Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDEQ-CFW_00083941W,flTED SIATE',S E--INWRONNHINTAL July *13, 2017 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Laboratory Results for GenX (Rounds I-3)NC DEQ Cape Fear Watershed Sampling FROM: Timothy J. Buckley- Dire c6./N Exposure Methods and UpAurements Division THRU: Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, Director TO: Linda Culpepper, Deputy Director Division of Water Resources North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Per your request of June 9, 2017, 1 am pleased to provide you with the laboratory analysis results for the concentration of GenX in water samples collected by NC DEQ. These results are f'or the first three weeks of sampling. Samples were received by our laboratory on June 23rd, June 30th, and July 7th for each of these three rounds of weekly sampling. It is our understanding that we will be receiving and analyzing samples from additional rounds of sampling. Results from these additional sampling rounds will be reported separately as they become available. We will also report semi -quantitative concentrations of additional PFAS analytes in a later report. Each round of sampling consisted of a number of sites selected by NC DEQ that included a variety of water types: effluent, source, drinking, and well waters. Sampling rounds 2 and 3 also included field blanks and spikes that were provided by our laboratory for quality control purposes. It is our understanding that duplicate samples were collected at each site. One of the duplicates was provided to our laboratory with the second sample being provided to a contract laboratory, 'Test America (Denver, Colorado), for GenX analysis. In rounds 2 and 3, Test America was also provided with field blanks and spikes that were prepared by our laboratory (round 2) and by an independent lab within EPA (round 3). Results from these QC samples will provide the basis for comparing our results with Test America, Our laboratory methods for this analysis are described in Sun et al., 20161 and Strynar et al., 20152. Sun M; Arevalo E- Strynar M-, Lindstrom A; Richardson M; Kearns B; Pickett A; Smith C; Knappe DRU: Legacy and Emerging Perfluoroalkyl Substances Are Important Drinking Water Contaminants in the Cape Fear River Watershed of North Carolina. Environmental Science &Tcchuolo,-4Y Letters. 2016 ,=Strynar M, Dagnino S, McMahen R, Liang S, Lindstrom A, Andersen E, McMillan L, Thurman M, Ferrer 1, Ball C. identification of Novel Perfluoroalkyl Ether Carboxylic Acids (PFECAs) and Sulfonic Acids (PFESAs) in Natural Waters Using Accurate Mass Ti nle-of- Fl i.-ht Mas; Spectrometry (TOFMS). Environ Sci Technol. 2015 DEQ-CFW-00083941 July 13, 2017 The following provides a brief summary of results. * GenX was observed above our detection limit of 10 ng/f. in all but one sample. * GenX concentrations ranged from 4 rig/l, (DWR 3 PO Hoffer WTP Raw Water) to 21,759 ng/l, (DWR #I-Chemours Outfall). * Some samples exceeded our calibration curve (particularly week I where this was the ease for all but one sample). These samples were diluted and the analysis was repeated. The dilution procedure introduces some additional uncertainty in our quantification. We have flagged results for samples that required dilution, * Quality control samples (included in rounds 2 & 3 only) indicated no field or laboratory contamination and results accurate with about 5% of the expected values, Specifically, QC samples showed: • GenX was not detected in either of the two field blanks (round 2 & 3) • Spiked field samples (n=4; round 2 & 3) were measured with an accuracy that ranged 1rom 96.7 to 106 percent. Hence, we have high confidence in the concentration results reported here. Thank you for inviting us to be a part of this effort that addresses a very important public health concern in North Carolina. These results represent the effort of many within our lab but I would especially like to acknowledge Dr. Mark Strynar and his laboratory conducting the analysis, his Branch Chief. Dr. Myriam Medina -Vera who provided invaluable support and coordination, and Ms. Sania Tong Argao who supported and oversaw quality assurance. If you have any questions or concerns, do not hesitate to contact me at (919) 541-2454 or email M". I look forward to our continued work together. .. . ............... ­�I,.,,----- Attachment CC: Becky B, Allenbach,Acting Deputy Director Water Protection Division, EPA Region 4 — Atlanta DEQ-CFW-00083942 July 13, 2017 Conc. Flag Week Location / Sample Identifier (n /L) 1 DWR #1- Chemours Outfall 21,760 1 1 DWR #2 - Bladen Bluffs Raw Water intake 501 2 1 NC DEQ #I- LCFWSA 629 2 1 NC DEQ #2 - CFPUA Sweeny 726 2 1 NC DEQ #3 - CFPUA ASR well 588 2 1 NC DELI #5 - International Paper Raw 703 2 1 NC DEQ #6 - International Paper Finished 523 2 1 NC DEQ #7 - NW Brunswick WTP finished 695 2 1 NC DEQ #8 - Pender County 421 WTP Finished 269 2 1 NC DEQ #4 - Wrightville Beach Well 11 27 2 DWR #1 Chemours Qutfall 002 15,250 1 2 DWR #2 Bladen Bluffs Raw Water 31 2 NCDEQ 1 LCFWSA Raw water 72 2 NCDEQ 2 Sweeny Finished 100 2 NCDEQ 3 ASR well 336 3 2 NCDEQ 4 Wrightsville Reach Well #11 28 2 NCDEQ 5 International Paper Raw water 41 2 NCDEQ 6 International Paper Finished water 111 2 NCDEQ 7 NW Brunswick WTP Finished 52 2 NCDEQ 8 Pender WTP Finished 112 3 DWR 1 Chemours Qutfall 002 21,530 1 3 DWR 2 Bladen Bluffs Raw water 168 3 DWR 3 PO Hoffer WTP Raw Water 4 4 3 NCDEQ 1 LCFWSA Raw 119 3 NCDEQ 2 Sweeny Finished 87 3 NCDEQ 3 ASR Well 148 3 NCDEQ 4 Wrightsville Beach Well #11 24 3 NCDEQ 5 International Paper Raw 158 3 NCDEQ 5 International Paper Raw DUPLICATE 162 3 NCDEQ 6 International Paper Finished 80 3 NCDEQ 7 NW Brunswick WTP Finished 125 3 NCDEQ 8 Pender CO 421 WTP Finished 68 Flag 1 Sample diluted 20X; diluted sample still exceeded calibration 2 Sample diluted 5X 3 Sample diluted 2X 4 Below limit of quantitation DEQ-CFW 00083943