20181583 Ver 1_401 Application_20181116

WETLANDS
WATERS, INC.
Mr. David Shaeffer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Satellite Office
C/O Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
-And-
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: Nationwide Permit Verifications 18 & 39
6801 Old Mt. Holly Road
Charlotte, NC — Mecklenburg County
PINs: 05715113, 05715110
SAW -2018-01635
Mr. Shaeffer,
PAID October 251h, 2018
20781583
od D
The attached information including Pre -Construction Notification forms and supporting documentation associated
with a delineation of Waters of the US for the subject parcels are being provided as part of a Pre -Construction
Notification on behalf of James J. White IV of Nisbet Oil Company.
The project area is located on parcels tied to 6801 and 6901 Old Mt. Holly Rd. in Charlotte, NC, 28214, the
assemblage of which totals 11.224 acres. General land use in the vicinity of the project area consists of commercial,
industrial, and low-density residential property. The project area currently hosts a vacant residential structure and
storage shed, wooded acreage, and an existing sanitary sewer easement. A field delineation conducted by our firm
identified potentially jurisdictional wetlands and non -wetlands totaling 0.354 acres and 2,908 linear feet,
respectively, within the project boundaries. On August 13111, 2018 Wetlands & Waters, Inc. submitted a Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination Request to your office for the subject parcels. Please note that the delineation map and
schematics included with this application have been updated to reflected professionally surveyed acreage and linear
footage amounts for potentially jurisdictional aquatic resources. The Pre -Construction Notification also reflects
these changes.
Project Purpose and Description
The overall purpose of the proposed project is to construct a petroleum supply facility owned and operated by Nisbet
Oil Company. A nationwide permit 18 verification is requested to construct portions of the petroleum facility
including a tank farm, equipment staging and circulation area, a warehouse/office building, and stormwater BMPs
for the proposed property. A nationwide permit 39 verification is requested to construct a semi -truck staging and
parking area.
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed project has been designed to minimize impacts to aquatic features as much as is practicable while still
accommodating the necessary inner site circulation requirements for heavy equipment and vehicles. Additionally,
Mecklenburg County zoning laws require a minimum property line setback of 100' for petroleum storage facilities,
Christopher Huysman Tamp Bandy
170 Dew Drop Road 4108 LB Propst Drive
Sparta, NC 28675 NJv, Conover, NC 28613
336.406.0906 828.302.3437
[e-mail] WETLANDS & WATERS, INC [e-mail]

WETLANDS
Sc WATERS, INC.
thus limiting the placement of the tank farm and appurtenant parking and staging areas. Access to inner upland
portions of the site utilize a spanning bridge where an existing impact for a road crossing exists, thereby minimizing
impacts that would have been necessary to upfit the pre-existing road crossing to accommodate heavy equipment.
Access to the northeastern semi -truck parking and staging area has been designed to limit impacts to jurisdictional
features to the greatest extent possible. Several iterations of site design were considered. Further, the site plan was
designed to avoid impacts to higher -quality features in the north -northwestern portion of the property.
Mitigation
The applicant is proposing to mitigate for 0.157 acre of permanent impacts to the lower -quality riparian wetland in
the southern portion of the site at a ratio of 1.5:1 due to the quality assessment by the NCWAM assessment method,
and for 0.082 acre of permanent impacts to the higher -quality riparian wetland in the northeastern portion of the site
at a ratio of 2:1 due to higher quality. An approval letter from NC DMS is enclosed with this application. No
compensatory mitigation is proposed for stream impacts as impacts were minimized to less than 150 LF.
Please do not hesitate to contact us should more information be required to process this request.
Best Regards,
Meagan Jolly
704.681.3479
Enclosures: ORM
Pre -Construction Notification
Site Plan Schematics
Resource Maps
NC WAM Wetland Assessment Form
NC DMS Letter
NHP Report
Field Photos
Parcel Information
Christopher Huysman Tamp Bandy
170 Dew Drop Road 4108 LB Propst Drive
Sparta, NC 28675 J Conover, NC 28613
336.406.0906 .1 828.302.3437
[e-mail] WETLANDS & WATERS, INC [e-mail]

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- 2018-01635
Prepare file folder ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Nisbet Oil Company
Begin Date (Date Received):
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
2. Work Type: ❑✓ Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑✓ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a petroleum supply and fueling facility. The overall project consists of
a tank farm and fueling yard, warehouse/office building, semi -truck parking/staging, and appropriately sized stormwater
BMPs. Typical earth -moving equipment will be used, including but not limited to pan, excavator, dump trucks, etc.
4. Property Owner/ Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Al B Morvin /applicant James White, Nisbet Oil Co.
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Meagan Jolly, Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: SAW -2018-01635
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Bib]:
35.28053, -80.92140
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B 1 a]: 05715113 and 05715110
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: UT to Paw Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03050101
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

\N ATT f;, G
o1411i� -r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑x Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 18 & 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑x Yes ❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑Q 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑x No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑x Yes ❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑x No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑x No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Nisbet Oil Company
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
n/a
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Al and Joy Morvan
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
26126-42; 09252-900
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
2418 Valencia Terrace
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28226
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑x Other, specify: Under contract to purchase
4b. Name:
Jimmy White
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Nisbet Oil Company
4d. Street address:
P.O. Box 35367
4e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28235
4f.
Telephone no.:
704.332.7755
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Meagan Jolly
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
4108 LB Propst Drive
5d.
City, state, zip:
Conover, NC 28613
5e.
Telephone no.:
704.681.3479
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
05715113, 05715110
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.2806 Longitude: 80.9213
1 c.
Property size:
11.224 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT to Paw Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
none (UT); C (Paw Creek)
2c.
River basin:
Catawba
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing conditions on the site consist primarily of mid-successional forested land, with a small cleared area with an existing driveway and vacant
house. There is an existing sanitary sewer easement on a portion of the property. General land use in the vicinity of the project is industrial and
commercial operations.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.354
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,126
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a petroleum supply and fueling facility.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of a tank farm and fueling yard, warehouse/office building, semi-truck parking/staging, and appropriately sized
stormwater BMPs. Typical earth-moving equipment will be used, including but not limited to pan, excavator, dump trucks, etc.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
romect (includingall prior phases)in the past?
x❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: PJD site review conducted 10/5/18
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
x❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Tamp Bandy, Meagan Jolly, Perry Isner
Agency/Consultant Company: wetlands & waters, Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
SAW-2018-01635; PJD requested by Wetlands & Waters, Inc. August 13, 2018 and field review conducted October 5, 2018; none currently issued
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑x No
6b. If yes, explain.
The project is proposed to occur in two stages that comprise the extent of the proposed project. Stage 1 is construction of a petroleum supply facility,
including tank farm, office/warehouse building, and stormwater BMPs. Phase II consists of constructing a semi-trailer parking area.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑x Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.157
W2 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.082
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.239
2h. Comments:
W1 impact is requested to construct fueling yard, tank farm, and fillslope for stormwater BMP. Property Line setbacks require that tank farm be
located at least 100 ft from property line, and the proposed placement of the tank farm is the most efficient and logical in order to avoid other impacts
to streams and wetlands of higher quality. W2 impact is requested for semi -truck parking/staging.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P
Fill
LIT to Paw Creek
INT
Corps
3
118.7
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
118.7
3i. Comments:
S1 impact is requested to construct semi -truck parking/staging.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Project designed to avoid impacts to higher -quality resources on the northwestern portion of the site, and utilizes a bridge to span the northeastern
tributary thereby avoiding impacts that would have been required to replace and widen the existing culvert for a road crossing to support heavy
equipment. Site layout designed to accommodate turning radii of equipment and property line setbacks required by Charlotte municipal code.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Project will be constructed under an approved sediment and erosion control plan to ensure that risk of downstream impacts to aquatic resources is
minimized. Stream buffers and preserved wetland areas will be clearly demarcated prior to construction activity.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑x Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑x Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑x Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
X❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.238 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: 0.238 total impacts requested to reserve credits for future phase II of project
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑x No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
75
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑x Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
Project will adhere to Phase II Stormwater requirements under review by City of Charlotte, and includes construction of a appropriately sized and
permanent
stormwater wet detention ponds shown on the attached site plans.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Charlotte
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
x❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes x❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
[]Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
0 No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
Q No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
Z No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The extent of development associated with this project is shown on site schematics provided with this application. No additional
development is
anticipated.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will tie into existing sanitary sewer onsite.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Q Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes Q No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Project occurs within range of NLEB, however, as there are no known hibernaculum locations within Mecklenburg County, we are deferring to the
Corps guidance for notification. No known occurrences of endangered species within project boundary. NC Natural Heritage Program GIS database
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes Q No
1-
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCAA EFH Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes Q No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC SHPO GIS database
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes Q No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer GIS
9/om
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applic Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

.--- -. fes--"-
,.
� _ r.._ .............. �g EXHIBIT #2
- ---------------------
i
y:- � PROP.
`..... BUILDING
/ I
� / I
/ I
PROP. PROP.
BMP BUILDING
� I
� � I
� I
EXHIBIT #1 \ --�--------------- - GRAPHIC SCALE
�r-
w 300 0 7150 300 600
1 INCH = 300 FEET
NISBET OIL
civaion% imn uxouw
"WETLANDS EXHIBIT COVER
�............ ................. TISAACSo "
a ,;,_,,,, "X�!

GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 60 FEET

CIL
OL
3,554 S.F./0.82
ACRES OF
WETLANDS IMPACT
BEGINNING OF
JURISDICTIONAL
STREAM
118.7 L.F. OF
IMPACTS
tea..
ND OF IMPACT .. .�.
GRAPHIC SCALE
60 0 30 60 120
1 INCH = 60 FEET
i
I
I
I
I
�
I �
II/
p
/I
� �
I
I
I
�
II
I

WWETLANDS
--5 WATERS, INC.
Vicinity Map
Project Name: 6801 & 6901 OLD MT HOLLY RD CHARLOTTE NC 28214
Owner/ Developer: AL B MORVAN
City/county: Charlotte / Mecklenburg
Tax PIN(s): 05715113 and 05715110
Coordinates: Scale: Date:
Lat: 35.2806 Lono -80.9213 1 graphic 07.07.2018

ff
Review Area
Boundary
WL DF1
Potential Non -wetland _
1
Waters of the US • .
Tributary - T2V
(-379 If) 0000 • 0000
Potential Wetland ,
Waters of the US UPL DF1
WL A200 series i
(0.018 acre)
111110•
�•
�•
Potential Wetland
• Waters of the US
♦ • WL A100 series
(0.082 acre)
Potential Non -wetland
Waters of the US
Tributary - T1
(-747 If)
Potential Wetland
Waters of the US
WL A300 series
(0.097 acre)
Tributary / Stream
(assessed perennial)
Potential Wetland ----" -------
Waters of the US •---- J
WL B100 series Tributary / Stream
( 0.157 AC) (assessed seasonal)
. � . .
Wetlands
-----------------
------------------
120 ft
graphic scale
I T4WETLANDS
A. & WATERS, INC.
*Wetland Sketch provided for illustrative purposes for preliminary planning use only. Not intended
to be relied upon for exact location, dimensions, or orientation. All findings and assessments made
by wetland consultants regarding limits of jurisdiction or permitting requirements are subject to
verification by the US Army Corps of Engineers and other appropriate state and local authorities.
Project Name: 6801 & 6901 OLD MT HOLLY RD CHARLOTTE NC 28214
Owner / Developer: AL B MORVAN I
City / County:
Tax PIN(s):
Figure 1: Approximate Depiction Coordinates: Scale:
of Waters and Wetlands Lat: 35.2806 Long: -80.9213
Charlotte / Mecklenburg
05715113 and 05715110
Date:
-1"=120'
07.07.2018

Polaris 3G Map — Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
1,dv
Review Area
PC Dist ct
L0WER%6JWYLJA
� 1 = 7
VYATERSD•R_ � . ��.
-ti r
0' 0.0125.025
0.051 Miles
Z '.
ti
Project Name: 6801 & 6901 OLD MT HOLLY RD CHARLOTTE NC 28214
Owner / Developer: AL B MORVAN
WETLANDS
City/County: Charlotte / Mecklenburg
.� do W ATER 5 , I N c. Tax PIN(s): 05715113 and 05715110
Figure 2: Count GIS Coordinates: Scale: Date:
9 y Lat: 35.2806 Lona: -80.9213 1 graphic 07.07.2018

•
1
F
; \\
e '. 1 r • •.,� J ... \ C` 11 � • � �i .� J•
t`
� `` 4r * B J
�'a4ri� �^ 5'
4
..
.._ _ y . • • an }R '�
I
r "
all
• 1J,
..
• •..•
4 .r
S/ytoad.04
i,
v,,5 �r, T7\f �. ` ',.j/ r ' Iii
l�\\\�\t(p•
,• •_�.p� Tyµ:.. � �
�iAK ti r
-
t _
•.
,.•
I;F z "Paw Creek
� c,
f
• 1
_
i„ .
r • 1
, s Che
' .. {: .• •
� �
Rad :G.e'
t
IL
4 0
0
0.5 Mi
3000 Fr Map provided by MyTopo.com
Project Name:
6801 & 6901 OLD MT HOLLY RD CHARLOTTE NC 28214
Owner/ Developer:
AL B MORVAN
ETLANDS
City/County:
Charlotte / Mecklenburg
aWWA
„{ TERS, INC.
TaxPiN(s):
05715113 and 05715110
Figure 3: USGS Topo Quad
Coordinates:
Lat: 35.2806 Long:
-80.9213
Scale:
1 graphic
Date:
07.07.2018

Soil Map—Mecklenburg County, North Carolina 5
506990 507040 507090 507140 507190 507240 507290
35° 16 57" N I _ 35° 16' S7" N
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit alma Aeras in AOI Psrant of AOI
CeB2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 2.1 18.6% -
percentslopes, moderately
eroded
HeB Helena sandy loam, 2 to 8 9.0 79.6%
percent slopes -
MO Monacan loam, 0 to 2 percent 0.2 1.8%
slopes, frequently flooded
Totals for Area of Interest 11.3 - 100.0%
e
r
s �
0
Y ` .
p may not be valid' at this s *`
i.r
35° 16'42"N . a. r . .,,, ,s.:
— 35° 16 42' N
50 507010 50709D 507140 507190 W7240 507290
3 3
7a b
MapScale: 1:2,230 f prirt0ed on A ptxlraR (8.5' x 11")sheet
Maas
N 0 30 60 120 180
/V
0 100 200 400 600
Map proms: Web Mercatrlr Correa coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGSB4
Project Name: 6801 & 6901 OLD MT HOLLY RD CHARLOTTE NC 28214
Owner / Developer: AL B MORVAN
WETLANDS City /County:
—a-at WATERS, INC. Charlotte / Mecklenburg
Tax PIN(s): 05715113 and 05715110
Figure 4: Soil Survey Coordinates: Scale: Date:
Lat: 35.2806 Long: -80.9213 graphic 07.07.2018

NC WAM WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5
USAGE AID#: NCDWR #:
Project Name Old Mt. Holly Huntersville Road Date of Evaluation 07/19/18
Applicant/Owner Name Nisbet Oil Wetland Site Name 8100
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Paw Creek
River Basin Catawba USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit 03050101
County Mecklenburg NCDWR Region Mooresville
f Yes t:' No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees)
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if
appropriate, in recent past (for instance, approximately within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited
to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? f" Yes {: No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? . Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area
r Anadromous fish
r Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
r Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
r Publicly owned property
r N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
r Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
r Designated NCNHP reference community
r Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
Blackwater
C: Brownwater
r Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) f Lunar { Wind {' Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? {" Yes t✓: No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? Yes No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? { ` Yes No
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure
(VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,
then rate the assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
A {: A Not severely altered
B (" B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and
duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only,
while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
{+ A {"' A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
B B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
C ( C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief —assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland
type (WT).
AA WT
3a. {" A ('' A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
{ ` B t-" B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
( C C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
{+ D �' D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. (" A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for
regional indicators.
4a. (- A Sandy soil
(Te B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
(" C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
{� D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
(` E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. (' A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. (-- A No peat or muck presence
(" B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
('" A (" A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
(: B (: B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
C C C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the
assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). Effective riparian buffers
are considered to be 50 feet wide in the Coastal Plain and Piedmont ecoregions and 30 feet wide in the Blue Ridge Mountains ecoregion.
WS 5M 2M
r A r A r A z 10% impervious surfaces
r B r B r B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
r C r C r C z 20% coverage of pasture
F D r D r D >- 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
r E r E r E >- 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
F F r F r F z 20% coverage of clear-cut land
r G r G r G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent dainage and/or overbank flow from affectio the
assessment area.
Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer - assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
(' Yes (: No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is weltand? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
( A 2 50 feet
B From 30 to < 50 feet
(` C From 15 to < 30 feet
D From 5 to < 15 feet
(` E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
(- S 15 -feet wide (- > 15 -feet wide (" Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
(" Yes (` No
7e. Is tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
r Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
(- Exposed - adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes
and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp
Forest only)
Check a box in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the
assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
(' A (' A 2 100 feet
(-' B (" B From 80 to < 100 feet
(" C (` C From 50 to < 80 feet
(' D r D From 40 to < 50 feet
( E (" E From 30 to < 40 feet
r F (' F From 15 to < 30 feet
(: G (: G From 5 to < 15 feet
(- H (' H < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
{: B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
{+ A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
{ C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
(" A A A >— 500 acres
{ ' B �"' B ' B From 100 to < 500 acres
C C C From 50 to < 100 acres
(- D { ` D D From 25 to < 50 acres
E E {" E From 10 to < 25 acres
(- F (-' F (` F From 5 to < 10 acres
{" G { G {"` G From 1 to < 5 acres
(" H ("' H (` H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
{: I (• I (-*I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
J J ' J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
K K ["` K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
{" A Pocosin is the full extent (z 90%) of its natural landscape size.
B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
metric naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility
line corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, fields (pasture open and agriculture), or water > 300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
{" A (` A z 500 acres
{" B B From 100 to < 500 acres
C ( C From 50 to < 100 acres
D (: D From 10 to < 50 acres
t+ E ("' E < 10 acres
(" F ("' F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
(- Yes (" No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas z 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directiions? If the assessment area is clear-cut,
select option "C."
("' A 0
(+ B 1 to 4
t"C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
(" A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
(To B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in
at least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (<10% cover of exotics).
(` B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
(' C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (>50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
f: Yes (" No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
r A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
r B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure
in airspace
above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
(" C
AA
WT
(: A
E
f— A
C— A
Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
m(:
B
(: B
Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U
(- C
("` C
Canopy sparse or absent
o
(�` A
C' A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
(: B
(: B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
°
C C
r C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
a t— A (— A Dense shrub layer
r (: B
(« B
Moderate density shrub layer
(" C
(" C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
(: A
(: A
Dense herb layer
a� { B
( B
Moderate density herb layer
C
C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
C A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 -inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
(. B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
C A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
(: B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 -inch DBH.
( C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
(— A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
(+ B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater
Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
( A r f C t- D
C:)J
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization,
diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
% A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
1— B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
r C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
r D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

Wetland Site Name
Wetland Type
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
8100
Headwater Forest
Date 07/19/18
Assessor Name/Organization Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
HIGH
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition MEDIUM
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Hydrology
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Particulate Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Physical Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition MEDIUM
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

Mitigation Services
ENV I RONNENTAL QUAL IT
September 19, 2018
Jimmy White
Nisbet Oil Company
PO Box 35367
Charlotte, NC 28235
Project: 6801 and 6901 Old Mt. Holly Road
ROY COOPER
MICHAEL S. RI;GAN
Expiration of Acceptance: 3/19/2019
County: Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location impact Type ( Impact Quantity
03050101 Riparian Wetland 0.238
I
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Tamp Bandy, agent
Sincerely,
3�4m
Jam . B Stanfill
Asset anagement Supervisor
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality ' Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh NC 27699-1652 217 w. Jones Slree4 Suite 3000
919 707 8976 T

r oP
Gwv, viF'H
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Governor Roy Cooper
August 13, 2018
Meagan Jolly
Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
529 North Graham Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
RE: Old Mt. Holly
Dear Meagan Jolly:
Secretary Susi H. Hamttton
NCNHDE-6697
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists. Tables of
natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile radius of the project area, if any, are also
included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of the project
area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for guidance. Contact
information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httD4 7//www.fws.gov/offices/Di rectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund easement, or Federally -listed
species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butler(@ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAILING ADDRESS- Telephone [phone] LOCATION -
1651 Mai! Service Center www.ncnhp.org 121 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 Raleigh, NC 27603

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Old Mt. Holly
August 13, 2018
NCNHDE-6697
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Last
Element
Accuracy Federal
State
Global
State
Group
Observation
Occurrence
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
Date
Rank
Freshwater 450
Lasmigonadecorata
Carolina Heelsplitter
1918 -Pre
X
3 -Medium Endangered
Endangered
G1
S1
Bivalve
Vascular Plant 13743
Delphinium exaltatum
Tall Larkspur
1800s
Hi?
5 -Very ---
Endangered
G3
S2
Low
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County Local Government
Catawba Lands Conservancy Easement Catawba Lands Conservancy Private
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at nn^nc /;nrnhrte natureserve nrgmnnteaLh&jp. Data query generated on August 13, 2018: source: NCNHP, 03 July 2018. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-6697: Old Mt. Holly
August 13, 2018
Project Boundary
E] Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
1:22,139
0 0.175 0.35 07m,
. .. . ,
0 03 0.6 1.2km
Sauces GuHERE Gaymn. atpmaG. ircremem S.
P Cao GEBCO. USG
WNGS. NRCAN G.— IGN RW — Nl. 0—Survey. E.. Jews
wri Ell Cana (Ha Rely I. -to 9 Ow SueeU caM-t— artl
na G:S U— Com.0

DIRECTION 35.28084°N ACCURACY 5 m
77 deg(T) 080.92181°W DATUM WGS84
r
1 4
:a
Ali
71
a
y .
y
b
.1
,. � 'fir � w `• �4 `.. fF _� - V
• '. - � � `V �= �. � = � _ iii
2
,
r
lit
VW
»t
or
w -
,cam
•
r� • .� !C- �•r�, �'(�, � s K '� �'T .yam i �� ��'. ��°R-• � /�/;✓C �BI
s
y+
u s
e C ,
t
4 e .
,a
�_ • a
IN
Old Mt Holly Rd Below culvert 2018-08-30
13:43:40-04

DIRECTION 35.28089°N ACCURACY 5 m
115 deg(T) 080.92193°W DATUM WGS84
cr
fir♦ <.yt %�.;�e._. � . '�� �•- 1 .R � i .v�, W
A
-
, . ...
• -� by w w . s
..w- _
4 -
Old Mt Holly Rd
r'. ,
r
Below culvert 2018-08-30
13:44:20-04:00

DIRECTION 35.28085°N ACCURACY 5 m
214 deg(T) 080.92211°W DATUM WGS84
Ok
':MPJ .i A -
."'.. ,. 1�i v
F J
40 .
a.
AISr
w
,5 •
Old Mt Hotly Rd Confluence 2018-08-30
13:46:14-04:00

DIRECTION 35.28084°N ACCURACY 5 m
341 deg(T) 080.92215°W DATUM WGS84
�
711
' � a
4
t,,4o
s
•h
a7.a fin,4:: �,' .♦ ..-.M 4.1,._.. _.»w...
t
ow
y
d'
R
e r
.-v q
,
Je a
t _,ow ' ya
y,.
Old Mt Holly Rd Confluence above 2018-08-30
13:46:34-04:00

DIRECTION 35.28089°N ACCURACY 5 m
25 deg(T) 080.92212°W DATUM WGS84
.�,o �"�� �'d � }• �.- r. ¢ .�, ,'!� ,�� ,dt�4 t � `� .�' Vis= i; ,,.•
kill
Ak
. p.
e .
t
w
.4
A - �
� w
r'
q
� oAllg�
m
t 1
� •r`
M • �
2018-08-30
Old Mt Hotly Rd Confluence above 13:46:53-04:00

11
DIRECTION 35.28142ON ACCURACY 5 m
56 deg(T) 080.92088OW DATUM WGS84
lot
•
AL2�,
14.
Ni.
ip
Ne,
Air A
4.
ix
mvj,,,. ,
A
Old Mt Holly Rd
OW
A4
SF1 2018-08-30
13:27:17-04:00

DIRECTION 35.28083°N ACCURACY 5 m
219 deg(T) 080.92182°W DATUM WG584
:1 s
itt
AL
jk
t5
_ a
F •-
+ -
1
` s
+'' «
i. i x
AL
p
t�
rAr
' 1 .
Old Mt Holl Rd Below culvert 2018-08-30
Holly 13:43:28-04:00

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed:
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
05715110 105715110
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Ouality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel# 3710452600) District Western Catawba
07/31/2018
Ownership
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
M27-96
Land Area
10.178 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
60.10
Account Type
INDIVIDUAL
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
INDUSTRIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Ouality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel# 3710452600) District Western Catawba
07/31/2018
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
AL B MORVAN
2418 VALENCIA TERRACE
CHARLOTTE NC 28226
JOY A (ET-AL)%PRECAST
CON
2418 VALENCIA TERRACE
CHARLOTTE NC 28226
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
I Sale Date
I Sale Price
09252-900
09/15/1997
1$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
60.10
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name PAW
Regulated Drinking Watershed Districts
Watershed Name LOWER LAKE WYLIE
Watershed Class PA
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
Built -Upon Area Restriction
OLD MT HOLLY RD CHARLOTTE Limit on amount of Built -Upon Area Yes
Allowed Built -Upon Area 10.00 sq ft
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name PAW
Regulated Drinking Watershed Districts
Watershed Name LOWER LAKE WYLIE
Watershed Class PA
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
Built -Upon Area Restriction
OLD MT HOLLY RD CHARLOTTE Limit on amount of Built -Upon Area Yes
Allowed Built -Upon Area 10.00 sq ft
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed: 07/31/2018
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
05715113
105715113
3710452600J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
M27-96
Land Area
1.046 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
INDIVIDUAL
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
INDUSTRIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer Yes
Mailing Address
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710452600J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
2418 VALENCIA TERRACE
CHARLOTTE NC 28226
E A JR ARNDT
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
6801 OLD MT HOLLY RD CHARLOTTE
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
RAYMOND H JR PIERCE
00000
AL B MORVAN
2418 VALENCIA TERRACE
CHARLOTTE NC 28226
LANA K ARNDT
00000
BRENDA C PIERCE
00000
JOY A MORVAN
2418 VALENCIA TERRACE
CHARLOTTE NC 28226
E A JR ARNDT
2418 VALENCIA TERRACE
CHARLOTTE NC 28226
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed Sale Date Sale Price
26126-42 12/07/2010 $0.00
09252-900 09/15/1997 $0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area No
Census Tract # 60.10
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Western Catawba
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I PAW
Regulated Drinking Watershed Districts
Watershed Name LOWER LAKE WYLIE
Watershed Class PA
Built -Upon Area Restriction
Limit on amount of Built -Upon Area
Yes
Allowed Built -Upon Area
0.00 sq ft
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.