Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDEQ-CFW_00074109west virginia department of environmental protection Office of Environmental Remediation 131A Peninsula Street Wheeling, WV 26003 Phone: 304-238-1220/Fax: 304-238-1006 MEMORANDUM To: Yogesh Patel Matthew Sweeney ` Q From: Lawrence P. Sirinek, Ph.D. t,. Date: January 31, 2012 Subject: DuPont GenX Toxicity CC: Pat Campbell Scott Mandirola Ken Ellison Don Martin Earl Ray Tomblin, Governor Randy C. Huffman, Cabinet Secretary www.dep.wv.gov I have completed my review of the documentation provided by DuPont regarding the toxicity of GenX Compound A and Compound B. As I requested redacted documents, the identities and chemical differences between the substances were not provided; however, most of the toxicological studies appear to involve compound B. For this reason I have focused my discussion on this compound. The relevance of the different compounds as they relate to permitted discharges should be clarified with DuPont. With regard to ecological endpoints, I concur with the points provided in the documents provided by DuPont. Thus, 4.2 mg/L, reported as the 21 day NOEC (no observed effect concentration) for Daphnia magna seems to be an appropriate endpoint for use in determining discharge levels that would protect aquatic receptors. With regard to human health effects, there were no data from chronic studies performed in either rats or primates contained in the material provided by DuPont. Chronic studies in both rats and mice are apparently ongoing, however data was not provided. While these data would be preferable, derivation of an appropriate toxicity criterion for human health can be based on a subchronic (90 day) study performed in rats. In this particular study, DuPont indicates a NOAEL (no observed adverse effect level) at 10 mg/kg/day, based on evidence of regenerative anemia in males at 100 mg/kg/d and females at 1000 mg/kg/d. Other effects were reported, but are likely attributable to mechanisms that are often considered irrelevant to potential human toxicity (e.g. PPARa agonists). With regard to the NOAEL, it must be noted that male rats exposed at this concentration (10 mg/kg/day) did exhibit significant decreases in erythrocyte (red blood cell) counts, hematocrit, and hemoglobin levels that are also indicative of anemia. DuPont considers the anemia Promoting a healthy environment. DEQ-CFW 00074109 DuPont GenX Review January 31, 2012 Page 2 described by these parameters as non -adverse in this group, since the animals lacked evidence of compensatory erythrocyte production (e.g. elevated reticulocyte counts). On the other hand, while the reticulocyte counts were not significantly elevated in this group, there was a clear, dose -dependent trend in the mean reticulocyte count at week 13. Unfortunately it cannot be determined whether continued dosing beyond this time point would have resulted in more dramatic indications of a compensatory response, or whether the impact was sufficiently limited at the 10 nig/kg/day dose, such that no compensatory response was needed. Absent more definitive data; the depressed red cell counts, hematocrit and hemoglobin levels should be sufficient to constitute a health -protective endpoint for purposes of assessing the potential impacts from chronic exposure to the test compound. Additional consideration should be made when results of the chronic study are provided. On the basis of a revised NOAEL of 0.1 mg/kg/day, and applying relevant uncertainty factors for chronic to subchronic extrapolation (10) and rat to human extrapolation (10), the oral reference dose (RfDo) = 0.001 mg/kg/day. Based upon this value, a reasonable risk -based drinking water equivalent level (DWEL) assuming total intake of the substance from a contaminated source would be 351Ag/L. As discussed in subsequent communications, a source adjustment of 50% could reasonably be applied to this value to allow for potential intake from other sources. Use of this adjustment would result in a final DWEL of 18 µg/L. Based upon the information provided by DuPont, I believe this value would protect both human health and the environment. I hope this discussion is helpful. Please contact me should you require further discussion or clarification. DEQ-CFW 00074110