20060268 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060217

Bold Run Creek Site
Wake County, North Carolina
2 i
Stream/Buffer Restoration Plan
Final
Contract No. D05067SD-050675
State Project No.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program

p R OpGf:e:ly0
If 01 ? .Zp*
February 2006
KCI
ASSOCIATES OF
NORTH CAROLINA, PA
Prepared by: KCI Associates of North Carolina, P.A.
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Manager: April L. Helms
Email: ahelmskkci.com
I _
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) intends to utilize the Bold Run Creek
Site for a stream and buffer restoration project. This restoration plan presents detailed information
regarding the existing site and watershed conditions, the morphological design criteria developed from a
selected reference reach, and the project design parameters based upon natural channel restoration
methodologies.
The project site is part of a 31-acre parcel owned by NCEEP formerly owned by Mr. Douglas Darch. It is
located 5 miles northwest of the Town of Wake Forest on Bold Hill Run Road, approximately 1.5 miles
east of the intersection with Mangum Dairy Road in Wake County, North Carolina. The property is an
active pasture for cattle grazing. The primary land use on the property is rangeland. Bold Run Creek is a
second order (becomes third order at the confluence with New Light Creek) perennial stream that flows
southwest through the subject property before joining New Light Creek. The project site is within the
Neuse 01 watershed cataloging unit (8-digit HUC: 03020201), in a portion of the NCDWQ Priority Sub-
basin 03-04-08. The NCEEP identifies this HUC as a Targeted Local Watershed.
Based on the following existing and reference condition descriptions, the restoration goals and objectives
for the Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration project are as follows:
Restoration Goals:
¦ Restore a stable channel morphology that is capable of moving the flows and sediment provided by
its watershed;
¦ Improve water quality and reduce land and riparian vegetation loss resulting from lateral erosion and
bed degradation through the establishment of bank and riparian vegetation and,
¦ Enhance aquatic and terrestrial habitat through the improvements to the stream water quality
(improved oxygen content, reduced sediment and nutrients, variable stream bed features).
¦ Improve water quality through approximately 27.1 acres of buffer restoration throughout the project
site.
Restoration Objectives:
¦ Project success will be assessed utilizing measurements of stream dimension, pattern, and profile, site
photographs, and vegetation sampling. These measurements should show little or no change from the
as-built conditions.
¦ A stable channel is able to move the sediment supplied by its watershed without the channel
aggrading or degrading. Through stream monitoring the stability of the restored stream will be
evaluated.
¦ Riparian vegetation must meet a minimum survival success rate of 320 stems/acre after five years.
The design proposes constructing 1,629 linear feet of meandering channel based on Priority Level II and
IV approaches (Table 1). Approximately 1,453.7 linear feet of Level II and 175.6 linear feet of Level IV
will be restored. The Level II restoration will establish a bankfull channel with a new floodplain, a
channel bed at its existing level in an existing gravel layer, and the cross section dimensions necessary to
provide stable flow maintenance and sediment transport. The Level IV design proposes to stabilize the
bed and banks while maintaining the existing channel pattern Bold Run Creek will be restored to Rosgen
stream type C4. Riparian buffers associated with the Bold Run Creek restoration will extend between
fifty (50) to two hundred (200) feet on both sides of the stream. Currently, there are small drainage
features located throughout the project site, which deliver direct runoff to Bold Run Creek. To maintain
the water quality of Bold Run Creek, an approximate 200' buffer will extend on either side of the
features.
I•
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffeer Restoration
Table 1. Project Restoration Structure and Objectives
Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Existing Designed
Restoration Priority Linear Linear
Station Range Type Approach Footage Footage Comment
or or
Acreage Acreage
1,600 1,453.7
(12.75)-(27.60) Stream Priority II Total Linear
Length Feet
1,600 175.6
(11.00)-(12.75) Stream Priority IV Total Linear
Length Feet
Buffer 27.1 Acres
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT SITE IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION ...............................................1
1.1 Directions to Project Site .............................................................................................1
1.2 USGS Hydrologic Unit Code and NCDWQ River Basin Designations ...................... I
2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION ......................................................................... 1
2.1 Drainage Area .............................................................................................................. l
2.2 Surface Water Classification/Water Quality ............................................................... 1
2.3 Physiography, Geology and Soils ................................................................................ 5
2.4 Historical Land Use and Development Trends ............................................................ 5
2.4.1 Historical Resources ....................................................................................... 5
2.4.2 Land Use and Development Potential ............................................................ 8
2.5 Endangered/Threatened Species ................................................................................. 8
2.6 Wetlands ..................................................................................................................... 8
2.7 Cultural Resources ...................................................................................................... 8
2.8 Potential Constraints ................................................................................................... 11
2.8.1 Hazardous Materials ....................................................................................... 11
2.8.2 Property Ownership and Boundary ................................................................ 12
2.8.3 Site Access ...................................................................................................... 13
2.8.4 Utilities ........................................................................................................... 13
2.8.5 FEMA/Hydrologic Trespass ........................................................................... 14
3.0 PROJECT SITE STREAMS (EXISTING CONDITIONS) ............................................14
3.1 General Site Description .............................................................................................14
3.2 Channel Classification ................................................................................................18
3.3 Channel Morphology (Pattern, Dimension, and Profile) ............................................18
3.4 Channel Stability Assessment ...................................................................................19
3.5 Bankfull Verification ..................................................................................................19
3.6 Vegetation ...................................................................................................................20
4.0 REFERENCE STREAMS ..................................................................................................21
4.1 Watershed Characterization ........................................................................................21
4.2 Channel Classification .................................................................................................21
4.3 Discharge (Bankfull, Trends) .....................................................................................24
4.4 Channel Morphology (Pattern, Dimension, Profile) ....................................................24
4.5 Vegetation ...................................................................................................................24
5.0 PROJECT SITE RESTORATION PLAN ........................................................................ 25
5.1 Restoration Project Goals and Objectives ................................................................... 25
5. 1.1 Designed Channel Classification .................................................................... 25
5.2 Natural Plant Community Restoration ......................................................................... 30
5.2.1 Target Buffer Communities ............................................................................ 30
5.2.2 Planting Zones ................................................................................................ 30
5.2.3 Plant Sources .................................................................................................. 30
5.2.4 Plant Care and Installation .............................................................................. 30
5.2.5 Plant List ......................................................................................................... 32
5.2.6 Schedule ......................................................................................................... 33
5.2.7 Site Preparation and Stabilization ................................................................... 33
5.2.8 Maintenance ................................................................................................... 33
5.2.9 On-site Invasive Species Management ........................................................... 33
5.3 Sediment Transport Analysis ....................................................................................... 33
- Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
6.0 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA ..........................................................................................36
- 6.1 Streams ........................................................................................................................36
6.2 Vegetation ....................................................................................................................37
6.3 Schedule/Reporting .....................................................................................................37
7.0 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................38
FIGURES
Figure 1. Project Site Vicinity Map ......................................................................................... 2
Figure 2. North Carolina Ecoregions Map ............................................................................... 3
Figure 3. Project Site Watershed Map .................................................................................... 4
Figure 4. Project Site NRCS Soils Survey Map ...................................................................... 6
Figure 5. Project Site Soil Classification Map ......................................................................... 7
Figure 6. Land Use and Land Cover Map ............................................................................... 9
Figure 7. National Wetland Inventory Map ............................................................................. 10
Figure 8. Project Site Floodplain Map ..................................................................................... 15
Figure 9. Existing Channel or Site Conditions Map ................................................................ 16
Figure 10. Project Site Hydrological Features with Gauge Locations Map .............................. 17
Figure 11. Reference Site Vicinity Map .................................................................................... 22
Figure 12. Reference Site Watershed Map ................................................................................ 23
Figure 13. Proposed Planform ................................................................................................... 27
Figure 14. Proposed Planting Plan ............................................................................................. 31
Figure 15. Bold Run Creek River State Diagram ...................................................................... 35
PLAN SHEETS
Plan Sheet 1. Title Sheet
Plan Sheet 2. Typical Details: Stabilization
Plan Sheet 2A. Typical Cross Sections
Plan Sheet 4. Plan and Profile
Plan Sheet 5. Plan and Profile
Plan Sheet 10. Planting Plan
Plan Sheet 11. Planting Plan
Plan Sheet 12. Planting Plan
TABLES
Table 1. Project Restoration Structure and Objectives .....................Executive Summary
Table 2. Summary of Design Constraints .................... ........................................................... 11
Table 3. Property Ownership History .......................... ...........................................................12
Table 4. Summary of Existing Channel Morphology .. ...........................................................18
Table 5. HEC-RAS Hydrologic Variables .................. ...........................................................20
Table 6. Priority Levels of Incised River Restoration . ...........................................................28
Table 7. Morphological Design Criteria ...................... ...........................................................29
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Historical Aerial Photographs
Appendix B. State Agency Correspondence
Appendix C. Environmental Screening Inspection Forms
Appendix D. Wake Electric Easement
Appendix E. Project Site Photographs
Appendix F. Project Site Stream Classification Forms
Appendix G. Existing Conditions
Appendix H. Reference Reach Data
Appendix I. Sediment Transport
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
1.0 PROJECT SITE IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) intends to utilize the Bold Run Creek
Site for a stream and buffer restoration project. This restoration plan presents detailed information
regarding the existing site and watershed conditions, the morphological design criteria developed from a
selected reference reach, and the project design parameters based upon natural channel restoration
methodologies.
- 1.1 Directions to Project Site
The project site is part of a 31-acre parcel owned by NCEEP formerly owned by Mr. Douglas Darch. It is
- located 5 miles northwest of the Town of Wake Forest on Bold Hill Run Road, approximately 1.5 miles
- east of the intersection with Mangum Dairy Road in Wake County, North Carolina. The site is situated
southwest of Bold Hill Run Road and south from the Granville/Wake County Line (Figure 1. Project Site
Vicinity Map).
1.2 USGS Hydrologic Unit Code and NCDWQ River Basin Designations
- Bold Run Creek is a second order (becomes third order at the confluence with New Light Creek)
- perennial stream that flows southwest through the subject property before joining New Light Creek.
- The project site is situated within the Neuse 01 watershed cataloging unit (8-digit HUC: 03020201) and
- the 03020201065010, Local Watershed Unit (14-digit HUC). It also falls within the NCDWQ Subbasin
03-04-08. The NCEEP identifies this HUC as a Targeted Local Watershed. Targeted local watersheds are
those that exhibit the need and opportunity for stream and riparian buffer restoration. The results benefit
• water quality, aquatic habitat and other vital watershed functions (NCEEP, 2002)
• 2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION
The project site is located in a rural setting within the Northern Outer Piedmont ecoregion of the
- Piedmont physiographic province (Figure 2. North Carolina Ecoregions Map). Site topography is
- characterized as gently rolling hills with elevations ranging from 270 feet above mean sea level (AMSL)
to 320 feet AMSL.
- 2.1 Drainage Area
The project watershed containing the study area, as seen in Figure 3 (Project Site Watershed Map), drains
approximately 12 square miles (7,650 acres) and occupies the southwest corner of the headwaters of the
• Falls Lake Drainage area. The project watershed, which includes Bold Run Creek and New Light Creek,
is located west off of US Highway 1 on the Wake and Granville County Line, with the majority of the
watershed in Granville County.
2.2 Surface Water Classification/Water Quality
For the water resources classification, New Light Creek, as the receiving waters, was used to characterize
Bold Run Creek.
GRANVILLE
WAKE
FRANKLIN
WAKE
COUNTY
Project
Site
Falls
Lake
Bold Run Hill Rd
COUNTY
Wake County,
North Carolinz
Figure 1. Project Site Vicinity Map
Proposed Restoration Site
N
Roads
W E
Municipalities
County Boundaries S
K C 1:63,360
I//\,/ Major Rivers 1 inch equals 1 miles
ASSOCIATES OF NC S I 0.s 0
Lakes and Reservoirs
FRANKLIN
COUNTY
''J} l .i? a? 8?tl t
!i,Cosysteni
1
Miles
b

North Carolina Ecoregions
Carolina Flathcoods
Carolina Slate Belt
Northern Outer Piedmont
Rolling Coastal Plain
Sand Hills
Southeaswm Floodplains and Low Terraces
Southern Outer Piedmont
C? Triassic Basins
K C I
ASSOCIATES OF NC
Figure 2. North Carolina Ecoregions Map
rir to
Proposed Restoration Site N
W? E
County Boundaries S
1:633,600
1 inch equals 10 miles
0 0 10
Miles
1 9
.pPlef ?
r~
Lcosystem
r•HOOnAM
?
V-14
T"
z
Figure 3. Project Site Watershed Map
r --J Project Watershed
Project Site Boundary N
14 -digit HUC 03020201065010 W�1: owstem
sK E�iamemci C 1/\/ Streams 1:36,000 PROGRAM
I inch equals 3,000 feet
ASSOCIATES OF NC 3,000 1,500 0 3,000
ISource: USGS Topographic Quadrangle Grissom, 1987 IMM — Feet
A.
66 AM
?
V-14
T"
z
Figure 3. Project Site Watershed Map
r --J Project Watershed
Project Site Boundary N
14 -digit HUC 03020201065010 W�1: owstem
sK E�iamemci C 1/\/ Streams 1:36,000 PROGRAM
I inch equals 3,000 feet
ASSOCIATES OF NC 3,000 1,500 0 3,000
ISource: USGS Topographic Quadrangle Grissom, 1987 IMM — Feet

Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
The NCDWQ assigns surface waters a classification in order to help protect, maintain, and preserve water
quality. New Light Creek is designated as WS-IV, NSW, and CA. The project area (Bold Run Creek) is
located upstream from this designated portion.
• WS-IV waters are used as sources of drinkable water, which are also protected for Class C uses. WS-
IV waters are generally in moderately to highly developed watersheds or Protected Areas (NCDENR,
2005). Class C uses are "waters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish and aquatic
life propagation and survival, agriculture and other uses suitable for Class C" (NCDENR, 2005).
• Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) is a supplemental classification intended for waters needing
additional nutrient management due to their being subject to excessive growth of microscopic or
macroscopic vegetation. In general, management strategies for point and nonpoint source pollution
control require control of nutrients (nitrogen and/or phosphorus usually) such that excessive growths
of vegetation are reduced or prevented and there is no increase in nutrients over target levels.
Management strategies are site-specific (NCDENR, 2005).
• Class CA waters indicate a Critical Area within a water supply watershed (NCDENR, March 2005).
2.3 Physiography, Geology and Soils
Local geology consists of metamorphic rocks of the Raleigh Belt. These include metamorphosed biotite
gneiss and schist, meta-ultramafic rock, and felsic mica gneiss.
According to the NRCS, Wake County Soil Survey, Chewacla (Cm), Wehadkee silt loam (Wn),
Wehadkee and Bibb soils (Wo), Altavista fine sandy loam 0 to 4 percent slopes (AfA), Madison sandy
laom 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded (MdE2) and Wilkes soils 20 to 45 percent slopes (WwF) are the
predominant soil types located within the project boundary (Figure 4. Project Site NRCS Soils Survey
Map).
However, during a July 14, 2005 field investigation, Steven Stokes, LSS mapped the predominant soils as
a Chewacla variant with inclusions of Riverview (Figure 5. Project Site Soil Classification Map).
According to the Wake County Soil Survey, Chewacla (Cm) is described as a somewhat poorly drained
soil. The Chewacla soils investigated on the project site were well to moderately well drained soils,
therefore the Chewacla variant classification was selected to describe these soils. Riverview soils are
currently not mapped by the Wake County NRCS.
2.4 Historical Land Use and Development Trends
2.4.1 Historical Resources
Historical aerial photographs were obtained from the Wake County Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) office in order to enhance the assessment of existing site conditions. The intent of the
review was to understand the chronology of land disturbance and aid in the evaluation of the site and the
development of an appropriate restoration strategy. Aerial photographs of the site were obtained from
1949, 1954, 1965, 1971, 1981, 1988, and 1993 (Appendix A).
In 1949, the subject property closely resembled the existing conditions, however the area on the west of
the project site appears to be forested.
In 1959, 1965, and 1971, the subject property resembles current conditions.
In 1981, the subject property appears to be reforested in the north section.

Au
CeD
Soil Series
LJAfA -Altavista Fine Sandy Loam, 0 To 4 Percent Slopes
OAsC2 - Appling Fine Sandy Loam, 6 To 10 Percent Slopes, Eroded
=AgB2 - Appling Gravelly Sandy Loam, 2 To 6 Percent Slopes, Eroded
MAgC2 - Appling Gravelly Sandy Loam, 6 To 10 Percent Slopes, Eroded
=Au - Augusta Fine Sandy Loam
=CIE3 - Cecil Clay Loam, 10 To 20 Percent Slopes, Severely Eroded
OCeB2 - Cecil Clay Loam, 2 To 6 Percent Slopes, Eroded
=CeC2 - Cecil Clay Loam, 6 To 10 Percent Slopes, Eroded
®CIC3 - Cecil Clay Loam, 6 To 10 Percent Slopes, Severely Eroded
®CeD - Cecil Sandy Loam, 10 To 15 Percent Slopes
MCeB2 - Cecil Sandy Loam, 2 To 6 Percent Slopes, Eroded
OCeC2 - Cecil Sandy Loam, 6 To 10 Percent Slopes, Eroded
®Cm - Chewacla Soils
MMdD2 - Madison Sandy Loam, 10 To 15 Percent Slopes, Eroded
®MdE2 - Madison Sandy Loatn, 15 To 25 Percent Slopes, Eroded
=MdB2 - Madison Sandy Loam, 2 To 6 Percent Slopes, Eroded
=MdC2 - Madison Sandy Loam, 6 To 10 Percent Slopes, Eroded
17]PaE - Pacolet Sandy Loam, 10 To 25 Percent Slopes
®WmE - Wedowee Sandy Loam, 15 To 25 Percent Slopes
=We - Wehadkee And Bibb Soils
0 Wn - Wehadkee Silt Loam
® WwE - Wilkes Soils, 10 To 20 Percent Slopes (WwE)
O WwF - Wilkes Soils, 20 To 45 Percent Slopes

AfA
K C I
ASSOCIATES OF NC
Figure 4. Project Site NRCS Soils Survey Map
Project Site Boundary
/*"'\/ Streams
WmE
W ?7 2006
WATER UU
I inch egialsb?eet
300 150 0 300
CeC2
r?
emc
PROGRAM
Cm
g e v?
a ? ET`` '(fir
A'
r
F z .,.
t
All
?w
r
u t•
,k
of W,
#.
lit,
%ZA
A-A
-
c
t,'I _V
4.1 ? w •
,; .
.r
AL

4r A.-
r

" I*Jr

-'f" 4
i
? tr
t ? As.
ws?'

lra?

i
1-4

Figure 5. Project Site Soil Classification Map
_ Chewacla
Chewacla Variant
Chewacla-Riverview
K C I
ASSOCIATES OF NC I age Source: Wake C'ounry GIS, 250
Digital Orthophotographv 1999
F
W-9-E
JC rjv< 'd:'A ! R QUi ? Ovstem
1 inch equals 250 feet
125 0 250
Feet

4 R 4f
p _ +k
s -?
gyp: ?e?. ? --
4 '
Fe-
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
In 1988 and 1993, the subject property appears to resemble current conditions; no significant differences
are discernable at the scale and quality of the photo.
The stream channel appeared to follow the pattern observable today. No changes in either the stream
valley or stream channel within the project area were observed in the historical aerial photographs.
Therefore, any alterations to the stream channel occurred prior to 1949. No significant changes have
occurred in the project area since 1949.
2.4.2 Land Use and Development Potential
An Anderson Level I classification indicates that the contributing drainage area consists of: forest (79%0),
agriculture (13%), rangeland (6%), urban (<1%), and wetlands / open water (2%) land use / land cover ;
(Figure 6. Land Use and Land Cover Map). Land use around the project area is mostly forest with new
residential developments (NCDENR, November 2001).
The property is an active pasture for cattle grazing. No machinery or structures are located on the subject
property. The primary land use on the property is rangeland. New Light Creek forms the western
property boundary, while Bold Hill Run Road borders the eastern boundary, respectively.
2.5 Endangered/Threatened Species
A formal review by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) was requested in July 2005 to
identify the presence of rare species, critical habitats, and priority natural areas on the project site and to
determine the potential impact of the proposed project on these resources. In their Findings Letter dated
September 20, 2005 (Appendix B), the NHP indicated "no record of rare species, significant natural
communities, or priority natural areas at the site or within 0.7-mile of the project area". In addition, no
threatened or endangered species were identified in the project area during the existing conditions site
assessment. Also, a formal review by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) was
requested in July 2005, however, no correspondence has been returned.
2.6 Wetlands
A review of the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps for the project area identified no wetland
systems (Figure 7. National Wetland Inventory Map). The NWI maps were reviewed using the 200-feet
buffer width.
Criteria to delineate and/or determine whether wetlands are jurisdictional include evidence of hydric soils,
hydrophytic vegetation and evidence of certain hydrologic characteristics during the growing season.
Using the aforementioned wetland criteria, no wetlands were found in the project area during the field
investigation.
2.7 Cultural Resources
To evaluate the presence of significant cultural resources on the subject property and the potential that the
proposed project would impact them, KCI requested a formal review at the North Carolina Department of
Cultural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). The formal SHPO review identified one
historic architecture site, the W.D. Bailey House. The site is located approximately one mile east of the
project site. It is not anticipated that this record occurrence would be impacted by the proposed
restoration project. (See Appendix B). The formal review by the State Archeology Office identified no
potential archeology sites on or around the subject property.

m
Project Site
Figure 6. Land Use and Land Cover Map
Land Use and Land Cover (Anderson t) Q Project Watershed
O Urban or Built-Up Land Project Site Boundary
- Agriculture
- Rangeland N
W E
K C - Forest Land
- Water
- Wetland a
- Barren Land I inch equals uals 3,000 feet
ASSOCIATES OF NC Source:NorrhCarolina GAPLand Cover Dalaser !sq 1"'., o
Published 2003
iiim?

1^
r4 I*-
1 system
PROGRAM
^ i t
•k * i 31
c -
1
/
GI

Fi- M
4

4" a

+ ti '! ?4

A

yyy??? k • ? :^ L
?' h J1

i

t ?..
4
3 ?
H r?
... . k, A,
t.
1
L?
?- -1; .
i,

XI 4

'
O }A
6? i3e.M ?fie
f

u f

Figure 7. National Wetland Inventory Map ;:v
N ? 2p?6
- Palustrine Emergent Persistent Semipermanently Flooded (PENI IF)
Palustrine Forested Broad-leaved Deciduous Temporarily Flooded (PFOIA) w? E J
Palustrine Forested Broad-leaved Deciduous Seasonally Flooded (PFO I C) S IP
PPalustrine Unconsolidated Bottom, Permanenetly Flooded Diked/Impounded (PUBFlh) "'ry1f110sy I
oject Site Boundary 1:6,000
K C I Pr
?` ?`77 ???7- 1 inch equals 500 feet
ASSOCLLITES (? l?F NC SOURCL: Wake County GbS, 500 250 0 500
Digital Orthopholography 1999 Feet
1.
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
2.8 Potential Constraints
The presence of conditions or characteristics that have the potential to hinder restoration activities on the
project site were evaluated. Existing information regarding project site constraints was acquired and
reviewed. In addition, any site conditions that have the potential to restrict the restoration design and
implementation were documented during the field investigation. Table 2 summarizes the identified
constraints related to the implementation of site restoration activities.
Table 2_ Summarv of Deciun C nnctrnints
Fatal Flaw/Constraint Nature of Constraint Proposed Resolution
Current Land Use (Specify) Pasture livestock grazing) Exclusion fencing as necessary
Forest, Agriculture, Low-
Adjacent Property Land Use Density Residential
Development
Utility easement crosses project The stream has been relocated to
Deed Restrictions/Easements site minimize the impacts of the power
lines on the stream/buffer restoration.
Project Constructibili /Access None
Utility poles cross project site Stream crossings have been proposed
Utilities to provide continued maintenance
access, post-restoration.
Structures None
State Historic Preservation
Cultural Office (Appendix B) indicated
(Historical/Archaeological) no record of occurrences within
one-mile radius of the project
site
Natural Heritage Program
Rare, Threatened, and Findings Letter (Appendix B)
Endangered Species indicated no record of
occurrences within one-mile
radius of the project site
Natural Features (Soils, Bedrock outcrops in streambed Identified bedrock incorporated into
Bedrock and banks the design.
FEMA Regulated Area P
E ect area within Zone X and No-Rise Certification
A
2.8.1 Hazardous Materials
The presence or likely presence of hazardous substances on the subject property and surrounding area
under conditions that indicate a past, present or potential release into the ground, groundwater, or surface
water was evaluated. The evaluation included a review of public record environmental database
information and a visual site inspection.
A report meeting ASTM E1527-00 Standards for records search requirements was obtained summarizing
existing federal and state database information regarding known environmental conditions for the subject
property and surrounding area. No conditions of environmental concern were identified on the Bold Run
Project Site or within the specified search radii.
11
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
An Environmental Screening Inspection (ESI) was conducted on the subject property in June 2005. The
purpose of the ESI was to visually evaluate the presence or evidence of any recognized environmental
concerns on the study site and surrounding areas. The ESI identified no recognized environmental
concerns that would have the potential to impact stream and buffer restoration on the project site. The
findings of the field investigation were documented on an Environmental Screening Inspection Form with
corresponding photographs (Appendix Q.
2.8.2 Property Ownership and Boundary
KCI obtained copies of the property deed dating back to 1950 from the Wake County Register of Deeds
in August 2005 (Table 3). The property deeds can be found on the CD included with the Restoration
Report.
Table 3. Property Ownershin Historv
Book Page Grantee (Buyer) Grantor Seller Date
9541 961 NC Capital Group Purnell Road Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 8/14/2002
Darch
9485 157 Marvin E. Sykes, Jr. Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 7/2/2002
Darch
8537 1861 John M. Rich, A. Melanie Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 3/8/2002
Murphy Darch
8300 1508 Christopher J. Marek Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 4/22/1999
Darch
8256 1188 Glen A. Darch, Susan K. Darch Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 2/18/1999
Darch
8169 1569 NCDOT Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 10/20/1998
Darch
8085 1493 William H. Steiner, Betty JoAnne Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 6/11/1998
Steiner Darch
3685 265 State of North Carolina, Right of Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 3/25/1997
Agreement Darch
6982 77 John Wade Stone, Shirley B. Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 4/16/1996
Stone Darch
3015 568 David C. Darch, Carrie M. Darch Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 2/28/1994
Darch
5922 405 C.M. Medlin Jr. Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 12/7/1993
Darch
5918 351 Lee Arnold Darch, Alison Wood Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 12/7/1993
Darch Darch
4701 923 Lee Arnold Darch, Alison Wood Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 5/3/1990
Darch Darch
4490 703 Mildred P. Davis, Geneva P. Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 5/8/1989
Stephenson Darch
3977 571 Glen A. Darch Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 3/7/1987
Darch
3692 925 Jack L. Taylor, Jr., Patricia L. Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 4/1/1986
Taylor Darch
3420 439 Edward Paschal, Beadie Bridges Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 1/24/1985
Darch
12
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
3420 434 Edward Paschal, Martha M. Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 1/21/1985
Leonard Darch
3232 459 Champion International Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 1/30/1984
Corporation Darch
2848 845 C.M. Kirk Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 7/25/1980
Darch
2831 53 Richard O. Gamble Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 5/27/1980
Darch, Lee A. Darch, Pat C. Darch
2830 92 David C. Darch Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 4/10/1980
Darch
2227 537 C.M. Kirk Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 2/20/1974
Darch
2020 487 Edward Paschal, P.C. Bailey Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 9/1/1971
Darch
1707 185 Donald Gulley, Central Carolina Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 4/1/1966
Bank and Trust Company
1587 661 Donald Gulley, Central Carolina Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 2/25/1964
Bank and Trust Company
1368 145 W.W. Sledge, Durham Bank & Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 5/21/1959
Trust Company
1335 535 W.W. Sledge, Durham Bank & Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 10/4/1958
Trust Company
1143 151 W.W. Sledge, Durham Bank & Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 2/12/1954
Trust Company
1061 344 Donald Gulley, P.V. Bailey, Lena Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 12/8/1950
S. Bailey Darch
1061 332 Donald Gulley, Charles L. Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 12/8/1950
Wheelous Darch
2.8.3 Site Access
There will be two access points to the project site. Both access points will be accessible from Bold Hill
Run Road. The first access point currently exists off of Bold Hill Run Road located on the southeastern
corner of the project site. The second access point will be established on the southeastern portion of the
project, located northwest from the first access entrance. The accessible road will be approximately (170'
x 14') which leads directly to the right of way for access to the utility line. During construction of the
proposed stream, construction equipment will have access to the stream channel and will be able to
maneuver up and down the channel, as necessary.
2.8.4 Utilities
A power line easement (Wake Electric) transects the subject property in a southeast-northwest orientation.
The documentation for the power line easement can be found in Appendix D. Wake Electric has a 100
feet right of way along the utility line. During construction and post construction, Wake Electric will have
access to the utility poles located on the project site. Wake Electric will access the site by way of the two
existing entrances mentioned in section (2.8.3). Two stabilized riffle grade control crossings will be
installed for machinery access to the utility lines located adjacent to the stream (Refer to Plan Sheet 4).
Also no vegetation will be planted along the 100-foot utility easement and access road on the project site.
13

Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
2.8.5 FEMA/Hydrologic Trespass
Bold Run Creek is located within the 100-year floodplain (Figure 8. Project Site Floodplain Map). As
such, any modifications to the stream that would result in the increase of the 100-year flood elevation
would require a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR). It is the intent of the restoration design
to maintain the 100-year flood elevation at the current level following restoration.
The FEMA provided an existing conditions HEC-2 model. The model parameters were reviewed to
verify that the conditions represent a benchmark hydraulic condition that can be compared to post-
restoration conditions. The existing conditions model will be revised to reflect changes to the channel
and floodplain as a result of.the restoration. A proposed hydrology and hydraulics (H&H) summary will
be submitted with a letter indicating that an increase in the 100-year flood elevation is not anticipated
(No-Rise Certification).
The proposed project reach is entirely contained within the Darch property. The restoration of the project
reach is not anticipated to produce hydrologic trespass conditions on any adjacent properties.
3.0 PROJECT SITE STREAMS (EXISTING CONDITIONS)
A site field assessment was conducted in June 2005 to document existing conditions and evaluate the
potential for stream and riparian buffer restoration. Observations and collected data are summarized
below, illustrated in Figure 9 (Existing Channel or Site Conditions Map), and documented in the site
photographs (Appendix E). The site was revisited several times from June to September 2005 to take
further measurements, to install a stream gauge, and to collect hydrology data from the instruments
(Figure 10. Project Site Hydrologic Features and Gauge Locations Map).
3.1 General Site Description
The Bold Run Creek project reach includes approximately 1,600 linear feet of perennial stream channel.
The project reach begins at Station 11+00. Several stream bedrocks exist in the upper reach. The
upstream portion of Bold Run Creek is a "134c" and "174" stream type, while the downstream portion is a
"G4c" stream type. Severe bank erosion throughout the stream has resulted from poor grazing
management. Bed degradation is evident and sedimentation from bank erosion is widespread.
One tributary (UT1) and one ephemeral channel enter Bold Run Creek. UT1 is a small, intermittent reach
that joins Bold Run Creek near Station 12+00. The ephemeral channel is located near the downstream
portion of Bold Run Creek. The channel starts at the bottom of a slope and runs parallel before
connecting with Bold Run Creek at Station 23+00. The channel was ditched in the early 1960's to
intercept runoff from the adjacent slope. Stream assessment forms were prepared for the channel; they
are included in Appendix F.
Four (4) drainage features exist on the project site. Drainage 1 connects to the left bank of Bold Run
Creek near the start of the project at Station 11+75. Drainage 2 starts at Bold Hill Run Road and directly
connects to Bold Run Creek. Drainage 3 connects to the right bank of Bold Run Creek in the middle
portion of the stream reach. Drainage 4 begins with two small drainage features beginning at the eastern
portion of the project boundary, near Bold Hill Run Road. The two drainage features connect to a larger
drainage feature in the middle of the project site, in the open field area, and runs south before connecting
to New Light Creek on the left bank.
14
I•

0,117, 7'J' rrt71r1r?rT t ?vt1 r t:
e f /
t
f1_ I?I fl!
rt
r f
fi
-Y f,
Figure 8. Project Site Floodplain Map
Special Flood Hazard Area (Subject to inundation by
the I % annual chance flood) N 't v
u u`?
Floodway Areas in Zone AE "-<? e ENO°KI t t l.'.'COSyStelI E
" t J'`?ll
S 4t
1:3,600 K C I Project Site Boundary l inch equals 300 feet
ASSOCIATES OF NC '°° "° 700
.Source: North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Progrmu• Feet
NRA1 Panel 1823
V
m
k
€T
I ? ?
a
Gte
th
-
80/0'R,, Creek R�a�y
r
V9r`0
001.
Ak
P a'
y rA �
D
Figure 10. Project Site Hydrological Features with Gauge Locations 7=7
MMMMVA��
FFA �,_pt�6
Bold Run Creek (Project Reach ~ Y
^� � J ) • Stream Gauge
1/ Ephemeral Channel to Bold Run Creek �� g(
Non -project Stream
Tributary to Bold Run Creek n/
1:3,600 � me
KC I al It
1 inch equals 300 feet PROGRAM
ASSOCIATES OF NC Image Source: Wake County GIS, 300 150 0 300
Digital Orthophotography 1999 Feet s

Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
A power line easement transects the project site with four (4) utility poles. The first utility pole is located
approximately 20 feet from the right stream bank. The second utility pole is located approximately 40
feet from the right stream bank near Station 16+50. The third utility pole is centrally located in the project
site and the fourth pole is situated adjacent to New Light Creek.
3.2 Channel Classification
The upstream portion of Bold Run Creek is classified as a "134c" and "F4" stream type. The stream
begins as a moderately entrenched channel (1.7) with a moderate width-to-depth ratio (11.6). Proceeding
downstream, the channel becomes entrenched and widens as the stream transitions into an "F" type
channel. Near Station 24+00, the channel narrows as Bold Run Creek changes to a "G4c" type stream.
Low width-to-depth and entrenchment ratios and high bank height ratios are typical of "G" type streams.
3.3 Channel Morphology (Pattern, Dimension, and Profile)
A Rosgen Level III assessment was conducted to gather existing stream dimension, pattern, and profile
data and determine the potential for restoration. Channel cross-sections and bed materials were surveyed
at six representative locations along Bold Run Creek. Data developed from these surveys are summarized
below (Table 4) with detailed data provided in Appendix G.
Table 4. Summarv of Existing Channel Mornholonv
LOCATION
PARAMETER XS-1 XS-2 XS-3 XS-4 XS-5 XS-6
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area

Abkf S ft 25.0 24.2 25.3 25.2 24.2 24.7
Bankfull Width

Wbkf ft 17.8 26.5 15.7 17.2 18.3 14.8
Flood Prone Width

Wf a ft 30.0 34.3 18.3 19.4 21.3 18.5
Maximum Depth
1.9 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.3
dmbkf ft
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.4 0.9 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.7
Dbkf (ft) I
W/D ratio
12.6 29.1 9.7 11.7 13.8 8.8
Wbkf/ dbkf
Entrenchment Ratio 1.7 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.3
Bank Height Ratio 1.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.6
Local W. S. Slope (ft/ft) 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007
Stream Type 134c F4 G4c G4c F4 G4c
18
Fee
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
3.4 Channel Stability Assessment
A qualitative stability assessment was performed to approximate the level of departure and determine the
likely causes of the channel disturbance. This assessment facilitates the decision-making process with
respect to restoration alternatives and establishing goals for successful restoration.
Bold Run Creek exhibits characteristics of an unstable channel, most notably bed degradation and bank
erosion. Poor grazing management is the primary mechanism of disturbance, however the past removal
of bank and riparian vegetation has exacerbated the bank erosion (eliminated rooting strength and cover
protection). Bank height ratios in excess of 1.5, as well as the presence of several exposed bedrocks in
Bold Run Creek, provide evidence of past bed degradation. Based on the field measurements, further
degradation and widening can be expected in the lower section of the project before it will be aggrade and
re-stabilize at the lowered base elevation.
3.5 Bankfull Verification
The standard methodology used in natural channel design is based on the ability to select the appropriate
bankfull discharge and generate the corresponding bankfull hydraulic geometry from a stable reference
system(s). Thus, the determination of bankfull stage is the most critical component of the natural channel
design (NCD) process.
Bankfull can be defined as "the stage at which channel maintenance is most effective, that is, the
discharge at which moving sediment, forming or removing bars, forming or changing bends and
meanders, and generally doing work that results in the average morphologic characteristics of the
channels," (Dunne and Leopold, 1978). Several characteristics that commonly indicate the bankfull stage
include: incipient point of flooding, breaks in slope, changes in vegetation, highest depositional features
(i.e. point bars), and highest scour line. The identification of Bankfull stage especially in a degraded
system can be difficult. Therefore, verification measures must be taken to ensure the correct
identification of the bankfull stage.
The three methods used to verify bankfull stage at Bold Run Creek were regional hydraulic geometry
relationships (regional curves), a pressure transducer/data logger combination gauge that monitored actual
water level in Bold Run Creek throughout the study period, and a hydrology/hydraulics model to evaluate
flow and sediment transport.
Regional curves are typically utilized in ungauged areas to approximate bankfull discharge, area, width,
and depth as a function of drainage area based on inter-related variables from other similar streams in the
same hydrophysiographic province. Regional curves and corresponding equations from "Bankfull
Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams" (Harman et al., 1999) were used to
approximate Bankfull in the project reach. Based on the regional curves, a bankfull discharge and cross-
sectional area of 130 ft3/s and 25 ft2 would be anticipated.
Stream stage data (water levels) were collected from Bold Run Creek. Data was collected for four
months (July through October) and water levels were correlated to an estimated discharge using a rating
curve generated for the gauged section. During the gauging period, no significant storm events were
recorded. The maximum discharge event was approximately 14 ft3/s on October 8 h. KCI will continue to
monitor the stage of Bold Run Creek in an attempt to validate the design discharge. Hydrograph data is
provided in Appendix 1.
Information from the regional curves and from the hydrologic monitoring was used in conjunction with
the Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) software to refine the bankfull
19
Is
F-6
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
determinations. The model allows for analysis of one-dimensional (1-D) steady state flow by solving for
the energy equation. The approximate discharges calculated using the Manning open channel flow
equation were run through the modeled reaches. The outputs corresponded well with the field indicators
and to the subsequent calculations of the existing morphological variables. A summary data output
developed from the model is provided below (Table 5).
Table 5. HEC-RASH drolo is Variables
Station Profile Bed Elev. WS Elev. EG Elev. EG Sloe Veloci Area Width F.N.
Units cfs ft AMSL ft AMSL ft AMSL ft/ft f s sf ft
XS1 BKF 120.0 275.46 277.60 277.95 0.010 4.74 25.34 19.9 0.74
XS2 BKF 120.0 274.80 276.78 276.55 0.010 4.63 25.89 22.69 0.76
XS3 BKF 120.0 272.34 274.73 274.93 0.005 3.59 33.46 22.94 0.52
XS4 BKF 120.0 271.53 273.78 274.17 0.009 5.06 23.8 15.74 0.72
XS5 BKF 120.0 268.29 270.73 271.08 0.008 4.74 25.3 16.96 0.68
XS6 BKF 120.0 267.11 269.32 268.86 0.007 4.65 25.81 15.83 0.64
3.6 Vegetation
The existing riparian area is predominantly in pasture. These areas are largely devoid of natural habitat
communities. Mature trees sporadically line the channel throughout the project reach. Also mature trees
are located along the hill slope bordering Bold Run on the left bank. It is the intent of the restoration
project to salvage any valuable trees that may provide immediate shade to the restored channel.
On July 14, 2005, Steven Stokes and April Helms classified the existing natural communities in
accordance with a "Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Third Approximation"
(Schafale and Weakley, 1990). The flora, including dominant species per stratum, were identified and
recorded.
Two community types were identified within the project area. The first community was classified as
Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest. This community is located in the southeastern portion of the
project, near Bold Hill Run Road. The dominant species observed in this community are as follows:
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), Black Walnut (Juglans nigra),
Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda), and Winged Elm (Ulmus alata).
The second community was classified as Piedmont/Mountain Levee Forest. This community is located
along the levee of New Light Creek and the banks of Bold Run Creek. The dominant species observed
along the levee of New Light Creek are as follows: American Elm (Ulmus americana), Sweet Gum
(Liquidambar styracijlua), River Birch (Betula nigra), Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), and
Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense). The dominant species observed along the banks of Bold Run Creek
are as follows: Sycamore, Southern magnolia (Magnolia grandijlora), Vietnamese Stilt Grass
(Microstigium viminium), River Birch, and Black Walnut.
20

Fe-
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
4.0 REFERENCE STREAMS
A reference reach is a channel with a stable dimension, pattern, and profile within particular valley
morphology. The reference reach is used to develop dimensionless morphological ratios (based on
bankfull stage) that can be extrapolated to disturbed/unstable streams to restore a stream of the same type
and disposition as the reference stream (Rosgen, 1998).
An upstream reach of Richland Creek located on the west side of the Town of Wake Forest was selected
to serve as a reference reach for the restoration of Bold Run Creek. Richland Creek flows south from its
headwaters in Franklin County towards its confluence with the Neuse River (Figure 11. Reference Site
Vicinity Map). It drains approximately 4.8 square miles of low-density residential, agriculture, and
forested lands. This selection was based on: location in the same hydrophysiographic province, similar
valley morphology, and similar sediment regime as the project site. Both streams are found in the
northern outer Piedmont ecoregion where local topography is relatively consistent with each other.
Approximately 400 linear feet of Richland Creek were surveyed in August 2004 and re-evaluated in
August 2005 (Appendix H contains supporting documentation from the field assessment). This reach of
Richland Creek was classified as a "C4" channel type. The dimensionless hydraulic geometry
relationships were developed from stable channel dimensions to facilitate the design of the proposed
channel cross-sections for the Bold Run Creek restoration reach.
4.1 Watershed Characterization
Richland Creek is situated within the northeastern portion of the Piedmont physiographic province, which
is typified by rolling topography with broad ridges, sharply indented stream valleys, and narrow, low-
gradient floodplains. The Richland Creek watershed (USGS 14-digit Hydrologic Unit 03020201070060)
is located within sub-basin 03-04-02 of the Neuse River Basin. The headwaters of the Richland Creek
form to the west and south of Youngsville, North Carolina. The watershed extends south-southwest to a
point approximately 1.5 miles downstream of the Falls Reservoir Dam where Richland Creek joins the
Neuse River.
The portion of Richland Creek evaluated for the reference survey is located between the Franklin/Wake
County Line and Harris Road in Wake Forest, North Carolina. Capital Boulevard (US 1) roughly bounds
the watershed to the west and the Seaboard Coast Railroad Line bounds it to the east (Figure 12.
Reference Site Watershed Map). The topographic relief within the project reach is approximately 25 feet,
ranging from approximately 282 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) at the upstream limits of Section 1 to
257 feet AMSL at the downstream limits at the Stadium Drive Bridge.
4.2 Channel Classification
Richland Creek is classified as a "C4" stream type. The majority of the cross-section calculations contain
an entrenchment ratio greater than 2.2, for a "C" or "E" with a width to depth ratio slightly greater 12.
21

T17.
Wake County, North Carolina

a
a
t
h
r?.
,l ? }fir

r.;? l !' ???? ?J? °",Y S 'eta ' '-
Figure 11. Reference Site Vicinity Map
Reference Reach on Richland Creek
w?E t wsysteii
1:12,000
C I s
I inch equals 1,000 feet
n
ATF? OF N( >.urcr rv;s ono ma goo
11"ri
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
i l+r fir' - J 11 ? 1 , ? t4 . ,
i,
oc
J? ?? r /? .1 1 ? l r -? r I? I
?, w 11 ? ,
J
t \i ? - - I?_...?i• rf' l ; ? 6 I ?- ?l '. ( \ , i J rI ?I. 1 1, .? 1 ,r l ---\
S I \
.7 j
,.I`
%
i _
r
_ •? h ,'ii` ?? l '"1 ?- ; r { Js(,?I 'k' r I) /a1` . \../?.? :;l 1 r n ` r! r
p? r
i( iJ!!fr?-?t' `?1R r (? r i _ 1 , ?f f .1 1
47
rte, J Y I 11 a ?. ini
r !? ?.- ?r??'t?A ? : %? ? ! IA? V ", ???y \ r. SY?+/ tl _ I ? ? tv - ? ? r1 ?
%
I ? ? ?"`- ?-' ? ! ???? +rS r 1A??\_; ?\) r ?t'1 ? •I l / ? ?? /<i, ??f-? ? 1 ?/- p_ T`,?"_ 1 ? , . A?. . `. ? I -
? ? ? i Sc, t?(? ? ?? V?, rl? ? t. , 1 _ ?r P jlll ill £ ?a I ) , ? ?? ?
\ rti , ?1 rl r /? .11??1 ?? 1 J 1 \ 1 45n-
rk ?`rv \ t ?r ?. ) ?11 1 / I ,11 f!S 11 ?v ?? •? ?1
7 4y "),t('?- ,111 •??? s-?i,i J?/?"?`,?. ?;?
r --
?` 1 M? f?1 __ X11 I,1 S ! rl?I ? i? ?' 5?,? jcj,
J'f
I
/%??1
?-? ?? ?? ?. (,? I ? I ??a ni I 1, L? ', _ ___ , ? , ?? Cv. ?. ? ? ?-.
4 A
- 1 t
r_ t , 1
Figure 12. Reference Site Watershed Ma
,p-- j,
Reference Reach
Reference Site Watershed
K C I 14-digit HCTC 03020201070060 ;,?lu?• 1??',OS?stel?1:30,000
1 inch equals 2,500 feet
ASSOCIATES OF NC 2,500 1,250 0 2,500
Source: Franklin County D2C Feet
I
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
4.3 Discharge (Bankfull, Trends)
Following the field assessment, three methods were used to verify the bankf ill stage at Richland Creek.
These methods included regional hydraulic geometry relationships (regional curves), a pressure
transducer / data logger combination gauge that monitored actual water level in Richland Creek
throughout the study period, and a hydrology/hydraulics model (HEC-RAS) to evaluate flow and validate
field calls.
Regional curves and corresponding equations from "Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for
North Carolina Streams" (Harman et al., 1999) were used to approximate bankfull in the project reach.
Based on the regional curves, a bankfull discharge and cross-sectional area of 270 W/s and 70 ft2 would
be anticipated at the Richland Creek Reference Reach.
Stream stage data (water levels) were collected downstream of the Richland Creek Reference Reach.
Data was collected for five months and water levels were correlated to an estimated discharge using a
rating curve generated for the gauged section. Three significant flow events occurred during the
monitoring period. Richland Creek in the vicinity of the gauge discharged 309, 185, and 155 W/s for
each of these events, respectively. This corresponded to a maximum discharge of approximately 210 -
220 ft /s in the reference reach.
The hydrology/hydraulics model provided a water surface profile and cross-sectional depiction based on
the sections surveyed during the reference reach assessment. This method provided a further means to
validate the discharge approximated in the reference reach section, as well as verify the field-call Bankfull
stage.
4.4 Channel Morphology (Pattern, Dimension, Profile)
A Rosgen Level III assessment was conducted to gather existing stream dimension, pattern, and profile
data and determine the potential for restoration. Channel cross-sections and bed materials were surveyed
at five representative locations along Richland Creek. Data developed from these surveys are provided in
Appendix H.
4.5 Vegetation
A field survey was conducted to identify and document the dominant plant communities in the project
area. Several distinct community mosaics were recognized, and complete species lists with dominance
were compiled. These lists were utilized to best fit the communities described in the Classification of
Natural Communities of North Carolina (Schafale & Weakley, 1990). The natural community in the
reference area was the Piedmont Levee Forest. Piedmont Levee Forests are prevalent along the active
levee position of Richland Creek. Woody species of the canopy include Fraxinus pennsylvanica (green
ash), Platanus occidentalis (sycamore), Betula nigra (river birch), Liquidambar styraciua (sweet gum),
Acer negundo (boxelder), and Juglans nigra (black walnut). Species in the overstory dominate those in
the understory.
24

70-
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
5.0 PROJECT SITE RESTORATION PLAN
5.1 Restoration Project Goals and Objectives
Based on the existing and reference condition descriptions, the restoration goals and objectives for the
Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration project are as follows:
Restoration Goals:
¦ Restore a stable channel morphology that is capable of moving the flows and sediment provided by
its watershed;
¦ Improve water quality and reduce land and riparian vegetation loss resulting from lateral erosion and
bed degradation through the establishment of bank and riparian vegetation and,
¦ Enhance aquatic and terrestrial habitat through the improvements to the stream water quality
(improved oxygen content, reduced sediment and nutrients, variable stream bed features).
¦ Improve water quality through approximately 27.1 acres of buffer restoration throughout the project
site.
Restoration Objectives:
¦ Project success will be assessed utilizing measurements of stream dimension, pattern, and profile, site
photographs, and vegetation sampling. These measurements should show little or no change from the
as-built conditions.
¦ A stable channel is able to move the sediment supplied by its watershed without the channel
aggrading or degrading. Through stream monitoring the stability of the restored stream will be
evaluated.
¦ Riparian vegetation must meet a minimum survival success rate of 320 stems/acre after five years.
5.1.1 Designed Channel Classification
The restoration design of Bold Run Creek will be restored to a Rosgen stream type "C4" and is based on
Priority Level II and IV approaches, as described in "A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of
Incised Rivers", (Rosgen, 1997.) For clarity and convenience, definitions of the four restoration priorities
are provided in Table 6.
The design proposes constructing 1,629 linear feet of meandering channel using a Priority Level II and IV
approach. Approximately 1,453.7 linear feet of Level II and 175.6 linear feet of Level IV will be
restored. The Level II restoration will establish a bankfull channel with a new floodplain, a channel bed at
its existing level in an existing gravel layer, and the cross section dimensions necessary to provide stable
flow maintenance and sediment transport. The Level IV design proposes to stabilize the bed and banks
while maintaining the existing channel pattern (planform) (Figure 13. Proposed Planform). The design
bankfull stage will equal the floodplain elevation in the new channel (bank height ratio = 1.0). The
establishment of a stable bedform (i.e., riffle-pool sequence, pool spacing) will be addressed in the
profiling of the design channel. The proposed stream dimension, pattern, and profile will be based on the
detailed morphological criteria and hydraulic geometry relationships developed from the reference
streams, see Table 7. Refer to the attached plan sheet drawings.
In-stream structures will be incorporated to reduce the burden of energy dissipation on the channel
geometry. Cross Vanes and Rock Sill Grade Controls (Refer to Plan Sheet 2) will be used to stabilize the
restored channel. These structures are designed to reduce bank erosion and the influence of secondary
circulation in the near-bank region of stream bends. The structures further promote efficient sediment
transport and produce/enhance in-stream habitat. Coir fiber matting will be used to provide temporary
stabilization on the newly graded streambanks. The confluence of tributaries with the restored stream will
25

Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
be stabilized with grade control structures where necessary to match the proposed grade of the restored
main channel (Refer to Plan Sheet 4 where UT1 joins Bold Run).
The restoration project will also include other non-stream related components:
• Cattle exclusion fencing will be installed along the outer boundary of the restored riparian buffers and
a permanent conservation easement will be recorded to protect the site in perpetuity.
• Two stabilized riffle grade control crossings will be installed to provide access to the utility power
lines located on the project site.
26
+, r laa3 6661 6Ndod8woydoyuD /ng8(7 'SID ,JunOJ RPM : d»noS )N 10 S3IVIDOSSY
LUOISA wfil SZI 0 979 SZI I D x
laa3 SZI slunba yaul I (ION auaull 9•9L0 uOUB-101sag AI,CI!JOl.>d N tuippold pasodoad •01 amn2i,l
009' F I
(ION .Uaull L•£Sb`I) uOllesolsag II XWO"d
+, 2? a
N_
•
*u
;il ,.fir. .. , . !...
Y W
Ilk - It
r F ... s. ?. .e? .g F lo?
Aw,
'Ook
r
i •? A
p Al
_AR
>f
..w s?
.
j ?
r y) ,?r? `E6_3!+ .,j•4s, nc ?... M, Xx R
,
•• i

Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Tnhle 6_ Prinrity i,evelc of Tneiced River Rectnration
Description Methods Advantages Disadvantages
Priori 1
Convert G and/or F stream Re-establish channel on Re-establishment of 1) Floodplain re-
types to C or E at previous previous floodplain using floodplain and stable establishment could cause
elevation with floodplain. relic channel or construction channel: flood damage to urban,
of new bankfull discharge 1) reduces bank height and agricultural, and industrial
channel. Design new streambank erosion, development.
channel for dimension, 2) reduces land loss, 2) Downstream end of
pattern, and profile 3) raises water table, project could require grade
characteristic of stable form. 4) decreases sediment, control from new to previous
Fill in existing incised 5) improves aquatic and channel to prevent head-
channel or with terrestrial habitats, cutting.
discontinuous oxbow lakes 6) improves land
level with new floodplain productivity, and
elevation. 7) improves aesthetics.
Priori 2
Convert F and/or G stream If belt width provides for the 1) Decreases bank height and 1) Does not raise water table
types to C or E. minimum meander width streambank erosion, back to previous elevation.
Re-establishment of ratio for C or E stream types, 2) Allows for riparian 2) Shear stress and velocity
floodplain at existing level construct channel in bed of vegetation to help stabilize higher during flood due to
or higher, but not at original existing channel, convert banks, narrower floodplain.
level. existing bed to new 3) Establishes floodplain to 3) Upper banks need to be
floodplain. If belt width is help take stress off of sloped and stabilized to
too narrow, excavate channel during flood, reduce erosion during flood.
streambank walls. End-haul 4) Improves aquatic habitat,
material or place in 5) Prevents wide-scale
streambed to raise bed flooding of original land
elevation and create new surface,
floodplain in the deposition. 6) Reduces sediment,
7) Downstream grade
transition for grade control is
easier.
Priori 3
Convert to a new stream Excavation of channel to 1) Reduces the amount of 1) High cost of materials for
type without an active change stream type involves land needed to return the bed and streambank
floodplain, but containing a establishing proper river to a stable form. stabilization.
floodprone area. Convert G dimension, pattern, and 2) Developments next to 2) Does not create the
to B stream type, or F to profile. To convert a G to B river need not be relocated diversity of aquatic habitat.
Be. stream involves an increase due to flooding potential. 3) Does not raise water table
in width/depth and 3) Decreases flood stage for to previous levels.
entrenchment ratio, shaping same magnitude flood.
upper slopes and stabilizing 4) Improves aquatic habitat.
both bed and banks. A
conversion from F to Be
stream type involves a
decrease in width/depth ratio
and an increase in
entrenchment ratio.
Priori 4
Stabilize channel in place. A long list of stabilization 1) Excavation volumes are 1) High cost for stabilization.
materials and methods have reduced. 2) High risk due to excessive
been used to decrease 2) Land needed for shear stress and velocity.
streambed and streambank restoration is minimal. 3) Limited aquatic habitat
erosion, including concrete, depending on nature of
gabions, boulders, and stabilization methods used.
bioengineering methods.
Source: Rosgen, 19Y7, "A Geomorphologieal Approach to Restoration oflncised Rivers ".
28
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Table 7. Moruholol?ical Design Criteria

Variables Project Site
Existing
Channel Reference Reach
Richland Creek
(Above Section 1) Project Site
Restored Reach
Ros en Stream T e B4/C4 C4 C4
Drainage Area mi 12 4.8 12
Bankfull Width W bkf (1 1) 17.5 28-32 17.7
Bankfull Mean Depth dbkf (ft) .9-1.7 1.5 2.3-2.4 1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional area Abp ftZ 24.2-25.3 24.9 67-75 25
Width/de th Ratio Wbkf/dbkf 8.8-29.1 12.2 11.7-13.9 12.5
Maximum Depth dmbkf (1 1) 1.9 ?3-75-__ 1.6
Width of flood prone area Wf , (1 1) 20.4 >i 53.1
Entrenchment Ratio ER 1.1-1.7 1.3 0*
- >3.0
Water Surface Slope S ft/ft 0.007 0
9 0.007
Sinuosi (stream length/valley length) K) 1.04 1.1 \` 1.1
Pool Depth (1 1) 2.9 1 1.54
Riffle Depth (1 1) 2.3-2.4 1.4
Pool Width ft - 26-.5 19.0
Riffle Width (1 1) 28-32 1 17.7
fi Pool XS Area s - 70-75 'k 27.5
° Riffle XS Areas 24.2-25.3 67-75 ` 25
Pool de th/mean riffle depth - 1.2-1.3 1.2-1.3
Q Pool width/riffle width - 0.9-1.1 0.9-1.1
Pool area/riffle area - 0.9-1.1 0.9-1.1
Max pool de th/dbkf - 1.9-2.0 1.9-2.0
Low bank height/max bankfull depth - 1.0-1.2 1.0-1.2
Mean Bankfull Velocity V s 3.14.6 3.6-5.0
Bankfull Discharge Q cfs 75-115 260-270
Meander length Lm) (1 1) 110-200 60-180
e
Radius of curvature Rd (1 1)
30-70
20-55
Belt width WbI) (ft) 20-75 300 160-195
Meander width ratio Wbit/Wbkf 1.1-4.3 9.3-10.7 9-11
Radius of curvature/bankfull width 1.1-4.0 1.0-2.5 1.1-3.0
Meander len h/bankfull width 3.8-8.6 3.5-7.1 35-10.0
Valle sloe 0.0083 0.0045 0.0083
Average water surface sloe 0.0087* 0.004 0.007
Riffle sloe 0.004-0.021 0.0045-0.009 0.0088-0.0158
Pool sloe 0.0002-0.0009 0.000-0.0025 0.000-0.0044
Pool to pool spacing 10-70 25-90 0-0.001
o Pool length 29-43 5-25 3-20
cy Riffle slo a/av water surface sloe 0.46-2.4 1.1-2.3 1.1-2.3
Pool slo a/av water surface sloe 0.023-0.103 0.0-0.6 0.0-0.6
Run slo a/av water surface sloe - 0.7-1.2' 0.7-1.2
Run de th/dbkf - 1.0-1.1 1.0-1.1
Pool len th/bankfull width 1.7-2.5 0.2-0.9 0.2-0.9
i Pool to pool s acin ankfull width 0.57-4.0 0.8-3.0 0.8-3.0
* T Hs value is influenced by the level of inci sion of Bold Run Creek b efore its confluence with Ne w Livht Creek
VVL
r
t.
vu ??
t
e1c, 29
V
o
of
CL
?r

Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
5.2 Natural Plant Community Restoration
Restoring natural vegetation will focus primarily on the buffer restoration areas and Bold Run Creek
floodplain areas. These areas will receive species consistent with a Piedmont Levee Forest and Piedmont
Bottomland Forest community. The typical Piedmont Levee Forest is seasonally to intermittently
flooded. The vegetation may consist of mature climax forest, or may be in various stages of primary or
secondary succession (Schafale and Weakley 1990). The typical Piedmont Bottomland Hardwood
community is flooded at least occasionally. Bottomland Forests are believed to form a stable climax forest
with uneven-aged canopy with primarily gap phase regeneration (Schafale and Weakley 1990).
5.2.1 Target Buffer Communities
The Neuse River Buffer Rule (15A NCAC 2B .0233) applies to 50-foot (15.24 m) wide buffers directly
adjacent to surface waters in the Neuse River Basin (intermittent streams, perennial streams, lakes, ponds,
and estuaries), excluding wetlands. The Neuse River Buffer Rules (NBR) is administered by the
NCDWQ. The purpose of this rule is to protect and preserve existing riparian buffers in the Neuse River
Basin and to maintain their nutrient removal functions. This rule is applicable to all streams identified on
either the most recent local county soil survey or the most recent USGS topographic map. If stream
features are not present on either map, the area is not subject to the rule, even if a stream is present.
The Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules were enacted to protect and preserve existing riparian buffers to
maintain their function for protection of water quality (NCDWQ, 2002). Currently, there are small
drainage features located throughout the project site, which deliver direct runoff to Bold Run Creek. To
maintain the water quality of Bold Run Creek, an approximate 200' buffer will extend on either side of
the features (Figure 14. Proposed Planting Plan).
5.2.2 Planting Zones
Two planting zones will be incorporated into the planting plan. Zone A is classified as a Levee Area;
which runs along the levee of New Light Creek. Zone B is classified as a Bottomland Hardwood Area;
which will border the streamside planting area along Bold Run Creek and run along the Levee area and
the remaining portion of the site. Included in Zone A and B is a 20' streamside planting area bordering
New Light Creek and Bold Run Creek, will also be planted with riparian vegetation. There is a small
portion, approximately 1.30 acres, in the middle of Zone B that was classified during the field
investigation with wetter soils (Chewacla) (Refer to Figure 5). This particular area will be planted with
tolerable, higher moisture Bottomland Hardwood species. The planting plan in Figure 14 illustrates the
two zones that will be used to target restoration vegetation.
5.2.3 Plant Sources
Field assessment observations, Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration (NC Department of
Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystems Enhancement Program 2004), and community
descriptions from Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina (Schafale and Weakley
1990) were all used to develop the species to be planted on the site.
5.2.4 Plant Care and Installation
All hardwood species on site will be planted using bare root plants. Four hundred thirty-six (436) trees
per acre (based on an average 10' x 10' spacing) will be planted in rows to achieve a mature survivability
of three hundred twenty (320) trees per acre in the riparian zone (NCDENR, 2001).
30
Is
? e
?M
F
C u
(F C 3 C, a r
:, l

o

C, .. . .

I t.
W°ts1}?
BlFCtR,C
r: m
J w4), e4444
SF
- (D _ C MFNT
'?t a _
Fi`
Figure 14. Proposed Planting Plan
® Zone A - Levee Planting Area 1, -
Zone B - Bottomland Hardwood Planting Area
® Zone B - High Moisture Planting Zone
Zone B - Streamside Planting Area eosyste i i
KC I 14\1 Proposed Thalweg 1:3,000
1 inch equals 250 feet -
ASSOCIATES OF NC SouRCB libkeC,-tVrrs 250 125 0 250
Digi(al OrWaph.mgraphi 1999 Feet
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
5.2.5 Plant List
The Bold Run Creek floodplain/levee in the project reach is predominantly forested with hardwood
species (Refer to Section 3.5). Plantings shall consist of native species, which are available during the
time of planting. The Bottomland Hardwood area will be vegetated with native woody and herbaceous
plant materials. In general, the two planting zones will consist of the following species groupings:
Zone A: Levee Area
Black Walnut Juglans nigra FACU
Willow Oak Quercus phellos FACW-
Overcup Oak Quercus lyrata FACW
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra FAC
Streamside
River Birch Betula nigra FACW
Boxelder Acer negundo FACW
American Sycamore Platanus occidentalis FACW-
Zone B: Bottomland Hardwood Area
Tulip Poplar Liriodendron tulipifera FACW-
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda FAC+
Willow Oak Quercus phellos FACW-
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii FACW-
High Moisture Area
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica FACW
American Elm UlmusAmericana FACW
Silky Dogwood Cornus amomum FACW
Herbaceous vegetation shall consist of a native grass mix that may include:
Bluestem Andropogon glomeratus
Deertongue Panicum clandestinum
Orchardgrass Dactylis glomerata
Switchgrass Panicum virgatum
Virginia wildrye Elymus virginicus
Rye grain (Secale cereale) and/or brown top millet (Pennisetum glaucum) will be used for temporary
stabilization.
In addition to the native seed mix and stabilization seeding, live stakes shall be installed to assist in
stabilizing the stream banks. The following species may be used for live staking:
Black Willow
Elderberry
Silky Willow
Silky Dogwood
Salix nigra
Sambucus canadensis
Salix sericea
Cornus amomum
32
1
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
5.2.6 Schedule
Woody vegetation planting will take place during the dormant season.
5.2.7 Site Preparation and Stabilization
The stream restoration project will generally utilize the same belt width as the existing channel, however
some areas will require clearing to achieve the appropriate pattern outlined in the design criteria. The
cleared areas will be re-vegetated with native woody and herbaceous plant materials. Following the re-
vegetation, riparian buffers associated with the Bold Run Creek restoration will extend between fifty (50)
to two hundred (200) feet on both sides of the stream.
The trees targeted for removal will be treated with herbicide in late summer when the trees have leafed
out entirely or in the winter once the sap has stopped flowing. A glyphosate herbicide will be applied at
this time. The trees will be left either downed or standing to provide habitat for terrestrial species.
5.2.8 Maintenance
C1
a
A pre-emergent herbicide will be sprayed in mid-March following the planting of the bare root seedlings
to control the herbaceous vegetation. This allows time for rainfall to settle the soil around the roots of the
seedlings, newly planted during the dormant season, but before the buds begin to swell in the spring.
Reducing competition from herbaceous vegetation is an important step to ensure maximum survivability
of the planted seedlings.
Correspondingly, nurturing the site with regular management activities is considered necessary to ensure
i that the goals and objectives of the project are met. These activities will be conducted throughout the
year. If the monitoring identifies failures in the project site, a remedial action plan will be developed to
investigate the causes of the failure and propose actions to rectify the problem.
5.2.9 On-site Invasive Species Management
Part of the regular management activities will include invasive species control for the project site.
Invasive species control will primarily focus on removing the existing invasive species, Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense) and Vietnamese Stilt Grass (Microstigium viminium). It is recommended that a
glyphosate herbicide with a 2 to 3-percent solution be used as a foliar spray (Miller, 2004). The
herbicidal treatment will be conducted during late summer, early fall. Herbicidal treatments will be
conducted yearly if needed.
5.3 Sediment Transport Analysis
A stable channel is able to move the sediment supplied by its watershed without aggrading or degrading.
This ability is evaluated through two parameters: competency and capacity. Competency is the channel's
ability to move particles of a certain size, expressed as units of Pascals (Pa) or lbs/ft . Capacity is the
channel's ability to move a specific volume of sediment (sediment discharge). Sediment discharge is the
amount of sediment moving through a cross section over a specified period of time, expressed in
dimensionless parameters or as mass or weight units of kg/sec or lbs/sec.
• The flow associated with the threshold movement of the streambed is the reference condition that all
sediment transport models are based upon. In natural streambeds there are particles of a wide range of
sizes. At low, but significant flow levels, the smallest particles will move, while the larger particles resist
i
•
33
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
the flow of the stream. This is the condition of partial sediment transport. As the stream flow increases,
eventually every particle on the streambed will show threshold movement, this is the condition of full
sediment transport.
There is a wide range of sand-gravel streams that have the flow conditions necessary to significantly
move particles greater than the D50, but do not reach the full sediment transport condition. This condition
is present in Bold Run Creek, and the model used for the sediment transport analysis was Wilcock-Crowe
(2003). The Wilcock-Crowe model is a "sediment capacity" model; however, it also contains an
entrainment predictor.
Entrainment is the condition that initiates the movement of a selected particle size in the presence of a
mix grade channel bed. If the largest particle that moves during a bankfull event can be identified, then
the flow conditions that produced this movement can be determined and this flow condition (the channel
competency) is used in the design of the restored stream channel.
In basic terms, given the bed surface grain-size distribution and the bed shear velocity, the Wilcock-
Crowe Surface-Based Transport Model (SBTM) calculates the bedload transport rate and the bedload
grain-size distribution. Using a hydraulics model, one can predict the shear velocity and discharge
characteristics that will provide the necessary sediment transport capacity. By making the sediment
transport and discharge dimensionless, this analysis can be scaled to another stream channel, separate
from the reference reach, that has a similar sediment distribution. In this case, it was applied to the Bold
Run Creek design section.
In the Richland Creek Reference Reach, the approximate bankfull depth was 3.7 feet (1.1 m). The shear
velocity (u*) associated with this discharge based on the hydraulics model was 0.17 meters per second
(m/s). This shear velocity corresponded to a dimensionless sediment transport rate (qT*) of 2.5E-05. A
qT* value of 2.5E-05 intersects with a dimensionless water discharge (qW*) of approximately 750 for the
Bold Run Creek design slope (0.007) on the Bold Run River State Diagram (Figure 15). The proposed
design channel will discharge approximately 92 W/s over the area subject to bedload transport with a u* =
0.14 m/s. The water discharge (qw) for this event based on the Manning-Strickler Resistance Equation is
1.25, which correlates to a qW* value of 595 (0 = 20.7%). This is based on a db5o (median diameter of the
bedload) value of approximately 6.5 millimeters.
qW* = qv / (((s-1)g)'/2 (db5o)3/2 = 1.252 / (((2.65 - 1) 9.81)'2 (6.45E-03)32 = 595
Where: s is the specific gravity of sediment, g is the gravitational constant, and all other variables are as
defined above. Refer to Figure 15. Bold Run Creek River State Diagram.
34
I•
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
qw*
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000
1.00E-01
1.00E-02
-L:- 5=0.001
1.00E-03

--I- S

1.00E-06
?F
1.00E-07

1.00E-09

1.00E-10

1.00E-11

1.00E-12

Figure 15. Bold Run Creek River State Diagram F
T
K CI
Ea>systcm ,
ASSOCIATES OF NC

I T?1-T I I I ?rt I I I ?rt I I I ?t? I I I ?? I I I I ?? I I

S=0.002
-?? I??II I?711 I II

5
0.003
=
-CIE- -0
S
004 I I I I? ? I I I I I I
.
-
?-5=0
005
.
°0:007

-4- 5=0.01
" ---1--1- ?
- 5=0.025 - I= - I I I I I= I I I -?'- ?
I I
? I ?? I I

I
I I I
?
N
I I I
-
-
-
I--III I-III ? I II

-- __ -- I? II
I I I +
---F I I - I?11
I ? - r I I = 1=11
ICI I
I-I-f-r-? I I I I
1= 11 =
I - I I -- ICI I
-}- I-T-;-r? I I - ICI I
?- i ?-? I I ? ICI I
I I -I-H -+ I I
? I? I I
?- I -H-fi-t I I I - I - I I
I I I--'? I I
I-t-t-F-t I I I? I I
?- I -H-t-t I I ? I I I
I I --i --H-t I I
I? I I
r I ?t-t-t I I I I -?-- - I I
-t- I I I I I I? I I
I -ifii- t I I I? I I
t- I ??1 I I =? I-? I I
-t- I ?t I I

CI I
rt l ?? I I

- ICI I
I ?t-t I I I ?f-Y I I

I- ?I I
I -t-tfit I I

---?I I
I-t-t-t-t I I 1.00E-04
1.00E
-05
1.00E-08
? ICI I
t- I ?t?hrtt I I
1
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
6.0 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
Monitoring shall consist of the collection and analysis of stream stability and riparian/stream bank
vegetation survivability data to support the evaluation of the project in meeting established restoration
objectives. Specifically, project success will be assessed utilizing measurements of stream dimension,
pattern, and profile, site photographs, and vegetation sampling.
6.1 Streams
The purpose of monitoring is to evaluate the stability of the restored stream. Following the procedures
established in the USDA Forest Service Manual, Stream Channel Reference Sites (Harrelson, et.al, 1994)
and the methodologies utilized in the Rosgen stream assessment and classification system (Rosgen, 1994
and 1996), data collected will consist of detailed dimension and pattern measurements, a longitudinal
profile, and bed materials sampling.
Dimension - Five permanent cross-sections, three riffle and two pools, will be established and used to
evaluate stream dimension. Permanent monuments will be established by either conventional survey or
GPS. The cross-section surveys shall provide a detailed measurement of the stream and banks, to include
points on the adjacent floodplain, at the top of bank, bankfull, at all breaks in slope, the edge of water, and
thalweg. Subsequently, width/depth ratios and entrenchment ratios will be calculated for each cross-
section.
Cross-section measurements should show little or no change from the as-built cross-sections. If changes
do occur, they will be evaluated to determine whether they are minor adjustments associated with settling
and increased stability or whether they indicate movement toward an unstable condition.
Pattern - Measurements associated with the restored channel pattern will include belt width, meander
length, and radius of curvature. Subsequently, sinuosity, meander width ratio and radius of curvature and
meander length/bankfull width ratios will be calculated.
Profile - A longitudinal profile of the entire restored channel will be surveyed. Measurements will
include slopes (average, pool, riffle), as well as calculations of pool-to-pool spacing. Annual
measurements should indicate stable bedform features with little change from the as-built survey. The
pools should maintain their depth with lower water surface slopes, while the riffles should remain
shallower and steeper.
Bed Materials - Pebble counts will be conducted at each representative cross-section for the purpose of
repeated classification and to evaluate sediment transport.
Photograph Reference Points
Photograph reference points (PRP) will be established to assist in characterizing the site and to allow
qualitative evaluation of the site conditions. The location and bearing/orientation of each photo point will
be permanently marked in the field and documented to allow for repeated use.
Cross-section Photograph Reference Points
Each cross-section will be photographed to show the form of the channel with the tape measure stretched
over the channel for reference in each photograph. Effort will be made to consistently show the same
area in each photograph.
36

Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Longitudinal Photograph Reference Points
Additional PRPs will be located, as needed, to document the condition of specific in-stream structures
such as cross vanes, as well as infrastructure associated with the stream such as utility and road crossings.
6.2 Vegetation
The success of the riparian buffer plantings will be evaluated using 55 (5% of total buffer area) ten by ten
meter (10m x 10m) vegetative sampling plots. The corners of each monitoring plot will be permanently
marked in the field. The monitoring will consist of a physical inventory within each plot and a
subsequent statistical analysis in order to determine the following: composition and number of surviving
species, and total number of stems per acre. Additionally, a photograph will be taken of each plot that
will be replicated each monitoring year. Riparian vegetation must meet a minimum survival success rate
of 320 stems/acre after five years. If monitoring indicates that the specified survival rate is not being met,
appropriate corrective actions will be developed, to include invasive species control, the removal of
dead/dying plants and replanting.
6.3 Schedule/Reporting
The first scheduled monitoring will be conducted during the first full growing season following project
completion. Monitoring shall subsequently be conducted annually for a total period of five (5) years.
Annual monitoring reports will be prepared and submitted after all monitoring tasks for each year are
completed. Each report will provide the new monitoring data and compare the new data against previous
findings. The monitoring report will follow the format described in the EEP document entitled "Content,
Format, and Data Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports."
37
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
7.0 REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., D.E. Wise-Frederick, C.M. Buckner, S.D. Wilkerson, W.A. Hannan, R.E. Smith, and J.
Spooner. 2002. Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for Urban Streams throughout the Piedmont
of North Carolina. JAWRA, Volume 38, Number 3, pp. 641-651.
Dunne, T. and L.B. Leopold. 1978. Water in Environmental Planning. New York: W.H. Freeman and
- Company.
Harman, W.A., G.D. Jennings, J.M. Patterson, D.R. Clinton, L.O. Slate, A.G. Jessup, J. R. Everhart, and
• R.E. Smith, 1999. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams.
Wildland Hydrology. AWRA Symposium Proceedings. Edited by D.S. Olsen and J.P. Potyondy.
American Water Resources Association. June 30 - July 2, 1999. Bozeman, MT.
• Harrelson, C.C., C.L. Rawlins, and J.P. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated
Guide to Field Technique. General Technical Report RM-245. USDA Forest Service, Rocky
Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
• HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas. 2001. "Constraint Analysis: McIntyre Creek at Hornets Nest
Park", 3pp., Report for the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program, Raleigh, NC.
- Miller, James H. Revised December 2004. Nonnative Invasive Plants of Southern Forests, A Field Guide
For Identification and Control. USDA Forest Service, Asheville, NC
• NCDENR. 2001. "Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration." Division of Water Quality, Wetlands
- Restoration Program, Raleigh, NC.
• NCDENR. 2001. "Interim, Internal Technical Guide: Benthic Macroinvertebrate Monitoring Protocols
- for Compensatory Stream Restoration Projects." Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Unit,
Raleigh, NC.
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality. November 2001. Basinwide Assessment Report, Neuse River
Basin. http://www.esb.etir.state.nc.us/Basinwide/NEU200I.pdf (August 2004).
- NCDENR, Division of Water Quality. Version 1 October 23, 2002. Interim, Internal DWQ Guide for the
Calculation of Riparian Buffer Mitigation Credits and Criteria for Riparian Buffer Mitigation
Projects.
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality. March 2005, Working Draft. Field Study and Modeling Plan for
The Falls of the Neuse Reservoir Nutrient Management Strategy.
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/tmdl/documents/FallsLakeNMS OOO.pdf
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality. 2005. Surface Water Classifications.
littp://h2o.enr.stat.e.tic.us/csu/swc.htm]
NCDENR. "Water Quality Stream Classification for Streams in North Carolina." Water Quality Section.
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/reports/basinsandwaterbodies (September, 2002).
NCEEP, November 2002. North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program Neuse River Basin Watershed
Restoration Plan. http://www.nceep.net/senri.ces/restplans/neuse 2003.pdf
38
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
NCGS. 1985. Geologic Map of North Carolina
Rosgen, D.L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22: 169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa Springs, CO.
Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A geomorphological approach to restoration of incised rivers. In: Wang, S.S.Y.,
E.J. Langendoen, and F.D. Shields, Jr. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Conference on Management of
Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. pp. 12-22.
Rosgen, D.L. 1998. The Reference Reach - a Blueprint for Natural Channel Design. Presented at ASCE
Conference, Denver, CO - June, 1998.
Rosgen, D.L. 2002. "Natural Channel Design Methodology (40 Steps)." Natural Channel Design and
River Restoration Short Course, Pagosa Springs, CO - October, 2002.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
31d Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, NCDEHNR, Division of Parks and
Recreation. Raleigh, NC.
Wilcock, P., and J. Crowe. 2003. "A Surface-Based Transport Model for Sand and Gravel. " ASCE
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 129(2), pp 120-128.
39
SNOISIAN
H
N'
1 90+9Z NOIlV1S Ol 00'00+M NOIlV1S z

a3?
3,.0
IMAM" 6091Z VN1108VD
HO13
VU
18O
ovoa sx80d xis 109V
VNIlONVO Hl»ON 'AiNf100 3NVM'1S3NO
J 3NVM 0
1? F
:
Q $
51511N3105 SN3NNtlld • S833NI0N3
1o3rOHd N011"OlM N3ddn9 / WH3uis a
"
3NN A S31ANSSY o
9001 IN S.N3WWOO d33 N3d SN01SMH I . ¦ M )133NO Nnm mos
900VAON NVId NOLM10193M H11m aw- 1WSf1S IAA?!! 111 1 a (q

z

F

? O

W

E

MWA I

tt ?yp? }p{ 'Z^
%z ? •Ti A ? V
9 a U z
LLJ
? Z
F r' - u
CL z - ....
a 4i ? a
O
H
O ?
clo?
W
1 I 1 7 1 }I `?? d NO
C-03
/? ? d •. ? 1 11\I l\11\ 1 ?\ 1 I r., j rlll??f
k®? ? ? ? 1 I i 1" ? III III
O O m 1??11
IL
O ? rrJ ?IIII // I/?
N
( 7 ? ? N
(? II Z
0
zo
0
I
unn0--O-N n
Nr.? L
0. ?
0
LL.
D
4
co? o. FI ? ? p, ? O pp OD
Q O aD
MANDUM WIR( HD'
N ? oFC
/ N y w O
N ? P d
gtlg L J
SS 'q q l? p? « O O LU O Ii.
UQU?EF RD, i i n v, o e U. 0
L06P8ZPcI9 *s99 o YcI
m••i•••.••Iii•t!
SNOISIAN 90+9Z NOLLVIS 0100'00+O1 NOLLVIS
034-1 3110 609LZ VNIIONVO HAON'HOMY8 fA
F OVON SMH03 XIS 1090 J K
VNI108VO H1MON 'AiNnoo 3NVM '1832!0:13)IVM
S1SI1N310S • S83NNVld • S833NION3 a
ON 30 S31r100SSY 103fOHd NOIIV'801S3N a3:gdn8 / WV3a1S „ o
900L'83d S1NMV403d331l3dSNOISIA3H y I M >133HO NnH mos
II?? 1111 S
d
900L'AON NV1d NOLLV!l0163U HLM 031LIIY8f18 ERE
00
H
m
06
74 v _v
N
:d
o
b py?
yy S
R R
e
_O - " -
CO 0
a
w F iL -I--
co U.
?
a J a I
Yvco
W N O F--_ 0
Ix CL
CL
?
} -?-- ° -?-- U U
m - - 4 a
a
a a

SNOISIA3N
€?
?
?
s
?
I
H
N'HO131YH 50+9Z NOLLVIS Ol 00.00+06 NOLLVIS
oa.ausn Wo nousus?a w.s ((?
},.
. ? ;
I,
. • 6091Z VNI
OMVO
18O
OV08 SAbloj xis 1090 `dNIlO>dVO H1210N '
ILN(l0O 3HdM '1S3210d 3)IdM
.
S1SI1N31OS • S83NNVld • SH33NION3
n3f0bd N011V801S3a b3ddn8 / WV3HIS
c
ON A S31n3aSSr
90OZ'83A SAMMOd33M3dSN01SMIJ ¦ . ¦ M
11 AJ LLLill )133ao Nna mos
900Z 'AON NV-1d NOLMdOlSM NLM 03L13W808 a
S
r' Or
.A
CD J K
v y u,
N
r? ?0 1 1 1
L
Li- LJ W? 1 1
1 nRl ^I
' r/1111/(( \I '
lr ! I 1
l / l 11 \IlI
A
.. / / l?ll I / I I 1
//^ / i ?11 /1111' i
/ 11 I I
l / ! III \ I ' ?LL
/ i ?x Iq?
/ MI I
/ / 1 I
O / // ? '911 I? I
/ / IhII I\
lllf
l ?f?see
? / I l l 1 ,? I l I ?Op\ ` 1\ I I I/ l l
/ / 11 \? 1 I l lI I l
co I/ I 1 1\ / `I / I I \I ?? I I /l i l l l l
I I I
A( r\ I\ 111 / l/ ,? I l l//
i I ? l l III ?/I
/ I 1 /ll IIIII
/ / I I " I I \ ?.\\ \ 1 1 1 1
' I I I I f II\ \\ \\\ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 w
/ ? l \ I; ?? `?? 1111 I I Il l 11 I I I
/ / I 1\ I I )l \1 1 II III 1 1 1 I I I
/ , I I /? / \ i 11 1 1 1 I I I I/ I
? / I I l,I / \ I IIIIII I/Illll// I I
/ / ! / r \ \\\\ I II I I IlIllll / I
Ulf
I ' -
/ r/ , Ill
/ z%
l/ll////// /j/l
llllll IIIIIIIIIIII
/ // / 1111 J/ 11111 iIj III?I???IIIII/
/ /?j ?j/ 1t I // //rywo3 1 /??I ??Yh?"Qo I???lll?llll jlll ?IIIII?IInI/IIIIII
///l? l / /lI Il/lllll/IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiII
1 I
Ij) I/11?
(IIIIIIIIIIf
l ? 1 ?Slll ///III I I I /1 (/IIIIII?IIIllilllllllllllll?llll
/ I / !1N'l(hi[ill\I\\\'81\ 1?1111111?1?1'll?llll?lllllhll\\?
I , 11 11 1 I I'll \\\\ 1\ I I I l I l I I I I 1 I I i I 1 111 11111 \ 111 \\\
I 1\ ?? \\d 1 I I Ill i Illll\\I\I\I1\I\I\\\\1\\1?
11\l\\\Vi11111\\I\\I\\\\\\\\1\\\g\\\\1\\\\\\
? `??'¢"? I "IN\"$ ` \ \;1111 \ \\ \\ \\ \`\\\\? \\\\\\1\\\ \\` \\
/ ,? \ `\ 1 ,?0 ? I 1 1 \ \ \ \ ? 111 \ \ \\ \\ `\ `\\\ \ \\\ \\ \\ o\\ \
o \\\\II\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
/ / ;\ 1 \ \\\
17+0? \\ \ \\11 1 \ \ \\ \\ \ \\
I 'R+ao'? ?i ! _ ? I II \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \1j1111111 \\ \\\ \\I,\\ \\\\\\ \
/ I 3pwt,r? Gas 8893" ' ,Isl?o / ' \ \ \ \ \ 111111111111\ \\\\\\?\\ \\ \\\ \\
I ? 1 / O?bd ' I//? ?? ! \ ` \? \111111111111111111`I1\\\\\\?\\\\\\\\\\\
? / I / 1 I I I ? \\ \\ ??111111?\I\I\11111\\\\ \
\ \ 1 II I I ' \
I ,
_ \ \I I I \I 11 ' I / MpTCN1-INE"EBHEET6
1 \ \ 1
J
LL
2
a
0 - -
- - - -
0
0 •
W • - - - - - -
N
IsC ??
i

o . . . . . .

--- -------- --

C

Al IWAXIM

4

9Z U91'
r v

cli

00+t1 -

ONZI --- - -- ?, .. --

- 0
1 Y
?
Z
O
LIJ W w

W J Vr
CO) CL w
0
0
a
z
0
0
c
n
oa LL o
v
a°
d v

00
00
r-
r-
(D
( +
O
0
0
0
0
N N N N N N
w • • • 4D • 4D 40 • ` • • 40 • 40 r 40 40 • 411111110 • 4w 4w 4w 4w 4w 4w 4w 4w 4w 4w 40 41111111, 40 4w 4w 00 4w 00 411w 4w 4w
SNOISIAN ,,,..,..
x 1
' 90+9Z NOLLVIS 0100'00+01 NOLLVIS
x ru !.
,.. •.+ <, Z.?
4 609!3 VNI108VO H1HON
HOMY8
o3nowdr 3110 d1,u0330 g
::. avoa sHaoA XIS 1091,
V
3NV
'
93
'

nor' 4 VNIION
O H1210N
kLNf100
M
1!0:! 3NVM
1 g o
? U

S1SI1N310S • S83NNV1d • S833NION3

o3roNd NOU"Oi M M3
if18 / m3M1S
A
R .

0

?+ ON 40 S3I10I30SSr E -
z 0.
9= 93j S1NM"00d33H3dSNOISMS . l M
11
?
11 >133MO NON mos
SOOL •AON NW1d NOLLWHOMW am amjA ns ?
! 11 d

00 .

A
y
1 =?? t co
w
e a7o
aw ?0•? U --- N
?
v ui O
I

?\ \\ \ \ / I\ ?1?3HS33s•am fr 1 to
\ ) ,
I I$YJ1M11
5 Z O
- -`?
-
- -
\
1
11-
;
1
/
'

e ,
\\?
\ \ 11 \\\
111 \\
I 11111
\ 1111 II'1
1
1
1
111111
? :..;.
: .

N
\
,
111111
I
\ 1 1 1 \( e \ \
II
I
I? I 400 \ V I I I III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I \v I Iil IIIIIIIIIIIIII11
I
\
?
'
-'`
`
'
1
1
? .. :_ -,_ - .. ... .. ..... .. .
.: -
1
1
111I1
1\
1 ?
? \ ; e
?
/
\
Illl
\ (
1
j; ;; 1
I11111111111111111111111
1?
?
? ? I
1
I / \
I I I I I I I I I l
\
?
\? -\
\
I I I I 11
1 111
i 1 1 1 1
'
\
I
I
\\
? \
„1 I I
1
o
1 1 11
?1?111111'
ll
???
'
1 ?
?
?
1
n
l
VA\\
,lilll
?\\\Vv ??
/ A(
/ 11 / ?? \\\\ \?\\\\\I I I I I I I I I I, I
\
?? .-? /?
,? \ ?:: \\\ \\? \\\\\\\\\\\ .. _

\ \ , 1\ \ R\
/ \
\\\q\\` 111111 -444MR A"q
P
\e , l I I ?\ \\\ \Iq 11111114p11
I ?'
1111
11
111
\\ 1\\
/
1 11
/
/ 1 I ? I
1
11
111
11141
111,11111111
? I ` 11
111
/ 1
1
11
?111 , ..,.. ' - - ... .
1
?
?1
1
1
1
?e
? ( I?11+1 ll?igl???l?1411 ???Iili 11111
Ui
/ / \ - .f - ..
.. i. ..
\
//
11
II40*00
,, III 111111111; 111111414j144111
,
II I III
1111
Il

;. .

.. . . . .
? .

::::?

\
hl
,
\ \
111
u
\ , \ ,
, "
11
° Ih
h
6
lU,

.
.

+
,
,, ,, ,
g1
,
f
II1,
% \ e? ? I II \\I?•p0 // `\ II 1111,,11111?111114'i11114111p
r 111 IU 11111 11j111111111j111\11111
1 JI
114
1g
1
?11
\
\
i
1 ?
?

-
11
1
1`
p111
\ ? 1
/
1111
?
I
? /
\ _ ? - ? ?' ' h I II h 111111 i IIII?\?,11\\1\ \\\
? - \
e \ ,/ / \II / I II'14 11\\
111\1\I I\\ ,- -

40 '
\
\ e \ ? , / _ \\ I p I ?, \\\ \ \1\ \111
?
1
1
1
1
1 /
\ i
, III VIII, 111j11
'11
;`
?1?
II I ll! hll 1j111 I I IIII I
// %. \ \ \ I\ \\I II lI(I !!lull ll l\?? \\\\\v C

Ill /i\?\ \\\\\? \\\?
ee' r/ i III 111 (0+00
\\\\\``\I1
\
?\ 111 l I \

.. -

-
N
\
\\
1 / ?- i \ \ 111 lit ' I I 1 \\\??\\yilr
of
I \ i // I I 1 \\\hp ,- -
1 ? 1 \ I \ 1\ 1 / I I I l 1\41111
11
1
\
'
r
l
\
11
/ / 111
l
QQ /, I I
\
? l
\ yeti' \ott \ I
/ / ? Z• 1 ? ?y \ I ? ! / /III -- - -
"

0 8
11 ll I/I I l! l 1, l
I Ill
/ / ++
1
,
// 1 1 ul I I 21+oo ?lll a4 I r I' I i i l! l
ll I l
l
'
\
1 cV
I ll?
l / l
/ ! l
11 P y??'
\1
I I 1 / , r S
I
l
III
/ll
l

:.
at
I,
a
I
\ \ \
I
\
1 / /
l
-.....
.--
,
'
\ \\ n
\ `\ \`\ I l \ I?'/.? -M /Ill I I I ? 1 \ \
1 , \
\
1
?
3
1
?? ,
'
, ?
\
? \
e
41 /N , , I 1 ?
, 1
1
I / 111 \ II Ill 1 1 1
1
\ I _ \\ / I till! I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I
? 1 1 1 1 1 1
\ I 1\ /VI
1 \
I ??
1 III! /
-
'

S
l
I
?
I
1 \ 1 \ \ ` ` l Ill 1111 l l/ I' 1 1 1 1
I \ 1 / /i , +

'1 \ \ \ 1 \ rl l l /1l
///11111
\ \ \ ` \ 1 l /%/ // '
,
1 \ \ \ ////% /rll%?
F
Tnp
77-7
1 \ \ // /(I III
1 \ \
1 , / I I \ w III "? 1111rlIIIiII II ?
I I
I
1
/
!
/
I
ll

:......

....:..;.
11 l
I I
! I
1
/
1
///
lll 1111
l
\\ 1 _ _ I I I 1 1'. 11111j1111 /l?l1??1/jl?l/j/?
(
/
1
!
1
\ ... '.
S
1 \
\ 11 I
l
\ / \ I I / 0 3
\l \
\ 1 C
1
1 \\
\
?
1I? O
^
\
l
1
\
(
1
\ \ \ I \II \ IlII \\\\`\Q\\???\`\\\\ N
11\?\\1\ \0V \N+\\\? ;.I.
3
\\ \ 1 J \ \ ` \ 0 \ \\\\\\\ \\\\\\\?\ \\\` \\1
\ `' \ `\ \\``\\\` ?` 1\ 111\ II II

\1`\M?'\I x'1111111 ? 11111 oo+c 1
/
\
\ \\
''
0
\
1
1
,
1
11 _
? -
11
.:: J.
, -
: _
- -
- ?:.. '
i
\ , \ ?
?
\
\,\
\\,,
,,
,
1
\
11
1
1\
\
1 \ \ \ -' \\
\\
\
\ \11 ,1111
- \
\` ,
? ,
. ? ..,.., ,
-,
g
1
\
\
\\
\
\
\\\
\ i \ _ _ ?
`
?
1
1
`
?
1
'
\\0\
11
1
`?p
\\
\1
\ \\\ \\\
o \
?
\ \ \ \\\\\ \\ 0` \`11?\\ \\111
\
......
O
\ \ \\\ _ _ \ \ 1 \ 1 I ` ? \\?\` \\?\ 1\\\ 111111' ® ?
00+Z I
%1
' 1 -
\\? \ - - - - _ \ ?? II
26+ I lilil?iilc
\ I
%
- ` \ \ \\\ ` \ \ \ \\ \ ` \ \V'"\

276 ?\ -` \\ \ \ \ \ w\\ ` - I \ \ 1 e\ 1 \??1?? C ------ - co

??_-C==_oit _?/?? _d\ _`` ?\\_//\\`I=oy ?T ?v/ \ 11111U O
=
'
I
1
l
'-
µ
µ,, ?
U
1111
1
\
1
_ _ _ \ I X1111 Y Z
_ 7o81 ?1H3 if - n
''?33HD 1NOnm3N 3NfRl
'J
-
- -
_ \
y b
V
' - - ..` -
0o U
w
La k

f7l
110ilvii
\\\1 / I iI?
w
\\\\ ?? 1 11 Q
co
1
?
.
O
O
?l 1 1 1 1 ` 411
ai a w c7
p0U +
O o z
(L 0: to
Z LL O
a°d cc V
t o
00 r- r- (0 (0 k1f
N 04 N 04 N

SNOISIA38
Olawew
1 1 SOOL'83d 1 S1NMMOO d331l3d SNOISIA311 I 1
e
i
i
W
a
U_
O
O
O
O
S
J
O
O
m
° ° V dOad
° 0 ° °
o ° ° °
? ° ° 0 0
° ° ° ° o 0 0 0 0
° 0 ° ° ° 0 0
0 ° ° ° 0 0 0
0 0°° 0 0 0
0 0°° 0 0 0
° ° ° ° 0 ° °
O
° ° ° ° ° ° 0
° °
° ° ° 0 ° 0
0 0 ° °
0 0 ° ° ° °
0 0 0 0 0.
0 0 0 ° 1
o o ° °
° 0 0 0
0 ° ° °
0 0 ° °
0 0 ° ° I
0 0 ° ° 1
1 I
0 0 °
o I
0 ° I
0 0 ° ° 0 I
0 0 0 ° ° I
0 0 °° o 0 0• II I
0 0°° 0 0 0
°° 0 0 0 0°° I
un o o ° I
° 0 ? 3p ° '1 SO D3Jr I
_ ° bd I
°° I
° ° ° ° ° ° °
° ° I
00000°°
6091Z VNIl0HV0 HAON'HO131V8 50+8Z NOIIMIS 01 00'00+M NOLLb1S
lI[ ac, rOv1 :: ovoa sHaoA XIS 109t VNIIONVO HAON '111Nnoo 3)4VM'1SBMOd 3NVM
S1SUN310S • S83NNVld • S03NION3
3N 30 S31n0OSSr Lo3rONd N011"0193H 2i33df19 / vyv3M1S
I D'm >133a0 Nnb 0108

?? • m
cry
11(T{} i,ig.

nn('? ?- WOi
i
A0l
' I r
1
I !
1
1 !
1
I
I !
I
I I
! I !
1 1
! I !
/ I !
I
I /
of
I
' 1x I ?
! x I !
I
k
1 I I
1 /
I I
1 I
1 k I 1
I I 1
1 x-I I
1 I 1
x I 1
I !
1
1 !
X /
I !
/
I i.
I I
I 1 '
I
1/
1
I's
I
/
1
1 `
1
1 `
1
• °
• °
N 1`1
p pLL
w
0

?M
nil
,fill
log
1-1

1.
4 x
1- b
8
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
~ ?b
n
x

la>agla I a
?aao
?G1 F I If
IQRRM s

?r

g
C9
Z
?a
a

w
Z
N

C9
Z

a
_ U
_

e
0
N
?b
x
Eb

4
n
?b
Eb

R F F I I
SAAR I s

LL
e?
g
;IIIm
at >? t3 e
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee•eeeeeeeeeeeeeee•
SNOISIA3a f« d;
?
"
,
?
' 90+9Z NOLLVIS Ol 00'00+06 NOLLVIS
a3nouur 31rn xaidux3a wss ri ?..
?.3
.?`I:?. X
.E.•
.
`I [
? U< C 6091Z VNI108VD H1HON
HD131V8
avod smog xis io9b
'
'
z
? VNIIONVO HiMON
,UNnoo 3NVM
IS3a0d 3)4VM z $
S1SUN310S • SONNVld . S833NION3
? I ? 5
Y
ON 10 SS331000SS 103fONd NOIIVNOiS3H 213-Adf18 / Wb
3a1S 0.
S00L'S3d S1N3YYY100d33H3dSNa8Vl3H ? SY
¦ M
a
ERE >133NO NnN (108
900L'AON NVId NOLLVN0183H H11N1031L ono 11
LLll 1 1 911 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
O
0 0 0 0 0
p O p p 0 0
O p 0 0 p p p
0 p 0 O 0 0
O O 0
O p
O 0 0 0
p 0 0 0
p

0
p
p

/

/

/
O p 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0

0
0 0 0

/

/
O
Cam,
" l? 3 r
C3
• O
i O
./ 0
• 0
• O O
• O O O
0 p 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 / 0 O
0 O O
O 0 p 0 0
O 0 O
// 0 0: •• 0 0 0 0
0 0 O p p p o p O
0 p o p O 0 0
0 p O Cc) O 0 p p p
0 0 0 0 0 p 0 p 0 0 1
/ O O
0
0 O p p 0 0 0 0 0
/ 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0
/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 o O
O p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
O p 0 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 0
0 0 O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O
p 0 p o 0 p 0 O p ?
p o 0 p o 0 p
0
0 0 0 p 0 0 p p 0 0 0 p p 0 0
) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O p 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 O p 0 0 O p
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p
0 0 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,
0 0 0 0 p p p p 0 O p 0 0
o p O p
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 p o p p p p
0 0 0 0 p p p p.
0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,
O p p p 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0 0
O p p O O O 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0• ,
O p p 0 0 0 0 0 p O p 0
O p p O p p
0 0 0 0 0 0 p p p p p 0 p p p p
p 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O p 0 0
0 O p 0 p p p p p p 0 O p 0 p
O p O p
O p p p p p p p o p p p ,
O p p p 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 p p p 0 0 0 0 0 ,
O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O p 0 0•
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ?XQ--?fP
0 0 0 0 Op O p 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0
O n
i

?aN?o
O
v°
Vf
U_
O
O
N
0T
W
Q
C7
z
z
a.
w
z
N
w
U.
LL
m
Q'
CL
w

w
z
J
w
w
z
N
Fg-

u?
Q
z
p
g
a
w
w
LL
LL
m
co
z
?d
a
w

0 o O
o O O
o p o

SNOISIA3a 60923 VNI108VO H18ON'HO131VH 90+9Z NOIlV1S Ol 00'00+M NOIlVA
xasuxw wss ? •.. <; s?,.f;.?. ? . .7a,'?,3 OVO8 SUN XI5109b
VNIIONVO HlaON 'uNnoo MI M ISM013NVM
S1SUN31JS • S83NNVId • S833NION3
ON 30 S31AOOSSY - iowO 1d NOII"OIS3N N3ddf19 / WV3Nis
.... S1N3MnOOd33,W3dSNOl'SMN w. ¦ ¦ M aea >133NO NnN 4 08
?N?(J Q
N T
All
\
0 0°° 0 0 0
0 O o ......w we _ SFF SHEET 11
p 0 °
p p

0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
`
4.1?
0 0 ° ° ° O .
O ° 0
O °
O O
0°°° 0
° 0
0
0 0 0°°
Q
?
0 0 0 0

0 O ° 0 0
0
0°° 0 0 0
0 °°
O O 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
°° 0
° 0 0 0 0 0
O p 0 0 0
0
0° 0 0 0 0
°°° 0 0 0 0 0
° 0
°° 0
0 0 p p 0 0 0
° 0 0 0
0
O p 0 0 0 0 p 0
0° 0 0 0 0 `
0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O
O p 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0° 0 0
O 0
0
0 0
0
0
O O 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0
0 0
0
°
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0
O 0 0
0 °
0 0 0 0° 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
°
0 O
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0 0 0 0
0 0°°° 0 a
0 0°° '
0 0 0 0 0 Z
0 0 ° °
° 0 ° .
0 0 ° ° ° ° 0
0 0 0 0 0°
° 0 0 0 .
11,11-111,
O p° 0
0 0 0°° 0° p

o O o°°°° o°
O O 0 °°
° o
0
°
0 0 °
0 0 0 0 0 0 0°0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0° 0 O O° 0 00 0°° 0 O 0 °°° 0°
O p
0 0
0 0 0
°
0
0 0
0 0 0
0° 0 0 0
O p 0 0 0 0 °°° 0 O p 0 0 0 0 0° O O O p 0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0°° 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° O O p
0°
°
°
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 Q
0 0 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° 0 0 00 0° 0 0° 0 0 0 0
0 0 O
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°
0° 0 0 0 0°° 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0 0 ° 0°
°°°
°°°
J
o 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
° p
0 00 0 0
0 0°° 0 0 0 0
0° 0°° 0 0 0
0 0 0 J
=
0 0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0° 0 °°° 0 0° 0 0 0°°. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°°° 0 0° 0 0 0 ' Z
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0° 0
0 0° 0
' cl:
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0
0° 0 O o 0 0° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0 o p 0 0°0 0 0
0
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°°° 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0
0 0 0 00 CO
° 0 0 0 0 0 0
° 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 O p 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0°O O p
0 °° 0 0 0 0 0°°°. 0 0
0 ° 0 0 0 0
0
0 0
0 0 00° 0 ° 0° 0 0 0°° 0° 0 0 0 0 0°°°° 0 O
0 0°
0°
0
° 0 0° 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
°°° 0 0 0 0 0 I
° 0 0 0
0 °°
0 0
0 0 0°
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
'
0° 0 0 0
°° 0 0
° 0 0 0
0 0°
0°°°
p
° 0 0 0
o o p 0
°° o o
0
0 0 0 0
O p 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 p 0
O p
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0° 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0°° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 p 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0°°°° 0 0 0 0 o p 0 0 0°°°°° o
0°° p O p o o p 0 0 p°°°° o 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '
0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 '
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0°
°°
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O
0 0 0
0
0
0 0 0
0° ° 0 0 0
0° ° 0 0 0
0
0 0°°°°
0 0 0 0°°°
0 0
0 0
O 0
0 0 0°° 0
°°° 0
0
0 0 0
0 0
0
0
0°
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
° 0 0 0 0
0
°° 0
°°
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0

0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0°°°° p 0 0 0 0 0°°° 0
0
'
0
O 0 0
p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O
0 0°0 ° 0
0 0°° 0 0
° 0
'
p o 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
C p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C p 0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° 0 0
0
° 0
°°
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 O O p 0 0 0 0 p
_'J\'
•,
O 0 p 0
0° 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
° o o .
3
\`,
0 0 0 0
° 0 0 0
0 0
nt\o\?t
0 0 ° ° ° ° p o
0 0 ° ° ° ° o
° ° ° ° ° o
o ° o ° °
[
0
o
p
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0°°
0 0 0 0
0
0 0
\ 0°°° 0
0 0 0 0°°° 0 o p° ° ° 0°° 0 0
°
o
° 0

0
0 0
° `
0 0 0
0 0 0°°
0 0°°° 0°°
0 0°
0°
0 0 0 0 0 0
p 0 \ 0 0 0
\ ° o o ? _ 0
Y?
2
.5
a
a
O
fV
r
0
O
?Op
I
cpvq El
I
Z
a
w
0
a
w
ILL
m m
a
a a
n E I roo.
••••••••••••••••••••••rr•rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Appendix A
Historic Aerial Photographs
t !rm l3
jq�jll, 40F.
Jr
r'. K
1
f6l
� '•ro� r �i � � Z� f �'_ `�� _ `fir
Am
IPA
Alt
ff
rn
� � It s "t• �. ,'!�'� � '�
y' ;X �� � t rj�; ` •.t ���,',�� } • .may` � . .
i�(w J r. ,• ,!. ''tea - �!� � t .n �'� s �'��.r,% ,C..,

L
�'�... s r ,,.q��"yrp }7Y?�.-•.if,�'` �f'{ f� .?��h; tv �f r,�,t � j
'•f.
AWN
•TtilEk� yrM r�ct' �.v'
r iAlmell,Y
AO
J i
� - •k.� l• � ��� � � Vit. "'
''fit .. ' . �� ��i "�' ��`ti. •
` fir '1:: 7 ;�� �•`€
ws. * f arm i +-�� f...•h.�'°t"'r' '� •;'
.a� y ' �.� �' _■ t �•,i." y. � ,/� K { tin se►' -a :��i.t1i� -'��a S�y� c' +�SY►-.. h
.; "!�'� �i, 1 1' �? •'� ia}.��pj��y�4 t'y��$a�y],'ti' + -l. J^?� ~. F ti��„ �.h it �t'� .
�� s-,...' .� ��� ..r�'4 r ' ` ..�x.'... ..; SFS ? •"�i3."� �`� �' `'r _ < , �'' . _,^rl '�` =tip ��� ,

DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
•
I.r4
4 l '.
w ?

Y y? ? ru wi ? ?5=.

?? '`r M
S' ?
? K L

1?
* "SY??
?
s
'
.u l?????i
i ? a L^?1 EI p
_?
.k?
...
" I?,???
i
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
•
•
•
•
e
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
14 ,
r�
ril .,may x .. s a - ' ., _ �•
s '°- t •{�
`-. _�
(j
F
47
olk
.ally -
t
6117
imuurmr '. S•' •�{
Historical Aerial Photograph - 1988
Project Location FEB 1 7 ZA6
Not Drawn to
KCI DENR - WATER QUALITY Specific Scale &os r S lent
UW
ASSOCIATES OF WETDSAND STORMWATERBRANCH
J
NORTH CARO[.NA. PA Source: USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service

Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Appendix B
State Agency Correspondence
.?a?.
KCI
ASSOCIATES OF NC
July 25, 2005
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
LANDMARK CENTER II • SUITE 220 • 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD • RALEIGH • NC 27609 • 919-783-9214 • (FAX) 919-783-9266
Linda Pearsall, Program Head
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27529
Subject. Natural Heritage Review
Bold Run Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Project ID# 12053743B
Dear Ms. Pearsall:
Please accept this information pertaining to the proposed Bold Run Stream and Wetland Restoration
Project, which is located approximately 5 miles northwest of the Town of Wake Forest on Bold Hill Run
Road approximately 1.5 miles east of the intersection with Mangum Dairy Road in Wake County, as a
submittal for natural area and rare species review by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
A portion of this property (refer to attached layout) is currently under investigation as a stream and
wetland restoration project for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). The
stream work typically involves modifying stream channels to a natural stable form through minor grading,
use of in-stream rock features, and establishment of vegetated riparian buffers. No impacts to any
structures oil the subject property are anticipated.
Following the review of the included documentation, please provide a determination regarding any
potential impacts to rare species or natural areas associated with this project.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone], ext. 133, should you have any questions or require any
further information to process this request. Thank you for your assistance and attention.
Sincerely,
,
'fill L+nr
April L. !Helms
Project Manager
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.A.
www.kci.com
L'mPIny-Owa,d sm'e 1948
AT?r
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Govemor William G. Ross Jr., Secretar7
September 20, 2005
Ms. Apri1:L. Ilelms
KCC Associates of North Carolina, P.A.
Landmark Center 11, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609,
Subject: Bald Run Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project; Wake Forest, Wake County
Project 1D4 12053743B
Dear TMs. Helms:
The Natural Heritage Program has no record of rare species, significant natural communities, or
priority natural arias at the site nor within 0.7-mile of the project area. The U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers's Falls Lake lands lie roughly 0.7 air-mile downstream of the project site. Thus, it
is important that proper sedimentation controls be in place to avoid any downstream impacts to
these Federal' Lands and their waters (Falls Lake,),.
You may wish to check the Natural Heritage Program database website at
<,w",vAy.nespark5 tietlnhl2/searcli.htrnl> for a listing of rare plants and animals and significant
natural communities in the county and on the topographic quad map. Please do not hesitate to
contact me at 919-715-8697 if you have questions or need further information.
Sincerely,
Harry E. -LeCrand, Jr., Zoologist_
Natural Heri4q,e Progi-ani
HELtltel
1501 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601 ''? I Ch??©?Ilc?
Phone.- 919-733-49E4 • fr?X: 919-715-3060 • lntemet: vA?r?r.a;ir.state.nc.us 1?V10? ?,???,??„
An Equal pcrtunit/ I Affirm, Ac?n Employer • 50 % Rec3c?ed • 10 % Fcst ???ir?Tner Paper y
.ur.r..?.rr.
KC1
GJuly 25, 2005

ENGINEERS * SURVEYORS * SCIENTISTS * CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
LAND,WX UNTER 11 * SUITE 120 * 4601 Six FARX5 ROAD * RALmH * NC ::bog * 90.731-9214 * Fvc, 919-73i-9266
Mr. Steve Woodruff, District Conservationist
USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service
Raleigh Service Center
4001 Carya Drive
Raleigh, NC 27610-2916
Subject: Farmland Conversion Impact Rating
Bold Run Stream and Wetland Restoration
Project Number 12053743B
Dear Mr. Woodruff:
Please accept this information pertaining to the proposed Bold Run Stream and Wetland Restoration
Project, which is located approximately 5 miles northwest of the Town of Wake Forest on Bold Hill Run
Road approximately 1.5 miles east of the intersection with Mangum Dairy Road in Wake County, as a
submittal for farmland conversion impact rating by the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service.
A portion of this property (refer to attached layout) is currently under investigation as a stream and
wetland restoration project for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). The
funding for this project comes from the USDOT Federal Highway Administration through NCDOT. The
current land use in the project area includes predominantly Agricultural Pasture Fields. The restoration
would improve water quality and provide greater protection for aquatic ecosystems from surrounding
agricultural lands. This type of work typically involves enhancing streams to create more natural and
stable channels through minor grading, use of in-stream rock features. and reforestation of riparian
buffers.
A soil classification was performed on the site recently. The following soils were found on the project
site; Chewacla- 1.3 acres. Chewacla variant- 163 ) acres, Chewacla Riverview- 7.6 acres.
Following the review of the included documentation. please provide a determination regarding any
potential impacts from farmland conversion associated with this project.
Please feel free to contact me at (919) 783-921=1. ext. 133, should you have any questions or require any
further information to process this request. Thank you in advance for your assistance and attention.
erely
Si
ORA
April Helms
Project Manager
KCI TECHNOLOGIES w w%A-,kci.tnm
•-=r-r'" 01-25-'08 09;01 FROM-DENS EEP 9197152001 T-576 P02102 U-996.
• U.S, RePrtnent of Agriculture
• FARMLAND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING
• PART) (To bs 007rAtild by Fedora/ A(,4ncy) 0p 01 130 "vBve"uAton RaQtavsI
• t+arsw Ol Protsct Bolo Rw? 5trram r>nd 4V+tttsrxi ReatnrAtton %;Qdwyt Awmy h rlv
LJSf)OT-PtiWA
P111pr4e0 Lana U:1 Stream and Watlrtrtrt f?tiStnraiic>+1 Cwrdy 3701 Su,ro WAker County, KoM GetaUrsa
• PART It (To be CPmplat t# by NR") vets koquc-A mcctv6d Ery NRC$
Don the cks contain prime, uNque, rzatownia or to<zi ;mporisnt farm,and? Yes No AcO31014" A Fbim 0.b_
(It 0. tho FPPA do4s jW apply - do not common add+Lonar parts of this fwmJ. No
•
a n
• -
• s
• 0

•

? r

• r!

s
CroD(aJ
(J rc? ixaYl bie tari?C ki ' ?{irGr 'airs Minn. .._ ?y __
Rcre4. Y uw d Qf Fatrr?t?rxlf,A; fiwd is FPA
Ades: `?> Y
Nact+k d Lam fwa,tbn &ysfem Ursd?
-.
Z l Name Of 1 W,415kv A"""rw t Sydwa -
4 04ta Land C aluatlon Ro nW d By NR
:.
1c-. %;" t7tJ
PART W (To bo C4mMt00yF8d8rs3ttSge y} _ W
1 _g$

A. Tote! ACrSS To £0 CAm*ritfd Clasen
itn

- .
A 13 __
Totes is To 8a Corsvcrind Ire ractT
?
a
ta ??.
% 4
C.
tat Acres
r St
T 31,2 O.b 0 U,a
PART IV (To bee cvMp1& d byNACS) Land Evacuation lnformat;pn
A. Toga! Acres Prue And Unique
R Total Aows Ustawufa And Local I
C. Perw?e 0! t?8rrsltJUsd In Coc:nly Or 1.41:1 GflvtRUnrt To Co?SwtrZ?d ? (J ?'j - `...-
r- ......"""---..- f--^ _..,?.?....
p. FWcft 0 Pattrdynd to Govt. Jw'"aan W21 SdmO Or 1 t 1sw st1,ative Vane ?? «
? - . ? -- .
PART V (To bo cwrWir ,ted by NRCS) Land Evair:ation G;tanon
97

0

i
{I

0
Reiativo Vak o Of F*md*nd To Be Converted Scala or 0 to too Fbints) i
tj/
PART VI (robe 'cromclorod Ay dd»ral i?rency) IAukf wn
$ii0 Aasesyc?nt Criterw (7ha.?e Cnknd era eKy?tnard n y't:PR G.'v?'S,'rl Ycj;AU. 1
t.kAatnNanurWU34? _. _ _..--- ..? _. ..,.._
2 Per'.mWy lit Nortutban USC
Parcent Of Sits BednFsrtsk d ? - ---
_4, Pr_owclion Frov4 d Uy State And Local GovQmmant
6. 1?i6WncaFr4m Urtraa Bu,?itupAroa ?
?
? ?
•'? "-I
?'"
••'
tf. M*tartce To Uroan sum Services ? - __ ' _ _? - --- ? -
---- -
7, Size Of Present Patin Un t ter3 To Avers es
8. Cfoation Of Notdwmab!e ra.,lWartd?y?
{ ?
_
??S, Avatla ty Of Farm Support Smicea
.6W

10. Fs:m tnyesbrtemst ---? -

_
11. Effects Of Convursion On Fum S rt Sorvscs ?. _ . ..
_ .._.
? _
12. CocmatbtW With Exsuno A&Io4ltural Uso --
. ?7_.... -

0
TOTAL SJTF ASSESSMENT POINTS
0
PART Vll fro ba mnptetod byFou&W Agancy)

Rctati a VWuo Of Fvim.; sW (From ,P4a 1r) Ypd ? 0
.fizz Site Asa6rt 7*d (,rans Pt)rr Yr above or e M -d arte assassmerrrl 30 Sk0 0 ! 0 0 _ {l
TOTAL i'QtNTS (rotal of abov4 2 Vnos) (17zi( ,(1 d 0 0
YJ?c Local gar
• Site Sect9d --- - I Odhs Of SvssettiGn A Au*"m¢nt Usvo?
_ _ _ Yes Q No
Ro7ratvt PFK Rp4nAkrtt •••_
• t? 'S! tes m 6q. a. >fafit? i SC=7t .elan Rfl4 t? flb?- Luc e r
. +d to +?,n fro+on clnd no C i#idt?,1 Ei4eS osed tcs
all
• (Sae rnsrruttro»> o» rcvtnc st¢cj Farm Ab-IM (10.0)
M?fyg11N?WG'ofrt/?rVW".Ka9 C?N`O[isidriWwvti?ltir?'tZL e:Mr -
• N ,
•
KCT ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
ASSOCIAMS OF NC LANDMARK CENTER 11 SUITE 220 • 46o1 Six FORKS ROAD • RALEIGH • NC 27609 • 919-783-92I4 • (FAX) 919-783-9266
July 25, 2005
Ms. Juliana Hoekstra
Environmental Review Specialist - SHPO
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Subject: Cultural Resources Review
Bold Run Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Project ID# 12053743B
Dear Ms. Hoekstra:
Please accept this information pertaining to the proposed Bold Run Creek Stream and Wetland
Restoration Project, which is located approximately 5 miles northwest of the Town of Wake Forest on
Bold Hill Run Road approximately 1.5 miles east of the intersection with Mangum Dairy Road in Wake
County, as a submittal for cultural resources review by the State Historic Preservation Office.
A portion of this property (refer to attached layout) is currently under investigation as a stream and
wetland restoration project for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). The
stream work typically involves modifying stream channels to a natural stable form through minor grading,
use of in-stream rock features, and establishment of vegetated riparian buffers. The wetland work
typically involves minor grading and establishment of wetland vegetation. No impacts to any structures
on the subject property are anticipated.
Following the review of the included documentation, please provide a determination regarding any
potential impacts to cultural resources associated with this project.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone], ext. 133, should you have any questions or require any
further information to process this request. '['hank you for your assistance and attention.
Sincerely,
IN I rN
! ^^ n
April L. Helms
Project Manager
KCI ASSOCIATES OF [NORTH CAROLINA, PA. ww w. k c i. C o m
Lruylesre-ownrJSrnu 1y8d
"t{J??ri fC?;. /ten:, }ill' T S

-carer'C " I P \.w
Aecress; l? U 7i k Torki' 4 s ? ?1 t 1TGtJ
PhcneiFaxrE-mail;
ii.. --Ire lriforna,,:?,,',:

u a a qer, _ v ,I a e ' a a 1 U S arounv sake)
qtr Re m, i i t ant ti? inn
i..-ir.
Ac'uress: 1J?C`i C Li 11 i?-4{ a xk4 County: ? le, ke,
Ill, Identification of historic Properties:
'L -7 509 quad N-17
ame: ?Si:1
List sites by site numcer and Status* NR = National Register listed: SL = Study List DOE = Determination of
El* ^ iitty; U0 = Lccai Designation: UA = Unassessed
Archeology
4 reccrdec sties in ?mrneu:ate area ,x site:
V, ? j?,VJ
'J Acditicriai lnfc ai cn car 'i?` est; a'si n needec:
Architecture
of reccrcen sites within mile radius
BJ. G>. ?. xt y r?? vs? (yroiecd
'5 t'^ 1 ite5 _ Bailcon 7es,
'c z /0 ' y rE ' ;r on
_
'cork are
'he . rea cf cc-'er 1al affec"",
?? _ w.
- ------------- - - -
KCI ENGINEERS' • SURVEYORS • SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
ASSOCIATESOFNIC LANDMARK CENTER II • SUITE 220 • 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD • RALEIGH • NC 27609 • 919-783-9214 • (FAX) 919-783-9266
July 25, 2005
Ms. Shannon Deaton
Habitat Conservation Program Manager
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Division of Inland Fisheries
1721 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Subject: Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act
Bold Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Project Number 12053743B
Dear Ms. Deaton:
Please accept this information pertaining to the proposed Bold Run Stream and Wetland Restoration
P, ujeLa, winuil is iucatea approximately ) mites northwest of the Town of Wake Forest on Bold Hill Run
Road approximately 1.5 miles east of the intersection with Mangum Dairy Road in Wake County, as a
submittal for the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act review by the NC Wildlife Resources Commission.
A portion of this property (refer to attached layout) is currently under investigation as a stream and
wetland restoration project for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). The
current land use in the project area includes predominantly Agricultural Pasture Fields. The restoration
would improve water quality and provide greater protection for aquatic ecosystems from surrounding
agricultural lands. This type of work typically involves enhancing streams to create more natural and
stable channels through minor grading, use of in-stream rock features, and reforestation of riparian
buffers. As part of the environmental documentation process (Categorical Exclusion), coordination with
the NCWRC and the USFWS is requested for compliance with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act.
Following the review of the included documentation, please provide a determination of the potential
effects to wildlife associated with this project.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone], ext. 133, should you have anv question-, or require any
further information to process this request. Thank you in advance for your assistance and attention.
Si erely
+AXpil Helms
Project Manager
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.A.
www.kci.com
L,,q,1o)wr0,,.md Since 1988
re-
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 9
Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director
8 August 2005
Ms. April Helms, Project Manager
KCI Associates of North Carolina
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Subject: Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, Bold Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Project,
Wake County, North Carolina. Project Number 120537438
Dear Ms Helms:
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject
document. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d), and North Carolina General Statutes
(G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program is currently investigating a stream and
wetland restoration site along New Light Creek, a headwater tributary to Palls-of-the-Neuse Reservoir in
the Neuse River basin. There are records for the federal species of concern and state significantly rare
pinewoods shiner (Lythrurus matutinus) and state significantly rare Carolina ladle crayfish (Camharus
davidi') in New Light Creek. Current land use is agricultural pasture. The project would involve minor
grading to form natural, stable stream channels, use of instream rock features and reforestation of the
riparian buffers.
The proposed restoration project should improve water quality and aquatic habitat. Additionally,
establishing a forested riparian buffer should improve terrestrial habitat and provide a travel corridor for
wildlife species. We do not anticipate significant adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources from the
proposed project.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this project. If you require further assistance, please
contact our office at [phone].
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
I0
rage z
8 August 2005
Bold Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Project No. 12053743B
Sincerely,
Shari L. Bryant
Piedmont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
ec. Sarah McRae, NHP
Angie Rodgers, WRC
to-
E:qGINE E RS • SURVEYORS • SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
W .
Cr. -mk 11 suet, ZZO * 4„01 . S:x 1LftAti rca n ' RALL ii' \C: 27,*.()s3 • *?.9-'$.3-?a'.: -f' 1, ,.Yf 9[9-'S.;-9z(;6
July 25, 2005
I•
Mr. Cary Jordan
US Fish and Wildlife' Service
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC' 27636
Subject; Endangered Species Act, Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act
Bold Run. Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Project Number 120537438
Dear ir. Jordan,
Please accept this information pertaining to the proposed Bold Run Stream and Wetland Restoration
Project, which is located' approximately 5 miles northwest of the Town of Wake Forest on Bold Hill Run
Road approximately 1.5 miles cast of the intersection with Mangum Dairy Road in Wake County, as a
submittal for review of the Endangered Species Act, Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, and Migratory
Bird Treaty Act by the US Fish and Wildlife Service.
A portion of this property (refer to attached layout) is currently under investigation as a stream and
wetland restoration project for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). The
current land use in the project area includes predominantly Agricultural Pasture Fields, The restoration
would improve water duality and provide greater protection for aquatic ecosystems from surrounding
agricultural lands. This type of % ork typically involves enhancing streams to create more natural and
stable channels through minor grziding,. use of in-stream rock features, and reforestation of riparian
buffers. As part of the environmental documentation process (Categorical Exclusion), coordination with
the USFWS is requested for compliance with the Endangered Species Act, Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act, and Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
Following the review of the included documentation, please provide a determination of the potential
effects to endangered species, wildlife, or migratory girds associated with this project.
Please feel tree to contact, me at [phone], ext. 133, should you have any questions or require any
further information to process this request. Thank you in advance for your assistance and attention.
Sincerely,
q,- n
April Helms
Project Manager
KCI As5cc1.,,TFs OF N10. RiTl1 CAROLINA, RA..
4W",I"Ci C0111

Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Appendix C
Environmental Screening Inspection Forms
ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING INSPECTION (ESI) FORM
The objective of the ESI is to have an Inspector screen a property for the visual presence of the items
listed on this form without making an evaluation of the conditions or history of the observed concerns.
This ESI Form defines the scope of work to be performed in a checklist format, and also serves as the
report document once the Inspector has recorded the observations taken during the inspection, and has
attached the site plan and photographs.
This form was completed in the field by an Inspector who conducted a non-destructive visual inspection
of the subject property to document observations on-site and, to the extent possible, on the adjacent
properties. The inspector did not disturb, dismantle or rearrange any materials, containers or equipment
in performance of the inspection.
The entire subject property was covered in a manner conducive to observing and recording evidence of
environmental concern. Photographs depicting the general overall condition of the site as well as each
item of environmental concern are included.
1. Subject Site Description
Site Name: Bold Run Site
Address/Location: Bold Hill Run Road
City: Wake Forest County: Wake State:
Size: acres
North Carolina
Current Landuse(s): Rangeland (pasture) and livestock farming
Number of 0 ? occupied 0 ? unoccupied
buildings:
Site Improvements: ® undeveloped land
Utilities Serving the Subject Property:
? city sewer
? septic system
? paving & utility
improvements
® electricity
? gas
? buildings ® fenced
? city water ? well water ? telephone
H. On-Site Industrial/Manufacturing Activity Checklist:
The following observations were made of industrial/manufacturing activities currently in operation
and/or evidence indicating such previous activities on the subject site:
1. agricultural or horticultural production ? Yes ® No
2. airport or aircraft maintenance ? Yes ® No
3. analytical testing laboratories ? Yes ® No
4. asphalt or cement plant ? Yes ® No
5. chemical manufacturing or treatment ? Yes ® No
6. dairy, meat or food processing ? Yes ® No
7. dry cleaning facilities ? Yes ® No
8. explosive manufacturing ? Yes ® No
9. foundries, smelters or casting operations ? Yes ® No
10. freight terminals ? Yes ® No
11. gasoline station or convenience store ? Yes ® No
12. herbicide or pesticide manufacturing ? Yes ® No
13. incineration furnace or air emissions ? Yes ® No
14. inks, dye and paint manufacturing or use ? Yes ® No
15. junk or scrap yard ? Yes ® No
16. landfill or open dump ? Yes ® No
17. livestock feed lots or manure stockpiles ® Yes ? No
18. machine shops ? Yes ® No
19. metal fabrication or production ? Yes ® No
20. metal plating or finishing ? Yes ® No
21. military base ? Yes ® No
22. mining or quarry activities ? Yes ® No
23. motor vehicle maintenance or repairs ? Yes ® No
24. oil and gas production or refining ? Yes ® No
25. paper manufacturing ? Yes ® No
26. pharmaceutical or medical production ? Yes ® No
27. photochemical laboratories ? Yes ® No
28. plastic or fiberglass fabrication or manufacturing ? Yes ® No
29. power plant ? Yes ® No
30. printing industries ? Yes ® No
31. railroad yard or spur ? Yes ® No
32. treatment, storage & disposal (TDS) facility ? Yes ® No
33. vehicle or equipment de-greasing or washing ? Yes ® No
34. waste treatment process ? Yes ® No
35. wood preservation or finishing ? Yes ® No
36. fertilizer manufacturing ? Yes ® No
Description of the overall appearance of the subject property and observed industrial/manufacturing
activities (if any):
All open land on the subject property is utilized as rangeland for cattle kept on the
property.
III. On-Site Inspection Checklist:
Evidence of the following operations/conditions was observed on the subject property:
1. floor drains, septic systems ? Yes ® No
2. damaged/leaking transformers ? Yes ® No
3. heavy equipment, tankers, spray rigs, paint booths ? Yes ® No
4. storage containers, drums ? Yes ® No
5. chemical, petroleum, foul odors ? Yes ® No
6. dumping, disturbed soil, direct burial activity,
injection wells, other disposal activities ? Yes ® No
7. surface impoundments/holding ponds
(other than storm water retention) ? Yes ® No
8. waste water discharges ? Yes ® No
9. sumps, hydraulic lifts/equipment ? Yes ® No
10. ASTs, USTs, fill pipes, vent pipes, vaults, UST
manhole covers, pumping equipment, patched areas
of asphalt or concrete indicative of previous UST
locations or repairs ? Yes ® No
11. monitoring wells, piezometers, other subsurface
monitoring devices, remedial activities ? Yes ® No
12. stained/discolored soil ? Yes ® No
13. leachate or seeps ? Yes ® No
14. chemically distressed, discolored, stained vegetation ? Yes ® No
15. chemical spills/releases ? Yes ® No
16. petroleum sheens on water
(excluding parking lot ponding) ? Yes ® No
17. other ? Yes ? No
Description of identified environmental concerns (if any):
There were no environmental hazards during the field investigation.
IV. Adiacent/Abutting Property Checklist:
The inspector has observed and documented land uses, business operations, and conditions of concern on
all adjacent/abutting properties, from the boundaries of the subject property and from public streets,
alleys, sidewalks, etc. An "abutting property" means those sites that share a common property boundary
with the subject site, while "adjacent property" means those sites separated from the subject site by an
easement, such as a street, highway, railroad, etc.
A. The adjacent property(s) to the north (direction) is:
® uphill from ? downhill from ? level with the subject site.
Current use(s) Rangeland/pasture, forest ? occupied ® unoccupied
Obs erved concerns: ? chemical spills/releases ? chemical odors
? underground storage tanks ? aboveground storage tanks ? stained soil
? impoundments/holding ponds ? drums/containers ? dumping
? remediation/clean-up activity ? landfill/burial activity ? monitoring wells
? industrial/manufacturing activity ? wastewater discharge ? air emissions
Comments:
B. The adjacent property(s) to the east (direction) is:
® uphill from ? downhill from ? level with, the subject site.
Current use(s) residential, rangeland/pasture ® occupied ? unoccupied
Obs erved concerns: ? chemical spills/releases ? chemical odors
? underground storage tanks ? aboveground storage tanks ? stained soil
? impoundments/holding ponds ? drums/containers ? dumping
? remediation/clean-up activity ? landfilliburial activity ? monitoring wells
? industrial/manufacturing activity ? wastewater discharge ? air emissions
Comments:
C. The adjacent property(s) to the west (direction) is:
? uphill from ? downhill from ® level with, the subject site.
Current use(s) forest, rangeland/pasture, residential ® occupied ? unoccupied
Observed concerns: ? chemical spills/releases ? chemical odors
? underground storage tanks ? aboveground storage tanks ? stained soil
? impoundments/holding ponds ? drums/containers ? dumping
? remediation/clean-up activity ? landfilliburial activity ? monitoring wells
? industrial/manufacturing activity ? wastewater discharge ? air emissions
Comments:
D. The adjacent property(s) to the south
® uphill from ? downhill from
Current use(s) forest, rangeland/pasture,
residential
(direction) is:
? level with, the subject site.
® occupied ? unoccupied
Observed concerns: ? chemical spills/releases
? underground storage tanks ? aboveground storage tanks
? impoundments/holding ponds ? drums/containers
? remediation/clean-up activity ? landfill/burial activity
? industrial/manufacturing activity ? wastewater discharge
? chemical odors
? stained soil
? dumping
? monitoring wells
? air emissions
Comments:
Environmental Screening Inspection (ESI) - Photograph Documentation
Photograph 1. View from the East on Bold
Hill Run Road looking at the northern portion
of the subject property. The land is used for
cattle/pasture.
Photograph 3. View from the East on Bold
Hill Run Road looking at the southwestern
portion of the subject property. The land is
used for cattle/pasture.

Photograph 2. View from the East on Bold
Hill Run Road looking at the western portion of
the subject property. The land is used for
cattle/pasture.
Photograph 4. View looking west at the
power line easement.

Photograph 5. View from the western portion
of the subject property looking east. Adjacent
property to the east is residential.
IVU
Photogt
Bold Ru
l
Photograph 6. View looking east on the right
bank side of Bold Run Creek.
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Appendix D
Wake Electric Easement
BKO01174PGO0171
=41174 X171
• Location Number
KNOW ALL MEN By THUZ P11E81M Tbat ere. the under sued
"mommiatl (husband and wife). In oomideratks of
guala-j
and other valuable comaderadorw and the 4YOnalamold.,alles as
]iLSCT?a1?lsp. B the Cmealpt
OIL.
d wwb to benhy adtoowidsd. do hmoy grant unto WAKE PORATION, a cooperative oorporstion orsaslsd and mdattns under the laws of North Canliaa, with
its prtadpd opka and pins of business in Wake Fend. Wake County and State of North Carellns,
Its and sneer6 the ristate of North Caroline. &addrnthe undersigned. ors Partkn4rb situated as tout":
?_
(A tract of bind. ayproslmateil `r -aG In era. ioa•ed ?nflae from the
Town et tad Zaded by Lads owed by- '11&14.1
sad
to ooaatruL% reaadewt. repair, eders4 operate sad maintain an the above dearibod leads and/or
in w span a0 streets. reads or bisbware abuttlas sald lands. an eleetria tmumalasloa or did+ibodon
use or system tgWJw with the AM of Iasi ?s sad elms ever the Lade et tbo uderdsnad to sad
from eW uses In the eser. of the AWE sad privow- Ussled. Provided, however. that in mentw
Ins such night of Ingram and soar the Cooperative will. Is se far as to prsdlal to de e4 we new
iorly mtsblis?ed klsbwaysor form roads. "rt&4 wry heroin conveyod Is to be oas husdrd (100)
feet Is width. fitty (50) fed from the said pswer Res oa sack aids d rant, and Wawa the right M
tut sad trim ere" and shrubbery upon mid ris Ad-vrar. and alm lndedm the riabt to cut dews from
tlms to pima all dad, week )swim or otberwl s daMSrm trees situated sear enoush to the "an
granted dshtof way to eoastltate a beard to now power traoentsid" 9sm.
sesstsla wbrmiddiss
mlkL-
_ imd+daaL t'se
- w
TM andasatpsd serer tat all palm, wires and other fadSWs ImWled an the ebove dmeribed land
at do expeass of mW Cooperative shall tamale the property of said Cooperative, rssavabW at Its op
ties.
The usdmdtasd coveaaat that they am the owners of tM obese dmedbd lands and Wet sW Loads
an free and alrr of all encumbrances sad Am of erbaboanr ostw%except those bald by the fo0ow•
ins persons:
IN WI NBSS P'YBRF.OF, the R 4unden)saed have boreusto sot their bands and ssa34 this
day of ' 1?r ISLAILI
EAL)
BKO01174PGO0172
61174 aWZ
NORTH CAROLI'NA,
Causer. L?a?
.Iu sM? ,w nokrr puban, do euabr e"fr e
)-Ut'.. - No rife, WMWIY aff u.a bdov m."day AM t cbao.)wPd
the dw osecuttoa of the foreaoing `trbeot war ossmaaL .
wRom w mod .Rd "storm S UL tAg. I S d r of - eet?_, 1R `>r
MMW MAW
ns Com. aim Endres - >r7r" -'t
? r
NORTH CAROLINA. _ \ RL?
t
1•
3i
ll*j
a ?__ notorr
W,
t>,. a). meutk. ac m. farsgdog?
wets.. sar eaoa aed
NORTH CAROLINA,
• r oy'• i/'TJ?•
L' news wrw. de boeobr
ud _ _ bis r(b. PUM-4 !bq?
tbo dw a ev" of tie foregoing rWg.@ rar mnmsoL wttams q bsod sad mote" sod. -- A.r of

Ifr Con EspL
(sZAL)
txw,s roar.)
CI

............
p j3

J

?--.~

(Do J q?Jc-?IO?? Box

Pik 2

IsXCZ AC,
DOUc5i rS DA2C

;? N,
/o6z-.3rc
? ;c6?-?3?

oc

c
.
• (1.550)
°
.

•
f?I?I6 TrtCp6I} r
11ma-tIO11 Box

5M1?1 u
SE'
p?J L \? ??

rVd ?C?? 41-11

41-1U-+
Attachment I (oae) to Douglas Darch
right-s-way easement (3-12-87).

Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Appendix E
Project Site Photographs
Bold Run Creek Photograph Log
Photograph 1. View from the East on Bold
Hill Run Road looking at the northern portion
of the subject property. The land is used for
cattle/pasture.

Photograph 2. View from the East on Bold
Hill Run Road looking at the western portion of
the subject property. The land is used for
cattle/pasture.
Photograph 3. View from the East on Bold Photograph 4. View from the East on Bold
Hill Run Road looking at the southwest portion Hill Run Road looking at the southern portion
of the subject property. The land is used for of the subject property. The land is used for
cattle/pasture. cattle/pasture.
Bold Run Creek Photograph Log
Photograph 5. Looking northwest from the
upstream portion of the stream at the utility line
crossing in the middle of the project site.

r f ? ,
F I. s
Photograph 7. Looking east toward Bold Hill
Road at Ditch 3 on the project site.

Photograph 6. Looking north at Ditch 3
crossing the project site.
Photograph 8. Looking east toward Bold Hill
Road at a swale located parallel to Ditch 3 on
the project site.
Bold Run Creek Photograph Log
•s
:i
r? j 1
Photograph 9. Stream bedrock signifies start
of project reach.

4 ?
•
•'
y. ?? a .ti'p' .:sf ti
'?`

ypY .

Photograph 11. Upstream portion of Bold
Run Creek.

a k
Photograph 10. Cattle fence bordering Bold
Run Creek.

AA-

Y

w

Photograph 12. Looking at Ditch 1, which
joins the upstream portion of Bold Run Creek.
Bold Run Creek Photograph Log
s
Photograph 13. Looking upstream at UT 1.
AV 3 ,ye i "fin' ,q yeti

Photograph 14. Looking upstream at UTl,
note the confined valley.

K , ? P
" -

w

?i

k
*
Photograph 15. Cattle fence bordering UTI. Photograph 16. Looking upstream at the
upper portion of Bold Run Creek. Note the
heavy cattle traffic on the right bank.
Bold Run Creek Photograph Log

Photograph 17. Looking upstream at the
upper portion of Bold Run Creek. Note the
utility pole immediately adjacent to the stream.
Photograph 19. Heavy cattle traffic on the
right bank of Bold Run Creek.
4.
Photograph 18. Looking upstream at the
upper portion of Bold Run Creek.
Photograph 20. Looking downstream, notice
the heavy cattle traffic located on the right bank
of Bold Run Creek.
Bold Run Creek Photograph Log
A _ P •
Photograph 21. Looking upstream at Bold
Run Creek.

AK &*
I

x -
_

e • Yi1 .

? cr
t

nndu

mi
Photograph 23. Looking upstream at the
downstream portion of Bold Run Creek. The
ephemeral channel connects to Bold Run Creek
on the left bank. Also, note the stable riffle in
the foreground.
_
` a -A,-
z n t&
Y F., 4u T
Photograph 22. Looking upstream at the
ephemeral channel, which connects to Bold
Run Creek.
MAO
ht ,.
Photograph 24. Looking upstream from the
downstream portion of Bold Run Creek.
Bold Run Creek Photograph Log

y?PCaR
?_ •Jpe 4

s r . yz ..

Photograph 25. Looking upstream from the
downstream portion of Bold Run Creek.

t F
*

14, A r

.[ r

Photograph 26. Looking upstream from the
downstream portion of Bold Run Creek at the
confluence of New Light Creek.
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Appendix F
Project Site Stream Classification Forms
l S:1C'E ;'?It; I)1S'{ Silo (indicate on attached neap)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the follotvivg information for the strerana reach under assessment: r
1. Applicant's na:ae:2. Evaluator's name:= 3. Date of evaluation: 4Time of evaluation:
a. Name of stream ?b. River basin: ?
7. Approximate dntinac>,c ea: 8 Stream order
9. Length of reach evalu,a;tcd: 19. County:
11. Site coordinates t, I'Mit,mit): p i:Cr iii dcc:int 11 12. Subdivision name elf any):-
LwAitudctex. 34.$7 '1_'0: Loogitude(ex: -11.556nt 1):
titetht?d ltsC ?Ci(tri mot; ri,?,i: u trite;): t rP [opo S13,;:ct Oil! m (Aerial) llholoiGIS Othcr GIS Other
13. Location ui dot evafuanon (note nearby ro.tds acid landmarks and attach neap identifying stream(s) location):
E tt S a
14. Proposed channel
HS. Recent weather c?onclitions
16. Site conditions at tine of'v isit:
17. identify any Fpeeial vvatLrvvati ciassilitaticons ktio%vn: ? Section 1() Tidal Waters Esscntial Fisheries Habitat
r -
Trout 1'taeonsutstandirtg itesourc tii,aers Nutrient Sans3tivc 11atcrs eater Supply Watershed (i-1)
lit. k t',iere a pt)id or lake located upstreaitt of' the evaluation point." YF-S NO, It'ves, cstiirt ite the v%,aer surface area:
19. Docs channel appear oa USGS quasi map`' YES ?t) 20. Does cliannci appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES 0?1
21. Esfutiated v%,itcishcd land use: Residential.' __".;> Ccniintercial %Industrial °l AgTiculturul
ForestedCleared - Logged' Other ( j
22. Barkfull width
23. E3ank hciglit (ft'ont bed to tnp of batty}
24. Channel slope driven center afstre;tna: ..Flat (_O it) ?' _. f ?c°ntlc (2 to 4 o) Moderate (4 to 10°0) Steep (>I6%)
25. Channel sutuo iiv: Str iioht k ; „_O4casiun:tl bends F rctiltient incander ?Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located Oil page 2): He in b% dctcrmining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
luc lion, terrain, v .:ct ition, strcani el ssrfic :pion. tc, Every char.ilaenstic must be ,cored using the saute ecoregion. Assign points
to, each characteristic vvitliiri the r:tnit .hti??n for the C, coregiuts. Pauc 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
i;haraL:wristics identified in the worksh ct. S,.ores aioutd reflect :m overall assessment ofthe-stream reach under evaluation. 1fa
characteristic cannot be evaluated due tai site or,veather conditions, enteral in the scoring; box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Whcrc there at"e ;obvious, char ;?s in the character ofa stream under review (e.g., the str"m flows from a pasture
into a forest) the aUrarn may be dividi.J into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to cvaluate each
reach.- The total score .usigited to a strcain reach must range between0 and 100, %<ith a score of 100 representing a stream of the
hio, test gtmlity.
Total Score (from reverse); ?f Courrucata:
Evaluator's Signature s)t1 Date _k.1
This channel evalu.ition fotlm is intended to he Used only as a huide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
;:ltherino the data required by tiie United States -krnw Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality.. The total score resulting front the conipietiun of this form is subject to USACE approvol and does not imply a
particular imitirmtion ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 061-03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

,f
CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RAN't,I; --ice
SCORE.

1
C'o nsat
1'iedilront
(lioulrt am .

1 Presence of flow / per ustent pools in sn enm
0

{)-4

0-S )
(no ilo or 'Saturation - 0. stron, flow n) ,IX points) _
EN iderce of past human ilter rtion

--
te?tcn'al1C li('i'itlOil?tl Ill) Viet 11 (la " 1 1a.x iC7lotti) }
-- _---
+
? t1-
i
? Ripari au cone
(
j I _ c ?ntr u.; 15 ?tiu ?r?f cr- _
ono ?atlcr 0: n1.rt)O Tto 0-6 0_4 0-

5

1

} Evidence of natr wilt of cht iuic d dbsch 1rles
U a
-l
0-4
icxtmsive disch arcs 0: no dis har,-,es relax polilts)
s (;roun(tw ater {Bach la re

1
[.)_,
0-11
0
(n') r
1.ch.lr, Q; 11 ul sic «cti lnda, c
tt -- 111.u i?oit?ts)

t; _
Ntcaence or adl scent Eloodphlill
4
''
(110 fle0d'P rill U c,xtcnsi c floodpi un - m l,\ points) U- 0--
E ntrelichmcnt f floodpl rm recess -
-

7 1

(dceoh en'rcrLlieii Creetenti3udim? nliixpi,intsi
{)-
t)-l

0 -? 1
Presence of adjacent wetlands

no \ e fltlnrts t) I lr c ?cnt ?s it mds Iliay points) 011-4 0-2
( hanncf suwosity
0 --4
-- (C,Atcl]a1LG Cili11111C1171tt ?n (} ]1 Cll: li t7 tie tl ?I=-71lax j. 1in15) i ) { I ...
l? 5edimclititiplit
j
?
C 0 _..1
0-4
j
___ (c:AlenR4t deposition f) Milt or no dnll.ni 7 ] i\ j ,ants) ? _
9

11 _
Sire ??. drscrsity (if Channel lied suhstr tte _
N

i
ihn? hi;im ?cnou> U' far cln r, >i-e 1 a°: r tntsi , U ? t) - S
I
J E;', iclcncc of c1i inner iit cisiiln or it uleiing
t i cp1L incised 0 bcd & bans max
pQir7tS,
- ._.._..-

?)

1?---1 i

O._

..
r

` i

l a.
Presence of major bane: f iilutc.
i
,_ M a

(s 1ci' c:Ti1'+Itell {) no i.rCDslt tl.:?tiiE I,.1>HI1ks 371a\ oulms) O-J

? ?)-5
0 >

.
Root depth and densit on banks
0
4 ?
o

ilay x isille rows - f1, dense r 1..,ts dire 1 ? hout n1 v oints)_ :
! -
--. -

'
15 Impact In :wricultare, liscstoch. or timber production
U - S I
0-4
0_`
{suf?at intini in1 t -0 no eriu?nce = n1 is, 110inls) )

1C Pr eseacc of r iflle poolri fipple-pool Complexes
; f
; l

(i1 ritilc 'ri ,ll?s car uols ) mill ?' sclo):ed ? nlax lloirts) (1_ }._ 0--6
{ l i? i 111bitatcomplexit} .
t iutlc
or it,,, li lilt t ` 41 trGi(li {,t varied ll hit lt5 vial lit ii Ij { z d
-"x .
( molt} co1'Cr r{.;c over strc ambed
- i
1110 31:1diW' %C Ct*,16011
) poirl'ts) i
0 substr uc embeddcduess
__.i L:Lil l cnlbcd (c 0 lilts" ?auctIiic ... 11 nr l I
?l) Presence of stre n inFertebrttes (sec p ??e y1} 11
(1t?1 1 ta?nc , {): ec,uvll?l;1. tunncr)u, 1<1rcti nlax points) J

.?.E
i
Presence of slmphibi us
qq
0
tl1 i et a-"t cc - 0: comilhillnunier<rr, t1 1e; ma.", points)
Presence or fish
0 4
0--4
©_ -t 1
(no Cv 0 C0111111011, numCaou, t+Lt, Miry )ic inua
- ? ?
Fvidence of ssildlife toic 0--6 0-5
i)
i ? tile) CtiIC1?i1Ct'. ? abund nt CliCie1C:, `- n1dY pU1n15) ? i-
Total Points Possible 100 1 1{1'0 iUIJ
TOTAL SCORE (also enter i)n iil'st pa?-?c)

s I11c'st, C11,11"tctCriatlCS fire; tict <1..seSscd In co a5ltll stt'CURIS. _
2
+ t i ? al ? t z LL c) ? .1. .
NCI)N%'() Stream Classification Form
Pray t h..;t;; r ?? $ River 13aattill;<2.Cc7tt=ak: \'?? FtialUalor.
1)14'0 ct 1.7.E c.: v rt S a n 3 tifr: t t , = •r },at is °P?? Sii; Lure ??
ua;SC)U
?, itirecti?au:
*PLE1SIFNOTE:
IlG?.ilarah?rsrn3lanluwrtc?rt?rt?tkuflkGfir?tame+l=r??yrrmaJrr7it<i?,r/rr?rusei?t/tisfr+trnls,r??ts?ce+rgry:
Ahv,r'J1+,rArhes:trrrr,)1,?rur,al?,t?l zi:,erur>J11ras???7urrnr,tt+rfruturgizum{rN ruicdiicl?rirtd?fufuatuMtifrcatviuturufrrrrrrnr-{Iris'.
rrttixr.^ a) ?t:1n .Irnir:d mgr }?r lurd'?
Primary Field Indicattxr ?,°„< 1a.rt;•xt Ohl
1. i,cUrrtr?r Sltlrya?*t= S1rt ant ii"rak ifinrir??te titrnzi??
2) k I' I SC)-1 "1'eytw': In Strc
-31 (s"1?:? t ' +i•u: fir its' {} p ? -g.
5)IsT:'t %0,Ae:"s, ({)r J`ej1C)
9'11 S A Co 3
fir ?r
PRI.IMRi tilitl.S1(}Itf'#1t7Lt)G) 1.i'DIt;tMR PoLv S
it.l4drrrlogn Absent NVeak Moderate Stroh;
1) Is Tt:_? :? t trrxsssa .:e;cr
PRLIIAR fI YDROLOG ],,VDIC,I TOR poliV. S.
ili: Y3ioirz??r AI)srrst i?4k ilnderrta Strom.,
11 Art-, l t4 ,...?n .r? f r ,t f,, .H.ji-.Ai d .
3) Is P41 Aw
P R I M , I R Y 131t)LO ( Y J;VDI C•1 TOR poll l'7:S: ?? C a
` econtlarr= Field Ndicators: Div-. t ::, r4fl:? s
3) Dais ! i rap n lnu.c.tt?1 w- -_.--
SfCOrV•D-tRf`,GEO,IIORPIIOLOG)*IiVDICAidit /'DIrVTS.
i L Ilt•drrdrrvi ;absent Weak Moderate Stroh.

4)1x11'; r1t:l')tt;?nJ.trttl -) S 1 3 $
•12 rt 17 _ ,.,. lr >r 11 !,(sa A?>k.?3
?) 1s 11i 1V tQi i ( ?I [)t . I);? (tt a? ?5 I 1 ?1,
l?or In(t?n$ct3t?_? Frr?7.? y? &3
SECOND. I RV HYDROLOGYINDIC I TOR PObv7S:

1 t :1re L i t I'.,,,?,r E r??r, V e<en+? •?`? ? 3 ? a
1 25
1) ate' 1t i i ' (I. t. (tt ?t'? t ti ? '- Mostly 061 hlvr'a FACti1' Mostly FAC - Momly
1tOUL
TOTAL POINTS (Fritnrtrr 4 econtirtrp}=� �(If Gteauer Tltntr or F'rlurtl %i /it Poitrts The Stream ls<dt Least htt rt

Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Appendix G
Existing Conditions
O
U e
0
;v
ti
O h
w
U
F
d
0
In

CU 0

O

E

C
II N
? C
o 'O-
Pa :u
C
.y U)
as
? N

a
y

z
0

0
LO °
o 0 ) 0 )
(aaaj) U0 4BAOl3
'L O 7 V; h h iD - N -- r M h h- h N --- ?- M r^ M M
r
W O O O O N h ON ON N O o h o0 0o m w CN O M h 0 ON
i^ O O O O 0, r r C, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,?? c,? 0, r r? O O O O O
,ti D\ D\ O+ O. 0, a O? 0, Q\ T O+ O? O? C7, C7, a C7, Q1 0, O+ O? (5,
w
M h h 01 O 00 00 O+ N M tb O h O? W h N ?O v1 ?O O (b 00 N
h O
7 ? h h r N O ?/'1 •--? N N •--? N •--? O O. ? b N O? O Q: N? M N
?p V'1 V 7 h ?D ?O [? [? 00 c, o, a, o, o, a, o, o, w w 00 w h h vn -n V a t?
C
0 0 0 h O O O O 'O O O 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V1 O O O
y O M ?C ?fJ h? N M et h ?O `O ?? N N N N N N N N M M M M M M ?t ? 7
h

b
r
ON
0
vi
N 00
r
r
•-+
h
d
O,
O
o
m
W
,..,,
V
N
oo
? t-
Op
0
U
L
a
a
W a -
a°
r+ d
a°I z o
?
= 'O d d a ? w
0 0 ? a. a. d G1 rx e x ?
? Y
? Y Y a e Q ? C y ?
Q °? u
v, a
?o oa m 'w r' ? ? 3 w a
C0i ?n c
N

Q
1
o
1 1 ?'

1 1
1 1

1 /

1 t

1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
/
1 1
1 /
1 /
1 1
1 1
1 1
t /
1 1
1 t
1 /
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 /
1 1
1 1
1 1
/
1 1
t 1 in LL

i 1

1 1

1 1
Bold Run Creek
Existing Conditions
tp- s ?1? r?ry -. s
XS-1 right bank looking left bank
{ .. T 4
01
eo-

3r
W-? ? yam. ".' 1

•? A F

XS-1 looking upstream XS-1 looking downstream
XS-1 left bank looking right bank

Drainage Area sq mi Bankfull Width: 26.53

11.0 7.85 97.51

-- -
-

1
0 00 -
- - - -
m
a
W
- - - _ - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

--- --- - - - - --

43 5.08 100.28 Station (feet)
:j

Bold Run Creek
Existing Conditions
River Basin: Neuse
Watershed: Bold Run
XS ID \S2. Pool

Date: 9/2/2005

ield Crew: SGYI?IARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 97.36
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 24.20
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 99.48
AH, AS Flood Prone Width: 34.30
Station Rod Ht. Elevation
0.0 5.36 100.00
3.0 5.45 99.91
6.0 5.57 99.79
6.7 5.58 99.78
8.0 6.57 98.79
9.0 6.89 98.47
9.6 7.41 97.95
10.0 7.63 97.73

12.0 8.07 97.29
13.0 8.I2 97.24
14.0 8.19 97.17
15.3 8.17 97.19
16.0 R.20 97.16
17.0 8.23 97.13
18.0 8.27 97.09
19.0 8.46 96.90
20.0 8.46 96.90
22.0 8.61 96.75
23.0 8.66 96.70
24.0 8.85 96.51
35.0 8.94 9(,.42
26.4 9.14 96.22
27.0 9.25 96.11
28.0 9.27 9(,.09
29.0 9.59 95.77
30.0 9.81 95.55
31.0 9.96 95.40
32.0 10.04 95.32
33 10.11 95.25
34 10.12 95.24
35 10.03 95.33
36 9.9 95.46
37 9.5 95.86
37.4 8.4 96.96
38 8.06 97.3
38.9 7.81 97.55
39.3 7.2 99.16
40 6.86 98.5
41 6.25 99.11
41.8 5.05 100.31

7

8 :dean Depth at Bankfull: 0.91
V1' / D Ratio: 29.1
Entrenchment Ratio: 1_19
Bank Height Ratio: 2.14
Slope (ft/f[): 0.007
Dischar a (cfs) 75
Stream Type: F4
Neuse River Basin, Bold Run, XS2, Pool
110
105
95
- - - Bankfull
Flood Prone Area
90
0 10 20 30 40 50
100.08

Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.12

Bold Run Creek
Existing Conditions
t w a
XS-2 right bank looking left bank
XS-2 looking upstream
XS-2 looking downstream
XS-2 left bank looking right bank

Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.97

8 5.05 99.98

w

- - -
- - - °
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- -
°

Station (feet)
Bold Run Creek
Existing Conditions
River Basin: Neuse
Watershed: Bold Run
XS ID XS3. Pool
Drainage Area (sq mi):
Date: 7/27/2005

ield Crew: SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 96.(,3
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 25.30
Bankfull Width: 15.68
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 98.60
AH, AS Flood Prone Width: 18.30
Station Rod Ht. Elevation
0 5.03 100.00
1 4.96 100.07
3 4.81 10022
4 4.73 100.30
6 4.73 100.30

10 5.95 99.08
11 6.66 98.37
11.9 9.69 95.34
12.5 10.14 94.89
14 10.35 94.68
15 10.32 94.71
16 10.37 94.66
17 10.34 94.69
18 10.33 94.70
19 10.3 94.73
20 10.3 94.73
21 10.19 94.84
22 10.2 94.83
23 10.17 94.86
24 10.03 95.00
25 9.57 95.46
25.8 9.31 95.72
26.8 8.82 96.21
28 7.56 97.47
28.8 7.09 97.94
29.3 6.19 98.84
30 5.81 99.22
31 5.43 99.60
32 5.23 99.80
34 5.1 99.93

5

3 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.61
N'/ D Ratio: 9J
Entrenchment Ratio: 1.16
Bank flei ht Ratio: 2.66
Slo a (ft/ft): 0.007
Discharge (cfs) I 15
Stream Type: G4c
Neuse River Basin, Bold Run, XS3, Pool
110
105
m
0 100
° - - - - - - - - ° - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
WaI
95
Bankfull
Flood Prone Area
90
0 10 20 30 40
99.90

•
'TOW
6

. XS-3 left bank looking right bank

XS-3 looking upstream
•
Bold Run Creek
Existing Conditions
3-3 right bank looking left bank
XS-3 looking downstream

Bold Run Creek
Existing Conditions
River Basin: Neuse
Watershed: Bold Run
XS ID XS4. Riffle (Gauge location)
Drainage Area (sq mi):
Date: 7/27/2005
Field Crew: AH, AS
Station Rod Ht. Elevation
0.0 5.82 100.00
3.0 5.64 100.18
6.0 5.34 100.48
9.0 5.17 100.65
9.7 5.39 100.43
11.0 7.88 97.94
12.0 9.07 96.75
13.0 9.91 95.91
14.0 10.12 95.70
16.0 10.03 95.79
18.0 9.89 95.93
19.0 10.22 95.60
21.0 10.01 95.81
22.7 9.89 95.93
23.0 9.84 95.98
24.0 9.72 96.10
25.0 9.55 96.27
26.0 9.56 96.26
27.8 9.38 96.44
29.0 7.56 98.26
30.0 6.72 99.10
30.4 5.53 100.29
32.0 5.31 100.51
34.0 4.64 101.18

- - Bankfull
Flood Prone Area
90 +
0
10
20
Station (feet)
40
30
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 97.52
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 25.20
Bankfull Width: 17.16
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 99.44
Flood Prone Width: 19.40
Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.92
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.47
W / D Ratio: 11.7
Entrenchment Ratio: 1.111
Bank Height Ratio: 2.44
Slope (ft/ft): 0. 0O-
Discharge (cfs) 110
Neuse River Basin, Bold Run, XS4, Riffle (Gauge location)
110
105
w
m
0 100
N
W
95
r
•
•
• XS-4 left bank looking right bank
•
?md
• XS-4 looking upstream
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Bold Run Creek
Existing Conditions
XS-4 looking downstream
XS-4 right bank looking left bank
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Drainage Ar ea sq mi Bankfull Width: 18.29

(ft/ft): 0.007

Stream Type: F4

Neuse River Basin
Bold Run
XS5
Riffle
,
,
,

110 -

16.0 9.62 95.14
105

m
w
21.0 10.03 94.73 0
100 - - - -
j - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - .
m
- - - -

25.0
9.24
95.52 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .

i

- - -
Bankfull
Flood
Prone Area
90
0 10
20 30 40
Station (feet)
-- -

Bold Run Creek
Existing Conditions
River Basin: Neuse
Watershed: Bold Run
XS ID \S5, Riffle

Date: 9/2/2005

ield Crew: Sl M1IMARl'DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 96.67
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 24.20
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 98.61
AH, AS Flood Prone Width: 21.30
Station Rod Ht. Elevation
0.0 4.76 100.00
3.0 4.81 99.95
6.0 5.10 99.66
7.0 6.40 98.36
7.8 7.03 97.73
8.0 7.59 97.17
9.0 8.09 96.67
9.3 8.53 96.23
10.0 8.52 96.24
10.5 8.96 95.80
11.2 9.32 95.44
12.0 9.45 95.31
13.0 9.44 95.32
14.0 9.50 95.26
15.0 9.59 95.17

17.0 9.71 95.05
18.0 9.83 94.93
19.0 9.70 95.06
20.0 9.97 94.79

22.0 9.52 95.24
23.0 9.38 95.38
24.0 9.26 9550

26.0 9.22 95.54
26.5 9.09 95.67
27.0 8.78 95.98
28.3 5.73 99.03
29.0 5.48 99.28
30.0 5.24 99.52
31.0 4.64 100.12
32.0 4.64 100.12
34.0 4.65 100.11

5.0

.67 Slope
Discharge
W
95
100.09

Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.94
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.32
W / D Ratio: 13.8
Entrenchment Ratio: 1.16
Bank Height Ratio: 2.54

(cfs) 99
Bold Run Creek
Existing Conditions

XS-5 left bank looking right bank
L
-? f ? ? ?`! '. yy,' ?LM?k'j?'? ? 1 ?? tali
44
rte- ?
.t ..
KS-5 right bank looking left bank
XS-5 looking downstream
XS-5 looking upstream

Bold Run Creek
Existing Conditions
River Basin: Neuse
Watershed: Bold Run
XS ID XS6. Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi :
Date: 9/2/2005
Field Crew: AH, AS
Station Rod Ht. Elevation
0.0 5.05 100.00
3.0 5.15 99.90
5.0 5.31 99.74
6.0 5.57 99.48
7.0 6.07 98.98
7.5 6.46 98.59
9.0 8.60 96.45
10.0 9.22 95,83
10.8 9.93 95.12
11.5 10.54 94.51
12.0 10.57 94.48
13.0 10.80 94.25
14.0 10.79 94.26
15.0 10.86 94.19
16.0 10.98 94.07
17.0 11.05 94.00
18.0 11.11 93.94
19.0 11.17 93.88
20.0 11.21 93.84
21.0 1 1 29 93.76
22.0 11.39 93.66
23.0 11.48 93.57
23.7 11.35 93.70
24.3 9.86 95.19
25.5 7.95 97.10
26.0 6.34 98.71
27.0 5.89 99.16
29.0 5.62 99.43
32.0 5.70 99.35
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--------------------------
Bankfull
Flood Prone Area
90 E
0
10
30
40
20
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DA,rA
Bankfull Elevation: 95.85
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 24.70
Bankfull Width: 14.75
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 98.13
Flood Prone Width: 18.50
Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.28
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.67
W / D Ratio: 8.8
Entrenchment Ratio: 1.25
Bank "eight Ratio: 2.57
Slope (ft/ft): 0.007
Discharge (cfs) 14
Neuse River Basin, Bold Run, XS6, Riffle
110
105
0 100
W
95
•
•
•
• XS-6 left bank looking right bank
•
• XS-6 looking upstream
•
•
•
•
w
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Bold Run Creek
Existing Conditions
-6 right bank looking left bank
1
XS-6 looking downstream
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Appendix H
Reference Reach Data
Appendix H. Mor hological Design Criteria

CLASSIFICATION
DATA Richland
Creek
Reference
Reach
Ro en Stream Type C4
Drainage Area a mi 4.8
Bankfull Width ft 28-32
Bankfull Mean De th d ft 2.3.2.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional area 67-75
Width/de th Ratio d 11.7-13.9
Maximum Depth d (ft) 3.75
Width of flood prone area
ft >100
Entrenchment Ratio ER > 3.0
Water Surface Slope S ft/ft 0.004
Sinuosity (stream
len th/valle len th K

1.1
DIMENSION DATA
Pool De th (ft) 2.9
Riffle Depth (ft) 23-2*4
Pool Width ft 26-35
Riffle Width ft 28-32
Pool XS Area sf 70-75
Riffle XS Area sf 67-75
Pool de th/mean riffle depth 1.2-13
Pool width/riffle width 0.9-1.1
Pool area/riffle area 0.9-1.1
Max of depthtdbid 1.9-2.0
Low bank height/max bankfull
depth 1.0-1.2
Mean Bankfull Velocity (V)
(fps) 3.6-5.0
Bankfull Discharge O cfs 260-270
PATTERN DATA
Meander length ft 110-200
Radius of curvature Rd ft 30-70
Belt width ft 300
Meander width ratio
(Wbtt/-WbW) 9.3-10.7
Radius of curvature/bankfull
width 1.0-2.5
Meander length/bankfull
width 3.5-7.1
PROFILE DATA
Valle sloe 0.0045
Average water surface sloe 0.004
Rifle sloe 0.005-0.009
Pool sloe 0.000-000025
Pool to pool spacing 25-90
Pool length 5-25
Riffle slope/avg water surface
slope 1.3-2.3
Pool slope/avg water surface
slope 0.0-0.6
Run slope/avg water surface
slope 0.7-1.2
Run de th/d 1.0-1.1
Pool len th/bankfull width 0.2-0.9
Pool to pool spacing/bankfull
width 0.8-3.0
Z2
C
0
m
w
of instrument
notes
Richland Creek
Reference Site
1 at 0+00 Riffle Richland Creek Reference Reach
h] I bankfull ItoD of
92 -.
1.85-.-.
1.67
1.27- '.
91.65- -
92
"n"
dimensions
4.6 x-section area 2.4 mean
30.8 width 32.5 wet P
3.7 d max 2.3 h yd radi
4.1 bank ht 12.7 w/d ratio
300.0 W flood tone area 9.7 ent ratio
8.6 friction factor u1u*
25.9
_1threshold grain size (MMI
ec from channel ma era
9 measured D84 mm
78.7 relative rou hness 13.6 fric. factor
0.022 Mannin 's n from channel material
Richland Creek
Reference Site
2 at 0+45 Pool Richland Creek Reference Reach
97
95
K 94 -
c
m 93
I'D 92
91
90
- - - --- --
89 - ' - -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
Pool
Richland Creek Reference Reach
Richland Creek
description:
height of instrument (ft):
omit distance FS FS FS channel
notes pt. (ft) I (ft) elevation... bankfull toa of bank clnna (OM
95.1
94.9 -- dimensions
94.19 - 4. x-section area .9 mean
92.71 - 25.9 width 29.0 wet P
92 4.7 d max 2.6 h yd radi
91.52-- , 5.7 bank ht
91.32 ;
91.12
90.1
30.18
y rau IGS

r?
0.00 shear stress Ibs/ft sq
0.00 shear velocity ft/sec

A 8 threshold rain size mm

Richland Creek
Reference Site
3 at 0+70 Riffle Richland Creek Reference Reach
Richland Creek Reference Reach
Richland Creek
description:
height of instrument (ft):
omit distance FS FS FS W fpa channel Manning's
notes pt. (ft) (ft) elevation..' bankfull top of bank (ft) slope
94.97
dimensions
9. x-section area .6
22.9 width 27.0
3.9 d max 2.2 i
F
4.9 bank ht 8.8 io

300.0
W flood prone area
13.1 entratio
check from channel material

9 measured D84 mm
84.0 relative roughness 13.8 Eric. factor
0.022 Mannin 's n from channel material
c
a
0
a
CO
m
Richland Creek
Reference Site
4 at 1+08 Run Richland Creek Reference Reach
w
notes
iu to 3U 40 50 an It
of instrument
70 80
Wi dth from River Left to Right (ft)
' .77,
un
chland Greek Reference Reach
chland Creek
UDII,

levation
94.86 ...
93.35 - -
92.71 --- ;;
FS W fpa
f bank (ft)
i I'Me
.4
;9",
channel
slope (%
Manning's
"n"
MINI
92.82 -- ! d
imensions
92.28 - 5. x-section area 1.8 d mean
91.96 -- 36.8 width 40.2 wet P
91.44-7 3.6 d max 1.6 h yd radi
91.33 - 5.7 bank ht 20.7 w/d ratio
91.4 300.0 W flood prone area 8.2 ent ratio
91.32......_ '
90.8 "y raulics
90.47 -
90.17 - 3.2 ?j
Fin n l velocity (ft/sec)
rfi.qrhnrnp mto n t,f.1
95.51 check from channel material
94.88 9 measured D84 mm
94.84 57.7 relative roughness 12.9 fric. factor
94.7 0.022 Mannin 's n from channel material
Richland Creek
Reference Site
Pool
Richland Greek Reference Reach
Richland Greek
description:
height of instrument (ft):
omit distance FS FS FS channel
notes pi (ft) (ft) elevation bankfull top of bank slone 10/
dimensions
78.3 x-section area 2.5 d mean
31.7 width 34.3 wet P
4.6 d max 2.3 h d radi
6.0 bank ht
91.33
91.81
11 24AI Itnresnold grain size (mm)
1•
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Appendix I
Sediment Transport

Bold Run Hydrograph
7/22/05 to 10/19/05
20.00
15.00
w
4)
LO. 10.00
ea
s
N
0
5.00
0.00 4--
JI-05
d1-05 Ag-05 iAg-05 k-05 Sep-05 Sep-05 Sep-05 Q-05
Q-05 Q-05
I Discharge
Date/Time
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Bold Run Creek
Pebble Count
Pebble Count Weighted by Channel Feature
Percent Riffle: Percent Run:
Percent Pool: Percent Glide: Pebble Count,
Material Size Range (mm) weighted Bold Run Creek
silUclay 0 0.062 0.0 New Light Creek
very fine sand 0.062 0.13 0.0 Wake County
fine sand 0.13 0.25 0.0 Note: 0%
medium sand 0.25 0.5 0.0
coarse sand 0.5 1 0.0 100/ Pebble Count, Bold Run Creek
100%
very coarse sand 1 2 0.0 I! ,
very fine gravel 2 4 0.0 90^i° -
- r T - -r- --? --- -1-rj-r-rT -rrr 90%
fine gravel 4 6 0.0
fihegravel f 6 8' 0.0 80% - -r-r-r-r?----^-r,-- ,-r--r-_rl--- ------rr`---?---r-r? -?-r---r-80%
medium gravel 8 11 0.0 CD'
, rn
medium gravel 11 16 0.0 70% r; - - - -r- r:-- T-------T- , 1i-- - 70%
coarse gravel 16 22 0.0 ° ? n
60% ?
coarse gravel 22 60/ 32 0 .0 (p
very coarse gravel 32 45 0.0 c 50%-
coarse ravel 45 CIO 50%
very
64 0.0 ..
w j
small cobble 64 90 0.0 40°i rr - r T ; -- T r -- = = ,' ao% o
medium cobble 90 128 0.0 It , , i
w
r -
large cobble 128 180 0.0 30% ?` - - r - -r 3o°io
very lar a cobble 180 256 0.0 P
20 /o -- - r n r - TO
- - -T - rr' - - r - -r 20%
small boulder 256 362 0.0 a aI
small boulder 362 512 0.0
r rt - rr« - rr -- -. - s 10%
medium boulder 512 1024 0.0
large boulde 1024 2048 0.0 0%
ve large boulde 2048 4096 0.0 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
weighted particle count: 0.0 particle size (mm) -+-weighted percent -riffle -pool -.-run -+--glide % of particles
;detritus/wood drock 0.0 based on size percent less than (mm) particle size distribution
rdpan 0.0 sediment D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95 gradation geo mean std dev
0.0 articles onl 0.000 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 ificial 0.0 based on percent by substrate type
weighted total count: 0 total count sift/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial
Bold Run Creek
Pebble Count
Riffle Pebble Count Riffle Pebble
very tine sand 0.062 0.13 Wake County
fine sand 0.13 0.25 Note:
medium sand 0.25 0.5 1
coarse sand 0.5 1 Riffle Pebble Count
Bol d R
C
k
very coarse sand 1 2 1 , un
ree
very fine gravel 2 4 7 100%

fine gravel
4
6
7 16
fine gravel + 6 8 7 90%
medium gravel 8 11 12 0
80%
medium gravel 11 16 g
coarse gravel 16 22 14 70 1 114
12
coarse ravel 22 32 10 60% -- -
10
o
very coarse gravel 32 45 10
very coarse ravel 45 64 3 50%
- - -?-r--r-T -- ---?-r-,7?• -, - , ;-,-n - --r---nV--?;--?- --r-,T 8 °
small cobble 64 90 7 ? 40%
medium cobble 90 128 1 " 6
large cobble 128 180
4

a

30%

m
U)
very large cobble 180 256 20% 4
small boulder 256 362
small boulder 362 512 10%
medium boulder 512 1024 0% + ' + + + + I ? I , ? i , ,

large boulde
1024
2048
0
01 0

ve lar a boulde
2048
4U99-
4 . 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
total particle count: 00 particle size (mm) -¦-cumulative % # of particles
bedrock base d on size percent less an mm article si

clay hardpan
sediment
D16
D35 D50 D65
D84
D95 p
d
ti ze is n u ion
d

detritus/wood
articles only

2.00 ra
a
on eo mean st
dev
artificial basec al on percent by substrate type
total count: 100 l total count silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial

Bold Run Creek
Pebble Count
11Pool Pebble Count Pool Pebble Count_
a ena Size Range mm Count
silt/clay 0 0.062 51
very fine sand 0.062 0.13
fine sand 0.13 0.25 2
medium sand 0.25 0.5 2
coarse sand 0.5 1 16
very coarse sand 1 2 11
very fine gravel 2 4 1
fine gravel 4 6 2
fine gravel 6; 8 : 2
medium gravel 8' 11 6'
medium gravel 11 16 3
coarse gravel 16 22 2
coarse gravel 22 32 1
very coarse gravel 32 45
very coarse ravel 45 64 1
small cobble 64 90
medium cobble 90 128
large cobble 128 180
very large cobble 180 256
small boulder 256 362
small boulder 362 512
medium boulder 512 1024
large boulderll 1024 2048
very large boulde 2048 4096
total particle count: 100
bedrock
clay hardpan
detritus/wood
artificial
total count: 100
bold Run Crel
New Light Creek
Wake Coun
Note:
Pool Pebble Coun t, Bold Run Creek
100%
I I 1 i l j
1 I 1 I i 1
: I i
1 1 11 60
iI I
90% 11 1 I I , I Iii i 1 I

.....
I l i t i-11
I I? I I'
I ? . 1 I I I
1 1 ,
i ? I ? I I I
j f I I I I;
1 I I ; ?, I ? I I
50
1: 1 1
80%
- .

1
1 ,

70% I I III
1 II i i 11
, I

I
-_- rl ?. I

1 I

I I I I I I
I I I II
I If
j 40

1 1 1 1
'
i
i 1
I I
3
60%- .. ;
?
50% 1 I I 1? : 1 1 ? l i

- 1 . 1 I I 1 I ?. i '. i

. .. 11 1

30
-
..
c I t II
I l i I I : I 1 1 I I
. i ; I 1 I
I '
, 1 ` ,
? 1 1
I , i I I? I
11
1 ?
i I I I

U 40/

.

?
. _
; ?

.
?
CIL I I I I '.
1 I I l i I
I'? I
I l 11 1 ''. I
I 1
i I I I I: 1 1?
I I I I 11 ''
? 1 1 1 1 (
I 1 20 (p

20% I I I'
_--?__1--1 -1. .11?-- ! : - -- I
___._:-J -i-1:1 +-I-;-_ ,
- -1- l
-• -.-Lu?i_.. 1 I
-4._ .J -- --
1 I I
III 1 t , 1 I'•. I I I I 1.?
i; I I 10

10%

- I i?If I I I 1
.
11 I III!; i 11

I 1111
°
0 /0 1 I I I .1 I I I I 1 i l, i I: I I
0
0.01 0.1 1 1 0 100 1000 10000
particle size (mm)
?fcumulative %
• # of particles
based on size percent less than (mm) particle size distribution
sediment D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95 gradation eo mean std dev
articles onl y 0.062 0.06 0.1 1 5 14 40.0 0.6 8.9
based on percent by substrate type
total count
1 silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial

1 51% 31% 18% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
•?tt?it?t?t???t???t?????t??/r??itt??t???•
Point / Side BAR-BULK MATERIALS SAMPLE DATA: Size Distribution Analysis Party: 13H, AS
S
u
Location: Bold Run Site - Pavement 1
Date: 15 Aug 2005 Notes:
B
s

A

Sieve Size
(mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size ( mm ) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size mm

Sieve Size mm Sieve Size mm
t ) ( ) ( ) Sieve Size

mm
()
IM < 2.0
P Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) SURFACE
L -- - MATERIALS
E 29 DATA
S Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights sample weights ( Two Lar
est Particles)
Total Net Total Net Total Net Total Net Total Net Total Net Total Net Total Net Total Net Total Net g
t 38.0 9.0 3.5 5.0 r 11.0 22.5 7.5 No. Dia. WT.
2 0.0 1 • • r

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Net Wt. Total
% Grand Tot.
Accum. % =<
38.5% II II 12.8% II II 0.0% II II 0.0% II II 0.0%
Materials
lessthan:
_mm.)
Sure to Add
parate Material
riahts to Grand
GRAND TOTAL
SAMPLE WEIGHT
NOTES

Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream:: • . -
Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: - -
2.0 9 15.4% 15.4% Location: - . t
4.0 3.5 6.0% 21.4% Note:
8.0 5.0 8.5% 29.9%
16.0 11.0 18.8% 48.7%
31.5 225. 38.5%. 87.2% Bar Sample .Sieve Analysis.
64.0 7.5 12.8% 100.00/0 Sands 1
f ??f -? ?
C
bl
b

128
0
0
0
100% ry
o
es Boulders Bedrock
. . 0.0% 100.0% '
s .?t

256
.0
0.0
0.0%
100.0%
90% I I , I I I 11
T -? -I-r 1 ?1 _Inl_I 1 1 4- 1 1
-T--1 1 1 1
FrT _T I TTI -?T
E:>
256
0 0
0 0
0% I
I 1 ' 1'" 1 ' ^"' '' '
. . . 100.0% 80% i-ITTT
r--T-j- '
T
rTT 11 1 1 1 i I I 1 1 I 11
_
_
-
Total: 58.5 100% L 70% I I 1 I I I I I
- I I i l f l l ~
_ 1 1 1 , 1 1? I r T
iF
T I
F 1 1
I If I.
1 1 1 1 ___T/_-T--T ,-F-1 1 F TT 1- I I T- 1
60% 111 1 1 1 1
-? 111 1 1 11 I I I I
d I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I l l t l 1 I I I
r I I I __
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
C
LL
50%
1 I 1 , 1 1 1 1
I
i 1 1 1 1 1
,
l I I I I
-
I I
1
I I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I
1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I V I I I .e j?
- I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I --- 1 I I I I I I
C 40% 1 , 1 1 1 111 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I
1 I I I I I I I 1 I I{ i l ! I I I I 1 1 i I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
N 30% I I I I I I' 1 1 1 1 10 Y I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I i 1 I I I I
a.
20% I I I I I I 1 1 1 I l l -t"r i
T I I I
R i I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I it '7 I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 1

10%

1 1 I I I I I I
_- I
1
1 _I I I? 1
1 1 I-I
_i I _ I _
i I I I I
I I
I I I

i

I I I I I
I 1 1 1 1
__ I I

1
0%
I I I I I I

0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
- Cumulative Percent ? Percent Item
Size percent less than mm Percent b substrate type
D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silt/clay sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock
2.1 9.6 16.4 29.8 48.5 0% 15% 85% 0% -- --

s
u Location:

S
A
Sieve Size (mm)
Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm)
Sieve Size (mm)
Sieve Size (mm)
Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm)

Sieve Size mm
t )
Sieve Size
(mm)

ieve Size mm
( )
M <2.0
EMMA

P Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) are Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz)
L
29
E
S Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights
-i ll Total Net Total Net Total Net Total Net Total Net Total Net Total Net Total Net Total Net Total Net
1 11 170.0 141.0 ? ? 37.5 _ 27.0 37.0 124.5 . . 197.5 HIM
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Net Wt. Total 1@1410 37°5
% Grand Tot. 6.6
\ccum. % _< -? 31.6°
NOTES
Point / Side BAR-BULK MATERIALS SAMPLE DATA: Size Distribution Analysis Party: BH, AS
Bold Run Site-Bar 1
Date: 15 Aug 2005
Notes:
4.8% II II 6.6% II 1122.1%11 II 35.0% II II 0.0%
SURFACE
MATERIALS
DATA
( Two Largest Particles)
No. Dia. WT.
Materials
less than:
_mm.)
Sure to Add
parate Material
siahts to Grand
GRAND TOTAL
SAMPLE WEIGHT
Josh:C/My Documents/Class Files/RAM/Forms/RAM Fonns.xls Wildland Hydrology 9/00

Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than
2.0 141 25.0% 25.0%
4.0
8.0 37.5
27.0 6.6%
4.8% 31.6%
36.4%
16.0 37.0 6.6% 43.0%
31.5: 1245 22;1 % 65.0% <
54.0 197.5 35.0% 100.0%
64.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0%
70.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0%
90.0 0.0 0.0% 100.00/0
Total: 564.5 100%
Watershed:
Location:
Note:
Bar.Sample. Sieve. Analysis.
Sands --? Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock
100%
90%
80%
t 70%
~ 60%
d
LL 50%
C 40%
d 30%
20%
10%-
0%
I I 1 1 1! 1 1 I I I 7 1 1 1 I I ;I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 11 1 I I I I U' 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 i I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-? I I TI 1 1 i
- I .I - 1 1
- 1 1 1 I I i i l l l - 1 1 I I I I
I ?
I Iliil
1 I I 1 1 1 1 1
- ?I
117
I I I I I I .i i;1 1 1
-
I '? 1 1 t 1 I I
I I I 1
I 1 1- II II I
I I 1 1 1 1 1 111-I i.1i
I I I I I I I
?
? ? I I I I I
1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I
1 I I I I I 1 ii 1 1
I .i I I I I III
I I I --I I I 11 I 1 1
I I 1 1 7 1 1 ___ __ ? ? ? 1 I 1 1
1 I 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I 1 1
1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I
I i I I I I I ?'I' I I 1 1
i i I I I ( 1 1
I I I 1
I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I __ I I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I
i 1 I 1 I I i l
1 I I I I I I I I i I I J., ?r.
1 ,o "-.7'_..I I I I
F .? I I I ?I
I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I
I I 1 I I I (1
I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I 11 'I
I I I I I I i I I I I 111 I I i 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I
1111 1 1 1 1
--J --L ?L.Ll_ 111 1 1 1 1
-L?L11LL i 111 1
_ I 1 I L. 1 1 1 1 1 1111111 111 1 1 1 1
-LLI 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I ? I I 1 ! 1 1 1 1 I I 1 i! I I I I I I I I I I
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
-Q-Cumulative Percent ? Percent Item
11 D16 I D35 I D50 I D84 I D95 II silUclay I sand I gravel I cobble I boulder i bedrock 11
6.5 s .5 1A 4 a9 sn n not 9 50/ 7X; 0/ not
- 9998989998811111
Point / Side BAR-BULK MATERIALS SAMPLE DATA: Size Distribution Analysis Party: BH, AS
s
u Location: Bold Run Site - Pavement 2 Date: 15 Aug 2005 Notes:
B i -11
7-5----??---1- -11 S ._... - , . .. n n it 11 317
A Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm)
M < 2.0
P
L are Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz) Tare Weight (oz)
Tare Weight (oz)
Tare Weight (oz)
Tare Weight (oz)
Tare Weight (oz)
Tare Weight (oz)
E 29
S Sample Weights
T
t
l Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights
o
a Net Total Net TotaE Net Total Net Total Net Total Net Total Net Total Net Total Net Total Net
1 40.0 11.0 5.5 7.0 13.0 10.5 43.5
2 0.0
3 0.0
4 0.0
5 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14 0.0
15 0.0
4ccum. % =< 12.2% P. SURFACE
Vet Wt. Total 11.0 5.5 7.0 11 13.0 10.5 43.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 11 0.0
%Grand Tot. 12.2% 6.1% 7.7q,1
14.4% 11 11.6% 48.1% 0.0% 11 0.0%
MATERIALS
DATA
( Two Largest Particles)
No. Dia. WT.
Materials
Bucket
)Is less than:
mm.)
Be Sure to Add
Separate Material
Weights to Grand
Total
GRAND TOTAL
SAMPLE WEIGHT

I I I I I I I I
I I 1 1 1 1 1
1 I I 1
I I I - -,-:
I
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 I I I I
r--r T
1 1 I i l l l l
_L__-f-
I I i 1 1 1 1 1 -TT-FT T-F
I 1 I I I I
-_T-7__l-1TfT.
1 I I I 1 1 1 ?-I
I I 1 ,4 1

1 I If I I V r
1 1 1

I I I
I

I _T__T-T'T _f-7
1 f 1 1 1 IT- 1
r_-_T_T.Tff
i 1 1 1 1 1 1 T -T-TTi-TT
I I I I I I
T'LT
! I I I I I I
- -?-T 11 T 1
1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 -T-1 11 I
1 I I I I I I
?
I 1 fl I I
t
I I I i
I
---
- -F-1 -F T-
I I I I I I I
-

---- FFT
I 1 I I I 1 1
--
I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I F1
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 l I I
1 1
1 I I I
? I I
I I I I
I I
I I II II
1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I t 1 I I I I I
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,:
I I I
?.d"°? 1 1' I I I
I I I 1
1 I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I I t l l l I
I I I I I I I
I I I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I 1 1 1 1 1 t I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I -' I I t I I
a 1 I i i I I I I
I I I I
I I 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I 1 1 1
1 I I I I I I I
1 I I
I I I I I I I 1 I I• i"
1 I .-t'I'l?t 1 1 I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I I I 1
i I I I I I I I
I I I
I I
I I I I 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I
_
'I I 1 1 1 1 1 1
I _? I I I 11
I I I I I I I I _
,_ I. ???-. 1?1 1 II I
?? I I I I I?I
I I I 1-1 I 1 J I I
? I _(. I I
I 1 I I I I I I
I, 1 1_
I I I 1
___f
1 _
_
I 1 1 1 1 1 1
? I I I f i
I It
I I I I I
__ ____I I I I i l i
I C I J I 1

I I I I I I
•????????????????????????????a??????????•

I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 ,'(•..?..I
r7r
111 1 I i i l l l l I I 1 1 1 1 1
?1-i'T-fT

I I 1 I I i f l

1 i I I I I I I -fTriTTT

I I I I III

i t I l l l i --I V"1

1 I 1 I I
`t-TT
I I I I i

I I

11-T l l

1

I T--T T

I 1 I I t 1 1
.T_l_7__T.._T._T.
i t I l l i i

____

-T-TTI-T
- TT
I 1 I I I I I
.-1-_I_T._TTI-I
t I I I I
1-(-1 I I I
I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 - -I-?I?1
1 I I i I''>'1 I I T-11
I I I 1 1 1
1 1 1
I 1 -F-T-i 11
t I 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I 1 1 1
I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I 1
1 r{' 1 1 1 1 I I -f-F-1
I I I I l I Fl-
i l t -- I
I 1 F -I I I TI
I I 11 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
1 I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 11
I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 i; 'I' t l l 11
+? I I I I I I I i
I 1 I t l 11
l l l 1
I I I I 1 1 11
i I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I
I 1 i I I I I I I I' I I I I

i I I I I I I
It, 1 I 1 I I

1 I I 1 1 I I I

1 1 1 1

I I I I I I I I

1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I

1 I I I I I
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

I 1 I I I I I I

_ 1 I I I I I I

_ 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1

I
I 1 I I 1 1 1

1 1 I I

I i I I l i l t

1
1 I I I I I

__
I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 I 1_I I I 1 + I I I I I
I I I ICI _
_
1 I I I
_ 1 ___??__(_I I i l
I I I __
I
I _
1 1 11111
1 I I I I I
__ I 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 I? 11 I 1
i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I
see see*** sofas*** Soso*** 68696469809410,041
Smallest Sieve
Passed mm Weight
oz
% Item Percent
Finer Than Stream::. • '
Watershed: • '
2.0 47 26.3% 26.3% Location: -
4.0
8.0 13.5
9.0 7.6%
5.0% 33.9%
38.9% Note:
16.0 25.0 14.0% 52.9% Sample Sieve Analysis
Bar

31.5.
28`.5
16<0%
68.9%i .
_
64.0 55.5 31.1% 100.0% E-- Sands Gravels
Cobbles Boulders Bedrock
128.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% 100%- 7 r
1
-T-

0
90% l I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S t 1 1 1 1 I t l l l I 1 1 1 1 1
256.0 0.0 0.0
/, 100.0% - rT 1 --r--17.11 T-FT --r r-r-r-i-T -- --1--r??--1
> 256.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% 80% I i I 1 1 1 1 1
i?-r-r-r -T-T-1- I I 1 1 1 1 1
-7'--r-i-I-n t i I 1 1
--?-T-4`-r- 1 1 1
r Tr I
---r- I 1 1 1 1 1 1
t-r'-I-r rr _ 1 I I I I I I
T
l 178
5 100% L 70% I I I I I I I I
?
- -
-?- I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I , I I I I 1. I 11 1 1 1 I I I I I I
ota
: .
F 1 tI
I
]I I I I I 1 Iy ..`I ? l
? i ---I iTr I -IF -- - I (-(--7-I I I

LL
60%
50% I I I H i l l
- 1 I i l l 111
I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I_I
--F I t I I C
I I I I I I I I I 1 1
I `
,,y I 1 1 1
r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1 I
__-- 1
I I I I I I I I
-i~I I I Iil
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
--- I I I I I 1 1
I -1-1 1 IT I
I 1 1 1 1

C
40% 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 f I l l i i I I 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 1 1 I_ I I 1 1 1
1 1 1 I I 1 1 1
I I I I
i i I 1 1 1 1 1
I I 11 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1
I I 1 1 1 1

CD
30% I I I 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 i I I I I I
I. I I I I I I 1 I I i
I I I I f i t
I I
i i I I I I I I
i I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
I I 1 1 1 1 1

20% 11 111111
_I I I I I_I
__
T "'1 111111
-_I _ I I I 1 1 1 1 1 111 111 1 1 111111 1 111111
i I I
I I I
I

10%
1 I 1 I I I! I
i 11Z
I I I l l l t
-_J_. I_I
1 ? I I I
• I_ 1_(_1 I
I I I
III-
I
I
I I I I I I I
I?_I _ -
_
_
-
I I I I I I I
_I 11_1 I I I

0% I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 17 1 1 i i 1 1 1 1 1 1
[it
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Particle Size (mm)
-u-Cumulative Percent 10000

? Percent Item
Size percent less than mm Percent b substrate type
D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silttcla sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock
4.7 4.7 13.8 44.4 57.1 0% 26% 74% 0% --- --
30
Bold Run Creek Site
Wake County, North Carolina
Stream/Buffer Restoration Plan
Final
Contract No. D05067SD-05067S
State Project No.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
FFR 1 7 2006
_ ` s C3?rdf( w?1TEkQUALITY
X117 f1SFddQ STMA XQVAUER BRAN

February 2006
KCI
ASSOCIATES OF
NORTH CAROLINA, PA
Prepared by: KCI Associates of North Carolina, P.A.
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Manager: April L. Helms
Email: ahelms(a)kci.com
I _
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
EXECUTIVE SUIVINVIARY
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) intends to utilize the Bold Run Creek
Site for a stream and buffer restoration project. This restoration plan presents detailed information
regarding the existing site and watershed conditions, the morphological design criteria developed from a
selected reference reach, and the project design parameters based upon natural channel restoration
methodologies.
The project site is part of a 31-acre parcel owned by NCEEP formerly owned by Mr. Douglas Darch. It is
located 5 miles northwest of the Town of Wake Forest on Bold Hill Run Road, approximately 1.5 miles
east of the intersection with Mangum Dairy Road in Wake County, North Carolina. The property is an
active pasture for cattle grazing. The primary land use on the property is rangeland. Bold Run Creek is a
second order (becomes third order at the confluence with New Light Creek) perennial stream that flows
southwest through the subject property before joining New Light Creek. The project site is within the
Neuse 01 watershed cataloging unit (8-digit HUC: 03020201), in a portion of the NCDWQ Priority Sub-
basin 03-04-08. The NCEEP identifies this HUC as a Targeted Local Watershed.
Based on the following existing and reference condition descriptions, the restoration goals and objectives
for the Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration project are as follows:
Restoration Goals:
¦ Restore a stable channel morphology that is capable of moving the flows and sediment provided by
its watershed;
¦ Improve water quality and reduce land and riparian vegetation loss resulting from lateral erosion and
bed degradation through the establishment of bank and riparian vegetation and,
¦ Enhance aquatic and terrestrial habitat through the improvements to the stream water quality
(improved oxygen content, reduced sediment and nutrients, variable stream bed features).
¦ Improve water quality through approximately 27.1 acres of buffer restoration throughout the project
site.
Restoration Objectives:
¦ Project success will be assessed utilizing measurements of stream dimension, pattern, and profile, site
photographs, and vegetation sampling. These measurements should show little or no change from the
as-built conditions.
¦ A stable channel is able to move the sediment supplied by its watershed without the channel
aggrading or degrading. Through stream monitoring the stability of the restored stream will be
evaluated.
¦ Riparian vegetation must meet a minimum survival success rate of 320 stems/acre after five years.
The design proposes constructing 1,629 linear feet of meandering channel based on Priority Level II and
IV approaches (Table 1). Approximately 1,453.7 linear feet of Level II and 175.6 linear feet of Level IV
will be restored. The Level II restoration will establish a bankfull channel with a new floodplain, a
channel bed at its existing level in an existing gravel layer, and the cross section dimensions necessary to
provide stable flow maintenance and sediment transport. The Level IV design proposes to stabilize the
bed and banks while maintaining the existing channel pattern Bold Run Creek will be restored to Rosgen
stream type C4. Riparian buffers associated with the Bold Run Creek restoration will extend between
fifty (50) to two hundred (200) feet on both sides of the stream. Currently, there are small drainage
features located throughout the project site, which deliver direct runoff to Bold Run Creek. To maintain
the water quality of Bold Run Creek, an approximate 200' buffer will extend on either side of the
features.
i
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Table 1. Project Restoration Structure and Objectives
Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Existing Designed
Restoration Priority Linear Linear
Station Range Type Approach Footage Footage Comment
or or
Acreage Acreage
1,600 1,453.7
(12.75)-(27.60) Stream Priority II Total Linear
Length Feet
1,600 175.6
(11.00)-(12.75) Stream Priority IV Total Linear
Length Feet
Buffer 27.1 Acres
70-
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT SITE IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION ...............................................1
1.1 Directions to Project Site .............................................................................................1
1.2 USGS Hydrologic Unit Code and NCDWQ River Basin Designations ...................... l
2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION ......................................................................... 1
2.1 Drainage Area .............................................................................................................. l
2.2 Surface Water Classification/Water Quality ............................................................... 1
2.3 Physiography, Geology and Soils ................................................................................ 5
2.4 Historical Land Use and Development Trends ............................................................ 5
2.4.1 Historical Resources ................................................................................... 5
2.4.2 Land Use and Development Potential ............................................................ 8
2.5 Endangered/Threatened Species ................................................................................. 8
2.6 Wetlands ..................................................................................................................... 8
2.7 Cultural Resources ...................................................................................................... 8
2.8 Potential Constraints ................................................................................................... 11
2.8.1 Hazardous Materials ....................................................................................... 11
2.8.2 Property Ownership and Boundary ................................................................ 12
2.8.3 Site Access ...................................................................................................... 13
2.8.4 Utilities ........................................................................................................... 13
2.8.5 FEMA/Hydrologic Trespass ........................................................................... 14
3.0 PROJECT SITE STREAMS (EXISTING CONDITIONS) ............................................14
3.1 General Site Description .............................................................................................14
3.2 Channel Classification ................................................................................................18
3.3 Channel Morphology (Pattern, Dimension, and Profile) ............................................18
3.4 Channel Stability Assessment ...................................................................................19
3.5 Bankfull Verification ..................................................................................................19
3.6 Vegetation ...................................................................................................................20
4.0 REFERENCE STREAMS ..................................................................................................21
4.1 Watershed Characterization ........................................................................................21
4.2 Channel Classification .................................................................................................21
4.3 Discharge (Bankfull, Trends) .....................................................................................24
4.4 Channel Morphology (Pattern, Dimension, Profile) ....................................................24
4.5 Vegetation ...................................................................................................................24
5.0 PROJECT SITE RESTORATION PLAN ........................................................................ 25
5.1 Restoration Project Goals and Objectives ................................................................... 25
5.1.1 Designed Channel Classification .................................................................... 25
5.2 Natural Plant Community Restoration ......................................................................... 30
5.2.1 Target Buffer Communities ............................................................................ 30
5.2.2 Planting Zones ................................................................................................ 30
5.2.3 Plant Sources .................................................................................................. 30
5.2.4 Plant Care and Installation .............................................................................. 30
5.2.5 Plant List ......................................................................................................... 32
5.2.6 Schedule ......................................................................................................... 33
5.2.7 Site Preparation and Stabilization ................................................................... 33
5.2.8 Maintenance ................................................................................................... 33
5.2.9 On-site Invasive Species Management ........................................................... 33
5.3 Sediment Transport Analysis ....................................................................................... 33
Is
I
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
6.0 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA ..........................................................................................36
6.1 Streams ........................................................................................................................36
6.2 Vegetation ....................................................................................................................37
6.3 Schedule/Reporting .....................................................................................................37
7.0 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................38
FIGURES
Figure 1. Project Site Vicinity Map .........................................................................................2
Figure 2. North Carolina Ecoregions Map .............................................................................. .3
Figure 3. Project Site Watershed Map ................................................................................... .4
Figure 4. Project Site NRCS Soils Survey Map ..................................................................... .6
Figure 5. Project Site Soil Classification Map ........................................................................ .7
Figure 6. Land Use and Land Cover Map .............................................................................. .9
Figure 7. National Wetland Inventory Map ............................................................................ .10
Figure 8. Project Site Floodplain Map .................................................................................... .15
Figure 9. Existing Channel or Site Conditions Map ............................................................... .16
Figure 10. Project Site Hydrological Features with Gauge Locations Map ............................. .17
Figure 11. Reference Site Vicinity Map ....................................................................................22
Figure 12. Reference Site Watershed Map ................................................................................23
Figure 13. Proposed Planform ...................................................................................................27
Figure 14. Proposed Planting Plan .............................................................................................31
Figure 15. Bold Run Creek River State Diagram ......................................................................35
PLAN SHEETS
Plan Sheet 1. Title Sheet
Plan Sheet 2. Typical Details: Stabilization
Plan Sheet 2A. Typical Cross Sections
Plan Sheet 4. Plan and Profile
Plan Sheet 5. Plan and Profile
Plan Sheet 10. Planting Plan
Plan Sheet 11. Planting Plan
Plan Sheet 12. Planting Plan
TABLES
Table 1. Project Restoration Structure and Objectives .....................Executive Summary
Table 2. Summary of Design Constraints ............................................................................... 11
Table 3. Property Ownership History ..................................................................................... 12
Table 4. Summary of Existing Channel Morphology ............................................................. 18
Table 5. HEC-RAS Hydrologic Variables ............................................................................. 20
Table 6. Priority Levels of Incised River Restoration ............................................................ 28
Table 7. Morphological Design Criteria ................................................................................. 29

Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
A PPF.NDT('F.C
Appendix A. Historical Aerial Photographs
Appendix B. State Agency Correspondence
Appendix C. Environmental Screening Inspection Forms
Appendix D. Wake Electric Easement
Appendix E. Project Site Photographs
Appendix F. Project Site Stream Classification Forms
Appendix G. Existing Conditions
Appendix H. Reference Reach Data
Appendix I. Sediment Transport
I
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
1.0 PROJECT SITE IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) intends to utilize the Bold Run Creek
Site for a stream and buffer restoration project. This restoration plan presents detailed information
regarding the existing site and watershed conditions, the morphological design criteria developed from a
selected reference reach, and the project design parameters based upon natural channel restoration
methodologies.
1.1 Directions to Project Site
The project site is part of a 31-acre parcel owned by NCEEP formerly owned by Mr. Douglas Darch. It is
located 5 miles northwest of the Town of Wake Forest on Bold Hill Run Road, approximately 1.5 miles
east of the intersection with Mangum Dairy Road in Wake County, North Carolina. The site is situated
southwest of Bold Hill Run Road and south from the Granville/Wake County Line (Figure 1. Project Site
Vicinity Map).
1.2 USGS Hydrologic Unit Code and NCDWQ River Basin Designations
Bold Run Creek is a second order (becomes third order at the confluence with New Light Creek)
perennial stream that flows southwest through the subject property before joining New Light Creek.
The project site is situated within the Neuse 01 watershed cataloging unit (8-digit RUC: 03020201) and
the 03020201065010 Local Watershed Unit (14-digit HUC). It also falls within the NCDWQ Subbasin
03-04-08. The NCEEP identifies this HUC as a Targeted Local Watershed. Targeted local watersheds are
those that exhibit the need and opportunity for stream and riparian buffer restoration. The results benefit
water quality, aquatic habitat and other vital watershed functions (NCEEP, 2002)
2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION
The project site is located in a rural setting within the Northern Outer Piedmont ecoregion of the
Piedmont physiographic province (Figure 2. North Carolina Ecoregions Map). Site topography is
characterized as gently rolling hills with elevations ranging from 270 feet above mean sea level (AMSL)
to 320 feet AMSL.
2.1 Drainage Area
The project watershed containing the study area, as seen in Figure 3 (Project Site Watershed Map), drains
approximately 12 square miles (7,650 acres) and occupies the southwest corner of the headwaters of the
Falls Lake Drainage area. The project watershed, which includes Bold Run Creek and New Light Creek,
is located west off of US Highway 1 on the Wake and Granville County Line, with the majority of the
watershed in Granville County.
2.2 Surface Water Classification/Water Quality
For the water resources classification, New Light Creek, as the receiving waters, was used to characterize
Bold Run Creek.
Is
w
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
w
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
GRANVILLE
WAKE

Wake County,
North Carolina
N
Roads
W E
Municipalities
County Boundaries S
KC I 1:63,360
Major Rivers I inch equals I miles
ASSOCIATES OF NC S 1 0.s 0 1
Lakes and Reservoirs Miles
FRANKLIN I
COUNTY
r~
Ecosystem
I
PROGRAM
FRANKLIN
GRANVILL
COUNTY
Bold Run Hill Rd
¦
¦
¦
r
¦
¦
¦

North Carolina Ecoregions
- Carolina Flatwoods
O Carolina Slate Belt -?i
O Northern Outer Piedmont
Rolling Coastal Plain -
- Sand Hills
Southeast- Floodplains and Low Tarr-
Southern Outer Piedmont _
Trianic Basins I --;,
.1.
i
t
V / Y r' + F J.444 3 .
x. U `
Rt ?:
i? Figure 2. North Carolina Ecoregions Map
1
r- t1
1

}r l
?-uF I
i
`A
-i l
Ah, I
Proposed Restoration Site W?E
r?
County Boundaries s IL'osystem
K C I 1:633,600
1 inch equals 10 miles
1o s o 10
ASSOCIATES OF NC Miles
r
? „ri5(l ?tE''- I ? 1 hl? t ? JIr'," - -? 1 ? f / ? •. t? - `,'1 !? ??'
(+ ? I;?? \A?=S) rr f- .1 - -5Z?S11 ?{ E .. 11 - r ,Ml C " 1`_ '`\_.,
+.r Il?? I; r r, 1 j` ?,?s +? I .? el?• {t `? '!tl -- r_.,. ?x,'?\ : •. IY 1? ?-
,< -• f <?, ? 5?j•r?'? `I' .f a ti, i l I ;? '? f• ?}; < ?'_r"
?I ?-l'-:}?t t?4 ? ??(7 ? i ?. t ?J? t ? ?1?J',`` i ?_ ? Irr i R ??•??,°.fr ?- ?+? (I.
1
' , ' -t 1Cv •l 1\ 15 I 11 I 1?i ri r - ?'r
'FT -
A :ni\ ?\ s .?' 1 ? -. t ':1 ? ?--- - ? ? pi'' A• ?. ?1'? I•y? °- ? r?'' pj Vl
Sc a ? ? - -'i,Y?? rr•1 ? `III ? IL. 1 e'?^, - ,I j? ` ,y? ?, 1 I
???5? r I ? f r'I J • tl iti; . ? 1'! 1 r ?? ' ? 1 , ,?1 ? ?? 11 r ?L e,%.
f` y ? 11 ` 1 I '?. I1.. 1? 1 ? ?t e. Jcs r` t i r" :?'J ' -. '' ' •? 1 >?
- 1 fY i /-? _ 4 ?' ?_: !.•., * } ? ?? l.."+?e?':? r / e r;r ? t - 5 Eli ?. ,1 `- J r / /?. 'ti 1 .l _.''
T "!1 ,r=. ' 1?t ,y' iI 1 ( 3 r `? r? t} tilL1l `I, alt
t+ r • I f
l . i'" ?- ??.? e?l Jl ?,• i. ? 1 e ? ;1 _.rii l ,i i• 3 ? 11 rlt?
? J
?(? ? 1 ? '?,? ?? -- i :-yl ,? 1- ,-t1 ?11 ? - it .l ?`?f'• ? ? 5 ` r - ?i ? ? l?
? .? .1 .?Y?} _ ? J j'.-? _ 'l9.,lrl" ?} ??% 5, f 'al} ??- ; ?. ? ? " I f n I ,? ? is • j'
{r. l .l '4. 1 r 1,?? `? ?" .?^ 1???} t•1jr? ?'+ rl "??i I J ?tr• ?1?.?.``v 1?;3?1 ! E ? '11 , ?{ ?I
41 L f,
- r k I is -? .?ti 1 - _ ?_ 1 .,? t 1. 1 I ` •,?-? I/ ?`
t ? J/ 1. -?', `•1` ?7t ., ? , 1 '`. ? ? ? ? ` SI 5 ) ?. I ? - ? 1 - , ' 1 1
1' ??. ?- \i`,,.t -? 1 i= ? 'Itii 1,1 -' E? !'1 ??* I i?'? + .'•' ?? - . _? ? ,- Jl; 1 ?I
y\ ' r ?
ILL-
- t - i?':? rr_ ?' y s'ir' ?1 'r` Ift llt• _?- _.? . ?? _ 1- '1 .-5i'•1 t -11 C .-
?, `
?I
, ? J I
Figure 3. Project Site Watershed Map
Y
Project Watershed
Project Site Bound N
a" ? E Emptem
14-digit HUC 03020201065010 W
K C I //\,/ Streams 1:36,000 PROGRAM
ASSOCIATES OF NC 1 inch equals 3,000 feet
3,000 1,500 0 3,000
Source: USGS "Topographic Quadrangle Grissom, 1987 Feet
Fe-
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
The NCDWQ assigns surface waters a classification in order to help protect, maintain, and preserve water
quality. New Light Creek is designated as WS-IV, NSW, and CA. The project area (Bold Run Creek) is
located upstream from this designated portion.
• WS-IV waters are used as sources of drinkable water, which are also protected for Class C uses. WS-
IV waters are generally in moderately to highly developed watersheds or Protected Areas (NCDENR,
2005). Class C uses are "waters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish and aquatic
life propagation and survival, agriculture and other uses suitable for Class C" (NCDENR, 2005).
• Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) is a supplemental classification intended for waters needing
additional nutrient management due to their being subject to excessive growth of microscopic or
macroscopic vegetation. In general, management strategies for point and nonpoint source pollution
control require control of nutrients (nitrogen and/or phosphorus usually) such that excessive growths
of vegetation are reduced or prevented and there is no increase in nutrients over target levels.
Management strategies are site-specific (NCDENR, 2005).
• Class CA waters indicate a Critical Area within a water supply watershed (NCDENR, March 2005).
2.3 Physiography, Geology and Soils
Local geology consists of metamorphic rocks of the Raleigh Belt. These include metamorphosed biotite
gneiss and schist, meta-ultramafic rock, and felsic mica gneiss.
According to the NRCS, Wake County Soil Survey, Chewacla (Cm), Wehadkee silt loam (Wn),
Wehadkee and Bibb soils (Wo), Altavista fine sandy loam 0 to 4 percent slopes (AfA), Madison sandy
laom 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded (MdE2) and Wilkes soils 20 to 45 percent slopes (WwF) are the
predominant soil types located within the project boundary (Figure 4. Project Site NRCS Soils Survey
Map).
However, during a July 14, 2005 field investigation, Steven Stokes, LSS mapped the predominant soils as
a Chewacla variant with inclusions of Riverview (Figure 5. Project Site Soil Classification Map).
According to the Wake County Soil Survey, Chewacla (Cm) is described as a somewhat poorly drained
soil. The Chewacla soils investigated on the project site were well to moderately well drained soils,
therefore the Chewacla variant classification was selected to describe these soils. Riverview soils are
currently not mapped by the Wake County NRCS.
2.4 Historical Land Use and Development Trends
2.4.1 Historical Resources
Historical aerial photographs were obtained from the Wake County Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) office in order to enhance the assessment of existing site conditions. The intent of the
review was to understand the chronology of land disturbance and aid in the evaluation of the site and the
development of an appropriate restoration strategy. Aerial photographs of the site were obtained from
1949, 1954, 1965, 1971, 1981, 1988, and 1993 (Appendix A).
In 1949, the subject property closely resembled the existing conditions, however the area on the west of
the project site appears to be forested.
In 1959, 1965, and 1971, the subject property resembles current conditions.
In 1981, the subject property appears to be reforested in the north section.
5
Is
f7 - , r Soil Series
MAfA -Altavista Fine Sandy Loam, 0 To 4 Percent Slopes
®AsC2 - Appling Fine Sandy Loam, 6 To 10 Percent Slopes, Eroded
=AgB2 - Appling Gravelly Sandy Loam, 2 To 6 Percent Slopes, Eroded
=AgC2 - Appling Gravelly Sandy Loam, 6 To 10 Percent Slopes, Eroded
=Au - Augusta Fine Sandy Loam
MCIE3 - Cecil Clay Loam, 10 To 20 Percent Slopes, Severely Eroded
=CeB2 - Cecil Clay Loam, 2 To 6 Percent Slopes, Eroded
= CeC2 - Cecil Clay Loam, 6 To 10 Percent Slopes, Eroded
MCIC3 - Cecil Clay Loam, 6 To 10 Percent Slopes, Severely Eroded
=CeD - Cecil Sandy Loam, 10 To 15 Percent Slopes
=CeB2 - Cecil Sandy Loam, 2 To 6 Percent Slopes, Eroded
®CeC2 - Cecil Sandy Loam, 6 To 10 Percent Slopes, Eroded
=Cm - Chewacla Soils
A =MdD2 - Madison Sandy Loam, 10 To 15 Percent Slopes, Eroded
=MdE2 - Madison Sandy Loam, 15 To 25 Percent Slopes, Eroded
OMdB2 - Madison Sandy Loam, 2 To 6 Percent Slopes, Eroded
i ,. EM MdC2 - Madison Sandy Loam, 6 To 10 Percent Slopes, Eroded
MPaE - Pacolet Sandy Loam, 10 To 25 Percent Slopes
= WmE - Wedowee Sandy Loam, 15 To 25 Percent Slopes
o Wo - Wehadkee And Bibb Soils
o Wn - Wehadkee Silt Loam
\I = WwE - Wilkes Soils, 10 To 20 Percent Slopes (WwE)
®WwF - Wilkes Soils, 20 To 45 Percent Slopes
J
a!
K C I
ASSOCIATES OF NC

Wn
Figure 4. Project Site NRCS Soils Survey Map
Project Site Boundary
/\/ Stream s
S<mrce: Wake C-1y Soit Survey
N
W_?_ t=
s
1:3,600
1 inch equals 300 feet
300 150 0
300
Feet
rPROGRAM
4
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
In 1988 and 1993, the subject property appears to resemble current conditions; no significant differences
are discernable at the scale and quality of the photo.
The stream channel appeared to follow the pattern observable today. No changes in either the stream
valley or stream channel within the project area were observed in the historical aerial photographs.
Therefore, any alterations to the stream channel occurred prior to 1949. No significant changes have
occurred in the project area since 1949.
2.4.2 Land Use and Development Potential
An Anderson Level I classification indicates that the contributing drainage area consists of forest (79%),
agriculture (13%), rangeland (6%), urban (<1%), and wetlands / open water (2%) land use / land cover
(Figure 6. Land Use and Land Cover Map). Land use around the project area is mostly forest with new
residential developments (NCDENR, November 2001).
The property is an active pasture for cattle grazing. No machinery or structures are located on the subject
property. The primary land use on the property is rangeland. New Light Creek forms the western
property boundary, while Bold Hill Run Road borders the eastern boundary, respectively.
2.5 Endangered/Threatened Species
A formal review by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) was requested in July 2005 to
identify the presence of rare species, critical habitats, and priority natural areas on the project site and to
determine the potential impact of the proposed project on these resources. In their Findings Letter dated
September 20, 2005 (Appendix B), the NHP indicated "no record of rare species, significant natural
communities, or priority natural areas at the site or within 0.7-mile of the project area". In addition, no
threatened or endangered species were identified in the project area during the existing conditions site
assessment. Also, a formal review by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) was
requested in July 2005, however, no correspondence has been returned.
2.6 Wetlands
A review of the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps for the project area identified no wetland
systems (Figure 7. National Wetland Inventory Map). The NWI maps were reviewed using the 200-feet
buffer width.
Criteria to delineate and/or determine whether wetlands are jurisdictional include evidence of hydric soils,
hydrophytic vegetation and evidence of certain hydrologic characteristics during the growing season.
Using the aforementioned wetland criteria, no wetlands were found in the project area during the field
investigation.
2.7 Cultural Resources
To evaluate the presence of significant cultural resources on the subject property and the potential that the
proposed project would impact them, KCI requested a formal review at the North Carolina Department of
Cultural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). The formal SHPO review identified one
historic architecture site, the W.D. Bailey House. The site is located approximately one mile east of the
project site. It is not anticipated that this record occurrence would be impacted by the proposed
restoration project. (See Appendix B). The formal review by the State Archeology Office identified no
potential archeology sites on or around the subject property.
8

V ? IMF %%, -140,
4L
-? 6
r
r,6 r ?• s
a .,?.
5 16
r
. am . or
'? •? • w"
C3 IN
J ?
w ? ? yR
o±
Ist
•?
on
Project Site •?• ? ? '
met,
l-
Figure 6. Land Use and Land Cover Map
Land Use and Land Cover (Anderson I) [=Project Watershed
Q Urban or Built-Up Land Project Site Boundary
- Agriwllure
® Rangeland N
Forest Land
W E
- Water
KC I Z:J Q Wetland a
Barren Land 1:36,000
1 inch equals 3,000 feet
ASSOCIATES OF NC Sou,., NorrhCcvolinaGAPL,nrdCa,,,.D , 3,000 1,500 0 3,000
Published 2003 Fed
?, et
tFcosystem
.?ta??
PROGRAM
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
2.8 Potential Constraints
The presence of conditions or characteristics that have the potential to hinder restoration activities on the
project site were evaluated. Existing information regarding project site constraints was acquired and
reviewed. In addition, any site conditions that have the potential to restrict the restoration design and
implementation were documented during the field investigation. Table 2 summarizes the identified
constraints related to the implementation of site restoration activities.
Tnhle 2_ Snmmnrv of De-don Cnin-drninft.
Fatal Flaw/Constraint Nature of Constraint Proposed Resolution
Current Land Use (Specify) Pasture livestock grazing) Exclusion fencing as necessary
Forest, Agriculture, Low-
Adjacent Property Land Use Density Residential
Development
Utility easement crosses project The stream has been relocated to
Deed Restrictions/Easements site minimize the impacts of the power
lines on the stream/buffer restoration.
Project Constructibili /Access None
Utility poles cross project site Stream crossings have been proposed
Utilities to provide continued maintenance
access, post-restoration.
Structures None
State Historic Preservation
Office (Appendix B) indicated
Cultural no record of occurrences within
(Historical/Archaeological) one-mile radius of the project
site
Natural Heritage Program
Findings Letter (Appendix B)
Rare, Threatened, and indicated no record of
Endangered Species occurrences within one-mile
radius of the project site
Natural Features (Soils, Bedrock outcrops in streambed Identified bedrock incorporated into
Bedrock and banks the design.
FEMA Regulated Area Project area within Zone X and No-Rise Certification
I AE
2.8.1 Hazardous Materials
The presence or likely presence of hazardous substances on the subject property and surrounding area
under conditions that indicate a past, present or potential release into the ground, groundwater, or surface
water was evaluated. The evaluation included a review of public record environmental database
information and a visual site inspection.
A report meeting ASTM E1527-00 Standards for records search requirements was obtained summarizing
existing federal and state database information regarding known environmental conditions for the subject
property and surrounding area. No conditions of environmental concern were identified on the Bold Run
Project Site or within the specified search radii.
11
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
An Environmental Screening Inspection (ESI) was conducted on the subject property in June 2005. The
purpose of the ESI was to visually evaluate the presence or evidence of any recognized environmental
concerns on the study site and surrounding areas. The ESI identified no recognized environmental
concerns that would have the potential to impact stream and buffer restoration on the project site. The
findings of the field investigation were documented on an Environmental Screening Inspection Form with
corresponding photographs (Appendix Q.
2.8.2 Property Ownership and Boundary
KCI obtained copies of the property deed dating back to 1950 from the Wake County Register of Deeds
in August 2005 (Table 3). The property deeds can be found on the CD included with the Restoration
Report.
Tnhle 3_ Prnnerty Ownembin Histnrv
Book Page Grantee (Buyer) Grantor Seller Date
9541 961 NC Capital Group Purnell Road Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 8/14/2002
Darch
9485 157 Marvin E. Sykes, Jr. Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 7/2/2002
Darch
8537 1861 John M. Rich, A. Melanie Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 3/8/2002
Murphy Darch
8300 1508 Christopher J. Marek Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 4/22/1999
Darch
8256 1188 Glen A. Darch, Susan K. Darch Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 2/18/1999
Darch
8169 1569 NCDOT Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 10/20/1998
Darch
8085 1493 William H. Steiner, Betty JoAnne Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 6/11/1998
Steiner Darch

3685
265 State of North Carolina, Right of Douglas A. Darch and Helen C.
3/25/1997
Agreement Darch
6982 77 John Wade Stone, Shirley B. Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 4/16/1996
Stone Darch
3015 568 David C. Darch
Carrie M. Darch Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 2/28/1994
, Darch
5922 405 M. Medlin Jr.
C Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 12/7/1993
. Darch
5918 351 Lee Arnold Darch, Alison Wood Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 12/7/1993
Darch Darch
4701 923 Lee Arnold Darch, Alison Wood Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 5/3/1990
Darch Darch
4490 703 Mildred P. Davis, Geneva P. Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 5/8/1989
Stephenson Darch
3977 571 Glen A. Darch Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 3/7/1987
Darch
3692 925 Jack L. Taylor, Jr., Patricia L. Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 4/1/1986
Taylor Darch
3420 439 Edward Paschal, Beadie Bridges Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 1/24/1985
Darch
12
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
3420 434 Edward Paschal, Martha M. Douglas A. Darch and Helen C.

Leonard
Darch 1/21/1985
3232 459 Champion International Douglas A. Darch and Helen C.

Corporation
Darch 1/30/1984
2848 845 C.M. Kirk Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 7/25/1980
Darch
2831 53 Richard O. Gamble Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 5/27/1980
Darch, Lee A. Darch, Patty C. Darch
2830 92 David C. Darch Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 4/10/1980
Darch
2227 537 C.M. Kirk Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 2/20/1974
Darch
2020 487 Edward Paschal, P.C. Bailey Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 9/1/1971
Darch
1707 185 Donald Gulley, Central Carolina Douglas A. Darch and Helen C.

Bank and Trust Company
Darch 4/1/1966
1587 661 Donald Gulley, Central Carolina Douglas A. Darch and Helen C.

Bank and Trust Company 2/25/1964
1368 145 W.W. Sledge, Durham Bank & Douglas A. Darch and Helen C.

Trust Company
Darch 5/21/1959
1335 535 W.W. Sledge, Durham Bank & Douglas A. Darch and Helen C.

Trust Company
Darch 10/4/1958
1143 151 W.W. Sledge, Durham Bank & Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 2/12/1954
Trust Company
1061 344 Donald Gulley, P.V. Bailey, Lena Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 12/8/1950
S. Bailey Darch
1061 332 Donald Gulley, Charles L. Douglas A. Darch and Helen C. 12/8/1950
Wheelous Darch
2.8.3 Site Access
There will be two access points to the project site. Both access points will be accessible from Bold Hill
Run Road. The first access point currently exists off of Bold Hill Run Road located on the southeastern
corner of the project site. The second access point will be established on the southeastern portion of the
project, located northwest from the first access entrance. The accessible road will be approximately (170'
x 14') which leads directly to the right of way for access to the utility line. During construction of the
proposed stream, construction equipment will have access to the stream channel and will be able to
maneuver up and down the channel, as necessary.
2.8.4 Utilities
A power line easement (Wake Electric) transects the subject property in a southeast-northwest orientation.
The documentation for the power line easement can be found in Appendix D. Wake Electric has a 100
feet right of way along the utility line. During construction and post construction, Wake Electric will have
access to the utility poles located on the project site. Wake Electric will access the site by way of the two
existing entrances mentioned in section (2.8.3). Two stabilized riffle grade control crossings will be
installed for machinery access to the utility lines located adjacent to the stream (Refer to Plan Sheet 4).
Also no vegetation will be planted along the 100-foot utility easement and access road on the project site.
13
F -e
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
2.8.5 FEMA/Hydrologic Trespass
Bold Run Creek is located within the 100-year floodplain (Figure 8. Project Site Floodplain Map). As
such, any modifications to the stream that would result in the increase of the 100-year flood elevation
would require a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR). It is the intent of the restoration design
to maintain the 100-year flood elevation at the current level following restoration.
The FEMA provided an existing conditions HEC-2 model. The model parameters were reviewed to
verify that the conditions represent a benchmark hydraulic condition that can be compared to post-
restoration conditions. The existing conditions model will be revised to reflect changes to the channel
and floodplain as a result of the restoration. A proposed hydrology and hydraulics (H&H) summary will
be submitted with a letter indicating that an increase in the 100-year flood elevation is not anticipated
(No-Rise Certification).
The proposed project reach is entirely contained within the Darch property. The restoration of the project
reach is not anticipated to produce hydrologic trespass conditions on any adjacent properties.
3.0 PROJECT SITE STREAMS (EXISTING CONDITIONS)
A site field assessment was conducted in June 2005 to document existing conditions and evaluate the
potential for stream and riparian buffer restoration. Observations and collected data are summarized
below, illustrated in Figure 9 (Existing Channel or Site Conditions Map), and documented in the site
photographs (Appendix E). The site was revisited several times from June to September 2005 to take
further measurements, to install a stream gauge, and to collect hydrology data from the instruments
(Figure 10. Project Site Hydrologic Features and Gauge Locations Map).
3.1 General Site Description
The Bold Run Creek project reach includes approximately 1,600 linear feet of perennial stream channel.
The project reach begins at Station 11+00. Several stream bedrocks exist in the upper reach. The
upstream portion of Bold Run Creek is a "B4c" and "F4" stream type, while the downstream portion is a
"G4c" stream type. Severe bank erosion throughout the stream has resulted from poor grazing
management. Bed degradation is evident and sedimentation from bank erosion is widespread.
One tributary (UT1) and one ephemeral channel enter Bold Run Creek. UT1 is a small, intermittent reach
that joins Bold Run Creek near Station 12+00. The ephemeral channel is located near the downstream
portion of Bold Run Creek. The channel starts at the bottom of a slope and runs parallel before
connecting with Bold Run Creek at Station 23+00. The channel was ditched in the early 1960's to
intercept runoff from the adjacent slope. Stream assessment forms were prepared for the channel; they
are included in Appendix F.
Four (4) drainage features exist on the project site. Drainage 1 connects to the left bank of Bold Run
Creek near the start of the project at Station 11+75. Drainage 2 starts at Bold Hill Run Road and directly
connects to Bold Run Creek. Drainage 3 connects to the right bank of Bold Run Creek in the middle
portion of the stream reach. Drainage 4 begins with two small drainage features beginning at the eastern
portion of the project boundary, near Bold Hill Run Road. The two drainage features connect to a larger
drainage feature in the middle of the project site, in the open field area, and runs south before connecting
to New Light Creek on the left bank.
14

Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
A power line easement transects the project site with four (4) utility poles. The first utility pole is located
approximately 20 feet from the right stream bank. The second utility pole is located approximately 40
feet from the right stream bank near Station 16+50. The third utility pole is centrally located in the project
site and the fourth pole is situated adjacent to New Light Creek.
3.2 Channel Classification
The upstream portion of Bold Run Creek is classified as a "B4c" and "F4" stream type. The stream
begins as a moderately entrenched channel (1.7) with a moderate width-to-depth ratio (12.6). Proceeding
downstream, the channel becomes entrenched and widens as the stream transitions into an "F" type
channel. Near Station 24+00, the channel narrows as Bold Run Creek changes to a "G4c" type stream.
Low width-to-depth and entrenchment ratios and high bank height ratios are typical of "G" type streams.
3.3 Channel Morphology (Pattern, Dimension, and Profile)
A Rosgen Level III assessment was conducted to gather existing stream dimension, pattern, and profile
data and determine the potential for restoration. Channel cross-sections and bed materials were surveyed
at six representative locations along Bold Run Creek. Data developed from these surveys are summarized
below (Table 4) with detailed data provided in Appendix G.
Table 4. Summarv of Existinz Channel Morphology
LOCATION
XS-1 XS-2 XS-3 XS-4 XS-5 XS-6
PARAMETER
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area 25.0 24.2 25.3 25.2 24.2 24.7
Abkf s ft
Bankfull Width 17.8 26.5 15.7 17.2 18.3 14.8
Wbkf ft
Flood Prone Width 30.0 34.3 18.3 19.4 21.3 18.5
Wf a ft
Maximum Depth 1.9 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.3
dmbkf ft
Bankfull Mean Depth 1.4 0.9 1.6 1.5
I 1.3 1.7
Dbkf (ft)
W/11) ratio 12.6 29.1 9.7 11.7 13.8 8.8
Wbkf/ dbkf
Entrenchment Ratio 1.7 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.3
Bank Height Ratio 1.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.6
Local W. S. Slope (ft/ft) 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007
Stream Type 134c F4 G4c G4c F4 G4c
18
I
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
3.4 Channel Stability Assessment
A qualitative stability assessment was performed to approximate the level of departure and determine the
likely causes of the channel disturbance. This assessment facilitates the decision-making process with
respect to restoration alternatives and establishing goals for successful restoration.
Bold Run Creek exhibits characteristics of an unstable channel, most notably bed degradation and bank
erosion. Poor grazing management is the primary mechanism of disturbance, however the past removal
of bank and riparian vegetation has exacerbated the bank erosion (eliminated rooting strength and cover
protection). Bank height ratios in excess of 1.5, as well as the presence of several exposed bedrocks in
Bold Run Creek, provide evidence of past bed degradation. Based on the field measurements, further
degradation and widening can be expected in the lower section of the project before it will be aggrade and
re-stabilize at the lowered base elevation.
3.5 Bankfull Verification
The standard methodology used in natural channel design is based on the ability to select the appropriate
bankfull discharge and generate the corresponding bankfull hydraulic geometry from a stable reference
system(s). Thus, the determination of bankfull stage is the most critical component of the natural channel
design (NCD) process.
Bankfull can be defined as "the stage at which channel maintenance is most effective, that is, the
discharge at which moving sediment, forming or removing bars, forming or changing bends and
meanders, and generally doing work that results in the average morphologic characteristics of the
channels," (Dunne and Leopold, 1978). Several characteristics that commonly indicate the bankfull stage
include: incipient point of flooding, breaks in slope, changes in vegetation, highest depositional features
(i.e. point bars), and highest scour line. The identification of bankfull stage especially in a degraded
system can be difficult. Therefore, verification measures must be taken to ensure the correct
identification of the bankfull stage.
The three methods used to verify bankfull stage at Bold Run Creek were regional hydraulic geometry
relationships (regional curves), a pressure transducer/data logger combination gauge that monitored actual
water level in Bold Run Creek throughout the study period, and a hydrology/hydraulics model to evaluate
flow and sediment transport.
Regional curves are typically utilized in ungauged areas to approximate bankfull discharge, area, width,
and depth as a function of drainage area based on inter-related variables from other similar streams in the
same hydrophysiographic province. Regional curves and corresponding equations from "Bankfull
Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams" (Harman et al., 1999) were used to
approximate bankfull in the project reach. Based on the regional curves, a bankfull discharge and cross-
sectional area of 130 ft3/s and 25 ft2 would be anticipated.
Stream stage data (water levels) were collected from Bold Run Creek. Data was collected for four
months (July through October) and water levels were correlated to an estimated discharge using a rating
curve generated for the gauged section. During the gauging period, no significant storm events were
recorded. The maximum discharge event was approximately 14 ft /s on October 8t'. KCI will continue to
monitor the stage of Bold Run Creek in an attempt to validate the design discharge. Hydrograph data is
provided in Appendix 1.
Information from the regional curves and from the hydrologic monitoring was used in conjunction with
the Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) software to refine the bankfull
19

Fe-
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
determinations. The model allows for analysis of one-dimensional (1-D) steady state flow by solving for
the energy equation. The approximate discharges calculated using the Manning open channel flow
equation were run through the modeled reaches. The outputs corresponded well with the field indicators
and to the subsequent calculations of the existing morphological variables. A summary data output
developed from the model is provided below (Table 5).
Table 5. HEC-IZAS H drolo is Variables
Station Profile Bed Elev. WS Elev. EG Elev. EG Sloe Velocity Area Width F.N.
Units cfs ft AMSL ft AMSL ft AMSL ft/ft fps sf ft
XS1 BKF 120.0 275.46 277.60 277.95 0.010 4.74 25.34 19.9 0.74
XS2 BKF 120.0 274.80 276.78 276.55 0.010 4.63 25.89 22.69 0.76
XS3 BKF 120.0 272.34 274.73 274.93 0.005 3.59 33.46 22.94 0.52
XS4 BKF 120.0 271.53 273.78 274.17 0.009 5.06 23.8 15.74 0.72
XS5 BKF 120.0 268.29 270.73 271.08 0.008 4.74 25.3 16.96 0.68
XS6 BKF 120.0 267.11 269.32 268.86 0.007 4.65 25.81 15.83 0.64
3.6 Vegetation
The existing riparian area is predominantly in pasture. These areas are largely devoid of natural habitat
communities. Mature trees sporadically line the channel throughout the project reach. Also mature trees
are located along the hill slope bordering Bold Run on the left bank. It is the intent of the restoration
project to salvage any valuable trees that may provide immediate shade to the restored channel.
On July 14, 2005, Steven Stokes and April Helms classified the existing natural communities in
accordance with a "Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Third Approximation"
(Schafale and Weakley, 1990). The flora, including dominant species per stratum, were identified and
recorded.
Two community types were identified within the project area. The first community was classified as
Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest. This community is located in the southeastern portion of the
project, near Bold Hill Run Road. The dominant species observed in this community are as follows:
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), Black Walnut (Juglans nigra),
Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda), and Winged Elm (Ulmus alata).
The second community was classified as Piedmont/Mountain Levee Forest. This community is located
along the levee of New Light Creek and the banks of Bold Run Creek. The dominant species observed
along the levee of New Light Creek are as follows: American Elm (Ulmus americana), Sweet Gum
(Liquidambar styracijlua), River Birch (Betula nigra), Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), and
Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense). The dominant species observed along the banks of Bold Run Creek
are as follows: Sycamore, Southern magnolia (Magnolia grandijlora), Vietnamese Stilt Grass
(Microstigium viminium), River Birch, and Black Walnut.
20
Is
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
4.0 REFERENCE STREAMS
A reference reach is a channel with a stable dimension, pattern, and profile within particular valley
morphology. The reference reach is used to develop dimensionless morphological ratios (based on
bankfull stage) that can be extrapolated to disturbed/unstable streams to restore a stream of the same type
and disposition as the reference stream (Rosgen, 1998).
• An upstream reach of Richland Creek located on the west side of the Town of Wake Forest was selected
to serve as a reference reach for the restoration of Bold Run Creek. Richland Creek flows south from its
headwaters in Franklin County towards its confluence with the Neuse River (Figure 11. Reference Site
Vicinity Map). It drains approximately 4.8 square miles of low-density residential, agriculture, and
• forested lands. This selection was based on: location in the same hydrophysiographic province, similar
valley morphology, and similar sediment regime as the project site. Both streams are found in the
northern outer Piedmont ecoregion where local topography is relatively consistent with each other.
Approximately 400 linear feet of Richland Creek were surveyed in August 2004 and re-evaluated in
August 2005 (Appendix H contains supporting documentation from the field assessment). This reach of
Richland Creek was classified as a "C4" channel type. The dimensionless hydraulic geometry
relationships were developed from stable channel dimensions to facilitate the design of the proposed
channel cross-sections for the Bold Run Creek restoration reach.
4.1 Watershed Characterization
Richland Creek is situated within the northeastern portion of the Piedmont physiographic province, which
- is typified by rolling topography with broad ridges, sharply indented stream valleys, and narrow, low-
gradient floodplains. The Richland Creek watershed (USGS 14-digit Hydrologic Unit 03020201070060)
is located within sub-basin 03-04-02 of the Neuse River Basin. The headwaters of the Richland Creek
form to the west and south of Youngsville, North Carolina. The watershed extends south-southwest to a
point approximately 1.5 miles downstream of the Falls Reservoir Dam where Richland Creek joins the
Neuse River.
• The portion of Richland Creek evaluated for the reference survey is located between the Franklin/Wake
County Line and Harris Road in Wake Forest, North Carolina. Capital Boulevard (US 1) roughly bounds
the watershed to the west and the Seaboard Coast Railroad Line bounds it to the east (Figure 12.
j Reference Site Watershed Map). The topographic relief within the project reach is approximately 25 feet,
• ranging from approximately 282 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) at the upstream limits of Section 1 to
257 feet AMSL at the downstream limits at the Stadium Drive Bridge.
4.2 Channel Classification
Richland Creek is classified as a "C4" stream type. The majority of the cross-section calculations contain
an entrenchment ratio greater than 2.2, for a "C" or "E" with a width to depth ratio slightly greater 12.
21
•
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Y
P.
•
Wake County, North Carolina " - •?
{
'J
Cl)
-..rte .
f
- r --- fir-,. -
f
Wake County. -- r' 4 ?--?
Figure 11. Referencp"Site ' 'nity Map
? r
UY
n 8 1 2006 J[f
l /Reference Reach on Richland Creek k N
???.../// wE rLA'i MD Siii ATER 8 E {'?CO?,Stell l
K C 1:11,000 PROGRAM
1 inch equals 1,000 feet
,000
Fe
ASSOCIATES OF NC source: usGsTopographicQuo&,mgles 1,000 500 0 '
Fee[
Grissom and Frankfinton
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1/ J v° ?! • ._-.? ?.?j t -, / - _ r ?. 't i 1 ? ' fl \.il i?? J? 1 r`-/ r t.v ?'? \?•
:+,?5?
% ?.,/? 1 (:'??,r<.}S? ?e:.?ff-.?i'` ,?.r.`•'M1?l?r,?" ?\? ? r ???/ l?fz.?`?rl ?*-? -? '?i \?}ii\i?("`!t( -r,-?/( ?\i`1:
Jy'../ (r /?•`.?} ,/\ v'? ?(_, ..)t?tc t? I )? /`'), 4'- /ir"j?t r ?.?'/?, \ :\: `J F.l?) 1r \\ -\
`t,i:
\ Ir r/ ? ?_ i (? L. ,? ? s? ray ( ??; . i ( ? 4 /?..?`,
rf 11? ?-?f L J? l/ p' s ? t^? ;} i \ "" ` L ' i ?' 1 i', 1 ?'
1, y*j (I l
r J I/ \
------ ---- f,;;,
\\V011` I ?i%? t. ? ?J/i 4?`?
1 ( 1Ld ? r ? i?
' j S
\/
--1 Ic
7(
1J/?,?`r???l f i. i? //?- , f ? ._??;Ir%R\ T C` 1, V? tom,.- _._..fa ? '' ?i 6'"^? fJ 1i? ?% .'?? t t ? ?6 -? l !`? (?`C }1.
A "' /?l i?` Iwr -!?a i??? t II i t ? I I t ! \??.. ,?
???'? ~ ?` f?? •r"?'? ?\? ???Ot? /? n:32 +i?c } r'? r?i' ;?/` ? (J`? - - .??' 1 1. { t r :.:7 ?II f ??-rj(y?`^ `,ti. 1\.
v(, 1 S t ,, % 1// ??_ra t? .t' Y \? 1? 1 ?% ?1! /? (7rt rt l? 1 .? G
`?\ i ? Y\J l??`????a?l 1?{{ '? \ ?"??' {.? J r'rr J?'. %? _ ? ^•?? ? C ' '_`?? i `5 ?\1 r <J/? ??!,>, ?\ r /:
S I 1 i ?? ?? f/ ? t J
??l d ?.? I?????'?j ??. r- f ??-',???? t., ?/ r l? ?. / ( R? V '';? LSD ' a ?_?? ? ?- r V. t t CJr ?'
(?= ?J?.?--.? T ?w S;-.. ? ( ?I j ((C ? r ? i ? I ?/?C : Il ? - r,w? '?? o ? .?- ?./?- _ (?, - ? I r .r
i t1 ?\ \ X131 t}t.I ?:) "f??_ , ??J \t;/
/ r-? ((?. ?. '?? I? ? j\?/ tJt / r' ! - / //r/i r,% ( r ? fn Ir y:. .? 4 ry
(i f{ ? -_l"_. ) I .gip %. 1,?-??b ?A!\?? } \%itt5; L i r ??J`'?' r It ??.,_ ? -'-•? /??.
\-. l \y 12??? J (?l
Sr
"`,??`?\????!'f ?. ;-''° ?fqqi" .,? ?\vA\v`*, {??? 4 i(?r?.., J" --/ /,• Jli li
'Lk .' ?i 1 ( 1(.. `-?`:.?•lI1 %. R,;.?/? 1 i t'\>'?\'??r l.J% 1 (( R '; , (r Jl v' \-:?. r l r. jt
,(,J.. s i?rs ti;???.? ?(C.% 1?)K!,+ ?t ' J JJVVr 1 r
?f J .1 Y i h1 l i?ELI,
I,, v
1?•' }?i J
s C `?../ r 1 fl rr'' , . \ (? i '\1?•.• ' r (''?,?t`?'? ? j ?1 ?, ?. .. ? %-- =-=-5?"?' 1 ?' ` j t' . ` _? ? /'?' - ?
\?-? :yam ^ ?..+. (.?? ?,v? k17" j?'l S.FLn?VI .1.V J-,1. c.`?VA.- J 1 A •? ?. i}S t .:3 ?, l(?,
1r .., t! v,.;;,,1 f i " \, J ii r r\ ( 7` ?'?i\ \ `?. S! _ ( r I >•?' i I ?` 1t\
`r u ?1 ,A ly l t ) j! , ?v ?r r? J ?r, l 1i A ? _ ! J ,' . i I }
y:. t e ?frv r I l? i t I ?'? r
1
i??? ) S 1 1.??" ,(? ?? %?11?- //;qf??/ ,,'?. C ??/? cso ?? Imo, ?; ?r V1 .0
-3j ???? )\?i-??'sli? ? 'rM? IfJ.??.-?. ..,?? s??;( , \?'?., ,--?? E I ? ? tls-? ?1),???? ?
L-
'?. ?t"9?r?`?'1? , •`? l1?iJ` "?(??.,=i(- r......\ -f `-?.-\???j _/ ?1?? t ?J. - f;_:f?
? f ?! i., ?..-?L 1 ?+;t {V? \?1. / i?. /1! ? ?,r;? •lAA S? ? ? ? I 1 ? •? ?.a,-?? ,i c ?..ll ?
!-„?.A Ii',?°r?? - ?'t ••s? ,ty tC '\, 1''n l'. ?r,.f .?.
{ Y
(4 ? 1 _•<? ? ?`1t''r? il. .?`-i ??1?i?J?,/w ? ?c?\ / i Ji r rY /? - t II?. ' i!?/ i \ ?'+ ..J? t ?' J -
Figure 12. Reference Site Wat
/N/ Reference Reach 2GG6 IS-
Reference Site Watershed aUH+r11?
? - - - pEN12 • wSSOR?AZER ??CH ??'
14-digit HUC 03020201070060 KC I 1'30'000 PKO( KAM
1 inch equals 2,500 feet
ASSOCIATES OF NC 2,500 1,250 0 2,500
Source: Franklin County DRG Mom"Feet
. Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
. 4.3 Discharge (Bankfull, Trends)
Following the field assessment, three methods were used to verify the bankfull stage at Richland Creek.
• These methods included regional hydraulic geometry relationships (regional curves), a pressure
• transducer / data logger combination gauge that monitored actual water level in Richland Creek
throughout the study period, and a hydrology/hydraulics model (HEC-RAS) to evaluate flow and validate
field calls.
Regional curves and corresponding equations from "Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for
North Carolina Streams" (Harman et al., 1999) were used to approximate bankfull in the project reach.
Based on the regional curves, a bankfull discharge and cross-sectional area of 270 W/s and 70 ft2 would
be anticipated at the Richland Creek Reference Reach.
Stream stage data (water levels) were collected downstream of the Richland Creek Reference Reach.
Data was collected for five months and water levels were correlated to an estimated discharge using a
rating curve generated for the gauged section. Three significant flow events occurred during the
monitoring period. Richland Creek in the vicinity of the gauge discharged 309, 185, and 155 ft3/s for
each of these events, respectively. This corresponded to a maximum discharge of approximately 210 -
220 ft /s in the reference reach.
The hydrology/hydraulics model provided a water surface profile and cross-sectional depiction based on
. the sections surveyed during the reference reach assessment. This method provided a further means to
validate the discharge approximated in the reference reach section, as well as verify the field-call bankfull
stage.
- 4.4 Channel Morphology (Pattern, Dimension, Profile)
- A Rosgen Level III assessment was conducted to gather existing stream dimension, pattern, and profile
• data and determine the potential for restoration. Channel cross-sections and bed materials were surveyed
at five representative locations along Richland Creek. Data developed from these surveys are provided in
Appendix H.
4.5 Vegetation
A field survey was conducted to identify and document the dominant plant communities in the project
area. Several distinct community mosaics were recognized, and complete species lists with dominance
were compiled. These lists were utilized to best fit the communities described in the Classification of
Natural Communities of North Carolina (Schafale & Weakley, 1990). The natural community in the
reference area was the Piedmont Levee Forest. Piedmont Levee Forests are prevalent along the active
levee position of Richland Creek. Woody species of the canopy include Fraxinus pennsylvanica (green
ash), Platanus occidentalis (sycamore), Betula nigra (river birch), Liquidambar styraciflua (sweet gum),
Acer negundo (boxelder), and Juglans nigra (black walnut). Species in the overstory dominate those in
the understory.
24
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
5.0 PROJECT SITE RESTORATION PLAN
5.1 Restoration Project Goals and Objectives
Based on the existing and reference condition descriptions, the restoration goals and objectives for the
Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration project are as follows:
i Restoration Goals:
¦ Restore a stable channel morphology that is capable of moving the flows and sediment provided by
its watershed;
¦ Improve water quality and reduce land and riparian vegetation loss resulting from lateral erosion and
- bed degradation through the establishment of bank and riparian vegetation and,
¦ Enhance aquatic and terrestrial habitat through the improvements to the stream water quality
(improved oxygen content, reduced sediment and nutrients, variable stream bed features).
- ¦ Improve water quality through approximately 27.1 acres of buffer restoration throughout the project
site.
Restoration Objectives:
- ¦ Project success will be assessed utilizing measurements of stream dimension, pattern, and profile, site
photographs, and vegetation sampling. These measurements should show little or no change from the
as-built conditions.
- ¦ A stable channel is able to move the sediment supplied by its watershed without the channel
aggrading or degrading. Through stream monitoring the stability of the restored stream will be
evaluated.
- ¦ Riparian vegetation must meet a minimum survival success rate of 320 stems/acre after five years.
5.1.1 Designed Channel Classification
- The restoration design of Bold Run Creek will be restored to a Rosgen stream type "C4" and is based on
Priority Level II and IV approaches, as described in "A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of
Incised Rivers", (Rosgen, 1997.) For clarity and convenience, definitions of the four restoration priorities
• are provided in Table 6.
The design proposes constructing 1,629 linear feet of meandering channel using a Priority Level II and IV
• approach. Approximately 1,453.7 linear feet of Level II and 175.6 linear feet of Level IV will be
- restored. The Level II restoration will establish a bankfull channel with a new floodplain, a channel bed at
its existing level in an existing gravel layer, and the cross section dimensions necessary to provide stable
flow maintenance and sediment transport. The Level IV design proposes to stabilize the bed and banks
while maintaining the existing channel pattern (planform) (Figure 13. Proposed Planform). The design
bankfull stage will equal the floodplain elevation in the new channel (bank height ratio = 1.0). The
establishment of a stable bedform (i.e., riffle-pool sequence, pool spacing) will be addressed in the
- profiling of the design channel. The proposed stream dimension, pattern, and profile will be based on the
detailed morphological criteria and hydraulic geometry relationships developed from the reference
streams, see Table 7. Refer to the attached plan sheet drawings.
i In-stream structures will be incorporated to reduce the burden of energy dissipation on the channel
geometry. Cross Vanes and Rock Sill Grade Controls (Refer to Plan Sheet 2) will be used to stabilize the
restored channel. These structures are designed to reduce bank erosion and the influence of secondary
- circulation in the near-bank region of stream bends. The structures further promote efficient sediment
• transport and produce/enhance in-stream habitat. Coir fiber matting will be used to provide temporary
stabilization on the newly graded streambanks. The confluence of tributaries with the restored stream will

25
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
be stabilized with grade control structures where necessary to match the proposed grade of the restored
main channel (Refer to Plan Sheet 4 where UT1 joins Bold Run).
The restoration project will also include other non-stream related components:
• Cattle exclusion fencing will be installed along the outer boundary of the restored riparian buffers and
a permanent conservation easement will be recorded to protect the site in perpetuity.
• Two stabilized riffle grade control crossings will be installed to provide access to the utility power
lines located on the project site.
26
?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••®•?••••i
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Table 6. Prioritv Levels of Incised River Restoration
Description Methods Advantages Disadvantages
Priori I
Convert G and/or F stream Re-establish channel on Re-establishment of 1) Floodplain re-
types to C or E at previous previous floodplain using floodplain and stable establishment could cause
elevation with floodplain. relic channel or construction channel: flood damage to urban,
of new bankfull discharge 1) reduces bank height and agricultural, and industrial
channel. Design new streambank erosion, development.
channel for dimension, 2) reduces land loss, 2) Downstream end of
pattern, and profile 3) raises water table, project could require grade
characteristic of stable form. 4) decreases sediment, control from new to previous
Fill in existing incised 5) improves aquatic and channel to prevent head-
channel or with terrestrial habitats, cutting.
discontinuous oxbow lakes 6) improves land
level with new floodplain productivity, and
elevation. 7) improves aesthetics.
Priori 2
Convert F and/or G stream If belt width provides for the 1) Decreases bank height and 1) Does not raise water table
types to C or E. minimum meander width streambank erosion, back to previous elevation.
Re-establishment of ratio for C or E stream types, 2) Allows for riparian 2) Shear stress and velocity
floodplain at existing level construct channel in bed of vegetation to help stabilize higher during flood due to
or higher, but not at original existing channel, convert banks, narrower floodplain.
level. existing bed to new 3) Establishes floodplain to 3) Upper banks need to be
floodplain. If belt width is help take stress off of sloped and stabilized to
too narrow, excavate channel during flood, reduce erosion during flood.
streambank walls. End-haul 4) Improves aquatic habitat,
material or place in 5) Prevents wide-scale
streambed to raise bed flooding of original land
elevation and create new surface,
floodplain in the deposition. 6) Reduces sediment,
7) Downstream grade
transition for grade control is
easier.
Priori 3
Convert to a new stream Excavation of channel to 1) Reduces the amount of 1) High cost of materials for
type without an active change stream type involves land needed to return the bed and streambank
floodplain, but containing a establishing proper river to a stable form. stabilization.
floodprone area. Convert G dimension, pattern, and 2) Developments next to 2) Does not create the
to B stream type, or F to profile. To convert a G to B river need not be relocated diversity of aquatic habitat.
Bc. stream involves an increase due to flooding potential. 3) Does not raise water table
in width/depth and 3) Decreases flood stage for to previous levels.
entrenchment ratio, shaping same magnitude flood.
upper slopes and stabilizing 4) Improves aquatic habitat.
both bed and banks. A
conversion from F to Bc
stream type involves a
decrease in width/depth ratio
and an increase in
entrenchment ratio.
Priori 4
Stabilize channel in place. A long list of stabilization 1) Excavation volumes are 1) High cost for stabilization.
materials and methods have reduced. 2) High risk due to excessive
been used to decrease 2) Land needed for shear stress and velocity.
streambed and streambank restoration is minimal. 3) Limited aquatic habitat
erosion, including concrete, depending on nature of
gabions, boulders, and stabilization methods used.
bioengineering methods.
aource. Aasgen, tYY1, A veomorpnotogtcat npproacn to nestoratton of [nctsea xtvers --.
` 28
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Table 7. Mornhological Design Criteria

Variables Project Site
Existing
Channel Reference Reach
Richland Creek
(Above Section 1) Project Site
Restored Reach
Ros en Stream Type B4/C4 C4 C4
Drainage Area min 12 4.8 12
Bankfull Width W bkf ft 15.7-26.5 17.5 28-32 17.7
Bankfull Mean Depth dbkr ft) .9-1.7 1.5 2.3-2.4 1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional area Abkr 24.2-25.3 24.9 67-75 25
Width/de th Ratio Wbu/dbkf 8.8-29.1 12.2 11.7-13.9 12.5
Maximum Depth dmbkf ft 1.9-2.3 1.9 3.75 1.6
Width of flood prone area r a ft 18.3-34.3 20.4 >100* 53.1
Entrenchment Ratio ER 1.1-1.7 1.3 >3.0* >3.0
Water Surface Slope S ft/ft 0.007 0.004 0.007
Sinuosi (stream length/valley length) K 1.04 1.1 1.1
Pool Depth ft - 2.9 1.54
Riffle Depth ft 9-1.17 2.3-2.4 1.4
Pool Width ft - 26-.5 19.0
Riffle Width ft 15.7-26.5 28-32 17.7
Pool XS Area s - 70-75 27.5
° Riffle XS Areas 24.2-25.3 67-75 25
Pool de th/mean riffle depth - 1.2-1.3 1.2-1.3
O Pool width/riffle width - 0.9-1.1 0.9-1.1
Pool area/riffle area - 0.9-1.1 0.9-1.1
Max pool de th/dbkf - 1.9-2.0 1.9-2.0
Low bank height/max bankfull depth - 1.0-1.2 1.0-1.2
Mean Bankfull Velocity V s 3.14.6 3.6-5.0
Bankfull Discharge Q cfs 75-115 260-270
Meander length Lm ft 68-150 110-200 60-180
r
Radius of curvature Rd ft
20-70
30-70
20-55
o Belt width Wbi, ft 20-75 300 160-195
Meander width ratio wbi,/Wbkf 1.1-4.3 9.3-10.7 9-11
Radius of curvature/bankfull width 1.1-4.0 1.0-2.5 1.1-3.0
Meander len h/bankfull width 3.8-8.6 3.5-7.1 35-10.0
Valle sloe 0.0083 0.0045 0.0083
Average water surface sloe 0.0087* 0.004 0.007
Riffle sloe 0.004-0.021 0.0045-0.009 0.0088-0.0158
Pool sloe 0.0002-0.0009 0.000-0.0025 0.000-0.0044
Pool to pool spacing 10-70 25-90 0-0.001
o Pool length 29-43 5-25 3-20
y Riffle slo a/av water surface slope 0.46-2.4 1.1-2.3 1.1-2.3
Pool slo a/av water surface sloe 0.023-0.103 0.0-0.6 0.0-0.6
Run slo a/av water surface sloe - 0.7-1.2 0.7-1.2
Run de th/dbkf - 1.0-1.1 1.0-1.1
Pool len th/bankf ill width 1.7-2.5 0.2-0.9 0.2-0.9
Pool to pool s acin ankfull width 0.57-4.0 0.8-3.0 0.8-3.0
i nis Value is mnuencea Dy the level or incision of bola Kun GreeK before its Continence With New Light Creek.
29
I
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
5.2 Natural Plant Community Restoration
Restoring natural vegetation will focus primarily on the buffer restoration areas and Bold Run Creek
floodplain areas. These areas will receive species consistent with a Piedmont Levee Forest and Piedmont
Bottomland Forest community. The typical Piedmont Levee Forest is seasonally to intermittently
flooded. The vegetation may consist of mature climax forest, or may be in various stages of primary or
secondary succession (Schafale and Weakley 1990). The typical Piedmont Bottomland Hardwood
community is flooded at least occasionally. Bottomland Forests are believed to form a stable climax forest
with uneven-aged canopy with primarily gap phase regeneration (Schafale and Weakley 1990).
5.2.1 Target Buffer Communities
The Neuse River Buffer Rule (15A NCAC 2B .0233) applies to 50-foot (15.24 m) wide buffers directly
adjacent to surface waters in the Neuse River Basin (intermittent streams, perennial streams, lakes, ponds,
and estuaries), excluding wetlands. The Neuse River Buffer Rules (NBR) is administered by the
NCDWQ. The purpose of this rule is to protect and preserve existing riparian buffers in the Neuse River
Basin and to maintain their nutrient removal functions. This rule is applicable to all streams identified on
either the most recent local county soil survey or the most recent USGS topographic map. If stream
features are not present on either map, the area is not subject to the rule, even if a stream is present.
The Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules were enacted to protect and preserve existing riparian buffers to
maintain their function for protection of water quality (NCDWQ, 2002). Currently, there are small
drainage features located throughout the project site, which deliver direct runoff to Bold Run Creek. To
maintain the water quality of Bold Run Creek, an approximate 200' buffer will extend on either side of
the features (Figure 14. Proposed Planting Plan).
5.2.2 Planting Zones
Two planting zones will be incorporated into the planting plan. Zone A is classified as a Levee Area;
which runs along the levee of New Light Creek. Zone B is classified as a Bottomland Hardwood Area;
which will border the streamside planting area along Bold Run Creek and run along the Levee area and
the remaining portion of the site. Included in Zone A and B is a 20' streamside planting area bordering
New Light Creek and Bold Run Creek, will also be planted with riparian vegetation. There is a small
portion, approximately 1.30 acres, in the middle of Zone B that was classified during the field
investigation with wetter soils (Chewacla) (Refer to Figure 5). This particular area will be planted with
tolerable, higher moisture Bottomland Hardwood species. The planting plan in Figure 14 illustrates the
two zones that will be used to target restoration vegetation.
5.2.3 Plant Sources
Field assessment observations, Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration (NC Department of
Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystems Enhancement Program 2004), and community
descriptions from Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina (Schafale and Weakley
1990) were all used to develop the species to be planted on the site.
5.2.4 Plant Care and Installation
All hardwood species on site will be planted using bare root plants. Four hundred thirty-six (436) trees
per acre (based on an average 10' x 10' spacing) will be planted in rows to achieve a mature survivability
of three hundred twenty (320) trees per acre in the riparian zone (NCDENR, 2001).
30

�� k
f, _ 'k
�AS
4764
•A #+y k
to
9 x•
r •3 - a Al
•

Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
5.2.5 Plant List
The Bold Run Creek floodplain/levee in the project reach is predominantly forested with hardwood
species (Refer to Section 3.5). Plantings shall consist of native species, which are available during the
time of planting. The Bottomland Hardwood area will be vegetated with native woody and herbaceous
plant materials. In general, the two planting zones will consist of the following species groupings:
Zone A: Levee Area
Black Walnut Juglans nigra FACU
Willow Oak Quercus phellos FACW-
Overcup Oak Quercus lyrata FACW
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra FAC
Streamside
River Birch Betula nigra FACW
Boxelder Acer negundo FACW
American Sycamore Platanus occidentalis FACW-
Zone B: Bottomland Hardwood Area
Tulip Poplar Liriodendron tulipifera FACW-
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda FAC+
Willow Oak Quercusphellos FACW-
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii FACW-
Hiah Moisture Area
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica FACW
American Elm Ulmus Americana FACW
Silky Dogwood Cornus amomum FACW
Herbaceous vegetation shall consist of a native grass mix that may include:
Bluestem Andropogon glomeratus
Deertongue Panicum clandestinum
Orchardgrass Dactylis glomerata
Switchgrass Panicum virgatum
Virginia wildrye Elymus virginicus
Rye grain (Secale cereale) and/or brown top millet (Pennisetum glaucum) will be used for temporary
stabilization.
In addition to the native seed mix and stabilization seeding, live stakes shall be installed to assist in
stabilizing the stream banks. The following species may be used for live staking:
Black Willow
Elderberry
Silky Willow
Silky Dogwood
Salix nigra
Sambucus canadensis
Salix sericea
Cornus amomum
32
F-6
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
5.2.6 Schedule
Woody vegetation planting will take place during the dormant season.
5.2.7 Site Preparation and Stabilization
The stream restoration project will generally utilize the same belt width as the existing channel, however
some areas will require clearing to achieve the appropriate pattern outlined in the design criteria. The
cleared areas will be re-vegetated with native woody and herbaceous plant materials. Following the re-
vegetation, riparian buffers associated with the Bold Run Creek restoration will extend between fifty (50)
to two hundred (200) feet on both sides of the stream.
The trees targeted for removal will be treated with herbicide in late summer when the trees have leafed
out entirely or in the winter once the sap has stopped flowing. A glyphosate herbicide will be applied at
this time. The trees will be left either downed or standing to provide habitat for terrestrial species.
5.2.8 Maintenance
A pre-emergent herbicide will be sprayed in mid-March following the planting of the bare root seedlings
to control the herbaceous vegetation. This allows time for rainfall to settle the soil around the roots of the
seedlings, newly planted during the dormant season, but before the buds begin to swell in the spring.
Reducing competition from herbaceous vegetation is an important step to ensure maximum survivability
of the planted seedlings.
Correspondingly, nurturing the site with regular management activities is considered necessary to ensure
that the goals and objectives of the project are met. These activities will be conducted throughout the
year. If the monitoring identifies failures in the project site, a remedial action plan will be developed to
investigate the causes of the failure and propose actions to rectify the problem.
5.2.9 On-site Invasive Species Management
Part of the regular management activities will include invasive species control for the project site.
Invasive species control will primarily focus on removing the existing invasive species, Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense) and Vietnamese Stilt Grass (Microstigium viminium). It is recommended that a
glyphosate herbicide with a 2 to 3-percent solution be used as a foliar spray (Miller, 2004). The
herbicidal treatment will be conducted during late summer, early fall. Herbicidal treatments will be
conducted yearly if needed.
5.3 Sediment Transport Analysis
A stable channel is able to move the sediment supplied by its watershed without aggrading or degrading.
This ability is evaluated through two parameters: competency and capacity. Competency is the channel's
ability to move particles of a certain size, expressed as units of Pascals (Pa) or lbs/fl . Capacity is the
channel's ability to move a specific volume of sediment (sediment discharge). Sediment discharge is the
amount of sediment moving through a cross section over a specified period of time, expressed in
dimensionless parameters or as mass or weight units of kg/sec or lbs/sec.
The flow associated with the threshold movement of the streambed is the reference condition that all
sediment transport models are based upon. In natural streambeds there are particles of a wide range of
sizes. At low, but significant flow levels, the smallest particles will move, while the larger particles resist
33

70-
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
the flow of the stream. This is the condition of partial sediment transport. As the stream flow increases,
eventually every particle on the streambed will show threshold movement, this is the condition of full
sediment transport.
There is a wide range of sand-gravel streams that have the flow conditions necessary to significantly
move particles greater than the D50, but do not reach the full sediment transport condition. This condition
is present in Bold Run Creek, and the model used for the sediment transport analysis was Wilcock-Crowe
(2003). The Wilcock-Crowe model is a "sediment capacity" model; however, it also contains an
entrainment predictor.
Entrainment is the condition that initiates the movement of a selected particle size in the presence of a
mix grade channel bed. If the largest particle that moves during a bankfull event can be identified, then
the flow conditions that produced this movement can be determined and this flow condition (the channel
competency) is used in the design of the restored stream channel.
In basic terms, given the bed surface grain-size distribution and the bed shear velocity, the Wilcock-
Crowe Surface-Based Transport Model (SBTM) calculates the bedload transport rate and the bedload
grain-size distribution. Using a hydraulics model, one can predict the shear velocity and discharge
characteristics that will provide the necessary sediment transport capacity. By making the sediment
transport and discharge dimensionless, this analysis can be scaled to another stream channel, separate
from the reference reach, that has a similar sediment distribution. In this case, it was applied to the Bold
Run Creek design section.
In the Richland Creek Reference Reach, the approximate bankfull depth was 3.7 feet (1.1 m). The shear
velocity (u*) associated with this discharge based on the hydraulics model was 0.17 meters per second
(m/s). This shear velocity corresponded to a dimensionless sediment transport rate (qT*) of 2.5E-05. A
qT* value of 2.5E-05 intersects with a dimensionless water discharge (qW*) of approximately 750 for the
Bold Run Creek design slope (0.007) on the Bold Run River State Diagram (Figure 15). The proposed
design channel will discharge approximately 92 W/s over the area subject to bedload transport with a u* =
0.14 m/s. The water discharge (qw) for this event based on the Manning-Strickler Resistance Equation is
1.25, which correlates to a qW* value of 595 (0 = 20.7%). This is based on a db5o (median diameter of the
bedload) value of approximately 6.5 millimeters.
qW* = qv / (((s-1)g)1n (db5o)3i2 = 1.252 / (((2.65 - 1) 9.81)1/2 (6.45E-03)3/2 = 595
Where: s is the specific gravity of sediment, g is the gravitational constant, and all other variables are as
defined above. Refer to Figure 15. Bold Run Creek River State Diagram.
34
Is

O O O
O O O

O O O O

O
O
O
O

O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
* O
O
cr O
O
O
O

iq

ON °
0 0 0 0 0

O O O O O O O O O

O O O O O O O O O

ti t T ' ? 1 -
r
- 11 i i y1 L Il i 'I t I ? -
? I
? l I ? I `
A 1
I I 7
q 7
T ,
,7

1 1 11 1 i I T 7 11

f f t f I - - - - - -

e
it
C?
A
C
b
0
rl
Lr
?I
U61
Fe-
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
6.0 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
Monitoring shall consist of the collection and analysis of stream stability and riparian/stream bank
vegetation survivability data to support the evaluation of the project in meeting established restoration
objectives. Specifically, project success will be assessed utilizing measurements of stream dimension,
pattern, and profile, site photographs, and vegetation sampling.
6.1 Streams
The purpose of monitoring is to evaluate the stability of the restored stream. Following the procedures
established in the USDA Forest Service Manual, Stream Channel Reference Sites (Harrelson, et.al, 1994)
and the methodologies utilized in the Rosgen stream assessment and classification system (Rosgen, 1994
and 1996), data collected will consist of detailed dimension and pattern measurements, a longitudinal
profile, and bed materials sampling.
Dimension - Five permanent cross-sections, three riffle and two pools, will be established and used to
evaluate stream dimension. Permanent monuments will be established by either conventional survey or
GPS. The cross-section surveys shall provide a detailed measurement of the stream and banks, to include
points on the adjacent floodplain, at the top of bank, bankfull, at all breaks in slope, the edge of water, and
thalweg. Subsequently, width/depth ratios and entrenchment ratios will be calculated for each cross-
section.
Cross-section measurements should show little or no change from the as-built cross-sections. If changes
do occur, they will be evaluated to determine whether they are minor adjustments associated with settling
and increased stability or whether they indicate movement toward an unstable condition.
Pattern - Measurements associated with the restored channel pattern will include belt width, meander
length, and radius of curvature. Subsequently, sinuosity, meander width ratio and radius of curvature and
meander length/bankfull width ratios will be calculated.
Profile - A longitudinal profile of the entire restored channel will be surveyed. Measurements will
include slopes (average, pool, riffle), as well as calculations of pool-to-pool spacing. Annual
measurements should indicate stable bedform features with little change from the as-built survey. The
pools should maintain their depth with lower water surface slopes, while the riffles should remain
shallower and steeper.
Bed Materials - Pebble counts will be conducted at each representative cross-section for the purpose of
repeated classification and to evaluate sediment transport.
Photograph Reference Points
Photograph reference points (PRP) will be established to assist in characterizing the site and to allow
qualitative evaluation of the site conditions. The location and bearing/orientation of each photo point will
be permanently marked in the field and documented to allow for repeated use.
Cross-section Photograph Reference Points
Each cross-section will be photographed to show the form of the channel with the tape measure stretched
over the channel for reference in each photograph. Effort will be made to consistently show the same
area in each photograph.
36
Is
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Longitudinal Photograph Reference Points
Additional PRPs will be located, as needed, to document the condition of specific in-stream structures
such as cross vanes, as well as infrastructure associated with the stream such as utility and road crossings.
6.2 Vegetation
The success of the riparian buffer plantings will be evaluated using 55 (5% of total buffer area) ten by ten
meter (10m x 10m) vegetative sampling plots. The corners of each monitoring plot will be permanently
marked in the field. The monitoring will consist of a physical inventory within each plot and a
subsequent statistical analysis in order to determine the following: composition and number of surviving
species, and total number of stems per acre. Additionally, a photograph will be taken of each plot that
will be replicated each monitoring year. Riparian vegetation must meet a minimum survival success rate
of 320 stems/acre after five years. If monitoring indicates that the specified survival rate is not being met,
appropriate corrective actions will be developed, to include invasive species control, the removal of
dead/dying plants and replanting.
6.3 Schedule/Reporting
The first scheduled monitoring will be conducted during the first full growing season following project
completion. Monitoring shall subsequently be conducted annually for a total period of five (5) years.
Annual monitoring reports will be prepared and submitted after all monitoring tasks for each year are
completed. Each report will provide the new monitoring data and compare the new data against previous
findings. The monitoring report will follow the format described in the EEP document entitled "Content,
Format, and Data Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports."
37
I
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
7.0 REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., D.E. Wise-Frederick, C.M. Buckner, S.D. Wilkerson, W.A. Harman, R.E. Smith, and J.
Spooner. 2002. Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for Urban Streams throughout the Piedmont
of North Carolina. JAWRA, Volume 38, Number 3, pp. 641-651.
Dunne, T. and L.B. Leopold. 1978. Water in Environmental Planning. New York: W.H. Freeman and
Company.
Harman, W.A., G.D. Jennings, J.M. Patterson, D.R. Clinton, L.O. Slate, A.G. Jessup, J. R. Everhart, and
R.E. Smith, 1999. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams.
Wildland Hydrology. AWRA Symposium Proceedings. Edited by D.S. Olsen and J.P. Potyondy.
American Water Resources Association. June 30 - July 2, 1999. Bozeman, MT.
Harrelson, C.C., C.L. Rawlins, and J.P. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated
Guide to Field Technique. General Technical Report RM-245. USDA Forest Service, Rocky
Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas. 2001. "Constraint Analysis: McIntyre Creek at Hornets Nest
Park", 3pp., Report for the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program, Raleigh, NC.
Miller, James H. Revised December 2004. Nonnative Invasive Plants of Southern Forests, A Field Guide
For Identification and Control. USDA Forest Service, Asheville, NC
NCDENR. 2001. "Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration." Division of Water Quality, Wetlands
Restoration Program, Raleigh, NC.
NCDENR. 2001. "Interim, Internal Technical Guide: Benthic Macroinvertebrate Monitoring Protocols
for Compensatory Stream Restoration Projects." Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Unit,
Raleigh, NC.
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality. November 2001. Basinwide Assessment Report, Neuse River
Basin. http://wNvw.esb.enr.state.nc.us/Basinwide/NEU2001..pdf (August 2004).
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality. Version 1 October 23, 2002. Interim, Internal DWQ Guide for the
Calculation of Riparian Buffer Mitigation Credits and Criteria for Riparian Buffer Mitigation
Projects.
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality. March 2005, Working Draft. Field Study and Modeling Plan for
The Falls of the Neuse Reservoir Nutrient Management Strategy.
http://112o.enr.state.nc.us/tmdl/documents/FallsI.,akeNMS OOO.pdf
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality. 2005. Surface Water Classifications.
http://h2o.enr.state.tic.us/csu/swc.htm]
NCDENR. "Water Quality Stream Classification for Streams in North Carolina." Water Quality Section.
http://l12o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/reports/basinsandwaterbodies (September, 2002).
NCEEP, November 2002. North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program Neuse River Basin Watershed
Restoration Plan. http:/hvww.nceep.net/services/restplans/neuse 2003_pdf
38
is
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
NCGS. 1985. Geologic Map of North Carolina
Rosgen, D.L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22: 169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa Springs, CO.
Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A geomorphological approach to restoration of incised rivers. In: Wang, S.S.Y.,
E.J. Langendoen, and F.D. Shields, Jr. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Conference on Management of
Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. pp. 12-22.
Rosgen, D.L. 1998. The Reference Reach - a Blueprint for Natural Channel Design. Presented at ASCE
Conference, Denver, CO - June, 1998.
Rosgen, D.L. 2002. "Natural Channel Design Methodology (40 Steps)." Natural Channel Design and
River Restoration Short Course, Pagosa Springs, CO - October, 2002.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
3`d Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, NCDEHNR, Division of Parks and
Recreation. Raleigh, NC.
Wilcock, P., and J. Crowe. 2003. "A Surface-Based Transport Model for Sand and Gravel. " ASCE
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 129(2), pp 120-128.
39
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Appendix A
Historic Aerial Photographs

14
[0-130 E 1 0
2i 2?
? D
1
1
DD c
m m
N
mm
1 0
m y
mm
i
41

Z
n
a
0
N
O
?z
El 9
c
m
Q
qN
m X
v m
z
G) 2
O
D zo
m
III
.21
so
° °p
°
° ° 0 0 0
0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 Opp 0 Q o °° 0 0 \\ 0 0
\-
0° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0 0°°° o°° 0 0 0 0 0 0 \
0 0 00 0 0 o O p 0 0 0 0 0°°°° 0 0 0. 0 °° o0 0 0 \
0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0° o 0 0 0 00 0° 0°° o 0 0 0 0 0 O p° 0 \ \
0° 0 00 0 0 0° 0 0 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° o oCf,/8n
0 p p 0°°°° 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 °° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7AiO?O7?,
0p o 0000 0 0 0 p 0 p00p0pOp0p00 ° p 0 p0 NF\?\
?M
0 0 0 0 0 0- o° o o 0 0 0 0 0°°°° 0 0 0 0 0 °° o 0
0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'SQy?A11 0 0 0 0 0°° 0 0 C p p 0 0°° p o O p p 0 0 0 0 0
0 00 p O o 0 0 0° 0 0 p0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0°° 0
p 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0
0 0 0°°° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0°°° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O
0 0 0°° 0 o o 0 0 00
0 0 o p 0
0 0 0 0 0°°° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°° 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 O°° o o p o 0 0 00 0 0 0 0
00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°° 0 0 0 00 00 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0
0000000°°000° 00000000
'° 0° 0°°° 0 0 0. ° 0 0 0
o p 0 ° °°° 0 0 0 o p 0 O o o ° o°°°
0 0 0 °°°° 0 0 0 0 O p 0. O p°°°
o p 0 °° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o 11 0 0 0 0 ° 0° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0
00 0 0 00000000 00 0 p 000000
0 0 °O o 0 0 p p 0 O p p°°°° 0 0 0
0 O O 0 0 0 O o 0 0 p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
000000000°0000p000000000000
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O p p O 0 0 0 p O p 0°° 0 0 0000 O p°° 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0 G p p 0 0 0 O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0° o 0 O p p 0 0 °° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °° 0 0 o p p 0 0 00 o p
0 0° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O p 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0° p o°° 0 0 0 °°° 0 0 0 0 0 o000 D 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0
0 °° 0 0 0 p o p°°° 0 0° 0 p p ° 0° 0 p o 0 °° 0 0 0
°° 0 o p p 0 °° 0 0 0 0° °0 0 0 0 0 0 °° 0 0 0
0°° 0 0 0 ° o°°° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° o°°° 0 0
:CJ ' ° 0 o p ° ° ° ° ° 0 0 0 o p 0 ° ° ° ° 0 0 0 0 p 0 ° ° °
' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°°° 0 0 0 p o 0°°° 0 0 0
r ° O O p p 0°°° 0 O O p 0 0° 0° 0 0 0 p 0°° 0 0 0
r O p p 0 °° 0 0 0 p p 0 °° 0 0 0 0 0 0 °°° 0 0 0 0 0
O p 0 0°° 0 0 0 p p 0 0°°° o 0 0 0 p O°°° 0 0 0 0 0
O ° 0 0 0 0 p 0 0°°° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°° o O p O 0 0 00 0 o O
6 0 0 0 0 0 p°o o p p O°°°° 0 o O 0°°°° 0 0
° ° 0 0 ° 0 ° ° ° ° ° o 0
°
0 0 0 D ° 0 0 0 0 0 0°°°° 0 0 0 0 0°°°° 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 °° o p o 0 0 0 o° 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O
00 0°OODOpODO0000000p0000000
°
0 0 0° O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0
. 0 0 0 0 0° 0 0° 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
. °°°0
° 0 0 0 0 0
0 0° 0 0 0 0
C 0 ° ° ° ° 0 0
z ° 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0°
o °
° p ° ° 0 0
° ° 0 °
0 0 0 0°° 0
000p0p0p°00p000p°
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °° 0 0 0
O° 0 0 0 0 0 0 O p 0 0 0 0 0 0
° 0 0p000a0p°°000000
0
0 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p°° O o
0
00000000°°°0000°
0 ° o 0 0
G o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
° 0°0 0 0 000000
°° 0 -0,,0,0)0...
0 0 O 0 0 0° o 0 o p 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0° 0° 0 0
° o ° p ° ° ° ° ° o 0 ?
0 0 0 0 0 0 °°°
° . 0 0
0 ° ° ° ° 0 0 0C? % 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 T. O p O p 0 0 0 p D
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 D A..?
.?mo a]
N_ lk,
DOA a°
z QED
BOLD RUN CREEK KC I
STREAM / BUFFER RESTORATION PROJECT ASSOCIATES Of RC
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS
WAKE FOREST, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA RALEIGH,4601 SIXNORTH FORKS CAROLINA ROAD 27609
STATION 10+00.00 TO STATION 28+05

A?
I-Yy `N _J
SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN
REVISIONS PER EEP COMMENTS
DEV,MPTM
REVISIONS

PRO[ECTP EP4284907
?I
? N O O
T
O O m O
?m
rr? 22
22
Z°
z
w
c
n
T
T
M
NN
'I
Z
II
N
V
An
N

i?
i!
a
m
z
z
0
N
O
O
0
0
0
z
r -
m
it
o.
N
?O
T

III
1
0
cm
•J
'rl
QS5Qpp?
N S[ ?•
a
O
ZZ •
r'S

m
9
D
r
'm
/C/)
r`
Z
a r .•. w w
a.?M

Q
T m

C V V
D
x, n

s?
a
y i3nooaN.
?? .
o

U Cana rvnonrrv

iRWN4N CWNN
b ?
H
x
y OC?
?Z
x?
b
O
two
co?
0
y
?o
a
n
0
z

0 t
--0
N
00
.0, 1
%o
va
?A, ?F

o
W
cl)
o
cl)
I
m
I?
IN III
ae? sm ~
jig
mill
5 ?? Tel ' ?'
I

ills
a
X15!
r
y
VARIES 1.6 TO 7

C7
--n Innl
z
v ?

g V v
I
U ??'
L
m o
m r-
Mr n
rn

Rol

H?

y SUBMITTEU VWTN RESTORATION PLAN NOV. 2005

-I
a o
BOLD RUN CREEK ? K C I REVISIONS PER EEP COMMENTS FEB. 2008
N 0 D 41 N STREAM / BUFFER RESTORATION PROJECT ASSOCIATES OF NC

E ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS
N WAKE FOREST, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 't?
4601 SIX FORKS ROAD s ' {
`
Z
STATION 10+00.00 TO STATION 26+05 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 !
;E;,'.';t
-.,•%..
REVISIONS
i

g ?
P.
- 0

F- r Z

O --- O ? m
y
r
N i
r G D I ,
n 0 7
C
rn ---? 22 --- r
- - z
cn
N

m --?_
D m n
'0 m
"' o
o
i 0)
;I

I c
m ?
'?

?-
h
a ?
4
- k z
4
?i

li aa
4
9
0
Q -
"?w
1
' TI Y

N f
.
lJ _. `j Y V
sn V! 1^a ?
$IJi7
,

_ t
f
` k

SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN NOV. 2005
-1 BOLD RUN CREEK KC REVISIONS PER EEP COMMENTS FEB. 2008
e
STREAM /BUFFER RESTOR
TIO
=:bq-- ASSOCIATES OF NC
A
N PROJECT ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS
WAKE FOREST
WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA ' °` y!, 9qY1
X ,
, 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD ', ??1? T,Jll.31? ? srw. ocscwrrox asrs ?mnovco
"' N STATION 10+00.00 TO STATION 26+05 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 REVISIONS

O? 00 0 0 N ? 0 CID ?
t
g
" _ -o
N m z oo

y
co 5;
I \
\
I
I \_
m g O
g'9N(INOIVW 1
m
I
°
1
'
\
1
n
\
1
I? i i
1
\1
1 \ \II u \ \ I I /
JJ
/
l l 1' If
1
1 1\\\\\ \
\\
1
\
\\
\
\
1
1
1
1
/
1
\ lJ
\
1
C \\ \\
\\
\
\1
1
1
1
1
F /
Or \\ \\\ \\\ \\\ \\ \\\ 11 11 11 11111 1 \ \ \ \ / / 011 i I ACES 014-
\ \\ \\ 1\6 \\
\\ \1 11 1 11 1I 111 \ \ \ \ \ 9' BB DRIVEF?DE 0 I

:.... .. \
C \ \\\ \\ 1\ 11\ \\ \\ 1111 111111 \ \\ \ \ \ \ II I - _ _ ' ORlITTU
\\\\\\1\\\p\\\\\111111\\\ \\\ 0\+LL\? \ 00. I
?
?..; : \\\\A\\1\\\ \I\\\\\? \\\
:.
------ -------- --
}

;..;..;
; ;\\\\\\\\\\\?\\\\\\\ \\\\\\II\I 1111^ \ \\ \I\?I Ic?

??\?\\\\\\ \?,\ 1\\\?\\\\\\ 11111111 V \ \ 1 I I"!; I\
t+ao \
? \ 1 1 1 1 1 I I \? \ /'
\ I
I I l
\

;? : I
\1 1
\ \
\ \ 11 \ ? /
?? \\\1j1j111111111111?1?lllllllillllill` \\111\11 \ III
l III ' / //
II I
O 1
1
;- ,- ll
,
1 1' J`i? l•µ1
I
III'?I?IIII?1111?111111111111) 1\1N? \ \ \
I
/

.....

..... .

.... A lit I i I I I I I III 1/ / I I 1 I I/// l I P
1
13+00 111111 III II II IIIIIIJI,ll,ll / /ll I
I
I
I
I
l
'
J
/
W ..'.. .;..-.-. ....;. II
II
J
Ijlll?
' /III
l/
1rA
J Ill/JllllJ4J Il//
- I111?IIIIII111?1/II / / ( /
/
/
/
I
p j%//
1?1/Illllolllllll?lllfII1II?IlI
ICI
l
I
/
/
l
---------- ---------- -=-----=- - \ II ^ ,
/
O ,/,////?llllllll I lullll
/
III /I'll I
Z /jl Jl/JJ/ 11 Il
..,. .,. ... ll
///jill/jlll
/
/i/l/lllJ
//
J
VFif P-tA- 1 . d&
J // 1

iiiiv
/W
Tog

,..
..,. .... ?r LN I I\\\ \ ?/ I / / /
??
8 .........
J/ /! i 111 I \ \ I
i
I J
Il/lll 1111111 1 \ / / 1 ? /
/
I
I 1 I I
/
II III II I
I I I
/
I
I I I I I I l l l I 1111 I 1 I I
1 ? III I
I
V I
\ I
I I
1 1 ? 1
?I
Ii I \\\ \ \ \II \ I I I

- -
--
------ ,
I 1 \11\I\1 ?\I\I ?I 11\ ?I\\???h
R Ty??l l / /
Ix
?
?
!11111 /l/l 1 \ Ily
? I i` 1 I/1 I I F I I
l
l 1/ l
l
l
I I 1 I
8 :
//
f I/
J 1 /l I I l l /
J J /I 1 I \?? \ Y0

-
- - - -
-
-
-
l
1 ? xl ?r I
/ / / / J / Z
\ \ /
l I \
/
1
8Z'?
II J
\
• - - - /
J -
1
J `
f
J
C
/ ?
V /
{? I I 1 i J / %Z1
O /

If /

1 I, i 11 I \ ? I / /

• - r - - r
-- 1 \ '
I
l
/j
? I I J II ? /,
-
I
? \
-- -------- ----- - ------ - ----
? I?
= III I
/
v
I \? 1/)I
I II
r
\
I
II

crD

`
"
?
I l co

-
-,- O
?-?
?y
?
?
' I 2m F.i ??RL1
a FV
• N
A O
O ? D Q

. .
..
.... ........ . ...... ...... `. . O
O
SUBMITTED RM RESTORATION PLAN NOV. 2005
BOLD RUN CREEK K C I REVISIONS PER EEP COMMENTS FEB. 2008
STREAM / BUFFER RESTORATION PROJECT ASSDCUTES OF NC
o >
TI Z ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS
m WAKE FOREST
WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA `
t
,
, 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD e ?1
~ l3
S WE ?PPR 0

"'
STATION 10+00.00 TO STATION 26+05 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 0_j.
° ^a%.,
REVISIONS

N 00)
11 a)
00 14
N 14
0 OD
O
rn
:..'..:
' 0 DD n b-0
T

V F11T101 VAI'A Q)
N Fn z 00
m (j)
r- ;o m
l
I
O

p

_

A
QB;W1`
h ?
Z W
p
\\1\
I 51 m m 0 m

.....

- - .
. - -
......
.
., . r
7
...... 00
O 7 \?-+
CE RUNE NEW ?QNT CREEKi

-1 QTA 7"
ELEYATJV
R27, zu. S\:
I 7? --tB,e-J
--4
`i1 G7 ?11
MA \?_= lp
_
//
i xio-_-
--
// =\?
0 r
\
'1
C
?j°??-1
1 ?,J
11111

:..,..,.-
.:-.,..: '_?_ C\
o
_
\
_
1
1
\
=.-
1
/
r r IIIIIIIIIII? hill/ (-
C
-- ?1jr-=
===?;
\?\ ///
?=?a-
\\1
_
l \ \ 1
?\ "\ 1 x
II?IIII\hI I II
c
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ SLZ
\\\? \ \
\

;..,
_ AM A It //III// I

Iz+oo d?/Ijll fill \111\ \\\\ 111 \\\ i - - - - - _ 1 \\\\\\
t \\ \
\ \
\\
\\
\
\\\
\
\
8 . - ? \
\\\
I \
I II11
II
1\
\\\
- ? ?
\ \ \\
11
\\\ \ ?\\1
1 1
\
\
\\
, ,
. ; 1
1
1
1
\\
\\
}+oo IIIIIIIIIIIII\\?\\\\ 1\ Ar,\\ \\
/ ` _ \\\ \\\ \
1
1 \
1
1 \\ /
\

-------- ,.. ?

11
11
111
I 1 \
\\ \
II \\ \
\\ \
\ h l\ \
11
\\
1
\
i
1 1
\\
\
\
\
O \
V
-
l
\\\\\\\\
\\\
(r\?\\
\?
\
\\\ \ \
c
\
\\ \\
\1\\ 1 I
\
'
\
I
\

N
+ \\\
\
"
\
\\\\ \Q
\\\ \\ \\\\ \? N?`\\?\\\\ \\ \
\ \? \ • \ \ I I1 \
?\
\.\\ \\ \\11\\\\\ \\\ \ of l I 1 I I \ I \ \ 111 \
s ?
I
`? / \
1
\
1
?
I
l
1
)
kLbAfAM 211.75
1 i
_
1
\
1
?)
I1
11?j11 111 ?
/I/
l//%/
jl

. FLftVAI

L I
III 1 I 1 1
I I /
"???%//IIII II III I1j11 ?U? III ?''
\
,.
AL ,. .,
-gw, \
\
llll IIII/z I/ \ 1 I 1 \ 1
' - ??? ?%IIII // /I / II / 1 \ 11
i// r/l
/ 1 1
1
?
? 1 1 1
I \ \ \
/
1
I \ II/ \
11 'Il
'
.
S
. I
1
1
1
\
l
? 1 1 I 1 ??_ 1 ,
I I 1 1 1 I
I 1 1 III fll „/ ?\ 1 I \\ \ - J 1 1 1
I I I III 111
1 1 1 11' I
r `\ I \

:
: I
r
\\ 1 1 1 1 1 \ / \?
?
I \
1I I , ^
\ \ 1 1 8 I ? I ? I Ih
?
....
. ,
\
\
+
?
i III ` I I \
\
I
,1T5 / 111\ \ ? `? \
l l !
I l I
II
I
..... .... /
//
I
?
I
l I I
111 ll I IIII /+z pl 1 lll\
.?, l l/ l! I I 1 1/11 Ill I I I F 1 / ?
c
1
_ ?
?
1 1 1 l I ,7? I I 111 11 1 j1 1 1 /
II 1
1 / ?

., / 00 _.275\ 1/ \
111 8 1 ) 1 I \ \ l ,
III1?1\ I I ! ,l l r/ \ 1 ?j \ I
I
/
1
I1";\\

.
I
\
,
I
h \\\ 1
III\\\\\\\\\ I i / / 11 I`,\ ry^/
\ \ \ \
\
/ 11
'
(Ni+
+ ..;..;.
:-A
1i ETA 22+d4j \
i
_ ?
\? \ )/ ll oo+o l 111 1\II /
\
I
o - - - ? ? -- - NNIN
1\\\I \\ ?/ /
I?
\

\ / /
tilllllllIII, IIII/// II
}??'
I Ill/ l
l II 111 1 I 0r1 0 \
11
I I
.:..
"M 7AT104-25 M. 1\
q 1
111
l
/
1\
I
f-U . I / _ /
'
\
dp\\\11\?ll III'11 I
1 I/ I \ . / _ i
1\\\1\1l 11l II 11111 II
111 - \ /
X11111\
j\I 111111111' IIIII II II
IIj
11111111jIIIIII111111 IIIII III \ / I I? III I i, \
l
I

N
+

. .

lp ) I IIII I \ /
111111 I
??
/
/ card \
?
11111)IIII
ll 1\?? 1
111 I)1 \
7l
11
ll
llg
O
p

.

:..:. r
?
l
ll
1
\
l
Ip
1\III III (IIII 111 1 1ll
\1111 IIII) pllllll 111 / 1
111
?IIII II 1?1111j
/
11
/ 0? I
I
III
I
111

L;- . ; . 1
1 ?
I ?'
I
I
0
111
11
111 1?IIIIIIIIIIIpIIIIIII 1111 1I11J
1?IIIII
11 1 IIII
1 i / i
IIIIIjlllj
1
1
1
\
II
11
1
1 \
l

''?
? \? I
l?llllj??\II\\1\ \\ \?
p?llllllll
111111pjllllll\\1\\\I\\1 \\'\\ \ I 1 \ /
II \\\1 \\ \ \\ I \

t \\ \\
\
\
11
1
\\?x I \ `
\ \

O I
/ \
)
\ 1
\\\\\?
\\\\\\\\
\\\\\
1l l
\\
•

O
; .
, ..;
- - - ulll\\\\\\
? ? -
\\\\\\\\\\\
\\?? \\ ? ? / r 1
/ 1 / ? ? ?
I 11`,"1111\\\?\\\\ \\ ?\ \\\ \\\\\ ? , , \ 11
\
II
I II
I
IIIIII\\\1\1\\
' \\\\ ?? \\\\
j1 / 1\ / \ ? i ? ? ? ? \
\1 O I

I
I
I
\
_ ?
\\
till
I
I
\
I
I
1
I
1
1
1
1
UI
I
III
I
I
/
I I
I1
1
1111
111
11j
111 --- --
111
1
I
11
1
1
?1
1
1
111
1
IIII II III A 1 d- /
II IIIIIIIIIII
I I
l
I

t

'

---------
1

----- -
+98 41

'

-;- ;-
'.
II
Il
II
I 1 \
llljlllllllllll1111111?111111j11 111111 \\ \ / oo+ //I /^ \
IIIIIIII
ill
I I I If IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllll f I ??\1\1 II I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIiilllllllllllll I? I
r/ ?,\\
II
1j \ \\\ \ i 1 \\ \
\
\\
I1
\ 1 11 I \
III
? \ \\
\
law
I
\ \
1111 11 j J \ \ \\
\ \ \ \
I \ \ \ \ l i ;
G7 ° v - m C

------- -------- --------
aD c 1
t
O NFL

:. ... .. N
A r CD
ry

m )

. 33. xN co

E SUBMITTED MATH RESTORATION PLAN NOV. 2005
BOLD RUN CREEK KC 1 REVISIONS PER EEPCOMMENTS FEB. 2008
o n STREAM / BUFFER RESTORATION PROJECT ASSOCIATES OF NC
T Z ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS

o
I
WAKE FOREST
WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA { (? [ Jl
?`
i
T ,
, 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD i.5/7 3
cin
5 S,W OESp1 pN DATE APP WED
N
STATION 10+00,00 TO STA71ON 26+05 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 [?2.1 10 (A', .
ii.1
REVISIONS

0
?i

slfa aw
Is I lit*!

81is is it
IIgig
I«p
a
4
Y

x?
€j
r
;s
i
0
c
A
i
i
r
r
r
I
? i

v BOLD RUN CREEK KC I
v
STREAM / BUFFER RESTORATION PROJECT ?ssaures oT He
Z ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS
WAKE FOREST, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
4601 0
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
STATION 10+00.00 TO STATION 26+05
V
O
Q
K N
91Tg
Y
Jill
Jill
z
slrs ig 1# u

E O O O
O O O
O 0 O
91-1
xx
a?

! I I1 1
pp
S
o?? z
? Y
N
?g?
y
0 m
d 1 M
{
z
fi
R .I
1
;r
r
Ii <
I
?r I
Y? I

?HDivw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I 0 0 0 0 0 O O o
I ACC o Lt4 sosED t?, O O 0 0 0
I O 0 ? R,?F? ??yEO.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
? 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
I r • O
I 0 0 0 0 0
/1 I 0 0 0 0 0
I 0 0 0 0
I o
0 0 O
0 0 0 0
I ' 0 0 0 0
I :• 0 0 0 0
I 0 0 0 0
I •.0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 O
• 0 0 0 0 0 0
• 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 O
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 p O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
O 0 0 O
0 0 O 0
0 0 0 O 0 0 , "P0-4.0- . p n O O '
? I I
I
r r
i 1 xi
i 1 If
i I-X i
i
1 i
I x ?
I ?
I ?
l If
1 xi
I ?
I ?r
r /
I r
r
I
I ?
I r
(
s
t 0
0
a
o

m
RZ it
--T1 1.

m =i
-` v') ???
i1 ? p otllo
%I g

O
O

SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN
REVISIONS PER EEP COMMENTS
msmtm
AMOYD

m 0 0 0 '
0 0 0 ,
O O 0
;o
A > O O p ° O O p 0
0 O O p O O O O p O p p ° 0 0 0
T. 5 5; 0 0 0
Z Z Z ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 p
ca co co CYO-OX a O O O 0 p 0 0 0 ° 0 0
0 0 0 O
n -n -n m m 0 00 o 0 0 ° p 0 0 0 0 ° p o°
m
X 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O p 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0
G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0
0
m °°° 0 0 0° O o p p 0 °° O o 0
0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° 0
o p 0 p
p m ? ` °° 0 p o°° o o p o 0 0 O 0 0 °
p 0
°° o p 0° 0 0 o p 0 0 0 0 0
p
X z D> O p 0 0 0 0 °° 0 0 0 0 p o o °
O E 0 0 00 O o °°°° o
v D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 O p ° 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0
O p p ° 0 0 O p p 0° 0 0 0 0
Z , 0 0 00 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
p 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0 0
O p 0 ° O
mX O p 0 0 ° 0 O p p 0 ° 00 0 0 0
O p° p p p O p° O p 0 O p 0 0
D O ° O O
•° 0 0 O p ° 0 0 O p ° 0 0 0
• 0 0 O p ° 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0
I O O p 0 ° 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0
00 0 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
O 0 0 O 0
• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0
O O O p O° O O O p 0 ° 0 0 0 0
O p 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 p p 0 ° 0 0 0 M
• p p p 0 O O p p p p° p
° 0° 0 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0 O° 0 0 N
O 0 p 0 0 O p
0 0 0 O p. p O O p p p p 0 0 O
0 X X 0 O p O 0 p p O p 0 0 p p O
O p. . O p O p
W X O O O O O p p ° 0 0 0
Z Z Z O p ° ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0
O 0 p 0 p
C) C C 0 0 O p• •. 0 0 0 O O O 0 p 0 O /
X --n - 0 0 O o o p ° O° o p O /
m m m 0 /
/
z A ;0 o 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0
m x o 0 0 O p 0 p 0 0 0°°
x 1 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0
0 ' 0 p 0 0/
Z C O p 0 0 O, O O O p 0
m 0 0 0
m o°°° o o p 0 ° o°
0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0
Z ° 0 0 0
Z p p o / 0 p
G7 p Z 0 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
> N 0 0 0 0• 0 0 0 0
Z O p 0 p / 0 0 0 0
m 0° / °° 0 0 0
0 / 0 0 0 0 0
0 p 0 0 0 p 0
0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0
/
p o 0
.0 / 0 0 0° 0 0 0
0 o p 0 0 0 0 0
0 om Er 10 0 0 0 000 p p o
C z -T7 °
yD
aw r?0 i; ? ^-° 1
p E. tr . 'J
Co
O
SUSMI A III Will R RESTORATION PLAN NOV, 2005
0 BOLD RUN CREEK KC I REVISIONS PER EEP COMMENTS FES.2008
STREAM / BUFFER RESTORATION PROJECT ASSOCIATES OF NC
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS
Z WAKE FOREST
WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
,
, 4601 5 FORKS ROAD :' . srw oESCrwrrox arE AWWWEO

STATION 10+00.00 TO STATION 28+05 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
REVISIONS

•
•
•

Y
•
? ?
,
5
? ?
•.-
} '9. S?
•a
L? Y
?
6
}
;hy?,,??I'1 i
+?
y ?
?
N
? ?y?
y
(y
?. Y -
,
? Y
2
( SSS F

?q1+
6
r
?
?P '.
ty,z7t •rt.^!ytd
t
+?
ff y \

??'"??CCC t a

Qr?zF4' y ? .. ?_

- M1'i
'
t
? -
?
H
.
h Y ?
.!1
1 ?
- 4 Y
X @ t ?
'
y y
,
• _ ?yy
.L.dk ti -'
1 ?1
r ?ti Y . ?
. {
. ? R
.kT p
r,•, i,1?
v s(f?
•? r
4 ?

.
,p. 1. p.
? . y
•?qd?. ? °K
#f
"?+F a? ?'ti

'
' N
Tpy
A
i,F ?
/t ?p'+'l'V it.4^ 4
>?YIF?Y' Zi } rq'•N
l
Il r
i 1{p'`id
2 I.Y 'f ?. ,a I
•yP
•
( t `k x J
t

s ?2

5
d
; } r
;y
J
f•t •? Y f
-
?
-?
?
? ?
Y ? ,4
?'?` ?y Sgt

H 'Ji' F4t 't_e tom' J ..t•, +T C

'
-? -^ ?
t =
;mo

"
tro ?
b
" J ? t Y ? ? l5 ?y'? d J .
*
i
p

.r
v
p( c
f k
c? ;
f,
d# _.•;,. t . .
1'c S
* ?t
ce
ur a, C
4 C
i??? y
.a,Yt-•aM
r t ? >•t
; f. ,P
F1' ? I r p *S ? i dt
r
?
" ?
F _
rt ??
•
1
?
?? ^
?
?
`
' a 9 ? . dr's z?rs? ? ; ?'
a ti
rY`, Yl"
e 3' r?'
' ?'?!.'I ,f ?^?.. ..
4-•`l . ?dA, ?
?§4 1r '^- ? j?f 1 F s`i tj+',
1 ? 4 B?x
'
•'4?'}7 - C t ?. Kyy 4 ?'1, ?y
n ?'
L q _ I fl
.y
4
?"+• l y
r lid
,?..
i i ?
> d ^
;
e r?
k •
t

J,kt
5s. Y
}
Y
,
Y
Zrl
s i't? ,; ,P
ti f ; I
. R4 +

r
r
y y T
.,
ti :,
1+ F
t
r ?y? <; fy' j{y((??{ wFl.A ti, a ;
AM*
_
bTF
•
? ?r Yv S G ; fi'
? l'SC Y
4 '
.
r fa ? `u d'
'
.t' ;1F4f! V?
`u
' 't ??
,
?
?? 1
i } ?. 4 t
?-Ty 1113
:4 7'.- .
?r..• 1,? r_ ..•r
??+?, ? '?`f
?' ' ""?s.. r
C
* ?.,
? f
- ?`' _ . ?x ??? ?• i ?? ??',, - L.,. 1 .3?' , a T f ?
o. ?t` ?
Y?_ ti
7
?
Y-'
-: •-?
Y f :i +?, tit"' _
`.+i, p' 2_ '? ? 7"'
•
F =.. .,yy
?p#g
?
?
? i. y
y
,
,
3
,( • y?
y•>F ?
" !'? .p h } t.. ' y ? .? y
11t T 1. t- ?'.re -
4
`
T" '
1`
??"ii
( 7 ? ?, ? i ?
.
,?d
?ry4\i+'- it A .
??
".•S ?'?'?1. Y, ? „?`??l-t"a ????
`

x
a
'tom 7e ktiii?rf t t4 c r Y{4
r... i r, ,?

r

FF , 2F's t? M v ha '
a ` 'GA
M1J3 lY f Y Y x
,? S"

Y,
?
in-W
fS y `Y! T p y. a1,6 Y t i 'y ra qh
Historical Aerial Photograph - 1949
Y

KCI Project Location
Not Drawn to
Specific Scale S
ASSOCIATES OF
OF
NORTH CAROLNA. PA Source: USD:9 Natural Resource Couservatiodp Service

i
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
} ? ?`.^h4 rr', 1`t.`: 4"
rr ?i i r ?r.?_g' r!' j?,i Rtsy*a{ ?t )++h .:1? •v1i,S+,s AJf•?'. ••,``?}y\ ?i
` >'?.? •,4 ?7+ y? l1 t ,.,
7:? •?. . ?y r x `rT i •;?•. 7r C-?vf, . ? ?,i. ,. 1 •1 . r?r
lee
S•Y F i
fir. 4?F?}•??,e-?'n p.r ?'?'kr'Y'fft??, :Na'°' .s.A+e, ?,i`"r+? ?? - Y.?,ti-?r r',+
? 1W,
w ij.
r! 4 } _.) A•'-`? try'" 'ks? -? ti`s f : y
'rgr;? :,%?r tj. J:??7• !? ? ?f * ? `? i'd+ F
1p?`lwddlrjCc,x;?_.?r:o f .4
y t r A J1 k'? y >,, i Tii G. !g; ?.b T A•t<t y? t?? b.'? (? M.?,? j _
"1 M. , it
r F?? w r ?k` Sr. .?¢ l i S?'? _ ? ip?'?? _6? ?,/'? .? ?,•?"3'•iS+` - r ?,, ''?rfl.' ?6 ,r ?;'x?,t , .. aeaa_?r,?: ?J ?f py?'.>,'{ _ ,r..:' ,. i ? ..w ? .:a ?j! > _c?. ?kq. ?? •
'jt':'?3 '?C'rR¢._l'' T.r '4>f r S,.?['j _ '" / i. ?4''•ct?(? ' i t '
Historical Aerial Photograph - 1965
Project Location
Not Drawn to
I- K I Specific Scale XMI S}i I}
ASSOCIATES OF
\ORU f CAROLINA. PA Source: USDA Natural Resource COMOTatior Service

tl 44"
4,
xcf
b ?'i t.}' Y' ?i t?. ?? ."Hy? 'Y_.i. 1 _„F.-t,y 'Yi f 4 r,?y?.{
I
. r• . i ?y '?i?: ? ?#? :Y ? a2 `R.6 j'?T'"1' ,.+?.+ Is -, ie -!r" _ - - ?a -a +.Y - =s
AN,
Historical Aerial Photograph - 1981
Project Location Not Drawn to
KCI Specific Scale FICOWI Sleur
ASSOCIATES OF
NORU I CAROUNA. RA Source. USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service
y t"
-... lit
Y
-_ '
4c-57 -
M 'fe r
Al
.
X,,.� � 3•.K'» 1�:r4t'� r r r ��`c _. �s��/ RIYI -
9
a
1�
_ s
7.
yZIL
r J
AKCI Specific Scale EcoxYlst
,>x
Historical Aerial Photograph - 1988
Project Location Not Drawn to
•
ASSOCIATES OF
1�10
r ', PA /uree: USDA Natural Resource Conservation

Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Appendix B
State Agency Correspondence
KCI ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
ASSOCIATESOFNC LANDMARK CENTER 11 • SUITE 220 • 4601 Six FORKS ROAD • RALEIGH • NC 27609 • 919-783-9214 • (FAx) 919-783-9266
July 25, 2005
Linda Pearsall, Program Head
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27529
Sabi jcot. Ncatuial iic;i-itagc 1-'GVie VV
Bold Run Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Project ID# 12053743B
Dear Ms. Pearsall:
Please accept this information pertaining to the proposed Bold Run Stream and Wetland Restoration
- Project, which is located approximately 5 miles northwest of the Town of Wake Forest on Bold Hill Run
- Road approximately 1.5 miles east of the intersection with Mangum Dairy Road in Wake County, as a
submittal for natural area and rare species review by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
A portion of this property (refer to attached layout) is currently under investigation as a stream and
wetland restoration projecl for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). The
stream work typically involves modifying stream channels to a natural stable form through minor grading,
use of in-stream rock features, and establishment of vegetated riparian buffers. No impacts to any
structures on the subject property are anticipated.
Following the review of the included documentation, please provide a determination regarding any
potential impacts to rare species or natural areas associated with this project.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone], cxt. 133, should you have any questions or require any
further information to process this request. Thank you for your assistance and attention.
Sincerely,
Alp,
April L. Ilelms
Project Manager
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.A.
www.kc1.com
pl,>I„-0""'d swrr , 9,48
. "1 1 4 L
NCDENR
Nolte Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
September 20, 2005
Ms. April L. Helms
KC1 Associates o North Carolina, P.A.
Landmark Center 11, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleit,;ll, NC 27609,
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Subject: Bold RLIil Creek Strewn and Wetland Restoration Project; Wake Forest, Make County
Project IDIt, 120537438
Dear Ms. Flelms:
The Natural Heritage Program has no record of rare species, significant natural communities, or
priority natural areas at the site nor within 0.7-mile of the project area. The_U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers's Falls Lake lands lie roughly 0.7 air-mile downstream of the project site. Thus, it
is important that proper sedimentation controls be in place to avoid any downstream impacts to
these federal lands and their waters (Falls Lake).
You may wish to check the Natural HeritagIe Program database website at
<«vw- v.ncsl?ark5 netlnhIlsearch html> for a listing of rare plants and animals and significant
natural communities in the cotuity and on the topographic quad map. Please do not hesitate to
contact me at 919-715-8097 if you have questions or need further. information.
Sincerely,
Harry E. LeGrand, Jr., Zoologist
Natural Heritage Program
HELlhel
1601 Mail errice Center, Paleigh, North Carolina 27899.1601 ?Oae ??arq?Sl?
Phone: [phone]' FAX: [phone]' intemet: www.2nr.s,8te.nc.us ???? f?
An Equal cr rily. Air=zt eAcScn Err;foyer_50 >6 Receded' 10 % Past Ca mmerPa;er 1
I
?rrrr+s
¦r?r?r?r?r
arir??rr
rrrriru??s
K i I ENGINEERS * SURVEYORS - SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
TECHNOLOGIES LANMIAx UNTER U* SUITE _0 • 4601 Six Fous RoAu • RALvca • NC 27609 • 90.7SI-9273 ' F,_xe 9t9--$;-9266
July 25, 2005
Mr. Steve Woodruff, District Conservationist
USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service
Raleigh Service Center
4001 Carya Drive
Raleigh, NC 27610-2916
Subject: Farmland Conversion Impact Rating
Bold Run Stream and Wetland Restoration
Project Number 12053743B
Dear Mr. Woodruff:
Please accept this information pertaining to the proposed Bold Run Stream and Wetland Restoration
Project, which is located approximately 5 miles northwest of the Town of Wake Forest on Bold Hill Run
Road approximately 1.5 miles east of the intersection with Mangum Dairy Road in Wake County, as a
submittal for farmland conversion impact rating by the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service.
A portion of this property (refer to attached layout) is currently under investigation as a stream and
wetland restoration project for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). The
funding for this project comes from the USDOT Federal Highway Administration through NCDOT. The
current land use in the project area includes predominantly Agricultural Pasture Fields. The restoration
would improve water quality and provide greater protection for aquatic ecosystems from surrounding
agricultural lands. This type of work typically involves enhancing streams to create more natural and
stable channels through minor grading, use of in-stream rock features. and reforestation of riparian
buffers.
A soil classification was performed on the site recently. The following soils were found on the project
site; Chewacla- 1.3 acres. Chewacla variant- 16.3 acres, Chewacla Riverview- 7.6 acres.
Following the review of the included documentation, please provide a determination regarding any
potential impacts from farmland conversion associated with this project.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone], ext. 133, should you have any questions or require any
further information to process this request. Thank you in advance for your assistance and attention.
lie rely
April Helms
Project Manager
KCI TECHNOLOGIES
„• ti w.kci.com
I•
01-25-'06 09:01 FROM-DENH EEP 9197152001 T-576 P02/02 U-996
• i?
• U.S. 09pdr4nant of AgdkWtum
• llFARMLAND} CONVERSION IMPACT RATING
• • PART) (To bs CLYnplUIMI by Furlerat A;Qrjcy) f}at4 of land evshabon n7w" sl
• r1atwOfFrolYCt B04d iIUA 5tr Nm and We4nd Remomt?an Ltrdwid usaot-Ftiwa

• Prapta#a Lana U14 Stream and Wotlmd 12++stotsdian 1 CwMy atwt Sr"-' Wake County, XoM Carolina
PART N (Yb by t omr?txr by NAC$) arty koqur>t tt?r¢rwA Ery NFtt S

•

• M

a ll-
a ll'
'
6 1111
• ?
• ?.
• o
a s

0 6'

o"
•
•
• 1.
•
•
,
does the BRa contain prime, uniqua, statew4o a load important faivand? Yes . No
(if (a, the PAPA 0063 not apply - do not complote sddit wai part., of mis famnj C
_._ Acm3 i 4WW r'ata', w6

F
6t4wCrQ;0) I'WMaeleL" In(iovt.Juli 4C

Arms: ` 6., ?e G ? % $S , _._
...._
Nto.x d oiFs?urmt??{l?Ac orduwa to FPra
Audit '
S f ?T?
Nana d Lax1 EvakWim Byssem Uu 4 .
Z
Ir Nave Of I wak &N Asswuornt sydam - L
Onto Land C itaibn :prod By NRCS
- -
PART iU (To bP "tadby Fe;iorW Agericy)
A
7oi81AC{is'toi3s Gop?eried rir6itnL'
. _. ._ . ?...
3? ?A•:?` FukrrUa s
t`.?"?!s-?_.
?C.._ w ??.?i...__
^
...._.
84 Total Ae ms To 886 Corsvettod Irxiu11c4t
i Total Acres G $ 3 t .? OA
PART IV (Toby cor7;pt9tbd by NACS) Land EvatuaGon irVcxmat;on

_A s Pnrnm And Unique Fa'rmtand
_µ -y
EL Total AmsStalawulSAndLocal lmpcrtan;Farrntnru!
r tN Pbtrra at?d In Cnur,t?r Or ?ocrl Cvvt
UnitTo tae Cktva,ted _
Q _..., .
_ -._?
- _?
T.. _ -_..
y
D r ?-•
. Pet .0f Faprimd In Govt. J 6',aok A Wgi Uaw CW!} plff,r Rtuats vo;ue r>?
PARTV(robe cwn;vikodbyrNRCS) LandbisluxbonCtMilort
F3efativo Vt%" Of Fsrrr x" To Be Converted (Scala olo to
100 points)
0
0
PARTVI fToba eorrlptotoslbyFodermtAgency) trnu+i
Silo Aswsvr*.n4C4ktW(}1tasCFrdtrle+vaarpZncdbtTtPRL?DSrt f?uvb,
I . Alas In Worauban Use -. .. -? - - _... ... -,....
.2- PeOr (ti Norturban Use
a Peru Of Sits Beino Fwmed
- 0 - -
_ 4,
ProlmicWn Etonridad t3Y Stara And Lora! GovQmrnant
5 DsW w Fj*n UtWm

&
?. cl stance to uraa» supnon sarv.ces? _ A M_
Sim of Re"ni Farm Unit Ctu+?ared To Avers e
......... 6. ??
,
r
& +C $; ia? of rlor?rmotsls Fwmjand
SumotSoavire3
• ...
10. On farm inyysta*ms
11. Mods Of CcnvoWon On Farm &-wort Sarvicas
12. ?iBa+SAlttt,Fxisting_._ A&lwttur2l
TOTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PONTS 3p Ad
PART lilt (7d ba mi7piutad by Foue(ml Agency)
- Rehpve Vatue Of F mtl.;rx2 (Fmm Pwt 0 _
ssiu aeiissr'en1 {From Part Vt ayove or s ucar 1i+<1 R - 0
0
0
TOTAL POINTS (Tornl or a? cve 2 tines) (,, 2Lr tl d 0 0
•
S Wit A LooW Sea A© Vr*?1 Uswd7
Elie ebtta Data Of sv!ection Yes Na
• Rcxtm For AaWkrr -_ _ ?.-.•_ _. - - - - .- .?
• ,? tes m6q,. a. tato..i &orc clan uLh no kw, qixn qurmr
• Ctxlsic cla, ? pro;oo cnd no c ?-tio+r?ukj sides nse-d to
• 6, evoAvA+ea It ? C FK q WOO
• (Sea tnstfucuotri on raven: udtj FaM Ab-tAOt 1(14.83)
?' _ n?ybuw.r.uw?r?.y?..uacrxwaar+rMwwacaai?vwYLirr
K C I ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
_.. -__-----_. ----
ASSOCIATL'SOFNC LANDMARK CENTER 11 • SUITI: 220 • 46oi Six Folds ROAn • RALEIGH • NC 276o9 • 919-783-9214 • (FAX) 919-783-9266
July 25, 2005
Ms. Juliana Hoekstra
Environmental Review Specialist - SHPO
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Subject: Cultural Resources Review
.Bold Run Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Project ID# 12053743B
Dear Ms. Hoekstra:
Please accept this information pertaining to the proposed Bold Run Creek Stream and Wetland
Restoration Project, which is located approximately 5 miles northwest of the Town of Wake Forest on
Bold Hill Run Road approximately 1.5 miles east of the intersection with Mangum Dairy Road in Wake
County, as a submittal for cultural resources review by the State Historic Preservation Office.
A portion of this property (refer to attached layout) is currently under investigation as a stream and
wetland restoration project for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). The
stream work typically involves modifying stream channels to a natural stable form through minor grading,
use of in-stream rock features, and establishment of vegetated riparian buffers. The wetland work
typically involves minor grading and establishment of wetland vegetation. No impacts to any structures
on the subject property are anticipated.
Following the review of the included documentation, please provide a determination regarding any
potential impacts to cultural resources associated with this project.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone], ext. 133, should you have any questions or require any
further information to process this request. `['hank you for your assistance and attention.
Sincerely, ) (1
April L. Helms
Project Manager
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com
Lop1owe-0,,mtd Sena i9AS
1Q"_ ' t>i ,.
??r Jr'? illy Rest-o arLio-n tv??.f??J
1 '^..tp?I 1. {??w (.irit i?Tt,irri tV ltrti ( . .._
?
t ri-
PreparerrCcrnoan5 :UnIY"zr^ :
caress: x ysr K _ . 5 c ZZ? 11j'jy Z7io0 1
PhoneiFaxdE=rrsail:
II. ite Information ?A*tra4n USES nac cr : C,:,.aa c e„erse: rciure ; a^a y Mus arc t;.10 sates
------------------
'Wetland Resicraticn Stream I eszcraron Acpiicar3t`s iyer.u cancn
C;h,nr
Address: fore. -r ce-s; '? 1 -
County: LJ4 ke,
Ill. Identification of Histcric Properties:
Z7 537
Quad Name: &r- Ssom
List sites by site numcer and Status: NR = National Register listed: SL Study List: DOE = Determination of
Eligibility: LID = Local Designation: UA = Unassessed
Archeology
4,-f recorded sites in €mnledlate area ct site:

Architecture
of reccrced sites within mile radius
ss'?G
;V .+cds icnai informatlcn cr nvestmatacn nee ec`
Survey
Pq_Testingaf sites
..^OSI11Ttt'nditl I'x: ter ail: 49 16S7
oJt `.» i. Stag .+s '1:. air ; JJ
0^oco Reccnnaissance
-Ballcon Test
'3 Reccmrnendat:c =siF°raj :)R--r "' ..t:crr
Reddr mended cy or
:Si?reey .a ??annsng Sranc:l=
seccrrmercatl ?nS 'cr ;cnal ?scyr? are sic or Gwc ?e,
2 croccseal restcraCiii` _,lia 'WHI ?'X iffec: -is.c c cC.`.?S r,, '17e area t =er?131 abed.,
-')ate
r _. n. IMF ' e a 8 ? '?
?o
KCI ENGINEERS' • SURVEYORS • SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
ASSOCIATES OF NC LANDMARK CENTER II • SUITE 220 • 4601 Six FoRKs ROAD • RALEIGH • NC 27609 • 919-783-9214 • (Far) 9I9-783-9266
July 25, 2005
Ms. Shannon Deaton
Habitat Conservation Program Manager
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Division of Inland Fisheries
1721 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Subject: Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act
Bold Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Project Number 12053743B
Dear Ms. Deaton:
Please accept this information pertaining to the proposed Bold Run Stream and Wetland Restoration
i luject, wiricir is iucatea approximately -) miles northwest of the Town of Wake Forest on Bold Hill Run
Road approximately 1.5 miles east of the intersection with Mangum Dairy Road in Wake County, as a
submittal for the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act review by the NC Wildlife Resources Commission.
A portion of this property (refer to attached layout) is currently under investigation as a stream and
wetland restoration project for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). The
current land use in the project area includes predominantly Agricultural Pashlre Fields. The restoration
would improve water quality and provide greater protection for aquatic ecosystems from surrounding
agricultural lands. This type of work typically involves enhancing strearns to create more natural and
stable channels through minor grading, use of in-stream rock features, and reforestation of riparian
buffers. As part of the environmental documentation process (Categorical Exclusion), coordination with
the NCWRC and the USFWS is requested for compliance with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act.
Following the review of the included documentation, please provide a determination of the potential
effects to wildlife associated with this project.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone]. ext. 133. should you have any questinns or require an;,
further information to process this request. Thank you in advance for your assistance and attention.
Si erely
+AXpil Helms
Project Manager
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.A. w w w. k c i. c o m
1: plo te-O,vwd Slnee 1988
70-
9 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 9
Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director
8 August 2005
Ms. April Helms, Project Manager
KCI Associates of North Carolina
Landmark Center 11, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Subject: Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, Bold Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Project,
Wake County, North Carolina. Project Number 120537438
Dear Ms Helms: .
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject
document. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-6674), and North Carolina General Statutes
(G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program is currently investigating a stream and
wetland restoration site along New Light Creek, a headwater tributary to Falls-ofths-Neese Reservoir in
the Neuse River basin. There are records for the federal species of concern and state significantly rare
pinewoods shiner (Lythrurus matutinus) and state significantly rare Carolina ladle crayfish (Cambarus
david:') in New Light Creek. Current land use is agricultural pasture. The project would involve minor
grading to form natural, stable stream channels, use of instream rock features and reforestation of the
riparian buffers.
The proposed restoration project should improve water quality and aquatic habitat. Additionally,
establishing a forested riparian buffer should improve terrestrial habitat and provide a travel corridor for
wildlife species. We do not anticipate significant adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources from the
proposed project.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this project. If you require further assistance, please
contact our office at [phone].
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries - 1721 Mail Service Centex - Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
In
rage
$ August 2005
Bold Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Project No. 12053743B
Sincerely,
'
Shari L. Bryant
Piedmont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
ec: Sarah McRae, NHP
Angie Rodgers, WRC

ASSOCi1'r" OF NC
July 25 2005
ENGINEERS 0 SVIkVEYQR5 - .SsCIENTIS7 S - CO STRUC ION ??ANAGE RS
I , l i ; C 2 It " SV;tt 220 • . 601 S€x fop, ?? Ii.*kn • RcLG?.u I NC 2 7609 * 914i-7S f'-9214 ' "Rx" 9th)-7 3.#'y2£ b
Mr. Gary Jordan
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636
Subject: Endangered Species Act, l?isll and Wildlife Coordination Act, IMigratoryBird Treaty Act
Bold Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Project Number 120537438
Dear Mr. Jordan,
Please accept this information pertaining, to the proposed :Bold Run Stream and Wetland Restoration
Project, which,. is located approximately 5 miles northwest of the Town of Wake Forest on Bold Hill Run
Road approximatelyr 1.5 miles east of the intersection r?ith Mangum Dairy Road in Wake County, as a
submittral for review of the'Endangered Species Act, Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, and Migratory
Bird'lreaty Act Gy the US Fish and Wildlife Service.
A portion of this property {refer to attached layout) is currently under investigation as a stream and
wetland restoration project for the i?ortlx Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). The
current land use in the project area includes predominantly Agricultural Pasture Fields. The restoration
would improve water quality and provide greater protection for aquatic ecosystems from surrounding
agricultural lands, This type of work typically involves enhancing streams to create more natural and
stably: channels through minor grading, use cif in-stream rock features, and reforestation of riparian
buffers. As part of the environmental documentation process (Categorical Exclusion), coordination with
the USF'WS is requested for compliance with the Endangered Species Act, Fish and Wildlife
Coordination .Act, and Migratory Bird 'Treaty Act.
#=ollowing the review of the included documentation, please provide a determination of the potential
effects to endangered species, wildlife, or migratory Girds associated with this project.
Please feet free to contact me at (919) 7fi3-9211, ext. 133, should you have any questions or require any
further information to process this request. Thank you in advance for y?our'assistance and attention.
Sincerely,
April I Ielnts
Project Manager
KCI Assoct,?,TE.s OF NcsRTH f"?,rrot.t?A, PA:
;ti VVV".kci coin
Is
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Appendix C
Environmental Screening Inspection Forms
ENWRONMENTAL SCREENING INSPECTION (ESD FORM
The objective of the ESI is to have an Inspector screen a property for the visual presence of the items
listed on this form without making an evaluation of the conditions or history of the observed concerns.
This ESI Form defines the scope of work to be performed in a checklist format, and also serves as the
report document once the Inspector has recorded the observations taken during the inspection, and has
attached the site plan and photographs.
This form was completed in the field by an Inspector who conducted a non-destructive visual inspection
of the subject property to document observations on-site and, to the extent possible, on the adjacent
properties. The inspector did not disturb, dismantle or rearrange any materials, containers or equipment
in performance of the inspection.
The entire subject property was covered in a manner conducive to observing and recording evidence of
environmental concern. Photographs depicting the general overall condition of the site as well as each
item of environmental concern are included.
1. Subject Site Description
Site Name: Bold Run Site
Address/Location:
Bold Hill Run Road
City: Wake Forest County: Wake State:
Size: acres
North Carolina
Current Landuse(s): Rangeland (pasture) and livestock farming
Number of 0 ? occupied 0 ? unoccupied
buildings:
Site Improvements: ® undeveloped land
Utilities Serving the Subject Property:
? city sewer
? septic system
? paving & utility
improvements
® electricity
? gas
? buildings ® fenced
? city water ? well water ? telephone
H. On-Site Industrial/Manufacturing Activity Checklist:
The following observations were made of industrial/manufacturing activities currently in operation
and/or evidence indicating such previous activities on the subject site:
1. agricultural or horticultural production ? Yes ® No
2. airport or aircraft maintenance ? Yes ® No
3. analytical testing laboratories ? Yes ® No
4. asphalt or cement plant ? Yes ® No
5. chemical manufacturing or treatment ? Yes ® No
6. dairy, meat or food processing ? Yes ® No
7. dry cleaning facilities ? Yes ® No
8. explosive manufacturing ? Yes ® No
9. foundries, smelters or casting operations ? Yes ® No
10. freight terminals ? Yes ® No
11. gasoline station or convenience store ? Yes ® No
12. herbicide or pesticide manufacturing ? Yes ® No
13. incineration furnace or air emissions ? Yes ® No
14. inks, dye and paint manufacturing or use ? Yes ® No
15. junk or scrap yard ? Yes ® No
16. landfill or open dump ? Yes ® No
17. livestock feed lots or manure stockpiles ® Yes ? No
18. machine shops ? Yes ® No
19. metal fabrication or production ? Yes ® No
20. metal plating or finishing ? Yes ® No
21. military base ? Yes ® No
22. mining or quarry activities ? Yes ® No
23. motor vehicle maintenance or repairs ? Yes ® No
24. oil and gas production or refining ? Yes ® No
25. paper manufacturing ? Yes ® No
26. pharmaceutical or medical production ? Yes ® No
27. photochemical laboratories ? Yes ® No
28. plastic or fiberglass fabrication or manufacturing ? Yes ® No
29. power plant ? Yes ® No
30. printing industries ? Yes ® No
31. railroad yard or spur ? Yes ® No
32. treatment, storage & disposal (TDS) facility ? Yes ® No
33. vehicle or equipment de-greasing or washing ? Yes ® No
34. waste treatment process ? Yes ® No
35. wood preservation or finishing ? Yes ® No
36. fertilizer manufacturing ? Yes ® No
Description of the overall appearance of the subject property and observed industrial/manufacturing
activities (if any):
All open land on the subject property is utilized as rangeland for cattle kept on the
property.
III. On-Site Inspection Checklist:
Evidence of the following operations/conditions was observed on the subject property:
1. floor drains, septic systems ? Yes ® No
2. damaged/leaking transformers ? Yes ® No
3. heavy equipment, tankers, spray rigs, paint booths ? Yes ® No
4. storage containers, drums ? Yes ® No
5. chemical, petroleum, foul odors ? Yes ® No
6. dumping, disturbed soil, direct burial activity,
injection wells, other disposal activities ? Yes ® No
7. surface impoundments/holding ponds
(other than storm water retention) ? Yes ® No
8. waste water discharges ? Yes ® No
9. sumps, hydraulic lifts/equipment ? Yes ® No
10. ASTs, USTs, fill pipes, vent pipes, vaults, UST
manhole covers, pumping equipment, patched areas
of asphalt or concrete indicative of previous UST
locations or repairs ? Yes ® No
11. monitoring wells, piezometers, other subsurface
monitoring devices, remedial activities ? Yes ® No
12. stained/discolored soil ? Yes ® No
13. leachate or seeps ? Yes ® No
14. chemically distressed, discolored, stained vegetation ? Yes ® No
15. chemical spills/releases ? Yes ® No
16. petroleum sheens on water
(excluding parking lot ponding) ? Yes ® No
17. other ? Yes ? No
Description of identified environmental concerns (if any):
There were no environmental hazards during the field investigation.
IV. Adiacent/Abuttin2 Property Checklist:
The inspector has observed and documented land uses, business operations, and conditions of concern on
all adjacent/abutting properties, from the boundaries of the subject property and from public streets,
alleys, sidewalks, etc. An "abutting property" means those sites that share a common property boundary
with the subject site, while "adjacent property" means those sites separated from the subject site by an
easement, such as a street, highway, railroad, etc.
A. The adjacent property(s) to the north (direction) is:
® uphill from ? downhill from ? level with the subject site.
Current use(s) Rangeland/pasture, forest ? occupied ® unoccupied
Observed concerns: ? chemical spills/releases
? underground storage tanks ? aboveground storage tanks
? impoundments/holding ponds ? drums/containers
? remediation/clean-up activity ? landfilliburial activity
? industrial/manufacturing activity ? wastewater discharge
Comments:
? chemical odors
? stained soil
? dumping
? monitoring wells
? air emissions
B. The adjacent property(s) to the east
® uphill from ? downhill from
(direction) is:
? level with, the subject site.
Current use(s) residential, rangeland/pasture ® occupied ? unoccupied
Observed concerns: ? chemical spills/releases ? chemical odors
? underground storage tanks ? aboveground storage tanks ? stained soil
? impoundments/holding ponds ? drums/containers ? dumping
? remediation/clean-up activity ? landfill/burial activity ? monitoring wells
? industrial/manufacturing activity ? wastewater discharge ? air emissions
Comments:
C. The adjacent property(s) to the west (direction) is:
? uphill from ? downhill from ® level with, the subject site.
Current use(s) forest, rangeland/pasture, residential ® occupied ? unoccupied
Observed concerns: ? chemical spills/releases
? underground storage tanks ? aboveground storage tanks
? impoundments/holding ponds ? drums/containers
? remediation/clean-up activity ? landfill/burial activity
? industrial/manufacturing activity ? wastewater discharge
Comments:
? chemical odors
? stained soil
? dumping
? monitoring wells
? air emissions
A The adjacent property(s) to the south
® uphill from ? downhill from
Current use(s) forest, rangeland/pasture,
residential
(direction) is:
? level with, the subject site.
® occupied ? unoccupied
Observed concerns: ? chemical spills/releases
? underground storage tanks ? aboveground storage tanks
? impoundments/holding ponds ? drums/containers
? remediation/clean-up activity ? landfill/burial activity
? industrial/manufacturing activity ? wastewater discharge
? chemical odors
? stained soil
? dumping
? monitoring wells
? air emissions
Comments:
Environmental Screening Inspection (ESI) - Photograph Documentation

Photograph 3. View from the East on Bold
Hill Run Road looking at the southwestern
portion of the subject property. The land is
used for cattle/pasture.
Photograph 4. View looking west at the
power line easement.
Photograph 1. View from the East on Bold
Hill Run Road looking at the northern portion
of the subject property. The land is used for
cattle/pasture.
Photograph 2. View from the East on Bold
Hill Run Road looking at the western portion of
the subject property. The land is used for
cattle/pasture.
Photograph 5. View from the western portion
of the subject property looking east. Adjacent
property to the cast is residential.
Photograph 7. View looking cast, upstream at Photograph 8. View looking north along the
Bold Run Creek. ditch in the center of the site
Photograph 6. View looking cast on the right
bank side of Bold Run Creek.
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Appendix D
Wake Electric Easement
BKO01174PGO0171
=41174 P;al71
Location Num1,er
KNOW ALL MCH BY THESE PRESZM That we, the wadenlpad
'>• ,il a
po,wled) (husband and wits). In oonsidentha of _
amd other valuable considerations and the AlYdooal censider"a a bentaaRsr eyielfled, the rwceipt
of which is busby aokoorWeA do busby Rant vote WAKB YLCCTRIC YYYBCRSHIP COR.
PORATON, • lecoopersUve e aml plus corporation ess ?W&U Taut. Wale County and Stats,d North CsrollY,
its Peieeipat oflta and pass
att?aad eesigmi, the right ale of enter a the lauded the undeni eitwod In the County
olleaw2
Btat North Carolina, and man particularly ularl u4rly dserlbed as follows
L armor. _ ??
<A tract of L4 approximately 2 1m located Ls from U.
+=^ f°
Tows of }mad added br Leda ewood by --
sag J `? i1 iLt1.,f anal ?.
s construct, recenstac4 repair. 'yeolvfw?-operate &M mole on the abe" dowiW lands &Wor
In or open all stre" roads or highways abottlng said lands, an eleetrle trwmisdon or distribution
line or $pla % togetbrr with the right of Ice- sad agrees over the lands of the undeniped to and
from ssW User is the serdee of the rights sod prfviww Ra" Prov" bowever, that in words.
Its web rldt of InRone and ev the Coopu*u" WILL, In eo for Y Is Practical to do p we rww
tarty cotablleW bybwayserr rare readers uM rW o -vmY hereto aonvayed Is to be me ban" (100)
teat Is width. fifty (50) red fray tha add ltstwr Ban on ucb aide thereof. and includes the dsbt is
cut and trim tress and shrubbery upon"rishW-W&Y. and oho lwlvdm the right to cut dawn Irma
time to time all deed, week Isaxim or otherwlss danwoes tren eitoaW a or snub to the above
granted r[g?bot-way to eoasUtub a USAW to SSW pewee trnosmin{on Boss.
nzP1 11 wbM,=W um
0* It
tow
-
ri undersigned agree that an poles, vim sad other fadWis tatdled at the above deserted land
rA 00 expos of sold Coopmwt va" resale the property Of old Cooperative, remmebWat Its OW
eta..
The undmdgmad amount that the an the owners of the above described lands and that saW Lads
an free ed alts of all ownebramess and lone of wiWoenr YWn, except those bsM by the follow.
lax,
mraor:
IN WI ESS W 011,90r. the uadusigaM tees berwnto set their be"$ sad erh, this Ji
day of 0'14,4- 191
(BCAL)
BKO01174PGO0172
61174 islW
NORTH CAROLINA.
• /?A` County.
1. ?; gz pWaq Yu?. do basbY caMtr thnl G.
,and „g'( n.. ?'! ) -C.'t .`- ife wlte, v?b b?^d beltte aw thta day sad aeisowMdaed
the dw um.uoa of the tatgdol -low-wq -a-L
• wits," w bald old nouew seal, the / • S a,y ( •r• Bert lui
/ a
Now r"k)
Hy Comslrtos zolm 7 ?y
yy?? 1
NORTH CAROLINA.
Z i L?. notat7
h4 a tea tl?aar and sckwwldpa
`Ct the an uWaum of the rW"Ghwr
wit. aw m" and - lY-
t SSg??,, alp yy
my commu"
$Af t ?,- a,
NORTH CAROLINA. 1 ptiG?d N
aaMry pubW. a. ht.hr tYn??? ?e ?e?
L -
and -- hb wife, paw"44 a ¦
the dw o watim at tm taetlotW TWAq&war w--L
wits," q hood and aatartal -L ?-
(UAL)
t,ieu* r¦WN

I
11
i
4• I-18 ?--•-- ?3 . v1?Mi ?a-(
4i-19
-'r M
cr. ?/ l Pa?TU??.'

Do 2

162-FZ AC
UOU61
d9S D
4
3
- .
,
2C N

, Q I
• 'N 1 ?
Y C
Plus -rxuft
j
1
G
R
k
© (
,
J
? f '
V Tau ? \ t/

j ems,.
Q °

v
?4t-ion
Attacbmant T (one) to Douglas Darch
right-a-way easement (7-12-87).
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Appendix E
Project Site Photographs
Bold Run Creek Photograph Log
Photograph 2. View from the East on B(
Hill Run Road looking at the western portion
the subject property. The land is used
cattle/pasture.

Photograph 4. View from the East on Bold
Hill Run Road looking at the southern portion
of the subject property. The land is used for
cattle/pasture.
Photograph 1. View from the East on Bold
Hill Run Road looking at the northern portion
of the subject property. The land is used for
cattle/pasture.
Photograph 3. View from the East on Bold
Hill Run Road looking at the southwest portion
of the subject property. The land is used for
cattle/pasture.
Bold Run Creek Photograph Log
Photograph 6. Looking north at Ditch 3
crossing the project site.
Photograph 5. Looking northwest from the
upstream portion of the stream at the utility line
crossing in the middle of the project site.
Photograph 7. Looking east toward Bold Hill
Road at Ditch 3 on the project site.
Photograph 8. Looking east toward Bold Hill
Road at a Swale located parallel to Ditch 3 on
the project site.
Bold Run Creek Photograph Log
Photograph 10.
Run Creek.
Photograph 11. Upstream portion of Bold Photograph 12. Looking at Ditch 1, which
Run Creek. joins the upstream portion of Bold Run Creek.
Photograph 9. Stream bedrock signifies start
of project reach.
w
Bold Run Creek Photograph Log
Photograph 14. Looking upstream at UT1
note the confined valley.
-w-4 wwP
s
/ ?S! a ?y,?. ,?1 4
y ?
Photograph 16. Looking upstream at
upper portion of Bold Run Creek. Note
heavy cattle traffic on the right bank.
Photograph 13. Looking upstream at UT 1.
Photograph 15. Cattle fence bordering UT 1.
Bold Run Creek Photograph Log
Photograph 17. Looking upstream at the
upper portion of Bold Run Creek. Note the
utility pole immediately adjacent to the stream.
Photograph 18. Looking upstream at the
upper portion of Bold Run Creek.
Photograph 19. Heavy cattle traffic on the
right bank of Bold Run Creek.
Photograph 20. Looking downstream, notice
the heavy cattle traffic located on the right bank
of Bold Run Creek.
Bold Run Creek Photograph Log
Photograph 22.
ephemeral channel,
Run Creek.
Looking upstream at
which cotmeos to _
Photograph 24. Looking upstream from the
downstream portion of Bold Run Creek.
Photograph 21. Looking upstream at Bold
Run Creek.
Photograph 23. Looking upstream at the
downstream portion of Bold Run Creek. The
ephemeral channel connects to Bold Run Creek
on the left bank. Also, note the stable riffle in
the foreground.
Bold Run Creek Photograph Log
Photograph 25. Looking upstream from the
downstream portion of Bold Run Creek.
Photograph 26. Looking upstream from the
downstream portion of Bold Run Creek at the
confluence of New Light Creek.
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Appendix F
Project Site Stream Classification Forms
DWO =; - siti:: iindicate on atiached neap)
?• S.rREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
M
ProN ide the following ir' fortnat ion for the stream reach under assessment;
1.. Applicant's_natue:- 2. Evaluator's natue:- ,-•?3. Date of evaluation: .t. Time of ei iluatioiv
a. Narne of streajn:_ -'*'__ i _ 6, River basin: ?
7. Approximate drainage arc i:__ 8. stream order:
9. Length ofreiCberaluatcd:_? -_? 10. onlity:,
11. Site coordioales t i f i noun); )xc.cr is deciln fl d ?:rees. 12. Subdivision name {it wiy ):_
Latittide(ex.314 a7 .,'): I iugituJLfc? °?? ?„ni l};
Me1l10d 100 iti0l'ri:knnsncd tcirclc): 61'ti lijp.5 Siic (,)??hn (;?rrial) I'1tNiu'Ci1S Offier(iIS Other
13. Location of retch under evaluatum 0note nearby roads and landmarks and attach ntap identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel %%oi if tnr ? ??
IS. RCCcglt v.Catile'r Conditions: 16. Site conditions as time ot'visit:
17. Identify any special rraterrv„y classiftcutions kno%rn: ,_,_,.S"60il 10 Tidal Waters Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters i(7utst,utdint? ltest?urce `til'atets _ 'Nutrient Sensitive Witers Water Supply Watershed (1-IV)
18. 1i there a por.1 or Like lt,ct :ed upstream of the ev.ilu li.in point`' YES '\O II`} es, estimate the water surraco rear
19. Does ctrrnncl ,Ippear nn I SGS quad iitap? `r 1 S i 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil-Survey? YES
21. Estimated ttiatcrsl,ed band a Residential __"., Ccntnlerci ?t °jo'Industrial v-1 % Agricultural
Forested o CL,,n ed L,oggged _'/' Other ( )
22. Bank fuII width 23. Bank hci,l ht (front bed to top of bank):
24. Ch;tnnel sloi?c durrrt center o sere ws: _Hat it) to 2?a) ? Gentle '(2 to -I°, u) ?hlodcrate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10°.40)
25. Channel sinuosity: Strai ht Otcasic nai bends _Frequentweander -Very sinuous braided channel
Instructions for completion of uoriahcct (located on pale ?): Begin by detcrtnining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location. terrain. vC-Ctation, stream ct:assidt:' tion, etc. Every clmrtdteristic must be scored usin- the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within th° ran e shc»crt for the eccre iou. PP -'e > 111'0r'iile5 a brief description of how to review the
:luiracteristics identified in tile worksheet. Scares should retIcct M overall asscssincnt of the Stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or Nveather conditions, enter 0 in the scorim, boa and proride an explanation in the
conlilleM section. Whcre there Lite -obvious Chan "c in the character of a stream under rceicw is tile stream flaws from a pasture
into a forest}, tile: stre.un 111,ly be divild::d into sm,titer reilches that ais'phty more eontinuit%. xid a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. Tito Iotal score assi-tied to a stream reach must range -between 0 and 100, with a score: of 100 rcpresentino a stream of the
highest.qualily,
Total Score (from reverse):, Cuntntetits:
Evaluator's Si=gniaturi Date
This channel er'Mu.ition fo in is intendiri to be Used only as a guide to :assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gtatliu the data required by the t'nited States Amity Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary' assessment of stream
-ut? C
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this forth is subject to USAiCE approval and does not imply a
particular miti-ation ratio or requirement. Fonts subject to change -version 06'03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441:x; 26.
s-rREANI QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
CIIARACTERISTICS
Presence of flow 0 persistent pools in stream
inn f1rr,4 (it ,;itu .i,i,n O %troty, 11rn? - in,iv: noint?i
EC;ORI t,ION POIN"I" RANGE -1
SC'OI21,
t.'ua5tal - Picdntont ? 11loiintain
0-4 0_
i
EN idence of past human alteration j
0--e 0...5 0
no alter it n = m t )oints)
Riparlin lone
(i 6 0--4
r
0-5
?-
' (n)
vuttcr 0. ciuu1 uouti j bullc,r= ul1y pt?i lt,) I ( ( ?.
I.'cidence of nutticnt of ci em4 ll discharoel 1 0 _ _
h
- 0
di
h
' {t
(extensive ursc
,lr>_cs
, lit)
sc
aitcs max })r>nlts
1?
G ouI] dN ltc1 disclInrIe l
0
- 3
0-4
L (no cii•.h?r c {) Ling ',ecps. "vet illds. ctc. = ma: polllts)

-4

Presence of adjacent floodpl lilt
incl flood) l ill (1 L'Y1 tUt hood})l lul' nl afi points)
- - - -------- -
Entrenchment / floodplrtn access
0-4

(dcepIv crn.rcr,ched 07 rcqucnt rlt odnl . Iwly: pointsl {
0-2
Prescncc of adjacent N%cal ands
i
8 I 0 J
?
t
0-4
ino wetlands 0 1lr,c :1 it scent'wed 1 ", lllati poilltO 0-2
f
11.luncl 411luo,,RN
i ) 0 --
0-3
tcst?u:`ivc ctlann?lit ltl .n r {1 natur it t X11 tLr max points) 1 ? 1
4cdimcnt input.
l0 0-? 0--4
0_}
j t (ext'nsiv°, dcposition 0 l,ttl or 11') ",2diment 11 ax t))!tt(ti) ) 1.
.
d Size & dtticlSity of citlnnct bed substl lre
NA 0-4
Ilitl? 110111O IOLIS 0 tar c uiva,, sl! _ max oiilts)
LI 5
i t
' L
d
b
f
.vl
ence o
c
ltlitcl lticl ion or Alidcnlnl?
,.., t i 1 ci iY
Presence of 11111
jolbash failure: (
scv ire crw ioll - (i 110 cr1,, 1_ ;1 1E?1 L_ln1 s lilx il()nlts)

!
t
i Root depth and dcusit oo banks

0
14
ru iyil)1e n ut? u d nsc roois thrcu Iiout rnax ts)
Impactbv agriculture. tiv stotk,ortimber production ? s
?
0_5 0_4
i , (mil-itit,lntial 1(1111 ,,,( "_-?), lit) cvidc.li?e Max ? Oilit'i D-5 -
Presulccoftlfilc-pouiitlpplc Complexes
_ no rinlu,?rtri) lua U1 j,'00 t) II i0 elul)Cd - 11KIy 1 0intsl }
?
.?.
l
f j 11)it.it Complexity
1 j-6
1 s hue c r rc) ll1blt at 0freq 1 i t. v rr ic,d habitats - may ix i 1t.s)
0 6 1

0--6

C tnop coverli_;eover ,Uc1ltlbcd
is 0 5
0--5
0-5
}`A
tilt' <111,1i,,] iit? tt,'CltihOn {): co iltill N
1 nts) i
v =_
ill=1\12
-
-
-
l-
-
Substrata embeddcdness?
19
ttle"ok embedded =- 0; loo>c structure - nlax'i _

0-4

0-4
f
P
i
resence o
stream
nti ertebr ttcs (see p l.,c 1
20 )
{ilO CV idleN CC 0; C0111111W;1 11il1l 1111iti tyl)c:7 - 11111.\ )1.)intsi ! a
Presence of ampblbi fns 4 0
1 0
1
i ? (no t7bidt flee 0: Crlmllloll
miiliLl'o "; t1'pLn '- naafi pi finis) - _
.
_ _
i Presence of fish`
22 i 0 _4
cvicieice 0 c0ru11i?u numi.Wll ni1ynt:;)
I
0-4

---

0--4
Z v idencc of wildlife use
- ? 0- 5
{Illl Cl idcn..i"
0. alJund.mt cYi&nc.: - in i\ pjints) )
Total Points Possible IOO 100 100

j TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
v ..;.
TI cC,,: chmr icltcrktlc,, are not .lascsscd ill iS[;ll st1" :1i11S.
2

`C )IN O Stream CLissif cation Form
I'rget r `?_ ?? f?iur? m l ti;' Ctuatgvluunr:_ Ct" t
iltt'Ql'r -t a •?er; tvt r?r ?trc u?
* PL [ kS E '041: lJrcvlrrator aaa t lrrndarerarr a cre rltut tlrcfr uUrr? is ca hoar-inside rlifib, then a se rf this farm A nail mrcc+srrry.
a(xa;+uihrLcstpre1i'tsioua>%+ea1.>uruta,frtrecvrlsatar,t$e,jcatnrcrtarras>Yaualrrlitchunarratutrttxitfler7irntrrrul,tYr4rrrla thiw'
Xadng scs1.?>n .rlr.nrhJ n, n &• us; :i "?
Primarv Field
1. C:eonlorphololly Ab, nt Weak Moderate Stroh.
I)rt , r i o .? ( rer t)_$ 1 .r
3
IL Ilvdruln<,?- Klrrut weak M Berate Stron+=
11 L;Tl;,r, ;1 61oondivj',:t
Polk P 0 1 ? 3
PRIMARI"Ii)PROLOGY]NUIC 17ORf"l>ta' IS:
111.IIiolo'Yc il»t?nt Weak Moder;ite ;Irnmr
j?rc{l,l ;try'i'rret•?_2„4,11,S,=yu}nlxti? 1 fl
+ ra 1, I P4+ _? r? ? it In Strcamhedl ! ?_ t 4

PR 13 I R l' IIIOL0GY INDIG4TOR POLY Ts. Lo-
Secontlary Field Indicators: r€=,,:, r1?.,1??1
1. Geonrornlroinrt> yh?cnt Wenk Moderate Strom?
W5 Ih
3} Doc.,, I o ;stay I ndieale A
'rv,,t,?rrl DI \ _ 4 5
:SFC"OiVD: I I ,}' t:r LY)-I10R1'IIC,IL 0G tNDIC'.I ffik Pl"llNTS:
11.llvtlrol4r„c a-lrs"l _-._ 11'calt_ Moderate Stront_
it Ts Tlrn 1"art`s iOr L >t'til l atliiter
ll 1; 1b';r 1n L?lr;rrrrtl Arrr! •°»S €irs Sincs S I I.?
5) Is 'ir tV'r;Uer' t t?ctt> ??17n° -- {? _ ?? 1 1.3
?( , t)r (rt t t?nl ice„ ? iJ _ _
h \, }Jt Ir c _ f ct' , ?i I" s U, h: mil sOr In F Y I ov"J,; ? ! m
SECOND. I RY NY7PROLOGY INDICATOR POLY EY.,
r ?.
3 I?;I?ih •'r,>,li ? _ S ! 1>
K} ?., 'cl 1'1 lu r;, a SAN' 51vs#ly 001, ° 100 F1CtiY Mostly F AC, Mewl} FACI,; Ma-l",111L:
St, rT. rii .f 2 l '75 .? S}
1t)1 Is A t) z r i C, : r (h ; r 15 t „ic,,.cd
Grp i' 1 t 1 y=t" 1
( t tl . It -1 Or In I w!,'3
"ter
PRI.t1.IR}' ( E0.1dt)ttPHOLOGYINDICATORPOINTS.--n-
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Appendix G
Existing Conditions

Bold Run Creek
Existing Conditions
River Basin: Neuse
Watershed: Bold Run
XS ID XS1 , Riffle
Drainage Areas mi :
Date: 9/2/2005
Field Crew: AH, AS
Station Rod Ht. Elevation
0.0 5.04 100.00
3.0 4.63 100.41
6.0 4.55 100.49
6.5 4.56 100.48
7.0 5.77 99.27
11.0 6.29 98.75
12.0 6.10 98.94
13,0 < 7.08 97.96•>
14.0 7.781 97:26
15.0 8.59 96.45
16.0 9.02 96.02
16.5 9.13 95.91
18.0 9.28 95.76
19.0 9.20 95.84
21.0 9.17 95.87
22.0 9.21 95.83
24.0 9.19 95.85
26.0 9.09 95.95
26.8 8.98 96.06
27.0 8.67 96.37
28.0 8.62 96.42
29.0 8.26 96.78
30.0 7.95 97.09
32.0 7.06 97.98
35.0 5.90 99.14
37.0 5.28 99.76
38.0 4.68 100.36
38.5 4.32 100.72
41.0 4.29 100.75
44.0 4.8 100.3
47.0 4.8 100.3
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 97.64
Bankfull Cros"ectional Area: 25.00
Bankfull Width: 17.78
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 99.52
Flood Prone Width: 30.00
Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.88
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.41
W / D Ratio: 12.6
Entrenchment Ratio: 1.68
Bank Height Ratio: 1.69
Slope ft/ft : 0.007
Discharge (cfs) 108
Stream Type: B4c
Neuse River Basin, Bold Run, XS1 , Riffle
110

105

0100
_ ___________________

W _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
95

- - Bankfull
- - Flood Prone Area
90

0 10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
Bold Run Creek
Existing Conditions
right bank looking left bank
rs
MM
[1

SS ? t ?Y; ? i.?
4
XS-1 looking upstream
XS-1 looking downstream
XS-1 left bank looking right bank
H
O
d
U e
?U
wW
O

co

O
10 N M
16 C?
O
O
a
M
X
W O
O

a
as o

49
CC
L O
N

?
F
z

0
0
o l0 0
r- o o LO
rn 0
rn
U)
O
0
(]88f) U017BA813
N A
.
0
N N Q
?o? a=
zmx ?a
o _
O O. oo O. 1` h M O, 7 l? D\ M a` O O h O -r N N Q\ t` V) O N
O, l? t` t` 7 P t` h N N-+--? O Q, O+ h (? h 7 N O? h it M
Vl v M b b u1 b "' W 00
N N M V, 00 Q` M ,.., vl ,.r M N O
> 8 01 D\ O. 00 00 l? l? -1`I? h [? l? I? t` n b 'o 'D 'D 'D 'D 'D v, h h V) vl h h Vl Vl ?D r-: m W o, O O O
O.
as O
,.. T Os ON ON rn ON rn M ON M O. ON O. C% M O, M M M O. M M ON ON ON ON D\ O? T
a
w
'E ?". ?D v1 n 00 (? (31 10
.-. M [? N O? [? O M l? b b vl Q vl l? U -+ ?D
O
.--. M
00 00
v) V)
.-. O O
h
N b .
,O M v) vt vl 00 7 ?O oo O .-• .-. N N N K V ?D ?O oc O\ .-. N N h m a
ov nv v D 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 o a rno o c
y? ?
a
oooao oo O o0
N
O O
N
oon?1D16vivivi
x
io
m
c .a Q
3

A ,= m -?-
C
m O O O l? O O ?O O O O O O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 V L G -.-•? N M V V1 ?D l? OO 01 O fV M 7 V1 [? W D1 C .-? N
O M I'D ID
oo a1 a\
'

'7 vl ?O [?

M M M M m

a M _ W
00 00 O M l?

M cf
-
>
w Qj
a
` ,?
N N N N N N N N N M M M M M m
cia.
?xc
3
D\ N N
O?
M
N
O
N
-4
N
p
?

0

77 O
p°
A ; o ,?, a 3 ? ? a ,?
a w U` 3 a g s ? a E ms ;: d
? ? ? F a a. Q A CX
A o x
d a`
? ? ? o o o K ? w o y
v?i oo m oa ? 'w ? ? 3 w aa ? 'c
m

1 1

1 t C
O

t 1 ?
j

t t O
C
1 1 O
1
1 t
1
1
1 1
t 1
1 t
t t
1 t
t t
1 1
1 1
1 t
1 t
1 1
1 t
t t
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
t
t
1
1 t
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
t t
t t m
1 1
1 1
1 t
Bold Run Creek
Existing Conditions
XS-2 looking upstream
XS-2 left bank looking right bank
XS-2 looking downstream
N
C
d O
V V
0
? m
? O
0
C4
0
v
m
d
Q
m
c
o
CL
0
1 1
0
m LL
1 t
1 t t 1
1 t 1 ?
1 / 1 1 M
t
1 t
1 1

O ? 1 1
1 1
M 1 t
t 1

C
= t
1 1
P4
?
C7 v 1 t
1 o
N

1 /
O
Z
.y 1 1
1 1
? 1 1
?
a
W 1 1

t 1

Gn t 1
=
W 6l 1 1

a
a
a''w??
w
°
c L z 1

on vl
,o
r
v
,
3 h ,
, o
1 t ?
1 1
1 t
1 t
1 t
1 t
1 t
1 1
1 1
t 1
1 1
0
° o °o 0) rn
o
D o °o
(laaj) uollena/3
N2a c?Q
Zm
<
x NI
a
0 0 l? N O O n 0, m 10 a\ O M M V M ?0 O ?D N [? 7 N O O M O
W O O N M M O? O t!5 M o0 ?O I? ? b r l? (
o0 00 0o O 7 h N 7 O
oo N ?O o0 O
0
?
?
?
?
O O O O O O? a? 00 Vl V 7 7 V'1 h Vl \O [? [? W Q\ a? a a?
O O O O O O \ 0 ? O ? m o, a 0, 0% o, 0, m 0% 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, a, 0, 0, 0, 0, a, 6% 0,
W
'„" M (D f`7 M Io to CO O) to N h a
M N O T O) C7 M M Cl) O O CO h h 0 0) ,0 c0 M M(. . . O u
O 0 O r N V N
.
?LO V V V V ?"i (00)OO O O OD N r(O IO ui ui Nui

B
N M V O N V to
NN
MMcoch
e NNNNN
l

M
?O
?D
O
M
h
oo
?D
h
O
?D
00
o
M
00
h
?
,__,

?0
„
,_

l?
O?
?
,ti
?
b
N
r
O
.?-.

L
d
o

O

d
A
y
W
'y
? ?
?
O
d 3
z w v 3 d d a L ? ,? ..

Q o ?
C C O
61
Bold Run Creek
Existing Conditions
XS-3 looking upstream
XS-3 left bank looking right bank
V C
0
V C
? H
W
Cl
v
co

Q
M
G
O

N N? 0 a
u

OD
7

r
V
w
_
R

a Q

N
O
U C
?
Q)
V
0

d

F ?
E
a
co
? Q
z

0
D
Q
°
o QQ 0)
Lf)
g
(;aaj) Ualenal3
N ? ? N Q
"O ^
'm O rn N 2
zco x nQ
a
O 7 ?D [t
'a h O O1 M O ... M DD O h ?D 7 ?D O N
Q\ h n h O+ ?D W O, a, N N -If N
W
y O O O O O vl vl 6 6 "C 6 Oo Oi O O O
01 ON O? O` ON ON a ON ON O, C, O+ ON X ON ON
W
.C CCi N V 'V' h O.
G .
OO ID M ti M 00 h ,N, O N O a1 tt N v7 ?D o0 ?D N M .-er
W O 01 '. 00 00 00 1
-n n m V1 h h M ?D
e
eviviviviv, -
rao;coQ;ooo?ao?o;o?o?r?viviv
? x
m

t H C
m O O O O h
V L -.
O O g 0 0 0 0 0 l? 0 0 0 0 00 O O V O O
O m b O\ O.
1' IU Q C
?
?? ? ?^„ N M V ?D m D; N t+i h "O 1- Oi C G (V 7
? N N N N N N N N M M M M
^
l0
? t0
_
uj ? l0 m
Q'?Yf OOIi
Ohi N ? ... ,- f V
?
d
C o

Q d
w
?
?

F =
e
? ? ? s
3 ? ?

c o
b
a
G
w
W U 3 o e t '° F E A .. u

o
>
y.y
>
yy
..?, o
a e
a`
d
O
A
C4
?
d
Y ?=
w u

CL
d G Y
C O O /! W ? y
a+ O d q
w 'w ? ?
v? oa oo 3 w aa v?

a?
c

_ o
a
?
? a
c o
0
1 1
1 1
' '
1 /
1 1
1 /
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1 , 1
, /
1 1
1 1
, t
1 ,
1 1
1
1 /
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
, 1
Bold Run Creek
Existing Conditions
XS-4 looking downstream
XS-4 left bank looking right bank
XS-4 looking upstream
y
? O
d C
V PC
O
?U
? c
w
O
v

0
co
-It M

w b o c
N
?O .O

D m
(q

0.1
L
ei
E
O
E
z

0
T
0
o ° LO n
T o
T T
?
r_ LO
9 o ?
(jeoj) uoi;enal3
N ? 0.i O Q
N
O :2 :Ej
4) 0 CA i:?
Zm>C rnQ
0
O b M n n M V O V •- N •O [? d' h M •D O, M !f o0
O O? ,O to 1? .? ,O cV N o0 cn M N -- -- O T O r-: V? N M
O N V
vi V1 v1
l- 00 M o0 N N N .'-.. C
,O Q\ O N vY '
er '?
i O, O? a0 t` n
a
d 10 b ?O ?/1 Vl Vi v1 Vl
' ?n h ?n er In V V " v v h h p
?n ?'1 O+ O? a, O O O O
O, O, ON O, O,
. .-.
O, O, a, a, Q\ a, a, a, O, O, ON a\ O, a, a\
.
W T 0, m m a1 a\ O, m
ai
•E ?. ,O •-O O M O, O, c?i N ,D N in d O
00
-11, V V ?n
O, N M O t- M N w ?O V N a\ w "
00 -. V O vi O h h O, M V V Vi
??I
G
O
r
,
w Vl la t. OO n D\ vl M N N N O r? V N ,O ,a •O ,O
?, a
n
o
- o
O
wa,aa;a, o,a, 0, a,aC?0,a, 0,0,0, 0, ww;w;w;??'t 'T
1
1
m
•n ? Q
t6 t m m
m O O O O DO O O c+.t O v1 N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O In q t+1 0 0 0 0 0 0
y
R O M ,O l? [? W
?' m C C
m ?„? «? ? O? a1 O O .•. N M h b [? 00 a\ O N M v, ?O ,O l? oo O? O .-• N m m
--N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M
e
d'?i iCGCti

lp

Q\
V

N

00

-

00

0.

N

? ?

M

r

N

O

0

?

d o
a
A a o a C` 3 ? a 0.'
a wh
iY W U ? C O a a=+ O ? .. u

i
r
r
V
4
P°

A
d
°
?
L
.?
a?
°'
?
? a o e c a
a A ` x
C u
? ? m m w rs, ? ? 3 w aa v°, ca
co

Q
m
c
o
_
? d

1 1 ? °o
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1 - -
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
t 1
t 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1 1
1 /
1 /
1 1
t 1
1 1
/ 1
Bold Run Creek
Existing Conditions
XS-5 right bank looking left bank
XS-5 left bank looking right bank
XS-5 looking downstream
XS-5 looking upstream
h
? O
U c
0
?U
O y
w
OHO
v1 On
C ?
V .Mn
00 h
00 N b
? ?
00 N H ? V

o
e _y ? w
O d
? W a=+
9 O
I ?
Gq trqq'
Lx O
a
d
A t
> a i
a 3 °' ? o a

z
w
u w
` i ? u d w d
e > > w r Q A c x .1
1
,
v? m a+ oo 'w ?. 4
3 3 m° ? A
0
d
d
0
v

CL

ca O

O
M
E

a

b
o
N

y

L
a

z
0

0
o Ln o Ln o
r - o o 0 ) 0 )
(IGGJ) u oiaena13
e
ooovoooornhK N w 'oano"tw *'D?noo 0 oM n
?p 0? n 7 c. w7 7 w Vl : N N .-. O O ? 00 00 t-: ?q V1 n -? --.
ol Ch 01 a 0, as rn C7, a T 0, d, 0, 0, 0, C, 0, 0, C, a, a a 0, a 0, 0, 0, rn rn
W
a3
r? h W) 'D O C-4 M n O O\ 'D 00 ul .. O+ C, 00 h h cf 0, N O
,? O M h O 7 "R N D\ h h 00 n °? Q` O N N m at M o0 0, m 00 'D n
o ?/1 vi h h b 'D w a, D\ O C O C O C .-. ^ O\ n ?D vi vi vi
a
A
?°ooooov oocohooooo0oOOOC OC Mr ?oooo
W C cn Vl ?o l? n D? O C .-. N tai V Vi iD W O cV 14 M et Vi ?D 1- 0, N
N N N N N N N N N N M
m

Q
m
c
0

Y ?
C ?

1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1 ,
1 1
1 1
1 1
t 1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
t ;
1 1
1
1 1
1 1
1 .
/ 1 C0 LL
1 1
1 1
1 ,
Bold Run Crook
Existing Conditions
XS-6 looking upstream
XS-6 right bank looking left bank
XS-6 left bank looking right bank
XS-6 looking downstream
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Appendix H
Reference Reach Data
Appendix H. Mor bological Design Criteria

CLASSIFICATION
DATA Richland
Creek
Reference
Reach
Ro en Stream Type C4
Drainage Area a mi 4.8
Bankfull Width ft 28-32
Bankfull Mean De th d ft 2.3-2.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional area
A s 67-75
Width/de th Ratio (Wad,,,) 11.7-13.9
Maximum Depth (dmbw) (ft) 3.75
Width of flood prone area
ft >100
Entrenchment Ratio ER > 3.0
Water Surface Slope S ft/ft 0.004
Sinuosity (stream
len h/valle en th K 1.1
DIMENSION DATA
Pool Depth (ft) 2ag
Riffle Depth ft 2.3-2.4
Pool Width (ft) 26-35
Riffle Width (ft) 28-32
Pool XS Area 70-75
Riffle XS Area sf 67-75
Pool de th/mean riffle depth 1.2-1.3
Pool width/riffle width 0.9-1.1
Pool area/riffla area 0.9-1.1
Max pool depthtdbld 109-2.0
Low bank height/Max bankfull
depth 1.0-12
Mean Bankfull Velocity (V)
(fps) 3.6-5.0
Bankfull Discharge O cfs 260-270
PATTERN DATA
Meander len h ft 110-200
Radius of curvature Rd ft 30-70
Belt width ft 300
Meander width ratio
w 9.3-10.7
Radius of curvature/bankfull
width 1.0-2.5
Meander length/bankfull
width 3.5-7.1
PROFILE DATA
Valle sloe 0.0045
Average water surface sloe 0.004
Riffle sloe 0.005-0.009
Pool sloe 0.000-0.0025
Pool to pool spacing 25-90
Pool length 5-25
Riffle slope/avg water surface
slope 1.3-2.3
Pool slope/avg water surface
slope 0.0-0.6
Run slope/avg water surface
slope 0.7-1.2
Run depth/dbkl
1.0-1.1
Pool len th/bankfull width 0.2-0.9
Pool to pool spacing/bankfull
width 0.8-3.0
Richland Creek
Reference Site
1 at 0+00 Riffle Richland Creek Reference Reach
Richland Creek Reference Reach
Richland Creek
description:
height of instrument (ft):
n omit distance FS FS FS W fpa channel Manning's
notes pt. (ft) bankf ill top of bank (ft) slope (%) "n"
91.27
91.05-
90.68
90.5
95.3
95.51 --
95.53--.
95.6
dimensions
74.6 x-section area .4 mean
30.8 width 32.5 wet P
3.7 d max 2.3 h yd radi
4.1 bank ht 12.7 w/d ratio
300.0 W flood prone area 9.7 ent ratio
check from channel material
9 measured D84 mm
78.7 relative roughness 13.6 fric. factor
0.022 Mannin 's n from channel material
Richland Creek
Reference Site
97
96
95
94
c
93
w 92
91
90
89
[ notes
2 at 0+45 Pool Richland Creek Reference Reach
0
10 20 30 40 50
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
section: ??.
MLR"cand Creek Reference Reach
Creek
description: `
of instrument (ft):
bankfull [too of b
60 70 80
95.1
94.9 .. dimensions
94.19 4. x-section area 2.9 'd
an
92.71 --- 25.9 width 29.0 P
92 4.7 d max 2.6 adi
!hd
91 .52 -- 5.7 bank ht
91.32 _ ;.
89.76 ---
89.84 --
90.1
90.18 -
95.43 -
95.56
95.5 -
95.04
94.77 -
Richland Creek
Reference Site
100
98-

94

92

90 f
-2
height of instrument (ft): Nffli?_
omit distance FS FS FS
notes pt. (ft (ft) elevatiof bankfull top of bank
95.6 -
95 94.13 95.12
94.97
94.13
90.21 -
90.6
93.54 -
94.28 -
94.87
95.12
95.17
95.1 .._':
95
68 78 88
"n"
dimensions
59.2 x-section area 2.6 d mean
22.9 width 27.0 wet P
3.9 d max 2.2 h yd radi
4.9 bank ht 8.8 w/d ratio
300.0 W flood prone area 13.1 ent ratio
y rau ics
3.9 velocity ft/sec
232.5 discharge rate, Q cfs
0.41 shear stress Ibs/ft s
0.46 shear velocity ft/sec
1.902 unit stream power Ibs/ft/sec
0.19 Froude number
8.5 friction factor u/u"
24.7 threshold rain size mm
check rom channel material--
a eria
9 measured D84 mm
84.0 relative roughness 13.8 Eric. factor
0.022 Mannin 's n from channel material
3 at 0+70 Riffle Richland Creek Reference Reach

i
Richland Creek
Reference Site

4 at 1+08 Run Richland Creek Reference Reach
• 100
98 - - - - -

96 -

94 -

92

W
90

88
i
86
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
- Width from River Left to Right (ft)
- sectio n:

• Run
Richland Creek Reference Reach
• Richland Creek
descriptio n:
• height of instrument (ft ):
omit distance FS FS FS W fpa channel Manning's
notes pt. (ft) (ft) elevation bankfull top of bank (ft) slope (%) "n"

- ' 93.35 93.35 95.4

' 92.71
92.82 dimensions
92.28 -- 65.3 x-section area 1.8 mean
' 91.96 - 36.8 width 40.2 wet P
• 91.44 -- 3.6 d max 1.6 h yd radi
' 91.33 - 5.7 bank ht 20.7 w/d ratio
• 91.4 - 300.0 W flood prone area 8.2 ant ratio
91.32,.. .
. 90.8 - y rau ics
90.47 ° 3.2 velocity (ft/sec)
. ' 90.17 °- ' 210.0 discharge rate, Q cfs
• 89.9 0.30 shear stress Ibs/ft s
89.75 -- 0.40 shear velocity ft/sec
- ' 89.78 -- 1.068 unit stream power Ibs/ft/sec
90.17 - 0.18 Froude number
- 95.4 8.1 friction factor u/u"
95.85--- 17.7 size (mm)
95.62
95.51 , check rom c anne ma erla
94.88 - 9 measured D84 mm
94.84 57.7 relative roughness 12.9 fric. factor
- 94.7 - 0.022 Mannin 's n from channel material

Richland Creek
Reference Site
5 at 1+95 Pool Richland Creek Reference Reach
96
--
94
93
C
92
w 91
90
89
88
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
Pool
Richland Creek Reference Reach
height of instrument ft): MEME
omit distance FS FS FS channel
notes pt. (ft) (ft) elevation bankfull top of bank Slone (%1
3.67--._ dimensions
2.35--_ ! x-section area 2. mean
1.37 -- 31.7 width 34.3 wet P
9.927 4.6 d max 2.3 h yd radi
9.05 -- 6.0 bank ht
9.08-._
a RR
89.92
90.28
91.13-
91.33
91.81 --
Final Restoration Plan Bold Run Creek Stream/Buffer Restoration
Appendix I
Sediment Transport
(1)
rn
as
s
U
_y
0
I
t
aLf)
M o
rncy)
O r
L C
? r
= O
w
O O
N
V N
Oi
m
m
O
LO
O
d
to
O
LO
O
Q.
a)
cn
Lf')
O
CL d
d
ca
LO
n.
a?
U)
LO
O
LO
O
LO
O
O
LO
O
°O -M
O
C) C)
0 q °O °O
N LO C>
(SP) OBIB40sia
•
•
•
•
•
weighted percent of particles in
range
•
W Cu
co m N (D - CL U) CO
•
!
•
•
•
•
!
•
•
•
•
•
•
• ,c

• as

L
c
! r u

• m a
•
•
m C, a) 0
•
•
10
•
•
(D i 6- 6- C; m q
•
•
•
•
CO CO C, W C, '0
04 CO L') 0 C:)
N C-4 CD
•
T
•
•
0 0 cc cu cu ca E .2 cc co cu :53 222
•
•
•
i
•
•
number of particles ° v E
(O d' N O N 3 CO (0
`" ? ?" ? O (O V' N O 0 U C
Y
m
a>
U
c
v
0
m
c
O
U
m
a
a
0
of
N
d
a
0
a
d
it
6
6
Z
O

O

0 0
C
Yk

c

o
>
_ D
- N
E
N N
W
CD
U CO
CL Ca 76
•o
m

06

Q
'00
'O
O
3
C
d
v
m
L
Y
U O
O
CD

0
0

CO
CO _Q
0

E
!
0
(0

D
CD
- M
>
o
O U
N

w C:)
LO
O Q

N
::3
E c >+ °'
a) c?
N

a)
N
Q jr) C

U O
U N D • a y
cc
(0 y
o.
CD -
------- -- - --
e o 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o 0 o' o o' o
O O CO 1- (O l0 ?t ( N O O
r
uey; jauy;uawed
TI I-I?I1- I?P I-II-I'-IrIMI-
OIOI?I?INI?I?°ICO -I NI MI--tIMIMI?I°?INLO 10
IM
OIO IOIOI?INI?I,(OIWI?IOIN IMI?IOIO I N OLIN
++ G C C C C -z:a:Bz w w w w w UO a
0 '2
d U N O E O N DI m O) O W O) D) D) U U U U 0 o o 00 a) m
mawwc-..?(`2 amccc>> 0EE N N?N?Eooaa?a?ia?i ar
??w EU?? wpm oozy-5-TEE.?Ell `T°
0 > ; E E v v E rn w -- U
> > a) (D > > E >
c
U
0
0
C
U
Y
V
C V
L
O a
m

a)
a)
C
0
O
U
c
number of particles N m
O
O Co
C
C D LO Co N
.. O p
---- -- - ---- O
..-
O a
+ L
L Co
-0 O •+
CU

O
- - - - - - - - 1 - -f ' - -
O CD

O o

O
-'--- -- --- - 't - --
- N O O
- - N a? 3
a)
_ U O O

Q 0
O
O N
> 'o
o O
(o O
-
m
L
_ _
-- -- - -- -
_ E Y

__ _ ___ _

._ _ -- _ _ - _ _ LO

`

e

O
? O
--------?------:---.---?--?--?-- + ?
x
I
O I
- -jj? -- O
T
C - - _- -- - I -- 000 a
U) O
D' o

O
_
I O E tD ?- d 2 o
C - .2:? o O
:3 a)
__ _ __ w f`6

a

_?

Nom

`- N _

\
o
N ...
p
0 :3 N
Ch a
0
i c
o E
1 -
N
a)
a)

- '' - ?_-- --- + - Fn CL
c
Y
a) - -- -- j - ...
- V Co
N O p
O G
a

(D
(D _
+
' w M
I w

.. a
C r o
7 .L (.) I '_
- -
- (D ? M c
3 0 - - -
I --- -- --7 -_-- j

O
Z m --- o -
W
33
_
Z
t
_ 1
0
0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° O C
O O O O O O O O O O O C C U)
O C 7
O
O O M t` O In `ct M N m N
- O
'0
E
5 °'

uey;Haug;uawad
E
v C
-
cag
C
Co
Co
S
D N Q
L
C
L
a
CL
cc
(L
C
O=
W)
N
N
'O
N
N
Cb
M
C
r
O
O
r
04
CD
0
CO
U)
Ln
O

W

N

V

10

00

N

M

't

Co

QA
00
CV
o
a0
(o
CN
CD
Cj
**
O;
CC)
10
:3
O
E
O
0
0 N
CY)
.-
N
a U
E a)
(
o
(M U
C mo
O
L
cc 04
(0 C,)
- Lo ? c- N st CO C70 ? O M A O O Co
N O N V C
D CA ? N C
7 Cn O C O

m m m m m >>>>>>>>> o a v v a v o o Co °

f0

c

R
M M t/1 N (n

m d
o o
N t? N m m m m 2

o?rnoirn
rn rn rn rn cr,

a a .O
.0
o 0
Q

>>>>>

o 0 0 0 0 o

2 3 w

co E

,,C r- .2 124 E2
L;z

c c c E E? C/°'i 0
` ?
U U
- E 0 o

:en.0 0

t M m
N ? 088
E mm
IE5vmm
N N 0 g U E g
y N 2 0lu:3
E N v Co `m m
V Q
>
o N
> E E E a>
> > > m
> E > LJ L
c
3
0
V
m
a
a
m
a

N
'

E a C
?
=
U?
a E g
o QU
N
LL N
LL N _ - N m
G W O W
of W Q
HO m h m a?
°'m r

C y
m m p
m V1 4. CW
J
? d
z N
5 LC Q
H d
:
m+ 3 m r 3

v L Z
N
?

a 12
E
o
m r N
E ^'
E °
m m
z
-
Q N
E m
3

2 U)
m ? m
n
m
Ca >y ° E Z
T N - VY F
ca

a
E N
? z
o
z m -
j m m
3
r m
N m °
U
21 cn r N r

c 0
N
E

Q
m
E v
m
z
I
O
Q m _
N m
N m
_ (n m

.n N ? N O

w
U3
r
N r
; Q
O E v y
N
E
to 6 d 3
5
d
?
n
m -
Q d m E o

/ E

E
p
y
N
J
?
{
j rn Z N
? I
' N
c
C I
'
I'
? j
>
m

Q E
E a o
N
It r z
W

Y E
E N
65
?
N
N

mi ?
d E
?
o
t
Z O
u1

Co
U) (I
I)
E
>
G
A
N c V d °' E o -
o co H )
r
to
_
E
C 000
E
r m
z n
of
O
d
p m
to m
3 m
m
cu 0 T E p
J N r r
E

E N.
v
d
Z mi
N. ?`0I
S 0
co

N D co 03 Q a w m F
0
O
0
0
0
0 0
0
G o
o
m
M
0
0
N
w
O
z
O I O I; O I O I C I o l O I C I O l O I C l O l 0
O 0
II
c
Fp o
c
12 E
U
O O
O
a

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Y --
-- --
-- --
-- --
-- --
-- --
-- --
-- --
-- --
-- --
--
`

L
--
--
-- _ _ _ _ _ a)
a
a

-
I -
--
--
-- 1
i
U
. O N G? .?
m _ ° a .° o
- - - _ - I-- -- - -- - 0
o - - - - -- -- -- -- -- - a?

> o
(a Lo
7

y
Y. o LU
E
U O a o
- - - - -- -- -- -- --
°

i
vm
C -
f
-
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-

-

E
Q ' 7
1 - -- -- - --

'.- I L4

.?
..
.
U O
) _ _
N I I ...,..`
Q.
C ? O

c0. -
--
--
--
--
--
--
--

-- LO LO
L -- _
-- _
-- __
-- __
-- --
__ --
__ _
--
- __
-- _ 0 C6

_
_I --
__ --
__ --
__ --
__ --
__ -
-
_ -- --
-It co
E co
j E O N
c

in - - - --I -- -- -- -- -- -
a)
LO
.. -- -- -- - -

LOO 1 _ (

12 m z
I
N LO
M
U)
2
0
C)
ci

.
ca -J
0 0
O O

0
O

0
O

0
O

0

0

0

0 0
C 0

O W
O
n
O O
U O
) V O
M O O O
N
Ue U J GUi d IU aa ad co r-
Q CV

C
C L?\ \
\°
?
?.0
0
0
0
O~ 6 N

N 0 cq 0
C r N N 6
0
V'
n
CO 0
C 0
l 0 0
0 0
0
Q.
LL-
E° o o
(D CD Lo
O °
?q °
oq o
O 0
O 0
O
0
LLO CD co M -4 0 0 0 0
0 r
L
LT N Un O
0
g
LQ
Ln
O
O
O
M 0
0 0 0 0 0 ?
>
(D

0 E
(0
0
c/) E A O O O F-

O O O
y ?CV? O O

? O

04

N C
6
M .(0 N
LO cn
s n
a
y
N
wW r
U ¢ a
R Q v
~ Q `m
J7/I?`r (n J
V 3 z°

G C
G:
R E O O
m
? m
'
?

m m nC
C
-M
m
.co N N m
EO
m m ?? rn :? rn m
+ co 4-
H
F-
O W
3:
O W
za

m z
- o, m
? a m
?
m ? o
? Fes- N ~
O W

E
r ?
z
D1

S a? 3 a m
m d E o

co

CL

E
N
o

z

Z
w
m - m 'm
m
N m m E o

N
m
E N

7
L
m z
C
o Q - m m
3
r 05 m
7
D A? n $

•C

l6
U)
F%
N -
N
p E a v?
O E ?_ r m
Z n
rn
N m = p1
d
N

N rn

? 3
m

m

-

m n
E

_
5

Q a1 H `? ~

J E
0 o

o

m
Z
N

N
N - L
m _
m
Q
m
65
J
E N
t
E
Oi z
M
W N
N
d m m

d

?

A?
m
N _

Y
N F

m (fl
m E
E O m
L
Z O
n
N
Q ? N
N m m
M
to N

3

m
3

co

C CO
E
°
t

Z

M
O
L 0 m m
3
a
U m
y E p

J
(A
F
t?
F- -
E N
r
? O
t ! rn Z a
r
N '. N .m N 3
0J' V m O
m' On
U5s F N ~ -
fA?m fAQ?1J W fA
0
O
a
0
0
Cl)
o
7
0
0)
O
Z
O O O O O O O O O O O O ?
0 0
O O O O O o O O o O O V
N N
? F V
F- v 0
_ C
10 E
47 f0 n tL o O N M V in ?_ C:)
m o
? w
- - - == I=- I== -= - _ _

- - - i-- ?-- - -- - - -

i
?,
i - -
j
r?_
1 _ _
_ _
- __
-- __
-- __
?-_ __
-- _
_ _
_

-

-
J
- r
--
-?
?
?--
~=
j--
?-
-?
--
-
-
_ ?
- I _
_
-
??
-
- -
- ?
- -
? -? _-I
--i --
-- _-
--? _
- -?
-? -
?
I
I
-
- -
- -I
- -- --
-? -- --
- - - -
•
•
•
•

• ? ? - - a c c

• m
W J m
UQ IL
Q

_
H E
m E m
"C
o o
J 2
QU

Q?
LL
o

. m 0 w
??
j Q
W
21
.
• m

c J
N
N
Co y ti
Z J

• 5'AIT
L O
3
z
tC L71
.
V
Y m d O1
N.
c
c
G

.~...
?
?
.m +
V
? N N
75
m H
A
<
Q
V
?
E _ ?
Z O o O

• t rn
m
g
oo
m
a

• -

• ? N
Z ° o o
• Q N _ O O O
co
-
m V ? p
p
co ~ F-

• a y E
N
_
N E t
m N
Z O o
O O
• O
z
3 O O O
J
L
•
Lf) V a?i
U) E o

• c O N
0
Q 0) E m Z o 0
o U 3
) 3 m

d
N n
N W m
F
• f0 co F co

Z u?

N
N E
?rn
.0 ci
7
M o
p
•
N

• Q

Q

u, n
d E
'- A v
o
~ '

• O E

E
o
n
Z m
_ ?
• 2
m
• CO
fn d
? E
~ `2 '

• J _

E _
N
o d

°
°?

o

o
z M v M
W m_ m v v °

•
Q
N
0
o
3 A
A v

C
a)

CD CD

E ? 70
° -

-
• Y E
Fn
m
~ F
•
m c?a
4 E
E v y
m z O
^
4 o
o
t
N N - 'N
•
a?i m E o
,
• CO ~ ~ ,
U) S
•
c
o
m E

E 0

z
y
N
L

43
m
m U )
• N N o
z
' 9
E v' L y ? O O! O O O O O O O O O O O O O
•
N O _
p? Z
m ?
2)' G O O O O O O C C G O O O O ? ?
N N
N
•
V C4

m
n T
O
' D
O v
F- c
c e
• ?? m (/J Q? d J W V1 N M "7 t q O ^ O O O N M V ? ? ?
Z .
• t
N
ID
?
N m d ?{
_
'
•
L
N ?
R O
c
N
? CO
V
H C7 O
6
U
O 0
O

------
---- 0
-
_-
r -
L
?--.--
--
--
----
- N
r
, ? c

l N
_ - -
-
a -o
m --- ---- -- -- -- , I l
0
? I
I ?
U
_
N
o
? 2 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O d a . O
0

Q -
-,
r-? 7

M o
0
_ _ _

? Q
L 2
U -
- -
- o - 0
2!. _
_ _ - -- -- - _ co
co -- --

< -- -- --
_i----
i -- -- --

>
__,__
__
__
__: co

0
-
E

co
Cl) - - --- --

-?---- - --

- --

-- --

----,-
Lo
Q
p
m -r-r---',- -- -- --I?-
I
i
' E co
I I cv

a

- FF

r
-

-

-

I
--

--
--

--
--

--
--

----,-
cu

o

?
co -
-
-
- --
I
-- --
-- -
--
-- ---
- --
lu co
0 O O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, a
9) co m Z j N c m
_
0 4
4

J
(0

0 0 0 0 0 0

0

0 -
o

0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
O m M ? co r 0
) < 0
{ c 0 0 0
o
N r-
Uegi J@Ui d IU aoJe d ?_ rn
C) M

_ c
C -C
o
0
0
0
0
°
0
0
0

LQ O CO N 0 0 0 0
a C
LL M L x 0 0 0 0 0
0
CO 0
t 0 0
O 0
n 0 0 0 0 0

M ?
-zl-
LO
L O O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0
o
p? N 0 0
, l() u7 O O O
O LO Lo r- co LO
O
O
O
j (O LQ CO CO M

N O
° O ? F-
a
?? 0 0 O o in o
00
(0 Ln
O N V co v2 4 N N
.- M CO N
(0 n
Cf) n
L
m 10
r
V
C) 2
C) p
o n -0
y C
U L
------------ --
m a ?
. 0
-------------
c'
p; m
a ° a a o 0
0 0
o 75
N
? C
a
N U c? L
_ a
? E N
C E
- - - - - - - - ---- - - - -
Q
N_
U) m
N (D
u ;
U) _ C O
a co
C). m
m
oLO
m
Eco
E a ?
N
twt?
O M
? c p M
------------
L
E c
'0 -6 OL to
LD L,
V/ 2 lJ O
N -J i r N
? " o a o a o o o a
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
iG 1n --t m N r'
HRU Jeui,.A )ua01ed I-
0-4
L
¢??° ( O
MO
Cl) 0 0 0 0
??
d ?jOM 00
N Cl) M .
N
? CO
O O O O O
C
LL
Eo 0 0
M
(O O 0

O 0

O 0 gz

0 -

0 ?

0 o

0
10 r-: Lo

C=;

CD
0

tTN rh o
c u7 OD ? O O O co
j
O N N LO O O O ti

E
E

O cu

~
O O O 0
cD _ 0
d 0
CD 0
(O to
y N d M M N N N
fC co
E m A

i
i

I

i

r~
PROG
February 17, 2006°
D
D
FFR .1 7 2006 j
Cyndi Karoly, Unit Supervisor
Division of Water DENR - WA'r k LlU LITY
Quality WE11AWDS AND STORA?yy BRANCH
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1650
Re: Permit Application- Bold Run Creek Stream and Buffer Restoration Project
Dear Ms. Karoly:
Attached for your review are two copies of restoration plans (one copy sent to DWQ Raleigh
Regional Office) for Bold Run Creek stream and buffer restoration project in Wake County.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions regarding this plan (715-7571).
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Attachment: Bold Run Creek Stream and Buffer
d es fovu2?... I itk' g c'"' t ... I-Iroted /-;
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Ral
Office Use Only: Form Version October 2001
2 1J0268
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank. , 79 t 7 O
1. Processing
FEB 1 ? 7006
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: DENR - WAXER UUALiTY
® Section 404 Permit 'NEWDSMDSTCRMWATERWNCH
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 27
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Mailing Address: 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Telephone Number: 919-715-7571 Fax Number: 919-715-2219
E-mail Address: lin.xu(i?ncmail.net
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation: N/A
Mailing Address: N/A
Telephone Number: N/A Fax Number: N/A
E-mail Address: N/A
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Bold Run Creek Stream and Buffer Restoration Project
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Wake County Nearest Town: Wake Forest
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The site is located S miles
northwest of the Town of Wake Forest on Bold Hill Run Road, approximately 1.5 miles
east of the intersection with Manzum Dairy Road in Wake County, North CArolina.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N/A
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Agriculture, forestry, pasture, and rural development
7. Property size (acres): 31 acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): New Light Creek
9. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 6 of 13
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Stream enhancement and restoration, buffer
restoration
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Track Hoes, loaders
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Agriculture, forestry, pasture, and a
small amount of rural residential
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application:
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 13
1. Wetland Impacts (No Impact)
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.eov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 0 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0 acres
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please seci )

Bold Run Creek Grading and
earthwork to
restore existing
stream
1,600
Bold Run Creek
18.4 feet
Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 1,600 LF
Page 8 of 13
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S. (No Impact)
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres)
Name Water)
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N//A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The nroiect is involved with enhancing and restoring streams and buffers in the Bold Run
Creek site in Wake County to serve EEP's program obiective and mitigation needs. The
project is a mitigation effort and does not impact adjacent streams and wetlands. See Bold
Run Creek stream and buffer restoration elan for specific information regarding the
restoration design.
Page 9 of 13
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The restoration plan is attached. The plan indicates the conservation easement
acquired by the state, plan views, cross section view and proposed method of
enhancement and restoration.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Page 10 of 13
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify Catawba Buffer Requirement )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Page 11 of 13
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 0 3
2 0 1.5
Total 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or .0260.
Stream restoration is an exempt activity under the Neuse Buffer rule (15A NCAC 2B .0233)
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
N/A
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Page 12 of 13
N/A

.z// 7/06
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
Office Use Only: Form Version October 2001
2(?, ^60268
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
-_ lI
1. Processing FEB 2006
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: DENR- WKIER UUALiTY
® Section 404 Permit WULANDS AND STMAWATER BRANCH
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 27
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Mailing Address: 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Telephone Number: 919-715-7571 Fax Number: 919-715-2219
E-mail Address: lin.xu _,ncmail.net
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation: N/A
Mailing Address: N/A
Telephone Number: N/A Fax Number: N/A
E-mail Address: N/A
Page 5 of 13
1. Wetland Impacts (No Impact)
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.Rov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 0 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0 acres
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)

Bold Run Creek Grading and
earthwork to
restore existing
stream
1,600
Bold Run Creek
18.4 feet
Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usas.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 1,600 LF
Page 8 of 13