DEQ-CFW_00087170

TITLE V AIR PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW
Revised July 7, 2003
APPLICANT:
SITE LOCATION:
COUNTY:
E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Co., LLC
Fayetteville
Bladen
DBA, Dupont - Fayetteville Works
TECHNICAL CONTACT: PHONE:
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
TITLE:
Michael Johnson 910-678-1155
Barry Hudson
Plant Manager
REVIEW ENGINEER:
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
Michael Benson
May 12, 2004
REGIONAL CONTACT:
REGIONAL OFFICE:
SIC CODE:
Tom Mckinney
Fayetteville
2821, 3081, 3083
APPLICATION NUMBER: EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER: NEW
PERMIT NUMBER:
03735T25
03735T26
1. Purpose of Application:
The purpose of this application is to make an administrative amendment to the originally issued initial Title V p
er
m
it.
T
hi
s
p
er
m
it
c
0
nt
ai
n
e
d
DEQ-CFW 00087170

a
S
ec
ti
0
n
2.
3
fo
r
m
is
ce
11
e
n
e
0
us
sc
ru
b
b
er
re
9
ui
re
m
e
nt
s
as
so
ci
at
e
d
w
it
h
v
ar
io
us
e
9
DEQ-CFW 00087171

}
l
ui
P
m
e
nt
ac
ro
ss
th
e
PI
a
nt
T
h
e
P
er
m
itt
ee
c
0
nt
ac
to
d
D
A
Q
b
Y
P
h
0
n
e
a
n
d
re
9
u
es
to
d
DEQ-CFW 00087172

4
%
th
at
th
es
e
re
9
ui
re
In
e
nt
s
b
e
In
0
v
e
d
to
th
ei
r
re
sp
ec
ti
v
e
su
bs
ec
ti
0
ns
in
s
ec
ti
0
n
2.
2.
T
h
e
DEQ-CFW 00087173

c
h
a
n
g
es
ar
e
li
st
e
d
0
n
th
e
to
bl
e
b
el
0
w
2. Facility Description:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., LLC produces polyvinyl butyral sheeting used in the automotive industry
andspecialized membranes used in the chemical industry as well as some fluoroproducts. The facility currently
has two oil -fired boilers, a Butacite® production process, a Nafion® production process, a fluoroproducts
polymer manufacturing development facility, and a wastewater treatment facility. The facility is considered
major for Title V purposes because S02, NOx and VOC exceed major thresholds. The facility also exceeds
10/25 TPY for HAP emissions.
DEQ-CFW 00087174

3. Application Chronology:
April 5.2004 - Permittee contacted Dr. Don van der Vaart in regards to making an adminstrative
amendment.
May 24, 2004 - Draft permit sent to Tom McKinney, FRO.
4. Changes to the Current Permit:
Changes to the permit are summarized below:
Page No.
Section
Changes
cover
N/A
Dates, Permit No.
Table of
contents
N/A
Removed Section 2.3.
11
2.1.B.3.
Added condensor and scrubber requirements
(b. - f.).
15-16
2.1.C.6 - 8.
Added MACT and scrubber requirements.
18
2.113.4.
Added scrubber requirements (e. - g.).
19
2.1.E.2.
Added scrubber requirements (a. and b.).
19
2.1.F.1.
Added condensor and scrubber requirements
(b. - d.).
28
2.2.13.2 - 4.
Added scrubber requirements.
DEQ-CFW 00087175

5. New Equipment/Change in Emissions and Regulatory Review:
There were no changes in equipment or applicable regulations as a result of this modification.
6. NSPS, NESHAPS, PSD, MACT and Attainment Status:
Bladen County has been triggered for PSD increment tracking for PM10 and S02. This modification does
not affect PSD increment tracking.
The facility also has equipment subject to MACT Subpart KK and FFFF. The facility will be subject to
MACT DDDDD in the future. A stipulation indicating that the facility shall comply with MACT Subpart
FFFF was included in this permit.
7. CAM Issues:
The facility is not subject to CAM at this time.
8. 112(r) Issues:
This facility is subject to 112(r).
9. Facility -wide Air Toxics:
The facility is subject to 2D .1100 and has completed maximum emission rate modeling for all TAPs.
These limits are in the current permit as facility -wide limit.
10. Monitoring Recordkeeping/Reporting:
This application did not change the facility's monitoring and recordkeeping requirements. However, the
way the monitoring and recordkeeping requirements are organized was changed. In Permit No.03735T25,
condensor and scrubber requirements were contained in Section 2.3. These requirements were moved to
each respective subsection as listed above. The facility is required to perform periodic maintanence as
recommended by the manufacture, as well as monitoring and recording key operating parameters of the
control equipment. These parameters shall be recorded in a logbook.
DEQ-CFW 00087176

11. Emissions Summary:
Facility -wide criteria emissions are summarized from the most recent application for modification.
Emissions have not changed as a result of this administrative amendment.
Pollutant
Actual Emissions
(after controls, TPY)
Potential Emissions
(before controls, TPY)
Potential Emissions
(after controls)
PM
82.86
419.51
124.04
PM10
41.81
134.87
56.31
PM2.5
238
241.16
90.31
S02
674.97
1530.19
1489.29
NOx
104.91
308.57
271.31
CO
13.84
49.67
49.67
VOC
167.34
2092.41
444.73
Lead
0.00
0.00
0.00
In addition, the facility has methanol emissions of 24.18, the largest HAP, and is also above the 10l25 TPY
threshold for Title V.
12. Compliance Status:
The DAQ has reviewed the compliance status of this facility. On its latest inspection, September 19, 2003,
the facility appeared to be operating in compliance with all requirements. There have been no violations in
at least five years.
13. Conclusions, Comments, and Recommendations:
FRO recommends issuance of Permit No. 03735T26.
Issue Permit No. 03735T26.
DEQ-CFW 00087177