20090841 Ver 1_401 Application_20090809

DR. J.H. CARTER III & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 891 • Southern Pines, N.C. 28388
[phone] 9 Fax [phone]
31 July 2009
Mr. Ian McMillan
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650

10?
Dear Mr. McMillan:
0 4 - 0 A 4 ?
Qc?@c?ne?I
AUG 4 2009
WETLANDS AND STORM A EAR BRANCH
Enclosed is a permit application for isolated wetland impacts at the proposed Pittman Crossing
development near Barbeque in western Harnett County, North Carolina (see attached maps). I've
enclosed 5 copies and a check in the amount of $240.00 in this packet. Two copies include full-sized
maps at a scale of 1 inch = 100 feet. Though 1 inch = 50 feet is recommended, it is not required and
this small project that has been clearly depicted on the drawings provided. The remaining 3 copies
include 11 x 17-inch sheets. I have also included a CD of the maps to further assist in your review.
In general, the proposed project will impact wetlands in order to construct an access road and a
few adjacent lots. The project has avoided impacts to streams and 404 jurisdictional wetlands onsite.
The impact is restricted to the edges of an isolated wetland near road frontage on the property. Ronnie
Smith of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers visited the site in June 2009 for a jurisdictional
determination. Jurisdictional waters and wetlands were limited to the western side of the parcel. An
old agriculture ditch onsite was determined to be non-wetland/ stream. The isolated wetland was also
addressed in a 2006 determination (see Action ID numbers enclosed in the application). Total project
impacts to non-404 wetlands are approximately 0.49 acre.
Please review the enclosed permit application and contact me if you need any additional
information. Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Jennifer M. Archambault
Wildlife Biologist
Endangered Species Surveys • Environmental Assessments • Land Management • Wetlands Mapping and Permitting
p9-p 84 1
0'- \N AT RQG
?' II.JWV

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.0 November 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing " `?-...._
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
? Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
..
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ® Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

® Yes ? No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Pittman Crossing
2b. County: Harnett
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Sanford
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: N/A DENR-WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS ANDSTORMWATERBRANCH
3. Owner Information
3a. Name on Recorded Deed: Mitzi Gizmo & Associates, Inc.
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 02515, page 0150
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Attn to Mr. John Cooper
3d. Street address: 2505 Dairymple Street
3e. City, state, zip: Sanford, NC 27332
3f. Telephone no.: 919-777-0820
3g. Fax no.: 919-777-0835
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
Section A. Applicant Information, continued
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Jennifer M. Archambault
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Dr. J. H. Carter III & Associates, Inc.
5c. Street address: 515 - F Midland Rd.
5d. City, state, zip: Southern Pines, NC 28387
5e. Telephone no.: 910-695-1043
5f. Fax no.: 910-695-3317
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 9588-53-8402.000
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 35.353534`N - 79.046664`W
1 c. Property size: 33.5 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Big Branch
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 03030004)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Approximately 2/3 of the parcel is fallow agricultural fields and the remainder is forested. General land use in the vicinity
consists of a patchy landscape of agriculture and forested land.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
approximately 6.16 acres (includes 404 jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetlands)
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
0. Riparian wetlands associated with Big Branch are located on the parcel, however, the stream is on adjacent property.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Development of the parcel for residential use.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will include some land clearing and grading, construction of roads and construction of homes and attending
features. 0.49 acre of isolated wetland will be filled in order to construct a main road into the parcel and make 3 adjacent
lots buildable. Most of the wetland will be undisturbed and left as open space in the subdivision. Standard heavy
equipment will be used, including bulldozers, graders, dump trucks, etc. Wetland impacts will be restricted to the isolated
wetland onsite for construction of an entrance road and lot development.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property Yes ? No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: JCA, Inc.
Name (if known): William Mullin Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
6/25/09 - SAW 2009-01038. Addresses jurisdictional wetlands on the western side of the parcel. All wetlands onsite
were delineated.
2/6/06 - Action ID 2006-00453 (different delineator) identified isolated wetland onsite near the eastern edge of the parcel
adjacent to Rosser-Pittman Rd. The isolated wetland was identified, but not delineated. A copy was not available to JCA
to include with this package. If needed, please contact Ronnie Smith at the USACE [phone].
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ®No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or impact (if known) DWQ - non-404, other)
Temporary T
W1 ® P ? T fill isolated,
herbaceous ? Yes ® No ? Corps
® DWQ 0.49
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.49
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f.
Stream impact Type of Stream name Perennial (PER) or Average stream width (feet) Impact
number - impact intermittent (INT)? length
Permanent (P) or (linear feet)
Temporary (T)
S1 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
S2 ?P?T ?PER ?INT
S3 ?P?T ?PER ?INT
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
S5 ?P?T ?PER ?INT
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
3g. Total stream and tributary impacts 0
3h. Comments: N/A
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all o en water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
- Permanent (if
(P) or applicable)
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts 0
4g. Comments: N/A
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction pro osed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ® Other: Cape Fear
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact (square Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) for impact Stream name mitigation feet) (square feet)
or Temporary required?
T
131 EIPEIT El Yes [-]No
62 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
133 EIPEIT El Yes [:]No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: N/A
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Jurisdictional riparian wetlands (and adjacent stream) on the western side of the parcel were completely avoided in the
project design. The initial development design included filling the entire isolated wetland on the eastern side of the
parcel. After review of the site with environmental consultants and the USACE, the project design was revised to allow
most of the isolated wetland to remain undisturbed as open space. Impacts were restricted to the edge of the isolated
wetland to allow construction of a road and effective development of the adjacent lots. Additionally, lot boundaries were
revised to exclude most of the wetland in order to reduce future opportunities for an individual lot owner to impact
wetlands.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Appropriate erosion control measures will be used , the site will be accessed from uplands and most of the forested
uplands will be left in place.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank
? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm, cool, cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h.. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation, continued
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
Total buffer mitigation required:
6c. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6d. Comments:
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? ? Yes ? No
2. Determination if the Project Requires a Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Does the project require a Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit? ® Yes ? No
2b. Is the project subject to General Certification 3704 or 3705? ? Yes ® No
3. Determination of Stormwater Review Jurisdiction
3a. Is this project subject to any of the following state-implemented stormwater ? Coastal counties
management programs (check all that apply)? ? HQW
? ORW
If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the DWQ and one copy of the ? Session Law 2006-246
approved stormwater management plan. ? Other:
3b. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Harnett County
3c. Is this local government certified to implement a state stormwater program? ? Yes ® No
If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the local government and one copy
of the approved stormwater management plan (or one copy of the approved
Stormwater management plan stamped as approved).
4. Information Required for DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
4a. What is the overall percent imperviousness according to the most current site plan? 3.65 acres or 11.0%
4b. Does this project contain any areas that meet the criteria for "high density" per ? Yes ® No
General Certifications 3704 and 3705?
4c. If the site is over 24% impervious and/or contains high density areas, then provide a brief narrative description of the
stormwater management plan.
N/A
4d. Has a completed BMP Supplement Form with all required items been submitted ? Yes ? No
for each stormwater BMP?
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project is not likely to cause cumulative impacts to downstream water quality. It is a relatively small, residential
development with no commercial aspect and proposed construction is largely in uplands and away from 404 wetlands
and waters.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Homes will be on individual septic systems and Harnett County water.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information, continued
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
?
Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program GIS data and database. Also, no protected species were observed during site visits,
however, specific surveys were not conducted.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh-coral/ims/viewer.htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Accessed the State Historic Preservation Office via http://www.hpo.dcr.state.nc.us/, however, did not request specific site
information
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? AWCK, Inc. Engineers and Surveyors. Site map
indicates the 100-year floodplain is located on the western side of the parcel, however, all subdivided lot lines have been
kept out of the 100-year floodplain.
Jennifer M. Archambault
7-31-09
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name A licant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's sin ture is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant Date
is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
08/03/2009 02:20 919-777-0835 COLDWELL BANKER SE PAGE 02102
N
Southeastern
Properties and Development Company
8-3-09
To Whom It May Concern:
Dr. J. H. Carter III & Associates, Inc. is authorized to prepare and submit the necessary
permits for the proposed Pittman Crossing development near. Barbeque, Harnett County,
North Carolina Additionally, this letter grants pea',znission to federal and state regulatory
authorities to conduct site visits an our property to evaluate wetland boundaries and
project impacts.
Co
2505 Dalrymple Street • Sanford, North Carolina 27332
Office: 919.777.0820 • Mobile! 919.749.3051 - Fax: [phone]
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
9
Action Id. SAW-20001038 County: Harnett Quad: Olivia
NO DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY AUTHORIZATION REQUIRED
Applicant: Mr. John Cooper
Mitzi Gizmo and Associates
Address: 2505 Dalrymple Street
Sanford, NC 27330
Decidegrees: N 35.35316 W -79.04809
Ms. Jennifer Archambault
Dr. J. H. Carter and Associates, Inc.
515-F Midland Road
Southern Pines, NC 28387
Size and Location of Property (water body, Highway name/number, town, etc.): The property is approximately 33.5
acres and is adjacent to Big Branch and located off of Rosser-Pittman between Barbeque Church Road and
Happy Lane, southeast of Sanford, Harnett County, North Carolina.
Description of work: Development of a residential subdivision.
Your work as described above does not require Department of the Army authorization for the following reason(s):
There are no jurisdictional waters or wetlands within the boundaries of the project as described
above.
X The proposed project does not have a regulated impact on jurisdictional waters or wetlands
The proposed project is exempt from Department of the Army regulations.
Remarks: The proposed proiect, as depicted on the attached plans that were submitted to our office by email on
June 17, 2009, will be conducted entirely in non-iurisdictional areas of the property This project will not involve
the discharee of fill material into waters of the United States or wetlands
Any changes in the described work resulting in impacts to jurisdictional waters or wetlands or any new work in
jurisdictional waters or wetlands outside the area described above must be coordinated with the Corps of Engineers prior
to commencement. Please contact the Regulatory Official specified below.
For any activity within the twenty coastal counties, before beginning work, you must contact the N.C. Division of
Coastal Management at telephone [phone] to discuss any required State permit authorization.
This Department of the Army determination does not relieve the property owner of the responsibility to obtain any other
required Federal, State, or local approvals/permits.
Date: June 25, 2009
Corps Regulatory Official: Ronnie SmithO-8Telephone: [phone]
+SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC., MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE
COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
SAW Form 654
Copy Furnished:
Mr. Ian Mcmillan
NCDENR-DWQ
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2009-01038 County: Harnett U.S.G.S. Quad: Olivia
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Applicant/Property Owner: Mr. John Cooper Mr. Bill Mullin
Mitzi Gizmo and Associates Dr. J. H. Carter and Associates, Inc.
Address: 2505 Dalrymple Street 515-F Midland Road
Sanford, NC 27330 Southern Pines, NC 28387
Phone Number:
Property description:
Size (acres) 33.5
Nearest Waterway Big Branch
USGS HUC 030300040204
910-695-1043
Nearest Town Sanford
River Basin Cape Fear
Coordinates N 35.35316 W -79.04809
Location description: The property is adjacent to Big Branch and is located off of Rosser-Pittman between Barbeque
Church Road and Happy Lane, southeast of Sanford. Harnett County, North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property.' We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC & 1344)Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date
of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or
our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more
timely delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the
Corps.
X The wetland on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps We
strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed Upon completion this survey should be reviewed and verified
by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction
on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations may be relied upon
for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on January 11, 2008. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Wilmington, NC at [phone] to determine
their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Ronnie Smith at (910) 2514829
Basis For Determination: This site exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual
and is adiacent to Bia Branch, a tributarv of Barbecue Creek, a tributary of the Upper Little River, a tributary of the
Cape Fear River, which is a naviaable water of the United States. The unnamed tributary of Biz Branch and Biz
Branch exhibits an ordinary high water mark as indicated by the absence of vegetation in the stream channel and the
presence of bed and banks, shelvina and sediment sortin0deyosition. This determination is based on information
provided by Dr. J. H. Carter and Associates, Inc. and a site visit conducted by Ronnie Smith of the U.S. Army Corps of
Enaineers on June 11, 2009.
Remarks: This site also contains isolated wetlands that are not adiacent to a water of the United States and are not
subject to the permit requirement of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. However, isolated wetlands are subject to
regulation by the state of North Carolina. Prior to starting any work you should contact Mr. Chad Turlinaton with
the North Carolina Division of Water Ouality. Their address is as follows: NCDENR - NCDWO, 225 Green Street,
Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301. The isolated wetland areas on the property have been identified
under a previous action. An approved iurisdiction determination with Action ID Number 2006-00453 was issued
on February 6, 2006.
Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Ronnie Smith, Project Manager,
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Ave
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by August 24, 2009.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official:

Date: June 25, 2009 Expiration Date: June 25, 2014
Corps Regulatory Official (Initial): RDS
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
• A plat or sketch of the property and the wetland data form must be attached to the file copy of this form.
• A copy of the "Notification Of Administrative Appeal Options And Process And Request For Appeal" form must be
transmitted with the property owner/agent copy of this form.
Copy Furnished:
Mr. Chad Turlington, NCDENR-DWQ, 225 Green Street, Suite 714, Fayetteville, NC 28301

11 1
1 o
I p.
!
R
1
Applicant: Mr. John Cooper File Number:
2009-
Date: June 25, 2009
01038
At tached is: wetland survey See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
X APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION-1 e flowing 'identities your,riglits aiid options regarding an administrative appeal a ;t e above
decision ,'46i'onal u format"ion ii ay be found at http'//?«v?v.usace.army,.mil/inet%fimctions%c,,v/cecyvofreU or
Co s regulations of 33 CFR Part33I.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section H of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
S
EkTIQN:It ,;RE ST F: R APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO'AN INITIAL PROFFERED`PERMIT.
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR. QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or If you only have questions regarding the appeal process
the appeal process you may contact: you may also contact:
Ronnie Smith Mr. Mike Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
PO Box 1890 CESAD-ET-CO-R
Wilmington, NC 28402 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this
form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Ronnie Smith, Project Manager,
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office, PO Box 1890, Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
For Permit denials and Proffered Permits send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Mike Bell,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-ET-CO-R, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303-8801

5 79'10'00° 79 6 Continue on Page 39 7 7E°55 [X;
79.1667" 79.633 7` C,167 _ a r_ I - ? ?? P p• e
j ?
Piir
°PP' CY i 501 NYEw .ryY PNEP e E ?? ' _ !7 PO sr
of u. .4
?"` ? ? $fq ioox=? r a \ ' G POEOEP z F r Q•6 _ '
AN s I PD °o .§' _S I C RR'IS LAID
_
4e? I
w 6URn3 R x \ w 9 J ?t
°N ? lffb. L Shadd C• fc ?/?Q g
E i
COi:N ?" V?•PQ' rp\E q° -
'b (ryc _ d$ car 4, ,. Hu ? anus oaa? E' • aar a wrHrx Ra. v ? __ ti . , - d' _ / 42
\ _-? ; { Off N " 42 S'? ? ? BUR ? 1RYEl0
k ri? ?'I g 0".dA EE / f• DN RIS h ?1`` iPED FO _
_ ? O6 {LAND Farx GAME AND
° sA P? g
1
?rqq ???19 • P qqf( .'?¢ fPP (i? ??f Mta-' _.rF. /• ?•?
vp n
e, 5 r j
501 ' 1z yfP" k"... °rDRrER
` 421
°i C'a. 6vinv P ., oiacE R°. E I cox: .?
v,ronfq T Yrr futon :`9 ,"Ei 4D rip PpPRYi - C°keba
14 n 4
a ra P? ? } ^
W ' ?. wPES PxeEE u „ _ _
v
N YG .?a ° •? ePESP I
v
4j
? - •
;
-EPEmDR `. i. ?_ DR CEeek
{ r g
PO +YtHEPS>oD ;YR4 W fOb ^•.s-..n r ?O i[/S _ C Ffl pC
Y o e
s I.' s E rp j
n lo-.l \anEP i 11119 Po 4 _/, ° c'rf+b° @? i F9 v
aPCY,.?D
°P / \? I _ r _r c \oN°n. Po ER E4 fE`Y .E i •?ils• r
..i???k ki '? ?,4i • cea Nc ii 42 R° ? ? ? wee ? ? RAVE _ CK
F / ?cmrr. <4 wr ?rlxnn im?wse Pla nD ?xD?Ar / me` -_! i ?) ATE PARK"
/Raven_R k y[ Raven Rni-k\ ,
OEfM 1 •'1. ,14'E RN - ! e. N Y ° 6 bIEY / dOY ° SEdEC P ik h L-p Trail
p y/ ?? RD P aP ?. 1• .?, ?i o _? ? ,q 9 r Ge Pf .?. CY
D .b n l
° - CJ' PfCem w i ? ( ? 421 { f {P P _ `?o ?;lqr/. -ff tI'/ r` I `• n __ _
o° ?t \'1 ; 7 ?1 °?`,? 87 t 6 6 •{4s5' ?aWR?f eo?/ ?`, p,j. d os}% seek is r.
e -1
Fr Ra ?1 s° I p not A;. \--Jq ?=? PgRwcp cn Rb C°mels-__ qO e?4o i•. ;._ E?
a PD 78 ° i ?a b wOOO a°t `i Sn^m° 421 /PO ?Y - rq"K
' ? ? 1 /_ °":'r? e?// Po `J ? ? ? 6 ,5, ? 9 \ so /? ° '= s. Ryes a 1 -?? I • QPtl"P r f - 4,
f ?• ? i
_ iJOt E"PO1 aP ° \ i)o ?<_ D?? „l. g',. PO g = r4' J(q q° ? a
G ¢ F ° qq / jj ` f ?? 'g?.. P?, 1! r I ' ?LG ( m I + °Pr \ m M _ - T srcMEb '' AElin9EOe oED E m .s( _ - e _ 421 Ora ?v
?co $ !,r$ ?y. $\1 osY,\O'l"` s`c `\//,' e r P col / _ i,.,
? y a 'p ' _. { 1_ v 1 t j ST { Po ! noRO I g
S? P ? 'V 1 7? n? /J r ? t _ Q
'•L O -- 1 1SY"M Ra / IY W! °4
`h ifP ya CGS " ? I,Gi} ? e R K'..?, J _ { 0 ? , p
e a w ?A ?_ @ ?E?.' E? @n ` .tom _ I? t a r'+ `?\
\ 1
Ip T q `Y' / Qµ ° 9 PD 'P,D ?- f9 P?°fE 9 - / \ , a s''6L / 1
d9 dE ® C'P ? .46 F `I , -Y POOir ? _ f i o?o _ a _/
" o ?? 'yyam ? yYYY $ (e _ _ ? I (O._ .. /.
!S PD ? L!!de -hD of e° r -_ O° ? U lfnw ODD fir,` g ? ?Y { IOE'iM ,° AC - r? C.? 4 '(? ? p '`4 ?P??,
? sa Pond & ? aggaf ;?a ? ' ° ' - ? € (nb ?\ ' - o $8 ? '?
,qq` ^` • PO ' '. s \?' fu ° yr? ?' R PHm+ o, °'4 - ? 9O e(ety `t + A,
PD is?t° ', `a? R0 ° '? ys^ ?° / t8 ` ? b uy °4" PBB nc ?!7 ?`? - qne o r t}fSS. ?rl _!p Ce?'
J'©1 t 91Rn BYee
Creek g.V Rb ?rc
Pa o ! esRefieE a t ° a Ro.. \
E
CtAPI no-?g
7 _j
ba r ?- \ ``\ °. Ew; Rte,
co i
G ??soP ? Fqu ? °fls ? / t ? ? ? 8 n • .'r ?Q•o _
I t? 0 0 ? ??{ LEtlle ,
,.'. w 2427 /- C 'Gp,yJ '^ - 3 _ ,II N ° p Pr 2.
'S \ r0 '\ _ ! I \? ?: °•° Antlerboa F W O . E t 4
y , 01? JP /P?°p't qa _, r J, a 0/ (O?`4 t .. =( ,} y` A $ to Pond if
? tP a
cN Hb `'- _ /\-. -_ 7 ^? . t} q ?,. 8 a(o '- c L $y, r Y ?onA?-(
87
24r
''>F ?c? _ - ?.? - "oS`-? ????..•.a se..m.. r``°°m( I, ra ". _ /? otiRr
Location of the proposed Pittman Crossing development along N
0 0.1 0.2 Miles
Rosser-Pittman Road in xestern Harnett County, North Carolina. w e
s
Aerial photograph (USA Imagery, ESRI) of the proposed Pittman Crossing N
development and surrounding land use, western Harnett County, 0 0.1 0.2 Miles w?/ E
North Carolina.
S
-- - Doe----
_ (loin,! sheet
GaGaB 3 Gaff
GaH
B ) GaB FaB
.. B m
�
Bb GaB G66 1175: GaB &
BOB Gz6 Gas BnB Bn8 yam', GaB 6 r
Ro 6nB
BnB Bb
m GaA J BOB
m Gas Sb 1 GaB Bb GaB J V0 w u
GaB Ro JJJ
Bb r BOB w
- I GaD BGaA nB BnD
lFaB Bn6 GaA BnB CaB u' BnB GaB
BbRo �<
I DoB GaB Ly GaB Bb
u• 111 � u
Bn8
Ro\ CaB
GaB
Bb Dob Bb 1 Feb gb
p ,Ga6
0� GaA FaB DoB
r`
BOB BOB GaD - u sb FaB u FaB R0 BnB w BnB
m O FaB DoB / BnB Gas
GaB BOB � 0° GaB '
i w m DoB 1
]
CaB c - Fa Do Bb.-
R. FaB Bry B B faB Fab Bb
j w NeD u y
GaB NeD Wh Bb
Fd �
Ga8 BnB w
GaB
BnD BnB NeD FB
Bb Bb O 1 FaB Fa8
Dob NoB
FaB GaD Fas FaB FaB NeD oo NeD
DoB BOB u• CeB yee Nob 0
o FaB Wh o Bb
m DoB
Ga8 0 / Ro DOB / u,) FaB
Fab. 0o
FaB / FaB m, Fab aD Z Fal
Fa B
U, NoB
Dob GoA Bb w ,� o Z '
Dob 66 FaB 1217 6b NeD
DoB CIS
NeD,
FaB m GaB Dos DoB G
/
Gab Ra NeE
BOB NeD Wh
Bb Bb Fab \
Fab Fa8 GoA "' a
NeD P� DoB u DOB
NeD
_f NeD GaB Bb GaB b DoB Bb Bb FaB NeE
BnB NeD - 5
DoB u GaB 1 / \
NeD / m DoB CO paE
GaB GaB FaB 0� w W u• w
DoB Wh FaB Bb
Bn8 I m �FaB GaB
FaB GaB u'
w Q
NoA Ga8
B6, Fd BnB G� NeE ' GaB FaB 1209
/J1 Q Wh
B
�o NeD NeD DoB VaB NeD I Bn8 NeE, NeD
\ NeE QGa¢ �P6
AtA FaB NeE Q4(b ;t
BOB V Ro
BOB Dos Wh Wh NeD 27
G Bwap1Q Wh Wh NeD ` i Bb FaB
B NeD S / FaB FaB
�O _ Bb
w I u•
BOB / NeD FaB NeD NoB Rc
d NoB w
Ro "Wh NeD CeB NoB Bb '
BnB NeD GaB Dob NeD z`, FaB Bb FaB FItis NoB Bb
\ o
Bb
Ro Bb GaB 1
Ro B_
b' Cas 't
r
BnD o NeD -"-� GaB BnB FaB Wh GaB GaB
w NeD u
NeD Bb GaB i Ga8 Bb Bn6 BOB Ro BOB
BnB VaB
Bb BOB CaB Po gpCaB AtA u' u, GaB Bn8 BnB
9 NeE
-Ro VaD Bb�
I Bn8 GaB Bb Bb n�� BB wafer
BnB Ga6 6
B6 �
Ro Va6 - :WQf!'lCall
Gas BnB
6bBnB i
Ro Bb \
1 r vin 1

_Zoom in Zoom out 4 Pan
Z
`lw s /P •i Sy`•y R ? ? ?
r } a ¢p
i
?5 t 1 'z
fi f c?,-' t°r 'Yd
e i ''? ?"SU ?j ?'•-?
dl?
y W?
_cc ? 9
? ? ?a yr??yC ?Y d•?y pr.a ?,n? Yi is _ y, ? Zi: ,,`,,
ID Soil Name
1 DoA
1 FaB
2 NeD
3 NeE
4 NoB
5 Ro
6 Wh
Hydric Description
Dothan loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Fuquay loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Nason silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Nason silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Roanoke loam, occasionally flooded
A wehadkee loam, frequently flooded
Map Scale = One Inch = 292 feet
Owner Information:
PID 039588 0003 01
NAME MITZI GIZMO & ASSOCIATES INC
ADDRESS 2505 DAIRYMPLE STREET
CITYST SANFORD, NC 273300000
ACRES 33.50595
Download Results: SoilsPolyaon 0395;
Acres
0.90
5.31
6.86
0.02
10.60
3.42
6.40
http://gistools.hamett.org/giswebsiteutils/SoilsOverlay.aspx?PID=039588 0003 01 7/22/2009