DEQ-CFW_00058444

From: Morgan, Martha [/O=EXCHANGELA8S/OU=[XCHANGEADMINISTRATIVE GROUP
(FYD|BOHF2]SPDLT)/CN=REOP|ENTS/CN=44A4991C113C4254AE7D7OCGC7Z0F98A-yWTMORGAN]
Sent: 1/3/20I74:4I:12 PM
To: Brower, Connie [/b=ExzhanXeLabs/ou=ExchangeAdministrative Group
(FYD|8OHFZ33PDO)/cn=Redpient$cn=7ee8db84d9554]1c9aIf781f5597ba62-cubrower]
CC: Ventaloro, Christopher [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group
(FYD|8OHFZ33PDO)/cn=Redpient$cn=fZaa57ceb789499fb6bff4I58c7I9O7d-dventa|oro];Prusiewic4CandaceK8
[/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=ExchangeAdministrative Group
(FYD|8OHFZ33PDO)/cn=Redpient$cn=e6acIf5199144181a3abc%I9f1Oo4]15'cmprusiewic]
Subject: RE: Aquick question O2Lsand |K8ACs
Hey Connie,
| just talked with Dave Loxvn more on this. 8o for the sites that m/ework with, at the military bases the likely sites that
could have these contaminants would befire training pits, flight lines, and hangars. At this point DoD isatthe front end
of testing sites that they consider to be more likely to have these and data is not in yet. Beyond the military bases there
would be airports fire training facilities for firefighters. | don't know who you would get that data from. | hope this
helps and feel free toask questions any time!
From: Brower, Connie
Sent: Wednesday, December Z8 201611:20AK4
To: Morgan, Martha <[e-mail]>
Cc: Venta|uro,Christopher «christopher.venta|oru@ncdenr.8uv>;Prusiew/ioz,Candace M
xcandace.prusiewicz@ncdenr.8ov>
Subject: RE: Aquick question O2Lsand |MACs
Good morning, Marti!
I send you best wishes for a wonderful holiday season!
Currently, at the request of Secretary van der Vaart, the |K8A[sare under review and assessment for potential
modifications. PFOA is among those being evaluated and going through internal and external review. Dave and Hanna
are our contacts at DVVM. Because PFOS and PFOA are often found "together" , we are considering a proposal for PFO8
as well. The proposals, after approval for release by DWR management, will make their way over to your office.
Could you tell me how many facilities /areas may encounter either of the chemicals? asyou are aware — the next step
after this one is obtaining approvals for rule -making and subsequently a fiscal note must be prepared that includes an
estimate of all affected parties. Any information that you could provide atthis time would be helpful in making final
Connie U. Brower
Water Quality Standards Coordinator

Fromm: Morgan, Martha
Sent: Wednesday, December 28,2Ol61D:DOAM
To: Brower, Connie <
Cc: Venta|oro,Christopher x ;Prusiewicz,Candace ��
Subject: RE: Aquick question UZLsand |MA[s
Hey there,
I wanted to check and see if you know if we will be setting an IMAC or 2L standard for PFOS? Also, do you know at this
time ifthere are proposed changes tothe current |MACfor PFOA? | work inthe SuperfundSection inDVVMand have
gotten some questions about these constituents so I thought I'd check in with you. Thanks!
Sent: Thursday, June 23,2D161:13PK4
To: Morgan, Martha
Cc: Venta|oro,Christopher x ;Prusiewicz,Candace ��
Subject: RE: Aquick question UZLsand |MA[s
Good afternoon, Marti —
It's always apleasure kzhear from you! All bwell, but, busy over here! Wedosee Linda guheabit — but, she, too,
stays busy and highly scheduled for meeting after meeting!
Candace Prusiewicz became our new GR standards coordinator about 8 weeks ago. She binthe process (by direction
from Sec. van der Vaart) of reviewing the IMACs (first) for possible adoption into the 02L rules. Thefirst half -dozen are
underway and have been forwarded toMichael Scott (with DVVM) for staff review, Iassume that tobeSandy, Dave and
Hanna—but,maybeotbeo,
We are hoping to have 15-20 ready for presentation to the EMC in late fall — this may change as we may encounter data
issues or other needs. So, in closing, check back wi�h us for Updates, and perhaps check in with the DWM staff tosee
where they may be in the review process!
Regards and bestwishes,
Connie
Connie U.Brower
Water Quality Standards Coordinator
Classifications arid Standards/ Rules Review Branch
Water Planning Section, Division ofWater Resources
Department ofEnvironmental Quality
9198076416 office

Physical Address: 5i2North Salisbury St,Rekyb]h.NC, 278U4
Mailing Addross:i8i1 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 278&Q-1811
�v`,sad� c-ss iS &u����m
N��h�ann0na�o�0���:nn%�Lmw/an�xnn�������h7�-c/�*�wn
From: Morgan, Martha
Sent: Thursday, June Z3,ZU161Z:38PM
To: Brower, Connie
Subject: Aquick question
Hey Connie,
How are you doing? I thought I would just touch base and see if you have heard anything regarding any upcoming
changes to2L'sand |K8A[s? I'm just updating the table I keep based on updates to some of EPA's RSL values so I
thought I'd just check inwith you. How are things going over inWater Resources? Doyou see Linda much? No
rush ... just write when you have time. Thanks!
Marti