HomeMy WebLinkAboutDEQ-CFW_00079122From: Christina Haley [chu|ey@wi|mingtonbizcom]
Sent: 6/22/20174:06:14PN1
To: Kritzer, Jamie [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=ExchangeAdministrative Group
(FYD|BOHFI]3PDLT)/cn=Kecipients/cn=cee93c49dO1445a]b54Ibb]I7dcdc84O-jbkhtzed
Subject: RE: Questions and fact check Greater Wilmington Business Journal
Ok'Thank you.
From: Kritzer, Jamie [maikojamie.kritzer@nodencgov
Sent: Thursday, June 22,2D1711:51AM
To: Christina Ha|ey<cha|ey@wi|mingtonbiz.com>
Subject: RE: Questions and tsc1 check Greater Wilmington Business Journal
Christina, I've got one of my colleagues working on answers now. Let me see where she's at and I'll let you know.
Jamie Kritzer
Communications Director
N.C.Department ofEnvironmental Quality
919-707-8602
0111,008���
�v`,sad� ess iS &u�ft"',�m
Ro:am/mndo,aybmx
From: Christina Haley
Sent: Thursday, June 22,2U171l:SUAM
To: Kritzer, Jamie
Subject: RE: Questions and fact check - Greater Wilmington Business Journal
Just checking to see if you all have reviewed this. I need to turn in my story soon. Please let me know. Thank you.
Regards,
Christina
From: Kritzer, Jamie
Sent: Thursday, June Z2,ZU177:43AM
To: Christina Haley
Subject: RE: Questions and fact check - Greater Wilmington Business Journal
OEQ-CFVV_00079122
Jamie Kritzer
Communications Director
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
4119-707-8602
ION-003KOW
No.r,,V", P,."'bfkl "Pecoec"'s Llaw'-".�.�' nnav "'h"'.ra,
From: Christina Haley [mailto:chaley@wilmingtonbiz.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 7:42 AM
To: Kritzer, Jamie <jam ie.kritzer@ ncdenr.gov>
Subject: Questions and fact check - Greater Wilmington Business Journal
wig
I wanted to check to see if you all received my questions yesterday. My absolute deadline for my story on GenX is today.
Also, I am inputing some of the permitting information released during the press conference last Thursday and wanted tt
send you the what I have written about it to double check it for factual information. As I understand your staff may not
have had documentation in front of them at the time, I wanted to give you all the chance to correct anything that needs
to be corrected. I have posted the information below.
pII!I!1'p;1I I � I � I I I I I � � I i! � 11 � I� 1 � I! � � 1 11! Ill 111VInEvIrTrym
11115 !1111!, IT•TIRP71111 1•1111111 1 1 � 11 Ilt a 0 6 -
Is this a reapplication after the 5-year timeframe, or simply a permit renewal and is there a difference? And what is the
timeline for Chemours new permit? Does the NCDEQ's investigation have any impact on the timeline for permit renewal at
this time? In other words, are you all waiting for the completed investigation before issuing a new permit to Chemours?
Here is the information from last week:
I0.49 Ill a a 8 0 -
INN Ill
Le I W.W4 uVem. UOW4 M.
1 11
1 1117!1 1111!1 lill
lot— 0 11 0
According to NCDEQ assistant secretary for environment Sheila Holman, every five years companies are required to
submit a new application to the NCDEQ, which looks into anything that has changed in the discharges as it relates to its
regulated pollutants. The agency's rules set a permit shield of six months while the NCDEQ conducts this review process.
During that time a company is allowed to operate under the existing permit.
DEQ-CFW-00079123
En the NCDEQ's current evaluation of Chemours' new application, and with the new information on GenX, the agency is
looking into any additional changes that need to be made with company's existing permit before reissuing its new permit,
Holman said.
Ahope you all can at least provide 8timely response tOthe questions and factual check 0nthe circumstances Of
Chemours current stance as it relates to the NCDEQ's permitting process.
Thank you again for your time.
Christina Haley O'Neal
Greater Wilmington 8uSine5S][mnnB| - Reporter
un|[e: 910-375-7290
Cell: 704-651-5828
OEQ-CFVV_00079124