WQ0015931_2015 July Flow Reduction Request Response_20150909

Leggett, Michael
To: Thornburg, Nathaniel
Subject: Flow Reduction Request: Trump
Nathaniel,
I'm going to return the Cottages of Boone down to you today as it isn't a flow reduction request. I'm also going to send
down the other request that was brought up here for the Trump National Golf Club facility (WQ0015931).
I'm of the opinion that this doesn't require a flow reduction. Per 15A NCAC 02T.0114(f), flow reductions can "be granted
for permitted but not yet tributary connections and future connections tributary to the system". The Trump facility is at
buildout according to the narrative and is requesting a reduction in the number of drip zones. From my perspective I
can't really issue a flow reduction. To me it's an evaluation of the NDMR data to see if the number of drip zones can be
reduced, which is probably best handled through a permit modification. I'm out of the office until Monday, however am
available to discuss when I return.
Michael W. Leggett, P.E.
Phone: [phone]
michael.lec gett(a)ncdenr.gov
Subscribe to Collection System Updates
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Lavv and mal, o -
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 10:43 AM
To: Leggett, Michael
Cc: rbarr(clrpbsystems.com; Thornburg, Nathaniel
Subject: RE: Flow Reduction Request: The Cottages of Boone
Michael - This is a permit modification request for the Cottages of Boone wastewater irrigation system
(WQ0035784'). Their sampling frequency increased from monthly to 2/month effective July 1, 2015. Their letter is
asking to continue sampling at the 1/month frequency. This request needs to go to Nathaniel Thornburg. Mik=.
Mi ke.Mickey@NCDE NR.eov
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources - Water Quality Programs
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Phone: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this addres-may be subject to the Norti,
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disdcsed to third parties.
From: Leggett, Michael
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 10:02 AM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: Flow Reduction Request: The Cottages of Boone
Hey Mike,

Doby, Troy
From: Doby, Troy
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 11:29 AM
To: Schutte, Maria
Subject: RE: Application No. WQ0015068??? for the Village at the Point WWTF
Maria,
I'm just going over that now. Yes, there is definitely a typo on the permit number. 1 used the one in the letter which is
wrong and then noticed all the old permits had a different number.
Nathaniel said that the package would not be going to the region. I only got a single copy of it myself. It was routed to
the PERCS people initially, but it is not a request for lower flow, just fewer fields. I can scan the package and send it to
you in parts. Will that be ok. IT has really screwed things up around here and can't get a file of any size scanned in one
piece. He said I was to send you the modified permit once it was done. I'll begin scanning it.
Troy
From: Schutte, Maria
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 11:23 AM
To: Doby, Troy
Subject: Application No. WQ0015068??? for the Village at the Point WWTF
Troy,
The MRO received a copy of the letter of receipt from CO on 8-28-15; however, we have not received the modification
package. A site visit was conducted on Aug 31't, but I am waiting for the modification package information to complete
the inspection report. In addition, I think there may be a typing error with the application # WQ0015068 because their
existing permit is # WQ0015931.
Maria
Maria Schutte, Environmental Specialist - [e-mail]
Division of Water Resources - Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office (MRO)
North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
MRO Main Phone: [phone]
Direct Office Phone: [phone]
MRO Fax: [phone]
DWR website: htto://www.ncwater.ore
NOTICE: Emails sent to and from this account are subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.

Doby, Troy
From: Schutte, Maria
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 4:05 PM
To: Doby, Troy
Subject: RE: Village at the Point WWTF W00015931
Well thanks for asking, because it reminded me that I called them fields 4-7 in my inspection report and need to change
them to the appropriate name.
From: Doby, Troy
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 3:48 PM
To: Schutte, Maria
Subject: RE: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
Thanks. Thought so, but also thought 1 should ask before deleting stuff when not 100% sure.
From: Schutte, Maria
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 3:47 PM
To: Doby, Troy
Subject: RE: Village at the Point WWTF W00015931
Yes.
From: Doby, Troy
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 3:08 PM
To: Schutte, Maria
Subject: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
Maria,
In the water balance, they are proposing to remove Drip Zones 4 to 7. Does this map to Zones D-4 to D-7 in the permit?
Are you still going to send a report?
Troy Doby, PhD, PE
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Water Quality Permitting Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
919-807-6336
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/aps/­lau

Doby, Troy
From: Doby, Troy
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 2:40 PM
To: Schutte, Maria
Cc: Pitner, Andrew; Thornburg, Nathaniel
Subject: RE: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
Maria,
Thanks for the markup and catching these things
• I've added the dash between the D and the number of the field in the permit letter.
• I've left the UV in the description though Nathaniel may want to take it out if it has not been built in fact. But for
now, it's still there. I don't have a problem with keeping it in the description either.
• on the repeat with item 12 under IV, it is actually item 12 that should be taken out. Copying and pasting can
sometimes be problematic with Word and I guess that's what happened.
• 1 have added the footnote for what 3 x year means in Attachment A.
I think that's all the things you caught and again thanks for being set of fresh eyes to look over it.
I'll email this to Tim Bannister right away.
Troy
From: Schutte, Maria
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 1:43 PM
To: Doby, Troy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Pitner, Andrew <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
Troy,
Attached is the draft with my notes. I just spoke with Tim Banister and let him know I was trying to move this
along. His email is: [e-mail] just in case you needed it to send the draft.
Thank You!
Maria
From: Doby, Troy
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 12:06 PM
To: Schutte, Maria
Subject: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
Maria,
Please find attached a copy of the draft permit for Village at the Point WWTF (the Trump Golf Course) WQ0015931.
you have questions, comments, or concerns, please let me know.

Thanks!
Troy Doby, PhD, PE
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Water Quality Permitting Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
919-807-6336
http:Hportal.ncdenr.org/web/`wq/aps/`lau

Doby, Troy
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 3:55 PM
To: Doby, Troy
Cc: Thornburg, Nathaniel; Schutte, Maria
Subject: RE: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
Thank you Troy, I will review by this Friday and get back to you. I appreciate your help on this project very much.
Regards,
Tim Bannister
TCW Wastewater Management, Inc.
POBox 187
3917 Hwy 74 East
Wingate, NC 28174
704.324.4145 Office
704.324.4147 Fax
704.201.7514 Cell
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
From: "Doby, Troy" <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, September 30, 2015 2:44 pm
To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Cc: "Thornburg, Nathaniel" <[e-mail]>, "Schutte,
Maria" <[e-mail]>
Tim,
Please find attached a copy of the draft permit for Village at the Point WWTF
WQ001593. If you have any comments, questions, or concerns, please let me
know by next Wednesday, October 7th. If you need additional time, please let me
know that as well.
Thanks!
Troy Doby, PhD, PE
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Water Quality Permitting Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
919-807-6336
httr)://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wg/­aps/lau

Doby, Troy
From: Doby, Troy
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 10:38 AM
To: '[e-mail]'
Subject: RE: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
Tim,
I have made both changes in the permit. I cannot guarantee that the mulch provision is going to survive, but the pond
change definitely will. At any rate, that is how I am submitting it for signature.
Troy.
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 10:26 AM
To: Doby, Troy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Thornburg, Nathaniel<[e-mail]>; Schutte, Maria <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
Troy,
I only see two statements that I would like for you to consider wording changes
III. Operation and Maintenance Requirements
Page 5, statement #5
"A suitable year round vegetative cover......."
I would like to correct this and get the language back to the original system approved design to " A suitable year round
mulch cover......". These drip zones were originally designed and approved with 4" of mulch cover over the tubing. It
gives me heartburn every time I read this statement and somehow got inserted, I believe, at the first renewal of the
original permit. I would like to get this corrected because it would be a huge undertaking to actually get this to a
"vegetative" state with the tubing on the surface. Mulch was approved back in 1995 and leaf litter, in these wooded sites,
have continued to keep the tubing covered lightly over the years.
IV. Monitoring and Reporting Requirements
Page 7, statement #6
Freeboard in the "five day detention pond........" should actually read as: Freeboard in the "wet weather storage
pond........". We have a large, probably six month storage pond for the "finished re -use water". The old permit had this
correct wording. This is a different storage pond than the 5 -day upset pond.
Everything else seems to be fine in my review. Thanks
Regards,
Tim Bannister
TCW Wastewater Management, Inc.
POBox 187
3917 Hwy 74 East
Wingate, NC 28174
704.324.4145 Office
704.324.4147 Fax
704.201.7514 Cell

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
From: "Doby, Troy" <troy.dobvCalncdenr.aov>
Date: Wed, September 30, 2015 2:44 pm
To: "tb(cDtcwwastewater.com" <tb(d)tcwwastewater.com>
Cc: "Thornburg, Nathaniel" <nathaniel.thornburg(c ncdenr gov>, "Schutte,
Maria" <maria.schutte(d)ncdenr.aov>
Tim,
Please find attached a copy of the draft permit for Village at the Point WWTF
WQ001593. If you have any comments, questions, or concerns, please let me
know by next Wednesday, October 7th. If you need additional time, please let me
know that as well.
Thanks!
Troy Doby, PhD, PE
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Water Quality Permitting Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
919-807-6336
httr)://i)ortal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/aps/lau
2

Doby, Troy
From:
[e-mail]
Sent:
Friday, October 16, 2015 8:16 AM
To:
Doby, Troy
Cc:
Thornburg, Nathaniel
Subject:
RE: Village at the Point WWTF W00015931
Attachments:
Screen Shot 2015-10-16 at 7.46.25 AM.png
Troy,
I went through all 17 spray and 6 drip coordinates last night checking each. I did find like you two or three that
popped up way out of place. I don't have the original surveyors logs either, I have only what you have which is
the permit listing. I would have to assume there may have been a typo or two. So, I have re -mapped all drip
and spray as you can see on the attached screen shot of my software that I use. I will get the new coordinates
typed.up in a list today and send to you by the end of the day. I checked all of them and tweaked any that
needed it. This matches the maps that I sent to you yesterday. of each zone area. I tried to hit the approximate
center of each area.
However, please understand that I have found Google to be fairly reliable. I have gone out many times and
found that the coordinates lead me to the approximate area but not always within 5 or 10 feet. It should keep us
in the area of each though.
Regards,
Tim Bannister
TCW Wastewater Management, Inc.
POBox 187
3917 Hwy 74 East
Wingate, NC 28174
704.324.4145 Office
704.324.4147 Fax
704.201.7514 Cell
--------- Original Message ---------
Subject: RE: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
From: "Doby, Troy" <[e-mail]>
Date: 10/14/15 8:15 am
To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Cc: "Thornburg, Nathaniel" <[e-mail]>
Thanks, Tim.

Two sheets is fine.
I did not know that about Google Earth being so far off. Good to know.
There's another possibility and that is that the latitudes and longitudes were mis-typed into our database.
Could I get the data you have on this and I will double check the typing previously done. That is by far the least
expensive thing to do.
All of the drip fields lined up with your map, so I don't think there is a problem with those. If I have a labeled
map of the spray fields I can get coordinates with reasonable accuracy if it is not a typo in the database.
Thanks and have a good conference.
Troy
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 9:24 PM
To: Doby, Troy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Thornburg, Nathaniel <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
Troy,
Thanks for your follow-up. I Just a need a couple of things clarified pertaining to the two points you are stating.
1. I don't have any issues with leaving the flow at 25,000.
2. 1 will provide a site map that shows what you want. Actually it will have to be two sheets, one for the six
drip fields, and one for the 17 spray fields. I will make sure they are labeled.
3. 1 am not sure about getting any coordinates corrected on the drip or spray fields. They were all surveyed
by Land Design engineering firm back when they mapped, designed, and submitted the plans
originally. I randomly searched several drip and several spay fields tonight on Google Earth and they hit
correctly. Just a side note, I don't know how much you use Google Earth, but I use it all day every day
with our inspection program. I have found it to vary much of the time. I have it give me as good as within
3 meters and as much as 40 meters at times. Tonight it was very good on the ones that I searched.
Before money is spent to survey again and give new coordinates can you provide me with the ones that
you showed out of bounds? Maybe it is Google issue, not a survey issue?
I am in Raleigh at a wastewater conference this week until Friday. I will try to get the maps sent to you by
Monday. Thank you for your assistance.

Regards,
Tim Bannister
TCWWastewater Management, Inc.
POBox 187
3917 Hwy 74 East
Wingate, NC 28174
704.324.4145 Office
704.324.4147 Fax
704.201.7514 Cell
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Village at the Point WWTF W00015931
From: "Doby, Troy" <troy.doby( ncdenr.aov>
Date: Mon, October 12, 2015 4:14 pm
To: "tbCaltcwwastewater.com" <tbOtcwwastewater.com>
Cc: "Thornburg, Nathaniel" <nathaniel.thornburg anncdenr.aov>
Tim,
Two things:
The permitted flow is not going to be reduced from 25,000 to 20,000 gpd because there
remains more than enough acreage to handle 25,000 gpd even without D-4 to D-7.
I need a site map of some type for the permit. There was a site map showing fields D-4
to D-7 that were to be removed. That map was excellent, but did not show the numbering
of the spray fields. The site map needs to show the numbering of the spray fields as
well. Also, the latitudes & longitudes of the spray fields need to be updated. When I
mapped these on Google Earth, there were spray fields in the road, the pond, and on the
other side of the road. Attached is a copy of the letter requesting this information. An
original copy is being mailed to you as well.
Thanks for your attention to this.

Troy Doby, PhD, PE
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Water Quality Permitting Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
919-807-6336
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/aps/lau

r

r
FA
p
y
o
ro
0LP.
T
C
�
1W
^SA
J
1
--- -Veslal'Dr� --
wee Y
l'
NS
o1A � ✓
J
7 MV
U �
0
4
} �A
Ik
co MV
I
O
i
(D�p
4' 4.1 N m q/
M ch C6 (n 00
Lo
LO
M4 �
Q'7
a

Doby, Troy
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 8:28 AM
To: Doby, Troy
Cc: Thornburg, Nathaniel
Subject: RE: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
Troy, sorry to be a bother, but the club is no longer know as "Villages at the Point". It was legally changed to "Trump
National Golf Club Charlotte". Didn't know if you want to make that change on the permit now or not. No one probably
cares but If you want to make it read accurate, that would be how it should be. There are no more Villages at the Point. I
actually thought when we did the owner change over several years ago we made that change.
Regards,
Tim Bannister
TCW Wastewater Management, Inc.
POBox 187
3917 Hwy 74 East
Wingate, NC 28174
704.324.4145 Office
704.324.4147 Fax
704.201.7514 Cell
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
From: "Doby, Troy" <troy.doby(lncdenr.gov>
Date: Wed, October 14, 2015 8:15 am
To: "tb(gbtcwwastewater.com" <tb((btcwwastewater.com>
Cc: "Thornburg, Nathaniel" <nathaniel.thornburg(c ncdenr.gov>
Thanks, Tim.
Two sheets is fine.
I did not know that about Google Earth being so far off. Good to know.
There's another possibility and that is that the latitudes and longitudes were mis-typed into our database.
Could I get the data you have on this and I will double check the typing previously done. That is by far the least
expensive thing to do.
All of the drip fields lined up with your map, so I don't think there is a problem with those. If I have a labeled
map of the spray fields I can get coordinates with reasonable accuracy if it is not a typo in the database.
Thanks and have a good conference.
Troy

From: [e-mail] f mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 9:24 PM
To: Doby, Troy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Thornburg, Nathaniel<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
Troy,
Thanks for your follow-up. I Just a need a couple of things clarified pertaining to the two points you are stating.
1. 1 don't have any issues with leaving the flow at 25,000.
2. 1 will provide a site map that shows what you want. Actually it will have to be two sheets, one for the six
drip fields, and one for the 17 spray fields. I will make sure they are labeled.
3. 1 am not sure about getting any coordinates corrected on the drip or spray fields. They were all surveyed
by Land Design engineering firm back when they mapped, designed, and submitted the plans
originally. I randomly searched several drip and several spay fields tonight on Google Earth and they hit
correctly. Just a side note, I don't know how much you use Google Earth, but I use it all day every day
with our inspection program. I have found it to vary much of the time. I have it give me as good as
within 3 meters and as much as 40 meters at times. Tonight it was very good on the ones that I
searched. Before money is spent to survey again and give new coordinates can you provide me with the
ones that you showed out of bounds? Maybe it is Google issue, not a survey issue?
I am in Raleigh at a wastewater conference this week until Friday. I will try to get the maps sent to you by
Monday. Thank you for your assistance.
Regards,
Tim Bannister
TCW Wastewater Management, Inc.
POBox 187
3917 Hwy 74 East
Wingate, NC 28174
704.324.4145 Office
704.324.4147 Fax
704.201.7514 Cell
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
From: "Doby, Troy" <troy.doby(ancdenr.gov>
Date: Mon, October 12, 2015 4:14 pm
To: "tb(cbtcwwastewater.com" <tbCabtcwwastewater.com>
Cc: "Thornburg, Nathaniel" <nathaniel.thornburg anncdenr.gov>
Tim,
Two things:
The permitted flow is not going to be reduced from 25,000 to 20,000 gpd because there
remains more than enough acreage to handle 25,000 gpd even without D-4 to D-7.
I need a site map of some type for the permit. There was a site map showing fields D-4
to D-7 that were to be removed. That map was excellent, but did not show the numbering
of the spray fields. The site map needs to show the numbering of the spray fields as
well. Also, the latitudes & longitudes of the spray fields need to be updated. When I

mapped these on Google Earth, there were spray fields in the road, the pond, and on the
other side of the road. Attached is a copy of the letter requesting this information. An
original copy is being mailed to you as well.
Thanks for your attention to this.
Troy Doby, PhD, PE
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Water Quality Permitting Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
919-807-6336
http://Dortal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/aps/­lau

NCDENR
Borth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
August 25, 2015
TIM BANNISTER—ORC
TNGC CHARLOTTE, LLC
POST OFFICE BOX 187
WINGATE, NORTH CAROLINA 28174
Dear Mr. Bannister:
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Subject: .Acknowledgement of I �q J
Application No. W^Q0Hfi5M
The Village at the Point W WTF
Reclaimed Water System
Iredell County,
The Water Quality Permitting Section acknowledges receipt of your permit application and
supporting documentation received on July 13, 2015. Your application package has been assigned the
number listed above, and the primary reviewer is Troy Doby.
Central and Regional Office staff will perform a detailed reNieA of the provided application, and
may contact you with a request for additional information. To ensure maximum efficiency in processing
pe:rriit applications; the Division of Water Resources requests your assistance in providing,., timely and
complete response to any additional information requests.
Please note that processing standard review permit applications may take as long � s 60 to 90 days
after receipt of a complete application. If you have any questions. ple,sc contact
Troy Doby at [phone] or troy.dobynncdem .aov,
Sincerely.
Nathaniel D. TliornburSt. Super�tisor
Division of Water Resourc:
cc: Mooresville Regional Office. Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Permit File W00015931
5.17 OE ov:-g.^.. ":'Ir' "ar"

I V3
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
L
Pat McCrory
Governor
Mr. Gavin Arsenault, General Manager
Trump National Golf Club Charlotte
120 Meeting House Square
Mooresville, North Carolina 28117
Dear Mr. Arsenault:
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
September 25, 2015
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Tracking No.: NOD -2015 -PC -0225
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Wastewater Collection System
Permit No. WQCSD0510
Iredell County
Mr. Barry Love and Ms. Maria Schutte of the NC Division of Water Resources, Mooresville
Regional Office (MRO) conducted a joint compliance evaluation inspection (CEI) of the Trump
National Golf Club Charlotte wastewater collection and treatment system on August 31, 2015. This
letter applies only to the collection system, permit number WQCSD0024. The assistance and
cooperation of Mr. Brandon Long of Tri County Wastewater Management, Inc. was greatly
appreciated. An inspection report is attached for your records.
Please take special note of the comments in the Performance Standards, Inspections,
Operations and Maintenance Requirements, and Pump Stations sections of the inspection
report. It is requested that a written response be submitted by no later than October 21, 2015
regarding the deficiencies found in these sections. Enclosed is a copy of the 15A NCAC 02T .0403
rules which apply specifically to deemed permitted collection systems.
Mooresville Regional Office, 610 East Center Avenue, Mooresville, North Carolina 28155
Phone: [phone]\ Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal eppodunity \AHlrmative Accton Employer - Made In pad by recycled paper

The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning
this inspection report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Love at [phone].
Sincerely,
1 i � 14
Fa ? Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
Attachment: Inspection Report —August 2015
Deemed Permitted Collection System Requirements
Tri County Wastewater Management, Inc. — Tim Bannister
MRO file
PERCS

Permit: WQCSO0510
SOC:
County: Iredeil
Region: Mooresville
Contact Person: Eric Trump
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 11/15/10 Expiration: Owner: Tngc Charlotte LLC
Effective: Expiration: Facility; The Village at the Point WWTF
2018 Brawley School Rd
Title:
Certification:
Mooresville NC 28117
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Related Permits:
WO0015931 Tngc Charlotte LLC - The Village at the Point W WTF
Inspection Date: 08131/2015 EntryTime; 10:OOAM Exit Time: 12:OOPM
Primary Inspector: Barry F Love Phone: [phone] Ed.263
Secondary Inspector(s):
Maria Schutte
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling
Permit Inspection Type: Deemed permitted collection system management and operation
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Miscellaneous Questions Performance Standards Operation & Maim Reqmts
Records Monitoring & Rpling Reqmts inspections
Pump Station Manhole Lines
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

permit WQCS00510 Owner- Facility: Tngc Chariots, LLC
Inspection Date: O8/31MI5 Inspection Type : Colledon System Inspect Non Sampling Reason For Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

PsrtnlC WOCSOOS10 Owner- Facility: Tngc Charlotte LLC
Inspection Date: 08/31@015 Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for visit: Routine
Performance Standards
Yes No NA NE
Is Public Educafion Program for grease established and documented?
❑ ■ 0 7
What educational tools are used?
None.
Is Sewer Use OrdinanceJLegal Authority available?
❑ El M El
Does it appear that the Sewer Use Ordinance is enforced?
(l 0 0
is Grease Trap Ordinance available?
0 ❑ 0 M
Is Septic Tank Ordinance available (as applicable, Le. annexation)
El El E
List enforcement actions by permittee, if any, in the last 12 months
Has an acceptable Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) been implemented?
El El ■
Does CIP address short Tenn needs and long term feaster plant" concepts?
El Q M El
Does CIP cover three to five year period?
❑ El . El
Does CIP include Goal Statement?
El Q N F
Does CIP include description of project area?
11 Q . 1-1
Does CIP include description of existing facilities?
- 11 El 0 n
Does CIP include known deficiencies?
El El 0 El
Does CIP include forecasted future needs?
El Q 0 ❑
Is CIP designated only for wastewater collection and treatment?
1:1 El M R
Approximate capital improvement budget for collection system?
Total annual revenue for wastewater collection and treatment?
CIP Comments
Is system free of known points of bypass?
■ El Q 0
If no, describe type of bypass and location
Is a 24-hour nofificalion sign posted at ALL pump stations?
El 0 Q 0
# Does the sign include:
Instructions for notification?
11 ■ ❑ 1-1
Pump station identifieR
M M El Q
24-hour contact numbers
0 ■ 0 D
If no, list deficient pump stations
# Do ALL pump stations have an "auto polling" featurelSCADA?
El ■ Q D
Number of pump stations
Number of pump stations that have SCADA
c
Number of pump stations that have simple telemetry
o
Number of pump stations that have only audible and visual alarms
1
Number of pump stations that do not meet permit requirements
1
# Does the permittee have a root control program?
El El ® D
Page: 3

permit WaCSD0510 owner- Facillty: Tngc Charlotte LLC
Inspection Data: 00/31/2015 Inspection Type: Collect an System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
# If yes, date implemented?
Describe:
Comment: The pump station does not have telemetry. It was previously available but has bee
disconnected for some time. 15A NCAC 02T.0403 requires that the pump station be inspected
daily (365 days a year) if it Is not connected by a telemetry system. It is currently checked only
once a week. A 24-hour emergency notification sign was not posted. The sign must provide a
pump station name or number. 24-hour contact number and instructions of what to do in
emergency.
Inspections
yes No NA NE
Are maintenance records for sewer lines available?
❑ ■ [❑ ❑
Are records available that document pump station Inspections?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are SCADA or telemetry equipped pump stations inspected at least once a week?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are non-SCADAItelemetry equipped pump stations inspected every day?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Are records available that document citizen complaints?
❑ 0 M ❑
# Do you have a system to conduct an annual observation of entire system?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has there been an observation of remote areas in the last year?
❑ ❑. 0 ❑
Are records available that document inspections of high-priority, lines?
❑ ❑ N ❑
Has there been visual inspections of high-priority lines in last six months?
❑ 110 Cl
Comment: No records are maintained of weekly pump station inspections. The telemetry system has been
disconnected, so daily inspections are reauired.
Operation & Maintenance Requirements Yes No NA NE
Are all log books available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Does supervisor review all log books on a regular basis? ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the supervisor have plans to address documented short-term problem areas? ❑ ❑ ❑
What is the schedule for reviewing inspection, maintenance, & operations logs and problem areas?
No records were available.
Are maintenance records for equipment available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Is a schedule maintained for testing emergency/standby equipment?
❑ ❑ []
What is the schedule for testing emergency/standby equipment?
automatic weekly
of generator
Do pump station logs inGude;
Inside and outside cleaning and debris removal?
❑ ❑ ❑
Inspecting and exercising all valves?
❑ ■ 0 ❑
Inspecting and lubricating pumps and other equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Inspecting alarms, telemetry and auxiliary equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Is there at least one spare pump for each pump station Wo pump reliability?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
Are maintenance records for right-of-ways available?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Are right-of-ways currently accessible in the event of an emergency?
■ ❑ Q ❑
Page: 4

permit: WQCSD0510 Owner- pac111ty:Tngc Chadotte LLC
Inspection Date: 08/31/2015 Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit; Routine
Are system cleaning records available? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Has at least 10%, of system been cleaned annually? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
What areas are scheduled for deaning in the next 12 months?
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available? ❑ M ❑ ❑
Does the plan include:
24-hour contact numbers
0 0 ❑ ❑
Response time
❑ M ❑ ❑
Equipment list and spare pans inventory
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Access to cleaning equipment
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Access to construction crews, contractors, and/or engineers
❑ M ❑ ❑
Source of emergency funds
❑ M ❑ ❑
Site sanitation and deanup materials
❑ M ❑ ❑
Post-overflow/spill assessment
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available for all personnel?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Is the spare pads inventory adequate?
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
Comment: No pump station log books, maintenance records, or spill response plan was available.
Records Yes No NA NE
Are adequate records of all SSOs, spills and complaints available? ❑ ❑ ❑ M
Are records of SSOs that are under the reportable threshold available? ❑ ❑ ❑
Do spill records indicate repeated overflows (2 or more in 12 months) at same location? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, is there a corrective action plan? ❑ ❑ 1:10
Is a map of the system available? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0
Does the map include:
Pipe sizes
❑ ❑ ❑ M
Pipe materials
❑ ❑ ❑ M
Pipe location
❑ ❑ ❑ M
Flow direction
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
Approximate pipe age
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
Number of service taps
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
Pump stations and capacity
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
It no, what percent is complete?
,
List any modifications and extensions that need to be added to the map
# Does the permittee have a copy of their permit?
❑ ❑ M ❑
Comment: A map was not available at the time of the inspection.
Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Yes No NA NE
Are copies of required press releases and distribution lists available? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Page: 5

permit WQCSDO510 Owner- Facllity:Tngc Charlotte LLC
Inspection bate: 08/3112015 inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for visit: Routine
Are public notices and proof of publication available?
# Is an annual report being prepared in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1C?
# Is permittee compliant with all compliance schedules in the permits?
If no, which one(s)?
Comment:
1ST UP FROM WET WELL -
Manhola
Yes No NA NE
Is manhole accessible?
a ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is manhole cover/vent above grade?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the manhole free of visible signs of overflow?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the manhole free of sinkholes and depressions?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is manhole cover present?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is manhole properly seated?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is manhole in good condition?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is invert in good condition?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is line free-flowing and unrestricted in manhole?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
Is manhole free of excessive amounts of grease?
❑ E ❑ ❑
Is manhole free of excessive roots?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is manhole free of excessive sand?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is manhole's extended vent screened?
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Are vents free of submergence?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are manholes free of bypass structures or pipes?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Manhole is adiacent to wet well inside
pump station fence. An accumulation of orease was built
up at the line to the wet well.
MANHOLES BELOW POOL
Manhole
Yes No NA NE
is manhole accessible?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is manhole cover/vent above grade?
❑ ❑ []
Is the manhole free of visible signs of overflow?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the manhole free of sinkholes and depressions?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is manhole cover present?
N ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is manhole properly sealed?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is manhole in good condition?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is invert in good condition?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is line free-flowing and unrestricted in manhole?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is manhole free of excessive amounts of grease?
M ❑ [❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit:• WQCSD0610 Owner• Facility: Tngc Charlotte LLC
Yes No NA NE
Inspection Date: ON31/2016 Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling
Reason for Visit: Routine
Is manhole free or excessive roots?
011 Q R
Is manhole free of excessive sand?
MCI © El
Is manhole's extended vent screened?
El D . R
Are vents free of submergence?
❑ El N D
Are manholes free of bypass structures or pipes?
■ ❑ Q El
Comment: The concrete ring at one of the manholes was broken
BELOW RESTAURANT -
nhole
Yes No NA NE
Is manhole accessible?
®
El Q ❑
# Is manhole coverivent above grade?
N
E] Ej 0
Is the manhole free of visible signs of overflow?
F� El F1
0
Is the manhole free of sinkholes and depressions?
■
Q 0
Is manhole cover present?
®❑
Are wet wells free of excessive debris?
# Is manhole property seated?
0
El D ❑
# Is manhole in good condition?
0
1:1 F-1 D
# Is invert in good condition?
E
r-1 0
Is line free-flowing and unrestricted In manhole?
0
El D El
Is manhole free of excessive amounts of grease?
n
Is manhole free of excessive roots?
Is manhole free of excessive sand?
Is manhole's extended vent screened?
El
C1 0 0
Are vents tree of submergence?
1:1 ■
Are manholes free of bypass structures or pipes?
0 El
Comment: Inspector was advised thgt this line is jetted about once a year.
TRUMP -
PumD Station
Yes No NA NE
Pump station Type
Duplex
Are pump station logs available?
i ❑
Is it accessible in all weather conditions?
F� El F1
# Is general housekeeping acceptable?
Q
Are all pumps present?
Are all pumps operable?
®❑
Are wet wells free of excessive debris?
N El n
Are upstream manholes free of excessive debriafsigns of overflow?
0 El El ❑
Are floatsicontrols for pumpsialarms operable?
0 D El 0
Is "auto polling" featuraISCADA present?
11 El ■ FJ
Page: 7

Pemlih WQCSDO510 Owner- Facility: Tngc Charlotte LLC
Inspection Date: MSI 2016 Inspection Type; 0011ecliw System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit Routine
Is"auto poiling"feature/SCADAoperational?
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Is simple telemetry present?
® ❑ ❑ []
Is simple telemetry operational?
❑ M ❑ El
Are audio and visual alarms present?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
Are audio and visual alarms operable?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the Pump station inspected as required? -
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Are backflow devices in place?
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Are bacitfbw, devices operable?
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Are air relief valves in place?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are air relief valves operable?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is an emergency generator available?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
Can the emergency generator run the pumps?
-0 [] ❑ ❑
Is the pump station equipped for quick hook-up? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Is the generator operable? M ❑ ❑ ❑
If Is fuel in tank and sufficient? ❑ ❑ [] M
Is the generator inspected according to their schedule? ❑ ❑ D 0
is a 24-hour notification sign posted? ❑ ❑ ❑
Does it include:
Instructions for notification? ❑ ❑ ❑
Pump station identifier ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Emergency phone number ❑ E ❑ ❑
Is public access limited? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is pump station free of overflow, piping? E ❑ [] ❑
Is the pump station free of signs of overflow? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are run times comparable for multiple pumps? unknown
Comment: No Dump station loci was available to document puma station inspections. A large amount of
grease was built up in the wet well. A Raco telemetry system was present, but apparently has
been disconnected for some time. Pump stations that are not connected to telemetry must be
Inspected daily (365 days a year). No 24-hour notification sign was not posted.
Page: 8

North Carolina Departnient'of Environmental Quality
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
September 25, 2015
Trump National Golf Club Charlotte, LLC
120 Meeting House Square
Mooresville, North Carolina 28117
Attention: Gavin Arsenault, General Manager
Subject: Non -Discharge Permit Inspection
Trump National - Permit No. WQ0015931
Reclaimed Water Distribution System
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Arsenault:
Barry Love and Maria Schutte of the Mooresville Regional Office (MRO) met with Brandon
Long of Tri -County Wastewater (TCW) on August 316t, 2015. The inspection included the
reclaimed system's WWTP, lagoon storage, application fields and records. The collection
system (WQCSD0510) was also inspected and those findings will be included in a separate
report from Barry Love,
The MRO noted a couple of issues to address to maintain overall permit compliance:
• Repair line breaks seen in field D-1; and, evaluate and repair driplines in
remaining fields.
Repair the mud -well's visual and audible high water alarms. The plant discharges
to the 5 -day upset pond with high water levels and the irrigation system is
connected by auto -dialer to the ORC; however, the permit notes audible and
visual high-water alarms in the system description.
This permit is currently in modification for the reduction of irrigation fields. The
contractor proposes the Driving Range spray irrigation system, which to date has
not been utilized for the reclaimed system (although permitted), be used as a
back-up application area as flows dictate. The MRO recommends that
appropriate siqnaqe be posted at the driving range prior to irrigation with
reclaimed water and that a system check is conducted to verifv it is workina
Properly. Specific questions about the modification should be directed to
Troy. DobyCa.ncdenr.gov with our permitting staff in Raleigh.
Equipment calibration is due. The last calibration date on the flow and turbidity
meters was Aug 8th, 2014.
• Address any concerns noted in the related WQCSDO510 collection system report,
as required under this permit in condition 11.3.
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301; Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone]lnternet www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 AKrmatve Acton Employer - Made in part by recycled paper

The attached report should be self-explanatory; however, I may be reached by phone (704-
235-2184) or email (maria.schutte(aDncdenr.gov) with questions.
Sincerely,
Maria Schutte, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
Attachment: WWQ0017321 Inspection Report
CC: Tim Banister, TCW, POB 1830, Indian Trail, NC 28079 (email)
Troy Doby, CO-LAU (email)

State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Pat McCrory, Governor
Donald R. van der Vaart, Secretary
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
GENERAL INFORMATION
City/Town/Owner: Trump National Golf Club, LLC County: Iredell
PermitNo.: W00015931 (non -discharge WTP) Issued: 11/13/2012 Expiration: 5/31/2018
Permittee Contact: Gavin Arsenault, General Manager Telephone No.: 704-799-7329
ORC Name: Brandon Long (Tri -County Waste Systems) #SI 991385 Telephone No.: 704-351-4049 (cell)
B/U ORC: Tim Banister #SI 23910 Telephone No.: 704-324-4145 or Email: tb catcwwastewater.com
Reason for Inspection
X ROUTINE COMPLAINT FOLLOW-UP OTHER
Type of inspection
_Collection System _Spray Irrigation Sludge X Other (Drip Irrigation)
Inspection Aate(sl: August 31, 2015
Inspection Summary: (additional comments may be included on attached pages)
This inspection included a records review and tour of the W WTP and irrigation fields. The collection system
was also inspected and will be addressed in a separate report.
Most issues of concern were noted in the cover letter. The daily log and reports appeared well organized. The
previous version of this permit was in the on-site manual, which was noted to the ORC during the inspection
and he was to update accordingly. The laboratory data is maintained at the contractor's (TCW) main office, the
MRO can acquire these at any-xime via email; however, it is recommended that either the hardcopies or a laptop
with access be requested for adequate review during the next inspection.
Please note:
• Issues mentioned in the cover letter.
The permit expiration date is 5/31/2018. Per permit requirements, a renewal application is due
180 days prior to expiration.
The Mooresville Regional Office (MRO) should be informed of any changes to the contact
information noted above.
Is a follow-up inspection necessary _yes X no
Inspector(s): Maria Schutte - Environmental Specialist; Barry Love — Environmental Specialist
Telephone No.: 704-663-1699 Fax No.: 704-663-6040
_
I.CY. _.. • _. a.1tCI 'A"

Non -Conjunctive Reclaimed Water Utilization System pg. Z
W00015931 Trump National Golf Club, LLC.- The Village at the Point - Iredell County
Tvve
Activated Sludge Spray, low rate
Activated Sludge Spray, high rate
Activated Sludge Drip, low rate
Lagoon Spray, low rate
X Reclaimed Water (Golf Courses)
Infiltration System
Treatment
Y Are treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in the current permit.
*Y Do all treatment units appear to be operational? If no, note below.
List any action items necessary for each unit.
*Comments:
a mayor modiitcation to the current permit.
Influent pump station
Y All pumps present, operational N Bypass structure present
Y Bar screen, maintained Y Free of excessive debris
Y Bars evenly spaced N Bars excessively corroded
Y Back-up power
Flow Measurement - Influent
*Y Is flowmeter calibrated annually?
Y Is flowmeter operating properly?
Y Does flowmeter operate continuously?
Y Does flowmeter record flow?
Y Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately?
*Comments: Flow and turbidity meters were due for annual calibration. Last calibration was Aug Yh 2014
Flow Measurement — Water Use Records
Y Is water use metered?
Y Are the daily average values properly calculated?
Aeration Basin
Y aeration pattern even across surface of unit
Y easily accessed
Clarifiers
Y weirs level Y scum rack operational Y easily accessible
Comments: Scum present is likely from fats, oils & grease.
Return Pumps
Y in place Y operational
Filters
Y media present NE air scour operational Y clear well free of solids

e
Non-Conjunctive Reclaimed Water Utilization System pg, 3
WQ0015931 Trump National Golf Club, LLC - The Village at the Point - Iredell County
Disinfection
Y Is the system working? Y Is the system properly maintained?
X Tablets Gas Liquid UV
X If tablets, proper size? X Present in cylinder(s)?
If gas/liquid, does cylinder/tank storage seem safe?
If bulbs, are replacement bulbs on hand?
Y Is contact chamber free of sludge, solids and growth?
Comments: Back-up chlorinator is on site.
Residuals NE - Per previous reports the tanks are pumped annuallyy by a septage hauler.
La oons
5-Day Pond
Y Influent structure (free of obstructions)
N Vegetation (is there excessive vegetation on the lagoon bank
N Banks/berms (are there signs of seepage, overtopping, down cutting or erosion)
Y Liner (if visible, is it intact)
Y Freeboard (>2 feet from overtopping)
N Evidence of overflow (vegetation discolored or laying down/broken)
N Unusual color (very black, textile colors) Algae present
Storage Lagoon (check any/all that apply)
Y Influent structure (free of obstructions)
N Banks/berms (are there signs of seepage, overtopping, down cutting or erosion)
N Vegetation (is there excessive vegetation on the lagoon bank)
Y Liner (if visible, is it intact) The liner is intact but pulling away at the top of the bank in some areas
It may be necessary to wei-ght those areas down with -gravel to keep anything (burrowing animals) from
getting underneath and causinr damage
NA Baffles/curtains (in need of repair)
Y Freeboard (>2 feet from overtopping)
Y Staff gauge (clearly marked) See Comment Section Below
N Evidence of overflow (vegetation discolored or laying down/broken)
N Unusual color (very black, textile colors)
N Foam (are antifoam agents used)
Y Floating mats (sludge, plants, inorganics) See Comment Section Below
NE Excessive solids buildup (from bottom) See Comment Section Below
NA Aerators/mixers operational (if present)
Y Effluent structure (free of obstructions, easily accessible)
Comments: Per previous reports:
Staff rouge was installed at time of construction and does not have markings at 1 inch or 10'h of a foot as
noted in Permit Condition 111.1 S. The MRO is okay with the foot increment markings at this facft because
they continue to produce below their permitted volume and the levels in the pond have remained well below
their 2 foot freeboard, even durin-g rainy years.
Bottom solids have not been examined and the high water(lloat) alarms in the storaze lagoon have not been
tested. The design of the laeoon would most likely require stafftwo out in a boat for accurate
measurement ofsludee and alarm testing. This poses a salty hazard and there is some potential for
dama-ge to the liner. The MRO is okay with continued visual inspection f the lagoon and monitoring of
freeboard.

Non-Conjunctive Reclaimed Water Utilization System •
W00015931 Trump National Golf Club, LLC - The Village at the Point - Iredell County
pg. 4
Flow Measurement—Effluent
*Y Is the flowmeter calibrated annually?
Y Is the flowmeter operating properly?
Y Does the flowmeter monitor continuously?
Y Does the flowmeter appear to monitor accurately?
*Comments: The meters are due for callbration as noted above Last calibration date was Aug
8'h 2014
Disposal (final end use)
Y Is the application equipment present and operational?
Y Is application equipment in need repair?
N Are cover crops the type specified in permit?
N Is cover crop in need of improvement?
N Signs of runoff?
N Sign of drift?
Y Signs of ponding?
Comments: Fteld(s) maintenance as noted previously in cover tetter. Only viewed irrigation at
field D-I and
located four leaks. Recommend other fields be examined and drtp-lines repaired as needed
Y Are buffers adequate?
N Is the acreage specified in the permit being utilized?
N Are there any limiting slopes in disposal fields?
N Are restrictions for use of these areas specified?
Y Is permit being followed?
Y Is site access restricted in accordance with permit?
Comments: Site is somewhat restricted, as the gotf course is for private use and the application
fields are not
adjacent to fairways, but signs are not posted and application fields are not fenced off. The spray
system at
the driving range has been utilizing lake water. The driving range was included in the original application
but that acreage has never been utilized for the reclaimed system Signage would need to be placed at the
driving range if this area is to be utilized for reclaimed distribution.
Recordkeepina
*Y Is the permit available upon request?
Y Are flow rates less than permitted flow?
Y Are monitoring reports present: NDMR _ NDAR _
Y Are operational logs present? Y Complete?
*Y Are lab sheets available for review?
NE Do lab sheets support data represented on NDMR or NDAR?
Y Are all samples analyzed for the required parameters?
*NA Are there any 2L GW quality violations?
NA Are annual soil reports available?
NA Did the last report indicate a need for lime? Was it applied?
Y Is the operation and maintenance manual present?
N Has DWQ received any complaints regarding the facility in the last 12 months?
Comments: Previous permit was in the on-site manual - ORC to update. The MRO can acquire lab data at
any time by email from TCW. but determined that to be unnecessary at this time Copies should be requested
for the next Inspection either by hard copy or laptop This permit does not require groundwater monitory

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Pat McCrory
Governor
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
October 12, 2015
Tim Bannister — ORC
TNGC Charlotte, LLC
Post Office Box 187
Wingate, NC 28174
Subject: Application No. WQ0015931
Additional Information Request
The Village at the Point WWTF
Reclaimed Water System
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Bannister:
Division of Water Resources' Central and Regional staff has reviewed the application package received
July 13, 2015. However, additional information is required before the review may be completed. Please
address the items on the attached pages no later than the close of business on November 11, 2015.
Please be aware that you are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules and
regulations. Any oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are still the
Applicant's responsibility. In addition, any omissions made in responding to the outstanding items in
Sections A, or failure to provide the additional information on or before the above requested date may
result in your application being returned as incomplete.
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. All revised
and/or additional documentation shall be signed, sealed and dated (where needed), with three copies
submitted to my attention at the address below.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] or
[e-mail]. Thank you for your cooperation.
Sin
;Aineer
Division of Water Resources
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section (Electronic Copy)
Permit Application File WQ0015931
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail service Center, Ralell;h, North Carolina 27699-1617
Phone: [phone] Internet htto•J/portal ncdenromhxehfwc
An Equal Opportunity 1Affirmadve Acton Employer— Made in partwith recycled paper

Mr. Tim Bannister
October 12, 2015
Page 2 of 2
A. Site May:
1. The site map provided showed drip fields D4 to D-7 clearly, but did not designate the spray
irrigation fields which will continue to be part of the permit. Please provide an updated site map
with both the drip and spray irrigation fields along with latitude and longitude coordinates of
these fields. From plotting this information using Google Earth it is clear that the coordinates
previously provided are in error.

Doby, Troy
From: Doby, Troy
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 8:42 AM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: Thornburg, Nathaniel
Subject: RE: Village at the Point WWTF W00015931
Hi Tim,
What you have sent is fine as is with the emails. That was a lot of decimal places in the latitudes and longitudes!
I have plotted the points and they are all reasonable/believable. I will put this package back in for signature.
Troy.
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 9:29 PM
To: Doby, Troy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Thornburg, Nathaniel<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
Hey Troy,
Here are all drip and spray zones with updated coordinates. They seem to be good when checked.
I did just get your letter at my office and noticed you asked for 3 copies of this stuff to be sent. Do you need me
to do so? Just let me know and I will be glad to do what you need. Thanks for your help.
Nathaniel, I sent you an NDAR sheet showing all the "spray" zones combined. I haven't used these zones ever
and don't expect to do so. Will it cause any problem with data input if i don't break all of these on 17 separate
columns? If I ever use these for some reason I will divide them up as separate zones at that time. Make
since? thanks
Regards,
Tim Bannister
TCW Wastewater Management, Inc.
POBox 187
3917 Hwy 74 East
Wingate, NC 28174
704.324.4145 Office
704.324.4147 Fax
704.201.7514 Cell

--------- Original Message ---------
Subject: RE: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
From: "Doby, Troy" <troy.doby(a,ncdenr.goy>
Date: 10/14/15 8:15 am
To: "tb(@tcwwastewater.com" <tb(atcwwastewater.com>
Cc: "Thornburg, Nathaniel"<nathaniel.thornburg_(a,ncdenr.gov>
Thanks, Tim.
Two sheets is fine.
I did not know that about Google Earth being so far off. Good to know.
There's another possibility and that is that the latitudes and longitudes were mis-typed into our database.
Could I get the data you have on this and I will double check the typing previously done. That is by far the least
expensive thing to do.
All of the drip fields lined up with your map, so I don't think there is a problem with those. If I have a labeled
map of the spray fields I can get coordinates with reasonable accuracy if it is not a typo in the database.
Thanks and have a good conference.
Troy
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 9:24 PM
To: Doby, Troy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Thornburg, Nathaniel<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
Troy,
Thanks for your follow-up. I Just a need a couple of things clarified pertaining to the two points you are stating.

I . I don't have any issues with leaving the flow at 25,000.
2. 1 will provide a site map that shows what you want. Actually it will have to be two sheets, one for the six
drip fields, and one for the 17 spray fields. I will make sure they are labeled.
3. 1 am not sure about getting any coordinates corrected on the drip or spray fields. They were all surveyed
by Land Design engineering firm back when they mapped, designed, and submitted the plans
originally. I randomly searched several drip and several spay fields tonight on Google Earth and they hit
correctly. Just a side note, I don't know how much you use Google Earth, but I use it all day every day
with our inspection program. I have found it to vary much of the time. I have it give me as good as within
3 meters and as much as 40 meters at times. Tonight it was very good on the ones that I searched.
Before money is spent to survey again and give new coordinates can you provide me with the ones that
you showed out of bounds? Maybe it is Google issue, not a survey issue?
I am in Raleigh at a wastewater conference this week until Friday. I will try to get the maps sent to you by
Monday. Thank you for your assistance.
Regards,
Tim Bannister
TCWWastewater Management, Inc.
POBox 187
3917 Hwy 74 East
Wingate, NC 28174
704.324.4145 Office
704.324.4147 Fax
704.201.7514 Cell
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Village at the Point WWTF WQ0015931
From: "Doby, Troy" <troy.dobY(dmcdenr.gov>
Date: Mon, October 12, 2015 4:14 pm
To: "tb()tcwwastewater.com" <tbCaltcwwastewater.com>
Cc: "Thornburg, Nathaniel" <nathaniel.thornbura anncdenr.aov>
Tim,
Two things:

The permitted flow is not going to be reduced from 25,000 to 20,000 gpd because there
remains more than enough acreage to handle 25,000 gpd even without D-4 to D-7.
I need a site map of some type for the permit. There was a site map showing fields D-4
to D-7 that were to be removed. That map was excellent, but did not show the numbering
of the spray fields. The site map needs to show the numbering of the spray fields as
well. Also, the latitudes & longitudes of the spray fields need to be updated. When I
mapped these on Google Earth, there were spray fields in the road, the pond, and on the
other side of the road. Attached is a copy of the letter requesting this information. An
original copy is being mailed to you as well.
Thanks for your attention to this.
Troy Doby, PhD, PE
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Water Quality Permitting Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
919-807-6336
httl2://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/aps/lau

Trump Nat'l Golf Course WWTP and Drip/Srpay
WQ0015931 Date: 10162015
AccountName
AssetClass
AssetDescription
AssetlD
Latitude
Longitude
TCW
Trump WWTP Spray Zone
Zone 01 spray
WWTP-SZ1
35.5311130966922
-80.9218195337295
TCW
Trump WWTP Spray Zone
Zone 02 spray
WWTP-SZ2
35.5319085379201
-80.9209602711639
TCW
Trump WWTP Spray Zone
Zone 03 spray
WWTP-SZ3
35.5325589238880
-80.9208797288360
TCW
Trump WWTP Spray Zone
Zone 04 spray
WWTP-SZ4
35.5329085381378
-80.9202950000000
TCW
Trump WWTP Spray Zone
Zone 05 spray
WWTP-SZ5
35.5314779453764
-80.9216213644179
TCW
Trump WWTP Spray Zone
Zone 06 spray
WWTP-SZ6
35.5320570965381
-80.9213167374344
TCW
Trump WWTP Spray Zone
Zone 07 spray
WWTP-SZ7
35.5328474058580
-80.9208037374344
TCW
Trump WWTP Spray Zone
Zone 08 spray
WWTP-SZ8
35.5330607309160
-80.9200851865082
TCW
Trump WWTP Spray Zone
Zone 09 spray
WWTP-SZ9
35.5312009033242
-80.9213735509262
TCW
Trump WWTP Spray Zone
Zone 10 spray
WWTP-SZ10
35.5323283859883
-80.9211552797623
TCW
Trump WWTP Spray Zone
Zone 11 spray
WWTP-SZ11
35.5326290000000
-80.9204720000000
TCW
Trump WWTP Spray Zone
Zone 12 spray
WWTP-SZ12
35.5314740000000
-80.9212280000000
TCW
Trump WWTP Spray Zone
Zone 13 spray
WWTP-SZ13
35.5321920205696
-80.9208618220902
TCW
Trump WWTP Spray Zone
Zone 14 spray
WWTP-SZ14
35.5330738072620
-80.9205791309357
TCW
Trump WWTP Spray Zone
Zone 15 spray
WWTP-SZ15
35.5317561931767
-80.9212230171967
TCW
Trump WWTP Spray Zone
Zone 16 spray
WWTP-SZ16
35.5323516549752
-80.9206547202377
TCW
Trump WWTP Spray Zone
Zone 17 spray
WWTP-SZ17
35.5331428438358
-80.9208858306885
TCW
Trump WWTP Drip Zone
Zone 01 drip
WWTP-DZ1
35.5329582794580
-80.921448279762
TCW
Trump WWTP Drip Zone
Zone 02 drip
WWTP-DZ2
35.5330118801305
-80.9217755092*QE
TCW
Trump WWTP Drip Zone
Zone 03 drip
WWTP-DZ3
35.5323050351409
-80.9222057374i,#
TCW
Trump WWTP Drip Zone
Zone 08 drip
WWTP-DZ8
35.5307615805298
g 1
-80.9210675423W�
�rryy�eeg
-, d
TCW
Trump WWTP Drip Zone
Zone 09 drip
WWTP-DZ9
35.5313041933242
-80.920719186598r-
80.920719186598xTCW
TCW
Trump WWTP Drip Zone
Zone 10 drip
WWTP-DZ10
35.5317690342659
-80.92041265248E

On
Fi
dV�� a0I ti 4:'
The Village At The Point �(,""�
YroiectN-1005033 Wastewater Treatment Facility Modifications �"1
j The Point on Norman, LLC , l:=' n
f I "0M I
Irr . I 4rripOcin Pian

I
I tli LxLLOL�Y+.a..• Q
( J 9k
f
7
i
I s
O
1Ii71Ef1 �7 �31I i1{ O
YIIYIY •YYY•YY YY•
1MINff�[f PUN
?i55i54Si<£6nr£SfiSS
rxxtxrrxratxs:rrt
-A
a
I
;I gp
p
7,7
��;ee� � � � P A Re �P � � � � m i" °<Y it \.`i ��"%7 2/"` \7 ,�, `� y� \ •
q$C
494
•\ 1
•\
7
,I;DYIF ®°C
The Village At The Point
M!;�
Wastewater Treatment Facility Madlfimdont
f N•
m.ree ^. r+a+w�UFnawn *u.�b.�eAee.Ne
•_.
C..5 ,
C
IMtrtl°n Z° ft Pbn
I
LmdDedp
r, wm I