510035_Inspection Report_20181213

JVJ u IlvS IaJaoI US"
'Division of Water Resources he
.r Facility Number ° 1 - 00,,E 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation °E ,"
'- 0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: aCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0-Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 0,J j;'))I i$ Arrival Time: /yra1 Departure Time:'I Q i ID all
County: abh1501 Region: ?a.°
Farm Name: Sher , K-e rth 0-acks 4 Owner Email:
Owner Name: s he tiv-) a-dc`LS(, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 7i A!et4h efove 0,/ POW(9a4s
Facility Contact: S1j€Ho, ?tckso Title: Q w/l•Pr Phone:
Onsite Representative: Shfe"61 acles(9,1 Integrator: M—B
Certified Operator: S)).eI ) C'acksCI Certification Number: 1-7763—
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current : Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity ; Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
X Feeder to Finish a y�6.) y "o Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder ' D , Poult Ca 1 aci Pot. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish •Layers -- Beef Stocker
Gilts U Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
•Turkeys --
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other ��
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: ,;I - 8,T Date of Inspection: )11)113'
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): )9
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes . No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes U"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. 121 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C Wh Soy.bean
)13.Soil Type(s): Njjf10
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 51 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ix No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? . ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [ 1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 'R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes .1i'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 12 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
tRi Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No NI NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Cj - 3 - Date of Inspection: Ia i I-�! I g
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes N'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [I'NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes fgl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes tg No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. El Yes IRNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Si No El NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes Er.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes l'No El NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
a(o_sh e I--ry) has m or-e_-ha, &l oyr CQ, n0, elL harms,
-, Sit)Cl e, s wU 11 III« by 14 knavIj
s v e /3,1 1: Li(v-viaie-3--n'F -`l alp
M
ay_ Cal kl ai 11N Iig Max Knowles -I It (�f a��-'e� beii reeis
al- S 0 `} ssfeL.- O c aoI1 ly Iv'es, Cor r (o-i) c wereCk , Lime 'vas wiled ih needtt1
(Qr.e ca ay) It Moo a Iga
,
Anay ei 411 pik ►y do ech so bet s (no f` f'y ofi WIiltccap
Wooa-1(a, IoIIs 1Ig 3 ever l-s In &cf- be. ail— gIIs city II/Wow i 1eddc_
6'V �(QI Ii s�� i you f
�m ), 11$ �le ern wayie eko yam edli d n of
- io o10 r � or�M,
r , ��dac�el d � 1
Math error correce.©n Diele,ld, but PA-Ws Char wft h hp,„ a oar� fr r��5�'
41M vvaT a lotof Pr v Dover . cielet y' a.+r�editev'r'ec2P� a.I I7 I IS Tel m.Vt9 WI ck��m�
s o beak j e i li ei-elct t iid o w1-e`c.11, g rondmltii S4Red4 b emcr?,a bow nol- podowt9°y 7
'RiSiAchei r* -For
fii �sse. arki5 ���� Or nia1ko y0-E-if/pray a h rt-coct e cod im bo©fit,
clf,.91-1—a313,—q tio'ice),
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 79‹.)41.1), Phone: qI4��ll— a3�! ®
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: -Tooh Sc1F) '?r Date: 4G I3 aQ 1�S
Page3of3 JOafa SChlifier0 ncctenii 3 6 J i 2/4/2015