Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDEQ-CFW_00023052From: Holman, Sheila [/O=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=94A3F69674D34B769B3BD834A97105C5-SCHOLMAN] Sent: 7/18/2017 9:31:14 PM To: Culpepper, Linda [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDI BO H F23SPDLT)/cn=Recip ients/cn =73d475cbae324a29 b87e17 1 ldc9a7k5d mcu I pepper] Subject: Fwd: Media inquiry regarding Gov. Cooper's GenX statement Fyi sent from my vefizon, sanis1mg cifll\y sup �a_rtpllo tic -------- Original message -------- From: "Talley, Noelle S" <Noell e. Tall ey@nc. gov> Date: 7/18/17 5:24 PM (GMT-05:00) To: "Porter, Ford C" <Ford.Porter@nc.gov>, "Weiner, Sadie" <sadie.weiner@nc.gov>, "Kritzer, Jamie" <jamie.kritzer@ncdenr.gov>, "Holman, Sheila" <sheila.holman@ncdenr.gov> Subject: Fwd: Media inquiry regarding Gov. Cooper's GenX statement Adding Sheila Holman and Jamie Kriffer from DEQ. Sheila can provide technical guidance to the reporter if needed Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: Resent -From: <SRSO=s690=6V=ui-nail.com=vauahn.haL)rertvr�t)securence.coi-n> From: Vaughn Hagerty <vau. h eqy_? 49 ,g ail.com> Date: July 18, 2017 at 5:19:04 PM EDT To: "Porter, Ford C" <Ford.Porter@nc.gov>, <Noel] e3alleyoa. tic. gov> Subject: Re: Media inquiry regarding Gov. Cooper's GenX statement Thanks, Ford. A followup question: Is there some reason that, in the meantime, given that it generally takes EPA years to set such guidelines and Chemours, that DEQ should not set a limit in Chemours'NPDES permit for GenX and, perhaps, some of the other perfluorinated compounds? After all, Chemours operates under the terms of its *current* permit until a new one is issued. -Vaughn Hagerty On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Porter, Ford C <Ford.Porterr& nc. gov> wrote: Vaughn, Got your request. The following is attributable to me, as spokesman: DEQ-CFW-00023052 North Carolina officials need EPA to provide its guidance in order for North Carolina to be able to set surface and ground water standards for GenX, which is why Governor Cooper is pressing the EPA for swift action. Once the EPA takes action on GenX, North Carolina can develop an enforceable standard for it instead of having to rely on Chemours agreeing not to discharge. As part of the state's ongoing investigation, DEQ is looking closely at Chemours' discharge permit and will not renew it while questions remain about the company's actions. Thanks, From: Vaughn Hagerty [rn ai I to:yg ughn Ih ageftv' gmafllcorn] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 11:56 AM To: Talley, Noelle S Subject: Media inquiry regarding Gov. Cooper's GenX statement Hi, Noel] e. My name is Vaughn Hagerty. I'm a journalist working with the StarNews in Wilmington on its GenX coverage. I had a few questions regarding Governor Cooper's statement yesterday, but I wanted to make sure I understood what was meant by one particular part. In the press release accompanying the statement, it says: "Additional action from the EPA is necessary in order for North Carolina to be able to permanently require Chemours to limit or end discharge of GenX or any currently unregulated chemical." Is the governor saying this is necessary because North Carolina does not have the regulatory authority without guidance from EPA to limit or end discharge of GenX? If so, is that something specific to North Carolina? If not, can you help me understand the obstacle(s) to which the governor is referring?. DEQ-CFW-00023053 Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. Regards, Vaughn Hagerty Press Secretary 20301 Mail Service Center 919 814 2104 office Office of the Governor governor. nc.gov/ DEQ-CFW-00023054 d thi,_ No:`h surli, DEQ-CFW-00023055