Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDEQ-CFW_00074745National Institute for Public Health and the Environment Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport Evaluation of substances used in the GenX technology by Chemours, Dordrecht RIVM Letter report 2016-0174 M. Beekman et al. W5;L-t7 rWF'C& M 4"?" %04,P P"11' 7 T)+t !Lr--'qfCM DEQ-CFW 00074745 RIVM Letter report 2016-0174 Summary In this report, the GenX related perfluorinated substances (FRD-903, FRD-902 and E1) are evaluated. These substances are used or are formed during the production of fluoropolymers by Chemours (Dordrecht) applying the GenX technology. In this technology, the controversial PFOA substances are replaced. The following questions are addressed in the evaluation: 1. What is known about the PBTS-properties of FRD-903, FRD-902 and E1? 2. What is known about the possible CMR6-properties and STOT RE - properties' (especially the toxicity to kidney and liver) of FRD- 903, FRD-902 and E1? 3. What is known about the emission of FRD-903 and E1 by Chemours (Dordrecht)? 4. What are the possible health effects (now and in the future) for people living in the vicinity of the Chemours Dordrecht plant due to exposure to FRD-903 and E1? For FRD-903 the evaluation is based on read across from FRD-902, since all available toxicological studies were performed with the ammonium salt (FRD-902). Read -across of the toxicological properties of the ammonium salt to the acid (FRD-903) is considered justified for systemic effects as after dissolution and dissociation of the acid and the salt the absorption in the intestinal tract and the lungs and distribution over the body of the anion (2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)- propanoate) will be the same. As to the first question above, it is concluded that RIVM cannot exclude that the GenX related substances meet the PBT/vPvBa criteria. All evaluated substances (FRD-903, FRD-902 and E1) are perfluorinated compounds and can be regarded as certainly very persistent. Since FRD- 903 and FRD-902 are more rapidly eliminated than PFOA, it is expected that both substances bioaccumulate to a lesser degree than PFOA does. However, it is not possible to reach a conclusion on the human bioaccumulation potential in absence of data on the human clearance time. For the substance E1, insufficient information is available to draw a conclusion about the bioaccumulation potential. Since E1 contains no hydrophilic group, the human clearance time of the substance and the bioaccumulation potential are expected to be higher than for PFOA, although E1 has the potential to be excreted via exhalation. FRD-903 and FRD-902 are considered less hazardous compared to PFOA. However, no definitive conclusion can be reached whether they meet the T criteria. E1 will most likely not meet the T criteria. For the CMR and STOT RE properties, it is concluded that classification as carcinogenic category 2 (suspected human carcinogen) is justified for 5 Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic 6 Carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for the reproduction 7 Specific Target Organ Toxicity, Repeated Exposure 8 Very Persistent and very Bioaccumulative Page 13 of 92 DEQ-CFW 00074746 RIVM Letter report 2016-0174 FRD-903 and FRD-902. The available studies show that both substances are not mutagenic. On reproductive toxicity the limited effects observed in presence of maternal toxicity do not normally result in classification, whereas PFOA is classified as toxic for the reproduction (category 1B). The requirement of STOT RE 2 (like liver and kidney) is difficult to assess due to dose levels tested in mice clearly below the guidance values, which may be taken as an indication that STOT RE 2 is needed. The effects in the rat are borderline and difficult to assess due to the large steps in the dose levels. Effects on the liver are observed at the similar dose levels for FRD-902 and PFOA. The available information on the toxicity of E1 is limited but that information indicates that E1 has a low to very low toxicity. This is supported by the repeated dose toxicity information on some structural analogues. However, all available studies were performed in male animals only and were of limited duration only. The available in vitro and in vivo data on mutagenicity combined with the read -across data show that E1 is unlikely to be mutagenic. In addition, the available data indicate no requirement for classification for acute toxicity nor probably for STOT RE via inhalation. The requirement for classification for other hazard classes including carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity and STOT RE via oral exposure, however, is unknown. A chronic inhalation exposure limit of 73 ng/m3 for FRD-903 and FRD- 902 is derived in the present report in a worst -case approach, taking into account an extra safety margin due to uncertainty in the accumulation potential. The year -average air concentrations of FRD-903 were calculated based on the permitted emissions. This led to estimated concentrations in air of about 20 ng/m3 for the nearest populated areas (along the dike opposite side of the river) and lower concentrations at greater distances from the plant. Based on the recorded emissions for 2014 the estimated concentrations for the nearest populated areas are about 15 ng/m3. Comparing these concentrations with the limit value of 73 ng/m3 leads to the conclusion that based on the available data, no health risk is expected for people living in the vicinity of the Chemours Dordrecht plant due to exposure to FRD-903. The information on the toxicity of E1 is limited. The data are insufficient for deriving an inhalation exposure limit for the general population. The year -average air concentrations for E1 were calculated based on the permitted emissions. This led to estimated concentrations in air of about 40 ng /m3 for the nearest populated areas (along the dike at the opposite side of the river) and lower concentrations at greater distances from the plant. Based on recorded emissions for 2014 the estimated concentrations for the nearest populated areas are about 20 ng/m3. Due to the insufficient health effects information available for E1, these concentrations cannot be evaluated as to the possible health risk they might pose for people living in the vicinity of the Chemours plant in Dordrecht. Page 14 of 92 DEQ-CFW 00074747 RIVM Letter report 2016-0174 2 General information 2.1 Description GenX technology FRD-902 is used as processing aid in the Teflon PTFE and Teflon FEP plants of Chemours. Other uses of FRD-902 are not described in the registration dossier or in the literature. FRD-902 is manufactured by mixing FRD-903 with an ammonium hydroxide solution. FRD-903 is imported. FRD-902 controls the polymerization to make fluoropolymers. Fluoroploymer resins and finished goods are used in many applications like wire cables and Teflon coating. During the resin manufacturing process, FRD-902 is transformed into the hydrophobic water -insoluble hydride (E1). During the process, FRD-903 and E1 are emitted to air from the Teflon PTFE and from the Teflon FEP plants. Furthermore, FRD- 902 and FRD-903 are emitted to wastewater. After removal of these compounds, the wastewater is sent to the local municipal sewage treatment plant. Exposure of people living in the vicinity of the Chemours is expected to be primarily through the emission to air. 2.2 Substance identity and status of FRD-902 Name: ammonium 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)- propanoate CAS -number: 62037-80-3 EC -number: 700-242-3 Synonyms: FRD-902, C3-dimer salt IUPAC name: ammonium 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)- propanoate Structure: C6H4NF11O3 F fFF F O NH4 F REACH: registered by Chemours Netherlands BV: 10 - 100 TPA, full registration CLP13: no harmonised classification, 28 notifiers to the CLP inventory (19 September 2016) (Acute Tox. 4; H302, Eye Dam. 1; H318, STOT RE 2; H373 (blood)), see table 1. 13 Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP Regulation) Page 17 of 92 DEQ-CFW 00074748 RIVM Letter report 2016-0174 2.3 Physical chemical properties" Melting point: 208 °C (99.4% purity) Freezing point: -21 °C (86% purity) Vapour pressure: 0.012 Pa (99.4% purity) Solubility in water: >1000 g/L (99.4 % purity) Form: liquid (86% purity, marketed form), solid (dried substance, 99.4% purity) Color: colourless liquid Density: 1118 g/L (99.4% purity) Dissociation constant: pKa: 3.82 (86% purity) Substance identity and status of FRD-903 Name: 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)propanoic acid CAS -number: 13252-13-6 EC -number: 236-236-8 Synonyms: FRD-903, C3-dimer IUPAC name: 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)propanoic acid, perfluoro-2-methyl-3-oxahexanoic acid Structure: C6HF1103 O �a F F 0 F F F F F -- — F F REACH: not registered CLP: no harmonised classification, 99 notifiers to the CLP inventory (including Acute Tox. 4; H302, Skin Corr. 1B or 1C; H314, Eye Dam. 1; H318, STOT SE 3; H335 (Respiratory) and no classification), see table 2. 14 REACH registration data, 19 September 2016 Page 19 of 92 DEQ-CFW 00074749 RIVM Letter report 2016-0174 2.4 Substance identity and status of El Name: heptafluoropropyl 1,2,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl ether CAS -number: 3330-15-2 EC -number: 671-353-1 Synonyms: propane, 1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptafluoro-3-(1,2,2,2- tetrafluoroethoxy)- E1 IUPAC name: heptafluoropropyl 1,2,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl ether Structure: C51-IF11O F F F F F F H F -'' F F 0 F F REACH: not registered CLP: no harmonised classification, 3 notifiers to the CLP inventory (29 August 2016) Page 21 of 92 DEQ-CFW 00074750