 Adjunct Professor of Historical Geology at the College of William and
Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia.
1979-1983 Graduate Assistant at the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (College of
William and Mary).
Duties: teaching Introductory Geology laboratory sections at the College of
William and Mary; lecturing at numerous elementary and secondary
schools on topics in Marine Science; reconnaissance mapping in Utah,
Virginia, and North Carolina in order to map surficial materials for USGS
Quaternary geologic maps; and working on the following scientific projects
at the Virginia Institute of Marine Science: performing sediment size and
water quality analyses on samples from the Chesapeake Bay and James
River; measuring tidal currents and tidal fluctuations; determining the
geometry and morphology of numerous tidal inlets; and determining
pollution susceptibilities of various drainage basins.
PUBLICATIONS
Crowson, Pamela R. (maiden name; now Pamela C. Peebles), 1972, Paleoenvironment
of Isoan' omon maxillata (Abstract): Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 23, No. 3,
p. 134.
r1`9 Cleaves, E. T., Glaser, J. D., Howard, A. D., Johnson G.H., Wheeler, W. H., Sevon, W. D.,
;j Judson, S., Owens, J. P., and Peebles, P. C., 1987, Quaternary Geologic Map of
the Chesapeake Bay 4* x 6' Quadrangle, U.S.: Map I-1420(NJ=18), Department
of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey.
'_,

Resume
Pamela C. Peebles
Page Three
Exline, J. D., Johnson, G. H., Goodwin, B. K., Peebles, P. C., Door, A. P., Campbell, J. N.
and Ridky, R. W., 1981, Region 1 Earth Science Field Guide: Virginia Department
of Education, Richmond, Virginia.
Johnson, G. H., Berquist, C. R., Ramsey, L., and Peebles, P. C., 1981, Guidebook to the
Late Cenozoic Geology and Economic Geology of the Lower York -James
Peninsula, Virginia; Guidebook No. 3, Department of Geology, College of William
and Mary, prepared for the 1981 meeting of the American Institute of Professional
Geologists.
Johnson, G. H., and Peebles, P. C., 1982, Virginia's Geologic Heritage: Earth Science,
Vol.35, No. 4, pp. 13-17.
Johnson, G. H., and Peebles, P. C., 1986, Quaternary Geologic Map of the Hatteras 4° x 6°
Quadrangle, U.S.: Map I-1420(NI-18), Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological
Survey.
Nichols, M. M., Johnson, G. H., and Peebles, P. C., 1991, Modern Sediments and Facies
Model for a Microtidal Coastal Plain Estuary, the James Estuary, Virginia: Journal
of Sedimentary Petrology, Vol. 61, No. 6, Nov., 1991.
Nichols, M., Kuo, A., Cerco, C., and Peebles, P. C., 1979, Virgin Island Bays: Modeling
of Water Quality and Pollution Susceptibility: Technical Report No. 3, Island
Resources Foundation, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands.
` i Peebles, P. C., 1984, Late Cenozoic Landforms, Stratigraphy, and History of Sea
Level Oscillations in Southeastern Virginia and Northeastern North Carolina: Ph.D.
J Dissertation, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary.
FIRM Peebles, P. C., Johnson, G. H., and Berquist, C. R., 1984, Late Cenozoic Stratigraphy
in Southeastern Virginia: Virginia Minerals, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 13-22, Virginia
u Division of Mineral Resources, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Peebles, P. C., Johnson, G. H., and Giese, R. N., 1981, Field Guide for Selected Sites
in Tidewater Virginia: Department of Education, College of William and Mary,
Williamsburg, Virginia (supported by a National Science Foundation Pre -College
Teacher Development Grant; project title: A Workshop for Teaching Teachers to
Teach Earth Science via Local Sites).

amp-
LISTING BY PROJECT NAME
j
ING PROJECT
Pro1 ect Name
Prolect Location
Dim
Alamance County Municipal Solid
Alamance County, NC
Hazen & Sawyer, P.C.
„
Waste Landfill
Camp Lejeune Solid Waste Landfill
Camp Lejeune, NC
Hobbs& Upchurch/Dewbeny
& Davis
Caswell County Landfill
Yanceyville, NC
Dewberry & Davis
I F7
Charlotte Motor Speedway
Concord, NC
Browning Ferris Industries
UIA
Cherokee County Landfill Closure Pian
Cherokee County, SC
Cherokee County Dept. of
Public Works
Commercial Hazardous Waste Disposal
Anson County, NC
Chem -Security System, Inc.
Facility
L
Demolition and Debris Landfill
Holly Springs (Wake County), NC
Browning Ferris Industries
Duplin County Solid Waste Landfill
Duplin County, NC
Duplin County, NC
Greenwood County Landfill Siting &
Greenwood, SC
GreWAKX)d Cbtiy
Permitting
of Public Works
Harnett County Solid Waste Landfill
Hamett County, NC
McKim & Creed -
Hazardous Waste Landfill Design
Kingsport, TN
Tennessee Eastman
Industrial Sludge/Solid Waste Landfill
Western Piedmont, NC
Confidential
r
Macon County Municipal Solid Waste
Macon County, NC
Macon County, NC
Landfill
Mecklenburg County Municipal Solid
Mecklenburg County, NC _
Camp, Dresser & McKee
Waste Landfill
Montgomery County Municpai Solid
Montgomery County, NC
Dewberry & Davis
Waste Landflll
79
New Hanover County Solid Waste
New Hanover County, NC
Post BucNey Sdv h & Jernigan
Pitt County Regional Solid Waste
Pitt County, NC
Confidential Private Co.
Landfill

Project Name project Location
Regional Solid Waste Landfill Site Sampson County, NC
Regional Solid Waste Landfill Site Coastal Plain, NC
Regional Solid Waste Landfill Site
Regional Solid Waste Landfill Site
Regional Solid Waste Landfill Site
Regional Solid Waste Landfill Site
Piedmont, NC
Coastal Plain, NC
North Central Piedmont, NC
North Central Piedmont, NC
Rockingham County Municipal Solid
Rockingham County, NC
Waste Landfill
Solid Waste Landfill Design & COA
Rowan County, NC
Wake County Solid Wase Landfills
Wake County, NC
(2 Sites)
Wilkes County Municipal Solid
Wilkes County, NC
Waste Landfill
Williamette Inert Landfill Design &
Bennettsville, SC
Permitting
tsndfill Sendoss
Statement of QuslHlo moons
Client
Confidential
Confidential Private
Landfill Co.
Confidential Private
Landfill Co.
Confidential Prime
Landfill Co.
Confidential Private
Landfill Co.
Confidential Private
Landfill Co.
Camp, Dresser & McKee
Rowan County, NC
Camp, Dresser & McKee
Wilkes County, NC
Williamette Industries, Inc.

REFERENCES:
Mr. Mark Ashness
Public Works Director, Chatham County
P. O. Box 87
Pittsboro, NC 27312
[phone]
Mr. Frank Stephenson
Dewberry & Davis
8601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27615
[phone]
Mr. Nathan Waley, Manager
Duplin County Landfill
P. O. Box 476
Kenansville, NC 28349
[phone]
Mr. Scott Sauer
Caswell County Manager
P. O. Box 98
Yanceyville, NC 27379
[phone]
Mr. C. T. Clayton
McKim & Creed
5580 Centerview Drive, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone]
Mr. Steve Robbins
Vaughn & Melton Engineers -Architects
219 West Depot Street
Greeneville, Tennessee 37743
[phone]

f-P
7
SITE ASSESSMENT SERVICES
F WAYNESVILLE LANDFILL
Haywood County, North Carolina
S&ME PROJECT
NO.1404-92-222-A
�xa FEB 2 2 1993
-t

M
GEE
February 4, 1993
Town of Waynesville
Office of Public Works/Utilities
P. O. Box C-100
Waynesville, NC 28786-0100
Attention:
Subject:
Dear Mr. Baker:
Mr. Frederick L. Baker, P.E.
Director of Public Works/Utilities
SITE ASSESSMENT SERVICES
WAYNESVILLE LANDFILL
Haywood County, North Carolina
S &ME Project No. 1404-92-222-A
S&ME, Inc. has completed the Site Assessment Services at the subject site. Our services were
authorized by your acceptance of our Agreement for Services dated August 14, 1992. Our
services were conducted in accordance with the directive letter dated May 5, 1992, from the
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management: (DEM). This report documents our
findings and conclusions.
EXECUTIVE SUNENIARY
The Site Assessment Services completed include reconnaissance geologic mapping, installation
of two (2) monitoring wells in compliance with the North Carolina DEM regulations and in
accordance with the Site Specific Health and Safety Plan developed by S&ME, groundwater
sampling and analysis, slug testing to obtain data for groundwater characteristics, and
compilation of water level data and slug test data to determine the hydraulic gradient, hydraulic
conductivity, and flow rate of the aquifer. The Site Assessment Services were performed at the
subject site in compliance with requirements of the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management (DEM), which included installation of two (2) monitoring wells and laboratory
analysis of water samples obtained from these wells, utilizing EPA Methods 601, 602, and 625.
SWE, Inc. P.O. Box 1118 TCAS, 2153 Highway 75, BlounMlle, Tennessee 37617, [phone], Fox [phone]
Printatl on
' ' RecYcletl Paper

Town of Waynesville
Page 2
February 4, 1993
The two (2) wells were installed under Well Construction Permit No. 43-0069-WM-0042.
Laboratory analytical results revealed that 1, 1 -Dichloroethane and Total Organic Halides were
detected as contaminants in water sampled from the new monitoring wells. The contaminant
1,1-Dichloroethane was detected at a concentration of 7.6 ppb in Monitoring Well No. 5, located
downgradient from the other monitoring wells and adjacent to the property line. The interim
maximum allowable limit established by the North Carolina DEM March 25, 1992 memorandum
for 1,1-Dichloroethane is 700 ppb. Total Organic Halides were detected at a concentration of
34 ppb in Monitoring Well No. 6. The maximum allowable limit established by the North
Carolina DEM for Total Organic Halides is 100 ppb.
It is our understanding that the ground water at the subject site is not used as a source of
drinking water and that all adjacent property owners receive water supplied by a municipal
source. However, it is anticipated that DEM may require additional monitoring.
S&ME, Inc. is pleased to provide these services. If you have any questions, please call.
Very truly yours,
S&ME, INC.
Pamela C. Peebles, Ph.D., P.G.
Project Manager
TN #2529
;'-t"m / ��
James J. Belgeri, P.E., P.G.
Senior Geotechnical Engineer
TN #12430
Wes Lowder, P.E.
Project Coordinator

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ..........................1
2.0 GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION .........................2
3.0 RECONNAISSANCE GEOLOGY INVESTIGATION ............... 3
4.0 CONCLUSIONS......................................4
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A Figure 1:
Site Location Map
Figure 2:
Monitoring Well Location Map
Figure 3:
Hydraulic Gradient Determination
APPENDIX B Table I:
Hydraulic Conductivity
Table II:
Groundwater Flow Velocity
APPENDIX C Well Construction Records and Permits
APPENDIX D Laboratory Analytical Results

Town of Waynesville
Site Assessment Services
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
February 4, 1993
Page 1
The subject site for this investigation, the Waynesville Landfill, is a sludge disposal landfill
(Permit No. WQ 0000195) located in the Town of Waynesville, North Carolina. Figure 1,
included in Appendix A, is a site location map depicting the location of the Waynesville
Landfill The landfill is owned and operated by the Office of Public Works/Utilities, Town of
Waynesville. Laboratory analytical results of split water samples obtained by personnel of the
Town of Waynesville and of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Management
(DEM) during the January 13, 1992, routine monitoring of existing wells at the landfill revealed
contamination by the following volatile organic compounds (Appendix D includes the laboratory
analyses):
ORGANIC
COMPOUND
CONTAMINANT
LEVEL (ppb)
Monitor Well N 91y 2:
1,1-Dichloroethane
11.0
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
6.6
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.4
1.4 -Dichlorobenzene
0.54
Benzene
3.0
Monitor Well N 91y 4:
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.62
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
1.1
Tetrachloroethene
0.87
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
Below detection method
limit
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
0.62
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
0.32
Because of this contamination, the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) required installation of two (2) additional monitoring wells to aid in delineating the areal
and vertical extent of groundwater contamination. Well Construction Permit No. 43-0069-WM-
0042 was issued August 27, 1992, to install the monitoring wells. Appendix C includes the
Well Construction Records of the monitoring wells.

Town of Waynesville February 4, 1993
Site Assessment Services Page 2
DEM further required that laboratory analysis of water samples obtained from the monitoring
wells be performed utilizing EPA Methods 601, 602, 625. Laboratory analytical results
(Appendix D) of water samples obtained from the two (2) monitoring wells, designated
Monitoring Well No. 5 and Monitoring Well No. 6, on October 29, 1992, indicated detectable
amounts of contamination in both wells; however, the contamination was below the maximum
allowable limits. Contamination detected in Monitoring Well No. 5 consisted of 1,1-
Dichloroethane, with a concentration of 7.6 ppb. The maximum allowable limit for 1,1-
Dichloroethane established by the North Carolina DEM is 700 ppb. Total Organic Halides were
detected at a concentration of 34 ppb in Monitoring Well No. 6. The maximum allowable limit
established by the North Carolina DEM for Total Organic Halides is 100 ppb.
2.0 GROUNDWGATION
Laboratory analytical results of routine split water samples obtained by personnel of the Town
of Waynesville and of DEM from the existing monitoring wells No. N 91y 2 and No. N 91y 4
on January 13, 1992, indicated the presence of volatile organic compounds contamination.
These two (2) wells were previously established as the downgradient wells at the Waynesville
Landfill. The two (2) new monitoring wells installed at the request of the North Carolina DEM
are designated as Monitoring Well No. 5 and Monitoring Well No. 6. Figure 2 (Appendix A)
provides the monitoring well locations. The well depths, water depths and elevations (relative
to an assumed elevation of 100.00 feet established at the top of casing of monitoring well No.
N91y 3) are provided as follows:
WELL
NUMBER
DATE
MEASURED
WELL DEPTH
(feet)
WATER
DEPTH
(feet)
WATER
ELEVATION
(feet)
No. N 91y 1
1/4/93
39.5
9.20
90.36
No. N 91y 2
1/4/93
32.9
5.52
53.07
No. N 91y 3
1/4/93
45.4
17.72
81.70
No. N 91y 4
1/4/93
33.3
6.45
54.48
MW -5
1/4/93
16.3
7.11
52.44
MW -6
1/4/93
15.2
7.93
51.73

Town of Waynesville February 4, 1993
Site Assessment Services Page 3
It should be noted that the existing monitoring wells No. N 91y 1, No. N 91y 2, No. N 91y 3,
and No. N 91y 4 are designated as MW -1, MW -2, MW -3, and MW -4, respectively, on the
analytical test results reported by Pace, Inc. (Appendix D). Groundwater movement at the
subject site is interpreted to be under gravitational forces at atmospheric pressure (water table
conditions). Therefore, there is no hydraulic pressure component to be included in determining
the hydraulic gradient. The hydraulic gradient was calculated as 0.07 utilizing data from
monitoring wells No. N 91y 4, MW -5, and MW -6. The 3 -point solution method (illustrated in
Figure 3, Appendix A) was employed to determine that the direction of hydraulic gradient is to
the southeast.
A slug test was performed on monitoring well MW -6 to obtain data to determine the hydraulic
conductivity. Table I (Appendix B) provides the slug test data and the calculations for the
average hydraulic conductivity at the subject site: 4.1 x 10, ft/min or 2.1 x 101 cm/sec. The
groundwater flow velocity was computed based on the hydraulic gradient between monitoring
wells No. N 91y 4, MW -5, and MW -6 and hydraulic conductivity measured in monitoring well
MW -6. The calculation is presented in Table II (Appendix B). Groundwater flow velocity is
1.5 x 101 cm/sec or 4.3 x 101 ft/day.
3. RECONNAISSANCE GEOLOGY INVESTIGATION
The subject site lies within the Blue Ridge Physiographic Province of North Carolina. This
province is characterized as deeply dissected with numerous steep mountain ridges, intermontane
basins and trench valleys that intersect at all angles and give the area a rugged mountain
topography. The area is underlain by a complex mixture of igneous, sedimentary and
metamorphic rocks which have been repeatedly deformed, fractured, and faulted. Bedrock
underlying the subject site consists of biotite gneiss with interlayers of amphibolite and
granodiorite.
Material directly underlying the waste material consists of residuum which formed from the
biotite gneiss as a result of chemical and mechanical weathering processes. Based upon review
and interpretation of the drilling logs/well construction records provided in Appendix C, the
residuum is as much as 19 feet thick within the area where the new monitoring wells were
installed. Material within the uppermost 5 feet to 8 feet consists predominantly of light to dark
reddish brown clayey silt. Material below this depth and extending to bedrock consists
predominantly of yellowish brown clayey silt varying with light brownish gray silty clay.

Town of Waynesville February 4, 1993
Site Assessment Services Page 4
Soils at the subject site are classified as loamy Udorthents, specifically mapped as a unit where
the original soil has been removed and solid waste material has been placed in alternating layers
with the original soil material. Soils interpretation records of the Haywood Soil and Water
Conservation District indicate that the material is predominantly fine-grained and that the
permeability ranges from 1.4 x 10'3 cm/sec to 4.2 x 10-5 cm/sec. The predominant grain size
is indicated as silt in the drilling logs, which supports the interpretation that the permeability is
in the lower range of 4.2 x 10-5 cm/sec. This is consistent with the calculated hydraulic
conductivity of 2.1 x 10-4 cm/sec.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
Review and comparison of the laboratory analytical results of water samples obtained for
monitoring wells No. N 91y 2 and No. N 91y 4 on January 13, 1992 to those of water samples
obtained October 29, 1992 from the same wells indicates that the concentrations of volatile
organic compounds have decreased to non-detectable except for the concentration of 1,1-
Dichloroethane, which decreased from 12 ppb to 3.8 ppb in monitoring well No. N 91y 2. A
detectable amount of 1,1-Dichloroethane was reported in the water sample from the new
monitoring well MW -5 at a concentration of 7.6 ppb. The interim maximum allowable limit
established by the North Carolina DEM March 25, 1992 memorandum for 1, 1 -Dichloroethane
is 700 ppb.
Laboratory analytical results of water samples obtained October 29, 1992 from monitoring wells
N 91y 4 and MW -6 indicated Total Organic Halides concentrations of 48 ppb and 34 ppb,
respectively. The maximum allowable limit established by the North Carolina DEM for Total
Organic Halides is 100 ppb. It is our conclusion that 1,1-Dichloroethane and Total Organic
Halides have been detected in the older monitoring wells in decreased amounts and in the new
wells, but the concentrations are within the currently allowable limits established by the North
Carolina DEM.
17

/le, r
✓� Ili , >/, �i\�\�� U t sn, T� -�°t�•�H II) •`.""Fulbright; em
��Co 0 /r r
�1
to\
� .��i �.._ � � �, ' >°H'� ��'l ..--..rte ( . \ � �. ✓/` „ `\-/-.. �_ ��} a 1 v ., `0 • ' • .y„`� : -
L 'c P44!4
\�'. ( ,6C 'off'•.•• `'� �� i\=yO•'�r�
It park
• 1 � �` . :\ ,Y13L Hill. L'' i� /�•� !C I\ � � , .� , - a \ Cha p,
�� • F i �. 1" ��,. BMA 144 \ft
•(. - ..� ��.. ^� outh center a 2565 ��• Ce' UIic3%i1S�i
�pSwimming t analusk 1
dCjd • • \t Pool •� SM N a J
` -
8Mu �° �.•" s •',:fir • :=� •, ELEV 2562 258
it
ark
`-1 AH yam. �/ /ate �� ,'�1 �Q J�i: ' 1 1 _� r T f �� .' ♦ l
L.\e' - (`tel' • �"``� " /% _ Y �� ' - �[� ro't�aas •�!' %i --`- ��
�'. �\ V•ellowgh4D 6h j,� G�/r- /� St
646
\.� • J SiI = �. • 11�e
its \' _ l�•. j Shtmmrn6
.\ MaDle'Grove 1. s
• _ ed it , _ ® :,�Church ° Golf-I �• �` ,t �' .' _ T.- �� ft'
ours
:' Fairwa4 r M` \•r , Co
• _ './ } ° .�, '�'•�• \Hill
�' % `Ha `Top •�`, ° •/V41,• 's`\ ''
'1b _ / / J�/� V � —�ii 1 •' l.; a \M � . � Ng- '$tv�' L 3.8 n • J' / _ --�' _�� -
- a=%'_'' ,�• � - -L -.- n � �a�f�'�• �� ° - //" -.. "-'ice>... � cG _ _ _�
_ %� • • , , '' U/ y^•r� ✓> .-t' n ' -ate i`. ./ _
`` • I as
• � -�' � '�"�'l � �;���� `�C ;•Gas• � \ _ � �,� -� ">� � ii
� -'-•� • q � '- t�7 1 C.y: _. /rot_ - � • •� ii" \. ,���� ?�c i /\/r.�' � �,rA�.
J.: c.. �, ' . "\ _ �J•• • ` �/'� G / (� / CSS .
r emorral • /: . \\ its
HHi
/ -i 3, I X11-:�.; �•.r l � a. ` [1.1i - � ,� _ � �
/ / tib' � �4 J ,� • :-� �- \\ `� i'�-`-�. � r � ' i.` ; - -. yj `a -. � _ ,m �-
SIre r
_a `^J �/�• i - e� ::..•�. �_ • %Q .� - nF 1ti'� iaynesvi
u'-rchJJJ.JJJ������� ���.� • i /�_� � �� ��. .` j
" DwMW from Gyc a NC Duadlangle
SCALE: r=2OW
R O J E C T �oa-sz-222-A
SrTE LOCATION MAP JOB NO:
WAYNEMIE LArDF1L - - FIG. NO : Fore 1
WAYPESVILLE, NC
154C

---ON
M:
ti
t
i
if
U
LR
W
O
a
a�
L
3� o
�
o c ati a4'
M
.c
> cC
CJ
cis
00
"it
v
II II II II II
h�
M:
ti
t
i
if
U
LR
W
O
a

Calculations for AM (method described in Seepage, Drainage, and Flow
Nets, Cedergren, H.R., 1989, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)
Symbols:
D = thickness of water measured from the groundwater table
to the bottom of the well = 7.93 feet
R = well radius = 0.4 feet
At = time interval of water level measurement = 2 minutes
Oh = change in water level (shown in table above)
k = hydraulic conductivity
k = R x h2 -h'
16DS At
1.) Using h, = 0.31 and h, = 0.32:
k = [0.4/(16 x 7.93 x 0.8)] x 0.005 = 0.000197 ft/min
2.) Using h2 = 0:32 and h, = 0.16:
k = [0.4/(16 x 7.93 x 0.4)] x 0.08 = 0.0006304 ft/min
3.) Using h, = 0.16 and h, = 0.05:
k = [0.4/(16 x 7.93 x 0.3)] x 0.055 = 0.0005802 ft/min
Average k = 4.1 x 10' ft/min or 2.1 x 10' cm/sec
DEPTH TO
CHTN ME IN
ELAPSED TIME
WATER
WATER LEVEL
(MINUTES)
(FEET)
Oh (FEET)
MW-6 Static Level
7.93
0
7.62
h, = 0.31
2
7.65
h2 = 0.32
4
7.77
h,=0.16
6
7.88
h, = 0.05
Calculations for AM (method described in Seepage, Drainage, and Flow
Nets, Cedergren, H.R., 1989, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)
Symbols:
D = thickness of water measured from the groundwater table
to the bottom of the well = 7.93 feet
R = well radius = 0.4 feet
At = time interval of water level measurement = 2 minutes
Oh = change in water level (shown in table above)
k = hydraulic conductivity
k = R x h2 -h'
16DS At
1.) Using h, = 0.31 and h, = 0.32:
k = [0.4/(16 x 7.93 x 0.8)] x 0.005 = 0.000197 ft/min
2.) Using h2 = 0:32 and h, = 0.16:
k = [0.4/(16 x 7.93 x 0.4)] x 0.08 = 0.0006304 ft/min
3.) Using h, = 0.16 and h, = 0.05:
k = [0.4/(16 x 7.93 x 0.3)] x 0.055 = 0.0005802 ft/min
Average k = 4.1 x 10' ft/min or 2.1 x 10' cm/sec

TABLE H
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY CALCULATIONS
WAYNESVILLE LANDFILL
NOTES:
The representative hydraulic gradient for the subject site is that calculated in the 3 -point solution
for monitoring wells MW -4, MW -5, and MW -6: 0.07. The calculations performed for
determining the hydraulic conductivity, using slug test data from monitoring well MW -6, are
used to provide the representative hydraulic conductivity: 2.1 x 10-' cm/sec. The groundwater
flow velocity equation is derived as follows:
Q=kiA=vA
v=ki
i = 0.07
k = 2.1 x 1W cm/sec
v = 0.07 x (2.1 x 10r' cm/sec)
v = 1.5 x 10' cm/sec or 4.3 x 10' ft/day

S&ME R'VILLE _ -ID:1-704-687-8003 NOV 24'92 16:04 N0.003 P.09
rt f MW -6
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT Of MIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF EwvINONMENTAL MANAGEMENT • GAOUNDWATER SECTION
P.O. NOX 27697 - RALEIGH, NC 27817-1667
PHONE (1110r431t1
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Quad. No. Serial No.. --
Let. Lono. PC
Minor Basin
Basin Code
Header Ent. QW -1 Ent.�r.
DRILLING CONTRACTOR SSM Ittd - STATE WELL CONSTRUCTIONi , 412 PERMIT NUMBER: 43-0069-VTM--4042
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER _
�r
rwmj. WELL LOCATION: (Shaw sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town:
Wa nesville County, Haood
yw-
Depth
r-1 (Road, Community, Or Subdivision and Lot No.) From T+�
2 OWNER Town f Wa nesville Off ice of Pub1 is Works 0 5
ADDRESS P 0 Box C-100
Street or Houle No. 2$786-0100
Waynesville NC
City or Town State Zip Code
3. DATE DRILLED
0$/27/92 USE OF WELL MonitorMR
_
4. TOTAL DEPTH 14+ 4----� --�— CUTTINGS COLLECTED Q Yes Lao
L-A 5, DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? Yes Is No
6. STATIC WATER LEVEL. FT. above TOP OF CASING.
below
TOP OF CASING IS ,- FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD (qpm): METHOD OF TEST -
8. WATER ZONES (00th):
Q. CHLORINATION: Type _. Amount _
10. CASING. Wall Thickness
Depth Cliameter or Weight/Ft. Material
4.3 2- Sch 40 PVC
From �� To — f t. �..-
From To Ft.
From —To — To Ft.— --
t. GROUT:
Depth
Material Method
To .3
Ft. Portlknd Pour
--
From ._.�
^
3 To 2.3-
Ft. Bentonite- PQUr
IL"
From
12. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Slot Slzs Material
4.3
Ft, 2 in.: 010_ In, PVC
From _
ToI4.3
,
From
-- To
FL - in.
T
FL in. in.
DRILLING LOG
Formation S scrigt1
Reddish Brown _ Y
Clays SIFT _—
Yellowish Brown SILT —
if additional spaCS Is needed use back of form.
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show direction and oistance from at least two State Roads,
or other trap reference points)
From -- o -- -
13. GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size material
I.:., From ?-3_To 14.3 Ft. Filter Sand
L, From_To Ft.
14. REMARKS: Adjacent o MoniCar Wall Y2
ORDANCE
TH 15
I DO STANDARDS, YCERTIFY THAT AND THAT A COPY THiS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN
THIS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDEDCTO THE WELLIOWNER.CAC 20. WELL CONSTRUCTION
SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT DATE
T,--
Submit original to Division of Environfi2r►tat tutar•agemant and copy to well owner.
rw-t REVISED 2190

S&ME A'VILLE ID:1-704-'087-8003
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF'ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
pivt6iON Or DmRONMaNTAL MANAt tMNT • GROUNDWATER SECTION
p.0. SOX 27697 • RALEIGH, HC 27611-7687
PHONe (9197"21
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
146k) 24' 92 16:04 N0.003 P-10
Ma -5
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Quad. No. serial No. —
Lat. Long. -- Pc,.
Minor Basin
Basin Code
Header Ent. QW -1 Ent.
RILLING CONTRACTOR S& Inc STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
'DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER 412
PERMIT NUMBER: 43-0069—Wt4--0042
. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below) Haywood
Waynesville
County,
Nearest Town: Depth DRILLING LOG
(Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.) Formation DA6cripti n
Framr o' Li ht Reddish Brows► %ILT
pwNER Town of Wti tneaville/Office of Public Works 6' 8' perk Reddish Brown Clayey
ADDRESS P• D• Bax C-100SILT
Street or outs No.
71 Waynesville NC 28786-01006r LiAt Brownish Gray siltiv
L City or Town State lip Code CLAY
8117/92--- USE OMonitor
. DATE DRILLEDF WELL 11+ -129L Yellowish Brown Clayey SILT
15 CUTTINQS COLLECTED ❑ Yes ® No -
4. TOTAL OEPTH--
LN 5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? Q Y9$ 3 No NOTE; Boring Caved in to 17'
fAli8. STATIC WATER LEVEL. 6 - FT. ❑ above TOP OF CASING,
below
TOP OF CASING IS 0_-- FT. A OVE LAND SURFACE. —
7. YIELD (gpm): METHOD OF TEST
8. WATER ZONES (depth):
9. CHLORINATION: Type _„ _ Amount
t0. CASING: H additional space is needed use back of form.
Wall Thickness
Depth Diameter or Weight/Ft. Materia' I OCATtON SKETCH
5 Ft _ 2" — PYC (Show direction and distanas from at least two State Roada,
From —Q, To 50 40 -----
or other map reference 00iMIS)
From TO
From _._ . — To Ft...._ ----
11. GROUT: Depth Material Method
From O -- To 1 Ft. Portland Pour
` From 1 To 3 Ft. Bentonite Pour
Law 1 12. SCREEN:
Doom Diameter Siot Site Material
From
5 — To 15 Ft. 2 __ in.. 010 in. PVC_
From
r TO_ Ft. _ in._ in.
fFrom --- To_..--..._ Ft.
Ij 13. GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Materia!
From, 3 �To
15 Ft. Fiber Sand
lig From To__ Ft.
14. REMARKS:
1 77111 DO HEREBYA� THAT A COPY IS W HIS RECORD CONSTRUCTED
AS BEEN PROVIDED TORDANCE O THE WELL OWNER. CAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION
STANDARDS,
•
SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGDA'CEENT
anaomem O and copy to well owner.
Submit original to Division of Environmental M
CW-i IIEVISED 2190

pINace.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
`rte S & ME
44 Buck Shoals Road
Arden, NC 28704
rk�
Attn: Mr. Wes Lowder
Client Reference: Waynesville MW's
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter
h INORGANIC ANALYSIS
November 24, 1992
PACE Project Number: A21029512
93 0084303 93 0084311 93 0084320
By Client 10/29/92 10/29/92
10/29/92 10/29/92 10/29/92
Waynesvill Waynesvill Waynesvill
Landfill Landfill Landfill
Units MDL Well #1 Well #2 Well #3
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
mg/L
0.1
ND
ND
0.13
Aluminum
Bacteria, Total Coliform-
col/100m1
1
-
LTl
-
10
'
Bacteria, Total Coliform
col/100m1
mg/L
10
0.001
100
ND
-
ND
ND
Cadmium
Chloride
mg/L
1
2.4
85
ND
Copper
mg/L
0.01
ND
ND
ND
f
Nitrogen, Ammonia
mg/L
mg/L
0.05
0.1
ND
0.56
ND
0.63
ND
1.2
Nitrogen, Nitrate
Potassium
mg/L
0.10
1.5
5.6
0.56
H
I`
Sodium
mg/L
0.10
3.4
10
2.1
Solids, Total Dissolved
mg/L
1
76
ND
520
29
30
ND
Sulfate
mg/L
1
Total Organic Carbon
mg/L
0.50
1.6
7.5
2.5
ND
Zinc
mg/L
0.01
0.020
ND
pH
Units
0.10
7.2
7.8
7.3
I
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Total Organic Halides
mg/L
0.004
ND
ND
ND
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS AND
AROMATICS
1.0
ND
ND
ND
Chloromethane
ug/L
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
ND
Bromomethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
ug/L
1.0
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
ND
Trichlorofluoromethane
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
ND
r
'
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Tampa, Florida
Charlotte, North Carolina
Asheville, North Carolina
An Equal Opportunity Employer
r; a
Asheville, NC 28801
TEL: [phone]
Iowa City, Iowa
San Francisco, California
New York, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
FAX: [phone]
Kansas City, Missouri
Denver,
Colorado
Los Angeles, California

aceN C O R P t1 R A T E D® REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
'. THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Mr. Wes Lowder
Asheville, NC 28801
November
24, 1992
.71 TEL: [phone]
Iowa City, Iowa
Page 2
FAX: [phone]
San Francisco, California
PACE Project
Number: A21029512
Kansas City, Missouri
Client Reference: Waynesville MW's
Los Angeles, California
"w`'
PACE Sample Number:
93 0084303
93 0084311
93 0084320
Date Collected:
By Client
10/29/92
10/29/92
Date Received:
10/29/92
Waynesvill
10/29/92
Waynesvill
10/29/92
Waynesvill
�.J
Client Sample ID:
Landfill
Landfill
Landfill
177,
Parameter
Units
MDL
Well #1
Well #2
Well #3
Lmi
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
1
LAI
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS AND AROMATICS
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
ND
1,1-Dicilloroethylene
ug/L
1.0
ND x;3.8,.%
ND
'`-
1,1-Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
ND
Chloroform
ug/L
ug/L
0.5
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
ND
Carbon Tetrachloride
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Bromodichlormethane
ug/L
ug/L
0.5
1.0
ND
ND
ND
'I
1,2-Dichloropropane
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
ND
1,1,2 -Trichloroethylene
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FIR
Dibromochloromethane
ug/L
0.5
ND
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
u 9/L
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
ug/L
1.0
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether
ug/L
0.5
ND
ND
ND
Bromoform
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethylene
ug/L
0.5
ND
ND
f
Methyl tert-butyl ether
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
+
Benzene
ug/L
ug/L
1.0
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ethyl benzene
ug/L
ug/L
1.0
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Xylenes
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
ug/L
1.0
1.0
ND
ND
ND
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Asheville, NC 28801
Tampa, Florida
Asheville, North Carolina
.71 TEL: [phone]
Iowa City, Iowa
New York, New York
FAX: [phone]
San Francisco, California
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Kansas City, Missouri
Denver, Colorado
Los Angeles, California

paceeREPORT
OF
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
-,
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
Mr. Wes Lowder
November 24, 1992
Page 3
PACE Project Number: A21029512
Client Reference: Waynesville MW's
L_,,i
PACE Sample Number:
93 0084338
93 0084346
93 0084354
Date Collected:
10/29/92
10/29/92
10/29/92
Date Received:
10/29/92
10/29/92
10/29/92
L
Client Sample ID:
Waynesvill
Waynesvill
Waynesvill
Landfill
Landfill
Landfill
Parameter
Units
MDL
Well #4
Well #5
Well #6
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
mg/L
0.1
ND
1.3
5.2
Aluminum
Bacteria, Total Coliform
col/100ml
col/100ml
1
1.1
LTL
-
-
GT23MPN
-
GT23MPN
Bacteria, Total Coliform
mg/L
0.001
NO
ND
0.001
Cadmium
Chloride
mg/L
1
64
64
86
Copper
m9/L
0.01
NO
NO
0.012
Nitrogen, Ammonia
mg/L
mg/L
0.05
0.1
NO
0.91
ND
1.1
0.72
5.2
Nitrogen, Nitrate
Potassium
mg/L
0.10
1.7
3.5
28
Sodium
mg/L
mg/L
0.10
1
20
320
9.7
250
48
640
Solids, Total Dissolved
mg/L
1
27
1.7
150
Sulfate
Total Organic Carbon
mg/L
mg/L
0.50
0.01
7.4
NO
4.2
ND
14
0.058
i
Zinc
pH
Units
0.10
7.0
6.7
7.1
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Total Organic Halides
mg/L
0.004
0.048
NO
0.034
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS AND AROMATICS
1.0
NO
ND
NO
Chloromethane
ug/L
ug/L
1.0
NO
NO
NO
Bromomethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ug/L
1.0
ND
NO
NO
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
ug/L
1.0
1.0
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
NO
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
ug/L
1.0
NO
ND
NO
Trichlorofluoromethane
u
1.0
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,1-Dichloroethylene
u9/L
9/L
ug/L
1.0
1.0
NO
ND
7.6
NO
1,1-Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ug/L'
1.0
NO
ND
NO
54 Ravenscroft Drive Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Tampa, Florida
Charlotte, North Carolina
Asheville, North Carolina
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Asheville, NC 28801
TEL: [phone]
Iowa City, Iowa
San Francisco, California
New York, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
FAX: [phone]
Kansas City, Missouri
Denver, Colorado
Los Angeles, California

- J pace.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
{
Mr. Wes Lowder
Charlotte, North Carolina An Equal Opportunity Employer
Asheville, NC 28801
November 24, 1992
PACE Project Number: A21029512
�9
Page 4
Iowa City, Iowa
New York, New York
FAX: [phone]
San Francisco, California
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
uKansas
Client Reference: Waynesville MW's
Denver, Colorado
Los Angeles, California
PACE Sample Number:
93 0084338
93 0084346
93 0084354
Date Collected:
10/29/92
10/29/92
10/29/92
Date Received:
10/29/92
Waynesvill
10/29/92
Waynesvill
10/29/92
Waynesvill
Client Sample ID:
Landfill
Landfill
Landfill
Parameter
Units
MDL
Well #4
Well #5
Well #6
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS AND AROMATICS
ug/L
0.5
ND
NO
NO
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
1.0
ND
NO
ND
ill
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
ug/L
1.0
1.0
NO
NO
ND
NO
ND
ND
Carbon Tetrachloride
ug/L
ug/L
0.5
ND
NO
NO
Bromodichlormethane
ug/L
1.0
ND
NO
NO
1,2-Dichloropropane
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
ug/L
1.0
1.0
NO
ND
NO
NO
NO
NO
1,1,2 -Trichloroethylene
ug/L
0.5
ND
NO
NO
'r_
Dibromochloromethane
ug/L
1.0
NO
NO
ND
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
NO
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether
ug/L
1.0
ND
NDO
ND
r
Bromoform
ug/L
ug/L
0.5
1.0
NO
NO
ND
NO
ND
NO
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethylene
ug/L
0.5
ND
NO
NO
Methyl tert-butyl ether
ug/L
1.0
1.0
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
ND
Benzene
ug/L
ug/L
1.0
ND
NO
NO
71
Toluene
Lai
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
ug/L
1.0
1.0
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
NO
Ethyl benzene
u
1.0
NO
ND
NO
Xylenes
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
ug/LL
g/
1.0
ND
NO
NO
NO
ND
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
ug/L
1.0
1.0
ND
NO
ND
NO
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
F-1
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Charlotte, North Carolina An Equal Opportunity Employer
Asheville, NC 28801
Tampa, Florida
Asheville, North Carolina
<=a TEL: [phone]
Iowa City, Iowa
New York, New York
FAX: [phone]
San Francisco, California
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
uKansas
City, Missouri
Denver, Colorado
Los Angeles, California

mei
N C 0 R P O B A T E o REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
7W9 THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
Mr. Wes Lowder
Page 5
Client Reference: Waynesville MW's
These data have been reviewed and are approved for release.
'L J
Barbara M. Miller
Supervisor, Inorganic Chemistry
Walt bh^ L. Miller
Regional Director
L
17
F79
November 24, 1992
PACE Project Number: A21029512
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Charlotte, North Carolina An Equal Opportunity Employe)
Asheville, NC 28801
Tampa, Florida
Asheville, North Carolina
TEL: [phone]
Iowa City, Iowa
San Francisco, California
New York, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
FAX: [phone]
Lj
Kansas City, Missouri
Denver, Colorado
Los Angeles, California

q paces
. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
.l iJ
Mr. Wes Lowder FOOTNOTES
Page 6 for pages 1 through
Client Reference: Waynesville MW's
GT Greater than.
LT Less than.
MDL Method Detection Limit
ND Not detected at or above the MDL.
i
L
�J
November 24, 1992
5 PACE Project Number: A21029512
`_- 54 Ravenscroft Drive
Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Charlotte, North Carolina An Equal Opportunity Employer
Asheville, NC 28801
Tampa, Florida
Asheville, North Carolina
=! TEL: [phone]
Iowa City, Iowa
New York, New York
r
FAX: [phone]
San Francisco, California
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Kansas City Missouri
Denver, Colorado
_-J '
Los Angeles, California

� O
n m ¢
w
F �
t ? Q
o > w -' Q
w to ~
}
,mow 7 (r a < V
..42 ¢ a w ¢cr
a
L.u,v : ~ tw-
O
ll'occ o` o
. •
i 'c } w V
=' co `2 �
o J
� C7
W
w � m
w W V ?
w O Q
D m u 2
r E LL.
Q.
-
a
p
J
�aQ
•o �
O �
�
a
Q
o
Z
o
-
C
f .0 3
Q
W
a
Q
\
3
p
Q
E
i
3
E
E
o
O_
w as
~ o n
c( 07 _ � a
u y E
O 01 A
O J O N
O
-
-
3
Q
o
-
o
-
0
¢
A
e
o
W
a
Q
N
�
Q
0
i
3
E
E
o
0
0
E°
i
a
E
O
¢
O
`m
0
I
E
E
•
v
_
_
E
a
=
¢
�
O-
m
O
W
c
v
r
L
Cn
¢
LL
O
0
U
•
!n
W
.
Y
u,
a
®
Z
Q
LL
Cm
ui
.-v
J
G
N
O
Cl
W
a
m
a
a:¢
a
O
Y
y.
D
!2
¢
O
Z
Q
W
•
y
C
up
C
O
I--
�
O
cco
O
m
C
Wc
J
O:
a
Et
°
y
a
a
O
Co
0
¢
N
3
z
N
O
0
Lt.
Z
a
(DE
-
-
-
-
o
-
o
e
o
Y
C
•
Q
E
Q
0
i
E
E
E
0
0
0
E°
i
a
E
O
0
E
E
•
v
_
_
E
a
=
Z.
•
Yoc
�
<
0
W
�
V
•
L
Ir
Qi
�
d
.A
`
•
t
.
Y
u,
a
®
c
0
c
O
Cl
W
a
i
W
•
=
e
p
G
O:
a
��
E
.
N
••
�
'
O
Gcb
N
z
J
N
N
<
<
I
U
(•i
o
U
W
Z
Y
I
u
Z
Z
i
N
N
•
•
v
4
�
v
e
b
e
v
IRS
V
o
L'
O
O
<
�
m
u
<
4
—
o
'
-
-
-
-
o
-
o
e
o
a
Q
E
Q
0
i
E
E
E
0
0
0
E°
a
E
E
E
E
E
E
Yoc
�
N
�
V
•
O
�
�
d
.A
`
�
t
.
Y
0
c
0
�
w
e
p
',
2
a
��
E
.
N
••
�
'
O
Gcb
N
z
J
N
N
<
<
m
U
(•i
U
U
W
Z
Y
I
u
Z
Z
i
N
N
n
4
n
b
e
v
IRS
V
o
-
-
-
-
o
-
o
e
o
a
o
E
o
0
i
E
E
E
0
0
0
E°
a
E
E
E
E
E
E
0
0
c
0
�
2
'
O
4
N
a
°
I
u
a
w
0
�
•
o
e
IRS
V
�
o
o
'
o
•
•
w
a
n
0
0
ntc
o
p
=J-_
a
a
Z
.O
c
o
U
G
.
±
p
o
Q
o
o
O
0
o
0
0
0
0
z•-
.
E
2
0
p
n
O
r
N
O
.if
'A
o
f<
U
r0
•O
u
U
u
u
u
a
m
U
•
_
•
i
'
u
�
Z
Z
O•
2
N
D
•
C
O
d
e
_
•
�
•
•
G
Q
7
7
=
Y
O
-
o
-
E
E
E
o
a
E
Z
i
E
E
E
E
E
E°
a
E
0
0
�
°
I
u
a
0
0
�
•
o
e
v
�
o
o
o
•
•
w
=J-_
m
U
G
.
±
p
•
Q
o
o
O
0
o
0
0
0
0
z•-
.
E
2
0
m
U
U
U
u
o
f<
U
<`
u
U
u
u
u
!MME

UIN /DEH LABORATORY VOLATILES ANALYTICAL REPORT
IR 110. 20 38 .
REPORTED BY ` SUPERVISOR
CHECKED BY DATE
REVIEWED BY ENTERED BY
CHECKED BY
S At 1PLE TYPE : WATER ANALYSIS RESULTS
CASs V0A Target Compound
96-18-4 1,2,3-Trichbr2prop
108-86-1 Rrornot*nzme
_95-49-8 2-Chbrotokwe_
TOL Conc
ug/l Detected
1
106-43-4 4-Chlorotoiuene
I CAS* VOA Target Compound
TOL
Com
0.25
U
ug/L Detected
025
1
95-50-1 1-Dichlorobctuene
qn n
U
96-12-812-Dibromo-3-Chlor a
7 5
_
1_20-82-1 1 4-Trichlorobmtne
1-75-09-21t-ietNlemChloride
035
U
0.25
1 156-60-51trans- l .2-Uichloroethene 0.75
F3=34-3 1, 1-Dich};oethsne 023
I U
11
r
590-20-7 2 2-Dichior ane
0.25
Dibrwar*thw*
1
156-5, 4 cis-1.2-Dichioroeth_ene
0.25_6.6
E
ry
_ 67-66-3 Chloroform
0.25 L
U
0.25
74-47-518romoohioromtthane
0.751
1 U
i
2 j1 -Trichloroethane
X7,1E81,
0.251 U
trs- l 3-Dichlor o
an
563l-Dichior ne
0.751
10.75
U
100-42-5 S rtr*
56-23-51Carbon Tttrachloride
U
U
CASs V0A Target Compound
96-18-4 1,2,3-Trichbr2prop
108-86-1 Rrornot*nzme
_95-49-8 2-Chbrotokwe_
TOL Conc
ug/l Detected
1
106-43-4 4-Chlorotoiuene
0.23
U '
541-73-1 t 3-Dichlorobenztne
0.25
U
106-46-714-Dichlorobtnzww
025
0.54
95-50-1 1-Dichlorobctuene
0.25
U
96-12-812-Dibromo-3-Chlor a
i
U
1_20-82-1 1 4-Trichlorobmtne
0.23
U
87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene
0.25
U
A7-6 t -6 1 2 3-Trichiorrbrnrrn#
0.75
1 U
r j07-06-2
.)79-01-6
,2-Dichioroethane
Trichbr"ttb"
i 025
0.25
0.
0.35H-4
1634-04-4 Mt 1-tert-but 1 ether
71-43-2 Stnzene
5
1
U
U
78-87-5
1 c -Dihioropr
0.25
U
108-88-3 Tokw*
1
U
.5-27-4
8romodichloromethane
0.25
U
100-41-4 E lbtnztne
1
U
1 74-95-3
Dibrwar*thw*
1
U
kn
108-38-3 m es
i
U
110061-01-5
ois-1 3-Diohbropropene
0.25
U
95-47-6 o -X kne _
i
U
D061-02-6
trs- l 3-Dichlor o
an
ne 0.25
U
100-42-5 S rtr*
1
U
79-00-51
12 -Trichloroethane
0.25
U
98-82-8 benzene
1
U
127-18-4
Tetrachbroethem
10.25
028
103-65-1 n -Pr benzene
1
U
142-28-9
1 3-Dichkr ane
0.25
U
108-67-8 1 3 5-Trime benzene
1
U
124-48-1
Dibromochbrw*thane
0.75
U
98-06-6 tort -But benzene
1
U
t 06-93-4
1-D�bromoethane
i
U
95-63-6 1,2,4 -Trines lbenzene
1
U
t 108-90-71Chbben
rozene
0.25
0.38
135-98-8 se-c-eu nzer*
lbe
1
U
I 6-,0-20-61.1,1
175-25-2
,1?-Tetrachbroethx0.25
Brornoform 1
U
�U
tsoe
99-87-6 p_opyttokxne _ _
104-51-8 n -But btnztne
1
i
_ U
U 1
79-34-5
1 1.2 -Tetrachbroethan#0_75
U
91-20-3 th:kne
1
U
LA
TQL- target quantitation limit
T- ttntativtly identified oompound
L-1 E- eatimetcd Talue
U- f mpour4 was -inalyzed for but
not dcttoted
N- not analyzed for this compound
D- dtttottd below quantitation limit
S
1 t- - X -GUMS analysis performed
TQL sub jtat to chwgt due to instrument sensitivity
COMMENTS :
J
Cow
Other purgeablts (up to 10 highest ptsks) Detected
ug/L
2 UNIDENTFIED PEAKS DETECTED BY OC/ELCD
3 LIN IDENTFIED PEAKS DETECTED BY Or,/PID

ri
a
V
0
c
O
0
'^ U
N
lu.
a
C
m
E
0
U
0
R
J
L) �
a
1
i
¢
w
c
m �
�
O
a e
E
m ,
co
i W J
> m `
�-
r Q
w
Vt
V
o E_
c
UJ
z
m g
CL
W ¢
w
a
2
E
Q
o
m J L
"Ooz2 J
a J
e V
L.�
vts
7
U w e
3
1 J
t p
w <
W .�
w
a Q
Jak W�
❑ ¢
.�
TL
CL
I�q
'r
- t0
w e
a
C
? 7
E e�
o
cr
w
_
�
o
6
f
G m
O
J O N
O �
¢FIM
U
0
jlw
CIAcr
cc 0
a
cc
¢ EY
�► N
C7
m o V
O t v
0
a v r-
zO
JI 'O
m 2
0 O
U
a o F
?
¢
m C s
U LNiJ
LL
Q m
3
Q 0 m J
_
N
_,�
N Q
Q N i, ¢
a
m
a o Z
6 Y p_ Q
< <
o m Q
�
G w
c 0n J
O G C
Q E a�
Z r
a N JO W
m U LL
= m -
o
r
¢ 3 N
ri
a
V
0
c
O
0
'^ U
N
lu.
a
C
m
E
0
U
0
R
J

77 ..
EHNR/DEH LABORATORY YOLATiLES ANALYTICAL REPORT
tB NO. 2G 40
REPORTED BY i SUPERYISOR
,m- CHECKED BY DATE �
REViEI/ED BY ENTERED BY 1
CFIECYED BY __4f�l_
SAMPLE TYPE: VATER ANALYSIS RESULTS
CAS* VOA Target Compound Tp. CorsoCAS* VOA Target Compound TOL Conn
ug/L Detected
I /L ugh Detected F
!7i-H69-
1-Dk?►lorotth#r* 0.73 /L
U 9b- i 8-4 1 3-7rfchtorant O Z3 Ue hne Chloride 0.25 U 108-86-1 Bromobenzene 1
156-60-5 trans-1-Diohloroetherre 0.75 U U
45-49-8 2-Chbrotok�rnt 0.25 U
73-34-311.1-Dichbrotth 025 0.62 106-43-4 4-Chlorotoiuene 0
590-20-7 2 2-Cich ane 0.25 U 541-73-1 1 3-Dichlorobentene U
I 156-59-4 cis -1 2-Diohlorotthtnt 025 t. t 0.25 D 11
i E 106-46-7 1 4 -Dichlorobenzene 0.25 0.62
b7-66-3 Chloroform
F 025 U 93-50-1 1-Diohlorobenzene 0.25 0.32
1..I 74-97-51 BromochioromethW* 0.75 U 96-12-812-Dibromo-3-Chlor
71-5_5-6 111,1-Trichioroe_thane 025 1 U
_ U 120-82- I 1 4-Trichlorobenzent 025 U
563-58-6 1 t-Dichtoro a 0.25 U 87-68-31 iexachlorobutadiene
I 56-23-51Carbon Tetrachloride 0.75 0 U
--- — -- ------ U 87-61-6 1 3-Trichiorobenzene 0.75 U
�07-06-2 1 Di�;hlaroethane 025 U 1634-04-4 Me }-tea-t-but 1 etfier S
79-01-61 Trichloroeth" U
0.25 0.25 71-43-2 Brruent 1 U
78-87-5�1-Dichbroprupane 0.251 U 108-88-3 Tohxrk 1
$romodichiorornethane - 7 U
U 100-41-4 Et ]benzene 1 U
I 74-95-31Dibrornwethano I i U I 108 -AB -31m -X 1en•s
0061-01-5 cis-1.3-Dichbr i 1 U I
1_--•-- �_ 025 _ _ U _ 95-47-6 o-}t�iene 1 U
h0061-02-61trans-1 3-Dichloro r ne 0.25 — U 100 -4? -5 St rene
79 -Ctrl -5 1,1,2-Trichlorotthant 0 2S98-
127-18-4
1 U
U 98-lbtnztne 1 U
i 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethtm 025 0.87 103 -65 -1n -Pr btnztne
ttw 142-28-9 1 3-Diohlor ane 0.25 1 U
U 108-67-8 1 3 5 -Trim► ibrnzent i U
I 124-48-1 D>7+romoohioron-*thane 0.75
U
98
106-93-4 1-D�romoethane -�-6 ttrt-But lbenzent 1 U
1 U 95-63-6 1 4-Trimeth benzene 1
f 108-90-7 Chbrobsnztnt 025 0.53 135 -99 -Ss
U I
630-20-6 1_,l 12 -Tetrachloroethane D.23 U 99-87-6 Lc p yk i U
�— 75-'?5-2�Bromoform - ---0�0--�-1— _ 1 U
1 U 104-51-8 n -But lbenztne 1 U
L- 79-34-5 1 1 2 2-Tttrachtoroethane 10.75 U 91-20-3 ttuknt
1 U
TOL- target quantitation limit Cono
Other purgeables (up to 10 highest peaks) Detected
T- ttntatireiy identified conVound
E- tstimattd wtut 1 LIN IDE ITFIED PEAK DETECTED BY OCIPID U9
U- oompound was analyre-d for but
not dettottd
N- not analyzed for this oompound
f D- detected below Quantitation limit
MS- X--M/MS analysfs performed
TOL subject to ch" dut to instrument sensitfrfty
COtItIENTS:

F-
w
a
u
i
il.
`
O
w
�
1'
L
0
tm
A
L
a
6
1
-
lL U-
�V
?� 05-
`
Z t
6
44Q
j
t
_
.
• •y -
o
JS
v� a
O
a
�
a.
C
Eo N
?
o
14c
I
(
I
p►
N N
m
S.
r.
o
C
c
CB
V
w
ZJF4Z
2`
�x.-w
1
_"
LU
=Q
w
J
CO
�•4 m
Q
V
c
�m
za Na.
c c c c c c
c ZZ c c4< c c
a�rn�a�rnrnv>,rncmmcnmCr) cmm
w
I
. 1 1 1 1 ,. 1
I
I
I
cO
o-
¢
mow
coo
0
Z
Z Z Z
c
c
F-
w
a
u
U
ol
LL LL I
E
c� 0
G-3
mC9
ni
C d C O
E_9EV
0 > A2
IL
C — J4
E Q
r+ - E
Z o.
J `� �U w
C _
ra a ID_
toa'F��
I
CD cn cm
�•'
i
il.
`
O
w
�
1'
L
0
U
ol
LL LL I
E
c� 0
G-3
mC9
ni
C d C O
E_9EV
0 > A2
IL
C — J4
E Q
r+ - E
Z o.
J `� �U w
C _
ra a ID_
toa'F��
I
CD cn cm
�•'
i
il.
`
1'
tm
A
L
LL
6
1
lL U-
�V
?� 05-
`
Z t
6
44Q
j
t
_
.
• •y -
o
a
�
a.
Eo N
?
o
S.
r.
o
C
c
CB
o
N
ZJF4Z
2`
�x.-w
1
_"
'
CO
�•4 m
8v
za Na.
c c c c c c
c ZZ c c4< c c
a�rn�a�rnrnv>,rncmmcnmCr) cmm
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
.. . . 1 . . 1
. 1 1 1 1 ,. 1
CL
I cz I I
Z
ch CU 0 0 jai
NO cr)C� C .0 .. B'_ me
OZ_2'E-9— E Q -c ` ca m
Z v ¢�UU.E� o�CL
zfa- UUUti2Y::2Z
c N� C-- =-- c�� c 02z--�
EcEEEEEEE�EE
I I I I I I I 1 1� I I
Ld
Q
0
LU
F-
cn
tE
2
cn
S
F-
N
S
w
U
E5
v
w
0
il.
A
L
LL
6
1
lL U-
�V
?� 05-
Ld
Q
0
LU
F-
cn
tE
2
cn
S
F-
N
S
w
U
E5
v
w
0

6c
LU
coz
t -
Q
LLICL
a
I
z
C w
m
r 2
� c �
0
w
I t
l)a
w _
C3 Z5
LU
z 15
Eli cc
4
w
El
0
,V-**,
0
.s�
I
\ \ \ \ \ \
cm cm cm
EEE 333
�i
0
1L
rn a� � rn a�rn rn� a�rn rn a� rn rn rn
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
I I - 2CL
ca —I-- EO tea,
N E.�E"�- 2'3aic�3E
ZOoE-�ca�EQ"c uc�dcac
v a) -&;R -c- M CL
c, O ,
zz�Qm08UUIi=Ym:2z
rnE E
Eoo
T T
C,< Nq-, c-- =.z c-, iz-- 4r-- Nl<l<
E�EEEEEEE=EE
I I. IS I I
U
0
LL LL
!
v
d
o
0
r
t�
uo
$etc-�i
U-
£
F•-
C
c_
j ccd
c
00
U
QQ
VC�?�n.�
c
.►
oc
U
Zr
o
e _
v
.'
z
C9 C-6
C3
o -91 y
a a >
Ao s'�q
uhf SSi z
_
..
\ \ \ \ \ \
cm cm cm
EEE 333
�i
0
1L
rn a� � rn a�rn rn� a�rn rn a� rn rn rn
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
I I - 2CL
ca —I-- EO tea,
N E.�E"�- 2'3aic�3E
ZOoE-�ca�EQ"c uc�dcac
v a) -&;R -c- M CL
c, O ,
zz�Qm08UUIi=Ym:2z
rnE E
Eoo
T T
C,< Nq-, c-- =.z c-, iz-- 4r-- Nl<l<
E�EEEEEEE=EE
I I. IS I I
r-
U
H
Q
0
Q
w
LL
=J
a
cc
cn
H
w
U
;�
B
.c
CD
W
c
LU
cc
n'
CD
v
r
t�
uo
$etc-�i
U-
£
F•-
cb
7
U- ti
j ccd
c
00
U
QQ
VC�?�n.�
r-
U
H
Q
0
Q
w
LL
=J
a
cc
cn
H
w
U
;�
B
.c
CD
W
c
LU
cc
n'
CD

r� {
PIC O R P O R A T E D
ace. REPORT -OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
INI ASS U6ANII Of eUAIIt1
Waynesville (Town of)
300 Walnut Trail
Waynesville, NC 28786
Attn: Mr. David Smith
Client Reference: Monitoring Wells
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter
r,�;
c
Units MDL
February 06, 1992
PACE Project Number: A2011
93 0002366 93 0002374
01/13/92 01/13/92
01/13/92 01/13/92
MW #2 MW #4
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
L
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS-601
Date Analyzed
012792
012792
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
1,1,2 -Trichloroethylene
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
1719
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/L
1.0::..12.4`
ND
1,1-Dichloroethylene
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
79
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
ug/L'
1.0
ND
ND
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
1,2-Dichloropropane
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
Bromodichlormethane
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
Dibromochloromethane
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
WIA
Bromoform
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
Bromomethane
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
Irm
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
LAW
Carbon Tetrachloride
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
PON
Chloroform
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
Trichlorofluoromethane ':
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
Chloromethane
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
Chloroethane
ug/L
1.0
ND
ND
Methylene chloride
ug/L
1.0
ND
tND__
MDL Method Detection Limit
r•..,
ND Not detected at or above
the MDL."
! FEB % f992 !
r
r
54 Ravenscrolt Drive Offices Serving: Minneapo(s, Minnesota
AAeville, NC 28801 Tampa, Ebrida
Charlotte, North Carolina
Asheville, North Carolina
An Equal Opporlunily Employer'
11`1� 704 754 7178
Ury but ',2nr 111
Iowa City, Iowa
New York, New York

PN
a Cie.
C o R P o R T E 0 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
18t At....... 0t oUAtrly
LJ,
Mr. David Smith
Page 2 February 06, 1992
PACE Project Number: A2011'
f� Client Reference: Monitoring Wells
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS-601
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Tetrachloroethylene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
PURGEABLE AROMATICS -602
Date Analyzed
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene
1,3-DichTorobenzene
F-9 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
PHENOLS
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2 -Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4 -Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
Llmil 2-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
1 2,4,6 -Trichlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol
ug/L
1.0
93 0002366
93 0002374
ug/L
1.0
01/13/92
01/13/92
ug/L
1.0
01/13/92
01/13/92
Units
MDL
MW X12
MW #4
ug/L
1.0
NO
NO
ug/L
1.0
NO
NO
ug/L
1.0
NO
NO
ug/L
1.0
NO
NO
ug/L
1.0
ug/L
1.0
ug/L
1.0
ug/L
1.0
ug/L
1.0
ug/L
1.0
ug/L
1.0
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
-'; ug/L
ug/L
HALOETHERS
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ug/L
LA' MDL Method Detection Limit
NO Not detected at or above the MDL.
5
5
15
15
15
5
5
15
1
012792
N-3,
+At
t2
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
012792
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
j
54 Ra N 2 Drive
Asheville.
M1 NC 27176
offices Serrinp: MirureepAS, Minnesota
T+mp+.Florida
Charlotte, North Carolina An Equal opportunity Employes
7
I TE[: 704 254•)176
Asheville, North Carolina ,
FAX: [phone]
Iowa City, Iowa
New York, New York
San Francisco, Calirornis
Pirtsburph, Pennsylvania
Kansas City, Missouri
Denver, Colorado

P
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
cice.-
IME ASSURANCE OF OYAllty
Mr. David Smith
Page 3
Client Reference: Monitoring Wells
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
HALOETHERS
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
4-Bromophenyl prenyl ether
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
February 06, 1992
PACE Project Number: A2
93 0002366 93 0002374
01/13/92 01/13/92
01/13/92 01/13/92
MW #2 MW #4
Units MDL
ug/L I ND ND
ug/L 1 ND ND
ug/L 2 ND ND
ug/L 2 ND ND
MDL Method Detection Limit
ND Not detected at or above the MDL.
These data have been reviewed and are approved for release.
i"
Walte L. Miller
Regional Director
54 Flavenscrolt Drive 011icss Sarva ng: Minneapolis. Minnesota Marietta. North Carolina An Equal Opportunity EqV oyer
Asheville, NC 28801 Tampa, Florida AshevRfe, North Carolina
TEL: [phone] tow& City. Iowa Now York, New York
FAX: [phone] San Francisco, California Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania