DEQ-CFW_00022070

From: Holman, Sheila [/D=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGEADMINISTRATIVE GROUP
(FYD|BOHF2]SPDLT)/CN=REOP|ENTS/CN=94A]F69674D34B7G9B3BD834A97105C5-SCHOLN1AN]
Sent: 7/7/20I78:38:22AW1
To: Culpepper, Linda [/b=ExchanXeLabs/ou=[xchangeAdministrative Group
(FYD|8OHFZ33PDO)/cn=Redpient$cn=73d475cbae3Z4aI9687e171Idc9a79c5'|mcu|pepper]
CC: Kritzer, Jamie [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=ExchanXeAdministrative Group
(FYD|8OHFZ33PDO)/cn=Redpient$cn=cee93c49dOI445a3b54Ibb3Z7dcdc84O-jbkritzer]
Subject: Re:Draftresponse—KE:Thankyou
Yes, please. Thank you for your help.
sonffrommyVorimn,Sammn,, mmarlphno
��
-----un0mmmessage --------
From: "Culpepper, Linda" x1indo.oulpepp .gov>
[)ate: 7/6/17 11:16PM 5:00)
To:" She�o"<ahc�o' gov>
(�c"Kritzer, Jamie" ^junie.kritz .sov>
Subject: FW: Draft response -- RE Thank you
Sorry, ljust read Jamieemail. Want outorespond back to Mr. Black?
Linda Culpepper
Deputy Director
Division ofWater Resources
North Carolina Department ofEnvivomnmen(u 0nuh(y
l6||Mail Service Center
9honu:9|9-7O7'9Ol4
Email correspondence k`and from this address insubject Nthe
North Carolina Public Records Law and may bodisclosed Lothird parties.
--'Original Message --'
Foono:KibzecJmnie
Sent: Thursday. June 29,2O|73:5OPM
To: Culpepper, Linda <hndu.oulpoppor(aDnodenr.go/>
Subject: RE: Draft response — RE: Thank you
I'm fine with this response. Did you want to forward onNSheila and she can send NMr. Black?
Jamie Kritzer
Communications Director
N.C.Department ofEnvironmental Quality
919-707-8602
919-218-5935

Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Culpepper, Linda
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 3:46 PM
To: Kritzer, Jamie <jamie.kritzerrqncdenr.gov>
Subject: Draft response -- RE: Thank you
Draft.................................................
Thank you for the follow up email from yesterday's forum. Glad to hear that the dialog was a helpful way to share information.
I appreciated being a part of the panel.
As part of moving forward with regulatory reviews, we are exploring options on legislative changes to the current processes.
Some may be at the state level and others at the federal. Your thoughts are very much appreciated, and we will carry them forward in
the discussions.
Linda Culpepper
Deputy Director
Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department. of Environmental Quality
1611 Mail Service Center
Phone: [phone]
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Holman, Sheila
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 10:59 AM
To: Kritzer, Jamie <jamie.kritzerCq,)ncdenr.gov>; Culpepper, Linda <lmda.cuIpepper4ncdenr.gov>
Subject: FW: Thank you
Jamie and Linda,
Can you all help with preparing a response to Mr. Black? Thank you.
Sheila
Sheila Holman
Assistant Secretary for the Enviroranent
NCDEQ
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Phone/Fax: [phone]
deq.nc.gov
Sheila. holman,(dncdenr. gov
-----Original Message -----
From: Bill Black [inailto:billblackrdapptao.o
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 10:51 AM
To: Holman. Sheila <sheila.holmanCd),ncdenr.gov>
Subject: Thank you
DEQ-CFW-00022071

Dear Sheila,
I am a resident of New Hanover County. Thank you for attending the event in Wilmington last night.
It must have been difficult for you because I was aware of some hostility from the people attending toward our regulators. You
seemed to handle it well, and I even saw a little smile from you. And thank you for the work on the GenX water pollution.
I am sorry that you that did not get more time to explain the work of the DEQ. I think it was a useful meeting but it would be much
more informative to have just a few panelists at one time. Perhaps that can be arranged later.
The point was made last night that discharge permits are allowed for substances to be dumped in our water supply without any
indication that the substances are safe for us to drink or otherwise use. This seems like a very wrong-headed approach to water
regulation. Why can you not turn the tables and require polluters to prove that substances are safe before they are allowed to dump
them in the river?
Yours sincerely,
Bill Black
DEQ-CFW-00022072