20060105 Ver 2_More Info Letter_20070207

O~ WATFR Michael F. Easley, Governor
\~~ '~G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Cq ~ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
~ ~
Q „~. Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 7, 2007
DWQ Project # 06-0105 V2
New Hanover County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. David Van Damme
4601 Linden Ridge
Wilmington, North Carolina 28412
Subject Property: Lot 17 1113 Bonito Lane
Applicant Signature
® REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
^ PERMITTING FEE MISSING/INCORRECT
^ RETURN OF APPLICATION PACKAGE
Dear Mr. Van Damme:
On February 5, 2007, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application for the above
referenced project. The DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided
inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to
process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore,
unless we receive five copies of the additional information requested below, we will have to move toward
denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as
incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the following information so that
we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
^ Water Quality Certification, See I. Processing, Item 2.. Please state which Permit
(Nationwide, Regional or General) number you intend to use. You may want to contact the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) to determine which permit they will allow you to
use.
^ DWQ requires the name of an individual shown as "Owner/Applicant" to set up the project.
® The PCN Application failed to contain the Applicant or Agent's Signature and Date. See last
page of application. (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from applicant is
provided). Signature page enclosed. Please return one (1) original and four (4) copies.
^ Water Body information not stated. See III Project Information, Item 7.
^ Incorrect and/or missing wetland, intermittent-perennial stream and/or buffer impacts.
DWQ is unable to review this project without noted or corrected impacts reflected.
N~Q~rthCarolina
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit ~aturallr~
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] /Internet: htto 11h2o enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No ^
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No ^
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No ^
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12