The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20100952 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report 2017_20180206FINAL YEAR 4 (2017) ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT MARTIN'S CREEK II MITIGATION PROJECT Cherokee County, North Carolina DMS Project No. 92633 (Contract No. 005717) USACE Action ID No. SAW — 2009-00209/DWR Project No. 10-0952 SCO No. 08-07251-01 Data Collection — March -November 2017 Hiwassee River Basin Cataloging Unit 06020002170010 SUBMITTED TO/PREPARED FOR: North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services 217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 December 2017 FINAL YEAR 4 (2017) ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT MARTIN'S CREEK II MITIGATION PROJECT Cherokee County, North Carolina DMS Project No. 92633 (Contract No. 005717) USACE Action ID No. SAW — 2009-00209/DWR Project No. 10-0952 SCO No. 08-07251-01 Data Collection — March -November 2017 Hiwassee River Basin Cataloging Unit 06020002170010 SUBMITTED TO/PREPARED FOR: North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services 217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 SUBMITTED BY: Axiom Environmental, Inc. Axiom Environmental, Inc. 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 December 2017 Axiom Environmental, Inc. 218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27603 919-215-1693 Axiom Environmental, Inc. December 5, 2017 Mr. Matthew Reid North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services 5 Ravenscroft Drive, Suite 102 Asheville, NC 28801 RE: Martin's Creek II Monitoring (DMS Project # 92633, Contract # 005717) Final MY4 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report 12-004.16 Dear Matthew: Axiom Environmental, Inc. (AXE) is pleased to provide you with three hard copies and a CD of digital files for the Final Martin's Creek II Annual Monitoring Report. We received your comments via email on November 28, 2017 and have addressed them as follows: Martins II: 2.1 Streams: Please add similar verbiage from Site Assessment Report: "On March 8, 2017, two time-lapse cameras were installed on MC UT1R2. These cameras were installed to document 30 consecutive days of continuous flow. XX number of days were recorded between XX dates." The following was added to the stream discussion: "On March 8, 2017, two time-lapse cameras were installed on MC UTIR2. These cameras were installed to document 30 consecutive days of continuous flow. The photos show obvious, continuous stream flow from March 8 until May 20, or 73 consecutive days. A selection of these time-lapse photos is in Appendix E, and all photos can be made available upon request. " Please also add a page at the end of the report showing some pictures collected with dates. A sampling of photos from each camera was added to the hydrology data in Appendix E. 2.2 Vegetation: Please remove the information regarding the 2016 supplemental planting Information regarding the 2016 supplemental planting was removed. 2.3 Wetland Hydrology: Gauges 2 and 11 have documented malfunctions occurring in MY4 and did not record the complete monitoring period. Have these gauges been repaired and/or replaced? If not, please let DMS know so replacement gauges can be provided if needed. Please add short discussion in section 2.3 Wetland Hydrology regarding the two malfunctioning gauges and the repair/replacement solution. The following was added to the wetland hydrology discussion: "Gauge 2 malfunctioned on July 1, 2017 and was replaced on August 30, 2017. The new gauge collected data for just 6 days before malfunctioning again for the remainder of the growing season; however, it was saturated/inundated for 42 days prior to its malfunction. Gauge 11 malfunctioned on August 29, 2017 resulting in loss of data for the remainder of the growing season. The gauge had not met success criteria prior to its malfunction, and it is not expected to have met success criteria during the period of its malfunction. Both gauges were replaced with functioning gauges, and, as of November 8, 2017, were functioning properly. " Axiom keeps several DMS -owned gauges in stock and brings them to every site visit in anticipation of gauge malfunction. We will request additional replacement gauges from DMS if the need arises. Division of Mitigation Services Axiom Environmental, Inc. Page 2 of 2 Cross Sections and Table 11: The IRT has requested that Bank Height Ratios be calculated. Please calculate BHR for x -sections and update Table 11. The bank height ratio was recalculated for all cross-sections, and since only 2 cross-sections exhibited any streambed elevation change, only 2 bank height ratios changed. Cross-section 3 has a bank height ratio of 1.16 and cross-section 13 has a bank height ratio of 1.71. All other cross-sections have a bank height ratio of 1.0, indicating minimal geomorphic change and good cross-sectional stability. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments regarding any component of this submittal. Thank you for the opportunity to continue to assist the Division of Mitigation Services with this important project. Sincerely, AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Kenan Jernigan Project Scientist Attachments: 3 hardcopies Final Martin's Creek II MY4 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report 1 CD containing digital support files Table of Contents 1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY...................................................................................................................1 2.0 METHODOLOGY.......................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Streams.................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Vegetation............................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Wetland Hydrology................................................................................................................. 5 3.0 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................................... 6 Appendices APPENDIX A. PROJECT BACKGROUND DATA AND MAPS Figure 1. Vicinity Map Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Table 3. Project Contacts Table Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes APPENDIX B. VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA Figures 2 and 2A -2C. Current Conditions Plan View Tables 5A -5E. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Stream Fixed -Station Photographs Vegetation Monitoring Photographs APPENDIX C. VEGETATION PLOT DATA Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species APPENDIX D. STREAM SURVEY DATA Cross-section Plots Longitudinal Profile Plots Substrate Plots Table IOa- IOf. Baseline Stream Data Summary Table l la -1 If. Monitoring Data APPENDIX E. HYDROLOGY DATA Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary Figure E1. Martin's Creek 11 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall Groundwater Gauge Graphs Sample Time -Lapse Photos from MC UT1R2 Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina Table of Contents 1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) has established the Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project (Site) located in Cherokee County, just south of the town of Murphy. The Site includes a 93.87 -acre easement encompassed within 14 -digit Cataloging Unit 06020002170010 of the Hiwassee River Basin (Figure 1, Appendix B and Table 4, Appendix A). Land use at the Site, prior to mitigation activities, was composed of livestock pasture, open land, a residence, and forested areas. Martin's Creek and its tributaries were impaired by historical and current land management practices, which included timber harvesting, pasture, channelization, and livestock grazing. Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and project attributes are summarized in Tables 1-4 (Appendix A). The Site is located along Martin's Creek and several unnamed tributaries, which have been assigned Stream Index Number 1-49 and Best Usage Classification of C. Site streams are listed on the NCDWQ draft 2014 and final 2012 Section 303(d) list of impaired streams due to a fair bioclassification for reduced ecological/biological integrity and fish communities, and elevated levels of fecal coliform bacteria. The Site is located within a Targeted Local Watershed that has been identified for stream and buffer restoration opportunities (NCDMS 2008). The Site lies within the focus area of the Peachtree -Martins Creek Local Watershed Plan (LWP) and roughly corresponds to Restoration site #1 & Preservation site #1 of the LWP project atlas (NCDMS 2007). Goals of the LWP include implementation of wetland and stream restoration projects that reduce sources of sediment and nutrients by restoring riparian buffers, stabilizing stream banks, and restoring natural channel geomorphology, particularly in headwater streams. The project goals will directly address stressors identified in the Peachtree -Martins Creek LWP, namely lack of riparian vegetation, channel modification, excess sediment inputs, excess nutrient inputs, and bacterial contamination as follows. • Restore geomorphically stable stream channels within the Site; • Restore or enhance wetlands; • Exclude livestock from accessing project streams, wetlands, and riparian zones; • Improve and restore hydrologic connections and achieve uplift of ecosystem functions; • Improve water quality within the Site by reducing bank erosion, improving nutrient and sediment removal, and stabilizing stream banks; • Restore and preserve headwater tributaries to the Peachtree -Martins Creek Watershed and the Hiwassee River; and • Improve aquatic and terrestrial habitat by improving substrate and in -stream cover, adding woody debris, reducing water temperatures, and restoring riparian habitat. The Site mitigation plan was completed in March 2010 with the final design and construction plans completed in November 2010 (Table 2, Appendix A). Proj ect construction was completed between October 2012 and July 2013. The implemented mitigation is as follows (Figure 2, Appendix B and Table 1, Appendix A). Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina page 1 8817 Stream Mitigation Units Restoring approximately 3486 linear feet of stream channel through construction of stable channel at the historic floodplain elevation. Enhancing (level I) approximately 832 linear feet of stream channel through cessation of current land use practices, installing grade control structures, repairing bank erosion, restoring proper channel dimension, and planting with native forest vegetation. Enhancing (level II) approximately 1903 linear feet of stream channel through cessation of current land use practices, removing invasive species, and planting with native forest vegetation. • Preserving 21,327 linear feet of stream channel. 5.97 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Units • Restoring approximately 5.20 acres of riparian wetland by removing spoil castings, restoring stream inverts to historic elevations rehydrating stream -side wetlands, removing drain tile, eliminating land use practices, and planting with native forest vegetation. • Enhancing approximately 1.61 acres of riparian wetland by fencing livestock and supplemental planting. Planting a native woody riparian buffer (at least 30 feet in width) adjacent to restored/enhanced streams and wetlands within the Site. • Protecting the Site in perpetuity with a conservation easement. Stream Success Criteria Stream restoration success criteria for the Site are based on the Stream Mitigation Guidelines issued in April 2003 by the USACE and NCDWQ. Success criteria for stream restoration will include 1) documentation of two bankfull events, 2) little change in the channel cross-section from as -built conditions, 3) stable longitudinal profile, 4) substrate consistency, and 5) photographic evidence of stability. Bankfull Events Two bankfull flow events in separate years must be documented within the 5 -year monitoring period. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until two bankfull events have been documented in separate years. Cross-sections Riffle cross-sections on restoration and enhancement reaches should be stable and should show little change in bankfull area, maximum depth ratio, and width -to -depth ratio. Riffle cross-sections should generally fall within the parameters defined for channels of the appropriate Rosgen stream type. If any changes do occur, these changes will be evaluated to assess whether the stream channel is showing signs of instability. Indicators of instability include a vertically incising thalweg or eroding channel banks. Changes in the channel that indicate a movement toward stability or enhanced habitat include a decrease in the width -to - depth ratio in meandering channels or an increase in pool depth. Longitudinal Profile Longitudinal profile data for the stream reach should show that bedform features are remaining stable. The riffles should be steeper and shallower than the pools, while the pools should be deep with flat water surface slopes. The relative percentage of riffles and pools should not change significantly from the design parameters. Bed Material Anal Substrate materials in restoration reaches should indicate a progression towards or the maintenance of coarser materials in the riffle features and smaller particles in the pool features. Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina page 2 Photo Reference Sites Photographs will be used to evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion, success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures subjectively. Lateral photos should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks. A series of photos over time should indicate successive maturation of riparian vegetation. Vegetation Success Criteria Success criteria have been established to verify that the vegetation component supports community elements necessary for forest development. Success criteria for this project includes an average density of 320 planted stems per acre must be surviving in the first three monitoring years. Subsequently, 290 planted stems per acre must be surviving in year 4, and 260 planted stems per acre in year 5. Wetland Success Criteria Hydrologic success will be based on conditions of on-site reference wetlands. Success will be determined by the following criteria. Years One Through Three Hydrologic success criteria will be met if the Site demonstrates groundwater table levels within 12 inches of the soil surface for a minimum of 13% of the growing season (this criterion reflects a deviation of 50% from the duration of saturation expected for this type of wetland system (-25%). Success for monitoring years one through three will be determined based on this 50% tolerance of deviation from the duration of wetland hydrology at the reference sites. Years Four and Five Success for monitoring years four and five will be determined based on a 20% tolerance of deviation from the duration of wetland hydrology at the reference sites. Therefore, it is expected that in years four and five the site will achieve a minimum of 20% saturation. Based on reference conditions and the criterion stated above, it is expected that reference soil saturation for years one through five will continue to exceed the regulatory 12.5% minimum requirement of the growing season for Cherokee County. In order to attain conditions suitable for the formation of wetland vegetation and hydric soils, the Site should be saturated within 12 inches of the surface or inundated for consecutive period equal to 24 days. However, to meet hydrologic success criteria and mimic the reference wetland hydrology, the site should demonstrate wetland hydrology for a minimum of 25 days in years one through three. In years four and five, this will increase to a minimum of 38 days. Overbank flooding from the adjacent channel will also be noted during monitoring. Reference areas will be monitored for a minimum of five years. Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in tables and figures within this report's appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from DMS upon request. 2.0 METHODOLOGY Monitoring of the Site's restoration efforts will be performed until agreed upon success criteria are fulfilled. Monitoring is proposed for the stream channel, riparian vegetation, and hydrology for a period of five years Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina page 3 (Figures 2 & 2A -2C, Appendix A). Monitoring reports of collected data will be submitted no later than December of each monitoring year. 2.1 Streams Post -restoration monitoring will be conducted for five years following the completion of construction to evaluate the effectiveness of the restoration practices. Measurements were taken using a Topcon GTS 303 total station and Recon data collector. The raw total station file was processed using Carlson Survey Software into a Computer Aided Design (CAD) file. Coordinates were exported as a text/ASCII file to Microsoft Excel for processing and presentation of data, and are not georeferenced. Pebble counts were completed using the modified Wolman method (Rosgen 1993). Monitored stream parameters include stream dimension (cross-sections), pattern (longitudinal survey), profile (profile survey), and photographic documentation. Stream data can be found in Appendix D. On March 8, 2017, two time-lapse cameras were installed on MC UT1R2. These cameras were installed to document 30 consecutive days of continuous flow. The photos show obvious, continuous stream flow from March 8 until May 20, or 73 consecutive days. A selection of these time-lapse photos is in Appendix E, and all photos can be made available upon request. Bankfull Events The occurrence of bankfull events within the monitoring period will be documented by the use of a crest gauge and photographs. One crest gauge was installed to record the highest watermark between site visits; the gauge will be checked each Site visit to determine if a bankfull event has occurred (Figure 2A, Appendix B). Photographs will be used to document the occurrence of debris lines and sediment deposition on the floodplain during monitoring site visits. Two bankfull events have been documented to date during monitoring year 4 (2017) for a total of fourteen bankfull events during years 1 (2014) through 4 (2017), with at least one occurring during each year. Cross-sections A total of 19 permanent cross-sections, 12 riffle and 7 pool, were established and will be used to evaluate stream dimension; locations are depicted on Figures 2, 2A, and 2B (Appendix B) Because riffle cross- sections are critical in determining bankfull design parameters, the number of riffle cross-sections established will generally outnumber pool cross-sections. Each cross-section will be marked on both banks with permanent pins to establish the exact transect used. A common benchmark will be used for cross- sections and consistently used to facilitate easy comparison of year-to-year data. The annual cross-section survey will include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, inner berm, edge of water, and thalweg, if the features are present. Riffle cross-sections will be classified using the Rosgen Stream Classification System. No areas of concern or indicators of instability were observed during year 4 (2017) monitoring; therefore, stream dimension measurements are currently meeting success criteria. Longitudinal Profile After Site construction, approximately 4493 linear feet of longitudinal profile was completed to document baseline conditions. Longitudinal profile will be resurveyed annually for the duration of the five-year monitoring period. Measurements include thalweg, water surface, bankfull, and top of low bank. Each of these measurements will be taken at the head of each channel unit (e.g., riffle, pool) and at the maximum pool depth. The survey will be tied to a permanent benchmark. No areas of concern or indicators of bedform instability were observed during year 4 (2017) monitoring; therefore, stream longitudinal profile measurements are currently meeting success criteria. Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina page 4 Bed Material Anal Pebble counts will be conducted annually on one permanent riffle cross-section (100 -counts) at the time cross-section and longitudinal surveys are performed during the five year monitoring period. These samples will reveal changes in sediment gradation over time as the stream adjusts to upstream sediment loads. Year 4 (2017) pebble counts indicate the maintenance of coarser materials in the measured riffle feature; therefore, bed material is currently meeting success criteria. Photo Reference Sites A total of 26 photographs will be used to visually document restoration success for at least five years following construction. Photographs will be taken from a height of approximately five to six feet. Photo locations will be recorded using sub -meter GPS to ensure that the same locations (and view directions) on the Site are monitored in each monitoring period. Year 4 (2017) photo reference sites show no channel aggradation or degradation, or bank erosion. In addition, riparian vegetation is meeting success criteria based on stem counts across the Site. 2.2 Vegetation After planting was completed, an initial evaluation was performed to verify planting methods were successful and to determine initial species composition and density. Fifteen sample vegetation plots (10 - meter by 10 -meter) were installed and measured within the Site as per guidelines established in CVS -DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008). Vegetation plots are permanently monumented with 6 -foot metal t -posts at each corner. In each sample plot, vegetation parameters to be monitored include species composition and species density. Visual observations of the percent cover of shrub and herbaceous species will also be documented by photograph. Vegetation plot data can be found in Appendix C. Year 4 stem count measurements indicate an average of 356 planted stems per acre (excluding livestakes) across the Site; therefore, the Site is currently meeting vegetation success criteria. Eleven of the fifteen individual vegetation plots met success criteria based on planted stems alone; plots 11 and 15 were one stem shy of meeting success criteria. A population of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) was observed on the left bank of UTI -R3 during previous monitoring years. This area was treated during 2014 and twice during 2016, and though it responded well, several privet resprouts were observed in this area late in year 4 (2017). Two additional privet populations were observed along the lower reaches of the Right Prong Tributaries particularly in the vicinity of Photo Points 21 and 23. These areas are depicted on Figures 2A and 2C, Appendix B. Furthermore, small populations of multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora) were observed scattered throughout the Site, with most occurrences in the preservation and enhancement reaches in areas shaded by canopy. 2.3 Wetland Hydrology Thirteen RDS Ecotone WM groundwater monitoring gauges were installed within Site wetland restoration areas to monitor groundwater hydrology (Figure 2A, Appendix A). Hydrological sampling will continue for five years with gauges recording daily and downloaded at a minimum of quarterly throughout the growing season (April 14 -October 21). In addition, an on-site rain gauge will document rainfall data for comparison of groundwater conditions with extended drought conditions. Finally, groundwater gauges located within riverine wetlands adjacent to restored stream reaches will supplement crest gauge measurements to confirm overbank flooding events. Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina page 5 Year 4 (2017) rain data comes partially from a Weather Underground Station in Andrews, North Carolina. The onsite rain gauge continued to be infested with ants throughout the growing season, despite efforts to remove them, and data did not appear reliable due to inability of the tipping bucket to empty properly and therefore not recording consistently. Wetland success criteria increases in Years 4-5 (2017-2018) to a minimum of 20 percent saturation or inundation during the growing season. Nine of the thirteen groundwater gauges met or exceeded wetland success criteria for the Year 4 (2017) monitoring year; however, the remainder of the gauges were saturated/inundated for 8.4-16.2 percent of the growing season. Year 4 (2017) data indicates that the majority of the Site wetland area is successful. Gauge 2 malfunctioned on July 1, 2017 and was replaced on August 30, 2017. The new gauge collected data for just 6 days before malfunctioning again for the remainder of the growing season; however, it was saturated/inundated for 42 days prior to its malfunction. Gauge 11 malfunctioned on August 29, 2017 resulting in loss of data for the remainder of the growing season. The gauge had not met success criteria prior to its malfunction, and it is not expected to have met success criteria during the period of its malfunction. Both gauges were replaced with functioning gauges, and, as of November 8, 2017, were functioning properly. 3.0 REFERENCES ACIS-NOAA Regional Climate Centers. WETS Table Murphy, NC6001. Available online at: http:Haaacis.rcc-acis.org/37039/wets/results [November 20, 20151. Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS -DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Levels 1-2 Plot Sampling Only, Version 4.2. Available online at http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm. North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2012. Final North Carolina Water Quality Assessment and Impaired Waters List (NC 2012 Integrated Report Category 5, 303(d) List) (online). Available: hqp://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get file?uuid=9d45b3b4-d066- 4619-82e6-ea8eaOe01930&groupld=38364 [February 17, 2014]. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina. North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2014. Draft 2014 NC 303(d) List -Category 5 Assessments Requiring TMDLs (online). Available: hqp://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document librar/ get file?uuid=096fb2ff-296b-4bd8-8b88-e83bb5984be6&groupld=38364 [February 17, 20141. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina. North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) and Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design. 2007. Peachtree -Martins Creek Local Watershed Plan (Phase3), Hiwassee River Basin, Cherokee and Clay Counties, North Carolina. October 2007 Watershed Management Plan. [Online WWW]. Available URL: http://www.hrwc.net/pmcplan/pmc plan_ executive_summary_.pdf. North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2010. Martin's Creek 11 Mitigation Plan. NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Available online at http://its.enr.state.nc.us/WebLink8/0/doc/140433/Pa eg 2aspx North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2014. Annual Monitoring and Closeout Reporting Format, Data Requirements, and Content Guidance, dated February 2014. NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Available online at http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get _file?p_1_id=60409&folderld=18877169&name= DLFE-86604.pdf Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina page 6 North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2008. Hiwassee River Basin Restoration Priorities 2008 (online). Available: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get file?uuid= ea2df99d-3031-4c7b-87ea-79d56a3e4ale&groupld=60329. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina. Rosgen. 1993. Applied Fluvial Geomorphology, Training Manual. River Short Course, Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO. United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, North Carolina Division of Water Quality (USACE et al.). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. United States Geological Survey (USGS). 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map - 1974. State of North Carolina. Weakley, Alan S. 2012. Flora of the Southern and Mid -Atlantic States. Available online at: http://www.herbarium.unc.edu/WeakleysFIora.pdf [September 28, 2012]. University of North Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina page 7 APPENDIX A PROJECT BACKGROUND DATA AND MAPS Figure 1. Vicinity Map Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Table 3. Project Contacts Table Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices lv �_ Ebenerer Ciikft(_-iKF F. ;1' . TQ 677 E f IA's i" '[ \, V5 00 'Bolts 2'N Pi� P � o-�J� ".h i � S.J± J i,��?'}y� �'• ! by.,, I� 011 t i ��- ��"•` � 00 6 -. rid' x(7'7 r00 �"r j c.a g k'_�r ' ti,� ,�' � - y �� ,_ ? •Q� �0 �� f � �'� ppb - ti ''Y_ J J O. f� MAn►r,s Project Location J reek 35.0534640N 84.024879°W AHALA - OATIONAI!, F T —CLAY UN10 _ — ixDEFriTT r;` )ARY ca o North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services Axiom Environmental, Inc. w Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site Mitigation Credit Summations Stream Riparian Wetland Nonriparian Wetland 8817 5.97 Pro'ects Components Station Range Existing Linear Footage/Acreage Priority Approach Restoration/Restoration Restoration Equivalent Linear Footage/Acreage Mitigation Ratio Mitigation Credits Comment Right Prong Martin's Creek and UTs 17,234 --- Preservation 17,234-203= 17,031 5:1 3406.2 Three short reaches in upstream portion of RP UTl do not have adequate buffer to claim credit and therefore have been removed from the total linear footage and calculated mitigation credits. Right Prong Martin's Creek and UTs 971 --- Enhance II 971 2.5:1 388.4 Enhancement Level II - invasive species controls and localized erosion stabilization. Martin's Creek UTs 4296 --- Preservation 4296 5:1 859.2 Martin's Creek* 857 --- Enhance II 857 5:1* 171.4 Enhancement Level II - invasive species controls and localized erosion stabilization. UT -2 to Martin's Creek 75 --- Enhance II 75 2.5:1 30.0 UT 1 (Reach 3) to Martin's CreekLevel Station 00+00 to 03+37 337 Enhance I 337 1.5:1 224.7 I stream enhancement - grade control structures, repair bank erosion, and restore proper dimension. UT 1-3 (Reach 1) to Martin's CreekLevel Station 00+00 to 04+95 495 Enhance I 495 1.5:1 330.0 I stream enhancement - grade control structures, repair bank erosion, and restore proper dimension. UT 1 (Reach 2) to Martin's Creek Station 00+00 to 10+52 1052 I Restoration 1052 1:1 1052 Construction of a new channel on the existing floodplain. UT 1 (Reach 4) to Martin's Creek 05+46 to 05+91 332 II Restoration 51 1:1 51.0 Construction of a new channel in a low slope valley. 05+91 to 06+35** 37 2:1** 18.5 06+35 to 15+75 941 1:1 941.0 15+75 to 16+75** 100 2:1** 50.0 UT 1-3 (Reach 2) to Martin's Creek 05+54 to 05+90 1068 II Restoration 35 1:1 35.0 Construction of a new channel in a low slope valley. 05+90 to 06+10*** 20 2:1** 10.0 06+10 to 18+59 1250 1:1 1250.0 Wetland Restoration --- --- Restoration 5.14 1:1 5.14 Restoration of riparian wetlands through stream restoration activities, filling abandoned channels and drain tiles, removing spoil castings, and planting. 0.06 2:1^ 0.03 Wetland Enhancement 1.61 --- Enhancement 1.604 2:1 0.802 Enhancement of existing riparian wetlands by fencing livestock and planting. 0.006 4:1' 0.002 Component Summation Restoration Level Stream (linear footage) Riparian Wetland (acreage) Nonriparian Wetland (acreage) Restoration 3486 5.20 -- Enhancement (Level 1) 832 -- Enhancement (Level II) 1903 1.61 -- Preservation 21,327 -- Totals 27,548 6.81 Mitigation Units 8817 SMUs 5.97 Riparian WMUs 0.00 Nonriparian WMUs * Martin's Creek proper is located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 5:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units. ** UTl (Reach 4) stations 05+91 to 06+35 and 15+75 to 16+75 are located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 2:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units. *** UTI -3 (Reach 2) station 05+90 to 06+10 is located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 2:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units. ^0.06 acres of wetland restoration is located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 2:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units. '0.006 acres of wetland enhancement is located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 4:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units. Martin's Creek II (final) DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) December 2017 Appendices Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site Activity or Deliverable Data Collection Complete Completion or Deliver Mitigation Plan January 2010- July 2010 September 2010 Final Design — Construction Plans September 2010- March 2011 March 2011 Construction -- October 2012 -July 2013 Temporary S&E Mix applied to Entire Project Site -- October 2012 -July 2013 Permanent Seed Mix applied to the Entire Project Site -- October 2012 -July 2013 Bare Root; Containerized; and B&B Plantings for the Entire Project Site -- March 2014 Mitigation Plan/ As -Built (Year 0 Monitoring Baseline) April 2014 April 2014 Invasive Species Treatment -- July 2014 Year 1 Monitoring October 2014 December 2014 Warranty Supplemental Planting -- March 2015 Year 2 Monitoring November 2015 December 2015 Warranty Supplemental Planting -- February 2016 Invasive Species Treatment -- July 2016 Invasive Species Treatment September 2016 Year 3 Monitoring November 2016 December 2016 Year 4 Monitoring November 2017 December 2017 Year 5 Monitoring Martin's Creek II (final) DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) December 2017 Appendices Table 3. Project Contacts Table Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site Designer Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. 797 Haywood Road, Suite 201 Asheville, NC 28806 Micky Clemmons 828-350-1408 Construction Plans and Sediment and Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. Erosion Control Plans 797 Haywood Road, Suite 201 Asheville, NC 28806 Micky Clemmons 828-350-1408 Construction Contractor River Works, Inc. 6105 Chapel Hill Rd. Raleigh, NC 27607 919-582-3574 Planting Contractor Carolina Silvics, Inc. 908 Indian Trail Road Edenton, NC 27932 (252)482-8491 As -built Surveyor Turner Land Surveying. PLLC 3201 Glenridge Drive Raleigh, NC 27604 919-875-1378 Baseline Data Collection Axiom Environmental, Inc. 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, NC 27603 Grant Lewis 919-215-1693 Martin's Creek n (final) DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) December 2017 Appendices Table 4. Project Attribute Table Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site Project County Cherokee County, North Carolina Physiographic Region Blue Ridge Ecoregion Broad Basins Project River Basin Hiwassee USGS HUC for Project (14 digit) 06020002170010 NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project 04-05-02 Planning Area Yes — Peachtree -Martins Creek LWP WRC Class (Warm, Cool, Cold) Cold % of project easement fenced or demarcated 100 Beaver activity observed during design phase? No Right Prong Martin's Creek Martin's Creek RP UTI RP Mainstem MC MC UTI MC UTI -3 MC UT2 MC Mainstem LII Enh Rest LI Enh PI Rest Drainage Area .17 0.6 0.02-0.18 0.07-0.08 0.39 6.81 Stream Order (USGS topo) 1st 3rd 2nd 1 st 1 st T 3rd Restored Length (feet) Perennial or Intermittent I/P I/P P P P P P P Watershed Type Rural Watershed impervious cover <10% NCDWQ AU/Index number 1-49 (Martin's Creek), 1-49-3 (Right Prong Martins Creek) NCDWQ Classification C C I C C C 303d listed? No Upstream of a 303d listed No Reasons for 303d listed segment NA Total acreage of easement 93.87 Total existing vegetated acreage of easement Total planted restoration acreage 17 acres Rosgen Classification of preexisting B B Eb/FbB /G Cb/G Eb/B OF B C Rosgen Classification of As -built B B B/C B/C B C B C Valley type II II VIII VIII VIII Valley slope N/A 0.015-0.05 0.007-0.04 N/A N/A Cowardin classification of proposed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Trout waters designation No Species of concern, endangered etc. No Dominant Soil Series Cullowhee fine sandy loam Thurmont- Dillard Complex Arkaqua loam Dillard loam Arkaqua loam Arkaqua loam Arkaqua loam Martin's Creek II (final) DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) December 2017 Appendices APPENDIX B VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA Figures 2 and 2A -2C. Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV) Tables 5A -5E. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Stream Station Photographs Vegetation Plot Photographs Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices 0 500 1,100 2,100 3,10 Axiom Environmental. Inc. Axiom Environmental 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, NC 27603 (919) 215-1693 CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW MARTINS CREEK II DMS PROJECT # 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Dwn. by. KRJ FIGURE Date: Nov 2017 2A Project: 12-004.16 Axiom Environmental. Inc. Axiom Environmental 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, NC 27603 (919) 215-1693 CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW MARTINS CREEK II (MARTINS CREEK TRIBUTARIES) DMS PROJECT # 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Dwn. by. KRJ FIGURE Date: Nov 2017 2B Project: 12-004.16 Axiom Environmental. Inc. Axiom Environmental 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, NC 27603 (919) 215-1693 CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW MARTINS CREEK II (RIGHT PRONG TRIBUTARIES) DMS PROJECT # 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Dwn. by. KRJ FIGURE 2C Date: Nov 2017 Project: 12-004.16 Table 5A Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Reach ID UT1 Reach 4 Assessed Length 1129 Adjusted % Number Number with Footage with for Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody Category Sub-Cateciory Metric as Intended As -built Segments Foota a as Intended Ve etation Ve etationVe etation 1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units) 1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars) 0 0 100% 2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100% 2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 23 23 100% 3. Meander Pool Condition 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 25 25 100% 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 25 25 100% 4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 25 25 100% 2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide) 25 25 100% 2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion 0 0 100% 100% Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears 2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable 0 0 100% 100% and are providing habitat. 3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 100% Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100% 3. Engineered Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. $ $ ° 100% 2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. $ $ 100% 2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. $ $ 100% 3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) $ $ 100% 4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow. $ $ 100% Table 513 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Reach ID UT1 Reach 3 Assessed Length 337 Adjusted % Number Number with Footage with for Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody Category Sub-Cateciory Metric as Intended As -built Segments Foota a as Intended Ve etation Ve etationVe etation 1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units) 1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars) 0 0 100% 2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100% 2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 10 10 100% 3. Meander Pool Condition 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 10 10 100% 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 10 10 100% 4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 10 10 100% 2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide) 10 10 100% 2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion 0 0 100% 100% Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears 2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable 0 0 100% 100% and are providing habitat. 3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 100% Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100% 3. Engineered Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 4 4 ° 100% 2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 4 4 100% 2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 4 4 100% 3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 4 4 100% 4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow. 4 4 100% Table 5C Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Reach ID UT1-3 Reach 2 Assessed Length 1305 Adjusted % Number Number with Footage with for Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody Category Sub-Cateciory Metric as Intended As -built Segments Foota a as Intended Ve etation Ve etationVe etation 1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units) 1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars) 0 0 100% 2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100% 2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 32 32 100% 3. Meander Pool Condition 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 32 32 100% 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 32 32 100% 4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 32 32 100% 2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide) 32 32 100% 2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion 0 0 100% 100% Banks undercuUoverhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears 2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable 0 0 100% 100% and are providing habitat. 3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 100% Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100% 3. Engineered Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 10 10 ° 100% 2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 10 10 100% 2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 10 10 100% 3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 10 10 100% 4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow. 10 10 100% Table 5D Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Reach ID UT1-3 Reach 1 Assessed Length 495 Adjusted % Number Number with Footage with for Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody Category Sub-Cateciory Metric as Intended As -built Segments Foota a as Intended Ve etation Ve etationVe etation 1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units) 1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars) 0 0 100% 2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100% 2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 16 16 100% 3. Meander Pool Condition 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 22 22 100% 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 22 22 100% 4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 22 22 100% 2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide) 22 22 100% 2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion 0 0 100% 100% Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears 2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable 0 0 100% 100% and are providing habitat. 3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 100% Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100% 3. Engineered Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 21 21 ° 100% 2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 21 21 100% 2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 21 21 100% 3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 21 21 100% 4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow. 21 21 100% Table 5E Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Reach ID UT1 Reach 2 Assessed Length 1051 Adjusted % Number Number with Footage with for Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody Category Sub-Cateciory Metric as Intended As -built Segments Foota a as Intended Ve etation Ve etationVe etation 1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units) 1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars) 0 0 100% 2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100% 2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 55 55 100% 3. Meander Pool Condition 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 55 55 100% 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 55 55 100% 4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 55 55 100% 2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide) 55 55 100% 2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion 0 0 100% 100% Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears 2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable 0 0 100% 100% and are providing habitat. 3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 100% Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100% 3. Engineered Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 57 57 ° 100% 2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 57 57 100% 2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 57 57 100% 3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 57 57 100% 4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow. 57 57 100% Table 6 Veqetation Condition Assessment Martins Creek II Mitigation Project Planted Acreage 17 Vegetation Category Definitions Mapping Threshold CCPV De fiction Number of Pol ons Combined Acrea a % of Planted Acrea e 1. Bare Areas None 0.1 acres none 0 0.00 0.0% 2. Low Stem Density Areas None 0.1 acres none 0 0.00 0.0% 2B. Low Planted Stem Density Areas None 0.1 acres none 0 0.00 0.0% Total 0 0.00 0.0% 3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor None 0.25 acres N/A 0 0.00 0.0% Cumulative Total 0 0.00 0.0% Easement Acreage 93.87 Vegetation Category Definitions Mapping ThresholdDe CCPV fiction Number of Pol ons Combined Acrea a % of Easement Acrea e 4. Invasive Areas of Concern Dense Chinese privet adjacent to UT1 R3, and along the lower reaches of the Right Prong Tributaries 1000 SF Blue Polygon 3 0.23 0.2% 5. Easement Encroachment Areas' None none none 0 0.00 0.0% 1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage, crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort. 2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries. 3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment, the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5. 4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes that are slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors by DMS such as species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the executive summary. Martin's Creek II Fixed Station Photographs Taken August 2017 Photo Point 1 I" I r Photo Point 6 Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices Martin's Creek II Fixed Station Photographs Taken August 2017 (continued) .,w Photo Point 7 X Photo Point 8 Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices Martin's Creek II Fixed Station Photographs Taken August 2017 (continued) Martin's Creek II (final) DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) December 2017 Appendices Martin's Creek II Fixed Station Photographs Taken August 2017 (continued) T .. Photo Point 24 Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices Martin's Creek II Fixed Station Photographs Taken August 2017 (continued) Martin's Creek II (final) DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) December 2017 Appendices Martin's Creek # Vegetation Monitoring Photographs Taken August 2017 Martin's Creke (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. DMS Project Number 9el Cherokee County, NorthCri Monitoring Year4+§Gmg December 2017 Appendices Martin's Creek II Vegetation Monitoring Photographs Taken August 2017 (continued) Martin's Creek 11 (final) DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) December 2017 Appendices Martin's Creek II Vegetation Monitoring Photographs Taken August 2017 (continued) Martin's Creek II (final) DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) December 2017 Appendices APPENDIX C VEGETATION PLOT DATA Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Based on Planted Stems Martin's Creek II Miti!ation Site (DMS Project Number 92633) Vegetation Plot ID Vegetation Survival Threshold Met? Tract Mean 1 Yes 73% 2 Yes 3 No 4 Yes 5 Yes 6 Yes 7 No 8 Yes 9 Yes 10 Yes 11 No 12 Yes 13 Yes 14 Yes 15 No Martin's Creek II (final) DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) December 2017 Appendices Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site (DMS Prosect Number 92633) Report Prepared By Corri Faquin Date Prepared 9/5/2017 9:40 database name Axiom-MartinsII-2017-A-v2.3.l.mdb database location S:\Business\Projects\12\12-004 EEP Monitoring\12-004.16 UT to Martins and Martins\Martins II\2017\CVS computer name PHILLIP-PC file size 47353856 DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------------ Metadata Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data. Pro', planted Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes. Pro', total stems Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems. Plots List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.). Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots. Vigor bSpp Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species. Damage List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each. Damage by Spp Damage values tallied by type for each species. Damage by Plot Damage values tallied by type for each plot. Planted Stems by Plot and Spp A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded. ALL Stems by Plot and spp A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded. PROJECT SUMMARY ------------------------------------- Project Code 92633 project Name Martin's Creek II Description Stream and Wetland Restoration River Basin Hiwassee length(ft) stream -to -edge width (ft) areas m Required Plots (calculated) Sampled Plots 15 Martin's Creek II (final) DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) December 2017 Appendices Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species DMS Project Code 92633. Project Name: Martin's Creek II Color for Density Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes P -all = Planting including livestakes T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes T includes natural recruits Current Plot Data (MY4 2017) Scientific Name Common Name Species Type 92633-01-0001 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0002 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0003 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0004 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0005 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0006 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0007 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0008 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0009 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0010 Pnol-S P -all T Acer rubrum red maple Tree 4 2 Alnus serrulata hazel alder Shrub 1 4 3 3 Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Tree Carya hickory Tree Carya alba mockernut hickory Tree Carya glabra pignut hickory Tree Celtis laevigata sugarberry Tree Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 Crataegus hawthorn Tree Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 3 3 3 Fagus grandifolia American beech Tree Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree Juglans nigra black walnut Tree Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 2 2 2 Malus apple Tree Nyssa tupelo Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 1 1 1 Pinus strobus eastern white pine Tree Pinus taeda loblolly pine Tree Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 4 4 4 5 5 5 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 Quercus oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Quercus alba white oak Tree Quercus coccinea scarlet oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 Quercus nigra water oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 Quercus shumardii Shumard's oak Tree Salix nigra black willow Tree 2 Unknown Shrub or Tree Stem count size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE 9 4 364.2 9 1 0.02 4 364.2 14 6 566.6 9 4 364.2 91 9 1 0.02 4 4 364.2 364.2 51 51 7 1 0.02 3 3 4 202.3 202.3 283.3 8 5 323.7 8 8 1 0.02 5 5 323.7 323.7 8 8 8 1 0.02 5 5 5 323.7 323.7 323.7 10 5 404.7 101 16 1 0.02 5 7 404.7 647.5 5 5 202.3 5 5 1 0.02 5 5 202.3 202.3 15 8 607 15 1 0.02 8 607 16 9 647.5 111 6 445.2 11 1 0.02 6 445.2LdLL 14 11 11 14 1 002 7 566.6 Color for Density Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes P -all = Planting including livestakes T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes T includes natural recruits Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species DMS Project Code 92633. Project Name: Martin's Creek II Current Plot Data (MY4 2017) 1 Annual Means Scientific Name Common Name Species Type 92633-01-0011 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0012 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0013 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0014 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0015 MY4(2017) MY3(2016) MY2(2015) MY1(2014) MY0(2014) Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all IT Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Acer rubrum red maple Tree 6 4 18 4 1 Alnus serrulata hazel alder Shrub 20 7 38 45 71 25 Betula nigra river birch Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 15 15 18 18 18 19 19 19 9 9 9 9 9 9 Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Tree 1 1 7 1 Carya hickory Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 Carya alba mockernut hickory Tree 3 3 3 3 3 3 Carya glabra pignut hickory Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 Celtis laevigata sugarberry Tree 1 Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 Crataegus hawthorn Tree 1 1 Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Fagus grandifolia American beech Tree 5 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 1 Juglans nigra black walnut Tree 3 1 3 41 2 Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1 1 2 1 3 12 12 17 13 13 15 20 20 23 20 20 20 24 24 24 Malus apple Tree 1 Nyssa tupelo Tree 8 8 8 7 7 7 9 9 9 4 4 4 Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 Pinus strobus eastern white pine Tree 4 10 14 3 Pinus taeda loblolly pine Tree 12 Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 3 3 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 35 35 36 38 38 46 39 39 40 27 27 27 27 27 27 Quercus oak Tree 3 3 3 5 5 5 6 6 6 8 8 8 40 40 40 Quercus alba white oak Tree 1 Quercus coccinea scarlet oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 3 3 3 Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 1 1 1 6 6 6 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 Quercus nigra water oak Tree 4 4 4 7 7 7 10 10 10 14 14 14 17 17 17 Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 1 1 1 5 5 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 5 5 5 37 37 37 46 46 46 50 50 50 25 25 25 2 2 2 Quercus shumardii Shumard's oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Salix nigra black willow Tree 2 3 Unknown Shrub or Tree 1 1 2 2 2 Stem count size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE 71 41 283.3 71 1 0.02 41 283.3 10 404.723.7 5El 8 8 8 1 0.02 3 3 323.7 10 6 404.7 10 14 1 0.02 6 8 404.7 566.6 9 4 364.2 9 1 0.02 4 364.2 34 7 1376 7 7 27 132 132 204 153 153 225 170 77 170 281 124 124 162 134 134 142 1 15 15 15 15 15 0.02 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 3 3 6 14 14 22 15 15 19 14 14 21 13 13 19 12 12 15 283.3 283.3 1093 356.1 356.11 550.41 412.81 412.81 6071458.61 458.61 758.1 334.51 334.5 437.11361.51 361.51 383.1 Color for Density Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes P -all = Planting including livestakes T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes T includes natural recruits APPENDIX D STREAM SURVEY DATA Cross-section Plots Longitudinal Profile Plots Substrate Plots Tables lOa-f. Baseline Stream Data Summary Tables l la -f. Monitoring Data Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices Site Martins Creek II Project Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 1, Riffle Reach UT 1-4 Date: 3/7/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan Station Elevation 0.00 95.35 1.53 95.42 2.62 95.20 3.35 94.75 4.24 94.46 4.97 94.34 5.99 94.23 6.73 94.18 7.89 94.19 8.94 94.25 10.03 94.28 11.09 94.38 11.93 94.47 12.69 94.78 13.77 95.16 15.2 95.26 16.1 95.28 17.0 95.20 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 95.2 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 8.1 Bankfull Width: 11.2 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 96.2 Flood Prone Width: 100.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 W / D Ratio: 15.5 Entrenchment Ratio: 8.9 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 97 96 m 0 95 ti W 94 93 Stream Type J E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1-4 XS -1, Station 15+32, Riffle ----------------------------------------------------------- ------- ---- ------------------------------ �. Bankfiill �. Flood Prone Area MY -00 4/1/14 MY -01 9/10/14 MY -02 7/22/15 MY -03 3/23/16 n ] n + MY -04 3/7/17 � Station (feet) Site Elevation Martins Creek II 96.14 2.06 96.06 Project Number: 92633 Date: 3/7/2017 Field Crew: XS ID 5.50 XS - 2, Riffle 5.99 94.96 6.51 Reach 7.65 UT 1-4 8.59 94.61 9.43 94.62 10.26 94.64 11.17 94.64 12.32 94.68 12.95 EL 13.8 95.16 14.6 95.48 15.1 95.64 }4 N 17.3 95.75 .:y r' XS 2 Looking Upstream Stream Typ E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1-4 XS - 2, Station 14+'72, Riffle 97 96 d ----------- ---- ----------------------------- �- 0 • Bankfull �l 95 • Flood Prone Area MY -00 4/1/14 MY -01 9/10/14 MY -02 7/22/15 94 MY -03 3/23/16 0 10 AMY -043/7/17 20 Station (feet) Station Elevation 0.00 96.14 2.06 96.06 3.03 Date: 3/7/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan Station Elevation 0.00 96.14 2.06 96.06 3.03 95.95 3.89 95.71 4.56 95.27 5.50 95.05 5.99 94.96 6.51 94.67 7.65 94.65 8.59 94.61 9.43 94.62 10.26 94.64 11.17 94.64 12.32 94.68 12.95 94.93 13.8 95.16 14.6 95.48 15.1 95.64 16.1 95.74 17.3 95.75 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 95.7 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 8.7 Bankfull Width: 11.4 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 96.8 Flood Prone Width: 100.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.1 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.8 W / D Ratio: 14.9 Entrenchment Ratio: 8.8 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 Site Project Martins Creek II ~y. .• -.i -.. XS ID XS - 3, Riffle Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Fr 5/18/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan 4.29 96.00 5.12 95.84 5.71 95.92 6.65 95.96 7.81 96.06 vl 96.16 9.66 96.55 10.45 96.72 11.12 96.72 1[ XS 3 Looking Upstream Stream Typ E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2 XS - 3, Station 16+54, Riffle 98 97 --------------------------------------------------- 5 o---------- ------------------------ ------ ti - - - • Bankfull W 96 ---•Flood Prone Area MY -00 4/1/14 My -01 9/10/14 MY -02 7/22/15 MY -03 3/23/16 95 0 10 MY -04 5/18/17 Station (feet) Station Elevation Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 3, Riffle Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: 5/18/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan Station Elevation 0.00 96.80 1.33 96.82 2.15 96.64 2.88 96.38 3.60 96.09 4.29 96.00 5.12 95.84 5.71 95.92 6.65 95.96 7.81 96.06 8.65 96.16 9.66 96.55 10.45 96.72 11.12 96.72 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 96.5 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 2.9 Bankfull Width: 6.9 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 97.1 Flood Prone Width: 100.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4 W / D Ratio: 16.4 Entrenchment Ratio: 14.5 Bank Height Ratio: 1.2 Site Martins Creek II Project Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 4, Pool Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: 5/18/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan Station Elevation 0.0 96.8 0.9 96.9 2.1 96.7 2.6 96.6 3.2 95.8 4.0 95.6 4.5 95.4 5.2 95.3 6.2 95.5 7.1 96.0 8.1 96.5 9.2 96.4 10.2 96.6 11.3 97.0 12.3 97.2 12.9 97.1 96 0 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 96.7 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 5.9 Bankfull Width: 8.4 Flood Prone Area Elevation: XS - 4 Station 16+03 Pool NA Flood Prone Width: 98 NA Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.5 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 W / D Ratio: NA Entrenchment Ratio: NA Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 4,f Z - � XS 4 Looking Upstream .ititir. t� ¢• � v Stream Type E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2 XS - 4 Station 16+03 Pool 98 97 m 5 96 0 • Bankfull Flood Prone Area W MY -00 4/1/14 95 MY -01 9/10/14 MY -02 7/22/15 MY -03 3/23/16 94 0 10 MY -04 5/18/17 Station (feet) Site Elevation Martins Creek II 92633 XS ID XS - 5, Riffle Project UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: 5/18/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan 4.51 96.51 5.07 96.40 5.69 96.41 6.46 96.55 7.16 .. 8.30 96.77 8.84 97.14 9.71 97.41 10.83 97.49 12.24 97.51 Js . XS 5 Looking Upstream Stream Typ E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2 XS - 5, Station 14+24, Riffle 99 -------------------------------------------------------- 98 5 - ------------------------- ------- 0 97 ti - - - • Bankfull Flood Prone Area 96 MY -00 4/1/14 MY -01 9/10/14 MY -02 7/22/15 MY -03 3/23/16 95 0 10 MY -04 5/18/17 Station (feet) Station Elevation Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 5, Riffle Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: 5/18/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan Station Elevation 0.00 97.38 1.50 97.51 2.28 97.33 2.98 97.17 3.70 96.82 4.51 96.51 5.07 96.40 5.69 96.41 6.46 96.55 7.16 96.73 8.30 96.77 8.84 97.14 9.71 97.41 10.83 97.49 12.24 97.51 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:Bankfull �V%4 Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: 100.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 W / D Ratio: 13.0 Entrenchment Ratio: 13.9 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 G:' a .h - K.1.�... - 't •..ti r�r. }, u- sf: �.. r.M.."k f XS 6 Looking Upstream ; ;lam 'R Stream Type E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2 99 XS - 6, Station 13+85, Pool 98 97 0 96 - - -- Bankfull • Flood Prone Area MY -00 4/1/14 95 MY-Ol 9/10/14 MY -02 7/22/15 MY -03 3/23/16 94 MY -045/18/17 0 10 20 Station (feet) Site Martins Creek II Project Station Elevation Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 6, Pool Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: 5/18/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan G:' a .h - K.1.�... - 't •..ti r�r. }, u- sf: �.. r.M.."k f XS 6 Looking Upstream ; ;lam 'R Stream Type E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2 99 XS - 6, Station 13+85, Pool 98 97 0 96 - - -- Bankfull • Flood Prone Area MY -00 4/1/14 95 MY-Ol 9/10/14 MY -02 7/22/15 MY -03 3/23/16 94 MY -045/18/17 0 10 20 Station (feet) Site Martins Creek II Project Station Elevation 0.00 97.69 1.55 97.90 2.67 97.87 3.04 97.28 4.20 95.94 4.85 95.49 5.99 95.48 7.58 95.54 8.59 95.97 9.36 96.39 10.56 96.82 11.37 96.87 12.61 96.99 14.22 97.03 16.34 97.37 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 97.0 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 7.9 Bankfull Width: 9.3 Flood Prone Area Elevation: NA Flood Prone Width: NA Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.5 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.8 W / D Ratio: NA Entrenchment Ratio: NA Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 Station Elevation Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 7, Pool Site UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Martins Creek II 5/18/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan 5.25 96.65 6.20 96.84 7.43 97.20 Project 97.91 9.43 98.11 10.82 98.20 12.09 98.22 13.25 T. - •. L - - .'.L�.. '.'1 �J -T. z r• W J y �,�.: � X5 7 Looking Upstream si Stream Typ E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2 XS - 7, Station 10+75, Pool 100 99 98 0 ti 97 � � �. Bankfull �l Flood Prone Area MY-00 4/1/14 96 MY-Ol 9/10/14 MY-02 7/22/15 95 MY-03 3/23/16 0 10 MY-04 5/18/17 Station (feet) Station Elevation Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 7, Pool Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: 5/18/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan Station Elevation -0.10 98.53 1.34 97.80 3.35 98.58 3.89 97.76 4.53 96.94 5.25 96.65 6.20 96.84 7.43 97.20 8.40 97.91 9.43 98.11 10.82 98.20 12.09 98.22 13.25 98.17 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:Bankfull FNA Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: NA Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.6 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 W / D Ratio: NA Entrenchment Ratio: NA Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 Site Elevation Martins Creek II 92633 XS ID XS - 8, Riffle Project UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: •+1.:= Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan 5.16 99.18 5.64 99.14 6.31 99.22 7.11 99.73 8.05 99.87 9.34 100.04 10.65 99.91 .-_ ..�..i .. F... < . - 5. i E y i - r .. ` XS 8 Looking Upstream Stream Typ E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2 XS - 8, Station 09+59, Riffle 101 -----------------------------------------------100 ------------------------------------------------- 100 ------- 0 Bankfull W 99 �. Flood Prone Area MY -00 4/1/14 My-Ol 9/10/14 MY -02 7/22/15 98 MY -03 3/23/16 0 10 MY -04 5/18/17 Station (feet) Station Elevation Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 8, Riffle Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: 5/18/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan Station Elevation 0.20 99.96 1.71 99.97 3.13 99.67 4.07 99.67 4.68 99.40 5.16 99.18 5.64 99.14 6.31 99.22 7.11 99.73 8.05 99.87 9.34 100.04 10.65 99.91 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 99.8 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 1.7 Bankfull Width: 5.3 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 100.5 Flood Prone Width: 100.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: L16.5 Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio: Site Martins Creek II Project Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 9, Pool Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: 5/18/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan Station Elevation -0.30 101.70 1.30 101.66 2.66 101.82 3.44 101.48 4.49 100.04 5.35 99.46 6.16 99.76 7.02 100.36 8.19 100.80 9.61 100.95 11.53 101.05 13.26 101.18 14.32 101.21 1.0 0 100 Bankfull Flood Prone Area SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 101.2 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 5.4 Bankfull Width: 9.5 Flood Prone Area Elevation: XS - 9, Station 08+79, Pool NA Flood Prone Width: 102 NA Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.7 Mean Depth at Bankfull: XS 9 Looking Upstream 0.6 W / D Ratio: Stream Typ NA Entrenchment Ratio: NA Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 yT.. Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2 XS - 9, Station 08+79, Pool 102 101 XS 9 Looking Upstream - Stream Typ E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2 XS - 9, Station 08+79, Pool 102 101 ---------------- -------------------------------- - d 5 0 100 Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY -00 4/1/14 99 MY -01 9/10/14 MY -02 7/22/15 MY033/23/16 98 0 10 MY -04 5/18/17 Station (feet) Site Elevation Martins Creek II 92633 XS ID XS - 10, Pool Reach Project Date: 5/18/2017 Field Crew: .' 5.35 104.97 6.19 104.35 6.70 104.30 7.36 104.64 8.06 105.01 8.79 105.27 9.95 .`y 11.18 105.62 12.60 105.61 fi :r S' �r `r f A }'gr7 :. XS 10 Looking Upstream Stream Type E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2 XS -10, Station 06+59, Pool 106 105 5 0 �. Bankfull �l 104 • Flood Prone Area MY-00 4/1/14 MY-01 9/10/14 MY-02 7/22/15 103 MY-03 3/23/16 0 10 MY-045/18/17 Station (feet) Station Elevation Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 10, Pool Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: 5/18/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan Station Elevation 0.00 105.77 1.11 105.79 2.42 105.63 3.42 105.50 4.46 105.27 5.35 104.97 6.19 104.35 6.70 104.30 7.36 104.64 8.06 105.01 8.79 105.27 9.95 105.64 11.18 105.62 12.60 105.61 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: jVNA Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Deth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 W / D Ratio: NA Entrenchment Ratio: NA Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 Site Martins Creek II Project Number: 92633 XS ID XS -11, Riffle Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 1 Date: 5/18/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan Station Elevation 0.00 113.84 2.17 113.83 3.44 113.80 4.08 113.57 5.01 113.28 6.00 113.34 6.67 113.32 7.28 113.20 7.98 113.16 8.50 113.33 9.48 113.75 11.20 113.98 13.77 114.47 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 113.8 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 2.5 Bankfull Width: 6.4 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 114.4 Flood Prone Width: 25.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: is 0.6 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4 W / D Ratio: 16.4 Entrenchment Ratio: 3.9 Bank Height Ratio: EAU1.0 115 HMj Stream Type E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 1 XS -11, Station 03+86, Riffle Station (feet) ..i1ffC .........I .... Bankfull ... Flood Prone Area MY -00 4/1/14 MY -01 9/10/14 MY -02 7/22/15 MY -03 3/23/16 rn MY -04 5/18/17 Site Elevation Martins Creek II 92633 a,. XS - 12, Riffle Project UT 1- 3, Reach 1 Date: a Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan 5.46 124.40 6.09 124.40 6.62 124.42 7.20 124.38 7.72 ..f r 8.46 124.94 9.20 125.17 10.47 125.53 12.29 125.67 y. - ,. x •. XS 12 Looking Upstream Stream Typ E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 1 XS -12, Station 00+81, Riffle 126 ------------------------------------------- ---------- 5 0 125 ------- ----------------------- ----------------- ti � � �. Bankfiill �l Flood Prone Area MY -00 4/1/14 MY -01 9/10/14 MY -02 7/22/15 124 MY -03 3/23/16 0 10 MY -045/18/17 Station (feet) Station Elevation Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 12, Riffle Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 1 Date: 5/18/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan Station Elevation 0.00 125.11 2.38 124.89 3.23 124.85 4.16 124.57 4.86 124.39 5.46 124.40 6.09 124.40 6.62 124.42 7.20 124.38 7.72 124.74 8.46 124.94 9.20 125.17 10.47 125.53 12.29 125.67 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 124.9 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 1.9 Bankfull Width: 6.2 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 125.4 Flood Prone Width: 14.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.3 W / D Ratio: 20.2 Entrenchment Ratio: 2.3 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 Site Elevation Martins Creek II 92633 XS ID XS - 13, Riffle Project UT 1, Reach 4 Date: 3/7/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan 5.85 98.71 6.39 98.56 7.12 98.50 7.75 98.39 8.41 98.57 9.10 98.74 9.97 99.24 11.35 A. 12.64 99.57 13.53 99.65 . ,....,1 XS 13 Looking Upstream Stream Typ E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4 XS -13, Station 12+38, Riffle 100 ------------------------------------------------------- 5 0 99------------- ------------------------ ----------------- Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY-00 4/1/14 MY-01 9/10/14 MY-02 7/22/15 98 MY-03 3/23/16 0 1() + MY-04 3/7/17 Station (feet) Station Elevation Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 13, Riffle Reach UT 1, Reach 4 Date: 3/7/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan Station Elevation 0.00 99.71 1.48 99.68 2.36 99.48 4.03 98.79 4.84 98.82 5.85 98.71 6.39 98.56 7.12 98.50 7.75 98.39 8.41 98.57 9.10 98.74 9.97 99.24 11.35 99.54 12.64 99.57 13.53 99.65 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 99.0 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 2.2 Bankfull Width: 6.2 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 99.7 Flood Prone Width: 25.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4 W / D Ratio: 17.5 Entrenchment Ratio: 4.0 Bank Height Ratio: 1.7 Site Elevation Martins Creek II 92633 XS ID XS -14, Riffle Project UT 1, Reach 4 Date: 3/7/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan 4.59 99.97 4.90 99.66 5.52 99.66 6.65 99.73 7.46 99.81 8.38 99.85 9.02 99.99 9.49 100.33 10.41 100.49 12.16 100.61 XS 14 Looking Upstream <�,_.... Stream Typ E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4 XS -14, Station 11+37, Riffle 102 ------------------------------------------------------- 101 0 Bankfull �l 100 • Flood Prone Area MY -00 4/1/14 MY -01 9/10/14 MY -02 7/22/15 99 MY -03 3/23/16 0 10 MY -04 3/7/17 Station (feet) Station Elevation Number: 92633 XS ID XS -14, Riffle Reach UT 1, Reach 4 Date: 3/7/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan Station Elevation 0.00 101.15 1.13 101.05 2.31 100.72 3.24 100.46 4.12 100.26 4.59 99.97 4.90 99.66 5.52 99.66 6.65 99.73 7.46 99.81 8.38 99.85 9.02 99.99 9.49 100.33 10.41 100.49 12.16 100.61 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 100.4 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 3.2 Bankfull Width: 6.5 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 101.2 Flood Prone Width: 25.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: 4 j38 Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio: Site Elevation Martins Creek II 92633 XS ID XS -15, Pool Project UT 1, Reach 4 Date: 3/7/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan 4.13 100.72 4.47 l�Of 4.99 100.19 5.78 100.16 6.34 99.87 6.87 100.12 7.40 100.27 7.84 100.46 8.68 100.55 9.47 100.65 10.56 i' .... 11.29 101.03 12.12 100.89 13.46 100.90 14.76 100.91 15.67 101.02 16.81 101.04 402 �.•, .5•. ••,.k Ea SKdS: .�. •. f�� ''1Y r' i>. XS 15 Looking Upstream' e •. .•: Stream Ty E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4 XS -15, Station 10+21, Pool 102 101 d 5 0 100 Bankfull Flood Prone Area 99 MY-00 4/1/14 MY-01 9/10/14 MY-02 7/22/15 98 MY-03 3/23/16 0 10 AMY-043/7/17 20 Station (feet) Station Elevation Number: 92633 XS ID XS -15, Pool Reach UT 1, Reach 4 Date: 3/7/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan Station Elevation 0.30 100.97 1.64 101.29 1.66 101.28 2.75 101.18 3.49 101.12 4.13 100.72 4.47 100.35 4.99 100.19 5.78 100.16 6.34 99.87 6.87 100.12 7.40 100.27 7.84 100.46 8.68 100.55 9.47 100.65 10.56 100.85 11.29 101.03 12.12 100.89 13.46 100.90 14.76 100.91 15.67 101.02 16.81 101.04 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 101.0 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 4.9 Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevafion:Flood EJUNA Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: INA Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio: Site Elevation Martins Creek II 92633 ' IT Project UT 1, Reach 4 Date: f Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan 4.88 100.88 5.43 100.79 6.29 100.76 6.80 100.88 7.58 101.04 8.17 101.19 8.44 101.45 9.05 s.l 9.52 101.91 10.45 102.01 11.0 102.12 r• 102.06 12.7 102.02 l `. C. XS 16 Looking Upstream ' Stream Typ E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4 XS -16, Station 09+53, Riffle 103 102 ONT 0 Bankfull�l 101 � � � •Flood Prone Area MY-00 4/1/14 MY-01 9/10/14 MY-02 7/22/15 MY-03 3/23/16 ]00 0 10 MY-04 3/7/17 Station (feet) Station Elevation Number: 92633 XS ID XS -16, Riffle Reach UT 1, Reach 4 Date: 3/7/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan Station Elevation 0.00 102.01 2.48 101.77 3.18 101.53 3.60 101.11 4.37 100.90 4.88 100.88 5.43 100.79 6.29 100.76 6.80 100.88 7.58 101.04 8.17 101.19 8.44 101.45 9.05 101.64 9.52 101.91 10.45 102.01 11.0 102.12 11.8 102.06 12.7 102.02 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 101.8 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 4.7 Bankfull Width: 7.2 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 102.8 Flood Prone Width: 25.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 W / D Ratio: 11.0 Entrenchment Ratio: 3.5 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 Site Elevation Martins Creek II 92633 XS ID XS -17, Pool Project UT 1, Reach 4 Date: 3/7/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan 4.02 105.70 4.59 105.47 5.15 105.04 5.80 104.91 6.69 104.80 7.34 104.71 8.08 104.60 8.95 104.43 9.36 104.23 9.84 104.10 10.04 104.09 10.70 103.76 11.11 103.91 11.87 104.42 r 106.08 12.65 106.41 13.50 106.40 14.32 106.54 15.22 106.54 �t �.. ,. XS 17 Looking Upstream Stream Typ E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4 XS -17, Station 07+41, Pool 107 106 d 105 0 d104 ---•Bankrntl �l • Flood Prone Area MY -00 4/1/14 103 MY -019/10/14 MY -02 7/22/15 102 MY -03 3/23/16 0 10 MY -04 3/7/17 Station (feet) Station Elevation Number: 92633 XS ID XS -17, Pool Reach UT 1, Reach 4 Date: 3/7/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan Station Elevation 0.00 105.96 1.26 105.95 2.10 105.94 2.80 105.76 3.40 105.70 4.02 105.70 4.59 105.47 5.15 105.04 5.80 104.91 6.69 104.80 7.34 104.71 8.08 104.60 8.95 104.43 9.36 104.23 9.84 104.10 10.04 104.09 10.70 103.76 11.11 103.91 11.87 104.42 12.23 106.08 12.65 106.41 13.50 106.40 14.32 106.54 15.22 106.54 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Deth at Bankfull: [IjNA Mean Deth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio: Site Martins Creek II Project Number: 92633 XS ID XS -18, Riffle Reach MC UT 1, Reach 2 Date: 3/7/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan Station Elevation 0.00 75.52 1.68 75.45 2.71 75.44 3.78 75.04 4.67 74.77 5.47 74.50 6.08 74.50 6.97 74.37 7.73 74.46 8.38 74.33 9.13 74.50 9.60 74.59 9.99 74.84 10.63 75.01 11.00 75.19 12.1 75.38 13.7 75.47 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 75.2 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: OW_4.5 Bankfull Width: 8.0 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 76.1 Flood Prone Width: 25.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 W / D Ratio: 14.2 Entrenchment Ratio: 3.1 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 77 W 75 74 Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach MC UT 1 Reach 2 XS -18, Station 08+74, Riffle \.. Station (feet) Flood Prone Area MY -00 4/1/14 MY -01 9/10/14 MY -02 7/22/15 MY -03 3/23/16 n MY -04 3/7/17 Site Martins Creek II Project Number: 92633 XS ID XS -19, Riffle Reach MC UT 1, Reach 2 Date: 3/7/2017 Field Crew: Perkinson, Jernigan Station Elevation 0.00 102.55 1.77 102.67 2.68 102.67 3.43 102.29 3.92 102.07 4.40 102.06 4.87 101.41 5.01 101.07 5.46 101.06 6.15 101.09 6.55 101.13 7.01 101.24 7.37 101.46 7.73 101.48 8.18 101.57 8.7 101.71 9.3 101.99 9.7 102.23 10.3 102.18 10.6 102.65 11.6 103.07 12.1 103.24 12.8 103.24 13.7 103.33 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 102.5 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 6.2 Bankfull Width: 7.5 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 103.9 Flood Prone Width: 25.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.4 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.8 W / D Ratio: 9.1 Entrenchment Ratio: 3.3 Bank Height Ratio: 1.1 XS 19 Looking Upstream Stream Typ E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach MC UT 1 Reach 2 XS -19, Station 04+37, Riffle 105 104 -------------------------------------------------------------- d 103 o--------------------------------------------- Bankfull ,� 102 - �l • Flood Prone Area MY -00 4/1/14 101 MY -01 9/10/14 MY -02 7/22/15 MY -03 3/23/16 ]00 0 10 MY -04 3/7/17 Station (feet) Project Name Martins Creek II Reach UT 1 - 3 Reach 1 and 2, Station 00+00 - 10+00 Project Number 92633 Date 5/18/17 Station 2014 Year 0 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station 2014 Year 1 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station 2015 Year 2 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station 2016 Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station 2017 Year 4 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation 996.5 98.7 99.1 1016.0 98.2 98.3 1016.9 98.2 98.5 1001.5 98.6 99.2 1021.5 97.6 98.3 990.2 97.9 99.1 996.9 98.6 99.0 992.6 98.4 99.1 992.5 97.6 99.2 996.5 98.6 99.1 983.6 97.5 99.1 991.3 97.7 99.0 990.2 97.4 99.2 985.0 97.3 99.3 992.0 97.6 99.1 977.2 98.1 99.1 980.6 97.9 99.0 979.8 97.7 99.2 977.9 98.8 99.4 984.2 97.7 99.1 972.7 99.1 99.4 973.8 99.1 99.4 976.9 98.9 99.4 956.9 99.6 100.2 978.6 98.7 99.1 958.7 99.2 99.7 952.9 99.6 100.0 954.7 99.4 100.1 952.1 98.6 100.2 956.5 99.5 100.0 952.1 99.6 100.0 949.0 99.0 100.0 951.8 98.8 100.1 945.2 98.8 100.2 953.5 98.4 100.0 948.5 98.7 100.0 942.2 98.7 100.0 943.5 98.7 100.1 941.4 99.7 100.3 946.8 98.5 100.1 944.4 98.6 100.0 941.0 99.5 100.0 941.6 99.5 100.1 926.5 99.9 100.6 941.4 99.7 100.1 941.0 98.6 100.0 922.8 99.8 100.4 925.3 99.9 100.4 923.3 99.0 100.6 927.3 100.0 100.4 937.6 99.7 100.0 919.3 98.7 100.3 921.4 99.0 100.5 920.1 98.9 100.6 922.8 99.2 100.4 921.8 100.2 100.4 917.1 98.9 100.3 917.1 98.7 100.4 915.6 100.0 100.6 918.6 99.1 100.4 919.2 99.3 100.4 913.2 100.0 100.3 914.0 100.0 101.2 895.4 100.7 101.3 915.3 100.1 100.5 914.8 99.2 100.3 890.4 100.7 101.1 889.8 100.4 101.3 887.1 99.2 101.4 891.8 100.6 101.2 911.0 100.1 100.5 884.2 99.8 101.1 886.8 99.7 101.3 877.6 99.7 101.3 886.9 99.6 101.2 889.7 100.7 101.1 877.4 99.4 101.2 875.5 99.7 101.3 870.3 100.3 101.4 876.6 99.8 101.2 882.6 99.7 101.2 867.7 100.2 101.1 869.0 100.2 101.3 848.3 101.2 102.1 872.0 100.4 101.2 876.7 99.3 101.2 863.0 101.0 101.2 845.9 101.1 102.1 842.8 100.3 102.2 844.2 101.3 101.9 867.3 100.1 101.2 846.9 101.5 101.9 835.2 100.0 102.1 834.9 99.3 102.1 840.9 100.2 101.9 861.5 100.7 101.3 839.9 100.8 101.9 832.5 100.4 102.1 830.1 101.4 102.2 835.7 100.0 101.9 846.0 101.4 101.8 830.6 99.7 102.0 828.3 101.4 102.1 802.5 102.3 103.0 831.4 101.3 102.0 839.0 100.2 101.8 825.8 101.4 102.0 799.1 102.3 103.1 797.4 101.6 103.1 803.0 102.4 102.8 829.8 100.4 101.8 797.2 102.3 102.8 795.5 101.6 103.1 785.9 101.5 103.2 797.0 101.6 102.8 824.9 101.5 101.9 791.6 101.8 102.9 779.4 101.5 103.1 776.8 100.7 103.3 785.3 101.6 102.9 814.6 102.0 102.4 776.1 101.5 102.9 775.9 101.9 103.2 771.4 102.2 103.3 777.5 102.1 102.9 796.9 102.4 102.9 771.2 102.7 103.0 755.2 102.8 103.4 748.7 102.7 103.6 755.5 102.7 103.1 792.1 101.8 102.9 743.5 102.8 103.5 722.0 103.8 104.3 744.4 101.6 103.6 749.2 103.0 103.3 130 125 Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633 Year 4 (2017) Profile - UT 1-3 Reach 1 and 2, Station 00+00 to 10+00 105 100 95 0 100 -Year 0 (2014) Bed 200 -Year 1(2014) Bed 300 400 -Year 2 (2015) Bed 500 Distance (feet) -Year 3 (2016) Bed 600 -A-Year 4 (2017) Bed 700 800 -0-Year 4 (2017) Water Surface --i-TOB 900 1000 2014 2014 2015 2016 2017 Avg. Water Surface Slope 0.0161 0.0162 0.0174 0.0170 0.0166 Riffle Length 20 20 22 19 21 Avg. Riffle Slope 0.0185 0.0209 0.0163 0.0197 0.0142 Pool Length 14 16 13 16 15 Pool to Pool Spacing 34 34 35 33 33 105 100 95 0 100 -Year 0 (2014) Bed 200 -Year 1(2014) Bed 300 400 -Year 2 (2015) Bed 500 Distance (feet) -Year 3 (2016) Bed 600 -A-Year 4 (2017) Bed 700 800 -0-Year 4 (2017) Water Surface --i-TOB 900 1000 J."11 uwc iviasu -..0 Reach UT 1 - 3 Reach 2, Station 10+00 - 20+00 Project Number 92633 Date 5/18/17 Station 2014 Year 0 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station 2014 Year 1 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station 2015 Year 2 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station 2016 Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station 2017 Year 4 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation 1855.8 95.4 95.9 1856.9 94.6 95.7 1829.0 95.1 96.0 1844.9 95.2 95.9 1852.4 94.6 95.8 1852.5 94.6 95.8 1853.2 94.5 95.7 1791.8 95.5 96.0 1843.2 95.2 95.9 1847.9 95.4 95.8 1848.3 94.5 95.9 1850.5 95.3 95.8 1784.6 95.0 96.0 1839.7 94.6 95.9 1805.3 95.4 95.8 1844.3 95.3 95.9 1828.7 95.1 95.7 1766.2 95.0 96.1 1835.7 94.3 95.9 1796.8 95.0 95.8 1841.9 94.9 95.9 1806.0 95.5 95.8 1761.4 95.4 96.1 1829.5 95.1 95.9 1785.4 94.9 95.8 1834.0 94.4 95.8 1797.1 95.0 95.8 1736.6 95.5 96.1 1799.4 95.3 95.9 1775.6 95.5 95.8 1830.6 95.1 95.9 1784.6 95.0 95.8 1732.7 94.9 96.1 1789.2 94.6 96.0 1749.7 95.6 95.9 1814.5 95.4 96.0 1775.5 95.6 95.8 1722.3 94.7 96.1 1778.8 94.8 96.0 1744.4 94.1 95.9 1799.6 95.4 95.9 1752.2 95.6 95.9 1719.2 95.6 96.1 1772.3 95.4 96.0 1736.7 94.4 95.9 1794.8 95.2 96.0 1746.3 94.1 95.9 1682.4 95.8 96.3 1747.1 95.5 96.1 1730.7 95.5 95.9 1784.4 94.9 96.0 1738.4 94.2 95.9 1674.4 95.1 96.3 1741.3 94.0 96.1 1695.4 95.8 96.1 1777.9 95.1 96.0 1731.8 95.6 95.9 1665.0 95.0 96.3 1734.4 93.7 96.0 1687.5 95.4 96.1 1770.2 95.6 96.0 1694.6 95.8 96.1 1660.4 95.6 96.3 1727.7 95.4 96.1 1680.2 95.0 96.1 1746.1 95.6 96.0 1688.2 95.3 96.1 1634.7 95.8 96.3 1712.4 95.5 96.2 1670.9 95.6 96.0 1741.1 93.9 96.0 1681.4 95.0 96.2 1633.5 94.7 96.4 1690.1 95.7 96.3 1646.5 95.7 96.1 1732.1 94.5 96.1 1673.0 95.6 96.1 1623.5 94.9 96.3 1684.1 95.2 96.3 1641.8 94.8 96.1 1726.8 95.5 96.0 1646.9 95.9 96.1 1622.6 95.8 96.3 1674.8 94.7 96.2 1635.0 94.7 96.1 1690.1 95.8 96.2 1644.5 94.0 96.2 1599.6 95.9 96.4 1668.4 95.6 96.3 1632.5 95.8 96.1 1684.6 95.4 96.2 1641.4 94.7 96.1 1595.8 94.8 96.4 1643.4 95.7 96.3 1608.0 95.9 96.3 1673.3 95.1 96.2 1635.7 95.8 96.1 1588.4 95.3 96.4 1641.7 94.7 96.3 1605.2 94.9 96.3 1669.0 95.7 96.2 1610.2 96.0 96.3 1583.4 95.9 96.4 1634.2 94.8 96.3 1596.6 94.7 96.2 1656.8 95.9 96.2 1608.3 94.6 96.4 1557.9 95.9 96.6 1629.6 95.9 96.3 1592.4 95.9 96.3 1643.3 95.9 96.3 1599.6 95.1 96.3 1552.4 95.2 96.6 1609.2 95.9 96.4 1567.5 95.9 96.3 1641.8 94.6 96.3 1596.1 96.0 96.3 1542.8 95.2 96.6 1603.4 94.8 96.4 1561.8 95.1 96.4 1634.6 94.5 96.3 1570.6 96.0 96.5 1538.4 95.8 96.6 1597.3 95.0 96.4 1554.2 95.0 96.4 1630.6 95.8 96.3 1563.3 95.0 96.5 1507.0 96.1 97.0 1591.7 95.9 96.4 1547.8 95.9 96.4 1606.4 96.0 96.4 1556.6 94.7 96.5 1501.9 95.3 96.9 1566.1 96.1 96.6 1516.8 96.3 96.9 1604-7 94-9 96-4 1547-2 96-1 96-5 1485-2 95-7 26,9 1558.7 94.7 96.6 1509.9 95.6 96.9 103 102 101 Z 100 m 99 v w 98 c 0 > 97 v W 96 95 94 Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633 Year 4 (2017) Profile - UT 1-3 Reach 2, Station 10+00 to 20+00 93 ' I i I I d i 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 Distance (feet) -Year 0 (2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed -Year 2 (2015) Bed -Year 3 (2016) Bed ->w Year 4 (2017) Bed -4-Year 4 (2017) Water Surface +TOB 2014 2014 2015 2016 2017 Avg. Water Surface Slope 0.0161 0.0162 0.0174 0.0170 0.0166 Riffle Length 20 20 22 19 21 Avg. Riffle Slope 0.0185 0.0209 0.0163 0.0197 0.0142 Pool Length 14 16 13 16 15 Pool to Pool Spacing 34 34 35 33 33 93 ' I i I I d i 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 Distance (feet) -Year 0 (2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed -Year 2 (2015) Bed -Year 3 (2016) Bed ->w Year 4 (2017) Bed -4-Year 4 (2017) Water Surface +TOB Reach MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 00+00 - 06+00 Project Number 92633 Date 5/18/17 2014 Year 0 Monitoring \Survey Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation 603.4 90.7 91.5 601.2 92.0 92.2 583.1 92.7 92.9 575.4 92.8 93.0 573.4 92.1 93.0 570.9 92.3 93.0 569.9 93.7 93.8 556.2 94.0 94.3 544.5 94.8 95.0 539.5 94.1 95.0 537.3 95.2 95.3 525.6 95.9 96.2 517.2 96.1 96.3 514.1 95.6 96.3 510.6 95.6 96.3 507.6 96.7 97.1 495.4 97.8 98.0 478.4 98.7 99.0 476.3 97.8 99.0 473.4 97.7 99.0 472.2 99.6 99.7 462.6 99.9 100.1 460.0 99.4 100.1 457.1 99.2 100.1 455.9 100.3 100.4 445.4 100.6 100.9 443.4 100.1 100.9 130 125 120 Z :n 115 m d w 110 c 0 v 105 W 100 95 90 + 0 100 -Year 0 (2014) Bed Station 2014 Station 2016 Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Year 1 Monitoring \Survey 2017 Year 4 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevatior Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation 603.8 91.2 90.4 600.7 90.5 90.1 597.8 92.0 92.7 582.4 92.2 90.0 572.9 92.7 92.0 570.7 91.9 92.1 568.5 91.9 92.1 566.6 93.5 91.8 540.0 94.7 92.3 536.8 93.9 91.6 534.7 95.2 91.7 523.2 95.8 93.6 514.2 96.0 91.4 511.5 95.7 96.1 508.4 95.5 96.1 505.3 96.8 92.2 493.9 97.6 97.7 477.0 98.7 94.0 473.3 97.6 98.8 470.9 97.5 98.8 469.7 99.4 95.2 459.3 99.6 92.3 456.5 99.1 99.6 454.5 99.0 99.6 453.8 100.2 92.2 443.5 100.6 92.1 441.4 100.0 100.7 100 -Year 0 (2014) Bed Station 2015 Year 2 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station 2016 Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station 2017 Year 4 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevatior 600.5 92.0 92.0 607.3 90.4 91.2 601.1 90.1 91.2 575.8 92.7 93.1 602.0 90.0 91.2 600.3 92.0 92.1 572.8 92.1 93.1 600.2 92.1 92.2 593.1 91.8 92.1 569.7 92.3 93.0 592.6 91.6 92.2 591.3 91.7 92.2 568.7 93.6 93.7 588.4 91.4 92.2 587.5 91.5 92.2 541.7 94.6 94.9 586.1 92.2 92.5 585.4 92.1 92.3 538.1 94.0 94.9 579.5 93.0 93.3 577.9 92.9 93.2 536.0 95.2 95.3 575.4 92.3 93.3 574.6 92.3 93.3 523.2 95.9 96.2 571.6 92.2 93.3 571.2 92.1 93.2 515.5 96.0 96.2 570.4 93.6 93.8 569.9 93.6 93.7 512.6 95.5 96.2 565.4 93.9 94.0 562.1 93.5 94.0 509.3 95.4 96.2 564.3 93.4 94.0 560.0 93.2 93.9 507.6 97.0 96.9 557.9 93.1 94.0 556.5 93.2 93.9 495.3 97.8 97.9 555.7 93.9 94.1 554.2 94.0 94.1 477.2 98.6 98.9 546.7 94.6 94.9 545.4 94.5 94.9 472.7 97.3 98.9 543.4 94.0 94.9 541.4 94.0 94.8 471.3 99.5 99.5 539.5 93.9 94.9 537.7 94.0 94.9 461.4 99.7 100.0 537.1 95.2 95.4 536.5 95.1 95.2 458.2 99.4 100.0 530.0 95.3 95.6 528.3 95.0 95.5 455.7 100.3 100.3 527.8 94.8 95.7 525.9 94.8 95.5 440.9 101.1 101.2 523.8 94.9 95.7 523.5 94.8 95.5 429.7 101.4 101.8 521.7 95.6 95.8 518.6 95.8 96.1 427.0 100.9 101.8 516.2 95.8 96.2 515.2 95.8 96.1 425.3 102.2 102.2 515.0 95.6 96.2 513.4 95.5 96.2 409.3 102.5 102.8 510.9 95.5 96.2 509.8 95.6 96.3 404.3 101.5 102.8 508.0 96.7 97.1 507.4 96.7 96.9 400.6 103.5 103.6 503.6 96.6 97.1 502.2 96.8 97.0 381.5 103.9 104.2 _500.9 96.2 97.1 5002 962 97.0 Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633 Year 4 (2017) Profile - MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 00+00 to 06+00 200 -Year 1(2014) Bed -Year 2 (2015) Bed 300 Distance (feet) -Year 3 (2016) Bed 0 c 0 d N N 0 U 400 NA* No water in channel during field surveys -#o-Year 4 (2017) Bed -40--Year 4 (2017) Water Surface 500 --w-TOB 600 2014 2014 2015 2016 2017 Avg. Water Surface Slope 0.0577 NA* 0.0582 0.0578 0.0576 Riffle Length 19 16 17 13 13 Avg. Riffle Slope 0.0457 NA* 0.0447 0.0386 0.0406 Pool Length 6 6 6 8 7 Pool to Pool Spacing 25 22 24 21 19 NA* No water in channel during field surveys -#o-Year 4 (2017) Bed -40--Year 4 (2017) Water Surface 500 --w-TOB 600 Reach MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 06+00 - 12+00 Project Number 92633 Date 5/18/17 2014 Year 0 Monitoring \Survey Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation 1170.7 58.4 58.5 1137.5 59.4 59.6 1134.1 58.7 59.5 1132.5 60.4 60.5 1119.6 60.3 60.6 1116.2 61.8 61.8 1099.7 61.8 62.1 1081.3 62.3 62.4 1077.3 62.2 62.5 1074.5 62.7 62.9 1064.6 63.4 63.3 1049.9 64.3 64.5 1047.7 63.9 64.5 1041.2 63.9 64.5 1040.6 64.8 64.9 1031.8 65.0 65.4 1030.0 65.0 65.4 1026.5 65.0 65.4 1025.8 65.8 65.8 1017.7 65.8 66.0 1013.8 66.0 66.2 1012.6 65.7 66.2 1011.0 66.5 66.7 984.7 67.6 67.9 980.6 67.2 67.9 978.9 68.5 68.7 967.1 69.2 69.4 95 90 85 m 80 m v w 75 c 0 n a, 70 W 65 60 55 - 600 700 -Year 0 (2014) Bed 2014 2014 2016 Year 1 Monitoring \Survey 2017 Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation 1169.9 58.4 58.4 1153.8 58.8 58.9 1138.0 59.2 59.3 1135.4 58.8 59.3 1133.5 58.7 59.3 1132.4 60.4 57.7 58.0 1124.3 60.2 58.8 1122.3 60.0 58.6 1118.7 60.3 1144.7 1115.6 61.7 1153.0 1091.2 62.0 1134.6 1079.4 62.3 59.5 1077.1 62.0 59.3 1075.5 61.9 58.7 59.4 1074.1 62.6 59.5 1068.2 62.8 59.5 1066.6 62.6 1131.3 1064.6 62.6 1132.9 1063.6 63.2 1122.9 1053.6 63.9 60.2 1048.0 64.2 60.4 1044.7 63.7 60.1 1039.2 63.8 60.7 1038.1 64.9 60.4 1027.3 65.1 1118.1 1024.5 64.7 1120.7 1023.8 65.7 1114.0 10170 661 61.7 700 -Year 0 (2014) Bed Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633 Year 4 (2017) Profile - MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 06+00 to 12+00 800 -Year 1(2014) Bed -Year 2 (2015) Bed c 0 900 Distance (feet) -Year 3 (2016) Bed -w-Year 4 (2017) Bed 1000 2015 2014 2016 2016 2017 2017 0.0577 NA* Year 2 Monitoring \Survey 0.0578 Year 3 Monitoring \Survey 19 Year 4 Monitoring \Survey Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevatior 1175.6 57.7 58.0 1168.6 58.6 58.8 1169.4 58.5 58.6 1167.4 58.5 1144.7 59.4 59.5 1153.0 58.9 59.1 1134.6 59.5 1135.7 59.5 59.5 1142.5 59.3 59.5 1131.7 58.7 59.4 1133.3 58.7 59.5 1137.9 59.0 59.5 1130.6 60.5 1131.3 60.5 60.6 1132.9 58.9 59.5 1122.9 60.4 1124.3 60.2 60.7 1131.6 60.4 1120.3 60.1 1122.0 59.8 60.7 1122.5 60.2 60.4 1117.4 60.1 1118.1 59.8 60.7 1120.7 59.7 60.5 1114.0 61.7 1114.8 61.7 61.7 1117.8 59.8 60.5 1094.3 61.9 1098.6 62.0 62.1 1114.0 61.6 61.7 1077.2 62.3 1082.9 62.6 62.9 1097.1 61.8 62.1 1074.4 62.1 1078.4 62.3 62.9 1079.1 62.5 62.9 1072.2 62.6 1074.5 62.1 62.9 1076.1 62.1 62.9 1066.1 62.8 1073.5 62.7 62.9 1074.7 62.1 62.9 1063.5 62.7 1062.9 63.3 63.4 1073.2 62.7 62.9 1061.7 63.3 1054.5 63.6 63.8 1058.1 63.4 63.6 1052.3 63.9 1053.1 63.4 63.8 1043.1 63.8 63.9 1046.0 64.3 1047.0 63.3 63.8 1040.1 63.9 64.0 1042.4 63.9 1040.0 63.8 64.1 1038.1 64.8 64.9 1038.1 63.9 1038.4 64.9 64.9 1026.2 65.1 65.4 1036.8 64.7 1028.5 65.3 65.5 1024.1 64.8 65.4 1025.7 65.2 1023.6 65.7 65.8 1023.2 65.7 65.8 1022.9 64.8 1018.8 65.6 65.8 1018.0 65.4 65.8 1022.3 65.8 1015.3 64.9 65.8 1015.2 64.9 65.8 1014.1 66.0 1010.8 65.1 65.8 1010.8 65.1 65.8 1010.2 65.4 1009.4 66.4 66.6 1008.5 66.4 66.5 1007.8 66.3 996.5 67.0 67.1 999.0 66.6 66.8 9R9 R 674 _983.8 6Z7 67.9 9R3 0 677 67 R Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633 Year 4 (2017) Profile - MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 06+00 to 12+00 800 -Year 1(2014) Bed -Year 2 (2015) Bed c 0 900 Distance (feet) -Year 3 (2016) Bed -w-Year 4 (2017) Bed 1000 NA" No water in channel during field surveys -0-Year 4 (2017) Water Surface 1100 --w-TOB 1200 2014 2014 2015 2016 2017 Avg. Water Surface Slope 0.0577 NA* 0.0582 0.0578 0.0576 Riffle Length 19 16 17 13 13 Avg. Riffle Slope 0.0457 NA" 0.0447 0.0386 0.0406 Pool Length 6 6 6 8 7 Pool to Pool Spacing 25.0 22 24 21 19 NA" No water in channel during field surveys -0-Year 4 (2017) Water Surface 1100 --w-TOB 1200 Project Name Martins Creek II Reach UT 1 Reach 3, Station 00+00 - 03+50 Project Number 92633 Date 5/18/17 Station 336.4 323.6 320.5 317.3 311.2 299.7 295.8 292.0 288.2 284.7 265.6 255.6 245.2 239.5 235.9 229.6 227.0 222.6 216.1 205.3 202.6 199.9 195.5 182.7 168.2 153.0 151.3 104 102 94 92 90 0 2014 Year 0 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station 2014 Year 1 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station 2015 Year 2 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation 2017 Station 2016 Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station 2017 Year 4 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation 91.4 91.5 339.1 91.4 91.5 335.5 91.6 91.7 341.7 91.8 91.9 341.7 91.8 91.9 91.8 92.1 326.0 91.7 92.0 313.4 92.1 92.5 337.1 91.1 91.9 330.2 91.6 91.9 90.9 92.1 322.7 91.0 92.0 294.4 92.6 93.0 325.9 91.2 91.9 326.5 91.3 91.9 91.2 92.0 320.3 91.7 92.0 291.9 92.5 93.0 313.0 91.2 91.9 320.9 91.4 91.9 92.2 92.6 299.9 92.5 92.8 286.5 92.5 93.0 311.6 91.9 92.2 312.1 91.7 92.0 92.5 92.8 296.9 92.4 92.8 282.3 93.0 93.3 304.9 92.4 92.7 303.4 92.5 92.7 92.5 92.9 292.0 92.3 92.8 261.5 93.7 94.0 303.2 92.1 92.7 294.2 92.8 93.0 92.3 92.8 286.9 92.7 93.0 254.1 93.3 94.0 300.5 92.3 92.7 291.8 92.4 93.1 92.3 92.8 268.6 93.6 93.8 245.7 93.5 94.0 298.0 92.6 93.0 288.4 92.7 93.1 92.8 93.1 262.1 93.4 93.8 239.6 93.3 94.0 295.4 92.5 93.0 282.3 93.3 93.6 93.6 93.8 254.3 93.3 93.8 237.7 94.4 94.8 287.4 92.7 93.3 266.4 94.0 94.3 93.3 93.8 245.8 93.3 93.8 225.0 94.9 95.2 285.4 93.2 93.5 260.4 93.6 94.3 93.3 93.8 241.3 92.8 93.8 203.2 95.7 96.0 274.9 93.6 93.8 248.4 93.8 94.3 93.1 93.8 236.7 94.4 94.7 200.0 95.6 96.0 266.0 93.9 94.2 242.6 93.2 94.3 94.2 94.9 229.6 94.8 95.0 195.9 95.6 96.1 261.9 93.5 94.2 240.0 94.3 94.4 94.8 95.3 225.4 94.5 95.1 193.5 96.0 96.3 254.1 93.4 94.3 237.4 93.8 94.4 94.6 95.3 222.1 94.9 95.1 183.1 96.1 96.5 244.4 93.3 94.3 235.6 94.1 94.6 94.6 95.3 203.3 95.5 95.7 179.2 96.0 96.5 239.1 93.3 94.3 228.3 94.6 95.0 95.0 95.3 191.6 96.0 96.2 175.3 95.9 96.5 237.6 94.4 94.6 210.1 95.4 95.7 95.4 95.8 188.0 95.7 96.3 169.2 96.6 96.9 227.1 94.9 95.3 192.3 96.7 97.0 95.3 95.8 179.6 95.7 96.3 152.5 96.8 97.3 224.4 94.6 95.3 187.1 96.0 97.0 95.3 95.8 173.6 96.2 96.4 149.7 96.7 97.3 219.7 94.6 95.2 179.7 96.1 96.9 95.7 96.0 152.1 96.8 97.1 141.6 96.9 97.3 216.1 95.4 95.6 173.9 96.2 97.0 95.9 96.3 147.3 96.7 97.1 138.7 97.7 97.7 207.3 95.9 96.2 166.6 96.6 97.0 96.5 96.8 144.2 96.9 97.1 135.0 97.6 97.8 204.7 95.7 96.2 148.8 97.0 97.4 96.8 97.0 135.3 97.5 97.8 133.2 97.2 97.8 200.5 95.7 96.2 146.0 97.0 97.4 96.4 97.0 132.9 97.0 97.8 126.4 97.3 97.8 198.6 96.4 96.7 143.1 96.8 97.4 965 970 1799 971 977 173 5 977 9R 0 192.8 969 979- 141 0 971 974 Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633 Year 4 (2017) Profile - UT 1 Reach 3, Station 00+00 to 03+50 50 100 -Year 0 (2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed -Year 2 (2015) Bed 150 200 250 300 Distance (feet) -Year 3 (2016) Bed -w -Year 4 (2017) Bed -0-Year 4 (2017) Water Surface +TOB 350 2014 2014 2015 2016 2017 Avg. Water Surface Slope 0.0305 0.0304 0.0305 0.0315 0.0281 Riffle Length 17 21 21 13 22 Avg. Riffle Slope 0.0388 0.0395 0.0310 0.0459 0.0404 Pool Length 13 13 14 16 14 Pool to Pool Spacing 31 34 44 27 31 200 250 300 Distance (feet) -Year 3 (2016) Bed -w -Year 4 (2017) Bed -0-Year 4 (2017) Water Surface +TOB 350 Project Name Martins Creek II Reach UT 1 Reach 4, Station 05+50 - 17+00 Project Number 92633 Date 5/18/17 Station 2014 Year 0 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station 2014 Year 1 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station 2015 Year 2 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station 2016 Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station 2017 Year 4 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation 1651.4 95.9 96.3 1672.7 94.9 95.6 1683.1 95.5 95.8 1668.1 95.4 95.9 1633.0 96.3 96.5 1644.5 95.0 96.3 1652.2 96.0 96.1 1664.7 95.8 96.3 1649.8 96.0 96.3 1628.1 96.2 96.7 1638.0 94.2 96.4 1643.3 94.7 96.2 1646.4 94.8 96.3 1641.6 94.7 96.3 1624.0 95.2 96.7 1634.4 96.3 96.4 1638.9 94.1 96.2 1640.1 94.7 96.3 1635.1 94.7 96.3 1616.9 94.8 96.7 1630.0 96.0 96.4 1636.1 95.0 96.2 1632.3 96.2 96.4 1632.6 96.3 96.4 1613.4 94.8 96.7 1624.0 94.5 96.4 1634.1 96.2 96.3 1630.1 95.9 96.5 1628.4 96.2 96.6 1608.2 96.5 96.8 1614.7 94.6 96.4 1623.8 94.8 96.3 1625.2 94.5 96.5 1622.3 95.2 96.6 1582.1 97.0 97.4 1611.1 96.7 96.8 1617.9 94.3 96.3 1618.0 94.8 96.5 1609.8 94.7 96.6 1565.6 95.8 97.5 1591.5 96.7 97.0 1611.2 94.8 96.3 1609.3 96.6 96.8 1607.1 96.7 96.8 1556.7 95.7 97.3 1571.8 97.0 97.2 1609.1 96.4 96.6 1606.4 96.8 97.4 1570.1 97.0 97.5 1548.9 97.1 97.5 1567.2 95.9 97.3 1570.4 96.9 97.1 1567.1 95.7 97.4 1564.8 95.7 97.5 1528.2 97.2 97.7 1563.9 95.7 97.3 1564.9 95.9 97.1 1561.2 95.8 97.3 1548.2 97.0 97.5 1514.8 97.3 97.9 1555.3 95.9 97.3 1557.1 95.9 97.1 1551.2 96.9 97.4 1513.5 97.3 97.9 1509.3 96.3 98.0 1551.1 97.0 97.2 1551.1 97.0 97.2 1547.3 97.4 97.9 1509.0 96.2 97.9 1503.5 95.9 98.0 1515.5 97.3 97.8 1515.2 97.5 97.6 1511.8 95.9 97.8 1502.5 95.7 97.9 1497.3 96.8 97.9 1512.7 96.4 97.8 1511.4 96.2 97.6 1506.9 95.8 97.9 1496.9 96.6 97.9 1493.9 96.3 98.0 1505.9 95.4 97.8 1502.7 95.6 97.6 1497.8 97.1 97.8 1494.1 96.1 97.9 1490.8 96.8 97.9 1500.0 96.8 97.7 1498.0 96.7 97.6 1487.5 98.0 98.4 1489.0 97.2 97.9 1487.2 97.3 98.0 1497.4 96.3 97.7 1493.6 96.1 97.6 1446.9 96.3 98.4 1449.1 98.0 98.5 1469.2 97.7 98.1 1495.0 96.3 97.8 1488.2 97.3 97.6 1436.9 96.4 98.4 1441.3 96.2 98.5 1448.8 98.1 98.5 1491.6 97.1 97.7 1448.8 98.0 98.2 1431.6 97.8 98.4 1433.7 96.1 98.5 1444.0 97.1 98.6 1450.2 98.1 98.3 1444.2 96.8 98.3 1427.8 98.5 98.9 1427.6 97.6 98.5 1437.4 96.4 98.6 1446.5 97.1 98.4 1435.5 96.2 98.2 1391.2 97.1 99.0 1401.2 98.3 98.9 1432.5 96.6 98.5 1440.5 96.4 98.3 1432.4 96.8 98.3 1385.5 96.3 99.0 1395.4 96.9 98.9 1429.3 97.7 98.6 1435.8 96.2 98.4 1424.8 98.0 98.2 1380.2 98.2 99.0 1391.0 96.4 98.9 1399.8 98.3 99.0 1429.6 97.9 98.3 1402.7 98.5 98.6 1371.8 98.4 99.1 1388.3 97.9 98.8 1394.2 96.7 99.0 1336.8 98.3 98.8 1398.5 97.8 98.7 1353.1 97.8 99.1 1386.4 97.2 98.9 1389.9 97.1 99.0 1320.1 98.3 98.9 1394.5 96.4 98.7 1348.6 97.7 99.2 1383.0 98.1 98.9 1384.2 98.1 99.1 112 110 108 106 m 104 v w 102 c 0 i 100 v W 98 96 94 92 550 750 950 1150 1350 1550 Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633 Year 4 (2017) Profile - UT 1 Reach 4, Station 05+50 to 17+00 Distance (feet) -Year 0 (2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed -Year 2 (2015) Bed -Year 3 (2016) Bed -w -Year 4 (2017) Bed -40--Year 4 (2017) Water Surface --w-TOB 2014 2014 2015 2016 2017 Avg. Water Surface Slope 0.0135 0.0123 0.0116 0.0120 0.0117 Riffle Length 21 23 6 22 19 Avg. Riffle Slope 0.0166 0.0161 0.1220 0.0197 0.0209 Pool Length 22 19 40 18 22 Pool to Pool Spacing 42 40 46 37 39 Distance (feet) -Year 0 (2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed -Year 2 (2015) Bed -Year 3 (2016) Bed -w -Year 4 (2017) Bed -40--Year 4 (2017) Water Surface --w-TOB Summary Data Feature: Riffle 0.25 D35 7.44 D5012.1 D84 45 2017 73 Description Material Size (mm) Total # Item % Cum % Silt/Clay silt/clay 0.062 3 12% 12% Sand very fine sand 0.125 0 0% 12% fine sand 0.250 1 4% 16% medium sand 0.50 1 4% 20% coarse sand 1.00 2 8% 28% very coarse sand 2.0 0 0% 28% Gravel very fine gravel 4.0 0 0% 28% fine gravel 5.7 1 4% 32% fine gravel 8.0 1 4% 36% medium gravel 11.3 3 12% 48% medium gravel 16.0 2 8% 56% course gravel 22.3 1 4% 60% course gravel 32.0 3 12% 72% very coarse gravel 45 3 12% 84% very coarse gravel 64 2 8% 92% Cobble small cobble 90 2 8% 100% medium cobble 128 0 0% 100% large cobble 180 0 0% 100% very large cobble 256 0 0% 100% Boulder small boulder 362 0 0% 100% small boulder 512 0 0% 100% medium boulder 1024 0 0% 100% large boulder 2048 0 0% 100% Bedrock bedrock 40096 0 0% 100% TOTAL % of whole count 25 100% 100% Summary Data D16 0.25 D35 7.44 D5012.1 D84 45 D95 73 100% 90% 80% 70% a 60% 50% v 40% a 30% :0 20% a 10% 0% Particle Size (mm) ■MYO-2014 EMYI-2014 ■MY2-2015 •MY3-2016 �MY42017 Individual Class Percent ■■■111111■■■111111■■■111111■■■4:111■■■111111 ■■■111111■■■111111■■■111111■■I%11111■■■1 1 ■■■111111■■■111111■■■111111■Ii1111111■■■111111 ■■■111111■■■111111■■■111111%111111 ' 1 ' ■■■11111111111 ■■■111111■■■111111■■■111111 �i�■111111■■■111111 ■■■111111■■■111111■■_■I!:%I��I■■111111■■■111111 • . , , ■■■111111■■■111111��!/!:ill�■■111111■■■111111 ,, ■■■111111■■■Ili'•:i��lllll■■■111111■■■111111 ' ■■■11=_��i�iil�:i�■■111111■■■111111■■■111111 ,, ■■■Ilmi�i�■11111■■■111111■■■111111■■■111111 100% 90% 80% 70% a 60% 50% v 40% a 30% :0 20% a 10% 0% Particle Size (mm) ■MYO-2014 EMYI-2014 ■MY2-2015 •MY3-2016 �MY42017 Individual Class Percent Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary (UT -1 to Martin's Creek) Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Gauge TRegional Curve Pre -Existing Condition (UT -1) Reference Reach(es) Data Design (UT -1) Monitoring Baseline (UT -1 Reach 4) Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Max Med Min Mean Med Max SD BF Width (ft) 5.9 8.5 7.6 14.0 3.0 11.7 21.7 7.7 8.5 6.4 7.1 6.6 8.4 1.1 Floodprone Width ft 9.0 17.0 16.2 30.8 8.2 20 410 16 100 25 25 25 25 0 BF Mean Depth 11 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.6 1.0 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.2 BF Max Depth (ft2 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.2 0.9 2.5 0.7 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.9 1.2 0.2 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft 2) 3.6 4.7 4.3 6.2 1.2 10.2 13.1 4.1 6.0 3.2 4.5 3.8 6.4 1.7 Width/Depth Ratio 7.6 18.8 12.6 55.0 18.0 10.7 17.0 12.0 14.3 10.5 11.4 11.0 12.8 1.2 Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 2.0 2.0 2.9 0.6 1.7 32.0 2.0 11.8 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 0.1 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 2.0 1.8 4.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Proflle Riffle length ft 5 21 20 40 8 Riffle slope ft/ft 0.025 0.170 0.2000 1.9000 0.0100 0.1600 0.0009 0.0166 0.0148 0.0337 0.0111 Pool length ft 8.0 22.0 22.0 37.0 9.5 Pool Max depth 11 2.2 2.5 1.6 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.4 0.2 Pool spacing (ft) 30.0 85.0 48.0 231.0 12.0 45.0 27.0 42.0 40.0 61.0 11.0 Pattern Channel Beltwidth ft 16 55 40 40 Radius of Curvature ft 28 47 30 40 30 40 Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft 2 3 3.8 4.7 3.8 4.7 Meander Wavelength ft 70 260 15 30 15 30 Meander Width ratio 1.1 4.1 4.7 4.7 Transport parameters Reach Shear Stress (competency) lbs/ft 2 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull Stream Power (transport ca aci W/m2 Additional Reach Parameters Ros en Classification Eb/Fb/B/G/Cb Aa/Bc B/C B/C Bankf ill Velocity s 4.2-4.4 3.9-4.3 Bankfull Discharge cfs 16-25 Valley Length ft 1565 ---- Channel Thalweg Length ft 1747 ---- ---- 781 Sinuosity 1.06 - 1.18 1.19 1.05-1.4 1.05-1.4 Water Surface Slope ft/ft 0.015-0.05 0.0333 .01-.057 0.0135 BF slope ft/11 ---- ---- ---- ---- Bankf ill Floodplain Area acres ---- ---- ---- ---- % of Reach with Eroding Banks ---- ---- Channel Stability or Habitat Metric ---- ---- Biolo ical or Other ---- ---- Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions) Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Pre -Existing Condition Reference Reach es Data Design Monitoring Baseline Ri%/RU%P%G%/S% SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%BE% dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95 .6-.8 2-4.4 3.6-8.7 15.9-28 66.8 - Entrainment Class <1.5/1.5 -1.99/2.0 -4.9/5.0 - Incision Class <1.2/1.2-1.49/1.5-1.99/>2.0 Table 10c. Baseline Stream Data Summary (UT -1 to Martin's Creek) Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Gauge TRegional Curve Pre -Existing Condition (UT -1) Reference Reach(es) Data Design (UT -1) Monitoring Baseline (UT -1 Reach 2) Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Max Med Min Mean Med Max SD BF Width (ft) 5.9 8.5 7.6 14.0 3.0 11.7 21.7 7.7 8.5 8.0 8.7 Floodprone Width ft 9.0 17.0 16.2 30.8 8.2 20 410 16 100 25 BF Mean Depth ft 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.6 1.0 0.5 0.7 0.7 BF Max Depth (ft2 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.2 0.9 2.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft 2) 3.6 4.7 4.3 6.2 1.2 10.2 13.1 4.1 6.0 5.2 5.9 Width/Depth Ratio 7.6 18.8 12.6 55.0 18.0 10.7 17.0 12.0 14.3 12.3 12.8 Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 2.0 2.0 2.9 0.6 1.7 32.0 2.0 11.8 2.9 3.1 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 2.0 1.8 4.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Profile Riffle length ft 5 21 20 40 8 Riffle slope ft/ft 0.025 0.170 0.2000 1.9000 0.0100 0.1600 0.0009 0.0166 0.0148 0.0337 0.0111 Pool length ft 8.0 22.0 22.0 37.0 9.5 Pool Max depth ft 2.2 2.5 1.6 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.4 0.2 Pool spacing (ft) 30.0 85.0 48.0 231.0 12.0 45.0 27.0 42.0 40.0 61.0 11.0 Pattern Channel Beltwidth ft 16 55 40 40 Radius of Curvature ft 28 47 30 40 30 40 Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft 2 3 3.8 4.7 3.8 4.7 Meander Wavelength ft 70 260 15 30 15 30 Meander Width ratio 1.1 4.1 4.7 4.7 Transport parameters Reach Shear Stress (competency) lbs/ft 2 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull Stream Power (transport ca aci W/m2 Additional Reach Parameters Ros en Classification Eb/Fb/B/G/Cb Aa/Bc B/C C Bankf ill Velocity s 4.2-4.4 3.9-4.3 Bankfull Discharge cfs 16-25 Valley Length ft 1565 ---- Channel Thalweg Length ft 1747 ---- ---- 1176 Sinuosity 1.06 - 1.18 1.19 1.05-1.4 1.05-1.4 Water Surface Slope ft/ft 0.015-0.05 0.0333 .01-.057 0.0577 BF slope ft/ft ---- ---- ---- ---- Bankf ill Floodplain Area acres ---- ---- ---- ---- % of Reach with Eroding Banks ---- ---- Channel Stability or Habitat Metric ---- ---- Biolo ical or Other ---- Table 10d. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions) Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Pre -Existing Condition Reference Reach es Data Design Monitoring Baseline Ri%/RU%P%G%/S% SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%BE% dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95 .6-.8 2-4.4 3.6-8.7 15.9-28 66.8 - Entrainment Class <1.5/1.5 -1.99/2.0 -4.9/5.0 - Incision Class <1.2/1.2-1.49/1.5-1.99/>2.0 Table 10e. Baseline Stream Data Summary (UT 1-3 to Martin's Creek) Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Gauge TRegional Curve Pre -Existing Condition SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%BE% Reference Reach(es) Data d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 0.3 1.1 3.5 12.1 15.7 Design Entrainment Class <1.5/1.5 -1.99/2.0 -4.9/5.0 - Monitoring Baseline (UT 1-3) Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Max Med Min Mean Med Max SD BF Width (ft) 5.0 7.5 6.9 11.4 2.7 11.7 21.7 6.0 6.5 5.1 8.0 6.8 11.4 2.5 Floodprone Width ft 10.3 15.4 12.6 26.2 7.3 20 410 11 100 14 77 100 100 39 BF Mean Depth ft 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.6 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.2 BF Max Depth ft 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.1 0.9 2.5 1 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.9 1.2 0.3 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft 2) 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.3 0.2 10.2 13.1 2.9 3.2 1.7 5.1 3.0 9.9 3.5 Width/Depth Ratio 8.6 19.9 15.6 39.7 13.6 10.7 17.0 12.5 11.9 15.5 14.3 22.7 3.8 Entrenchment Ratio 1.5 2.1 2.0 2.7 0.6 1.7 32.0 3.8 15.4 2.7 9.4 9.4 15.4 5.0 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.7 1.4 3.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Profile Riffle length ft 7 19 18 51 10 Riffle slope ft/ft 0.013 0.100 0.2000 1.9000 0.0100 0.1800 0.0215 0.0457 0.0445 0.0667 0.0125 Pool length ft 3.0 6.0 6.0 10.0 2.0 Pool Max depth ft 2.2 2.5 1.6 Pool spacing (ft) 20.0 100.0 48.0 231.0 10.0 60.0 15.0 25.0 23.0 58.0 10.0 Pattern Channel Beltwidth Jft 22 46 16 55 26 50 40 Radius of Curvature ft 14 28 28 47 15 40 30 40 Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft 1.2 5.6 2 3 2.5 6.7 3.8 4.7 Meander Wavelength ft 56 81 70 260 65 110 15 30 Meander Width ratio 1.9 9.2 1.1 4.1 4.3 8.3 4.7 Transport parameters Reach Shear Stress (competency) lbs/ft 2 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull Stream Power trans ort ca aci W/m2 Additional Reach Parameters Ros en Classification Eb/B/C/F AaBc B/C E Bankfull Velocity s 6 -Feb 3.8-4.9 Bankfull Discharge cfs 11.0 - 14.0 Valley Length ft 1320 ---- Channel Thalweg Length ft 1584 ---- ---- 2092 Sinuosity 1.2 1.19 1.26-1.42 1.2 Water Surface Slope ft/ft 0.007-0.04 0.0333 0.005-0.054 0.0161 BF slope ft/11 ---- ---- ---- ---- Bankf ill Floodplain Area acres ---- ---- ---- ---- % of Reach with Eroding Banks ---- ---- Channel Stability or Habitat Metric I I ---- ---- Biolo ical or Other ---- I ---- Table 10L Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions) Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Pre -Existing Condition Reference Reach es Data Design Monitoring Baseline Ri%/RU%P%G%/S% SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%BE% d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 0.3 1.1 3.5 12.1 15.7 Entrainment Class <1.5/1.5 -1.99/2.0 -4.9/5.0 - Incision Class <1.2/1.2-1.49/1.5-1.99/>2.0 Table lla. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections) Martin's Creek II Mitigation Protect - DMS Proiect Number 92633 Table 116. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Baseline UT 1-3 Cross Section 1 UT 1 Reach 4 MY -1 UT 1-3 Cross Section 2 T 1 Reach 4 MY -2 UT 1-3 Cross Section 3 T 1-3 MY -4 UT 1-3 Cross Section 4 UT 1-3 Cross Section 5 1-3 Cross Section 6 1-3 Parameter Riffle Riffle Riffle Dimension and Substrate -Riffle Only Min Mean Med Pool SD Min Mean Med Riffle SD Min Mean Med Pool SD Dimension MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO 8.2 6.8 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ BE Width ft 11.4 11.2 11.9 11.4 11.2 11.4 11.8 11.3 11.1 11.4 6.8 6.8 6.5 6.4 6.9 7.7 77 100 7.4 8.4 8.3 9.3 7.6 7.4 7.2 9.2 8.3 9.0 7.0 9.3 Floodprone Width (ft) (approx) 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 NA 0.5 0.4 NA NA 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 NA NA NA NA NA BE Mean Depth ft 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.3 0.8 BE Max Depth ft 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 2.0 11.9 4NANYA2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.2 0.9 2.7 2.6 2.3 2.2 1.5 BE Cross Sectional Area (f?) 9.6 9.4 8.2 8.4 8.1 9.9 10.2 8.2 8.6 8.7 2.8 2.8 2.5 2.8 2.9 7.3 2.6 9.2 6.5 5.9 6.2 6.3 4.3 4.7 4.0 12.0 11.1 9.1 9.3 7.9 Width/Depth Ratio 13.5 13.3 17.3 15.5 15.5 13.1 13.7 15.6 14.3 14.9 16.5 16.5 16.9 14.6 16.4 NA 1.0 1.0 NA NA 11.1 13.7 13.4 11.7 13.0 NA NA NA NA NA Entrenchment Ratio 8.8 8.9 8.4 8.8 8.9 8.8 8.5 8.8 9.0 8.8 14.7 14.7 15.4 15.6 14.5 NA NA NA 12.0 10.8 13.2 13.5 13.9 NA NA NA NA NA Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.33 1.50 1.60 1.50 1.16 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0578 0.0153 0.0000 0.0163 0.0154 0.0418 0.0123 0.0000 0.0197 0.0197 0.0715 0.01 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 30 8 3 Cross Section 7 UT 1-3 10 3 Cross Section 8 UT 1-3 35 9 Cross Section 9 UT 1-3 2.1 2.0 Cross Section 10 UT 1-3 1.4 2.0 Cross Section 11 UT 1-3 0.4 1.6 Cross Section 12 UT 1-3 Parameter 0.3 1.6 1.9 Pool 2.2 0.3 1.2 1.5 Riffle 1.7 0.2 Pool spacing (ft) 7 Pool 31 63 15 7 Pool 33 75 16 7 Riffle 35 71 15 9 Riffle 30 67 16 7 33 33 72 16 Pattern Dimension MYO MY] MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MY] MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ BF Width ft 6.5 8.1 9.5 7.6 8.5 6.5 6.7 5.7 4.5 5.3 10.6 10.6 8.5 8.3 9.5 6.2 6.5 6.5 6.8 6.0 5.7 5.9 6.4 Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft 5.1 5.4 5.6 6.1 6.2 Flood rone Width (ft) a rox NA NA NA NA NA 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 110 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 BE Mean Depth ft 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.1 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 BE Max Depth (ft) 2.7 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.6 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.7 2.0 1.8 1.9 2.2 1.7 INANA 1.6 2.0 1.2 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 BE Cross Sectional Area (fte) 7.1 6.8 6.1 6.8 5.5 3.0 2.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 9.3 8.0 7.2 9.1 5.4 5.1 4.7 3.5 2.3 2.5 2.0 2.6 2.5 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.0 1.9 Width/Depth Ratio NA NA NA NA NA 14.1 16.0 18.1 11.3 16.5 NA NA NA NA NA 1833 NA NA NA 20.1 14.4 16.2 13.4 16.4 15.3 17.2 15.7 18.6 20.2 Entrenchment Ratio NA NA NA NA NA 15.4 14.9 17.5 22.2 18.9 NA NA NA NA NA 1.3 NA NA NA 3.7 4.2 4.4 4.2 3.9 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.3 23 Bank Hei ht Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ----- 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 d50 mm ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- Ri%/RU%P%G%/S% Table 116. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Baseline UT 1-3 MY -1 UT 1-3 MY -2 UT 1-3 MY -3 UT 1-3 MY -4 UT 1-3 MY -5 UT 1-3 Dimension and Substrate -Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean x SD Min Mean Med Max SU BF Width (ft) 5.1 8.0 6.8 11.4 2.5 5.4 8.2 6.8 11.8 2.6 5.6 7.8 6.5 11.9 2.7 4.5 7.5 6.4 11.4 2.7 5.3 7.8 4 2.5 Floodprone Width ft 14 77 100 100 39 14 77 100 100 39 14 77 100 100 39 14 77 100 100 39 14 77 39 BE Mean Depth (ft) 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.9 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.2 BE Max Depth ft 0.5 0.9 0.9 1.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 0.7 1.3 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.7 1.0 0.2 0.6 0.9 0.9 1.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 *2.98.7 0.2 BE Cross Sectional Area (f?) 1.7 5.1 3.0 9.9 3.5 1.7 5.1 2.8 10.2 3.5 1.8 4.1 2.5 8.2 2.9 1.8 4.4 2.8 8.6 2.9 1.7 4.3 2.9 Width/De th Ratio 11.9 15.5 14.3 22.7 3.8 13.1 15.3 15.0 18.0 2.0 12.7 15.6 16.1 19.0 2.1 11.3 15.0 14.8 20.3 3.0 13.0 16.1 2 2.2 Entrenchment Ratio 2.7 9.4 9.4 15.4 5.0 2.6 9.2 9.2 14.9 4.7 2.5 10.0 10.0 17.5 5.6 2.3 10.8 10.8 22.2 6.9 2.3 10.2 9 6.0 Bank Height Rati 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Profile Riffle length (ftA 4 1 20 1 19 1 41 1 8.9 1 4 1 20 1 20 1 44 1 9 4.1 1 22.2 1 22.7 63.5 1 11.5 2 1 19 1 19 38 1 7 1 4 21 1 21 43 1 8 Riffle slope ft/ft 0.0000 1 0.0185 0.0166 0.0550 0.0145 0.0000 0.0209 0.0183 0.0578 0.0153 0.0000 0.0163 0.0154 0.0418 0.0123 0.0000 0.0197 0.0197 0.0715 0.01 0.0000 0.0118 0.0142 0.0495 0.0132 Pool length ft 3 14 12 33 9 3 16 12 37 10 3 13 10 30 8 3 16 12 49 10 3 12 15 35 9 Pool Max depth (ft) 1.2 2.1 2.0 2.7 0.6 1.4 2.0 1.9 2.6 0.4 1.6 1.9 1.9 2.3 0.3 1.6 1.9 2.0 2.2 0.3 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.7 0.2 Pool spacing (ft) 7 34 31 63 15 7 34 33 75 16 7 35 35 71 15 9 33 30 67 16 7 33 33 72 16 Pattern Channel Beltwidth ft 26 50 Radius of Curvature ft 15 40 Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft 2.5 6.7 Meander Wavelen h (ft) 65 110 Meander Width ratio 4.3 8.3 Additional Reach Parameters Ros en Classification E -type E -type (stype E -type (stype Channel Thadweg Length ft 2092 2099 1833 1847 1851 Sinuosity 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.0161 0.0162 0.0174 0.017 0.0166 BE slope ft/ft ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Ri%/RU%P%G%/S% SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B % BE % dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95 % of Reach with Eroding Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Meft' Biological or Other] Table llc. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections) Martin's Creek D Mitinatinn Proiect - DMS Proiect Number 92633 Table lld. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Baseline (UT 1 Reach 4) Cross Section 13 UT 1 Reach 4 MY -1 (UT 1 Reach 4) Cross Section 14 UT 1 Reach 4 MY -2 (UT 1 Reach 4) Cross Section 15 UT 1 Reach 4 MY -3 (UT 1 Reach 4) Cross Section 16 UT 1 Reach 4 MY -4 (UT 1 Reach 4) Cross Section 17 (UT 1 Reach 4) Parameter Riffle Riffle Pool Riffle Pool Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Dimension MYO MY] MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MY] MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS MYS+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS MYS+ BF Width (ft) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.3 6.2 6.4 6.3 6.1 5.7 6.5 13.4 13.6 12.4 7.0 13.2 8.4 8.6 7.4 6.8 7.2 9.7 9.9 7.8 8.1 9.4 Floodprone Width (ft) (approx) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 NA NA NA NA NA 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 NA NA NA NA NA BF Mean Depth ft 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.0 BF Max Depth ft 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.8 2.1 2.1 1.4 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.0 2.4 2.7 2.7 3.1 2.0 BF Cross Sectional Area (fe) 3.8 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.2 3.2 2.9 2.7 3.0 3.2 10.9 10.2 6.2 5.6 4.9 6.4 6.1 4.9 4.8 4.7 13.2 13.9 10.6 12.1 9.5 Width/Depth Ratio 11.5 13.2 14.5 14.2 17.5 12.8 13.7 13.8 10.8 13.2 NA NA NA NA NA 11. 1 12.1 11.2 9.6 11.0 NA NA NA NA NA Entrenchment Ratio 3.8 3.8 3.8 4.0 4.0 1 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.4 3.8 NA NA NA NA NA 3.0 2.9 1 3.4 1 3.7 3.5 NA NA NA NA NA Bank Height Ratio 1.33 1.44 1.33 1.55 1.71 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 d50 (nim) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- 23 22 43 9 0.4 5.8 4.1 20.9 4.9 3 22 22 40 11 4 19 16 57 13 Table lld. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Baseline (UT 1 Reach 4) MY -1 (UT 1 Reach 4) MY -2 (UT 1 Reach 4) MY -3 (UT 1 Reach 4) MY -4 (UT 1 Reach 4) MY -5 (UT 1 Reach 4) Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD BF Width (ft) 6.4 7.1 6.6 8.4 1.1 6.3 7.2 6.6 8.6 1.3 6.1 6.7 6.6 7.4 0.7 5.7 6.3 6.3 6.8 0.6 6.2 6.6 6.5 7.2 0.5 Floodprone Width ft) 25 25 25 25 0 25 25 25 25 0 25 25 25 25 0 25 25 25 25 0 25 25 25 25 0 BF Mean Depth ft 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.1 BF Max Depth ft 0.8 1.0 0.9 1.2 0.2 0.8 1.0 0.9 1.2 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.2 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.1 0.2 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.0 0.2 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft) 3.2 4.5 3.8 6.4 1.7 2.9 4.1 3.3 6.1 1.7 2.7 3.5 3.0 4.9 1.2 2.8 3.5 3.0 4.8 1.1 2.2 3.4 3.2 4.7 1.3 Width De th Ratio 10.5 11.4 11.0 12.8 1.2 12.3 12.7 12.6 13.2 0.5 10.6 13.0 13.2 15.3 2.3 9.7 12.3 11.4 15.8 3.1 11.0 13.9 13.2 17.5 3.3 Entrenchment Rati 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 0.1 2.9 3.6 3.6 4.0 0.6 3.4 3.8 3.8 4.1 0.4 3.7 4.0 4.0 1 4.4 0.4 3.5 3.8 3.8 1 .0 1 0.3 Bank Height Ratiol 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 0.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 0.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 0.0 1 1.0 1.0 i 1.0 1 1.0 1 0.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 0.0 Profile - Upstream Riffle length (ft) 5 21 20 40 8 3 23 22 43 9 0.4 5.8 4.1 20.9 4.9 3 22 22 40 11 4 19 16 57 13 Riffle slope ft/ft) 0.0009 0.0166 0.0148 0.0337 0.0111 0.0000 0.0161 0.0192 0.0426 0.0131 0.0031 0.1220 0.0556 1.0788 0.2138 0.0001 0.0197 0.0151 0.0516 0.01 0.0000 0.0209 0.0180 0.0463 0.0145 Pool length (ft) 8 22 22 37 10 6 19 18 34 8 21 40 39 57 11 5 18 18 32 8 8 22 20 51 10 Pool Max depth (ft) 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.4 0.2 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.7 0.4 1.4 2.1 2.1 2.7 0.9 1.5 2.3 2.3 3.1 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.6 2.0 0.6 Pool spacing (ft) 27 42 40 61 11 15 40 42 57 12 23 46 49 66 11 5 37 39 61 16 10 39 41 67 17 Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ftA 40 Radius of Curvature (ft) 30 40 Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft 3.8 4.7 Meander Wavelength (ft 15 30 Meander Width ratio 4.7 Additional Reach Parameters Ros en Classificatio B/C - Type Cb -Type Cb -Type Cb -Type Cb -Type Channel Thalweg Length (ft 781 786 1107 1113 1072 Sinuosity 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.0135 0.0123 0.0116 0.012 0.0117 BF slope ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Ri%/RU%P%G%/S% SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%BE% dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95 % of Reach with Eroding Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Table Ile. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections) Martin's Creek II Mitigation Proiect - DMS Proiect Number 92633 Parameter Baseline (UT 1 Reach 2) Cross Section 18 UT 1 Reach 2 Riffle MY -1 (UT 1 Reach 2) Cross Section 19 UT 1 Reach 2 Riffle MY -2 (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -3 (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -4 (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -5 (UT 1 Reach 2) Dimension MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ BF Width ft 8.0 7.9 8.2 7.8 8.0 8.7 8.0 8.6 8.3 8.3 Floodprone Width (ft) (approx) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 BF Mean Depth ft 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.9 BF Max Depth ft 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.6 1.6 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft), 5.2 5.5 4.7 4.4 4.5 5.9 5.0 5.8 7.3 7.3 Width/Depth Ratio 12.3 11.3 14.3 13.8 14.2 12.8 12.8 12.8 9.4 9.4 Entrenchment Ratio 3.1 3.2 3.0 3.2 3.1 2.9 3.1 2.9 3.0 3.0 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 d50 mm --- ---- --- ---- --- 0.6 Table III. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Baseline (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -1 (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -2 (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -3 (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -4 (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -5 (UT 1 Reach 2) Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD BF Width ft 8.0 8.7 7.9 8 8.2 8.6 7.8 8.3 7.5 8 Floodprone Width(ft) 25 25 25 25 25 BF Mean Depth ft 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.8 BF Max Depth Lft 1.1 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.6 0.9 1.4 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft) 5.2 5.9 5.0 5.5 4.7 5.8 4.4 7.3 4.5 6.2 Width/Depth Ratio 12.3 12.8 11.4 12.5 12.7 14.3 9.4 13.7 9.2 14.0 Entrenchment Ratio 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.2 2.9 3.1 3.0 3.2 3.1 3.3 Bank Height Ratiol 1.0 1.0 1 1 1 1 1 1.0 1 1 1 1 1.0 1 1 1 1.1 1 1 1.0 1 1 1 1.1 Profile Riffle length ft 7 19 18 51 10 4 16 12 37 9 4.3 16.5 12.8 46.7 9.4 4 13 11 37 8 3 10 13 35 8 Riffle slope ft/ft 0.0215 0.0457 0.0445 0.0667 0.0125 NA* NA* NA* NA* NA* NA* NA* NA* NA* NA* 0.0000 0.0386 0.0396 0.1171 0.03 0.0000 0.0382 0.0406 0.1209 0.0257 Pool length ft 3 6 6 10 2 3 6 5 12 2 3 6 6 14 2 2 8 7 17 3 3 8 7 16 3 Pool Max depth ft Pool spacing (ft) 15 25 23 58 10 9 22 19 45 9 9 24 19 55 11 9 21 17 46 9 6 17 19 41 8 Pattern Channel Beltwidth(ft) 40 Radius of Curvature(11) 40 Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) 4.7 Meander Wavelength ft 30 Meander Width ratio 4.7 Additional Reach Parameters Ros en Classification C - Type C - Type C - Type C - Type C - Type Channel Thalweg Length ft 1176 1167 1176 1169 1169 Sinuosity 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.0577 NA* 0.0582 0.0578 0.0576 BF slope ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- Ini�c�ft/ft Ri%/RU%P%G%/S% SC%/SA%/G%/C°/aB%BE% dl6/d35/d5O/d84/d95 % of Reach with Eroding Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other NA* No water in channel during field surveys. APPENDIX E HYDROLOGY DATA Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary Figure E1. Martin's Creek 11 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall Groundwater Gauge Graphs Sample Time -Lapse Photos from MC UT1R2 Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site (DMS Prosect Number 92633) Date of Data Date of Occurrence Method Photo (if Collection available) Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after August 25, 2014 April 7, 2014 approximately 2.4 inches of rain documented in one day at --- an onsite rain gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after August 25, 2014 July 1, 2014 approximately 2.02 inches of rain was documented over two --- days at an onsite rain gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after August 25, 2014 August 24, 2014 approximately 1.39 inches of rain documented over two days --- at an onsite rain gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after October 27, 2014 September 3, 2014 approximately 1.67 inches of rain documented in one day at --- an onsite rain gauge. Crest gauge data and laid back vegetation indicate a bankfull October 27, 2014 October 14, 2014 event after approximately 2.5 inches of rain documented in 1 one day at an onsite rain gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after April 12, 2015 November 17, 2014 approximately 1.44 inches of rain documented in one day at --- an onsite rain gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after July 13, 2015 June 11, 2015 approximately 1.68 inches of rain documented in one day at --- an onsite rain gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after July 13, 2015 June 26, 2015 approximately 1.57 inches of rain was documented in one --- day at an onsite rain gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after September 11, 2015 August 19, 2015 approximately 2.94 inches of rain was documented over --- three days at an onsite rain gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after November 18, 2015 September 26, 2015 approximately 2.65 inches of rain was documented over two --- days at an onsite rain gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after November 18, 2015 October 3, 2015 approximately 4.50 inches of rain was documented over --- three days at an onsite rain gauge. Crest gauge data, floodplain scour, and laid back vegetation August 22, 2016 June 5, 2016 indicate a bankfull event after approximately 2.28 inches of 2 rain was documented over two days at an onsite rain gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after August 29, 2017 June 23, 2017 approximately 1.85 inches of rain was documented in one -- day at an onsite rain gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after November 8, 2017 October 8, 2017 approximately 1.97 inches of rain was documented in one -- day at an onsite rain gauge. Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site (DMS Proiect Number 92633) *This gauge malfunctioned on July 1, 2017 and was replaced on August 30, 2017. The new gauge collected data for just 6 days before malfunctioning again for the remainder of the growing season; however, it was saturated/inundated for 42 days prior to its malfunction. **This gauge malfunctioned on August 29, 2017 resulting in loss of data for the remainder of the growing season. The gauge had not met success criteria prior to its malfunction, and it is not expected to have met success criteria during the period of its malfunction. Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season Gauge (Percentage) Year 1 (2014) Year 2 (2015) Year 3 (2016) Year 4 (2017) Year 5 (2018) 1 Yes/75 Days Yes/118 Days Yes/49 Days Yes/137 Days (39%) (61.8%) (25.7%) (71.7%) 2 No/21 Days Yes/36 Days No/ 12 Days Yes*/42 Days (11%) (18.8%) (6.3%) (22.0%) 3 Yes/52 Days Yes/72 Days Yes/45 Days Yes/58 Days (27%) (37.7%) (23.6%) (30.4%) 4 No/21 Days Yes/27 Days No/ 12 Days No/31 Days (11%) (14.1%) (6.3%) (16.2%) 5 No/ 15 Days Yes/25 Days No/12 Days No/23 Days (7.8%) (13.1%) (6.3%) (12.0%) 6 Yes/58 Days Yes/69 Days Yes/47 Days Yes/58 Days (30%) (36.1%) (24.6%) (30.4%) 7 Yes/85 Days Yes/69 Days Yes/27 Days Yes/99 Days (44%) (36.1%) (14.1%) (51.8%) 8 Yes/65Days Yes/72 Days Yes/45 Days Yes/55 Days (34%) (37.7%) (23.6%) (28.8%) 9 No/22 Days Yes/27 Days Yes/27 Days No/24 Days (11.5%) (14.1%) (14.1%) (12.6%) 10 No/24 Days Yes/28 Days No/ 12 Days No/31 Days (12.5%) (14.7%) (6.3%) (16.2%) 11 No/ 18 Days No/22 Days No/7 Days No**/16 Days (9%) (11.5%) (3.7%) (8.4%) 12 No/20 Days Yes/27 Days No/ 12 Days Yes/38 Days (10%) (14.1%) (6.3%) (20%) 13 Yes/116 Days Yes/117 Days Yes/66 Days Yes/96 Days (61%) (61.2%) (34.6%) (50.3%) *This gauge malfunctioned on July 1, 2017 and was replaced on August 30, 2017. The new gauge collected data for just 6 days before malfunctioning again for the remainder of the growing season; however, it was saturated/inundated for 42 days prior to its malfunction. **This gauge malfunctioned on August 29, 2017 resulting in loss of data for the remainder of the growing season. The gauge had not met success criteria prior to its malfunction, and it is not expected to have met success criteria during the period of its malfunction. Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices 12 10 a� 8 6 4 a 2 0 Figure E1: Martin's Creek 11 30-70 Percentile Graph vs. Onsite Rainfall Data from WETS Station: MURPHY, NC 6001 2014 X2015 � 2016 2017 - 30th Percentile —70th Percentile 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 ami -6 J -8 -10 12 -14 c7 -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 -40 A A A Ln Ln Ln Ln Un Ol Ol Ol Ol V V V V V 00 00 00 00 l0 l0 l0 l0 IJ IJ IJ IJ N F\-� 0000 F\-� N N UUl F\-� F\-� N W F\-� F\-� N W J IJ N N A IJ IJ N \ \ \ \ O V A In N l0 N l0 6l O V A IJ A IJ 00 IJ 00 In N l0 IJ N V V Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 1 Year 4 (2017 Data) 2.5 2.0 c 1.0 0.5 m Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 2 Year 4 (2017 Data) 12 October 21 10 April 14 8 Growing Season Growing Season 6 4 Start End 2 0 -2 -4 ami -6 J -8Gauge Malfunctioned 27 Days 3 10 12 Gauge Malfuncti ned 3 14 42 Days -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 I -34 -36 -38 — -40 1 to to to to to rn rn rn am V V V V V 00 00 00 W ko ko ko ko r r r r F� F-� N F-� co I--� N N In F-� F-� N W F-� F-� N W V F-� N N A I--� F-� N \ \ \ \ O V \ \ U'i N to \ N to Ql \ O V I--� \ I--� W \ I--� W U'i N to F-� N V V 2.5 2.0 2 1.0 0.5 0.0 Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 3 Year 4 (2017 Data) 12 10 8 6 4 U April 14 Growing Season Start October 21 Growing Season End 2 0 _ 2 (U -4 > J -6 d -8 3 -10 12 IE = 36 DaVs 58 Da Vs N. o' -14 Q 16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 I I -32 -34 -36 -38 -40 ' 41 O 41 V -PI N Ln \ �n 00 \ �n Un Um N N Um N l0 am Ln \ am F\-� N m F\-� l0 am N Ol V W \ V F\-� O V F\-� V V N A V 00 W v I--� \ 00 I\-� 00 N I--� 00 N 00 1.0 A \ 1.0 I\-� I--� 1.0 F\-� 00 1.0 N U" i r \ N r \ l0 r \ V r \ N V 2.5 2.0 1.0 0.5 em Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 4 Year 4 (2017 Data) is M 1.0 0.5 we ' • ■ April October ■ ■ M -■i■ • m .�... i.�►�■��►�� , ►�� ►ter ILI ' ■��1� �■��'■ �'�� Imo■ �! ■ X11 M ■ ■i■■ �W ■l■mm ■��■■ll �■■■ i■r■■■■ ■m■mml ■ ■■�1 �� i ��i i■m■ . . . . .. .. .. .. . . is M 1.0 0.5 we Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 5 Year 4 (2017 Data) m =owing Season m ;N m7m7m N �■r'�li��l��l��■ OEM 1=111 lsImC� iimimI RlmUEElNlAmm WRIMUNIIIIIII Wall WWII Sir �I�1 t■ \ �►\_i��I — t■ it ' v■ ir■ ■I!■m �■ ■��■�■11 A ■ ■ �w ■1■■■1 ■��■■11 A 7 ■ I■m ■ ■'■mmI ■ ■��mm1 h ■ I■I■ ■■■ ! ■■■■1 I !momm 7 ■rllmmmo■mi ■ +�IJ ,; ■��■�■ L■w r �■-lrml I m� Ell ■�� 2.5 mul 1.5 E Q 1.0 0.5 12 10 8 6 4 2 _ 0 2 v -4 -6 J ar -8 3 10 -12 c -14 -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 -40 A N v Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 6 Year 4 (2017 Data) 2.5 2.0 c A A In In In In In m m m m v v V V v 00 00 00 00 �O �O �D �O N N N 0000 N N N U\i N N N W N N N W N N N A N N N v A \ \ In N tD \ N tD m \ O �I A N \ A N 00 \ N 00 In N tD N N v v 1.0 0.5 110 Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 7 Year 4 (2017 Data) 12 April 14 10 Growing Season October 21 8 Sta rt Growing Season 6 A rNmj— End 4 IX 2 0 _ -2 v -4 a, J -6 a -8 99 Days 3 -10 -12 'o -14 -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 -40 — - to to to to to m m m m V V V V V 00 00 00 00 � � � � r r r r N F-� 00 F-� N N In F -a F -a NW F -a F -a NW V F-� N N A F-� F-� N-- \ \ \ O V A \ \ In N lb \ N l0 m \ O V A A 00 00 In N lb m N W V V 2.5 2.0 c 1.0 0.5 m 12 10 8 6 4 2 _ 0 2 v -4 v -6 J ar -8 3 -10 -12 c -14 l7 -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 -40 A N v Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 8 Year 4 (2017 Data) 2.5 Flu P A A In In In In In m m m m v v V V v 00 00 00 00 �O �O �O tO N N N 0000 N N N U\i N N N W N N N W N N N 4 N N N \ \ \ \ v A \ \ In N 1.0 \ N 1.0 m \ O �I A N \ A N 00 \ N 00 In N 1.0 N N v v 1.0 0.5 110 12 G row 10 I 8 6 4 2 _ 0 2 v -4 v -6 J ar -8 3 10 -12 c -14 2 -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 -40 A A A N N N N v N N v v Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 9 2.5 c In In In In In m m m m V v v v v 00 00 00 00 tD tD tD tD \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O O O O \ \ Ul N 1.0\ N 1.0 m \ O --4A N \ A N 00 \ f-+ 00 In N 1.0N N m W v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v 1.0 0.5 W Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 10 Year 4 (2017 Data) is 1.0 0.5 0.0 ■�GrowingSeason April Sta rt Uctober GrowingSeason End M m \1■�1�■�� ■o■� Mill I�� II■\VI ■a\MEN ■�1��1 ■�■�I■Ia�l�l�� 11��1 ' I ■■ MINNIE1 t! ■ NINEPIN If■ ■ ONE�I 1 ' ME ir■�■iiw� ■��■�i MEN ■: ■ ■ I■■ ��w ■I■■■7 ■��■■ll M 7 ■ I■17 ■ ■l■! mi ■ ■r■�mmI ,; V ■7 10 F IIIIII!!I■I■ I■I■ ■■■ ■W ! r ■■■■1 I !mimm WEEE 7 ■ ■rllmmmo■mmi W' mI�om'1`11 . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . is 1.0 0.5 0.0 12 10 8 6 Grow 4 2 _ 0 -2 v -4 v -6 J 8 1 161 3 -10 -12 c -14 -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 rl -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 -40 A A A N 0 O --4 � A v v v Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 11 Year 4 (2017 Data) P&I rig c In In In In In m m m m v v V V v 00 00 00 00 tD tD tD tD N N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O O O O \ \ (n N 1.0\ N 1.0 m \ O --4A \ A 00 \ N 00 (n N lD N m W v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v 1.0 0.5 r, Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 12 Year 4 (2017 Data) n 2.5 2.0 2 00 00 00�O �O �O �O N N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ Ln \ \ \ a) N v v v v v v v v v v 1.0 0.5 [fill N G April row in Sta 14'n g Sea so rt MIER ,■ t� MEN ' MEN MEN mm ■ ONE t■ ■ ONE ' A■ ir■ �� tl!■■ ' MEN IN= i on�wm u ■ i■i■ ■ F■■■ 2.5 2.0 2 00 00 00�O �O �O �O N N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ Ln \ \ \ a) N v v v v v v v v v v 1.0 0.5 [fill Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 13 Year 4 (2017 Data) 12 10 8 6 April Growing Season Sta rt 14 October 21 End Growing Season End 4 2 0 _ -2 a� -4 J -6 a, -8 3 -10 _ -12 96 Days -14 -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 -40 41 41 41 N Um Um 00 �n Um N N Um N l0 am In \ rn F-� N rn F-� l0 rn N Ol V W \ V F-� O V F-� V V N A V 00 W V I--� \ 00 F-� A 00 00 N N I--� 00 1.0 A \ 1.0 I--� I--� 1.0 F-� 00 1.0 N lJ'i r \ N r \ l0 r \ I--� V r \ N V 2.5 mus c N 1.0 0.5 ms Martin's Creek II Sample Time -Lapse Photos from MC UTIR2 (Downstream Camera) Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2017) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2017 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices x/17 — Flow g& «' ' 104 yk� he a�l. mf2f�"�lt ti� y1T.Aid f _.. �aa�li�' R NII H T `) 28.34 inl ial 0 64— 03 ,19'2017 03:20PM'CAMERAL IRT,777", 77 a OZ 1 r `) 28.287nligl 6 53= ) 03 29'2017 09:30AM CAMERAL J 7 IN k.", 37 1 -W- t� e iv =� 2823in1� 6X66 0a 0972017 inlig i 8 '19F 1 03/201201 7 1 7 0 6:5'1 28.341n1Int H 68'F 9512012017 09:3 1 I , h y B 28.491n ifgf 8 44'F 0411'2017 07:17AM CAMERAL k @. 1 7 0 6:5'1 28.341n1Int H 68'F 9512012017 09:3