Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDEQ-CFW_00085996DuPont Fluoroproducts 22828 NC Highway 87 W Fayetteville, NC 28306-7332 August 6, 2008 Mr. Steven F. Vozzo NCDENR — Division of Air Quality Fayetteville Regional Office 225 Green Street — Suite 714 Fayetteville, NC 28301 SUBJECT: Title V Air Quality Permit Deviations Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing NESHAP (MON) Air Quality Permit No. 03735T33 Dear Mr. Vozzo: Pursuant to Part I Section 3(I.A)(3) of the subject Title V permit, this letter is the required notification of four (4) permit deviations of a requirement specified in Part I Section 2.1(C)(7)(a) of the subject permit. That condition requires that this site comply with all applicable provisions of the Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing NESHAP ("MON") as promulgated in 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart FFFF. The effective date of the MON was May 10, 2008. Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.2490, any heat exchanger subject to the MON must comply with the work practice standards of 40 CFR 63.104. The DuPont Company — Fayetteville Works' HFPO Process (ID No. NS-A) operates two (2) process heat exchangers that are subject to the MON. To monitor for the presence of a leak in a heat exchanger system, §63.104(b)(5) requires that three (3) samples of both the cooling water entrance and exit of the heat exchanger be monitored for the presence of speciated hazardous air pollutants ("HAP") monthly for the first six months of operation and quarterly thereafter. To comply with the monthly heat exchanger monitoring requirement, three samples of both the cooling water entrance and exit were taken at both of the above heat exchangers for the months of May 2008 and June 2008. DuPont personnel believed that these samples satisfied the requirement of monthly triplicate samples at each required monitoring location. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company DEQ-CFW 00085996 W. Steven F. Vozzo NCDENR — Division of Air Quality August 6, 2008 Page 2 of 2 When the commercial laboratory received the sets of triplicate samples, their belief was that each set represented.a single sample for analysis of the specific HAP, a duplicate sample for QA/QC purposes, and a spare sample container in case of breakage of the other two samples. As such, the lab analyzed at most two of the samples from set each instead of the required three. This error was discovered in July 2008 and DuPont personnel were able to sample and submit the required three samples per monitoring point for that month. Therefore, the two heat exchangers subject to this MON requirement did not have the required number of samples analyzed for either May 2008 or June 2008. This results in the four permit deviations. The cause of these deviations was a misunderstanding between DuPont personnel submitting triplicate samples and the commercial laboratory who interpreted them as being a single sample. DuPont personnel will now submit nine (9) samples per monitoring point per month, and those samples will be clearly labeled to identify them as the required triplicate samples. This will eliminate the possibility of the recurrence of these deviations. If you have any questions regarding this permit deviation, or if you need any additional information, please contact Michael Johnson at (910) 678-1155. By my below signature, I certify that I believe the information contained in this letter is true, accurate, and complete. Sincerely, Karen B. Wrigley Plant Manager DEQ-CFW 00085997