Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDEQ-CFW_00022218Main Legislation Affecting DWR 0 Session Law 2017-57 (S13 257) In Situ Nutrient Management Strategies — Allow the use of $1.3 million for permitting and implementation of alternative technologies for in situ approaches to nutrient management in Falls Lake and Jordan Lake; — Require testing or sampling activities required to support permit applications begin by September 1, 2017; and — Submit an interim report no later than September 1 of each year the study an trial, with a final report due no later than December 31, 2020. 1 q,ection 13.8(a) Dredging Study The DWR shall study the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of the acquisition by the State of North Carolina of one or more dredges. Recommendations for fiscal or legislative actions are due no later than April 1, 2018. The Department ofTransportation and the Department ofEnvironmental Quality shall jointly perform a cost -benefit analysis of the State providing dredging services versus the State utilizing private contractors to provide dredging services. The findings ofthe analysis required, including any legislative W MUSE Tom., — Section 4 outlines clarification for reporting of wastewater discharges- - Section 5 consolidation of water resources and water quality reports. -- Section 9clarifies setbacks for permitted disposal systems. -- Section 13 amends existing buffers toexempt requirements for public safety. -- Section 14 exempts the Catawba River Basin Buffer rules on publicly owned property that will be sued for walking trails. -- Section 15 directs the General Assembly's Fiscal Research Division to estimate the value ofproperty subject to the buffer rules with a report due by May I018. --- Section 16 directs DVVRto conduct water quality sampling program for nutrients along the mainstern of the Catawba River and include water quality sampling for nutrients above, in, and below each major tributary of the Catawba River. The report is due no later than October l, 2018. -ocal government riparian buffer uniformity, amends Jordan water supply #uffers to exempt requirements for public safety, and repeals the Catawba lo,offer rules. Nutrient Management Regulatory Framework Revisions including adjusting ru re-acloption dates for Falls and Jordan Lakes. I OEQ-CFVV_00022218 Directs DEQ and the State Property Office to negotiate with federal authorities for the state to assume responsibility for acquiring dredged material easement sites for the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Beaufort Inlet and the Virginia border. DWR has worked with Dr. Detlef Knappe at NCSU to evaluate concentrations of 1,4- dioxane in 2014-15 in the Cape Fear River, and we continue to work with local governments on methods to reduce the introduction of the chemical into water systems. Currently there is no certified wastewater laboratory test method so our Water Sciences lab is developing a test method, which once approved, will allow NPID permittees with conditions for required monitoring to conduct testing.. EPA has not s;1-1 a Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) at this time but has established health screenin information: httPs://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014- 0 DWR is continuing work with EPA to evaluate current concentrations of perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluoroctanesulfonic acid (PFOA/PFOS) successor chemicals (GenX) in the Cape Fear River, and assisting DHHS in the development of initial health advisory levels along with federal agencies: EPA, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Earlier studies conducted in the Cape Fear River by Dr. Mei Sun and colleagues, including Dr. Knappe and EPA's National Exposure Research Lab in RTP, NC, Current sampling and analysis conducted in June — July 2017 will supplement those results. There are limited health studies on some of the chemicals. Discussion continue between the DWR staff and EPA Region 4 and Headquarters staff concerning listing methodology, delisting methodology and use of action levels. Staff discussed use of the states proposed 10/90 listing method vs EPA >1 in 3 method. EPA Region 4 Water Director agreed to discuss further. Staff also discussed use of Action Levels as currently prescribed by NC rules and implications for NPIDES permits. Working on a path forward that will allow permits to comply with state rules until modified and OEQ-CFVV_00022219