DEQ-CFW_00004541

From: Brower, Connie [/O=NCMAIL/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP
(FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CONNIE.BROWER]
Sent: 6/11/2012 8:16:01 PM
To: Moore, Sandra [/o=NCMAIL/ou=Exchange Administrative Group
(FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=sandra.moore]
Subject: RE: [DEN R.DAQ.SAB_committee] NCSAB Final Draft PFOA Risk Assessment June 8, 2012
Nada - zip -nothing - at alL...
Love it..
From: Moore, Sandra
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 2:20 PM
To: Brower, Connie
Subject: RE: [DENR.DAQ.SAB_committee] NCSAB Final Draft PFOA Risk Assessment June 8, 2012
Thanks. I received an email from Benne Hutson also wanting to know how many comments had been received. Unless
there is a pile in my inbox outside my office or on my desk, Mr. Vogels is the only one. That is so sad considering the timt.
and expense that's gone into this effort.
State Water Quality Standards Co -coordinator
Division of Water Quality Planning Section
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Sandra. [e-mail]
[phone]
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
From: Brower, Connie
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 1:18 PM
To: Moore, Sandra
Subject: RE: [DENR.DAQ.SAB_committee] NCSAB Final Draft PFOA Risk Assessment June 8, 2012
You have been having an exciting dayl Still think 1. and 2. ug/L. are not: exceptionally different ender the circumstance..
but, all good ..
On another note: Mr Mark Vogel (spelling?) called - he wanted to know how many comments you rec'd from the GW
rule proposals. I told him that I was not sure, but, that I knew that you rec'd one before you went to California. (die said
that: was likely his - I knew it was) He will be calling you tomorrow - I requested that he call after lunch to allow time for
you to .scan through the e-mails rec'd for any potential comments, He said that would work_
Connie
From: Moore, Sandra
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 12:42 PM
To: Brower, Connie
Cc: Moore, Sandra
Subject: RE: [DENR.DAQ.SAB_committee] NCSAB Final Draft PFOA Risk Assessment June 8, 2012
DEQ-CFW 00004541

monkey). Interestingly, they came up with 0.9 ug/L using Minnesota's HRL by adjusting the DW Intake from 3.5L
2L. Once they finalize the RA we can talk about what to do. I
State Water Quality Standards Co -coordinator
Division of Water Quality Planning Section
N[Department OfEnvironment and Natural Resources
1517Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N[Z7699'1617
[phone]
From: Brower, Connie
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 1:32 PM
To: Moore, Sandra
Subject: RE: [DENR.DAQ.SAB—committee] NCSAB Final Draft PFOA Risk Assessment June 8, 2012
I will not: look at: it: till you get back -and I will not: forward to anyone, until we discuss
Fromm:B3rn3w5 Robin
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 1:07 PM
To: Moore, Sandra; Brower, Connie
Subject: FW: [DENR.DAQ.SAB—committee] NCSAB Final Draft PFOA Risk Assessment June 8, 2012
| have sent this latest PF0ARAdraft out tothe N[SABinthe hopes that w/ewill have afinal risk assessment soon. |have
attached the latest draft for your information. Let me know if| need to dosomething else, or differently. |'m still feeinB
myway into how tohandle some ofthis interdepartmental work.
Kind Regards,
Robin
Robin RLBarrows, M5, Environmental Senior Specialist
ToxesProtection Branch
Technica!Services Section
Division ofAir C0aJity,NCDEN R
-164-1 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1641
*** NEW Phone/F/0(:(919)7o7-0445^��
Email correspondence toand from this address issubject tuthe North Carolina Public Records Law and may bedisclosed tuthird
parties unless the content is exempt by statute, or other regulation,
Please Cronsidertll,,ccnviron'rnent do You /eaflyneed m.0"';r1tthbdocument?

From: Barrows, Robin [mailto: robin. [e-mail]
To: NCDENR.DENR.DAQ.SAB — committee
Subject: [DENR.DAQ.SAB_committee] NCSAB Final Draft PFOA Risk Assessment 3une 8, 2012
Good Afternoon.
| have completed the changes tothe PFOARisk Assessment. The changes include:
* Addition to the Animal Studies — Developmental/Reproductive Section as suggested by Drs. Cunny, Kenyon
and Dorman (thank you toall for the comments)
* Editorial changes throughout for readability and completeness
* Reference check for completeness and accuracy
Given that the board has voted on and approved the IMAC developed in the risk assessment, I am hoping that all this
document needs isone more review and approval asamended. |donot anticipate that this needs further discussion at
the July meeting, unless someone has anobjection.
|twould befantastic if your reviews could be completed by Friday June 22, 2012 so that the risk assessment can be
finalized. After that, the next step is drafting a letter to DWQ with the recommendation, and posting the final risk
assessment onthe vvebpa8e which should beaccomplished byJuly l,IOlZ
Dr. Starr, please let me know if you have a different way in which this needs to proceed or any other concerns regarding
the completion ofthe PFOArisk assessment.
Robin RLBarrows, MS, Environmental Senior Specialist
Toxics Protection Branch
Technical Services Section
Division ofAir C0aJity,NCDEN R
1641Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-/64/
Ern iii correspondence to and frorn this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties unless the content is exernpt by statute or other regulation,
Ps'pase, conshler the environment dnYou oos,�Yneed to print this "Y"OmmmO