19890264 Ver 1_Complete File_19890101

SrAIZ
ti
a,w
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor hugust 2, 1989 R. Paul Wilms
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Parker
FROM: Bill. Mills
SUBJECT: Application
Garland Sl.a,
Dare County
C)rivla; S fined `
Pfl
for CAMA Permit
jle
The Subject application has been reviewed for water quality
impacts and. the following comments are offered:
a) The proposed project does require a 401 Water Quality
Certification but does meet the requirements of General
Certification No. 1273 for discharge of liquid effluent
from an upland diked disposal area.
b) The proposed excavation will result in a direct loss of
11,250 sq. ft. of shallow water habitat. We are
especially concerned that this excavation will
indirectly result in impacts to the marsh fringe which
is between the proposed basin and the bulkhead. This
marsh fringe may possibly slough off into the proposed
basin.
We recommend that the CAMA permit not be issued unless
adequate assurance can be provided that the marsh fringe would
not be directly or indirectly affected by the creation of the
basin.
BM/kls
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
+':1,'• DA i f•'i ',!l...:' t.:f••i#"If•ir'•`r01 REV DATE 070 8/89
ACTION
#s:.. ..:. ,. #
: #!i" i r?';'
!NO +'-!i: . !.E...:.
f..;.... ,.
' 0'iI::` PE WD
E :? >

i:....
? E`'!F. .. if•`.
'1.il??•i.•:;'; i
• NEXT #•+...: ...?,..:.,7...
,••,
l;:;t:?t.:,?:+1
!`' R ! ! !' .{ ENTERED THIS DA TA, RECORD IS N O 00660 {" E•= D DATA
E" #":t i ';u; : 0 0('.6+°. 0 #•: f''`i::?,.i : SLAGLE.:: , GARLAND COUNTY: +.?f°1RliE : REGION: 01
AS SIGNED TQ DA,''.-.*.' J OINT NOTICE: N
TYPE CERTIFICAT ION RECOMMEND DATE ,-.--.' `'Y'?`'si``#DS'
404 PN: 401 RED: ISSUE: RECE IVED: 89060i?
t.. A. , i ONL Y: .....: DIKED : !:: DENY: r INIT IAL REPORT: 890710
OF,``(::.AE" A : •:f. ,',,..•E. P : S WE•'RI:::#::r : • C$ "l...D : FINA L REPORT:
.
89071
RECEIVIN G STREAM: P A M s.. I t i f SOUND CLAS S: SA BASIN: PAS
COMMENTS :
SITE LOC ATED IN BRIGANDS BAY SUBDIV. IN , :. s.. i. t..; L.! : LOTS -j }` , '; ?:s 19 i..:. BROOK S CRT...
PROPOSAL TO ENLARGE AN +! EX
t ,: ..
ISTING 170'
... ..
... BASIN BY EXC
AVATING
_. .
150' X 75' X -5' AREA BELOW MHW
PROPOSAL TO t CAUSE LOSE OF SOFT O F SHA LLOW WATER AB T TA AND POTENT IAL
ADVER SE IMPACTS OF ADJ ACENT FRINGE MAR0-1
SITE INV ESTIGATION ON 7/1 2/89
LOWERING ? H #::. BOTTOM LEVEL OF ADJACENT WATERS WILL POTENTIALLY DESTROY WH
! :.
AT
LEFT OF A FRINGE MARSI-i
PLANS
FO R DIKED DISPOSAL AREA E-i:i': i •• 2. {.: .
COPIES: 1.,:1 r'r i:? t.'t .... C;::: i••:+ 7• R psi....... #`•f :C i... i... E.... ri t: M
`' Jv
?t
` 1989
Ajar<•,
an% C
61 l?Or
i':.':.. r ? F S•'S .. i" : 1"# S'S f...,• .....i REV DATE 07/ 10/85'
`.,.+i
N
(•?# ,.: t •#:I'di:,t #"i.i...#: '•. {jf.:# ';' :. :90-ii' '•..., : ; ' #:'Si'.#... ;•
.. , ..: r i {-'{ S.:i ...r i'•. i'S f•?i #'??'f #"::. # {`+.?{ {,..;r'?f S"S(••i NEXT S''.'F••..:1.:: 'F 00661
NR (••i ''1 ENTERED THIS DATA. RECORD IS NO 00660 FRD DATA
PROj*: 00 660 PROJ: SLAGLE, GARLAND COUNTY: DARE: REGION: 07

TYPE: CER TIFICATION RECOMMEN D DATE...,.! `i `? '3M?.:1:{..-'
+:?'t Ps`''d : 40i RED: ISSUE- RECEIVED: 8906 2 E
t.:rr.
:ii?tr••S #.±t''•i#...r (,r(:;: DIKED ?.?.#..?•;: _+#E.i:Ni INITIAL L . REPORT: •8•'9890710
'
DF'.` f.:('li"iA : `r` ,`.:•#::.f.: #'' : S?f'#"•;:'#:: Q : HOLD: 'r FINAL REPORT:
RECEIVING STREAM: !•• f.a i"i .....#...:._ SOUND CLASS: S63 BASIN: PAS
COMMENTS:
SITE LOCA TED .#.S'-J BR IGANDS BAY • Ut:{DIV:. .,.i`•: a i`..i.:`;ai•`t.? LOTS i s' 10. 19 OFF B#•°'O•..:.. ... ..:i'`;
PROPOSAL TO ENLARG E AN EXISTING 170' 75' ---': BAS IN BY EXCAVATING AN A DD...
150' X 75' X -5 ' AREA BELOW MHW
PROPOi:.•A#... TO (.:AUS#::. #...Ot`.SrS OF ? i:.::f'::t'ii a3QF•i O F l:''Hf"li...#...+...'•f'k WAT ER HABITAT AND #°'t:'..; #::.N S .#.Ai...
;"4D•..ER,:> #.:. IMPACTS OF 6:1a.:..IAt.:#::.NS FRINGE MARS!--i
HOLD FOR SITE INVE STIGATION
COPIES: W A#:;: t:; .... C #::: N.•'," R A#....... M :#: #... #... ` .... ::: M
.-

¢/I
E ? j

?r
( !'.?vl.
W ASH NGT.0 F FF??F
JON 2 8,989
MEMORANDUM
v} D.EM
TO: DEBORAH SAWYER
FROM: David R. Griffin
SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR CAMA MAJOR PERMIT AND/OR
DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT
DATE:- June 26, 1989
Attached is an application by GARLAND L. SLAGLE
which was received by me on 6/2/89
• T am conci_dcr i nix
this application complete, have acknowledged receipt, and have
begun
processing.
If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me.

/yll
Enclosures
OFFICE OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT Lat:35015'56"N
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT Long:75035136"W
1: APPLICANT'S NAME GARLAND L. SLAGLE
2 LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE Brooks Court, Brigands Bay Subdivision,
Frisco, Dare, juncture of man-made canal and Pamlico Sound.
Photo ref. #145-390, A-20
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: DREDGE & FILL X CAMA X
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE:
(A) DATES OF SITE VISIT 6/21/89
(B) WAS APPLICANT PRESENT no
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: APPLICATION RECEIVED 6/2/89
OFFICE Elizabeth City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION: (A) LOCAL LAND USE PLAN Dare County
LAND CLASSIFICATION FROM LUP Transition
DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS IDENTIFIED IN LUP none
(B) AEC(S) INVOLVED: OCEAN HAZARD ESTUARINE SHORELINE X
COASTAL WETLANDS PUBLIC TRUST WATERS X
ESTUARINE WATERS X OTHER
(C) WATER DEPENDENT: YES X NO OTHER

(D) INTENDED USE: PUBLIC PRIVATE X COMMERCIAL
(E) TYPE OF WASTE WATER TREATMENT: EXISTING N/A
PLANNED N/A _
F) TYPE OF
N/A
PLANNED N/A
(G) ESTIMATED ANNUAL RATE OF EROSION 0 SOURCE personal
observation
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
AREA
(A) VEGETATED WETLANDS DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(B) NON-VEGETATED WETLANDS:
Shallow-water habitat 11,250 sq. ft.
(C) OTHER:
upland fill area 15,000 sq. ft.
(D) TOTAL AREA DISTURBED: 26,250,sq.ft. (.6 acres)
8 PROJECT SUMMARY: Applicant proposes to enlarge an existing 170' X
75' X -5' basin by excavating an additional 150' X 75' X -5' area
below MHW at the juncture of a man-made canal and Pamlico Sound
adjacent his property, parcel 17, Brooks Court, Brigands Bay, Frisco,
Dare County.

GARLAND L. SLAGLE
BIO REPORT
PAGE 2
BIO REPORT
The applicant owns lots 17, 18 and 19 off Brooks Court in
Brigands Bay Subdivision, Frisco, Dare County adjacent Pamlico
Sound. The lots are vegetated with lawn grasses, pampas grass
and live oaks. The shoreline has been bulkheaded along all three
lots. A two to five foot wide coastal wetland fringe exists
waterward of the bulkhead in front of lot 17. Spartina
alterniflora, Spartina patens and Distichlis spicata make up this
fringe area; it is kept cut at a very short height by frequent
mowing. Under LAMA permit #130-82, the applicant excavated a
boat basin to -8' deep in front of lots 18 and 19. This
excavated area extended out 75' from the bulkhead. Current water
depths in front of lot 17 range from approximately -1' near shore
to -4.5' deep at a distance of 75' from the waterward edge of the
marsh fringe. The property is situated at the mouth of Brooks
Creek and/or a man-made canal and the Pamlico Sound.
The applicant proposes to extend his existing boat basin
across in front of lot 17. The basin extension area would be -5'
deep and 75' wide by approximately 150' long. Excavation would
begin waterward of the marsh fringe and slope down to the
proposed -5' deep bottom area. The excavation is proposed to be
accomplished by dragline and hydraulic dredge. The spoil
material is to be deposited landward of the bulkhead on lot 17.
Water depths adjacent the area to be excavated are currently -5'
deep; however water depths decrease toward Pamlico Sound to a
minimum of approximately -3.5' to -4.0' deep.
ANTICIPATED IMPACTS
The excavation of the proposed boat basin will cause the
loss of 11,250 square feet of shallow water habitat. The
excavation adjacent the marsh fringe may cause the fringe to
slough off into the basin.
CAMA REVIEW
No restraints are identified for the project under the
transition classification in the 1987 Dare County Land Use Plan.
Submitted by: David R. Griffin
Date: June 23, 1989
Please type or print Carefully describe all anticipated
development activities, including construction, excava-
tion, filling, paving, land clearing, and stormwater con-
trot. If the requested information is not relevant to your
project, write N/A (not applicable). Items 1-4 and 8-9
must be completed for all projects.
1 Applicant
a. Name S ?-F\ ?
Address
city ??v x ? ,, a
State N ?-
Zip -4-1,?,, 2 Day phone .y \ ,,
at Landowner or Authorized agent
b. Project name (if any) NU N Q
c. If the applicant is not the landowner, also give the
owner's name and address.
2 Location of Proposed Project
a. Street address or secondary road number
b. Ci?tyy, town, community, or landmark
c. County \") ;'
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? y s
e. Name of body of water nearest project
3 Description and Planned Use
of Proposed Project
a. Describe all development activities you propose (for
example, building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead,
or pier). u s,,-< t; , N
If you plan to build a marina, also complete and
attach Force DCM-MP-2.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an
existing project, new work, or both?
c. Will the project be for community, private, or
commercial use?
d. Describe the planned use of the project.
4 Land and Water Characteristics
a. Size of entire tract I'l I ?,
b. Size of individual lot(s) N ? N.
c. Elevation of tract above mean sea level or
National Geodetic Vertical Datum
\? 1 c?
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
e. Vegetation on tract N o
f. Man-made features now on tract N n N
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan Classification of
the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
x Conservation Y Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
\'w y):.
i. How are ad'aet waters classified?
j. Has a professional archaeological survey been
carried out for the tract? \);) If so, by whom?
,5 Upland Development
Complete this section if the project includes any land,
development.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, or
structures proposed
b. Number of lots or parcels
c. Density (Give the number of residential units and the
units per acre.)
d. Size of area to be graded or disturbed
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources?
f. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
mean high water to be covered by impermeable
surfaces, such as pavement, buildings, rooftops.
g. List the materials, such as marl, paver stone, asphalt,
or concrete, to be used for paved surfaces.
h: If applicable, has a stormwater management plan
been submitted to the Division of Environmental
Management?
i. Describe proposed sewage disposal and/or waste
water treatment facilities.
j. Have these facilities received state or local approval?
k. Describe existing treatment facilities.
1. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of
the state (for example, surface ninoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down").
in. Water supply source
n. If the project is oceanfront development, describe
the steps that will be taken to maintain established
public beach accessways or provide new access.
o. If the project is on the oceanfront, what will be the
elevation above mean sea level of the first habitable
floor?
6 Excavation And Fill Information
a. Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation
or fill activities (excluding bulkheads, which are
covered in Section 7).
Length Width Depth
Access channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Boat basin
Other (break-
water, pier,
boat ramp,
rock jetty)
Fill placed in
wetland or below
MHW
Upland fill
areas

b. Amount of material to be excavated from below
water level in cubic yards v c z
c. Type of material a Are h
d. Does the area to be excavated include marshland,
swamps, or other wetlands?
Nu
e. High ground excavation, in cubic yards
<v k_, r)
f. Dimensions of spoil disposal area
\i ? ` k \vv` x a,`
g. Location of spoil disposal area Q ??Z?.c \1
h. Do you claim title to the disposal area? N Z S
If not, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
i. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? -4
If so, where? -z, \,.?.,~
j. Does the disposal area include any marshland,
swamps, or water areas?
Ho
k. Will the fill material be placed below mean high
water? ray
1. Amount of fill in cubic yards
m. Type of fill material _ m t,.
n. Source of fill material _ %
o. Will fill material be placed on marsh or other
wetlands?- N ">
p. Dimensions of the wetland to be filled
q. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
'<ticta ?t0.i?S1?h
r. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? V, \,4
s. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Nv If yes, explain steps that will
be taken to lessen environmental impacts.
7 Shoreline Stabilization
a. Length of bulkhead or riprap
b. Average distance waterward of mean high water or
normal water level
c. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months, in
feet
d. Type of bulkhead material
e. Amount of fill, in cubic yards, to be placed below
mean high water
f. Type of fill material
8 Additional Information
In addition to the completed application form, the follow-
ing items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other
instrument under which the applicant claims title to the
affected property. If the applicant is not claiming to be
the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the
deed or other instrument under which the owner claims
title, plus written permission from the owner to cant' out
the project.
An accurate work plat (including plan view and cross
sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black ink on an 8
1/2 x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal Resources
Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if 16 high
quality copies are provided by applicant. (Contact the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding that agency's
use of larger drawings.) A site or location map is a part
of plat requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed
to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
site. Include county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and
the like.
A stormwater management plan, if applicable, that
may have been developed in consultation with the
Division of Environmental Management.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the ad-
jacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These in-
dividuals have 30 days in which to submit comments on
the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Manage-
ment and should be advised by the applicant of that op-
portunity.
3

Named
Address 5 v4 u ??? .t> ,t. ?4,, 9 Certification and Permission
to Enter on Land
Name \-? \C\io?_ .F•,% S C \.\4\
Address 4\k ?:i\.wR "fit ,
Any permit issued in response to this application will
allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions
contained in the permit.
Name
Address
A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
A check for $100 made payable to the Department of
Natural Resources and Community Development to
cover the costs of processing the application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront
and inlet areas.
A statement on the use of public funds. If the project
involves the expenditure of public funds, attach a state-
ment documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's ap-
proved Coastal Management Program and will be con-
ducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in
fact, grant permission to representatives of state and
federal, review agencies to enter on the aforementioned
lands in connection with evaluating information related
to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of
project.
This is the \ day of
Landowrl?r or Authorized ag t
4
00 1
ash\i ?' / ?•
g9
b ` S5 .
i92 G E L \ ?3 '
JA R
??1 \ ?•-'
Pi
.93 \X10 \
.. e \ \ 1 \ Ile
9 3 \
o 'o
96 (
\Pa?? ? iZf r ?
\? l n '
A ` o 11 Ari ;' S8 C O
• '? 9 ? ? P a R? , ?? ?` X10 ? ^?
49 9 \ a ` ?9 \
\Pp?.?.?. RG \ 55
?? \ E L a 1 R G ?*
53
\ 73 10pRCEI __ •1
72
sz 5
P?
.130
Q P ?101 ' /i . LCC-4,t,FF a9 4 ? ?` F I \
got` G E 3%
19 PR N0E 'Qi/'F / ?' r
. 20 RC
PP
21 GEL of v / ad /
. P 22 R?E? Z? .• • T c,? ` ? ?
''?B RI0A ND S D A `
)
0
« cY'
S
•
V L,
? u
<
9e .
it OtV
Y
C,?V •y '7)
Rt F
r
'h
O.-Ce leu.r•
i
1
r

•<, ee w x
O •3 ,y ry x -?1"

"IS, al

V "< o r 'Ir sJO O' t
'
'+'1 C '
't'+'
'•r
r< j
1 I

Coue-r

a ?e I t
I
s AIN
r VA
)•

' d = J
'Ad
'. ,7j biN
/' /f,
'
I
nr e e
,
l
l
in I,%

A ?

7rr /
Is l

., ? t
21.
COURT
;I + ; ,,, .» ,I• JwC
' ,4
a j 'fY?f.7'fN I1flF tq fr7);.r' '
t `
y
r,
+<, ?? )
PL
~
°'+
OP
e•? !
}
`a

. • <.< •<• '„ str ,r DRIV
r
I' E 1
s I

•
•
r
' n
IN, w
•? J1a
BRIGANDS' DAY • .+ a0

I.1•GO, 40e7u Cl%n OIIM^

7.
. Z?dill. ANO ?G:e? SS
tt.
-Lit
`•F e ;?r?, • 7''rt illy o O `? f Vh `I
t .!y ....?ci^?N1 . h o Sa.?°.,'? ^?. ?. ,. ?''• ' t / 1, r
' •A /j' ?.atj yKf y,t '?t?411? Y +? ' \ .` F?, ! .r f •? •'k.?ix,?rf.
' ; ?/ ''a~4? ; + ?° `l ?`?,.. ? . ? ? z Y1 1r?'r rfi??',? { 4 ` ?l??rp . yr
, Jr
r r' y 1 . r r , ,'/. t
1raY?v R rlrr i I Y? / q r V _'
x.ar
' ; ,1 Iii l
e? a, +
?. ?Ai ,(r b.?•?• ? ? I yea f X +"' .'7??ti?f ,,,y ' .
' , -,? ? t •}t ?r ? ? +y1F ?ir o.• : ,, ? `'' `"'G?A`OSO ?Tq1? ?tZ?. f
SCALE
r r t .} r `
A. A/
tI. ?j
r N ' t-1 y 8rc /GFAnNr s 8A Y Y 1a v, r
'F2/5'CO 7'WSP NG?TfI CAre01 !n//.?r
r]? y

+
G
u 1

y

i
l

9

-c .c
17

i
yC ?' ib

\ Y,

X?

Z ILA(

6. ? (f

?
r

T

r
z ?.

? lI
- r
"" J 1
1)
G

L'

i
f?

Gx
C?0.Uw a?
i
.i

NOTICE OF FILING OF
APPLICATION FOR CAMA MAJOR DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT AND WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION

silt 1989
I
d ,
, arch COP
The Department of Natural Resources and Community
Development hereby gives public notice as required by NCGS
113A-119(b) and 143-215 3(a)(1)(c) that Garland L. Slagle of Dare
County, North Carolina, filed an application on June 2, 1989, for
a permit from the Division of Coastal Management to develop in an
Area of Environmental Concern and for certification from the
Division of Environmental Management that a discharge of fill
material in project wetlands will not violate applicable water
quality standards.
According to said application the applicant proposes to
enlarge an existing 170' X 75' X -5' basin by excavating an
additional 150' X 75' X -5' area below MHW at the juncture of a
man-made canal and Pamlico Sound adjacent his property, parcel
17, Brooks Court, Brigands Bay, Frisco, Dare County.
A copy of the entire application and additional information
may be examined (or copies furnished upon request and payment of
reproduction costs) during normal business hours at the office of
David R. Griffin, Division of Coastal Management, located at
Route 6, Box 203,Elizabeth City, N.C., [phone], and/or the
office of Deborah Sawyer, Division of Environmental Management,
NRCD Regional Field Office, Washington, N.C., 27889.
The Division of Environmental Management proposes to take
final action on this water quality certification on or before
August 10, 1989. The issuance of the CAMA Major Development
permit and the Section 401 Certification may deviate from this
projected date depending upon the nature of the comments
submitted and subsequent hearings that may result.
All persons desiring to make comments should do so in
writing to Mr. George T. Everett, Director, Division of Coastal
Management, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, N.C., 27611, prior to
August 5, 1989 for consideration in the CAMA permit decision, and
to Mr. Bill Mills, Division of Environmental Management, P.O. Box
27687, Raleigh, N.C., 27611, prior to August 5, 1989 for
consideration in the water quality certification decision. Later
comments on the CAMA application will be accepted and considered
up to the time of permit decision. Project modifications may
occur based on review and comment by the public and state and
federal agencies. Notice of the permit decision in this matter
will be provided upon request.

PUBLISHED ON: July 16, 1989