NC0089621_EAA_20181130

Dewberry
Engineering
Analysis
Alternatives
NPDES Discharge Permit to Cedar Creek
Novozymes, North America, Inc.
November 30, 2018
SUBMITTED BY:
Dewberry
2610 Wycliff Road
Suite 410
Raleigh, NC 27607
PREPARED FOR:
Novozymes
North America, Inc.
SUBMITTED TO:
NCDEQ

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................................1
LISTOF TABLES........................................................................................................... 2
APPENDICES................................................................................................................. 3
LISTOF ACRONYMS.....................................................................................................4
1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 5
2. CONTACT INFORMATION......................................................................................7
3. INDUSTRIAL PROCESS DESCRIPTION................................................................8
3.1 Facility Description....................................................................................................................8
3.2 Existing Wastewater Treatment Discharge Permits................................................................9
3.3 Future Flow Projections.......................................................................................................... io
4. EAA STEP 1: DETERMINE ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE LOCATION .................12
4.1 Proposed Discharge Location.................................................................................................. 12
4.2 Water Quality Factors.............................................................................................................. 12
4.3 Speculative Limits....................................................................................................................13
4.4 Determination..........................................................................................................................14
5. EAA STEP 2: PROVIDE POPULATION AND FLOW PROJECTIONS................15
6. EAA STEP 3: EVALUATE TECHNOLOGICALLY FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES 16
6.1
Alternative A: Connection to an Existing Wastewater Treatment System ..........................16
6.2
Alternative B: Land Application.............................................................................................16
6.3
Alternative C: Onsite Reuse....................................................................................................16
6.4
Alternative D: Direct Discharge to a Surface Water..............................................................16
6.5
Alternative E.1: Direct Discharge to Cedar Creek with Existing Land Application and
Discharge to the Franklin County WWTP..............................................................................
17
6.6
Alternative E.2: Additional Indirect Discharge to a POTW with
Existing Land Application and Discharge to the Franklin County WWTP ..........................18
6.7
Alternative E.3: Onsite Reuse with Existing Land Application and
Discharge to Franklin County WWTP....................................................................................
21
6.8
Alternative E.4: Additional Land Application with
Existing Land Application and Discharge to Franklin County WWTP.................................
21
�•� Dewberry¢ Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 11
.•:•
:,1

7. WWTP UPGRADES AND EXPANSION................................................................ 22
7.1 Primary Clarification...............................................................................................................22
7.2 Bioreactors...............................................................................................................................22
7.3 Aeration and Mixing Equipment............................................................................................23
7.4 Secondary Clarification............................................................................................................23
7.5 Dissolved Air Flotation(DAF).................................................................................................23
7.6 Ultra -Filtration (UF)/Reverse Osmosis (RO) System...........................................................23
8. EAA STEP 4: EVALUATE THE ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY
OF ALTERNATIVES..............................................................................................
25
8.1 Capital Costs.............................................................................................................................25
8.1.1 Alternative E.1 Capital Costs...................................................................................................25
8.1.2 Alternative E.2 Capital Costs...................................................................................................25
8.2 Annual Reoccurring Costs.......................................................................................................26
8.2.1 Alternative E.1 Annual Reoccurring Costs..............................................................................26
8.2.2 Alternative E.2 Annual Reoccurring Costs.............................................................................26
8.3 Comparison of PVCA...............................................................................................................
27
9. SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES...........................................................................28
10. LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW FORM..............................................................30
11. CERTIFICATION STATEMENT.............................................................................31
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1 Industrial User Pretreatment Permit Limits
Table 3.3 Current Average vs. Future Estimated Average Daily Flows
Table 3.4 WWTP Upgrade and Expansion Schedule
Table 4.1 Direct (NPDES) and Indirect (IUP) Discharge NPDES Speculative Permit Limits
Table 6.1 Novozymes' Influent Wastewater Characteristics
Table 8.1 PVCA Comparison of Alternative E.1 and E.2
�Irali Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 12
1;:1 Dewberry

APPENDICES
Appendix A
Wastewater Irrigation System Permit (Permit # WQ00028o6)
Appendix B
Industrial User Pretreatment Permit (Permit # 0112)
Appendix C
Division Approved Corrective Action Plan
Appendix D
Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) Guidance Document
Appendix E
Novozymes Water Balance
Appendix F
Proposed Cedar Creek Discharge Location and Alignment
Appendix G
USGS 7Q10 Determination Correspondence
Appendix H
US Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species List
Appendix I
Block Flow Diagram
Appendix J
Town of Louisburg — Flow Limitation Letter
Appendix K
2018 Franklin County Headworks Analysis (9/26/18)
Appendix L
Preliminary Specification Table
Appendix M
Cost Tables for Alternatives E.1 and E.2
Appendix N
Vendor Quotes
YDewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 13

LIST OF ACRONYMS
ADF Average daily flow rate
BAT Best Available Technology
BFD Block flow diagram
BOD Biological oxygen demand
CEAM Center for Exposure Assessment
Modeling
COD Chemical oxygen demand
C.F.R Code of Federal Regulations
DAF Dissolved air floatation
DO Dissolved oxygen
EAA Engineering alternatives analysis
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
gpd gallons per day
gpm gallons per minute
HWA Headworks Analysis
IUP Industrial user permit
lb/d pound per day
lb/wk pounds per week
MGD Million gallons per day
mg/L milligrams per liter
MLVSS Mixed liquor volatile suspended solids
NCDEQ
North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality
NH3-N
Ammonia measured as nitrogen
NPDES
National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System
NSW
Nutrient sensitive waters
POTW
Publicly owned treatment works
PVCA
Present value cost analysis
RAS
Return activated sludge
RO
Reverse osmosis
s.u.
standard units (pH)
SND
Simultaneous nitrification and
denitrification
TDS
total dissolved solids
TP
total phosphorus
TSS
total suspended solids
TKN
total Kjeldahl nitrogen
TN
total nitrogen
USGS
United States Geological Survey
WAS
Waste activated sludge
WWTP
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Dewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 14

1. INTRODUCTION
Novozymes North America, Inc. (Novozymes) has applied for a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit for direct discharge of wastewater from its manufacturing facility located in Franklinton, North
Carolina. Novozymes is seeking a NPDES discharge to Cedar Creek, a tributary to the Tar River located in Tar -
Pamlico River Basin. Novozymes desires to have a NPDES permit with permit limits for three flow tiers based on 1.o,
1.5, and 2.0 MGD average daily flow rates. Currently, Novozymes discharges all process wastewater from the facility
by one of two methods: (i) land application on agricultural fields pursuant to Non -Discharge Permit (WQ00028o6)
(Appendix A), and (2) indirect discharge to the Franklin County Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) pursuant to
Industrial User Pretreatment (IUP) Permit 0112 (Appendix B).
Novozymes applied for the NPDES permit to comply with the provisions of the Corrective Action Plan for the North
Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) Division of Water Quality (Division) Incident Number
86545 that was conditionally approved by the Division Director on January 31, 2017 (Appendix C). Per the
requirements of the approved Corrective Action Plan, Novozymes must reduce land application rates of treated
wastewater from 30 inches/yr to 8.5 inches per year and also must recover and treat approximately go,000 gpd of
groundwater. The Division's approval of the Corrective Action Plan requires Novozymes to obtain the NPDES permit
to satisfy these requirements (Appendix C). Additionally, the NPDES permit will allow Novozymes to establish a fully
conjunctive wastewater system and increase operational flexibility by giving it three methods for disposing of
wastewater: (1) land application on nearby farm fields, (2) discharge to the Franklin County WWTP, and (3) direct
discharge to surface water. Last, Novozymes would like to expand the facility, increase production capacity, and add
manufacturing jobs in a rural community. Expansion of the facility will require significant additional discharge
capacity that would be provided by the NPDES permit.
To apply for a NPDES individual permit, new direct dischargers are required by the NCDEQ Division of Water
Resources (Division) to conduct an Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) in accordance with 15A NCAC
02H.0105(c)(2)'. Per the Division's Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) Guidance Document (rev April 2014)
provided as Appendix D, applicants are to follow these steps in preparation of the EAA:
• Step 1: Determine if a Proposed Discharge Will be Allowed
• Step 2: Provide Reasonable Projections for Population and Flow
• Step 3: Evaluate Technologically Feasible Alternatives
• Step 4: Evaluate Economic Feasibility of Alternatives
For Step 1, non -municipal applicants must make their own determination as to whether the proposed discharge will
be allowed by the Division. For Step 2, an applicant is required to present flow projections. Novozymes is a non -
municipal applicant and flow projections are developed based on production predictions, not on population
projections as flow is independent of local population growth.
Dewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 15

For Step 3, an applicant is required to evaluate the technological feasibility of the following alternatives:
• Alternative A: Connection to an existing wastewater treatment system
• Alternative B: Land application
• Alternative C: Wastewater reuse
• Alternative D: Direct discharge to surface water
• Alternative E: Combinations of the above
For Step 4, for each technologically feasible alternative identified in Step 3, the new discharger must develop
conceptual designs and perform a Present Value Cost Analysis (PVCA). The PVCA should include capital costs
associated with land/easement acquisition, equipment, design, construction, and startup, and recurring costs
associated with operation and maintenance, equipment replacement, personnel costs, user/connection fees, utility
costs, permit and compliance fees, residual disposal costs, and laboratory costs. The PVCA should be performed
assuming a 20-year planning period at the current Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) discount rate.
The steps outlined above were followed in evaluating the direct discharge of Novozymes' treated wastewater to the
proposed location on Cedar Creek. The results of the EAA evaluation are presented herein.
0.1 Dewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 16

2. CONTACT INFORMATION
The following EAA was prepared by Dewberry Engineers, Inc. (Dewberry) on behalf of Novozymes.
Applicant:
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Mailing Address
PO Box 576
Franklinton, NC 27525
Facility Address
77 Perry Chapel Church Road
Fran1dinton, NC 27525
Contact Person
Angela Walsh, PE
Phone Number
[phone]
EAA Preparer:
Dewberry Engineers Inc.
Mailing Address
2610 Wycliff Road, Suite 410
Raleigh, NC 27607
Contact Person:
Katie Jones, PE
Phone Number:
[phone]
•"' Dewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 17
. �

3. INDUSTRIAL PROCESS DESCRIPTION
3.1 Facility Description
At Novozymes, industrial enzymes are produced using a process called submerged fermentation. This involves
growing carefully selected microorganisms (bacteria and fungi) in closed vessels containing a rich broth of nutrients.
As the microorganisms break down the nutrients, they produce the desired enzymes. The fermentation process
requires nutrients based on renewable raw materials like corn starch, sugars, and soy grits.
The first step in harvesting enzymes from fermentation medium is to remove insoluble products, primarily microbial
cells. This is normally done by centrifugation or microfiltration steps. As most industrial enzymes are extracellular —
secreted by cells into the external environment — they remain in the fermented broth after the biomass has been
removed. The spent biomass can be recycled as a fertilizer on local farms, as is done under a residuals disposal permit
at Novozymes' Franklinton site. Enzymes in the remaining broth are then concentrated by evaporation, membrane
filtration or crystallization depending on their intended application. Certain applications require solid enzyme
products, so the crude enzyme is processed into granules for convenient dust -free use. The wastewater discharge at
Novozymes consists of discharge from the fermentation and recovery production processes and from site utilities
such as cooling tower and boiler blowdown. From the facility, the waste streams are characterized into two groups:
permeate (e.g. filtrate produced from the membrane filtration step) and non -permeate (e.g. all other waste streams).
Both the permeate and non -permeate waste streams are treated onsite at the Franklinton facility at Novozymes'
WWTP.
Permeate represents filtrate from the production ultrafiltration recovery processes. As this is the filtrate from an
ultrafilter, the solids in this waste stream are low. Non -permeate waste streams include fermentation waste and
process wastewaters other than filtrate. Both waste streams are treated in the same wastewater unit processes except
that permeate bypasses the primary clarifier as the solids concentration in this waste stream is low.
Novozymes currently treats process wastewater through the following unit operations: primary clarification,
anaerobic system, biological nutrient removal, and secondary clarification. The secondary clarifier overflow
discharges to two effluent storage lagoons. From the lagoons, wastewater can either be land applied or undergoes
tertiary treatment via dissolved air flotation (DAF) for phosphorus removal before discharge to Franklin County
WWTP (Figure 1).
Based on Novozymes' SIC Code 2869, the facility's industrial discharge is regulated under the Organic Chemicals,
Plastics, and Synthetic Fibers (OCPSF) effluent limits for Subcategory G Bulk Organic Chemicals (40 CFR 414.70).
However, Novozymes' manufacturing process is a fermentation process, and 40 CFR 414.11(e) states the provisions of
40 CFR 414 do not apply to discharges from the manufacture of organic chemical compounds solely by fermentation
processes. It should be noted that even if the provisions of 40 CFR 414 did apply to the Novozymes facility, BAT
limits are not established in 40 CFR 414 Subcategory G for nitrogen.
Dewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 18

Anaerobic Svstem
i
i
Primary ' Anaerobic
Clarifier Reactor
i Pre
i Ackliflcation i T02
Tank Aerobic
i
----------------------
I Tot I
Anoxic/
Aerobic
ISludge Return
'I
nternal Nitrate Recycl
L_
,
Anoxic
Aerobic
'
Lagoon ,
'
'-- -
Used as needed -
--- - - - - --
Figure 1. Current Wastewater Treatment Configuration
Effluent
Storage
To Land
Secondary Application
Clarifier
Dissolved Air
Flotation
\4_ To Franklin
County
3.2 Existing Wastewater Treatment Discharge Permits
As noted above, Novozymes currently discharges treated wastewater via two discharge permits: (1) land application
through Non -Discharge Permit (WQ00028o6), and (2) indirect discharge to the Franklin County WWTP pursuant to
Industrial User Pretreatment (IUP) Permit o112. IUP Permit 0112 was issued by Franklin County, effective November
9, 2018 and establishes effluent parameters with numerical limits as described in the table below.
Novozymes also holds Non -Discharge Permit (WQ00028o6) as reissued by the Division with an effective date of June
8, 2017 for land application of 30" per year of treated wastewater. As described above, Novozymes' Corrective Action
Plan for DWR Incident Number 86545 was approved by the Division and requires Novozymes to reduce its land
application rate from 30 in/yr to 8.5 in/yr following receipt of a NPDES permit and after the construction and
commissioning of an expanded and upgraded WWTP onsite.
Dewberry, Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 19

Table 3.1.Current Industrial User Pretreatment Permit Limits — Novozymes IU Permit #0112
I
Parameter
Flow
M IUP Permit
Limit
MGD 0.525
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)
m /L
100
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
m /L
150
Ammonia-N NHs
m /L
10.0
Total Nitrogen (TNI)
Ibs/month
1,825
Total Phosphorus TP
Ibs/month
295
Potassium
Ibs/ month
65,956
Sodium
Ibs/month
50,608
Temperature
°C
40.0
H
S.U.
6 - 10
Turbidity
NTU
15
Antimony
m /I
1.0
Cadmium
m /I
0.008
Chromium
m /I
0.020
Copper
m /I
0.05
Cyanide
m /I
0.010
Lead
m /I
0.0125
Nickel
m /I
0.0313
Zinc
m /I
0.390
3.3 Future Flow Projections
Novozymes intends to expand production at its facility over the next 5 years. With the addition of expanded
production capacity, Novozymes projects a total wastewater flow of approximately 2.06 MGD in 2023. This projected
flow includes 2.o MGD process wastewater and o.06 domestic wastewater. The projected wastewater flow was
determined by performing a water balance of the existing production facility using average daily flows recorded for
2015, and increasing water use based on future production increases. The water balance is attached as Appendix E.
According to the water balance, historical flow data, and subsequent to receiving a NPDES permit, Novozymes
anticipates to reduce discharges to land application fields and to the Franklin County WWTP. The reduction in land
application rate is the result of the CAP that reduces the irrigation rates for wastewater discharge. The planned
reduction in the indirect discharge rate is based on a number of factors, including operational challenges at the
Franklin County WWTP in receiving Novozymes' treated wastewater. The table below summarizes 2017 average
wastewater discharge rates and future projected average rates from the water balance. Flows presented are average
daily flows (ADF). It should be noted that Novozymes will maintain the current permit with Franklin County without
requesting a reduction in discharge capacity. This will allow Novozymes flexibility in its discharge options and will
allow Novozymes to increase discharge to the Franklin County WWTP should the County need additional influent
flow for their own operational efficiency.
Dewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 110

Table 3.3. Current Average vs. Future Estimated Average Daily Flows
In conjunction with the desired production increases, Novozymes plans to expand and upgrade its onsite WWTP in
phases over the next 5 years according to the schedule below. Novozymes desires to have a NPDES permit with permit
limits for three flow tiers based on i.o,1.5, and 2.o MGD average daily flow rates. The planned expansion and
upgrade of the WWTP is discussed in detail in Section 7 below and includes upgrading the WWTP facility to a
simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) process for biological nitrogen removal. SND continuous flow
activated treatment facilities operate at lower DO concentrations (0.50t0.2 mg/l on average), and are able to achieve
nitrification and denitrification in the same bioreactor tank. Recent studies have presented data demonstrating over
go% COD removal, and at increased carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratios, nitrogen removal efficiencies higher than 98%
SNDii. Phosphorus removal shall be achieved through chemical precipitation in the primary clarifiers and dissolved
air floatation (DAF) units.
The upgrade and expansion to treat the ultimate 2.0 MGD NPDES discharge shall include new primary and secondary
clarifiers; new SND bioreactors, aeration equipment, controls; additional dissolved air floatation (DAFs) units; and
new pumping equipment and appurtenances. Existing unit processes shall be retrofitted and incorporated into the
proposed SND process, i.e.; the anaerobic reactor shall continue treating the permeate side stream, and existing
moving bed biological reactor (MBBR) tanks shall be converted into post aeration and anoxic polishing tanks. The
expansion shall also include installing and operating an ultra -filtration and reverse osmosis (RO) unit processes to
reduce the concentration of total dissolved solids (TDS), principally potassium, in treated wastewater to be
discharged.
Table 3.4. WWTP Upgrade and Expansion Schedule
Wastewater Treatment System Upgrade and Expansion Design to 1.5 MGD
Anticipated
Completion Date
Q2 2019
Effluent Pump Station and Force Main Design
Q2 2019
Wastewater Treatment System Upgrade and Expansion to 1.5 MGD Construction
Q4 2019
Construction of Effluent Pump Station and Pump Station to Proposed Outfall Location
Q4 2019
Wastewater Treatment System Startup of 1.5 MGD Expansion
Q4 2020
Wastewater Treatment System Upgrade and Expansion to 2.0 MGD
2023
Dewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 111

4. EAA STEP 1: DETERMINE ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE
LOCATION
Step 1 of the EAA is to determine if the proposed wastewater discharge is allowable. This section identifies the
proposed discharge location, potential speculative limits, and Novozymes determination of an allowable discharge. A
project description and contact information is presented in Sections 2 and 3.
4.1 Proposed Discharge Location
Novozymes proposes to discharge treated effluent to Cedar Creek at a location ~1.3 km downstream of the existing
Franklin County WWTP discharge location. The coordinates to the proposed discharge location are 36.07372 and (-)
78.39861. Cedar Creek is a tributary to the Tar River, which is part of the Tar -Pamlico River Basin. Per North
Carolina General Statue 15A NCAC 2B .0223, the Tar -Pamlico River Basin has been classified as nutrient sensitive
waters (NSW). Cedar Creek is classified as a Class C, NSW. Cedar Creek is not identified as an impaired water
stream per NCDEQ's Final 2016 Category 5 Assessments — 303(d) List. A map identifying the proposed discharge
location is presented in Appendix F.
4.2 Water Quality Factors
Since Cedar Creek is a NSW located in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin, North Carolina Administrative Code Section 15A
NCAC 02B.0229 provides that new industrial wastewater discharges with permitted flows greater than 0.05 million
gallons per day (MGD) must perform a Best Available Technology (BAT) analysis to determine nutrient offset
payments for total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN). A BAT analysis was prepared and submitted
concurrently with this report to develop TP and TN speculative permit limits.
To evaluate the impact of the proposed Novozymes direct discharge, a water quality modeling study was performed
and the modeling report, titled QUAL2K Cedar Creek Model (October 2018), was submitted to DWR on October 26,
2018. The surface water quality model selected was QUAL2K, a model developed by EPA Center for Exposure
Assessment Modeling (CEAM) in conjunction with Tufts University. The QUAL2K model has been used extensively
for simulating stream water quality and is widely used for modeling dissolved oxygen profiles. Based on the QUAL2K
modeling results, the 2.0 MGD proposed discharge by Novozymes into Cedar Creek at the proposed outfall location is
predicted to result in daily average DO concentrations above the daily average water quality standard of 5 mg/l and
instantaneous maximum standard of 4 mg/l for Cedar Creek. The modeling scenarios included calibrating a model to
field conditions, then adjusting the field calibrated model to the USGS reported 7Q10 low flow condition at summer
time conditions, i.e.; the 9olh percentile stream temperature and monthly mean maximum normal ambient air
temperature. The model was prepared in accordance with modeling protocol as agreed upon with DWR.
Cedar Creek is not a zero -flow stream. The 7Q10 low flow yield and discharge for Cedar Creek were provided by the
United States Geological Survey (USGS) for the proposed discharge location. See Appendix G for USGS
correspondence. According to the USGS, a low flow determination was possible based on transfer of low -flow
characteristics from nearby partial -record and continuous -record sites within or near the basin. USGS identified
three (3) nearby USGS partial record sites and one (1) continuous -record stream gauge in the vicinity of the proposed
Novozymes discharge point. Among the 4 sites, one of the partial -record sites (Station ID 02081770, drainage area
11.9 sq.mi) and the continuous -record stream gauge (Station ID 0208i800, drainage area 47.8 sq.mi) located
ftDewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 112

upstream and downstream, respectively, of the proposed Novozymes discharge were used by USGS to determine the
following the low -flow discharge yields in Cedar Creek:
• Annual median 7Q10 low -flow yields of 0.07 cubic foot per second per square mile (cfsm)
• Annual median 30Q2 low -flow yield of 0.32 cfsm
• Average median annual discharge yields of 1.03 cfsm
A basin delineation performed using the online USGS Stream Stats application for North Carolina for the proposed
Novozymes discharge location provides an estimated drainage area of 33.6 acres for the proposed Novozymes
discharge location. Application of the above low flow discharge yields to the 33.6-acre drainage area results in the
following estimated low -flow discharges:
• Annual 7Q10 discharge of 2.4 cubic feet per second (cfs)
• Annual 30Q2 discharge of io.8 cfs
• Average annual discharge of 34.6 cfs
Regarding endangered species, a review of the US Fish and Wildlife Service website (Appendix H) revealed three
endangered species that are believed to be present in Franklin County. These are the Tar River Spinymussel, Dwarf
Wedgemussel, and Michaux's Sumac. Based on comments related to potential impacts of potassium in Novozymes'
discharge on indigenous freshwater mussels, Novozymes prepared and submitted to DWR a detailed study entitled
Potassium Aquatic Life Values Study Report (Ramboll Group 2018) that evaluated acute and chronic aquatic life
values for potassium. Based on the Ramboll Group report, Novozymes anticipates a numerical limit for potassium
that is protective of indigenous freshwater mussels and proposes the use of reverse osmosis (RO) to reduce potassium
to such protective levels.
4.3 Speculative Limits
Speculative limits were determined for indirect and direct discharges based on the following factors:
• In -stream water quality standards;
• Existing industrial user permits;
15A NCAC 02B .0229;
• BAT Analysis; and
• DWR Meetings and Guidance from 2016 through 2018.
Speculative TN and TP limits for the direct discharge (NPDES) option were developed in the BAT analysis submitted
concurrently with this report. For the indirect discharge option, Franklin County is required to continue to meet
stringent effluent TN and TP discharge limits, and its capacity to accept additional TN and TP loads from Novozymes
is speculative. Therefore, existing TN and TP IUP limits are assumed to be equal to future TN and TP IUP limits.
As noted above, Novozymes anticipates a potassium numerical limit to be determined by the Division for the direct
discharge (NPDES) option. For the indirect discharge (IUP) option, Alternative E.2, it is assumed that the potassium
limit shall remain equal to the Novozymes existing IUP discharge limit. Also as noted above, Novozymes proposes the
use of reverse osmosis (RO) to reduce potassium to protective levels for both the NPDES and IUP options.
Dewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 113

The NPDES speculative limits for ammonia (NH3) and dissolved oxygen (DO) are based on the in -stream water
quality standards and are assumed to be i.o mg/l and greater than 5.0 mg/l, respectively for the direct discharge
(NPDES) option. For the indirect discharge (IUP) option, it is assumed that the NH3 limit will remain the same as
the existing IUP permit. Speculative limits are listed below and represent monthly averages unless otherwise noted.
Table 4.1. Direct (NPDES) and Indirect (IUP) Discharge NPDES Speculative Permit Limits
NPDES
Parameter Units Alternative E.1 Alternative E.2
Flow MGD 2.0 2.0
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)
m /L
5.0
100
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
m /L
30
150
Ammonia-N(NH3)m
/L
1.0
10
Total Nitrogen TN
m /I
8.8
1,8251bs/month
Total Phosphorus JP)
Mg/1
1.0
295 Ibs/month
Potassium
Ibs/ month
TBDM
65,956
H
S.U.
6-9
6-9
Dissolved Oxygen
m /I
>_ 5
NA(2)
WTBD, to be determined by the Division
(2) NA, not applicable
4.4 Determination
Novozymes is a non -municipal applicant; therefore, a determination as to whether the discharge would be allowed
must be developed by the applicant. As discussed in Sections 4.1 through 4.3 above, the proposed discharge location
at Cedar Creek is appropriate based on the water quality modeling requested by DWR, stream flow data and water
quality information are satisfactory, and potassium aquatic life studies together with the proposed use of RO
wastewater treatment mitigate concerns regarding indigenous freshwater mussels. Accordingly, the proposed direct
discharge to Cedar Creek should be allowed.
n' Dewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 114
.

5. EAA STEP 2: PROVIDE POPULATION AND FLOW
PROJECTIONS
Development of population projections required for Step 2 apply to municipal facilities to account for flow and load
increases due to population changes. Novozymes is an industrial facility and projected flow is independent of
population changes, and dependent on facility production. Based on future production projections in combination
with the required reduction in land application rates and the recovery and treatment of groundwater, as presented in
Section 3, Novozymes requires the ability to discharge 2 million gallons per day (MGD) through a NPDES discharge
permit.
'Dewberry, Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 115
.

6. EAA STEP 3: EVALUATE TECHNOLOGICALLY FEASIBLE
ALTERNATIVES
Four combination alternatives were evaluated to assess their technological feasibility. Single fate discharge
alternatives were not evaluated for the reasons discussed below. All four combination discharge alternatives
incorporate the existing land application and existing discharge to the Franklin County WWTP. The four combination
alternatives evaluated were:
i. Direct discharge to Cedar Creek in combination with existing land application and existing indirect discharge
to Franklin County WWTP
2. Additional indirect discharge to Franklin County WWTP in combination with existing land application and
existing indirect discharge to Franklin County WWTP
3. Onsite reuse in combination with existing land application and existing indirect discharge to Franklin
County WWTP
4. Additional land application in combination with existing land application and existing indirect discharge to
Franklin County WWTP
6.1 Alternative A: Connection to an Existing Wastewater Treatment System
Connection to an existing wastewater treatment system as a single discharge alternative was not evaluated because
Novozymes will maintain its existing non -discharge permit for land application of treated wastewater. Therefore,
connection to an existing wastewater treatment system was evaluated in combination with the existing land
application system. This combination alternative is presented as Alternative E.2 below.
6.2 Alternative B: Land Application
Similarly, land application as a single discharge alternative was not evaluated. Novozymes will maintain its existing
IUP for discharge to the Franklin County WWTP; therefore, expansion of the existing land application system was
evaluated in combination with the existing discharge to Franklin County WWTP. This combination alternative is
presented as Alterative E.4 below.
6.3 Alternative C: Onsite Reuse
Onsite reuse as a single discharge alternative was not evaluated. Novozymes will maintain its existing land application
permit for non -discharge and its existing IUP for discharge to the Franklin County WWTP; therefore, onsite reuse
was evaluated in combination with the existing discharge rates. This combination alternative is presented as
Alternative E.3 below.
6.4 Alternative D: Direct Discharge to a Surface Water
Direct discharge to a surface water as a single discharge alternative was not evaluated. As noted above, Novozymes
will maintain the existing land application system and existing discharge to the Franklin County WWTP; therefore,
direct discharge to a surface water was evaluated in combination with the existing discharge fates. This combination
alternative is presented as Alternative E.1 below.
Dewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 116

6.5 Alternative E.1: Direct Discharge to Cedar Creek with Existing Land
Application and Discharge to the Franklin County WWTP
This alternative includes discharging treated wastewater to Cedar Creek, Novozymes' existing land application fields,
and to the Franklin County WWTP at the future flow rates identified in Table 3.3. To provide maximum flexibility for
production increases and meet discharge reductions for land application, Novozymes requires a primary discharge
method that can singularly provide 2.0 MGD process wastewater discharge capacity. Therefore, this alternative
includes direct discharge of Novozymes projected 2.0 MGD process waste stream in combination with existing land
application and indirect discharge to Franklin County. As described below, a conjunctive wastewater treatment
system consisting of (i) land application, (ii) discharge to the Franklin County WWTP, and (iii) direct discharge to
Cedar Creek is technologically feasible.
A surface water discharge would need to meet the more stringent, speculative NPDES limits presented in Table 4.1.
To meet such limits, Novozymes plans to upgrade and expand its existing onsite WWTP. The preliminary influent
basis of design for Novozymes' proposed WWTP expansion and upgrades was developed based on historical influent
data collected at the existing Novozymes WWTP, as documented in the BAT analysis report submitted concurrently
with this EAA report. As indicated in the BAT report, future production activities are anticipated to be similar to
historical activities as it relates to influent characteristics, so historical data is expected to be representative of future
influent process wastewater.
Table 6.1 Novozymes' Future Influent Wastewater Characteristics
Chemical Ox gen Demand COD
Design
Concentrations
5,389
COD, mass limits in lbs/day
89,900
Ammonia-N
63
Total K'ehldahl Nitrogen TKN
197
Nitrate-N
29
Total Nitrogen TN
208
Total Phosphorus TP
90
Sulfate
118
To meet speculative limits presented in Section 3, a simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND), aerobic
conventional activated sludge process is proposed. Per the BAT analysis submitted concurrently with this report,
treatability testing and biological modeling was performed to determine the technological feasibility of the proposed
SND activated sludge process. Per treatability testing, the technically achievable effluent total nitrogen concentration
for the proposed SND process was 8.8 mg/l; this includes a 1.o mg/1 total nitrogen removal credit via the proposed
RO unit process. The results of biological process modeling indicate that proposed SND process will produce
secondary effluent with NH3 and NO3+ concentrations of less than 1 mg/l, each. Therefore, Alternative E.1 is deemed
technologically feasible. A block flow diagram of the anticipated upgraded WWTP configuration is provided in
Appendix I.
Dewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 117

To meet the speculative NPDES limits, the following unit process upgrades are required:
• Primary Clarification upgrade and expansion
• New Biological Reactors
o Reactor Tanks
o New blowers, mixers and diffused aeration equipment
Secondary Clarification upgrade and expansion
Chemical Phosphorus System upgrade and expansion
New Reverse Osmosis System
o Ultrafiltration Step
o Reverse Osmosis Step
o Evaporators for waste stream
Electrical and Mechanical Process Building
Appurtenances
o Pumping
o Electrical
o Piping
o Instrumentation
o Civil Site Work
In addition to the equipment listed above, a new effluent pump station, discharge pipeline, and cascade aeration at
the outfall will be required. The proposed force main alignment is located on Novozymes' property and land
acquisition is not required; only NC Department of Transportation (DOT) utility easements are required. The
proposed route for the discharge pipeline is presented in Appendix F.
The Novozymes WWTP upgrades, including operation of an RO unit, as described above are deemed technologically
feasible, and as a result Alternative E.1 is technologically feasible overall. A PVCA has been performed for this
alternative.
6.6 Alternative E.2: Additional Indirect Discharge to a POTW with Existing
Land Application and Discharge to the Franklin County WWTP
This alternative includes discharging treated effluent to Novozymes' existing land application fields, and increasing
indirect discharge to a publically owned treatment works (POTW) at the future flow rates identified in Table 3.3. To
accommodate the projected production increases and to meet discharge reductions for land application, Novozymes
requires a primary discharge method that can singularly accept the total required 2.0 MGD process wastewater.
Therefore, POTWs are evaluated on the ability to accept a total of 2.o MGD of Novozymes discharge. Two POTWs are
located within the general vicinity of the Novozymes facility: Town of Louisburg WWTP and Franklin County WWTP.
Discharge to the Town of Louisburg was considered, but was determined to be infeasible due to flow limitations at the
Town of Louisburg's WWTP. The Town of Louisburg's WWTP is designed and permitted to treat and discharge 1.37
MGD of wastewater. Novozymes is seeking capacity to discharge 2.0 MGD of wastewater. Therefore, the Louisburg
WWTP does not have the design or permitted capacity to treat and discharge 2.0 MGD from Novozymes.
Furthermore, the Louisburg facility does not have the permit capacity to comingle the treated Novozymes wastewater
Dewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 118

with the Louisburg WWTP effluent and discharge in a single outfall under the auspices of the Louisburg NPDES
permit. A letter from the Town of Louisburg stating the flow limitations described above is provided in Attachment I.
The Franklin County WWTP is designed to treat 3 MGD. The Franklin County WWTP NPDES permit NCoo69311
contains tiered discharge limits for 2.0 MGD and 3 MGD, and Franklin County is currently discharging under the 2.0
MGD permit limits. Novozymes is currently permitted to discharge an average daily flow of 0.525 MGD to the
Franklin County WWTP under the auspices of the existing IUP 0112.
Per the Franklin County POTW Headworks Analysis (HWA) dated 9/26/18 (Appendix K), the Franklin County
WWTP has o.82 MGD in flow maximum allowable industrial load (MAIL) remaining at the tiered permitted flow of
2.0 MGD. At the tiered permitted flow of 3 MGD, the Franklin County WWTP has 1.82 MGD MAIL capacity
remaining. Therefore, the Franklin County WWTP ostensibly has sufficient flow capacity to accept 2.0 MGD
Novozymes process wastewater discharge when the 1.82 MGD MAIL remaining is combined with the 0.525 MGD
already permitted and allocated to Novozymes.
If Novozymes were to be permitted to discharge 2.0 MGD to the Franklin County WWTP, 88.5% of the HWA capacity
is utilized at the tiered 3 MGD permitted flow. This accounts for the 0.35 MGD permitted flow to other Significant
Industrial Users (SIUs) and 0.3 MGD of uncontrollable flow (Franklin County HWA 9/26/18). Per i5A NCAC
02T.o118, prior to exceeding 8o% of the permitted hydraulic capacity, a facility must submit an engineering
evaluation of future wastewater treatment needs and provide expansion plans if required"'. In addition, prior to
exceeding go% of the permitted hydraulic capacity a facility must obtain all permits needed for expansion and have
submitted final plans and specifications for expansion.
Pursuing this alternative would require Franklin County to submit an engineering evaluation of future wastewater
treatment needs. Conventionally, at 88.5% HWA capacity consumption and prior to exceeding go% of the HWA
capacity, Franklin County shall obtain all permits needed for the expansion of the wastewater treatment, utilization,
or disposal system and, if construction is needed, submit final plans and specifications for expansion to provide
Novozymes capacity while maintaining the County's obligation for future community growth. Typical costs to
upgrade a municipal treatment plant to meet TN concentrations between 3 and 8 mg/l are typically less than $25/
gallon, with operational costs frequently less than $0.25 per gpd per year'°. Assuming a capital cost of $12 to $25 per
gallon treated, to upgrade and expand Franklin County's WWTP, an additional $24 to $50 million capital costs and
$500,00o annual operating costs are required for a 2.0 MGD capacity increase. The capital and long term operation
and maintenance costs for a 2.0 MGD municipal WWTP expansion compared to Alternative E.1 is an unnecessary
cost burden to existing residential and commercial users, i.e. local tax payers, which can be avoided if pursuing
Alternative E.1. Franklin County's potential costs for the design, permitting and future expansion of the Franklin
County WWTP are not included in the PVCA for this alternative.
Increasing Novozymes' process wastewater discharge to the Franklin County WWTP from 0.525 MGD to 2.0 MGD
would require Novozymes to upgrade its onsite WWTP. Per the Headworks Analysis (dated 9/26/1.8), increasing
Novozymes permitted discharge to 2.0 MGD at the Franklin County WWTP permitted flow of 3 MGD at Novozymes'
current IUP limits results in over allocation of ammonia, cadmium, cyanide, lead, and zinc on the HWA. Further, it is
anticipated that IUP permitted potassium mass limits will not increase with an increased flow request, therefore
potassium removal via reverse osmosis unit is necessary. To produce reverse osmosis quality effluent, Novozymes
must produce secondary treated effluent to ensure the reverse osmosis step is efficient and can meet anticipated
ftDewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 119

potassium limits. Therefore, the same SND, aerobic conventional activated sludge process identified for Alternative
E.1 is proposed. Refer to Appendix I for a preliminary BFD of the proposed process.
Discharge of Novozymes' RO treated effluent to the Franklin County WWTP is deemed to be unnecessary, due to the
high -quality effluent which does not require further treatment. In this alternative, the high -quality RO effluent from
Novozymes will cause significant dilution to the incoming commercial, other industrial, and domestic wastewater
streams as Novozymes will account for over 60% of the incoming flow. Such dilution may cause operational issues at
the Franklin County WWTP resulting in ineffective treatment and permit exceedances. Furthermore, the Novozymes
discharge will unnecessarily consume hydraulic capacity within the Franklin County WWTP which could instead be
used to support residential, commercial, and industrial growth in the area.
In the recent past, Franklin County has periodically limited Novozymes discharge below the current IUP permitted
discharge rate of 525,000 gpd due to operational challenges which intermittently occur at the Franklin County
WWTP. If the proposed high quality treated effluent will result in operational challenges, it is anticipated that
Franklin County will limit Novozymes' indirect discharge to below future IUP permitted limits.
For this option, the following unit process upgrades are required:
Primary Clarification upgrade and expansion
New Biological Reactors
o Reactor Tanks
o New blowers, mixers and diffused aeration equipment
• Secondary Clarification upgrade and expansion
• Chemical Phosphorus System upgrade and expansion
New Reverse Osmosis System
o Ultrafiltration Step
o Reverse Osmosis Step
o Evaporators for waste stream
Electrical and Mechanical Process Building
Appurtenances
o Pumping
o Electrical
o Piping
o Instrumentation
o Civil Site Work
In addition to the equipment listed above, upgrades are required to the existing effluent pump station and discharge
pipeline to convey the proposed 2.0 MGD to Franklin County's collection system.
Based on the above discussion, Franklin County shall apply for and receive a modified or new NPDES permit
including final plans and specifications for expansion and specific engineering and design information. This process
would require extensive planning, engineering, permitting and funding by Franklin County to meet the regulatory
prerequisites to allocate wastewater capacity above the 8o% and go% thresholds. Such an alternative would require
the commitment and agreement of Franklin County and would be years in the process. Thus, while Alternative E.2
may be technically "technologically feasible", it is simply not realistic from a practical standpoint. Further, sending
tertiary treated effluent to Franklin County is deemed unnecessary, consumes hydraulic capacity that may be
Dewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 120

otherwise allocated, and may result in operational issues, which would limit the amount Novozymes can discharge to
below future IUP permitted limits. Thus, Alternative E.2 is not a dependable option. Nevertheless, for comparison
purposes, a PVCA for this alternative was conducted and included below. The PVCA includes the necessary upgrade
and expansion to Novozymes Facility to meet the anticipated future IUP limits. It should be noted that the PVCA
does not include costs associated with upgrading and expanding Franklin County's WWTP facility or collection
system infrastructure.
6.7 Alternative E.3: Onsite Reuse with Existing Land Application and
Discharge to Franklin County WWTP
This alternative includes onsite reuse in combination with the existing indirect discharge and land application.
Novozymes Franklinton facility is an Orthodox Union (OU) certified, Chometz-Free facility. Novozymes currently
reuses recovered groundwater as non -contact cooling tower makeup water. Novozymes is projected to supply the
cooling towers with i00% reuse groundwater within the next 3 years. However, Novozymes' OU certifying body does
not allow reuse water elsewhere within the production process. As such, whole effluent reuse is not deemed feasible.
6.8 Alternative EA: Additional Land Application with Existing Land
Application and Discharge to Franklin County WWTP
This alternative would involve expansion of the existing land application system with continued existing indirect
discharge to the Franklin County WWTP. Based on the Corrective Action Plan approved by DWR in January 2017,
Novozymes is required to reduce current irrigation rates. The need for additional discharge capacity is in part due to
the requirement by DWR to reduce irrigation rates on the existing land application fields. The addition of new land
application fields is not consistent with the goal of reduced irrigation; therefore, this option is not deemed
technologically feasible.
•"' Dewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 121
.

7. WWTP UPGRADES AND EXPANSION
Two alternatives were identified as technologically feasible for further consideration: Alternative E.i. Direct
Discharge to Cedar Creek with Existing Land Application and Indirect Discharge to the Franklin County WWTP and
Alternative E.2. Additional Indirect Discharge to a POTW with Existing Land Application and Discharge to the
Franklin County WWTP. As discussed in Section 6, Novozymes is required to upgrade their onsite WWTP to support
either option. Within this section, sizing criteria for major unit process upgrades are discussed.
For the purpose of this analysis, it is assumed that the existing anaerobic system shall be utilized as a side stream
process to aid in COD removal prior to the SND process. It is anticipated that the anaerobic process can treat 0.50
MGD and remove 24,000 lb/day of COD. Treated effluent from the anaerobic reactor will mix with the influent
wastewater prior to the proposed SND treatment process. The influent wastewater characteristics to the proposed
SND, aerobic activated sludge process shall be equal to those presented in Table 6.1 with the exception of COD and
ammonia. For COD, the basis of design concentration to the SND process will be 3,950 mg/l, which is 1,439 mg/l less
than the raw influent COD concentration shown in Table 6.1. This reduction is provided by the side -stream anaerobic
treatment process. For ammonia, it is anticipated that the concentration will increase across the anaerobic system,
as organic nitrogen undergoes ammonification. However, the TKN is expected to remain the same as shown in Table
6.1., as ammonification simply shifts the speciation of TKN from organic nitrogen to the more readily available
ammonia compound. Refer to the block flow diagram attached as Appendix I. Major equipment to be installed is
summarized in the attached preliminary equipment specification table in Appendix L.
7.1 Primary Clarification
A new primary clarifier is required due to the increased hydraulic and solids loading to the treatment process. The
primary clarifier shall reduce solids present in the influent wastewater. The primary clarification unit process step
shall also include capacity for phosphorus removal through chemical precipitation, such as the addition of ferric
chloride.
Using October 201.6- October 2o18 flow data, the historical average flow to the primary clarifiers was 0.76 MGD,
resulting in an overflow rate of 790 gal/ft2/d for the existing clarifier. This historical overflow rate of 790 gal/ft2/d is
nearly within the recommended loading rate of 800-1,200 gal/d/ft2 for primary clarifiers (Metcalf & Eddy, pg S98).
This loading rate has provided sufficient settling of solids for the Novozymes facility in the past, and the same
overflow rate was used to size the new primary clarifier.
7.2 Bioreactors
Three (3), above ground, bolted stainless steel bioreactor tanks shall be provided for the proposed SND, aerobic
activated sludge system. Bioreactor tanks were sized based on a 0.5 food to microorganism (F:M) ratio, mixed liquor
volatile suspended solids (MLVSS) concentration of 4,000 mg/l and an influent COD concentration identified in
Table 6.1.
The required bioreactor tank configuration for the conventional aeration treatment technology was provided to
vendors for pricing.
Dewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 122

7.3 Aeration and Mixing Equipment
Bioreactor tanks will be equipped with fine bubble diffuser aeration grids and surface mixers. Air supply will be
provided by centrifugal blowers for the required design air flow and pressure. Mixing shall be provided by fixed or
floating direct drive mixers. Required design air flow rates and pressures were provided to vendors for pricing on
blowers and aeration grids. Tank size and TSS concentrations were provided to vendors for pricing on surface floating
or fixed mixers.
7.4 Secondary Clarification
A new concrete secondary clarifier is required to treat the higher future flow rate conditions and separate solids from
the treated effluent. The return activated sludge (RAS) and waste activated sludge (WAS) pump station will also
require modifications and upgrades. The new RAS pumps will provide 150% of influent flow return, while the WAS
pumps will be sized to maintain the desired MLVSS concentration. Both pumps will be self -priming pumps.
The proposed secondary clarifier is sized based on the historical solids loading rate. Historically, the existing
secondary clarifier operated at a solids loading rate of 0.51 pounds per day per square foot (gal/hr/ft2). The historical
solids loading rate was calculated based on an existing clarifier diameter of 87 ft and an average historical clarifier
influent flow rate of 0.73 MGD. The historical solids loading rate is below the recommended loading rate of 1.0-1.5
lb/hr/ft2 for secondary clarifiers (Metcalf & Eddy, pg 687). Using the projected flow of 2.0 MGD, the secondary
clarifier was sized to maintain the historical solids loading rate.
7.5 Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF)
Chemical precipitation is currently employed onsite for phosphorus removal and additional treatment capacity is
required for the flow increase. Novozymes currently utilizes a ioo ft2 DAF with ferric chloride and lime addition for
phosphorus removal. Historically, the DAF has been operated at an average surface loading rate of 2.9 gpm/ft2. This
surface loading rate is calculated based on the 2014-2015 average effluent flow rate to Franklin County of 0.423 MGD.
The historical surface loading rate is within the recommended range of 0.2 — 4.0 gpm/ft2 for dissolved air flotation
(Metcalf & Eddy, pg 423).
Two additional DAFs at 250 ft2 each are proposed. The surface loading rate for the new DAFs and the existing DAF at
2.0 MGD will be 2.3 gpm/ft2, which is below the historical surface loading rate and within the recommended range. In
addition, Novozymes will have the ability to vary the ferric addition rate as needed to achieve phosphorus removal.
Flow to the DAFs will be controlled to prevent over loading.
7.6 Reverse Osmosis (RO) System
Reverse osmosis is included to reduce the concentration of potassium in the Novozymes' discharge. An ultra -
filtration process is included as a pretreatment step to eliminate fine particulates that may damage the RO
membranes or cause fouling. Both unit processes are sized to treat the projected 2.0 MGD process wastewater low. An
evaporator is included to reduce the volume of reject brine solution and achieve a consistency that can be disposed of
at an approved facility. Flow to the OF/RO and evaporator will be fully automated. It is also anticipated that the RO
system will provide, on average, i.o mg/l total nitrogen removal.
Since the effluent potassium limit for the proposed NPDES discharge alternative E.1 remains to be determined by the
Division, the RO system was preliminary sized using the speculative IUP mass limit for the indirect discharge to the
Dewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 123

Franklin County WWTP, Alternative E.2. The preliminary RO design for Alternative E.2 requires that 74% of the
projected 2.0 MGD process wastewater flow undergo RO treatment with the remaining flow bypassing treatment.
This results in a blended effluent that meets the speculative IUP mass limit. For Alternative E.1, it is anticipated that
i00% of the projected 2.o MGD process wastewater flow undergo RO treatment, with no bypassing. Costs for the RO
system for Alternative E.2 were requested from vendors. Costs for Alternative E. i were scaled accordingly from
received vendor quotes for Alternative E.2
RO reject material will be sent to an evaporator, with bottoms disposed of at an approved facility. Novozymes is
currently seeking environmentally advantageous disposal options for evaporator bottoms, but has yet to identify
concrete reuse options at this time. For the purpose of this report, it is anticipated that evaporator bottoms will be
landfilled. The PVCA includes transporting and tipping costs associated with landfill disposal. Evaporator costs were
determined based on a go% distillate recovery and 50,000 gallon per day capacity modular units. Alternative E.1
requires 4 modular units, and Alternative E.2 requires 3 modular units.
*.'Dewberry,
Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 124

8. EAA STEP 4: EVALUATE THE ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF
ALTERNATIVES
A PVCA was prepared for Alternatives E.1 and E.2. The remaining alternatives are not deemed technologically
feasible. The PVCA was performed assuming a 20-year planning period at the current Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) discount rate of 2.2%v. Vendor quotes obtained for the capital equipment described below are
presented in Appendix N.
8.1 Capital Costs
The capital costs associated with the required upgrades identified in Section 6 for alternatives E.1 and E.2 are
presented in Tables A.1 and A.2 of Appendix M. Capital costs were estimated using vendor supplied budgetary quotes
for the process equipment identified in the preliminary Specification Table attached as Appendix L. Additionally, unit
costs for installed items such as concrete were estimated from recent construction data, as well as allowances for
equipment installation, electrical, piping, civil site work, and were determined as a percentage of equipment costs.
The total capital costs for Alternative E.i and E.2 are summarized below. The main difference in capital costs between
alternatives is the RO and evaporator costs.
8.1.1 Alternative E.1 Capital Costs
The capital costs to construct a 2.0 MGD WWTP with a direct NPDES discharge to Cedar Creek is approximately
$79.6 million. This includes maintaining the existing indirect discharge to Franklin County and the reduced land
application discharge. Costs also include the effluent pump station and force main to Cedar Creek. It is anticipated
that the effluent force main shall be installed on existing Novozymes property or within existing easements.
Therefore land acquisition or easement costs are not included, with the exception of a new NCDOT utility
permit/easement to cross NC Highway 56.
8.1.2 Alternative E.2 Capital Costs
The capital costs to provide a 2.0 MGD indirect discharge to Franklin County is approximately $65.8 million. This
includes maintaining the reduced land application discharge. It is anticipated that the effluent force main upgrades
shall occur on existing Novozymes property or within existing easements. Therefore, land acquisition or easement
costs are not included.
To meet speculative IUP potassium limits, a reverse osmosis process step is necessary, which requires Novozymes to
produce secondary treated effluent to ensure the reverse osmosis process is efficient and can meet anticipated
potassium limits. Therefore, the same SND, aerobic conventional activated sludge process identified for Alternative
E.1 is proposed.
ItDewberry® Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 125

8.2 Annual Reoccurring Costs.
The following reoccurring cost categories have been included in the PVCA analysis:
1. Sewer use fees to Franklin County
2. Operation and maintenance
3. Laboratory analytical
4. Labor
5. Chemical costs (carbon addition for denitrification, chemical for phosphorus removal, anti-scalant for RO)
6. Utility costs
7. Residuals disposal costs
8. Tar -Pamlico Basin nutrient offset fees
9. NPDES permit fee
The annual reoccurring costs for alternatives E.1 and E.2 are summarized below. The main differences in reoccurring
costs are the Franklin County sewer use fee at $7.70 per gallon, and bottoms disposal costs at $70 per ton.
8.2.1 Alternative E.1 Annual Reoccurring Costs
The annual reoccurring costs for Alternative E.1 are $11.6 million. This includes the nutrient offset fee per NC
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 02B .0229 for new discharges to the Tar Pamlico River basin. Per i5A NCAC
02B.0229 Part c, the calculated nutrient offset fee for 2.0 MGD discharge is $865,332 per permit cycle. Assuming a
5-yr permit cycle, the annual nutrient offset fee is $178,000 per year. This corresponds to a total of $2.90 per lb of
combined TN and TP removed.
These costs also include a sewer use fee to Franklin County in the amount of $7.70 per one thousand gallons
discharged to Franklin County's WWTP and the evaporator bottoms disposal costs at $70 per ton. Based on the
minimum 0.13 MGD indirect wastewater discharge rate to Franklin County per the agreement between Novozymes
and Franklin County, the annual sewer use fee is $365,000. Based on a go% RO recovery and go% distillate recovery,
it is estimated that the evaporation process will create 30,440 tons per year of bottoms material to dispose of. This
results in an annual cost of $2.13 million.
8.2.2 Alternative E.2 Annual Reoccurring Costs.
The annual reoccurring costs for Alternative E.i are $15.3 million. This includes the sewer use fee to Franklin County
in the amount of $7.70 per gallon discharged to Franklin County's WWTP, and the evaporator bottoms disposal costs
at $70 per ton. Based on the proposed 2.0 MGD indirect discharge rate to Franklin County, the annual sewer use fee
is $5.6 million. Based on a 90% RO recovery and 90% distillate recovery, it is estimated that the evaporation process
will create 22,830 tons per year of bottoms material to dispose of. This results in an annual cost of $1.6o million. Lab
costs are also reduced as NPDES compliance sampling is not required.
ftDewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 126

8.3 Comparison of PVCA
A detailed comparison of the present value cost analysis for Alternatives E.1 and E.2 is presented below. Detailed
costs estimates are attached as Tables A.i and A.2. attached in Appendix M.
Table 8.1. PVCA Comparison of Alternative EA and E.2
Capital Costs
Equipment Installation and Construction
CedarDirect Discharge to
$51,654,000
Indirect Discharge to
$42,692,000
40% Contingency
$20,662,000
$7,232,000
$17,077,000
$5,977,000
Engineering
Total Required Capital Costs
$79,548,000
$65,746,000
Reoccurring Costs
O&M, including chemicals, labor and maintenance
$1,781,000
$1,572,000
Laboratory Costs
$42,000
$10,000
Residuals Disposal Costs
$5,681,000
$5,148,000
Sewer Use Fees
$365,000
$5,621,000
Tar -Pamlico Nutrient Off Set Fees
$173,000
$0
Utility Costs
$3,578,000
$2,917,000
Total Annual Reoccurring Costs
Present Value Cost Analysis (PVCA)
$11, 620,000
iii
$15,268,000
$310,648,000
The PVCA indicates that Alternative E.2, with PVC of approximately $311 million, is not a reasonably cost effective
option compared to Alternative E.1, with PVC of approximately $266 million. At a PVC of $266 million, Alternative
E.1. costs are estimated to be ~15% lower than Alternative E.2. This conclusion is even clearer if Franklin County's
additional costs to upgrade and expand its WWTP (as would be required under Alternative E.2) were considered. As
noted above, such costs could be in the range of an additional $24 to $50 million in capital costs and $500,000 in
annual increased operational costs.
�" Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 1 27
Dewberry

9. SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES
The primary purpose for seeking a NPDES discharge option is to establish a conjunctive WWTP system in accordance
with the Corrective Action Plan approved by the Division and to allow expansion of Novozymes' manufacturing
facility, which would increase manufacturing jobs in a rural community. Since the CAP identifies a conjunctive
wastewater system, and requires the decrease in land application be offset by a direct discharge, four (4) alternatives
were evaluated:
Alternative E.i Direct Discharge to Cedar Creek with Existing Land Application and Indirect
Discharge to Franklin County's WWTP
Alternative E.2 Additional Indirect Discharge to Franklin County's WWTP with Existing Land
Application and Indirect Discharge to Franklin County's WWTP
Alternative E.3 Onsite Reuse with Existing Land Application and Discharge to Franklin County
WWTP
Alternative E.4 Additional Land Application with Existing Land Application and Discharge to
Franklin County WWTP
Of the four (4) alternatives evaluated, Alternatives E.i and E.2 were deemed technologically feasible, and Alternatives
E.3 and E.4 were deemed technologically infeasible. Novozymes Franklinton facility is an OU certified, Chometz-Free
facility. Novozymes currently reuses recovered groundwater as non -contact cooling tower makeup water. Novozymes
is projected to supply the cooling towers with i00% reuse groundwater within the next 3 years. However, Novozymes'
OU certifying body does not allow reuse water elsewhere within the production process. As such, whole effluent reuse
is not deemed feasible. Furthermore, the addition of new land application fields is not consistent with the goal of
reduced irrigation per the approved CAP.
Although Alternative E.2 may be considered technologically feasible, sending tertiary treated, reverse osmosis quality
wastewater that meets speculative direct discharge limits (Section 4.3) for further treatment is significantly less
efficient, and more costly than Alternative E.1 without any appreciable additional environmental benefit. According to
the HWA, pursuing Alternative E.2 will result in Franklin County's WWTP using nearly go% of its permitted
hydraulic capacity. Conventionally, at 88.5% HWA capacity consumption and prior to exceeding go% of the HWA
capacity, Franklin County shall obtain all permits needed for the expansion of the wastewater treatment, utilization,
or disposal system and, if construction is needed, submit final plans and specifications for expansion to provide
Novozymes capacity while maintaining the County's obligation for future community growth. Typical costs to upgrade
a municipal treatment plant to meet TN concentrations between 3 and 8 mg/1 are typically less than $25/ gallon, with
operational costs frequently less than $0.25 per gpd per year. Assuming a capital cost of $12 to $25 per gallon treated
to upgrade and expand Franklin County's WWTP, an additional $24 to $50 million capital costs and $500,000
annual operating costs are required for a 2.0 MGD capacity increase. The capital and long term operation and
maintenance costs for a 2.0 MGD municipal expansion compared to Alternative E.1, is an unnecessary cost burden to
existing residential and commercial users, i.e.; local tax payers, which can be avoided if selecting E.1. Note such costs
were not included in the performed PVCA.
Furthermore, Franklin County already limits Novozymes discharge to the Franklin County WWTP for operational
reasons, and this alternative would require extensive planning, engineering, permitting, and funding by the County to
meet the regulatory prerequisites to allocate wastewater capacity above the 8o% and go% thresholds. Such process
would require the commitment and agreement of Franklin County and would be years in the process. Thus, while
Dewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 128

Alternative E.2 may be technically "technologically feasible", it is simply not realistic from a practical standpoint.
Therefore, Alternative E.i, a direct NPDES discharge to Cedar Creek in combination with the existing indirect
discharge to Franklin County and the reduced land application discharge is deemed the most technologically feasible
alternative.
A detailed comparison of the present value cost analysis for Alternatives E.i and E.2 indicates Alternative E.1, direct
discharge to the Cedar Creek in combination with existing land application and indirect discharge to the Franklin
County's WWTP, is the more cost effective alternative. At a present value cost of $266 million, Alternative E.1. costs
are estimated to be ~15% lower than Alternative E.2. In comparison, Alternative E.2 is not reasonably cost effective.
Additionally, Alternative E.2 would provide no appreciable additional environmental benefit. Both Alternatives
involve installation and use of the RO system described above and would result in RO-quality effluent that would
meet the direct discharge speculative limits listed in Table 4.1 that are protective of the receiving stream.
In conclusion, the most technologically and economically feasible alternative is Alternative E.i. Although Alternative
E.1 requires a new NPDES discharge permit, Alternative E.i will produce a high -quality effluent compared to other
approved municipal and industrial NPDES discharges, and allows for continued use of the Novozymes existing land
application fields and existing indirect discharge to Franklin County.
0.1
Dewberr y Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 129

10.LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW FORM
The Local Government Review Form is required for non -municipal domestic wastewater treatment facilities. The
Novozymes discharge will be for industrial process wastewater discharge only and will not contain domestic
wastewater. Domestic wastewater generated at the Novozymes facility is discharged to the Franklin County WWTP
for treatment; therefore, this form is not required.
Dewberry, Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 130

11. CERTIFICATION STATEMENT
This EAA and report was prepared by Dewberry. Dewberry is licensed to practice engineering (#F-0929) in North
Carolina. I, Katie L. Jones, a North Carolina Licensed Engineer for Dewberry, do certify that the information
contained in this report is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Katie L. Jones, PE (#034450)
Associate
Dewberry Engineers Inc.
i North Carolina Division of Water Resources, North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Subchapter 02H,
"Procedures for Permits: Approvals"
ii Rodrigo F. Bueno, Roque P. Piveli, Fabio Campos & Pedro A. Sobrinho (2018) Simultaneous nitrification and
denitrification in the activated sludge systems of continuous flow, Environmental Technology, 39:20, 2641-2652,
DOI: io.io8o/oQCiQ3330.2oi7.i363820
iii North Carolina Division of Water Resources, North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Subchapter 02T,
"Waste Not Discharged to Surface Waters"
i° US Environmental Protection Agency (2015). A Compilation of Cost Data Associated with the Impacts and Control
of Nutrient Pollution. USEPA 82o-F-12-o96
Office of Management and Budget, 2o18 Discount Rates for OMB Circular No. A-94, February 8, 2018
1.1 Dewberry Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis 131

Appendix A: Wastewater Irrigation
System Permit (Permit #WQ0002806)
www.dewberry.com

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
June 8, 2017
FRED REIKOWSKY - SENIOR DIRECTOR OF PRODUCTION
NOVOZYMES NORTH AMERICA, INC.
77 PERRY CHAPEL CHURCH ROAD
FRANKLINTON, NORTH CAROLINA 27525
Dear Mr. Reikowsky:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Subject: Permit No. WQ0002806
Novozymes Franklin County
Facility
Wastewater Irrigation System
Franklin County
In accordance with your permit minor modification request received May 3, 2017, we are
forwarding herewith Permit No. WQ0002806 dated June 8, 2017, to Novozymes North America, Inc. for
the continued operation of the subject wastewater treatment and irrigation facilities.
The modifications to the subject permit are as follows:
1. Addition of two new Schedule Conditions because of the Corrective Action Plan conditionally
approved by the Division on January 31, 2017. The new Schedule Conditions are Conditions
1.3 and I.4.
2. Modifications in Attachment B to (1) Fields EJ9 and GF 1 have reductions of yearly maximum
irrigation rate to 0 in/yr; and (2) Field GF4 has a reduction of wetted acreage from 33.1 to 31.1
acres.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until May 31, 2020, shall void Permit No.
WQ0002806 issued dune 25, 2015, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein.
Please pay particular attention to the monitoring requirements listed in Attachments A, B and C for they
may differ from the previous permit issuance. Failure to establish an adequate system for collecting and
maintaining the required operational information shall result in future compliance problems.
Please note the following permit conditions are new since the last permit issuance dated June
25, 2015-
➢ Condition I.3. —Twenty-one (21) new wells to be added.
➢ Condition I.4. — Overall capacity reduction from 30 in/yr to 8.5 in/yr.
➢ Attachment B — Fields EJ9 and GF4 have loading rates reduced from 30 in/yr to 0 in/yr; and
the net wetted area of Field GF4 is reduced from 33.1 acres to 31.1 acres.
­' 'Nothing Compares_,.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality j Water Resources I Water Quality Permitting I Non -Discharge Permitting
1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919-807-6332

Mr. Fred Reikowsky
June 8, 2017
Page 2 of 2
If any parts, requirements or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, the Permittee
has the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within 30 days following receipt of
this permit. This request shall be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings at 6714 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. Unless such demands are made, this permit shall be final and binding.
If you need additional information concerning this permit, please contact Troy Doby at (919) 807-
6336 or troy.dobygncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
S. Jay Zimmerman, P.G., Director
Division of Water Resources
cc: Franklin County Health Department (Electronic Copy)
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section (Electronic Copy)
Digital Permit Archive (Electronic Copy)
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
RALEIGH
WASTEWATER IRRIGATION SYSTEM PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin County
FOR THE
operation of an extended aeration wastewater treatment facility with nutrient removal capability,
discharging to the Franklin County POTW as permitted by the County and to an average 700,000 gallon
per day (GPD) wastewater irrigation facility consisting of the:
continued operation of a collection system consisting of: approximately 1,335 linear feet (LF) of 8-inch
gravity sewer; approximately 1,600 LF of 4-inch gravity sewer; approximately 705 LF of 3-inch force main;
approximately 9 LF of 3-inch wastewater collection piping to allow the collection of food preparation
wastewater a 112,800 gallon primary clarifier; and all associated piping, valves, controls, and
appurtenances; the
continued operation of: a 2,100 gallon concrete wet well and approximately 900 LF of 8-inch force main
and conversion of one existing 300 gallons per minute (GPM) pump to transfer primary clarifier effluent to
the concrete weir box receiving a mixture of high -strength wastewater and recycled activated sludge and
serving basins TO and T02; and all associated piping, valves, controls, and appurtenances; the
continued operation of: an influent flow meter and sampler for Lagoon No.1, the existing 4.7 million gallon
(MG) aeration basin, and operation of the Biolac diffused aeration system in Lagoon No.1 which is supplied
air by three 200 horsepower (hp) blowers an approximate 185,000 gallon anoxic zone; a floating baffle
curtain to physically separate the anoxic and aerobic zones, which shall be installed at the Permittee's
discretion; an aerobic zone with a relocated 1,920 gallon per minute (GPM) pump for internal recirculation,
and a motorized weir gate; and all associated piping, valves, controls, and appurtenances; the
continued operation of an anaerobic treatment system consisting of a 400,000 gallon covered pre -
acidification tank (PAT) which is supplied by two 700 GPM feed pumps and a 3,500 GPM centrifugal jet
mix pump; a 24,000 gallon covered recirculation tank (RT tank) with two 900 GPM centrifugal feed pumps
and 1,100 GPM recirculation/mixing pumps; a 208,000 gallon covered internal recirculation anaerobic
reactor (IC Reactor) with three heat exchangers; a bulk lime 6,350 gallon storage and metering tank for pH
and alkalinity adjustment for process control in the PAT, IC/RT and T02. The anaerobic treatment system
may be used at the discretion of the Permittee to replace or reduce the treatment load on Lagoon No. 1; and
all associated piping, valves, controls, and appurtenances; the
WQ0002806 Version 3.1 Shell Version 151201 Page I of 12

continued operation of. a 564,000 gallon secondary clarifier and associated pumps (A pit:. return sludge
pumps, B pit: waste sludge pumps, and C pit: effluent pumps) with approximately 600 LF of 8-inch force
main; and all associated piping, valves, controls, and appurtenances; the
continued operation of. a 250,000 gallon aerated basin (T02) with coarse bubble diffusers, served by three
existing 200 hp centrifugal blowers; a 240,000 gallon aeration basin (TO1) with a diffused aeration system;
foam suppression systems for TO 1 and T02 served by a submersible pump and associated nozzles; a recycle
pump station with centrifugal recycle pumps; and all associated piping, valves, controls, and appurtenances;
the
continued operation of: a 6 MG storage lagoon (Lagoon No. 2); a 36 MG storage lagoon (Lagoon No. 3)
and associated pumps; a flow meter for waste storage; transfer of evaporator condensate from the plant
facilities directly to the wastewater storage Lagoon No. 2 without pretreatment in the aeration basin; and
all associated piping, valves, controls, and appurtenances; the
continued operation of: approximately 10,800 LF of 8-inch diameter force main to supply treated effluent
from Lagoon No. 3 to a phosphorus removal system prior to discharge to the Franklin County POTW; a 25
hp submersible pump located in the wet well at Lagoon No. 3; and approval for occasional bypass or
overflow from the phosphorous removal system into existing Lagoon No. 2; the transfer of groundwater
from a remediation system for use as cooling tower make-up and process water prior to being treated in the
existing wastewater treatment facility; and all associated piping, valves, controls, and appurtenances; and
the
continued operation of a wastewater irrigation system consisting of: 906.3 acres of spray irrigation fields
served by a 700 GPM irrigation pump; a 1,500 GPM irrigation pump; an 800 GPM pump; a center pivot
irrigation system; a reel type irrigation system with portable spray guns; approximately 1,320 LF of 6-inch
diameter force main; approximately 1,900 LF of 8-inch force main with hydrant connections;
approximately 1,375 LF of 12-inch irrigation piping with hydrant connections; approximately 15,500 LF
of 8-inch irrigation piping with hydrant connections; approximately 1,220 LF of 6-inch irrigation piping
with hydrant connections; 1,400 LF of 6-inch irrigation line, 3,800 LF of 8-inch irrigation line and twelve
6-inch hydrants serving the R.J. Journigan property and portions of the E.H. Journigan Farm; 5,400 LF of
6-inch irrigation line with 10 hydrants serving the Charles Goswick property; a center pivot serving Fields
W7 and W9 and a Model 8000 Valley Center Pivot system with a Nelson 100 end -gun providing 670 LF
of wetted area and 250 GPM to irrigation Farm 3, Field G2, and 2,600 LF of 6-inch irrigation piping and
seven 6-inch hydrants serving Novo Farm #2; two center pivot irrigation systems consisting of a Model
8000 Valley Center Pivot system with a Nelson 100 end -gun providing 1,194 LF of wetted area and 450
GPM, 950 LF of 6-inch irrigation piping, 10 LF of 8-inch irrigation piping, and five 6-inch hydrants serving
Novo Farm #3:, 2,000 LF of 6-inch irrigation piping, 4,200 LF of 8-inch irrigation line with 19 hydrants
and three areas to be irrigated by reel type sprinkler equipment serving the Novo Farm #4; temporary,
above -ground piping from the Novo Farm #2, Novo Farm 44, and the E.H. Journigan Farm piping systems
serving the William E. Pearce Farm; the remaining acreage of these listed fields will be handled by portable
irrigation equipment from existing irrigation piping; and all associated piping, valves, controls, and
appurtenances;
to serve the Novozymes North America, Inc. Franklin County Facility, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters, pursuant to the application received May 3, 2017, and in conformity with the project plans,
specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and approved by the Department of
.Environmental Quality and considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until May 31, 2020, shall void Permit No.
WQ0002806 issued June 25, 2015, and shall be subject to the following specified conditions and
limitations:
WQ0002806 Version 3.1 Shell Version 151201 Page 2 of 12

I. SCHEDULES
Upon completion of construction and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a certification
(attached) shall be submitted from a licensed North Carolina Professional Engineer certifying that the
permitted facility has been installed in accordance with this permit, Division approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting documentation, including the location of all monitoring wells as
applicable. If this project is to be completed in phases and partially certified, the Permittee shall retain
the responsibility to track further construction approved under the same permit, and shall provide a
final certificate of completion once the entire project has been completed. Mail the Certification to the
Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Permitting Section, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
NC 27699-1617. [15A NCAC 02T .0116(a)]
2. The Raleigh Regional Office, telephone number [phone], shall be notified at least 48 hours in
advance (excluding weekends and holidays) of operation of the installed facilities such that an in -place
inspection can be made. Notification to the regional supervisor shall be made from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00
p.m. on Monday through Friday, excluding State Holidays. [15A NCAC 02T ,0108(b)(2)]
3. Per the Corrective Action Plan conditionally approved by the Division on January 31, 2017, the
Permittee shall submit a request for modification to include twenty-one (21) new compliance
monitoring wells upon completion of installation and commissioning. (Anticipated completion in
September 2017). [15A NCAC 02T .0108(b)(2)]
4. Per the Corrective Action Plan conditionally approved by the Division on January 31, 2017, the
Permittee shall submit a request for modification for the overall capacity reduction of the facility from
30 in/yr to 8.5 in/yr upon receipt of a direct discharge permit and construction and commissioning of
the upgraded process wastewater treatment facility. (Anticipated completion at the end of Quarter 1,
2019). [15A NCAC 02T .0108(b)(2)]
5. No later than six months prior to the expiration of this permit, the Permittee shall request renewal of
this permit on official Division forms. Upon receipt of the request, the Division will review the
adequacy of the facilities described therein, and if warranted, will renew the permit for such period of
time and under such conditions and limitations as it may deem appropriate. Please note Rule 15A
NCAC 02T .0105(d) requires an updated site map to be submitted with the permit renewal application.
[15A NCAC 02T .0105(d), 02T .0106, 02T ,0109, 02T .0115(c)]
II. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The subject non -discharge facilities shall be effectively maintained and operated at all times so there is
no discharge to surface waters, nor any contravention of groundwater or surface water standards. In
the event the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of nuisance conditions due
to improper operation and maintenance, or failure of the irrigation areas to adequately assimilate the
effluent, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective actions including Division required actions, such
as the construction of additional or replacement wastewater treatment or irrigation facilities. [G.S. 143-
215.1, 143-213.3(a)]
2. This permit shall not relieve the Permittee of their responsibility for damages to groundwater or surface
water resulting from the operation of this facility. [ 15A NCAC 02B .0200, 02L .0100]
3. All wells constructed for purposes of groundwater monitoring shall be constructed in accordance with
15A NCAC 02C .0108 (Standards of Construction for Wells Other than Water Supply), and any other
jurisdictional laws and regulations pertaining to well construction. [15A NCAC 02C .0108]
WQ0002806 Version 3.1 Shell Version 151201 Page 3 of 12

4. The wastewater collection facilities shall be properly maintained and operated at all times. The
Permittee shall maintain compliance with an individual system -wide collection system permit for the
operation and maintenance of these facilities in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .0400. If an
individual permit is not required, the following performance criteria shall be met:
a. The sewer system shall be effectively maintained and operated at all times to prevent discharge to
land or surface waters, and any contravention of groundwater or surface water standards.
b. A map of the sewer system shall be developed and actively maintained.
c. An operation and maintenance plan shall be developed, implemented and maintained.
d. Pump stations not connected to a telemetry system shall be inspected every day (i.e., 3 65 days per
year). Pump stations connected to a telemetry system shall be inspected at least once per week.
e. High -priority sewers shall be inspected at least once every six months.
f. A general observation of the entire sewer system shall be conducted at least once per year.
g. Overflows and bypasses shall be reported to the Raleigh Regional Office in accordance with 15A
NCAC 02B .0506(a), and public notice shall be provided as required per North Carolina General
Statute § 143 -215.1 C.
h. A grease control program shall be developed, implemented and maintained.
i. Right-of-ways and easements shall be maintained.
Inspection and maintenance records for Conditions IIA.a. through IIA.i. shall be maintained for a
period of at least three years, except for Conditions IL4.b. and 11.4.c., which shall be maintained
for the life of the system.
[15A NCAC 02T .0403]
5. Effluent quality shall not exceed the limitations specified in Attachment A. [15A NCAC 02T
.0108(b)(1), 02T .0505(b)]
6. Application rates, whether hydraulic, nutrient or other pollutant, shall not exceed those specified in
Attachment B. [15A NCAC 02T .0505(c), 02T .0505(n)]
7. This disposal system was individually permitted prior to December 30, 1983; therefore, the compliance
boundary is established at either 500 feet from the effluent disposal area, or at the property boundary,
whichever is closest to the effluent disposal area. An exceedance of groundwater standards at or beyond
the compliance boundary is subject to remediation action according to 15A NCAC 02L .0106(d)(2) as
well as enforcement actions in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A through
143-215.6C. [15A NCAC 02L .0107]
8. In accordance with I SA NCAC 02L .0108, the review boundary is established midway between the
compliance boundary and the effluent disposal area. Any exceedance of groundwater standards at the
review boundary shall require action in accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .0106. [15A NCAC 02L
.0106, 02L .0108]
9. The Permittee shall apply for a permit modification to establish a new compliance boundary prior to
any sale or transfer of property affecting a compliance boundary. [ I5A NCAC 02L .0107(c)]
10. In accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .0107(d), no wells, excluding Division approved monitoring wells,
shall be constructed within the compliance boundary except as provided for in 15A NCAC 02L
.0107(g). [15A NCAC 02L .0107]
WQ0002806 Version 3.1 Shell Version 151201 Page 4 of 12

11. Except as provided for in 15A NCAC 02L .0107(g), the Permittee shall ensure any landowner who is
not the Permittee and owns land within the compliance boundary shall execute and file with the Franklin
County Register of Deeds an easement running with the land containing the following items:
a. A notice of the permit and number or other description as allowed in 15A NCAC 02L .0107(f)(1);
b. Prohibits construction and operation of water supply wells within the compliance boundary; and
c. Reserves the right of the Permittee or the State to enter the property within the compliance boundary
for purposes related to the permit.
The Director may terminate the easement when its purpose has been fulfilled or is no longer needed.
[15A NCAC 02L .0107(f)]
12. The facilities permitted herein shall be constructed according to the following setbacks:
a. The setbacks for irrigation sites permitted under 15A NCAC 02H .0200 shall be as follows (all
distances in feet):
i. Any habitable residence or place of public assembly under separate ownership: 400 1
ii. Surface waters: 100
iii. Any well with exception of monitoring wells: 100
iv. Any property line: 1502
v. Public right of way. 50
i Per pre-existing waivers, setbacks to habitable residences or places of public assembly under
separate ownership have been reduced for the following:
Site
Setback
Approval
Pearce Farm
200 feet to Field PF3
July 1, 1997
Goswick Farm
200 feet to Field GF1
November 17, 1995
2 Per pre-existing waivers, setbacks to property lines have been reduced for the following:
Site
Setback
Approval
Pearce Farm
50 feet to Field PF3
July 1, 1997
Goswick Farm
50 feet to Fields GF I, GF2, GF3 & GF4
November 17, 1995
Novozymes Farm 4
50 feet to Fields S2, S3 and S4
July 1, 1997
[ 15A NCAC 02H .02190)]
b. The setbacks for storage and treatment units permitted under 15A NCAC 02H .0200 shall be as
follows (all distances in feet):
i. Any well with exception of monitoring wells:
ii. Any property line:
[I 5A NCAC 0214 .02190)]
100
50
WQ0002806 Version 3.1 Shell Version 151201 Page 5 of 12

c. The setbacks for the 250,000 gallon aerated flow equalization unit permitted under 15A NCAC
02T .0500 shall be as follows (all distances in feet):
i. Any habitable residence or place of public assembly under separate ownership: 100
ii. Any private or public water supply source: 100
iii. Surface waters: 50
iv. Any well with exception of monitoring wells: 100
v. Any property line: 50
[I 5A NCAC 02T. 0506(b)]
HL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
1. The facilities shall be properly maintained and operated at all times. The facilities shall be effectively
maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of any wastewater resulting
from the operation of this facility. The Permittee shall maintain an Operation and Maintenance Plan,
which at a minimum shall include operational functions, maintenance schedules, safety measures and
a spill response plan. [15A NCAC 02T .0507]
2. Upon the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission's (WPCSOCC)
classification of the subject non -discharge facilities, in accordance with 15A NCAC 08G .0200 the
Permittee shall designate and employ a certified operator in responsible charge (ORC) and one or more
certified operator(s) as back-up ORC(s). The ORC or their back-up shall visit the facilities in
accordance with 15A NCAC 08G .0200, and shall comply with all other conditions specified in the
previously cited rules. [ 15A NCAC 02T .0117]
A suitable year round vegetative cover shall be maintained at all times, such that crop health is
optimized, allows for even distribution of effluent and allows inspection of the irrigation system, [15A
NCAC 02T .0108(b)(1)]
4. Adequate measures shall be taken to prevent effluent ponding in or runoff from the irrigation sites listed
in Attachment B. [15A NCAC 02T .0108(b)(1)]
5. Irrigation shall not be performed during inclement weather or when the ground is in a condition that
will cause ponding or runoff. [15A NCAC 02T .0108(b)(1)]
6. All irrigation equipment shall be tested and calibrated at least once per permit cycle. Calibration records
shall be maintained at the facility for a period of no less than five years, and shall be made available to
the Division upon request. [15A NCAC 02T .0108(b)(1)]
7. Only effluent from Novozymes Franklin County Facility shall be irrigated on the sites listed in
Attachment B. [G.S. 143-215.1]
8. No automobiles or machinery shall be allowed on the irrigation sites except during equipment
installation or while maintenance is being performed. [15A NCAC 02T .0108(b)(1)]
J. Public access to the irrigation sites and wastewater treatment facilities shall be prohibited. [ 15A NCAC
02T .0505(q)]
10. The residuals generated from the wastewater treatment facilities shall be disposed or utilized in
accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .I100. The Permittee shall maintain a residual management plan
pursuant to 15A NCAC 02T .0508. [ 15A NCAC 02T .0508, 02T .1100]
11. Diversion or bypassing of untreated or partially treated wastewater from the treatment facilities is
prohibited. [15A NCAC 02T .05050)]
WQ0002806 Version 3.1 Shell Version 151201 Page 6 of 12

12. Freeboard in the Lagoon Nos. 1, 2 and 3 shall not be less than one foot at any time. [15A NCAC 02T
.0505(d)]
13. Gauges to monitor waste levels in Lagoon Nos. 1, 2 and 3 shall be provided. This gauge shall have
readily visible permanent markings, at inch or tenth of a foot increments, indicating the following
elevations: maximum liquid level at the top of the temporary liquid storage volume; minimum liquid
level at the bottom of the temporary liquid storage volume; and the lowest point on top of the dam.
[15A NCAC 02T .0108(b)(1)]
14. A protective vegetative cover shall be established and maintained on all earthen embankments (i.e.,
outside toe of embankment to maximum allowable temporary storage elevation on the inside of the
embankment), berms, pipe runs, erosion control areas, and surface water diversions. Trees, shrubs, and
other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the earthen dikes or embankments. Earthen
embankment areas shall be kept mowed or otherwise controlled and accessible. [15A NCAC 02T
.0108(b)(1)]
15. Wastewater irrigation fields with rock outcrops within the wetted area shall be properly buffered to
avoid irrigation on these rock outcrops. [15A NCAC 02T .0108(b)(1)]
16. If animal waste is applied to any of the wastewater irrigation fields, adequate protection shall be taken
to insure the animal waste is not washed off the site and the irrigation rate shall be reduced to an
appropriate level to ensure that agronomic rates are not exceeded for that field. [15A NCAC 02T
.0108(b)(1)]
17. Irrigation areas not under the Permittee's ownership (i.e., the 287.6 acres owned by R.J. Journigan,
Charles Goswick, E.H. Joumigan and William E. Pearce) shall not be used to provide additional
wastewater treatment and disposal capacity, and shall only be used to provide better operation of the
wastewater treatment and disposal system. [15A NCAC 02T .0108(b)(1)]
18. All water supply wells adjacent to the treatment or disposal areas shall be properly buffered or
permanently abandoned in accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0113. If any of these water supply wells
are to be converted into monitoring wells in lieu of being abandoned, the wells must comply with the
15A NCAC 02C monitoring well requirements and be properly constructed to prevent the vertical
migration of any groundwater contaminants that maybe released. [15A NCAC 02T .0108(b)(1)]
IV. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. Any Division required monitoring (including groundwater, plant tissue, soil and surface water analyses)
necessary to ensure groundwater and surface water protection shall be established, and an acceptable
sampling reporting schedule shall be followed. [15A NCAC 02T .0108(c)]
2. A Division certified laboratory shall conduct all laboratory analyses for the required effluent,
groundwater or surface water parameters. [15A NCAC 02H .0800]
3. Flow through the treatment facility shall be continuously monitored, and daily flow values shall be
reported on Form NDMR.
The Permittee shall install and maintain an appropriate flow measurement device to ensure the accuracy
and reliability of flow measurement consistent with accepted engineering and scientific practices.
Selected flow measurement devices shall be capable of measuring flows with a maximum deviation of
less than ten percent from true flow; accurately calibrated at a minimum of once per year; and
maintained to ensure the accuracy of measurements is consistent with the selected device's accepted
capability. The Permittee shall maintain records of flow measurement device calibration on file for a
period of at least five years. At a minimum, documentation shall include:
a. Date of flow measurement device calibration,
b. Name of person performing calibration, and
c. Percent from true flow.
WQ0002806 Version 3.1 Shell Version 151201 Page 7 of 12

[I5A NCAC 02T .0105(k)]
4. The Permittee shall monitor the effluent from the subject facilities at the frequencies and locations for
the parameters specified in Attachment A. [15A NCAC 02T .0108(c)]
5. The Permittee shall maintain adequate records tracking the amount of effluent irrigated. At a minimum,
these records shall include the following information for each irrigation site listed in Attachment B:
a. Date of irrigation;
b. Volume of effluent irrigated;
c. Site irrigated;
d. Length of time site is irrigated;
e. Continuous weekly, monthly, and year-to-date hydraulic (inches/acre) loadings;
f. Continuous monthly and year-to-date loadings for any non -hydraulic parameter specifically
limited in Attachment B;
g. Weather conditions; and
h. Maintenance of cover crops.
[ 15A NCAC 02T .0108(c)]
6. Freeboard (i.e., waste level to the lowest embankment elevation) in Lagoon Nos, 1, 2, and 3 shall be
measured to the nearest inch or tenth of a foot, and recorded weekly. Weekly freeboard records shall
be maintained at the facility for a period of no less than five years, and shall be made available to the
Division upon request. [15A NCAC 02T .0108(c)]
Three copies of all monitoring data (as specified in Conditions IV.3. and IVA.) on Form NDMR for
each PPI and three copies of all operation and disposal records (as specified in Conditions IV.5. and
IV.6.) on Form NDAR-1 for every site in Attachment B shall be submitted on or before the last day of
the following month. If no activities occurred during the monitoring month, monitoring reports are still
required documenting the absence of the activity. All information shall be submitted to the following
address:
Division of Water Resources
Information Processing Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
[I5A NCAC 02T .0105(1)]
A record shall be maintained of all residuals removed from this facility. This record shall be maintained
at the facility for a period of no less than five years, and shall be made available to the Division upon
request. At a minimum, this record shall include:
a. Name of the residuals hauler;
b. Non -Discharge permit number authorizing the residuals disposal, or a letter from a municipality
agreeing to accept the residuals;
c. Date the residuals were hauled; and
d. Volume of residuals removed.
[I5A NCAC 02T .0108(b)(1)]
9. A maintenance log shall be maintained at this facility. This log shall be maintained at the facility for a
period of no less than five years, and shall be made available to the Division. upon request. At a
minimum, this log shall include:
a. Date of calibration of flow measurement device;
b. Visuai observations of the plant and plant site; and
c. Record of preventative maintenance (e.g., changing of equipment, adjustments, testing, inspections
and cleanings, etc.).
[I SA NCAC 02T .0108(b)(1)]
WQ0002806 Version 3.1 Shell Version 151201 Page 8 of 12

10. Monitoring wells shall be sampled at the frequencies and for the parameters specified in Attachment
C. All mapping, well construction forms, well abandonment forms and monitoring data shall refer to
the permit number and the well nomenclature as provided in Attachment C. [15A NCAC 02T
.0105(m)]
11. Two copies of the monitoring well sampling and analysis results shall be submitted on a Compliance
Monitoring Form (GW-59), along with attached copies of laboratory analyses, on or before the last
working day of the month following the sampling month. The Compliance Monitoring Form (GW-59)
shall include this permit number, the appropriate well identification number, and one GW-59a
certification form shall be submitted with each set of sampling results. All information shall be
submitted to the following address:
Division of Water Resources
Information Processing Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
[15A NCAC 02T .0105(m)]
12. An annual representative soils analysis (i.e., Standard Soil Fertility Analysis) shall be conducted on
each irrigation site listed in Attachment B. These results shall be maintained at the facility for a period
of no less than five years, and shall be made available to the Division upon request. At a minimum, the
Standard Soil Fertility Analysis shall include the following parameters:
Acidity
Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
Phosphorus
Base Saturation (by calculation)
Magnesium
Potassium
Calcium
Manganese
Sodium
Cation Exchange Capacity
Percent Humic Matter
Zinc
Copper
pH
[15A NCAC 02T .0108(c)]
13. Noncompliance Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the Raleigh Regional Office, telephone number (919) 791-
4200, as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours, or on the next working day following the
occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following:
a, Treatment of wastes abnormal in quantity or characteristic, including the known passage of a
hazardous substance.
b. Any process unit failure (e.g., mechanical, electrical, etc.), due to known or unknown reasons,
rendering the facility incapable of adequate wastewater treatment.
c. Any facility failure resulting in a by-pass directly to receiving surface waters.
d. Any time self -monitoring indicates the facility has gone out of compliance with its permit
limitations.
e. Ponding in or runoff from the irrigation sites.
Any emergency requiring immediate reporting (c.g., discharges to surface waters, imminent failure of
a storage structure, etc.) outside normal business hours shall be reported to the Division's Emergency
Response personnel at telephone number [phone], [phone], or [phone]. Persons
reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in letter form within five days
following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report shall outline the actions taken or proposed to
betaken to ensure the problem does not recur. [15A NCAC 02T .0105(l), 02T .0108(b)(1)]
WQ0002806 Version 3.1 Shell Version 151201 Page 9 of 12

V. INSPECTIONS
1. The Fermittee shall provide adequate inspection and maintenance to ensure proper operation of the
wastewater treatment and irrigation facilities. [15A NCAC 02T .0108(b)]
2. The Permittee or their designee shall inspect the wastewater treatment and irrigation facilities to prevent
malfunctions, facility deterioration and operator errors resulting in discharges, which may cause the
release of wastes to the environment, a threat to human health or a public nuisance. The Permittee shall
maintain an inspection log that includes, at a minimum, the date and time of inspection, observations
made, and any maintenance, repairs, or corrective actions taken. The Permittee shall maintain this
inspection log for a period of five years from the date of the inspection, and this log shall be made
available to the Division upon request. [15A NCAC 02T .0108(b)]
3. Any duly authorized Division representative may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect
any property, premises or place on or related to the wastewater treatment and irrigation facilities
permitted herein at any reasonable time for determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or
copy any records required to be maintained under the terms and conditions of this permit, and may
collect groundwater, surface water or leachate samples. [G.S. 143-21,5.3(a)(2)]
. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. Failure to comply with the conditions and limitations contained herein may subject the Permittee to an
enforcement action by the Division in accordance with North Carolina General Statutes. 143-215.6A to
143-215.6C. [G.S. 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C]
2. This permit shall become voidable if the permitted facilities are not constructed in accordance with the
conditions of this permit, the Division approved plans and specifications, and other supporting
documentation. [ 15A NCAC 02T .0110]
3. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes described in the permit
application, Division approved plans and specifications, and other supporting documentation. No
variances to applicable rules governing the construction or operation of the permitted facilities are
granted, unless specifically requested and approved in this permit pursuant to 15A NCAC 02T .0105(n).
[G. S. 143-21.5.1 ]
4. The issuance of this permit does not exempt the Permittee from complying with any and all statutes,
rules, regulations, or ordinances, which may be imposed by other jurisdictional government agencies
(e.g., local, state, and federal). Of particular concern to the Division are applicable river buffer rules in
15A NCAC 02B .0200; erosion and sedimentation control requirements in 15A NCAC Chapter 4 and
under General Permit NCG010000; any requirements pertaining to wetlands under 15A NCAC 02B
.0200 and 02H .0500; and documentation of compliance with Article 21 Part 6 of Chapter 143 of the
General Statutes. [15A NCAC 02T .0105(c)(6)]
In the event the permitted facilities change ownership or the Permittee changes their name, a formal
permit modification request shall be submitted to the Division. This request shall be made on official
Division forms, and shall include appropriate property ownership documentation and other supporting
documentation as necessary. The Permittee of record shall remain fully responsible for maintaining
and operating the facilities permitted herein until a permit is issued to the new owner. [ 15A NCAC
02T .0104]
6. The Permittee shall retain a set of Division approved plans and specifications for the life of the facilities
permitted herein. [15ANCAC 02T .0108(b)(1)]
7. The Permittee shall maintain this permit until all permitted facilities herein are properly closed or
permitted under another permit issued by the appropriate permitting authority. [15A NCAC 02T
.01050)]
WQ0002806 Version 3.1 Shell Version 151201 Page 10 of 12

8. This permit is subject to revocation or unilateral modification upon 60-day notice from the Division
Directo, in whole or part for the requirements listed in 15A NCAC 02T .0110. [ 15A NCAC 02T .0110]
9. Unless the Division Director grants a variance, expansion of the permitted facilities contained herein
shall not be granted if the Permittee exemplifies any of the criteria in 15A NCAC 02T .0120(b). [15A
NCAC 02T .01.20]
10. The Permittee shall pay the annual fee within 30 days after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay
the annual fee accordingly shall be cause for the Division to revoke this permit. [15A NCAC 02T
.0105(e)(3)]
Permit issued this the 8' day of June 2017
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Jay Zimmerman, P.G., Director
Division of Water Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number WQ0002806
WQ0002806 Version 3.1 Shell Version 151201 Page 1 I of 12

Permit No. WQ0002806 Wastewater Irrigation System
Novozymes North America, Inc. June 8, 2017
Novozymes Franklin County Facility Franklin County
ENGINEERING CERTIFICA 1rION
❑ Partial ❑ Final
In accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .0116, I, as
a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North Carolina, having the Permittee's authorization
to ❑ periodically ❑ weekly ❑ fully observe the construction of the permitted facility, hereby state to the
best of my abilities that due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction, such that
the facility was built within substantial compliance and intent of this permit, the Division -approved plans
and specifications, and other supporting documentation.
❑ Any variation to this permit, the Division -approved plans and specifications, and other supporting
documentation has been documented in the attached as -built drawings, and shall serve as the
Permittee's minor modification request to amend the permit accordingly,
Provide a brief narrative description of any variations:
THE COMPLETED ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHALL BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS;
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
WATER QUALITY PERMITTING SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
By U.S. Postal Service:
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
By Courier/Special Delivery:
512 N. SALISBURY ST.
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
WQ0002806 Version 3.1 Shell Version 151201 Page 12 of 12

ATTACHMENT A — LIMITATIONS AND MONITORUNG RE, QUIEREP4ENTS
PPI 091 -- qNWTP Effluent
Permit Nu bey. Q4)002806 Version: 3.1
EFFLUENT C ARACTERISTtCS
EFFLUENT LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
PCS
Cade
Parameter Description
of
Measure
Measure
Monthly
Average
Monthly nthly
Geometric Mean
DailMinimum
y
1�<aaly l axirnAja i
Measi.9rem. ent
frequency
S4 ;'nple
Type
00310
BOD, 5-Day (20 °C)
mg/L
2 x Month
Grab
00916
Calcium, Total (as Ca)
mg/L
3 x Year t
—a Grab
50060
Chloride (as Cl)
mg/L
3 x Year
Grab m
50050
Flow, in Conduit or thru Treatment Plant
GPD
700,0002
_
Continuous
Recorder
00610
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as N)
mg/L
3 x Year
Grab
00625
Nitrogen, Kjeidahl, Total (as N)
mg/L�
2 x Month
Grab
00620
Nitrogen, Nitrate Total (as N)
mg/L
2 x Month
Grab
00600
Nitrogen, Total (as N)
mg/L
2 x Month
Grab
00400
pH
su
5 x Week
Grab
00665
Phosphorus, Total (as P)
mg/1,
�—
2 x Month
Grab
00931
Sodium Adsorption Ratio
ratio
3 x Year
Calculated
00929
Sodium, Total (as Na)
mg/L
3 x Year
Grab
70300
Solids, Total Dissolved —180 °C
mg/L
3 x Year
Grab
L 3 x Year sampling shall be conducted in March, July and November.
2. This flow value does not include the amount discharged to the Franklin County POTW.
WQ0002806 Vcrsio€t 3.1 Attachment A Pago 1 of 1

ATTACHMENT B - APPROVED LAND APPLICATION SITES AND LIMITATIONS
Novozymes North America, Inc. - Novozymes Y2-anidSn Ccuuty Facility
Permit Number. WQ0002806 Version: 3,1
IRRIGATION AREA, INFORMATION
APPLICATION LIMITATIONS
Field
®weer
County
Latitude
Longitude
- --
Net
Acreage
Dominant
-Soil Series
Parameter
- --
Hourly
Rate
Yearly
Max
30
Units
inches
EJ 1
Journigan, E H
Franklin
36-0844180
78.3845640
12.1
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
EJ2
Journigan, E H
Franklin
36.07902"
78-3844690
T6
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
EJ3
Journigan, E H
Franklin
36.0765040
78.38437V
4.3
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
EM
Journigan, E H
,Franklin
36.0754660
78.3855630
4.3
01284--Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
EJ5
Journigan, E H
Franklin
36-07293GO
78.384636"
8.8
01284-Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
EJ6
Journigan, E H
Franklin
36.0797120
78.3831380
7.7
01284-Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
EJ7
Journigan, E H
Franklin
36-0800000
78.381260
17
01284-Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
EJ8
Journigan, E H
Franklin
36.0759080
78.3819500
33.6
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
E19
Journigan, E H
Franklin
36,072796"
78.3968340
6.6
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
0
inches
G1
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.0838560
78.4007500
55.3
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
G2
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36,0791160
78.4011780
40
01284 -Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
G4A
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.0840530
78.3897460
31.5
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
G4B
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36,0798460
78.389555"
36.9
01284 -Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
G4C
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36-075620
78.3893890
26.6
-
01284 -Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
G5
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.0862230
78.3898170
5.3
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
G6A
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.0879130
78.389841"
7.5
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
G613
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.0881250
78.3911480
7.5
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
G7
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36-0787510
78.3988490
7.9
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
GFI
Goswick, Charles
Franklin
36.0630550
78.3912670
9A
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
0
inches
GF2
Goswick, Charles
Franklin
36.0664560
78.3938340
20,9
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
GF3
Goswick, Charles
Franklin
36.06757°
78.39219V
15A
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
GF4
Goswick, Charles
Franklin
36.0709130
78-3946660
31.1
01284 -Non-Discharge Application Rate
.30
inches
J1
Joiarnigan, IZJ
Franklin
36.0846480
78.3870120
12,9
01284-Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
J2
Journigan, RJ
Franklin
36.0798080
78.3871070
28.8
1
01284-Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
WQ0002806 Version 3.1 Attachwent 13 Page 1 0F3

Field
J3
Owner
Journigan, RJ
County
Franklin
;latitude
36.0749670
Longitude
g
78,3871550
Net
Acreage
12.7
Dominant
Soil Series
Parameter
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
Hourly
Rate
Yearl y
Max
30
Units
inches
NI
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.1048620
78.4062940
71.6
01284-Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
PF i
Pearce, William E
Franklin
36.0945210
78.396484°
4.2
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
PF2
Pearce, William E
Franklin
36.0927150
78.3961390
13.3
01284-Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
PF3
Pearce, William E
Franklin
36.094924°
78.3934530
11.6
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
PF4
Pearce, William E
Franklin
36.093080
78.3932160
11.2
01284-Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
PF5
Pearce, William E
Franklin
36.0845140
78.3835180
5.9
01284 -- Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
PF6
Pearce, William E
Franklin
36.081306"
78.3811180
6.2
01284 -Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
S1
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.0965180
78.396923"
20.9
01284-Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
S2
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.0969020
78.393620
I4.6
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
S3
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36,0996680
78.388700°
26.5
01284 --- Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
S4
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.0999940
78.3955930
13.7
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
T2
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.1032010
78.4113W
6
01284 -Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
VFI
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.098995°
78.4153910
46.9
01284-Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
VF2
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.101050
78.4196930
48
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
VF3
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36,1065420
78.4181480
16.6
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
VF4
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.1071180
78.4205250
7.5
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
VF5
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.1077710
78.4137750
5.5
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
W 1
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.0953850
78.4046240
8.7
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
W2
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.0952690
78.4028180
5.9
01284 -Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
W3
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.0949430
78.3992530
7.4
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
W4
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.0931380
78.4002990
16
01284 - Non -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
W5
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.093810
78.4055750
5.3
01284 -Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
W6
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.0949810
78.408261°
10.5
01284 -Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
W7
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.0967680
78.4079040
9.6
01284 -Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
W8
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36,0974010
78.403151°
4.1
01284 -Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
W9
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.0985150
78.4049810
38.8
01284 - Nan -Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
W10
Novozymes North America, Inc.
Franklin
36.0973820
78.39932V
16.1
01284 -Non-Discharge Application Rate
30
inches
Q0002806 Version 3.1 Attachment D Page 2 ol'3

Totals 904.30
WQ0002806 Vorsion 3.1 A tachment B Pagc 3 of

M �
-.

ATTACHMENT C — GROUNDWATER 140 ZTORING AND LIMITATIONS
i Onitoring wells; MW-1, W-2, IWW-3, 11 '-11, MW-12, MW-13, M -14, W-15, NM-M, l VV-17, MW--18, V-19, W-y24, I�ft -2�, I-22,1�'� d
23, iQ W-24. and MW-25
GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISTICS ERISTICS
GROUNDWATER STANDARDS
Daily Maximum
� — _ MONITORING REQUIREMENTS -
Frequency Measurement Sample Type Footnotes
PCS Code
Parameter Description
00680
Carbon, Tot Organic (TOC)
mgfL
l
3 x Year Grab 1,4
00940
Chloride (as Cl)
250 mg11,
3 x Year Grab 1
01055
Manganese, Total (as Mn)
0.05
mg/L
3 x Year
Grab
l
00610
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as N)
1.5
mg/L
3 x Year
Grab
� � 1
00620
Nitrogen, Nitrate Total (as N)
10
mg/L
3 x Year
Grab
1
00400
pH
6.5-8.5
su
3 x Year
Grab
1,2
00665
Phosphorus, Total (as P)
mg/L
3 x Year
Grab
1
70300
Solids, Total Dissolved — 180 °C
500
mg/L
3 x Year
Grab
1
00945
Sulfate, Total (as SO4)
250
mg/L
3 x Year
Grab
1
82546
Water level, distance from measuring point
ft
3 x Year
—E---
Calculated
1, 2, 3
--
3 x Year monitoring shall be conducted in March, July & November; annual monitoring shall be conducted every November.
2. The measurement of water levels shall be made prior to purging the wells. The depth to water in each well shall be measured from the surveyed point on the top of the casing. The measurement of
pH shall be made after purging and prior to sampling for the remaining parameters.
3. The measuring points (top of well casing) of all monitoring wells shall be surveyed to provide the relative elevation of the measuring point for Each monitoring well. The measuring points (top of
casing) of all monitoring wells shall be surveyed relative to a common datum.
4. If TOC concentrations greater than 10 mgfL are detected in any downgradient monitoring well, additional sampling and analysis must be conducted to identify the individual constituents comprising
this TOC concentration. If the TOC concentration as measured in the background monitor well exceeds 10 mg/L, this concentration will be taken to represent the naturally occurring TOC
concentration. Any exceedances of this naturally occurring TOC concentration in the downgradient wells shall be subject to the additional sampling and analysis as described above.
5. Monitoring wells shall be reported consistent with the nomenclature and location information provided in this attachment.
6. A Corrective Action Plan was conditionally accepted by the Division on January 31, 2017, See Condition 1.3.
WQ0002806 Version 3.1 Attachinent C Page 1 of l

Farm 3
Field G7
14
4 �L
F arm 3
Field G6B Farm 3
Field G6A
R. Journigan #� `
Field A
Farm 3 E. Journigan
Field G field EA
• Pearce Farm
Field PF5
Pearce Farm
Field PF6
irn n
Field EJ5
E. JOnrno
Field EJ3
�w -. w�.;1✓�,av, fix] � tUU:, l
L'utitil"utiv. ;J:.uu�: L-�� L^.f�J.r:,UsLc.

Farm
eld`W8 Farm 2
Field
Field W1
a 2
Farm 2
el W6 Field W r
arce
field PF1'
Farm 2 r-
Field W5 Pearce Farm -
Farm 2 Field PF4
Field ,
Pearce Farm`
i F
S�l%����il,X.y.: --, A L4
ry�..i..0 • ! V:-�S U4,4ti^r :�.

Farm 6
Field VF3
6
VF4
Farm 6
Field VF2'.,
Farm 6
Field VF5
Farm
Field
Farm 6
Field VF1
UoLtw, usurh Us�-- Gzu= xkg,
ZW t6p, ai'=- as Lbw cowitunb/

t
i
i
i
i s t
it t t
i tit
+��
%
♦
i
e
�
1
i
y
1
�
%
�
r
#
i
Coyht:4Esr rE Tom
eoEye, i-cubed;.Us,' tma
isstopo andtd16'�

Appendix B: Industrial User
Pretreatment Permit (Permit #0112)
www.dewberry.com

Franklin County Public Utilities
Control Authority and/or Municipality
PERMIT
Industrial User Pretreatment Permit (IUP)
To Discharge Wastewater Linder the
Industrial Pretreatment Program
0112
lUP Number
N/A
40 CFR Categorytif Applicable)
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, any
applicable federal categorical pretreatment regulations, all other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Control Authority and/or Municipality Sewer Use Ordinance. The
following Industry hereafter referred to by name or as the permittee:
Induslry name, permitlee-
Novoz mes NA, Inc. (NZNA)
Facility Located at Street Address
77 Perry Chapel Church Road - P. O. Box 575
City
Franklinton
Stale, Zip
North Carolina 27525
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from the facility located at the above listed
address into the sanitary sewer collection system and the wastewater treatment facility of
the Control Authoritv and/or Municipality also known as the POTW listed below:
IVP Control Aulhority and/or Mumcipality WWTP name:
Franklin County Public Utilities
NPOES Number:
NCO069311
VAVTP Address:
1099 Lane Store Road
city, State, Zip
Franklinton, NC 27525
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and all other conditions
set forth in Parts I, II, and III of this Industrial User Pretreatment Permit (IUP).
Effective date, this permit and the authorization to discharge shall become effective at midnight on this date:
11/9/2015
Expiration [fate, this permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on this date:
9/22/2023
Sig Lure Date signed
Chris ❑ohe Director Public Utilities

Industrial User Pretreatment Permit JUP)
PART I
Specific Conditions
IUP, PART I, OUTLINE:
A.} IUP Basic Information
B.) 1UP Modification History
C.) Authorization Staternent
D7) Description of Discharges
E.) Schematic and Monitoring. Locations
F.) Effluent LirniB & Monitoring Requirements
C:} Definitions and Limit. Page(s) Notes
A It IP Rncir...Inl=nrmatinn-
Reeerving Control Authority & WWTP nanie :
POTW NPDES #:.
Franklin. County Public Utilities &, Frankliri Cotiwy ww,rP
NCO0693 t 1
[UP Nanie ;
I.UP Number :
NovozymeS.NA, Inc.
0.t 12
I U P EfNet ive date :
Pipe Num6ixs. Jist all regulated pipes-
i I1912D:18
OD 1
1UP Expiration slate :
[UP 40 CFR H.(if applicable), or NIA:
9/22/2023
NIA
B. IUP History:
2

Industrial User Pretreatment Permit JUP)
PART I
Speeffic Uonditions.
Renewal or
Effective Date. Modification Description of changes over previous IUP
11191261:8 ReriewaE . .
Tncreasednitri geii'"d. pl ospfiorgi s; limits
•:: C€angetl.tn uriiforin:atxior.al'irnits
Updated `5cl a natics flow::diagrairi :;and,treatinent processes.. o match
�urrenf::setiip
e.:: Added speciaT:cgndtiolz 24.f6r sltiiige: narlageni... plan.
$1912U15: Modified mass limits for total nitrogen discharge. to the Pt7TW.
• Changed phosphorous from a concentration based lirnit to a mass based
limit
■ Added penalty clause. giving the PO.TW director.authority to mvokeor
curtail permission to.discharge in the event Iimits are. violated.
• Modified definitions page
• Streatxilined :references to PDTW and the. S.UU throughout permit
• Reduce ammonia iimit.from 40 MyL to seasonal limits.
121231201.4 Modified Winter: Weekly average 29.4 mgIL,.Monthly average 10.0 mgll.
Summer: Weekly average 15..0 mgIL,.Manthly :average Sd ma1L.
• Change ammonia FREQUENCY.to Weekly
■ Remove.testing requirement for acrolein, acrylonitrile,
2,4 dinitrnphenol and 2..methyl 4.,.6 dinitrophe.nol.
• FLOW limit increase from 0.400 to 0.525 GPD.
8/08/2014 Modified 6 Sodium limit iiierease from 20,294 lbs. nerriionth to 50,608 lbs, per
month
■ Copper limit increase from .0'03. mgll to 0.05 mglt
R. Potassium limit stays at 65,956 tbs. per month
311712�14 Monthly average limit on.Potassi ui; 65,956 lbs pec month = 650rh-/I.at
Modified 400000. PD.
• Monthly average limit on Sodium...20,?94lbs, per month = 200 mgll at
4.001060 GPI7.
• Seasonal .Iimit from. October 31 toAprii 1 for Turbidity monitor Weekly
with Monthly average limit:cif t5 NTU's.
3

Industrial User Pretreatment Permit (IUP)
PART I
Specific Conditions
912212013 Renewal Removed Turbidity, Chlorine. and Daily Maximum l imits. Increased
Copper to 0.03 mgll.. Changed frequency of Temperature to Quarterly,
TSS and Alkaliniity. to Monthly. Now parameters-..acrolein and
acrylonitrile at 200..ug/L, 2,4 dinitrophenol and 2 methyl.4,6
dinitrophenol. at 500 ugll, , .and antimony at i mg1L as per NPDFS
Permit NC.00693.1 1 Part: III Other.RequiremenLs Section C. a.
Typographically error:oa.limits pages corrected
11/14/201.1 Modified Incremental FLOW increase: 0.325 MGD starting. l V11201:2 increase to
0.400 MGD starting f2111201.2. Reduce CD (cadmium) limit from 0.01:2
to 0.008 mg11... Reduce. CU (copper) limit from 0.045 to U.030 .ing/l.
Reduce ZN (zinc) limit from 0.480 to 0.4 mol Reduce monitoring
frequency to..quartedy for the Following parameters: AG (silver), CN.
(cyanide), 13OD5, NH3 (ammonia); CL (chlorine), and AL (aluminum).
11/112012 Modified
Replace limit for AG, and CL with MONITOR ❑ItiiLY:
61271201.1 Modified Incremental FLOW increase: 0.200 MGD starting 2115/?012.increase to
0.25 MGD starting. 71112..01..2..Increase Copper (Cu) daily limit to 0..045.
mgll, ntonthly average 0.036.. mg1l. Increase Line (`Ln) daily. limit to 0.48
moll, rhonthly avcrage.0.38 mg/l.
51.912011. Modified Chlorine. should be listed as a grab not composite and Chlorine limit
change to.2.0 mglL
1.015109 Modified Total Phosphorus limit Monthly Average of 1:5 mgli.. DECREASING to
10..mg/L beginning, 1.1/9/201 1 then DECREASING to .5 mg1L
beginning, 1.11912011 Daily Max. 18 1 1216 respectively:
Frequency -Weekly by IUP
• FLOW _ daily maximum at .10.4 gpm
• Alkalinity •- Monitor Only Frequency Weekly by ILII'
Expiration Date.- from 1213 !/20 t 1 .to 9122120 13
09/22/08 Mod iFied .: Lim its page relax parameters zinc, clipper, `lead, nickel, silver, chlorine.
and TSS;.also changed sampling to "twice a month," Part III Special
Condition .2 Changed to `'meter shall have.. appropriate. preventive
maintenance performed.at least every 12.months ."
Permit Issued
C.. Authorisation Statement:.
1..)' The. Permittee is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater in accordance. with
the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements; and .all other conditions set
forth in this Industrial User Pretreatment Permit (IUP) into the sewer collection
system and wastewater. treatment. facility of the POTW.
2.) The. Permittee is. hereby authorized to continue operation of and discharge:
wastewater from the following; treatment or pretreatment facilities. These
facilities. must correspond to the treatment units listed nn both. the application
and inspection Forms.
4

List all'rreatment /mils:
Pretreatment
Industrial User Pretreatment Permit JUP)
PART I.
.Specific. Conditions
IU Treatment Units
.6. aerati n tank; anaerobic up .ffow.;reactor;
al centrifu ation Sediri er titian via primary.
g
yp11 Pro tectork';ard 17AF;for flocculation -wit
3.,) The Permittee is hereby authorized to,. if required by the. POTW and after
receiving Authorization to Construct (A. to C) from the POTW, construct and
operate additional pretreatment units as: needed to meet final. effluent
limitations.
D_) Description of IUP Discharges) .from all regulated pipes:
Pipe # 00 1 ; Description. of Discharge:
>1?racers<:water`firvrrr; aqu a tiiire was"ati
es'enz Tries residuals offs ecification
is < Men :sent 1
anctay'elarFe
--
er:a:
1 -I'd- "'€ orri>secoricia'' 'clazrfi re
;:.:;:
g p ;samplPprnt at F13IV) tleri'dscYiar ed is Pi e�0.- , Sv- s :.x iy
fettled out, removed, treater/. and Stored": See map on page 6 for specific locations.
E.) Schematic and Monitoring Locations:
The facility schernatic and description of monitoring location(s) given on Following pages
must show enough. detail such that someone unfamiliar with the facility could readily find
and identify the monitoring. location(s) and connection to the. sewer. It must. include. and
identify all. regulated pipes. Representative sampling for Pipe 40 1 may be taken from 2
sample points. Sample point A and/or sample point B as shown on PART I Specific
Conditions- Plant Site Layout Plan (page, 6).
5

Industrial User Pretreatment Permit (IUP)
PART I
Specific Conditions
"i-
m

Inclustrial User Pretreatment Permit
PART
Specific Conditions
w
]
\
�
« \
�
| �
/
--
m�.�t
/
.
\
at7jq
:
.
%,
7

Industrial. User Pretreatment Permit OUP).
.PART I
Specific Conditions
Wl

Industrial User Pretreatment Permit JUP)
PART I
Specific Conditions
azi~-
"�;,^ mow• _ _ _
w�
3 Nn[
..........."." .
_� '$fir �"ir jj • .�
..n.-
'Fa
�'�'rt^•�q'' 'art r:� .
is
- 4
a-
O
viz" 5`i� � !y'-• A'
Y..
>• s'' :�:s': Esc;:,.:;-:.�:" '
3
SzLr•. >:f +x: -=Cr'� E'- ' !=C r+f'x„':� J?"; '' .
• 'c tir
-v'
It '
k:C
$. .. _
fir` :k � a;�+• �'�?5;;�-;;.., 'ss::';,;>.>.:.
l r4" • -vt
r ,
a3F , Ff' E.
S ti�•r �+�.'
Mg
i=- ;_'�: .:car _ ,aE•.� ,"r�.�'`��... n � -
5.t�:'"X C's;��T� ...J.%:5•.'r' X<'•� - .5•..'�:L:r" .,�. 3:rry¢'%•=��':
=•ram:' IImo�,, r _a. �J
J•N+eY: =7' •]ice.
`gig-„<.,:"..x..:�: � �•x
s
mac(
-r
':?�e� �]' ::.lC�,.i'S''. i�jF��•.�ni ,• ,�• �' v'`�rj Z'"�..�.1%-iY :/Ij, '�3
^y<C`:: �. :'i,?r•, .� �� f'. '' a3 ��_ ..,:lp".�Si� s�• S-yi" -� • Fi, � ,
�;; s ❑. �s�X,yA:- �.�',�-�..: ;GS Q_ .7'yc:;t:li� -p)�r�''S,.�` :�'c` ,§,� .�5
' '.nFc. . NSA 1�. .<_Y '•.. S� ?.. e•.,.
� 3r= ;'iN'� .: �. • „3 =tr %a} �" "..=:�i' 3,s : }�. _ n �3 :_i _>;:.: ls� r .,Y--5'•f-.: ,�' ��y �.� '�'r
r ors. _� Hy j,., _ .:,r....>�: • �:, ei:�,.,r7:�; '7=�:+:��';,�..: Nr�,.s_�� �; .s.�. �� , � c�;
k _ .s,S,ahi ; �rrw J �';"i'i�.,x. y�y�ss �' rya._ l., - � �-'."-:e �k,.. •5_ `„-_-�" e�-'. _
r">::t'..�:'Fz"iy.�ri�.�� rn y�i•:i=.•.: s"-F��'�~-.4'�H:.. _
- '`-'= - is :l.,,,�i'S:%'::xi".-i'�� v'FA ��''"u..� ��•Y.
��4':: sxy��' - a�: 1M �•: :� y� ¢�.34r EL-r`,:� � . C�.�. r2:; ' - 'tiF��r-e'i },, �:�.
"l.N Y§` .�'�1. �^"i':C:'. •.,x i ;1.,'. �f�'i 'tiy;y.:� Lr,.=7.;F.y: iD �.`.ifi%"'�w;l' _
-
7

6
�a
UC7UU'C]UUC'3UC7CJUUULiC:JUU`C7:UU
..•-�'„�CJUU:7C7C7
rJ7 U
y aJ-1
i�
�:
�i
n
n
n
�
�
n.
:n
n
n
*n
n
rn
r
� n
n
:n
:n
:n
:n
-✓r
:r.
n
cn
a
E
E.E
E
E
E
E
,E
E
E
E
E..E
E
E.
E.
E
E
E.
E
E
E
E
E
E
�,
------y--
------
C
7
G
❑
...
❑
��
-o
�333
�30
av�
aa�
CY
i
to
E
.E
E
E
`:E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E.
E
E
E
E
E
E
.E
LDS
CI]
rn
a
vi
r
L
'41) 7
Nfn
N
G
00
J
rJ
-GV.
r�
C
�O
C
C]
v
.in
o I I
2 -2
O
�.:
v
cz
F r74
..
x
�.
c
r�sal
QQUUUC}U�.jrrsrnr.�N
(10
ry
(n
.vn.
+n
t�
oo
❑�
o
—
c�
r
�.
�n
'r

Industrial User Pretreatment Permit (IUP)
PART I
Specific Conditions
G. Definitions and Limit Pages notes.:
ln:addition to the definitions in the Franklin County Sewer Use Ordinance .(SUO), the
following definitions. and requirements apply:
!. Permit issuing authority means Franklin County Public Utilities
2. Division or DWR means the Division of Water Resources,.part of the
Department. of Environment and Natural. Resources.
3. EMC means the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission.
4_ POTW (Publicly Owned 'Treatment Works).means Franklin County Public
utilities
5. Act: of "the Act" the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also. known as the
Clean Water Act,. as amended 33 USC 1251, et seq.
6. Continuous, for the purpose of flow monitoring, is a measure of discharge (low
from the facility which occurs without interruption throughout the operating hours
of the facility. Flow shall be monitored continually except for the infrequent
tunes when there may be no flow or for infrequent maintenance activities on the
flow device.
7. Grab sample for the monitoring requirements of this 1tJP, is defined nu single
"dip and take" sample collected at a representative point in the. discharge stream.
S. A composite sample, for monitoring requirements. of this.IUP; is defined as a
series of grab. samples collected at equal. time intervals during. the entire discharge
.period on the sampling. day (24 hours +1= 2 hours). The time interval shall be at
teast.every 15 minutes, approximately 100 ails. of gample and greater than 50
.samples per day. The sampling day shall be a typical production and discharge
day..
9. Daily Monitoring Frequency as specified in this lUP shall mean each day of
discharge.
10. 116 months Monitoring Frequency as. specified in this IV is defined as sampling
to be conducted during the irtonths of March and September.
I L Quarterly Monitoring frequency as specified in. this IUP is defined as.sampling to
be conducted quarterly as one 24-hour composite sampling period during the
months ofJanuary, April, July and October.
11

Industrial User Pretreatment Permit (IUP)
PART I
Specific Conditions
12. Monthly Monitoring Frequency as specified in this IUP is defined as samplinla to
be conducted mondily as one 24-hour composite samplin- period during all
twelve calendar months.
13: Weekly monitoring as specified in this l UP. is d6fitiod a§ .samplii g; to lie conducted
t Least once a week (defined as Sunday to Saturday} as nne' Z4 Hour composite
sarpliug`period:
1-4. An instantarieous, measurement as specified in. this I UP is defined as a single
reading, observation, or measurement.
12

Industrial User Pretreatment Permit QUP)
PART II
General Conditions
Outline. of PART I.I,
1.
Representative Sampling
1.6:
2.
Reporting
17.
3.
Test Procedures
18.
4.
Additional Monitoring: by
.1.9.
Perrnittee
5.
Duty to comply
20.
6.
Duty. to Mitigate
21.
7.
Facilities Operation, Bypass.
22.
8.
Removed substances
23.
9.
Upset Conditions
2.4.
10.
Right of Entry
25.
1. l ..
Availability of Records.:
26.
12.
Duty to provide information
27.
13.
Signatory Requirements
28.
14.
Toxic. Pollutants.
29.
15:
Civil acid Criminal Liability
3.0.
Representative SampIing
Federal and/or State Laws.
Penalties
Need to Halt or Reduce
Transferability
Property .Riglits
Severability
Modification, Revocation,
Termination.
Reapplication
Dilution Prohibition
Reports of Changed Conditions
Construction of pretreatment
facilities.
Reopener
Categorical Reopener
General Prohibitive Standards
Reports of Potential Problems
Samples and measurements taken as required. herein shalt be representative of the volume
and. nature of'the monitored discharge. .Ali samples shall be taken at the rnonita.ring points
specified in this permit and, unless otherwise specified, before the effluent joins or is
diluted by any other waste stream., body of water; 'or substance. Monitoring points shall
not be changed without notification to and approval by, the permit issuing authority.
2. Reporting
a.) Monitoring results obtained by the pertuittee shall be reported on forms
specified by the PDTw; postmarked no later than. the twentieth (20). day of the month
followh.ig the month in which the samples were taken. if no discharge occurs during a.
reporting period (herein defined as each calendar month) in which a sampling event was to
have occurred,, a form with.the .phrase "no discharge" shall be submitted. Copies of these
and all other reports required herein shall. be submitted to the POTW and shall be sent to
the following address:.
.Pretreatment Coordinator
Franklin County Public Utilities
1.63:0 US l l.wy I.
Youngsvi[le, NC 27.596
13

Industrial User Pretreatment Permit
PART II
General Conditions
b.) if the sampling performed by the permittee indicates a violation, the
permitteeshall notify. the .purW within 24.ho.urs of Ybecoming aware of the violation. The
.n pe ittee shall alsorepeat. the sampling and analysis. and submit the results of the repeat
analysis to the POTW within 30 days after becoming aware of the violation..
3. Test Procedures
Test. procedures for the analysis of pollutants shall be performed in accordance with the
techniques prescribed in 40 CFR part 136 and amendments thereto unless specified
otherwise in the monitoring conditions of thispermit.
4. Additional. Monitoring by Permittee
lithe permittee monitors any pollutant at the location(s) designated herein more frequently
than. required by this. permit, using approved analytical methods as specified above, the
results of such monitoring shall be. submitted to the POTW. The POTW may require more
.frequent monitoring. or the monitoring of other pollutants not. required in this peririit by
written notification.
5. Duty to.Comply
The permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliarree
constitutes. a violation of the SUO and is grounds for possible enforcement action.
b. Duty to Mitigate - Prevention of Adverse Impact
The pennittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in
violation of this pen -nit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human
health, the POTW; the waters receiving the POTW's discharge, or the environment.
7. Facilities Operation, Bypass
The permittee shall at all times maintain in good working orderand operate as. eft:iciently
as possible, all control .facilities or systems installed or used. by the permittee to achieve
compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. Bypass of treatment facilities is:
prohibited except when approved in advance by the POTW. Bypass. approval . shall be-.
given only when such. bypass is in compliance with 40 CF'R 403.17.
S. Removed. Substances
Solids, sludges, filter backwash, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or
control of wastewaters shall be disposed of in a manner such as. to prevent any pollutants
from such materials from entering the sewer system. The permittee is responsible for
assuring -its compliance with any requirements regarding the generation, treatment, storage,
and/or disposal of "I lazardous waste" as defined under the Federal Resource.Conservation
.and Recovery Act_.
9. Upset Conditions
14

Industrial User Pretreatment Permit (IUP)
PART II
General Conditions
An `'upset" means an. exceptional incident in which there is an unintentional and temporary
noncompliance with the categorical pretreatment standards because of factors beyond the
reasonable control of the penninee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent
caused by operational error, improperly designed or inadequate treatment facilities, lack of
preventative maintenance, or careless or improper operations.
An upset may constitute an affirmative defense for action brought for [he..noncomp]iance.
The permittee has the burden of proof to provide. evidence and demonstrate that none of
the factors specifically listed above were respons1We For the. noncompliance:
I0. Right of Entry
The permittee shall allow the staff of the State of North Carolina Division ,of Water
Resources, the Regional Administrator of -the Environmental Protection Agency,. the Staff
ofthe POTW, and/or their authorized representatives, upon the presentation of -credentials:
I. To enter upon the. permittee's premises where a real or potential discharge
is located or in which records are required to be. kept under the. terms and conditions
of this permit; and
Z. At reasonable .tiines to have access to and copy mcords.rcqu 1 red to be kept.
Linder the terms and conditions of this permit;. to inspect any monitoring equipment.
or monitoring. method required in this permit; and to sample any discharge of
pollutants.
1 L Availability of Records and Reports
The permittee shall retain records of all monitoring. information, including all calibration
and maintenance records as well as copies of reports and information used to complete. the.
application for this permit for at least three years. All records that pertain to matters that
are subject to any type of enforcement action small be retained and preserved by the
permittee until.alI enforcement activities have concluded and all periods of limitation with
respect to any and all. appeals have expired.
Except For data determined to be confidential under the SU-0, all reports. prepared in
accordancewith terms of this permit shall. be available for public inspection at the Control
Authority and/or Municipality. As required by the. SUO; effluent data shall. not be:
considered confidential.
l Z. Duty to Provide infonnation.
The permittee shall furnish to the Director of Public VWorks or his/her designees, within. a
reasonable time.; any information. which the Director, his/her designs; or the .Division of
15

fnd.ustrial User Pretreatment Permit
PART 11.
General Conditions
Water Resources may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying; revoking
and reissuing, or terminating this. permit or to determine compliance with this permit. The
permittee shall also furnish, upon request,. copies of records required to be kept by this
permit.
13.. Signatory Requirements.
All reports or: information submitted pursuant to the requirements of this permit must be
signed and certified by the Authorized Representative as defined under the:SUU. if tile.
designation of an Authorized Representative is no longer, accurate because a different.
individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation of the facility, or ov.eral.l
responsibility for environmental matters for the company; a new authorization satisfying
the requirements of this section must be submitted. to the POTW Director prior to or
together.with any reports to be signed by an authorized representative.
14. Toxic Pollutants
If a toxic. effluent standard or prohibition (ineluding any schedule of compliance specified.
in such effluent standard or prohibition)is established under Section.307(a) of the Federal.
Clean Water Act. for a toxic. pollutant which is present in. the discharge and such standard
'ar prohibition is more stringent than any limitation for such pollutant in this permit, this
permit may be revised or modified in accordance with the toxic. effluent standard or
prohibition and the perm.ittee so. natifwd.
15. Civil and Criminal Liability
Nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the perrnittee from civil or criminal.
penalties for noncompliance.
16. Federal and/or State Laws
Nothing in this .permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or
relieve the perinittee from any responsibilities, Iiabilitfes, or penalties. established pursuant
to any applicable federal and/or state law or regulation.
1.7. Penalties
The SUQ County provides that any person who violates a permit condition. is subject to a
civil penalty not to exceed $25,000 dollars per day of such violation.
In addition, The PU`l'1N Director may for go.od.cauw revoke wastewater discharge permit
or permission to discharge for any of the following reasons:
(1) Failure to accurately report the wastewater constituents and characteristics
of the discharge;
(2) Failure to report significant. changes in operations, or wastewater
constituents and characteristics
(3) Refusal of reasonable access to the user's premises for the purpose of
inspection or monitoring; or,
(4) Violation of conditions. of the permit or permission to discharge, conditions
of the SUO, or any applicable state and federal regulations:
16

Industrial User Pretreatment Permit QUP)
PART II
General Conditions
Noncompliarit industrial users will be notified of the proposed termination of their
wastewater permit and will be offered an opportunity to demonstrate why the proposed
action should not be taken.
it is the responsibility of the holder of this permit to deliver pretreated wastewater within
the effluent limits prescribed in this permit. The POTW is not required to. accept any
wastewater which. contains effluent.Iimits in excess of such limits prescribed in.this permit.
Upon notice to the perm iCho lder, the POTW has the right and option to curtail .acceptance
of sewer flow from the permit holder whenever there has been a violation. of 'the effluent
limits of this permit, including delivery of sewer flow.by the permit holder that causes or
contributes to the POTW 'violating or potentially violating the. loading jimits imposed. on
the POTW for its.discharge at itsapproved location. Any curtailment shall be for a duration
and in a volume or amount, in the.sole discretion of the POTW, deemed sufficient for it to
remain incompliance with any laws imposed. on it or with agreements to which it is a party.
Should the POTW exercise its right and option to 'Impose curtailment on the holder of this
permit, the POTW may thereafter gradually or all at once resurne acceptance. of flow
provided. the permit holder hassatisfied the Pam that the holder is.able to discharge
within the effluent limits prescribed herein.
Under state law, (NCCS 143-215.6B), under certain circumstances it is a crime to violate
terms, conditions; or requirements of pretreatmen(perrnits. It is a crime to knowingly make.
any False statement, representation, or certification in any record or either document
submitted or required. to be maintained under this peen -it, including monitoring reports or
reports of compliance or noncompliance. These crimes are enforced at the prosecutorial
discretion of the: local District Attorney.
18. Need to Halt or Reduce not a Defense
It shall not be a defense for a.perm ittee. in: an. enforcement action that it would have been.
necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity to maintain compliance with the:
conditions:ol: the perirrit.
1:9. Transferability
This permit. shall not be reassigned or transferred or sold to a new owner, new user,
different premises, or a new or changed operationwithout approval of the POTW.
20. Property Rights
This permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property,or any
exclusive privileges; nor does. it authorize any "injury to .private property or any invasion of
personal. rights, nor any infringement of Federal, State or local laws or regulations.
21. Severability
The. provisions of this permit are severable and, if any provision of this permit or the
application of any provision of this permit to any circumstance is held invalid, the
application of such provision to other. c ircurnstances and the remainder of this permit shall
not be affected thereby.
17

Industrial User Pretreatment Permit (][UP).
PART It
General Conditions
22. Permit Modification, Revocation, Termination
This permit may be modified, revoked and reissued or terminated with cause in accordance
to the requirements of the SUO and North Carolina. General Statute or implementing
regulations..
23. Re -Application for Permit Renewal
The permittee is responsible for. filing an application for reiSsuance of this permit at. least
180. days prior to its expiration date.
24. Dilution Prohibition
'rho permittee shall not increase the use of potable or process water:or in any other way
:attempt to dilute the discharge as a partial or complete subslitute for adequate treatrrient to
achieve compliance with the limitations contained in this permit:
25. Reports of Changed Conditions.
The permittee shall give notice to the POTW of any planned .significant changes to the
permittee's operations or system which rilight alter the nature, quality; or volume of its
wastewater at least 19O days before the change. The permittee shall not begin the changes
until receiving. written. approval from the Control Authority and/or Municipality. Also see
Part II, 30. below for additional reporting requirements for spil1/slug.1ssues.
25. Reports of Changed Conditions Continued
Significant changes may include butare.not limited to
(a) increases or decreases to production;
(b) increases in discharge of previously reported pollutants;
(c) discharge of pollutants not previously reported to: the. Control Authority
and/or Municipality;
(d) new or changed product lines;
(e) new or changed manufacturing processes and/or chemicals; or
(f) new or changed customers.
26. Construction
No construction o..f pretreatment facilities or additions thereto shall be begun until Final
Plans and Specifications have been submitted to the POTW and written approval and an
Authorization to Construct (A to C) have been issued.
2T Reopener
The permit shall be modified or, alternatively, revoked and reissued to comply with any
.applicable effluent standard or limitation for the control of any pollutant shown to.
contribute to toxicity of the. WWTP effluent or any pollutant that is otherwise limited by
l8

Industrial User Pretreatment Permit JUP)
PART II
General Conditions
thePOTW discharge permit. The permit as modified or reissued under this paragraph may
also :contain any other requirements of state or federal pretreatment regulations then
applicable..
28. Categorical. Reopener
This permit shall be inodified, or alternativety, revoked and reissued, to comply with any
applicable effluent. standard or limitation issued or approved. under Sections 302(b)(2)(C)
and. (1)), 304(b)(2), and 347(a)(2) of the Clean Water Act, if the effluent standard or
limitation so issued or approved:
l.) contains different conditions or is otherwise more stringent than any
effluent limitation. in this permit; or
2.) controls any pollutant not limited €n this permit.
The permit as modified or reissued under this paragraphshall also contain any other
requirements. of the Act then applicable:
29. General Prohibitive Standards.
The permitteeshall comply with the .general prohibitive discharge. standards. in 40 CFR.
4015 (a) and (b) of the Federal pretreatment regulations.
30. Potential Pt:obletns
The permitteeshall provide protection from accidental and slug discharges or prohibited.
materials and other. substances regulated by this permit. The permittee shall. also notify the
POTW immediately of any changes at its facility affecting the potential for spills and. other
accidental discharge, discharge of a non -routine, episodic. nature, anon -customary batch
discharge, or a sling load as defined in the. S[JO.
Additionally, the permittee.' shall notify by telephone the POTW immediately of all
discharges that could cause problems to the POTW, including any slag loadings as defined
in the SUO. If the permittee experiences such a discharge, they shall inform the POTW
immediately upon the first awareness of the commencement of the discharge_ Notification
shall include location of the discharge, type of waste, concentration and voluine if known
and corrective actions taken by the. permittee, A written tolls}w-up. report thereof shall be
Filed by the pennittee within five (5} days, unless waived by the POTW.
19

Industrial User Pretreatment Permit JUP)
Part III
5necial Conditions
1. Slug/Spill control Measures
The permittee shall provide protection from accidental and slug discharges of prohibited
materials and other substances regulated by this.perm.it. the plan shall include, but is not
limited to:
- description of discharge practices, including non- routine batch discharges,
description of. stored chemicals, procedures for. immediately notifying the POTW of
slug discharges. that would cause a violation of 40 CFR 403.5 (b), with procedures.
for follow up notification within 5. days, .and if necessary, procedures, and if
necessary, procedures to prevent adverse impact from accidental spills, including.
inspection and maintenance of storage areas, handling and transfer of materials;
loading and unloading operations, control of plant. site run --off: worker training
building of containment 'structure or equipment , measures for containing toxic
organic. pollutants (including solvents), and for measures and equipment for
emergency response..
In addition. to the requirements in .Part. 11, 30, the. Permittee shall maintain,. update and:
submit current revisions and versions of the Novozyrnes Safety:document named "Spill
On -Site" to the PQTW.
The periilittee shall provide updates to Franklin County as required by Part 11, 30, of this
1UP. Modifications to tfie measures shall be approved by Franklin County prior to.
installationlirriplementati6n. If a measure fails, the Control Authority shall be notified
within 24 hours.
2 5Iudge TVlanagement P°an
3. Flow Measurement Requirements
The permittee shall maintain appropriate discharge flow measurement devices and methods
consistent with approved scientific practices to ensure the accuracy and reliability of
measurements of the volume of monitored discharges. Devices installed shall be a
continuous recording flow meter capable of measuring flows with a maximum deviation
of less than 10% from true discharge rates throughout the range. of expected discharge
volumes. The devices shall be. installed, calibrated, and maintained to ensure::accuracy. At
the time of issuance of the permit; this method consists of MAGNETIC FLOW METER.
The meter shall have appropriate preventative. maintenance performed at least every twelve
(12) months. Modifications to the flow teetering. equipment shall be approved by the.
20

Industrial User Pretreatment Permit JUP)
Part III
at Conditions
P01'W prior to installation. If a required flow measurement. device fails., Elie Control
Authority shall be notified within 24 hours.
4. Certified Laboratory Analysis
Pollutant. analysis. shall be: performed by a North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Certified Laboratory that is certified in the. analysis of the pollutant in. wastewater.
5. Laboratory Fees and Administrative: Charges /surcharges
The permittee shall be billed for all. Laboratory fees associated with Franklin County's
C.Qmpliance monitoring of the permittee. The permittee will be bitted a monthly
Administrative fee of $100.00. The. permittee will be surcharged for any overage of
allowable limits per the. S.UO.
6. Certified Operator
Pursuant to Chapter 90A-44 of north Carolina General Statutes, and upon classification of
the facility by the Certification Commission, the permittee shall employ a certified waste
water pretreatment plant operator in resporisibility charge: (ORC) :of the wastewater
treatment facilities. Such operator must hold a. certification of the type and grade
equivalent to, or greater that the. classification assigned to. the wastewater treatment.
.Facilities by the Certification Commission.. The.. permittee must also employ.a certified
backup.. operator. of the. appropriate type and grade to comply with the conditions of Title
15A, Chapter 8A .020. The ORC of the facility must visit. the wastewater facility as,
required; must properly manage and document daily operation arid. maintenance of the
facility; and must comply with all other conditions of Title 15A, Chapter .8A .0200. The
permittee, shall submit a letter designating the operator in responsible charge to the
Certification Commission or their des i6riee within thirty days after facility classification.
7. Attachment from NPI9FS NCO06931.1. Part III -- Other [requirements, Section.
C "Municipal Control of Pollutants from Industrial Users.,"
20

Industrial User Pretreatment Perm.it(JUP)
Part III
5 ecp ial Conditions
20

Industrial User Pretreatment Permit JUP}
Part III
Special Conditions
NPDES permit` Standard Conditions.
Page 15 of 1.8
Section H. Pufiliciv Ua.ned Treatment Works (POTW ]
All POMs must provide adequate notice to the Nreclor of the foIIowing [4.0 CFR i22A2(b)]:
1. Any new introduction ofpolluiants into th:e POTW front an indircct:discharger, regardless ofthe means of
transport, which would be. subject`ta section 361 or 3D6orCWA if it were directly.discharging those pdIIntattts;
and
2, .any substantial change in the volume or character aFpoliutants'heing introduced by an. ind ircmd isch arger as:
influent to that: POTW at the time of issuance pf the pennit.
3. For pttrposes.of this paragraph, adequate notice sha11 include information on (I') the quality and quantity of'effluent.
introduced into the POTW, and (2) any anticipated impact. thAt.may result. rrom the change of the quantity or
qua lity.of effluent to be. discharged hom.thc POTW.
Section C. Municipal Control of Pollutants from„ Industrial Users;
Effiucn[ limitations are list ed'in Pali 16fthis. permit: Other pollutants attributable to inputsfrom industrial Users
discharging to the POTW may be present in the Permittee's discharge. At such time as sufficient nfotmat[on
becomes available:to: establish limitations for such po.11utan[s,.this permit may be revised. to specify eftluenl
limitations for any a a]l.of such other pollutants in accordance with best practicable technology or water quality
standards.
2: Prohibited Discharges
a. The .Permittee shall*velop and enforce. their Pretreaunenl.Progranh to implement rite prohibition against the
introduction ❑fpollutaws or discharges into the waste treatment system orwaaste collectia4system. which .
cause at- cant ribute to Pass Tbsaugh:dr.Interference as defined. in I. A:NCAC 02H .0900'and 40 C FR 463. [40
CF.R 4o3.5(a)(1.))
h, The Penn ittee.shit II develop and enfaree their Pretreatment Program to implement the. prohibitions against the
introduction ofthe following wastes in the waste treatmenI or waste co11ec[ion. syste.tn [40 CFR.403,5(b)]:
0 ) PoIIutartta which..create a fire or explosion hazard in die POTW, including; but rat iiniifed. to,
wastestreams with a..closed cup Ra_shpaint orlass than: [40 degrees Fahrenheit or 60 degrees Centigrade.
using the test meihodsspecified.in 40 CFR 261? 1;
(2) Pollutants. which cause rarrosive strucrural damage to the POTW,.bul in no case discharges'With pH lower
than 5.6, un]ess.the works isspec i€icaily designed to accommodate such discharges;
(3) Solid or, viscous poi€utams in amounts which cause obstruction to the flow in: the PO.TW resulting in
Interference;.
(4) Any pollutant, inrludbig oxygen demanding pollutants (BOD, etc.) released. in a Discharge at a flow rate
and/or pollutant concentration which will cause Interference with the POTW;
(5) Heat in amounts which.wi11 i6..ibit binilogica€ activity in.the POTW resulting is Interfereace, but in na
case heat in such quantities that the temperature at the PdTW Treatment Plant exceeds 400C (1040F)
unless the. Division, upon request of the POTW, approves alternate temperattire Iitihits-,
(6) Petroleum oil, non -biodegradable cutting oil, or prcducts,;ofmineral oil origin in amounts that will cause
Interference or Pass Through;
(7). Po110tants which. resuIt in the .prescnce of [oxic. gases, .vapors;.or fumes within the POTW in a quantity that
may cause atute.worker health and safety problems;. or
(8) Any trucked. or hauled pollutants, except at discharge points designated by Ihe.POM
c. The Perm itte..e•AaIf investigate the.source of a discharges into the POTW, including slug loads and other
unusual discharges, which.have the potential to adver3ely impact: the Prtmittee's:Pretreatment Program and/or.
the operation of the POTW,
The Pe. rmittee shaft report sue h.discharges into the POTW'to the Director or the appropriate, Region 1 Office.
Any information shall be provided orally within 24 hours from the time the Perntittee became aware of the
circumstances. A written .submission shall also be provided within.5 days of the time the.Perniinee becomes
Version 10/310011
2[]

Industrial l User Pretreatment Permit JUP)
Part IIY
Special Conditions
NPOES. Permit Standard Conditions
Page 16 of I S.
aware of the cimunmstancea. The written submission shall contain a descriptioil .of the discharge; Ole
investigation into possible sources; the period o f t h e discharge, including exact dates and cities; if the
discharge has. notecased. the anticipated time it is expected 16 caniinue; and steps taken or planned to:red ticc,
cliniinate,.and prevent reoccurrencc or.the noncompliance,
3. With regard to the effluent requirements Iisted in Part I of this perniit, it may be necessary for the Perm ittee to
supplement the requirements of the Federal Pretreatment Standards (40 CFR. Pan 403) to ensure•compliance by
the Permittee.with all applicable effluent limitations. SucIt actions by the Perin ittee may be necessary regarding
so rite. or all of the industries discharging. to the mttnicipa1.systern
4.. The Permitfee .sha1) require. any Ind ustr'ial User ([U.) discharging to the P.O.TW .to meet Federal Pretreatment
Standards developed.under Section 307(bj of the Act as attended (which includes categorical standards and.
speciFw IocaI limits, best management practices and narratiVe requirements)..prior to accepting wastewater from
any Significant lrtdustrial User (SiU), the Penh ittee shall either develop and submit to the Divisiona new
Pretreatment Program or, as necessary; a,moditication ofan existing l'retir"tment Program, for approvai as
required under section D below as well as 15A NCAC 02IL0907(a) and (b). [40 CFR 122.44(j)(2)]
S. This permit shall be. modified; or alternatively, revoked and reissued, to. incorporate or modify an approved POTW
Pretreatment Program or to. include a cont pliance.schedule for the development of a POTW Pretreatment Program
as required under Section 402 (b)(8) of ilia CWA and implementing regulations.or by the requirements of the
approved State pretreatment progrant:.:as appropriate
Section D.. Pretreatment Prop -rams
Under authority. of sections 307 (b) and (c) and 402{b)(8) of the CWA and implementing regulations 40 CFR 403,
North Carolina 0cneraI Statute 1437215.3(.14) and. implementing regulations. 15A NCAC 0 2 H ,0900,.and in accordaEice.
with: the approved pretreatment pro gram,.a1i pro visions. and rcguIaIions.conWned and referenced in the pretreatment
program. suhm itta I are an enforceable part of.this permit. (40 CFR I22A40)(2)]
The Perm ittee: shal I operate its approved pretreatment program in ac.ccrdance with Section 402(b)(8)..ofthe.CWA, 40.
CFR403,15A NCAC 02H .0900, and the legal authorities; policies,.procedures. and financial provisions contained in
its pretreatment program submission and Division approved modifications thereof.. Such operation shad include but
not limited to the implementation of the following conditions and requkemenis. Terms not defined in. Part I or Part IV
of this permit are as defined in 15A NCAC 0 2 H .0903 and%40 CFR 403:3.
1. Saw& Use Ordinance (SUO)
The Permittee.shall maintain.adequate legal.authorito implement its approved pretreatment program: [ISA
NCAC 02H .090ty 3(b)(32), 0905 and .0906(b)(l); 40 CFR 403.8(f)(1) and 4.03.9(b)(1) and (2)].
2. Industrial Waste Survey (1WS)
The Permittee shall implement an I.WS consisting 0fthe survey of users of the POTW collection system or
treamtent plant, as required by 40 CM 403.8(f)(2)(i-lii) and 15A NCAC 02H .[i905 ]also 40 CFR l?2.44(j)(1)],
including identification of all lad ustria1.Users that may haire:an impact on the POTW and the character and amount.
6f06lhnants contributed io.the POTW by these industrial. Users'and identification of.those. Ind ustrial Users
meeting the definition of SR7. Where. the Perm ittee accepts waslewater front one or more satellite Pl:1TWs, the
IWS for the Permitlee shall address: all sate IIile POTW services areas, unless the pretreatment program hi those.
satellite service areas isadIninistered lit+a separate Perin ilice with an approved Here atment:Prograin, The.
Parm iaee shall sobin il a. summary. of its I W S activities to the Division:at least once every rive years; and as
required by the Division. The IWS submission shall include a sunmtary.of any investigations conducted under
paragraph C 2 c.. of this. Pail. [ I SA NCAC 02H .0903 (b)(1 3), ,0905 and .0906(h)(2); 40 CFR 403.8(fl(2) and 403.9]
3, Moniorine PIan
The Permitlee shall implement a Division -approved Monitoring Plan for.the collection of facility specific data to
be used ill a w=e ator treatment•platil 14eadv<orks Analysis (HWA).for the development of.speciric pretreatment.
Local limits. Effluentdata from the Plan shall be reported on the DMRs (as. required by Parts 11.D and iI.E.5.).. [l.5A.
NCAC 02H ,0903(h)(l6), .0906.(b)(3)and .0905.]
End of Permit
Version 43112011
20

Appendix C: Division Approved
Corrective Action Plan Letter
www.dewberry.com

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
January 31, 2017
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Steve Stadehnan, PhD
Groundwater Manager/Specialist
Novozymes North America, Inc.
77 Perry Chapel Church Road
PO Box 576
Franklinton, NC 27525-0576
RE: Conditional Corrective Action Plan (CAP) Final Approval
Novozymes North America, Inc. (NZNA)
Permit No. W00002806 and WQ0003487
77 Perry Chapel Church Road
Franklinton, NC
Franklin County
Dear Dr. Stadelman:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
On July 16, 2015, the Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
received your proposed Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for the above -referenced site. Review and
conditional approval for this CAP was delayed in anticipation of legislation (HB 765), which contains
provisions to allow for monitored natural attenuation of groundwater at certain permitted facilities.
As described in Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2L, Classifications and
Water Quality Standards Applicable to the Groundwaters of North Carolina (15A NCAC 2L), the
Division's final approval of a CAP is contingent upon consideration of public input received following
notification in accordance with 15A NCAC 2L .0114. Certified mail receipts were provided, showing proof
of notification to the property owners and occupants potentially affected by the approval of the proposed
CAP submitted pursuant to 15A NCAC 2L .0106(1), "using natural attenuation processes."
Based upon a review of the information submitted in the CAP and after considering any public
comments and the Raleigh Regional Office recommendations, I am hereby granting conditional approval
to implement the CAP. The Division's decision is based on the information submitted in the proposed CAP
and supporting documents, and is contingent upon the following conditions:
1. The NZNA-recommended approach is for selected area active remediation via
groundwater extraction associated with Farms 1 and 2 and monitored natural attenuation
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street 11611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh NC 27699-1611
919.707,9000

(MNA) of the impacted groundwater found in association with Farms 3 and the Smith,
Pickrel, and Alston properties and adjoining NZNA properties. The details of the CAP
Phase I and Phase 1I are found in Sections 6.3-7.2 of the CAP on pages 36-44.
a. Focused ground water extraction includes the continued extraction of groundwater
via six (6) existing groundwater recovery wells located north of Farm 1, six (6)
proposed recovery wells on the east side of Farm 2, and eight (8) proposed
groundwater recovery wells on the north side of Farm 2. Further details on this are
available in the CAP Section 7.1.1.2 on page 40.
b. As discussed in Section 6.1.1, natural attenuation of impacted groundwater at
points beyond the compliance boundary will require a reduction in irrigation rates
primarily to reduce total dissolved solids (TDS) loading. Reduced irrigation rates
require an off -setting increase in direct discharge of treated wastewater.
2. The Monitoring Plan is discussed in Section 8.0, beginning on page 45 of the CAP. Tables
21 and 22 summarize the monitoring wells to be included in the groundwater monitoring
program by farm.
a. On Fart 1, Farm 2, and the Smith/Pickrel/Alston/NZNA Properties, all of the trend
monitoring wells and the background monitoring wells will be sampled for Nitrate -
Nitrogen and TDS annually. All of the new and existing compliance monitoring wells
will be sampled for Nitrate -Nitrogen and TDS semi-annually in the fast year, and
annually after the first year.
b. On the Joumigan and Goswick Farms where MNA is proposed as the remedial
strategy, NZNA proposes to monitor groundwater for 5 years, examine data collected,
and report the findings to DWR. The existing and new trend and background
monitoring wells on these properties will be sampled for Nitrate -Nitrogen and TDS
three times per year.
c. New monitoring wells will be installed on the following properties, as mapped in
Figures 2, 3, 4A, 4B, and 5:
i. Farm 1: 9 new monitoring wells
ii. Farm 2: 6 new monitoring wells
iii. Farm 3: 4 new monitoring wells
iv. Smith, Pickrel, Alston, and NZNA Properties: 2 new monitoring wells
v. Journigan Property: 3 new monitoring wells
vi. Goswick Property: 1 new monitoring well
d. Known or potential water supply wells in the NZNA vicinity are included in Table 12,
and Figures 7 and 8. NZNA proposes to conduct monitoring upgradient of the Bowers,
Burt, McNeil, and Goswick water supply wells as outlined in the CAP Section 8.1.
DWR may recommend including the sampling of these water supply wells if any of
the upgradient monitoring wells show increases in nitrates or TDS over two or more
sampling events.
The surface water assessment plan is outlined in Section 6.2 of the CAP. A surface water
monitoring plan will be prepared and issued upon completion of pilot testing and the
selection of the final remedial options. This CAP Phase 3 includes the development of full-
scale design, costs, and permitting of the corrective actions. Approval of this CAP is
conditional upon receipt of an NPDES permit to allow for the treatment and disposal of
contaminated groundwater, which is required to comply with conditions of 15A NCAC
02L .0106(e), and .0106(l)(1).
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I `Hater Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street 11611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1611
919.7079000

4. Approval of this CAP is conditional upon successful demonstration that NZNA can
demonstrate compliance with 15A NCAC .0106(l)(6) upon completion of the surface water
assessment plan outlined in Section 6.2 of the CAP.
Upon receipt of additional information by our office, you may be required to perform additional
monitoring, conduct additional site assessment activities, assess the performance of the ongoing corrective
action, and/or evaluate the technological and economic feasibility of implementing a new technology at the
subject site. If NZNA cannot meet any of the conditions described in Conditions 1 — 4 above, a new
Corrective Action Plan may be required to meet the requirements of 15A NCAC 02L .0106.
You are required by 15A NCAC 2L .0114(c) to notify all interested parties, as specified in
paragraph (b) of that rule, that approval of the CAP was granted by the Director. Notification is required
by certified mail and must be made within 30 days of receipt of the Director's decision.
The above referenced restrictions have been determined to be applicable to the site and NZNA is
hereby approved in conjunction with the CAP. A survey plat delineating the areas of contamination at the
site and containing the information required in § 143B - 279.10.
A report detailing the findings of the monitoring effort must be submitted to this office on or before
the last day of March, July, and November of each calendar year. Failure to adhere to the requirements of
the CAP and this approval letter may be considered to be a violation of the rules, subject to possible
enforcement action by the Division.
If you have any questions, please call Laura Robertson of the Raleigh Regional Office at 919-791-
4200.
Sincerely,
l
. Jay erman, P.G., Director
Division of Water Resources
cc: Franklin County Health Department
WQROS Central Files
Water Quality Permitting, Non -Discharge Unit
RRO files
Edmund Henriques, S&ME, Inc. 8646 W. Market St. Ste. 105, Greensboro, NC 2740
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street 11611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1611
919.707.9000

Appendix D: Engineering Alternatives
Analysis (EAA) Guidance Document
www.dewberry.com

Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) Guidance Document
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
NOTE: The N.C. Division of Water Resources (DWR) will not accept an NPDES application for a new or
expanding wastewater treatment plant discharge unless all the required application requirements are
submitted. A complete NPDES application will include the following items:
NPDES Application Form (in triplicate)
Application Fee
Engineering Alternatives Analysis (in triplicate)
Local Government Review Form (non -municipals only)
Failure to submit all of the required information will result in return of the incomplete package. If you have
any questions about these requirements, contact the NPDES Unit staff. Contact names, application forms,
applicable fees, and guidance documents are available on the NPDES website at
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ps/npdes. Completed applications should be mailed to:
NCDENR/DWR/NPDES Complex Permitting Unit,1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
Background
The NPDES permit program was enacted in 1972 as part of the Clean Water Act. The original goal of the program
was to eliminate all point source discharges to surface waters by 1985. Although this goal was not achieved, the
NPDES program continues to strive toward it. In that light, an Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) is
required with any NPDES application for a new or expanding wastewater treatment plant discharge, in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0105(c)(2). In order for an NPDES application to be approved, the EAA must
provide complete justification for a direct discharge to surface water alternative, and demonstrate that direct discharge
is the most environmentally sound alternative selected from all reasonably cost-effective options [per 15A NCAC
2H.0105(c) (2)].
The purpose of this EAA Guidance Document is to provide guidance to the regulated community for the evaluation of
wastewater disposal alternatives. The impetus behind this comprehensive guidance was based on the following: 1) a
majority of new NPDES applications were being returned as incomplete due to inadequate EAA submissions; and 2) a
few recent court cases resulted in unfavorable rulings for the NPDES discharger due in part to inadequate EAAs.
DWR most frequently returns EAAs as incomplete due to inadequate flow justification, inadequate alternatives
evaluations, and/or lack of documentation/references used to design and cost alternatives.
Please note that this guidance document is designed primarily for domestic wastewater discharges. For other proposed
discharges such as water treatment plant discharges from ion exchange and reverse osmosis units, some alternative
disposal options may not be technologically feasible. Within this guidance document, we have attempted to point out
where such technological limitations may exist. You are urged to review NPDES permitting guidance documents on
the NPDES website, which discuss some of the limited disposal options for some discharges.
Please note that if a proposed municipal expansion is subject to SEPA Environmental Assessment (EA)/Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) requirements, the EAA requirements should be incorporated into the SEPA document. In
addition, the NPDES Unit cannot accept an application for a new/expanding NPDES discharge until departmental
review of the SEPA document is complete and a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) has been submitted to the
State Clearinghouse for circulation.
The following step-by-step outline should be used for the preparation of all EAA submissions. If an EAA submission
lacks any of these basic elements, the NPDES application will be returned as incomplete.
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 1 of 8

STEP 1. Determine if the proposed discharge will be allowed
Before beginning any engineering evaluation of alternatives, you must first determine if the proposed wastewater
discharge will be allowed. Otherwise, time and money may be spent needlessly for an EAA preparation that will
ultimately be rejected on the basis of existing water quality restrictions. There are several potential restrictions to a
wastewater discharge to surface waters, including:
■ Zero flow stream restrictions [15A NCAC 2B.0206(d)(2)] apply to oxygen -consuming waste in zero -flow
streams. In order to determine streamflow at the proposed discharge location, contact the U.S.
Geological Survey at 919-571-4000.
■ Receiving stream classification restrictions [e.g., ORW, WS, SA, NSW, and HQ class waters have various
discharge restrictions or require stricter treatment standards]. Stream classifications are available on the
the DWR Classification and Standards/Rule Review Branch website:
(http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu), while wastewater discharge restrictions for various stream
classifications are presented in state regulations [ 15A NCAC 2B.0200].
■ Basinwide Water Quality Plans. These basin -specific plans list NPDES permitting strategies that may
limit wastewater discharges to particular streams within the basin due to lack of stream assimilative
capacity, etc. Basin plans are available on the DWR website, or you may contact the DWR Basinwide
Planning Branch (http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu)..
■ Impaired waters and TMDLs. Certain waterbodies listed as impaired on the 303(d) list and/or subject to
impending TMDLs may have wastewater discharge restrictions. The list of 303(d) impaired waters is
located on the DWR website, or you may contact the DWR Modeling and Assessment Branch
(http: / /portal.ncdenr.Org/web/wq/ps/mtu).
■ Presence of Endangered Species. If endangered species are present in the proposed discharge location,
there may be wastewater discharge restrictions. Endangered species information may be included in the
Basinwide Water Quality Plan, or you may contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (919-856-4520),
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission (919-733-3633), or the N.C. Natural Heritage Program (919-733-
7701).
Municipal applicants.
As a public service, the NPDES Unit will evaluate whether a proposed municipal discharge is considered allowable.
The municipality needs to initiate this review by submitting a letter request for Speculative Effluent Limits to the
NPDES Unit. You must obtain streamflow estimates for the proposed discharge location to ensure that the receiving
stream is not subject to zero flow restrictions. Low flow data (specifically, drainage area, summer and winter 7Q10,
average flow and 30Q2 flow statistics) can be obtained for a nominal fee from the U.S. Geological Survey in Raleigh at
919-571-4000. The low flow data must be submitted with the speculative limits request letter. If the proposed
discharge appears to be allowable, the NPDES Unit will prepare speculative effluent limits for a maximum of 2 flows
and 2 discharge locations using water quality models. The municipality can then use the speculative limits to prepare
preliminary engineering design and cost estimates for the direct discharge alternative within the EAA. In limited
instances where complex water quality models are necessary to develop speculative limits and determine potential water
quality impacts, some municipalities have undertaken the modeling effort (with DWR review) in order to expedite this
portion of the NPDES permit review process.
Non -municipal applicants.
Due to staff constraints, the NPDES Unit cannot prepare speculative limits for non -municipal applicants. Thus, it is
your responsibility to make your own determination as to whether the proposed discharge might be allowed by the
Division, by evaluating the water quality factors listed above. It is highly recommended that you discuss the proposed
discharge with the applicable DWR Regional Office and/or NPDES Unit staff, who may be able to provide input on
the likelihood of a new/expanding discharge. As a first step, you must obtain streamflow estimates for the proposed
discharge location to ensure that the receiving stream is not subject to zero flow restrictions. Low flow data
(specifically, drainage area, the summer and winter 7Q10, average flow and 30Q2 flow statistics) can be obtained for a
nominal fee from the U.S. Geological Survey in Raleigh at 919-571-4000. The low flow data must be submitted with
the EAA, and will be used by the permit writer to develop permit limits. You must also verify that the proposed action
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 2of8

(i.e., construction of a wastewater treatment plant and its appurtenances) is consistent with local zoning and/or
subdivision ordinances. You will need to request the local government(s) to complete a Local Government Review
Form (Attachment A), and include the signed and notarized form with your NPDES application package.
All al2plicants.
If you conclude that the proposed discharge will pass the "allowable discharge" criteria, then begin the EAA preparation
by summarizing the following general information about the proposed project:
■ Provide a description of the proposed project. If the project will be constructed in phases, provide a
schedule for constructing each additional phase, and provide the projected flow per phase (see STEP 2).
■ Applicant name, mailing address, phone number, contact person
■ Facility name, address, county, phone number, contact person
■ EAA preparer's name, mailing address, phone number, contact person
STEP 2. Provide reasonable projections for population and flow
Residential Population Projections.
Facilities requesting an NPDES discharge permit for new or expanding domestic wastewater discharges must
document the population to be served within the service area over a 20-year planning period. The NC State
Demographics unit provides population data for each county and municipality and can be accessed on the Internet at
http://www.demog.state.nc.us. If 20-year population projections for specific areas are not available, a linear
extrapolation of population trends from the past decade should be used. Any deviation from a linear projection
method must be clearly justified. If population projections include future annexations, include a proposed annexation
schedule as well as any annexation requirements that must be met.
Municipal Flow Projections.
Justification of flow as well as a demonstration of need shall be provided. Mere speculation is not sufficient. Flow
projections should represent average anticipated flows, since permit flow limits are based on monthly averages.
Peaking factors used to design various components of the wastewater collection system (e.g., collector sewers,
interceptor sewers, pumping stations) should not be used in the justification of the average anticipated flow. For
municipal wastewater dischargers, flow must be justified using the Clean Water Loan Program (CWLP) Guidance for
Preaparing Engineering Reports available on the Internet at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wi/cleanwater/er.
Exceptions to these flow criteria may be approved on a case -by -case basis provided adequate justification is supplied.
■ Current Flow- Provide current flows including residential, commercial, industrial, and infiltration/inflow
(I/I) based on actual flow data or water billing records. Current residential flow and current commercial
flow may be based on water billing records minus a 10% consumptive loss. Current industrial flow may
be based on dual metering to determine consumptive losses.
■ Future Residential Flow- Provide 20-year residential flows based on projected residential growth.
Multiply the projected growth in residential population by 70 gallons per day per capita.
■ Future Commercial Flow- Provide 20-year commercial flows based on projected residential growth.
Multiply the projected growth in residential population by 15 gallons per day per capita.
■ Future Industrial Flow- Provide flow for future documented industrial flow. A nominal allowance for
future unplanned industrial expansions may be considered by the Division, provided the basis is clearly
justified and current land -use plans and local zoning allow for such industrial growth.
Non -Municipal Flow Projections.
Flow may be justified in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0219(1) for various activities (e.g., new subdivisions, new
schools, various commercial activities). For other proposed discharges (e.g., groundwater remediation, water
treatment plant filter backwash, industrial facilities), the flow projections will be based on engineering design
considerations and/or production projections rather than population projections.
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 3of8

STEP 3. Evaluate technologically feasible alternatives
Since a goal of the Clean Water Act is to minimize or eliminate point source discharges to surface waters, any proposal
for a new or expanding wastewater discharge must include evaluation of wastewater disposal alternatives in addition to
direct discharge. Particularly for dischargers of domestic wastewater, this evaluation should investigate the feasibility
of the following wastewater disposal alternatives:
■ Connection to an existing wastewater treatment plant (public or private)
■ Land application alternatives, such as individual/community onsite subsurface systems, drip irrigation,
spray irrigation
■ Wastewater reuse
■ Surface water discharge through the NPDES program
■ Combinations of the above
In order for the applicant to eliminate a wastewater disposal alternative, you must either show that the alternative is
technologically infeasible, or that it would be cost prohibitive to implement relative to a direct discharge alternative.
Please note that for some alternatives, it might be easier to prove an alternative is not viable based on high cost rather
than technological feasibility. For example, for a large municipal expansion that would require several hundred acres for
a land application alternative, it might be easier to simply assume that the required acreage could be purchased and
calculate the present value costs (including current market land costs) for this option, rather than evaluating whether
land application is technologically infeasible due to lack of available land and/or poor soil conditions. For those
alternatives identified as technologically feasible, you must develop and compare costs, based on a preliminary level
design effort (see STEP 4).
The Division recognizes that wastewater disposal alternatives may be limited for some non -domestic wastewater
scenarios, and a full alternatives evaluation may not be warranted. If there is some question as to whether an alternative
may be eliminated, contact the NPDES Unit staff. Some scenarios that might not require a full alternatives evaluation
include:
Water Treatment Plant Discharges. Discharges from water treatment plants (WTPs) that utilize a
membrane technology (e.g., reverse osmosis, nanofiltradon) or ion exchange system tend to generate
highly concentrated wastestreams. These wastestreams are not amenable to land application and do not
have to be evaluated for this alternative. However, since these wastestreams can also have a toxic impact
on a receiving freshwater system, proposed new discharges from these WTPs to freshwaters will not be
considered for an NPDES permit unless you can demonstrate that the environmental impacts would be
minimal based on dilution modeling. You should investigate whether the wastewater can be piped to a
stream with sufficient dilution, or whether a local WWTP might accommodate this discharge. Please note
that discharges from WTPs that utilize greensand filtration or conventional technology produce a
wastestream that is not saline, therefore no disposal alternatives can be automatically ruled out as
infeasible for these other WTPs. Refer to the NPDES website for permitting strategies for reverse
osmosis, ion exchange, greensand filtration, and conventional WTPs.
Groundwater Remediation System Discharges. You will need to evaluate whether WWTP connection,
land application, infiltration galleries, in -situ groundwater remediation wells, or closed -loop groundwater
remediation wells are viable disposal alternatives. While land application might be a feasible alternative in
rural areas, it would not be a feasible alternative in downtown Charlotte, where there is no land available
for wastewater application. In this instance, you may simply state that land application is infeasible based
on land constraints within the city. You will also need to evaluate connection to an existing WWTP (in
accordance with Alternative A), since there are some municipalities that have accepted this wastestream in
the past. If the municipality will not accept the wastestream, the connection alternative is also considered
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 4of8

technologically infeasible. Please note that in -situ and closed -loop groundwater remediation wells are
permittable well types and further guidance is available through the Aquifer Protection Section.
Aside from these exceptions, you should proceed with the alternatives evaluation in accordance with the following
requirements. If you have any questions about these requirements, contact the NPDES Unit staff.
Alternative A. Connection to an Existing Wastewater Treatment System.
You must evaluate the feasibility of connecting to an existing wastewater treatment system served by a municipality or
other entity holding a valid NPDES or Non -Discharge Permit. All connection options should include an evaluation of
a gravity line and/or force main with pump station(s).
1. Existing Sewerage System:
(a) Identify whether there are existing sewer lines within a five -mile radius, or consider a greater radius if
cost effective for the project size.
(b) Provide a preliminary indication of flow acceptance from existing municipal or private WWTPs
under consideration for connection. If a municipal or private WWTP cannot accept the wastewater,
include a letter documenting such and consider this alternative technologically infeasible.
(c) If an existing sewerage system will accept the wastewater, evaluate the piping/pumps/resources
necessary to connect to the existing wastewater treatment plant. Attach a topographic map or a site
drawing showing the physical route of this alternative. Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per
STEP 4.
2. Planned Sewerage System: Determine if a regional sewerage system within a five mile radius is projected
to be available within the next five years to receive waste from the project site. If applicable, determine
availability date and flow acceptance projection from appropriate authority.
Alternative B. Land Application.
Land application disposal alternatives include individual/community onsite subsurface systems, drip irrigation, and
spray irrigation.
1. Provide an estimate of the best case hydraulic loading rate based on County Soil Surveys or from a soil
evaluation performed by a soil scientist. Include calculations showing the hydraulic loading rate and
the total area of land needed for the land disposal system, including buffers.
2. Assess the availability of land. If insufficient land is available onsite, assume that the necessary land can be
purchased and estimate the land purchase cost based on local real estate prices. Alternatively, provide
documentation to demonstrate that insufficient land is available for sale in the project area (include letters
from adjacent property owners indicating no interest in selling property).
3. Provide a description of the wastewater treatment system and the non -discharge application system.
Include a site plan showing the proposed layout, the application area, any existing structures, proposed
structures, and other uses within the site.
4. Explain the proposed reuse plan if reclaimed water will be used by a third party.
5. Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per STEP 4. For the reclaimed water system include the potential
revenue generated by selling the water.
6. Provide all calculations, documentation and maps as necessary to support assumptions and conclusions.
7. Note: The design of land application systems must meet the treatment and design requirements specified
in 15A NCAC 2T .05 or 15A NCAC 18A.1900.
8. Note: Proposed discharges from groundwater remediation systems must evaluate the potential for an
infiltration gallery treatment alternative.
Alternative C. Wastewater Reuse.
You must evaluate reusing all or a portion of the wastewater generated. Some municipalities are currently reusing
wastewater within the confines of their WWTP property for irrigation, toilet flushing, backwashing, etc., while other
municipalities have established progressive reuse programs for residential irrigation. Reuse applications might include
golf course irrigation, crop irrigation (e.g., hardwood or pine plantation, grasses), athletic field irrigation, landscape
uses, and commercial/industrial uses. Some of these reuse applications will be evaluated under Alternative B, Land
Application. The design of reclaimed water systems must meet the treatment and design requirements specified in
15A NCAC 2U.
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 5of8

Alternative D. Direct Discharge to Surface Waters.
1. No new or expanding (additional) discharge of oxygen -consuming waste will be allowed to surface waters
of North Carolina if both the summer 7Q10 and 30Q2 streamflows are estimated to be zero, in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0206(d). Private applicants must contact the USGS in Raleigh at 919-
571-4000 and obtain (generally for a nominal fee), the receiving streamflow data (s7Q10, 30Q2, annual
average streamflow) at the proposed discharge location. This information must be included in the EAA,
and will be used to develop permit limits.
2. All direct discharge systems of oxygen -consuming wastes should be evaluated both with tertiary filtration
[BODS= 5 mg/l, NH3-N= 1 mg/1] and without, and assuming a weekly sampling regime.
3. Provide a description of the proposed wastewater treatment facilities, including a schematic diagram of
the major components and a site plan of the treatment facility with outfall line(s).
4. Provide documentation of the availability of required land and/or easement agreements.
5. Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per STEP 4.
6. Note: All direct discharge treatment systems must comply with Reliability Requirements specified in 15A
NCAC 2H.0124.
Alternative E. Combination of Alternatives.
You should evaluate the possibility of a combination of wastewater alternatives that would minimize or eliminate a
direct discharge alternative. For example, consider whether the facility can operate a land application system during
the dry season when streamflows are at their lowest and provide less dilution, and operate an NPDES discharge
system during the wet season when soils may not be as amenable to land application and the receiving stream provides
its greatest dilution.
STEP 4. Evaluate economic feasibility of alternatives
To provide valid cost comparisons among all technologically feasible wastewater alternatives identified in STEP 3, a 20-
year Present Value of Costs Analysis (PVCA) must be performed. A preliminary design level effort is considered
appropriate for comparing feasible options and their associated costs. For the PVCA cost comparison, all future
expenditures are converted to a present value cost at the beginning of the 20-year planning period. A discount rate is
used in the analysis and represents the time value of money (the ability of money to earn interest). Present value is also
referred to as "present discounted value" or "present worth".
The PVCA should include all monetary costs associated with construction, startup and annual operation and
maintenance of a facility. All unit cost information must be provided, and costs must be referenced. Costs can be
referenced in paragraph format by summarizing the sources utilized (e.g., vendor quotes, realtor land quotes, past bids,
Means Construction Index, etc). Vender quotes received for treatment units or other components, as well as realtor
land quotes, shall be included as well. For each treatment alternative identified as technologically feasible, costs should
include, but not be limited to, the following:
Capital Costs
■ Land acquisition costs
■ Equipment costs
■ Labor costs
■ Installation costs
■ Design costs
Recurring Costs
■ Operation and maintenance costs (with replacement costs)
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 6 of 8

■ Laboratory costs assuming a weekly monitoring regime for discharge systems and a monthly regime for
non -discharge systems
■ Operator and support staff costs
■ Residual disposal costs
■ Connection fees and subsequent user fees
■ Permit and compliance fees
■ Utility costs (power, water, etc.)
Lost 01212ortuni1y Costs
PVCA Calculation Method.
The following standard formula for computing the present value must be used in all cost estimates made under this
evaluation:
Where:
PV= C +Y Ct
° t-1 (1 + r)t
PV = Present value of costs.
Co = Costs incurred in the present year.
Ct = Costs incurred in time t.
t = Time period after the present year (The present year is t = 0)
n = Ending year of the life of the facility.
r = Current EPA discount rate. EPA adjusts this rate annually on October 1, and it can be accessed from
the Internet at http:/www.nccgl.net/fap/cwsrf/201gui.html.
If recurring costs are the same in years 1 through 20, then Ct=C and the formula reduces to:
PV = C +
(1+r)"—1
° r(1 + r)"
As an example, assuming capital costs (Co) of $2 million, annual recurring costs (C) of $40,000, and a discount rate (r)
of 5.625%, the 20-year (n=20) present value of costs would equal:
PV= capital costs + recurring costs X
PV= $2,000,000 + $40,000 X
PV= $2,000,000 + $471,428
PV= $2,471,428
[(1+0.05625)20 —1] / [0.05625(1+0.05625)20]
[1.98/0.168]
PVCA Summary Table.
The EAA must include a Summary Cost Table, which summarizes present worth costs developed for all technologically
feasible wastewater alternatives. The summary should include a breakdown of capital costs and recurring costs. In some
situations, the Division may require the applicant to refine cost estimates for some alternatives, or possibly collect actual
soil data to better characterize the land application alternative. Ultimately, the final determination on cost effectiveness
is made by the Division with consideration of monetary costs as well as potential environmental impacts.
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 7 of 8

Attachment A. Local Government Review Form
General Statute Overview: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (c)(6) allows input from local governments in the
issuance of NPDES Permits for non -municipal domestic wastewater treatment facilities. Specifically, the Environmental
Management Commission (EMC) may not act on an application for a new non -municipal domestic wastewater discharge facility
until it has received a written statement from each city and county government having jurisdiction over any part of the lands on
which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be located. The written statement shall document whether the city or
county has a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect and (if such an ordinance is in effect) whether the proposed facility is
consistent with the ordinance. The EMC shall not approve a permit application for any facility which a city or county has
determined to be inconsistent with zoning or subdivision ordinances unless the approval of such application is determined to
have statewide significance and is in the best interest of the State.
Instructions to the Applicant: Prior to submitting an application for a NPDES Permit for a proposed facility, the applicant
shall request that both the nearby city and county government complete this form. The applicant must:
■ Submit a copy of the permit application (with a written request for this form to be completed) to the clerk of the city and
the county by certified mail, return receipt requested.
■ If either (or both) local government(s) fail(s) to mail the completed form, as evidenced by the postmark on the certified
mail card(s), within 15 days after receiving and signing for the certified mail, the applicant may submit the application to
the NPDES Unit.
■ As evidence to the Commission that the local government(s) failed to respond within 15 days, the applicant shall submit a
copy of the certified mail card along with a notarized letter stating that the local government(s) failed to respond within
the 15-day period.
Instructions to the Local Government: The nearby city and/or county government which may have or has jurisdiction over
any part of the land on which the proposed facility or its appurtenances are to be located is required to complete and return this
form to the applicant within 15 days of receipt. The form must be signed and notarized.
Name of local government
(City/County)
Does the city/county have jurisdiction over any part of the land on which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be
located? Yes [ ] No [ ] If no, please sign this form, have it notarized, and return it to the applicant.
Does the city/county have in effect a zoning or subdivision ordinance? Yes [ ] No [ ]
If there is a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect, is the plan for the proposed facility consistent with the ordinance? Yes [
No [
Date
State of , County of
Signature
(City Manager/County Manager)
On this day of , , personally appeared before me, the said
name to me known and known to me to be the person described in
and who executed the foregoing document and he (or she) acknowledged that he (or she) executed the same and being duly sworn
by me, made oath that the statements in the foregoing document are true.
My Commission expires .(Signature of Notary
Notary Public (Official Seal)
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 8of8

Appendix E:
Balance
www.dewberry.com
Novozymes Water

Table 1. Internal Process Streams
Stream
Stream ID
Average Flow
(GPD)*
Future Estimated
Avg. Flow (GPD)
1
City Water for Production
1,086,000
2,685,000
2
City Water to Fermentation
320,000
667,000
3
City Water to Recovery/Granulation
520,000
1,522,000
4
Cool i ng Tower Ma keu p
208,800
348,000
5
Boiler Makeup
71,000
149,000
6
City Water for Domestic Use
35,000
59,000
7
Condensate Return
33,000
69,000
8
Steam to Process
95,000
198,000
9
Boiler Blowdown to PWW
9,500
20,000
10
Cooling Tower Evaporative Losses
176,000
365,000
11
Cool ingTower Blowdown to PWW
35,000
73,000
12
Groundwater to Cool i ng Tower
1,200
91,000
14
Fermentation Process Wastewater
244,000
509,000
15
Recovery/Granulation PWW
460,000
960,000
18
Water to Product
195,000
411,000
20
Residuals Dewateringto PWW
0
438,000
To Irrigation
To Proposed Outfall 001
Table 2. Effluent Discharge Streams
Stream
Strea m ID
Avearge Flow
(GPD)*
Future Estimated
Avg. Flow (GPD)
13
Domestic Waste to POTW
35,000
0 - 60,000
16
PWW Effluentto Irrigation
257,000
0-265,000
17
PWW Effluent toPOTW
460,000
130,000 - 525,000
19
Proposed OutfaI1 001, maximum*
0
2,000,000
*Water balance streams 1- 18 represent 2015 conditions. Future production increases, reduced land application rates, and groundwater
recovery and treatment are expected to increase wastewater discharge rates to 2,000,000 gpd at proposed outfall 001 (stream 19).
11/30/2018

Appendix F: Proposed Cedar Creek
Discharge Location and Alignment
www.dewberry.com

INS
Dewberr
Dewberry Engineers Inc.
DATE I TITLE
ALTERNATIVE E.1
11/12/18 CEDAR CREEK DISCHARG
SHEET NO.
E.1
2610 WYCLIFF ROAD
SUITE 410
RALEIGH, NC 27607
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
EAA REPORT
50107104 NOVOZYMES NA. INC

Appendix G: USGS 7Q10
Determination Correspondence
www.dewberry.com

ANWA {Angela Walsh)
From: Weaver, John <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 201812:29 PM
To: ANWA (Angela Walsh)
Cc: Steve Tedder; John C Weaver
Subject: Response from USGS concerning...Re: [EXTERNAL] Flow determination request
Ms. Walsh,
In response to your inquiry about the low -flow characteristics (7Q10, 30Q2, average annual discharge) for (1) Cedar Creek upstream from
Secondary Road 1114 (Peach Orchard Road) and for (2) Tar River downstream from U.S. Highway 401 at Louisburg in central Franklin
County, the following information is provided:
For streams in Franklin County, low -flow characteristics published by the USGS are provided in the following reports:
(1) The first is a statewide report completed in the early 1990's. It is USGS Water -Supply Paper 2403, "Low -flow characteristics of streams
in North Carolina" (Giese and Mason, 1993). An online version of the report is available at http:i/nubs.uses.govhvsi) 2403;report.pol: The
report provides the low -flow characteristics (based on data through 1988) via regional relations and at -site values for sites with drainage
basins between 1 and 400 sgmi and not considered or known to be affected by regulation and/or diversions.
(2) The second is a statewide report published in March 2015. It is USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2015-5001, "Low -flow
characteristics and flow -duration statistics for selected USGS continuous -record streamgaging stations in North Carolina through 2012"
(Weaver, 2015). The report is available online at htip:ilR bs.usas.eov/sir/2015/5001 /. The report provides updated low -flow characteristics
and flow -duration statistics for 266 active (as of 2012 water year) and discontinued streamgages across the state where a minimum
of 10 climatic years discharge records were available for flow analyses.
Cedar Creek
A check of the low -flow files here at the USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center (Raleigh office) does not indicate a previous low -flow
determination for the specific point of interest, as identified by the fat/long coordinates (36.073863,-78.397628) provided in your email dated
August 15, 2018. However, low -flow characteristics have been estimated at nearby locations within the Cedar Creek basin based on transfer
of low -flow characteristics from nearby partial -record and continuous -record sites within or near the basin.
No USGS discharge records are known to exist for the point of interest

In the absence of site -specific discharge records sufficient for a low -flow analysis, estimates of low -flow characteristics at ungaged locations
are determined by assessing a range in the low -flow yields (expressed as flow per square mile drainage area, or cfsm) at nearby sites where
such estimates have previously been determined.
A basin delineation completed using the online USGS StreamStats application for North Carolina
(httl2://water.ogs.gov/osw/strt;ilmstats,lnortb carolinahtml) indicates the drainage area for the point of interest (36.07379,-78.39761
NAD83) is 33.6 sgmi.
Inspection of the above two reports indicates the presence of four (4) selected nearby USGS partial -record sites (3) and continuous -record
streamgages (1) in general vicinity of the point of interest where low -flow characteristics were published Among the 4 sites, one of the
partial -record sites (station id 02081770, drainage area 11.9 sgmi) and the continuous -record streamgage (station id 02081800, drainage area
47.8 sgmi) are located upstream and downstream, respectively, of the point of interest on Cedar Creek. Among these 2 sites, the low -flow
discharge yields for the indicated flow statistics are as follows:
Annual 7Q10 low -flow yields => from 0.07 to 0.08 cfsm (average and median about 0.07 cfsm)
Annual 30Q2 low -flow yields => from 0.3 to 0.34 cfsm (average and median 0.32 cfsm)
Average annual discharge yields => from l to 1.05 cfsm (average and median about 1.03 cfsm)
Application of the above yield ranges to the drainage area (33.6 sgmi) for the point of interest results in the following estimated
low -flow discharges
Annual 7Q 10 discharges => from about 2.4 to 2.7 cfs (average and median about 2.4 cfs)
Annual 30Q2 discharges => from 10.1 to 11.4 cfs (average and median about 10.8 cfs)
Average annual discharge =_> from 33.6 to 35.3 cfs (average and median about 34.6 cfs)
Tar River
A check of the low -flow files here at the USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center (Raleigh office) indicates a previous low -flow
determination for the location almost identical to the specific point of interest, as identified by the lat/long coordinates (36.086493, -
78.292017) provided in your email dated August 15, 2018. Completed in January 1986, the low -flow characteristics were estimated for this
location (station id 02081757) below Fox Creek based on transfer of low -flow characteristics from nearby continuous -record streamgages on
the Tar River.
No USGS discharge records are known to exist for the point of interest.

In the absence of site -specific discharge records sufficient for a low -flow analysis, estimates of low -flow characteristics at ungaged locations
are determined by assessing a range in the low -flow yields (expressed as flow per square mile drainage area, or cfsm) at nearby sites where
such estimates have previously been determined.
A basin delineation completed using the online USGS StreamStats application for North Carolina
(hits'«ater.uscs.gov/osw/streamstats/north carolina.html) indicates the drainage area for the point of interest (36.08649,-78.29200
NAD83) is 446 sgmi.
There is a USGS continuous -record streamgage USGS Sta. 02081747 Tar River at U.S. 401 at Louisburg (drainage area 427 sgmi) located
about 0.5 mile upstream from the point of interest. This streamgage has continuous records of discharge (for all ranges of discharge) since
October 1972. The most recent low -flow statistics published for this streamgage are available in the second above -referenced report
(Weaver, 2015). The low -flow yields for the 7Q1O and 30Q2 low -flow discharges (Table 3 on page 20 of this report, based on period of
record during the 1974-2011 climatic years) are as follows:
Annual 7Q10 = 0.0156 cfsm
Annual 30Q2 = 0.0821 cfsm
Average annual discharge yield = 1.05 cfsm
Note: The climatic year is the standard annual period used in low -flow analyses for continuous -record streamgages and is from April 1
through March 31, designated by the year in which the period begins. For example, the 2011 climatic year is from April 1, 2011, through
March 31, 2012.
Application of the above yields to the drainage area (446 sgmi) for the point of interest results in the following estimated discharges:
Annual 7Q 10 = 7.0 cfs
Annual 30Q2 = 36.6 cfs
Average annual discharge yield = 468 cfs
Please note the estimated flows are provided in units of cubic feet per second (cfs).
Please note: The IQIO low -flow discharges for the points of interest also were requested in your email dated August 15, 2018. The 1Q10
discharge is not among the low -flow statistics available within the standard scope of USGS responses to low -flow requests. There is
currently no cast -recovery fees applied to USGS responses to low -flow requests received by this office at this time. Additional analyses and
turnaround time would be required for the determination of 1 Q I O low -flow characteristics, but would be limited to continuous -record

streamgages with sufficient period of record for low -flow analyses. If you still require the IQ 10 discharge for the streamgage on the Tar
River at Louisburg. please let me know and we will proceed from there, as appropriate.
Please understand the information provided in this message is based on a preliminary assessment and considered provisional, subject to
revision pending further analyses.
Hope this information is helpful.
Thank you.
Curtis Weaver
J. Curtis Weaver, Hydrologist, PE Email. [e-mail]
USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center Online: httosJlwww.usus.ogylcenterslsa-water
North Carolina - South Carolina - Georgia
3916 Sunset Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone: [phone] // Fax: [phone]
On Wed, Aug 15. 2018 at 1:48 PM. ANWA (Angela Walsh) <ANWArd%novozvmes.com> wrote:
Mr. Weaver,
I hope this email finds you well. Steve Tedder provided me with your contact information and 1 was hoping you might
be able to help with some flow determinations. I am looking for 7Q10 and 1Q10 determinations for two stream
locations (approximate GPS coordinates for areas of interest are below). Please let me know if there's anything else I
need to provide that would help with my request.
Cedar Creek: 36.073863,-78.397628
Tar River: 36.086493,-78.292017
4

Best regards,
Angela Walsh, PE
Mgr -Environmental & Utilities Operations
Novozymes North America Inc.
PO BOX 576
77 Peras Chapel Church Road
NC 27525 Franklinton United States
Phone: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Noroa-mes North America, Inc. (reg. no.I3-?639630J. Registeredaddres, CTC orpororon Sysieni, i r._i __-'d v;u'�'a ;ri—
This e-mail imchrding mry attaelunents.; is for the mreuded addressee(s) only and may contaili confidential and or proprietary iirformanon protected hp lase You are hereby notified that any
tntardlrorized reading, di.sciasure, copying or desirihution ofilus e-mail or use ofinfonnaunn here it? is strnth• prohibited. lfyou are not at: uuended recipient you should delere this a -nail
anmethately. Thank wv

Appendix H: US Fish and Wildlife
Service Endangered Species List
www.dewberry.com

11/9/2018 Species By County Report
ter, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
ECOS
ECOS / Species Reports / Species By County Report
Species By County Report
The following report contains Species that are known to or are believed to occur in this county. Species with
range unrefined past the state level are now excluded from this report. If you are looking for the Section 7 range
(for Section 7 Consultations), please visit the IPaC application.
County: Franklin, North Carolina + CSv
Need to contact a FWS field office about a species? Follow this link to find your local FWS Office.
Recovery Recovery
Lead Recovery Plan Action Plan
Group Name Population Status Office Plan Status Stage
Amphibians Neuse River Wherever Under Raleigh
waterdog found Review Ecological
(Necturus Services
lewisi) Field
Office
Clams Tar River Wherever Endangered Raleigh Tar River Implementation Final
spinymussel found Ecological Spinymussel Progress Revision
(Elliptic Services 1
steinstansana) Field
Office
Clams Dwarf Wherever Endangered New York Dwarf Implementation Final
wedgemussel found Ecological Wedge Progress
(Alasmidonta Services Mussel
heterodon) Field
Office
Clams Yellow lance
Wherever
Threatened Raleigh
Recovery
(Elliptic
found
Ecological
Outline for
lanceolata)
Services
Yellow
Field
Lance
Office
(Elliptio
lanceolata)
Clams Atlantic pigtoe
Wherever
Proposed Assistant
(Fusconaia
found
Threatened Regional
masoni)
Director -
Ecological
Services
Recovery Outline
efforts in
progress, but
no
implementation
information yet
to display.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecpO/reports/species-by-cu rrent-range-county?fips=37069
1/2

11 /9/2018
Species By County Report
Group
Fishes
Name
Carolina
madtom
(Noturus
furiosus)
Lead Recovery
Population Status Office Plan
Wherever Under Raleigh
found Review Ecological
Flowering Michaux's Wherever
Plants sumac (Rhus found
michauxii)
Services
Field
Office
Endangered Raleigh Michaux's
Ecological Sumac
Services
Field
Office
Recovery
Plan Action
Status
Recovery
Plan
Stage
Implementation Final
Progress
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-by-current-range-county?fips=37069 2/2

Appendix I: Block Flow Diagrams
www.dewberry.com

Non -
Permeate
Primary
Clarifier
Primary
Clarifier
O
Permeate O
Pre Anaerobic
Acidification Reactor
Primary Tank PAT Transfer
Clarifier Pump Pump
Pump
Station
P-617
Sludge to Offsite Disposal
Industrial Process Wastewater Influent Basis of Design
Parameter
(Permeate + Non -
Permeate)
Flow
2
MGD
Ib/d
mg/L
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
9,082
544
Chemical Oxygen Demand
89,889
5,389
Ammonia-N
1,045
63
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
3,283
197
Nitrate-N
485
29
Total Nitrogen
3,463
208
Total Phosphorus
1,503
90
Sulfate
1,963
118
Potassium
8,470
508
Primary Clarifier and Phosphorus Removal
Future Non -Permeate Flow
1 1.74
MGD
New Primary Clarifier Diameter
1 46
ft
New
Carbon Addition
Existing
Aerobic
I
Secondary
Reactor
I
Clarifier
Existing
New
Aerobic and
Aerobic
Anoxic Reactors
Reactor
(TO1 /T02)
i
New r
New
Secondary
Aerobic
Clarifier
Reactor
Ile
-7'
O
— Aeration System
O
n .
Return Activated Sludge RAS Pump Station
Biological Treatment Upgrade
Existing
Lagoons
Existing Land Application
Chemical Feed
Existing
Lagoon Phosphorus
Pump FIRemoval System
Chemical Feed
Phosphorus I
Removal —
OSystem
0 / Sludge to Offsite Disposal
WAS Pump Station
Existing T01/T02
Rea ctor Vol ume
1 480,000
gallontotal
Reactor Type
I Swing
Diffused Air System
Biological Upgrade
New Aerobic Reactor - Total Volume
4.0
MG
Quantity
3
Volume per Reactor
1.3
MG
Reactor Type
Aerobic
Fine Bubble Diffusion
Secondary Clarifier
ExistingClarifier Diameter
87
ft
New Clarifier Diameter
115
Ift
Tertiary Phosphorus Removal
Existing Phosphorus Treatment
Existing System Operating Capacity
1 0.5
MGD
New Phosphorus Treatment
Flow Capacity
2
MGD
Quantity
2
Surface Area
250
ftZ
Discharge to
Franklin County
POTW
(0.5 MGD)
- - - O - - - Discharge to
Cedar Creek
Ultrafiltration IRO Skstem 07
OF System I System i RO System Effluent
— Effluent
Pump — — — — Pump Pump
Station
Exhaust to Atmosphere
r L - -1
Evaporator 10
- - - - - J Evaporator Bottoms
to Offsite Disposal
Legend
Pump Station
Sludge/UF Reject to Offsite Disposal
— — — New Equipment
Existing Equipment
` 6 Ultrafiltration, Reverse Osmosis, and Evaporator
Flow Capacity
2
MGD
Reverse Osmosis Permeate Recovery
TBD
Ultrafiltration
TBD
Evaporator Capacity
TBD
Effluent Limits
Parameter
Effluent
Basis of
Design
Flow
2 MGD
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
5 mg/L
Ammonia-N
1 mg/L
Total Nitrogen
8.8 mg/L
Total Phosphorus
1 mg/L
Total Suspended Solids
30 mg/L
Notes:
1. Final configuration for miscellaneous pump stations, including, return activated sludge,
waste activated sludge, effluent pumps, and phosphorus treatment feed pumps to be
determined during detailed design.

Non -
Permeate
Existing
Primary
Clarifier
New
Primary
Clarifier
O
Permeate O
Pre- Anaerobic
Acidification Reactor
Primary Tank PAT Transfer
Clarifier Pump Pump
Pump
Station
Sludge to Offsite Disposal
Industrial Process Wastewater Influent Basis of Design
Parameter
(Permeate + Non -
Permeate)
Flow
2
MGD
Ib/d
mg/L
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
9,082
544
Chemical Oxygen Demand
89,889
5,389
Ammonia-N
1,045
63
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
3,283
197
Nitrate-N
485
29
Total Nitrogen
3,463
208
Total Phosphorus
1,503
90
Sulfate
1,963
118
Potassium
8,470
508
Primary Clarifier and Phosphorus Removal
Future Non -Permeate Flow
1 1.74
MGD
New Primary Clarifier Diameter
1 46
ft
New
Carbon Addition
Existing
Aerobic
I
Secondary
Reactor
I
Clarifier
Existing
New
Aerobic and
Aerobic
Anoxic Reactors
Reactor
TO /T02
— — J
i
New r
New
Secondary
Aerobic
Clarifier
Reactor
Ile
-�J
O
Aeration System
O
n .
Return Activated Sludge RAS Pump Station
Biological Treatment Upgrade
Existing
Lagoons
Existing Land Application
Chemical Feed
Existing
Lagoon Phosphorus
Pump Removal
System
Chemical Feed
New
Phosphorus
O Removal I
System
0 / Sludge to Offsite Disposal
WAS Pump Station
Existing T01/T02
Rea ctor Vol ume
1 480,000
gallontotal
Reactor Type
I Swing
Diffused Air System
Biological Upgrade
New Aerobic Reactor - Total Volume
4.0
MG
Quantity
3
Volume per Reactor
1.3
MG
Reactor Type
Aerobic
Fine Bubble Diffusion
Secondary Clarifier
ExistingClarifier Diameter
87
ft
New Clarifier Diameter
115
Ift
Tertiary Phosphorus Removal
Existing Phosphorus Treatment
Existing System Operating Capacity
1 0.5
MGD
New Phosphorus Treatment
Flow Capacity
2
MGD
Quantity
2
Surface Area
250
ftZ
Discharge to
---�
O---� Franklin
County POTW
Ultrafiltration
System
n RO kstem 07
OF
RO Effluent
System — — — — I
System
— — Pump
Pump
Pump
Ststaion
Exhaust to Atmosphere
r —
— —1
1 Evaporator 10
— — — — — - J Evaporator Bottoms
To Offsite Disposal
Legend
Pump Station
Sludge/UF Reject to Offsite Disposal
— — — New Equipment
Existing Equipment
` 6 Ultrafiltration, Reverse Osmosis, and Evaporator
Flow Capacity
2
MGD
Reverse Osmosis Permeate Recovery
TBD
Ultrafiltration
TBD
Evaporator Capacity
TBD
Effluent Limits
Parameter
Effluent Basis of
Design
Flow
2 MGD
Potassium
65,956 1 b/month
Sodium
50,608 1 b/month
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
100 mg/I
Total Suspended Solids
150 mg/I
Ammonia -Nitrogen
10 mg/I
Total Phosphorus
295lb/month
Total Nitrogen
1,8251b/month
Notes:
1. Final configuration for miscellaneous pump stations, including, return activated sludge,
waste activated sludge, effluent pumps, and phosphorus treatment feed pumps to be
determined during detailed design.

Appendix J: Town of Louisburg —
Flow Limitation Letter
www.dewberry.com

�/ou�s o� 1�oui�Gwry
Office of the Mayor
110 W. Nash St.
Louisburg, N.C. 27549
[phone]
[phone] Fax
September 24, 2016
Ms. Leigh -Ann Dudley, PE, Project Manager
Dewberry
2610 Wycliff Road, Suite 410
Raleigh, N. C. 27607
Dear Ms. Dudley:
s" tq Afo4iA ea.
The Louisburg Tar River Water Reclamation Facility is permitted to treat and discharge 1.37
MGD of wastewater. The Novozymes North America Facility is seeking capacity to discharge 2
MGD of wastewater. The Louisburg facility does not have the design or permitted capacity to
treat and discharge 2 MGD from Novozymes. Furthermore, the Louisburg facility does not have
the permit capacity to comingle the treated Novozymes wastewater with Louisburg effluent and
discharge in the single outfall under the auspices of the Louisburg NPDES permit. Therefore,
Louisburg is not able to consider either scenario further.
Sincerely,
Karl T. Pernell
Mayor
KTP/cp

Appendix K: 2018 Franklin County
Headworks Analysis (9/26/18)
www.dewberry.com

25
Workbook Name: Franklin Co HWA AT 2015 - 2016 BK• Worksheet Name: HWA Page 1 o
� Printed 11/28/2018, 11:08AM AM
A I B
C
D
E I F G H I
J K
1
Headworks Analysis Spreadsheet Spreadsheet Instructions:
POTW Name: Franklin Count 1) Applicable Values should be entered in the Heavy Bordered Blue cells. The rest of worksheet is
Date: 11/13/2015 protected, password is "2".
POTW NPDES # => NCO069311 2) Additional pollutants can be added in cells A34 to A42. Note all Pollutant names are linked from
POTW Sludge Permit # => W00000838 here to other pages in HWA worksheet and also to AT worksheet (i.e., automatically entered into
other pages in HWA worksheet and also AT worksheet from HWA worksheet).
POTW NPDES Permitted Flow(MGD)= 3.0 -used in AT only 3) Formulas are discussed in the Comprehensive Guidance HWA Chapter.
4) HWA, AT and HASL worksheets are linked. MAHLs, Basis, and Uncontrollable load are
POTW Average Flow(MGD)= 0.834 <=used in HWA calculations automatically entered into AT from this worksheet.
Uncontrollable Flow(MGD)= 0.303 5) If red tab notes are not visible, they can be turned on in the "Tools" menu under "options", in the
7Q10 Stream Flow(MGD)= 1.03 "view" tab click the "comment indicator only" button.
Stream Classification = C
Class of Sludge generated (A, or B) B
Sludge to Digester Flow(MGD)= Through calc. for different POTW use Design
Sludge to Disposal Flow(MGD)= 0.0019 flows Criteria
%Solids to Disposal= 1.06 Design Values Average Flow Permitted Flow Loading
Sludge Site Area(acres)= 180.48 WWTF Influent BOD (mg/1) 250 110.3 30.7 x
Sludge Site Life(yrs)= 100 WWTF Influent TSS (mg/1) 250 1325.3 368.6 x
Age of Sludge Site(yrs)= 15 WWTF Influent NH3 (mg/l) 22 21.6 6.0 x
WWTF Influent Total N(mg 1) 35 30.0 8.4
Pass -Through Loading Calculations WWTF Influent Total P (mg/1) 5.8 1.6
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
19
d18
20
21
23
Pollutant
NPDES LIMIT
(mg/1)
Plant Removal
Rate (%)
Removal rate
Source
NPDES Loading
(lbs/day)
Stream
Standard
(mg/1)
Stream Standard
Source
Standard
Loading
(lbs/day)
Design Criteria
Loading (lbs/day)
Pass-Thru
Loading
(lbs/day)
Minimum Pass-Thru
Basis
24
BOD
8.0
92.75
Site Specific
767
6,255
6,255
Design
25
TSS
30.0
97.74
Site Specific
9,222
6,255
6,255
Design
26
Ammonia
1.0
95.38
Site Specific
151
1
550
550
Design
27
Arsenic
45.00
Default Literature
0.05
C- WQS-C
1.4135
1.4135
Stream Sid
28
Cadmium
67.00
Default Literature
0.002
C- W S-C
0.0942
0.0942
Stream Std
29
Chromium
82.00
Default Literature
0.05
C- WQS-C
4.3191
4.3191
Stream Sid
30
Copper
76.85
Site Specific
Action Level
31
Cyanide
69.00
Default Literature
0.005
C- WQS-C
0.2508
0.2508
Stream Sid
32
Lead
61.00
Default Literature
0.025
C- W S-C
0.9967
0.9967
Stream Std
33
IMercury
98.20
Default Literature
0.000012
NC- WQS-C
0.01037
0.01037
Stream Sid
34
Molybdenum
16.86
Site Specific
35
Nickel
42.00
Default Literature
0.088
C- WQS-C
2.3591
2.3591
Stream Sid
36
Selenium
50.00
Default Literature
0.005
C- W S-C
0.1555
0.1555
Stream Std
37
Silver
75.00
Default Literature
Action Level
38
Zinc
65.74
Site Specific
Action Level
39
Total Nitrogen (It
42784
43.90
Site Specific
208.9420
875.7
208.942
NPDES
40
Total Plies. lbs.
7732
47.88
Site Specific
40.6438
40.644
NPDES
41
Oil & Grease
41.00
Site Specific
42
d
43
e
44
f
45
46
h
14711
Modeled after: Chapter 5-HWA Guidance, Appendix 5-A
Revision Date: February 2008

Workbook Name: Franklin Co HWA AT 2015 - 2016 BK• Worksheet Name: HWA Page Printed
� Printed 11/28/2018, 11:08 AM
A B C D E F G H I J K
49
Average Influent NH3 (mg/1) 15.942
Average Anaerobic Digester NH3 (mg/1 /A
Inhibition Loading Calculations only enter when have ANAEROBIC digester
50
51
52
Pollutant
Primary
Removal Rate
(%)
Primary
Removal Rate
Source
A.S./Nit,/T.F.
Inhibition
Concentration
(mg/1)
A.S./Nit,/T.F.
Inhibition
Concentration
Source
A.S./Nit,/T.F.
Inhibition
Loading
(lbs/day)
Digestor
Inhibition
Concentration
(mg/1)
Digestor
Inhibition
Cone. Source
Digestor Inhibition
Loading (lbs/day)
Minimum
Inhibition
Loading
(lbs/day)
Minimum Inhibition
Loading Source
53
BOD
54
TSS
55
Ammonia
480
EPA Lit A.S.
3340.1042
1
3 340. 10
AS/Nit/TF inhibition
56
Arsenic
0.1
EPA Lit A.S.
0.6959
0.6959
AS/Nit/TF inhibition
57
Cadmium
1
EPA Lit A.S.
6.9586
6.9586
AS/Nit/TF inhibition
58
Chromium
0.394
EPA Lit Nit
2.7417
2.7417
AS/Nit/TF inhibition
59
Copper
0.48
EPA Lit Nit
3.3401
3.3401
AS/Nit/TF inhibition
60
Cyanide
0.1
EPA Lit A.S.
0.6959
0.6959
AS/Nit/TF inhibition
61
Lead
0.5
EPA Lit Nit
3.4793
3.4793
AS/Nit/TF inhibition
62
Mercury
0.1
EPA Lit A.S.
0.69591
0.6959
AS/Nit/TF inhibition
63
Molybdenum
64
Nickel
0.25
EPA Lit Nit
1.7396
1.7396
AS/Nit/TF inhibition
65
Selenium
66
Silver
0.25
EPA Lit A.S.
1.7396
1.7396
AS/Nit/TF inhibition
67
IZinc
1.0
EPA Lit Nit
6.9586
6.9586
AS/Nit/TF inhibition
68
Total Nitrogen
69
Total Phos. (lbs.)
70
Oil & Grease
71
d
72
e
73
f
74
g
75
Ih
7611
Modeled after: Chapter 5-HWA Guidance, Appendix 5-A
Revision Date: February 2008

Workbook Name: Franklin Co HWA AT 2015 - 2016 BK• Worksheet Name: HWA Page Printed
� Printed 11/28/2018, 11:08 AM
A B C D E F G H I J K
77
Sludge Loading Calculations
78
79
Pollutant
Sludge Ceiling
Concentration Limit
(mg/kg)
Sludge Ceiling
Load
(Ibs/day)
Sludge Ceiling Load
- HASL Cale. -
(lbs/day)
Cumulative Sludge
Rate Limit
(lbs/(acre*fife))
Cumulative
Sludge Loading
(lbs/day)
Class A Limits
Monthly
Average Rate
Limit (mg/kg)
Class A Limits
Monthly Avg.
Loading
(lbs/day)
Class A Limits Mon.
Avg. Load. -
HASL Cale. -
(lbs/day)
Minimum
Sludge
Loading
(lbs/day)
Minimum Sludge
Loading Sorce
80
BOD
81
TSS
82
Ammonia
83
Arsenic
75
0.0280
36
0.3953
41
0.0280
Sludge Ceiling
84
Cadmium
85
0.0213
1.0377
34
0.2508
39
1.0377
Sludge Ceiling HASL
85
Chromium
86
Copper
4300
0.9399
13.6357
1338
8.6040
1500
13.6357
Sludge Ceiling HASL
87
Cyanide
88
Lead
840
0.2313
267
2.1629
300
0.2313
Sludge Ceilin
89
Mercury
57
0.0097
15
0.0755
17
0.0097
Sludge Ceiling
90
Molybdenum
75
0.0747
11.1113
N/A
11.1113
Sludge Ceiling HASL
91
Nickel
420
0.1680
1.9872
374
4.4003
420
1.9872
Sludge Ceiling HASL
92
Selenium
100
0.0336
89
0.8796
100
0.0336
Sludge Ceilin
93
Silver
94
Zinc
7500
1.9162
16.0834
2498
18.7760
2800
16.0834
Sludge Ceiling HASL
95
Total Nitro en
96
Total Phos. lbs.
97
Oil & Grease
98
d
99
e
100
f
101
102
h
10311
104
Modeled after: Chapter 5-HWA Guidance, Appendix 5-A
Revision Date: February 2008

Workbook Name: Franklin Co HWA AT 2015 - 2016 BK• Worksheet Name: HWA Page
� Printed 11/28/2018, 11:081:08 AM4 of AM
A I B I C I D E F G H I J K
105
Maximum Allowable
Headworks Loading
Calculations
Minimum Sludge
Loading Sorce
Sludge Ceiling
Slud a Ceilin HASL
Slud a CeilinR HASL
Sludge Ceiling
Sludge Ceiling
Slud e Ceilin HASL
Slud e Ceilm HASL
Slud a Ceilin
Slud e CeilinR HASL
106
Minimum Pass
Through Loading
(Ibs/day)
Pass Through
Source
Minimum
Inhibition Loading
(Ibs/day)
Minimum
Inhibition Loading
Source
Minimum
Sludge Loading
(Ibs/day)
Allowable
Headworks Loading
(Ibs/day)
Maximum Allowable Headworks
Loading Source
107
BOD
6255.0
Design
6255.0
Design
108
TSS
6255.0
Design
6255.0
Design
109
Ammonia
550.4
Design
3340.1042
AS/Nit/TT inhibiti4
550.4
Design
110
Arsenic
1.4135
Stream Std
0.6959
AS/Nit/TF inhibiti4
0.0280
0.0280
Sludge Ceiling
111
Cadmium
0.0942
Stream Std
6.9586
AS/Nit/TT inhibiti4
1.0377
0.0942
Stream Std
112
Chromium
4.3191
Stream Std
2.7417
AS/Nit/TF inhibiti4
2.7417
AS/Nit/TF inhibition
113
Copper
3.3401
AS/Nit/TT inhibiti4
13.6357
3.3401
AS/Nit/TT inhibition
114
Cyanide
0.2508
Stream Std
0.6959
AS/Nit/TF inhibiti4
0.2508
Stream Std
115
Lead
0.9967
Stream Std
3.4793
AS/Nit/TT inhibiti4
0.2313
0.2313
Sludge Ceilin
116.Mercury
0.01037
Stream Std
0.6959
AS/Nit/TF inhibiti4
0.0097
0.00975
Sludge Ceiling
117
Molybdenum
11.1113
11.1113
Sludge Ceiling HASL
118
Nickel
2.3591
Stream Std
1.7396
AS/Nit/TF inhibiti4
1.9872
1.7396
AS/Nit/TF inhibition
119
Selenium
0.1555
Stream Std
0.0336
0.0336
Sludge Ceiling
120
Silver
1.7396
AS/Nit/TF inhibitii
1.7396
AS/Nit/TF inhibition
121
Zinc
6.9586
AS/Nit/TT inhibiti
16.0834
6.9586
AS/Nit/TT inhibition
122
Total Nitrogen (It
208.9
NPDES
208.9420
NPDES
123
Total Phos. lbs.
40.6
NPDES
40.6438
NPDES
124
Oil & Grease
125
d
126
e
127
f
128
129
h
1301
131
Modeled after: Chapter 5-HWA Guidance, Appendix 5-A
Revision Date: February 2008

Workbook Name: Franklin Co HWA AT 2015 - 2016 BK• Worksheet Name: HWA Page Printed
� Printed 11/28/2018, 11:08 AM
A B C D E F G H I J K
132
133
Maximum Allowable
Industrial Loadings
Calculations
Design vs. Pass-
Thru Warning
134
Pollutant
Maximum Allowable
Headworks Loading
(Ibs/day)
MARL Basis
Check to Use HASL
Calcs (x)
Uncontrollable
Concentration
(mg/1)
Uncontrollable
Source
Uncontrollable
Load (Ibs/day)
Maximum
Allowable
Industrial Load
(Ibs/day)
135
BOD
6255.0000
Design
153.165
mass balance
386.9480
5868.0520
136
TSS
6255.0000
Design
494.394
mass balance
1249.0071
5005.9929
137
Ammonia
550.4400
Design
38.222
mass balance
96.5627
453.8773
138
Arsenic
0.0280
Sludge Ceiling
0.003
literature
0.0076
0.0204
139
Cadmium
0.0942
Stream Std
x
0.003
literature
0.0076
0.0867
140
Chromium
2.7417
AS/Nit/TF inhibiti
N/A
0.05
literature
0.1263
2.6154
141
Copper
3.3401
AS/Nit/TF inhibiti
x
0.140056919
mass balance
0.3538
2.9863
142
Cyanide
0.25081
Stream Std
N/A
0.041
literature
0.1036
0.1472
143
Lead
0.2313
Sludge Ceiling
0.011831482
mass balance
0.0299
0.2014
144
Mercury
0.00975
Sludge Ceiling
0.0003
literature
0.00076
0.00899
145
Molybdenum
11.1113
Sludge Ceiling H
x
0.041822554
mass balance
0.1057
11.0057
146
Nickel
1.7396
AS/Nit/TF inhibiti
x
0.021
literature
0.0531
1.6866
147
Selenium
0.0336
Sludge Ceiling
0.005923077
POTW Inf
0.0150
0.0186
148
Silver
1.7396
AS/Nit/TF inhibiti
N/A
0.005535335
mass balance
0.0140
1.7257
149
Zinc
6.9586
AS/Nit/TF inhibiti
x
0.175
literature
0.4421
6.5164
150
Total Nitrogen (lb
208.9420
NPDES
40
Metcalf & Edd
101.0536
107.8883
151
Total Plies. (lbs.)
40.6438
NPDES
8.79
mass balance
22.2065
18.4373
152
Oil & Grease
153
d
154
e
155
f
156
g
157
h
1581
Modeled after: Chapter 5-HWA Guidance, Appendix 5-A
Revision Date: February 2008

POND=
NPDESik
1UP
Count
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Workbook Name: Franklin Co HWA AT 2015 - 2016 BK, Worksheet Name: AT Printed: 11/28/2018, 11:08 AM
Page 6 of 225
Allocation Table
Headworks last approved: 03/18/16
Allocation Table updated: 09/26/18
Permits last modified: 10/20/161
Franklin County
NCO069311
Spreadsheet Instructions:
1) Applicable Values should be entered in the Heavy Bordered cells. Rest of worksheet is protected, password is "2".
2) Formulas are discussed in the Comprehensive Guidance, Chapter 6, Section C.
3) HWA and AT worksheets in this workbook are linked. Pollutant Names, MAHLs, Basis, and Uncontrollable load in
this AT worksheet are automatically entered from the HWA spreadsheet. This includes pollutant names in columns AT
through BK.
Industry
INDUSTRY NAMES Permit
(pieaselist alphanficly) number
Type Renewal Modification Date
Pipe of Effective Effective Permit
number Industry Date Date Expires
FLOW
Permit Limits
BOD
Permit Limits
TSS
Permit Limits
MGDgal/day
Cone. Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Cone. Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Novozymes
0112
0001
2869
09/22/13
8/8/14, 12/23/1
09/22/18
2.0000
2,000,000
100.00
1668.00
150.00
2502.00
Southern Litho late
0103
0002
433
12/19/14
/2/16, 10/14/1
12/31/19
0.2000
200,000
monitor
258.00
430.34
Southern Litho late
0103
0003
433
12/19/14
/2/16, 10/14/1
12/31/19
0.1500
150,000
monitor
258.00
322.76
Column Totals =>
2.3500
2,350,000
1668
3255
Basis=>
MAHL from HWA (lbs/day) => NPDES Permitted Flow=>
Uncontrollable Loading (lbs/day) =>
Total Allowable for Industry (MAIL) (lbs/day) =>
Total Permitted to Industry (lbs/day) =>
MAIL left (lbs/day) =>
Percent Allow. Ind. (MAIL) still available (%) =>
Percent MAHL still available (%) =>
5 Percent MAHL Obs/dav) =>
NPDES
Design
Design
6255
6255
0.3029
387
1249
2.6971
5868
5006
2.3500
1668
3255
0.3471
4200
1751
12.9 %
71.6 %
35.0 %
11.6 %
67.1 %
28.0 %
0.1500
313
313
HWA.AT
Revised: November 2005

POND=
NPDESik
1UP
Count
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Workbook Name: Franklin Co HWA AT 2015 - 2016 BK, Worksheet Name: AT
Allocation Table I
Printed: 11/28/2018, 11:08 AM
Page 7 of 225
Headworks last approved:
Allocation Table updated:
Permits last modified:
03/18/16
Pipe
number
09/26/18
10/20/16
Franklin County
NCO069311
Industry
INDUSTRY NAMES Permit
(p1eese list elph°betiay) number
Ammonia
Permit Limits
Arsenic
Permit Limits
Cadmium
Permit Limits
Chromium
Permit Limits
Copper
Permit Limits
Cyanide
Permit Limits
Conc. Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Conc. Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Conn, Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Conn, Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Conn, Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Conn, Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Novozymes
0112
0001
29.40
490.39
monitor
0.0080
0.1334
0.0200
0.3336
0.0500
0.8340
0.0100
0.1668
Southern Litho late
0103
0002
monitor
monitor
0.0100
0.0167
0.0500
0.0834
0.2000
0.3336
0.0100
0.0167
Southern Litho late
0103
0003
monitor
monitor
0.0100
0.0125
0.0500
0.0626
0.2000
0.2502
0.0100
0.0125
Column Totals =>
490
0.0000
0.1626
0.4796
1.4178
1 0.1960
Basis=>
MAHL from HWA (lbs/day) =>
Uncontrollable Loading (lbs/day) =>
Total Allowable for Industry (MAIL) (lbs/day) =>
Total Permitted to Industry (lbs/day) =>
MAIL left (lbs/day) =>
Percent Allow. Ind. (MAIL) still available (%) _>
Percent MAHL still available (%) =>
5 Percent MAHL Obs/dav) =>
Design
550.44
96.56
453.88
490.39
-36.51
8.0 %
-6 66 %
27.52
Sludge
Ceiling
Stream Std
0.0942
0.0076
0.0867
0.1626
-0.0760
87.7
-80.6 %
0.0047
0.0280
0.0076
0.0204
0.0000
0.0204
100.0 %
72.9 %
0.0014
HWA.AT
Revised: November 2005
AS/NIt/TF
inhibition
AS/NIt/TF
inhibition
3.3401
0.3538
2.9863
1.4178
1.5685
52.5%
47.0%
0.1670
Stream Std
2.7417
0.2508
0.1263
0.1036
2.6154
0.1472
0.4796
0.1960
2.1358
-0.0488
%
33.1%%
E
-19.5%
0.1371
0.0125

POND=
NPDESik
1UP
Count
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Workbook Name: Franklin Co HWA AT 2015 - 2016 BK, Worksheet Name: AT
Allocation Table I
Printed: 11/28/2018, 11:08 AM
Page 8 of 225
Headworks last approved:
Allocation Table updated:
Permits last modified:
03/18/16
Pipe
number
09/26/18
10/20/16
Franklin County
NCO069311
Industry
INDUSTRY NAMES Permit
(p1eese list elph°betiay) number
Lead
Permit Limits
Mercury
Permit Limits
Molybdenum
Permit Limits
Nickel
Permit Limits
Selenium
Permit Limits
Silver
Permit Limits
Conc. Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Conc. Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Conc. Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Conn, Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Conc. Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Conn, Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Novozymes
0112
0001
0.0125
0.2085
Monitor
Monitor
0.0313
0.5221
Monitor
monitor
Southern Litho late
0103
0002
0.0100
0.0167
Monitor
0.2000
0.3336
Monitor
0.0100
0.0167
Southern Litho late
0103
0003
0.0100
0.0125
Monitor
0.2000
0.2502
Monitor
0.0100
0.0125
Column Totals =>
0.2377
0.000000
0.0000
1.1059
0.0000
0.0292
sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Ceiling
AS/Nlt/TF
Sludge
AS/NiUTF
Basis=>
Ceiling
Ceiling
HASL
inhibition
Ceiling
inhibition
MAHL from HWA (lbs/day) =>
0.2313
0.009750
11.1113
1.7396
0.0336
1.7396
Uncontrollable Loading (lbs/day) =>
0.0299
0.000758
0.1057
0.0531
0.0150
0.0140
Total Allowable for Industry (MAIL) (lbs/day) =>
0.2014
0.008992
11.0057
1.6866
0.0186
1.7257
Total Permitted to Industry (lbs/day) =>
0.2377
0.000000
0.0000
1.1059
0.0000
0.0292
MAIL left (lbs/day) =>
-0.0363
0.008992
11.0057
0.5807
0.0186
1.6965
Percent Allow. Ind. (MAIL) still available (%) _>
18.0 %
100.0 %
100.000
98.3
Percent MAHL still available (%) =>
15.7 %
kO
92.2 %
99.0 %
MO.O870
MOOO
97.5 %
5 Percent MAHL Obs/dav) =>
.0116
0.000487
0.5556
0.0870
HWA.AT
Revised: November 2005

POND=
NPDESik
1UP
Count
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Workbook Name: Franklin Co HWA AT 2015 - 2016 BK, Worksheet Name: AT Printed: 11/28/2018, 11:08 AM
Page 9 of 225
Allocation Table
Headworks last approved:
Allocation Table updated:
Permits last modified:
03/18/16
Pipe
number
09/26/18
10/20/16
Franklin County
NCO069311
Industry
INDUSTRY NAMES Permit
(please list alphabeNay) number
Zinc
Permit Limits
Total Nitrogen (lbs.)
Permit Limits
Total Phos. (lbs.)
Permit Limits
Oil & Grease
Permit Limits
Aluminum
Permit Limits
Conn, Load
mg/1 lbs/day
Conn, Load
mg/1 lbs/day
Conn, Load
mg/1 lbs/day
Conc. Load
mg/1 lbs/day
Conn, Load
mg/1 lbs/day
Novozymes
0112
0001
0.3900
6.5052
60.00
9.69
Monitor
Southern Litho late
0103
0002
0.2000
0.3336
23.73
4.62
Monitor
Southern Litho late
0103
0003
0.2000
0.2502
Monitor
Column Totals =>
7.089
1 83.73
14.31
0.0000
0.0000
AS/NIt/TF
Basis=> inhibition
MAHL from HWA (lbs/day) => 6.9586
Uncontrollable Loading (lbs/day) => 0.4421
Total Allowable for Industry (MAIL) (lbs/day) => 6.5164
Total Permitted to Industry (lbs/day) => 7.0890
MAIL left (lbs/day) =>-0.5726
Percent MAHL still available (%) =>
Percent Allow. Ind. (MAIL) still available (%) => 00.34719
5 Percent MAHL (lbs/day) =>
NPDES
NPDES
208.9420
40.64
101.0536
22.21
107.89
18.44
83.73
14.31
0.0000
24.16
4.13
22.4 %
11.6 %
10.45
2.0322
HWA.AT
Revised: November 2005

POND=
NPDESik
1UP
Count
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Workbook Name: Franklin Co HWA AT 2015 - 2016 BK, Worksheet Name: AT Printed: 11/28/2018, 11:08 AM
Page 10 of 225
Allocation Table
Headworks last approved:
Allocation Table updated:
Permits last modified:
03/18/16
Pipe
number
09/26/18
10/20/16
Franklin County
NCO069311
Industry
INDUSTRY NAMES Permit
(please list alphabeeay) number
TTO
Permit Limits
Potassium
Permit Limits
Sodium
Permit Limits
Conductivity
Permit Limits
Acrolein
Permit Limits
Acrylonitrile
Permit Limits
Conc. Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Conn, Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Conc. Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Conc. Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Conc. Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Conn, Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Novozymes
0112
0001
2198.50
1686.90
Monitor
Southern Litho late
0103
0002
2.1300
3.5528
Monitor
Southern Litho late
0103
0003
2.1300
2.6646
Monitor
Column Totals =>
6.2175
1 2198.50001
1#######
1 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Basis=>
MAHL from HWA (lbs/day) =>
Uncontrollable Loading (lbs/day) =>
Total Allowable for Industry (MAIL) (lbs/day) =>
Total Permitted to Industry (lbs/day) =>
MAIL left (lbs/day) =>
Percent Allow. Ind. (MAIL) still available (%) =>
Percent MAHL still available (%) =>
5 Percent MAHL Obs/dav) =>
6.2175
2198.5000
#######
0.0000
0.000f
#######
R
M
q
R
#######
HWA.AT
Revised: November 2005

POND=
NPDESik
1UP
Count
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Workbook Name: Franklin Co HWA AT 2015 - 2016 BK, Worksheet Name: AT Printed: 11/28/2018, 11:08 AM
Page 11 of 225
Allocation Table
Headworks last approved:
Allocation Table updated:
Permits last modified:
03/18/16
Pipe
number
09/26/18
10/20/16
Franklin County
NCO069311
Industry
INDUSTRY NAMES Permit
(pieaselist atynanetiay) number
Antimony
Permit Limits
2,4 dinitrophenol
Permit Limits
2 methA 4,6 dinitrophenol
Permit Limits
Conc. Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Conn, Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Conn, Load
mg/1 lbs/da
Novozymes
0112
0001
1.0000
16.6800
Southern Litho late
0103
0002
Southern Litho late
0103
0003
Column Totals =>
16.6800
0.0000
0.0000
Basis=>
MAHL from HWA (lbs/day) =>
Uncontrollable Loading (lbs/day) =>
Total Allowable for Industry (MAIL) (lbs/day) =>
Total Permitted to Industry (lbs/day) =>
MAIL left (lbs/day) =>
Percent Allow. Ind. (MAIL) still available (%) =>
Percent MAHL still available (%) =>
5 Percent MAHL Obs/dav) =>
16.6800
0.0000
0.0000
#######
#######
#######
#######
#######
#######
HWA.AT
Revised: November 2005

Appendix L: Preliminary Specification
Table
www.dewberry.com

110. Dewberry
DATE: 10/10/2018
Preliminary Equipment Specification Table
Alternative E.1, 2.0 MGD Discharge to Cedar Creek
WWTP Upgrade and Expansion
Novozymes North America, Inc.
EQUIPMENT ITEM 77!
DESCRIPTION
1. BIOREACTOR
Quantity:
3
Size:
1.33 MG each, 107' DIA, 20' SWD
Bolted 304 SS
Provide minimum of 2' freeboard
Materials of Construction:
Notes:
Provide access stairs and platform. No cover.
Volume listed is required process volume.
qq.
2. PRIMARY CLARIFIER
Quantity:
I Jim"
1
Size:
47' DIA, 15' SWD
Materials of Construction:
304 Stainless Steel Mechanism in Concrete Tank
Notes: Provide minimum of 2' freeboard
Provide pier mounted H-type conventional scraper blade,
energy dissipating inlet, effluent launders, density current
baffles, and scum skimmer.
3. BIOREACTOR DIFFUSED AERATIONEQUIPMENT
Quantity: 1 per tank, 3 total
Type: Fine Bubble Diffusion Grid
Size: 12,275 scfm/tank
2.0% SOTE per ft SWD.
Diffuser Density:
Provide 15% with 10% installed
Notes:
Design AOR - 3,350 Ib/hr
4. BIOREACTOR BLOWERS
Quantity:
3 duty/1 standby
Type-
Centrifugal or Turbo
Size: 12,275 scfm at 11 PSI,
Notes: Site Elevation: 360 ft MSL
Inlet Air Temperature: 105°F
I Relative Humidity: 80%
Preliminary Equipment Specification Table Rev.0.0

'*-*"Dewberry
IF
DATE: 10/10/2018
Quantity: 1
Size: 115' DIA, 15 SWD, 170 al/ftz/d (SOR), 10 Ib/ftz/d SLR
Materials of Construction: Epoxy Coated Steel Mechanism in Concrete Tank
Notes: Provide pier mounted H-type conventional scraper blade,
energy dissipating inlet, effluent launders, density current
baffles, and scum skimmer.
Quantity: 1 2 Duty / 1 Standby
Size: Max — 2,084 GPM at 31 FT TDH
Design — 1,390 GPM at 28 FT TDH
Min. - 700 GPM at 26 FT
a
: Sized 50-150% of Desi n Flow
Quantitv: 1 1 Dutv/1 Standbv
Size: 1 111 GPM at 36 FT TDH
Quantity: 2 duty
Size: 1,400 GPM
250 saft per unit
Quantitv:
Size:
TDS:
Permeate Recoverv:
Notes:
1 duty/1 st
1400 GPM
2,000 mg/L (average)
90% with reiect recvcle loop
System shall include ultrafiltration step, RO Feed Pumps, RO
filtration, chemical feed systems, appurtenances and
Evaporator sized for 10% reject stream and 90% distillate
antit : 1 duty/1 standby
Size: 1400 GPM at 28 FT TDH
Size:
1 duty/1 standby
1400 GPM at 28 FT TDH
Assumes 25 FT static head
Preliminary Equipment Specification Table Rev.0.0

Dewberry
Quantity: 1 1 duty/1 standby
Size: 1400 GPM at 56 FT TDH
Notes: Assumes 15,000 Linear Feet
Assumes 45 FT static head
DATE: 10/10/2018
1. Multiple (dual at a minimum) components such as pumps, chemical feed systems, and aeration equipment
are provided where necessary.
2. Pumping total dynamic head assumes 1,000 L.F. of force main, 25 FT static head, and design velocities
between 2-5 fps. Unless otherwise noted.
3. Diffused Aeration Equipment assumes design operating level of 0.5 mg/I dissolved oxygen (DO), with
maximum design of 2.0 mg/I DO.
Preliminary Equipment Specification Table Rev.0.0

Appendix M: Cost Tables for
Alternatives E.1 and E.2
www.dewberry.com

Table A.I. Alternative E.1 Capital and Recurring Costs
Direct NPDES Discharge Option
Engineering Alternative Analysis
Novozymes North America - Franklinton, NC
CAPITAL COSTS:
Item
Description
Unit
City
Unit Cost
Est Cost
Capital Equipment Costs
1
Blower, 600 HP, 10000 scfm
LS
4
$
161,000
$ 644,000
2
Mixers
EA
3
$
26,000
$ 78,000
3
Fine Bubble Aeartion Systems
LS
1
$
895,000
$ 895,000
4
Waste Sludge Pumps, 3 HP each, 1 duty, 1 standyby
EA
2
$
12,000
$ 24,000
5
Return Sludge Pumps, 25 HP each, 2 duty, 1 standby
EA
3
$
32,000
$ 96,000
6
Primary Clarifier Pumps, 20 HP each, 1 duty, 1 standby
EA
2
$
24,000
$ 48,000
7
PAT Effluent Pumps, 20 HP each, 1 duty, 1 standby
EA
2
$
24,000
$ 48,000
8
Anaerobic Reactor Effluent Pumps, 20 HP each, 1 duty, 1 standby
EA
2
$
24,000
$ 48,000
9
DAF Influent Pumps, 1 duty, 1 standby
EA
2
$
15,000
$ 30,000
10
Primary Clarifier Internals
EA
1
$
230,000
$ 230,000
11
Secondary Clarifer Internals
EA
1
$
413,000
$ 413,000
12
Phosphorus removal Dissolved Air Flotation and Chemical Feed System
LS
2
$
257,000
$ 514,000
13
Ultrafilter
LS
1
$
1,881,000
$ 1,881,000
14
Reverse Osmosis Skid
LS
1
$
3,491,000
$ 3,491,000
15
Evaporator
LS
4
$
2,750,000
$ 11,000,000
16
Effluent Pump Station, 50 HP each, 1 duty, 1 standby
EA
2
$
25,000
$ 50,000
17
Auxiliary Power Source, Backup Generator
LS
1
$
925,000
$ 925,000
Capital Equipment Subtotal
$ 20,415,000
Installed Equipment Costs
18
46' primary clarifier concrete tank
LS
1
$
280,000
$ 280,000
19
115' secondary clarifier, concrete tank
LS
1
$
1,020,000
$ 1,020,000
20
Biological Reactor Tanks, above ground, 304 bolted SS with foundation
EA
3
$
820,000
$ 2,460,000
21
Building - phosphorus removal system, OF/RO
SQ
2,000
$
250
$ 500,000
22
Miscellaneous Concrete
CY
300
$
2,000
$ 600,000
23
Cedar Creek Alignment
LF
13,500
$
80
$ 1,080,000
Installed Equipment Subtotal
$ 5,940,000
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL
$ 20,415,000
Equipment Installation Cost (%of Capital):
30%
$ 6,125,000
Sub -Total
$ 26,540,000
Civil Site Improvements (%of Capital)
10%
$ 2,041,500
Electrical Equipment, Controls, and Instrumentation (%of Capital)
20%
$ 4,083,000
Electrical Installation(% of Capital)
15%
$ 3,062,000
Piping Allowance (%ofCapital)
10%
$ 2,041,500
FOB Allowance (%of Capital):
4%
$ 817,000
Sub -Total
$ 38,585,000
Installed Equipment Subtotal
$ 5,940,000
Sub -Total
$ 44,525,000
Overhead and Profit
15%
$ 6,679,000
Contractor General Conditions:
MONTH
18
$
25,000
$ 450,000
Sub -Total:
$ 51,654,000
Contingency:
40%
$ 20,662,000
Sub -Total:
$ 72,316,000
Engineering Design Fees:
10%
$ 7,232,000
Sub -Total:
$ 79,548,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $
79,548,000
Notes:
1. Cost opinion is based on concept design assumptions shown and stated in Figure 1 Block Flow Diagrams.
2. Assumes that an existing power source may be utilized without new primary transformer and power can be distributed to local control panels.
3. Assumes flat, clear site; no significant grading, clearing and grubbing required.
4. Assumes no rock excavation, deep foundations, or dewatering.
5. Assumes 2,000 PSF soil bearing capacity so allowances assume conventional concrete foundations.
6. Assumes exising SCADA has capacity to accommodate 1/0 from new instrumentation.
7. Listed tank volumes are process volumes and costs account for freeboard
8. Assumes primary feed is located within 100 ft of electrical room
9. Assumes primary transformer provided by utility
10. Assumes no impact to wetlands
11. Assumes Novozymes will handle construction phase of WWTP upgrades
12. Costs presented in table are rounded to the nearest thousand.
OPERATING COST ESTIMATES:
Operation and Maintenance Costs
O&M Costs (5% of Capital Equipment Subtotal)
$1,021,000
Lab Costs
Lab Fees
$42,000
Chemical Costs
Acetic Acid Needed'
17 gpd
Unit Cost
$2.42 $/gal Acetic Acid
Annual Acetic Acid Cost
$15,000
Phosphorus Chemical Unit Costz
$0.60 $/1,000 gallon treated
Phosphorus Removal Chemical Costs
$438,000
OF/RO Chemical Feed Costs3
$101,000 per year
Total Chemical Costs
$554,000
Utility Costs
Mixers, Pumps, Blowers, Phosphorus Removal
System, OF/R04
15,405,700 kW-hr
Unit Cost
$0.07 $/kW-hr
Natural Gas
6.03E+08 CF/yr
Quantity
625,294 MBTU/yr
Unit Cost
$4.20 $/1000 CF
Evaporator Utility Costs
$2,533,000
Total Utility Costs
$3,578,000
Residual Disposal Costs
Chemical Phosphorus Sludge Generations
253 cubic meters/day
Biological Waste Activated Sludge Generation
530 cubic meters/day
Sludge Disposal Unit Cost'
$12.43 $/cubic meter
Evaporator Bottoms Generations
30,440 ton/yr
Evaporator Bottoms Landfill Unit Cost'
$35.00 /ton
Evaporator Bottoms Haul Unit Cost'
$35.00 /ton
Total Disposal Costs
$5,681,000
Labor
Additional Full -Time Employee
3 employees
Labor Rate
$33.00 /hr
Annual Additional Labor Costs
$206,000
Sewer Use Fees
Franklin County Hydraulic Surcharge
$7.70 /1,000 gallons
Discharge to Franklin County'
130,000 gpd
Annual Sewer Use Fee
$365,000
Nutrient Offset Fee
Flow
2.00 MGD
Total Nitrogen
8.8 mg/I
Total Phosphorus
1 mg/I
TN BMPc
29.00 $/kg
Nutrient Offset Fee10
$865,000 per 5 yr permit cycle
Offset Fee
$173,000 peryear
VAnnual
nnual Recurrin Costs
Total
$11,620,000
Notes:
1. Required 84% acetic acid volume calculated based on polishing 10 mg/I of nitrate -nitrogen.
2. Phosphorus chemical unit cost estimated from historical NZNA chemical cost data.
3. OF/RO chemical costs are based on previous experience.
4. Electrical costs are calculated based on demand of future electrical equipment.
5. Phosphorus sludge generation rate estimated from historical NZNA sludge data.
6. Biological waste activated sludge generation rate estimated from historical NZNA sludge data.
7. Sludge disposal unit cost based on historical NZNA sludge disposal cost data.
8. Evaporator bottoms disposal costs are based on previous experience.
9. Value represent the minimum flow Novozymes projects to send to Franklin County.
10. Nutrient offset fee calculated per the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B.0229(c) and 15A NCAC 02B.0237.
11. All costs are rounded to the nearest thousand.
11/29/2018 41P Dewberry

Table A.2. Alternative E.2 Capital and Recurring Costs
Indirect Discharge Option
Engineering Alternative Analysis
Novozymes North America - Franklinton, NC
CAPITAL COSTS:
Item
Description
Unit
-0ty
Unit Cost
Est Cost
Capital Equipment Costs
1
Blower, 600 HP, 10000 scfm
LS
4
$
161,000
$ 644,000
2
Mixers
EA
3
$
26,000
$ 78,000
3
Fine Bubble Aeardon Systems
LS
1
$
895,000
$ 895,000
4
Waste Sludge Pumps, 3 HP each, 1 duty, 1 standyby
EA
2
$
12,000
$ 24,000
5
Return Sludge Pumps, 25 HP each, 2 duty, 1 standby
EA
3
$
32,000
$ 96,000
6
Primary Clarifier Pumps, 20 HP each, 1 duty, 1 standby
EA
2
$
24,000
$ 48,000
7
PAT Effluent Pumps, 20 HP each, 1 duty, 1 standby
EA
2
$
24,000
$ 48,000
8
Anaerobic Reactor Effluent Pumps, 20 HP each, 1 duty, 1 standby
EA
2
$
24,000
$ 48,000
9
DAF Influent Pumps, 1 duty, 1 standby
EA
2
$
15,000
$ 30,000
10
Primary Clarifier Internals
EA
1
$
230,000
$ 230,000
11
Secondary Clarifer Internals
EA
1
$
413,000
$ 413,000
12
Phosphorus removal Dissolved Air Flotation and Chemical Feed System
LS
2
$
257,000
$ 514,000
13
Ultrafilter
LS
1
$
1,881,000
$ 1,881,000
14
Reverse Osmosis Skid
LS
1
$
2,584,000
$ 2,584,000
15
Evaporator
LS
3
$
2,750,000
$ 8,250,000
16
Effluent Pump Station, 50 HP each, 1 duty, 1 standby
EA
2
$
25,000
$ 50,000
17
Auxiliary Power Source, Backup Generator
LS
1
$
925,000
$ 925,000
Capital Equipment
Subtotal
$ 16,758,000
Installed Equipment Cost
18
46' primary clarifier concrete tank
LS
1
$
280,000
$ 280,000
19
115' secondary clarifier, concrete tank
LS
1
$
1,020,000
$ 1,020,000
20
Biological Reactor Tanks, above ground, 304 bolted 55 with foundation
EA
3
$
820,000
$ 2,460,000
21
Building - phosphorus removal system, OF/RO
SQ
2,000
$
250
$ 500,000
22
Miscellaneous Concrete
CY
300
$
2,000
$ 600,000
23
Effluent Pipe Alignment to Franklin County Collection System
LF
2,500
$
80
$ 200,000
Installed Equipment
Subtotal
$ 5,060,000
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL $
16,758,000
Equipment Installation Cost (% of Capital):
30%
$ 5,027,000
Sub -Total
$ 21,785,000
Civil Site Improvements (% of Project)
10%
$ 1,675,800
Electrical Equipment, Controls, and Instrumentation (% of Project)
20%
$ 3,351,600
Electrical Installation (%of Capital)
15%
$ 2,514,000
Piping Allowance (%of Capital):
10%
$ 1,675,800
FOB Allowance (% of Capital):
4%
$ 670,000
Sub -Total
$ 31,672,200
Installed Equipment Subtotal
$ 5,060,000
Sub -Total
$ 36,732,200
Overhead and Profit
15%
$ 5,510,000
Contractor General Conditions:
MONTH
18
$
25,000
$ 450,000
Sub -Total:
$ 42,692,200
Contingency:
40%
$ 17,077,000
Sub -Total:
$ 59,769,000
Engineering Design Fees:
10%
$ 5,977,000
Sub -Total:
$ 65,746,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
$ 65,746,000
Notes:
1. Cost opinion is based on concept design assumptions shown and stated in Figure 1 Block Flow Diagrams.
2. Assumes that an existing power source may be utilized without new primary transformer and power can be distributed to local control panels.
3. Assumes flat, clear site; no significant grading, clearing and grubbing required.
4. Assumes no rock excavation, deep foundations, or dewatering.
5. Assumes 2,000 PSF soil bearing capacity so allowances assume conventional concrete foundations.
6. Assumes exising SCADA has capacity to accommodate 1/0 from new instrumentation.
7. Listed tank volumes are process volumes and costs account for freeboard
8. Assumes primary feed is located within 100 ft of electrical room
9. Assumes primary transformer provided by utility
10. Assumes no impact to wetlands
11. Assumes Novozymes will handle construction phase of W WTP upgrades
12. Costs presented in table are rounded to the nearest thousand.
OPERATING COST ESTIMATES:
Operation and Maintenance Costs
O&M Costs (5% of Capital Equipment Subtotal)
$838,000
Lab Costs
Lab Fees
$10,000
Chemical Costs
Acetic Acid Needed'
17 gpd
Unit Cost
$2.42 $/gal Acetic Acid
Annual Acetic Acid Cost
$15,016
Phosphorus Chemical Unit Costz
$0.60 $/1,000 gallon treated
Phosphorus Removal Chemical Costs
$438,000
OF/RO Chemical Feed Costs'
$75,000 per year
Total Chemical Costs
$528,000
Utility Costs
Mixers, Pumps, Blowers, Phosphorus Removal
System, OF/RO'
14,983,652 kW-hr
Unit Cost
$0.07 $/kW-hr
Natural Gas
4.53E+08 CF/yr
Quantity
469,412 MBTU/yr
Unit Cost
$4.20 $/1000 CF
Evaporator Utility Costs
$1,901,000
Total Utility Costs
$2,917,000
Residual Disposal Cost
Chemical Phosphorus Sludge Generations
253 cubic meters/day
Biological Waste Activated Sludge Generation
530 cubic meters/day
Sludge Disposal Unit Cost'
$12.43 $/cubic meter
Evaporator Bottoms Generation'
22,830 ton/yr
Evaporator Bottoms Landfill Unit Cost$
$35.00 /ton
Evaporator Bottoms Haul Unit Cost'
$35.00 /ton
Total Disposal Costs
$5,148,000
Labor
or
Additional Full -Time Employee
3 employees
Labor Rate
$33.00 /hr
Annual Additional Labor Costs
$206,000
Sewer Use Fees
Franklin County Hydraulic Surcharge
$7.70 /1,000 gallons
Discharge to Franklin County
2.00 MGD
Annual Sewer Use Fee
$5,621,000
Annual Recurring Casts
Total
$15,268,000
Notes:
1. Required 84% acetic acid volume calculated based on polishing 10 mg/I of nitrate -nitrogen.
2. Phosphorus chemical unit cost estimated from historical NZNA chemical cost data.
3. OF/RO chemical costs are based on previous experience.
4. Electrical costs are calculated based on demand of future electrical equipment.
5. Phosphorus sludge generation rate estimated from historical NZNA sludge data.
6. Biological waste activated sludge generation rate estimated from historical NZNA sludge data.
7. Sludge disposal unit cost based on historical NZNA sludge disposal cost data.
8. Evaporator bottoms disposal costs are based on previous experience.
9. All costs are rounded to the nearest thousand.
11/29/2018 tit Dewberry

Appendix N: Vendor Quotes
www.dewberry.com

Appendix N Contents:
1. Blowers
2. Mixers
3. Fine Bubble Aeration System
4. Pumps
5. Primary and Secondary Clarifier Equipment
6. Dissolved Air Flotation
7. Ultrafilter/Reverse Osmosis
8. Evaporator
9. Bioreactor Tanks
.:1 Dewberry°
Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis I APP M

1. Blowers
.:1 Dewberry°
Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis I APP M

s
23 Corporate Circle
East Syracuse, NY 13057
Date: 11/8/18
To: Heyward Inc.
Attn: Jim Cooper
Phone No: [phone]
Email: ic000erCalhevward.net
No. Pages: 1
Subject: Dewberry — bio Pharma Project
Dear Jim,
From:
Patti Waring
Phone No.
[phone]
Fax No:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
CC:
I have reviewed your revised application and am pleased to offer the following budget proposal. For
this lower flow, I would go with this selection as it is more efficient at the new design condition. The
blower model remains the same but with a different impeller mix and smaller motor. Have included a
standard accessory and blower protection package.
Job Conditions: 10,000 SUM Air Flow per Blower
11.0 PSIG Discharge Pressure
360' Elevation
105OF Inlet Temperature
80% RH
Equipment List: 4 — Model 600.04 Multistage Centrifugal Blower
4 — Base Assembly with Baseplate, Coupling, Coupling Guard & Base Pads
4 — 650 HP 3/60/460-volt 3,550-rpm TEFC Motor
4 — 24" Inlet Filter Silencer, Panel Style
4 — 24" Inlet Butterfly Valve, Wafer, Manually Operated
4 — 24" Inlet Expansion Joint
4 — 20" Discharge Check Valve, Wafer
4 — 20" Discharge Expansion Joint
4 — Surge/Overload/Vibration Protection Panel, NEMA 12
Budget price for the above equipment is $642,000.00 FOB Syracuse, NY. Freight to the
jobsite, start-up service and training are not included in this price.
Due to the size of the project, payment terms will need to be discussed prior to order placement.
Drawings can be supplied in 3 to 4 weeks from receipt of an order. Estimated shipping time is 22 to
26 weeks from release for fabrication.
Please let me know if you have any questions or require any additional information.
Regards,
PattvW art vq,

Continental Blower LLC - Blower / Exhauster Selection - design data
Customer
Dewberry
Project -No
bio Pharma Project
Application
Date
22-10-2018
Notes
Heyward
Air blower
600A.04 - 590.8 HP - 3570 RPM
Impeller
3x9202 + 1x9201
Drive arrang.
direct drive, 2-poles motor 60 Hz
Suggested motor
650.0 HP
Prepared by
PLW
Printed
13 November 2018 14:59
---- PERFORMANCE CURVE ----
600A.04. 3x9202 + 1x9201
3570 RPM 3570 RPM
591
600
523
550
a
=
o`
0
500
3
0
n
450
d
0
400
350
4000 5000 6000
7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 16000 17000
13
.N
:-to
9
n
0
6
m
6
5
rn
4
0
N
3
CO
2
1
0
4000 5000 6000
7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 16000 17000
Flow rate - scfm (Std: 14.696 psia, 68°F, 36% RH)
=DESIGN POINT
Dsgn : AIR: t1 = 105.0 °F
pBar = 14.496 psia RH / inlet = 80 %
AIM : AIR: H = 105.0 `F
pBar = 14.496 psia RH / inlet = 80 %
CURVE DEWBERRY-BIO PHARMA-REV1A - WINSELECT 6.65-59e ©8. October 2018 - CONTINENTAL INDUE11/13/2018
14:59
-- page 1 of 5 --

Continental Blower LLC - Blower / Exhauster Selection - design data
Customer
Dewberry
Project -No
bio Pharma Project
Application
Date
22-10-2018
Notes
Heyward
Air blower
600A.04 - 590.8 HP - 3570 RPM
Impeller
3x9202 + 1 x9201
Drive arrang.
direct drive, 2-poles motor 60 Hz
Suggested motor
650.0 HP
Prepared by
PLW
Printed
13 November 2018 15'.01
---- OPERATING CONDITIONS ---
Operation :
Air blower
Barometric pressure
360 It asl
-->
14.496 psia
Gauge pressure / inlet
14.496 PSIA
->
0.000 psig
Variable losses / inlet
0 inchH2O
-->
0,000 psig
Gauge pressure / outlet
11 PSIG
-->
11.000 psig
Variable losses / outlet
0 inchH2O
-->
0.000 psig
Design temperature / inlet
105 F
-->
105.0 °F
Relative Humidity / inlet
80 %
-->
80 %
Design flow rate
10000 scfm
-->
11455.2 icfm
----
THERMODYNAMICAL DATA ----
PI =
14.496 psi a
p2
= 25.532 psi a
p2/pl
= 1.7613
It =
105.0 °F
t2
= 233.0 °F
Ri
= 293.7533 J/(kg K)
Q1 =
11455.2 icfm
Q2
= 7978.5 cfm
Pad
= 444.9 HP
rhot =
0,0681b/ft3
rho2
= 0.09721b/ft3
PGas
= 581.9 HP
kappal =
L3939
Clot
= 1039.56 J/(kg K)
MW
= 6.761b/Ibmol
mTotal =
775.8 lb/min
mAir
= 745.7 lb/min
mWV
= 30.0 lb/min
Vol.%Total =
100.0 lb/min
Vol.%Air
= 93.9 %
Vol .% WV =
6.1 %
---DESIGN POINT -UNTHROTTLED ----
Flow rate (QO) :
10000.0 scfm
Gauge pressure Pressure
11.04 psig
Driver (PDr) / Machine (P) shaft power:
590.8 HP
Adiabatic efficiency (eta ad)
76.5 %
Polytropic efficiency (eta poly)
78.3 %
Blower mech. efficiency
98.5 %
Transmission mech. efficiency
100.0 %
(Std: 14.696 psia, 68°F, 36% RH)
(deviation : + 0.3 %)
(at 105.0 °F, 80 % rel. humidity)
I ---- SURGE / DESIGN POINT DATA --- I
Q1
icfm
QO
scfm
Q2
cfm
Pressure
psi
P PDr
HP HP
eta ad
%
eta pot
%
t2
°F
SP
DP
5198.9
11455.2
4538.49
1 10000.00
3677.76
7978.50
12.34
11.04
365.70 365.70
590.79 590.79
61.42
76.52
6454
78.29
1 279,a
1 233.0
turn down
pressure rise DP-->SP
power rise SP-->DP
6256.3 icfm (54.6 %) (for Of)
1.3 psig (11.8 %)
61.5 %
REPORT DEWBERRY-BIO PHARMA-REV1A - WINSELECT6.65-59e ©8.October2018- CONTINENTALINDUn 1n3/201a 15:01
-- page 1 of 4 --

BEContinental Blower LLC - Blower / Exhauster Selection - design data
---- MACHINE SPECIFICATIONS ----
model
600A.04
impellers
3x9202 + 1x9201
drive arrangement
direct drive, 2-poles motor 60 Hz
REPORT DEWBERRY-BIO PHARMA-REV1A - WINSELECT 6.65-59e ©8. October 2018 - CONTINENTAL INDU:11n312018 15:01
--page 2 of 4--

Continental Blower LLC - Blower / Exhauster Selection - alternate 1
----
OPERATING CONDITIONS-ALT1 ---
Operation :
Air blower
Barometric pressure
360 It asl
-->
14.496 psia
Gauge pressure / inlet
14.496 PSIA
-->
0,000 psig
Variable losses / inlet
0 inch H2O
-->
0.000 + 0.476 psig (throttled)
Gauge pressure/outlet
11 PSIG
-->
11.000 prig
Variable losses / outlet
0 inchH2O
-->
0.000 psig
Design temperature / inlet
105 F
-->
105.0 °F
Relative Humidity / inlet
80 %
-->
80 %
Design flow rate
8000 scfm
-->
9164.1 icfm
--- THERMODYNAMICAL DATA -ALT1
----
pl =
14.020 psi a
p2 =
25.497 psi a
p2/pi
= 1.8187
t1 =
105.0 °F
t2 =
246.9 °F
Ri
= 293.7533 J/(kg K)
Q1 =
9475.6 icfm
Q2 =
6514.7 cfm
Pad
= 377.8 HP
mot =
0.065 Ib/ft3
rho2 =
0.0952 Ib/ft3
PGas
= 515.6 HP
kappal =
1.3939
Cpt =
1039.56 J/(kg K)
MW
= 6.761b/lbmol
mTotal =
620.1 lb/min
mAir =
595.3 lb/min
mWV
= 24.8 lb/min
Vol%Total =
100.0 lb/min
Vol.%Air =
93.9%
Vol.%WV
= 6.1%
---DESIGN POINT - ALT1 -THROTTLED ----
Flow rate (QO) :
8000.0 scfm
Gauge pressure Pressure
11.00 psig
Driver (PDr) / Machine (P) shaft power:
523.5 HP
Adiabatic efficiency (eta ad)
73.3 %
Polytropic efficiency (eta poly)
75.4 %
Blower mech. efficiency
98.5 %
Transmission mech. efficiency
100.0 %
(Std: 14,696 psis, 68°F, 36% RH)
0.0%)
(at 105.0 °F, 80 % rel. humidity)
I --- SURGE I DESIGN POINT DATA - ALT1 ----
Q1
QO
02
Pressure
P
PDr
eta ad
eta pol
t2
icfm
scfm
cfm
psig
HP
HP
%
! %
°F
SP
5198.9
4493.58
3676.69
12.07
362,00
362.00
61.43
64.55
i - 279.7 :-
`246.9
DP
9475.E
8000.00
6514.72
11.00
523.50
523.50
73.27
75.39
turn down a 4276.7 icfm (45.1 %) (for Q1)
pressure rise DP-->SP 1.1 psig (9.8 %)
power rise SP --- >DP 44.6 %
---- MACHINE SPECIFICATIONS - ALT1 ----
model
600A.04
impellers
3x9202 + 1 x9201
drive arrangement
direct drive, 2-poles motor 60 Hz
REPORT DEWBERRY-BIO PHARMA-REVIA - WINSELECT 6.65-59e ©8. October 2018 - CONTINENTALIN 15:01
--page 3of 4--

TECHNICAL DATA
Number of stage : 1 thru 6
Inlet connection : 24" (612 mm) flange, matches 125# ANSI
Outlet connection: 20" (511 mm) flange, matches 125# ANSI
or 18" (460 mm) flange, matches 125# ANSI
Operating speed:3550 rpm in direct drive (601-1z)
Lubrication : Oil type with constant level
Impeller diameter: From 34" (864 mm) to 36" (915 mm)
Impeller tip speed : 443 fps (135 m/sec)
Drive : Direct drive or gear box
Vibration tolerance : 1.25 mils peak -to -peak (4.5 mm /s)
Balance piston : From 3 to 6 stages with pipes connection
Shaft end : 3" 3/4 (95 mm), 'inlet end drive standard
MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION
Heads, Sections, Bearing housings : Cast iron ASTM A-48 Class 35B
Tie rods : 7/8" (22 mm) diameter cold drawn steel A60
Joint sealing compound : RTV IS502 Silicone
Seals (air) : Two graphit rings each end
Seals (gas) : Four carbon rings each end with inert gas injection
Bearings: Ball bearings 6320 C3 PER AFBMA BI 0 STANDARD
Shaft: AISI 1038 Carbon steel or equivalent
Impellers : Fabricated aluminium ASTM 6061
Baffle rings : Stainless steel
Motor pedestal : Structural steel.
Base pads: Anchor bolts
Noise level : In compliance with OSHA standards when machine is fully,
piped (certified tests available).
BLOWER
SIZE
„A„
"B"
"C"
WEIGHT
LES KG
ROTORWK2
(Ib. W)
60001
26.77 (680)
126.0 (3200)
144.0 (3658)
8600
3900
76.03
60002
36.85 (936)
138.0 (3505)
156.0 (3962)
10580
4800
128.55
60003
46.93 (1192)
162.0 (4115)
180.0 (4572)
12780
5800
181.07
60004
57.00 (1448)
162.0 (4115)
180.0 (4572)
14770
6700
233.59
60005
67.08 (1704)
186.0 (4724)
204.0 (5182)
16970
7700
286.11
60006
�77.16 (1960)
186.0 (4724)
204.0 (5182)
18950
8600
338.11
DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES AND (MM)
ACTUAL DIMENSIONS MAY VARY SLIGHTLY TO SUIT APPLICATION
"600" SERIES
!
AIR & GAS
IITiIITIITi'--`
■� �- lil IIIIiIL'—�
C I��IIIIIIII��I�� ��
�■■.■�-�illllllll�'Dll�'j� ..
1 t
�
��� IIII IIII II s;1
_
■ �= III Illlfll. =�
■"-_..� `III'lllIIIIIIII11I� ��`1►,�
"
II1111111P11
1• I •1
26
24
22
OF
a
Eff
IL
20
n
9IMF
W
18
II
MODEL 600 all
w
a
16
W =
I �
14
OLL
a
=
12
c z
v
�
o II
in
10
0
g
m
c
6
I
5000
10 000 15 000 20 000 25 000 30 000
INLET FLOW IN SCFM
®Values, dimensions and reference in this brochure are approximate and intended as a guide only, not for construction and are subject to change without notice.
CONTINENTAL BLOWER LLC . CONTINENTAL BLOWER LLC . CONTINENTAL BLOWER LLC . CONTINENTAL BLOWER LLC .

2. Mixers
.:1 Dewberry°
Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis I APP M

AQUA -AEROBIC SYSTEMS, INC.
A Molawgw Cw pa-y
TO: Franklinton Biopharma Project
Franklinton, NC
USA
ATN:
CC: Heyward Incorporated,Jim Cooper
If billing and/or shipping address is different, please advise.
PROPOSAL DATE: November 8, 2018
Proposal # 51268
Qty Description Unit Price Total Price
We are pleased to quote, for acceptance within (30) days of this date, prices and terms on equipment listed
below. Equipment readiness is expected to be (8-10) weeks* after receipt of purchase order with mutually
acceptable terms and conditions, subject to credit approval. *Notes: Aqua -Aerobic Systems' proposal is
based upon supply of equipment models as noted. Actual shipment is dependent on equipment availability
at the time of receipt of order.
Note: Aqua Aerobic Systems, Inc. will be closed November 22-23 & December 24 - January 1.
- Equipment will be furnished by Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. with civil work and installation by the
purchaser.
3 40 HP Model SS Endura® Series AquaDDM® Mixer. Motor base $25,585.81 $76,757.43
and intake volute assemblies will be of 304 stainless steel. Float is
14 gauge 304 stainless steel skin, filled with closed cell
polyurethane foam. Propeller is cast stainless steel. Motor will be
premium efficient, TEFC, 460 volt, 3 phase, 60 hertz, 900 RPM with
1.15 service factor and Class F nonhygroscopic insulation. Motor
shaft is one-piece 17-4 PH stainless steel.
WARNING:
The AquaDDM® Mixer has a high velocity downflow discharge directly below the unit. This flow pattern may,
in some instances, cause damage to basin bottoms, creating leaking potential. In earthen or lined basins,
Aqua Aerobic Systems recommends the use of a concrete pad on the basin bottom directly below the
mixer. If concrete is known to be nonresistant to the waste, other materials should be investigated. If basin
contains toxic wastes, user is advised to obtain engineering advice as to basin design and construction
necessary to prevent possible erosion and leakage. Aqua Aerobic Systems assumes no liability or
responsibility for any damage to basin bottoms or walls, or for any injuries or damages resulting therefrom.
COMMERCIAL NOTES:
- Freight charges are NOT included in this proposal. Freight charges will be prepaid with actual charges to
be added to invoice.
- Startup supervision is NOT included.
- Payable net 30 days from date of shipment subject to credit review; no retainage allowed.
- Unless specifically stated herein, no taxes were included in Aqua -Aerobic Systems' price. State and/or
local taxes will be charged unless we receive a valid resale/exemption certificate.
6306 N. Alpine Rd. Loves Park, IL 61 1 11-7655 p 815.654.2501 f 815.654.2508 www.aqua-aerobic.com
Copyright 2018, Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc Printed: November 8, 2018 Page 1 of 5

AO_UA-AEROBIC
Proposal Date: November 8, 2018 Proposal # 51268 �&. SYSTEMS, INC.
AMat 1.Cwmy y
SCOPE / EQUIPMENT NOTES:
- Only the aerator and/or mixer unit is provided. Electrical and mooring accessories, control panels, junction
boxes, anchors and eyebolts are not included in Aqua's scope of supply and shall be supplied by others.
Pricing is provided below for reference.
- Based on the current instability in stainless steel pricing, Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. reserves the right to
re-evaluate the pricing quoted prior to order acceptance.
- Aqua -Aerobic Systems' offer is based upon the supply of Aqua -Aerobic Systems' standard equipment as
described within this proposal, including the warranty as included within Terms and Conditions of
Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc., and Aqua -Aerobic Systems' standard factory test(s) prior to shipment.
Aqua -Aerobic Systems' scope of supply does not include any process or performance guarantees or
warranties or process or performance testing unless specifically detailed within this proposal.
- TRADEMARKS: Aqua -Aerobic, Aqua -Jet, Aqua -Jet II, AquaDDM, ThermoFlo, Endura Series, OxyMix,
Fold -a -Float, Aqua MixAir, AquaCAM-D, AquaSBR, Aqua MSBR, AquaPASS, Aqua BioMax, AquaEnsure,
Aqua EnduraTube, Aqua EnduraDisc, Aqua CB-24, AquaDisk, AquaDiamond, AquaDrum, Aqua MiniDisk,
Aqua MegaDisk, AquaPrime, OptiFiber, OptiFiber PES-13, OptiFiber PA2-13, OptiFiber ACR-13, OptiFiber
PES-14, OptiFiber PF-14, Trust the Tag, AquaABF, Turbilite, AquaMB Process, Aqua -Aerobic MBR, Aqua
UltraFiltration, Aqua MultiBore, Aqua MultiBore Series C, Aqua ElectrOzone, SpareCare, IntelliPro, Aqua
Financing Solutions, and the Aqua -Aerobic logo are registered trademarks or pending trademarks of
Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. All other products and services mentioned are trademarks of their respective
owners. Nereda@ is a registered U.S. trademark of Royal HaskoningDHV.
SHIPPING NOTES:
To expedite your order, please provide the shipping instructions below:
Earliest acceptable equipment on site date:
Ship to address (including zip code):
Driver to provide 24 or 48 or
Jobsite contact name:
@ telephone number:
HOURS pre -delivery notice to:
Deliveries are accepted on the following days of the week:
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
Acceptable hours of delivery AM to PM
Special instructions to relay to the carrier and/or the driver:
6306 N. Alpine Rd. Loves Park, IL 61 1 11-7655 p 815.654.2501 f 815.654.2508 www.aqua-aerobic.com
Copyright 2018, Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc Printed: November 8, 2018 Page 2 of 5

AQ_UA-AEROBIC
Proposal Date: November 8, 2018 Proposal # 51268 V. SYSTEMS, INC.
AMB18 1.Cwmy y
Pricing Summary
Equipment and/or Accessories:
Total Job Price:
$76,757.43
$76,757.43
Material and/or services not specifically listed in this proposal are not included in the quoted TOTAL JOB PRICE and are
to be supplied by others.
Goods quoted above will be sold subject to the terms and conditions of sale set forth on the face hereof and the following
pages entitled "Terms and Conditions of Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. (A MetaWater Company)": Any different or additional
terms are hereby objected to.
Available Options
1 Feet, 7 X 19 X 1/4" high flex 304 stainless steel mooring cable.
$1.10
$1.10
1 Cable clip(s) 1/4" U-bolt.
$4.09
$4.09
1 3/16" - 1/4" 316 stainless steel wire rope thimble.
$4.05
$4.05
1 Feet, #4 AWG flexible service cable for 460 V, 40 HP operation.
$13.18
$13.18
Cable has three power conductors and an insulated ground
conductor assembled together with a nonhygroscopic filler materia
in a hard usage outer jacket.
1 1" - 1-1/4", 2 eye, wire mesh strain relief cord grip assembly.
$45.15
$45.15
1 3/4" spiral wrap abrasion protection for power supply cable.
$43.39
$43.39
1 5" x 9" plastic electrical/mooring cable float complete with 2 nylon
$14.83
$14.83
ties.
6306 N. Alpine Rd. Loves Park, IL 61 1 11-7655 p 815.654.2501 f 815.654.2508 www.aqua-aerobic.com
Copyright 2018, Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc Printed: November 8, 2018 Page 3 of 5

AO_UA-AEROBIC
Proposal Date: November 8, 2018 Proposal # 51268 SYSTEMS, INC.
V.
AMeWa WC-W.W
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AQUA -AEROBIC SYSTEMS, INC. (A Metawater Company)
Page 1 of 2
This offer and all of the goods and sales of Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. are subject only to the following terms and conditions. The acceptance of any
order resulting from this proposal is based on the express condition that the Buyer agrees to all the terms and conditions herein contained. Any terms
and conditions in any order, which are in addition to or inconsistent with the following, shall not be binding upon Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. This
proposal and any contract resulting therefrom, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois, without regard
to conflicts of laws principles.
PAYMENT
Unless specifically stated otherwise, quoted terms are Net 30Days from shipping date. Past -due charges are 1.5%per month andwill apply only on
any past -due balance. Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. does not allow retainage of any invoice amount, unless authorized in writing by an authorized
representative of our Loves Park, Illinois office.
DURATION OF QUOTATION
This proposal of Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. shall in no event be effective more than 30 days from date thereof, unless specifically stated otherwise,
and is subj ect to change at any time prior to acceptance.
SHIPMENT
Shipping dates are not a guarantee of a particular day of shipment and are approximate, being based upon present production information, and are
subject to change per the production schedules existing at time of receipt of purchase order. Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. shall not be responsible for
any delay in shipment for causes beyond its control including, but not limited to, war, riots, strikes, labor trouble causing interruption of work, fires,
other casualties, transportation delays, modification of order, any act of governmental authorities or acts of God Quoted shipment dates in this
proposal are approximate dates goods will be shipped and, unless agreed to in writing by Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc., Buyer may not postpone or
delay the dates of shipment of goods from our plant or from our supplier's plants beyond the dates set forth in this proposal.
III10W/\U17RM'All 01111V
All prices and all shipments of goods are F.O.B. Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc.'s plant at Loves Park, Illinois unless specifically stated otherwise
Delivery of the goods sold hereunder to the carrier shall be deemed delivery to the Buyer, and upon such delivery, title to such goods and risk of loss
or damage shall be upon Buyer.
TAXES
Prices quoted do not include any taxes, customs duties, or import fees. Buyer shall pay any and all use, sales, privilege or other tax or customs duties
or import fees levied by any governmental authority with respect to the sale or transportation of any goods covered hereby. IfAqua-Aerobic Systems,
Inc is required by any taxing authority to collect or to pay any such tax, duty or fee, the Buyer shall be separately billed at such time for the amounts
Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc isrequiredto pay.
INSURANCE
Unless the goods are sold on a CIF basis, the Buyer shall provide marine insurance for all risks, including war and general coverage.
SECURITY
If at any time the financial responsibility of the Buyer becomes unsatisfactory to Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc., or Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc.
otherwise deems itself insecure as to receipt of full payment of the purchase price from Buyer hereunder, Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. reserves the
right to require payment in advance or security or guarantee satisfactory to Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. of payment in full of the purchase price.
LIMITATION OF ACTION
No action shall be brought against Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. for any breach of its contract of sale more than two years after the accrual of the cause
of action thereof, and, in no event, unless the Buyer shall first have given written notice to Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc., of any claim of breach of
contract within 30 days after the discovery thereof.
CANCELLATION CLAUSE
No acceptance of this proposal, bypurchase order or otherwise, maybe modified except by written consent of Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. nor may it
be cancelled except by prior payment to Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. the following sums as liquidated damages therefore: 1) If cancellation isprior to
commencement of production and prior to the assumptionof any obligations by Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. for any materials or component parts, a
sum equal to 15% of the total purchase price; 2) If cancellation is after the commencement of production or after the assumption of any obligations by
Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. for any materials or component parts, a sum equal to the total of the direct, out-of-pocket expenses incurred to the date of
cancellation for labor, machine time, materials and any charges made to us by suppliers for cancellation, plus 30% of the total purchase price. All
charges and expenses shall be as determined by Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. In the event any items are used by Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. to fill a
subsequent order, then upon receipt of payment for such order, Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. shall pay the Buyer a sum equal to the direct out-of-
pocket expenses previously charged and received from Buyer.
PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
This proposal, including all descriptive data, drawings, material, information andknow-how disclosed by Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. to Buyer in
relation hereto is confidential information intended solely for the confidential use of Buyer, shall remain the property of Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc.
and shall not be disclosed or otherwise used to the disadvantage or detriment of Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. in any manner.
6306 N. Alpine Rd. Loves Park, IL 61 1 11-7655 p 815.654.2501 f 815.654.2508 www.aqua-aerobic.com
Copyright 2018, Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc Printed: November 8, 2018 Page 4 of 5

AO_UA-AEROBIC
Proposal Date: November 8, 2018 Proposal # 51268 SYSTEMS, INC.
V.
AMeWa WC-W.W
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AQUA -AEROBIC SYSTEMS, INC. (AMetawater Company)
Paget of
QUALIFIED ACCEPTANCE AND INDEMNITY
In the event the acceptance of thisproposal by Buyer either is contingent upon or subject to the approval by any third party such as, butnot limited to,
a consulting engineer, with respect to goods, parts, materials, descriptive data, drawings, calculations, or anyother matter, thenupon such approval by
any thirdparty, Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. shall have no liability to Buyer or to any third party so long as the goods sold and delivered by Aqua -
Aerobic Systems, Inc. conform to this proposal. In the event any such third party requires modifications in the proposal prior to the approval thereof,
Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. may at its sole option and without liability to anyparty elect to cancel this proposal or return the purchase order to Buyer.
In the event Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. elects to modify this proposal to conform to the requirements for approval by any thirdparty, Aqua -Aerobic
Systems, Inc. in such event shall have no liability to Buyer or to any third party so long as the goods sold and deliveredby Aqua -Aerobic Systems,
Inc, conform to this proposal as modified.
Buyer agree s to indemnify and save harmless Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. from and against all costs and expenses and liability of any kind
whatsoever arising out of or in connection with claims by third parties so long as the goods soldhereunder conform to the requirements of this
proposal as approved by any third party.
WARRANTY; LIMITATION OF LIABILITY; AND DISCLAIMER
In return forpurchase and fullpayment forAqua-Aerobic Systems, Inc. goods, we warrant newgoods providedbyus to be free from defects in
materials and workmanship under normal conditions and use for a period of one year from the date the goods are put into service, or eighteen months
from date of shipment (whichever first occurs). If the goods include an "Endura Series" motor, the complete Endura Series unit shall be warranted by
Aqua -Aerobic to be free from defects in materials and workmanship under normal conditions and use for three years from the date the product is put
into service or 42 months from the date of shipment (whichever occurs first).
OUR OBLIGATION UNDER THIS WARRANTY IS EXPRESSLY AND EXCLUSIVELY LIMITED to replacing or repairing (at our factory
at Loves Park, Illinois) any part or parts returned to our factory with transportation charges prepaid, and which our examination shall show to have
been defective. Prior to return of any goods or its parts to our factory, Buyer shall notify Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. of claimed defect, and Aqua -
Aerobic Systems, Inc. shall have the privilege of examining the goods at Buyer's place of business at or where the goods have otherwise been placed
in service. In the event this examination discloses no defect, Buyer shall have no authority to return the goods or parts to our factory for the further
examination or repair. All goods or parts shall be returned to Buyer, F.O.B. Loves Park, Illinois. This warranty shall not apply to any goods or part
which has been repaired or altered outside our factory, or applied, operated or installed contrary to our instruction, or subjected to mmisusq chemical
attack/degradation, negligence or accident. This warranty and any warranty and guaranty of process or performance shall no longer be applicable or
valid if anyproduct, including any software program, supplied by Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc., is modified or altered without the written approval of
Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc Our warranty on accessories and component parts not manufactured by us is expressly limited to that of the manufacturer
thereof
THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS MADE IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AND OF
ALL OTHER LIABILITIES AND OBLIGATIONS ON OUR PART, INCLUDING ANY LIABILITY FOR NEGLIGENCE,
STRICT LIABILITY, OR OTHERWISE; AND ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS
FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE IS EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED; AND WE EXPRESSLY DENY THE RIGHT OF ANY
OTHERPERSON TO INCUR OR ASSUME FOR US ANY OTHERLIABILITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SALE OF
ANY GOODS PROVIDED BY US. THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES OR GUARANTEES OF PERFORMANCE UNLESS
SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE.
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, INCLUDING ANY CLAIM OF NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, OR OTHERWISE,
SHALL AQUA -AEROBIC SYSTEMS, INC. BE LIABLE FORANY INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES,
COSTS OF CONNECTING, DISCONNECTING, OR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE RESULTING FROM A DEFECT IN THE
GOODS. LIMIT OF LIABILITY: AQUA -AEROBIC SYSTEMS, INC.'S TOTAL LIABILITY UNDER THE ABOVE
WARRANTY IS LIMITED TO THE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF ANY DEFECTIVE PART. THE REMEDIES SET
FORTH HEREIN ARE EXCLUSIVE, AND OUR LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO ANY CONTRACT OR SALE, OR
ANYTHING DONE IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, IN TORT, UNDER ANY
WARRANTY, OR OTHERWISE, SHALL NOT, IN ANY CASE, EXCEED THE PRICE OF THE GOODS UPON WHICH
SUCH LIABILITY IS BASED.
Final acceptance of this proposal must be given to Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. at their office in Loves Park, Illinois. Please
acknowledge acceptance by signing the proposal and returning it to Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc.
Accepted by:
By: Date:
Offer Respectfully Submitted,
Michaela Villarreal. Rotatina Products Sales Assistant
Aciva-Aerobic Svstems. Inc.
6306 N. Alpine Rd. Loves Park, IL 61 1 11-7655 p 815.654.2501 f 815.654.2508 www.aqua-aerobic.com
Copyright 2018, Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc Printed: November 8, 2018 Page 5 of 5

3. Fine Bubble Aeration System
.:1 Dewberry°
Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis I APP M

Lawrence, Jordan
From: Jim Cooper <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2018 12:15 PM
To: Poulios, Michael; Lawrence, Jordan
Subject: Franklinton, NC - Dewberry Biopharma project - SSI Aeration Biological treatment basin
(Q-102518 [A])
Attachments: Dewberry Biopharma project- (Heyward Incorporated )_Q-102518 [A].docx
This message originated from outside your organization
Michael and Jordan:
Attached is the revised layout and relevant information on Fine bubble Aeration System for
Dewberry Biopharma project based on the lower air flow rate given yesterday (10,000 scfm per
basin). This is for the biological basin as we have sent earlier the coarse bubble diffused air
recommendation for the EQ, digester and reaeration tanks.
The costing and layout is based on each of the three (3) tanks being 107' diameter X 20' tall.
TOTAL LUMP SUM Budgetary Price: FOB jobsite including site service is $ 895,000.00.
The service is 3T/6D. Don't know if that is enough for installation and training and commissioning. Just
depends on the schedule and your requirements.
SSI Aeration kept the same number of diffusers in this revised proposal even with the reduced total air
requirement. In the prior or original proposal SSI Aeration used maximum air capacity of diffusers r,
now its came down to comfortable range for the diffuser.
If you have any questions and / or need clarification we would be glad to assist further.
Sincerely,
Jim Cooper
Heyward Incorporated
704-583-2305 - office
704-591-1270 - cell
[e-mail]

i�
I
:11 [•
551 Budget Proposal
eration Pe. rform;a6rhwcM,.,,
roe h +Innovation
Fine Bubble Diffusers
alscType
-. Reliability 9wIt: In
Advanced
Membrane Materials
PTFE
V— Complete Aeration Systems
*" C6eslgned fbrYcu
�,#,L Fins BubbleI}iffusers
Tube Type
Telemetryystems
Deal Time Camera Mon Itoring
Retrievable Systems
Easyto Maintain
r OEM Rgoacement
Mernbranes
RetrofltExisting Systems

jTo:Dewberry Revision -A
Attention: Jordan Lawrence, EI Date: 251"October, 2018 1
m: SSI Aeration, Inc.
Dewberry Biopharma Project(Heyward Incorporated)
PROPOSAL AERATION EQUIPMENT
Revision 'A': Updated with latest airflows provided in email dated on 8th November, 2018
Sir,
In response to your email and based on the information, SSI as an ISO-9001 certified corporation is
pleased to submit this proposal quotation for the design, manufacture & supply of Aeration Equipment
Including all pre-engineered and pre -fabricated 304SS Drop pipe + piping within the tank, all diffusers
and accessories required to connect diffusers to pipe, as well 304SS support stands, pipe joints and
continuous purge for each grid. (Standard limit of supply from t6" above water level and Isolation
valves are not included in SSI Scope of supply).
A. Design Information:
Parameter
PerBioreactor Tank
Airflow (SCFM)
10,000
Airflow/Diffuser(SCFM)
2.24
Diffusers (Pcs)
4,464
B. SCOPE OF SUPPLY:
Fine Bubble Diffuser Equipment with AFD270-EFine bubble diffusers with EPDM membranes for Three
(3) Bioreactor Tanks.
Each Bioreactor Tank is 107'(Dia) x 20' (SWD) consists of Four (4) grids andSupplied with Aeration
Equipment as follow:
C
012" 304SS SCH.10
04" PVC SDR.32.5 Headers
-E Fine
R
Droppipe + Cooling
012" PVC SCH.40 Manifold
c/w factory drilled holes for field
bububblebble diffusers
I
Pipe ±70'
mounting of Saddles & diffusers
D
SS
304SS
SS
304SS
304SS
PVC
Coupling
Supports
Length
Coupling
Supports
Length
Supports
Couplings
Active
Blank
# 1
4
11
20'
1
3
1,400'
255
85
1,116
256
#2
4
11
25'
2
5
1,350'
260
88
1,116
238
#3
4
11
20'
1
3
1,400'
255
85
1,116
256
#4
4
11
25'
2
5
1,350'
260
88
1,116
238
Number of AFD270-E Diffusers per Bioreactor tank
4,464
988
Pag. 2SSI Aeration Proposal prepared RFQ101618 (Heyward Incorporated) on 25t' October, 2018

F. TOTAL LUMP SUM PRICE (for all listed above)..............................................................$
(To be pro vided by Jim Cooper of Heyward Incorporated our local rep Email: jcooper@heyward. net)
COMMERCIAL BASIS OF OFFER
1. Delivery Program:
• Approval Submittals and 0 & M Manuals; 1-2 weeks after receipt of P.0 and all information
necessary to prepare submittals.
• Ready to ship: after receipt of approved submittals
6-8 weeksfor Bioreactor#1
10-12 weeksfor Bioreactor#2
14-16 weeksfor Bioreactor#3
2. Payment Terms:
• For Municipal/Govt projects 95% net 30 days after shipment and balance 5% at the time
of startup or 75 days after shipment whichever comes earlier.
• For private and overseas jobs: 30% with PO , 30% with approve submittal and balance
40% net 30 days afer shipment (subject to credit approval)
3. Quotation Validity:Valid from date of proposal for a period of 45days.
4. Exclusions:
• All local taxes import custom duties, brokerage etc.
• Freight cost CIF jobsite unless otherwise noted
• Offloading upon delivery to site
• Site services for installation inspection and start up assistance.
• Field assembly if any, installation, site work and relevant field tests.
• Any localized bank charges and L/C charges are to be paid by the customer or by agreement.
• Field tests
• Factory Oxygen transfer efficiency (OTE) test
• Blowers, Isolation valves and air main piping
• Any items and services not itemized within the above scope of supply.
5. SSI Quality Assurance: SSI is an IS09001 certified company.
6. Warranty:
Products manufactured by Seller are warranted to be free from defects in materials or workmanship for
18 months from date of shipment or 12 months from the date of start-up, whichever comes first.
SSI's responsibility is limited to the cost of the defective parts, and specifically excludes damages
because of maintenance activities, excessive airflow, foreign debris in the airstream, or excessive
exposure to heat or other elements. Fouling because of bio film or chemical precipitation or solvent
exposure do not constitute defects. Unless fieldwork has been contracted to SSI, labour is excluded
from warranty coverage.
We thank you for the inquiry with the opportunity to quote on the Aeration equipment of this project
and look forward to work with you in the very near future.
Pag. 4SSI Aeration Proposal prepared RFQ101618 (Heyward Incorporated) on 25' October, 2018

We would be pleased to assist you further if you have any questions or need clarification on this
proposal.
Yours truly,
SSI Aeration., INC
Kiran Banala, (Ext .308)
Manager — Engineering
[e-mail]
Cc: Jim Cooper of Heyward Incorporated our local rep Email: [e-mail], Phone: [phone]
Pag. 5SSI Aeration Proposal prepared RFQ101618 (Heyward Incorporated) on 25' October, 2018

• •
SSI Aeration
SMART IDEAS FOR WATER
What Makes the
SSI 9" Disc Diffuser Systems
a Worldwide Choice?
The SSI g" Disc Diffuser System combines engineering excellence, superior component
quality, and a technically advanced product design. Proven highly durable and efficient
in thousands of municipal and industrial installations around the world, this advanced
system has reliability built into every stage of performance.
Grommet Connection
1055" [268mm]
POD Connection
10.55'[3fiBmmi
So'e+�- MemMane
Retainer nut
Bullet Wedge -Ofx Base
--> Disc Diffuser
10.55"(269mm1 Mem6ranR
r � r
\stainer Nut
314" N n Disc B ass
Pag. 6SSI Aeration Proposal prepared RFQ101618 (Heyward Incorporated) on 25t' October, 2018

Unique System Strengths
Complete product line -creating the system that fits your needs
SSI manufactures disc diffusers and coarse bubbled iffusers, and we mount these
products on a wide range of piping materials including PVC, CPVC, PP and Stainless Steel. We have
the ability to attach diffusers to pipe using saddles, grommets, or pre -assembled PODS. We can
provide retrievable systems or fixed grids, and systems in kit form or mostly factory assembled. We
try to understand and anticipate your needs, and fit our recommendations to your situation.
Piping system integrity- thicker wall pipe and double anchors for fewer breakages
Our piping is 38%thicker and has double rod support stands as standard -two anchors for each
support location means twice the resistance to hydraulic and thermal loads. Most often supports
fail due totem perature and water velocity. SSI locates two anchors where support is needed
most, helpingto increase product longevity.
Comprehensive design service and after sales support
SSI provides full design services, including biological and mixing calculations, process simu-
lations and hydraulic studies. We maintain a full drafting departmentwith 3D and animation
capabilities and we can assist with specifications and CAD drawings. Ourservice and installation
crew can hold your hand during the early stages of the project and ourworldwide multilingual
staff is dedicated to your complete satisfaction.
nteNgent Upgrade Options
Patented PTFE membranes prolong efficiency and reduce whole -life costs
SSI's patented PTFE membrane barrier properties not only reduce plasticizer extraction, shrinking,
and membrane hardening but also limit dynamic changes that can result from swell, such as
creep. Compared with uncoated products that are more susceptible to increases in DWP due to
more aggressive fouling and changes in physical properties and weight, the PTFE coated mem-
brane improves consistency of DWP (Headloss) values overthe product life. This directly impacts
long-term powercosts and the ability of the system to distribute air uniformly across the tank floor.
SSI Telemetry -the inside story solves maintenance problems
At the click of a mouse, you will know the DWP of yourd iffuser membranes, airflow rate to those
monitored diffusers, and airtemperature in the submerged piping system. You cansensevibra-
tion, pipe roll over, and water in the grid.Automatic moisture purging and automatic acid dosing
systems are available. Through multiple cameras, you can see both inside the grids, and surface
bubble patterns. Wet probes are also available for DO and WW temperature. Tracking all this data
on a user-friendly online dashboard facilitates communication between consultant and client,
manufacturer and rep. This smart technology lets you locate problem areas and allocate resources
more efficiently. SSI Telemetry is your preventive maintenance hub in the heart of the plant.
Airflowsm3/hr
0 1.5 3.5 5.0 7.0 8.5 10.0
3 + 9.5 N
O 2s 8.0
2 6.5
2 1.5 5.0 N
Q
a 1 3.0 0
LU 0.5 1.5 w
0 00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 O
N
Airflow - SUM
SSI Aeration Stamford Scientific International, Inc.
Grommet Connection
Simple to install on site, compact
to ship and move. Affordably
priced and time tested over 15
years worldwide.
Airflow sm3/hr
0 1.5 3.5 5.0 7.0 8.5 10.0 12.0 14.5
l7 30 750
(D
N 25 625
N
20 500
15 375
V)
O 10 250
00
am)nz 5 125 N
=
2
0 im 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Airflow - SCFM
www.stamfordscientific.com
Pag. 7SSI Aeration Proposal prepared RFQ101618 (Heyward Incorporated) on 25' October, 2018

T E C H N I C A L D A T A S H E E T
I IL 1:� &`1 1
Quick Connect
NPT Saddles
mount on nominal
US 4" or metric
114.3mm OD pipe.
They allow retrofit of 12"
to 9" discs without changing the
piping system. Quick Connect NPT Saddles
are made of polypropylene, and install into a
5/8" (16mm) hole.
GROMMETS
Grommets are
available for round AV
plastic or square
stainless steel pipes in
US or Metric dimensions. Installation is
simple. Multiple sizes are available based on
pipe wall thickness. Grommets install into
a 1-1/4" (32mm) chamfered hole.
CHECK VALVES
SSI fine and coarse bubble
diffusers are available
with optional check valves.
These are not required for
proper operation since most
diffusers are self -checking,
but they may give peace of mind to
the designer or operator.
dm� �J
Tube Dif wr check valves
•
M •
SSI Aeration
SMART IDEAS FOR WATER
1
EXPANSION
JOINT OPTIONS
,j
Expansion Joints are available in three types:
y
Flexible PVC with SS Shell, RikBoltedS,
i '
and Anti -rotation, TelescopinPVC.
The flexible expansion
joints are recommended for
disc installations and the
Rigid
positive locking type for
BodtedS4
tube diffuser projects.Flexibl
Slotted band joints with stainless steel shear PVCwo shell
rings are suitable for disc -type fine bubble and cap -type coarse bubble
lateral plastic piping systems, in conjunction with SSI's fixed and guide
support stand system to manage thermal expansion and contraction.
Positive locking bolted stain-
less steel couplings are
suitable for drop
pipes, stainless
joints, and for all
tube diffuser piping
systems to restrict
header pipe rotation.
And -rotation,
Telescoping PVC
Coarse Band (M
Disc showing check valve installation
SSI's Sliding
p Expansion Joint
is an anti -
rotational
telescopic
union which
absorbs pipe
expansion and
contraction to
up to 15' (38mm).
4 TUCKER DRIVE
POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK 12603 USA
SSI AERATION, INC. [phone] TEL www.ssiaeration.com
+ 1 -845-454-8094 FAX EMAIL: [e-mail]
Pag. 8SSI Aeration Proposal prepared RFQ101618 (Heyward Incorporated) on 25" October, 2018

T E C H N I C A L D A I '%. S H E E T
MOISTURE
SYSTEM
An airlift type purge system is used
in all SSl fine bubble aeration
systems to remove condensate
from the piping system. Purging
entrained water helps tip
ensure even air distribution I
to all diffusers in a grid. f
A ball valve is supplied with the
system and is opened manually.
Continuous urge s stems are available for retrievable -
type aeration systems, or w ere it is not possible to fasten
a purge line to a tank wall.
SUPPORTNU
STANDS
Support Stands N—I
are available in 3045S,
316SS or in ABS
plastic. SSI's standard is
304SS with drop -in
anchor bolts. In our
aeration piping systems,
support stands fulfill the dual role
of anchoring pipes to the floor and
controlling thermal expansion and
contraction. Special support stands
for uneven tank floors, for installing
into concrete ballast forms, and for
tanks with significant channel
velocity (with lateral supports) are
also available. ABS support stands
are Primarily
used with disc
diffusers and
plastic pipe,
where a low
capital cost is the
primary objective. ABSp1a5k-PP0rt1Wnd
• a
aa•••• •• •
SSI Aeration
SMART IDEAS FOR WATER
ACID DOSING
SYSTEM
In -situ Acid Dosing Systems are
available to control calcareous deposits
in the perforations which will reduce
membrane backpiessure.
PRESSURE
MONITORING
SYSTEM
Throughout the life of an
aeration system, oxygen transfe
efficiency may decline
somewhat when diffusers
become fouled, but headloss
can increase dramatically whicl
in turn increases energy costs.
A pressure monitoring system
the operator to better determine the optimal cleaning
frequency of the membranes- The fouling rate can vary
by aeration zone, hence it is recommended to install at
least one system in each zone.
TELEAMETRY S i STEAM
Adding a Telemetry System to
your aeration system will allow
you to remotely monitor factors
inside your tank from any PC,
tablet or mobile device.
Telemetry can be installed in new
systems or retrofitted through an
end cap into existing systems.
Telemetry sensors are available to
monitor variables in your system
such as temperature, vibration,
humidity, water detection, DO,
and other environmental factors.
4 TUCKER DRIVE
POUGHKEEPSIE, NEw YORK 12603 USA
S51 AERATION, INC. [phone] TEL www.3siceration.com
+ 1 -845-454-8094 FAX EMAIL: [e-mail]
Pag. 9SSI Aeration Proposal prepared RFQ101618 (Heyward Incorporated) on 25' October, 2018

4. Pumps
a) WAS Pumps
b) RAS Pumps
c) Primary Clarifier Pumps
d) DAF Lagoon Pumps
e) Effluent Pumps
.:1 Dewberry°
Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis I APP M

P: 336.665.0250
Tom' CA1 VA F: 336.665.0303
1115 Pleasant Ridge Rd.
MACHINERY COMPANY Greensboro, NC 27409
SERVING INDUSTRY SINCE 1978
Project Name: WAS Pumps
Date: 11/12/2018
Quote Number: NWE102818
Invitation to Bid No.:
Quoter: Nathan Edens
Package Name: WAS
a -Mail: nedens6a�tencarva.com
CONDITIONS OF SERVICE
Pumpage: WAS
Temperature ff): 68
Flow (gpm): 111
NPSHa (ft): not specified
TDH (ft): 36
Solids: not specified
S.G.: 1
Viscosity (SSU): not specified
Type: Self Priming End Suction Centrifugal
Pump Speed (RPM): 1750
Make: Gorman -Rupp
Motor Speed (RPM): 1800
Model: T2
Motor Power (HP): 3
Letter Code: T2A60S-B/F
Motor Voltage: 460
Size: 2"
Motor Phase: 3
Construction: Cast Iron with Ductile Iron Impeller
Motor Frequency (Hz): 60
Connections: Flanged
Motor Frame Size: 182T
Mounting: Vertically Driven V-Belt
Motor Enclosure: S.D. M&C PE
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
To view a PDF of the equipment including drawings and curves, please double click the icon:
PRICING AND AVAILABILITY
Unit Cost: $11,792 Shipping: Best way-PPA. Unless otherwise specified.
Quantity: 2 Freight on Board: Shipping Point
Total Price: $23,584 Payment Terms: Net 30
Lead Time: 5-6 weeks Note: Price does not include tax or freight.
Quotation is valid for 30 days.
Comments: Package includes pump, motor, base/guard, belts/sheaves, casing heater, air release
valve, gauge kit, and 316SS check valve.
Pumps can be fitted with Austempered Ductile Iron Impellers for a $1,487 adder

P: 336.665.0250
Tom' CA1 VA F: 336.665.0303
1115 Pleasant Ridge Rd.
MACHINERY COMPANY Greensboro, NC 27409
SERVING INDUSTRY SINCE 1978
Project Name: RAS Pumps Date: 11/12/2018
Quote Number: NWE102318
Invitation to Bid No.: Quoter: Nathan Edens
Package Name: RAS Sump Pumps a -Mail: nedens6a�tencarva.com
CONDITIONS OF SERVICE
Pumpage: RAS Temperature ff): 68
Flow (gpm): 2084 NPSHa (ft): not specified
TDH (ft): 31 Solids: not specified
S.G.: 1 Viscosity (SSU): not specified
Type: Self Priming End Suction Centrifugal
Pump Speed (RPM): 850
Make: Gorman -Rupp
Motor Speed (RPM): 1800
Model: T10
Motor Power (HP): 25
Letter Code: T10A60S-B/FM
Motor Voltage: 460
Size: 10
Motor Phase: 3
Construction: Cast Iron w/ Ductile Iron Impeller
Motor Frequency (Hz): 60
Connections: Flanged
Motor Frame Size: 284T
Mounting: Vertically Driven V-Belt
Motor Enclosure: S.D. M&C PE
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
To view a PDF of the equipment including drawings and curves, please double click the icon:
PRICING AND AVAILABILITY
Unit Cost: $31,591 Shipping: Best way-PPA. Unless otherwise specified.
Quantity: 3 Freight on Board: Shipping Point
Total Price: $94,773 Payment Terms: Net 30
Lead Time: 5-6 weeks Note: Price does not include tax or freight.
Lead time is subject to change based on
shop work load.
Quotation is valid for 30 days.
Comments: Package includes pump, motor, base/guard, belts/sheaves, casing heater, air release
valve, gauge kit, and 316SS check valve.
Pumps can be fitted with Austempered Ductile Iron Impellers for a $3,679 adder

P: 336.665.0250
Tom' CA1 VA F: 336.665.0303
1115 Pleasant Ridge Rd.
MACHINERY COMPANY Greensboro, NC 27409
SERVING INDUSTRY SINCE 1978
Project Name: Primary Clarifier Pumps
Date: 11/12/2018
Quote Number: NWE102318
Invitation to Bid No.:
Quoter: Nathan Edens
Package Name: Primary Clarifier Pumps
a -Mail: nedens6a�tencarva.com
CONDITIONS OF SERVICE
Pumpage: Primary Clarifier Influent
Temperature ff): 68
Flow (gpm): 1210
NPSHa (ft): not specified
TDH (ft): 30
Solids: not specified
S.G.: 1
Viscosity (SSU): not specified
Type: Self Priming End Suction Centrifugal
Pump Speed (RPM): 850
Make: Gorman -Rupp
Motor Speed (RPM): 1800
Model: T8
Motor Power (HP): 20
Letter Code: T8A60S-B /F
Motor Voltage: 460
Size: 8"
Motor Phase: 3
Construction: Cast Iron w/ Ductile Iron Impeller
Motor Frequency (Hz): 60
Connections: Flanged
Motor Frame Size: 256T
Mounting: Vertically Driven V-Belt
Motor Enclosure: S.D. M&C PE
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
To view a PDF of the equipment including drawings and curves, please double click the icon:
0
PRICING AND AVAILABILITY
Unit Cost: $23,644 Shipping: Best way-PPA. Unless otherwise specified.
Quantity: 2 Freight on Board: Shipping Point
Total Price: $47,288 Payment Terms: Net 30
Lead Time: 5-6 weeks Note: Price does not include tax or freight.
Lead time is subject to change based on
shop work load.
Quotation is valid for 30 days.
Comments: Package includes pump, motor, base/guard, belts/sheaves, casing heater, air release
valve, gauge kit, and discharge check valve.
Pumps can be fitted with Austempered Ductile Iron Impellers for a $1,918 adder

P: 336.665.0250
Tom' CA1 VA F: 336.665.0303
1115 Pleasant Ridge Rd.
MACHINERY COMPANY Greensboro, NC 27409
SERVING INDUSTRY SINCE 1978
Project Name: Effluent Pumps
Date: 11/12/2018
Quote Number: NWE102318
Invitation to Bid No.:
Quoter: Nathan Edens
Package Name: Effluent Pumps
a -Mail: nedens6a�tencarva.com
CONDITIONS OF SERVICE
Pumpage: Effluent
Temperature (°F): 68
Flow (gpm): 1400
NPSHa (ft): not specified
TDH (ft): 66
Solids: not specified
S.G.: 1
Viscosity (SSU): not specified
Type: Self Priming End Suction Centrifugal
Pump Speed (RPM): 1200
Make: Gorman -Rupp
Motor Speed (RPM): 1800
Model: T8
Motor Power (HP): 50
Letter Code: T8A60S-B /F
Motor Voltage: 460
Size: 8"
Motor Phase: 3
Construction: Cast Iron w/ Ductile Iron Impeller
Motor Frequency (Hz): 60
Connections: Flanged
Motor Frame Size: 326T
Mounting: Vertically Driven V-Belt
Motor Enclosure: S.D. M&C PE
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
To view a PDF of the equipment including drawings and curves, please double click the icon:
0
PRICING AND AVAILABILITY
Unit Cost: $25,081 Shipping: Best way-PPA. Unless otherwise specified.
Quantity: 2 Freight on Board: Shipping Point
Total Price: $50,162 Payment Terms: Net 30
Lead Time: 5-6 weeks Note: Price does not include tax or freight.
Lead time is subject to change based on
shop work load.
Quotation is valid for 30 days.
Comments: Package includes pump, motor, base/guard, belts/sheaves, casing heater, air release
valve, gauge kit, and discharge check valve.
Pumps can be fitted with Austempered Ductile Iron Impellers for a $1,918 adder

xylem
Let's Solve Water QUOTATION
Quote Number: 9001-181023-057
Date: October 26, 2018
Terms: ExWorks Factory
Job: DEWBERRY-102618-WKNE
DAF Lagoon Pump
We are pleased to quote you for the following equipment, subject to Xylem approval and acceptance of Xylem terms and conditions of sale. Quantities
are not guaranteed and should be verified, with any prices adjusted, prior to placing an order.
Due to recent volatile pricing from our suppliers, Xylem reserves the right to change the price at any point up to submittal approval and release to
fabrication. Every attempt will be made to honor pricing for 30 days from date of quote.
Item # Qty Description Net Price USD
1
1
VIT - Short Set Lineshaft Turbine Pumps
14,839
Wet pit/Open Sump Lineshaft Turbine: Open Lineshaft, VIT-DITM 10LHC, 1 Stage
1.1
1
Bowl Assembly
10LHC, 1 Stage(s), Manufacturer's Standard
1.2
1
Column Assembly
8" x 1.1875" Threaded W/L Column
1.3
1
Head Assembly
8" x 16.50" DI W/L Head, 150 # Flange
1.4
1
Motor
US, VHS 15.00 Hp 0 RPM H015B2A1 GD-WVRU-OOOAOB000, Steady Bushing: Yes, Motor
Coupling: NRR
Total Item Net Price USD 14,839
Additional Freight (not included in item Net Price) USD
Total Quotation Net Price USD 14,839

SUBMITTAL
GOULDS
Quote ID: 9001-181023-057:0:1 QTY: 1
WATER TECHNOLOGY
VIT-DITM 10LHC, 1 Stage
a xylem brand
PERFORMANCE ON DESIGN CURVE AT 1760 R
-
Shut Off
Design [2]
Run Out [5]
Flow (USGPM)
0.0
1400.0 11
0.0
Best Efficiency
80.50 % at 1458.0 USgpm
TDH-Bowl (ft)
49.2
28.0
0.0
Design Flow % BEP
96.02 %
TDH-Disch Flange (ft)
43.4
20.3
- '
Pump Efficiency
74.31 %
Bowl Efficiency (%)
-
80.20
-
Overall Efficiency
69.10 %
Power (Hp)
-
12.3
-
I%ax Power (NOL)
14.0 Hp at 159.0 USgpm
NPSHr (ft) [1]
15.9
-
Max Power (NOL) at Max Trim
15.1 Hp at 200.0 USgpm
NPSH Margin (ft) [1]
-
30.7
-
Specified NPSH Ratio
1.1
Hydraulic Thrust(lb)
688.8
392.0
0.0
Thrust Load Power Loss
0.06285 Hp
Thrust (lb)
806.6
499.4
0.0
Total Flow Derate Factor
1.00
Pressure -Bowl (psi)
21.3
12.1
-
Total Head Derate Factor
1.00
Pressure-Disch Flange (psi)
18.8
8.8
Total Efficiency Derate Factor
1.00
Min Submergence (Inch) [3]
-
43.68
Actual Submergence
177.00 in
Friction Loss (ft) [4]
-
1.94
-
Shaft Friction Power Loss
0.00 Hp
Lineshaft Elongation (Inch)
0.00448
0.00255
-
Min Flow (MCSF)
364.0 USgpm
Column Elongation (Inch)
0.00000
0.00000
kWh per 1000 gal
0.12723
Lateral (Inch)
0.13448
0.13255
-
Impeller Running Clearance
0.13 in
[1] at 1st impeller eye [2] rated values
[3] from bottom of pump
[4] from bowl to disch flange [5] based on user entered TDH
OPERATING CONDITIONS
Specified Flow
1400.00 USgpm
Specified TDH
28.00 ft
Rated Speed
1760 RPM
Atmospheric Pressure
15 psi
TPL
19.75 ft
Pumping Level
5.00 ft
NPSHa at 1st Impeller
46.6 ft
NPSHa at Grade
33.9 ft
MATERIALS & DIMENSIONS
Bowl Data
Bowl Material
Bowl Material Derate Factor
Impeller Material
Additional Stage Impeller
Material
Impeller Matl Derate Factor
Bowl Shaft Material
Impeller Attachment
Taper Lock Material
Discharge Bowl Material
Suction Type
Suction Material
Bowl Bolting Material
Sand Collar
Pipe Plug
Suction Bearing
Discharge Bowl Bearing
Intermediate Bowl Bearing
Strainer Type
Strainer Material
Cast Iron with Glass Enamel
1.00
Bronze
Aluminum Bronze
1.00
416SS
Taper Lock
416SS
Cast Iron
Bell
Cast Iron
Carbon Steel
304SS
Iron
Bronze
Bronze
Bronze
Clip -On Bell Type Strainer
Galvanized Steel
FLUID CHARACTERISTICS
Fluid
Water
Service
DAF Influent
Pumps
Fluid Temperature
68.0 °F
Specific Gravity
1.0000
Viscosity
1.0017 cP
Vapor Pressure
0.3393 psi
Density
621bs/ft'
Bowl Data
Tube Adapter Bearing
Not Included
Material
Impeller Trim
5.69 in
Max Impeller Trim
5.88 in
Thrust K-Factor
14.0 Lb/Ft
Bowl Pressure Limit
300 psi
Available Lateral
0.50 in
Bowl Assembly Length (BL)
27.88 in
Disch Bowl Length OLS (01)
4.00 in
Disch Bowl Length ELS (1-2)
7.63 in
Bowl Shaft Diameter
1 11/16" [42.9 mm]
Impeller Balance
Manufacturer's Standard
Impeller Design
Enclosed
Bowl Wear Ring
Not Included
Impeller Wear Ring
Not Included
Suction Pipe Diameter
No Suction Pipe
Bowl Diameter (D)
10.63 in
Bowl Length (1-3)
8.75 in
Bowl Flange Diameter (A)
6.25 in
Bowl Flange Thickness (E)
6.75 in
Strainer Length (SL)
2.75 in
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS CERTIFIED
Certified By
Project DEWBERRY-102318-WKNE
Tag
PO Number
Serial Number

GOULDS
WATER TECHNOLOGY
a xylem brand
Floor Clearance (X)
6.50 in
Min Column Diameter
8 in
Max Column Diameter
10 in
Max Bowl Shaft Diameter
1.69 in
Bowl
Column Data
coiumn type
Column Diameter
Lineshaft Diameter
Column Pipe Material
Lineshaft Material
Lineshaft Bearing Material
Lineshaft Coupling Type
Lineshaft Coupling Material
Column Loss
Column Shaft Sleeve
Column Bearing Retainer
Column Bearing Options
Column Retainer Design
Column Specials
Head Data
Head Type
Discharge Flange Rating
Disch Flange Pressure Limit
Head Design
Discharge Head Material
Headshaft Material
Headshaft Coupling Type
Headshaft Coupling Material
Headshaft Diameter (BX)
Discharge Head Size
Discharge Head BD
Sealing Method
Stuffing Box Material
Tension Plate
Seal Provided By
Head Specials
Motor Data
Driver Type
Motor Manufacturer
Selected Motor Power
Voltage
Phase / Frequency
Enclosure
Motor Efficiency
Motor Frame
Motor Diameter (BD)
Motor Diameter (BX)
Thrust Level
Thrust Capacity
Inverter Duty
Threaded
8" [203mm]
1 3/16 in [30.2 mm]
Carbon Steel
416SS
Rubber (dog bone)
Threaded
416SS
1.03 ft
Not Included
304SS
Not Included
Separate
Type DI (Ductile Iron Head)
150 #
250 psi
One Piece Head
Ductile Iron
416SS
Threaded
416SS
1.19 in
8" [203mm]
16.5" [419mm]
Packing
Cast iron
Not Included
Customer
Vertical Hollow Shaft Motor
US
15.00 Hp
230/460
3PH/60Hz
WPI
93.00 %
254TPA
16.50 in
1.19 in
100 %
3300 I bs
Yes
SUBMITTAL
Quote ID: 9001-181023-057:0:1 QTY: 1
VIT-DITM 1OLHC, 1 Stage
Bowl Shaft Length 30.75 in
Bowl Shaft Power Limit 384.41 Hp
Column Data
Maximum Bearing Spacing
Max Column Section Length
Number of Bearings
Column Length (COL)
Column Wall Thickness
Column Load
Lubrication Method
Lineshaft Length
Head Sleeve
Lineshaft Power Limit
Head Data
Seal Mounted By
Stuffing Box / Seal Hsg Bolt
Stuffing Box / Seal Hsg Brg
Steel Sub Base
Head Loss
150# Disch Companion Fig
300 # Suct Convenience Fig
Column Hanger Flange
Head Sleeve
Head Bolting
Split Gland
Motor Stand
Air Vacuum Valves
Motor Data
Steady Bushing
Motor Coupling
Insulation Class
Service Factor
Motor Provided By
Motor Mounted By
Mfg Catalog Number
Motor Part Number
Driver Size Criteria
10 ft (3 m) Spacing
120 in
2
209.12 in
0.32 in
75.9 Ib
Water (Open Lineshaft)
209.12 in
Not Included
127 Hp
Customer
316SS
Bronze
Carbon Steel
0.91 ft
Not Included
No suction flange
Not Included
Not Included
Carbon steel
316SS
Not included
Not Included
Yes
NRR
F
1.15
Xylem
Customer
H015V2BLE-C
H015B2A1 GD-WVRU-
000AOB000
Max power on design curve
(NOL)
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS CERTIFIED
Certified By
Project DEWBERRY-102318-WKNE
Tag
PO Number
Serial Number

GOULDS
WATER TECHNOLOGY
a xylem brand
Coating Data
Goulds Water Technology
Bowl OD
Standard Blue Enamel
Column ID
Not Included
Goulds Water Technology
Column OD
Standard Blue Enamel
Column Bearing Retainer
Not Included
Can ID
Not Included
Testing Data
Miscellaneous Specials
Weight Data
Total Bowl Weight
208 Ibs
Unit Bowl Weight
195 Ibs
Strainer Weight
13 Ibs
Total Column Weight
594 Ibs
Unit Column Weight
33 Ibs
INFO, WARNING & ERROR MESSAGES
Invalid ilis invalid
SUBMITTAL
Quote ID: 9001-181023-057:0:1 QTY: 1
VIT-DITM 101-1-IC, 1 Stage
Coating Data
Head ID
Not Included
Head OD
Goulds Water Technology
Standard Blue Enamel
Enclosing Tube OD
Not Included
Steel Sub Base
Not Included
Weight Data
Head Weight 260 Ibs
Motor Weight 265 Ibs
Total Weight 1327 Ibs
Total Rotating Weight 94 Ibs
Our offer does not include specific review and incorporation of any Statutory or Regulatory Requirements and the offer is limited to the requirements of the
design specifications. Should any Statutory or Regulatory requirements need to be reviewed and incorporated then the Customer is responsible to identify those
and provide copies for review and revision of our offer.
Our quotation is offered in accordance with our comments and exceptions identified in our proposal and governed by our standard terms and conditions of sale —
Xylem Americas attached hereafter.
For units requiring performance test, all performance tests will be conducted per ANSIIHI 14.6 standards unless otherwise noted in the selection software
submittal documents. Test results meeting with grade 213 tolerances for pumps with a rated shaft power of 134HP or less and grade 1 B for greater than 134HP will
be considered passing.
Customer is responsible for verifying that the recommendations made and the materials selected are satisfactory for the Customer's intended environment and
Customer's use of the selected pump. Customer is responsible for determining the suitability of Xylem recommendations for all operating conditions within
Customer's and/or End User's control. Xylem disclaims all warranties, express or implied warranties, including, but not limited to, warranties of merchantability
and fitness for a particular purpose and all express warranties other than the limited express warranty set forth in the attached standard terms and conditions of
sale — Xylem Americas attached hereafter.
Xylem does not guarantee any pump intake configuration. The hydraulic and structural adequacies of these structures are the sole responsibility of the Customer
or his representatives. Further, Xylem accepts no liability arising out of unsatisfactory pump intake field operating conditions. The Customer or his
representatives are referred to the Hydraulic Institute Standards for recommendations on pump intake design. To optimize the hydraulic design of a field pump
intake configuration, the Customer should strongly consider performing a detailed scale model pump intake study. However, the adequacies of these
recommendations are the sole responsibility of the Customer.
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS CERTIFIED
Certified By
Project DEWBERRY-102318-WKNE
Tag
PO Number
Serial Number

GOULDS
u TECHNOLOGY
a xylem brand
DIA FOUR PLCS
SP ON "H" BC
DISC HEAD
F-e..A sL
"r• DIA
FOUR PLCS
FF X 7 Irv
mz .
SOUL PLATE
OUTLINE DRAWING
Quote ID: 9001-181023-057:0:1 QTY: 1
VIT-DITM 10LHC, 1 Stage
DIMENSIONS
PUMP DATA
G [Mounting Flange Dia]
21.00 in
Column Diameter 8" [203mm]
Flange Hole
0.75 in
Lineshaft Diameter 1m/] 6 in [30.2
Dia]ounting
K [Mounting Hole Places]
8
Specified Flow 1400.00 USgpm
H [Mounting Flange Bolt
18.75 in
Specified TDH 28.00 ft
Circle]
Pumping Level 5.00 ft
AG [Motor Height]
26.75 in
Motor Manufacturer US
CD [Motor Coupling
Height]
23.38 in
Driver Vertical Hollow
Type
Shaft Motor
XC [Top Hdshft to top VHS
3.25 in
Selected Motor Power 15.00 Hp
Motor]
Phase / Frequency 3 PH / 60 Hz
BD [Motor Base Dia]
16.50 in
Voltage 230/460
BD Head [Discharge Head
16.50 in
Base Dia]
HH [Head Height]
21.00 in
WEIGHTS
AD [Mounting Flange
0.88 in
Total Bowl Weight 208 Ibs
Thickness]
Unit Bowl Weight 195 Ibs
DID [Disch Flange Stickout]
11.00 in
Strainer Weight 13 Ibs
DH [Disch Flange Height]
9.00 in
Total Column Weight 594 Ibs
Column Length (COL)
209.12 in
Unit Column Weight 33 Ibs
COL [Column Diameter]
8.00 in
Head Weight 260 Ibs
TPL [Total Pump Length]
237.00 in
Motor Weight 265 Ibs
MIN SUB [Minimum
Submergence]
43.68 in
Total Weight 1327 Ibs
MAX [Max Assembly OD]
9.50 in
Total Rotating Weight 94 Ibs
BL [Bowl Assembly
27.88 in
Length]
V [Sub Base Thickness]
0.75 in
W [Sub Base Overall Size]
22.00 in
X [Center Line of Holes]
19.00 in
Y [Mounting Holes Base
0.88 in
NOTES
Plate Dia]
1 Total Pump Length ± 1.0 inch.
Z [Base Plate Opening or
15.25 in
2 Tolerance on all dimensions is .12 or± .12
Can ID]
inch per 5 ft, whichever is greater.
SL [Suction Length]
2.75 in
3 All dimensions shown are in inches unless
otherwise specified.
4 Drawing not to scale.
5 /" NPT - Gauge Conn (plugged)
6 Driver may be rotated at 900 intervals about
vertical centerline for details refer to driver
dimension drawing.
7 Refer to product IOM for impeller setting
requirements.
8 This assembly has been designed so that
its natural frequency responses avoid the
specific operating speeds by an adequate
safety margin. The design has assumed
the foundation to be rigid.
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS CERTIFIED
Certified By
Project DEWBERRY-102318-WKNE
Tag
PO Number

GOULDS
WATER TECHNOLOGY
a xylem brand
60
CROSS SECTION DRAWING
Quote ID: 9001-181023-057:0:1 QTY: 1
VIT-DITM 10LHC, 1 Stage
BILL OF MATERIALS
ITEM
PART NAME
CODE MATERIAL
ASTM#
Head Assembly
608
Headshaft
2227 SST 416
A582 S41600
600
Head -Discharge
1018 Ductile Iron 65-45-12
A536
602
Sub Base
3201 Carbon Steel Gr D
A36M
604
Nut —Adjusting
2242 Carbon Steel 1018
A108
605
Motor Stand
NA NA
NA
617
Bearing -Housing
1618 Bronze Bismuth
B584 Modified
618
Gland -Split
1203 SST 316
A744M
621
O-Ring
5302 Nitrile Buna N
D4322
622
Slinger
5121 Rubber Epdm
D3568
625
Tension Plate
N/A Not Included
N/A
637
Hanger Flange
N/A Not Included
N/A
648
Headshaft Sleeve
N/A N/A
N/A
608
Headshaft Coupling
2265 SST 416
A582M
730
Key -Motor Gib
2242 Carbon Steel 1018
A108
757
Screw -Gland Adj
2229 SST 316 AL
A276
760
Head Bolting
2298 Steel Bolting Gr 8
J429
Column Assembly
642 Column Pipe
6501
Black Pipe Sch 40
A 53
645 Column - Coupling
9645
Carbon Steel Fab
A53
646 Lineshaft
2227
SST 416
A582 S41600
649 Lineshaft-Coupling
2265
SST 416
A582M
652 Retainer -Bearing
1205
SST 304
A744M
656 Lineshaft Bearing
5121
Rubber Epdm
D3568
Bowl Assembly
660
Shaft - Bowl
2227
SST 416
A582 S41600
661
Discharge Bowl
1003
Cast Iron C130
A48 CLASS 30B
664
Bearing - Discharge Bowl
1618
Bronze Bismuth
B584 Modified
668
Bearing Tube Adapt
N/A
Not Included
N/A
670
Bowl - Intermediate
6911
Cast Iron CI30 Enamel
A48
672
Bearing - Intermediate Bowl
1618
Bronze Bismuth
B584 Modified
673
Impeller
1398
Silicon Bronze C87610
B584
673
Impeller
1126
Bronze, Ni Al C95800
B148
677
Taper Lock -Impeller
2217
SST 416
A582M
680
Wear Ring -Bowl
N/A
Not Included
N/A
681
Wear Ring - Impeller
NA
Not Included
NA
688
Suction
1003
Cast Iron C130
A48 CLASS 30B
690
Bearing - Suction
1109
Bronze C90300 "G" Mod
B584
692
Sandcollar
1205
SST 304
A744M
698
Strainer
6952
Carbon Steel Galy
A123M
747
Pipe Plug
1046
Malleable Iron
A197
760
Capscrew-Hex
2298
Steel Boltinq Gr 8
J429
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS CERTIFIED
Certified By
Project DEWBERRY-102318-WKNE
Tag
PO Number
Serial Number

GOULDS
WATER TECHNOLOGY
a xylem brand
50
40
'v
y 30
2
20
10
20
C
2 10
N
a
z 0
16
a
r s
m
0 0
a US gpm
CURVE DATA
PERFORMANCE CURVE
Quote ID: 9001-181023-057:0:1 QTY: 1
VIT-DITM 101-1-IC, 1 Stage
Specified Flow
1400.00 USgpm
Shut Off TDH (Bowl)
49.2 ft
Specified NPSH Ratio
1.1
Specified TDH
28.00 ft
Shut Off TDH (Disch Flange)
43.5 ft
NPSH Margin at Design
30.7 ft
Atmospheric Pressure
15 psi
Shut Off Pressure (Bowl)
21.3 psi
Min Submergence at Design
43.68 in
TPL
19.75 ft
Shut Off Pressure (Disch Flange)
18.8 psi
Actual Submergence
177.00 in
Pumping Level
5.00 ft
Bowl Efficiency at Design
80.20 %
Shaft Friction Power Loss
0.00 Hp
NPSHa at Grade
33.9 ft
Best Efficiency
80.50 %
Thrust Load Power Loss
0.06285 Hp
NPSHa at list Impeller
46.6 ft
BEP Flow
1458.0 USgpm
Hydraulic Thrust at Design
392.0 lb
Fluid
Water
Design Flow % BEP
96.02 %
Thrust at Design
499.4 lb
Service
DAF Influent Pumps Pump Efficiency
74.31 %
Hydraulic Thrust at Shut Off
688.8 lb
Fluid Temperature
68.0 °F
Motor Efficiency
93.00 %
Thrust at Shut Off
806.6 lb
Specific Gravity
1.0000
Overall Efficiency
69.10 %
Bowl Material
Cast Iron with Glass
Viscosity
1.0017 cP
Friction Loss at Design
1.94 ft
Enamel
Vapor Pressure
0.3393 psi
Power at Design
12.3 Hp
Bowl Material Derate Factor
1.00
Density
62 Ibs/ft'
NOL Power
14.0 Hp
Impeller Material
Bronze
Design Flow
1400.0 USgpm
Max Power (NOL) Flow
159.0 USgpm
Impeller Matl Derate Factor
1.00
Min Flow (MCSF)
364.0 USgpm
Max Power (NOL) at Max Trim
15.1 Hp
Total Flow Derate Factor
1.00
Design TDH (Bowl)
28.0 ft
Max Power (NOL) Flow at Max
200.0 USgpm
Total Head Derate Factor
1.00
Design TDH (Disch Flange)
20.3 ft
Trim
Total Efficiency Derate Factor
1.00
Design Pressure (Bowl)
12.1 psi
Recommended Power
15.00 Hp
Curve ID
E6410LAPC1
Design Pressure (Disch Flange)
8.8 psi
kWh per 1000 gal
0.12723
NPSHr at Design
15.9 ft
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS CERTIFIED
Certified By
Project DEWBERRY-102318-WKNE
Tag
PO Number

5. Primary and Secondary Clarifier Equipment
a) Clarifier Mechanism and Internals
b) Clarifier Baffles and Effluent Weir/Launder Systems
.:1 Dewberry°
Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis I APP M

�) evoQUA
WATER TECHNOLOGIES
Preliminary Proposal
Bio-Pharma Plant
NC
Please direct questions regarding this budget quote to:
Jim Cooper
Heyward Incorporated
Office 704-583-2305
Mobile [phone]
Email [e-mail]
Version: 1
Date: Click here to enter a date.
Prepared By:
2607 N. Grandview Blvd., Suite 130, Waukesha, W 1 53188
[phone] (phone) [phone] (fax) www.evoqua.com

SUMMARY:
We are pleased to present Evoqua's Envirex proposal for Two (2) Conventional Scraper
Mechanisms. One to be installed in a 47' X 15 swd Primary Clarifier in 304ss and One to be
installed in a 115' x 15 swd Secondary Clarifier in painted carbon steel.
EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION PRICE
One (1) 47' X 15 swd Primary Clarifier in 304ss $152,569
One (1) 115' X 15 swd Secondary Clarifier in painted carbon $184,759
Total $337,328
Equipment for each Clarifier will consist of the following:
oo Beam type access bridge with aluminum walkway, aluminum handrail
oo Drive mechanism with micro -switch overload device and shear pin.
oo Center drive cage
oo FEDWA influent energy dissipating baffles
oo Center column
oo Influent flocculation well with supports
oo Two (2) truss type scraper arms with plow blades and squeegees
oo One (1) skimmer assembly
oo Scum trough
oo Counterweights
oo Associated anchor bolts and attachment bolts
CONTROLS
Electrical controls consist of the two (2) micro -switches (one N.O. and one N.C.) in the drive
mechanism overload device housing for high torque alarm and motor shut -down.
WEIRS AND BAFFLES
Effluent weirs and baffles are not included.
SPARE PARTS
No spare parts are included.
No special tools are required for the installation or maintenance of this equipment.
MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION
oo Submerged material: painted carbon (Secondary) and 304ss (Primary)
oo Non -submerged material: painted carbon (Secondary) and 304ss (Primary)
oo Handrail: aluminum
oo Walkway and platform flooring: aluminum

SURFACE PROTECTION
For Secondary Clarifier: Submerged and Non -submerged components will be prepared by
blasting to SSPC-SP10 and prime painted with one (1) shop coat of Tnemec N140-1211 Pota-
Pox Plus polyamidiamine epoxy OR Sherwin-Williams Dura-Plate 235NSF Red Oxide multi-
purpose epoxy to 4-6 mills DFT. Finish coats are to be applied in the field by the Contractor.
For Primary Clarifier: Submerged components will be fabricated from Type 304L stainless steel
and brush passivated per ASTM-A380.
Ferrous chain: One (1) coat of slush oil.
Shafting and exposed machined surfaces: Solvent wiping, followed by one (1) coat of Evoqua's
standard shop preservative.
Wood, nonferrous materials, stainless steel and galvanized surfaces: Unpainted.
Drive unit and controls: Evoqua's standard.
Touch-up and all additional coats shall be furnished and applied by others at the site.
Prices are based on paints and surface preparations as outline in this quotation. In the event an
alternative paint system is selected, purchaser's order must advise of its selection. Evoqua will,
at its sole discretion, either adjust its price as necessary to comply or ship the material
unpainted if compliance is not possible due to price considerations, application problems, or
environmental controls.
Evoqua does not guarantee primer's compatibility with purchaser's coating system unless
approved by the coating system manufacturer. Primers will only protect for a minimal amount of
time, usually thirty (30) days. Specific information should be obtained from coating system
manufacturer.
EXCLUDED ITEMS (including but not limited to):
0o Scum spray system
00 Pumps
0o Misc. access bridges, walkways, stairs, etc.
0o Controls or control equipment
0o Unloading of equipment and storage
0o Concrete work of any sort, grout, mastic, sealing compounds, shims
0o Lubricants
0o Pipe supports
0o Conduit or wiring in the field
0o Cable trays, fittings, and supports
0o Instrumentation
0o Motor control centers
0o Variable frequency drives
0o Weirs and baffles
0o Density Current baffles

Lawrence, Jordan
From: Jim Cooper <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2018 12:39 PM
To: Poulios, Michael; Lawrence, Jordan
Subject: FW: Franklinton, NC Bio Pharma project - Dewberry Engineers - Nefco lauder troughs
and weirs & baffles
Attachments: WDCB 36 & UNDER 2018 (NEW VENT).dwg; WDCB 36 & UNDER 2018 (NEW VENT).pdf;
NEFCO LAUNDER COVER SPECIFICATION 2018.docx; NEFCO LAUNDER COVER
SPECIFICATION 2018.pdf, NEFCO-LCS-2017-small.pdf, weir scum-baffle_spec.doc; Wall
Mounted Cover FULL SET.pdf
This message originated from outside your organization
Michael and Jordan:
This is the Nefco scope of supply for fiberglass launder troughs, weirs and baffles, density current baffles and launder
covers for the 47' diameter tank and the 115' diameter tanks for Novozymes in Franklinton.
Detailed equipment scope is as follows:
FRP Reinforced Launder Troughs for One (1) 47' Dia. Clarifier Tank
The set includes twelve (12) isophthalic polyester FRP square -bottom effluent trough sections, each trough section has
nominal dimensions of 18" wide x 18" deep x 11'-11" long (avg.). Each trough section is supported by two (2) 304
stainless -steel trough support brackets. The trough sections are provided with spacer rods @ 30" o.c. to reinforce the
side -walls, as well as a 2" stiffening inner wall flange for added rigidity. Additional reinforcement is provided by a 24-
ounce layer of woven roving throughout and encapsulated reinforcement along the length of the trough when
necessary. The trough laminate is corrosion resistant and contains additives to suppress UV. All holes and openings are
drilled and sealed. The set includes neoprene gasket, and all the required 304 stainless steel fasteners for a complete
installation. FRP color is green.
Price is $49,550.00.
FRP Weir & Scum Baffle Panels for One (1) 47' Dia. Clarifier Tank
The set includes 12 isophthalic polyester FRP weir panels 1/4" x 9" x 11'-6", 12 FRP scum baffle panels 1/4" x 12" x 11'-
1", 5" dia. FRP weir washers, FRP weir and scum baffle splice plates, 3/8" FRP angled scum baffle brackets, neoprene
gasket, and all of the required 304 stainless steel anchors and fasteners for a complete installation. FRP color is green.
Price is $8,510.00.
FRP Density Current Baffle for One (1) 47' Dia. Clarifier Tank
The Density Current Baffle set will consist of 20 baffle modules that combine the baffle panel, baffle bracket, vents and
mounting and stiffening flanges in an integrally molded unit. Each baffle module is 1/4" thick x 28" wide x 8' long and
mounts directly to the tank wall. Each baffle panels extends about 24" into the tank. The integral bracket holds the
baffle at a 30' angle from the horizontal, which has been proven the most effective in diverting rising solids back into the
main volume of the tank. Mounting holes are factory drilled and sealed. The baffle is delivered with all of the 304
stainless steel fasteners required for a complete installation. FRP color is black.

Price is $19,540.00.
4. FRP Wall -Mount Launder Cover for One (1) 47' Dia. Clarifier Tank
The Launder Cover set consists of 13 three-piece cover modules, each made up of one (1) Mounting Section and two (2)
Cover Sections. The Mounting Section is fastened to tank's concrete wall and serves as the fixed base for the hinged
Cover Sections. The Cover Section is connected to the Mounting Section by a continuous stainless steel hinge. The Cover
Sections arch over the 18" wide effluent launder trough and weir, and rest on two stainless steel support brackets
fastened to the inner weir wall. Overall, the Cover extends from the outer tank wall over the launder and weir to a point
just outside the scum baffle. The covers open away from the operator and toward the center of the tank to allow for
ease of inspection and maintenance. The Cover hinge points are strategically located to ensure maximum visibility of
the launder and weir when the Cover panel is opened. Each Cover panel is equipped with a stainless steel handle
mechanism to open and close the Cover Section. A restraint cable is included to control the range of motion. The Cover
set is delivered with all of the required 304 stainless steel fasteners and anchors for a complete installation. FRP color is
white.
Price is $25,550.00.
FRP Reinforced Launder Troughs for One (1) 115' Dia. Clarifier Tank
The set includes thirty (30) isophthalic polyester FRP square -bottom effluent trough sections, each trough section has
nominal dimensions of 30" wide x 30" deep x 11'-10" long (avg.). Each trough section is supported by two (2) 304
stainless -steel trough support brackets. The trough sections are provided with spacer rods @ 24" o.c. to reinforce the
side -walls, as well as a 2" stiffening inner wall flange for added rigidity. Additional reinforcement is provided by a 24-
ounce layer of woven roving throughout and encapsulated reinforcement along the length of the trough when
necessary. The trough laminate is corrosion resistant and contains additives to suppress UV. All holes and openings are
drilled and sealed. The set includes neoprene gasket, and all the required 304 stainless steel fasteners for a complete
installation. FRP color is green.
Price is $166,200.00.
FRP Weir & Scum Baffle Panels for One (1) 115' Dia. Clarifier Tank
The set includes 30 isophthalic polyester FRP weir panels 1/4" x 9" x 11'-6", 30 FRP scum baffle panels 1/4" x 12" x 11'-
4", 5" dia. FRP weir washers, FRP weir and scum baffle splice plates, 3/8" FRP angled scum baffle brackets, neoprene
gasket, and all of the required 304 stainless steel anchors and fasteners for a complete installation. FRP color is green.
Price is $18,640.00.
FRP Densitv Current Baffle for One (1) 115' Dia. Clarifier Tank
The Density Current Baffle set will consist of 47 baffle modules that combine the baffle panel, baffle bracket, vents and
mounting and stiffening flanges in an integrally molded unit. Each baffle module is 1/4" thick x 50" wide x 8' long and
mounts directly to the tank wall. Each baffle panels extends about 44" into the tank. The integral bracket holds the
baffle at a 30' angle from the horizontal, which has been proven the most effective in diverting rising solids back into the
main volume of the tank. Mounting holes are factory drilled and sealed. The baffle is delivered with all of the 304
stainless steel fasteners required for a complete installation. FRP color is black.
Price is $43,140.00.
FRP Wall -Mount Launder Cover for One (1) 115' Dia. Clarifier Tank

The Launder Cover set consists of 31 three-piece cover modules, each made up of one (1) Mounting Section and two (2)
Cover Sections. The Mounting Section is fastened to tank's concrete wall and serves as the fixed base for the hinged
Cover Sections. The Cover Section is connected to the Mounting Section by a continuous stainless steel hinge. The Cover
Sections arch over the 30" wide effluent launder trough and weir, and rest on two stainless steel support brackets
fastened to the inner weir wall. Overall, the Cover extends from the outer tank wall over the launder and weir to a point
just outside the scum baffle. The covers open away from the operator and toward the center of the tank to allow for
ease of inspection and maintenance. The Cover hinge points are strategically located to ensure maximum visibility of
the launder and weir when the Cover panel is opened. Each Cover panel is equipped with a stainless steel handle
mechanism to open and close the Cover Section. A restraint cable is included to control the range of motion. The Cover
set is delivered with all of the required 304 stainless steel fasteners and anchors for a complete installation. FRP color is
white.
Price is $60,435.00.
Exclusions: Caulk, sealants, assembly, installation and field services are not included.
Delivery: Submittals provided 5-10 weeks ARWO. Materials 12-16 weeks ADA.
The price for this material is FOB jobsite, and includes freight to the above referenced location. Price does not include
installation or any applicable fees or taxes. Payment terms are 100% thirty (30) days from date of invoice.
Price is valid for delivery on or before March 30, 2019.
Please let us know if you have any questions on our proposal.
Sincerely,
Jim Cooper
Heyward Incorporated
704-583-2305 - office
704-591-1270 - cell
[e-mail]

6. Dissolved Air Flotation
.:1 Dewberry°
Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis I APP M

FRC1,
AJWC Environmental Brand
Trusted Wastewater olutionsTM
DAF System
Proposal
7 i
Project: Biopharma Project
Franklinton, NC
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com

FR4&, Trusted Wastewater Solutions —
A JWC Enwonrner-W Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
Proposal for:
Proposal Presented by:
Jordan Lawrence
Adriaan van der Beek
Graduate Engineer
President FRC
Dewberry
JWC Environmental Inc.
2610 Wycliff Rd, Suite 410
PO Box 3147
Raleigh,
Cumming,
NC 27607
GA 30028
[phone]
Project: Biopharma Project
Proprietary & Confidential Information
The document contains proprietary and confidential information that is the property of JWC
Environmental Inc. This document is released to the receiving party on the understanding
that the receiving party:
• Acknowledges and accepts the proprietary and confidential nature of the information
contained herein,
• Agrees that it will not directly, or indirectly, disclose the information contained herein to a
3rd party, and;
• Agrees to limit the exposure of the information contained herein to as few people as possible
and only to those personnel and subcontractors who have a need to know'.
If these conditions are not acceptable to the receiving party, all copies of the document are
to be immediately returned to JWC Environmental Inc.
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com Page 2 of 19

FR4&, Trusted Wastewater Solutions —
A JWC Enwonrner-W Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
Dear Jordan,
Please find enclosed the technical and commercial details of the DAF unit for the plant in
Franklinton, NC.
The quoted unit have hydraulic surface loading rate of < 1 gpm/sgft and solids loading rate
< 2 1/2 Ib/sqft/hr. the quoted FRC units have >> 250 sqft of separation area and we
recommend the consequential < 1 gpm/sqft for performance reasons and reduced chemical
consumption.
Please contact us if you have any questions, comments or concerns regarding our proposal
or attached documents. We look forward to working with you in the near future!
Respectfully,
Adriaan van der Beek
President FRC
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147
Cumming, GA 30028
Office: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
[e-mail]
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com Page 3 of 19

FR4&, Trusted Wastewater Solutions —
A 1WC Enwonrner-W Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
Content
1. System Information
2. Process Overview
3. Technical Details
4. Commercial Details
5. Items not included in scope of supply
6. Delivery and Payment terms
7. Terms and Conditions
8. Equipment Renderings
Enclosures
a) Process & Instrumentation Diagram (P&ID)
b) Dimensional Drawings
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com Page 4 of 19

FR(t, Trusted Wastewater Solutions"
A 1WC En�ironmer-W Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
1. System Information
1.1 Design Information
The design of the proposed wastewater treatment system is based on information provided
by client and FRC site visit. Client should inform FRC if the system information does not reflect
the actual situation.
Parameter
Flow rate [gpm]
Dsign
700
BOD [mg/L]
-
TSS [mg/L]
250
FOG [mg/L]
-
pH
-
1.2 General Information
Available at WWTP
Power Supply
Quantity
460 V/60 Hz/3 phase
Control Voltage
120 VAC
Air Supply
Supplied by customer @ 100 psi
City Water
For Commissioning/Start-up
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com Page 5 of 19

FR4&. Trusted Wastewater Solutions -
A 1WC Enwonrner-W Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
1.3 Technical Information
Utility
Power Installed (PCL-60)
ELCOnsumption
1 HP - Skimmer Drive
15 HP - Recycle Pump
0.33 HP - Auger Drive
Approx. Weight of DAF (Empty)
10,500 lbs.
Approx. Weight of DAF (Full)
47,964 lbs.
Approx. Weight of Flocculator (Empty)
1,410 lbs.
Approx. Weight of Flocculator (Full)
4,975 lbs.
Air usage by DAF Process
Approx. 1 cfm @ 100 psi, dry filtered
Coagulant
TBD
Neutralizer
TBD
Flocculant
TBD
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com Page 6 of 19

FR4&, Trusted Wastewater Solutions —
A 1WC Enwonrner-W Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
2. Process Overview
DAF systems function on the chemical/physical separation process as explained below:
1. Raw wastewater is pumped at a constant rate from a lift station or flow equalization
basin (FEB) into the inlet side of the flocculator.
2. A coagulant is dosed into the pipe flocculator just prior to an in -line static mixer that
provides the necessary mixing action inside the pipe. The result is the separation of the solids
from the water to form "micro flocs" which generally have a positive (+) charge.
Iiifluent�
compressed
air
1
Sludge
-Effluent
3. A flocculant is dosed into the pipe just prior to a second static mixer. The flocculant is
a polymer with an opposite charge that attracts the positively charged micro flocs, and
agglomerates the micro flocs into larger "macro flocs" in order to achieve a size suitable for
separation in the flotation cell.
4. Immediately after flocculant dosing, the flocculated wastewater is injected with a side
stream of "whitewater", which is recirculated clarified water from the DAF. This whitewater
is super -saturated with dissolved air and which forms bubbles that aid in solids separation.
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com Page 7 of 19

FR4&, Trusted Wastewater Solutions —
A 1WC Enwonrner-W Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
5. Water then flows into the DAF unit via a distribution manifold to evenly spread the flow
across the entire width of the system. As the water passes through the manifold, it is again
hit with a stream of air saturated water. As the super saturated dissolved air is released into
the flotation vessel at atmospheric pressure, the air comes out of solution and forms 30-50
micron sized bubbles. These small bubbles attach to the solid particles and give them
buoyancy to float to the surface of the tank.
6. The solids rise to the surface and accumulate in a floating sludge blanket. This floating
layer is removed from the unit with a dewatering/skimming device. The sludge/water interface
is within a static de -watering grid that allows the float sludge to partially de -water before it
is sliced off the top by skimming blades. The thickness of the floating layer may be adjusted
by raising or lowering the tank water level. This is accomplished by adjusting the height of
the outlet weirs. This simple adjustment allows an operator to obtain the optimum level of
float dewatering prior to removal from the DAF Unit.
7. Heavy solids sink to a "V" bottom where they are concentrated until they are
discharged by a drain valve that is periodically opened using a timer and an automatic,
pneumatically controlled valve. The valve is opened for a short duration and the head of the
water in the DAF tank flushes any collected settled solids from the drain. The DAF system
continues to run throughout this automatic process.
8. Finally, water flows out of the flotation cell via effluent channels and spills over
adjustable weirs along the sides of the DAF. Water is then discharged from a common effluent
flange.
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com Page 8 of 19

FR4&, Trusted Wastewater Solutions —
A 1WC Enwonrner-W Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
3.Technical Details
Technical summary of equipment supply for wastewater treatment plant:
3.1 Flow Measurement
■
Tag ID
FT2001
■
Type
Mag Meter
■
Brand
Endress+Hauser
■
Model
Promag 10W series
■
Size
6"
•
Quantity
: Two (2); One (1) per DAF
3.2 Flow Control Valve
■
Tag ID
V2150
■
Type
Butterfly with Pneumatic Positioner
■
Brand
Keystone with Westlock K10 Positioner
■
Size
6"
■
Quantity
: Two (2); One (1) per DAF
3.3 Neutralizer dosing pump
■
Tag ID
P5041
■
Make
Grundfos
■
Model
DDA 30 Series
■
Capacity
: 0-8 gph
■
Power
120 VAC
■
Including
: 4-20 mA cable
■
Quantity
: Two (2); One (1) per DAF
3.4 Coagulant dosing pump
■
Tag ID
P5061
■
Make
Grundfos
■
Model
DDA 200 Series
■
Capacity
: 0-52.8 gph
■
Power
120 VAC
■
Including
: 4-20 mA cable
■
Quantity
: Two (2); One (1) per DAF
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com Page 9 of 19

FR4&, Trusted Wastewater Solutions —
A 1WC Enwonrner-W Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
3.5 Automatic liquid polymer dosing module
■ Tag ID
PMA5081
■ Make
: Acrison or equal
■ Model
: 580 series
■ Pump Style
Diaphragm
• Water Capacity
: 480 gph
■ Pump Capacity
1.5 gph (neat polymer)
• Water Supply Pressure
: 25-100 psi
• Water Supply In/Out
: 1/2" FTP
■ Power Supply
115 VAC / 1 Phase / 60 Hz, 15 Amp
■ Including
Control Panel in NEMA 4X Enclosure
• Quantity
: Two (2); One (1) per DAF
3.6 FRC Model F-8 Flocculator System
■ Tag ID
PF3001
■ Design Flow
: 700 gpm
■ Materials of construction
o Support
Stainless Steel 304
o Reactor
HDPE
o Mixing
HDPE
■ Three (3) dosing points for
o Coagulant
o Neutralizer
o Polymer
■ Including per dosing point
o Check valve
o Ball valve
o Dosing lance
■ Four (4) sample ports
• Quantity
: Two (2); One (1) per DAF
3.7 pH level transmitter with probe
■ Tag ID
: AIT3001
■ Manufacturer
Endress+Hauser
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com Page 10 of 19

FR4&, Trusted Wastewater Solutions —
A 1WC Enwonrner-W Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
■ Transmitter model
Liquiline M CM-442 series
■ Probe model
CPD91D series
■ Manufacturer
E & H
■ Measuring Range
: 0-14 pH
• Output
: 4-20 mA
• Quantity
: Two (2); One (1) per DAF
3.8 FRC DAF system, model PCL-60
■ Tag ID
DAF6001
■ Design flow
: 700 gpm
■ Materials
SS 304
■ Quantity
: Two (2)
Rotating top -skimmer
■ Skimmer drive
o Tag ID
SC6005
o Manufacturer
SEW Euro Drive
o Model
SA67
o Power
1 HP
o Motor
TEFC
o Voltage
460V/60Hz/3phase
o Quantity
Two (2); One (1) per DAF
■ Skimmer blades
SS304 + FRP
■ Chain
Polyacetal
■ Sprockets
NYLON
White water aeration system including:
■ Recycle pump
o Tag ID
P6001A/13
o Manufacturer/Model
MP Pumps/Chem Flo
o Type
End Suction Centrifugal
o Recycle flow
130 gpm @ 205 ft
o Casing Materials
316 Stainless Steel
o Impeller
316 Stainless Steel
o Mechanical Seal
Silicon -Tungsten Hard -Face
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com Page 11 of 19

FR4&, Trusted Wastewater Solutions -
A 1WC Enwonrner-W Brand
o Motor
o Power
o Voltage
o Location
o Quantity
standby; One (1) per DAF
■ Air Dissolving Tube
■ Manifold
■ Bleed off valves
■ Pressure meters
■ White water hosing
■ Isolation and aeration valves
Sand drain valve:
■ Tag ID
■ Type
■ Brand
■ Size
■ Model
■ Disc
■ Quantity
Bottom drain valve:
■ Tag ID
■ Type
■ Brand
■ Size
■ Model
■ Disc
• Quantity
Bottom Auger
■ Material
■ Type
■ Auger drive
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
Closed Coupled TEFC
15 HP
460V/60Hz/3phase
Installed on DAF skid
Two (2); One (1) per DAF + two (2) optional
SS304
SS304
V6103
Butterfly, double actuating
Keystone
4"
222 - Cast iron lugged style body
SS304
Two (2); One (1) per DAF
V6104
Butterfly, double actuating
Keystone
8„
222 - Cast iron lugged style body
SS304
Two (2); One (1) per DAF
Stainless Steel 304
Shaftless Screw
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com Page 12 of 19

FR4&, Trusted Wastewater Solutions —
A 1WC Enwonrner-W Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
o Tag ID AU 6006
o Manufacturer SEW Euro Drive
o Model SA 57
o Installed Power 0.33 HP
o Motor TEFC
o Voltage 460 V/60Hz/3phase
o Quantity Two (2); One (1) per DAF
Plate pack system
■ Materials of construction FRP
■ Free area : 65 sq.ft
■ Effective area 1,034 sq.ft
■ Installed area : 2,068 sq.ft
Pneumatic control panel including
■ Pressure Regulator/Filter
■ Air Rotameter
■ Air Check Valve
■ Pressure Switches for:
o Compressed Air
o Recycle Pump
■ Solenoids for:
o Inlet Solids Drain
o Bottom Solids Drain
o Air supply to DAF
Float Chamber (Sludge Collection)
3.9 Engineering and Documents:
■ Equipment dimension drawings as
o Top -view
o Side view
o Influent/Effluent sides
■ Process & Instrumentation Diagram (PID)
■ Two (2) copies of Operation & Maintenance Manuals
■ Electrical control narrative document
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com Page 13 of 19

FR4&, Trusted Wastewater Solutions -
A 1WC Enwonrner-W Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
■ Drawings and instructions for installation
Optional
3.10 E-Panel for Caontrol of FRC-Supplied Equipment
■ NEMA 4x, 304SS Enclosure
■ PLC (Allen Bradley - CompactLogix)
■ HMI (Allen Bradley - 10" PanelView)
■ Not including motor contactors
• Quantity : One (1)
3.11 Two (2) Standby Recycle Pumps, each pre -installed to a DAF (P600113)
3.12 E-Shaped DAF Access Catwalk
■ Frame SS304
■ Grating FRP
■ Access to two sides and one end each of both DAFs, with stairs
• Quantity : One (1)
3.13 Services
■ Supervision of Installation
■ Commissioning and start-up of system
■ Training of the Operators by FRC engineer
o System operations
o Operational procedures
o Process Maintenance
o Equipment maintenance
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com Page 14 of 19

FR4&. Trusted Wastewater Solutions —
A 1WC Enwonrner-W Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
4.Commercial Details
IN y
Item #
Description
- Total
FRC PCL-60 DAF Systems: Flow Control Loop
+ Chemical Dosing + F-8 Flocculator + pH
2
3.1-3.9
Instrumentation + PCL-60 DAF with
$ 213,660
Whitewater Aeration System + Engineering and
Documentation as mentioned above in scope,
FRC Ex -works (as per 2015 INCO terms)
-
Extra
Transport DAP jobsite
Billed at cost
Total FRC
$
Optional
Single Control Panel (NEMA 4x) with Allen
1
3.10
$ 32,560
Bradley Components, FRC Ex -works
Pre -installed standby recycle pumps, one on
2
3.11
each DAF, with E-panel extensions, FRC Ex-
$ 9,460
works
E-shaped catwalk for access to both DAFS with
1
3.12
$ 43,670
stairs, 304SS with FRP grating, FRC Ex -works
$950/day (per 8-
Supervision of Installation, Commissioning,
hours) +per
-
3.13
Start-up and Training of the Operators by FRC
diem* + travel
engineer
expenses
* Per diem rate based on those established by the US GSA: htto://www.gsa.gov/portal/category/100120
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com Page 15 of 19

FR4&, Trusted Wastewater Solutions —
A 1WC Enwonrner-W Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
5.Items not included in scope of supply
■ Any civil work, anchor bolts or concrete work
■ Any site preparation, building and/or structures to house equipment, landscaping or
painting
■ Any installation, labor or material
■ Any hoisting or lifting work during unloading and during installation
■ Any chemicals or chemical storage totes
■ Any air supply to system
■ Any influent or effluent piping, valves, fittings or supports
■ Any process water piping, valves, fittings or supports, calibration columns etc. for
dosing equipment
■ Any pump alignment
■ Any sludge handling system
• Any solids transfer piping, valves
■ Any electrical work, including cables and connections between control panel and
equipment
■ Any local disconnects required at motor locations for equipment
■ Any heat tracing or insulation of pipes or equipment
■ Any water for hydrostatic testing
■ Any insurance at place of installation
■ Any applicable state, federal or local taxes
■ All other items unless specifically mentioned in this proposal
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com Page 16 of 19

FR4&, Trusted Wastewater Solutions —
A 1WC Enwonrner-W Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
6. Delivery and Payment terms
6.1 Payment Terms
■ 40% with the PO
■ 50% with the delivery of the equipment
■ 10% after start-up or 3 months after delivery whichever comes first
6.2 Equipment Delivery
To be agreed upon. Our goal is to meet your project timing, please do not hesitate to contact
us if you have specific delivery or timing requirements so we can verify whether expedited
delivery is feasible or not.
Please use following guideline:
■ Engineering Submittal : 2 weeks
• Manufacturing 10-14 weeks from submittal approval
• FAT 2 days
■ Packing & Delivery : 2 days
6.3 Delivery Terms
The system is quoted Ex -works FRC. Transport DAP to jobsite will be billed at cost.
6.4 Validity
30 days from date of proposal.
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com Page 17 of 19

FR4&, Trusted Wastewater Solutions —
A JWC Enwonrner-W Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
7.Terms and Conditions
7.1 TAXES
Except for the amount, if any, of tax stated in a JWC Environmental Inc. proposal, the prices
set forth therein are exclusive of any amount for federal, state, local, excise, sales, use,
property, in -country, import, VAT or similar taxes or duties. Such prices also exclude permit,
license, customs and similar fees levied upon shipment of JWC Environmental Inc.
7.2 Warranty
Products manufactured, construed or assembled by FRC, are warrantied for a period of (12)
months from date of start-up or (18) months from date of shipment from manufacturer,
whichever occurs first, against manufacturing defects and workmanship which develop in the
service for which they are designed, provided the products are installed and used in
accordance with any applicable instructions or limitations issued by FRC.
7.3 Limitation of Warranty
Components used by FRC, but manufactured by others, are warrantied only to the extent of
that manufacturer's warranty. This limited warranty shall not apply if the product has been
altered or repaired by others. FRC will make no allowances or credit for such repairs or
alterations unless authorized in writing by FRC.
No statement, representation, agreement. or understanding, oral or written, made by any
agent, distributor, representative, or employee of FRC, which is not contained in the
Warranty will be binding upon the Company unless made in writing and executed by an
officer of FRC.
7.4 Governing Law
It is understood and agreed that these Terms and Conditions of Sale shall be interpreted
under and pursuant to the laws of the State of Georgia; you agree that any action at law or
suit which is related to any contract of sale brought against us shall be filed in a federal or
state court located in the State of Georgia.
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com Page 18 of 19

FR4&, Trusted Wastewater Solutions -
A 1WC EmAronmenlal Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
8. Equipment Renderings
Snrn.n �! I
lnjcclion Porls
Flocculator Rendering*
PCL DAF Rendering*
* For Illustration purpose only
JWC Environmental Inc.
anirpl
ion Pori
110
mple Fort
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com Page 19 of 19

ID
TY
SPECIFICATIONS
A
2
8"0 INLET OUTLET ANSI FLANGE
B
5
1 2 HOSE BARB SAMPLE
D
4
1" HOSE BARB INJECTOR
F
2
1" PVC PLUG PH BYPASS
G
6
1 /2" AERATION VALVES
a
a
r
44 [1118]
:. 7/8 [22]
2 [51]
01
NOTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS IN INCHES [MM]
2. ALL VALVES TO BE FIELD INSTALLED.
122 1/4 [3105]
49 [1245]
v >r Q
124 [3150] D D D
I �
194 [4928]
A
a
P.F rrrnl
UNIT WEIGHT
EMPTY: 1410 Lbs. [640 kgs]
FULL: 4975 Lbs. [2257 kgs]
IRA 1 /d r307 R1
FOOT DETAIL
L
FLOCCULATOR — 8" X 6" HDPE (F8/6L-2-2M)LMN
P
JWC ENVIR❑NMENTAL, LLC Confidential NoRz,�"'°trs °ar° Na.,LEatc s�a,e
CLIENTS NAME Da— LE 8/z3/Zola
P.O. B ❑ X 3147 This drawing Is the exclusive property JWC CLIENTS LOCATION / PROJECT NAME c
Environmental LLC. Its acceptance constiti Chcktutes nn Chcccd: LW 4/19/2013
CUMMING, GE❑RGIA 30028 agreement that It shall be treated as strictly Project No.: NUMB.
PHONE: C 7 7 0) 5 3 4- 3 6 81 confidential. Its use Is restricted to those
authorized In Drawing No. REV No.
C FAX: [phone] writing by JWC Environmental LLC and shall be Q 1 F8—L
returned upon request. Information contained on or I `� I I A
AJWC Environmental Brand EMAIL info@FRCS stems,com derived from this drawing is not to be communicated,
y disclosed, used or copied without prior authorization.

i
9 [229]
1 1/4 [32]4—i—I
1 1/4 [32]
J—
I
N
e
I
T4.
DETAIL
A
I
1010 [254]
II
1 1/4 [32] I
I
1 1/4 [32]
DETAIL B
n'1. 1 /d Ifl.'ii91
N /
/ 1 [25] \
/ g
I I I
I
�\ NT2.X
13/160 /
\
FOOT DETAIL
i
ALL DIMENSIONS IN INCHES [MM]
171 3/4 [4362]
100 [2540] 59 1/2 [17
I
o I
iv
m I
I
m JWU LNVII<UNMLN I AL , LLU Confi nfial
P.O. BOX 3147
GUMMING GE❑RGIA 30028Ehisdrawing isthe cEtliliwJoEbrtOofIWCEnvironmental L`C.
Cfls acceEtance constitCtes an agreement that it shall @ treated as
PHONE: [phone] strictloconfidential. its Etc is restricted to those aEthoriEbd in willing
m6VC Environmental LLC and shall Eb retEined Ulan rest.
i FAX: [phone] aformation contained on or derived from this drawing is not to:b
A )WC EnvleonmEMAIL: info@FRCsysteMs,com"'n""EdisclosedEll;ed°rcoiled with°131ti°raElh°ri®tim.
¢
RECIRCULATION PUMPS
UNIT WEIGHTS:
Empty Top:
3400 lbs. [1542 kgs]
Empty Bottom:
7200 lbs. [3288 kgs]
Empty Total:
10600 lbs. [4808 kgs]
Full:
48070 lbs. [21805 kgs]
SETTING EQUIPMENT:
USING A BUBBLE LEVEL THE UNIT SHOULD BE LEVELED
TO (within 1/4" Level) FRONT TO REAR,
AND TO (within 1/8" Level) SIDE TO SIDE
170 1 /P.. rARA1I
PCL 60 - RIGHT HAND FLOAT DISCHARGE A x
1K1.5x1LF-82RV M3 ST (15 HP) DURCO MARK 3 INFLUENT a I I I x
SAND c
10" DIA X 74" TUBE EFFLUENT D
SETTLED SOLIDS E I I I I X
Name Da'
RevisionsCLIENTS NAME
Drawn: LE 11/30
CLIENTS LOCATION / PROJECT NAME Cheiked: LW II/13
Project No.: NUMB.
GENERAL Drawing No. oA❑OR
9

FR(t, Trusted Wastewater Solutions-
A JWC Environmental Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
Project : Biopharma Project
Design Calculations
PCL-60 Features
Imperial
Metric
Recycle Flow (OR)
130 gpm
2.9.104 L/h
Free area
65 ft2
6 m2
Effective separation area
1,034 ft2
96 m2
Assumed Solids Loading Rate for 100%
Solids Loading Rate
Average DAF Solids Loading Rate
TSS (42,000 9h) (2.1 10-3 Lb )
SLR Ave Ave — gal = 1.35 lb
AUe = Free Area 65 f t2 ft2 • h
Hydraulic Surface Loading Rate
Average Hydraulic Surface Loading Rate
OAve + OR 700 gpm + 130 gpm gpm
HSLRA1e = Effective Area 1,034 ft2 = 0.803 ft2
100%
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com
Page 1 of 2

FR(t, Trusted Wastewater Solutions-
A JWC Environmental Brand
Proposal Number: 18011004RS
Date: October 24, 2018
Project : Biopharma Project
Air to Solids Ratio
Table 1: Water solubility of gasses at selected temperatures and pressures'
23 1 6.77.10-4 1 1.32.10-3 I 1.48.10-3 I 7.58.10-2 1 1.43.10-4
31 1 6.08.10-4 1 1.16.10-3 I 1.64.10-3 1 8.60.10-2 1 1.28.10-4
38 5.65.10-4 1.06.10-3 1.77.10-3 9.42.10-2 1.18.10-4
Sx : = solubility of species x; H. : = Henry's Law constant of species x
Sources: IUPAC-NIST Solubility Reference Database; 1. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Vol 12, No. 2, 1983
Air -to -Solids Ratio: 23 °C
Air Air Solubility • OR (1.43 10-4 kg I (2.9 104 hr)
k \/ L l = 0.106
Solids TSS
(PAvg (2.5 • 10-4 9 I • (1.59 • 105 hrl
Air -to -Solids Ratio: 31 °C
Air Air Solubility �a
(1.28 • 10-4 k9) • (2.9 •
104 L
Solids TSS • -Pavg
4 ky
(2.5 10- L) (1.59
5 L ll = 0.0951
10 hrl
Air -to -Solids Ratio: 38 °C
Air Air Solubility �a
(1.18 • 10-4 k9) • (2.9 •
104 L
Solids TSS • -Pavg
4 kg
(2.5 10-
) (1.59
L ll = 0.0877
105hrl
L
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147 • Cumming, GA 30028 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com
Page 2 of 2

H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
30'-5"
4
4
11'-14"
Q
Q
PF23001
PF13001
F8
MCE
F8
I
CO
N
DAF26001
DAF16001
PCL-60
PCL-60
SIN
3
w
z
Z z
Q W
Cn J
lWi
W
Z z
¢ W
J
LWi
W
w
z
C
3
2
L
O
SIN
EFFLUENT
in I
Mo
I
o
+
•
SIN
I
�1-0
•
(0
I
DRAIN
(+
•
• •
O
FRONT VIEW
DAF SI E VEIW
NOTES:
JWC ENVIRONMENTAL LLC
P.O. BOX 3147
CUMMING, GEORGIA 30028
PHONE [phone]
No.
REVISION
BY
DATE
Dewberry -
Two PCL-60 Units -
NJ
Name Date
Scale
3/8" = 1'
Drawn
AG 23/10/2018
0
Design
checked
Size
Project No.
18011004RS
FAX: (770)) 783-8632
1
D
2
Drawing No.
Revision
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES
EMAIL: [e-mail]
2. PRELIMINARY DRAWING,CHANGES RESERVED
©
GENERAL
ARRANGEMENT
18011004 LAYOUT
Q
CONFIDENTIALM
3
A JWC Environmental Brand
"
a
H
G
FI
E
D
C
B
A

INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION
PRIMARY LOCATION
AUXILIARY LOCATION
LETTERS
NORMALLY ACCESSIBLE TO
FIELD MOUNTED
NORMALLY ACCESSIBLE TO
OPERATOR
OPERATOR
Discrete
Instruments
x
x
xxx
x
xxx
xxx
Shared Display,
Shared Control
x
xxx
x
x
-x
xxx
Programmable
Logic Control
INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION LETTERS
LETTERS
PROCESSOR INITIATING
VARIABLE
MODIFIER
READOUT OR PASSIVE
FUNCTION
OUTPUT FUNCTION
MODIFIER
A
Analysis
Alarm
C
Conductive
Control
Close,Closed
D
Density
Differential
E
Voltage
Emergency
Primary Element
F
Flow Rate
Ratio
G
Gauge
H
Hand(Manual)
High
I
Indicate
L
Level
Low
N
Turbidity
Middle/Intermediate
O
User's Choice
Orifice
Open
P
Pressure(or Vacuum)
S
Speed or Frequency
Safety
Sw itch
Stop
T
Temperature
Transrnitter
V
Viscosty
Valve or Damper
Y
Status
Relay or Compute
Z
Position
Drive or Actuate
LIM
NUMBERS
6534- 4"- PVC
\ \ Line Material
Nominal Pipe Size
Line Designation
LINE MATERIAL
ABBREVIATIONS
By Client
CL
SS
Stainless Steel
CS
Carbon Steel
PVC
Polyvinyl Chloride
CPVC
Chlorinated Polyvinyl Chloride
A JWC Environmental Brand
INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION LETTERS
Flow Rate
Indicate
Transmitter
FIT
20
P&ID Tag No.
Minor Process Pipe or FRC Skid Boundary
Major P rocess Pipe
Pneu matic Signal
— — — — — — — Process By Customer/Existing
— — — — — — — Electrical Signal
— • — • — • — • — Optional or Packaged Boundary
— — — — — — — Heat Trace
Flexible Pipe
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147
Cumming GA, 30028
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com
EQUI PM ENT & VALVE ABBREVIATIONS
T TankorSump
RS Rotary Screen
P Pump
PMA Polymer Make Up (Automatic)
MIX Mixer
PF Pipe Flocculator
DAF Dissolved Air Rotation Unit
CMP Compressor
BW Blower
SC Skimmer Drive
AU Auger Drive
SP Saturation Pipe
CLF Clarifier
BP Belt Press Filter
FP Filter Press
V Valve
SV Solenoid Valve
VALVES SYSMBOLS
-0o- Butterfly Valve
CheckValve
Ball Valve
Gate Valve
Angle Valve
Three Way Valve
Four Way Valve
Needle Valve
I Acturated Valve
Pressure Control Valve
Pressure Relief Valve
ACTUATOR SYSMBOLS
4 Solenoid
4 Pneumatic
4 Electric
Primary Element Symbols
FI
Ro to meter
❑Electromagnetic
IFlowmeter
I Level Probe
__000 Parshall Flume
ABBREVIATIONS
& LETTER SYSMBOLS
MNPT
Male Nominal Pipe Thread
FNPT
Female Nominal Pipe Thread
POTW
Public Owned Treatment Works
VFD
Variable Frequency drive
CONFIDENTIAL REV.
This drawing istheexclusive property ofJWC
Environmental Inc.. Its acceptance constitutes an
agreement that it shall be treated as strictly confidential.
Its use is restricted to those authorized in writing byJWC
Environmental Inc. and shall be returned upon request.
Information contained on orderived from thisdravving
is not to be communicated, disclosed, used or copied
without prior authorization.
DESCRIPTION
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SYMBOLS
In- Line Pump (GeneralSymbol)
Centrifugal Pump
Chemical Feed Pump
Air Operation Diaphragm (ADD) Pump
OGearPump (RotaryLobe Pump)
O
Electric Diaphragm Pump
Progressive Cavity (PC) Pump
Submersible Pump
Centrifugal Compressor
OO Screw Compressor
Blower
Injector
Fan Blades
Submersible Mixer
M
Surface Aerator
DATE I BY I NOTES:
®
Auger/Screen Conveyor or
Motorized Chamber
Skimmer
Drive Motor
MISCELLANEOUS SYSMBOLS
II �il Bag Strainer
Filter/Regulator
YDrainage to Sewer
Electrical Motor
4 Y Strainer
I Open Vent
Flame Arrester
Reducer
DEnd
Cap
Flange
Water Surface
Interface From
Interface To
End Cap
PROCESS & INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAM
LEGEND
SCALE DRAWN BY DWG NO REV
N/A P&I D — LEGEND
SIZE 11 X 17 SHEET

SERVICEWATER-
@ 180 GPH
POLYMER
CUSTOMER SUPPLY
UPS
-- -- -PI--
a08
V
PI-
PMA5081
POLYMER MAKEUP SKID0-1.5
GPH NEATPOLYMER0-480
GPH WATER
MOTORIZED
CHAMBER
HS L
06
---5503=1"--1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
V5104
--
——————
- 5502-W'
———— — — — — —— -----
COAGULANT
5505-Y"
I I
CUSTOMER SUPPLY
V5103 P5061
I I
I I
COAGULANTDOSING PUMP
0-53 GPH HIS L
I I
04
V5102
5501-%" I
5504-'/="
I
NEUTRALIZER
--------
I
CUSTOMER SUPPLY
I
V5101 P5041
I I
NEUTRALIZER DOaINC
PUMP
I
0-8 GPH
FIT
L
00
1 V5116 1 V5118 1
FEi6x8"
HC
00
15 V5117 V5119 V3102
8"
INFLUENT
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- -- M
�-
vzlso
COMPRESSED AIR I
Q SCFM @ 100 PSIG
BY CUSTOMER i
PNEUMATIC
PANEL
V7101 1 3/8" MNPT
V5120
5121
V3103 1
�y pH
V3107
PF3001
FLOCCULATOR SKID
F-8
SV7011
- - - - -
I
- - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
6515-12"
I
DAF SKID
PCL-60
I
HS
L L ES
EMERGENCY
I
600
1 600
STOP
CS 6005
I SKIMMER DRIVE
V6111
I 1 HP
460V/3PH/6OHz
AERATION LINES
I
12,
i
(6 TOTAL)
V6102A-F
- - - - - - -
- - -
V6112 BLEEDLINE
V6113
DAF6001
PCL-60
—Y lo'
V6109A-L
V611OA-L
1
V3104 6534-8"
8"
3---------------
DAF SLUDGE
8"
z
4„
0
AU6006
AUGER DRIVE
V6103 8" 0.33 HP
460V/3PH/60Hz
V6104
I
--- L---------- - - - - --
- 6509-8"-----
DAFSEDIMENT
DRAIN
48"
PI
600
HS L
V6102
V6108
001
V6106A
SP6001
4
V6105A
SP6001
V6107
SATURATIONPIPE V6114
6'2" x 12" DIA.
P6001A
V6106B
P6001B
(OPTIONAL)
P6001A/B
RECYCLE PUMPS
130 GPM @ 205 FT
15 HP
460V/3PH/6OHz
V6105B
PRELIMINARY
F11C
©
A JWC Environmental Brand
JWC Environmental Inc.
PO Box 3147
Cumming GA,30028
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.fresystems.com
CONFIDENTIAL
This drawing is thee xclusive property of JWC
Environmental Inc. Its acceptance constitutes an
agreement that it shall be treated as strictly confidential.
Its use is restricted to those authorized in writi ng by JWC
Environmental Inc. and shall be returned upon request.
Information contained on or derived from this drawing
is not to be communicated, disclosed, used or copied
without prior authorization.
REV.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
BY
NOTES:
Equipment in blocks is skidded
by FRC.
-Dashed Piping Is Supplied By
Others.
-Skids may require some field
assembly.
DEWBERRY ENGINEERS
PROCESS & INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAM
SCALE
N/A
DRAWN BY
PK
DWG NO
18011004R5
REV
0
SIZE ANSI B
10/24/2018
SHEET 1 OF 1

7. Ultrafilter/Reverse Osmosis
a) Cloth Filter / Ultra Filtration Process
b) Reverse Osmosis Process
.:1 Dewberry°
Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis I APP M

Lawrence, Jordan
From: Jim Cooper <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 4:57 PM
To: Poulios, Michael; Lawrence, Jordan
Subject: Novozymes NA INC, NC Biopharma Project Franklinton, NC - Aqua Aerobics #104226G
Attachments: 2018-10-26 153954 Preliminary MB Report.pdf, 2018-10-26 Preliminary AquaPrime
Design 153936.pdf
Importance: High
This message originated from outside your organization
Mike and Jordan:
From Aqua Aerobics
Please find attached two (2) preliminary design reports (Design #153954 and Design #153936) for the Biopharma project
in Franklinton, NC. Please note, we are continuing to work on the reverse osmosis and evaporator designs and will follow
up when completed.
Due to the quick turnaround requested, and the lack of information available, we made the following assumptions:
- Both designs include a 2 MGD average flow and a 3 MGD peak flow.
- The AquaPrime cloth media filter utilized a max loading of 8 lbs. TSS/Day/ft2.
- We assumed the influent conditions to the cloth media filter in design #153954, along with typical loading removals to
obtain the influent parameters listed in the UltraFiltration design summary.
Desian #153954 -- Cloth Filter and OF Train Desian
In design #153954 we have designed the one (1) 8-Disk AquaDisk@ Cloth Media Filter followed by three (3)
UltraFiltration@ Trains consisting of fifty-two (52) membrane modules per train to process an average flow of 2 MGD and a
maximum flow of 3 MGD.
Please note the following design considerations:
- We have included the cloth media filter to reduce the loadings to the UltraFiltration membranes to increase the flux, thus
reducing the number of required modules.
- Redundancy was not considered in either mechanical equipment design.
- Outdoor provisions, such as stainless steel control panel enclosures, HMI sunshield and an A/C unit have been included
in the cloth media filter design.
Preliminary pricing, including freight to the jobsite and our standard start-up supervision services, is as follows:
- Cloth Media Filter: $314,800
- UltraFiltration Membranes: $1,566,540
Desian #153936 - AauaPrime@ Desian
Based on the flows received, and the assumed influent loadings to the system, two (2) 8-disk AquaPrime@ Cloth Media
Filters, Model 108, in concrete configuration, are recommended to handle the design criteria in the referenced report, for a
primary effluent application. As the above design option for tertiary application, because of the short time around request
and not sufficient information available, this design is subject to change as the design criteria becomes available.
Redundancy has been included in this recommendation.
Preliminary budget price for the equipment in this design, which includes freight to the jobsite and our standard start-up
supervision services, is $1,132,000.
Please review the attachments and let us know if you have questions or if additional information is required.

Sincerely,
Jim Cooper
Heyward Incorporated
704-583-2305 - office
704-591-1270 - cell
[e-mail]

AQUA -AEROBIC SYSTEMS, INC.
A Metawater Company
Process Design Report
NOVOZYMES NA INC NC
Design# 153954
Option: Preliminary CMF / OF Treatment Train
Design
AquaMB Process®
Multiple Barrier Membrane System
October 26, 2018
Designed By: Jakob Nowicki
6306 N. Alpine Rd Loves Park, IL 61111
[phone] www.aaua-aerobic.com © 2018 Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc

Design Notes
Process/Site
- Pre cloth media filtration treatment includes phosphorous removal system.
Filtration
- The cloth media filter recommendation and anticipated effluent quality are based upon influent water quality conditions as
shown under "Design Parameters" of this Process Design Report
- The anticipated filtered effluent quality is based on the filter influent conditions as shown under "Design Parameters" of this
Process Design Report. In addition, the filter influent should be free of algae and other solids that are not filterable through a
nominal 5 micron pore size media. Provisions to treat algae and condition the solids to be filterable are the responsibility of
others.
For this application, pile filter cloth is recommended.
Redundancy has not been considered in the cloth media filter design.
Membrane
Chemicals required for process and/or cleaning and their containers are not included.
Spare parts are not included.
Interconnecting wiring and piping are not included unless specifically called out within this design.
Influent to the membrane system must contain no substance that is incompatible with the membrane, epoxy potting, SS/PVC
piping, or EPDM gaskets/seals, including silicones, solvents, or free oil.
Influent to the membranes must contain no more than 3 mg/I of fats, oils, or grease (FOG).
Acid and chlorine pump sizing is based on an influent alkalinity of 500 mg/I as CaCO3, conductivity of 1000 uS/cm, & hardness
of 100 mg/I as CaCO3 and assumes there are no additional contaminants that will affect the pH.
CIP system piping is not included for OF system
The design of the OF backwash pump(s) assumes the backwash drain flow empties into an open drain near the OF train(s)
System is designed to handle the maximum flow with all OF trains online.
The coagulant and CEB chemical feed systems are included for the OF system.
The OF feed and backwash pumps will be VFD-controlled.
Equipment
The control panel does not include motor starters or VFDs, which should be provided in a separate MCC (by others).
Equipment selection is based upon Aqua Aerobic Systems' standard materials of construction and electrical components
- Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. is familiar with various "Buy American" Acts (i.e. AIS, ARRA, Federal FAR 52.225, EXIM Bank,
USAid, PA Steel Products Act, etc.). As the project develops Aqua -Aerobic Systems can work with you to ensure full
compliance of our goods with various Buy American provisions if they are applicable/required for the project. When applicable,
please provide us with the specifics of the project's "Buy American" provisions.
- A dual -compressor air supply system has been included for all Aqua -Aerobic MBR equipment requiring process air (e.g.
pneumatic valves).
- This product is being sold as a domestic project. However, if circumstances arise where this item would be exported, this
product is classified as ECCN 213352 under US export compliance laws/regulations. This product would require an export
license from the Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) to all countries listed in CB Column 2 on the
BIS country chart, if the goods are exported from the United States. See http://www.bis.doc.gov website for details and
additional information for compliance with the laws/regulations.
10/26/2018 2:19:22PM Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc CONFIDENTIAL Page 2 of 8
NOVOZYMES NA INC NC / Design#: 153954

AquaDISK Tertiary Filtration - Design Summary
DESIGN INFLUENT CONDITIONS
Pre -Filter Treatment: Phosphorus Removal System
Avg. Design Flow = 2 MGD = 1388.89 gpm = 7571 m'/day
Max Design Flow = 3 MGD = 2083.3 gpm = 11356 m'/day
Effluent
DESIGN PARAMETERS Influent mg/I Required <= mg/I
Anticipated
Avg. Total Suspended Solids: TSSa 20 TSSa 10
TSSa
Max. Total Suspended Solids: TSSm 25
-
Phosphorus: Total P 10 Total P 4
Total P
*Turbidity: NTU 4
NTU
*Note: Tubidity represented in Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU's) in lieu of mg/I.
AquaDISK FILTER RECOMMENDATION
Qty Of Filter Units Recommended = 1
Number Of Disks Per Unit = 8
Total Number Of Disks Recommended = 8
Total Filter Area Provided = 430.4 ft2 = (39.99 m2)
Filter Model Recommended = AquaDisk Package: Model ADFSP-54 x 8E-PC
Filter Media Cloth Type = OptiFiber PES-14
AquaDISK FILTER CALCULATIONS
Filter Type:
Vertically Mounted Cloth Media Disks featuring automatically operated vacuum backwash . Tank shall include a rounded bottom
and solids removal system.
Average Flow Conditions:
Average Hydraulic Loading = Avg. Design Flow (gpm) / Recommended Filter Area (ft2)
= 1388.9 / 430.4 ft2
= 3.23 gpm/ft2 (7.89 m/hr) at Avg. Flow
Maximum Flow Conditions:
Maximum Hydraulic Loading
Solids Loading:
Solids Loading Rate
= Max. Design Flow (gpm) / Recommended Filter Area (ft2)
= 2083.3 / 430.4 ft2
= 4.84 gpm/ft2 (11.83 m/hr) at Max. Flow
= (Ibs TSS/day at max flow and max TSS loading) / Recommended Filter Area (ft2)
= 625.5 Ibs/day / 430.4 ft2
= 1.45 lbs. TSS /day/ft2 (7.09 kg. TSS/day/m2)
<= mg/I
10
4
4
10/26/2018 2:19:22PM Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc CONFIDENTIAL Page 5 of 8
NOVOZYMES NA INC NC / Design#: 153954

Aqua UltraFiltrationTM System Design Summary
DESIGN INFLUENT CONDITIONS
Pre-UF Treatment: Aqua Cloth Media Filtration
Avg. Design Flow: = 2.000 MGD = 7,571 m3/day
Max. Design Flow: = 3.000 MGD = 11,357 m'/day
INFLUENT PARAMETERS
Dissolved Organic Carbon:
Turbidity (NTU):
Suspended Solids:
SITE CONDITIONS
Ambient Air Temperature:
Influent Waste Temperature
MEMBRANE PROCESS VARIABLES:
Number of Parallel Membrane Trains:
No. Membrane Modules per Train:
Active Membrane Area per Module:
Total Membrane Area Provided:
Maximum Membrane Flux:
Recovery:
Est. Membrane Average Power Consumption:
Est. Membrane Average Chemical Consumption:
Effluent
Influent mg/I Required <_ mg/I Anticipated <_ mg/I
DOC 20
Turb. 4 Turb. 1 Turb. <0.1
TSS 10 TSS 2 TSS <2
Maximum
82 F 27.8 C
68 F 20 C
Minimum
25 F -3.9 C
50F 10C
3
52
861 ft2
134,347 ft2
26.9 Gallons/ft2/day (GFD)
83.2 %
122.7 kWh/day
Design
82 F 27.8 C
50F 10C
= 80 m2
= 12480 m2
= 45.6 Liters/m2/hour (LMH)
3.458 gallons/day
50.0% NaOH
4.095 gallons/day
32.0% HCI
0.291 gallons/day
12.5% NaOCI
169.9 gallons/day
48.5% Alum
Elevation
594 ft
181 m
SYSTEM DIMENSIONS:
Length
Width (Depth)
Height
Feed Tank:
= 8.5 ft diameter
= 2.6 m
= 6000
gallons
= 15.7 ft
= 4.8 m
Membrane Assembly (ea):
= 14.1 ft
= 4.3 m
= 4.7 ft
= 1.4 m
= 8.69 ft
= 2.6 m
Feed Skid (ea):'
= 10.1 ft
= 3.1 m
= 8.7 ft
= 2.6 m
= 9.4 ft
= 2.9 m
Backwash Tank:
= 8.5 ft diameter
= 2.6 m
= 4500
gallons
= 11.9 ft
= 3.6 m
Chemical Feed System (ea):z
= 4.33 ft
= 1.3 m
= 1.6 ft
= 0.5 m
= 4 ft
= 1.2 m
Main Control Panel:
= 4 ft
= 1.2 m
= 1.0 ft
= 0.3 m
= 5 ft
= 1.5 m
CIP Tank:
= 5.33 ft diameter
= 1.6 m
= 1000
gallons
= 6.75 ft
= 2.1 m
Notes:
'Each feed skid is typically mounted to its membrane assembly.
2Each chemical feed system can be mounted to a wall/frame and contains equipment for pumping two separate chemicals (tanks/containers by others).
Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. CONFIDENTIAL Page 4 of 8

Equipment Summary
Air Compressor
1 Valve Actuation Compressed Air System(s) will be provided as follows:
- (2) compressor pumps rated for 1.0 hp each pump with a 80-gallon receiver tank, air dryer, alternating control
panel, and wide range pressure switches.
(1) Coalescing, oil removing filter
(1) Set of 4 machine vibration isolators
(1) Adjustable pressure regulator
Cloth Media Filters
AquaDisk Tanks/Basins
1 AquaDisk Model # ADFSP-54x8E-PC Package Filter Painted Steel Tank(s) consisting of:
8 Disk painted steel tank(s).
3" ball valve(s).
AquaDisk Centertube Assemblies
1 Centertube(s) consisting of:
304 stainless steel centertube weldment(s).
Centertube driven sprocket(s).
Dual wheel assembly(ies).
Rider wheel bracket assembly(ies).
Effluent seal plate.
Centertube bearing kit(s).
Effluent centertube lip seal(s).
Pile cloth media and non -corrosive support frame assemblies.
Disk segment 304 stainless steel support rods.
Neoprene media sealing gaskets.
1 Cloth set(s) will have the following feature:
- Cloth will be OptiFiber PES-14.
AquaDisk Drive Assemblies
1 Drive System(s) consisting of:
Gearbox with motor.
Drive spocket(s).
Drive chain(s) with pins.
Stationary drive bracket weldment(s).
Adjustable drive bracket weldment(s).
Chain guard weldment(s).
Warning label(s).
AquaDisk Backwash/Sludge Assemblies
1 Backwash System(s) consisting of:
Backwash shoe assemblies.
Backwash shoe support weldment(s)-
1 1/2" flexible hose.
Stainless steel backwash shoe springs.
Hose clamps.
1 Backwash/Solids Waste Pump(s) consisting of:
- Backwash/waste pump(s).
10/26/2018 2:19:22PM Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc CONFIDENTIAL Page 5 of 8
NOVOZYMES NA INC NC / Design#: 153954

Stainless steel anchors.
0 to 15 psi pressure gauge(s).
0 to 30 inches mercury vacuum gauge(s).
Throttling gate valve(s).
3" ball valve(s).
AquaDisk Instrumentation
1 Pressure Transmitter(s) consisting of:
- Level transmitter(s).
1 Float Switch(es) consisting of:
- Float switch(es).
1 Vacuum Transmitter(s) consisting of:
- Vacuum transmitter(s).
AquaDisk Valves
1 Set(s) of Backwash Valves consisting of:
- 2" full port, three piece, stainless steel body ball valve(s), grooved end connections with single phase electric
actuator(s). Valve / actuator combination shall be TCI / RCI (RCI, a division of Rotork), Nibco, or equal.
2" flexible hose.
Victaulic coupler(s).
1 Solids Waste Valve(s) consisting of:
- 2" full port, three piece, stainless steel body ball valve(s), grooved end connections with single phase electric
actuator(s). Valve / actuator combination shall be TCI / RCI (RCI, a division of Rotork), Nibco, or equal.
2" flexible hose.
Victaulic coupler(s).
AquaDisk Controls w/Starters
1 Conduit Installation(s) consisting of:
- PVC conduit and fittings.
1 Control Panel(s) consisting of:
Nema 4X 304 stainless steel enclosure(s).
Control panel sun shield.
Air conditioner(s).
Circuit breaker with handle.
Transformer(s).
Fuses and fuse blocks.
Line filter(s).
GFI convenience outlet(s).
Control relay(s).
Selector switch(es).
Indicating pilot light(s).
MicroLogix 1400 PLC(s).
Ethernet switch(es).
Power supply(ies).
Operator interface(s)-
Operator interface sun shield(s).
Motor starter(s)-
Terminal blocks.
UL label(s).
Membrane
Rfi—k nnc
156 Membrane Module(s) with T-Rack(s), each consisting of:
10/26/2018 2:19:22PM Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc CONFIDENTIAL Page 6 of 8
NOVOZYMES NA INC NC / Design#: 153954

80 square meter PES membrane modules encased in PVC housing.
T-Rack 3.0 mounting assembly(ies)
3 Membrane Feed Skid(s) consisting of:
Painted steel feed skid frame(s).
Piping within the membrane skid, required for interconnection of skid mounted membrane system components.
Piping will be schedule 80 PVC, socket welded or threaded. Air piping will be stainless steel tubing and schedule 10
stainless steel piping.
10 inch pneumatically operated wafer style butterfly valve(s).
Pressure transmitter(s).
1/4" Solenoid valve(s).
8" magnetic flow -meter and converter(s).
Air filter(s).
6" Expansion joint(s).
4 inch gasket kit(s)
3 Strainer(s) will be provided as follows:
- 6 inch manual Y-strainer with NSF -approved epoxy lining and 60 mesh 304 stainless steel screen.
1 Control Panel(s) consisting of:
NEMA 12 panel enclosure suitable for indoor installation and constructed of painted steel.
Fuses and fuse blocks.
GFI convenience outlet(s)-
Control relay(s).
Selector switch(es).
Indicating pilot light(s).
Ethernet switch(es).
Hubbell Cat 6 Ethernet Cable.
Power supply(ies).
Terminal blocks.
Compactlogix Processor.
Compactflash.
End cap(s).
Power supply(s).
Input card(s)
Relay output(s).
Analog input(s).
Analog output(s).
Panelview plus 6 1250 operator interface(s).
UL label(s).
Enter Misc Description
3 Electrical Junction Box(es) will be provided as follows:
NEMA 4X stainless steel enclosure(s)-
Terminal blocks.
1 CIP System(s) will be provided as follows:
1000 gallon capacity heavy duty polyethelene holding tank.
Mixer(s).
Float switch(es).
316 stainless steel float switch mounting bracket(s)-
Gorman-Rupp pump model 14A22-13 with base and direct drive 7.5 HP, TEFC, 3 ph. motor.
4" butterfly valve(s) with lever operator as manufacturer by Nibco or equal.
4 inch diameter Nibco F-918-B check valve(s) with cast iron body with bronze disk.
Immersion heater(s) 25KW.
Local control station(s) with on/off switches, on indicating lights, in a Nema 4X enclosure.
Polyethylene tank(s).
1/2 HP Mixer(s).
Centrifugal pump with 7.5 HP, 3 ph. motor.
4" manual butterfly valve(s).
10/26/2018 2:19:22PM Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc CONFIDENTIAL Page 7 of 8
NOVOZYMES NA INC NC / Design#: 153954

Membrane Accessories
1 OF Feed Tank(s) consisting of:
Polyethylene tank(s).
1/2 HP Mixer(s).
Pressure transducer(s).
3" PVC flange with coupling.
1/2" PVC pipe.
Float switch(es).
Float switch mounting bracket(s).
1 Backwash Tank(s) consisting of:
Polyethylene tank(s).
Pressure transducer(s).
3" PVC flange with coupling.
1/2" PVC pipe.
Transfer Pumps/Valves (Membranes)
3 Membrane Feed Pump Installation(s) consisting of:
Centrifugal pump with 20 HP, 3 ph. motor.
6" manual butterfly valve(s).
1 Membrane Backwash Skid(s) consisting of:
10" magnetic flow -meter and converter(s).
Centrifugal pump with 75 HP, 3 ph. motor.
10 inch pneumatically operated wafer style butterfly valve(s).
Air filter(s).
Chemical Feed Systems
2 Chemical Feed System for acid, caustic, chlorine, and coagulant, each system consisting of the following:
PVC backing panel(s).
Calibration columns.
Chemical feed pumps.
Pressure relief valves.
GFI outlet(s).
Ball valves.
316 stainless steel shelf weldments.
Polypropylene utility trays.
6 Chemical Flow Control Valve(s) consisting of:
- 1/2" Electric PVC ball valve(s).
10/26/2018 2:19:22PM Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc CONFIDENTIAL Page 8 of 8
NOVOZYMES NA INC NC / Design#: 153954

Lawrence, Jordan
From: Jim Cooper <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 2:23 PM
To: Lawrence, Jordan; Poulios, Michael
Subject: Novozymes NA INC, NC Biopharma Project Franklinton, NC - Aqua Aerobics RO
Proposal #104226G
Attachments: 2018-11-05 Preliminary RO Design 154051.pdf
This message originated from outside your organization
Michael and Jordan:
Provided from Aqua Aerobic System, preliminary pricing for the RO System detailed in the attached Design 154051 to
include freight to the jobsite and standard start-up supervision services is $2,583,576.00.
Please review the attached information and let us know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Jim Cooper
Heyward Incorporated
704-583-2305 - office
704-591-1270 - cell
[e-mail]

AQUA -AEROBIC SYSTEMS, INC.
A Metawater Company
Process Design Report
NOVOZYMES NA INC NC
Design# 154051
Reverse Osmosis (RO)
System
November 05, 2018
Designed By: David Holland
6306 N. Alpine Rd Loves Park, IL 61111
[phone] www.aaua-aerobic.com © 2018 Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc

Design Notes
Membrane
Chemicals required for process and/or cleaning and their containers are not included.
Spare parts are not included.
Interconnecting wiring and piping are not included unless specifically called out within this design.
Influent to the RO system must contain no substance that is incompatible with the RO element materials, SS/PVC piping, or
gaskets/seals, including oxidants, solvents, or free oil.
Influent to the RO must contain no more than 0.1 mg/I of fats, oils, or grease (FOG).
The RO will share the CIP system included with the OF system.
The design of the RO system assumes the backwash drain flow empties into an open drain near the RO trains.
System is designed to produce the maximum flow with all RO trains online and a portion of the influnet bypassing the RO
trains.
- The RO booster and high-pressure pumps will be VFD-controlled.
Equipment
The control panel does not include motor starters or VFDs, which should be provided in a separate MCC (by others).
Equipment selection is based upon Aqua Aerobic Systems' standard materials of construction and electrical components
- Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. is familiar with various "Buy American" Acts (i.e. AIS, ARRA, Federal FAR 52.225, EXIM Bank,
USAid, PA Steel Products Act, etc.). As the project develops Aqua -Aerobic Systems can work with you to ensure full
compliance of our goods with various Buy American provisions if they are applicable/required for the project. When applicable,
please provide us with the specifics of the project's "Buy American" provisions.
- This product is being sold as a domestic project. However, if circumstances arise where this item would be exported, this
product is classified as ECCN 213352 under US export compliance laws/regulations. This product would require an export
license from the Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) to all countries listed in CB Column 2 on the
BIS country chart, if the goods are exported from the United States. See http://www.bis.doc.gov website for details and
additional information for compliance with the laws/regulations.
11/06/2018 8:03:03AM Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc CONFIDENTIAL Page 2 of 4
NOVOZYMES NA INC NC / Design#: 154051

Single -Pass RO Design Summary
Novozymes, NC (ID #104226G) AASI Design Number 154051
RO SKID DESIGN
Skid Quantity
Membrane Skid Size
First Stage Housing Qty:
Second Stage Housing Qty:
Third Stage Housing Qty:
Membranes per Housing:
Total Membrane Quantity:
=3
= 23'(L) x 9.4'(W) x 9.5'(H)
= 19
=9
=5
=6
= 594
MEMBRANE PROCESS VARIABLES: 1
Active Area per Membrane: =
400 ft2 per membrane (37.2 m2)
Total Membrane Area Provided: =
237,600 ft2 total (22,073 m2)
Maximum Daily RO Feed Flow (all trains in service): =
1977 gpm
Maximum Daily RO Permeate Flow (all trains in service) =
1740 gpm
Maximum Daily RO Concentrate Flow (all trains in servic =
237 gpm
Maximum Daily RO Recycle Flow (all trains in service): =
32 gpm
RO System Recovery (all trains in service): =
88 %
Maximum Daily RO Bypass Flow (all trains in service): =
360 gpm
Maximum Daily System Effluent Flow (all trains in service =
2100 gpm
RO System Recovery (all trains in service): =
90 %
Average System Power at 300C (two trains in service): =
3291 kwh/day at 2 MGD (1400 gpm) average daily effluent flov
Parameter System Influent Expected
Blended Effluent
pH 7
6.5
Water temp (°C) 30
30
Sodium (mg/1) 395
96 (47,848 Ibs/mo)
Potassium (mg/1) 508
132 (65,818 Ibs/mo)
Ammonium (mg/1) 0.62
0.2 (69 Ibs/mo as N)
Sulfate (mg/1) 118
23
Cl (mg/1) 955
240
Nitrate (mg/1) 17.7
11.2 (1,264 Ibs/mo as N)
Phosphate (mg/1) 9.2
1.8 (289 Ibs/mo as P)
SDI (%/min): <2
-
Turbidity (NTU) <0.1
-
TDS (mg/1) 2004
503
'Flows and recoveries are with new membranes. After 5 years, total system recovery will drop to 87% to maintain effluent flow.
2Amounts listed are at the average daily flow of 2 MGD.
Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc. CONFIDENTIAL Printed on: 11/5/2018 at 9:47 AM Page 3 of 4

Equipment Summary
1 RO Booster Pump System consisting of the following:
(2) Centrifugal pumps with 30 HP, 3 ph. motors.
4" magnetic flow -meter and converter for RO bypass line.
4-inch electric butterfly valve for RO bypass line.
Actuator will be upgraded from open/close service to modulating service.
3 Reverse Osmosis (RO) Trains, each consisting of:
- (33) Pressure vessels arranged in a 19 x 9 x 5 3-stage array, FRP construction, 450 psi rating, each capable of
holding (6) RO elements.
(1) Painted steel equipment frame.
(8) Stainless steel multi -cartridge pre -filter housings, each designed to accept (7) standard 40" long filter
cartridges.
(56) 1 micron nominal polypropylene filter cartridges.
(1) Feed pump horizontal end suction, centrifugal pump, as manufactured by Tonkaflo or equal. Pump will be
coupled to a 100 HP, 460 volt, 3 phase, 60 cycle, premium efficient, inverter duty TEFC motor.
(1) Lot of stainless steel high pressure piping, Sch. 80 PVC low pressure piping, and EPDM or NBR gaskets.
(2) Flow meters, for permeate & concentrate.
Permeate conductivity monitor.
(8) Pressure indicators, for Pre & Post Cartridge Filter, RO Feed , Pump Outlet, Interstage (x2), Concentrate, &
Permeate.
(3) Pressure switches, for Feed, Permeate, Concentrate.
Control panel with Allen-Bradley (A-B) CompactLogix PLC and A-B PanelView Plus 700 monitor.
(2) 6-inch electric butterfly valves for permeate flush.
(198) Hydranautics LFC3-LD low -fouling spiral -wound polyamide RO elements, each 8-inch diameter x 40
inches long.
1 Duplex Chemical Feed System for antiscalant and bisulfite, consisting of the following:
PVC backing panel.
(2) Calibration columns.
(2) Chemical feed pumps.
(2) Pressure relief valves.
GFI outlet.
Ball valves.
(2) 316 stainless steel shelf weldments.
(2) Polypropylene utility trays.
11/06/2018 8:03:03AM Aqua -Aerobic Systems, Inc CONFIDENTIAL Page 4 of 4
NOVOZYMES NA INC NC / Design#: 154051

8. Evaporator
.:1 Dewberry°
Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis I APP M

(j) VEOIIA
3 July 2017
Dewberry
2610 Wycliff RD, Suite 410
Raleigh, NC 27607
To: Jordan Lawrence - [e-mail]
c/o Finn Nielsen — VAND Solutions.
Subject: Evaled System for Novo Nordisk in Clayton North Carolina
Dear Jordan,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with our preliminary proposal for two EVALED mechanical
vapor recompression evaporators for your customer Novo Nordisk, located in Clayton, North Carolina.
Veolia Water Technology specializes in technological solutions and provides the complete range of water
and wastewater treatment services including equipment supply, design, build, maintain and upgrade. A
customer focused culture combined with a portfolio of more than 350 proprietary technologies makes
Veolia a preferred partner for all water and wastewater related projects.
Completely computer -based for continuous function without operator, EVALED° evaporators allow high
concentration ratios, good separation levels as well as recycling and a decrease in volumes to be
disposed.
The different EVALED models are:
• EVALED° PC - Heat pump vacuum evaporators
• EVALED° AC - Hot/cold water vacuum evaporators
• EVALED° RV - Mechanical Vapor Recompression evaporators
This document is confidential and contains proprietary information. It is not to be disclosed to a third party without the written consent of Veolia
Water Technologies.
Veolia Water Technologies
6981 N. Park Drive, Suite 600
Pennsauken, NJ 08109 USA
tel. [phone] • fax [phone]
www.veoliawatertech.com

[A�
Veolia EVALED® Mechanical Vapor Recompression (MVR) forced circulation evaporators
The new EVALED RV F series evolves from the MVR range, itself the pinnacle of technological excellence
within every industry using water in its process. Designed to notably reduce the volume of wastewater
and its disposal costs, and to stringently comply with the discharge limits imposed by the numerous
environmental regulations worldwide, EVALED evaporators have now moved on to their next level of
excellence: RV F is the answer to the future challenges facing mankind.
The technical solutions applied, backed by experimental analyses, permit a further improvement in
performance and energy savings:
• the innovative demister offers excellent distillate quality levels;
• the new compressor has been repositioned and offers an improved transmission; a stainless
steel version is also available;
• an even more efficient thermal exchange recovers energy both from the concentrate and the
distillate.
Close attention to customer needs, matured from the know-how accumulated from thousands of
installations worldwide, ensures a focused approach as regards the user's daily needs:
• improved accessibility to all main components;
• user manual available in tablet format for a more intuitive and easier access to information;
• a new heat exchanger automatic chemical cleaning kit allows this activity to be scheduled during
the night, the weekend or any other moment, and with minimum manpower's employment;
• improved unit monitoring and remote control;
• a reduced footprint and the ability to install the unit outdoors.
EVALED's development was focused on further environmental awareness, driving the innovation
process towards an even greater respect for the ambient:
• further reductions in energy consumption and COZ emissions;
• a new soundproof housing offering notable noise reductions;
• completely drainable unit through the specific discharge sleeves, avoiding the risk of leakages
which could potentially be noxious for the environment.
RV F represents the new EVALED challenge, offering the User an even more focused solution featuring
real added value in every field.
Confidential Proposal Number-xx_1101016 Date 07/03/2017
Page 2of7

[A�
EVALED Process Description
The liquid to be treated is preheated in the heat exchanger E03 by the concentrate (if the optional
system V is installed) and in E02 by the discharging distillate. Then it enters the boiling chamber D01
(where the vacuum conditions of 70 kPa and 90°C are maintained). Pump G02 works continuously
recirculating the liquid to be treated in order to keep clean the heat exchanger E02 and feeding the
boiler through opening of valve VP01. The concentrate is recirculated through the primary heat
exchanger E01 (tube side). In the heat exchanger E01, the liquid receives from the condensing vapor the
heat to boil; once heated, the concentrate is sent back to the boiling chamber. As a result of the
vacuum, a part of the liquid immediately boils (flash evaporation). The produced vapor passes through
the drops separator (1-104) in order to eliminate suspended liquid drops and improve the quality of the
distillate.
The blower compresses the vapor and sends it to the heat exchanger E01 (shell side) where it releases
the latent heat to the process liquid. The condensed vapor is collected in the tank D02 and then it is
discharged after a heat exchange in E02. The sensor CE01 measures the conductivity of the distillate:
high conductivity means high entrainment of liquid in the boiling chamber and the machine shows an
alarm to the operator.
VrM
r.:D ' s Wd F 25 DIM
The temperature and the flow of the distillate are continuously measured.
The concentrate is discharged automatically through the valve VPOS. The flow of the discharged
concentrate is continuously measured.
Confidential Proposal Number-xx_1101016 Date 07/03/2017
Page 3of7

[A�
The density meter DT01 (if the optional system I is installed) allows to discharge the concentrate once it
reaches a density value set by the user.
The produced vapor in the boiling chamber is sucked into the positive displacement blower K01 that, by
means of the compression, raises the temperature; then, the vapor passes through the shell of the
exchanger E01 where it condenses and releases the latent heat to the recirculated liquid of the boiling
chamber.
Fans K02 and K05 allow to keep controlled the temperature of the oil in the blower in order to extend its
service life in case of operation in thermally hard conditions.
Thermal recovery is realised through the exchangers E03 (if the optional system V is installed) and E02.
The liquid to be treated crosses both of them and warms up before entering the boiling chamber.
Temperature sensor TE08 measures the temperature of the liquid to be treated entering the boiler after
the recovery exchangers.
The concentrate passes through the tube and shell heat exchanger E03 and cools down, before its
discharging, as a consequence of the heat exchange with the liquid to be treated. Valve VP03 (if the
optional system V is installed) allows the flow of the liquid to be treated through exchanger E03. The
distillate enters the heat exchanger E02 and cools down, before its discharging, as a consequence of the
heat exchange with the liquid to be treated.
Temperature sensor TE07 measures the temperature of the distillate exiting the machine.
Confidential Proposal Number-xx_1101016 Date 07/03/2017
Page 4of7

[A�
Design Basis
The design basis is provided in the Equipment Request, June 2017 and is as follows:
Main Parameters
units
Characteristics
Average flow rate
gpd
48,000
TDS
mg/I
2,000
Expected Performance Summary
Considering the TDS in the influent, the expected distillation yield should be 90%.
A bench laboratory boil off test can be completed in the Veolia New Jersey lab to confirm the expected
performance of the Evaled unit with respect to syrup and distillate quality and quantity.
Confidential Proposal Number-xx_1101016 Date 07/03/2017
Page 5of7

[A�
Preliminary Scope of Work
Veolia will supply the following system components and services as described in this section.
• Two Evaled units TC120000, mechanical vapor recompression evaporators with forced
circulation and external shell and tube heat exchanger. Each are made of special materials in
contact with the liquid (evaporation chamber and heat exchanger in Super duplex stainless
steel). Each unit also includes centrifugal pump with fluxed mechanical seal, a positive
displacement blower, an automatic, continuous 24/24h 7/7 days PLC.
• Engineering Scope. Veolia will provide an engineering package associated with our work
scope.
• 10 continuous days of supervision during the installation and start-up.
Clarifications and Assumptions
Scope of work by owner:
All work not described above, including but limited to:
1. Installation work including civil design, earth work, foundations, building, mechanical and
electrical installation.
2. All permits.
3. All utilities (water, air, and natural gas or other as required), and influent wastewater and
effluent wastewater tie-in's to supplied system.
4. Consumables for operation (chemicals, or first fill of lubricants).
5. Storage tank.
Clarifications and assumptions:
1. Equipment is supplied per Veolia's standard specifications.
2. Supply documentation will be prepared per Veolia's standards.
3. Stamping of drawings by a Professional Engineer is not included.
4. Process hazard review (PHA) is excluded.
Confidential Proposal Number-xx_1101016 Date 07/03/2017
Page 6of7

[A�
Pricing
The budget price associated with the Veolia work scope as described above is $2,750,000 USD.
In order to confirm the distillate & syrup quality, a bench lab testing can be provided - $2,500 USD per
test per sample.
Material delivery will be 28 weeks after receipt of shop approval drawings.
Delivery DAT Port of Boston (Incoterms 2010).
Taxes, bonds and letters of credit, and Liquidated Damages have been excluded.
This non -binding estimate of probable cost is presented for project planning and evaluation purposes
only and is not a firm offer.
Veolia Standard Terms and Conditions Apply.
Thank you for the opportunity to present our budget proposal which we shall be pleased to formalize at
your request. We shall call in the next few days to follow up.
Kind regards,
Chris Harvey
Director, Business Development
VEOLIA WATER TECHNOLOGIES
Cell: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
6981 N. Park Drive, Suite 600,
Pennsauken, NJ 08109. USA.
[e-mail]
www.veoliawaterstna.com
Resourcing the world G E LF
Confidential Proposal Number-xx_1101016 Date 07/03/2017
Page 7of7

9. Bioreactor Tanks
.:1 Dewberry°
Novozymes North America, Inc. I Engineering Alternatives Analysis I APP M

LIQUID TECH TANK SYSTEMS, INC.
Send To: Jim Cooper
Company: Heyward
Subject: Dewberry Bio Pharma/Franklinton, NC
Date: October 19, 2018
Bid #: 1842
We are pleased to offer the following proposal for your review. Liquid Tech Tank Systems, Inc. will provide
all tank materials for the prices listed on the following pages.
Aqua -Spec Builders, Inc. will provide all the installation for the prices listed on their bid contained in a separate
document.
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us and we will be more than happy to help
you.
If you are interested in purchasing, please complete both order forms, provide two separate purchase orders
accordingly, and return to the appropriate office.
BB/ss
Web Site: www.liquidtechtanks.com E-mail: bbltts comcast.net

LIQUID TECH TANK SYSTEMS, INC. BID SHEET
Liquid Tech Tank Systems, Inc.
125 Old Orchard Road (Accounts Payable/Receivable)
53 South York Road (Physical/Shipping)
Dillsburg, PA 17019
Send To
Heyward
Attention
Jim Cooper
Subject
Dewberry Bio Pharma/Franklinton, NC
Total pages: 2
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
From
Brian Badger
Date
October 19, 2018
Bid #: 1842
LTTS MODEL 107-22 1,379,769 gallons $627,750 each
• Sizes are nominal w/2' freeboard
PRICE INCLUDES
• Submittal information, delivery to job site
• Complete tank package, 304 bolted stainless steel tank shell, shell manway, galvanized hardware,
stainless steel bolts, galvanized stairs and landing
• Concrete foundation (which may be ground -formed) and monolithically poured concrete floor
(performed by sub -contracted installation crew)
DOES NOT INCLUDE
• Leveling tank site to sub -grade (10" - 11" below finished tank floor level), below grade rock
excavation, obtaining 2,000 psf soil bearing capacity (soil analysis of prepared site shall be the
responsibility of others)
• Licenses, permits, bid bonds, performance and payment bonds, sales/and or use taxes
• If the project is exempt, the Buyer must provide LTTS with a tax -exemption certificate upon
ordering or applicable taxes will be added.
• Provisions for any piping to tank, valves, mixers, lighting, wiring, control systems, and other
auxiliary equipment are supplied and installed by others
• Concrete testing, insulation, and heaters are the responsibility of others
• Representative mark-up
• Items not expressly stated above on this bid are not included.
PAYMENT TERMS
• 50% due within 7 days of receipt of purchase order
• 50% due prior to shipment
• No Retainage Applicable
BB/ss
Web Site: www.liquidtechtanks.com E-mail: bbltts(cDcomcast. net

LTTS Bid Sheet
CONDITIONS
• WARRANTY: Seller warrants its product against defects in workmanship and material for a period of one (1) year
from the date of installation or delivery (but not to exceed 15 months from date of delivery of the product to the site
upon which it is to be erected). Buyer must provide written notice of any claim under this warranty within 30 days after
they become aware of the defect and must provide access to the product for Seller's investigation.
a. This warranty only applies to the original purchaser and only to equipment manufactured by the Seller. It does
not apply to components used in conjunction with the Seller's product that was not manufactured by the Seller.
Seller will have sole discretion to approve warranty coverage. The warranty also does not apply to the erection or
installation of Seller's products, which are not factory -trained installers.
b. Any replacement part or accessory provided in accordance with this warranty will carry a warranty for the balance
of the period of warranty applicable to the part it replaces. The Seller will supply the replacement part F.O.B. the
Seller's factory, or the Seller, at its option will repair or allow credit for such part. The Seller does not cover
corrosion rust through in applications that are not within the guidelines of 304/316 Stainless Steel Corrosion
Limits, or if there is evidence of abuse, due to periods of high concentrations of highly corrosive chemicals.
c. Seller shall not be liable for any person or persons working on or around the tank, or any other persons gaining
access to the tank, after installation is complete.
• AFFILIATES: Buyer and Seller further agree that Seller's Affiliates may perform work for Buyer. In such event, the
references to Seller in this Agreement shall mean Seller and such Affiliate of Seller. The Affiliate and Buyer shall be
deemed to ratify, and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Agreement with respect to its subject
matter.
• STAGING: Adequate area for material staging adjacent to foundation is required. Typical 100' laydown area is
requested with 360' clear access provided.
• ADDITIONAL WORK: No extra labor, materials, or parts will be furnished under this Agreement, unless it has been
ordered by Buyer's change order, and the prices and terms of sales are approved by Seller. Seller may at its option
subcontract labor, material, and parts required by this Agreement without Buyer's consent. Unless otherwise agreed
to, Seller shall not be responsible for unpacking, storage, field assembly of goods, or construction of foundations.
Furthermore, Seller shall not be responsible for the installation, attachment, or connection of piping, conveying, and
ventilating equipment or other attachment of accessories or components not sold hereunder.
• THEFT: Buyer is required to provide protection to prevent theft of material from job site.
• CANCELLATION: Buyer's cancellation of any order is required to be in writing, and Buyer is subject to pay a
cancellation fee equal to 25% of the total purchase price plus all non -recoverable costs and expenses.
• FAILURE: In the event the Buyer fails to abide by the terms and conditions of the Agreement, requiring LTTS to
collect on amounts due, purchaser agrees to pay all interest, all attorney fees and costs incurred by LTTS as a result.
• INDEMNIFICATION: LTTS will be responsible for their negligence only.
SCHEDULE
• Submittals: 2-3 weeks after order placement
• Manufacture: 8-10 weeks after receipt of approval (pending current workload)
• Erection by dedicated sub -contractor: 2-4 weeks depending on tank size and weather conditions
If this schedule is not satisfactory, every effort will be made to meet your requirements. Aluminum domes can
significantly change the schedule. If one is required, please ask for an update.
* PRICE VALID FOR 15 DAYS FROM ABOVE DATE *
TO PLACE AN ORDER, FILL OUT THE REQUIRED INFORMATION, SIGN & RETURN
The undersigned is authorized to purchase products on behalf of the company they represent.
Printed Name
Title
Purchase Order Number
BB/ss
Signature
Date
Requested Delivery Date
Web Site: www.liquidtechtanks.com E-mail: bbltts(cDcomcast. net

AQUA -SPEC BUILDERS, INC. BID SHEET'
AQUA SPEC BUILDERS, INC.
PO BOX 567
LITfTZ, PA 17543
SEND TO
H EYWARD
ATTENTION
,AIM COOPER
SUBJECT
DEWBERRY BIO PHARMA/FRANKLINTON, NC
TOTAL PAGES: 2
LTTS MODEL 107-22
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
FROM
IVAN REIFF
DATE
OCTOBER 19, 2018
BID #: 1842
$192,500 EACH
PRICE INCLUDES
• COMPLETE ERECTION OF LIQUID TECH TANK INCLUDING FOOTER EXCAVATION, FOUNDATION
INSTALLATION, AND MONOLITHICALLY POURED CONCRETE FLOOR, STAIRS AND LANDING,
EQUIPMENT RENTAL IF REQUIRED, TRAVEL EXPENSES
DOES NOT INCLUDE
• LEVELING TANK SITE TO SUB -GRADE 0 0" - 1 1 " BELOW FINISHED TANK FLOOR LEVEL),
BELOW GRADE ROCK EXCAVATION, OBTAINING 2,000 PSF SOIL BEARING CAPACITY (SOIL
ANALYSIS OF PREPARED SITE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OTHERS)
• SUPPLYING ELECTRICITY (1 1 0/220) FOR ERECTION ADJACENT TO SITE
• DUE TO THE TIME FRAME OF ERECTION, DELAYS DUE TO INSTALLATION OF PIPING, AND/OR
THE AVAILABILITY OF WATER AT THE SITE; WE CANNOT HYDROSTATICALLY TEST THE TANK.
WE WILL HOWEVER RETURN TO CORRECT ANY LEAKS SHOULD THEY OCCUR. IF REQUIRED,
DISINFECTION IS TO BE HANDLED BY OTHERS.
• PREVAILING WAGES, SANITARY FACILITIES, TRASH DUMPSTER
• ITEMS NOT EXPRESSLY STATED ABOVE ON THIS BID ARE NOT INCLUDED.
ADDERS:
DEDUCTS:
PAYMENT TERMS
• 50% DUE WITHIN 7 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF PURCHASE ORDER.
• 40% DUE IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF EACH TANK IF MORE THAN ONE TANK IS
PURCHASED.
• 1 0% RETAINAGE DUE UPON SATISFACTORY LEAK TEST, START-UP, OR WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
COMPLETION (WHICHEVER COMES FIRST)
IR/ss
Web Site: www.liquidtechtanks.com E-mail: [e-mail]

AQUA -SPEC BUILDERS, INC. BID SHEET
CONDITIONS
• INSTALLATION: PRICE IS QUOTED ON SUMMER WEATHER CONDITIONS. INCREASED
COSTS MAY APPLY DURING WINTER WEATHER CONDITIONS.
A. INSTALLATION PRICING IS BASED ON FREE AND CLEAR ACCESS ALL AROUND THE
FOUNDATION WITH NO OVERHEAD OBSTRUCTIONS.
B. LEVEL AND COMPACTED TERRAIN TO AND AROUND WORK AREA IS REQUIRED.
C. OUR BID IS BASED ON OPEN WORK HOURS, UTILIZING ALL DAYLIGHT HOURS, 7
DAYS/WEEK. CONTINUOUS INSTALLATION IS REQUIRED, ELIMINATING THE NEED FOR
LOST TIME.
D. FOUNDATION CENTERLINES WILL BE ESTABLISHED BY OTHERS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION
CREW ARRIVING AT JOB SITE.
E. ONSITE SAFETY ORIENTATION UP TO ONE HOUR HAS BEEN INCLUDED IN PRICING. IF
ADDITIONAL SAFETY ORIENTATION OR CLASSES ARE REQUIRED, ADDITIONAL CHARGES
MAY BE APPLICABLE.
IN THE EVENT THE PURCHASER FAILS TO ABIDE BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE
CONTRACT, REQUIRING ASB TO COLLECT ON AMOUNTS DUE, PURCHASER AGREES TO PAY ALL
INTEREST, ALL ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS INCURRED BY ASB AS A RESULT.
*,PRICE VALID FOR 15 DA YS FROM ABOVE DATE
TO PLACE AN ORDER, FILL OUT THE REQUIRED INFORMATION, SIGN & RETURN
The undersigned is authorized to purchase products on behalf of the company they represent.
Printed Name
Title
Purchase Order Number
Signature
Date
Requested Delivery Date
NOTE. Typically Aqua -Spec Builders, Inc. will do the installation of the Liquid Tech tank. However, due to scheduling
conflicts other factory trained installation contractors may be required. The other contractors will be required to abide by
all conditions set forth in this bid.
IR/ss
Web Site: www.liquidtechtanks.com E-mail: [e-mail]