Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
DEQ-CFW_00065628
FORM Al FACILITY (General Information) om/lc�n nGn1;119 NCDENRIDivision of Air Qualitv - Application for Air Permit to ConstructlOperate Al NOTE- APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED WITHOUT THE FOLLOWING: ❑ Local Zoning Consistency Determination (if required) LJ Facility Reduction & Recycling Survey Form (Form A4) ❑� Application Fee Responsible Official/Authorized Contact Signature F] Appropriate Number of Copies of Application P.E. Seal (if required) GENERAL INFORMATION Legal CorporatelOwnerName: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company Site Name: DuPont Company - Fayetteville Works Site Address (911 Address) Line 1: 22654 NC Highway 87 W A.,� Site Address Line 2: .' City: Fayetteville State: North Carolina Zip Code: 28306 County: Bladen CONTACT INFORMATION Permit/Technical Contact: Facility/Inspection Contact: Name/Title: D. Faye Godwin / SHE Competency Consultant Name/Title: D. Faye Godwin / SHE Competency Consultant Mailing Address Line 1: 22654 NC Highway 87 W Mailing Address Line 1: 22654 NC Highway 87 W Mailing Address Line 2: k /° Mailing Address Line 2: city: Fayetteville State: NC Zip code: 28306 city: Fayetteville State: NC zip code: 28306 Phone No. (area code) (910) 213-1383 Fax No. (area code) (910) 491-9769 Phone No. (area code) (910) 213-1383 Fax No. (area code) (910) 491-9769 Email Address: D-Faye.Godwin@dupont.com Email Address: D-Faye.Godwin@dupont.com Responsible Official/Authorized Contact: Invoice Contact: Name/Title: Donald C. Stockhausen / Plant Manager Name/Title: D. Faye Godwin / SHE Competency Consultant Mailing Address Line 1: 22654 NC Highway 87 W Mailing Address Line 1: 22654 NC Highway 87 W Mailing Address Line 2: Mailing Address Line 2: city: Fayetteville state: NC Zip code: 28306 City: Fayetteville State: NC Zip code: 28306 Phone No. (area code) (910) 213-1 355 Fax No. (area code) (910) 491-9769 Phone No. (area code) (910) 213-1383 Fax No. (area code) (910) 491-9769 Email Address: Donald.C.Stockhausen@dupont.com Email Address: D-Faye.Godwin@dupont.com APPLICATION IS BEING MADE FOR P1 New Non -permitted Facility/Greenfield ❑ Modification of Facility (permitted) ❑ Renewal with Modification ❑ Renewal (TV Only) FACILITY CLASSIFICATION AFTER APPLICATION (Check Only One) ❑ General El Small ❑ Prohibitory Small ❑ Synthetic Minor ❑ Title V FACILITY (Plant Site) INFORMATION Describe nature of (plant site) operation(s): Facility ID No.: Polyvinyl Fluoride ("PVF") Resin Manufacturing Primary SIC/NAICS Code: 325211 Current/Previous Air Permit No. Expiration Date: Facility coordinates: Latitude: 34 deg. 50 min. 20.1 sec. Longitude: -78 deg. 49 min. 56.2 sec. Does this application contain confidential YES El NO ❑ `*'If yes, please contact the DAQ Regional Office prior to submitting this application.. — data? (See Instructions) PERSON OR FIRM THAT PREPARED APPLICATION Person Name: Michael E. Johnson Firm Name: Mailing Address Line 1: 22828 NC Highway 87 W Mailing Address Line 2: City: Fayetteville State: NC Zip Code: County: Phone No. (area code) (910) 678-1155 Fax No. (area code) (910) 678-1247 Email Address: SIGNATURE OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL/AUTHORIZED CONTACT Name (typed): Donald C. Stockhausen Title: Plant Manager X SignaturA(Blue Ink): f ' ' - Date: HLLdUll FiUU1L1U1iC11 J11VVL0 `+a -a Vc Jy DEQ-CFW 00065628 E FORMS; A2, A3 EMISSION SOURCE LISTING FOR THIS APPLICATION - A2 112r APPLICABILITY INFORMATION - A3 REVISED 04/10/07 NCDENR/Division of Air Quality - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate A2 EMISSION SOURCE LISTING: New, Modified, Previously Unpermitted, Replaced, Deleted EMISSION SOURCE ID NO. EMISSION SOURCE I DESCRIPTION I CONTROL DEVICE ID NO. CONTROL DEVICE I DESCRIPTION Equipment To Be ADDED By This Application (New, Previously Unpermitted, or Replacement) PVF-A Polyvinyl Fluoride Manufacturing Process No. 1 none n/a PVF-B Polyvinyl Fluoride Manufacturing Process No. 2 none n/a PVF-Vac-A PVF-1 House Vacuum System PVF-Vac-A1 PVF-Vac-A2 2-stage fabric filter PVF-Vac-B PVF-2 House _Vacuum System PVF-Vac-131PVF-Vac-B2 2-stage fabric filter Existing Permitted Equipment To Be MODIFIED By This Application Equipment To Be DELETED By This Application 112(r) APPLICABILITY INFORMATION I A3 Is your facility subject to 40 CFR Part 68 'Prevention of Accidental Releases" m Section 112(r) of the Federal Clean Yes 0 No ❑ Air Act? If No, please specify in detail how your facility avoided applicability: If your facility is Subject to 112(r), please complete the following: A. Have you already submitted a Risk Management Plan (RMP) to EPA Pursuant to 40 CFR Part 68.10 or Part 68.150? Yes 0 No ❑ Specify required RMP submittal date: June 30, 1999 If submitted, RMP submittal date: June 8, 1999 RMP resubmitted on July 30, 2015 B. Are you using administrative controls to subject your facility to a lesser 112(r) program standard? Yes ❑ No 0 If yes, please specify: Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary DEQ-CFW 00065629 • 0 FORM 6 SPECIFIC EMISSIONS SOURCE INFORMATION (REQUIRED FOR ALL SOURCES) REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/Division of Air Quality - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate B EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: Polyvinyl Fluoride Manufacturing Process No. 1 EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: PVF-A CONTROL DEVICE ID NO(S): None OPERATING SCENARIO 1 OF 1 EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO(S): EP-Al, A2, A3, and A4 DESCRIBE IN DETAILTHE EMISSION SOURCE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM): Vinyl fluoride (VF) reacts in a continuous reactor to form crude polyvinyl fluoride (PVF). The PVF is then isolated in a separation system followed by a filter press and a dryer. The final product is packaged as a solid powder. See attached process flow diagram. TYPE OF EMISSION SOURCE (CHECK AND COMPLETE APPROPRIATE FORM B1-B9 ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES): ❑ Coal,wood,oil, gas, other burner (Form B1) ❑ Woodworking (Form 64) ❑ Manufact. of chemicals/coatings/inks (Form 37) ❑ Int.combustion engine/generator (Form B2) ❑ Coating/finishing/printing (Form 85) ❑ Incineration (Form 138) ❑ Liquid storage tanks (Form 33) ❑ Storage silos/bins (Form 136) X Other (Form 139) START CONSTRUCTION DATE: Aug 2006 1OPERATION DATE: Sept 2007 DATE MANUFACTURED: Sept 2007 MANUFACTURER / MODEL NO.: n/a 1EXPECTED OP. SCHEDULE: 24 HR/DAY 7 DAY/WK 50 WK/YR IS THIS SOURCE SUBJECT TO? NSPS (SUBPART?): NO NESHAP (SUBPART?): NO MACT (SUBPART?): NO PERCENTAGE ANNUAL THROUGHPUT (%): JAN-MAR 25 APR-JUN 25 JUL-SEP 25 OCT-DEC 25 EXPECTED ANNUAL HOURS OF OPERATION: -8300 VISIBLE STACK EMISSIONS UNDER NORMAL OPERATION: -O % OPACITY CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS INFORMATION FOR THIS SOURCE AIR POLLUTANT EMITTED SOURCE OF EMISSION FACTOR EXPECTED ACTUAL (AFTER CONTROLS/LIMITS) POTENTIAL EMISSIONS (BEFORE CONTROLS/LIMITS) (AFTER CONTROLS/LIMITS) Ib/hr tons/yr Ib/hr tons/yr Ib/hr tons/yr PARTICULATE MATTER (PM) Vendor 2.34 10.25 6.19 27.12 6.19 27.12 PARTICULATE MATTER<10 MICRONS (PMto) Vendor < 2.34 < 10.25 < 6.19 < 27.12 < 6.19 < 27.12 PARTICULATE MATTER<2.5 MICRONS (PM2.5) Vendor < 2.34 < 10.25 < 6.19 < 27.12 < 6.19 < 27.12 SULFUR DIOXIDE (S02) 0 0 0 0 0 0 NITROGEN OXIDES (NOx) 0 0 0 0 0 0 CARBON MONOXIDE (CO) 0 0 0 0 0 0 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC) Site Specific 3.20 14.03 8.47 37.11 8.47 37.11 LEAD 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTHER 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS INFORMATION FOR THIS SOURCE HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT AND CAS NUMBER SOURCE OF EMISSION FACTOR EXPECTED ACTUAL (AFTER CONTROLS/LIMITS) POTENTIAL EMISSIONS (BEFORE CONTROLS/LIMITS) (AFTER CONTROLS/LIMITS) Ib/hr tons/yr Ib/hr tons/yr Ib/hr tons/yr Formaldehyde 50-00-0 Site Specific 0.01 0.040 0.01 0.044 0.01 0.044 TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS INFORMATION FOR THIS SOURCE INDICATE EXPECTED ACTUAL EMISSIONS AFTER CONTROLS / LIMITATIONS TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT AND CAS NO. EF SOURCE Ib/hr lb/day Ib/yr Formaldehyde 50-00-0 Site Specific 0.01 0.24 79 Attachments: (1) emissions calculations and supporting documentation, (2) indicate all requested state and federal enforceable permit limits (e.g. hours of operation, emission rates) and describe ho these are monitored and with what frequency, and (3) describe any monitoring devices, gauges, or test ports for this source. COMPLETE THIS FORM AND COMPLETE AND ATTACH APPROPRIATE B1 THROUGH B9 FORM FUR EACH SOURCE Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary DEQ-CFW 00065630 • • POLYVINYL FLUORIDE MANUFACTURING FACILITY NO. 1 EMISSION SOURCE ID NO. PVF-A PROCESS FLOWCHART INHIBITED VINYL FLUORIDE ANALYTICAL ♦ FEP—Al VINYL STORAGE TANK ` ` ` EQUIPMENT a _ FLUORIDE MODIFIER FEED SYSTEM REMOVED INHIBITOR INITIATOR No FEP—A4 i PVF REACTOR�CRUDE (FE�P—A3 1 PRODUCT COLLECTION PVF ISOLATION FLASH SYSTEM EQUIPMENT TANK SEPARATOR SYSTEM FINISHED PRODUCT FEP—A2 1 MAINTENANCE HEADER "------- I I I I I I I I 1 I FROM PROCESS EQUIPMENT DEQ—CFW 00065631 • • FORM B SPECIFIC EMISSIONS SOURCE INFORMATION (REQUIRED FOR ALL SOURCES) RFVISFn 19101101 NCDENR/Division of Air Quality - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate FT-1 EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: Polyvinyl Fluoride Manufacturing Process No. 2 EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: PVF-B CONTROL DEVICE ID NO(S): None OPERATING SCENARIO 1 OF 1 EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO(S): EP-131, B2, 133, and B4 DESCRIBE IN DETAILTHE EMISSION SOURCE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM): Vinyl fluoride (VF) reacts in a continuous reactor to form crude polyvinyl fluoride (PVF). The PVF is then isolated in a separation system followed by a filter press and a dryer. The final product is packaged as a solid powder. See attached process flow diagram. TYPE OF EMISSION SOURCE (CHECK AND COMPLETE APPROPRIATE FORM B1-B9 ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES): ❑ Coal,wood,oil, gas, other burner (Form 131) ❑ Woodworking (Form B4) ❑ Manufact. of chemicals/coatings/inks (Form 137) ❑ Int.combustion engine/generator (Form B2) ❑ Coating/finishing/printing (Form 135) ❑ Incineration (Form 136) ❑ Liquid storage tanks (Form 133) ❑ Storage silos/bins (Form 66) IJ Other (Form B9) START CONSTRUCTION DATE: Aug 2008 1OPERATION DATE: June 2010 IDATE MANUFACTURED: June 2010 MANUFACTURER / MODEL NO.: n/a EXPECTED OP. SCHEDULE: 24 HR/DAY 7 DAY/WK 50 WK/YR IS THIS SOURCE SUBJECT TO? NSPS (SUBPART?): NO NESHAP (SUBPART?): NO MACT (SUBPART?): NO PERCENTAGE ANNUAL THROUGHPUT (%): JAN-MAR 25 APR-JUN 25 JUL-SEP 25 OCT-DEC 25 EXPECTED ANNUAL HOURS OF OPERATION: -8300 IVISIBLE STACK EMISSIONS UNDER NORMAL OPERATION: -O % OPACITY CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS INFORMATION FOR THIS SOURCE AIR POLLUTANT EMITTED SOURCEOF EMISSION FACTOR EXPECTED ACTUAL (AFTER CONTROLS/LIMITS) POTENTIAL EMISSIONS (BEFORE CONTROLS/LIMITS) (AFTER CONTROLS/LIMITS) Ib/hr tons/yr Ib/hr tons/yr Ib/hr tons/yr PARTICULATE MATTER (PM) Vendor 1.98 8.67 6.19 27.12 6.19 27.12 PARTICULATE MATTER<10 MICRONS (PM1e) Vendor < 1.98 < 8.67 < 6.19 < 27.12 < 6.19 < 27.12 PARTICULATE MATTER<2.5 MICRONS (PM2.5) Vendor < 1.98 < 8.67 < 6.19 < 27.12 < 6.19 < 27.12 SULFUR DIOXIDE (S02) 0 0 0 0 0 0 NITROGEN OXIDES (NOx) 0 0 0 0 0 0 CARBON MONOXIDE (CO) 0 0 0 0 0 0 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC) SiteSpecifie 2.26 9.89 7.06 30.93 7.06 30.93 LEAD 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS INFORMATION FOR THIS SOURCE HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT AND CAS NUMBER SOURCE OF EMISSION FACTOR EXPECTED ACTUAL (AFTER CONTROLS/LIMITS) POTENTIAL EMISSIONS (BEFORE CONTROLS/LIMITS) (AFTER CONTROLS/LIMITS) Ib/hr tons/yr Ib/hr tons/yr Ib/hr tons/yr Formaldehyde 50-00-0 Site Specific 0.01 0.040 0.01 0.044 0.01 0.044 TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS INFORMATION FOR THIS SOURCE INDICATE EXPECTED ACTUAL EMISSIONS AFTER CONTROLS / LIMITATIONS TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT AND CAS NO. EF SOURCE Ib/hr lb/day Ib/yr Formaldehyde 50-00-0 Site Specific 0.01 0.24 79 Attachments: (1) emissions calculations and supporting documentation, (2) indicate all requested state and federal enforceable permit limits (e.g. hours of operation, emission rates) and describe ho these are monitored and with what frequency, and (3) describe any monitoring devices, gauges, or test ports for this source. COMPLETE THIS FORM AND COMPLETE AND ATTACH APPROPRIATE B1 THROUGH B9 FORM FOR tacM SOURCE Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary DEQ-CFW 00065632 Pi POLYVINYL FLUORIDE MANUFACTURING FACILITY NO.2 EMISSION SOURCE ID NO. PVF-B PROCESS FLOWCHART INHIBITED VINYL FLUORIDE ANALYTICAL FEP-BI VINYL --A STORAGE TANK ` ` ` EQUIPMENT FLUORIDE MODIFIER REMOVED INHIBITOR INITIATOR 10 CFEP-"B)4 i FEED SYSTEM CRUDE PVF REACTOR PVF PRODUCT PVF ISOLATION FLASH COLLECTION EQUIPMENT TANK SYSTEM SEPARATOR SYSTEM FINISHED PRODUCT FEP-B2 I MAINTENANCE i HEADER --------- FROM PROCESS EQUIPMENT DEQ-CFW 00065633 • • FORM B SPECIFIC EMISSIONS SOURCE INFORMATION (REQUIRED FOR ALL SOURCES) RFVISFn 12/01/01 NCDENR/Division of Air Quality - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate I B__j EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: PVF-1 House Vacuum System EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: PVF-Vac-A CONTROL DEVICE ID NO(S): CD -Vac -Al, Vac-A2 OPERATING SCENARIO 1 OF 1 EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO(S): EP-Vac-A DESCRIBE IN DETAILTHE EMISSION SOURCE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM): For general good housekeeping purposes, the DuPont Company - Fayetteville Works' PVF-1 Process uses a vacuum system to remove the PVF resin powder from the building's floor and equipment. The emission of particulate matter from the vacuum system is controlled by a two -stage fabric filter from TDC Filter: the QX Filter (CD -Vac -Al) capture / control efficiency is 48% for particles less than 1.0 pm and 88% for particles greater than 1.0 pm; the SB-ME Filter Media (CD-Vac-A2) capture / control efficiency is 38% for particles less than 1.0 pm, 72% for particles between 1.0 pm and 3.0 pm, and 98% for particles greater than 3.0 pm. It is assumed the CD-Vac-A2 capture / control efficiency is 38% for particles less than 1.0 pm, and 72% for particles greater tha 1.0 pm. For potential emissions determination, it is assumed the before - control solids loading is three times (3X) greater than typical. TYPE OF EMISSION SOURCE (CHECK AND COMPLETE APPROPRIATE FORM 131-1139 ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES): ❑ Coal,wood,oil, gas, other burner (Form 131) ❑ Woodworking (Form 134) ❑ Manufact. of chemicals/coatings/inks (Form 137) ❑ Int.combustion engine/generator (Form 132) ❑ Coating/finishing/printing (Form 65) ❑ Incineration (Form B8) ❑ Liquid storage tanks (Form 63) ❑ Storage silos/bins (Form 136) 0 Other (Form 139) START CONSTRUCTION DATE: Aug 2006 OPERATION DATE: Sept 2007 I DATE MANUFACTURED: Sept 2007 MANUFACTURER / MODEL NO.: TDC QX / SB-ME I EXPECTED OP. SCHEDULE: 2 HR/DAY 7 DAY/WK 52 WK/YR IS THIS SOURCE SUBJECT TO? NSPS (SUBPART?): NO NESHAP (SUBPART?): NO MACT (SUBPART?): NO PERCENTAGE ANNUAL THROUGHPUT (%): JAN-MAR 25 APR-JUN 25 JUL-SEP 25 OCT-DEC 25 EXPECTED ANNUAL HOURS OF OPERATION: 730 1 VISIBLE STACK EMISSIONS UNDER NORMAL OPERATION: 0 % OPACITY CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS INFORMATION FOR THIS SOURCE AIR POLLUTANT EMITTED SOURCE OF EMISSION FACTOR EXPECTED ACTUAL (AFTER CONTROLS/LIMITS) POTENTIAL EMISSIONS (BEFORE CONTROLS/LIMITS) (AFTER CONTROLS/LIMITS) Whirtons/yr Ib/hr tons/yr Whir tons/yr PARTICULATE MATTER (PM) Vendor 4.39 1.60 55.89 20.40 13.18 4.81 PARTICULATE MATTER<10 MICRONS (PM10) Vendor <4.39 <1.60 <55.89 420.40 <13.18 <4.81 PARTICULATE MATTER<2.5 MICRONS (PM2.5) Vendor <4.39 <1.60 <55.89 <20.40 <13.18 <4.81 SULFUR DIOXIDE (S02) 0 0 0 0 0 0 NITROGEN OXIDES (NOx) 0 0 0 0 0 0 CARBON MONOXIDE (CO) 0 0 0 0 0 0 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEAD 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS INFORMATION FOR THIS SOURCE HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT AND CAS NUMBER SOURCE OF EMISSION FACTOR EXPECTED ACTUAL (AFTER CONTROLS/LIMITS) POTENTIAL EMISSIONS (BEFORE CONTROLS/LIMITS) (AFTER CONTROLS/LIMITS) Ib/hr tons/yr Ib/hr tons/yr Ib/hr tons/yr None TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS INFORMATION FOR THIS SOURCE INDICATE EXPECTED ACTUAL EMISSIONS AFTER CONTROLS / LIMITATIONS TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT AND CAS NO. EF SOURCE Whir lb/day Ib/yr None Attachments: (1) emissions calculations and supporting documentation; (2) indicate all requested state and federal enforceable permit limits (e.g. hours of operation, emission rates) and describe how these are monitored and with what frequency; and (3) describe any monitoring devices, gauges, or test ports for this source. COMPLETE THIS FORM AND COMPLETE AND ATTACH APPROPRIATE B1 THROUGH B9 FORM FOR EACH SOURCE Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary DEQ-CFW 00065634 • C� POLYVINYL FLUORIDE MANUFACTURING FACILITY NO. I EMISSION SOURCE ID NO. PVF-VAC-A HOUSE VACUUM SYSTEM FLOWCHART ATMOSPHERE BLOWER FROM 18T STAGE 2ND STAGE HOUSE VACUUM --► FILTER FILTER MANIFOLD (CD-PVF-Al) (CD-PVF-A2) SYSTEM WASTE WASTE SOLIDS SOLIDS CONTAINER CONTAINER LANDFILL LANDFILL DEQ-CFW 00065635 • FORM B SPECIFIC EMISSIONS C/Dr SOURCEINFORMATION ORMATION (REQUIRED nFORoperL SOURCES) RF\/ICF 1 B 1 EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: PVF-2 House Vacuum System EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: PVF-Vac-B CONTROL DEVICE ID NO(S): CD-Vac-131, Vac-132 OPERATING SCENARIO 1 OF 1 EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO(S): EP-Vac-B DESCRIBE IN DETAILTHE EMISSION SOURCE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM): For general good housekeeping purposes, the DuPont Company - Fayetteville Works' PVF-1 Process uses a vacuum system to remove the PVF resin powder from the building's floor and equipment. The emission of particulate matter from the vacuum system is controlled by a two -stage fabric filter from TDC Filter: the QX Filter (CD -Vac -Al) capture / control efficiency is 48% for particles less than 1.0 µm and 88% for particles greater than 1.0 µm; the SB-ME Filter Media (CD-Vac-A2) capture / control efficiency is 38% for particles less than 1.0 µm, 72% for particles between 1.0 µm and 3.0 µm, and 98% for particles greater than 3.0 µm. It is assumed the CD-Vac-A2 capture / control efficiency is 38% for particles less than 1.0 µm, and 72% for particles greater tha 1.0 µm. For potential emissions determination, it is assumed the before - control solids loading is three times (3X) greater than typical. TYPE OF EMISSION SOURCE (CHECK AND COMPLETE APPROPRIATE FORM B1-B9 ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES): ❑ Coal,wood,oil, gas, other burner (Form B1) ❑ Woodworking (Form B4) ❑ Manufact. of chemicals/coatings/inks (Form B7) ❑ Int.combustion engine/generator (Form B2) ❑ Coating/finishing/printing (Form B5) ❑ Incineration (Form B8) ❑ Liquid storage tanks (Form B3) ❑ Storage silos/bins (Form B6) l Other (Form B9) START CONSTRUCTION DATE: Aug 2008 OPERATION DATE: June 2010 IDATE MANUFACTURED: June 2010 MANUFACTURER / MODEL NO.: TDC QX / SB-ME I EXPECTED OP. SCHEDULE: 2 HR/DAY 7 DAY/WK 52 WK/YR IS THIS SOURCE SUBJECT TO? NSPS (SUBPART?): NO NESHAP (SUBPART?): NO MACT (SUBPART?): NO PERCENTAGE ANNUAL THROUGHPUT (%): JAN-MAR 25 APR-JUN 25 JUL-SEP 25 OCT-DEC 25 EXPECTED ANNUAL HOURS OF OPERATION: 730 1 VISIBLE STACK EMISSIONS UNDER NORMAL OPERATION: O % OPACITY CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS INFORMATION FOR THIS SOURCE AIR POLLUTANT EMITTED SOURCE OF EMISSION FACTOR EXPECTED ACTUAL (AFTER CONTROLS/LIMITS) POTENTIAL EMISSIONS (BEFORE CONTROLS/LIMITS) (AFTER CONTROLS/LIMITS) Ib/hr tons/yr Ib/hr tons/yr Ib/hr tons/yr PARTICULATE MATTER (PM) Vendor 4.39 1.60 55.89 20.40 13.18 4.81 PARTICULATE MATTER<10 MICRONS (PM,o) Vendor <4.39 <1.60 <55.89 <20.40 <13.18 <4.81 PARTICULATE MATTER<2.5 MICRONS (PM2.5) Vendor <4.39 <1,60 <55.89 <20.40 <13.18 <4.81 SULFUR DIOXIDE (S02) 0 0 0 0 0 0 NITROGEN OXIDES (NOx) 0 0 0 0 0 0 CARBON MONOXIDE (CO) 0 0 0 0 0 0 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEAD 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTHER 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS INFORMATION FOR THIS SOURCE HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT AND CAS NUMBER SOURCE OF EMISSION FACTOR EXPECTED ACTUAL (AFTER CONTROLS/LIMITS) POTENTIAL EMISSIONS (BEFORE CONTROLS/LIMITS) (AFTER CONTROLS/LIMITS) Ib/hr tons/yr Whir tons/yr Ib/hr tons/yr None TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS INFORMATION FOR THIS SOURCE INDICATE EXPECTED ACTUAL EMISSIONS AFTER CONTROLS / LIMITATIONS TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT AND CAS NO. EF SOURCE Ib/hr Ib/day Ib/yr None Attachments: (1) emissions calculations and supporting documentation; (2) indicate all requested state and federal enforceable permit limits (e.g. hours of operation, emission rates) and describe how these are monitored and with what frequency; and (3) describe any monitoring devices, gauges, or test ports for this source. COMPLETE THIS FORM AND COMPLETE AND ATTACH APPROPRIATE B1 THHUUUH B8 PUKIW Putt c.vcn swtcLc Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary DEQ-CFW 00065636 • POLYVINYL FLUORIDE MANUFACTURING FACILITY NO.2 EMISSION SOURCE ID NO. PVF-VAC-B HOUSE VACUUM SYSTEM FLOWCHART ATMOSPHERE I I I 1 BLOWER FROM HOUSE I IT STAGE 2ND STAGE VACUUM -► FILTER FILTER MANIFOLD (CD-PVF-BI) (CD-PVF-B2) SYSTEM WASTE WASTE SOLIDS SOLIDS CONTAINER CONTAINER LANDFILL LANDFILL DEQ-CFW 00065637 0 FORM B9 EMISSIONS SOURCE (OTHER) REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/Division of Air Quality - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate B9 EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: Polyvinyl Fluoride Manufacturing Process No. 1 EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: PVF-A CONTROL DEVICE ID NO(S): None OPERATING SCENARIO 1 OF 1 EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO(S): EP-Al, A2, A3, and A4 DESCRIBE IN DETAILTHE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM): Vinyl fluoride (VF) reacts in a continuous reactor to form crude polyvinyl fluoride (PVF). The PVF is then isolated in a separator system followed by a filter press, a heated -air dryer, and finished product packaging. The final product is a solid powder packaged in Super Sack containers. See enclosed Emission Source ID No. PVF-A Process Flowchart. MATERIALS ENTERING PROCESS - CONTINUOUS PROCESS MAX. DESIGN CAPACITY (UNIT/HR) REQUESTED CAPACITY LIMITATION (UNIT/HR) TYPE UNITS Vinyl fluoride RU 318.3 n/a d-Limonene RU 1.0 n/a Modifier RU 0.3 n/a Inorganic salt RU 0.3 n/a MATERIALS ENTERING PROCESS - BATCH OPERATION MAX. DESIGN CAPACITY (UNIT/BATCH) REQUESTED CAPACITY LIMITATION (UNIT/BATCH) TYPE UNITS MAXIMUM DESIGN (BATCHES / HOUR): REQUESTED LIMITATION (BATCHES / HOUR): (BATCHES/YR): FUEL USED: n/a TOTAL MAXIMUM FIRING RATE (MILLION BTU/HR): n/a MAX. CAPACITY HOURLY FUEL USE: n/a REQUESTED CAPACITY ANNUAL FUEL USE: n/a COMMENTS: Vinyl fluoride ("VF") is delivered to the facility with a small amount of d-Limonene to stabilize the VF during transportation. The d-Limonene is separated from the VF and is disposed of as a solid waste. The VF is polymerized in a continuous reactor to form polyvinyl fluoride ("PVF"). A modifier is added to the VF feed to the reactor, however the modifier is consumed in the reaction and is not an air emission. A 1 It ' d ti r the salt leaves � process a$ water soluble lievrgania. �aee. i� u.`�2�+ as r^c'aCairin Initic'1t'�9r, hiD`v"r°e.@ h I aL .. p �J a wastewater stream and is not an air emission. The PVF is separated from the process water in a filter press, then dried using hot air, and finally packaged as a dried resin powder. Attach Additional 5neets As Necessary DEQ-CFW 00065638 E FORM B9 EMISSIONS SOURCE (OTHER) REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/Division of Air Quality - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate 139 EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: Polyvinyl Fluoride Manufacturing Process No. 2 EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: PVF-B CONTROL DEVICE ID NO(S): None OPERATING SCENARIO 1 OF 1 EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO(S): EP-1311, B2, B3, and 134 DESCRIBE IN DETAILTHE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM): Vinyl fluoride (VF) reacts in a continuous reactor to form crude polyvinyl fluoride (PVF). The PVF is then isolated in a separator system followed by a filter press, a heated -air dryer, and finished product packaging. The final product is a solid powder packaged in Super Sack containers. See enclosed Emission Source ID No. PVF-B Process Flowchart. MATERIALS ENTERING PROCESS - CONTINUOUS PROCESS MAX. DESIGN CAPACITY (UNIT/HR) REQUESTED CAPACITY LIMITATION (UNIT/HR) TYPE UNITS Vinyl fluoride RU 318.3 n/a d-Limonene RU 1.0 n/a Modifier RU 0.3 n/a Inorganic salt RU 0.3 n/a MATERIALS ENTERING PROCESS - BATCH OPERATION MAX. DESIGN CAPACITY (UNIT/BATCH) REQUESTED CAPACITY LIMITATION (UNIT/BATCH) TYPE UNITS MAXIMUM DESIGN (BATCHES / HOUR): REQUESTED LIMITATION (BATCHES / HOUR): (BATCHES/YR): FUEL USED: n/a TOTAL MAXIMUM FIRING RATE (MILLION BTU/HR): n/a MAX. CAPACITY HOURLY FUEL USE: n/a REQUESTED CAPACITY ANNUAL FUEL USE: n/a COMMENTS: Vinyl fluoride ("VF") is delivered to the facility with a small amount of d-Limonene to stabilize the VF during transportation. The d-Limonene is separated from the VF and is disposed of as a solid waste. The VF is polymerized in a continuous reactor to form polyvinyl fluoride ("PVF"). A modifier is added to the VF feed to the reactor, however the modifier is consumed in the reaction and is not an air emission. A water soluble inorganic salt is used as a reaction initiator, however the salt leaves the process as a wastewater stream and is not an air emission. The PVF is separated from the process water in a filter press, then dried using hot air, and finally packaged as a dried resin powder. Attach Additional 5neets As Necessary DEQ-CFW 00065639 FORM B9 EMISSIONS SOURCE (OTHER) REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/Division of Air Quality - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate B9 EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: PVF-1 House Vacuum System EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: PVF-Vac-A CONTROL DEVICE ID NO(S): CD -Vac -Al, Vac-A2 OPERATING SCENARIO 1_— OF 1 EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO(S): EP-Vac-A DESCRIBE IN DETAILTHE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM): For general good housekeeping purposes, the DuPont Company - Fayetteville Works' PVF-1 Process uses a vacuum system to remove the PVF resin powder from the building's floor and equipment. The powder is collected in 340-lb bags that are disposed of in an off -site Subtitle D landfill. The emission of particulate matter from the vacuum system is controlled by a two -stage fabric filter from TDC Filter: the QX Filter (CD -Vac -Al) capture / control efficiency is 48% for particles less than 1.0 pm and 88% for particles greater than 1.0 pm; the SB-ME Filter Media (CD-Vac-A2) capture / control efficiency is 38% for particles less than 1.0 pm, 72% for particles between 1.0 pm and 3.0 pm, and 98% for particles greater than 3.0 pm. MATERIALS ENTERING PROCESS - CONTINUOUS PROCESS MAX. DESIGN CAPACITY (UNIT/HR) REQUESTED CAPACITY LIMITATION (UNIT/HR) TYPE UNITS MATERIALS ENTERING PROCESS - BATCH OPERATION MAX. DESIGN CAPACITY (UNIT/BATCH) REQUESTED CAPACITY LIMITATION (UNIT/BATCH) TYPE UNITS Polyvinyl fluoride resin powder ib. 340 n/a MAXIMUM DESIGN (BATCHES / HOUR): 0.014 REQUESTED LIMITATION (BATCHES / HOUR): n/a (BATCHES/YR): n/a FUEL USED: n/a TOTAL MAXIMUM FIRING RATE (MILLION BTU/HR): n/a MAX. CAPACITY HOURLY FUEL USE: n/a REQUESTED CAPACITY ANNUAL FUEL USE: n(a COMMENTS: The basis for the Maximum Design value of 0.014 batches/hour is from the 40,800 Ib/yr of solid waste generated that was the basis of the Potential to Emit for this source. This quantity is three times the typical solid waste generated from this housekeeping operation. It is assumed that one "batch" is equal to one 340-lb bag of collected solid waste. The 40,800 lb. of collected powder would equal 120 of the 340- lb. bags used with this vacuum. The 120 bags/year equals 0.014 bags/hour or 0.014 batches/hour. Attach Additional SneetS As Necessary DEQ-CFW 00065640 FORM B9 EMISSIONS SOURCE (OTHER) REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/Division of Air Quality - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate 69 EMISSION SOURCE DESCRIPTION: PVF-2 House Vacuum System EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: PVF-Vac-B CONTROL DEVICE ID NO(S): CD-Vac-1311, Vac-132 OPERATING SCENARIO 1 OF 1 EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO(S): EP-Vac-B DESCRIBE IN DETAILTHE PROCESS (ATTACH FLOW DIAGRAM): For general good housekeeping purposes, the DuPont Company - Fayetteville Works' PVF-2 Process uses a vacuum system to remove the PVF resin powder from the building's floor and equipment. The powder is collected in 340-lb bags that are disposed of in an off -site Subtitle D landfill. The emission of particulate matter from the vacuum system is controlled by a two -stage fabric filter from TDC Filter: the QX Filter (CD-Vac-1311) capture / control efficiency is 48% for particles less than 1.0 lam and 88% for particles greater than 1.0 pm; the SB-ME Filter Media (CD-Vac-132) capture / control efficiency is 38% for particles less than 1.0 pm, 72% for particles between 1.0 lam and 3.0 pm, and 98% for particles greater than 3.0 lam. MATERIALS ENTERING PROCESS - CONTINUOUS PROCESS MAX. DESIGN CAPACITY (UNIT/HR) REQUESTED CAPACITY LIMITATION (UNIT/HR) TYPE UNITS MATERIALS ENTERING PROCESS - BATCH OPERATION MAX. DESIGN CAPACITY (UNIT/BATCH) REQUESTED CAPACITY LIMITATION (UNIT/BATCH) TYPE UNITS Polyvinyl fluoride resin powder lb. 340 n/a MAXIMUM DESIGN (BATCHES / HOUR): 0.014 REQUESTED LIMITATION (BATCHES / HOUR): n/a (BATCHES/YR): n/a FUEL USED: n/a TOTAL MAXIMUM FIRING RATE (MILLION BTU/HR): n/a MAX. CAPACITY HOURLY FUEL USE: n/a REQUESTED CAPACITY ANNUAL FUEL USE: n/a COMMENTS: The basis for the Maximum Design value of 0.014 batches/hour is from the 40,800 lb/yr of solid waste generated that was the basis of the Potential to Emit for this source. This quantity is three times the typical solid waste generated from this housekeeping operation. It is assumed that one "batch" is equal to one 340-lb bag of collected solid waste. The 40,800 lb. of collected powder would equal 120 of the 340- lb. bags used with this vacuum. The 120 bags/year equals 0.014 bags/hour or 0.014 batches/hour. Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary DEQ-CFW 00065641 r 0 FORM C1 CONTROL DEVICE (FABRIC FILTER) RGxncFn vwmimi NCDENR/Division of Air Quality - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate Ti- CONTROL DEVICE ID NO: CD -Vac -Al -CONTROLS EMISSIONS FROM WHICH EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: PVF-Vac-A EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO: EP-Vac-A POSITION IN SERIES OF CONTROLS NO. 1 OF 2 UNITS MANUFACTURER: TDC Filter MODEL NO: QX DATE MANUFACTURED: Aug 2006 PROPOSED OPERATION DATE: Sept 2007 OPERATING SCENARIO: PROPOSED START CONSTRUCTION DATE: Aug 2006 1 OF 1 P.E. SEAL REQUIRED (PER 2Q .0112)? © YES ❑ NO DESCRIBE CONTROL SYSTEM: For general good housekeeping purposes, the DuPont Company - Fayetteville Works' PVF-1 Process uses a vacuum system to clean the building's floor and equipment. A conservative basis of 13,600 Ib/yr of powder vacuumed during a 2-hr period each day (18.63 lb. powder per hour) was used, with 70% being <1 pm and 30% being >1 pm. The emission of particulate matter from the vacuum system is controlled by a two -stage fabric filter from TDC Filter. The first stage is a QX Filter (CD -Vac -Al) with a capture / control efficiency of 48% for particles less than 1.0 pm and 88% for particles greater than 1.0 pm. POLLUTANT(S) COLLECTED: PM <1 pm PM >1 pm BEFORE CONTROL EMISSION RATE (LB/HR): 13.04 5.59 CAPTURE EFFICIENCY: 100 % 100 % % CONTROL DEVICE EFFICIENCY: 48 % 88 % % CORRESPONDING OVERALL EFFICIENCY: 48 % 88 % % EFFICIENCY DETERMINATION CODE: 2 2 TOTAL EMISSION RATE (LB/HR): 6.78 0.67 PRESSURE DROP (IN. H20): MIN: 0 MAX: n/a GAUGE? ❑ YES NO WARNING ALARM? ❑ YES NO BULK PARTICLE DENSITY (LB/FT3): 84.3 INLET TEMPERATURE (OF): 60 MIN 100 MAX POLLUTANT LOADING RATE: 18.63 LB/HR OUTLET TEMPERATURE (OF): 60 MIN 110 MAX INLET AIR FLOW RATE (ACFM): < 450 ACFM FILTER MAX OPERATING TEMP. (OF): 200 NO. OF COMPARTMENTS: 1 NO. OF BAGS PER COMPARTMENT: 2 LENGTH OF BAG (IN.): 30 DIAMETER OF BAG (IN.): 12.75 DRAFT: ❑ INDUCED/NEG. ® FORCED/POS. I FILTER SURFACE AREA (FT 2): 524 AIR TO CLOTH RATIO: < 0.8 : 1 FILTER MATERIAL: cellulose / synthetic fiber ❑ WOVEN INA FELTED DESCRIBE CLEANING PROCEDURES: PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SIZE WEIGHT % CUMULATIVE N AIR PULSE ❑ SONIC ❑ REVERSE FLOW ❑ SIMPLE BAG COLLAPSE (MICRONS) OF TOTAL % 0-1 70.0 70.0 ❑ MECHANICAL/SHAKER ❑ RING BAG COLLAPSE 1-10 30.0 100.0 ❑ OTHER DESCRIBE INCOMING AIR STREAM: 10-25 0 100.0 25-50 0 100.0 The incoming air stream to the 1st -stage filter is the power -laden air from the process area. 50-100 0 100.0 >100 0 100.0 METHOD FOR DETERMINING WHEN TO CLEAN: ❑ AUTOMATIC N TIMED ❑ MANUAL METHOD FOR DETERMINING WHEN TO REPLACE THE BAGS: Replaced ❑ ALARM ❑ INTERNAL INSPECTION ❑ VISIBLE EMISSION © OTHER annually SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ❑ MOISTURE BLINDING ❑ CHEMICAL RESISTIVITY ❑ OTHER EXPLAIN: DESCRIBE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES: The two filter canisters are replaced annually, or more frequently if area personnal deem them to be blinded with powder. ON A SEPARATE PAGE, ATTACH A DIAGRAM SHOWING THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CONTROL DEVICE TO ITS EMISSION SOURCE(S): Attacn Aaamonal meets Hs Necessary DEQ-CFW 00065642 0 • FORM C1 CONTROL DEVICE (FABRIC FILTER) REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/Division of Air Quality - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate C� CONTROL DEVICE ID NO: CD-Vac-A2 CONTROLS EMISSIONS FROM WHICH EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: PVF-Vac-A EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO: EP-Vac-A POSITION IN SERIES OF CONTROLS NO. 2 OF 2 UNITS MANUFACTURER: TDC Filter MODEL NO: SB-ME DATE MANUFACTURED: Aug 2006 PROPOSED OPERATION DATE: Sept 2007 OPERATING SCENARIO: PROPOSED START CONSTRUCTION DATE: Aug 2006 1 OF _ 1 P.E. SEAL REQUIRED (PER 2Q .0112)? YES ❑ NO DESCRIBE CONTROL SYSTEM: For general good housekeeping purposes, the DuPont Company - Fayetteville Works' PVF-1 Process uses a vacuum system to clean the building's floor and equipment. The emission of particulate matter from the vacuum system is controlled by a two -stage fabric filter from TDC Filter. The second stage is a SB-ME Filter (CD-Vac-A2) with a capture / control efficiency of 38% for particles less than 1.0 pm, 72% for particles between 1.0 pm and 3.0 pm, and 98% for particles greater than 3.0 Pm. POLLUTANT(S) COLLECTED: PM <1 Pm PM >1 }gym BEFORE CONTROL EMISSION RATE (LB/HR): 6.78 0.67 CAPTURE EFFICIENCY: 100 % 100 % % CONTROL DEVICE EFFICIENCY: 38 % 72 % % CORRESPONDING OVERALL EFFICIENCY: 38 % 72 % % EFFICIENCY DETERMINATION CODE: 2 2 TOTAL EMISSION RATE (LB/HR): 4.20 0.19 PRESSURE DROP (IN. H20): MIN: 0 MAX: n/a GAUGE? ❑ YES NO WARNING ALARM? ❑ YES ED NO BULK PARTICLE DENSITY (LB/FT3): 84.3 INLET TEMPERATURE (OF): 60 MIN 100 MAX POLLUTANT LOADING RATE: 7.45 LB/HR OUTLET TEMPERATURE (OF): 60 MIN 110 MAX INLET AIR FLOW RATE (ACFM): << 450 ACFM FILTER MAX OPERATING TEMP. (OF): 275 NO. OF COMPARTMENTS: 1 NO. OF BAGS PER COMPARTMENT: 1 LENGTH OF BAG (IN.): 16 DIAMETER OF BAG (IN.): 12.75 DRAFT: ❑ INDUCED/NEG. I] FORCED/POS. FILTER SURFACE AREA (FT 2): 46 AIR TO CLOTH RATIO: << 9.8:1 FILTER MATERIAL: 100% polyester metalized media ❑ WOVEN N FELTED DESCRIBE CLEANING PROCEDURES: ❑ AIR PULSE ❑ SONIC ❑ REVERSE FLOW ❑ SIMPLE BAG COLLAPSE ❑ MECHANICAL/SHAKER ❑ RING BAG COLLAPSE iX1 OTHER either replaced or manually cleaned PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SIZE (MICRONS) WEIGHT % OF TOTAL CUMULATIVE % 0-1 91.0 91.0 1-10 9.0 100.0 DESCRIBE INCOMING AIR STREAM: The incoming air stream to the 2nd-stage filter discharged filtered air from the 1st -stage filter. 10-25 0 100.0 25-50 0 100.0 50-100 0 100.0 >100 0 100.0 METHOD FOR DETERMINING WHEN TO CLEAN: ❑ AUTOMATIC ❑ TIMED ❑X MANUAL METHOD FOR DETERMINING WHEN TO REPLACE THE BAGS: Replaced ❑ ALARM ❑ INTERNAL INSPECTION ❑ VISIBLE EMISSION ® OTHER annually SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ❑ MOISTURE BLINDING ❑ CHEMICAL RESISTIVITY ❑ OTHER EXPLAIN: DESCRIBE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES: The filter canister is manually cleaned as needed and replaced annually. ON A SEPARATE PAGE, ATTACH A DIAGRAM SHOWING THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CONTROL DEVICE TO ITS EMISSION SOURCE(S): Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary DEQ-CFW 00065643 0 • FORM C1 CONTROL DEVICE (FABRIC FILTER) REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/Division of Air Quality - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate C1 CONTROL DEVICE ID NO: CD-Vac-131 CONTROLS EMISSIONS FROM WHICH EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: PVF-Vac-B EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO: EP-Vac-B POSITION IN SERIES OF CONTROLS NO. 1 OF 2 UNITS MANUFACTURER: TDC Filter MODEL NO: QX DATE MANUFACTURED: Aug 2008 PROPOSED OPERATION DATE: June 2010 OPERATING SCENARIO: PROPOSED START CONSTRUCTION DATE: Aug 2008 1 OF _ 1 _ P.E. SEAL REQUIRED (PER 2Q .0112)? 0 YES ❑ NO DESCRIBE CONTROL SYSTEM: For general good housekeeping purposes, the DuPont Company - Fayetteville Works' PVF-2 Process uses a vacuum system to clean the building's floor and equipment. A conservative basis of 13,600 Ib/yr of powder vacuumed during a 2-hr period each day (18.63 lb. powder per hour) was used, with 70% being <1 lam and 30% being >1 lam. The emission of particulate matter from the vacuum system is controlled by a two -stage fabric filter from TDC Filter. The first stage is a QX Filter (CD-Vac-131) with a capture / control efficiency of 48% for particles less than 1.0 lam and 88% for particles greater than 1.0 lam. POLLUTANT(S) COLLECTED: PM <1 lam PM >1 lam BEFORE CONTROL EMISSION RATE (LB/HR): 13.04 5.59 CAPTURE EFFICIENCY: 100 % 100 % % CONTROL DEVICE EFFICIENCY: 48 % 88 % % CORRESPONDING OVERALL EFFICIENCY: 48 % 88 % % EFFICIENCY DETERMINATION CODE: 2 2 TOTAL EMISSION RATE (LB/HR): 6.78 0.67 PRESSURE DROP (IN. H20): MIN: 0 MAX: n/a GAUGE? ❑ YES NO WARNING ALARM? ❑ YES ® NO BULK PARTICLE DENSITY (LB/FT3): 84.3 INLET TEMPERATURE (OF): 60 MIN 100 MAX POLLUTANT LOADING RATE: 18.63 LB/HR OUTLET TEMPERATURE (OF): 60 MIN 110 MAX INLET AIR FLOW RATE (ACFM): < 450 ACFM FILTER MAX OPERATING TEMP. (°F): 200 NO. OF COMPARTMENTS: 1 NO. OF BAGS PER COMPARTMENT: 2 LENGTH OF BAG (IN.): 30 DIAMETER OF BAG (IN.): 12.75 DRAFT: ❑ INDUCED/NEG. ® FORCED/POS. FILTER SURFACE AREA (FT 2): 524 AIR TO CLOTH RATIO: < 0.8 : 1 FILTER MATERIAL: cellulose / synthetic fiber ❑ WOVEN 0 FELTED DESCRIBE CLEANING PROCEDURES: PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION N AIR PULSE ❑ SONIC SIZE WEIGHT % CUMULATIVE ❑ REVERSE FLOW ❑ SIMPLE BAG COLLAPSE (MICRONS) OF TOTAL % ❑ MECHANICAL/SHAKER ❑ RING BAG COLLAPSE 0-1 70.0 70.0 ❑ OTHER 1-10 30.0 100.0 DESCRIBE INCOMING AIR STREAM: 10-25 0 100.0 The incoming air stream to the 1st -stage filter is the power -laden air 25-50 0 100.0 from the process area. 50-100 0 100.0 >100 0 100.0 METHOD FOR DETERMINING WHEN TO CLEAN: ❑ AUTOMATIC ❑X TIMED ❑ MANUAL METHOD FOR DETERMINING WHEN TO REPLACE THE BAGS: Replaced ❑ ALARM ❑ INTERNAL INSPECTION ❑ VISIBLE EMISSION ® OTHER annually SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ❑ MOISTURE BLINDING ❑ CHEMICAL RESISTIVITY ❑ OTHER EXPLAIN: DESCRIBE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES: The two filter canisters are replaced annually, or more frequently if area personnel deem them to be blinded with powder. ON A SEPARATE PAGE, ATTACH A DIAGRAM SHOWING THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CONTROL DEVICE TO ITS EMISSION SOURCE(S): Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary DEQ-CFW 00065644 0 • FORM C1 CONTROL DEVICE (FABRIC FILTER) REVISED 12/01/01 NCDENR/Division of Air Quality - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate C1 CONTROL DEVICE ID NO: CD-Vac-132 CONTROLS EMISSIONS FROM WHICH EMISSION SOURCE ID NO: PVF-Vac-B EMISSION POINT (STACK) ID NO: EP-Vac-13 IPOSITION IN SERIES OF CONTROLS NO. 2 OF 2 UNITS MANUFACTURER: TDC Filter MODEL NO: SB-ME DATE MANUFACTURED: Aug 2008 PROPOSED OPERATION DATE: June 2010 OPERATING SCENARIO: PROPOSED START CONSTRUCTION DATE: Aug 2008 — 1 _ OF _ 1 P.E. SEAL REQUIRED (PER 2Q .0112)? 0 YES ❑ NO DESCRIBE CONTROL SYSTEM: For general good housekeeping purposes, the DuPont Company - Fayetteville Works' PVF-2 Process uses a vacuum system to clean the building's floor and equipment. The emission of particulate matter from the vacuum system is controlled by a two -stage fabric filter from TDC Filter. The second stage is a SB-ME Filter (CD-Vac-132) with a capture / control efficiency of 38% for particles less than 1.0 pm, 72% for particles between 1.0 pm and 3.0 pm, and 98% for particles greater than 3.0 pm. POLLUTANT(S) COLLECTED: PM <1 pm PM >1 pm BEFORE CONTROL EMISSION RATE (LB/HR): 6.78 0.67 CAPTURE EFFICIENCY: 100 % 100 % % CONTROL DEVICE EFFICIENCY: 38 % 72 % % CORRESPONDING OVERALL EFFICIENCY: 38 % 72 % % EFFICIENCY DETERMINATION CODE: 2 2 TOTAL EMISSION RATE (LB/HR): 4.20 0.19 PRESSURE DROP (IN. H20): MIN: 0 MAX: n/a GAUGE? ❑ YES 0 NO WARNING ALARM? ❑ YES NO BULK PARTICLE DENSITY (LB/FT3): 84.3 INLET TEMPERATURE (OF): 60 MIN 100 MAX POLLUTANT LOADING RATE: 7.45 LBf HR OUTLET TEMPERATURE (OF): 60 MIN 110 MAX INLET AIR FLOW RATE (ACFM): << 450 ACFM FILTER MAX OPERATING TEMP. (OF): 275 NO. OF COMPARTMENTS: 1 I NO. OF BAGS PER COMPARTMENT: 1 ILENGTH OF BAG (IN.): 16 DIAMETER OF BAG (IN.): 12.75 DRAFT: ❑ INDUCED/NEG. FORCED/POS. FILTER SURFACE AREA (FT 2): 46 AIR TO CLOTH RATIO: << 9.8:1 FILTER MATERIAL: 100% polyester metalized media ❑ WOVEN FRI FELTED DESCRIBE CLEANING PROCEDURES: ❑ AIR PULSE ❑ SONIC ❑ REVERSE FLOW ❑ SIMPLE BAG COLLAPSE ❑ MECHANICAL/SHAKER ❑ RING BAG COLLAPSE 0 OTHER either replaced or manually cleaned PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SIZE (MICRONS) WEIGHT % OF TOTAL CUMULATIVE % 0-1 91.0 91.0 1-10 9.0 100.0 DESCRIBE INCOMING AIR STREAM: The incoming air stream to the 2nd-stage filter discharged filtered air from the 1st -stage filter. 10-25 0 100.0 25-50 0 100.0 50-100 0 100.0 >100 0 100.0 METHOD FOR DETERMINING WHEN TO CLEAN: ❑ AUTOMATIC ❑ TIMED 17 MANUAL METHOD FOR DETERMINING WHEN TO REPLACE THE BAGS: Replaced ❑ ALARM ❑ INTERNAL INSPECTION ❑ VISIBLE EMISSION (] OTHER annually SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ❑ MOISTURE BLINDING ❑ CHEMICAL RESISTIVITY ❑ OTHER EXPLAIN: DESCRIBE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES: The filter canister is manually cleaned as needed and replaced annually. ON A SEPARATE PAGE, ATTACH A DIAGRAM SHOWING THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CONTROL DEVICE TO ITS EMISSION SOURCE(S): Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary DEQ-CFW 00065645 FORM D1 FACILITY -WIDE EMISSIONS SUMMARY RwicFn 19/n1 /n1 NCnFNR/nivisinn of Air Qualitv - Annlication for Air Permit to ConstrUCUOperate D1 CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS INFORMATION - FACILITY -WIDE EXPECTED ACTUAL EMISSIONS (AFTER CONTROLS / LIMITATIONS) POTENTIAL EMISSIONS (BEFORE CONTROLS / LIMITATIONS) POTENTIAL EMISSIONS (AFTER CONTROLS / LIMITATIONS) AIR POLLUTANT EMITTED tons/yr tons/yr tons/yr PARTICULATE MATTER (PM) 22.12 95.04 63.86 PARTICULATE MATTER < 10 MICRONS (PMio) < 22.12 < 95.04 < 63.86 PARTICULATE MATTER < 2.5 MICRONS (PM2.5) < 22.12 < 95.04 < 63.86 SULFUR DIOXIDE (S02) O O 0 NITROGEN OXIDES (NOx) 0 0 0 CARBON MONOXIDE (CO) 0 0 0 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC) 23.92 68.04 68.04 LEAD O 0 0 OTHER 0 0 0 HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS INFORMATION - FACILITY -WIDE EXPECTED ACTUAL EMISSIONS (AFTER CONTROLS / LIMITATIONS) POTENTIAL EMISSIONS (BEFORE CONTROLS / LIMITATIONS) POTENTIAL EMISSIONS (AFTER CONTROLS / LIMITATIONS) HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT EMITTED CAS NO. tons/yr tons/yr tons/yr Formaldehyde 50-00-0 0.088 0.088 0.088 TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS INFORMATION - FACILITY -WIDE INDICATE REQUESTED ACTUAL EMISSIONS AFTER CONTROLS / LIMITATIONS. EMISSIONS ABOVE THE TOXIC PERMIT EMISSION RATE (TPER) IN 15A NCAC 2Q .0711 MAY REQUIRE AIR DISPERSION MODELING. USE NETTING FORM D2 IF NECESSARY. Modeling Required ? TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT EMITTED CAS NO. Ib/hr lb/day lb/year Yes No Formaldehyde 50-00-0 0.02 0.48 175.2 X COMMENTS: Actual and potential emissions of total particulate matter has been estimated and reported in this application. A size distribution of the particulate matter has not been performed, therefore the fractions of the particles that are <2.5 micron and <10 micron are not know, and are reported as merely being less than the total quantity of particulate matter. The Potential to Emit of both volatile organic compound (VOC) and Particulate Matter < 10 microns (PM-10) is less than the 100 ton/year PSD threshold for both pollutants. The facility can emit small quantities of formaldehyde, which is created as a decomposition product in the high temperatures of the PVF Dryer. A laboratory simulation of the dryer was made and analysis of that dryer's exhaust air showed the potential uncontrolled emission of formaldehyde to be 0.01 Ib/hr for each process and a facility -wide total of 0.02 lb/hr. This potential emission rate is less than the 0.16 Ib/hr toxic permit emission rate ("TPER") of formaldehyde that would require a permit per 15A NCAC 02Q .0711(b). Attach Additional 5neets as Necessary DEQ-CFW 00065646 • FORM D2 AIR POLLUTANT NETTING WORKSHEET RA„icAri-i gmimi NCDFNR/Division of Air Qualitv - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate D2 PURPOSE OF NETTING: ❑ AIR TOXICS ❑ PSD (1001250 tons per year) ❑ PSD SIGNIFICANT LEVELS AIR POLLUTANT: None CAS NO.: EMISSION SOURCE ID NOS.: SECTION A - EMISSION OFFSETTING ANALYSIS FOR MODIFIED/NEW SOURCES Summarize in this section using the B forms EMISSIONS - USE APPROPRIATE COLUMNS ONLY LB/YEAR LB/DAY LB/HR MODIFICATION INCREASE - MINUS - - MINUS - - MINUS - - MINUS - MODIFICATION DECREASE = EQUALS = = EQUALS = = EQUALS = = EQUALS = NET CHANGE FROM MODIFICATION SECTION B - FACILITY -WIDE EMISSION NETTING ANALYSIS CREDITABLE INCREASE - MINUS - - MINUS - - MINUS - - MINUS - CREDITABLE DECREASE = EQUALS = = EQUALS = = EQUALS = = EQUALS = NET CREDITABLE CHANGE SECTION C - FACILITY -WIDE EMISSIONS TOTAL FACILITY EMISSIONS TPER LEVELS (2Q .0711) CHECK HERE [FAN AIR DISPERSION MODELING ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED ❑ COMMENTS: Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary DEQ-CFW 00065647 • • FORM D3 MODELING REQUEST FORM RFVn,;F-n• n?/2o/03 NCDENR/Division of Air Quality - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate D3 If the applicant desires, the NCDAQ/AQAB will perform the initial modeling compliance demonstration using EPA approved screening and, if applicable and where possible, refined models. If the model results indicate the facility will be unable to demonstrate compliance with applicable Acceptable Ambient Level(s) the applicant will be notified and will be required to perform the compliance demonstration using established modeling protocol and modeling analysis requirements as defined in the North Carolina Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2D .1100 and 2Q .0700 and in the Guidelines for Evaluating the Impacts of Toxic Pollutants in North Carolina. To perform the dispersion modeling compliance demonstration, the AQAB will require the following data: 1. INTRODUCTION Provide a brief description of the modification and/or addition necessitating the toxic modeling request: The facility can emit small quantities of formaldehyde, which is created as a decomposition product in the high temperatures of the PVF Dryer. A laboratory simulation of the dryer was made and analysis of dryer's exhaust air showed the potential uncontrolled emission of formaldehyde to be 0.01 Ib/hr for each process and a facility - wide total of 0.02 lb/hr. This potential emission rate is less than the 0.16 lb/hr toxic permit emission rate ("TPER") of formaldehyde that would require a permit per 15A NCAC 02Q .0711(b). Therefore this application for a minor air permit requires no modeling. 2. EMISSIONS DATA - Facility -wide emissions, by source, of all modeled toxics. TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT (TAP) MAXIMUM TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT (TAP) EMISSIONS (After Controls) Emission Point ID Ibs/year Ibs/day Ibs/hr Formaldehyde FEP-A4 87.6 0.24 0.01 Formaldehyde FEP-134 87.6 0.24 0.01 Attach Additional 5neets As Necessary DEQ-CFW 00065648 FORM D4 EXEMPT AND INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES SUMMARY oM"CM-1 al)ini ini ki ni=hiRinivicinn of Air Mmlity - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate D4 "� v�✓ ._._.._. ACTIVITIES EXEMPTED PER 2Q .0102 OR INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES PER 2Q .0503 FOR TITLE V SOURCES DESCRIPTION OF EMISSION SOURCE PRODUCTION INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY 1. PVF Facility - Quality Control Laboratory Per 2Q .0102(c)(1)(C)(i) laboratory activities using bench -scale, on -site equipment exclusively for chemical or physical analysis for quality control purposes do not require a permit. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Attach Additional Sheet As Necessary DEQ-CFW 00065649 • • FORM D TECHNICAL ANALYSIS TO SUPPORT PERMIT APPLICATION REVISED: 12/01/01 NCDENR/Division of Air Quality - Application for Air Permit to Construct/Operate D5 PROVIDE DETAILED TECHNICAL CALCULATIONS TO SUPPORT ALL EMISSION, CONTROL, AND REGULATORY DEMONSTRATIONS MADE IN THIS APPLICATION. INCLUDE A COMPREHENSIVE PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM AS NECESSARY TO SUPPORT AND CLARIFY CALCULATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS. ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC ISSUES ON SEPARATE PAGES: A SPECIFIC EMISSIONS SOURCE (EMISSION INFORMATION) (FORM B) - SHOW CALCULATIONS USED, INCLUDING EMISSION FACTORS, MATERIAL BALANCES, AND/OR OTHER METHODS FROM WHICH THE POLLUTANT EMISSION RATES IN THIS APPLICATION WERE DERIVED. INCLUDE CALCULATION OF POTENTIAL BEFORE AND, WHERE APPLICABLE, AFTER CONTROLS. CLEARLY STATE ANY ASSUMPTIONS MADE AND PROVIDE ANY REFERENCES AS NEEDED TO SUPPORT MATERIAL BALANCE CALCULATIONS. B SPECIFIC EMISSION SOURCE (REGULATORY INFORMATION)(FORM E2 - TITLE V ONLY) - PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF ANY REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO INDIVIDUAL SOURCES AND THE FACILITY AS A WHOLE. INCLUDE A DISCUSSION OUTING METHODS (e.g. FOR TESTING AND/OR MONITORING REQUIREMENTS) FOR COMPLYING WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS, PARTICULARLY THOSE REGULATIONS LIMITING EMISSIONS BASED ON PROCESS RATES OR OTHER OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS. PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR AVOIDANCE OF ANY FEDERAL REGULATIONS (PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION (PSD), NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NSPS), NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS (NESHAPS), TITLE V), INCLUDING EXEMPTIONS FROM THE FEDERAL REGULATIONS WHICH WOULD OTHERWISE BE APPLICABLE TO THIS FACILITY. SUBMIT ANY REQUIRED TO DOCUMENT COMPLIANCE WITH ANY REGULATIONS. INCLUDE EMISSION RATES CALCULATED IN ITEM "A" ABOVE, DATES OF MANUFACTURE, CONTROL EQUIPMENT, ETC. TO SUPPORT THESE CALCULATIONS. C CONTROL DEVICE ANALYSIS (FORM C) - PROVIDE A TECHNICAL EVALUATION WITH SUPPORTING REFERENCES FOR ANY CONTROL EFFICIENCIES LISTED ON SECTION C FORMS, OR USED TO REDUCE EMISSION RATES IN CALCULATIONS UNDER ITEM "A" ABOVE. INCLUDE PERTINENT OPERATING PARAMETERS (e.g. OPERATING CONDITIONS, MANUFACTURING RECOMMENDATIONS, AND PARAMETERS AS APPLIED FOR IN THIS APPLICATION) CRITICAL TO ENSURING PROPER PERFORMANCE OF THE CONTROL DEVICES). INCLUDE AND LIMITATIONS OR MALFUNCTION POTENTIAL FOR THE PARTICULAR CONTROL DEVICES AS EMPLOYED AT THIS FACILITY. DETAIL PROCEDURES FOR ASSURING PROPER OPERATION OF THE CONTROL DEVICE INCLUDING MONITORING SYSTEMS AND MAINTENANCE TO BE PERFORMED. D. PROCESS AND OPERATIONAL COMPLIANCE ANALYSIS - (FORM E3 - TITLE V ONLY) - SHOWING HOW COMPLIANCE WILL BE ACHIEVED WHEN USING PROCESS, OPERATIONAL, OR OTHER DATA TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. REFER TO COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS IN THE REGULATORY ANALYSIS IN ITEM "B" WHERE APPROPRIATE, LIST ANY CONDITIONS OR PARAMETERS THAT CAN BE MONITORED AND REPORTED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. E PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SEAL - PURSUANT TO 15A NCAC 2Q .0112 "APPLICATION REQUIRING A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SEAL," A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER REGISTERED IN NORTH CAROLINA SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SEAL TECHNICAL PORTIONS OF THIS APPLICATION FOR NEW SOURCES AND MODIFICATIONS OF EXISTING SOURCES. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS FOR FURTHER APPLICABILITY). Michael E. Johnson attest that this application for DuPont Company - Fayetteville Works has been reviewed by me and is accurate, complete and consistent with the information supplied in the engineering plans, calculations, and all other supporting documentation to the best of my knowledge. I further attest that to the best of my knowledge the proposed design has been prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations. Although certain portions of this submittal package may have been developed by other professionals, inclusion of these materials under my seal signifies that I have reviewed this material and have judged it to be consistent with the proposed design. Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to exceed $10,000 as well as civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation. (PLEASE USE BLUE INK TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING) PLACE NORTH CAROLINA SEAL HERE NAME: Michael E. Johnson DATE: July 31, 2015 COMPANY: DUPO Om r' y y ����� C A RO� ADDRESS: 28 NPA$7-- ayoKeville, NC TELEPHONE: i910-_ , ,156 SEAL r: SIGNATURE: r'n „ �'1,' =� 0 39 9 PAGES CERTIFIED:: {=0r 'f g and F9`' .�t GIN Forms C1 �# Form D5 - Attachments �'�/01111`WO (IDENTIFY ABOVE EACH PERMIT FORM AND ATTACHMENT THAT IS BEING CERTIFIED BY THIS SEAL) Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary -- See Attached Calculation Sheet DEQ-CFW 00065650