WQ0024725_Staff Report_20190114

S:u
State of North Carolina
La
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
To: ❑ NPDES Unit[K Non-Dischar ege Unit Application No.: (W00024725)
Attn: (Ranveer Katyal) Facility name: 714 Ferguson Rd SFR
Orange County
From: (Gary Kreiser)
Choose an item. Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non-discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non-
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or❑No
a. Date of site visit: 12/07/2018
b. Site visit conducted by: Gary Kreiser
c. Inspection report attached? ❑ Yes or❑ No
d. Person contacted: and their contact information: ext.
e. Driving directions:
2. Discharge Point(s):
Latitude: Longitude:
Latitude: Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
Classification:
River Basin and Sub-basin No.
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
II. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit)
Proposed flow: -
Current permitted flow:
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ❑ Yes or❑No
If no, explain:
3. Are site conditions(soils, depth to water table, etc.) consistent with the submitted reports? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site(property lines, wells, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑No❑N/A
If no,please explain:
FORM:WQROSSR04-14 Page 1 of

5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
6. Are the proposed application rates(e.g.,hydraulic,nutrient) acceptable? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment,storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or❑No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals,will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions(Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme:
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
11. Pretreatment Program(POTWs only):
III.EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge(ORCs) for the facility? ❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A
ORC: Certificate#: Backup ORC: Certificate#:
2. Are the design,maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
Description of existing facilities:
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know(i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.)
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils,topography, depth to water table, etc.) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit(e.g., drainage added,new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes,please explain:
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates(e.g., hydraulic,nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
S. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ N/A
If no,please explain:
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 5

11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BRAS? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please complete the following ex and table if necessary):
Monitoring Well Latitude Longitude
O , II O ,
11
O , „ O ,
11
O , „ O. ,
11
O , „ O ,
11
O , „ O ,
11
12. Has a review of all self-monitoring data been conducted(e.g.,DMR,NDMR,NDAR, GW)? ❑ Yes or❑No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review:
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑Yes or❑ No
If yes,please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
❑No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e.,NOV,NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle,please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If yes,please explain:
16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
17. Pretreatment Program(POTWs only):
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 5

IV.REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or® No
If yes,please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non-Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item Reason
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
5. Recommendation: ❑Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
❑Deny(Pleas state reasons: )
6. Signature of report preparers - /
Signature of regional supervisor:
Date:
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 Page 4 of 5

V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
An inspection was performed on 12/7/18. The number listed in BIMS has been disconnected. Mr. CraPes#is 919-
960-5060. The septic tank has not been pumped since the permit was issued. Recommended that the tank be pumped
and effluent filter cleaned. There were no chlorine tablets in the chlorinator. The ones that Mr. CraPes had had og tten
wet and dissolved. He has ordered more and the tablets would be there the next day. Mr. Crapps showed an email of
conf=tion of the order. The pun tank and audible and visual alarm were functional. The irrigation field has 9
Wray risers. Two of the shy heads were not operational and some of the other ones were stuck and not rotating.
Mr. CraPes will need to repair the two nonfunctioning heads and do maintenance on the others. The two-strand wire
was broken in several locations. The fence will need to be repaired.The permit shows two setback waivers: one from
the western property line(75 feet)and the northem property(50 feet).
An NOD was issued for the following:
Irrigation area not completely functional.
no fence around irrigation area.
On 1/14/19,Mr. CraPes emailed pictures showing repairs made to the system, new chlorine tablets and receipt that
septic tank had been pumped. It appears that the NOD has been resolved.
Approximate center of irrigation area is: 35.884806, -79.155631
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 Page 5 of 5