DEQ-CFW_00065238

FA
Clay
F
PR 27 1989
{ ENV. MANAGEMENT
FAYETTEVILLE REG. OFFICE
State of North 'Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
V. H. r L'
ED . T_ p,Ao,,4 A8"-I�1 gwlle Works
-P.O. n rT4r Z
Dear my, L/I
R. Paul Wilms
Director
Subject: NPDES Permit Application
NPDES Permit No. NC00
. -7 e enla
Cou ty
This is to acknowledge receipt of the following documents on A41:1 94,/9B
,j Application Form, T— -
Engineering Proposal (for proposed control facilities),
Request for permit renewal,
Application Processing Fee of $ 4100,E ,
,/ Other �.,es+ 1o,r a m.l t71o[i;7 �co�i [A1
The items checked below are needed before review can begin:
Application form (Copy enclosed),
Engineering Proposal See Attachment),
Application Processing Fee of $ ,
Other
If the application is not made complete within thirty 30 days, it. will
be returned to you and may be resubmitted when complete.
This application has been assigned to 4u1a 140vrj,g
(919/733-5083) of our Permits Unit for review. You will be advised of
any comments recommendations, questions or other information necessary
for the review of the application.
I am, by copy of this letter, requesting that .our Regional Office
Supervisor prepare a staff report and recommendations regarding this
discharge. If you have any questions regarding this application, please
contact the review person listed above.
'eNceXely,
ur Mouberry, P.E.
Supervisor, Permits and Engineering
cc: a ;�nAI Orf;fe-
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
DEQ-CFW 00065238

Z-544 REV. 12-79
aUPONT
ESTABLISHED 1802
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY
INCORPORATED
P. O. DRAWER Z
FAYETTEVILLE, N. C. 28302
POLYMER PRODUCTS DEPARTMENT
April 7, 1989
Dear Mick,
Enclosed is an almost complete copy of the NPDES Permit renewal
application, for your local use, which was sent to Raleigh in
triplicate. The only items missing from your copy are the actual
production figures on Table III. By removing this actual
production documentation, which I feel is required at the Central
Office but not at the Regional Office, you are given meaningful
information for any application review locally without requiring
you to deal with the complication of handling a CONFIDENTIAL
page.
Tom Olcott
APR 10 1989 "2 ,
ENV. MANAC EMENT
FAYETTEVILLE REG. c rFIa
BETTER THINGS FOR BETTER LIVING
DEQ-CFW 00065239

z-__a FEV. 12-79
✓ i � 1 1 i
rS7A?L:5H"c0'302
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY
INCORPORATED
P. O. DRAWER Z
FAYETTEVILLE, N. C. 28302
POLYMER PRODUCTS DEPARTMENT
Mr. R. Paul Wilms, Director
Division of Environmental Management
N.C. Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
SUBJECT: NPDES PERMIT NO. NC0003573
Dear Mr. Wilms:
BCC: T.D. Gill, Jr. - FW*
J.E. Hagle - FW*
C.A. Palmiotto/
J.M. Stallings - D12026
R.A. Reich L13WO4
File: F-1-3-3
*Cover letter only
April 7, 1989
With this cover letter, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc.
submits (3) copies of an application for early renewal of NPDES permit
NC0003573 for the Fayetteville Works facility in Bladen County. A $400
check for the application fee is also enclosed. The major reason this
application is submitted ahead of the required renewal date is to
declare a manufacturing expansion which ultimately requires relief from
the existing best professional judgement (BPJ) permit restriction
generated many years ago for suspended residue.
Fayetteville Works currently discharges treated industrial and
domestic wastewaters, non -contact cooling wastewaters, and stormwater
runoff to the Cape Fear River. We understand that the site industrial
process wastewater treatment system discharge (designated Discharge 001)
will be regulated under 40 CFR Part 414, "Organic Chemicals and Plastics
and Synthetic Fibers Category Effluent Limitations Guidelines". In
order to develop permit limitations based on these OCPSF guidelines, the
permit writer must have information which is not fully available from
the Form 2C permit application. In the interest of expediting the
permitting process we have appended the additional information necessary
for permit limitations development (see Attachment II). One component
of this information is a confidential list of production rates. These
have been appended separately (Attachment III). We request that your
department afford this confidential exhibit the proper handling and
safeguards.
All Group I and Group II stormwater discharges from the
manufacturing area and auxiliary plant areas discharge through the
existing 002 outfall with the exception of one corner of an employee
vehicle parking lot, external to any manufacturing facilities. This
plant's stormwater status declaration was submitted to Mr. Mouberry on
BETTER THINGS FOR BETTER LIVING
DEQ-CFW 00065240

r
Mr. R. Paul Wilms, Director -2- April 7, 1989
Division of Environmental Management
June 17, 1985. Mr. Mouberry informed us at the time that this
declaration would be filed until the stormwater permitting program was
clearly defined by EPA and he would inform us if more information was
needed when that definition occurs.
Expansion of the Butacite* Area manufacturing facilities requires
this submission. However, the low overall environmental impact of this
expansion can be characterized by the following:
1. These expansion facilities do not generate hazardous waste
or result in generation of hazardous waste elsewhere.
2. Even at full capacity these expansion facilities will not
generate detectable VOC or particulate process emissions
(detectability limit = 0.5 ton/yr). See Air Permit
3735R5.
3. No constituents of any potential non -routine emissions
from these facilities are currently included in N.C. Air
Toxics regulatory proposals.
4. Over 2 million dollars have been invested within the past
three years to expand the activated sludge wastewater
treatment facilities to treat aqueous wastewater from the
expanded Butacite* process streams and pollution control
devices with high efficiency.
Fayetteville Works has an active program toward minimizing the
generation of both hazardous and non -hazardous wastes and
reclaiming/recycling formerly incinerated wastes. We will be glad to
discuss in detail if you desire further information.
If you have any questions concerning the enclosed application or
appended information, please contact me at [phone] Ext. 155.
Also, I will be glad to meet with your permitting personnel in Raleigh
at your convenience.
*Du Pont Registered Trademark
TWO:mm
(8.23)
Attachments (3)
CC: M.J. Noland, Regional Supervisor
Very truly yours, /
Thomas W. Olcott
Environmental Control
Coordinator
DEQ-CFW 00065241

Please print or type In the unshaded areas only
(fill—in areas are spaced for elite type. i.e.. 12characrerslnchl
C...—A ­­r1••o Al., 190-Dn•74
FORM U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 1. EPA I.D. NUMBER✓
' GENERAL INFORMATION ..
Consolidated Permits
00EMBA
GENERAL "General
Program F N C D O 4 7 3 6 8 6 4 2
(Read the instructions"
before starting.)
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
1. EPA 1\ .NUMBER NCD047.368642
If a preprinted label has been provided, affix
lIt in the designated space. Review the inform-
ation carefully; if any of it is incorrect, txass
Ilt. FAC LITY NAME Du Pont — Fayetteville Works through it and enter the correct data in Via
P.O. Drawer Z
fill—in area below, Also, if any of
Y. AGILITY Fa etteville, _NC 28302
MAILING ADDRESS 1 - - - - - — _
j1ppropriate
e preprinted data is absent (the erect to e1v
�� eft of the lobe! t?he
—_ _-_ -- _ -.-- space lse the ulfit
that should apPasrl, Please provide it in L'+e
in
proper fill—in steals) below. If the label is
.y
\
Iomplete and correct, you need not complete
jltems 1, Ill, V. and VI (except V/•d n+hieh
State Highway 87 South
FACILITY
(rust be completed regardless). Complete ail
VI. LOCATION Fayetteville, NC
rtems if no label has been provided. Rater to
instructions for -detailed item desexip-
4the
ions and for the legal authorizations under
)which this data is collected.
If. POLLUTANT CHARACTERISTICS
INSTRUCTIONS: Complete A through J to determine whether you need to submit any permit application forms to the EPA. If you answer "yes" to any
questions, you must submit this form and the supplemental form listed in the
parenthesis following the question. Mark "X" in the box in the third column
if the supplemental form is attached. If you answer "no" to each question, you need not submit any of these farms. You may answer "no" if your activity
is excluded from permit requirements; see Section C of the instructions. See also, Section 0 of the instructions for definitions of bold—faced tsrtnL
SPECIFIC QUESTIONS
MAMW
-
M '
•{/
MO
�o•�
ATTAC�CD
v[f
"c
FORM
A TTACM<
SPECIFIC QUESTIONS
A. Is this facility a publicly owned treatment works
B. Does or will this facility (either existing or proposed)
which results in a dischargetowaters of the U.S.?
X
include a concentrated animal feeding operation or
(FORM 2A)
aquatic animal production facility which results in a
X
discharge to waters of the U.S.? (FORM 2B)
X
X
�
X
sI
C. Is this a facility which currently results in discharges
to waters of the U.S. other than those described in
. Is this a proposed facility other than those described
A or B above? FORM 2C)
in A or B above) which will result in a discharge to
s
„
waters of the U.S.? (FORM 2D)
E. Does or will this facility treat, store, or dispose of
SEE
F. Do you or will you inject at this facility industrial or
hazardous wastes? (FORM 3)
X
NOTE
municipal effluent below the lowermost stratum con-
taining, within one quarter mile of the well bore,
X
underground sources of drinking water? (FORM 4)
„
�r
13
G. o you or willyou Inject at t is acl Ity any produced
water or other fluids which are brought to the surface
H. Do you or will you inject at this facility fluids for spe.
in connection with conventional oil or natural gas pro-
X
cial processes such as mining of sulfur by the Frasch
X
duction, inject fluids used for enhanced recovery of
process, solution mining of minerals, in situ combus-
oil or natural gas, or inject fluids for storage of liquid
tion of fossil fuel, or recovery of geothermal energy?
h drocarbons? (FORM 4)
(FORM 4)
74
li
76
s t Isth facility a propose e 28 industrial categories
ovary source w Ic Isgories listed in the in-
one of the
J. Is this facility a propose ta attonary source which is
NOT one of the 28 industrial categories listed in the
structions and which will potentially emit 100 tons
per year of any air pollutant regulated under the
-
X
instructions and which will potentially emit 250 tons
X
Clean Air Act and may affect or be located in an
per year any air pollutant regulated under the Clean
Air Actn y affect or be located in an ettairunertt
attainment area? (FORM 5)
erea? (FORM 5►
.s
.+
.:
�m
III. -NAME OF FACILITY
' S KIP F AYE T T E I V LI LI E] W 0
I - E9 l0
+FACILITY
R K
S
I
IV. CONTACT -
A. NAME Q TITLE (last, first, & title)
c
a. PHONE (area code & no.)
919 483 4-681�
2TWOLCOTT
ENVIRON"`CO.ORDINATOR
V. FACILITY MAILING ADDRESS
.+ .. +�
A. STREET OR P.O. BOX
c
3P0 DRAWER Z
If It
B. CITY ORTOWNC.STATE
c
D. ZIP CODE
4 F A Y E T T. E V. I L L E
N C 2 8 30 2
VI. FACILITY LOCATION
A. STREET, ROUTE NO. OR OTHER SPECIFIC IDENTIFIER
5 S T A T E HIGHWAY 8 7 S OUT H
6. COUNTY NAME
B L A D E N
A,
,.
e F. COUNTY C5ZT
TOWN D.STATE E. ZI�92-
EE
6 D U A R T
N C 2 8
PA
EForm 3510-1 (&Rnl
CONTINUE OY REVERSE
DEQ-CFW 00065242

UN 11 UEO FROM THE FRONT
VI1. SIC CODES (4•digit, in order of priorityl`
A. FIRST tB. SECOND
7 2 8 2"I(Specify; 7 3 0 7 9 (specify)
Plastics Material & Syn Resins
O. THIRD
tri Misc. Plastics Products
- - "- - - - - -
0. FOURTH
7 2 8 6 9 (sPecijy) (specify)
Industrial Organic Chem., NEC 7
Vill. OPERATOR INFORMaTloru _
c - - - A. NAME - - ---- IS VW name liatae in
Item VIII,Aaim Vie
g E I D U P 0 N T DF. N E M 0 U R S & C O oars
/. ,. IM YES C NO
-
- C. STATUS OF OPERATOR (Enter the appropriate }ester into the answer Yf/x; }j"Other '; specffy.) D. PHONE (area code & no.)
= F DERAL M = P BLI (other than federal or state) (specify) C
S STATE O =OTHER P = PRIVATE (Specify)14 P A 3 0 2 7 7 4 21 8 416
E. STREET OR P.O. BOX
1 0 0 7 M A R K E T S T R E E T
so
F. CITY OR TOWN O.STAT14 H. Zip CODE IX. INDIAN LAND
c
g W I L M I N G T 0 N D E 1 9 g 9 8 Is the facility located on Indian lands?
to Is C7 YES LX] NO
52
N . - -
X. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS -
fl q H !t
A. NPDes (Discharges to Surface Water) D. PSO (Air Emissions from Proposed Sources)
C T 1
NC0003573 T 9 N 9 P N O N E
s. Unde '0 ( +ground Injection ojFluidsJ E. OTHER
ER (specify)
C T •1
9 U N O N E ��=
S E E A T T A C H. E D (Spe`Air Permit
If ,• 17 If 17A ,.
C. RCRA (Hazardous Wastes) E. OTHER (Specify)
c T ,
3 R NCD04 7 3.68 642 g T SEE ATTACHED (specifi'J
XI. MAP `-
]f Dredgimz Permit
Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending to at least one mile beyond property bounderies. The map must show.
the outline of the facility, the location of each of its existing and proposed intake and discharge structures, each of its hazardous waste
treatment, storage, or disposal facilities, and each well where it injects fluids underground. Include all springs, rivers and other surface
water bodies in the map area. See instructions for precise requirements.
XII. NATURE OF BUSINESS (provide a brief description _m _
Manufacture of resins,plastic products and intermediates:
1. —Polyvinyl butyral resin and Butacite® sheeting
2. Dymetrol® nylon strapping
3. Tape products
4. Modified EPDM rubber
5. Per£luorinated intermediates and resins
6. Nafion® membrane
XI11. CERTIFICATION (see instructions) �. -. 't
1 certify under penalty of law that / have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this application and all
attachments and that, based on my inquiry of those persons immediately responsib/a for obtaining the information contained in al f
application, l believe that the information is true, accurate and complete. / am aware that them are significant pens/ties for submitting
false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
A. NAME & OFFICIAL TITLE (type or print) B. SIGNATURE
T.D. Gill, Jr. • C. DATE SIGNED
Works Manager C5;. Aj. .
COMMENTS FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
1.
Form 3510.1 I6-sol REVERSF
DEQ-CFW-00065243

FORM 1 ATTACHMENT 1
NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO. (INC.) FAYETTEVILLE WORKS
(EPA I.D. NUMBER MCD047368642)
FORM I ITEM II-E: Form 3 was previously submitted in 1987 for a
RCRA Permit modification concerning interim
storage facilities (prior to off plant
disposal). The wastewater treatment facilities
are not RCRA regulated and are not used for
hazardous waste treatment. A copy of Form 3 from
that submission is attached to the end of this
application.
FORM I ITEM X-E:
OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS
North Carolina - Air Emissions
3735R5 All Fayetteville Works Emissions
Canal Dredging
SAWC080-N-009-000002
DEQ-CFW 00065244

tt Farli 'evi l l e tS rA de5
y' f FAYETTEVILLE WORKS
., 1 FRCS
` vary
Swans t;reek G "•iarvin Ch
Crays Creek Sch!'' •� : I ?55
Swans Qrwk Ch
o� v 'p� �j, �I t 1. a .�•, �l
J.PORrL,}
�, _ � . �sysa \� � �•\ , t ..1 %%d p is , ��
�'P
I
Chapel Ciova CM_
-• `f: , ^•i I..:7+ '�, ,.�. /�_�/ ~., .•.�� .r�; ± I _ �. / �;'�' ,ri cam.• .
' "�• 1 BM •'`-•C:�a .. t e iI , > /-.tJO.. t . y /�• .P. - / c y t lease. -
ROADS
—_ RELOCATION ,t ' : _hi c- y t\ II ,�`�
Mt M�nan �• f��;' , �. di:.\!'','+
r • --• ::`Cem e .�� `yy�lNa._;.•-- Cr • . 1 . �1 _ �ee �I �l �• L
--e•,l \ �t
.-.f� 16.' V '�T:1 _:i1'ilL �•'%l �,'.' •i.j^ . _'/• , , 'Cj ^ti• y . i0. J:11� /''t i' ''
•sy UU _f� E'. -,.o) ,' ._I(% �l�d'C.'• CUL
9 •'�'i. !-/--._— •es't'/iiJV Creck��.��' 1 " (f-mil--��'.�+�--
�s
`�// _Vernon Cib.•'o .q„/•-Gem. 0
• �: .Cem off♦ c/:",�.,,, m 15 "'�` 1, o;'• •�r `�j �'Vj
as \ sa1�
_ _ �, `�� �/ �` -a) '' � tii � '��,. Ins -� -•
i3yrreli -A 'x � C � '' �b � r `�. 1" ='E•_'��• y �. ``,, i.�r� .o ` \\a��• `C)0' fOx+fctpte�tjj�q�, /.�ik/�� t'0o
.%L r s !i/ as �• \ •!r �• 1 bN V Ii. �`� it 1 )2� ``\�` •+�
t `•F_ _ Cwntr Lie dlft$.��
�•{-1.�,,�`�C..m '-,� �J IE7• a('0/pry(•` 't\i'•K: )t�G i�•V�fi['�54aq{�y.�/�.••�•,�_%'i_�` •r� -
L--.-y1� A.' `•• vy- . �r•y -.+r ��..+� IY ! • ^.'_ _il.�(ff.�..+_�t � F•7�4'�%%.+•M,L�.1 t B\ �•
•rf±� [ � .. ( `,n •Cem 1 �', �r� •l^' 1 i,T`�, - I, _ � � I`.f7 �'.' , \,•� �.
a-�\,.
,�.-�'-��
OUNDARY� L_ ,I
�'_ APPROXIMATE B `
• �/� __.
1 p -'mot Tx - :� �' j• .>; -�- P V aa��• �'�"C. f�11 ,'' �X) .`ram.,
cck S�\1t� ^/ �Qt .i' / ;`•. _-'` '` �e�• J, �t39 ! y■It� :'�� !� 'I_L�lr.
Cam-- '-f ' ' �'., � \`�" �1d1_ _ '�i( `�' ij (r q � 0 " "r '- i� _ •r)-,i ' -t-! t.
��- I �_• �' _ti �. _ '. '.. , ti1.. t?; L res etlflall `• ,� �A
J�� [^�� ! •Y `jg.'ht'tic:;_ 'a:J =_afar t,\: C: K3•y` (�rd'nl g1r7-
r, .. •tv •� 'cs
• tl�� Y
�•• -'1..� ,_ -r - `•"' T�..ermory _ - i' >,�.;'.a t, ••' -- ` /• `� ii.', ' V1.
71, is
l`ens%/IH,c:1�{��`
("lam }•-01�`•� �•. -iu .•'.•••o i•a `. i �'`- �� � i••
'�•"�•`\ F�'a>�•/-.a*i7 /I)� /'O '. 1.1111er C apelyCem % •1/• \\ 1 t' _ , Iti-'-�qv
fuiecNer3[' soon,
P'- U
a•. _•1,c>m Fj'• ,0
FA
�1 w" \, '•ri�'� �- �`L� _ _ . � _ I` �.. �1> ••�t; t•1r. \ .\airy I ,
�.��.�` •S7: • •� •;; _ _� w Qom'=,+�,.�1 ,,off '�.:'"}}1., : a �O \�"` , . \
s Z :—� i� \ `' •.O y\�.� �•o� '.i 0 j ,/ 1� �, o . `\� `tf �' •I _II
i NC _/ J_ Y�f/•, a?4 s� 2? S a
AYGROatMATE MEAN -L •_/ / � 1' :11 - •; ( a• . ,p ) C{ 1 _/• ,�.
OECUNATtON. 1959 ,.-Ws•.,.J ` v •'` i • .7\- • 1 ..; _ �•
VP Atw �. : �i•n�.:`
[ l SCAL E 1 62500 i yTi • • +'� :' .1
� •' � - ,\ A'•
)0)0 0 WfA &^m •nn 17•tf. 1;t») 1b'ow 71w) 1[ET
F_L7i]_33-7'=_1=_3_L=--'i-�-.l_1=� 7_1=�`r-L_1� :C_=7 •t ' �•.F-
l 5 S 1 7 l • 5 uILrETI Ry `\,a
CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET • E;•,:�� `� F •:t •• p
DATUM is MEAN SEA LE''EL 1 1 r [a :: L � I•
(Co p;ed from USGS rrn&p)5t•. Pa1A Is N C j Map 49,S3= Series Y71fz)
DEQ-CFW 00065245

I "r 1111:.�1 UI iVPP in the unshao,,ii.,I•.is om, i Ncnn471ARF)49 - I .............. .
FORM U.ti ENVIRC`NMI IVTAL FIf CITECTION A(-[ J( .
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER
®�P& EXISTING MANUFACTURING, COMMERCIAL, MINING AND SILVICULTJRAL OPERATIONS
NPDES COM0/iddto(I PCrfttits Pro[lrign
1. OUTFALL LOCATIONJill I
For each outfall, list the latitude and IUn(Iltud(! of I!$ if)CatlO rl Io Lf1Enea1CSI 15 $!'COnd$ and the! rl i)ll le of the If`CelVlnll Waft'+.
A. UTFALL B. LATfTt7C)E C
NUMBER . LONGITUDE — —
(list) •. n•M1. :, u. w. -.,,. ,, r>I-t,. r,. I,.,. ,r [). I7 EC r. IV I N G (V Al 111?
— 001— N 34_ 50 00 W 78 50 00 Combines with Outfall 002
-t--50 --;- - - - _ _ -- -- ---
002 N 34 00 W 78 50 00 Unnamed stream to Cape Fear River
003 N 34 ! 50 ! 10 s W 78 50 j 00 IOutfall 002
11. FLOWS, SOURCES OF POLLUTION, AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
A. Attach a line diawinti showing the Witter flow throucih the facility. Inclicale sources of iroake Walin, U{iel a2lUnS f;Ull it lbU Un(i +aszrN a;•I to ;tw rt!lueni
and treatment units labeled to Conesponrl it, the more detailed descriptions rn Item B. Construct a water Wlance on file line drawmn to !a.t�r:,1 rage
.Ive
flows between intakes, operations, treatment units, and outfalls. If a water balence cannot he determined (e.g., for c•rrram [nfnif:,t aC[:. •tied, p! blur a
pictorial description of the nature and amount
of any sources of water and any collection or treatment measures.
B. For each outfafl, provide a description of: (1) All operations contributing wastewater to Ule effluent, including proc's wa$tewa:er, suna::ry w.r,:awau•r,
coulirg water, and storm water runoff; (2) The average flow contributed by each operation; and (3) The treatment received by if..: w—mit•waler. Continue
on additional sheets if necessary.
1. OUT-
FALLN
2. OPERATION(S) CONTRIBUTING FLOW
-- 3, TREATMENT
(list)
n. OPERATION (lis(I
t). AVERAGE FLOW
tin ('iudr units)
'- LIST COOLS f f?C N
•l. DESCHIPTION TABLE 'C t
001
Processed & Pad Runoff:
-
560,000 GPD
1. Retention tank ! X X
1. Polyvinyl butyral resin
175,000 gal.__
and sheeting
— --Capacity:
(ButaciteU)
—
2. Extrusion of nylon
(Dymetrol®)
2. Equalization Tank ! 3 ! E
3. Extrusion of tape products]
(EPS tape)
Capacity: 250,000 gal.
4. Extrusion of rubber graft
(TRX)
Retention Time: 10 hr
5. Hexafluoropropylene epoxid
(HFPO)
3. Activated sludge 3 A
6. Perfluorinated
intermediates
(VE's & FPX)
—fi
a. Aeration basin
7. Perfluorinated resins
(XR and CR)
Capacity: 1,500,000 gal].
8. Perfluorinated sheeting
(Nafion®
Retention Time: 60 hr.
_--
b. Clarifiers (Two in parallel)
(1) Capacity: 120,000 gal.
Retention Time: 11
r.
(2) Capacity: 168,000 gal.
Retention Time: 11
hr.
4. Discharge to surface water
4
A
-5. Sludge Handling
a. Aerobic Digestion
5
A
Capacity: 720,000 gal.
b. Gravitv Thickening
5
L
c.- Pressure Filtration
5
R
d. Landfill (Off -Plant)
5
Q
(Potential Future On-
(5)
(P)
>FFIctAL usE oNLr IrllluenrRurdrinlr�auh•eoleAr+rirel
PAr_>: 1
t Lands read
i,N
_
DEQ-CFW 00065246

f'll•nsr print or type In the unshaded arr.ls only. M , ,i;,•n•e.r/ /•.rrurs 12 31 h5
r'UNh'I U.S. ENVIRONME. NTAL PROI ECTION AC.LNCY
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER
L C aS�EPA EXISTING MANUFACTURING, COMMERCIAL, MINING AND SILV CULTURAL OPERATIONS
NPDES Consolidated Permits Proarartt
1. OUTFALL LOCATION
For each outfall, list the latitude and longitude of Its location to the nearest 15 seconds and the name of the recelvino water.
A. UUTFALL
li.t/
B, LATITUDE
C. LONGITUDE:
D. RECEIVING WATER (1107)r)
I. ova.
—
•
j
I
� I
--- - ---•�, _.�..,,v.... v• . v��V IV Y, nlvV I I�LM I IYIC IY I 1 Ca.rl1YVLVUICJ -•- -- •
A. Attach a line drawing showing the water fiuw through the facility, htchcate sources of intake water, uperations contributing wastewater to the effluent,
and treatment units labeled to correspond to the more detailed descriptions i I Item B. Construct a water balance on the line drawing by showing average
flows between intakes, operations, treatment units, and outfails. If a water balance cannot he determined fe.g., for certain mininar activaiesi, provide a
pictorial description of the nature and amount of any sources of water and any collection or treatment measures.
B. For each outfall, provide a description of: (1) All operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, Including prow-,s wastewater, sanitary wastewater,
cooling water, and storm water runoff; (2) The average flow contributed by each operation; and (3) The treatment received by the wastewater. Continue
on additional sheets if necessary.
1. OUT- 2. OPERATION(S) CONTRIBUTING FLOW
- 3. TREATMENT
FALLN
(list) a. OPERATION (list) U. AVERAGE FLOW b. LIST CODES IF ROM
(irtcludl- unrlal a. DESCRIPTION TABLE 2C-1
001 Sanitary Wastewater 20,000 -GPD (Combined with process See Pg la
wastewater)
-
001
Demineralizer Regeneration
30,000 GPD
Co -neutralized and then
2
K
combined with process
wastewater
See
Ip_g la
..
001
Acidic and alkaline wastes
50,000 GPD
Pretreatment provided: Streams
2
K
from Nafion® Area shown
co -neutralized before
as Items 5, 6, 7 & 8 above
combination with other process
< 1,000 GPD
wastes.
Neutralization
I i
i
K
002
Perfluorinated sheeting -
2 (
neutralized nitric acid
Capacity: (pipeline)
4
A
002
Boiler blowdown & condensate
120,000 GPD
None
4
A
002
Demineralizer Regeneration
30,000 GPD
Neutralization (batch)
2
K
(alternate)
Capacity: 100,000 gal.
Retention Time: 34 hr.
4
A
002 Non -Contact 11,270,000 GPD None
Cooling Water,
(Filtered Water & River Water-)
►FICIAL USE ONLY (efflue•,II jewds'llnl•A sub-rOteRem.vs)
PArF. lh (C..nni-inttarl on Pnop jr)
4 1 A
DEQ-CFW 00065247

I'l—Se wi4t or ivpe in the unshaded iv. is ortiv. /�;;••r�.r+••.par•. l i 31 h.S
FORM ® U.S. ENV IRONMLNT AL PROTECTION A(.LN(-Y
®�®��/� APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER
EXISTING MANUFACTURING, COMMERCIAL, MINING AND SILVICULTURAL OPERATIONS
NPDES Consolidates! Permits Pronram
1. OUTFALL LOCATION
For each outfall, list the latitude and lonottude of Its location to the nearest 15 seconds and the name of the receivma water_
A. OU FALL
NUMBER
B. LA7ITUDE
C. LONGITUDE
D. RECEIVING WATER (t)alrtr)
1
1
i
I
I
I
-
FN
If. f-LOWS, SOURCES OF POLLUTION, AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
A. Attach a line drawing showing the water flow through the facility. Indso of Intake water, operations contnbutiny stiastewoter to the effluent,
and treatment units labeled to correspond to the more detailed descriptions in ftem B. Construct a water balance on the line drawing by showmg average
flows between intakes, operations, treatment units, and outfalls. If a water balance cannot he determined fe.y., for certain mining activiticsi, provide a
pictorial description of the nature and amount of any sources of water and any collection or treatment measures.
B. For each outiall, provide a description of: (1) All operations contributing wastewater to the eiiluent, including pion,,s wastewaier, sanitary wastewater,
cooling water, and storm water runoff; (2) The average flow contributed by each operation; and (3) The treatment received Uy the wastewater. Continue -
on additional sheets if necessary,
I. OUT- 2. OPERATION(S) CONTRIBUTING FLOW 3. TREATMENT
FALLNO b. AVERAGE FLUKY
(list) a. OPERATION (tirl) b. LIST CODES r ROM
/include utut..'i a. DESCRIPTION TABLE 2C-I
002 Storm Water 500,000 GPD None 4 A
(average)
Basis: 45 in.
annual rainfall
None Filter Plant - Clarifier 30,000 GPD Lagoon 5 FT
Blowdown and Filter
Backwash
003 1 Lagoon overflow
< 1,000 GPD
Overflow to cooling water 4
ditch 002
A
O►FICIAL. USE ONLY (efflur•tir Ru
tluh•ca
DEQ-CFW 00065248

rt71�T'INIlFr1•�-rtnnn TWI: FRnnIT
C. Except for storm runoff, leaks, or spills, are any of the discharges described in Items 11-A or B intermittent or seasonal?
!X YES (Complete the following table) L 1 NO (gU (o Section 111)
3.FREQUENCY
4.FLOW
1. OUTFALL
2. OPERATION(S)
a. DAYS
b. MONTHS
e. FLOW RATE �b.
(in ??)Rd)
TO VOLUME
(specify with unit$i
S DVR-
NUMBER
CONTRIBUTING FLOW
PER WEEK
PER YEAR
ATION
(tlst)
((t.t't)
(specify
($pecify
1. LONG TERM
2. MAxIMUM
1. LONG TERM
2. MA% UM
r
(m c•a>ft
average)
average)
AVERAGE
DAILY
AVERAGE
DAILY
003
Filter sludge lagoon overflo
- Very
infrequl
nt flo
. Difficult
to
quantify.
I
III. PRODUCTION
A. Does an effluent
guideline limitation promulgated by EPA under
Section 304
of the Clean
Water Act apply
to your facility?
YES
(complete Item Ill-B)
L NO (to to
Section Ili)
B. Are the limitations in the applicable effluent guideline expressed in terms of production (or other measure of operation)?
,YES (Complete Item III-C) [ENO (go to Section IV)
C. If you answered "yes'* to Item I11-8, list the quantity which represents an actual measurement of your level of production, expressed In the terms and units
used in the applicable effluent guideline, and indicate the affected outfalls.
1. AVERAGE DAILY PRODUCTION
2.AFFECTED
a. QUANTITY PER DAY b. UNITS OF MEASURE C. OPERATION, PRODUCT. MATERIAL, ETC.
(specify)
OUTFALLS
(list outfall numbers)
IV. IMPROVEMENTS
A. 'Are you now required by any Federal, State or iocaI authority to meet any implementation schedule for the construction, upgrading or operation of waste-
water treatment equipment or practices or any other Environmental programs which may affect the discharges described in this application? This Includes.
but is not limited to, permit conditions, administrative or enforcement orders, enforcement compliance schedule letters, stipulations, court orders, and grant
or loan conditions. E)YES (complete the following table) CK,No (go to Item IV•B)
t. IDENTIFICATION OF CONDITION,
2. AFFECTED OUTFACES
4. FINAL COM
N £ DATE
AGREEMENT. ETC.
3. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
tl. NO.
b. EOu RCE or DISCHARGE
GUIR - I I.
<C.ro
I
j'I
I
I
I I
B. OPI IONAL: You may attach additional sheets describing any additional water pollution control programs (or other environmental projects which may affect
Your discharges) you now have underway or which you plan. If,dicate whether each program Is now underway or piannro, told Indicate 1 our actual or
Planned schedules for construc11or1. LXMARK "X•' IF DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL PROGRAMS IS ATTACHED
EPA Form 351(1-7r IRPv P-RS;1 PACC 2 OF 4 CONTINUE ON PAGE 3
DEQ-CFW 00065249

EPA LD. NUMBER (Copy from ip•rn ! o%!non 1) fwm Appnwed.
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2 NCD047368642 OMB No. 2000-0059
Approval expires 12-31-85
V. INTAKE AND EFFLUENT ICHARACTERISTICS
A, B, & C: See instructions before proceeding — Complete one set of tables for each outfall — Annotate the outfall number in the space provided.
NOTE: Tables V-A, V-B, and V-C are included on separate sheets numbered V-1 through V-9.
D. Use the space below to list any of the pollutants listed in Table 2c-3 of the instructions, which you know or have reason to believe is discharged or may b
discharged from any outfall. For every pollutant you list, briefly describe the reasons you believe it to be present and report any analytical data in you
possession.
I.POLLUTANT 2. SOURCE i.POLLUTANT 2. SOURCE
Vanadium Trace amounts inIfuel oil
burned in boiler. Could
get into outfall from
area washdown
Asbestos Insulation of steam lines.
In building wallboard.
V1. POTENTIAL DISCHARGES NOT COVERED BY ANALYSIS
Is any pollutant listed in Item V-C a substance or a component of a substance which you
byproduct?
(,NYES (list all such pollutants below)
1. Antimony (small amounts of catalyst)
2. Methylene chloride
3. Toluene
4. PCB's (trace amounts in transformers)
use or manufacture as an intermediate or final product or
❑NO (go to !rem VI-B)
5. Octylphenol (contributor to total phenol)
6. 1,2 Dichloroethane (small amount of catalyst)
See Note 3 on Attachment 1
There are a number of pollutants listed in Item V-C which are used in the plant laboratories.
EPA Form 3510-2C (Rev. 2-Rfi1
PAGE 3 OF d
n�u�)utlF nN RFVFRt
DEQ-CFW 00065250

Doi©u have any knowledge or reason to believe that any b:oIoglcal test for acute or c ai:•Ftc rextci•y has tbe%-n maou on any of your CIS: heroes or o^ a
receiving water in relation to your discharge within the last 3 years?
�yj Yes ridh nlify the fea ifs; ane( dc.c••-dw (heir pn riroxe., 1'. I'm i No (Co to Section 1,111)
Routine test by State of North Carolina
II.CONTRACT ANALYSIS INFORMATION >t'
Were any of the analyses reported in Item V performeu by a contract laboratory or consulting firm?
,X YES (ltsI the name• address• and telephorle number of, and poliutan is 'NO IC(, to Scctton 111
analy'zen oy, rach sucil iaboratory or firm below)
A. NAME B. ADDRESS LEI'11 UNE --Tll- LU�ANTS ANAL1 ZED
Conoco Analytical Services Conoco Inc. 405-442-4478 ;All pollutants
P.O. Box 1267 lanalyzed for in
Ponca City, OK 74603 ;part V-C
I
I
Law & Company 1711 Castle Street 919-762-7082 ;BOD, TOC, TSS and
Wilmington, NC 28402 :all pollutants
I j analyzed for in
;part V-B
CERTIFICATION
/ certify under penalty of la w that this document andall attachments wereprepared undermy direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properlygather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the system or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and befiel, true, accurate, and corn ottete.
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
A. NAMC & OFFICIAL TITLE IIWW rrr pe'Inle n f'N ONE NO
T.D. Gill, Jr. 919-483-4681
Works Manager
C. S14NA ru RE
C-,�- 0, /-,;e�
U IIATE SIL.NED
EPA Fp tm 3510.2C (Rev. 2.85)
PAGE 3 OF a
DEQ-CFW 00065251

~ 7
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE IN THE UNSHADED AREAS ONLY. You may report some or all of EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item I Of Form I)
t';is information on separate sheets (use the same format) instead of completing these pages. I Form Approved
NCD047368642 ' OMB No.200()-0059
SSE INSTRUCTIONS. j ,,,,___.-_,_,-_,___ ,.,
it.INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS (continued from page 3 of Form 2-C)
OUT FALL NO
001
PART A - You must provide•the-resu►,fs of at least one•analysis for every pollutant in this table. Complete one table for each outfall. See instructions for additional details.
2. EFFLUENT
3. UNITS
4. INTAKE (optional
I.:)POLLUTANT
(specify It bank)
a: MAXIMUM pA1LV VALUE
• MAXI M a
QUQ(lQble
Y VALUE
C. A
t QVat a P
a. LONG TERM
'
d. NO OFa.CONCEN
AN
a NO. OF
ANALYSES
.. ill •'
CONCENTRATIONCONCENTRATION
'. .
(i) Mwef
•
(
l�l MASS'
'
CONCENTRATION
MASS
-AVEPAr.EVALUE
TRATION
bMASS
CONCENTRA TION
ICIMAff
is, Siorh^rnical
" °R"''®nd
38
186
22
106
10
44
51
mg/l
lb
exop)
+aov)
b. Chemical
Okygen Demand
140
408
50
174
33
144
244
mg/1
lb
((.ADD) ,
v Total organic
50
193
-
-
-
-
1
Mg/1
lb
Ctaibon ('TUC)
d!. 71rOtal Suspended
f.Olids
36
176
26
125
16
70
51
m 1
g/
lb
(T.")
p; Ammonia (as N)
2.7
12
1.2
5
0.6
3
48
mg/l
lb
f!°"
VALUE
744,000
VALUE
604,000
VALUE
523,000
--
362
gal/day
-
VALUE
t
g.,Temp9ratV re
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
il�inr/•r1
17
14
12
121
'C
h. Temperature
VALVE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
'Rummer)
29
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
28
24
241
°C
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
7.4 8.3
-
-
51
STANDARD UNITS
PART B - Mark "X" in column 2-a for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present. Mark "X" in column 2-b for each pollutant you believe to be absent. If you mark column 2a for any pollutant
which is limited either directly, or indirectly but expressly, in an effluent limitations guideline, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. For other pollutants for which you mark
column 2a, you must provide quantitative data or an explanation of their presence in your discharge. Complete one table for each outfall. Seethe instructions for additional details and requirements.
1. POLLIJT-
2. MARK 'X•
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE
(optional)
1
ANT AND
CAS N.
:,. ur- 1,. Rc.-
tvr I.IEvr.
a. MAXIMUM
DAILY VALVE
—
b. MAXIM M 3p pq Y, VALUE
i�aUai(abl¢
C.LONG T�pM
(t/aUailab�c/
yv
r� VALUE
riNO.O
e. LONG
AVERAGE
TERM
VALUE_
9
NO.
(i(avnllab►t•)
Rnr Ad-
sc •+r sr.Nr
ANAL-
a. t-ONCEN-
-RATION
b. MASS
ANAL. 1
It
CONCENTRATION
I=) MASS
r
CONCENTRATION
I=I MASS
CONC CNT)RAr10N
(�) MASS
1
CONCENTRATION
121 MASS
1 '-
YSES
YSES I
}
-
e, Bromide
l
i24959 67.9)
I X
b. Chlorine,
Total Residual
c. color � I
i X
X —
35
N/A
—
—
— --
----
—
1
APHA
N A
/
j
1
3100
N/A
950
N/A
630
N/A
6
c/100ml
N/A
I
d, Fecal
Cohform X I
;�`t`luorlde
(76saa ass) .X I.
"
180
615
135
484
-
-
2
mg/1
lb
I ':
-I ' �--
---- -
--...- ---
-
- -- .
..—.
_...—_
�i'N I trate—
- -
-- -
--
-
---'
Nltrlts (be N) X
47.5
195
47.5
195
19.0
83
12
mg/1
lb
l
EPA Forth zblU•a.0 (Rev. 2-85) N/A= Not Applicable FALL v-1 CONTINUE ON REVERSE
'

ITEM V-B CONTINUED FRnM FRnNT
3.POLLUT-
ANT AND
2. MARK'X-
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
i S. INTAKE /optional)
CAS NO.
a, •E• b.rc-
I-F a.If.DE
,.AF. Aa_
b. MAXE M 3 AY VALUE C,L N TjZM Y�G. VA VE d. NO OF
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALVE pp j1 rDl /I
r auoi?able r aoara e
L 7� NO.OE
bL
(//aaniln 6le)
_
SF•.T SENT
_.—..
a,CONCEN-
7R ATION b. MASS
AVERAGE VALUE
ANAL • '
,
CONCENTRATION (:) MASS YSE$
a'
CONCE NTq ATION
(=) MASS
1
CONC E NTA ATION
(
I:) MASS
CONCENTRATION
I:I MASS
YSES
g. Nitrogen,
Total NOrganic
(qs)
X
14.1
58
14.1
58
7.1
29
12
mg/1
lb
h, Oil and
Q►eass
—g
ND
1
mg / 1
, lb
I, Fhosphorut
(asP), Total
X
6.8
30
6.8
30
4.4
19
12
mg/1
lb
(7723-14-0)
jl:Aadioactivity.
r
-
t1) Alpha,
X
Total
,,. ..
(2) Beta,
X
Total
(3)�'Aed lu m,
X
Total
(4) Radium
I X
226, Total
k: Sulfate
NS SO4)
g I
762
2,936
1
mg/1
lb
(14808-79.8)
_
I. Sulf [do
-
lw
X
- -
fn. Sulfite
I
(a SOg) •
X
I
(1426545-3)
I
n.Ourfactants
X
2.77
10.7
1
mg/1
lb
9, Aluminum,
—
•fcttEll
(�429•sa5)
X
1.1
4
1
mg/1
lb
9.', a► um,
T4ta)
X
t7440.39-3).
q. oron,
—
7 Otsl'
X
i 7440-42.8 )
Mali,
-
bts l
X
t2440.48.4)
t, lion, Total
yi39 ss s)
I
x
0.17
0.7
1
mg/1
lb
------
-
agnKlum
foal
X
N/A
X,
17.434.9E-4)
_
i .#Aolybdenum,
utal ' '
X
?439-9s3-7 )
anganase,
74�3s=9a-5)
X
N/A
X
OW TIn, Toth
X
Q440.31.5)
X Titanium,
X
(1440 34.8)
1 on I V•Z%- Inay. L-ti7) vm"M V -c CONTINUE ON PAGE V -3

EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy front Ifcnt I o/DER
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 3 OF FORM 2-C
Form Approved
OMB No. 2000-0059
AOProvalerplres t2.3t•B5
PART C - If you area primary industry and this outfall contains process wastewater, refer to Table 2c-2 in the instructions to determine which of the GC/MS fractions you must test for. Mark "X" in column
2-a for all such GUMS fractions that apply to your industry and for ALL toxic metals, cyanides, and total phenols. If you are not required to mark column 2-a (secondary industries, nonprocess
wastewater outfalls, and rlonrequired GUMS fractions), mark ­X­ In column 2-b for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present. Mark ­X­ in column 2-c for each pollutant you
believe is absent. If you mark column 2a for anypollutant, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. If you mark column 2b for any pollutant, you must provide the results
of at least one analysis for that pollutant if you know or have reason to believe it will be discharged in concentrations of 10 ppb or greater. If you mark column 2b for acrolein, acrylonitrile, 2,4
dinitrophenol,, or 2-methyl•4, 6 dinitrophenol, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for each of these pollutants which you know or have reason to believe that you discharge in
concentrations of 100 ppb or greater. Otherwise, for pollutants for which you mark column 2b, you must either submit at least one analysis or briefly describe the reasons the pollutant is expected to
be discharged. Note that there are 7 pages to this part; please review each carefully- Cmmnlptp nno t.hlp /.0 7 ­­1 1— ___i_
NCD047368642
001
- v--• -- ----- --.. _...
(.POLLUTANT 2. MARK �
., .... .. w.. ....,..,,,a ,.,, a-t-la,
uctallb a11V requ!remems.
AND CAS 3. EFFLUENT
.NUMBER aTEsr (x ec• Gad= a, MAXIMUM bA1LY VALUE b. MAXIM M 3pp S/A, VALUE C.LONG T�j�M q, .VALUE
N. I.IEvs I.ItvE 1 aVaila a d NO.OF
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE (optional)
a. LONG
/I(aValla blP.
AE- vAE-. Ae-. ANAL-
'(11f al'a/fahleJ Ar_Q SENT SENT (2) MASS (t)
_ CONCENTRATION COPICENTRATION (2) MASS
(2) MASS. YSES
a. CONCEN-
b. MASS
TRATtON
TERM
AVERAGE VALUE b. NO
_ ANAL-
(0
CONr..FNT)RATION
AETALS, CYAN_I_DE_, AND TOTAL PHENOLS -
ATIONN I2) MASS YSES
IPA. Antimony,
j
r.#tat (.7440.36 0)
X
ND
5
mg/1
lb
4'.A:rsenic, To*.OI
a4�40-38.2i
X
ND
'.'
7
5
mg/l
lb
i Beryllium,
X
rotbl; 7440-41.71
...-
ND
5
mg/1
lb
IM:.Cadmium,
6itat (7440.4.7-r)
X
4---
ND`11. .
5
mg/1
lb
---- -
44, Chromium,
atal (7440,473)
X
0.050
0.2
0.032
0.1
0.026
0.1
5
mg/1
lb
N440- 0-8)per, Total
two-so-8)
0.023
0.1
0.020
0.1
0.013
0.05
5
mg/1
lb
.
_X
7t . -92-1)
4.92
X
0. 208
1.0
0.172
0.6
0.111
0.4
5
mg / 1
lb
M. Mercury, Total
7439.97.6)
X
0.001
0.0056
1
mg/1
lb
14, Nickel, Tot,,,'
X
mg/1
lb
7440.02-0f -
0.0212
0.10
0.0132
0.06
0.0086
0.03
5
OM. Selenium,
otal.(7782-49.2)
ND
-X
5
mg/1
lb
tM: Silver. Total
7440.22-4) -
X
0.017
0.08
-
5
mg/1
lb
2M. Thallium,
'Otal (7440-28.01
ND
EE_tff_
_
_X
5
mg/1
lb
3M. Zinc, Totai
744066-6)
X
0.12
0.6
0.11
0.5
0.075
0.3
5
- -j�
mg/1
lb
4M..Cyanide, I
X
--
-
ptal (57-12 5)-
5
mg/l
lb
J
F6M:1'heNols,
X
0.072
0.4
1
mg / 1
lb
]TOXIN
:hWrodibenzo-f'- X
3ioxIn (1764 01 6)�
.PA Form 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85).
ESCRI
(Not Required)
ND= Not Detectable (See Notes) PAGEV-3
CONTINUE ON REVERSE

I.POLLUTANT
AND CAS
2. MARK'X'
'•
� 3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
S. INTAKE (optional)
. NUMBER
a.Te:RT b. aa- Sae'
INc love ul[va
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE • mAxim M 8pp p/IY VALUE C.LONG T f7 M /��((t VALUE
1 aVot(a61e /auatlablC�� d. NO.OF
a. LONG TERM
(iJavoilahlr)
_
Ou1R• lCNT icw1
a. CONCEN- 7
TRATION b- MASS
ALUE b.NO.o
111 CONC[N- (tl MASS YSES
III
G0.cc.TRI�TION
(1) MA{{
CONC aNTA11{ION
(_) "A Ms.
—
(I)
Ill �IAas
ANAL-
YSES
-
CPNC CNTRATION
DC/MS FRACTION VOLATILE COMPOUNDS
TRA
TION
V:'Acrole�n-
T
107.02.8) X ND
ug/1 lb
'V. Acrylonitrilp I X
ND
107.13-11 ;
5
ug/1
lb
ND
v.; B9nzene 1 X
71.43.2)
I
-----
-.._...— _
—
5
----
ug/ 1
--
lb
V.BIt(chh(chi�rn--._i_...
ug/1
lb -
lethyl) Ether
342-88.1)
X
—
--
V. Bromoforr I X
ND
75,25.2>
5
ug/1
lb
V. Carbon
—I
'etrachloride X
5e-23.5) I
ND
5
ug / 1
lb
V. ChlorobenzAna! X
108.90-7)
--J__.
—
5
ug/1
lb
Y. Chloror,i— i
rornomethane X
124.48-1)
—..--- --
—
5
ug/1
lb
I
V. Chloroeth,-
15-00-3) ; X
ND
5
ug/1
lb
_
OV.2-Chloro t,--
—
titylvinyl Ethe, i X
---
—
110-75-8) _ -}I--
ND
5
ug/1
lb
1V. Chloroform
X
ND
57-66.3)
5
ug/1
lb
2V.'Dichloro
--
-
-.—
f'omomethane 4 X
75-27.4)
ND
5
ug/1
lb
3V-. Dichloro-
--
--
r—
Ifluoromethane
ls'a1 B)
X
ug/1
lb
4V, 1,1-Dichloro-
X,
ND
--
- -
,hyne(75.34.3)
5
u /1
g
lb
9V. 1,2-Dichloro
X
----
--- -
-- --- —
--
-
:hone (107-06.2)
.5
ug / 1
lb
�.-- - _ --
6Vy /,1-Dichloro,
75 36-a1
Lhylene (75.
X
S
ug/1
lb
X
ND
r6pane(7887.5,, !
5
ug/1
lb
IV,.1,3-Dichloro
--'
-
ropo.one(642-71-C) j
X
ND
5
ug/1
lb
6thylberrpnr'
X
ND
100 4]•4)
5
ug/1
lb
4v..'ImeihVi
X
ND
nimidr(74s39)
5
ug/1
lb
IV,ito Methyl X
1lbride (74 $7 ?; j
ND
5
ug/1
lb
:b Fnrm 351t1.9t" rDe..
-2 Oel
PALL V-a
CONTINUE ON PAGE V

qn+HNr, iJw,u•';
Approval r.pn,u 12 •.31 Bb
• It. PA 1. Eh,NUM UI: rr ,,,.n, It, , I . , ,1 I. , r 1 1.. ,I, „4 U1 1•
N'rIN0F0 F-ROM PAGF VA NCD047368642 j 001
POLLUT-ANl'
z. MAVIK'X;
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
S. INTAKE (oprional)
AND CAS
NUM[3E F? 4nsr
(i/aro17„hh lu�w
'�
b. wc•
L nv[
►w [-
t[NT
G wc-
u[v[
w•
CNT
-
8. MAXIMUM
(�)
DAILY VALUE
(I) MASS
b. MAXIM M 3pQ
I aVailab(Pf
(r)
ppqqV VALUE
(<) MAS!
CLUNG T�tN /�y�t VALUE
(1/ aVallgblt•�•
—
(') (J) MAST
—
I. NO.OF
ANAL.
USES
a. CONCEN
TRATION
b. MASS
e LONG
r A
TERM
b NO.O.
ANAL'
VSEti
(1) CONC.N (I) MA[•
TAATION
_L�
;/MS FRAC1'ION� -VOLATILE
COMPOUNDS
CONLLNTIIATIr,N
(continued)
8
CONC wNTRATION
GO,. rl NrllArlO,�
5
5
5
—_—_,-
ug/ 1
ug/1
ug/1
lb
lb
lb
I
,
V. Methylf-,
loride (75 09 2) X
0.03
-
-
- -
II I
I
V. for.o
3.34e51anr_ � X
ND
V. Tetrachloro
)ylene (127-1`s 4), X
ND
ND I
V. Toluene
38.88-3) X
'
I
5 I
ug/1
lb
ND
I
!
V. 1,2-Trans-
ch1oroethy1(-.::. i X
SB 60-5)
1 I ug/1
lb
V. 1,1,1-Tri-
loroeihene
X
l
I`
5 �� ug/1
lb
1-55-6)
V.1,1,2-T,ri•-
loroethane
9•00.5) X
ND
_....._.. _._._I
!
}
5 I ug/1
lb
I
r
'
%V: Trlr-hloro
tiVlene (79-01," ': X
ND
1
5 ug/1
lb
!V. Trichloro
1
tbromethane
5.69-41
--- , X
--+
I —
28
0.1
15
0.07
.. _.
9 I .04
0
... _ ..
5 ug/1
�. _.. ----
lb
!
V. vinyl--
,loride 175.01 :' I X
ND
5 ug/1
lb
./MS FRAMON - ACID COMPOUNDS
\' 2-Chlorm,h, ,' E
X
ND
—
I 5 I ug/1 lb
i I
1, 2,4-Dichinro
;Ono),(120-83 2) I X
ND I
I
i
i I
5 i ug/1 lb
-
`-�-
---- - -i---------.1------
--- - --- --
i
5 ! ug/1 lb
12.4 pimothyl
2,
+.l (105.67.5;, I X
ND
I
1'. 4.6•Dinitro Ci
viol (534.52-1) ; X �
ND
/
; I ; 5 ug 1 lb i
--—' -
1.2,4-Dinitro
! X
NDI
i .
5 ug/1 I lb
,enol (51.28.5'
�
—
S:'2•Nitro{ihernol
R 75-51 X
ND
5 ! ug/1 lb
'. 4-Nit,ophen,J'
00 02 7) ; X
I
ND
I 5 ug / 1 ! lb I
Q. P-Chloro•M
rr:ol (59-50.7i •; X
I
ND
I 5 j ug/1 i lb
.�.a.M--1,..��--�.-
PeMacfiloro
X
(
74
0.3
5 ug/1 ! 1b
I ! I I ! I
1.8.95-2) X
ND
-- --
! i I
i 5 ug/ 1 I lb
..
— —� 1
IA.-2,4,6s T.rl
?H 6 2y not
X
ND
5
ug/1
f lb I
CONTINUE ON REVER.

CUr.Tlh�Uf_D FROM THE .FRONT
■YLI {. t. V 1 H17 1 Z. MARK
AND CAS
NUMBER e. ra sr Wit•
wi rw r�
'.((/aualWblrf ouro- sent
hCJMS FRA(:: L.)N -• B,ASEMEUTRAL
•X•
G ..•
�Iwia
r...r
a. MAXIMUM
(i)
cOnC[giww^ow
COMPOUNDS
ND
UAiLV VALUE
(�1 n■ra..
3.
t�U
d• MAY.1- M
(1.l aual�_UfC�•__
(11
Concvrat w�, tiara
----
EFFLLJFNY
3 r VALU P_ c.LC7NG TI h9
Q(�/�� ,_ _�
_ - _ _
(:( "�nis r�!
--_ ....._--- —}-
--- - -
^---^--'�—'-■■'�
yy� VALUE
1 (rl M1FM
f NU.OF
�`•
ANAL-
YSES
�• UtJiT57
e.l"8N(:FN��
THl►TIC IQ
Arwrra♦■��,yw�q�yry*A
S, INTAKf: (IfiSfinggiJ
w LONC, TERM
h. MASS dY LfiAG ,_Y.A t.vt
i i,) c�tic�s-
I.I .....
j lb
—T
lb
, lb R
ANhr.
rsts
i
- ----
18. Acenapht:,r.nu ;
X
----
15
t -- --
I
5
j 5
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
r-=---
(�08-P6.8) XND
�B. Anthraces..
(120.12 7) i X
4B. Benzhdind
c�2 e7•s1 ! X
-
ND
ND
—�--
7m
1V 1J
�
_ ---
(I -
-..
I --- ---- - - "---
I
15
I ------
I'
5
5
i
u �
ug/-
u /1
ug/1
lb -
lb
'
lb
lb i
I
-
13B. Benzo (a!-----1_.--�—g�1
p.nthracone X
(sfi 55-3)
I
'
GB. 13en7o (a)
PyrOna (GO 21 -32.X
78.-
fiuoranthene X
;.os-432)
,.rylene i X
A91.2.2)
-- - - -
t?tut+renthene X
�o,•os st
4--_
,
--
- -_ _
ND
--- - ---
ND
---i-
-- —
--- --- --
_--------- -- _-
i
i
5
5
----�-
u 1 g/
ug/1
- i- ---
I lb
lb I
_.-._.._..,.---
;.-Chia
10).Bi.t.- X�
__
--------
t-
-..._..----- -----
-
_ -..--
5
—
u 1
g/
------I
lb
TIT
CV!yl tr �; X
-
--ND.—.
ND
--
I*
5
ug/1
lb I t
xii. Bts i2 .:hlrral:,, i
oraay%i Ether (iQ2 t.. X
---
ND
_
--
---
5
-
ug / 1
--- —�—y-
r�
1_t.>. Eis (<n F.,P
(a-yi) Pl,thr.larc ''
X�
799
4
502
2 I 343
1
5
u /1
g
lb
lb l
-
14W 4-Br __
phenvl Phenv: j
Erhor (101-55 t` X�-
.15B. Sutyl Ber.r •
Phthalata (85-6t' X I
-- --
166. 2 (t lord.--
neFhthalene
fl1 58.71 X
-
-
--
-ND -
ND
-�
-_ -
j
----- — - -- - ._. -- —
j
i
I
I
-- — --
5
5 +
I
5
ug/1
—
ug/1
ug / 1
lb l
-
lb
lb
-
178.
Ethc� (7onniz-:�; I X
-- ---
-- --._
ND
j
5
u g
- - �--
lb
- -
18B. Chrysene
f218 01-9) X
Ahthracene
ND I
ND
ND I
--
j
--
1
- F ------ -�-
I
}
----.-
----
5_
5
ug/1...
u g/ 1
- -
I
lb j
1
Fo8�1513-71,z'oicnior� _._X
6Anftane (95 50•!' i X !
ti1ns {5.ii•')3• : q X 1
.,., ... .:.. ; ,nv. PACE V-6 CON'TINUE ON PAr=E

I I -A 1.1.). r4UM"' " 1. "" I'."" I(' rn r " , 1 �), 1, 'IIJ r ) At.l Pik.) PA It u 1 rn, n+r.,
CONTINUEO FROM PAGE V•6 I NCD047368642 I 001 0,,,,HNn)) ,!,! .• ',+„ o}
I. AONL) CANT 2. MARK 'x' 3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE („ptinnall
_
XIMUM DAILY VALUff . MAXIM M D pAY VALUE C,LONG,T�JiM /��[�t VALUE ,,0.OF
NUMBER lTf.•T b w[- G •c-t�,,A aVa(labPI
a LONG TERMb. NO.()'
n �'�•Kwi[���[aValleblG)
fit arailahle) o"I' st [[Nr10 (_) Mw[s OI ANAL•
N"Ntn wt)oN coNc[NTwwnoN (}) n'wss I�) (}) rAAs[ YSES
f.l>,ICt NTH wTIt)N
a. CONCEN b. MASS
TRATION
AVE) A E
L-G ANAL
1,1 CONGf N
I}I MA•1 YSES
GC/MS FRACTION •- BASEMEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (continued)
TMA TJOZ
22B. 1,4•Dichloro•
-
----
benzene (106.46 71
X
ND
5
ug/1
lb
23B. 3,3'-Dir.hloro
--
benzidine
(91-94-1)
X
ND
5
`-ug/1
lb
---
---
-- -- -
- ... --
24B. Diethyl
1
phthalate
184-66.2)
X
47
0.2
-
-
-
-
5
ug/1
lb
:R68. Dimethyl
--
--
Phthalate
(131.11.3) X
ND
5
1
ug/1
lb
B. Di-N-Bute.
-"--
Phthelate X
(84.74-2)ND
i--
j
5
ug/l
lb
- -
278. 2,4-Dmitrr>,
toluene (121-te;� X
ND
D --
5
ug/1
lb
r X
toluene (60,.-20.2):
ND
---
------.._..
5
u 1
lb
298.Di-N-Oct:,
_
5
ug/1
lb
i
Phthalate
- X_
398.1,2-DipnonV1
,
12
--
0.04
--- -
-
-
-
-
hydrazine (as :1:')
X
i
1
benzene) (122-6> 71
ND
ug/1
lb
F luoranthw-,
aw06- 440)X
j
- - -
5
ug/1
lb
_
ND
-.._...�
328. Fluorens
------ --
-----
'5
(86•73_7) X
ND
ug/1
lb
M, Hezacnlorob.erzenei
- ---
—
---
----
trlaad,t X
ND
5
ug/1
lb
1
24$. Hexs
---+
ug/1
lb
chlorobutadiene
s07-68.3) X
ND
5
758. Hexachloro
-
--
-
lb
cyclopentadiene
177-47-4► X
—
ND
----
----
-- ---
- --
-- ---
5
ug/1
368. Hexachloro•
1---
Vthane (67.72-1t
X
ND
I
5
ug/1
lb
378.Indano
-
----
(1,2,3-ca) Pyrene
(193-39.5) —
X----
ND
5
ug/1
lb
389. isophorone
—
_ --
-
17$•69-1)
X
ND
--
5
ug/1
lb
398. Naphthatcne
--------
-
_
191-20.31
X
ND
5
u 1
lb
400 Nitrobenzene'
—
(88.95-3) XND5
ug/1
lb
�''411,18. N-Nitro-
---
—
- -
--
m dimethylamina
(A2-76.9) • X
9 7 —
0.4
-
-
-
-
5
ug / 1
lb
26,.N-Nltrosodi,..
'
— --
----
------
---
---
--.....
—
N-propyl*mine
821.64-7) X . —Lj
NDk
5
ug/1
1b
rn rorm 3510ZC (Rev. 2-85) PAGE V-7 CONTINUE ON REVER

:O?JTINUED FROM THE FRONT
t.' POLL
UTAAND CASNT 2. MAR lxf; „ .,;-
fi
NUMF3ER 0.frar b. •r C.a- 'e. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
• we ra.v�y arty[
IJ QL•e/iO i�1r' w[• •wa-. w[-
• ) urw- a7wr a[ws' I'I
u cower w♦wwnow (aI r+wa•
' L`jjL_
3.
MAXIM M
(i OPni
I'1
EFF LUEN T
30 Wje VALUE
.� _�—
—
i (�( wwss
c.LONG T�f2M
_ LI/OUQII[IOIPf
-
(')
--_
A�(�7 �i VALUE
r1, NV OF
— ANAL
I�l nrwss YSES
4. UNITS*
J,. CONCEN.
b. MASS
TRATION
5. INTAKE (oplirrrrul)
`----�---
A L:>Nt; TERM
�[,--Fw_li ACjE VAslf�--
t--
Ir,..w.rnww
Ih NO OF
ANAL-
GC/IUIS FRACTION - BASE/NEUTRAL,COMPOUNDS (continued)
-4 - - ---
CONClwrww rl ,w
_
rower wrww surw�
—
1+1 ..war
YSES
3?•if: N-Nitro
mine
fodiphenylax �
fio•30-61
5
ug/1 lb
X ND
�9�-Ot-el -
t ----
I
I
5
i
ug/l lb
158; Pyrene
129-00-0) X
ND
5
ug/1 lb
,
.16B. 1,2,4 - -1rf•
1 - ---
---
-------
---- - ..._..
:hiorobenzene X
ta'a82.1)
ND
_
,
1 5
ug/l ; lb
"C/MS FRACTION -_ PESTICIDES
;i'. Aldrin X
309.00 21
-- -- --
1 ug/1 lb
------
ND
I
I
319 84-61 X
.IP. Q.BHC---t----�.
ND
I --
I 1 I U/ l lb
X ! 1
` ND
I ,
lb
7 P14C
a9S't X
i------ ---,
I
T
�
�91 •.
ND
1 ug/ 1 1 lb i
r, f -F71ic
379 fi5-E31 X '
i 1 ug/1 lb
._
_.—ND-
57.74.9I x I
ND
1 ug/1 lb
-
sa a^ 31 X
ND
I 1 ug/l lb
--
�2 -s 9) X
ND
I 1
r2 54 Al X ,
1 g/1 lb !
1-
ND
--- — --
-- - --
-
X !
ND
! ug/1 lb
_
11P Q Encfos r •.
--- - —_...
- -_ -- -
1 _... � . .__--.-----.•.-
,775 29.7f i X
ND
1 ug/l lb
t�1529.7) X '
ND
1 ug/1 lb i i
:ullete t X
-1031•07.8f 1
ND
-t
u l i lb
g
14P. Endrin
X I
#I
.. _: .. ..
;72.208) i
ND
I ug/1 lb I
4ldehyde x
t7r21 s3 4)
ND
I
1 ug) lb
j6i
--
e-dae)tac1t!o•
x
•ralar���
ND
I 1 ug/1 I lb I
i
r F-A Form 35 1U-[t. (Nev. z-ti5) PAGE V-8 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-3

C.ON7INUCD FROM PAGE V-8 I NCD047368642
0l.1li /io .'ir,fl 0,1,9
Approval expires 12.31 85
1. POLLUTANT 2. MA0K 'X' 3. EFFLUENT
CAS
4. UNIT $
S. INTAKE (optional/
AT—T h r!• G tee• .MAXI M Sp Q�Y VALUE C.LONG TE/iM AN(RG. VALUE
NUMBER e: MAXIMUM DA14Y VALU! (( I l (l bl 1 d. NO.OF
1Nc 1!V! UA". aUa aJlC t aua a e
• LONGTERM
/ r
h NO.c
kANI)
ANAL- •w¢- w�•
•SNT :SENT I'I "fit) MASS L' ('I - (t) MASS 111
II) MA54 YSES
s CONCEN-
TRATION
b. MASS(_)
(II CONCr.N-
Tw AT1oN
ews5___CONCCNTwAT10N[ON[lNTqAT10N
IS FRAt,T' I — PESTICIDES (conitnued)
17P. Heptachlor
Epoxide
(102467-3)
X
ND
1
ug/1
lb
18P. PCB-1242
(53469.21-9)
X
ND
1
ug/1
lb
19P. PCB•1254
X
_-- --
--
(11097-69.1)
ND
-----
1
ug/1
lb
20P. PCB-1221
(11104-28.2)
X
ND
--
1
ug/1
lb
21P. PCB•1237.
( Ill 41.16-5)
X
ND
----
1
ug/1
lb
22P.PCB-1248
(12672.29.6)
X
ND
]
ug/1
lb
23P. PCB-1260--
(rlossa2.5) .
X
ND
1
ug/1
lb
'l4P, PCB-1016�
---
(12674.11-2)
X
ND
_
,_--
-- --- —
----
ug/1
lb
YSP. Toxaphene
--
—
($001-35.2)
X
ND
1
ug/1
lb
tt-A rorm Jbiv- ,%; (Kov. 4-tf4)
'� ••+� 361q-aC (Rev. 2-85� - y ..��'M.�.7i'rp'M�L''�{�5.+.S,y, r?.fr:v�H++I•i�.1. .

EPA LD. NUMBER (copy from item l of Furrn l)�
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE IN THE UNSHADED AREAS ONLY. You may report some or all of I Form Approved
this information on separate sheets (use the same format) instead of completing these pages. NCD047368642 OMB No. 2000 0059
SEE INSTRUCTIONS. A
pproval expires 12•31-ti5
V. INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS !continued from page 3 of Form 2-C)
)UTF LL NO
002
PART A - You must provide.the-resu),4s of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table. Complete one table for each outfall. See instructions for additional details.
777
2. EFFLUENT
3, UNITS
4. INTAKE (op Nona!
t: POLLUTANT
'
(specify tf blank)
a. MAXIMUM DAILYVALUfi
MAXI M 3g p/&Y VALUE
- ava(labte
e.L A
1 avat a e
U
a. LONG
TERM
d, NO. OF
ANALYSES
4 NO. OF
ANALYSES
III
(i) MASS .'
hJ
CONCENTRATION
(a) MASS'
III
CONCENTRATION
(2) MASS
a,CONCEN-AVERAGE
ONCEN
b• MASS
11)
(_) MASS
4e Bloch^micad
CONCENTRATION
Oxygen Demand
eXOD1
1
96
1
96
1
73
4
mg/1
lb
b. _Chemical
Oicygen Demand
30
2 049
30
2,049
26
1,908
4
mg/1
lb
�r::Total Organic1.1
c�tnol+ {Toe0C)
ND
-
mg/1
lb
11":`dtal Suspended
Surd• lTss)
10
917
10,
917
10
917
1
mg / 1
lb
P:'Ammonia (as N)
0.85
78
0.85
78
0.85
78
1
mg/1
lb
f'ii°"
VALUE
12,000,000
VALUE
11,960,000
VALUE
9,080,000
366
gal/day
-
VALUE
VALUE ALUE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
_
iivinh,r)
24
17
13
122
'C
h. Tetnperature VALUE VALUE VALUE_T_
VALUE
lrtarnnler) 34 32 25
244 °C
MINIMUM MAXIMUM MINIMUM MAXIMUM
°H . 6.2 9.0 - -
366 STANDARD UNITS
PART S - Mark ­X" in column 2-a for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present. Mark "X" in column 2-b for each pollutant you believe to be absent. If you mark column 2a for any pollutant
which is limited either directly, or indirectly but expressly, in an effluent limitations guideline, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. For other pollutants for which mark
you
column 2a, you must provide quantitative data or an explanation of their presence in your discharge. Complete one table for each outfall. Seethe instructions for additional details and requirements.
I. POLLUT-
ANT AND
2. MARK
'X'
3. EFFLUENT
4- UNITS
5. INTAKE (optional
CAS NO.
, or
�IFv.-
U, wE-
I.IEVE
a, MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
--
b. MAXIM{1M 3p gjA VALUE C.LONG T jZM A�(RG
IJavaiiat)le �IAV AFI
VALUE
riNO.O,
a. LONG TERM
AVERAGE VALUE
fit Osatln bte)
awec-
sr •+r
Ae•
se�.Nr
II 1
t=)
ANAL-
a. t,.ONCEN•
- 4ATION
b. MASS
NO. OF
ANAL-
II
CONCENTRATION
] MASS
( I
I
CONCENTRATION
12) MASS
"
-
MASS CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
(:) MASS YSES
YSES
a. Bromide
(24959 67.9.) 1
1.
I X
—
� 3
b. Chlorine, i
+
total Residual I
X
0.43
39
-
-
_
-
1
mg/1
lb
c. Color ( X
1
i
_
-'---
-
X
d;•Fecal
---
�011form ! X �
—
I X
';'Fluorlde X I
,(46984-48 .t+J
-
7.4
--
506
5.35
423
3.0
-
228
52
mg/1
lb
See Note
I
%i'Nltrate—
'—
-
NJtrlta (os N)
X
I
ern rori" _•o Iv•/..i, Inev. t-aa) r,. v-I CONTINUE ON REVERSE
ND= Below detection limit

ITEM V•B CONTINUED FROM FRONT
I.POLLUT-
2. MARK'X'
3. EFFLUENT
4, UNITS
r 5. INTAKE /optional)
ANT AND
CAS NO.
a. •c•
ILVI:r
b.ac•
1lr�eo
a, MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MAXI M 3pQ p�Y VALUE
."Olio P
c. N T �[R VALUE
aam a e
p`
d, NO.OF
L TE
71 ONG RM
AVERAGE VALUE
NO.OI
(l/aynilnblr)
rA.
s.•.i
A.-
svNT
ANAL-
e.CONCEN•
TRATION
b. MASS
.
ANAL-
1
CONC[NTA ATION
Itl MAST
(_) MAS4
I2)
_
}
CONCENTRATION
CONCENITAATION
MASS
Y$ES
LONG CNTR ATION
(r1 MAR•
YSES
g. Nitrogen,
Total Organic
fat NI
hi Oil and
Grease
X
1. B
137
-
-
_
_
1
mg/1
I lb
1.0
76
1
l- Phosphorus
(as P), Tot3I
X
_
(7723-14.0)
X
I.,Aadioactivity
t
(1) Alpha,
Total
X
(2•) Bets,
Total
1..
X
i3)�'Rsd{um,
Total
X
(4) Radium
I
226, Total.
X
It. Sulfate
('it SO4)
X
(14808-79-8)
—
X
I. Sulf Ids
(w 20
X
M. Sulfite
(a So3)
X
i
(14265-45-3)
I1 �urfactsnts
X
a's A, u-^�minurn
--
X
foal ,
X
(7429-90-5)
P. Barium,
total
X
Q44.39-3 0).
--
: "on,
lOtal
X
•
t, Olt,
--
-
? ota I
X
(7440.48.4)
k,lion, Total
+
fy439 ass)
X
apneslum,
Total
X
ff, , 9-99-5•4)
_ .._
X
I, Molybdenum,
iOYal ,'
X
7438-9s3.7)
—
V. anpanese,
X
(7439•96-5)
It
X
VO Pr in, Total
1
X
1.7440.31.51
X. Titanium,
total '
X
(1440-32-6)
H
.„ 1 "TT, dt)lu-zu lHev. 2-t35) PAGI:.'V-Z CONTINUE ON PAGE V - 3

EPA I.D. NUMBER (Copy
m I of Form I)IOUTFALL NUMBER
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 3 OF FO
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2000-0059
- Approvalexpires 12-31.85
PART C - If you are a primary industry and this outfall contains process wastewater, refer to Table 2c-2 in the instructions to determine which of the GC/MS fractions you must test for. Mark "X" in column
2-a for all such GUMS fractions that apply to your industry and for ALL toxic metals, cyanides, and total phenols. If you are not required to mark column 2-a (secondary industries, nonprocess
wastewater outfalls, and nonrequired GC/MS fractions), mark "X" in column 2-b for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present. Mark ­X" in column 2-c for each pollutant you
believe is absent. If you mark column 2a for anypollutant, you must provide the results of at least one you
for that pollutant. If you mark column 2b for any pollutant, you must provide the results
of at least one analysis for that pollutant if you know or have reason to believe it will be discharged in concentrations of 10 ppb or greater. If you mark column 2b for acrolein, acrylonitrile, 2,4
dinitrophenoR, or 2-methyl-4, 6 dinitrophenol, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for each of these pollutants which you know or have reason to believe that you discharge in
concentrations of 100 ppbor greater. Otherwise, for pollutants for which you mark column 2b, you must either submit at least one analysis or briefly describe the reasons the pollutant is expected to
be discharged. Note that there are 7 pages to this part; please review each carefully. ComDlete one tablA roll 7 narrpel I— o F%,,,,rl a 0-
NCD047368642
002
t. AOLLUT
AND CASS 2. M3. EFFLUENT
- -�--. .- ���.. �....�,•. moo Nlou �C,lvlls for additional aetaus and requirements.
ARK 'X' 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optiorlall
NUMBER a. aST ■c• C ■11= b, MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIM M 3o p11Y VALUE C.LONG T RM AV� VALUE
IE .!a■1 auahabte / l b d NO.OF a. LONG TERM
Ac- Ae-. 1 °V°1° C a. CONCEN- AVERAGE VALUE b.N0.0
at'aliai)lCI' QENT se ni 11) ANAL-
_ b. MASS
CONC [NTA ATION (�) MAEi C01-ICEN'TR ATION (_) MASS (�) (t) MA36 Y.jEs TRATION (1) coNCEN• ANAL
Co- F.NTAATION TFATION (r) MASS YSES
v}ETALS, CYAN_I_OE, ANO TOTAL PHENOLS -�-
t RA. Antimony, r
rptel (.7440.36 0) X ND 1
?W Arsenic, Total
' 7440-38.2) X ND. 1
• 1
3Ail: Beryllium,
rot^.bl, 7440-41.71 X ND 1
3. .Cadmium, '
TAtel (7440.47-i) i X ND
5M 7Chromium,
Total (7440.47.3) X ND 1
6f t Copper. Total
(?440-50•t1) _ X ND 1
7U.1ead, Total
(7439 92-1) X 0.062 4.4 1 mg/1
3M. Mercury, Tot.!
7439.97.6) X
Del}, Nickel, Total
7440.02-0) _ _ X 0.002 0.14 1 mg/1
,OM. $e!enium,
'-otal•(7782 49 2) X ND 1
IiW Silver, Total
7440.23.4) - X ND 1
2M. Thallium,
'otal (74.40-28.01 X ND 1
3M. Zinc, Total
744066-6) -- — X 0.014 1.0 1 mg/1
4M.. Cyanide,
"6tal (57-12.5) X ND
_ 1
ITiM Phenols, X
GOtlll. "'
DIOXIN
t3,7,a•Tetra7DESCRIBE RESULTS
:6kSrodibenio-P-
)ioxin (1764 01 6) X
.PA Form 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85), a PAGE V-3
CONTINUE ON REVERSE
.PA Form 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85), a PAGE V-3
CONTINUE ON REVERSE

,.POLLUTANT
AND CAS
2. MARK'Jt'
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
S. INTAKE (options!)
NUMBER
an sT
INr.
bee'
IIVa[
4 •to
lltlVal
a• MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
Ml.XIM M 80 DAY VALUE
alle Q e
C.LONG T fiM AVR . VALUE
! tl 6l
•^'• OOft e e
! NO OF
t•
e. LONG TERM
b. NO.O
(t(OUoffshl!')
w �.-
OIIIR•
•wa'•
sr NT•
Aw•.
s.,
ANAL'
YSES
ATRATION
r
h. MASS
ANAL
I
I )
Iai MA{/
(Il
(a) Mwsi
I
(a) Mwat/
_
(liwwrl
CONCl NTwwT10N
CONC<NTRATION
coNc V..NTN ATION
oc"
Ia) Mwas
YSES
C/MS FRACTION - VOLATILE COMPOUNDS
16 Aerole;n-
107.02 8) X
ND
1
V. Acrylonitriis I X
2
107-13.1) j
V..Benzene ,
r1•X 43.2)
ND
2
1(• Bit (Chlnrn
ethyl) Ethpr
X
_
ia2$8-1)
-
V. BfOm OiOnn --� -
--
-
- -. ---
'5•25-2)
X
ND
2
V."Csrbon
strachloride
X
ND
I
2
;6-23-5) i
V. Chlorobenzera !
08.90-7) -� --
X
ND
2
J. Chlorodi
'omomerhane
X
ND
2
24-48-1)
I. -•�
J. Chlorosth,K•
—
5-oo-s)
X
ND
2
t - --
-- -
—
3V. 2-Chloro
--
hylvinyl Ether
I
X
ND
2
.10.75.6)
W. Chloroform
'7-66-3)
X
ND
2
y
--
2V.'Dichloro
-'—
—
'omomsthanc
X
ND
2
!
'_6-27.4) .
W. Dichloro•
---
—
fluoromethane
X
_
'S-71.8)
tV, 1,1•Dichloro•
--- ---
--
--
hitne
X
ND
2
3V, 1,2-Dichkuo �-
---
-�----
-- ------
-
hane (107-06-2!
iV. 1,1-Dichiora
X
ND
2
h0ena (75.35-4)
X
ND
2
TV. 1,2•Dichlo. c
bpane (78 87.5
X
ND
2
W.1.3-Dichlorn I
gpyiena (642.75 £.) I
X
ND
2
iV, Ethylber.r�:�r:'
0tsal.a)
X
ND
2
,�r/;.�MOthyl
rsjmido (74-83-9)
X
ND
2
_T
��i,.MOLhY.1
X
—
I)Iorida (7487 ?i I
ND
2
A corm 3510.2E (Rev. 2-85) PAGE V-4 CONTINUE ON PAGE V

FPA I.D. NUMFJE i (c'.. lc r:�m i I;rl i •�; ln�"i rig'.; t� c. 1. 1. raiir.t Ul i. /p•,,. ;; .
IF-
NCDO/+73�8. 42 002 ! pn,y va 7,pir'.s 12
7NTINl1FD FROM PAGE V•4
Arrpr,rv;rl er';vr• s 17 31 65
POLLUTANTtRK
-X;
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS '
S. INTAKE (optional)
AND CAS
I.leve
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MAXIM M 30 VAY VALUE
,I
1 OUala P)
C.LONG T M l4V� VALUE
jj7 bbd.
(1/a�'ailn C
NO.OF
a. CONCEN-
b. MASS
a LONG
f Ave
TETIM
b. Np.O;NUMf1ER
(I) (zl Mwss
NTH A TION
(1
CONCeNTRATIONRTNC/MS
(t)le Ass
(1)
—
(:)rAwss
(,CONCEN•O)MAC■
T
•c„r
ANAL-
YSES
TRATION
ANAL-
YSES
FRACl-IOPJ— VOLATILE
COMPOUNDS
(continued)
2V. Methylau
hiorlde (75.092) '
X
44
3.1
44
3.1
25 1.8
2 ug/l
2 ug/l
lb
lb
,loroethane
X
ND
X
ND
4V. Tetrachlolo
;)lylene (127.1ts 4)'
I
2 ug/1
lb
5V. Toluene ;
108-88-3)
X
ND
2 ug/1
lb
I
8V. 1,2-Trans—
iehloroethyle.:+. f'
X
ND
2 ug/1
lb
I
t..,--------.—'
.. — —"----I------}------
----
X
7V. 1,1,1-Tri-
Moro®'thane
2 ug/l
lb
/1-55.6)
3V. 1,1,2-Tri-•
hloroethane ?
79-00-5)
9V. Trichloro
thylene (79.01,z,
X
ND
N11
}
2 I ug/1
2 ug/l
lb
lb
--T
I
X
_. ..._._.i...-
h-brometh Ane
75.69-4)
1
I
2 ug / 1
lb
X
ND
'IV, V inyi
:l'lloride 175•01 •'.1 I
X
ND
I
ug/l
j lb
IC/MS FRACTION - ACID COMPOUNDS
A: 2-Chloror•hl '
9S•57.8)
I'A,
X
ND
I I
— 1 II ug/l lb
2,4•DichiOro
n©no' (120-83 2) I
X
ND
1 ug/l lb
:6.'2.4 Dimothyl
— —�
--
—
�
hnnol (tns-s7..il
X
ND
I
1 I u /1 lb '
�--g ---t
,4,6•Dinttro-Ci
:resol (534-52.11
X
ND
I I l ug/1 I lb 4.
'
#A,2,4-Dinitro---
laanol (57-28.5? I
X
ND
I
! i 1 ! ug/l lb
;A..'2•Nltroljhen,,l
X
ND
i l , ug / l lb
�.
; I 1 ug / 1 ! lb
VA. 4-Nitrophenor
100 b2 7) ;
X
ND
iq.'P-C,'hloro•M" �
•asol 159-50.7 f
`
X
ND
I I 1 i ug / 1 i lb
9J47pehtachloro-'
a1 (07-8651 I
l
X
ND
I
I I � lug/l � lb
1�A..Ohenol
4tog-95.2t j
X
ND
l ug/
l� �
.,
I IA: 2,4,6-TH
cl:lorpphenol
X
i l ug/l I lb I
'A8 06.2)..._
CON7 lNuF ON REVF,h

FROM T W' .FRONT
4.i1J04
i,•pC11.l.UTAilT 2,
`ANV CAS
" 1YUM9Et7
IN9
',11�000Itght(: oulw'
1 ,iMS FRAt:"sD.PJ — BASE/NEUTRAL
MARK
us v.!
[!Nt
'x'.
ury!
f[NT
X
�aw.i.Y�twNYYwn+
MAXIMUM
—�,
CONC[NITRwT1UN
COMPOUNDS
ND
DAILY VALUE
-
.MiwrlNel+taxi'qi.Jw�uMsw�,w4Jlwn»w�.wwwwi4Cwr+�.11wMMiw.rl�w�Ja'wllwl'i
3.
P. MAY.I�UM 3
I'i'Qtlgl�ghl")_
C ONLt NTH /.f10N
EFFLUENT
_,
UAV VALUE C.LONG Tr�7M
y (1(t1Ugt
-• 1 ) "• -•-- ('I
— — IJ (:[NTN•YIU/1
pr VALUE
gYjfCJ'
T ItI--
l
(Il. NO.Q1
YSAS-
1
4• ti'4i
THATICh
/'�Llbliwlw�ll�QLYwl�lp/!w[9�[�
T S, INTAKE:
—
Y. LONG_
I b. MA55 i+}af nNCw h•
I
(u;:rinngl/
TERM
-i-
1i1 MA[[
i
--
h. NO
Yl.i'.+
183.32.r�)
26.Acennr;h:.1+'.,a�
(i08-96 8)
X
ND
-
'26. Anthrarerz i
(920.12 7) !
X
ND
--
1
(§2-87-5)
1
X
X
X
X
—
ND
NDI
—' —
1
i
- —
Anthracone QZ.
JB. BenZO (q)
Pyrone (50-32-2t
7B.3,4•eanr0
fluotarrthene
;205-99 2)
98, Senzo (''hii
Per y lene
181-242)
46. 3anzo (k1
riluocenthene
X
X
ND
-
I
—
— --
--
1
— --
-----��
------
-—�----•—
— - ---
__.
� '
—
(; 08 $ I
2d
i 00.-
M7ethana•
+
ND
I
1
ealr�xy;
ethyl, 1:t1wr i
t111•aa •:)
t--
X
X
ND
—
1 _.1--
—�--
7roJYfi (:�Sh6r (l02
F,.^+-y// Phthalan:
X.
ND
1
(1174Br :
X
X
ND
NDWg:
I
_
I
----.._.._ —
---- — --
1
1
I
phenvlPheny: j
Ether (101-55 :'Ji
156. Butyl Bona..:
l
Phthalatn (85-6P''h
16R.2-Chiorc-nui hthaleneD
X
X
ND
tN
--
ND
ND
—
-
I
----�
I
----- I I
I I
—.—--_----
--_.._._—
?-----
--
— 1
—._ ..------
-----t..
-- _--
I+
---
—
---
_
-
—
178.4•Chloro-
phenyl Phenyl I
Ether
16E3. Chrysene
�218-01-9)
ibanrp
1. 8. D� 1;.,h
Anthracene I
153-70-3)
I
X
X
I
ND
!
i
;
1
I
i
I
208. 1,2 Dichlor:)
66nze-e (95 50-?' !
1 B: 1,3-D it h io n)x
I
ND
,
1. �•^;c, r ay. 2-f S! PACE V-6 CON'TINUE ON FATE

NUM ul.1 (1,'rl)•; ,",r. ,i,:11 1 r, l t,)-'!) ), '!)U I ALL. API UM Ur.. It /"'f')C,), I—,...
CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-6 + NCD047368642 I 002 oma lla 1 bA■ ■ "UvA ?"+�:+
j I Approval exprres 12.31 -85
I IT T
AND CAS 3. EFFLUENT
4, UN17$
5. INTAKE (trprinrral)
NUMEIER dr■:sr b. ■e• G wc- e. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE •MAXI M 3D pAY VALUE C.LONG T� RM /A���(r�Rt .VALUE
• INc u■.ve uevr aVa a e d. No.OF
a.
(+j available
.' (i/at�aiJahlrl piiw• siiir iier ICI ANAL-
( I m-2
CONCl (TI MASS 11)
a. CONCEN
b, MASS
TRATION
AVEI AN ETE L b, NQ.r�
ANAL
NTRATION Cp NC[N,TRA PION (t) MASS YSES
C ONCCNTN ATION
GC/MS FRACTION — BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (continued -
(,) co.cl N- Ill MA{s Y§Ei
TRATION
22B. 1,4-Dichloro-
-
--'_
benzene (106 416 7
X
ND
- --
__.._._._.__....__._.._..
_-.- --
1
236.'Dir.hloro
-
-- -
--••
_
benzidine
X
ND
(91.94-1)
----------
__
_____
249. Diethyl
-'----
Phthalate
X
ND
1
84-66-2)
---
:11$e. Dimethyl
-'
--
Phtholate
(131.11.3)
X
ND
)
—
68. DI•N Bute.,... I._.—
'Phtholate
-------
-----�-..__
.... _.. ..
..---------
-----
- --
i
--
(64-74-2)
X
ND1
276.2,4-Ditrrr
wfuene (121-letn
[rND
RBB. 2,6-Dinib
1
toluene (60C-20-2):
X
-
ND
--
264.'Di•N-Oct•.
- . . -- - ---
----
-
I
---
-- -- -
(117olat
-84 0)
378.1,2•DiphonVl--
X
hydrazine (ax .'i. o I
X
_
benzene) (122-EG 7S
318.Fh:orant'rlerA�
--
I
f -- -
(206-44.0)
ND
-
--- - -
-----
1—
} --
---
VS. Fluorcne
(86.73-7)
X
ND
1
I
-- ...-1
336• Ilexacnlotatlerzene'I
--
------- 1
-_.___
It1R•74 tt I
X
ND
1
--� —
rhbrobutadiena
ND
M7-68.3) !
1
358, Hexachloro
- -'---
--_ ----
...- --
-- —'-
----
Cyclopentodiene
I
X
ND
1
--
(77.47-4)
-----
386. Hex achloro-
*thene (67.72-11
X
ND
I
1
M2,3-ca) Pyrene
X
ND-
1193.39-5)
1
389.Isophorone
078-59.1)
X
ND
1
1913. Naphthafcne
---- -
(9i-20 3)
I.
X
ND
1
40g: Nttrobenzone'
----
-
—
—
— -
X
ND
1
.mod(methylamina
X
ND
.162.75.9) .
1
N-propylsmine
X
ND
1
a21.64-7)
F PA i'nrm antn_or
to ..,
o pit
r PAGE V-7 CONTINUE ON REVER

.O?JTINUED FROM THE FRONT
!. POLLUTANT
,,.AND CAS
2. MAR :XF:
3. EFFS_LJEN f
'e.
a. UNITS
5. INTAKE (opti,nlol)
• NUME3ER
Gf►aT
we
b. ••,
Iavl,
c:ic-
u•v[
MAXIMUM DAILY,:VALUE
MAXIM M
/I all
3� UqX VALUE
,Jhll�—
0.LONG Tf2M
/1/UUOf[a
AYR VALUE
blP� d. NU Or
----r—
N LONG TERM
Ih NO OF
1r,eVOlid t)1f,
'.(.� )
'
w[-
VUIw•
I.
NNT
H•-
uNT'.
ANAL
' 11 y�/f: V�iE$
a. CONCEN
b. MASS
TRATION
RASE VA IjYC _
i
y11aa
„wTl
ANAL-
Y$E$
.,
I') f-I- s
COnG1 NTw nTIVN
('I _
G-VnCk NTH/�TI ,N
(r)ra fa r.
— --
r'I,NGr NrH wTi„N
GC/MS FRACTION BASE/NEUTRAL,COMPOUNDS
--. ---- - -
(continued)
40r1lphehylan'iine•
x, ND
1
�HA'•30 G)
.
14:1 Pher!rrlf) r.rl"
»»•01 el !
X ND
1
1
X
129-00-0,
I
68, 1,2,4 - T
1
+
.hlorobenzenr.• I
X
ND
I
1
I
l
I A^o-82.1)
!
I
I
3C/MS FRACI ION -- PESTICIDESell
309 00 2) i
X
,P. Q-BHC
!
i
- - - — --- —
319.84.61
X !
11'. Q BHC-
31Sr
X
�t -
t j e H C
--..._.—
--
------
----- -- - --
---- -- ! - ---. —.
X
I
•
; i
319 f;5-IIi
X I
i
;7.74 9)
X
—
50 24 3) I
X
I �
!
I
G. r
729) I
X
I I 1
tz 54 R)
X
I
IP. Q-E nrlo ,',r,•:
I
...
I
.._ .._ ., 1 _.. .:. _.._,.._—�--- ._..
115 29 7) i I
X
I
2P. F ndp••:'La,
115-29.71
X
I
I
I I i
j
1 --
�uHate I
X
I
1031.07-81
72 20 8)
X
I
!
�Jdehyde
7 421-9 3 4)
i
--
rA rurm jo IU.[t-, Irtev. C-t1b1 PAGE. V-8 CONTINUE ON PAGE V•3

CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-8 I NCD047368642 i 002 OVc 1.,,
�+ 1 i Approval expires 12-31.85
LLU IA"I 2. MARK •x• -, - ".' -'. 3. EFFLUENT
AND CAS
4. UNIT
S. INTAKE (optional)
f� R
NUMBER a'.6 b rc• 4 ■[- Q;. MAXIMUM DAILY,VALUE MAXI M a Qf�Y VALUE C.LONG T�Fd mld,(leG. VALUE � NO.
Inc Icv[ Neva dbdilpule // -i v61 11
a, LONG T£Aht —
b•NO.r
(if aoailahl•, wa- ►wa- A■- ,_, ANAL-
oulw• senT :ee wT (') _) gAtf' (T)-
_ eoacc NTw ATIon 1z) wnss 11) (Z) Mw51 YSES
CONG [nTNll TIOh CoNC[NTw
117"P"H'eptachlor
a. CONCEN•
b. MASS
TRATION
r
ANC'+
n- li)
11Tw
ATION
GC/MS FRAt:TION - PESTICIDES `(continued)
AiloN "^as YSES
Epoxide
X
41024.6 7.3 )
18P. PCB-1242
(63469-21-9)
X
OP. PCB•1254
— ---
(11097-69-1)
X
----
20P. PCB-1221
— —
(11104-28.2)
X
)
ZIP. PC8.1232—
(11141-16.5)
X
22P. PC6-1248
—'
(12672.29-6)
X
— _ — ---
-- —
23P. PCB-1260
-
0109"2.5)
X
24P.'PC8-1016
- ----
-
(12674.1 1'-2)
--
X
-
-
—
----
-----
--------
YSP. Toxzphene •-
-
($Q0135-2)
X
�..-. 1 v 11 ..v Iv-ct. Inov. r-O-j
•^� 3510.2C (Rev. 2-$6)

TY
Q
W
LA-
W
tZ
<X
U
0
0
6
n
0
0
0
cn
N
v
O
I I.Y�.I M/r�W M O�RLM�.I I t.11 URI•
SOW BOYS ARE ESTIMATED TO MVE XTAIQ: W
asew a TOTALS.
CURRENT
SCHEMATIC WATER FLOW
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO.
FAYETTEVILLE WORKS
PAGE 1 OF 2
sm VATER
cn
W
Z
J
O
O
IJ-

TO n LIED1MYDI
bw popP
CURRENT
SCHEMATIC WATER FLOW
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO.
FAYETTEVILLE WORKS
PAGE 2 OF 2
0
m
p
C�
m
TO 810-7iEATlENi
--- - r 1)
a

ATTACHMENT I
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO. (INC.)
FAYETTEVILLE WORKS
1. Form 2C: Item II Part A - Water Flow Diagram
The intake and effluent water are based on actual average flows
reported in the monthly monitoring report. Flows within the plant
are estimated and are calculated so as to balance with the intake
and effluent flows.
2. Form 2C: Item IV Part B - Water Pollution Control Programs
A. A larger aeration tank with forced air blowers was installed
in 4th Quarter 1988. The new unit, having a liquid capacity
of 1.5 million gallons, replaced an existing 0.720 million
gallon basin (Application No. AC0003573).
B. The existing aeration basin was converted to use as an
aerobic sludge digester. Together with the installation of
dewatering equipment this provides for off -site landfilling
and potential future land spreading of sludge on site,
replacing the practice of lagooning.
C. Studies are being made to divert low-BOD Nafion® wastes
directly to outfall 001. Since these wastes contain almost
all the fluorides and fluorinated organic salts it would be
possible to landspread the biotreatment plant sludges, as
described above.
3. Form 2C: Item VI - Pollutants Listed
All substances listed in Item VI are "used" on the site as
"auxiliary" chemicals. Under routine operations, only
octylphenol, a very minor additive, could be a constituent of
wastewater. The remainder do not come into contact with waste
streams.
4. Form 2C: Outfall 002 Item V-B-le - Fluoride
Refer to the existing discharge permitfor the fluoride sampling
location. All samples reported in this application were taken
downstream of the 001 discharge. The proposed discharge of
neutralized Nafion@ wastes into the cooling water outfall 002 has
not been implemented during the period of this sampling. In other
words, all wastes containing fluoride were discharging from 001
and thus are reflected in the samples taken in the combined
outfall downstream of the 001 discharge.
5. Form 2C: Item V Part A, B. & C
"NOT DETECTED" (ND) means that the pollutant so referenced was not
present in a quantity greater than the detectability limit.
DEQ-CFW 00065272

6.
7.
Materials checked as "Believed Absent" are not belived to be
present in quantities equal to or greater than the limit of
detectability.
Form 2C: Item V Outfall 001, Part C
Outfall 001 is subject to the Organic Chemicals Plastics and
Synthetics Fibers guidelines (OCPSF). The chemicals listed under
these guidelines have therefore been checked as "Testing
Required". Other substances are identified as either "Believed
Present" or "Believed Absent".
Form 2C: Item V Part C
Most of the values obtained in this group were below detection
limits. In a few cases, for a give pollutant, slightly positive
values were reported, as well as some values below detection
limits. To perform the averaging required, the procedure used for
the "below detection limits" values was to assume one-half the
detection limit number. For example, the average of the five
analyzes for Chromium in Outfall 001, (in mg/1) was computed as
follows:
DATE
REPORTED
CALCULATED
3/15/88
0.029
0.029
3/29/88
0.034
0.034
4/12/88
0.050
0.050
4/26/88
<0.015
0.0075
5/10/88
<0.015
0.0075
Average 0.026
In a few cases, this averaging method led to peculiar results,
such as when one or two out of five values were slightly above
reported levels which resulted in an average below the
detectability limit. In'these cases no averages are shown, just
the daily maximums.
DEQ-CFW 00065273

ATTACHMENT II
INFORMATION FOR APPLYING INDUSTRY EFFLUENT
LIMITATIONS GUIDELINES TO PERMIT CONDITIONS FOR
E. I. DU PONT FAYETTEVILLE WORKS
Background
The Du Pont Fayetteville Works is a multiproduct plant which conducts
the following operations:
• Manufacture of polyvinyl butyral resin ("flake") which is converted into
Butacite® sheeting
• Extrusion of various plastics into strapping and tape products.
• Extrusion and grafting of elastomers ("TRX").
• Manufacture of a variety of fluorocarbons and fluorocarbon resins and
sheeting products (Nafion®).
Wastewater resulting from these operations, together with associated
laboratory and sanitary waste, are sent to an "end -of -pipe" biotreatment system,
an activiated sludge process, consisting of aeration and clarification.
Production in Various Subcategories
The Fayetteville Works production described above falls into different
subcategories under the industry guidelines. Confidential Attachment III
provides detailed production information, both current and for planned and
authorized expansions. Based on confidential Attachment III, production is
divided as follows into the applicable subcategories:
SUB CATEGORY
% OF TOTAL PRODUCTION
Current Future
• Specialty Organic Chemicals (SIC 2869) 0.2 0.3
(40 CFR 414 Subpart H)
• Thermoplastic Resins (SIC 2821) 94.5 96.6
(40 CFR 414 Subpart D)
• Plastics Molding and Forming (SIC 3079) 5.3 3.1
(40 CFR 463 Subpart A)
100.0 100.0
DEQ-CFW 00065274

Attachment II page 2
On December 17, 1984, EPA promulgated its effluent guidelines for
Plastics Molding and Forming (PMF). Also, on November 5, 1987, EPA promulgated
its effluent guidelines for the Organic Chemicals and Plastics and Synthetic
Fibers (OCPSF) Category (40 CFR 414). These guidelines are to be applied to
regulate the discharge from the Fayetteville Works industrial wastewater
treatment system.
The PMF and OCPSF guidelines provide concentration values which
represent Best Practicable Control Technology (BPT) for the conventional
pollutants, BOD5 and TSS, and Best Available Control Technology (BAT) for 63
priority pollutants. The concentration values must be multiplied by the
appropriate flow values to determine the daily maximum and monthly average
limits which apply to a discharge. Table II-1 lists the BPT effluent
limitations guidelines concentrations for the applicable subcategories of
production at Fayetteville Works. Table II-2 lists the BAT concentrations for
priority pollutants.
Several issues are encountered in developing permit conditions in this
manner:
• In multi -product plants effluent guidelines values must be weighted
according to production in various subcategories.
• Actual discharge flows should be used in the calculation rather than a
long-term average value. These flows should be adjusted for reasonably
expected increases due to planned and authorized expansions of
production facilities.
• Appropriate monitoring frequencies should be selected depending on
concern for the presence or levels of pollutants in the discharge.
This exhibit is meant to provide the information necessary for the
permit writer to develop the appropriate guidelines -based permit conditions for
Discharge 001, the industrial wastewater treatment plant effluent for
Fayetteville Works.
Effluent Guideline Subcategory
As shown in the table above, 95% or more of Fayetteville Works
production belongs in the Thermoplastic.Resins Category. Therefore, it is
recommended that only the thermoplastic resins guidelines be used in developing
effluent limitations.
Flow Basis For Developing Limitations
The concentration -based OCPSF guidelines were developed by EPA by first
determining the long-term average concentrations of regulated constituents in
the wastewaters from its model plants and then applying a variablility factor to
that long-term data to reflect the variability in the pollutant concentrations
above the long-term average..
DEQ-CFW 00065275

Attachment II
Page 3
Permit writers are directed to use a "reasonable estimate of process
wastewater flows and the concentration limits to develop mass limitations for
the NPDES permit" (52 Federal Register 42566). The development of the OCPSF
guidelines did not address variabiliity of flow nor do the concentration
guidelines implicitly incorporate flow variability. There is certainly no
direct relationship between constituent concentration and wastewater flow. An
increase in the concentration of a constituent does not necessarily reflect an
increase in flow, or vice versa.
The most appropriate flows to use in the calculation of mass limits are
the daily maximum flow for daily maximum limits and the maximum monthly average
flow for monthly average limits. The best guidance for such a selection is 40
CFR 122.45(b)(2)(i), which states that "The time period of the measure of
production shall correspond to the time period of the calculated permit
limitations". That is, for production -based guidelines EPA directs that monthly
average production is to be used for monthly average limits and daily maximum
production for daily maximum limits. By analogy, for concentration -based
limits, the monthly and daily flows should be used as described above.
Over a one-year period from July 1987 through June 1988 the Fayetteville
Works treated effluent discharge (001) recorded a maximum monthly average flow
value of 0.604 million gallons per day (MM gpd) and a maximum daily flow of
0.744 MM gpd. Using the attached schematic water flow diagram for the expanded
plant, it is estimated that the average flow value will increase to 0.950 MM
gpd. The maximum daily flow will be 1.170 MM gpd using the current variability.
Calculation of Limitations
Table II-3 shows the calculation procedure recommended for developing
pollutant permit limitation for Discharge 001 at Fayetteville Works. As noted
in previous permit discussions and correspondence, Du Pont does not see the need
to limit the flow at Discharge 001 since the conventional pollutants are limited
on a weight basis. If the State of North Carolina feels a need to also regulate
flow, then Du Pont recommends a daily average limit of 2.0 MM gpd. As shown in
Table III-6 this figure is based upon recommended engineering standards as well
as experience with the existing plant.
It should be noted that discharges of five metals and cyanide are
regulated by the OCPSF guidelines. However, EPA directed that limitations for
these pollutants are to be "determined by multiplying the concentrations listed
... for these pollutants times the flow from metal -bearing waste streams..."
Note that there are no specific sources of metals from production areas at
Fayetteville Works. The discharge data listed in Application 2c for Outfall 001
and Discharge 002 indicate trace quantities of a number of metals. These low
levels are derived primar%y from corrosion of tanks, pipes and equipment.
OCPSF guidelines should not be applied for these metals, unless the entire
wastewater stream in considered the source.
Monitoring Frequency
The OCPSF guidelines set no specific requirements for monitoring of
regulated pollutants. Du Pont believes that the monitoring frequencies set
forth in the permit, which is currently in effect, are appropriate for all
currently regulated parameters at all outfalls. These include BOD5, TSS, flow,
DEQ-CFW 00065276

Attachment II
Page 4
fluoride, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and pH at Discharge 001. The
parameters which will be added to the permit for Discharge 001 as a result of
the OCPSF guidelines are priority pollutants. (Note: The fluoride monitoring
location has been changed from 002 to 001 because of the proposed routing of
Nafion® low BOD5 wastes. See the flow diagram attached for "Future" Plant.)
Only small amounts of the priority pollutants are handled at
Fayetteville Works. Sampling indicated only non -detectable amounts or traces in
the effluent. In light of this demonstrated excellent performance it is
~ apparent that there should be no concern with respect to the discharge of
organic priority pollutants from the Fayetteville site. Further, the site has
demonstrated consistently low, or non -detectable, discharges of regulated heavy
metals and cyanide. For these reasons, Du Pont recommends that the priority
pollutants regulated under the OCPSF guidelines be monitored once annually at
Discharge 001.
Recommended Permit Conditions
I. Discharge 001
Table II-4 and II-5 present a summary of the recommended NPDES permit
conditions for Discharge 001. Table II-4 lists the BODS and TSS limitations
calculated as described above, but replaces the daily maximum limitations with
the existing limits (increased in proportion to expected production) to avoid
"backsliding". The pH limitations continue as in the present permit. All
monitoring frequencies remain the same as in the existing permit.
Table II-5 lists the priority pollutant limitations calculated as
described above. All monitoring frequencies are set at once per year.
II. Discharge 002
Limits at Discharge 002 should continue as in the existing permit except
for fluoride which should be in Discharge 001.
III. Discharge 003
Limits at Discharge 003 should continue as in the existing permit. This
is not a process outfall and is not regulated by OCPSF guidelines.
DEQ-CFW 00065277

TABLE II-1
BPT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS GUIDELINES
(Note: All values expressed in mg/1)
Effluent Characteristics Daily Maximum Monthly Average
Organic Chemicals, Plastics and Synthetic Fibers
Subpart D - Thermoplastic Resins
BOD5 64 24
TSS 130 40
pH (a) (a)
Subpart H - Specialty Organic Chemicals
BOD5 120 45
TSS 183 57
pH (a) (a)
Plastics Molding and Forming
Subpart A - Contact Cooling & Heatin
BOD5 26
Oil and Grease 29
TSS 19
pH (a)
---------------------------
(a) Within the range 6.0 to 9.0
DEQ-CFW 00065278

TABLE II-2
BAT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS GUIDELINES FOR THE
ORGANIC CHEMICALS, PLASTICS AND SYNTHETIC FIBERS (OCPSF) INDUSTRY
(40 CFR PART 414 SUBPART I: END -OF -PIPE BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
(Note: All values expressed in Ug/1)
Effluent Characteristics
Daily Maximum
Monthly Average
Acenaphthene
59
22
Acrylonitrile
242
96
Benzene
136
37
Carbon Tetrachloride
38
18
Chlorobenzene
28
15
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
140
68
Hexachlorobenzene
28
15
1,2-Dichloroethane
211
68
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
54
21
Hexachloroethane
54
21
1,1-Dichloroethane
59.
22
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
54
21
Chloroethane
268
104
Chloroform
46
21
2-Chlorophenol
98
31
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
163
77
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
44
31
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
28,
15
1,1-Dichloroethylene
25
16
1,2-Trans-dichloroethylene
54
21
2,4-Dichlorophenol
112
.39
1,2-Dichloropropane
230
153
1,2-Dichloropropylene
44
29
2,4-Dimethylphenol
36
18
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
285
113
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
641
255
Ethylbenzene
108
32
Fluoranthene
68
25
Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
757
301
Methylene Chloride
89
40
Methyl Chloride
190
86
Hexachlorobutadiene
49
20
Naphthalene
59
22
DEQ-CFW 00065279

Attachment II-2
Page 2
Effluent Characteristics
Daily Maximum
Monthly Average
Nitrobenzene
68
27
2-Nitrophenol
69
41
4-Nitrophenol
124
72
2,4-Dinitrophenol
123
71
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
277
78
Phenol
26
15
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
279
103
Di-n-butyl Phthalate
57
27
Diethyl Phthalate
203
81
Dimethyl Phthalate
47
19
Benzo(a)anthracene
59
22
Benzo(a)pyrene
61
23
3,4-Benzofluoranthene
61
23
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
59
22
Chrysene
59
22
Acenaphthylene
59
22
Anthracene
59
22
Fluorene
59
22
Phenanthrene
59
22
Pyrene
67
25
Tetrachloroethylene
56
22
Toluene
80
26
Trichloroethylene
54
21
Vinyl Chloride
268
104
Total Chromium
2,770
1,110
Total Copper
3,380
1,450
Total Cyanide
1,200
420
Total Lead
690
320
Total Nickel
3,980
1,690
Total Zinc
2,610
1,050
DEQ-CFW 00065280

TABLE II-3 '
CALCULATION PROCEDURE FOR PERMIT LIMITATIONS
(All limitations expressed in lb/day)
Conventional Pollutants
Pollutant Limit = OCPSF Guideline Subpart D x Flow x 8.34
BOD5 Maximum Daily = 64 x 1.170 x 8.34
= 624
However, to avoid "backsliding", the limit should no be greater than
the current limit, increased in proportion to the planned production
increase or:
Maximum Daily = 359 x 1.589
= 570
Monthly Average = 24 x 0.950 x 8.34
= 190
TSS Maximum Daily = 130 x 1.170 x 8.34
= 1269
However, to avoid "backsliding", the limit should not be greater than
the current limit, increased in proportion to the planned production
increase, or:
Maximum Daily = 350 x 1.589
= 556
Monthly Average = 40 x 0.950 x 8.34
= 317
Prioritv Pollutants
Pollutant Limit = OCPSF Guideline Subpart I x Flow x 8.34
For example; Acenaphthene:
Maximum Daily = 59 x 1.170 x 8.34/1000
= 0.58
Monthly Average = 22 x 0.950 x 8.34/1000
= 0.17
For remainder of pollutants, see Table II-5
DEQ-CFW 00065281

TABLE II-4
PROPOSED PERMIT CONDITIONS FOR
CONVENTIONAL AND NON -CONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
AT DISCHARGE 001
(Note: All limitations expressed in lbs/day, except as noted)
Daily Monthly Monitoring
Effluent Characteristics Maximum Average Frequency
BOD5 570 190 2/month
TSS
Fluoride
Flow, MM gpd
556
317
7663 (b) -- 7663 (b)
PH (a)
(a) pH within the range 6.0 - 9.0
(b) No change from current permit
2.0
2/month
weekly
continuous
daily
DEQ-CFW 00065282

TABLE II-5
PROPOSED PERMIT CONDITIONS FOR
PRIORITY POLLUTANT PARAMETERS AT DISCHARGE 001
(Note: All limitations expressed in lbs/day)
Daily
Effluent Characteristics
Maximum
Acenaphthene
0.58
Acrylonitrile
2.37
Benzene
1.33
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.37
Chlorobenzene
0.27
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1.37
Hexachlorobenzene
0.27
1,2-Dichloroethane
2.07
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
0.53
Hexachloroethane
0.53
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.58
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
0.53
Chloroethane
2.63
Chloroform
0.45
2-Chlorophenol
0.96
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1.60
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.43
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.27
1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.25
1,2-Trans-dichloroethylene
0.53
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1.10
1,2-Dichloropropane
2.25
1,2-Dichloropropylene
0.43
2,4-Dimethylphenol
0.35
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2.79
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
6.28
Ethylbenzene
1.06
Fluoranthene
0.67
Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
7.42
Methylene Chloride
0.87
Methyl Chloride
1.86
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.48
Naphthalene
0.58
Monthly
Monitoring
Average
Frequency
0.17
1/yr
0.76
1/yr
0.29
1/yr
0.14
1/yr
0.12
1/yr
0.54
1/yr
0.12
1/yr
0.54
1/yr
0.17
1/yr
0.17
1/yr
0.17
1/yr
0.17
1/yr
0.82
1/yr
0.17
1/yr
0.24
-1/yr
0.61
1/yr
0.24
1/yr
0.12
1/yr
0.13
1/yr
0.17
1/yr
0.31
1/yr
1.21
1/yr
0.23
1/yr
0.14
1/yr
0.89
1/yr
2.01
1/yr
0.25
1/yr
0.20
1/yr
2.38
1/yr
0.32
1/yr
0.68
1/yr
0.16
1/yr
0.17
1/yr
DEQ-CFW 00065283

Table II-5
Page 2
Daily
Monthly
Monitoring
Effluent Characteristics
Maximum
Average
Frequency
Nitrobenzene
0.67
0.21
1/yr
2-Nitrophenol
0.68
0.32
1/yr
4-Nitrophenol
1.22
0.57
1/yr
2,4-Dinitrophenol
1.21
0.56
1/yr
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
2.71
0.62
1/yr
Phenol
0.25
0.12
1/wk
Bis(2-ethylhexy-1) Phthalate
2.73
0.81
1/mo
Di-n-butyl Phthalate
0.56
0.21
1/yr
Diethyl Phthalate
2.00
0.64
1/yr
Dimethyl Phthalate
0.46
0.15
1/yr
Benzo(a)anthrancene
0.58
0.17
1/yr
Benzo(a)pyrene
0.60
0.18
1/yr
3,4-Benzofluoranthene
0.60
0.18
1/yr
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
0.58
0.17
1/yr
Chrysene
0.58
0.17
1/yr
Acenaphthylene
0.58
0.17
1/yr
Anthrancene
0.58
0.17
1/yr
Fluorene
0.58
0.17
1/yr
Phenanthrene
0.58
0.17
1/yr
Pyrene
0.67
0.20
1/yr
Tetrachloroethylene
0.55
0.17
1/yr
Toluene
0.78
0.21
1/yr
Trichloroethylene
0.53
0.17
1/yr
Vinyl Chloride
2.63
0.82
1/yr
Total Chromium
NL
NL
1/yr
Total Copper
NL
NL
1/yr
Total Cyanide
NL
NL
1/yr
Total Lead
NL
NL
1/yr
Total Nickel
NL
NL
1/yr
Total Zinc
NL
NL
1/yr
Note: Since there are no process
sources of
chromium, copper,
cyanide, lead,
nickel or zinc, the OCPSF
guidelines
limitations do not
apply.
DEQ-CFW 00065284

TABLE II-6
BASIS FOR RECOMMENDED FLOW LIMITATION
FAYETTEVILLE WORKS DISCHARGE 001
Equipment Specifications
Aeration Tank Volume - 1.5 million gallons
Clariflier Effective Surface Area - 3,964 square feet
(Two units combined)
Estimated Capacity
Aeration Detention, hr.
Clarifier
Overflow, gpd/ft2
* Current permit
FLOW
MGD
1.1* 2.0
33 18
277 505
RECOMMENDED
DESIGN
6.0 - 7.5 **
500 ***
** From GLUMRB Standard - Great Lakes - Upper Mississippi River
Board of State Sanitary Engineers, Recommended Standards for
Sewage Works, 1971
*** GLUMRB recommends 700 gpd/ft2 but for industrial sludge,
500 gpd/ft2 is more reasonable.
Note: For additional information on the projected capacity of the
Fayetteville Works wastewater treatment facilities, see the
letter of T. W. Olcott to Babette McKemie, March 21, 1988.
DEQ-CFW 00065285

TABLE III
DU PONT FAYETTEVILLE WORKS
CRITERIA FOR ESTABLISHING EFFLUENT GUIDELINES
APPLICABLE PRODUCTION
INDUSTRY CURRENT FUTURE
PROJECT GUIDELINE MM lb % MM lb %
1. Butacite® Sheeting Thermoplastic 84.0 69.4
Resins
2. Polyvinyl Butyral Thermoplastic 0.0 12.9
Resins (Not otherwise Resins
converted into
sheeting, Item 1.
above)
3. Strapping and Tape Plastics Molding 5.3 3.1
and Forming
4. TRX Elastomers Thermoplastic 10.4 14.2
Resins
5. Nafion® Fluoropolymers Thermoplastic 0.1 0.1
(Membrane) Resins
6. Fluorocarbons (Not Specialty Organic 0.2 0.3
otherwise converted Chemicals
100.0 100.0
Notes:
C �aic6rt'
* Current production is 12 month period July 1987 through June 1988
Future production is forecast 12 month period January through December 1991
DEQ-CFW 00065286

C
.."ease print or type in Ica: unsnadea areas only
; f.')1—in areas are snacrd for elite rvoe, i.e., 12 characters/inch). Form Anproved OMB PJo. 15&S80004
FORM a� U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY I. EPA I.D. NUMBER
HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT APPLICATION
5
Ty
Consolidated Permits Program F N I C I DT 0 1417131618161412
RCRA (This information is required under Section 3005 of RCRA.)
FOR OFFICIAL USE OtiLY 7
PPLICATION GATE RECEIVED[ COMMENTS
4PPROVED (vr..mn._.+_-davl
11. FIRST OR REVISED APPLICATION
Place an "X" in the appropriate box in A or B below (mark one box only) to indicate whether this is the first application you are submitting for your facility or a
revised application. If this is your first application and you already know your facility's EPA I.D. Number, or if this is a revised application, enter your facility's
EPA I.D. Number in Item I above.
Ittb I APPLICATION (place an "X" below and provide the appropriate date)
re 1. EXISTING FACILITY (See instructions for definition of "existing" facility.
71 Complete item below.)
FOR EXISTING FACILITIES, PROVIDE THE DATE (yr.. Mo., & day)
OPERATION BEGAN OR THE DATE CONSTRUCTION COMMENCED
( use the boxes to the left)
rJGLJ tirrLlLA -IIUN (place an "X'"below and
1. FACILITY HAS INTERIM STATUS
III. PROCESSES — CODES AND DESIGN CAPACITIES
G2.NEW FACILITY (Complete item below.)
FOR NEW FACILITIES
PROVIDE THE DATE
YR. MO. OAY (yr., mo.. & day) OPER;
TION BEGAN OR 15 '
EXPECTED TO BEGIN
Pfl2. FACILITY HAS A RCRA PERMIT
A. PROCESS CODE — Enter the code from the list of process codes below that best describes each process to be used at the facility. Ten lines are provided for
entering codes. If more lines are needed, enter the code(s) in the space provided. If a process will be used that is not included in the list of codes below, then
describe the process (including its design capacity) in the space provided on the form (item l//-C).
B. PROCESS DESIGN CAPACITY — For each code entered in column A enter the capacity of the process.
1. AMOUNT — Enter the amount.
2. UNIT OF MEASURE —For each amount entered in column 8(1), enter the code from the list of unit measure codes below that describes the unit of
measure used. Only the units of measure that are listed below should be used.
PROCESS
PRO-
CESS
CODE
APPROPRIATE UNITS OF
MEASURE FOR PROCESS
DESIGN APACITY
Storage:
CONTAINER (barrel, drum, etc.)
S01
GALLONS OR LITERS
TANK
S02
GALLONS OR LITERS
WASTE PILE
S03
CUBIC YARDS OR
CUBIC METERS
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
SO4
GALLONS OR LITERS
_Disposal
INJECTION WELL
079
GALLONS.OR LITERS
LANDFILL
080
ACRE-FEET (the volume that
would cover one acre to a
depth of one foot) OR
HECTARE -METER
LAND APPLICATION
D8I
ACRES OR HECTARES
OCEAN DISPOSAL
D82
GALLONS PER DAY OR
LITERS PER DAY
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
083
GALLONS OR LITERS
PRO- APPROPRIATE UNITS OF
CESS MEASURE FOR PROCESS
PROCESS .ODE D SISN CAPACITY
Treatment:
TANK Tot GALLONS PER DAY OR
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
INCINERATOR
OTHER (Use forphysical, chemical,
thermal or biological treatment
processes not occurring in tanhs,
surface impoundments or incinen
ators. Describe the processes in
the space provided; Item III.C.)
LITERS PER DAY
T02 GALLONS PER DAY OR
LITERS PER DAY
T03 TONS PER HOUR OR
METRIC TONS PER HOUR:
GALLONS PER HOUR OR
LITERS PER HOUR
T04 GALLONS PER DAY OR
LITERS PER DAY
UNIT OF UNIT OFUNIT OF
MEASURE MEASURE MEASURE
UNIT OF MEASURE CODE UNIT OF MEASURE CODE UNIT OF MEASURE CODE
GALLONS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G LITERS PER DAY. . • . . . . . , V ACRE-FEET. . _ - -
LITERS A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L TONS PER HOUR . • • , D HECTARE -METER . - p
CUBIC YARDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Y METRIC TONS PER HOUR. W ACRES.
CUBIC METERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C GALLONS PER HOUR E HECTARES . . . . . . . . . - B
G GALLONS PER DAY U LITERS PER HOUR . . . . . . . H '
EXAMPLE FOR COMPLETING ITEM III (shown in line numbers X-1 and X-2 below): A facility has two storage tanks, one tank can hold 200 gallons and the
other can hold 400 gallons. The facility also has an incinerator that can burn up to 20 gallons per hour.
5
C
DUP
T'A
C
I
�
A. PRO-
B. PROCESS DESIGN CAPACITY
�
PRO-
B. PROCESS DESIGN CAPACITY
2. UNIT
2• UNIT
_ "a
W
CESS
CODE
FOR
OFFICIAL
W
M
CESS
FOR
`
2
Z
^D
(from list
1. AMOUNT
(specify)
OF MEA-
SURE
USE
ONLY
W
2
Z>
CODE
(from list
1. AMOUNT
OF MEA-
SURE
OFFICIAL
USE
�Z
above)
:
(enter
code)
_JZ
above)
code[
ONLY
1 S
02
I 600
C
32
5
Is
,B
19 27
2a
29
e
I
Si
0; 1 i 24,200
I
I G
7
S
0 2; 5,740
G�
8
' 3
Tj
,
01 1 130 j
U-
9
14
t
10
7
SPA s: . •103 u
:9 - 17
7
z+
'S 1e Ul PAGE I OF 5 CONTINUE ON REVERS
DEQ-CFW 00065287

Continued from the front.
Ill. PROCESSES (continued) a
u-. v
C. SPACE FOR ADDITIONAL PROCESS CODES OR FOR DESCRIBING OTHER PRO
INCLUDE DESIGN CAPACITY. -
ES (code ""T041 ). FOR EACH PROCESS ENTERED HERE
C
Fir. DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS WASTES au`�'" yIM
tgo
1011 ME
A. EPA HALAr`if. em mrtseratrtizfYltl{YI
rOUS WASTE Nwi73ER Enter the tour Mart nu-noer from 4U CFR, Subpart U for eacn hstea hazardous waste you will hana.e. It you
handle hazardous wastes which are not listed in 40 CFR, Subpart D, enter the four —digit number(s) from 40 CFR, Subpart C that describes the characteris-
tics and/or the toxic contaminants of those hazardous wastes.
S. ESTIMATED ANNUAL QUANTITY — For each listed waste entered in column A estimate the quantity of that waste that will be handled on an annual
basis. For each characteristic or toxic contaminant entered in column A estimate the total annual quantity, of all the non —listed waste(s) that will be handled
which possess that characteristic or contaminant.
C. UNIT OF MEASURE — For each quantity entered in column B enter the unit of measure code. Units of measure which must be used and the appropriate
codes are:
'PIQ1_!SH UNITnF t A4 tR CnnF METRIC UNIT OF MFASU1RE nnF C
POUNDS ........................... P KILOGRAMS. K
TONS ................ .T .......
METRIC TONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M
I f facility records use any other unit of measure for quantity, the units of measure must be converted into one of the required units of measure taking into
account the appropriate density or specific gravity of the waste.
13. PROCESSES
1. PI?OCESS CODES:
"or listed hazardous waste: For each listed hazardous waste entered in column A select the codes) from the list of process codes contained in Item I I I
to indicate now the waste will be stored, treated, and/or disposed of at the facility.
For non—listedhazardous wastes: For each characteristic or toxic contaminant entered in column A. select the code($) from the list of process codes
contained in Item III to indicate all the processes that will be used to store, treat, and/or dispose of all the non —listed nazardous was
that characteristic or toxic contaminant. tes that possess
?dote: Four spaces are provided for entering process codes. If more are needed: (1) Enter the first three as described above: (2) Enter "000" in the
extreme right box of Item I V-D(1); and (3) Enter in the space provided on page 4, the line number and the additional code(s).
2. PROCESS DESCRIPTION: If a code is not listed for a process that will be used, describe the process in the space provided on the form.
%40TE: HAZARDOUS WASTES DESCRIBED BY MORE THAN ONE EPA HAZARDOUS WASTE NUMBER — Hazardous wastes that can be described by
more than one EPA Hazardous Waste Number shall be described on the form as follows:
1. Select one of the EPA Hazardous Waste Numbers and enter it in column A. On the same line complete columns B,C, and D by estimating the total annual
quantity of the waste and describing all the processes to be used to treat, store, and/or dispose of the waste.
2. In column A of the next line enter the other EPA Hazardous Waste Number that can be used to describe the waste. In column D(2) on that line enter
"included with above" and make no other entries on that line.
3. Repeat step 2 for each other EPA Hazardous Waste Number that can be used to describe the hazardous waste.
EXAMPLE FOR COMPLETING ITEM IV (shown in line numbers X-1, X-2, X-3, and X-4 below) — A facility will treat and dispose of an estimated 900 pounds
=er Year of chrome shavings from leather tanning and finishing operation. In addition, the facility will treat and dispose of three non —listed wastes. Two wastes
are corrosive only and there will be an estimated 200 pounds per year of each waste. The other waste is corrosive and ignitable and there will be an estimated
^0 pounds per vear of that waste. Treatment will be in an incinerator and disposal will be in a landfill.
A.
d -4A-ZARD.1
_=p INASTEN01
J II fen ter cndc•) !
01 1-ii
i rD�QI01
X-31D 00 i
X-4 DI O 10121
I C. U N 1 T I
MEA
0. ESTIMATED ANNUAL. IOSURF-
QUANT(TY OF WASTE 1 (•.rltrr 1. PROCESS CODES
roae) (enter)
90O 1 IPI IT031Ds0
400 1P IT 0 30 8 0
:00 P ;T_0 3 D 3 0
D. PROCESSES
2. PROCr_SS DESCRIPTION
(if a cede is not entered in n(1))
Q
included ivith abore
PA Form..:il' 0.3 u',-o0)
PAGE 2 OF 5
CONTINUE ON PAGE 3
DEQ-CFW 00065288

LI
-'Gntinued from page 2.-
1110TE: Photocopy this page before completing if you have more than 26 wastes to list. Form Approved OMB No. 158-SB0004
!EPA I.D. NUMBER Irater i,)?n 1) FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
N 'C ID 10 :4 7-3 6 :8:6 ;;4 !2 DUP 121 DUP
V. DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS,NASTES (contirtied)
A EPA C. L;,.4 1 T D. PROCESSES
W 13. ESTIMATED ANNUAL HAi
ARD WR E
rVASTC NO! QUANT!TY OF ' I. PROCESS CODES 2. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
0 :entr
Z (enter) (if a code is not entered in LIM)
Ion ter code) coele) 1 1
D 0 !0 110,000 P :s 0 i's 0 2
F;0;0 :!31 51000 :P is 0 1 1
3
D,0.0:2 25,000 T S 0 1
4
D'O O "3: 200,000 P
S 0 1 S 0 2
!T 0 1
5
F'0.0!2' 145,000 i P
S 0 1
2S 0 21
6
D'0'0 T: 5,000 i IF,
J
IS 0 1
7
ID 1 0'00 6
Included with above
's
ID 0 07
Included with above
9
DO018.
I
IIncluded
with above
A
L2
13
14
116
{ I i
i
,
17
{ { f
{
{
13
i � � �
l
i
i
I
..
19
-4
-16 f
1% 1
27
=,',k rorm —j1U-j (u-w) CONTINUE ON REVERS.
PAGE: 3 OF 5
DEQ-CFW-00065289

ontlnueo from tn? front.
W. DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS WASTES (continued) , - „
E. USE THIS SPACE TO LIST ADDITIONAL PROCESS CODES FROM ITEM t)(1) ON P
I
EPA I.D. NO. tenter frOM Pane 1/
NC`DI.0;47'3,6 186�426
:.\CALFrY DIt k VI. G
.I existing utilities must include in the space orovioed on page 5 a scale drawing of the facility (see instructions ror more derail).
.iI_'eHOT0GI(APH1 :-tr__a_ t x
All existing facilities must include photographs (aerial orground—level) that clearly delineate all existing structures; existing storage,
:reatment and disposal areas; and sites of future storage, treatment or disposal areas (see instructions for more detail).
-'Ii. FAC.IJTY GEOGRAPHIC LOCATIONS - r
s
- LATITUDE (dej!rees, nlinutes, &''seconds)
p
I LONGITUDE (degrees, minutes• t seconds.;
I
3j45`0,7 8�5'0';0 OW'
�0{PJ1
:`III. FACILITY OWNER
A. It the facility owner is also the facility operator as listed in Section Vlll on Form 1, "General Information", place an "X" in the box to the left and
skip to Section IX below.
S. If the facility owner is not the facility operator as listed in Section VIII on Form 1, complete the following items:
1. NAME OF FACILITY'S LEGAL OWNER 2. PHONE NO. (area code & no.)
-,5.
;z
;s
3. STREET OR P.O. BOX
4. CITY OR TOWN 5.ST.I ZIP CODE
a
771,
' i 1
U1VNER C'iiRT!!'IC.�"rION "..77 }
certify under penalty of law that/ have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this and all attached
locuments, and tnat based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, l helieve that the
submitted information is true, accurate, and complete. / am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibi/ity of fine and imprisonment
A. NAME (111-1 nr 1vPe) B. SIGNATURE C. i
. ATE SIGNED
Gerald T. Rosenlund, Fay. Wks. Mgr.l DI
Polymer �� 1 3-�o-tiS7
Products Department I. i
S^
l certtry under penalty of law that l have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this and all attached
aocuments_ and that based nn niv inn(iiry of thncp individtiale immorlintphl rocnnnclh L, for n(.* :r,:. ..(.,.: t___._.:__ c
submitted information is true, accurate, and complete. l am awarethat there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fine and imprisonment.
.. o.e •r.•nn ur n'ne/ 15. SIGNATURE C. DATE SIGNED
Gerald T. Rosenlund
Fayetteville Works Manager ,7 /L 3 -to - e 7
pA form 510-.3 !u t,U) PAGE 4 OF 5 CONTINUE ON PAGE 5
DEQ-CFW 00065290

Continued from page 4. Form Approvrd 0AlB No. 158•S80004
FIGU R Z
i
i f
LUMBERTON
i
LAKES
a
RECREATION
�J C
RAILROADS
WOODS 0 FARMING
j�
i
N �
5; ITF ROUNnARIE
L
WOODS © FARMING
NAc1000 DRVH 11
.STORAGE_ g5•K/o5'
Jr DYMETROL
SEltvl�
NAc,o„ WA 1
✓..� 1 F�vet.eKc3y,
IP'AF,o �+r4 jjYDRocK¢6ur
,s....r�rr.. 11Rcan R) TAwK1(i)
1
= Bl7TACI�E
j� 11 WASTE TREATMENT t 1
ALI B/DPON0 _Nqv-QLQq
a CONSTRUCTICN -
LCC:K
• I no. 3 <
WOODS a FARMING. L
l w
ta
cil
_ x
U
TO ELIZABETHTOWN
1
l000' Zoeo boon itOeo
scAc-E —Fr. _ l
EPA Form 3510-3 (6.80)
PAGE 5 OF 5
DEQ-CFW 00065291

0
0
FUTURE
SCHEMATIC WATER FLOW
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO.
FAYETTEVILLE WORKS
PAGE 2 OF 2
70 B10—TREMMENT
.W __�, ja

cc
uj
}
cr-
Q
L1J
Li
LiJ
cl-
tL
L.)
0
0
ESTDMTED,AVERWLEVELS AT CAPACRIf IdTH
EIPMOED FACAJTE&
FUTURE
SCHEMATIC WATER FLOW
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO.
FAYETTEVILLE WORKS
PAGE 1 OF 2
STOM W RR
C_.)
F—
cm
cm
Lu
Z
J
O
O
3

Permit No. NC0003573
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
P E R M I
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143--215.1,
other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina.
Environmental_ Management Commission, and the Federal Water_ Pollution Control Act, as
amended,
E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Company, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a. facility located at
N. C. Highway 87
Duart
Bladen County
to receiving waters designated as the Cape Fear_ River in the Cape Fear_ River. Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitorIng requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I, II, and III hereof.
This permit shall_ become effective
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall. expire at: midnight on
Signed this day bT.„T
NJ
JXA
R. Paul. Wilms, Director_
Division of Environmental. Management
By Authority of the Environmental. Management: Commission
DEQ-CFW 00065294

Permit No. NG0003573
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SIIEET
E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Company, Inc.
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate the existing 1.1 MGD wastewater treatment
facility (001) consisting of neutralization, equalization, a nutrient
feed system, a sludge aeration basin, an aeration tank,
clarification, disinfection facilities, and sludge filter press; a once
through cooling water system (002) which will receive the "Nafion Area"
wastewater and; continue to discharge lagoon overflow (003) from a facility
located on. N. C. Highway 87 in Duart, ' Bladen County (See Part III of this
Permit), and
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the
attached map into the Cape Fear River which is classified Class "C"
waters in the Cape Fear River Basin.
DEQ-CFW 00065295

A. (1). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Final NPDES No. NC0003573
0
r'
6
n
0
0
0
rn
o,
N
v
During the period beginning on the effective date of the Permit and lasting until expiration the
Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) serial number(s) 001. Such discharges shall be
limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Discharge Limitations
Monitoring Requirements
Lbs da
Other Units (Specify)
Measurement
Sample
*Sample
Monthly
Avg. Daily
Max._
Monthly Avg. Daily Max.
Frequency
Type
Location
Flow
1.1 MGD
Continuous
Recording
I or E
BOD, 5Day, 20 degrees C
190.0
570.0
2/Month
Composite
E
Total Suspended Residue
317.0
556.0
2/Month
Composite
E
Acute Toxicity*
Quarterly
Composite
E
Fluoride
Monthly
Composite
E
Total Phosphorus
Monthly
Composite
E
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Monthly
Composite
E
Temperature
Weekly
Grab
E
Acenaphthene
0.17
0.58
Monthy
Grab
E
Acrylonitrile
0.7.6
2.37
Monthly
Grab
E
Benzene
0.29
1.33
Monthly
Grab
E
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.14
0.37
Monthly
Grab
E
Chlorobenzene
0.12
0.27
Monthly
Grab
E
1,2,4-Trichorobenzene
0.54
1.37
Monthly
Grab
E
Hexachlorobenzene
0.12
0.27
Monthly
Grab
E
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.54
2.07
Monthly
Grab
E
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
0.17
0.53
Monthly
Grab
E
Hexachloroethane
0.17
0.53
Monthly
Grab
E
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.17
0.58
Monthly
Grab
E
1,1,2,-Trichloroethane
0.17
0.53
Monthly
Grab
E
Chloroethane
0.82
2.63
Monthly
Grab
E
Chloroform
0.17
0.45
Monthly
Grab
E
2-Chlorophenol
0.24
0.96
Monthly
Grab
E
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.61
1.60
Monthly
Grab
E
1,3 Dichlorobenzene
0.24
0.43
Monthly
Grab
E
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.12
0.27
Monthly
Grab
E
1,1-Dichlorethylene
0.13
0.25
Monthly
Grab
E
1,2-Trans-dichloroethylene
0.17
0.53
Monthly
Grab
E
2,4-Dichlorophenol
0.31
1.10
Monthly
Grab
E
1,2-Dichloropropane
1.21
2.25
Monthly
Grab
E
1,2-Dichloropropylene
0.23
0.43
Monthly
Grab
E
2,4-Dimethylphenol
0.14
0.35
Monthly
Grab
E
'
Continued. . .
1

Effluent Characteristics
Lbs da
Monthly Avg. Daily Max.
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Ethylbenzene
Fluoranthene
Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
Methylene Chloride
Methyl Chloride
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
Phenol
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Di-n-butyl Phthalate
Diethyl Phthalate
Dimethyl Phthalate
Benzo (a) anthrancene
Benzo (a) pyrene
3,4-Benzofluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Chrysene
Acenaphthylene
Anthrancene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl Chloride
Discharge Limitations
Other Units (Specify)
Monthly Avg. Daily Max.
Monitoring Requirements
Measurement Sample *Sample
Frequency Type Location
0.89
2.79
Monthly
Grab E
2.01
6.28
Monthly
Grab E
0.25
1.06
Monthly
Grab E
0.20
0.67
Monthly
Grab E
2.38
7.42
Monthly
Grab E
0.32
0.87
Monthly
Grab E
0.68
1.86
Monthly
Grab E
0.16
0.48
Monthly
Grab E
0.17
0.58
Monthly
Grab E
0.21
0.67
Monthly
Grab E
0.32
0.68
Monthly
Grab E
0.57
1.22
Monthly
Grab E
0.56
1.21
Monthly
Grab E
0.62
2.71
Monthly
Grab E
0.12
0.25
Monthly
Grab E
0.81
2.73
Monthly
Grab E
0.21
0.56
Monthly
Grab E
0.64
2.00
Monthly
Grab E
0.15
0.46
Monthly
Grab E
0.17
0.58
Monthly
Grab E
0.18
0.60
Monthly
Grab E
0.18
0.60
Monthly
Grab E
0.17
0.58
Monthly
Grab E
0.17
0.58
Monthly
Grab E
0.17
0.58
Monthly
Grab E
0.17
0.58
Monthly
Grab E
0.17
0.58
Monthly
Grab E
0.17
0.58
Monthly
Grab E
0.20
0.67
Monthly
Grab E
0.17
0.55
Monthly
Grab E
0.21
0.78
Monthly
Grab E
0.17
0.53
Monthly
Grab E
0.82
2.63
Monthly
Grab E
Continued. .

Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent
11
Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow 24 hr) No Significant Mortality at 90%; May, August,
November, and February; See Part III, Condition H.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be
monitored weekly at the effluent by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
M3
0
m
fJ
_
C�
n
I
0
0
0
rn
o,
N

0
r'
6
n
C)
C)0
0
rn
w
0
0
A_ (1). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FinalNPDES No. NC0003573
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration the
Permittee is authorized to discharge front outfall(s) serial number(s) 002 (Cooling water and Nafion
Wastewater). Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics liischax-ge. Limitations Monitoring Requirements
Lbs da Other Units (gip cify) Measurement Sample *Sample
Monthly Avg. Daily Max. Monthly Avg. Daily Max. Frequency, Type Location
Flow Continuous Recording T or E
Temperature -� Daily Grab E
BOD, Day, 20 degree C Quarterly Composite E
COD Quarterly Composite E
Fluoride ysy 3476 (7663) 3476 (7663) Weekly Composite
THERE SHALL BE NO CHROMIUM, ZINC, OR. COPPER ADDED TO THE COOLING WATER.
Sample locations: E - Effluent, U - Upstream, D - Downstream
y The temperature of the effluent shall be such as not to cause an increase in the temperature of the
receiving stream of more than 2.8 degrees C and in no case cause the ambient water temperature to exceed 32
degrees C.
Daily means every day a discharge occurs except for Saturdays. Sundays, and legal holidays.
y^` The sample for fluoride must be taken downstream of the 001 discharge, unless or until, all neutralized
Nafion Area streams are discharged entirely into the cooling water outfall 002.
The permittee shall obtain authorization from the Division_ of Environmental Management prior to utilizing
anv biocide in the cooling water (See Part IIT of this Permit).
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be
monitored daily.at the effluent by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam. in other than trace amounts.

0
r'
6
n
0
0
0
rn
o,
w
0
A. (1). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Final
NPDES No. NC0003573
During the period
beginning on
the effective date of the permit
and lasting
until until expiration,
the Permittee is
authorized to
discharge from outfall(s)
serial number(s) 003-Back Wash Water.
Such
discharges shall be
limited and monitored by the Permittee as
specified
below:
Effluent Characteristics
Discharge Limitations
Monitoring Requirements
Lbs da
Other Units (Specify)
Measurement
Sample *Sample
Monthly Avg. Daily
Max. Monthly Avg. Daily
Max.
Frequency
Type Location
Flow
Weekly
Instantaneous
E
Total Suspended Solids
30.0 mg/1 45.0
mg/1
2/Month
Grab
E
Settleable Solids
0.1 ml/l 0.2
ml/l
Weekly
Grab
E
Turbidity
yy
Weekly
Grab
U, D
M3
0
`Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent D-Downstream
*The discharge shall to cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU.
If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge
level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the receiving water.
All samples collected should be of a representative discharge.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be
monitored weekly at the effluent by grab samples.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Part III
Permit No. NC0003573
F. Toxicity Reopener
This permit shall be modified, or revoked and reissued, to incorporate toxicity
limitations and monitoring .requirements in the event toxicity testing or other
studies conducted on the effluent or receiving stream indicate that detrimental
effects may be expected in the receiving stream as a result of this discharge.
G. The permittee shall_ not use any biocides except those approved in conjunction
with the permit application. The permittee shall notify the Director in
writing not later than ninety (90) days prior to instituting use of any
additional biocide used in cooling systems which may be toxic to aquatic life
other than those previously reported to the Division of Environmental
Management. Such notification shall include completion of Biocide Worksheet
Form 101 and a. map locating the discharge point and receiving stream.
H. Acute Toxicity Testing Requirement
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a _quarterly basis using
protocols defined in the North Carolina. Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail.
Methodology For Determining Acute Toxicity In A Single Effluent
Concentration". The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow
(Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static test, using effluent collected as a 24
hour composite. The effluent concentration. at which there may be at no 'time
significant acute mortality in any two consecutive toxicity tests is 90%
(defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). Effluent
samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained during .representative
effluent discharge below all waste treatment. The first test will. be
performed after thirty days from issuance of this permit during the months
of May, August, November and February.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be
entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which
it was performed, using the parameter code TGE6C. Additionally, DEM Form AT-2
(original) is to be sent to the following address:
Technical. Services Branch
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
PO Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Test data shall_ be complete and accurate and include all supporting
chemical/physical measurements performed in association with -the toxicity
tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total. residual chlorine of the
effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed
for disinfection of the waste stream.
DEQ-CFW 00065302

Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified
limits, then monthly monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a
single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will revert
to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirement or tests
performed by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate
potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened end
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
Note: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document,
such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate environmental
controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate retesting
(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test
results will constitute non-compliance with monitoring requirements.
DEQ-CFW 00065303

Request No.: 5247
-----------------.__._-----_--.-- WASTEi-001) ALLOCATION APPROVFiL FORM - - - - -- -- - - ------ -
Facility Name:
NPDES No..
Type of Waste:
Status:
Receiving Stream-
Classif ication:
Subbasin:
County:
Regiunol Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Quad:
E . I. DUPONT DE
NC000:3573
97% INDUSTRIAL,
MODIFICATION
CAPE: FEAR RIVER
C
0:30b 1 b
BLADEN
FAYETTEVILLE
LULA HARRIS
4/27/99
H23SW
NEMOURS & COMPANY
3% DOMESTIC
Drainage area:
Summer 7Q 1 O :
Winter 7Q10:
Average f low:
30G2-
s q fn i
791 cfs
1028 cfs
cfs
rfs
----------- RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS -----------
Mo. Avg. Daily Max. �
Wastef 1 ow (mgd) : 2.00 2.00 MAY 9 1989
BOD5 (lb/day): 190 570
Settleable Solids (# /d) : '31 7 556 ENV. MANAGEMENT
PH ~-.-C? FAYETTEVILLE REG. OFFICE
Also applicable are the parameters listed in 40 CFR Part 414.91,
Federal Guidelines for production of Organic Chemicals and Plastics
and Svnethic Fiber (OCPSF) (See Attached)
Toxicity Testing Rey.: Acute/Fathead Minnow 24 hr.-No Sig. (port./Qrtrly
(See Attached)
- --- - - ---- - MONITORING -------------- _ _ ---- - -- -- ----- -
Upstream (Y/N) : IN Location:
Downstream (Y/N): N Location:
COMMENTS
THIS PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR AN INCREASE OF PRODUCTION.
RECOMMEND EFFLUENT 11ONITORING OF TP AND TN.
A REOPENER CLAUSE SHOULD BE PLACED I1\1 THE PER111IT TO Al -LOW FOR LIMITS TO
BE PLACED ON TOXICANTS SHO LD THE FACILITY FAIL ITS WHOLE -EFFLUENT
TOXICITY TEST. (,e-c.v., 'e4(Lr&,,,- �`�ir�-��vorrcQC
----------------------_------_---- - ---- ---- ------
Recommended by: -/�-� J Date:
Reviewed by
�ech Support Supervisor: _- _ - _-- -- _ __-_-- Date: `
Regional Supervisor: _ _.-_----_-•_-- _ Date: -__C
Permits & Engineering: ___ Date:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: ------ JUNV 0 6_1989
DEQ-CFW 00065304

41 ql
Daily Monthly /
Effluent Characteristics
Maximum ��bf(1` 1
Average
Acenaphthene
0.58
0.17
Acrylonitrile
2.37
0.76
Benzene
1.33
0.29
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.37
0.14
Chloro benzene
0.27
0.12
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1.37
0.54
Hexachlorobenzene
0.27
0.12
1,2-Dichloroethane
2.07
0.54
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
0.53
0.17
Hexachloroethane
0.53
0.17
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.58
0.17
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
0.53
0.1.7
Chloroethane
2.63
0.82
Chloroform
0.45
0.17
2-Chlorophenol
0.96
0.24
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1.60
0.61
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.43
0.24
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.27
0.12
1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.25
0.13
1,2-Trans-dichloroethylene
0.53
0.17
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1.10
0.31
1,2-Dichloropropane
2.25
1.21
1,2-Dichloropropylene
0.43
0.23
2,4-Dimethylphenol
0.35
0.14
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2.79
0.89
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
6.28
2.01
Ethylbenzene
1.06
0.25
Fluoranthene
0.67
0.20
Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
7.42
2.38
Methylene Chloride
0.87
0.32
Methyl Chloride
1.86
0.68
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.48
0.16
Naphthalene
0.58
0.17
DEQ-CFW 00065305

Daily
��b Monthly
Effluent Characteristics
Maximum
Average
(�
Nitrobenzene
0.67
0.21
2-Nitrophenol
0.68
0.32
4-Nitrophenol
1.22
0.57
2,4-Dinitrophenol
1.21
0.56
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
2.71
0.62
Phenol
0.25
0.12
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
2.73
0.81
Di-n-butyl Phthalate
0.56
0.21
Diethyl Phthalate
2.00
0.64
Dimethyl Phthalate-
0.46
0.15
Benzo(a)anthrancene
0.58
0.17
Benzo(a)pyrene
0.60
0.18
3,4-Benzofluoranthene
0.60
0.18
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
0.58
0.17
Chrysene
0.58
0.17
Acenaphthylene
0.58
0.17
Anthrancene
0.58
0.17
Fluorene
0.58
0.17
Phenanthrene
0.58
0.17
Pyrene
0.67
0.20
Tetrachloroethylene
0.55
0.17
Toluene
0.78
0.21
Trichloroethylene
0.53
0.17
Vinyl Chloride
2.63
0.82
Total Chromium
NL
NL
Total Copper
NL
NL
Total Cyanide
NL
NL
Total Lead,
NL
NL
Total Nickel
NL
NL
Total Zinc
NL
NL
t/ote: Since there are no process
sources
of chromium, copper, cyanide, lead,
nickel or zinc, the OCPSF
guidelines limitations do
not apply.
J/':� ! .
DEQ-CFW 00065306

i
Facility Name t T I�•a�n'�' de Kemour s I- Comp,,^W Permit # gC000 3 S 73
ACUTE TOXICITY TESTING REQUIREMENT (QRTRLY)
Fathead Minnow 24 hr - No Significant Mortality
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a quarterly basis using protocols defined in the
North Carolina Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute
Toxicity In A Single Effluent Concentration". The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead
Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static test, using effluent collected as a 24 hour
composite. The effluent concentration at which there may be at no time significant acute mortality
in any two consecutive toxicity tests is 90% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina
procedure document). Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained during
representative effluent discharge below all waste treatment. The first test will be performed after
thirty days from issuance of this permit during the months of day , AiAl doer, rc h
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
code TGE6C. Additionally, DEM Fomi AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Technical Services Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental ',\!lanagement
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream,
this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit
suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 791 cfs
Permitted Flow x, o MGD
IWC% 0.14
Basin & Sub -Basin o306 16
Receiving Stream Zx o r-e&r tver
County -1 to,,6 n
Recommended by:
4�j -/). scnA
Date sl3/ a:I
**Acute Toxicity(Fathead Minnow 24hr) No Significant Mortality at 90%, Mau . AkA . Alo✓, kb ,
See Part 3 , Condition Cam.
DEQ-CFW 00065307

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NCOO p 3.593
FACILITY NAME: E,dKpon� de �e"notc�S -� �oa�pvnr�
Facility Status: leOPOtiiF�
(circle one)
Permit Status( RMw MOOFIt'.A i7DlE PHEW -
(circle owe)
MaJor ✓ minors_
Pipe No: 00 1
Design .Capacity (MGD): /nCrD
Domestic (S of Flow): 31..—_
Industrial (X of Flow): 7
Comments:
RECEIVING STREAM: adQ �eQr %vtr
Class: e'
Sub -Basin: 0 3 —O (o --1 i
Reference USGS Quad: 5('`J (please attach)
County: 81ad n
Regional Office: As © Me . Ra We W1 WS
Requested By: .Dates'
Prepared By:
Reviewed By: ate.
Modeler
Date Rec.
s �'
-S"Dk1
zZ S g
5Z �k
Drainage Area (m?) gib Avg. Streamflow (cfs):
A I_t_\ -iq I \lrz-&-_ 9A1 n i-*.% irn R onne
oxicity Limits: �� B
imits: 1
kinN oae) Acut / Chronic
Ac"4e/F,+6 j
Nvinow 49Z4 koKc RIo S)q, �Norf�Qc�+
t1
I stream Monitoring:
Parameters
N
Upstream Location
A4 9Y 9
Downstream d Location
MXMAUEMEN
ENV.
FAYETTEVILLE PEG. Offla
j Effluent
CharacteristicsHalc
Igo �hr
A`1 ,
SODS ( I
190
570
Se�}leab So
31
55G
SU61
acamLt _r
lisp-e�q0
CFP,--Pax+
vl , 9l
6tAjjrjj3
]'OC c8 4
U441 O!
O SLA:C- C Mi
and 465
a ol 1
S10411tt
OGPSF
i r
Xe � }
one t 1L
� �-
i
Comments: reo ner c�auta s�toull b� rl4«! :A f

0
0
0
0
0
W
0
't.i(-1v
• 'Tips of Product Produced t '.
`Lbe/Day Produced
Effluent Guideline Reference

Request No.: 5247
--------------------- WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM ----------------- - -
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Status:
Receiving Stream:
--Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Quad:
E.I. DUPONT DE
NC0003573
97% INDUSTRIAL,
MODIFICATION
CAPE FEAR RIVER
C
030616
BLADEN
FAYETTEVILLE
LULA HARRIS
4/27/89
H23SW
NEMOURS & COMPANY
3'% DOMESTIC
Drainage area:
Summer 7Q10:
Winter 7Q10:
Average flow:
30Q2-.
sq m i
791 cfs
1028 cfs
cfs
cfs
-------------------- RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS --------- gAV
Mo. Avg. Daily Max.
Wasteflow - (mgd): 2.00 2.00 M9 19&4
BOD5 (lb/day) 190 570
Settleable Solids ( # / d) : 317 556 ENV. MANAGEMENT
pH ( su) : 6-9 FAYETTEVILLE REG. OFFICE
Also applicable are the parameters listed in 40 CFR Part 414.91,
Federal Guidelines for production of Organic Chemicals and Plastics
and Syneth is Fiber ( OCPSF ) =Se-w=.At.tac e_d )
Toxicity Testing Req.: Acute/Fathead Minnow 24 hr.-No Sig. Mort./Qrtrly
(See Attached)
's
----- MONITORING------------------------�
Upstream (Y/N): N Location:
Downstream (Y/N): N Location:
M [A i 1 1989
K fl ii : L
- COMMENTS
THIS PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR AN INCREASE OF PRODUCTION.
RECOMMEND EFFLUENT MONITORING OF TP AND TN.
A REOPENER CLAUSE SHOULD BE PLACED IN THE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR LIMITS TO
BE PLACED ON TOXICANTS SHOqLD THE FACILITY FAIL ITS WHOLE -EFFLUENT
TOXICITY TEST. kEc.o- -A,,,e( 'e4(Lrt.f _q-1r- +(V0(1Lde,
Recommended by:-��=h---=d------------- Date:
Reviewed by
�ech Support Supervisor: _ _ Date:
Regional Supervisor: _ Date:
Permits & Engineering: Date:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: JUN 4 6 1989
DEQ-CFW 00065310

7U fa,;� 414, V
4h,�Q� z
Effluent Characteristics
Daily
Maximum s(/
J
Monthly,,-)
Average
Acenaphthene
0.58
0.17
Acrylonitrile
2.37
0.76
Benzene
1.33
0.29
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.37
0.14
Chlorobenzene
0.27
0.12
1,.2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1.37
0.54
Hexachlorobenzene
0.27
0.12
1,2-Dichloroethane
2.07
0.54
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
0.53
0.17
Hexachloroethane
0.53
0.17
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.58
0.17
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
0.53
0.17
Chloroethane
2.63
0.82
Chloroform
0.45
0.17
2-Chlorophenol
0.96
0.24
1,2-bichlorobenzene
1.60
0.61
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.43
0.24
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.27
0.12
1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.25
0.13
1,2-Trans-dichloroethylene
0.53
0.17
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1.10
0.31
1,2-Dichloropropane
2.25
1.21
1,2-Dichloropropylene
0.43
0.23
2,4-Dimethylphenol
0.35
0.14
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2.79
0.89
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
6.28
2.01
Ethylbenzene
1.06
0.25
Fluoranthene
0.67
0.20
Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
7.42
2.38
Methylene Chloride
0.87
0.32
Methyl Chloride
1.86
0 6£i
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.48
0.16
Naphthalene
0.58
0.17
DEQ-CFW 00065311

pppp
Daily
Effluent Characteristics Maximum MonthlyAverage
Nitrobenzene 0.67 0.21
2-Nitrophenol 0.68 0.32
4-Nitrophenol 1.22 0.57
2,4-Dinitrophenol 1.21 0.56
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol 2.71 0.62
Phenol 0.25 0.12
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate 2.73 0.81
Di-n-butyl Phthalate 0.56 0.21
Diethyl Phthalate 2.00 0.64
Dimethyl Phthalate- 0.46 0.15
Benzo(a)anthrancene 0.58 0.17
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.60 0.18
3,4-Benzofluoranthene 0.60 0.18
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.58 0.17
Chrysene 0.58 0.17
Acenaphthylene 0.58 0.17
Anthrancene 0.58 0.17
Fluorene 0.58 0.17
Phenanthrene ;:- 0.58 0.17
Pyrene 0.67 0.20
Tetrachloroethylene 0.55 0.17
Toluene 0.78 0.21
Trichloroethylene 0.53 0.17
Vinyl Chloride 2.63 0.82
Total Chromium NL NL
Total Copper NL NL
Total Cyanide NL NL
Total Lead, NL NL
Total Nickel NL NL
Total Zinc NL NL
�/ote: Since there are no process sources of chromium, copper, cyanide, lead,
nickel or zinc, the OCPSF guidelines limitations do not apply.
DEQ-CFW 00065312

Facility Name dn'1' At NCWtAr 5 C M n Permit # ACOoo 3 5 73
ACUTE TOXICITY TESTING REQUIREMENT (QRTRLY)
Fathead Minnow 24 hr - No Significant Mortality
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a Cuarter basis using protocols defined in the
North Carolina Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute
Toxicity In A Single Effluent Concentration". The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead
Minnow Pime hales promelas) 24 hour static test, using effluent collected as a 24 hour
composite. The effluent concentration at which there may be at no time significant acute mortality
in any two consecutive toxicity tests is 90% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina
procedure document). Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained during
representative effluent discharge below all waste treatment. The first test will be performed after
thirty days from issuance of this permit during the months of 14og r4l10 tjoy. 6
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
code TGE6C. Additionally, DEM Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Technical Services Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream,
this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit
suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 741 cfs
Permitted Flow a, o MGD Recommended by:
IWC% __ o, N
Basin & Sub -Basin o306 16 - ,
Receiving Stream �< < I%
as ye� �'� S,_
County 1�31a,ie Date S a y
**Acute Toxicity(Fathead Minnow 24hr) No Significant Mortality at 90%, IN y Aj4 , Alai ,
See Part 3 , Condition C.
DEQ-CFW 00065313

fis�v
OCT 25 1989
AGEMENT
MAN Office
�yETT.EVILLE R�-
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
October 20, 1989
Mr. Thomas W. Olcott
E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company
P. O. Drawer Z
Fayetteville, N.C. 28302
R. Paul Wilms
Director
Subject: NPDES Permit No. NC0003573
E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Olcott:
The Division of Environmental Management has reviewed your comments on the subject
permit and has made the following changes to it. The design flow of 1.1 MGD has been replaced
by 2.0 MGD on the permit supplement page and the effluent limitations page for outfall 001. The
title "Sewage Disposal" and the discharge location have been correctly placed on the accompanying
map. The acute toxicity requirement has been changed from a fathead minnow 24 hour sampling
requirement at 90% to a daphnid 48 hour requirement with a 39% LC50 criterion. The fluoride
monitoring requirement on outfall 001 has been deleted since this parameter is limited for outfall
002.
The Division has agreed to lessen the monitoring frequency for the parameters from the
"Organic Chemicals and Plastics and Synthetic Fibers Category - Subpart I" from monthly to
quarterly for those parameters that were not detectable in your effluent analysis. The parameters
from the abovementioned federal guideline that were detectable in the effluent at the subject facility
are methylene chloride, bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, and diethyl phthalate. Therefore, the
monitoring frequency for these three parameters will remain monthly.
"Monthly average" values should be reported in addition to "daily maximum" values even
in cases wherein the monitoring frequency is less often than monthly. If, for example a parameter
is monitored quarterly, that parameter's quarterly value will be considered as it's monthly average,
as well as, the daily maximum.
A boilerplate has been included with this draft permit as you requested. If no additional
comments have been received from you by November 6, 1989, the Division will go back to notice
as required by the guidelines with the intent to issue the subject permit on January 1, 1990.
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
DEQ-CFW 00065314

If you have any additional questions, please contact Mr. Dale Overcash at [phone],
S1ncerely, /
R. Paul Wilms
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Permit File
.A
DEQ-CFW 00065315

r
Z-544 REV. 12-79
aUPONT
ESTABLISHED 1802
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY
INCORPORATED
P. O. DRAWER Z
FAYETTEVILLE, N. C. 28302
POLYMER PRODUCTS DEPARTMENT
Mr. R. Paul Wilms, Director
Division of Environmental Management
N.C. Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Attention: Lula Harris
Subject: NPDES Permit No. NC0003573
Dear Mr. Wilms:
CC: M.J. Noland -Fayetteville
Regional Supervisor
November 20, 1989
�0
ti
NOV ' " 9
ENV. M1ANAGEMENW
FAYETTEVILLE, 44y
This letter formally responds to the second draft NPDES permit no. NC0003573
issued 10/20/89 (received 10/27/89) and also documents discussion and followup
resulting from a preliminary.meeting with Lula Harris, Dale Overcash and Mike
Scoville on 11/03/89 at the Archdale Building.
1. Duration of Permit
No duration of the permit was shown on the draft. At the
meeting, Mr. Overcash stated it would be a five year permit.
2. Location of Discharge
Although the discharge location map is not technically in
error, it can be misleading. The waste streams are blended
3/4 mile "up outfall" from the river discharge point - at the
wastewater treatment facility in the center of the property.
This is shown on the attached sketch and has a bearing on our
recommendation concerning aquatic toxicity.
3. Aquatic Toxicity Testing
Although favorable reduction of the LC50 has been made since
the first draft, we still submit for your consideration that
the combined discharge, rather than 001 discharge, is the
more appropriate testing location for the following reasons:
a. No aquatic exposure to 001 "regulatory outfall" alone
occurs on the site. See attached sketch. Exposure of
aquatic life will only occur exit the wood lined ditch,
which is the combination of all plant treated process,
wastewater, non -contact cooling waters and stormwater
runoff.
BETTER THINGS FOR BETTER LIVING
DEQ-CFW 00065316

Pg. 2
b. The high ionic salt content of 001 wastewater (4000 to
7000 micromhos) has a natural acute toxicity for.higher
forms of aquatic life - based on ionic strength rather
than any fundamental toxic chemical nature. This ionic
toxicity is eliminated by the cooling water dilution and
is an insignificant addition to naturally occurring salt
concentrations in the river. The salts in wastewater are
predominantly sodium and potassium sulfates, chloride, -
fluoride and bicarbonates. Our programs, aimed at
reducing wastewater flow, -could make this an even greater
concern - i.e. higher salt concentrations in 001 with the
same mass quantity and, therefore, insignificantly
changed concentrations in the combined outfall.
We realize that much of the concern discussed above is
theoretically compensated for in the protocol of the LC50
test. However, theory does not always apply in the real
world and we think evaluating toxicity on the actual stream
of concern when available, rather than an interpolation of a
synthesized stream, is a more straightforward and appropriate
method of testing. The last point in (b) above is not
compensated for in protocol
In discussing this point on 11/03/89, the need for a minimum
flow requirement and the question concerning our capability
to discharge at 001 in the absence of an 002 discharge arose.
In answer, we occasionally operate with an 002 discharge
without 001 but it is inconceiveable to operate in the
reverse fashion. Without cooling water, our manufacturing
processes cannot be operated.
Regardless, we are capable of specifying either a cooling
water flow of 7MM-gallons/day as a minimum permit compliance
parameter or preferably a correspondingly appropriate 002/001
flow ratio (such as 6).
With respect to -the toxicity statements in the draft permit,
Part III H indicates 90% for LC50 rather than the 39% shown
for the Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements for
001. On 11/03/89, Mr. Overcash agreed this was an oversight
and the 90% for H should have read 39%. Also, since toxicity
testing is already specified, no need for Part III F Toxicity
Reopener appears to exist.
4. Effluent Limitations - Priority Pollutants Analysis
We appreciate the move for relief on monitoring from the
original draft but suggest that the resulting analytical load
reduction is not as significant as one might think. More
importantly, we still feel strongly that the water quality
and compliance needs can be suitably assured on the basis of
the annual frequency -required by EPA for all priority
pollutants listed in light of the near total absence of these
chemicals in our processes and our laboratories. Mr.
Overcash requested at the meeting that I expand on this point
in my formal response. The following summarizes our
reasoning for this recommendation.
a. Of the 54 pollutants shown for quarterly analysis, 48 are
neither used as process chemicals nor even inventoried or
DEQ-CFW 00065317

Pg. 3
used as laboratory chemicals anywhere on the site. The
nature of the chemicals are also such that few if any
could be conceived to be generated via byproduct
reactions within our process. This qualitative
conclusion is supported by the five separate analyses
reported on the 2C submission which confirmed, over a
three month period, non -detectable levels for these 48
chemicals.
Of the other six which are present on the site, four are
small inventory (<l quart), non -routinely used laboratory
chemicals with use rates below a gallon/year (<3ppb
equivalent in the outfall). The absence of these four
was also confirmed by the five sets of analysis.
The two remaining chemicals are secondary use process
chemicals which do not contact wastewater in our
processes or contact other chemicals/materials which
subsequently contact wastewaters. For confirmation, both
these chemicals (toluene and 1, 2 dichloroethane) were
not detected in any of the five analytical surveys.
b. You propose three chemicals for monthly analysis. Two,
diethyl phthalate and bis (2-ethyl hexyl) phthalate, are
in the "ubiquitous plasticizer" category, particularly
the latter. According to analytical laboratory personnel
I have talked with, such plasticizers tend to show up
chronically in the ppb range of many analyses, generally
attributable to sample contamination from plasticized
materials such as tubing, rubber gloves, etc. involved in
the sampling and analytical protocol. Because of the
erratic nature of the contamination, it is hard to
accurately and consistently compensate for such
contamination in blanking procedures. It is also
possible to have some general contamination of water
sources but we do not feel this is a very likely cause
unless you have knowledge we do not on the contamination
of the Cape Fear River.
Diethyl phthalate is not used either as a process
chemical or a laboratory chemical on our site. Only once
did this show up in our five analyses and this was a
questionable one, only 10% above the limit of
detectability for that run. (This detectability limit
was seven times higher than normal because of inadvertent
overdilution in the contract laboratory. I now wish I
had disregarded that questionable set of data.)
The second plasticizer, bis (2-ethyl hexyl) phthalate, is
not a process chemical and is only used as a very minor
laboratory chemical (0.1 lb/week) with an inventory of 1
quart and use rate of less than 1 gallon/year. This
would convert to an expected level no greater than 2ppb
(below the limit of detectability) from that source.
It is significant that every inlet river water sample
analyzed for information during the same three month_
period also showed measurable quantities of the
plasticizer (94, 9, 58, 239, 410 ppb versus 001 analysis
DEQ-CFW 00065318

Pg. 4
of 81, <8, 204, 799, 630ppb). The two are not directly
related (i.e. one capable of serving as a blank for the
other) because of variable time delays, dilutions .
treatments, etc. but it does indicate the particularly
ubiquitous nature of this contaminant, whatever the
origin, at levels which far exceeds our capability of
generating as a significant wastewater contaminant from
site sources. (Again, the 799ppb came from that same
base neutral analysis mentioned above with the potential
for multiplying errors or analytically introduced
contaminants seven fold.) It is hard to believe that the
river could be contaminated to that level and we feel it
is more likely phantom analytical contamination. However
the analytical presence in the inlet water samples
supports our contention that our discharge is not the
origin of the contamination.
In light of the discussion in the previous paragraph, the
proposed discharge limitation for bis (2-ethyl hexyl)
phthalate creates a basic problem which we did not
adequately recognize earlier. Our data on the inlet
river water shows three of the five analysis as weU as
the average of the five analysis on inlet river water to
be above the monthly average you propose though we have
no known source of anything but inconsequential
quantities. Therefore, with our current data base we
have essentially little hope of meeting the proposed
limitation because of inexplicable conditions over which
we have no control at this time. We would suggest that
monitoring of this parameter is valid but a discharge
limitation, in the absence of a potential for processes
on this plant to add significantly to an existing high
background concentration (though it probably is phantom
background), is not. We recognize a problem exists and
want to work with you in discussing and resolving this
confusion.
None of the other proposed limits suffer from this
problem though we obviously would prefer applying the
daily maximum rather than monthly average quantities to
infrequent analysis as a general rule - particularly in
light of the inherent vulnerability for analytical error
in the low ppb range on complex field wastewater samples.
The remaining contaminant is methylene chloride, which is
also somewhat notorious for its ubiquitous appearance in
analyses. Methylene chloride is not a process chemical
but a service brine in a closed loop circulating low
temperature refrigeration system. It, therefore, is not
a normal constituent of wastewater. Contaminated
material is drummed out for recovery infrequently, not
discharged to wastewater. Of the five analysis, only two
were found above the detectability limit of 5ppb and
these were only detected at 7 and 8ppb.
C. The three monthly analysis you propose on non -process
wastewater chemicals require two of the three organic
priority pollutant protocols - the Volatile Organic
Fraction (Methylene Chloride) and the Base/Neutral
DEQ-CFW 00065319

Pg. 5
Fraction (the two phthalates). Only the acid extractable
fraction is exempted from the original proposal._
Therefore; even though the relief from monthly analysis
on all constituents appears to be extensive, in actuality
the sampling and analytical setup for all but eight
chemicals on the original monthly analysis list must
still be run monthly though only three numbers are
reported monthly. This will only reduce the analytical
cost by 30%. (Typical costs for analyses are: Base/
Neutral-$625, Volatiles-$275 and Acid Extractable-$320.)
3. Summar
I thank you for the consideration you have shown us in our
negotiations. We are committed to meeting the regulatory
requirements under the Clean Water Act and are attempting by
these comments to both Mead off future environmentally
inconsequential but potentially time consuming compliance
controversies ahead of time and 2)provide the necessary
compliance data to characterize and control our discharge in
as efficient and economical a manner as possible.
With the lengthy discussion and additional data presented on
these permitting matters, we feel we have built a technically
sound basis for annual analysis on all priority pollutants on
the basis of knowledge of our processes and plant chemical
inventories. We suggest that if you disagree with our
position, quarterly testing on all monthly parameters with a
reopener for evaluating after one year could be considered as
a compromise position although we think the three months
worth of data presented in 2C in conjunction with the
expanded discussion in this response has already served the
purpose of confirming the lack of significant potential for
priority pollutant additions to our discharges. In addition,
we feel we have built a reasonable case for altered toxicity
testing.
Thank you again for your consideration. I realize this was a complicated letter
and therefore stand ready to discuss additional details with your personnel in
the Archdale Building at their convenience.
TWO/akd
Sincerely,
:� J
4V
Thomas W. Olcott
Environmental Coordinator
[phone]
0
DEQ-CFW 00065320

DEQ-CFW 00065321

ZZC99000 M=10-034
-4404
n(/ ''M
Aa 'i '6
a V

Z-544 REV. 12-79
aUPONT
ESTABLISHED 1802
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY
INCORPORATED
P. O. DRAWER Z
FAYETTEV►LLE, N. C. 28302
POLYMER PRODUCTS DEPARTMENT
Mr. Don Safrit
Permits and Engineering Branch
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Safrit:
CC: M.J. Noland, DEHNR
Regional Supervisor, Fayetteville
October 25, 1989
)\J MANAGEMENT >
r*A--y $ EV ILLE REQ OFFICE
Enclosed are two sets of a design package for the planned waste sludge
handling facility associated with the activated sludge wastewater treatment
plant at Fayetteville Works of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc. in Bladen
County.
Biopond sludge was previously lagooned on site. Last year we committed
to discontinue the lagooning of newly generated sludge by the end of January
1989 which then required contracted sludge handling and/or test operations with
experimental equipment to prepare sludge for off -site landfilling at approved
secure landfills. We have successfully done the latter in the interim and have
developed a design for permanent sludge handling using a series of commercial
waste operations which are detailed in this package. We have abandoned a
proposed project for on -site landspreading because of concern for future
groundwater quality problems.
In summary, these facilities consist of three major commercially available
sludge handling unit operations connected in series - floatation thickening,
filteration, and sludge drying. This sequential treatment generates a suitably
concentrated, landfillable sludge. The equipment will be centrally located in
one building and all filtrates and water streams discharge back to the
headwaters of the waste treatment plant. This facility does not affect our
existing outfalls and we are requesting no changes in any current or requested
discharge parameters as a result of these facilities on NPDES Permit NC0003573.
(Note: at this time, this permit is currently in the "draft status for comment"
stage for early renewal because of a manufacturing plant expansion.)
BETTER THINGS FOR BETTER LIVING
DEQ-CFW 00065323

."... t'
Each attached package consists of:
1. a summary description of the facilities
2. a flowsheet indicating quantitative design and operational data for the
facilities and showing the interrelation with existing waste treatment
facilities
3. vendors descriptive and design information
Please note that the maximum flow rates shown are the design throughput rates
for the vendor equipment and are a factor of 2 to 6 times higher than any
forecasted sludge generation rates.
If you have questions or need additional information, please call me at
[phone] or John Hagle at [phone].
Sincerely,
Thomas W. Olcott
Enivronmental Coordinator
DEQ-CFW 00065324

DUPONT FAYETTEVILLE WORKS
Waste Treatment Facilities
The existing waste water treatment facility employs activated
sludge treatment to handle the organic load from the sites,
production units; Nafion@, Dymetrol@ and Butacite@.
The overall treatment system is shown on the attached drawing.
During the removal of the biodegradable organic load, excess
sludge is generated. This excess sludge was previously fed to
on -site lagoons for disposal. This lagooning was discontinued in
January, 1989, and temporary facilities have been used since then
to compact the sludge and send it to an approved off -site
landfill for disposal.
In order to establish permanent sludge handling facilities, we
are proposing new facilities that will thicken, dewater and
partially dry the sludge prior to shipment to an approved
off -site landfill.
These permanent sludge handling facilities will be centrally
located in an existing enclosed ventilated building, and will
utilize commerically available equipment connected in series
to achieve the operations outlined below.
All generated waste water from the sludge facilities will be
returned to the inlet of the waste water treatment facilities
for reprocessing.
o Thickening
Excess waste sludge is taken from the waste
treatment clarifiers recycle stream and fed to a Dissolved Air
Floatation Thickener (DAF), where the solids are concentrated
a nominal 3 % from 0.5 %. The DAF effluent is pumped to the
Digester, where it is held until it is pumped to sludge
dewatering. The Digester is an existing concrete lined basin
that was previously used as the biological treatment aeration
prior to 1989.
o Dewatering
to
basin
The thickened sludge is mixed with a commercial
coagulant aid, and is then pumped to a Pre -Thickener, followed by
a Screw Press where the solids are concentrated to a nominal 8 %.
The dewatering system filtrate is returned to the waste treatment
equalization tank.
A standard belt conveyor is used to transport the
dewatered sludge to an intermediate 2200 gallon sludge holdup
vessel, and then conveyed to the the drying system.
o Drying
Sludge drying is accomplished by using a steam
heated dryer to boil off about 70% of the water in the waste sludge.
A blower is used to pull water vapor from the dryer to the
direct water spray type scrubber. The scrubber collected water
DEQ-CFW 00065325

2
effluent is returned to the waste treatment equalization tank.
The dry sludge, nominal 26 % solids, is conveyed
to the landfill container.
o Landfill
When a landfill container is full, about 22,000
lbs., it is then shipped to the an approved landfill, which is
currently the -GSX landfill in Pinewood, South Carolina.
DEQ-CFW 00065326