20020763 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20030522

n North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
John R. Dorney, Division of Water Quality
Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
June 3, 2002
Review of an application by Bob Burkett/Kerry Watts, Villages at Moss
Creek, DWQ No. 020763, NWP 14, UT Rocky River, Cabarrus County
JUN - 4 A2
?.
-AWS
WAIM, A CTION
The applicants are requesting 401 Water Quality Certification from the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality. The NCWRC has reviewed information provided by the
applicant, and field biologists on our staff are familiar with habitat values of the project
area. These comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water
Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat.
401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The proposed development will create 120 acres of impervious area in a 400.54 acre
tract. Impervious will be nearly 30%. The development is near the Rocky River, which
may provide suitable habitat for the Carolina heelspliter (Lasmigona decorata), a
federally listed endangered species.
We do not object to the culvert installation providing the following conditions are
implemented:
1. Culverts 48" or larger should be buried approximately V into the streambed.
Culverts less than 48 inches in diameter should be buried to a depth equal to or
greater than 20% their size to allow for aquatic life passage.
2. Remaining streams and wetlands, including forested undisturbed buffers are
preserved and protected through deed restrictions or other enforceable methods.
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] ext. 281 • Fax: [phone]
Villages at Moss Creek 2 June 3, 2002
3. Undisturbed buffers should be 50' for intermittent channels and 100' for perennial
streams. Maximum available buffers should be provided for wetlands.
If the associated school site is part of a public-private arrangement or venture, additional
stormwater maintenance facilities are recommended. Naturally shaded stormwater
detention wetlands or ponds may provide reduction of hydrographic and thermal impacts.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any
questions regarding these comments, please contact me at 336/769-9453.
Cc: Mark Cantrell, USFWS
Becky Fox, EPA
wA TF Michael F. Easley, Governor
F
Q 9
CR pG
02 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
055
r Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
y Division of Water Quality
O Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
June 24, 2003
DWQ# 02-0763
Cabarrus County
Mr. Bob Burkett
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
9179 Davidson Highway
Concord, NC, 28027
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions, Wetland Restoration Program
Dear Mr. Burkett:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place permanent fill in 0.365 acre of
jurisdictional wetlands, 230 linear feet of intermittent streams and 296 linear feet of perennial streams in order to construct
the Villages at Moss Creek Subdivision in Cabarrus County, as described in your revised application received by the
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on May 22, 2003. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this fill is
covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3402, which can be viewed on our web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands. This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 39 when it is issued
by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go
ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply
Watershed regulations. Also this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification. This Certification replaces the one issued to you on June 19, 2002.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us in writing and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification, as well as the additional condition listed below:
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands and waters or
areas within 50 feet of all streams and ponds on the property. These mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of
the date of this letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later). A sample deed notification format can be
downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at http:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands ;
2. We understand that you have chosen to contribute to the Wetland Restoration Program in order to compensate for the
impacts to streams. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2R .0402 and 15A NCAC 2B .0242(7), this contribution will satisfy
our compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h) and 15A NCAC 2B.0233(10). Until the
Wetland Restoration Program receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR - Wetlands Restoration
Program), stream impacts (including fill) shall not occur. Mr. Ron Ferrell should be contacted at [phone] if you
have any questions concerning the Wetland Restoration Program. You have one month from the date of this
Certification to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this Certification authorizes the fill of 0.365 acre of
wetlands, 230 linear feet of intermittent streams and 296 linear feet of perennial streams in the Yadkin River Basin,
Cataloging Unit 03040105, and 296 linear feet of stream mitigation is required for the 401 Certification. Please be aware
that the Wetland Restoration Program (WRP) rules require rounding of wetland impacts to the nearest foot (15A NCAC
2R .0503(b));
3. The culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles are not altered
(i.e. the depth of the channel must not be reduced by a widening of the streambed). Existing stream dimensions
(including the pattern and profile) are to be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. The culverts shall be
designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of the streams. If any of the
existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a
perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-installed correctly. AS&
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
The culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles are not altered.
Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal profile) are to be
maintained above and below locations of each culvert. The culverts shall be designed and installed to allow for aquatic
life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of the streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the
appropriate stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be
removed and re-installed correctly.
The Applicant must submit a plan and receive written approval from this Office to address any head cutting that will
occur as a result of this project (e.g., use of cross vanes downstream of the culvert).
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques must be used where
practicable instead of rip rap or other bank hardening methods; If rip-rap is necessary, it shall not be placed in the
stream bed, unless specifically approved by the Division of Water Quality.
Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure continuity of water movement and be designed to adequately
accommodate high water or flood conditions.
4. Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of Completion" form to
notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been completed. The responsible party shall
complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon completion
of the project. Please send photographs upstream and downstream of each culvert site to document correct installation
along with the Certificate of Completion form.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act
within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which conforms to
Chapter 1506 of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have
any questions, please telephone Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699 or Cyndi Karoly in the
Central Office in Raleigh 919-733-9721.
Sincerely,
kl
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AW K/cbk
Attachments
cc: Corps of Engineers Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Mooresville DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
File Copy
Craig Wyant, 1960 Chapman Wyant Lane, Lincolnton, NC, 28092
020763
NORTH CAROLINA-DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2 H .0500, Mr. Bob Burkett of J & B Development and Management, Inc. has
permision as outlined below to fill in 0.365 acre of jurisdictional wetlands, 230 linear feet of intermittent streams and 296
linear feet of perennial streams in order to construct the Villages at Moss Creek Subdivision in Cabarrus County, North
Carolina. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed in the
attached certification. THIS CERTIFICATION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT
WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM
LOCATION:
COUNTY:
Villages at Moss Creek Subdivision in Cabarrus
Cabarrus
BASIN/SUBBASIN Yadkin (03-04-01-05)
Impacts:
0.365 acre of jurisdictional wetlands,
230 linear feet of intermittent streams, and
296 linear feet of perennial streams
As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506, and the conditions of this certification, you are required to compensate for
the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands as outlined below prior to
conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
Mitigation:
296 linear feet of perennial streams by WRP required for the 401 Water Quality Certification. In correspondence dated
May 21, 2003, the WRP indicated that up to 592 linear feet of stream mitigation will be conducted by WRP if necessary for
the 404 Permit.
Note: Linear foot requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Wetland Restoration Program must be rounded
to the nearest foot and acreage requirements must be rounded to one-quarter acre increments according to 15 2r
.0503(b).
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the payment
of a fee to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per NCAC 213 .0503. If you choose this. option, please sign this form and mail it
to the Wetlands Restoration Fund at the address listed below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be
sent to you upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU
RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE WETLANDS RESTORATION
PROGRAM.
Signature Date
WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM
DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669-1619
[phone]
North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
A Fine Ling Design
1960 Chapman-Wyant Lane
Lincolnton, NC 28092
Subject: Project: Villages at Moss Creek
County: Cabarrus
1' •
r ?
N C 1),ENR
May 21, 2003 p
:kA '"'Y06
Fa
zY
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is
willing to accept payment for stream impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision by
the NCWRP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be
approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is
the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCWRP for impacts
associated with this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued
404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated May 19, 2003 the stream restoration that is necessary to
satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The
maximum amount of mitigation that the NCWRP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table.
Stream
(linear feet) Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Riparian Buffer
(ft2)
Impacts 296
Mitigation Maximum 592
The stream mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or Section 404
Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03040105 of the Yadkin River Basin.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4,
1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely,
XQ l
Ronald E. Ferrell,
Program Manager
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Steve Chapin, USACOE-Asheville
Allen Johnson, DENR Mooresville Regional Office
file
Wetlands Restoration Program 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
[phone] Fax: [phone]
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Alan Johnson
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: Rex Gleason
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Villages at Moss Creek c% AB Development County CABARRUS
Project Number 02 0763 County2
Recvd From MOD Region Mooresville
Received Date 5/22/03 Recvd By Region
Project Type
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME
14 OHWM O Y O N 13-17 ?? 30,712. 0.37 525.00 295.12 229.88
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Stream WRP Stream r - 296.00
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y 0 N Did you request more info? Q Y Q N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y O N Recommendation: Q Issue O Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
Samar has previously walked the site with the consultant (6/02) for the
initial road crossing to the school and other stream impacts.
Everything appears to be fine with him. WRP has agree to accept payment
for the 296 ft of perenial streams. I will email again and let you know
for sure.
alan
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Triage Check List
Project Name: V I V l l ?5? C
DWQ#: 02- 0 3
County:
To: ? ARO Mike Parker ? WaRO Tom Steffens
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
MRO Alan Johnson ? WSRO Cyndi Karoly (Central Office)
? RRO Steve Mitchell
rom: Telephone : (919) X33
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
0 Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? IvCnimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman).
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
nment
05/21%2003 WED 09:26 FAX
May 19, 2003
John Dorney, Director
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1650
[phone]
,-4
RA y
AL// ys?
Re: Pre-Construction Notification (PCN)
Villages at Moss Creek (Moss Farm) Site,
±400.54 acres, Cabarrus County, NC
Applicant: Bob Burkett / Kerry Watts
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
9179 Davidson Highway
Concord NC 28027
[phone]
Dear John,
t
2001
Please find enclosed for your review seven (7) copies of a completed PCN application for five after
the fact road crossings at a ±400.54 acre site in Cabarrus County, NC. The site is located within the
Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin within the headwaters of un-named tributaries to the Rocky River (NC
Stream Index 13-17). The site is located on the Kannapolis (1993), NC, USGS 7.5 minute quad.
This PCN is being forwarded to your attention as a part of the Clean Water Act 404/401 (PCN)
permitting process- The activities described in this PCN have already been conducted and therefore
this request is for after the fact authorization. Road crossings have been constructed to provide access
to a newly constructed public school on adjacent property and to provide access to the interior of the
site. Since a NWP authorization had been issued for the first crossing {Site 1) it is requested that the
original XWP authorization be rescinded and re-authorized to include all of the subsequent activities
within the single and complete project. The original authorization is Corps Action ID # 200230876
Although the PCN application is being made after the fact, the project had followed the appropri-
ate sequencing of pre-application consultation with Corps and DWQ personnel, delineation, verifica-
tion, avoidance and minimization. Avoidance and minimization of irnpacts includes locating crossings
at marrow point,, on each channel or at those portions of channel whi,.h have been previously degraded
by farm crossings, cattle or otherwise exhibit fewest field indicators associated with stream channel
functions and values including water quality and instream habitat. The smallest allowable crossing
section has been used to cross each channel as near to perpendicular as possible. Alternative design
methods have been employed for downstream outlet protection to receive local approvals to minimize
the use of rip rap- Culverts have been placed below the QHWM in channels to allow the passage of
aquatic life. Every effort has been made to comply with conditions of the NWP and associated Water
Quality Certification. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices have been implemented and
maintained throughout the construction process.
Mitigation is being proposed through participation in the NC Wetland Restoration Program by
payment of in lieu of fees or by restoration of stream channel segments on site which have been de-
graded by previous agricultural practices.
crow k Nynr,.t. coo rl cF?r",_Zf„s / DCSi(,i,, 19bu Cr,otimon-1Wyo^t I onc, ncok to NC 280'2 [phone]
05/21/2003 WED 09:27 FAY
X002
All wetlands and waters on the Villages at Moss Creek site have been delineated, surveyed and
verified by the U. S. Army Corps. (Corps Action 1D #200130114). Wetlands and waters have been
delineated, verified, and surveyed on the adjacent Harris Road School Site (originally ±78.82 acre
Moss Fw-rn site, Corps Action ID #200130025).
One permanent road crossing has been constructed to replace a temporary construction access to
the school site. The temporary access was built in the vicinity of a former farm road crossing for the
purposes of school construction. The crossing provided access to he adjacent school property and
provides access to the interior of the Villages at Moss Creek Site. Four additional permanent crossings
have been built within the Villages at Moss Creek site.
The Mooresville Regional DWQ office has conducted a previous site visit to this property to re-
view each road crossing location in the field prior to the onset of construction activity. The DWQ has
been notified of this PCN and of the need for an "after the fact" status during processing.
Thank you very much for your review of the enclosed. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you
should have questions or if there is any way in which I can be of assistance to you.
Respectfully,

Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
A Fine Line Design
1960 Chapman-Wyant Lane
Lincolnotn NC 28092
704-735-1084
[e-mail]
cc: Bob Burkett/Kerry Watts, J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Steve Chapin, U.S. Army Corps, Asheville Field Office
page 2 of 2
Croig R. Wyan'L, dbo ??'cJtiY,n` r,FI DESIGN, 1960 ChGOmon-Wyont Lora. Lin(olnton NC 28092 [phone]
. 0 F WNT 0
June 19, 2002
DWQ# 02-0763
Cabarrus County
Mr. Bob Burkett and Ms. Kerry Watts
J&B Development and Management, Inc.
9179 Davidson Highway
Concord, NC, 28027
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Burkett and Ms. Watts:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place permanent fill in 149.75 linear feet of perennial streams
in order to construct a road crossings to a school site at the Villages at Moss Creek in Cabarrus County, as described in your application
received by the Division of Water Quality on May 14, 2002. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this fill is covered
by General Water Quality Certification Number 3375. This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 14 when it is issued
by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your
project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. Also this
approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project, you must
notify us in writing and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner
must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland
fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or if total stream fills exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be
required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and the additional conditions listed below:
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands and waters or areas within
50 feet of all streams and ponds. These mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of this letter or the issuance of
the 404 Permit (whichever is later). A sample deed notification format can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands .
The following condition applies unless you can demonstrate to the Division that the anticipated buildout impervious area is less than
30%: A final, written stormwater management plan shall be approved in writing by this Office before the impacts specified in this
Certification occur. The stormwater management plan must include plans and specifications for stormwater management facilities
designed to remove 85% TSS according to the most recent version of the NC DENR Stonnwater Best Management Practices
Manual. Also, before any permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities, as approved by this Office, shall be
constructed and operational, and the stormwater management plan, as approved by this Office, shall be implemented. The structural
stormwater practices and well as drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater
practices shall be made without written authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days
of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions
are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any
questions, please telephone Samar Bou-ghazale in our Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699 or Cyndi Karoly in Raleigh at 919-
733-9721.
i rely,
Klimek, P.E.
NUDEW
N. C Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
AW K/cbk
Attachments
cc: Corps of Engineers Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Mooresville DWO Regional Office
Central Files
File Copy
020763

MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Samar Bou-ahazale
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: Bex Gleason
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Villages at Moss Creek c/o AB Development
Project Number 02 0763
Recvd From APP
Received Date 5/14/02 Recvd By Region
Project Type
County CABARRUS
County2
Region Mooresville
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. BE
F14 I -OY ON F_ 13-17 rC r- 30,712. ??-
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y ) N Did you request more info? Q Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y O N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y (0 N Recommendation: QQ Issue O Issue/Cond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 352600 Longitude (ddmmss) 804425
Comments:
The applicant has impacted less than 150 feet of stream for a road crossing at a new school
construction site. Field investigations revealed that the impacted stream is perenial with important
aquatic life. Future impact to the remaning tract was discussed with the applicant during a site
invP_ 'gation on 6-7-02. Any new impact to streams at the site will require mitigation. Please note
that anew application will be submitted to address stream and wetlands impacts to the entire site.
The applicant wishes to obtain approval at this time in order to complete the entrance at the school,
which is planning to open during.july 2002. It is recommended that the NW14 certification be issued,
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1

Page 5 of 12 WERANDS 1401 GROUP
MAY 'r ? 7003

Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002 020763 USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
N Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
N 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
11. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name:
Bob Burkett /
Watts
Mailing Address: J & B Development and Management, Inc.
9179 Davidson Highway
Concord NC 28027
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail] or [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS (Consultant one
Company Affiliation: A Fine Line Design
Mailing Address: 1960 Chapman Wyant Lane
Lincolnton NC 28092
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
NATER QUALITY SECTION

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
' landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
' so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than l l by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size constriction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If frill-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
' 1. Name of project: Villages at Moss Creek
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
' 3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): DB 2430 PG 224, DB 1439 PG 194,
DB 1104 PG 176, DB 232 PG 218
' 4. Location
County: Cabarrus Nearest Town: Concord, NC
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Villages at Moss Creek
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
NC 73 west of Concord to Odell School Road. Left (south) on
Odell School Road to Harris Road. Right (west) on Harris Road approximately
4000' to Site on right (north) side of road.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): (S-1) 35-25-49/80-44-21
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
' (S-2) 35-25-59/80-44-12, (S-3) 35-26-05/80-44-21, (S-4) 35-26-09/80-44-13, (S-5) 35-26-10/80-44-04
6. Property size (acres): Approximately 400.54 acres total from survey
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Tibutaries to Rocky River
(NC Stream Index 13-17)
8. River Basin: Yadkin-PeeDee River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
' River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
' at the time of this application:
Abandoned single family farm residences (2) and outbuildings, forest, old field
successional area, new residential roads and crossings in place, new school on
adjacent property.
Page 6 of 12

IV.
i
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of construction of minor road crossings to gain access to
interior portions o the site as a part o single family residential su ivision.
Typical site construction equipment has been utilized including Lyraders_
loaders, trucks, etc.
Additional information attached on separate page.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
Construction o minor road crossings to provide access to interior portions o
site from existing roads.
Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
U.S. Armv Corps iurisdictional determination Action ID 200130114_
Action ID 2001
Future Project Plans
school
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project'? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Additional permit requests are not anticipated for the project in the future.
previous PCN for NWP 14 was submitted and authorized for Site 1 access to adia
Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
' Section III.
Item 10.

The Villages at Moss Creek site occurs at the location of a former farm which consisted of beef
cattle production, fruit/vegetable farming and forestry. The upland portions of the site were used pri-
marily for crop production. Wetlands and other lower areas of the site were used for cattle pasture,
grazing and forestry. The original delineation and Corps verification of wetlands and waters was con-
ducted on this site and surrounding adjacent properties while the site was still actively being operated
as a farm.
A public school (Harris Road Middle School) was recently constructed on adjacent property. A pre-
existing farm road crossing on the Villages at Moss Creek site was improved and was provided for use
as a temporary construction access for the school while it was being built. A PCN was prepared and
submitted to replace the temporary construction access road with a permanent access road to provide
access to the school as well as to the interior portions of the Villages at Moss Creek site from Harris
Road. The use of NWP 14 was authorized for this activity. A total of 149.75 linear feet of channel
impact was authorized by the NWP. A total of 75 linear feet of this authorized impact occurred on the
Villages at Moss Creek site. The remainder occurred downstream on the school property. The site was
inspected by Corps and DWQ personnel during a pre-application site visit. At this time the specific
location and final design of the additional crossings on the remainder of the Villages at Moss Creek site
were not known.
Approximate anticipated additional road crossing locations on the Villages at Moss Creek site
were identified in the field and inspected by Corps personnel. A draft PCN application was prepared
and submitted to the regional DWQ office for review and comment prior to finalizing the location and
design of additional proposed road crossings. A site visit was conducted by regional DWQ office per-
sonnel to review each proposed crossing location in the field based upon information provided in the
draft PCN. Recommendations made during these visits to relocate or redesign crossings to avoid and
minimize impacts to wetlands and waters were taken into consideration and proposed crossings were
subsequently redesigned and submitted to local reviewing agencies for approval.
Pipe and culvert locations were approved by local reviewing agencies and grading permits were
issued. The final design of downstream rip rap and other outlet protection had not been finalized at the
time of the local approvals for pipe and culvert locations. As such, pipes and culverts were constructed
per local approval but without the additional authorizations from necessary from the Corps or DWQ.
The applicant was not aware that additional approvals from Corps and DWQ had not yet been ob-
tained, however all conditions which would be required by the NWP were followed during construc-
tion. Pipes and culvert inverts have been set below streambed levels to allow the passage of aquatic
life, live concrete has not been allowed to come into contact with wetlands or waters, and strict sedi-
ment and erosion control measures were implemented, maintained, and have been inspected through-
out the construction process. Once the applicant became aware that additional authorizations were
required by the Corps and DWQ an appropriate after the fact PCN was prepared to be re-submitted for
the authorizations for all additional crossings.
Although the impacts have already occurred, it has been the intent of the applicant to follow appro-
priate regulatory procedures from the outset of the project. This has been demonstrated by conducting
delineations and verifications prior to design or onset of construction and by following the required
process of mitigation sequencing. All proposed crossings have been located and designed to avoid and
minimize impacts to wetlands and waters and pre-application site visits were conducted with both
Corps and DWQ personnel to review each proposed crossing location. Draft PCN applications were
submitted to regional DWQ staff for comment and assistance in the preparation of a final PCN. Recom-
mendations from Corps and DWQ personnel were followed as the project design was being finalized.
Very close coordination with local plan review agencies has ensured that strict sediment and erosion
control measures have been implemented and maintained and that appropriate protections to down-
stream water quality and aquatic resources have been utilized. The applicant also recognizes the neces-
sity for mitigation for impacts to stream channels and has proposed participation in the NCWRP, if
available, or restoration of degraded channels on-site to satisfy this requirement.

n

Description of Crossings
Site 1
The road crossing at Site 1 is a previously authorized crossing constructed to provide access to a new
school on adjacent property. The channel which was crossed by this crossing is an important Corps
Intermittent Channel and a perennial DWQ channel. The permanent crossing occurs in the vicinty of a
former farm crossing and temporary construction entrance. Impacts to channels and wetlands which
have actually occurred in association with this crossing on this site total 75 linear feet of channel.
Site 2
The road crossing at Site 2 is a new road crossing constructed to gain access to the interior of the
property. This channel at this crossing is an important Corps intermittent channel and a perennial DWQ
channel. Site 2 has sidestream wetlands which are located above headwaters. The location of this
crossing is situated at the narrowest point of wetlands along the channel and at the location of a previ-
ously existing farm road crossing. Culverts have been constructed with headwalls to minimize length
of pipe needed to cross the channel and the downstream outlet protection rip rap has been designed
using alternative methods to reduce the size of the required rip rap apron. Total impacts to channel at
this crossing are 66.29 linear feet of pipe and 80 linear feet of rip rap apron. Total impacts to wetlands
are 7,748 square feet (0.178 ac.).
Site 3 a and b
The road crossing at Site 3 a and b occurs at the point where the channel transitions upstream from
important Corps intermittent channel and perennial DWQ channel (3a) to unimportant Corps intermit-
tent channel and DWQ intermittent channel (3b). The lower 78.83' of this crossing impacts the impor-
tant/perennial portion of the channel. The upper 30.00 linear feet of this crossing impacts intermittent
channel. The channel has been crossed at a point which does not have sidestream wetlands outside of
the top of bank. Culverts have been constructed with headwalls to minimize length of pipe needed to
cross the channel and the downstream outlet protection rip rap has been designed using alternative
methods to reduce the size of the required rip rap apron. Total impacts to intermittent channels at this
crossing are 30 linear feet of pipe. Total impacts to perennial/important channel at this crossing are
48.83 linear feet of pipe and 25 linear feet of rip rap apron. Total area impacts to wetlands or other
waters are 1859.5 square feet (0.178 ac.).
Site 4
The road crossing at Site 4 crosses an unimportant intermittent Corps channel and intermittent DWQ
channel and associated sidestream headwaters wetlands to gain access to the interior of the property.
The crossing occurs at a narrow point of wetland. Culverts have been constructed with headwalls to
minimize length of pipe needed to cross the channel and the downstream outlet protection rip rap has
been designed using alternative methods to reduce the size of the required rip rap apron. The total
linear feet of impact to intermittent channel is 88.49 linear feet. The total area of impact to wetlands
and waters is 2,978 square feet (0.068 ac.).
Site 5
The road crossing at Site 5 crosses an unimportant intermittent Corps channel and intermittent DWQ
channel and associated sidestream headwaters wetlands to gain access to the interior of the property.
The crossing occurs at a narrow point of wetland. Culverts have been constructed with headwalls to
minimize length of pipe needed to cross the channel and the downstream outlet protection rip rap has
been designed using alternative methods to reduce the size of the required rip rap apron. The total
linear feet of impact to intermittent channel is 111.39 linear feet. The total area of impact to wetlands
and waters is 3,297 square feet (0.076 ac.).

1
1
1
1
1
1
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
All impacts are after the fact and include placement of culverts, fill, and rip rap in
intermittent and perennial stream channels and headwater wetlands for permanent
road crossings.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
Site 1* fill (.002) yes (letter OK'd) 0' ephemeral /herb.
* Note: Pr vious PCN au horized for this crossing o nly.
Site 2 fill/pipe (.178) no 0' channel/herbdfore
Site 3a/b fill/pipe .043 no 0' channel OHWM
Site 4 fil i e •068 no 0' channel / forest
Site 5 fill/ i e .076 no 09 channel WM
" List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Kate Map,
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htta://www.fbina.KOV.
List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond.
Carolina Bay, bug, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACF only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 22.54 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.365 acres
includes previous impacts
Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream, 'mpselow:
I
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent"
(please secif )
Site 1 Pie 75.00 If UT Rocky River 5' OHWM Perennial
Site 2 Pipe/Rip-Rap 146.29 if UT Rock River 7' OHWM Perennial
Site 3a Pipe/Rip-Rap 73.83 if UT Rocky River 3' OHWM Perennial
Site 3b Pipe 30.00 if UT Rock River 3' OHWM Intermittent
Site 4 Pipe/Rip-Rap 88.491f UT Rock River 7' OHWM Intermittent
Site 5 Pipe/Rip-Ra 111.39 If UT Rock River 4' OHWM Intermittent
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.jZov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tunozunr_i m,
wwtv.manaucsLCOin, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 525.00 if total
(Note: Cumulative impacts to DWQ Perennial Channels or Corps Important
Intermittent Channels is 295.12 l.f.)
Page 8 of 12

1

4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number

(indicate on ma
Type of Impact*
p Area of
Im
pact
acres
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Wttterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

d - I., . uuNuc? acNaIa'cly auu wcuuty tcutpurary Impacts. impacts ineutae, but are not nmtted to: fill, excavation, drudging,
' flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
' included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
' Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
' VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
' Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
' site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
' Description attached on separate page.
VIII. Mitigation
' DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
' streams.
Page 9 of 12

Section VII.
Although the PCN application is being made after the fact, the project had followed the appropriate
sequencing of pre-application consultation with Corps and DWQ personnel, delineation, verification,
avoidance and minimization. Avoidance and minimization of impacts includes locating crossings at
narrow points on each channel or at those portions of channel which have been previously degraded by
farm crossings, cattle or otherwise exhibit fewest field indicators associated with stream channel func-
tions and values including water quality and instream habitat. The smallest allowable crossing section
has been used to cross each channel as near to perpendicular as possible. Alternative design methods
have been employed for downstream outlet protection to receive local approvals to minimize the use of
rip rap. Culverts have been placed below the OHWM in channels to allow the passage of aquatic life.
Every effort has been made to comply with conditions of the NWP and associated Water Quality Cer-
tification. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices have been implemented and maintained
throughout the construction process.
I

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmt;ide,htni1.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
' as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
' preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
' Mitigation ro osed for this site includes participation in the NC Wetland Restora-
tion Program. There is a limited opportunity to restore channel segments on this
site which have been degraded by former agricultural practices. Observed de ra-
' a ion includes damage by cattle, ditching, and channelization.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
' Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at httt)://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrl)/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
' Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 296 if
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0 sf
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0 ac
' Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0 ac
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0 Re

Page 10 of 12

iL
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
' (federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)'?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
' Yes ? No ? N/A
' If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ? N/A
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
' justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
' Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
' Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )'?
' Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
' mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
i
Zone" Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
I N/A 3 N/A
2 N/A is N/A
Total N/A N/A
Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page I I of 12

If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
' identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
' Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
' downstream from the property.
Maximum 120 ac. impervious versus 400.54 acres total on site /
equals less than 30% impervious for entire project. Cabarrus County approved
stormwater management plans will be implemented to protect water quality.
X11. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
' wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Public Sanitary Sewer will be utilized for wastewater treatment
' X111. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules'?
' Yes ® No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
' Yes ® No ?
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
' It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
All impacts in this PCN are after the fact. A PCN had been previously submitted for the
crossing at Site to provide access to the ad'acent School Site. All impacts for Site 1 are
included in the umu ative Impacts or the entire project on this PCN.

u,,, ot O
pplicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
EXHIBITS
USGS Location Map
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
USFWS National Wetland Inventory
UDSA-NRCS Soils
Hydric Soils List
Correspondence

3922 /
1
1

?7 4,
?) V. c 7311
V,
M
99
-a ees at ?( - " -
Rn,l
M ' ek"5 it _ i'r f ya ; i f
? Site + S-4)Q,"
z /.
- W
,n
?O /^ Il\•.?, _ 650
33
t Imo( P1? N)F
thoo
t
site
r ,
392 1.. i _.? ?• ?? ?? i . ?• ?? ?i ( r
Whitney
Lake
c l A?
=650 o r J f \ r. f 7 1
•-
1? ? - "?
?1394?
I ? f f
i f r ! f. 144.
? W 8??0 1 ?, l c-r I ? ? 650 ? , ? `?
\? l\ `Cros?I' iA
3919 e Ch,
J V44 I?
i! J.
Cl-
Cox L-
\
'(? ..r .?jl? I'1,-". ?r? /\.L.•ll Ir1 ?f ?? ,..
Source: USGS 7.5 minute quad, Kannapolis, NC (1993)
Villages at Moss Creek
J&B Development and Management, Inc. Scale: 1 "=2000'
Cabarrus County, NC NORTH Project Location
EHNR - ENVIRONMEWAL MANAGEMENT 2B .0300
.0309 YADKIN-PEE DEE RIVER BASIN
Classification
Name of Stream Description Class Date Index No.
mouth to Lake Tillery, Pee Dee River
PEE DEE RIVER (including From Norwood Dam to mouth of Turkey WS-V&B 8/3/92 13-(15.5)
Blewett Falls Lake below Top Creek
normal operating levels)
Clarks Creek From source to Pee Dee River C 7/1/73 13-16
Dumas Creek From source to Clarks Creek C 9/1/74 13-16-1
Lather Branch From source to Clarks Creek C 9/1/74 13-16-2
Stony Fork From source to Clarks Creek C 9/1/74 13-16-3
Lick Fork From source to Clarks Creek C 9/1/74 13-16-4
Hall Branch From source to Lick Fork C 9/1/74 13-16-4-1
Big Branch From source to Clarks Creek C 9/1/74 13-16-5
Rocky River From source to Pee Dee River C 8/3/92 13-17
Dye r ranc ran source to Rocky ver C 9/1/14 =177
West Branch Rocky River From source to Rocky River C 9/1/74 13-17-3
South Prong West Branch From source to West Branch Rocky C 9/1/74 13-17-3-1
Rocky River River
Clarke Creek From source to Rocky River C 7/1/73 13-17-4
Borth Prong Clarke Creek From source to Clarke Creek C 9/1/74 13-17-4-1
South Prong Clarke Creek Fran source to Clarke Creek C 9/1/74 13-17-4-2
Cane Creek From source to South Prong Clarke C 9/1/74 13-17-4-2-1
Creek
Ferreltown Creek From source to Clarke Creek C 7/1/73 13-17-4-3
(Ferreltown Lake)
Ramesh Creek From sauce to Clarke Creek C 7/1/73 13-17-4-4
Mallard Creek From source to Rocky River C 9/1/74 13-17-5
Griffith Lakes Entire lakes and connecting stream C 9/1/74 13-17-5-1
to Mallard Creek
Clarks Creek From source to Mallard Creek C 9/1/74 13-17-5-2
Doby Creek From source to Mallard Creek C 9/1/74 13-17-5-3
Toby Creek From source to Mallard Creek C 9/1/74 13-17-5-4
Stony Creek From source to Mallard Creek C 9/1/74 13-17-5-5
Coddle Creek From source to a point 0.5 mile WS-II 8/3/92 13-17-6-(0.5)
downstream of East Coddle Creek
East Fork Coddle Creek From source to Coddle Creek WS-II 8/3/92 13-17-6-1
Coddle Creek, including From a point 0.5 mile downstream of WS-II CA 8/3/92 13-17-6-(1.5)
crater supply reservoir East Coddle Creek to a point 0.2 mile
for concord) upstream of N.C. Hwy. 73 (Concord
water supply intake)
Unnamed Tributary to From source to dam at Earnhardt Lake WS-II 8/3/92 13-17-6-2-(1)
Coddle Creek (Earnhardt to Coddle Creek
Lake)
Unnamed Tributary to From dam at Earnhardt Lakt to Coddle WS-II CA 8/3/92 13-17-6-2-(2)
Coddle Creek (Emerson Creek
Lake)
Park Creek From source to a point 0.1 mile up- WS-II 8/3/92 13-17-6-3-(1)
stream of Cabarrus County SR 1615
Park Creek From a point 0.1 mile upstream of WS-II CA 8/3/92 13-17-6-3-(2)
Source: Classifications & Water Quality Standards Assigned to the
Waters of the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin, NCDENR, Raleigh, North Carolina
R2UBHx
Riverine, Lower Perennial, Unconsolidated Bottom, Permanently Flooded, excavate
PSS1A
Palustrine, Scrub-Shrub, Broad-leaved Deciduous, Temporarily Flooded
PF01A
Palustrine, Forested, Broad-leaved Deciduous, Temporarily Flooded
PF01C
Palustrine, Forested, Broad-leaved Deciduous, Seasonally Flooded.
/ J
1
> 7-
} r:
'4"W4'
Site 5 (s-5)
11a?1t r- (S-3)
stCrtep. (S-2)
h„ 'it ious PCN)
N
Villages at Moss Creek
J&B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabarrus County, NC
Source: USFWS National Wetlands Inventory,
Kannapolis NC quad, 1991
Scale: 1 "=2000'
NORTH N.W.I. Maps
We Wehadkee loam,frequently flooded
Ch Chewacla sandy loam, frequently flooded
EnB Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8%n slopes
EnD Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15% slopes
Cc132 Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8% slopes, eroded
PoB Poindexter loam, 2 to 8% slopes
PoD Poindexter loam, 8 to 15% slopes
PoF Poindexter loam, 15 to 45% slopes
MeD Mecklenburg loam, 8 to 15% slopes
En8 A sti' nyv;,:
,f EnD I'
?a F oB CcS2 j _..
B EnB P ,
v 3 r
w
i, D A
i En
tiY
t
es at nB y?
S re Site V'-- ?,. S-3)*
4 `C
w._ -. .? -2)`
o fe •1. S 2
2 F
g En9 tea r
0110 CcB2
A.i
sit
?nB
t En8
} En6
rrc p . { - -1 _jtB r
K- CCB2
CeB2
1 i S
Cc82
Source: USDA - NRCS Soil Survey for Cabarrus County,
Sheet 1, September 1988
Villages at Moss Creek
J&B Development and Management, Inc. Scale: 1 "=2000'
Cabarrus County, NC NORTH Soils Survey
MAY-04-00 THU 07:250 AM CARARRl1S S14CD + 704 793 6432 P.03
' u. S. KFARIKN1 Of WICIA.IM Technical Guido
Soil Conservation Service Ifttioe 11•A•2
,,arms 1991
j
"YORK SOILS
¦ Cabwus Cwww. Nw* Ca miNna
Hydrfo codes (11C): i - tydrie soils, only because of saturation for a
significant period during the growing season.
2 • liydria soils that are frequently flooded for long or
wry laws perfade OjMsg the gracing season: and
3 dydria soils that are ponded for lane or wry long
paris& during the growliq season.
VsqeaMon coded (MCI: I Hydrit soils that support veody wo station under
natural conditions: and
to Nydrie sells that do Act support woody vegetation under
natural condittans.
IMPORTANT NOTES: (1) Nydric soils to this minty caneot be farmed under natural conditions
without r6awng woody vsgetatim or hydrology manipulation. (t) Sous mp units and included soils
listed as hydris soils in this o0lrnty MK not meet the definition of hydrie soils and wetlands because
the hydrology too been altered through drainage or other manipulations.
A. Map units cost we an hydria sots-or haw hl" soft se s n*or component.

cop fief t
Symbol HC VC Nap Wit Xoms
AV (10) 1.3 1 Armooia loam
' we (e) 1 I ibhadwe loam. frw portly flooded
' B. Mop unks with fMirhtsicns of by* soft or haw vet spots.
amp Unit Nydria Normal )motion
' Symbol Nap unit Name Inclusion HC VC Inclusion
Aab (151 Altavista sandy leas. nett spots l.3 1 depressions
z to d percent slopes
Ch (4) Choweale sandy loses Vehodces 1 t adjoining upland side slopes
frooumtly flooded

' 164 (5I) irade)l loam. Q to 2 Anss+nia 1,3 1 depressians
perceftt slopes
' Sfd Sedgofteld sandy loam. Arsania 1.3 1 depressions
(3911 t to 0 portent slopes
Hydric Soils List, USDA NRCS,
Cabarrus County, NC
C

Action Id. 200230876
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
County Cabarrus
' GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property owner: J&B Development and Management, Inc., Att'n: Mr. Bob Burkett
' Address: 9179 Davidson Hwy.
Concord, NC 28027
' Telephone No.:
Size and Location of project (water body, road name/number, town, etc.):
Villages at Moss Creek development located on approx. 400.54 acre tract on Harris Rd. and
Odell School Rd.; near Concord
Description of Activity:
Construct a minor road crossing on an unnamed trib. to the Rocky River for the purpose of
' providing access to a new school. The project will impact < 150 LF of intermittent channel
and 0.0017 acre of wetlands.
' Applicable Law: X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.1344).
(check all that apply) Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899).
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number.
14 Nationwide Permit Number.
1 Your work is authorized by this Regional General (RGP) or Nationwide Permit (NWP) provided it is
accomplished in strict accordance with the attached conditions and your submitted plans. If your activitiy is
subject to Section 404 (if Section 404 block above is checked), before beginning work you must also receive a
Section 401 water quality certification from the N.C. Division of Environmental Management, telephone (919)
733-1786. For any activity within the twenty coastal counties, before beginning work you must contact the
N.C. Division of Coastal Management, telephone [phone].
Please read and carefully comply with the attached conditions of the RGP or NWP. Any violation of the
conditions of the RGP or the NWP referenced above may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a
' restoration order, and/or appropriate legal action.
This Department of the Army RGP or NWP verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to
' obtain any other required Federal, State, or local approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact
appropriate State and local agencies before beginning work.
If there are any questions regarding this authorization or any of the conditions of the General Permit or
' Nationwide Permit, please contact the Corps Regulatory Official specified below.
Date June 17, 2002
Corps Regulatory Official Steve Chapin Telephone No. [phone]
Expiration Date of Verification June 17, 2004
cc: A Fine Line Design
CFSA W Forth 591
Revised July 1995
J
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: 200130114 County: Cabarrus
Waters of the U.S. Survey/DelineationVerification
Property owner/Authorized Agent: J&B Development pnd Management, Inc.
' Address: 9179 Davidson Highway
Concord, NC 28027
' Telephone Number:
Size and Location of Property (waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.):
' 420 acre "Village at Odell" site located on NC 73 and Harris Rd.; west of Concord
' Indicate Which of the following apply:
' X There are waters of the U.
S. on the above described property which have been accurately
' flagged/delineated. We recommend that the delineated lines be surveyed. The surveyed
lines must be verified by our staff before the Corps will make a final jurisdictional
determination on your property.
The submitted survey plat dated for the above referenced property
accurately reflects the limits of waters of the U.S. on the property. Unless there is a
' change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed 5 years from the date of this notice.
' Placement of dredged or fill material in waters othe U.S. on this property without a Department
of the Army permit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC
1311). A permit is not required for work on the property restricted entirely to existing high
' ground. If you have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please
contact:
Steve Chapin at_ ???)_271--4014 - - -- - ------ - ------------- ----
Project Manager Signature /?- Date November 13, 2000
' cc: A Fine Line Design

11

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: 200130025 County: Cabarrus
COUNTY
Waters of the U.S. Survey/DelineationVerification
Property owner/Authorized Agent: Cabarrus Co. School Board; c/o Cabarrus Co.
Planning Services

I
Address: P.O. Box 707
Concord, NC 28206-0707
Telephone Number:
Size and Location of Property (waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.):
Cabarrus School Board - Future School Site located on approx. 78.82 acres at the
intersection of the Rocky River and Harris Road.
Indicate Which of the following apply:
X _ There are waters of the U.S. on the above described property which have been accurately
flagged/delineated. We recommend that the delineated lines be surveyed. The surveyed
lines must be verified by our staff before the Corps will make a final jurisdictional
determination on your property.
The submitted survey plat dated for the above referenced property
accurately reflects the limits of waters of the U.S. on the property. Unless there is a
change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed 5 years from the date of this notice.
Placement of dredged or fill material in waters othe U.S. on this property without a Department
of the Army permit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC
1311) A permit is not required for work on the property restricted entirely to existing high
ground. It is our understanding that no impacts to waters of the U.S. are planned on the
site. If you have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please
contact:
Steve Chapin/ at
' Project Manager Signature
,L
000
7

t
NORTH CAROLINA
March 9, 2001
Mr. Steve Chapin
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Dear Mr. Chapin:
' This letter is regarding the stream crossing for the school being constructed by Cabarrus
County on Harris Road. I have discussed this issue with both Mr. Craig R. Wyant of A
Fine Line Design, and Mr. Jeff Schmidt with Kenney Design Group.
The box culvert (15'4" x 6'5 ") under the road serving the school was designed to handle
a 100 year flood for the entire drainage area upstream. Since the area upstream from the
culvert will soon be included in a mixed-use development in the area, the design was
based on full build-out in the drainage basin. Based on this, the County feels the flood
issue has been addressed sufficiently, and this design has our approval.
If you have any questions, or need any additional information, feel free to contact me.
' Sincerely,

Michael L. Byrd

II Cabarrus County
I ' Planning Services
I r.
----- -- -------- - ------ ----- - - -
I

' Planning Services Division
P. Q. Box 707 , Concori, NC 28026-0707 (704) 788-8 41

7

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
June 5, 2002
Mr. Craig R. Wyant, RLA/SWS
' A Fine Line Design
1960 Chapman-Wyant Lane
Lincolnton, North Carolina 28092
' Dear Mr. Wyant:
Subject: Villages at Moss Creek (Moss Farm), Cabarrus County, North Carolina
In your letter dated May 13, 2002, you requested our comments with regard to the subject
' project. The following comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e), and Section 7 of the Endangered
' Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Endangered Species. According to our records and a review of the information you provided,
no listed species or their habitats occur on the site. We concur with your determination that the
' proposed project will not affect endangered or threatened species and their habitats. Therefore,
we believe the requirements under Section 7 of the Act are fulfilled. However, obligations under
' Section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this
identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously
considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this
' review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the
identified action.
' Notwithstanding the above information, we do have records of Heller's trefoil (Lotus helleri) and
the Carolina darter (Etheostoma collis collis), both of which are species of Federal concern, from
the vicinity of the project and provide the following recommendations to minimize potential
-------------------------------- -
- effects-to-them.- - - - - ---
Storm Water. Loss of riparian buffers and inadequately controlled storm-water run-off from
' developed areas are major factors resulting in the degradation and loss of aquatic resources.
Accordingly, we recommend that you develop and implement an adequate storm-water-control
and -treatment plan and that undisturbed riparian buffers (natural vegetation) be maintained
1

and/or reestablished along any perennial and intermittent streams on the site. Vegetated riparian
buffers serve as filters for contaminants, lessen storm-water velocities, provide thermal cover,
and protect stream-bank stability.
Floodplain Protection. Executive Order 11988 requires Federal agencies to consider and
protect floodplain functions. We believe the recent examples of flooding highlight the
importance of avoiding the "... long- and short-term impacts associated with the occupancy and
modification of floodplains ..." and that we should "avoid direct and indirect support of
floodplain development ...." We are concerned about the potential loss of floodplain functions
and modifications of wildlife habitat within the floodplain at this site. Were any floodplain
studies completed for this area; if so, what date(s)? Has additional impervious surface been
developed that might affect the current 100-year floodplain elevations? How much impervious
surface is in the watershed? Does Cabarrus County have a limit on impervious surface area for.
the watershed?
Erosion Control. Given the proximity of the project to aquatic environments, we want to
' emphasize that stringent sedimentation- and erosion-control measures should be implemented
prior to ground disturbance and should be maintained throughout project construction.

Thank you for allowing us to comment on this project. Please contact Mr. Mark Cantrell of our
staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 227, if you have any questions. In any future correspondence
concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-02-315.
Sin ely, __.._._?
Brian P. Cole
State Supervisor
cc:
Mr. Steve Chapin, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Regulatory Field Office, 151 Patton
Avenue, Room 208, Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Mr. Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator, Habitat Conservation Program, North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission, 3855 Idlewild Road, Kernersville, NC 27284-9180

' May 19, 2003
Ron Ferrell, NCWRP Program Manager
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1619
' Re: Request for Participation in NCWRP
' Villages at Moss Creek (Moss Farm) Site
±400.54 acres, Cabarrus County, NC
Applicant: Bob Burkett / Kerry Watts
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
' 9179 Davidson Highway
Concord NC 28027
' [phone]
Dear Ron,
This letter requests participation in the NC Wetlands Restoration Program through payment of in
lieu fees for impacts to stream channels at a ±400.54 acre site in Cabarrus County, NC. The site is
' located within the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin within the headwaters of un-named tributaries to the
Rocky River (NC Stream Index 13-17). The site is located on the Kannapolis (1993), NC, USGS 7.5
minute quad. The amount of stream channel mitigation credit being requested is 296 linear feet located
' in Cataloging Unit 03040105 of the Yadkin River Basin. If this credit is available could you please
provide written approval for attachment to the PCN Application for the project.
Representatives of the Corps Asheville Regional Office and Mooresville Regional DWQ office
have previously conducted site visits to this property.
' Thank you very much for your consideration of this request.. Please do not hesitate to contact me if
you should have questions or if there is any way in which I can be of assistance to you.
'
Respectfully,

Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
A Fine Line Design
' 1960 Chapman-Wyant Lane
Lincolnotn NC 28092
' 704-735-1084
crw
ant@aol
com
y
.
cc: Bob Burkett/Kerry Watts, J & B Development and Management, Inc.
John Dorney, NC Division of Water Quality
' Steve Chapin, U.S. Army Coprs, Asheville Field Office
Craig R. Wyont, dbo DESIGN, 1960 Chapman-Wyant Lane, Lincolnton, NC 28092 [phone]

May 19, 2003
John Dorney, Director
' NC Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1650
[phone]
' Re: Pre-Construction Notification (PCN)
Villages at Moss Creek (Moss Farm) Site,
±400.54 acres, Cabarrus County, NC
' Applicant: Bob Burkett / Kerry Watts
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
9179 Davidson Highway
' Concord NC 28027
[phone]
Dear John,
' Please find enclosed for your review seven (7) copies of a completed PCN application for five after
the fact road crossings at a ±400.54 acre site in Cabarrus County, NC. The site is located within the
Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin within the headwaters of un-named tributaries to the Rocky River (NC
' Stream Index 13-17). The site is located on the Kannapolis (1993), NC, USGS 7.5 minute quad.
This PCN is being forwarded to your attention as a part of the Clean Water Act 404/401 (PCN)
permitting process. The activities described in this PCN have already been conducted and therefore
this request is for after the fact authorization. Road crossings have been constructed to provide access
' to a newly constructed public school on adjacent property and to provide access to the interior of the
site. Since a NWP authorization had been issued for the first crossing (Site 1) it is requested that the
original NWP authorization be rescinded and re-authorized to include all of the subsequent activities
' within the single and complete project. The original authorization is Corps Action ID # 200230876
Although the PCN application is being made after the fact, the project had followed the appropri-
ate sequencing of pre-application consultation with Corps and DWQ personnel, delineation, verifica-
tion, avoidance and minimization. Avoidance and minimization of impacts includes locating crossings
' at narrow points on each channel or at those portions of channel which have been previously degraded
by farm crossings, cattle or otherwise exhibit fewest field indicators associated with stream channel
functions and values including water quality and instream habitat. The smallest allowable crossing
' section has been used to cross each channel as near to perpendicular as possible. Alternative design
methods have been employed for downstream outlet protection to receive local approvals to minimize
the use of rip rap. Culverts have been placed below the OHWM in channels to allow the passage of
t aquatic life. Every effort has been made to comply with conditions of the NWP and associated Water
Quality Certification. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices have been implemented and
maintained throughout the construction process.
Mitigation is being proposed through participation in the NC Wetland Restoration Program by
payment of in lieu of fees or by restoration of stream channel segments on site which have been de-
graded by previous agricultural practices.

Craig R. Wyont, dba / OESiGN, 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone, Lin<olnton, NC 28092 [phone]

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
All wetlands and waters on the Villages at Moss Creek site have been delineated, surveyed and
verified by the U. S. Army Corps. (Corps Action ID #200130114). Wetlands and waters have been
delineated, verified, and surveyed on the adjacent Harris Road School Site (originally ±78.82 acre
Moss Farm site, Corps Action ID #200130025).
One permanent road crossing has been constructed to replace a temporary construction access to
the school site. The temporary access was built in the vicinity of a former farm road crossing for the
purposes of school construction. The crossing provided access to the adjacent school property and
provides access to the interior of the Villages at Moss Creek Site. Four additional permanent crossings
have been built within the Villages at Moss Creek site.
The Mooresville Regional DWQ office has conducted a previous site visit to this property to re-
view each road crossing location in the field prior to the onset of construction activity. The DWQ has
been notified of this PCN and of the need for an "after the fact" status during processing.
Thank you very much for your review of the enclosed. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you
should have questions or if there is any way in which I can be of assistance to you.
Respectfully,

Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
A Fine Line Design
1960 Chapman-Wyant Lane
Lincolnotn NC 28092
704-735-1084
[e-mail]
cc: Bob Burkett/Kerry Watts, J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Steve Chapin, U.S. Army Corps, Asheville Field Office
page 2 of 2
Craig R. Wyont, dbo c?c ?s??ne / DESIGN, 1960 Chapman-Wyont Lone, Lincolnton, NC 28092 [phone]

May 19, 2003
' Steve Chapin
U.S. Army Corps, Asheville Office
151 Patton Avenue Room 208
' Asheville NC 28801-5006
[phone]
Re: Pre-Construction Notification (PCN)
Villages at Moss Creek (Moss Farm) Site,
±400.54 acres, Cabarrus County, NC
' Applicant: Bob Burkett / Kerry Watts
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
9179 Davidson Highway
' Concord NC 28027
[phone]
' Dear Steve,
Please find enclosed for your review a copy of a completed PCN application for five after the fact
road crossings at a ±400.54 acre site in Cabarrus County, NC. The site is located within the Yadkin-Pee
Dee River Basin within the headwaters of un-named tributaries to the Rocky River (NC Stream Index
13-17). The site is located on the Kannapolis (1993), NC, USGS 7.5 minute quad.
' This PCN is being forwarded to your attention as a part of the Clean Water Act 404/401 (PCN)
permitting process. The activities described in this PCN have already been conducted and therefore
this request is for after the fact authorization. Road crossings have been constructed to provide access
' to a newly constructed public school on adjacent property and to provide access to the interior of the
site. Since a NWP authorization had been issued for the first crossing (Site 1) it is requested that the
original NWP authorization be rescinded and re-authorized to include all of the subsequent activities
' within the single and complete project. The original authorization is Corps Action ID # 200230876
Although the PCN application is being made after the fact, the project had followed the appropri-
ate sequencing of pre-application consultation with Corps and DWQ personnel, delineation, verifica-
tion, avoidance and minimization. Avoidance and minimization of impacts includes locating crossings
' at narrow points on each channel or at those portions of channel which have been previously degraded
by farm crossings, cattle or otherwise exhibit fewest field indicators associated with stream channel
functions and values including water quality and instream habitat. The smallest allowable crossing
' section has been used to cross each channel as near to perpendicular as possible. Alternative design
methods have been employed for downstream outlet protection to receive local approvals to minimize
the use of rip rap. Culverts have been placed below the OHWM in channels to allow the passage of
aquatic life. Every effort has been made to comply with conditions of the NWP and associated Water
' Quality Certification. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices have been implemented and
maintained throughout the construction process.
Mitigation is being proposed through participation in the NC Wetland Restoration Program by
payment of in lieu of fees or by restoration of stream channel segments on site which have been de-
graded by previous agricultural practices.
7
Craig R. Wyont. dbo cc,e??t / DESIGN, 1960 ChaPman-Wyant Lone, Lin<olnton, NC 28092 [phone]

1?

J

All wetlands and waters on the Villages at Moss Creek site have been delineated, surveyed and
verified by the U. S. Army Corps. (Corps Action ID #200130114). Wetlands and waters have been
delineated, verified, and surveyed on the adjacent Harris Road School Site (originally ±78.82 acre
Moss Farm site, Corps Action ID #200130025).
One permanent road crossing has been constructed to replace a temporary construction access to
the school site. The temporary access was built in the vicinity of a former farm road crossing for the
purposes of school construction. The crossing provided access to the adjacent school property and
provides access to the interior of the Villages at Moss Creek Site. Four additional permanent crossings
have been built within the Villages at Moss Creek site.
The Mooresville Regional DWQ office has conducted a previous site visit to this property to re-
view each road crossing location in the field prior to the onset of construction activity. The DWQ has
been notified of this PCN and of the need for an "after the fact" status during processing.
Thank you very much for your review of the enclosed. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you
should have questions or if there is any way in which I can be of assistance to you.
Respectfully,

Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
A Fine Line Design
1960 Chapman-Wyant Lane
Lincolnotn NC 28092
704-735-1084
[e-mail]
cc: Bob Burkett/Kerry Watts, J & B Development and Management, Inc.
John Dorney, NCNENR Division of Water Quality (seven copies)
page 2 of 2
Craig R. Wyont, dbo aQfc?T a..Yi- / DESIGN, 1960 Chapman-Wyont Lone, Lincolnton, NC 28092 [phone]

Crossing Detail Plans and Sections

? o

?-?bZ' ;g = ?' a

a?zo<
D j•?=gYgi ? Cn?
; 5?
•J
???=• NOflTH i cb?qY???
$
¢w
° $?? v

G y ? ?
S 3F l
3s
f€
:_?
i ?$ 3 e 4
p?w.? °
? ? ?? ?Yg£???
N;- g

#R
E e k "g YS ?}k3?§
t, y p
'
t ? • Yb1?Y y1
3

6i
, b

3j
?
? I
m ? I e
y s'
a

to xL =

-
ma
-
r
A"F E^
fdA
Ry
t Y4'ifi A
/
?

g
S?g

C
t?
N b 'n / ? .n
J ? ?? R?
E9y5
5' 0
a / ? b

s :10
J y
s? fi ` ^ t
b
p yti•w d
4S ? -. .

r ?-
N

iEj3?[c 4
?

T
j
' y

Yr :7;„1 , 7?`?a?$ 1 ??a ? k} tY ?E{? ?? Tf f, d k :,v 5 c
'. dY94a[EG ':e,tl4ldy ,, 6A &4110 4 L,1; L. J?i
_ i ky•6
t #; '{k? 'C. ,S'SY
` ? :2 ?y ae8 'Cak i (1{ kdT Efts
` '
'
e'
°
- tF B '?aY 6???g gnnf Y'R g
?
? ? ? ?}d Z
1 f
r '?
- '1i° ?
? "s FC?y3•x?'k ,4,?4N f ???,?
•7?:
j ,
i
f;
'i'
4EEx[?'Y, k4?Li?5?G i55: ,?
7, !3};
.Cr'e -?? .3..'4&idf i
rt-.
?iL L
e k ?
? r
k
4 ? }
a
? 1 s
}E'
[ }i-t? ::
€
[
•4 k ? d??E
a I
5?
????y
y
?
? d
?? Sk?x
? f?
??
? i R!
Y??, ??
i414
1
?
? Y
?
` ? }
kg
3?
P
L
?
Y
- ??
u .,. -
j
f 5 ? f7
3 ? i?iYf f ?? a 9 s
-F EeE F 4. 64 4 ?
1
S"
?
?f? 7t !
f $ i?E ..
S '
i
?.
et 6t9 L 41 kij k ?
'- F. ai?• a bt. r,. gg ?; ZZ
? ?"?? O
??•?? ?
?? pfi
a =} I??g V
I

' s ??- ?5:#
? 1. .... ?a d ?-Y "7,7
? ? asb ' s f A'11
rl f-il
f
- ?3d
,6 E ( R E Y f? I
I
Y .,
E 5
Y
-
EF?
G
R
k
'
4
? tx
G45?? f
}
}
a
E F iR
w
"` • = d
? ? ? g
???? 4ti
?
[
5[ CCt'
9
E9 _s. K CC:
4
. S
bHe
?t Ei9 ,
M t. nY
s-::
.<eeei
a y
Ftl
- r _
` } ? _
x
Y -
k
-
? `' 3 ?YSY
8 v
e
i h
. 6 i
et ??{'JS 113
you vh
T T > i
P
' .?
:• mf ,i ?, ?? d
rS i 4V
:? :a", 4 y
}
y
9
; ! g;-f#?, ,i.l! ,S .
p
a ?,+; ?9r 1
?.; S ! ??

1

I

\Z
1
N049

a.

?o
z

I _
I
co
D
D
77
Cf)
v
v
m
m
n

\ CD
"A 1,
-13
m
D
0
I v
0
>c
rn?nrn
V2
I !CD
x
rt
J

s
i
\1 ? I I
II

1

m
r
w
m
M
v
D
D
U
D
M
D
O
Z

N
x
m
i.
N
- C
z
C
0
x
n
C
m
I
l 1
O ?
c
I
O ?+ C/)
rcn CA
V n
I 0-4 MM
l1J
ao
Dz
00T
DO o" Z)
IC?C
Zo o?
D o. n .
<m m O
mom
Cr1 000,
>T>?
r ?D? A
(n cn
wL
wr
RW
RW
n
D
D
D
D
C
D0
O O
mC:
n
r
m
PROPERTY LINE
V
N
-0 m
mm
n
?U)
C)
D
m
m
x
ENDWALL

C
r
d
0 ?
?y
?O
N C/?
14
N ?r`+
o
0
??i

r
m
z
0
z
O
8
z
z
m
m
m
D
3
C)
D
z
z
m
r
co
O
8
r
D
D
r
m
v
D
"O
D
'O
D
zz
x
t ENDWALL
4,
v
N
x
x
m
b
0
2
n
r
C
M?M
1?1 O
O rl i??
Vl
rO?
^ r
O \ 1
N ?
C)
z
c
? I
W
D
m
0
c
r
m
D
r
w
Dz
T
0n z
0 RW
?.

O 3
1
amino <
n m
o
O
Z
Z
mmo
i Z
u
p
Tpz
m
<
<
,
<T< W
>

y
DF m
ENDWALL
co rn
t ?
0 $
IV

C
r
??
?d?
?n?
m??
WOE
v1 O
`? Z ?
??
c?
w
?°'?Tti ,\
?,
O
?n

N
N
r
N
CN
9
D
T
D
T
1)
O
Z
<2
G
* ENDWALL
z
m
O
tV
.L
w
RW
l
?..?
O ?
O
rr^ r^
vul
I
W
2z
00
T
y? D?3 0
v
«?y Zvo?
D*=c'
'
<g?
mf5ZU
^3 0$08
-n* OD
SODA
"r

a
M

iZ
I

8 '
II DWALL
T
D
r rr r r r r r r r r r rr r r ?r r r r r
O?
?r
d?
n?
o?
?O
cn
-P ?
GR;9ry/
O
_I

z
m
O
c
rn
8
N
m
r
x
w
<N
7J
T
D
T
D
T
0
O
z
x
* ENDWALL
A
\yJ
H O
7
?''f V J
rO^
V^J
rO ? \ 1
r
n?
m
?z
n n
T
;0
On
?
O 1
n?DV
$-,8O z
m
`
Ci7 ZM v z w
-<. *C) v
?g m n

z
M
Z.
i?
DD
w N S
A
W
m
n
O
ENDWALL
* o

if
O
acx
o m
?
? r
xS

/ 1 1
it f ?&
/
/
00
l \? 1? I i? J

Np
i
O
C
d ?
V1 id ?
y
rn0?
c? n
t?

A
T DEFT Nhi

In
V
O
D Z
Cl1 O T
> MO
l^l? ~ 0
1 O Z?00
0
rn
m m
33 (n
I?
.
O °0ou
DMDu
U) En
V]
V1 ? n

0
I
Stream Transect Forms and Photographs
Wetland Sample Plot Forms and Photographs
US ARMY CORPS/ENGRS ID:18282714858 OCT 09'98 9:23 No.002 P.02
i..
INTERMITTENT CHANNEI.
E4 VALUATION fORM
Al: PION IU APPLICANT NAME Cd R R6lS k - Q69D TIATR 8 -S -Cx?)
PROPONVI) CHANNEL WORK (i&, advert, relocation, etc.)
WATERBODWRIVER BASIN OC;e- 4%< (fit JE t- J Vj of M wSLFi COi11V7'1'ICPI Y „? e?AMk -LS.
Rr.CENTW KIWERCONDITIONS__ S'OD (?(1ZL??1T?r1 111 PE-11VLOUS Z44 Hie.
8-`t ?C>O Nd ?ArreuF4t,er trt P?L?tot t-?, z<-( k?,
p SP NP Observation Conimpals or 1)escriritinn
>e
x
X
or
Important To Dumt:slic Water Supply? V
Does Channel Appear On A !Quad Or Soi Map & N Approx. Dralltage Area: :tZgQ-AL
Determinatinn:
Perennial Channel (step) important Channel! LF PROJECT MGR Initials .•
Intemittent Channel (pad) ® IMimporlant C:hanncl: LP
Ephemeral Channel (nojd) (atluch map Indieating location of importent/unimponant channel)
Ditch Through tlpland (no Jd)
A vnltMter•s
(if other than C:.OR project managor)
?NF Wt?hT
P=Present SP=fiton* Present NP=Not Present
Measurements looking upstream
27'
Upland Top of Bank Upland
1.5' No OHWM 1.5'
2' Bed
Not to Scale
Area has been excavated and
degraded due to use by cattle.
Notes: 0"-2" ephemeral flow
No standing water
Bottom saturated
Moss Farm Site - 78.82 Ac. Crossing S- I
Cabarrus School Board
Cabarrus County, NC (Site 1)
C>Ca?rv,aiu, l DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone Lincolnton NC 28092 (704) 735-1x84
I
Moss Farm Site - 78.82 Ac.
Cabarrus School Board
Cabarrus County, NC
C*"Y"i zc2;: e,, l DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone
Crossing S-1
(Site 1)
Lin(olnton - NC 28092 [phone]
Moss Farm Site - 78.82 Ac.
Cabarrus School Board
Cabarrus County, NC
rYe:?,.p l DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone
Crossing S-1
(Site 1)
Lincolnton N( 28092 (704) 73.5-1084
Villages at Moss Creek
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
' Cabarrus County, NC
Crossing S-1
(Site 1)
{ ns?6ne / DESIGN • 1960 Chapman-Wyont Lone Lincolnton • NC 28092 [phone]

a

d t c yw ' Ord" i CSj
„
x
y
ly 1055bT
t ?` r

e. 1 ? rT ( ?•C ? tip.

c y -J4 J `

`
y
Y
^
- - v.?. L. ...___ ) ?"'t. '
-b. 'x''?
.? 'tr
?p '.??
1.
Villages at Moss Creek
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
' Cabarrus County, NC
> G.Z. / DESIGN 1960 Chapman-Wyont Lone Lincolnton
Crossing S-1
(Site 1)
NC 28092 [phone]
' US ARMY CORPS/ENGRS ID:18282714858

?11

OCT 09'98 9:23 No.002 P.02
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
,lam l3 opav.+ M4T• 11 4.
AGl'10N In =1 a0t 4j AFPI,tCAN'1'NAME M? Si (0
1'RiDpOMB CIIANNEI. WORK (i.e., cudveM relouallon, etc.) .
TV46 To
WATERBOUVIRIVER BASIN eotw r ALk-. -- / Y4-0V-4" - PBB t Ze f:OI)1VT'Y/CI'1Y? LA+R?•I?PU.S
IIF:CNNT WP•ATNIr.R CONDITIONS K o . 6jj!E ?bl.l;M46i kc i h.6 iPPxUlQ" 44 $ 41gs
Does Channel Appear On A Qaad Or Sour Map? LJ? N
Approx. Drainage Area:

Dw % 37 Perennial Channel (crop) M. Important ChMnel-' Lh PR0JI:CT MGR, lultials
C.o£ X Intermittent Channel (Ptomd) Unimporiant Chanel: LP
Ephemeral Channel (hold) (alU Ch MOP lndlentinq Incallon of importw+Uunhoporloot channel)
Ditch Through tlpland (no Id)
?:VNlnnter'f? til?nNtuh' .. ._. _
(if other t hail jecl mnod ger)
iairirrrrurini?irmr?runuumninuiuriruurrrruririmiriiiriarrurr?m rnmuiirniii?ri?iiuiiu???uiiiniraaii?unnnnu??nnunriirriniinuniiun?nr??nr?lr?i{?bi?iii?ninmrrniui?lri
-WON"z
P=Present Sl'--Sam*ly Present NP=Not Present
tS ? 18
1
Important To Domestic Wattr Supply? Y N
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form S--L
V i L_"C'.ES AT btu GzC:GK
' Project Name: Moss SITE (ObELc, s Cre) River Basin: Y&b4t K - PLEL2 C E
DWQ Project Number: County: 4A94Pe lS
Nearest Named Stream: Lrr r'o (Zccky tZtJE,?. Evaluator: c-V?Atc?. R wY.6.NT
USGS QUAD: y?.?ue ? .?s r Signature: Q---,
2.
' Latitude: Date: 5 -z S- dZ.
Longitude: Location/Directiong: l,oc4, I09 NM "geb
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-
this rating system should not be used*
PrimaryField Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
' I. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence Q 1 2 3
' 2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 0 2 3
' 3) Are Natural Levees Present? 1 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 0 2 3
' 5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplain Present? 0 C 2 3
6) Is The Channel Braided? 0?1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 2 3
' 8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 3
(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score-0*)
' 10) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map AndlOr In Field) Present? es=3 No=0
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: l.Z
1.11. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1 Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 1 Q 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: ?-
'III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 (D 0
Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 0
3) Is Periphyton Present? CO) 1 2 3
F Are Bivalves Present? ?0 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: Z

' Number Per Line
.. Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle one )
? Z
' I. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? ( .5 1 1.5
' 2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? .5 1 1.5

' 3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0
.5

O
1

.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: I
' II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed? 1.5
©
.5
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 SQ 1 1.5
' 3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 3) 1 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5 1 1.5
Last Known Rain?
*)
' (*NOTE • ?f Ditch -indicated 1n,#9 Above Skip This Step And #5 Below
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 1.5
' Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Hezdcut)? es=1. No=O
' SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: G
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fish Present? .5 1 1.5

' 2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 .5 0
1 1.5
1
5
3) Are AquaticTurtles Present? .5 .

' 4) Are Crayfish Present? QO 5 1 1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? ® .5 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? 0 V 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? G .5 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
SAV Mostly OBL . Mostly FACW Mostly
5
75
FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
0 0
.
2 01 .
(* NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 7-4'
rrn•rA I DnTMT1 lDrimnnr 1. Qarnndnrvl-Zi,Stif Greater Than Or Eaual To 19 Poin ts The Stream Is At L east Intermitt,
Measurements looking upstream
99
Top of Bank 01
Upland
Wetland
18" Bank
Not to Scale
18" Bank
7' OHWM
679 679
12" Bed V
Notes: 0" to 2" Flow observed
Standing Water Observed
Villages at Moss Creek
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabarrus County, NC
C?w'?Xne-q9ine / DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone Lincolnton NC
Crossing S-2
(Site 2)
28092 • [phone]
Villages at Moss Creek
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabarrus County, NC
W(;5' neYnne / DESIGN 1960 Chapman-Wyont Lone Lincolnton - NC
Crossing S-2
(Site 2)
28092 [phone]
Villages at Moss Creek
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabarrus County, NC
CSICKneYi. / DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone
Crossing S-2
(Site 2)
Lincolnton • NC 28092 [phone]
Villages at Moss Creek Crossing S-2
J & B Development and Management, Inc. (Site 2)
Cabarrus County, NC
CWCOrineZane / DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone UnwInton NC 28092 [phone]
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
VtL.L. F_S Ar )4oSs6 cZC-EK S - 3
' Project Name: Mom e rTe (ooEu, sq,5? River Basin: YADk?44 - PEE Dee
DWQ Project Number: County: C i?m4Zzas
Nearest Named Stream: L(1- To ?CLV-,( elJeR Evaluator: C2&Lcr P-, Vc yA_& T-
' USGS QUAD: VA Kg&PoLLs N c, Signature:
Latitude: Date: S -ZS -oz
Longitude: Location/Directions:?,
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also), if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-
this rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
' I. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate
1) Is There ARiffle-Pool Sequence 1 2
' SDA T
I
S
b
d
exture
n
tream
2) Is The U
e
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 2
' 3) Are Natural Levees Present? Q 1 2
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 0 2
' 5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)

t?
l
i
P
Fl
d ??\\
1
n
resen
oo
p
a u1? 2
' 4) Is The Channel Braided? OQ 1 2
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1Q 2
III ' 8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 (2
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1
(*NOTE: J'Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0 *)

10) I A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel As Indicate
Is d
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present?

Yes=3

0=0
'
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
H. Hydrology Absent
'
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0
' PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: Z
' III. Biology Absent
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3
,2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3
3) Is Periphyton :Present?
'4) Are Bivalves Present?
CIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: Z.
Strong
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Weak Moderate Strong
l (2) 3
Weak
2
2
1
1
Moderate
C
Cl
d
2
2
Strong
0
0
3
3
I US ARMY CORPS/ENGRS ID:18282714858
.---.. "

n

u

OCT 09'98 9:23 No -002 P-02
INTERMITTENT CHANNEI.
EVALUATION FORM S - 3
14 a DeV +M4T,i w- - Vt"b c as Ar YIoSS e-ZEEK
AC I'1QN ID LOO 110 1141 APPLICANT NAME Moss St LE ??DELL, 5ln 1 JDATR
I'Ropost 1) CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relueatiou, etc.). , 20.&p _ cpcss- ?CT
T F-0& TO
WATERBODWRIVE R BASIN tZ0[yc`?p?V?.p. ??(AD t.r_PC?1JEE f:011NTY/CPI'Y?GA[
11tfiLNT WP.ATIII%R CONDITIONS N C> l,c EA":-c1.a'A.R1 J= ? irtt= LL, l +PtPEaw" a WIG-_
r SP . NP Observation Commcnls or Vescrintinn
k
k rish/Shetlittih/Caruilnccon$ Present
nnAt c MAOro Invertbratts
-
k Ampbl isnx 1'r?e, Dreading o ?
k A gust td/Or Pungua water quality fun011011)
k Wildil[b luuttlcl Use tic. tracks. 144 shvits, Others)
- P ro y otected Species accent (Discontinue)
fttall'txr . truaute _ ? -.-
Goble 8troambun

X rjwnml sulmroo
(1•a. gravol, cobble me Como sand

X Riparlais nopy Present (SP /> 509A closure)
undercut Ilanksrlnstreonl l btlnt Sinicutrc C
Plow In Channel
Wotiondx djrrint Toxontig RO haune) (1)iscnntinuc) O ?- L rr
Persistent I'nnls/Surursted "otrnm
(Juno thru !rcp(.)
Secpwaoundwatet Dischlrpo (tune Illru Sept.)
Adjacent Nlnndplaln Proscnt

-
Wrack Maltnal or 11rin Linos U?10 (? S G L --
k ydmphyBe Vcgttation inrltljscenl 10 0111111101
Important To Domestic Water Supply7r Y /6
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Approx. Drahtage Area: _
' pCtern)ination_
Pereltltial Channel (stop) Important Channel! Lh PROJYCT MGR. Ittltials
' eoE/zmw intermittent Channel (pad) Mimporlant Chanel: LP
Ephemeral Channel (rro jd) (unuch mop Indicating location of imporlant/unimporlant channel)
Ditch Through tlpland (no 1d)
I:V111111nr'A $Ignnturt' _ ?_,_
(ifulher then C.0.R_ projeot rnnn, gar)
' rirrriliinNrirililrliUNruurrnniiruriinrrra?lrrairuiririaririamn??rn??lrnrlnniiilnlanrnnrnriiiiiniraiirrrruinnnn?m?rraiiiiiuiu?iiiar?in?r??in?rl ulgtililiiilnnimininulrii
8
P=t'resent Present NP=Not Present L 3 3
? t 8 C'

Secondary Field Indicators:-(Circle One Number Per Line) J?- 3
' I. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? (0) .5 1 1.5
' 2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
0
5
©
1.5
Natural Drainage Way? .
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: l
' II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
1
5
5
0
' .
Present In Streambed? .
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 © 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 V 1 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 5 ® 1.5
' Last Known Rain?
j*NOTE • If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skin This Step And #5 Below
*)
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 1.5
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? es- . No=O
I
'
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: ?
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fish Present? ® .5 1 1.5

' 2) Are Amphibians Present? lJ
(a) .5
5 1
1 1.5
1
5
3) Are AquaticTurtles Present? . .
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 Q 1 1.5
5 Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? 0 d 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? S .5 1 1.5
' S) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
SAV Mostly OBI, Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Most ly FACU Mostly UPL
2 d .75 .5 0 0
(* NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: Z-
II
n Or E
Th
t
Z0 (If G
qual To 19 Points The Stream Is At L
east Intermittent)
er
a
rea
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary =

Measurements looking upstream
8'
Top of Bank
Upland
Upland
2' Bank 3' Bank
3' OHWM
6"
18" Bed
Not to Scale
6"
Notes: 0" to 2" Flow observed
Standing Water Observed
Villages at Moss Creek
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabarrus County, NC
(2 ne2?°ane / DESIGN
Crossing S-3
(Site 3)
1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone Lincolnton NC 28092 [phone]
Villages at Moss Creek
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabarrus County, NC
?(?axe?cxe / DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone
Crossing S-3
(Site 3)
Uncolnton NC 28092 [phone]
Villages at Moss Creek Crossing S-3
J & B Development and Management, Inc. (Site 3)
Cabarrus County, NC
Q91CFineYine / DESIGN 1960 Chapman-Wyont Lone hn(olnton NC 28092 [phone]
Villages at Moss Creek
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabarrus County, NC
C xe?'axe / DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone
Crossing S-3
(Site 3)
Uncolnton NC 28092 (704) 735-10&4
' US ARMY CORPS/ENGRS ID :18282714858 OCT 09'98 9:23 No . 002 P .02
' INTERMITTENT CHANNEI.
EVALUATION RM S --?
' kA+0 Devrr-KT lg(- -vlt-t.Aczs W l?tssg C-Prieto
ACIIONID 2501,30ti4,^ APPLICANTNAME MCISS StPE Coyu..I- StT'E.) JDATF-

r.

J

I'ROPUSt:U CIIANNFI. WORK (I.e., culvert, raloosllon, etc.) )Alz Gib LLB .. ._ `_
't2.iB 1,-a dt2A,p?
WATB1tBUDY/RIVCII BASIN pK - YA.DKah4-PEE 1 E C INTY/Cl''Y„
j4v(,* ,'NT WF.ATRKR CONDITIONS No _„ MEA-SLLP?AQLE rAt 1.4 FA- , 1 19t&JUNUIC, 4ff NWSr
P SP NP Obserntlon Com cnts or VescriPtion
.ls>v$hcllittilJCatuctaecans I'reseM
,x oath a MAWo InverlbrMCS i4o pa-t&
k. Aatpbl isas Pm-mi D M111g
A gus t Ur Fungus water quality funs on) Bur tgkg?
W1141114 mwi 5. (ire. tracks. Icons, shoi s, oWers) PLyL /Z.-kL*?- o
" ro y otoaW Secs Nrcccnt (Discontinue) -

t X In oo . ouctum
Stable 1miunbsnks

X f?amtel SnWtrabo
p.o. gravol, cobbta rack, eoam smd
.?A 1,r,-CDtL,
k NtpaNan atlDpy Ptasent (SP - F> 50% clusure)
-
X rAA DAM/InSIreom Habitat Sintclum
IJn m
0
X H ow In Cltaancl
- S
0
Wotlends djacentTo/Contig ilk anttol(Uicenntinu Oho
Yiblent I'nn . uturaled . onnm
Irmo thtu Yept.) . , b.P
3cepsKaviwWater Disoharga (lure Il m Sept.) APP A?
Ad acol Flaodplain Present
wrack Mater al or blip Lim 4 As
)
x ydmphydc Vegetation in/adjacenl to channel -
in Ql,tl Ac t? R
llnportant To Dumeslle Water Supply? Y /Q)
' Does Channel Appear On A Qnad Or Soils map? N Approx. Dralltage Area: _
I!/llllll11111111//1111!/11l/l11111/1l!/I/I/1l1(!11/!l/1111/11/llllllll111/1111111111111111111111111111111/1111111/!I/1ll//fl/1l/Il/llllllllll11liilllllil/1111X1/11111111/11111/1/I%itl!/1%lllllllllllllll/lull/I/1lI/Illlll
' DClerlt)inatinn:
Peretmial Channel (stop) Important Channel: LF PR00CT MGR. lnllials
' (A*1 0w0 Intermittent Channel (pmmd) llnimportant C:hanncl: LP
Ephemeral Channel (tto jd) (atlu h Map Indlcnting Itivallon of importanitunimportant ohannei)
Ditch Through tlpland (no id)
p:vi?luatnr's tilgnalurt' _ ?--
(ifether than ntt ('..0. ,. project mntlago
' ////1/11!!/l/1/l/111/!!ll/I!1/!/1ll/1/1/ll///Illllll/11/1///!/111/!/!!/l/l///11111/111/ll//I111/1//!//Illl1/llll/!/1//11111!/1/1J1/!/1ll/?IIN/Ill/I!/1ll/1Jl/ll/////ll/l/ll/?///1111///Il!/!//1/I///1/I////1/!1///!11/11!
t P=Present SP---€bq Present NP=Not present 7 LA A
3
NCDW Stream Classification Form
' Vt t.t.o• Ar Mcf.G C.RM k
Project Name: Mb44, . stTr, /60GU-StTF River Basin: YAI> u "
DWQ Project Number: County: e4AAeZLL%
Nearest Named Stream: aF 'To back.,( iz osp, Evaluator: e_e a G, p , ANr
I , USGS QUAD: KA.?S HL Signature: C-t
Latitude: Date: S--LS-o
Longitude: Location/Directions: Loc&Tta+j MA# AtTk
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-
this rating system should not be used*
. (Circle One Number Per Line)
Primary Field Indicators.
' h
l
L G Absent Weak Moderate
o
ogy
eomorp

' 1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence ( 1 2
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 10 2
3) Are Natural Levees Present? ® 1 2

' 4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
?
0
2
Floodplain Present
' b) Is The Channel Braided? 0 © 2
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 0 2
' 8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 m 2
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 T) 2
'Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WI THOUT Sinuo sity Then Score= 0* )

10) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 0=0
' PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: J_
II. Hydrology Absent Weak
' 1 Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? Q
' PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: n_
' III. Biology
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed?
'2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed?
3) Is Periphyton Present?
'4) Are Bivalves Present?
Absent
3
3
0.
0
1
Weak
2
1
Strong
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Moderate Strong
2 3
Moderate
a
1
2
2
Strong
0
0
3
3
r IMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: Zi
r
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line) j-c{
t
1. Geomorphology Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong

0
Cut Present In Channel?
1) Is There A Head

?

1

.5
1

There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0
2 Is

.5

®

1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0
.5
Q
1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: Z .S
' H. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
1.5
1
0
Present In Streambed?
Plants Debris Present? 0

2 Is Sediment On Pl (Or )
1
1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 © 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since OQ .5 1 1.5
' Last Known Rain?
(*NOTE: If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And #5 Below
*)
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 1.5
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or in Headcut)? es=1.5 No=0
' SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 4-l .S
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
' 1) Are Fish Present? .5 1 1.5

' 2) Are Amphibians Present? .5
5 1
1 1.5
1
5
3) Are AyuaticTurtles Present? .
4) Are Crayfish Present? Cj0 .5 1 1.5
' 5) Are Macrobenthos Present? Q? .5 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? ® .5 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present.
.5
1
1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly
FAC Most
ly FACU Mostly UPL
2 1 .75 CV 0 0
' (* NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: S
n Or E
Th
19
t
5(If G
) ual To 19 Poin ts The Stream Is At L east Intermittent
)
a
er
rea
=
.
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + SecondarY q

Measurements looking upstream
12'
Top of Bank 01
Upland
Wetland --
12" Bank
3' OHWM
3' Bed
12" Bank
Not to Scale
Notes: No Flow observed
No Standing Water Observed
Villages at Moss Creek
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabarrus County, NC
<2 ne Zane / DESIGN 1960 Chapman-Wyont Lone Lincolnton
Crossing S-4
(Site 4)
NC 28092 [phone]
Villages at Moss Creek Crossing S-4
J & B Development and Management, Inc. (Site 4)
Cabarrus County, NC
Gene-ane l DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone Lincolnton NC 28092 (704) 735-104
' US ARMY CORPS/ENGRS ID:18282714858 OCT 09'98 9:23 No.002 P.02
' INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM T l? S-? S
' a?>3 My +- M(,T a rke:. V?t.?,b46S A-r 1?06S CR66K
AC7.10N ID 2001 301 14 APPLICANT NAmr. MOSS S tly.. (gbriL - s tr4DATE S -LS` -UL

I-ROPOS n CIIANNEI. WORK (Le., culvert, relocation, etc.) RO&N
M& To ? r7D r t
5.
WATERBODWrRIVERDASIN vof?y Zlz?fel -FEED'E? f:OTIMICPfYed,s;nRZ-U
Ita:t~.hWWFATHI:KCONDITIONS Wo .t.c>%6?tkPb.g(r_ Ott??d c :? t tit Ae c)tLY?,` 4A c,~ies
P SP . NP Observation Corn utll9 t)r Vewriptinn
x, Ish/Shctl tile/Uruitaccatts Present ? -t d
entitc Macto Invesibrales µ0 O _
X Ampbl tans Prawn Dtcedi» ll
0
Ago ?dU Fungus water quality function) -S
W I eatutcl Use (i.e. tracks. Iccc,% shallsr others) SE
N ,re y toctc4 species Present (Pliconlinue)
x -Riffle/Fool . trucluse
St c Iraamban ?-•

x rhwniel Subslraft
Ov. gravol. cobble roc Coarse sand
SAt?A S O
Bipedal anopy Present (SP h 50%e:luturc)
un extol Danks/lnslroeen?1 tint Slmcwrc
X
y Now in Chaand
Wetlands djuuntTOIContir, id haunt) (1)iccont nue)
y Pent ant Penimmulurated Hotrnm
" ??Ina thtu !rcpt.)
Secpit0mundwater Discharge (June Ilim Sept.) A
X Ad accnt Plondplaln Trowel -
Wrack Malenal or UHR Linos
Z7
ythophyde vegetation intodjeuxol to 0118111101
k
linportaat To Domestic Water Supply? Y R
' Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? ? N Approx. Dralnage Area: _
r i i ? i n r n ? r i?? I! 11 i i n? i i ? u i i i i i ? i n r i ? i? i?? I t u u i i u a u i n u i n u i I o n n? i u? i i i r n i n u ? u ?? r n? n i I r r ? i? i N n i u n n i ? i i i n u ? u n n n i i i i i a?? r i i i r au ? i i i i u i i? a? r i? n i i i i i ?? a i i? r i r n i i i i n u n u n ? i i i a i?? n u
' DCtermination:
Perennial Channel (stop) Important Channel! Lh PRUJJX T MGR, lnitials..
' cr rt Intermittent Chalutel (pmmd) 11nimporlant Channel: • LP
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (stluch snap Indleating location of imporlan(huhnportant channel)
Ditch Through tipland (noA
(if other than C.O.H. projoel motmagor)
' rinuiriiuriiiiiiriririi?miiiniuiianinnu?rrariururriiiiuiririuuunr, ruaarrriiiiiirn?annmr?riiriiiiirrniinriuriaru??nrrnrruiiiiuiiniiiiiirri??nr???uroiurriii?iiinuimiiniinrnrr
<o Life
' P=ftcsent SP--€h9%* Present NP=Mot present y ?
1
? ? b
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
s-?
V 1" Acre s AT Mbfis eeftv-
' Project Name: Mt?S? 5?j"E (csbsw_ Sqz) River Basin: yA v_jR-PMd7E6`
DWQ Project Number:. County: 6Ajg ,'Zc1
Nearest Named Stream: LLT ru -2ny etJEp Evaluator: e-ZAtc, r- wy*'['
' USGS QUAD: k,A4w4Powc NG. Signature:
Latitude: Date: $-2.5--CL.
Longitude: Location/Directions: LocATuom MAP .A-1Tk_4 eb
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-
this rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
' 1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence OO 1 2 3

2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 2 3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 (U 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0
R
li
A
i
O
Th
A 1 3
r
n
ct
ve (
e
c)
ere
5) Is
Floodplain Present? 0 G 2 3
' 6) Is The Channel Braided? 0 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 © 2 3
' 8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 d 3
(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuo sity Then Sc ore=O*)

10) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
And/Or In Field) Present? es=
o Ma
On To
No=O
p
p
'
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
11. Hydrology Absent
' Weak Moderate Strong
1 Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 © 2 3

PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: I
'III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 © 0
'2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 (2) 1 0
3) Is Periphyton Present? 0 (1) 2 3
t ) Are Bivalves Present? 0 1 2 3
(RIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:__
' Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
5-S
' I. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? ?fb .5 1 1.5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 .5 © 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 .5 © 1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: Z
' II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
' Present In Streambed? 1.5 1 SQ 0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 .5 Uf 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 UI 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 5 Q 1.5
Last Known Rain?
(*NOTE: if 1 Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Sktn.This Step And #S Below*)
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 1tJ 1.5
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
es=1.5
6 Are HYdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel Or In Headcut)? No =O
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: (In
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
' 1) Are Fish Present? GO .5 1 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? ® .5 1 1.5
3) Are AyuaticTurtles Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 Q 1 1.5
' 5) Are Macrobenthos Present? .5 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? GO .5 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? ® .5 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
2 1 .75 ' 0 0
' (*NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed As Noted Above kip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
POINTS PrimM + Secondary)= Z If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent
TOTAL
1
Measurements looking upstream
6'
Top of Bank
Upland Upland
- 1?
12" Bank
4' OHWM
2' Bed
12" Bank
Not to Scale
Notes: No Flow observed
Standing Water Observed
Villages at Moss Creek Crossing S-5
J & B Development and Management, Inc. (Site 5)
Cabarrus County, NC
CSne?one / DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone Lincolnton NC 28092 [phone]
Villages at Moss Creek Crossing S-5
J & B Development and Management, Inc. (Site 5)
' Cabarrus County, NC
?xe Z a?ae l DESIGN 1960 Chapman-Wyonl Lane Lincoln[on NC 28092
[phone]

Villages at Moss Creek Crossing S-5
J & B Development and Management, Inc. (Site 5)
Cabarrus County, NC
CCne?'ane l DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone Lincolnton NC 28092 [phone]

Villages at Moss Creek
(Portion of Site)
Wetland Transect and
NORTH Sample Plot Locations
Scale - I"=500'

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: alt Llit\f4?. AT n c " SIB Date: 9 -7 _nen
Applicant/Owner: .1... DcVrAA T .6 kar:p. tom. County: ?AAA.b.16
Investigator: ! nAt r. , \A ?-rr- State: tie,
Do normal Circumstances exist on the site? CTn No Community ID: 1(0
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) No Transect ID: a:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes 4:12P Plot ID: A
(if needed, explain on reverse.) 11
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator
Q I _I/Oa?a (' Pt?b?s?r!4 r ??c4hFI ?'f ?l? r L? t o
ra?a???cc ,pEtQ Q& TPEF_' ,__kA&4&k7* t AV •,b,IA. rak"It PAW = S
t l.D.2 A TCt?lE 7r1 . tltL?G _ 0a 4 afte.6 Fme:+
1 ? rJi ? t?+ ltc.A.ar?. `t'?d? FAt1a't' a'?s+(-?,?? 1?l?2R fiE4t11 b
Tep8 FAe- G WVddEfAis I,J6-m6t; ML to
a6?' .?i? FA[_ F1,Fr'Ai4.l.??FrDP?1s ?'ZNID.t? 1-Ii??3 tlP?? t(?
PALL4 I , tci??-ututr k S??a[Pppt_ - cea.?,l.l^ rz_. F'c k to
1 •?LI???L?1?IR JLdG1L ?L?L4jun .}? F-4 Zt t0
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC 53.I%( sLz= y
(excluding FAQ. J
Remarks: ?WPLZ AL-Or AA SA 0,04E, 8a!?:F-L RA4 t vt' L(-EAACP Ak-V(
?{Ee„Jtt? cc kZ0& of eA-Lrtg .
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indications:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: Roge'
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other - Saturated in upper 12 inches
_ No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
NWt RC0DI-!Ad m N?lf? T Sediment Deposits
_ _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary indications (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: ?_L4A(in.) ,-- Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12 in
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: Ia,, (in.) Local Soil Survey Data

rt FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: >tt!3
(in.) - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: "?2A4A.E PWF c cf-"M C+A WEu. A2A?nzc?i sum scc?t?c .

cnn c
S--.
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): hwo 4-.4t oy La4x16 -lS°yo Drainage Class: Wc:'ij-t'j ,A&r-
Taxonomy (Subgroup): _ v , kkA PL u oAL S Confirm Mapped Type? es No
Profile Descri jtf ion:
Mottle
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Contrast Structure, etc.

-? 0 Yjz Sly li+r S99"T WAM
It-?(p- ---$----_ 1Q_...YtZ_-s?3._ _z???_y?y- .???j' -?A?T%`i?Y ,,,d,?,?
Hydric Soil Indicators: ?d?((
Histosol Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor - Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DE TEKMINA I ION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (ZD Is this sampling point within a wetland? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes tG
11 Remarks:

Village at Odell - ±420 ac.
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabarrus County, NC
OSV(-''ildPie2't"Nr / DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone
5-A
Upland
Lincolnton NC 28092 [phone]
i 1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Vtwc4 r er 0?_,L Slrp Date:
Applicant/Owner: v-? T I Lit_ County:
Investigator: ??zAlr; State: t-AC.
Do normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID: It
is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VFr.FTATIAN
? Dominant Plant S ecles Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
L M Se.PAd.L s P1kc ul t
Q? V W&& At u_#,mA SEE
G FA'GW L-1!y n;z I hLLA ???+16
l LIPt
10
e
-!
r
Q1vJNLlt Pew???eauw,?.?TQE1e
1ZJ
-
' F LW
P A ,
_0
6,A MIL1431&RA
ewtg
f; t' LO
Age
t
l=
&DAMA L fi (gl?ciFiuA
s. g- 4
6. ,ACAM BUAD-euM T Q?t=
m .ic,?.crlaous vltse?tq• ?PePL.
l.lGiy,::?:.?.?=??hG•lR.cbA c_aAPL tkG_

? FA e_wt +-
?14U?1
eiL? t1M uwa ?`?/4CJ.1 l
?
.
+
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC t!!(D 76- )? Ili{ 71.(4 °7e)
(excluding FAC).
Remarks: 41Z-'EA. KA?e- ?Zet-E RE,&.J(L,f Af-L6 5E(.? 9-zvy- 6"ZE1c,
fay Cloi(T-0 .
e
i
1
V
t
k
U
t
t
HVr)R0I nGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indications:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
X Aerial Photographs Inundated
X Other Saturated in upper 12 inches
_ No Recorded Data Available x Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
NWt t?c.ocnPr?m t?te?s oILA, ?f Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary indications (2 or more required):

Depth of Surface Water: r-t/e (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12 in
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (b It (in.) X Local Soil Survey Data
Clue?g?oae5)

Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: 6kA4(PIStE *40LES t 4=TAKO104A vtlokrEz IN MMtagtovsN TeZe pITS,
14UMNIOCA&( C?2oof{

fl

SOILS
.51-R
Map Unit Name -60mzw Ar
(Series and Phase): 64A ZAA&NACL4k Sb?4;D Loll Drainage Class: P=gl,?r L:fz14!ui-6
P?'eCd.4t?I?tru( ??OOtJBA
Taxonomy (Subgroup): f?uv?tt n? 1rreoulepvgr? Confirm Mapped Type? ? No

Profile Descri ?tf ion:
Mottle
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Contrast Structure, etc.

3-q g 'S `t y/ t - Y Z. v-A Few Israo0c ? cA.•r

I t -1 L S Y ?/? -) . 5+ Y tz I'm ?? f ?r2onlr s,t r-ct?
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (it?tc-t?t?te,?ce)
_ Reducing Condi tions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? <GD No
Wetland Hydrology Present? e No Is this sampling point within a wetland? es No
Hydric Soils Present? e No
Remarks:
1
Village at Odell - ±420 ac. 5-B
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabarrus County, NC Wetland
c Xr ene iw,e / DESIGN 1960 Chapman-Wyont Lone LincoInton NC 28092 (704) 735-1 84
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: t.-. Date: q - ? - 00
t7?JE? t.4.(i' w MIC;,r ?t.tc, County: ?.a? &p
Applicant/Owner: J+3
Investigator: G.9ZAIC+ tZ . S&tgA' fi&7:: State: 1%4e
- Y-1111
Do normal Circumstances exist on the site? No Community ID: I t-_
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) No Transect ID: S
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes (ISD Plot ID: e-
(if needed, explain on reverse.) 11
e
VFr:FTAT1nNJ
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator °j
d+?P?cuc ,lu 4,e TtZP?
t 1?
FA t:'i-A '71G?tc
"
0
d
R ?S u Sd+s g
e
l
T LAPI- s
,?a?u?? ++ s yt iKa+u_a
*aE _
eA i
&r
. a
yX&m ?
1uetu? / ?La r? r2?' {'?{? ±' 0. / ?dAIGA?+ Ll?EA 154e- S
n JtC
l ?s?? A 7?x-S _. ?Mu.A
8 _Ar?-Na?c wakA L
li
t L 4 kLe PA _ 6&01' l -A" . &?'?]Wj LL

14
-?
N &
A 0bAUE11LLt. 6'
F-A.-U S
Aa.A Z. .
> m Eg
F?
fi
2
1 hk ?s
3
t
iM t 15.
16
-
i
t
? uc
,.
?
s .
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC S/ `3 0/a = 61j0)
(excludin g FAQ.
Remarks: C. LLI -EP-C- t c*y Atut?- tWEJ 96TEM
1464,1! t l-? AtiID s?l,irc J?c.? G,eA,?-M t3Y G4n-i-c
3
b
4
l
l?
V
14
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indications:
Stream, lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: Kc*4e
* Aerial Photographs - Inundated
M Other _ Saturated in upper 12 inches
_ No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
_144 (
„Fc c pCJP0 t ,M 9" Sow _ Sediment Deposits
r Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indications (2 or more required):

Depth of Surface Water: ht I?4 (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12 in
_T Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >[a (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data

Depth to Saturated Soil: >I S (in.) FAC•Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
r

SOILS
s
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): ePe D- Pott40Lxq tz L-0" a -ls Oar, Drainage Class: %AtELJ- ti-?'P-At4 p

Taxonomy (Subgroup): T(PIL {AApi- Ls_ L,A TS Confirm Mapped Type? (G) No
Profile Descri ati ion:
Mottle
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Contrast Structure, etc.
1.0 YZ '413 MA/FiNaT 1-06-4
z -q ?.s ?rtz s?? 7.19 Y -P, sro FEW /FA-tt-t.15AMD? Ld/kM
G 7 VSray OerhLse
ZS-- .-*4 ..._M4NY/Sr ?! ??r.to? r Sena
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
I LANU Ut I tKMIINA I IUN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
1Hydric Soils Present?
II Remarks:
Yes
Yes Is this sampling point within a wetland? Yes 0
Yes 11
.N

Village at Odell - ±420 ac. 5-C
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabanus County, NC Upland
C ?%r:?re?ane / DESIGN • 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone Lincolnton NC 28092 (704) 73S-1084
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)

Project/Site: VLt-L_Ac,€ A.1- emu. 4S Date: cf-1'i-cam
Applicant/Owner: -It va, - County: c.A&AeeglS
Investigator: 6jcc a, &.-r State: hl!_
Do normal Circumstances exist on the site? No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) No Transect ID: ?.,
is the area a potential problem area? Yes ® Plot ID: Lt
(if needed, explain on reverse.)
c
1
L
1
1
2
i
VFGFTATION
Dominant Plant S ties Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator
UL-MIL- tkc.AA Saar. FA" ?' scs FF L*
f2]?n?g?er? VLtZL lArccutia S?PL. uwdcltS Cr Ftt?t1? h4 EitB P4cy?± L
,L .IL A&L?? sIt?4A A- ,i
1 MiL.?? ,iuut IlU?[r 'F
® n ?LLP-L1&gUAJ-6 sfrQue? ?_ 12. lahlj"_?[I"IAL
e_M,L V ?2c`ti4?D1?i.u? ?akt2cCB 1`ikc-
1 13.
ZSTros/t/ti ?FDt'_? lC_uti`-S
&L-V, nhk [jM f
Llm1PMILS YtftiNtE44A. 5RJkQ"& FAW 14.
1 1 Fi1?AkireLtuw u4PtL??FouuM kt? 15.
A C? 4kP.4I-CeN hi rat Dw e1 F _
6) 16.
f Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC ?t I DES ,S ,? ( 7q .33.3 `io)
(excluding FAC).
LReks.
4vA E VkS Bm1-L C tzAacb AAo 14,tS Beiziae,-w I,' SaC4LGSrcmA f_,
So-t-iAct , 6tt4ue, , v HEIe13Ar-?c?5 s z.ta? , rk12?-71 NAS BEGGnI Cat?rta>:A
ZY c.a.T-IIA. ,
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indi ations:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: c)&t6
Aerial Photographs _ Inundated
Other _ Saturated in upper 12 inches
_ No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
kw t , r= I,onDe!, 1m 14 tt,,6 s«Le. Sediment Deposits
_
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary indications (2 or more required):

Depth of Surface Water: t?/A (in.)
11 _x_ Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12 in
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: --t811 (in.) - Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: J-IA (in.) -
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: SAMPLE PL.oT- Occ-ut2s ON WC44-. CWaoloMED gibe Scno ,
cnii c
C, A
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): 8-15 _O Drainage Class: WE- r2?AtAb
Taxonomy (Subgroup): v c, "A.PL_s! 6tw c:;. Confirm Mapped Type? ® No
Profile Descri atf ion:
Mottle
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon ( unsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Contrast Structure, etc.

S Yz k/ro no"le4ae-'q' 9,m n r _L6%-L a (

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor - Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
-,y Gleycd or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks) Y

Remarks:
WEfLANU UEtEKMINAIIUN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (ED
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (E0 Is this sampling point within a wetland? Yes (IELD
Hydric Soils Present? Yes (SD
I Remarks:

II

t

Village at Odell - ±420 ac.
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabarrus County, NC
6-A
Upland
Q*75?iwvYi,e / DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone Lin(olnton NC 28092 [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: VtL ,44E #Z CDDt~4_" Stj-E Date: q -1,4( 00
Applicant/Owner: County: cAAAt_P_LIS
Investigator: CZAt c., tZ L4&= State: Ne_
Do normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: I.(
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) CeO No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ® Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
%/Ce'CTAT1nKJ
_•g
Dominant Plant S cles Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
® K ocuotr?•cra
-T _WW At.14us fw-z2Uu,&rA s W} aD
? TQELC
? ®LAfhl?}?1F(BF1RS FA.L..'t-' . Q?S_d ??(i1"(?R?? `N??tR t1Pt? S
'
-
+T
MFOWNLVx F°tzH"x ud _-Mr-
P EAQd
12 ?ulr•?M EWP13 ;=Af 4
Mv946Q;p z
!+?! l
u
m P&Afi
"
1ft ID
R
AP
eaileato T
P . JJ
oLy omo
i J,
-
C
il u1,Mus AartE2 ?G?kr t k 11.• JI& r 4c 14Ee$ FA [.w t
! 1 LA.64, Ect
® t_Itx,td?MelaS Ac.t? - r-Az-+* 14. %Amem! .LA %ea A && 'k4FpA Ae-t S
®t=rt??.?CtFCws ?PF3?tNIbYl vAwtc6_ SA<Pt.. FA (_W 15. - 4 F'AL S?
8. •ekatt.4 6 ad . Cwo"e, <-"I FALW - 16. ?kVAAr?Fe A #&+AttA MEQB C W t
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC E
(excluding FAQ.
Remarks: (1µtJEe4Af0P_'( A tb Nee.BAzA:_? AeZ t-4r6A )(L>1r
6-( CATT-+-E
C
3
l
1
2
2
t
1i
NvnRni nr:v
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indications:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
* Aerial Photographs _ Inundated
* Other Saturated in upper 12 inches
_ No Recorded Data Available X Water Marks
?e Drift Lines
Nw,
Fc.oa 4 ,
MP" 5!QtLC-, k- Sediment Deposits
-
.
I ,
Y Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indications (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A, (in.) - Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12 in
K Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >.tf311 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
_i?

" FAC-Neutral Test
(in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: I?' ?t Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: 62AYFts+A +AOLZ PkZ5&M7. Nctmleto"y 4kot_?T+I1

I

SOILS

Map Unit Name --0KElJWt4Ar
(Series and Phase): l? ( - 4u, d A 4.&, gZ)f L.,? Drainage Class: PCO" CeAtk~ D
Maz 2uE[J.(ty l:=-c.?EO
Taxonomy (Subgroup): PL uv.ac?jgp4!p re?cu+ee,?T Confirm Mapped Type? © No
r pyr-,
T
L? ? aK
Profile Descri ill ion:
Mottle
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Contrast Structure, etc.

6
S YP /Z y mm come.
-7 S- `(P /? f-EW /SZ'?2cpbt; S r 7 A .mwk
vI
S AN`(MK COMG

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol X Concretions MK CONS 7'AAeCX-k4AWT*
_ Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (ttiEC. LW.toPlc,)
_ Reducing Condi tions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
-aX- Gleyed or Low- Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
L-
if
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? (M No
Wetland Hydrology Present? <M No Is this sampling point within a wetland? 49 No
Hydric Soils Present? QEE? No
Remarks:

Village at Odell - ±420 ac.
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabarrus County, NC
Crr.e?one l DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone Lin<olnton
6-B
Wetland
NC 28092 [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 1/t"uu.r A= Ebn.L.L_ S,= Date: q-(44 00
Applicant/Owner: .I+3 D*,umoPmgar t tnT ftg4c. County: A°°u
Investigator: l?t??C? 2 , utYA?ur State: NC-
Do normal Circumstances exist on the site? No Community ID: ?Z
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ® Plot ID: G
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
,1"&APVAS vitaLiMt&A(? rem t=5kclr ?J AlsA+tu??t Oi{? - +WeR =A- +
S
® Guti?.PY? vt ?K saw F,ar_ m 4ttAMUKItZS.w4?•=B ?
l lct°L. s'
LlL WUS Aukr1y skate ?aG3d u p? ?.,.c 4 )fig F+k W+ s'
C.,?cs_ M1LL'rr.F?ea 3 _ctAt.. Tat?t?,fPP 4s HEea Fr• La S
® Sgeum 71 tic. Y k L4 LlF2M
-A" te-IA t 14 FA,L" S
t>;i? St?tt.?x -r-?x StkR11?3 F=A.[_ Po t•J_E ALAI
© Euh?=LaA CMuwFbuuM hyaA FAL41 GYW nLL u OAL = M 4 P-A _ r-A"1
® ?/clazt?u.A OL.I?FUTat ?S t?R-8 _? "Q'K=t?' cI't???C t1??2Q t=f?GW
WSPIOLLS E4 E FA rt
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC ??
(excluding FAC).
Remarks: ,AP-EA Mc6 Br- t? o-?Aee;b -&?c? WEkV(Ly_ C,tZA-e-Ep 3Y

t
t
1
ti
u
Z
a
HVnROIOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indications:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: µomp_
X Aerial Photographs Inundated
x Other _ Saturated in upper 12 inches
_ No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
N`N t . F&g?mf 2LS Sb(Lc. Sediment Deposits
_
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indications (2 or more required):

Depth of Surface Water: t`t/A (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12 in
= Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: > 16" (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil; >(a"
(in.) FAC-Neutral Test
- Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: SWpt C Pt-cT oa ORS iH weu- pJ?-A'µtD mif-l w- F`ooAp???E .

C!? II
C

Map Unit Name - dCma1fi#q-
(Series and Phase): G.N - GN?t?v?uv. 6 4"W L 0&-X Drainage Class: Pcgk6y c?PAr 4C-b
t=eeth-IE?TI_Y i-;..oo?p
Taxonomy (Subgroup): 1~L-uv0.czuG -4p c- .+?oars Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ??
Profile Description:
Mottle
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Contrast Structure, etc.

/4 L- 0 4t, W%

Hydric Soil Indicators:
bN{E
Histosol Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor - Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WFTI ANn nr-TFRMINATI()N
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (:ZD Is this sampling point within a wetland? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Remarks:

Village at Odell - ±420 ac.
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabarrus County, NC
CAS '?Tiite Z,iwx / DESIGN 1960 Chapman-Wyont Lone
6-C
Upland
Lincolnton NC 28092 [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: VIL L-A4-S AT OOtt.l' std Date: 9-(4(-00
Applicant/Owner: Ji(3 MyF Qprrg4: M4T. Init. County: GAQ?.Qi2LL<,_,-
Investigator: ' C ajr. , P- , V4YAt4q State: ntr_
Do normal Circumstances exist on the site? No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) 9R No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes c2g> Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VFr..FTAT1nKJ
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
?9 j Le, Aacz!,cF, TPg?F_ FA?t- GYt.lo? Ar4Gt Yc?l-F t !S'
..'a, Llg Am6AL s? uF: •.n cG F&C+ .A esarl r? 7N+CUrt6r4S Ftt fi'_B
r to
d&"A Q ? Sl P? M lt?izR _Flke- t 10
0, oF 2GS vtltG.:ip?A 5 FAC. AG?TtS Stat.ert ?p t-?728 RA[.W tO
,?u1ptF.?t4 Vli7 irL1AN4 S?.Pe, e-Ll 13. L`(LiMS e&gggeAl rteei? uPc. C'
OLLAAAc Aet.ur<< NAdA FAt_tl! TOYtf?OF16D?M?D?C,tits tr1.zPR FAd-- 10
FJ1Allt•8Pa ?i?I CJkPtu.lCnuy,?¢? ? , [ L 15.
vr?ei3tKJ? cr?iw s HFDQ ?l? 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC ?3 ` ?((o
Z °fv (X! 1 3(,, ?{ °5a?
(excluding FAQ. ,
Remarks: Ai2Eb, +k AS 13bE5J, P"VNA-( GLEAeZz Ago,. 6t-t2AZZ1:1 13Y

t
Z
1
I
e
1
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indications:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: Nc*.4
Aerial Photographs Inundated
-? Other _ Saturated in upper 12 inches
_ No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Mw( wl . E6&QQ L' 41M .mie:e-s SO(t.S Sediment Deposits
_
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indications (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface water: N /A (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12 in
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: > it (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >t 8t, (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
- Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: SAMla-E. PLOT ocL.,410S 0" WcLLl A?tt,46D SLOE SLOPE
R d
J V ?
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): ?o Pe?4r.?1? L

oAwc Boo s?o Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): `[?Ptr ??4Pt,t E t?S Confirm Mapped Type? cXED No
Profile Descri ?tf ion:
Mottle
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Contrast Structure, etc.

0-3 1

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
_
Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor - Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks) Y
Remarks: p j(," Gl /P-oK4 NG4-p-?'lX 7Kkc 4G4/otir PzOFtLE
WETLAND DEFEKMINA I IVN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes CEM
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (1 Is this sampling point within a wetland? Yes 0
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
I Remarks:

Village at Odell - ±420 ac. 8-A
J & B Development and Management, Inc. Upland
Cabarrus County, NC Gwbi?neZane / DESIGN 1960 Chopmon^ont Lone Lincolnton NC 28092 (704) 735-1 84
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: VLLL-A0,1E A7- oOEL L- S(T Date: 9-l,-{ -UU
Applicant/Owner: U t3 Dell EL > KEJ,Cr- t n=, tI-L4- County: g: ?Z_tlc,
Investigator: L2AtC, 1Z. 16"&= State: PlL
Do normal Circumstances exist on the site? No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes Plot ID: [Z
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
S
Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator
FRAxItAUS PEN*KL(J.Vd"tc-A TIES FA-e-W
LL0-i1a4, ,Ah4E&W_' At t 4 'CPS FA C?nr
4?Al-k,e ZUALLLM t-e8-FF trAG
m D?esPXl?u?w?,(,r-?taNA s.J?o?,., FAC_
?luKiP?,ELLS yt??rit4 17AL L
idw,4S Aa,?awAo4A AaAP L FALJW
A"LL 11t Epn1St1G ttFie R F'6cw h

'UPQuM ZAALA.ifdu stn A
9. ,A u , t?CM.". kr c sAk N?,eg o c- j a
t?? Q, t
11. ?i???u?wt L=cocrrscu?-t N>?eQ [?4C.W
12. %JPg ,!nm 4 ?f(yv..'Q'p it Lt H -F'lZ t=Ac_"t
13. KJ p'?, F
14. jit2tlx ke iDccS FAC,q-h-
S
15.
MI Di -tr ( thtt}tK1M tt?PRt= 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excludin FAQ. ?? ?Z , 790 ?6, g 11
Remarks: tQ?tC1 HAC, BFzt,[ Q•AR-tALt.Y GCrE,?2?? t C%Z?ALEiD 8`?
e_' L_E ,
t
t
Z
Z
t
HYI)ROIOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indications:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photographs _ Inundated
_X_ Other Saturated in upper 12 inches
_ No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
Drift Lines
N W I
FL nQP1 AtM Flacge' SeN Sediment Deposits
r Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indications (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 141A (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12 in
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >r l (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC
N
l T

Depth to Saturated Soil: >lf'3 (in.) -
eutra
est
- Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: C4Yt 644 1AOC6S OFS l V8p . S4h_& ID" occ"p_c, im DEP2sstot?t
op PLCC;Dp'-AN m
chit c

Map Unit Name -50mlew({ 7
(Series and Phase): ? - U.lttnLdCi-A <SA, Drainage Class: r l.Y ORAW4ED
Taxonomy (Subgroup): fcit?tAQt.trc ? Confirm Mapped Type? r No
Profile Descri at( ion:
Mottle
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Contrast Structure, etc,
44 t-oA,m M)4 g2?W

Ye S/a + S/o Few Kk awuc,
n j
?.S Y"" M4NxJTK e-t4* '

77t .` X 4
MIA
!=-Ls L4n>e4-t
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions M146oµ(-.
Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks) Y
Remarks:
WFTI ANr) r)FTFRMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Is this sampling point within a wetland? <G?> No
Hydric Soils Present? e No
Remarks:

Village at Odell - ±420 ac.
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabarrus County, NC
C rtlGoteYiote / DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone
8-B
Wetland
Lincolnton NC 28092 [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: V(t'_"r t?.r mz« Srr-i= Date: 9-« "Cc)
Applicant/Owner: County: GA&&Pt_ c,
Investigator: C2Art 6V Ag_t7- State: NG
Do normal Circumstances exist on the site? No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) No Transect ID: 8
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes I? Plot ID: , 6
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VGr..FTAT1nhJ
Dominant Plant S ties Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator c

fizA?nKUS PFJ14NaYcyM[?y4
(D
ti2i$ _ I?dLW
?
E?IPkm? tuML,??1?t?y f{E?2A
OEt
VEQBESF
ul
'
N
tB
a
?p
_?
u Tt2? F
.c.,+. ?
k
??S
?
c
cu tS
Ac.E& Q16 01.6-i 13ZAK FAA r_ PAr_PAL.u_m euhrr??TM14L-epL SA?`+ GS
jlmuinAMBAR ?wy?KaA Url1 SAPL. 1=?G'?` D46IjI.R/J? 1{lrWNI?t1',? tiF.?3 FAA--- X
.tu?1?DC?lus vl¢[.?uwaa. -%AAi- tAe-LI 13. L jZ&LA* Tr'p+! f6ralir"! NAB c ?Ar . 5
ptc)SPJAC6 Nu24g14& & SI.Pt- 1=4?_ 14. F of - s
_&C&LL_60 u? _ S t+C?1Q f' 15.. U L r ?c '? c ?
ee-A S
P_abl. Mt1t 7? FJ?R? .S L?Qt Ili
At !5 ME?R
16. U4
S f 1i
*
_

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC 6llZ . Sv ?o Cyld 4C7 ?o, '
(excluding FAC).
Remarks: AeZA- ' M Ac., g>`? PdeTLAUY e-(XAQt:O a?? e-LL?!I-AZZD [3Y

0
r
Z
L
Z
t!
l!
l?
It
HYDR01 Or.Y
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indications:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: NoP48E
T Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other Saturated in upper 12 inches
_ No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Ww I ?LL?L7PtktM . t-t,??S sott_? Sediment Deposits
_
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indications (2 or more required):

Depth of Surface Water: N ?Q (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12 in
-'? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >(a (in.) - Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: t8" (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: SAKPV_: Ptrr(- cxc,utzS tN WtLL_ pp_VMkb Fc.aapPtiet?
cnuc
Pl-e- _
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Zk(- "jr -WAu" Drainage Class: L?'1?04?x4?p
1=P-vG2"EW4TI-Y t-EOnF1?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): FLtttiA[vtE'i?ne pMdl Confirm Mapped Type? ® No
Profile Descri at( ion:
Mottle
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Contrast Structure, etc.

YI? Vq ?.SY'_ 4t/4, _ F WI'6? LDA61-10 EiQW Maims.
Y?. *q. -
MA N 1 T- -s?u? ??t u Ce ?cc.
- 'S y 3/44
7 • S YP- s/,t -)-5 Y e 3A s LOAM ,u(,?c Cgn, c.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions MK (!!64L• 841-ct-? 4"
_ Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
i Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: q 1!1 H C-44 "4A t"'8 r j -(goctG440LI ?n?'0F' L ,
WtILANU UtItKMINAIIUN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (ED
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® Is this sampling point within a wetland? Yes ®o
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
11 Remarks:

Village at Odell - ±420 ac.
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabarrus County, NC
QWC:%%dwre Z,6oae / DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone Lincolnton NC
8-C
Upland
28092 [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: o - Date: °l -(Jf - cXD
Applicant/Owner: ,t -,N CN 2?VEL.d°NttW:4 1,"c. County:
Investigator: , 4'MALQ R -k4lr T' State: ug-
Do normal Circumstances exist on the site? (Ja?? No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) Yes 4F Transect ID: 9
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes o Plot ID: A
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VCr CTATlf%M
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator °.?
'
tU
. :9 s 61619UNA
Yom
i=XAA

?
4P_JM S. A-

(o
? Pr-lk
?
= (? PLYSSA SYLtlArj(? 'I'=
^t2eE __ I? S?e?tiA
P?hu.us
?. ??!.M?{??-,(a
Se.P?. ca
Ffi to
5. foulM ftco, VF_1,"i T2EE itai;w'_ A"_143 56!< 99 %&a S'
Q ?ctL?LU& 14ARlt.A -1b
F
AA " IadrL LLPL-
d"
0
S NkQ$
ue &h&
2R PAW-, (p
A_4
t?R(.
dl Cf?R.t A.LS L..
1 rp _J d_ l6
® gt. fir, QV-Am SAPS. ViAc FAc-t [a
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC 4?0 yo l
?S a 3 Z? 7
(excluding FAC). o
Remarks:

V
U
L?
tt
Nvnani nr:v
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indications:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
k Aerial Photographs _ Inundated
Y Other _ Saturated in upper 12 inches
_ No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
Drift Lines
kw I . f[.?Pr.Ay4 . PtZGZ. Sac. _ Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary indications (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: - (in.) - Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12 in
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: .-IA (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: t;B (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: S (tom ocu-it-S ON WtL4- bt*?Awgt?, s/aE S4Ar°&,
cnt? c
?-A
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): P
,oZ - R>ititbt:xL

Drainage Class: WFc,- Dt2.A,?,)
oANI
?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): 'TYtDIL ,t4kpt.U 0At?1=S Confirm Mapped Type? des No
Profile Descri ate ion:
Mottle
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Contrast Structure, etc.

Lp Yz 4/e -- - rs„arc.L?aN o

Hydric Soil Indicators:
.af E
Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions - Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: H IGN CV620MA MAI-e4x T-I (&0i 4uoQT- P2of:-tt-. e
Wt I LAND Ut ItKMINA I IUN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Ct (9) jj? Is this sampling point within a wetland? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes N 11
11 Remarks:

Village at Odell - ±420 ac.
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabarrus County, NC
DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone Lin<olnton NC
9-A
Upland
28092 [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) 9-S
Project/Site: Vtl.t.j.y.G-r- 0DFLI ?s c -IX=. Date: 9 14-
Applicant/Owner: 2 vt?c.o + --T- i McT 16LL County: GABAre?c?,
Investigator: e_aAldr R. kL'?CA'6T State: c"lG
Do normal Circumstances exist on the site? (ZIT No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) Yes Transect ID:.,
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes <31j) Plot ID: l;
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VFr:FTATInN
Dominant Plant S ties Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator g
dCr`? eLtkp 4e% -MjEML_ L. cok*UK AYOMuM 1 "gall ,f:Aew ' S
® I ??LDdMBAR. S?(PI?NrLW 'tT1_OF
Aj^ d? u-NUI,- &&ir®At-Q ee .LL 'r'
>=A? Ml f !+?IlM ?LIM
rev. c iWA twL?i lift tt'Q
C, ?d4*
FAI>W+- to
(¢j .%,A L,
_ ? p/1.A?•Nt -s0.At.
1.t?9w taM1BAd: 'S RAu 4 ?,?Pf _
du lys r ?w-+er?. _ s tµ _u8
® ei -LLR"s r ? FA41W
?Ar-
?=tl[.
t?aL'?'
P '" LoAt$dA cs+.eQl?+I?t
Gove??c ?1?¢,e,?
14. l G4 g=gR? JLAos-
15. &QidQ ne Ae-d G a -
?4'l1 1 !?_tskCw? t+s EtR
_,_ _?'L?tQ
A L•t eA
I F k V 02WA
V s"E 1=AUU*_ 10
ot3?_ !iD
F-A.c__- 5-

T F.4t 4.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC c,t C I ? ?o?
(excluding FAQ.
Remarks: 'S44MP LZ PtoT_ «,GCIrf-S tk M1.1E0P- r-L009> PL4WA OF aRALMO
JJ?_tB"TAAy GFts4hEµ$L .
a
d
2
a
t'
11
5
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indications:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs _ Inundated
Other _ Saturated in upper 12 inches
_ No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
e Drift Lines
1L11A! I
Ft.c?otDPt.atrLl . N4PC? SotC ? Sediment Deposits
+
, ,r, Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary indications (2 or more required):

Depth of Surface Water: k?A (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12 in
T' Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: > IAll (in.) x Local Soil Survey Data 6u_Lus1oe45)

cc FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: >If3
(in.) x Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: GZAYPtsH i(oLES v@simt/>=p
CnII S
GL-B
Map Unit Name svMswmj'
(Series and Phase): 6A -C-?AEWALL-& 5.LgLt( G.LnW Drainage Class: r ?Y Qe&A.48b
'?2EG? u rc ? j'LY ?c.acD81J
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ft,?ty?r ??- +:? ue= ? Confirm Mapped Type? ® No
t W41-us to t
Profile Descri ?tf ion:
Mottle
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Contrast Structure, etc.
o-Z - A---- LDYg?- 3!Z'- - LO YZ 3/1 F-ey-1 /FAINT nAm M. e w
.
Z-9 10 Y1Z 5& t 9t
15? 5l G1?_ NI, F Gsn?c ,
It > `f Iz 4'/4 F *-W

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol >e Concretions Mr.a COW-
_ Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
?C Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WFTI ANn IIFTFRMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ?105 No
Wetland Hydrology Present? No Is this sampling point within a wetland? 41 No
Hydric Soils Present? No
Remarks:

Village at Odell - ±420 ac.
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabarrus County, NC
C*-i-K-taeYine / DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone Lincolnton NC
9-B
Wetland
28092 [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
9-4-
Project/Site: V' L-L'Ae'F- AT- Gac.c_L_ S t r E Date: q- (4-00
Applicant/Owner: .1 + 6 DE?11;c ?P?t?r tr ?. 1•?Ic;? 1)" C_ County: c.A..BA0_Zc1S
Investigator: State: 6J.
Do normal Circumstances exist on the site? No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) Yes No Transect ID: 9
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes Q9 Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
a
le
t!
tC
IC
IC
VFGFTATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator
btosArecs vcr?s tit tea. SAP,- _FAe-_ & b is Ia A A LABda this mmm sae_- t0
ydu kt PEItdf. Vtl?c.?xukKA S?!?P4 F!P!w - 10.
t tuM ma FAC Q
s 11.
ikM17 or t V BOG. W 1[1K t.l?/t? - 12.
1/Y?tiz =A 6rAttb 4IP.ffi
? 13.
> ega
-- 14.
15.
> a PAr'PAWA bf?7 p 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are 08L, FACW or FAC 3? l?? [4J
3yo?
l
(excluding FAC). .
J
Remarks: 6WPt F_ ec ar cxc4jeS LM 6_LrArP-E1> + 6k2A-Z&0 OPext P,ASJUeE .
G?W SJIQt? gS o2.
?o `Ct?EES S"""4S P SCB-tj`.
t
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indications:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other _ Saturated in upper 12 inches
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
1?4w t , ?PL-o )DPLAirt . MaCA, Sods Sediment Deposits
_
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indications (2 or more required):

Depth of Surface Water: ).L??i (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12 in
T' Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >'.n (in.) - Local Soil Survey Data

`t FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: > tp)
(in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: 4---ANtPL?C, P rues Ct4 VL/eLi- 012-A'ALO scoF <4cP8,

q-111 -
Map Unit Name 8C° tsg0 ER-one0
(Series and Phase): /_. DZ - ea I ' 6 ? y (:?l.A1r LpAm Drainage Class: Wry-j--Dlzarrv o
Taxonomy (Subgroup): T`(PV- API uoa?2!& Confirm Mapped Type? (:57g No
Profile Descri alb ion:
Mottle
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Contrast Structure, etc.

_ f S `?2 S?1 5 Ya Vt"?FAbc1!. - SAI -Y UAY L AM
B j Y S? - - 7! Y?_??a _. #? C lr•EL?-*? f?,???r- -A?IbX ejA!C LA ?4
Hydric Soil Indicators: NC>MF-
Histosol _ Concretions
_
Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor - Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
- Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks) Y
Remarks: (3e!(4kj- K" x G44,eo1-tA '(J-4qCC,6C; cqT Pgof(LZ ,
Wt I LANU Ut I tKMINA I IUN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Is this sampling point within a wetland? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes 4o
I Remarks:

Village at Odell - ±420 ac. 9-C
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Cabarrus County, NC Upland
09 C9Jiotc Zane / DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wuont Lone Lincolnton NC 28092 [phone]
0 ?
Date: 105- 02
To: ?RRO
?FRO
?WaRO
Steve Mitchell
Ken Averitte
Deborah Sawyer
f
Triage Check List
Project Name Vlltlw" 0. Q` USA Crejak
DWC Project Number C) Z_04 3
Count ba
?WiRO Joanne Steenhuis
?WSRO Jennifer Frye
L;ARO Mike Parker
From:
Telephone (919) 733- qw-O(o.
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation. Please call if you need
assistance.
Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USGW topo maps
linimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamilco, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
AS the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
Xcumulative impact concerns
ments l "rte ""C1E -
PNr-T
?A C?r+3?VC ?1bK?
Qlref-14 on ptc ce am A p%cme..-wA
A- I V IJAN IC1? `S ?
nr CIo sn2
ova o ?[??.tc?(, `Th?? (? ?,Me ?kc, nxJ3ci UWA UnAer
1 lnv-I? bA {bg?:{ GI'e` c1S?y?L f l i??1?'[an Ye+f Dre' awl ?^`'
c? ? h
?na<xc ?o gn?,??, v?6w? JU, +? iUt w.?aav1
p e nn%' Gw? ?v rn? ?tice ?'w?(x ch7
i
May 13, 2002
John Dorney, Director
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1650
[phone]
t1Z f copy
Re: Pre-Construction Notification (PCN)
Villages at Moss Creek (Moss Farm) Site, 020763
±400.54 acres, Cabarrus County, NC
Applicant: Bob Burkett / Kerry Watts
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
9179 Davidson Highway
Concord NC 28027
[phone] PAYMENT
RECEIVED
Dear John,
Please find enclosed for your review seven (7) copies of a completed PCN application for a pro-
posed minor road crossing at a ±400.54 acre site in Cabarrus County, NC. The site is located within the
Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin within the headwaters of an un-named tributary to Rocky River (NC
Stream Index 13-17). The site is located on the Kannapolis (1993), NC, USGS 7.5 minute quad.
This PCN is being forwarded to your attention as a part of the Clean Water Act 404/401 (PCN)
permitting process. The applicant proposes to construct one minor road crossing to provide access to a
newly constructed public school on adjacent property and to provide access to the interior of the site.
The proposed activities will be performed under the conditions and authorizations of Corps Nation-
wide Permit 14 and the accociated State DWQ Water Quality Certifications.
All wetlands and waters on the Villages at Moss Creek site have been delineated, surveyed and
verified by the U. S. Army Corps. (Corps Action ID #200130114). Wetlands and waters have been
delineated, verified, and surveyed on the adjacent Harris Road School Site (originally ±78.82 acre
Moss Farm site, Corps Action ID #200130025). One intermittent channel and its sidestream wetland
areas were identified on both of these delineation in the vicinity of the proposed road crossing. The
proposed road crossing occurs on the north side of the common property line between the two sites on
the larger Villages at Moss Creek Site.
One permanent road crossing will be constructed to replace a temporary construction access. The
temporary access was built in the vicinity of a former farm road crossing for the purposes of school
construction. The proposed road crossing will initially provide access to the adjacent school property
and will provide access to the interior of the larger Villages at Moss Creek Site.
A total of 149.75 linear feet of intermittent stream channel will be impacted and a total of 76 square
feet or 0.0017 acre wetlands will be impacted by the project. Future impacts are not known for either
property at this time and additional permitting may be necessary for the schawt cite or future site devel-
opment of the Villages at Moss Creek site. N01103S d11mm } ;tq
0099 SGINV ;'MA
page 1 of 2
Craig R. Wyont, dbo c c e? / DESIGN, 1960 Chapman-Wyant Lane, Lincolnton, NC 28092 *[phone]
Since the original farm road and temporary construction access crossing were conducted prior to
notification requiremnts and the proposed permanent crossing will be constructed at the same location
this PCN request is being submitted for an "after the fact" permit. Construction of the permanent
crossing is expected to begin before a complete review of the PCN is complete due to revised schoo
opening schedule. Accelerated school openings are necessary to accommodate unforeseen student popu-
lation growth in Cabarrus County during recent months. Additional classroom space is needed now for
new students during summer session which were originally scheduled to be made available for fall
school session. Safe access to the school site is essential for protection of students. All NWP conditions
will be followed during construction of permanent road crossing.
The Mooresville Regional DWQ office has conducted a previous site visit to this property and has
been notified of this PCN and of the need for an "after the fact" status during processing.
Thank you very much for your review of the enclosed. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you
should have questions or if there is any way in which I can be of assistance to you.
Respectfully,
Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
A Fine Line Design
1960 Chapman-Wyant Lane
Lincolnotn NC 28092
704-735-1084
[e-mail]
cc: Bob Burkett/Kerry Watts, J & B Development and Management, Inc.
Steve Chapin, U.S. Army Corps, Asheville Office (one copy)
page 2 of 2
Craig R. Wyont, dbo QQ(6 ..Z,o . l DESIGN, 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lane, Lincolnton, NC 28092 [phone]
FILE COPY
6 iflce Use Only: 4 2 O 7 6 3111 Version April 001
US.-kCE..Action Ili No, ? DWQ 1Vit. _
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" ratter than
leaving the space blank.
I. Processing `J
I . Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
Section 404 Pen-nit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification'---T ;----+
OUP
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules WA_.._." ?',J_?TY SECTION
Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:_ NWP 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because wri tten approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for•
mitigation of impacts (see section Vi l - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Bob Burkett /Kerry Watts
Name:
Mailing Address: J & B Development and Management, Inc. Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone] 1 m_- -
E-mail Address: N/A
7. Agent Information (A signed and (iated- copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Anent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation: N/A
Mailing Address: N/A
Telephone .Number: ? N/A - Fax Number: N/A
Fa-snail Address:__.___ _____._._.__.N/A
Page of 1?
i
Ill. Project information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing tile location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the neaps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and MRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
U:SACti requires infori nation to be submitted on sheets no larger than I I by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any site. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If (till-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be infornied that
the project has been place(] on hold until decipherable neaps are provided.
1. Name of project: Villages at Moss Creek
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (I'ax PIN): DB 2430 PG 224, DB 1439 PG 194, D-ff YMYGIT6,D23"2P 21$
4. Location
('ounty: Cabarrus Nearest. Town: Concord, NC
Subdivision name (include phase/lot ntinlber): Villages at Moss Creek _______
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
Odell School Road to Harris Road. Right (west) on Harris Road anaroximately
4000' to Site on right (north) side of road.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35-26-00 Lat/ 80-44-25 Long
(Note - if project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach it sheet that separately lists the
coordinates .for each crossing of a distinct wate.rbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Single familv farm residences (2) and outbuildings, forest, old field successional
on
7. Property size (acres): Approximately 400.54 acres total
Nearest body of water (stre,ail7iu•ivei-/st)tind/occanflake):Tibutory to
(NC Stream Index 13-17)
Diver Basin: Yadkin-PeeDee River
(Mote this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated maior river basins, The
(Liver Basin inap is available at htt??;
t'a?rc? ; cyf t2
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work:
Construction of a minor 52? SL1L1_ m
r prv and to a .rest remainder n, c?tP._, _._
11. List the type ofequipment to be used to construct the project:
Typical site construction a ui ment. Graders, loaders, trucks, etc.
12. IN-scribe the land use in the vicinity of this project: _
Surrounding land uses are residential development, forest, and undeveloped
farm land. A school is being constructed on adjacent land.
1V. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases or the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a. NCI OT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P, project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion (if this work from the current
application:
Additional permit reauests are anticipated for the vmiect in the future. This
request will provide access to the school site on adjacent land. ruture site plans for
Vl. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate, and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VU below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a.
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is heeded for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
I'a?4iof12
1. Wetland Impacts
1Vecland impact ^
Site Nunlher
(indicate on Ina )I
Type of Impact" Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
IQt)-yeatr Floodplain*1
('y "!i1o) Distalwe to
Nearest Stream
linear toed
"Cyilc of Wethri(l
Site 1 y fill 76 sf yes * 0' ephemeral /
(.0017 .) _ 'her-hiceous
r
Note: Le tter of clearanc e attach ed from Cabarrus ounty Flood dministrator

} List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not unite to: rmc tanti.e clearing. 911at mat;, Dif,
cwavatioi, tlt?exlinl;, ditchirightrainage, etc. For darns, separately list impacts due it) troth structure aid flooding,
1110.Year Iloodpiains sari identified through the Federal Emergency ;Management gcney s (FUMA) FIcNxI Insurance Rate N hips
(FIRM). or FEMA-approved local dlomiplaill mars. Mars are available through tits. FI:MA Nfap Service ('enter at 1-800-:158-90 1(). or
onilrle at l`It . '?4'Ir''kV. tC?atr L'l)J.
I'J"I a wetland type that best describes wetland to lie itnpacl%xi (eel;.. liesh:vtiterrsaltrvater marsh. fore cd ta'etlarld, beater poild,
Carolina flay, lx)g, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 22.54 acres _
Total area of wetland impact propose & 0.0 acres _
2. Stream Impacts, including alt intermittent and perennial streams
Stmam Impact
Site Number
(i11(jlCi1te nil 1111))
Type of Impact, Length of
Impact
(linear feet -
Stream. Name** Average width
of Stream
Berore Imptict Pcreonial or
Intermittent?
P-IC4St.21 ! lLlty)
Site 1 Pipe/Rip-Rap 149.751f UT Rocky River 5' OHWM Intermittent
or road)

° t,isi each impact septa lely atld identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited tit: culverts and sw;ocialeo rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to hoth NtnactUPC and 1100(ting). relocation (include, tincar loci Infore and after. and net loss,"gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc. 1, cxcavation. ditching"arai„hiening, cue. U' nur;nrl rc:icrcation is
proposed. plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for troth the original and relocated streams must be •inchtdrd,
f>k Stream mantes can he firund oar INNS topographic map"'. It' a strr:un has no name, list. as UT I, nrnamed u'ibutiay) to tht; neaw st
downstream named stream into which it Ilo,.rs. UisciS maps are available illrougtl the USCiS at 14St)p.358-9010, or online .it
y _,._ar4+; ..t„! , Several internet si(¢s also allow direct download and printing of tltititi Wraps
:C4 tr s`}.)! ;??"1!, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in (eet) to all strea rns on site: _ 149.75 l?f.
Page6oFI?
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, t:stuaries, Sounds, ).Mlantic Oscan and lolly
other Water of the U.S.
Open water Impact

`fits. Number
(in(icate oft Map)

Type or hxtpact,
_ Area of

Impact
(acres) ? Name of, waterxody

(if';rppi icrtt>tc}
type of Wa(erhody
i lake. pond. estu try, sound.
bay. ocean. etc) w_ -
_
?
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

List (Nish impact sepat:dely and identity temporary impacts, hupacts include. but arc not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage. bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
if construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts shot.tld be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., darn/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining; to pond: N/A Expected pound surface urea: N/A
V1 1. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid: the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain wily these design options were not feasible. Also discuss grow impacts
were minimized once the desires{ site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction.
techniques to be followed dining construction to reduce impacts.
The road frontage for the site occurs along Harris Road. The site contains a stream
channel segment which must be crossed at some point in order to access the interior of
the site and provide access to a new school. The intermittent channel at Site 1 has an
existing culverted ten rat construction crossing located in t e vicin' of a fo er
ect o anew
farm road crossing. The vicini a this 's 'n crossing se, e minor
road crossing to minimize impacts at Site 1. Other future crossings on the remainder of
the site j1 also be located ' a manner which avoids and VAWMMgs ' Mpg acts. Buffers
are proposed on undisturbed channel segments
Page 7or12
Fill. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NC,AC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by tilt, NC"
Division of" Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of in]pacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 1,50 linear fear of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACI;:.. In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register t-n March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal, factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation is proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project, establishing and. maintaining wetland
rind/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams, and replacing kisses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking it required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration.
in DWQ's Draft 'rechnica.l Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available tit.
hItt Y t- state. 11c'. us", hull
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide:
as much information as possible, including, bitt not limited to; site location (attach directions
and/or trap, if otTsite), affected stream and river basin, type and anIoitnt (acreage/linear t"ect)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please: attach
a separate sliect if more space is needed.
zatiion. One unavoidable crossing will be located in the vicinity of existing im-
pacts and along se ments of channel which exhibit fewest natural characterisitics.
Remaining stream channel segments will be buffered to the greatest extent pos-
Additional mitigation is not proposed for this project since tote Impacts to peren-
_
nial channels are _less than 150 linear feet and total area of impacts to all wetlands
and waters on the site are less than on-tenth acre.
Page 8 cif 1-2
?. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North C.aroli.n i Wetlands Restonatioll
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the boy: vindicating that
you would. like to pay into the NCWR.P. Please note: that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wet.iands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as in option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWR.P, check the NCW.RI' website at If
use of the NC'WRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the billowing information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet:): N/A
Amount of bulTer mitigation requested (square feet): NTA
Amount of Riparian wetland iitigation requested (acres):
IVA N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):__ N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (:acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federa)/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NF',PA/SI PA)?
Note: if you are not sure whether a NEiPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ? N/A
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? Non N/A
X. Proposed impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buff ors associated with the project. The applicant artist also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site, plan. All buffets must be shown on a
neap, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the :DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included tit the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NC'AC: 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tirr-Painlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (.please identify ?_)?
Yes [] No if you answered "yes", provide the following irtforniatiow
Page 9 of 12
Identify tl?e square feet and acreage of inipact to each zone of the riparian ht iTers. If buffer
r?titigation is required calculate the required aunount of mitigation by applying tile buffier
multipliers.

lime Impact

(Square teem)
;Multiplier Required

Miti rttion
1 N/A N/A
2 N/A N/A
Taal N/A N/A
pane i extends out 30 feet perliendicular rmrn near bank of channel; Zane :) cmends an
additionat 20 feet tiom the edge of Zone I-
if buffer rnitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / k nl?ancernent. Preservation or
payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0200' N/A
X1. Storntwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Maximum 120 ac. impervious versus 400.54 acres total on site
;X11. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge), of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
xlsting Public aniitary ewer is present on-site
X111. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC; 21.1.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes [] No JN
Is this an aller-the-diet permit application? Proposed permanent crossing is intended to replace
yes (V No E] temporary construction access road which was con-
structed in vicinity of old farm crossing. Notification
was not provided for prior temporary access or farm
road construction activities.
Page 10 ()f 12
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sullicicntly in ;advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant naay
choose to list constt-aints associated with construction or sequencing that tnay innp osa limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with E ndiangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant proposes to construct permanent crossing prior to complete PCN review due to
revised school opening schedule. Accelerated school openings are necessary to accommo-
date unforeseen student population growth during recent months. Additional classroom
space is needed now for new students during summer session which were originally sched-
uled to be made available for fall school session. Safe access to the school site is essential
for protection of students. All NWP conditions will be followed during construction of
permanent road crossi?&. r I
5 h 2) ] 0 2
Applicant/Agent's , itnature Date
(,Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
GS Army Corp3 Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Ot'fice Alexander Cherokee lredell Mitchell
US Anny Corps of Eng, icers Avery Clay Jackson Palk
ISI Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Roots 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asshevillc, NC: 28801-5(ft Cabarrus Grahrun Madison Stanley
Tclephone:[phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] C.atawtsa l Ienderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alatrrance Dtarllarn Johnston Rockrt glum
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgccotnbe Lace Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neese. Road Ashe Fnanklin Nash Sorry
Suite; 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance.
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Ciraanviilc Orange Wake
'relel>hune: (9t9) 876-8441 Davidson Guiltbrd Person Warren
Fax, [phone] Davie flalifax• Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort C'urrituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertic Dare Lenoir
Past Office Box 1000 Camden Fumes Martin
Washington, NC: 217889-10M Carteret' (ireen Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chow;an Hertford Pasafootank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde f ergn'rnaans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of ngineers Bladed Harriett Pender
P"st office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone:: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
I`ax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
Union
Watmiga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest. Only
Page I I of 12
3
27
%
v
1+
g

a;
?m
rn '?
ri
O

D
?y
ROGI Y _ RIVER
JIM
ROAD

?n+aa ,oa+x

? 00
0 p-0 d_JO 1 c

4
q
00
00 _
N
KENNEY DESIGN
GROUP, P.A.
1316 GREENWOOD CLIFF
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28204
PH: 704/377-0099 FAX: [phone]

1' .300'
DQU

- 04109/02
Fn
"d:
T1A
Ch.dud:
MIK
Job No.
4199
00
o?o
?o

WETIANd ExNIbiT SITE *I
T E Vi lliA?ES AT MOSS CREEk
J&B DEYElopmENT ANd MANAGEMENT, INC.
9179 DAvidsoN HWY., CONcoKd, NC 280 5
Sh..t No,
1
of 2
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: 200130114
County: Cabarrus
Waters of the U.S. Survey/DelineationVerification
Property owner/Authorized Agent
Address:
Telephone Number:
J&B Development,pnd Management, Inc.
9179 Davidson Highway
Concord, NC 28027
Size and Location of Property (waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.):
420 acre "Village at Odell" site located on NC 73 and Harris Rd.; west of Concord
Indicate Which of the following apply:
X There are waters of the U.S. on the above described property which have been accurately
flagged/delineated. We recommend that the delineated lines be surveyed. The surveyed
lines must be verified by our staff before the Corps will make a final jurisdictional
determination on your property.
The submitted survey plat dated for the above referenced property
accurately reflects the limits of waters of the U.S. on the property. Unless there is a
change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed 5 years from the date of this notice.
Placement of dredged or fill material in waters othe U.S. on this property without a Department
of the Army permit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC
1311). A permit is not required for work on the property restricted entirely to existing high
ground. If you have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please
contact:
Steve Chapin at [phone]
Project Manager Signature 1?- Date November 13, 2000
cc: A Fine Line Design
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: 200130025 County: Cabarrus
COUNTY
Waters of the U.S. Survey/DelineationVerification
Property owner/Authorized Agent: Cabarrus Co. School Board; c/o Cabarrus Co.
Planning Services
Address: P.O. Box 707
Concord, NC 28206-0707
Telephone Number:
Size and Location of Property (waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.):
Cabarrus School Board - Future School Site located on approx. 78.82 acres at the
intersection of the Rocky River and Harris Road.
Indicate Which of the following apply:
X There are waters of the U.S. on the above described property which have been accurately
flagged/delineated. We recommend that the delineated lines be surveyed. The surveyed
lines must be verified by our staff before the Corps will make a final jurisdictional
determination on your property.
The submitted survey plat dated for the above referenced property
accurately reflects the limits of waters of the U.S. on the property. Unless there is a
change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed 5 years from the date of this notice.
Placement of dredged or fill material in waters othe U.S. on this property without a Department
of the Army permit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC
1311) A permit is not required for work on the property restricted entirely to existing high
ground. It is our understanding that no impacts to waters of the U.S. are planned on the
site. If you have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please
contact:
Steve Chapin at [phone]
Project Manager Signature .C, Date October 18, 2000
•
1. L
CARARRUS COUNTY
NOR] H CRHO6NA
March 9, 2001
Mr. Steve Chapin
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Dear Mr. Chapin:
This letter is regarding the stream crossing for the school being constructed by Cabarrus
County on Harris Road. I have discussed this issue with both Mr. Craig R. Wyant of A
Fine Line Design, and Mr. Jeff Schmidt with Kenney Design Group.
The box culvert (15'4" x 6'5") under the road serving the school was designed to handle
a 100 year flood for the entire drainage area upstream. Since the area upstream from the
culvert will soon be included in a mixed-use development in the area, the design was
based on full build-out in the drainage basin. Based on this, the County feels the flood
issue has been addressed sufficiently, and this design has our approval.
If you have any questions, or need any additional information, feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Michael L. Byrd
Cabarrus County
Planning Services

May 13, 2002
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville NC 28801
[phone]
Re: Project Review for Protected Species
Villages at Moss Creek (Moss Farm) Site,
±400.54 acres, Cabarrus County, NC
Applicant: Bob Burkett / Kerry Watts
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
9179 Davidson Highway
Concord NC 28027
[phone]
Dear Sir or Madam:
Please find enclosed for your review a project location map for a 400.54 acre site in Cabarrus
County, NC. Could you please compare the location of this project with your database of known Pro-
tected Plant or Animal Species to determine if they would be present at this location. The site is located
within the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin within the headwaters of an un-named tributary to Rocky River
(NC Stream Index 13-17). The site is located on the Kannapolis (1993), NC, USGS 7.5 minute quad.
This project is being forwarded to your attention as a part of the Clean Water Act 404/401 (PCN)
permitting process. The applicant proposes to construct a minor road crossing to provide access to a
public school on adjacent proerty and to provide access to the interioir of the remainder of the property.
The proposed activities will be performed under the conditions and authorizations of Corps Nation-
wide Pen-nit 14 and the accociated State DWQ Water Quality Certifications.
All wetlands and waters on the Villages at Moss Creek site have been delineated, surveyed and
verified by the U. S. Army Corps. (Corps Action ID #200130114). Wetlands and waters have been
delineated, verified, and surveyed on the adjacent Harris Road School Site (originally ±78.82 acre
Moss Farm site, Corps Action ID #200130025). One intermittent channel and its sidestream wetland
areas were identified on both of these delineation in the vicinity of the proposed road crossing. The
proposed road crossing occurs on the north side of the common property line between the two sites on
the larger Villages at Moss Creek Site.
page 1 of 2
Craig R. Wyont, dbo c?a??ne?ine l DESIGN, 1960 Chapman-Wyont Lane, Lincolnton, NC 28092 [phone]
A total of approximately 149.75 linear feet of intermittent stream channel and 76 sqare feet of
sidestream wetlands will be impacted by the proposed activitiy. Impacts will occur in the vicinity of a
former farm road crossing and at the location of an existing temporary construction access. The entire
site was previously used for agriculture and portions have regrown into young and medium aged forest.
Thank you very much for your review of the enclosed. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you
should have questions or if there is any way in which I can be of assistance to you.
Respectfully,
Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
A Fine Line Design
1960 Chapman-Wyant Lane
Lincolnotn NC 28092
704-735-1084
[e-mail]
cc: Bob Burkett/Jerry Watts, J & B Development and Management, Inc.
page 2 of 2
Craig R. Wyont, dba c,e?ixa / DESIGN, 1960 Chapman-Wyant Lone, Lincolnton, NC 28092 [phone]
May 13, 2002
Department of Cultural Resources/Division of Archives
Attn: Renee Gledhill-Earley
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-4617
919-733-4763,
Renee.Glendhill-Earley@ ncmail. net,
Re: Project Review for Historic or Cultural Resources
Villages at Moss Creek (Moss Farm) Site,
±400.54 acres, Cabarrus County, NC
Applicant: Bob Burkett / Kerry Watts
J & B Development and Management, Inc.
9179 Davidson Highway
Concord NC 28027
[phone]
Dear Ms. Gledhill-Earley:
Please find enclosed for your review a project location map for a 400.54 acre site in Cabarrus
County, NC. Could you please compare the location of this project with your database of known Cul-
tural or Historic Resources to determine if they would be present at this location. The site is located
within the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin within the headwaters of an un-named tributary to Rocky River
(NC Stream Index 13-17). The site is located on the Kannapolis (1993), NC, USGS 7.5 minute quad.
This project is being forwarded to your attention as a part of the Clean Water Act 404/401 (PCN)
permitting process. The applicant proposes to construct a minor road crossing to provide access to a
public school on adjacent proerty and to provide access to the interioir of the remainder of the property.
The proposed activities will be performed under the conditions and authorizations of Corps Nation-
wide Permit 14 and the accociated State DWQ Water Quality Certifications.
All wetlands and waters on the Villages at Moss Creek site have been delineated, surveyed and
verified by the U. S. Army Corps. (Corps Action ID #200130114). Wetlands and waters have been
delineated, verified, and surveyed on the adjacent Harris Road School Site (originally ±78.82 acre
Moss Farm site, Corps Action ID #200130025). One intermittent channel and its sidestream wetland
areas were identified on both of these delineation in the vicinity of the proposed road crossing. The
proposed road crossing occurs on the north side of the common property line between the two sites on
the larger Villages at Moss Creek Site.
A pedestrian survey of the site was conducted to note the presence of potential historical, archaeo-
logical or cultural resources. Two single family farm residences and various outbuildings were ob-
served. The date of construction of the buildings is not known but they appear to be less than fifty to
one hundred years old. No cemeteries or other structures or other resources were observed on this site
at the time of observation. The entire site was previously used for agriculture and portions have re-
grown into young and medium aged forest.
page 1 of 2
Croig R. Wyont, dbo aq(6rin82?me / DESIGN, 1960 Chapman-Wyont Lane, Lincolnton, INC 28092 [phone]
Thank you very much for your review of the enclosed. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you
should have questions or if there is any way in which I can be of assistance to you.
R7ec-1 tfu lly,
1421- 1-)
Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
A Fine Line Design
1960 Chapman-Wyant Lane
Lincolnotn NC 28092
704-735-1084
[e-mail]
cc: Bob Burkett/Jerry Watts, J & B Development and Management, Inc.
page 2 of 2
Croig R. Wyont, dbo QY6rixeZins / DESIGN, 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone, Lincolnton, NC 28092 [phone]
V111dge5 UL MUSS k-.TCCK A11U
School Site
J&B Development and Management, Inc. Scale: 1 "=2000'
Cabarrus County, NC NORTH Project Location
R2UBHx
Riverine, Lower Perennial, Unconsolidated Bottom, Permanently Flooded, exca
PSS1A
Palustrine, Scrub-Shrub, Broad-leaved Deciduous, Temporarily Flooded
PF01A
Palustrine, Forested, Broad-leaved Deciduous, Temporarily Flooded
PFO1C
Palustrine, Forested, Broad-leaved Deciduous, Seasonally Flooded.
Proposed Road
-rossing - Site I
Villages at Moss Creek and
School Site
J&B Development and Management, Inc
Cabarrus County, NC
Source: USFWS National Wetlands
Kannapolis NC quad, 199
Scale: 1 "=2000
NORTH N.W.I. Map,
We Wehadkee loam,frequently flooded
Ch Chewacla sandy loam, frequently flooded
EnB Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8% slopes
EnD Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15% slopes
CcB2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8% slopes, eroded
PoB Poindexter loam, 2 to 8% slopes
PoD Poindexter loam, 8 to 15% slopes
PoF Poindexter loam, 15 to 45% slopes
MeD Mecklenburg loam, 8 to 15% slopes

Source: USDA- NRCS Soil Survey for Cabarrus Count)
Villages at Moss Creek and Sheet 1, September 198
School Site
J&B Development and Management, Inc. Scale: 1"=2000
Cabarrus County, NC NORTH Soils Survey

US ARMY CORPS/ENGRS ID:18282714858
OCT 09'98 9:23 No.002 P.02
H%wimul
- INTERMITTENT CH_ANNE1.
EVALUATION f ORM T-
ACIJON ID APPLICANT NAME SU.IODL a?6&n _ PATE. S - 5
6 -9
1'ROPotib:D CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.) ..-
WATERBODW RIVER BASIN QO[,k`t ?IJSt? - AQ(6f k Slt? COiiNTY/Cl'I Y„ l j3AP_ec is C=
IiM:CENT WP.ATII1:R CONDITIONS
8 -`1 -00 No
IN PP-t tl[0U-::i a-14 k k ,
A e,
Does Channel Appear On A Quad or Sol Map? 6)1 N Approx. Drainage Area: ?-
Determinatinn-
Perennial Channel (stop) important Channel: Lt' PRUJ)XT MGR. Initials..
Intermittent Channel (promd) Unimportant C:hanncl: LF
Ephemeral Channel (00 jd) (couch neap Indleating location of importanUuniutpor(ant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (nnld)
I vAlostor's Mansdurt.. -Q ...
(if other than C.O.R. project mnnagar)
,v0MCWt-(AT
P=Prtsent SP=Rton* Present NP-Not Present

Important To Domestic Water Supply? V 0
Measurements looking upstream
Upland Top of Bank Upland
1.5' No OHWM 1.5'
_jl'?
2' Bed
Not to Scale
Area has been excavated and
degraded due to use by cattle.
Notes: 0"-2" ephemeral flow
No standing water
Bottom saturated
Moss Farm Site - 78.82 Ac.
Cabarrus School Board
Cabarrus County, NC
C c oiusYiotc. i DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone Lincolnton
Channel T 12
NC 28092 (704) 735-10 4

Moss Farm Site -
Cabarrus School Board
Cabarrus County, NC
CJ? XYCfG17 f: I9F6
78.82 Ac.
Channel T 12
I IF
Moss Farm Site - 78.82 Ac.
Cabarrus School Board
Cabarrus County, NC
Channel T 12
0005?r,7*pirYi- e, / DESIGN 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone hn(olnton NC 28092 [phone]

n
Z
D
v
- Y

•
N2a 3
g ?
4 r? QQ NORTH
Z
M
Y m
n rn p? ?
C r r 22 z $
r

a - a S r y
w W ° S _
D p °
- - m
- r
W m
m z
" z

o
x
z
z
Uz
A ' A

?bF
46
aJ /
0
8
'n z 2
S T
W ? o
xv D
m
m
A
s ?
z
p

N
w
0

Z 00
00
N

OD
o
n
w
°-
2
v
D D W
n 2
T v
r j

z
0 g W

?
C:
n C y

m
(A
o
c
A 0
Z V
(D

0
m
z
{I v
I
I ?
Dy>e
pA??
? om
4 °p \
sj
m ? 5B
a
xay 20.0
se? c ?O®?t ?"f'1
O o -• " 8 ?, ? co
G ? a Q.
C.cn
?: g 9 ? op a 7'CD
c,? a 411
?
n fit

:?i?ii? --? N
t0 (7

-n
(D N m
X. cn v?
(D

w to
9 3
0-0
_
tZ CL
0
90
Q
c O
m
CD r.
(D
CL
e
0

myZ ,
s ?+

m
0
g=
iAg
AF
am=
.M

/ i
0
i-
i "

b fA V 1n A W ?
0S
o z°n 9:
?RaPw o:?R ,??8a ocV?n,?o$
W y?? N? D ? y A -i y Q
oR! ? W? 92 F pp R i ^v y
f m a Z f? p D ZS
w Tri
O Gl O N S O
61 0
W m Z p 0 O
•alit
¦If
91
8 io
,fit
zC7?
o
a
r^
Q V
¦i J
;11_
71 N ?i
cc n ,
. .
? ? m (D U)
X q 0)
r±tp CD
M
CAD 3 ?°- ;jj
a a cQ ???
CD 5 = o
C a cn
rn ? ??f
¦{1
:_
oil

e
?
1 ?1
¦q
¦q
z?
CD-

e Ff.
RfR3
t6??
e?q
e
a3?=

J & B DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT, INC.
NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
INRADS/4
01 GAOUP
MAY ",, 1? X04
TERacgrir
ysEcr?oN
006666
05/20/2003 6668
Check Date: Check No.:
GROSS DISCOUNT
475.00 0.00 475.00
J & B DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT, INC. •

NCWQ01 NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY Check Date: 05/13/02
BOB BURKETT J&B DEV. AND MGMT

TOTAL .....
200.00
005302
2
Check No.: 0053 02
.00 200:00