WQ0004893_FP AttB_20090929

r
Ago'.
Yra
CDENR
North Carolina Department a; Environment ak Natura' Resources
Division a Water Quah
Be . erly EGves Pe, Jue uoleen H. Sullins
Governe� Direcia.
September 29, 2009
MARK T. CACCIATORE — SENIOR DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS
CAMPBELL SOUP SUPPLY COMPANY
2120 NC 71 HIGHWAY NORTH
MAA'TON, NORTH CAROLINA 28364
Dear Mr. Cacciatore:
Dee Fresma
Secretary.
Subject: Attachment B Certification
Permit No. WQ0004893
Campbell Soup Supply
Company — Maxton Facility
Land Application of Residual
Solids (503 Exempt)
Robeson County
In accordance with your permit modification request received August 4, 2009, and subsequent
additional information received September 17, 2009, we are forwarding herewith a modified Attachment
B, certified September 29, 2009, to Campbell Soup Supply Company for the subject residuals land
application program.
This certification is being issued to modify Attachment B as follows: removal of existing fields
H-1, H-2 and H-3; reduction in acreage of field H-4 from 22.5 acres to 5.1 and renamed to Site 1; and
addition of two new fields named Site 2 and Site 3 with 8.4 and 26 acres, respectively.
Please replace the existing Attachment B of Permit No. WQ0004893 previously certified on
November 30, 2006 with this modified Attachment B. Note only the vicinity and buffer maps for any
new and modified land application sites are attached to this modified Attachment B. It is the Permittee's
responsibility to ensure that a complete permit is created by inserting this modified Attachment B and
vicinity and buffer maps into Permit No. WQ0004893 issued on November 30, 2006.
This modified Attachment B shall be effective from the date of certification until the Permit No.
WQ0004893 expiration date of October 31, 2011; shall void Attachment B of Permit No. WQ0004893
that was previously certified on November 30, 2006; and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations
as specified therein and well as those specified in the above -referenced permit. As always, remember to
take the time to review this modified Attachment B thoroughly, as some of the conditions contained
therein may have been changed since the last certification.
' :5'JWN'.flCLVc�1E UdGr,.Or-

Mr. Mark T. Cacciatore
September29, 2009
Page 2 of 2
If any parts, requirements or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, the Permittee
has the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within 30 days following receipt of
this permit. This request shall be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings at 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. Unless such demands are made, this permit shall be final and
binding.
If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Nathaniel Thornburg at
[phone] or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
4oleen H. Sullins
cc: Robeson County Health Department
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Robert T. Branch, LSS — Branch Residuals & Soils, LLC
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
Permit File WQ0004893
Notebook File WQ0004893

ATTACHMENT B - APPROVED LAND APPLICATION SITES Permit Number: WQ0004893 Version; 2.1
CERTIFICATION DATE: September 29, 2009
RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION AREA INFORAIATION
Field
Owner
Lessee
County
Latitude
Longitude
Net Atreage
Dominant Soil Series
Site I
Campbell Soup Supply Company
Robeson
34.796431
-79.289683
5.1
Noboco (NbA)
Site 2 `
Campbell Soup Supply Company
Robeson
34.793503
-79.297747
8.4
Goldsboro (GoA)
Site 3
Campbell Soup Supply Company
Robeson
34.770956
-79.320014
26
Johns (Jo)
Totals
39.5
For Sites 2 and 3, residuals and other sources of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) shall be applied at or below agronomic rates. Appropriate agronomic
rates shall be calculated using expected nitrogen requirements based on Realistic Yield Expectations (RYE) for each approved land application site.
Realistic Yield Expectations for crop types and specific fields or soil types shall be determined using any of the following methods:
a. North Carolina Historical Data for specific crop and soil types as provided by the Department of Soil Science at North Carolina State University.
The Department webpage is located at: Izttp:Hnutrients.soil.ncsu.edtt/yields/.
Site Specific Historical Data for crop types on specific fields or soil types by calculating the mean of the best three yields of the last five
consecutive crop harvests for each field.
c. If the RYE cannot be determined using either of the two methods above, RYE can be established from specially developed soil interpretation
records for Nutrient Management Planning, Farm Service Agency Records, University trials, or inference from crop performance on soil with very
similar physical and chemical features.
d. RYE and acceptable nitrogen application rates using the above methodology are required parts of many agricultural planning documents. The
Permittee may use the RYE and appropriate agronomic rates reported in any of the following documents:
i. Crop management plan as outlined by the local Cooperative Extension Office, the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer
Services, the Natural Resource Conservation Service, or other agronomist.
ii. Waste Utilization Plan as outlined by Senate Bill 1217 Interagency Group- Guidance Document: Chapter 1. Guidance for the completion of
the plan can be found at: htt ://www.enr.state.nc.us/DSWC/ a es! uidance docs.html.
iii. Certified Nutrient Management Plait as outlined by Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS). These plans must meet the USDA-
NRCS 590 Nutrient Management Standards. which are available at: Rp://Rp-fe.se.egoy.tisda.gov/NH / ractice-standards/standards/590. df.
e. For any crop type for which the RYE and appropriate nitrogen application rate cannot be determined, the Permittee shall contact the Division to
determine the necessary actions.
WQ0004893 Version 2.1 Attachment 13 Page t of i

Legend
— --- Compliance Boundary
— — — Review Boundary ?
® Buffer
Land Application Fields
+Or Borings
Parcel Iines
—'— — Ditch (Blue Line)
_._._..._ Drainage Ditch
Houses ;
Monitoirng wells
�i
SCALE: t°oo'� Campbell Soup and Supply Company
CHECKEDRY: RTB �''� Land Application Fields Buffer
DRAWN BY: RTB � T CH Maxton, North Carolina Map
1�E��Srr-EpFC]E3AL�S+ p -7 2
DATE: Sept ^ 2009 � �gliLJ� LL4.. Pmject No. 2.008- f 6

I

K-oQFiSoAJ
Barber, Jim
From: Thornburg, Nathaniel
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 7:24 AM
To: Barber, Jim; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: WQ0004893 - Campbell Soup Supply Company Residuals Program Draft Permit
Bob & Jim,
I looked through an amended 2007 annual report, and found a mineralization rate of 0.4. I ,All include this
rate in the Attachment A.
Do either of you'have any other concerns with the draft permit?
Please let me know at your earliest convenience. .
Thank you,
Nathaniel
Nathaniel D. Thornburg — Environmental Engineer II
Aquifer Protection Section — Land Application Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
919-715-616o
919-715-6048 FAX
http://h2o.ent.state.nc.us/lau/main.html
Please note: my e-mail address has changed to nathaniel.thornburg(@ncdenr.gov
DISCLAIMER: All e-mails sent to and from this account are subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Barber, Jim
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:40 AM
To: Thornburg, Nathaniel; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: WQ0004893 - Campbell Soup Supply Company Residuals Program Draft Permit
Nathaniel;
Upon reviewing the FRO files, it appears that a mineralization rate of 30% has been used historically for calculating PAN
at Campbell Soup. Based upon the treatment infrastructure (i.e. new DAF units with polymer); if this constitutes aerobic
digestion, then the 30% value would be warranted. Since very little holding time exists for subsequent aeration, I would
think that the 40% mineralization rate would be more in line with the treatment activities at the facility.. I would also
think that since the material has a very low nutrient value, the 40% mineralization rate shouldn't pose a problem with
the available land resources and total PAN being applied annually.
Bob;
Hope everything turned out fine with your knee procedure on Thursday morning. Once you have a chance to digest;
what would be your take on this. If we need to discuss to further pin down the actual treatment process; just let me
know and we can have a conference call if needed.
ps: I received the City of Rockingham residuals application this morning. Dave Goodrich is the permitting engineer. My
plan at this moment is to have the staff report out of Fayetteville by Friday evening courier or at the worst Monday the
28th

.Jim Barber
From: Thornburg, Nathaniel
Sent: Wednesday,. September 23, 2009 9:16 AM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Barber, Jim
Subject: WQ0004893 - Campbell Soup Supply Company Residuals Program Draft Permit
Bob,
Attached is a copy of the subject draft permit. You will notice the shell has undergone a recent rewrite, and we
would appreciate if you have any comments pertaining to the shell language, in addition to any comments you
may have specific to the Campbell Soup facility.
The only piece of information that is missing from this draft is the approved mineralization rate in Attachment
A. If either you or Jim could provide me with this data, I will amend the draft,
Please provide your comments at your earliest convenience.
Thank you,
Nathaniel
Nathaniel D. Thornburg — Environmental Engineer II
Aquifer Protection Section'— Land Application Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
919-715-616o
919-715-6048 FAX
http://h20.enr.state.nc.us/lau/main.html
Please note: my e-mail address has changed to nathaniel.thornburg cr ncdenr.gov
DISCLAIMER: All e-mails sent to and from this account are subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.

t .
BRANCH RESIDUALS & SOILS, LLC
8646 W. Market St., Suite 111 Greensboro, NC 27409
rxoNF, [phone] • FAX [phone]
September 16, 2009
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Water Quality Section
-Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
1636 Mail Service Center -
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RECEIVED
SEP 2 2 2009
DENR-FAVEffEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
ATTENTION: Mr. Nathaniel Thornburg
REFERENCE: Additional Information Permit No. WQ0004893
Campbell Soup and Supply Company
Land Application Permit
Dear Mr. Thornburg:
On behalf of Campbell Soup and Supply Company, please find attached three copies of the revised
maps as you directed in your September 3; 2009 letter for the above referenced permit.
If you have any questions regarding this information, please give me a call me at [phone] or
Hope Walters at [phone].
Sincerely,
Robert T. Branch, LSS
Soil Scientist / Project Manager
Branch Residuals and Soils
Attachments (3 Copies)
I September 3, 2009 Additional Information Letter
II Revised, Buffer Maps with Compliance and Review Boundaries
cc: Mark T. Cacciatore - Campbell Soup and Supply Company
Hope Walters — Campbell Soup and Supply Company
RECEIVED i DENR I DWO
A rPp, OT Tiny; � CTION
S E P 17 2009

Attachment I
September 3, 2009 Additional Information Letter
01
RECEIVED / DEC 1 DWIQ
AQ U I r F P -7,, P rr, r- r T I () N' '-,'r CT 10 N
r
SEP 17 2009

A : •�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor -Director
September 3, 2009
MARK T. CACcrATORE — SENIOR DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS
CAMPBELL SOUP SUPPLY COMPANY
2120 NC 71 HIGHWAY NORTH
MAXTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28364
Dear Mr. Cacciatore:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Application No. WQ0004893
Additional Information Request
Campbell Soup Supply Company
Land Application Program
Robeson County
The Central and Regional Aquifer Protection' Section Reviewers have completed their review of the
subject permit application package. Additional information is required before we may complete our
review. Please address the following items no later than the close of.business on -October 3, 2009.'
Please be aware that you are responsible for meeting'all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules and
regulations. Any oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are still the
responsibility of the applicant. In addition, any omissions made in responding to the above items shall
result in future requests for additional information -
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. Three (3)
copies of all revised and/or additional documentation shall be signed, sealed and dated by the proper
North Carolina licensed professional and shall be, submitted to my attention at: 1636 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636. Please note that failure to provide this additional information on or,
before the above requested date may result in your application being returned as incomplete.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
E E W NO
Nathaniel D. Thornburg
Environmental Engineer II
cc: Jim Barber — Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Robert T. Branch, LSS —Branch Residuals & Soils, LLC
Permit Application File WQ0004893
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX 1: 919-715-0588; FAX 2: 919-7.15-6048 \ Customer Service:1-877.623-6748 - NoithCarOlina
Internet: www.ncwaterguality.orQ Naturally
A�L{fK,Lyr L/ fy�
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer N " " " " " a" l
REC"J NED I DENR I DWO
AQUI rT? PP s 1=jrT}!",gaf Pr'*CTION
S F F 1 7 2009

Mr. Mark Cacciatore
September 3' 2009
Page 2 of 2
General:
1. Per 15A NCAC 02T .1104(c)(1), amend the provided buffer maps in Attachment Order 3-e to include
the following information:
a. Amend Buffer Maps 1 and 2 to include all property boundaries within 500 feet of the land
application sites. Review of the Robeson County GIS shows a property line near the onsite
wetland that is not indicated on the current Buffer Maps (see photograph below).
b. Expand Buffer Maps 2 and 3 to show all required featuresmithin 500 feet of the proposed land
application sites.
c. Amend Buffer Maps 1, 2 and 3 to include the delineation of the review and compliance
boundaries for the land application sites. The compliance boundary shall be 250 feet from the
waste application boundary or 50 feet within the property boundary, whichever is closest to the -
waste application boundary. The review boundary shall be midway between the compliance
boundary and the waste application boundary.
2. Please note per the attached document from the Attorney General's Office, all property and/or parcel
lines, regardless if the adjoining owner(s) is the same as the Applicant/Pernuttee, shall be buffered
according to the applicable setbacks listed in 15A NCAC 02T .1108. Therefore, the parcel line near
the onsite wetland between Sites 1 and 2 (see photo above) shall be included on the buffer map, and
shall be buffered 50 feet on either side for surface application by vehicle and injection/incorporation
or 150 feet on either side for surface application by irrigation.

Attachment II
Revised Buffer Maps with Compliance and Review Boundaries

Field F
ield G
Field H
wtlkc
as a No -
SCALE:
1" =400'
Campbell Soup and Supply Company
RTB
Land App lication Fields
CHECKEDBY-.
Maxton, North Carolina
DATE:
Sept - 2009
I

Field H
and 311
MIXIMAM
7_7
,
A
MW 11 ty IV"
, T
Legend
t4
Ulf"
10 I � t.4
M.
Compliance Boundary 1 .011.
Review Boundary i ;kj t
9". -
0
Buffer 7,
Land Application Fields
Borings
k j
— — — Parcel lines M
Ditch (Blue Line) 'tg ky,
"k. A
Drainage Ditch
VA
Houses V
V
Monitoirng wells I
A
SCALE: 1" =400' Campbell Soup and Supply Company
CHECKED BY-. RTB Land Application Fields Buffer
DRAWNBY: RTB BRANCH Maxton, North Carolina Map
RESIDUALS __1 2
DATE: Sept - 2009 & SOILS, LLC F Project No. 2008-76
I

"`.�, fir+..• n .ems„ G'' 'C - � � f ` � i � �.
b r, d
./"
J 1
Campbell'`-Soup Maxton- �(
.. � � - �\ -�� ;r� ,. ��!• �l�e � t.s tj 1, ;
. C�
Legend
Compliance Bound
p ar3'
Review Boundary
Buffer
Land Application Fields
® Borings
— — — Parcel lines
—'--- Ditch (Blue Line)
_..._..._ Drainage Ditch r • �'
Houses '
Monitoirng wells"
SCALE: V =660' Campbell Soup and Supply Company
CHECKED BY: RTB Land Application Fields Buffer
-4
RTB Ne BRANCH
Maxton, North Carolina Map
DRAWNBY: SIDUAS 3
DATE: Sept - 2009 & SOILS,LLC Pmlmt No. 2008-76 ___j

I
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
Date: 08/19/09 County: Robeson
To: Aquifer Protection Section Central Office Permittee: Campbell Soup Supply Co.
Central Office. Reviewer: N. Thornburg Project Name: Campbell Soup Land application
Regional Login No: ?? Application No.: W00004893
L GENERAL INFORMATION -
1. This application is (check all that apply): ❑ New ❑ Renewal
® Minor Modification ❑ Major Modification
❑ Surface Irrigation ❑ Reuse❑ Recycle ❑ High Rate Infiltration ❑ Evaporation/Infiltration Lagoon
® Land Application of Residuals ❑ Attachment B included ❑ 503 regulated ® 503 exempt
❑ Distribution of Residuals ❑ Surface Disposal
❑ Closed -loop Groundwater Remediation ❑ Other Injection Welfs (including in situ remediation)
Was a site visit conducted inorder, to prepare this report? ®Yes or El -No'.
-
a. Date of site visit: 08/11/09
b., Person contacted and contact information: Bob Branch and Hope Walters
c. Site visit conducted by: Jim Barber
d. Inspection Report Attached: ❑ Yes or Z No.
2. Is the following information entered into the BIMS record for this application correct?
® Yes or ❑ No. If no; please complete the following or indicate that'it is correct on the current application.
For Treatment Facilities:
a. Location: 2120 NC 71, Maxton NC 28364
b. Driving Directions: From Maxton take Hwy 71 North approx. 5 mile. Campbell Soup plant is on the right
after crossing the lumber river bridge. Land application site #3 is located behind the plant..
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number: Wakulla, NC (1121SE).
d. Latitude: 3.4.771899N,. Longitude:-79.323585W (WWTP bldg and DAF units at manufacturing plant)
e. Regulated Activities / Type of Wastes (e.g., subdivision, food processing, municipal wastewater): Industrial
wastewater generated from washing and moving vegetables throughtout plant.
For Disposal.and Injection Sites:
(If multiple sites either indicate which sites the information applies to, copy and paste a new section into the
document for each site, or attach additional pages for each site)
a. Location(s): Maxton, NC (Robeson County)
b. Driving, Directions: From Campbell' Soup plant take Hwy 71 North approx. 0.50 miles and turn left onto
Oxendine School road. At the intersection of Modest Road and Oxendine School turn right and stay on
Oxendine,School road. Land application sites 1 and 2 are located on the right, adjacent to spray irrigation .
fields H & J.
c. USGS, Quadrangle Map name and number:' Wakulla, NC (H21SE)
d. Latitude: 34.79643IN
Longitude:.-79.289683W
(Site #1 - 5.10 acres)
e. Latitude: 34.793503N
Longitude:-79.297747W
(Site #2 - 8.40 acres)
f. Latitude: 34.770956N
Longitude:-79.320014W
(Site#3 - 26.00 acres)
FORM: APSARRcampbellsoupLAWQ0004893Aug2009.doc 1

�T
J
,AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
II. NEWAND MAJOR MODIFICATIONAPPLICATIONS (this section not needed for renewals or minor
modifications; skip to next section)
Description. Of Waste(S) And Facilities
1. Please attach completed rating sheet. Facility Classification:
2. - Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system?
Yes.❑ No .❑ N/A. If no, please, explain:
3. Are the. new site conditions (soils, topography, depth to water table, 'etc) consistent with what was reported by
the soil scientist and/or Professional Engineer? ❑ Yes- ❑ No ❑ N/A. if no, please explain:
4. . Does the„application (maps, plans,etc.) represent the actual site (property lines, wells, surface drainage)? ❑
Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. If no, please explain:
5. Is.the. proposed'' residuals management plan adequate and/or acceptable to the Division. ElYes ElNo El
N/A. If no, please explain:
6. Are the proposed application rates for new sites (hydraulic or nutrient) acceptable?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. If.no, please explain:
T Are.the,new treatment facilities or any new disposal Bites located in a 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. If yes, please attach a map showing. areas.of 100-year floodplain and please explain
and re'commend' any mitigative measures/special conditions in Part IV:
81. Are there any buffer conflicts (new treatment facilities or new disposal sites)? ❑ Yes or ❑ No. If yes, please
attach a map showing conflict areas or' attach any new, maps you have received from' the applicant to be
incorporated into the permit:
9: .Is proposed and/or existing groundwater monitoring' program (number of wells, frequency of monitoring,.
monitoring parameters, etc,) adequate? ❑ Yes ,❑ .No ❑ N/A. Attach map" of existing monitoring well
network if applicable. Indicate the review and compliance boundaries. 'If No,' explain and recommend any
changes to the groundwater monitoringprogram:
10. For residuals,, will seasonal,;or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If.yes, attach list'of sites.
with restrictions, (Certification B?)
III RENEWAL AND MODIFICATIONAPPLICATIONS (use previous section -for new or manor modification
systems)
Description Of Waste(S)And Facilities
1. Are there appropriately certified ORCs for the facilities? Z Yes .or ❑ No.
Operator in Charge: Hope Walters' Certificate #:LA-23907
Backup- Operator in Charge: James Wilson Certificate #1A-26333
FORM:. APSARRcampbellsoupLAWQ000489,3Aug2009.d6c 2

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
2. Is the design, maintenance and operation (e.g. adequate aeration, sludge wasting, sludge storage, effluent
storage, etc) of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? Z Yes or ❑ No.
If no, please explain:
3. Are the site conditions (soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No. if no, please explain: Site is comprised of three land application
fields 39.50 acres. Site #1 will consist of row crop plantings. Site 92 will consist of a bermuda field with hay
cut and removed. Site 93 is a pine tree plantation with 15 to 20 year -old pines trees (most are 8" to 10" in
diameter). Site #3 will require some thinning of tree rows to allow for application equipment travel and to
provide straight runs between rows of standing timber.
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect permit (drainage added,' new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? If yes, please explain: NO
5. Is the residuals management plan for the facility adequate and/or'acceptable to the Division?
Z Yes or ❑ No. If no, please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates (hydraulic or nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or ❑ No. If no, please
explain: No biological treatment taking place since very little organic material being introduced into the
treatment'system. The material being land applied is the residuals from the DAF units at, the plant treatment
system. DAF residuals consist of very small fragments of vei etable material along plant residue that is washed
from the vegetables processed at the plant for soup products.
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program (number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring
parameters, etc.) adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A. Attach map of existing monitoring 'well 'network if
applicable. Indicate the review and compliance boundaries. If No, explain and recommend any changes to the
groundwater monitoring program: Monitoring wells exist near Site #1 and Site 42 due to adjacent spray
irrigation fields. Groundwater monitoring is not necessary, at this time, for the land application program due to
very low nutrient content of the DAF residuals and very low volume of DAF residuals land applied'on a annual
basis (approx. 30 to 40 dry tons/year average of the past several years, which is well below the permitted .
amount of 334 dry tons).
8. Will seasonal or other restrictions be required for" added sites? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ N/A If yes, attach list of sites
with restrictions (Certification B?)
9. Are there any buffer conflicts (treatment facilities or disposal sites)?"❑ Yes or Z No. If yes, please attach 'a
map showing conflict areas or attach any new maps you have received from the applicant to be incorporated
into the permit:
10. Is the description of the facilities, type and/or volume of waste(s) as written in the existing permit correct?
Yes or ❑ No. If no, please explain:
11. Were monitoring wells properly constructed 'and located? ® Yes or ❑ No ® N/A. If no, please explain:
MW's located for the spray irrigation fields on this facili .. See permit condition on page 7 of permit
FORM: APSARRcampbellsoupLAWQ0004893Aug2009.doc 3

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
W00004893 section IV GROUNDWATER REQUIREMENTS condition 1, that addresses wells MW-8,9,10
for permit W00003626 (spray irri atg ion•.permit for the Campbell Soup facility).
12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (GW, NDMR, and NDAR as applicable)? ® Yes or
❑ No ❑ N/A. Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: Annual reports for "the last four
years 'reviewed by Jim Barber .08/24/09. .
13. Check all that apply:' ❑ No' compliance issues; '❑ Notice(s) of violation within, the. last permit cycle;
Current enforcement action(s) ® Currently under SOC; ❑ Currently under JOC; ❑ Currently under
moratorium. If any items checked, please explain and attach any documents .that may help clarify
answer/comments (such as NOV, NOD etc): Campbell Soup and DWQ have entered into a SOC
concerning the operation and maintenance of the spray irrigation, system. The facili is updating control
systems for pivot operation, along with adding a new pivot in Field H. Also, Field B has been cleared of
vegetation and excavated of sediments to. design elevations for emergency management of wastewater as
originally conceived.
14. Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing .permit, (SOC, JOC, -etc.) been complied with? ❑ Yes
❑ No ® Not. Determined ❑ N/A.. If no, please explain: Facility is currently working under the intended
SOC and makingpro�ress toward the desired goals.
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit? ❑ .
Yes or ®No ® N/A. If yes, please explain:. See items 13 and 14 above.
FORM: APSARRcampbellsoupLAWQ0004893Aug2009.doc 4

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
IV. INJECTION WELL PERMIT APPLICATIONS (Complete these two sections for all systems that use injection
wells, including closed -loop groundwater remediation effluent injection wells, in situ remediation injection wells, and heat
pump injection wells.)
Description Of Well(S) And Facilities — New, Renewal, And Modification
l . Type of injection system:
❑ Heating/cooling water'return flow (W)
❑ Closed -loop heat pump system (5QM/5QW)
,❑ In situ remediation (5I)
❑ Closed -loop groundwater remediation effluent injection (5L/"Non-Discharge")
❑ Other (Specify: '
2. Does system -use same well for water source and injection? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Are there any -potential pollution sources that may affect injection? ❑ Yes -❑ No
What is/are the pollution source(s)?, What is the distance of the injection well(s) from the pollution
source(s)? ft.
4. What is the minimum distance of proposed injection wells from the property boundary? ft.
5. Quality of drainage at site:' ❑ Good ❑ Adequate ❑ Poor
6. Flooding potential of site: ❑ Low ❑ Moderate ❑ Nigh
7. For groundwater remediation systems, is the proposed and/or existing groundwater monitoring program
(number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring parameters, etc.) adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No. Attach
map of existing monitoring well network if applicable. If No, explain and recommend any changes to the
groundwater monitoring program:
8. Does the map presented represent the actual site (property lines, wells, surface drainage)? ❑ Yes or ❑ No. If
no or no map, please attach a sketch of the site. Show property boundaries, buildings, wells, potential pollution
sources, roads, approximate scale, and north arrow.
Injection Well Permit Renewal And Modification Only:
1. For heat pump systems, are there any abnormalities in heat pump or injection well operation (e.g. turbid water,
failure to assimilate injected fluid,'poor heating/cooling)?
0 Yes ❑ No. If yes, explain:
2. For closed -loop heat pump systems, has system lost pressure or required make-up .fluid since_ permit issuance
or last inspection? ❑ Yes ❑ No. If es, explain:
3. For renewal or modification of groundwater remediation permits (of any type), will
continued/additional/modified injections have an adverse impact on migration of the plume or management of
the contamination incident? ❑ Yes ❑ No. If yes, explain:
4. Drilling contractor: Name:
FORM: APSARRcampbellsoupLAWQ0004893Aug2009.doc .5

1 ,
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION. REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
Address:
Certification number:
5.. Complete and. attach Well Construction Data Sheet.,
FORM: APSARRcampbelIsoupLAWQ0004893Aug2009.doe

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
V. EVALUATIONAND RECOMMENDATIONS.
1. Provide any additional narrative regarding your review of the application.:
2. Attach Well Construction Data Sheet - if needed information is available
3. Do you foresee any problemswith issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes ® No. If yes, please explain
briefly.
4. List any items that you would like APS Central Office to obtain through, an additional information request..
Make sure that you provide a reason for each item:
5. List specific Permit conditions that you recommend to be removed from the permit when issued. Make sure
that you provide a reason for each condition:
Condition Reason
6. .List specific special conditions or compliance schedules that you recommend to be included in the permit when
issued. Make sure that you provide a reason for each special condition:
Condition . Reason
7. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review.ofadditional information by regional office; ❑ Hold;
pending review of draft permit by regional office; ❑ Issue upon receipt'of needed additional information;
Issue; ❑ Deny. • If deny, please state reasons:
8. Signature' of report preparer(s): �� i ' . �
Signature of APS.regional supervisor:
Date: O09
ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
The land application of DAF residuals program is well maintained by Campbell Soup Co. and the farmer that
operates at the facility. The'land application activities appear to be operated in accordance with the permit.
FORM: APSARRcampbellsoupLAWQ0004893Aug2009.doc 7

AQUIFER PROTECTION"SECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT .
Attached with this staff report are R.Y.E tables for Site #1', 2 and 3. Based upon hand auger borings performed
during the site visit with Bob Branch and Hope Walters on 11 August 2009; the seasonal high water table is
greater than 24" .at all sites and the soils indentified by Branch Residuals and Soils. are acceptable for land
abplication of DAF residuals. -
A spreadsheet is provided for inputing information into the'Attachment B for this 'proiect. No modifications
have been undertaken by the regional office in BIMS for this permit modification. The spreadsheet is provided
for ease of review and comments to be included with. the Attachment B modification.
FORM: APSARRcampbellsoupLAWQ0004893Aug2009.doc 8

Field/Site
Site 1
Owner Lessee
County
Robeson
Latitude Longitude
34.796431 i-79.289683
Net Acreage
5.1
Dominant soil series
Noboco (NbA)
Crop
row
R.Y.E
varies
Footnotes
(._a) '
Campbell Soup Supply Co ; _
Site 2
Campbell Soup Supply Co
Robeson
34.7935031 -79.297747
8.4
Goldsboro (GoA)
bermuda
299,
(b)
Site, 3
Campbell'Soup Supply Co f
Robeson
34.770956'--79.320014
26
Johns (Jo)
Pine Trees
60
_
( c)
TOTAL
ROBESON
39.5,
_
(a) Site 1 was originally permitted as Field "H", a'90 acre field consisting of four 22.50 acres application zones. Field"H" is currently under
construction for use as a spray irrigation field under DWQ permit WQ0003626:
(b) See attached Realistic Yield Expectation (R.Y.E.) chart from NC State Nutrient Management website addressing the Nitrogen application for
bermuda hay.
(c) See guidance info from.the Div. Of Forestry concerning R.Y.E values for mature trees.

;Realistic Yield Expectations for North Carolina Soils
The following tables are the result of extensive data gathering and review process conducted by NC State
University, the Natural Resource Conservation Service, the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and
ConsurmerServices, and the North Carolina Division of Soil and Water Conservation. In 1999, county -based
representatives of each of the above -named organizations were asked to collect yield data and make a
reasoned judgement of the yields for various crops on each of the soils occurring in their county. These data
,were collected from 87 responses, representing 93 counties. The data were then compared with available
research data and intensively reviewed by a panel of field agronomists, soil scientists and researchers familiar
with the soils, crops and climatic conditions in each region. In reviewing the data, the following assumptions
were made:
1: Realistic Yield Expectations should be based on the average of the best 3 years in a 5 year period which
could be achieved with a high level of management (top 20% of .growers)
2. For soils that may be mapped in multiple regions or in slightly different landscapes (for example, flood
plains or stream terraces), the Realistic Yields are based on the most common prevailing conditions for
that soil rather than the most ideal site for agricultural production.
3. For soils that are Somewhat Poorly, Poorly, or Very Poorly Drained, effective artificial drainage MUST -be
in place to achieve the yields shown in the RYE tables.
4. For tobacco production in the Piedmont physiographic, irrigation was assumed to be available, whereas
no irrigation was assumed in the Coastal Plain physiographic region. This is in accordance with numerous
surveys which show less than 15%-20% of tobacco in the Coastal Plain is irrigated, while 70 to 80% of
tobacco in the Piedmont receives some irrigation
Citation: North Carolina Nutrient Management Workgroup. 2003. Realistic yields and nitrogen application
factors for North Carolina crops., http://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/yields/.North Carolina State University, North
Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Raleigh NC.
To access the database, select a county and at least one crop. Multiple crops may be selected by holding the
Ctrl key when selecting crops. A report will be generated showing a summary of currently available data for
the county you selected.
Select Your County Duplin ��PBE t„C, .Sou wao60.�89�
Select Your Soil NbB: Noboco loamy fine sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes -
NoA: Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
NoB: Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
0 Use -Representative Slope Typical of the Soil Mapunit
Correct for Slope ------._ ---_--.__- _.-- -- -- -_
0 Use my slope. 0
Submit Reset,
Realistic Yields for NbA: Noboco loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent
slopes in Dupl-in County
Realistic
Nitrogen Estimated Phosphorus
Nitrogen Rate Removal
Crop Yield Factor (Ibs/acre) (Ibs P20s/acre)
Barley (Grain) 81 Bushels 1.51 122 31
Corn (Grain) 115 1.14 131 51
Bushels
......... ........................................... ..................... :.......... ............. ........... ................................. ........ .......... ............................................................ ..................................... .....................................................................................

'
` Cotton
875
0.089
78
25
Pounds
.
Oats (Grain)
102
1.17
119
26
�
Bushels
.
Pnunds
Rye (Grain)
60. Bushels
Z
Sorghum (
Soybeans (Double Cropped)
38 Bushels
0 -
0
30
Soybeans
Soybeans (Double Cropped --Manured)
`
38 Bushels
3.91
149
30'
Soybeans (Full Season - Manured)
45 Bushels
3.91
176
36.
Tobacco (Flue Cured)
3K0
0.031
102
17
-Pounds
'
�
Tropical Corn (Silage)
0 Tons
6.7
. 0
0
` ---____
Common d
'
---
F
Hybrid Bermudagrass (Hay)
6.5 Tons
46
80
Hybrid Berrnudograss overseeded with
7.7 Tons
/ 46
354
105
Rescua
Mixed Cool Se6son'Grass (Hay)
2.5 Tons
46
115
36
Timothy Grass (Hay)
0 Tons
46
0
0
AnnualH
.................. ....................................... —............. ............................................ ......................... ........................
...............................................................
O
O
--'------------------.r-----r—
0 ................. ...........
Annual
OTons
O`
0
O
Bahiagrass (Pasture).
4.9 Tons
34
167
5
Caucasion/Old d
Annual Rye Overseed Hay - April 7 Harvest
0 Tons
0
0
0
Annual Rye Overseed, Grazed - April 7 UTons O O O
Harvest (Hay)
34
167
6
34
167
6
34
119
� 6
___
46
354
11

Mixed Cool Season Grass (Pasture),,
................................................................... ................................ .....................................
2.5 Tons
...........................................................................................................
-34
85
4 .
Orcharclgrass (Pasture)
. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................
2.5 Tons
34
I ....................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
85
4
Pearl Millet (Pasture)
................................................................ . .................................. .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
5.5 Tons.
38
...........................................................................................
209
7
:
Rescuegrass (Pasture)
.................................................................................................................. ; ..................................................
3.5 Tons
...................................
34
......................................
119
......................
................
4
.
Small Grain Cover (Hay),
................ ......................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................
0 Tons
0
I ........................... ......................
0
...............................................................
0
Small Grain Overseed'(Hay)
............................................................................................................................... . .........................
0 Tons
.............................................................................................
0
............................................................
0
. ............................................................................................................
.......................................................................
0
Sorghum Sudan (Pasture)
.............................. : ................................. .........................................................................................................................
6.2 Tons
. ..............................................................................................
38
236
...............................
9
Switchgrass (Hay)",
......................................................................... I .......................................................... ; ........................
0 Tons
. ................
. 46 .
I ............... I .............................................
. 0
..............................................
0
Switchgrass (Pasture)
........................................................................................ T ...........................................................................................................................................................
..................................................
0 Tons
...................................................................................................................................................................
34
0
............................................................................
0
Timothy Grass (Pasture)
....................................................................... ............................................................................
1 0 Tons
..........................................................................................................................................................................
34
0
!. .....................................................................
: 0
:
Other Crop
.......................................................................................................................................... : ........................................................................................................................................
I
0
0
0 ;
­ ................. .....................................................
0,
Other Pasture
.............................. .................................... .......................................... ...........................................................................
.0
......................................................................................................................
45.6
...................................................................................................................
0 .........................................
0 ............................

Realistic Yield Expectations for North Carolina Soils
The following tables are the result of extensive data gathering and review. process conducted by NC State
University, the Natural. Resource Conservation. Service, the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and
Cons urmerServices, and the North Carolina Division of Soil and Water Conservation. In 1999, county -based
representatives of each of the above -named organizations were asked to collect yield data .and make a
reasoned judgement of the yields for various crops on each of the soils occurring in their county. These data
were collected from 87 responses; representing 93 counties. The data were then compared with available
research data and intensively reviewed by a panel of field agronomists, soil scientists and researchers familiar
with the soils, crops and climatic conditions in each region. In reviewing the data, the following assumptions
were made:
1. Realistic Yield Expectations should be based on the average of the 'best 3 years in a 5 year period which
could be achieved with a high level of management (top 20% of growers)
2. For soils that may be mapped in multiple regions or in slightly different landscapes (for example, flood
plains or*stream terraces), the Realistic Yields, are based on the most common prevailing conditions for
that soil rather than the most ideal site for agricultural production.
3. For soils that are Somewhat Poorly, Poorly, or Very Poorly Drained, effective, artificial drainage MUST be
in place to achieve the yields shown in the RYE tables.
4. For tobacco production in the Piedmont physiographic, irrigation was assumed to be available, whereas
no irrigation was assumed in the Coastal Plain physiographic region. This is in accordance with numerous
surveys which show less than 15%-20% of tobacco in the Coastal Plain is irrigated, while 70 to 80% of
tobacco in the Piedmont receives some irrigation
Citation:' North Carolina Nutrient Management Workgroup. 2003. Realistic yields and nitrogen application
factors for North Carolina crops. http://nutrients. soil.ncsu.edu/yields/ North Carolina State University, North
Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Raleigh NC.
To access the database, select a county and at least one crop. Multiple crops may be selected by holding the
Ctrl key when selecting crops. A report will be generated showing a summary of currently available data for
the county'you selected.
Select Your County Robeson �MML SOV)S: W& oft 8
•1 .. M... •. •- - .•- :fir,:
Select Your Soil Jo: Johns sandy loam
JT: Johnston soils
KaA: Kalmia loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
0? Use Representative Slope Typical of the Soil Mapuhit
Correct for Slope _
0 Use my slope 0
Submit Reset .
Realistic- Yields for GoA: Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent
slopes in Robeson County
Realistic
Nitrogen
Estimated Phosphorus
Nitrogen
Rate
Removal
Crop
Yield
Factor
(Ibs/acre)
(Ibs P205/acre)
Barley (Grain)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................:...........
88 Bushels
' 1.51
133
33
Corn (Grain)
130
1.14
148
57
................................................... .................... ................................ ......
Bushels
:................
...........................
Corn (Silage)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
..............................................................
24 Tons
.......... ........................ ............
11.1 _........%..................................:...............,............................................................................................
............ ........... ..
266
............................... ................................ ......................... ......... .
82

C.OLLOn
IjZ
U.UMy
bZ
L/
..........................................................................................................................................................................
Pounds
Sorghum (Silage)
................................................................................................................................:.................................................................
20.4 Tons ....................................................................................................................:............................................................................
7.8
159
.......................................
61
Oats (Grain)
110
1.17
129
- 28-
.................................. :...................................................................................................................
Bushels
Peanuts
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................
4000
0
0
:............................
22
......................................................................................................................................................................................................_...............
Pounds
Rye (Grain)
..............................................................................................................................................................
65 Bushels .................................................................................................................................................................................................
.
2.09
136
21
Small Grain (Silage)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................,.................................._......................................................................................................
10.5 Tons
11.4
120
57
Sorghum (Grain)'
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
65 CWT
1.78
116
.......................................................
49
Soybeans (Double'Cropped)
38 Bushels
_.................
........:.......................................:.......................................................................................................:....
0
0
30
Soybeans (Full Season)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................:.......................................................:.�
.................:...............................................................................................................................................................................
45 Bushels
0
0
36
Soybeans (Double Cropped -.Manured)
...........................................................................................................................:....................................:..................................................................................:................................:................................................................................:.........:.......................
38 Bushels
3.91
149
30
Soybeans (Full Season - Manured)
..............................................................................................................................................................................._..............................:.................................................................
45 Bushels
3.91
176
36
Tobacco (Burley)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................::.........................................._....................................:.............................,..:........................
1 0 Pounds
0.06
0
p
Tobacco (Flue Cured)
3400
0.029
99
17
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Pounds
Triticale (Grain)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................:............................................................................................................................................:.....................................:..........................
91 Bushels
1.53
139
30
Tropical Corn (Silage) .....................................................................................................................................................................................I......................
24 Tons
6.7
161
82
Wheat (Grain)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................:.........................................................................................................................................................
65 Bushels
2.09
136
...................................................................
33
.Bahiagrass (Hay) ...........................................................:..............................................................:
4.9 Tons'
46
...........................................................................................
225
56
Caucasion/Old' World Bluestein (Hay)
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
5.2 Tons
46
.................................................................:...............................
239
62'
Common Bermudagrass (:Hay)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._...........................:.......:........................................................:...
4.9 Tons .
46
-225
59
Dallisgrass, (Hay)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................:..........:................................................................:................................................................................................................
4.9 Tons
46
225
64
(Hay)
4 Tons
46
184
63
.....................................................................................:............,.
,..F.e.s.c..u..e
Hybrid Bermudagrass,(Hay)
6.5 Tons
46
.'
299 .
80
Hybrid Bermudagrass overseeded with
8.2 Tons
46
....................................................................................................................................:.
377
112
Rescuegrass (Hay)
:...............................................................................................................:..............:..............................................................................................::..................................................:.................................................................
Mixed Cool Season Grass (Hay)
...............................................................................................................................................................::.................................................................................................................I...............
.2.8 Tons .
46
129
1 40
Orchardgrass (Hay)
...............................................................................................................................................................................
2.8 Tons
.
46
_........................................................................:.......................
129
41
Pearl Millet (Hay)
............................... ................. ..........................................................................................................................
5.5 Tons
......................................
51
........................
281
73
Rescueg,rass(Hay) .
............................................ _................................................................................................................
4 Tons
............................................................
..........:.................................................................
46
..........................................
184
:.......... :...........................
45
Sorghum Sudan (Hay)
......................................................... ....................... ........................................................................................................................................
- 6.2 Tons
....................................................................................................
51
316
.........................................................................
. 86
Timothy Grass (Hay).
.......................... ................................................................................................. .....................................................
0 Tons
......................... :
................... ..........................................................................................
46
................................................................................................................
0
...........................:::.....................................
0
Annual Ryegrass (Hay)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................:....................................................................................................................................................................
O'Tons
0
.....:........................................................
0
.............
0
Annual Ryegrass (Pasture)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________..............................._..................................
0 Tons
0
0
Bahiagrass (Pasture)
.......................... ........................................................................ ...........................................................
49 Tons
............. ........................................
34
167
:
Caucasion/Old World Bluestem (Pasture)
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................:.:.:................................................................................
5.2 Tons
......................................................................................................................
34
177
Annual Rye Overseed 'Hay -April 7 Harvest
0 Tons
0
...................................
0
(Hay)
Annual Rye Overseed, Grazed, - April 7
0 Tons
0
Harvest (Hay)
.......................................................................................................................................................:.....................................................................
Common Bermudagrass (Pasture) -
.....................................................................................................................................................I
4.9 Tons
34
Dallisgrass (Pasture)
..................................... ............................. .................. .......................................... ..................
_.............................................................
4.9 Tons
34
...............................................................................
Fescue'(Pasture)
....................................................... ................... :..................................... .....................
4 Tons
34
.......................................................................................
Hybrid Bermudagrass overseeded with
8.2 Tons
46
Rescuegrass (Pasture)
..........................................................................................................................................................:.................:...............................................
Hybrid Bermudagrass (Pasture) '
..............................................................................................................................................................
. 6..5 Tons
34
Mixed Cool Season Grass (Pasture)
..................................................... :.................................... .................... .............................................................................................................
.:..............................................................
2.8 Tons .
34
Orchardgrass (Pasture)
...................:...........................:..........................................................................................._.._.........................................................................
2.8 Tons
.
34
If
............................................................
167
................................
167
...........................................................
136
.......................... .................
............................... ..........
............................ I................... _....
95
.................... ..................
95
0
5
6
0'
L
6
6
6'
11

KC-scuegrass �F'asuure).
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
4 1onS
-14
1.5b
Small Grain Cover (Hay)
.......... ............................ ................... ........................ ..................................... ...........................................................
0 Tons
0
0
` Small Grain Overseed (Hay)
..............................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................
0 Tons
........................................................................................................................................
...............................
0
:............................
0
Sorghum Sudan (Pasture)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
. 6.2 Tons
38
.
236
Switchgrass (Hay)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
0 Tons -
46
0 -
Switchgrass (Pasture)
..............................................................................................................................................................
0 Tons
............................................................................
34
0
Timothy Grass (Pasture)
.............................................................................................................................................................
0 Tons
__...........................,...........................................................................................................
............................................................
34
..
0
Other Crop
...................................................................................................................................:..................................................................................
0
0
0
Other Pasture
.............................................................................................................................................................._......................................._...............................................:..............................................._.
0
............................................................................
45.6
... ..
0
— — - — - - — — — ..r�waft�

r
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION_
APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST FORM . RECEIVED
Date: August 24, 2009
AUG 2 5 2
To: ❑ Landon Davidson,_ARO-APS ❑ David May, W l ?Al1§MIALLEREGITALOFHGE
Art Barnhardt,_ERO_-APS_J1 ❑' Charlie Stehman, WiRO-APS
❑ Andrew Pitner, MRO-APS ❑ Sherri Knight, WSRO-APS
❑ Jay Zimmerman, RRO-APS
From: Nathaniel Thornburg , Land Application Unit
Telephone: [phone] Faz: [phone]
E Mail: nathaniel.thomburg(a,nemail.net
A. Permit Number: WQ0004893
B. Owner: Campbell Soup Supply Company
C. Facility/Operation: Campbell Soup Supply Company Residuals Program
❑ Proposed ® Existing ®,Facility ❑ Operation
D. Application:
1. Permit Type: _ ❑ Animal ❑ Surface Irrigation ❑ Reuse ❑ H-R Infiltration
❑ Recycle ❑ I/E Lagoon ' ❑ GW Remediation (ND)
❑ UIC - (5A7) open loop geothermal
For Residuals: ❑ Land App. ❑ D&M ❑ Surface Disposal
❑ 503 ® 503 Exempt ❑ Animal
2. Project Type: ❑ New ® Major Mod. ❑ Minor Mod. ❑ Renewal ❑ Renewal w/-Mod.
E. Comments/Other Information: ❑ I would like to accompany you on a site visit. .. '
Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above -referenced application for your
review; comment, and/or action. Within calendar days, please take the following actions:
® Return a Completed APSARR Form.
❑ Attach Well Construction Data Sheet.
❑ Attach Attachment B for Certification by the LAPCU.
❑ Issue an Attachment B Certification from the RO.*
* Remember that you will be responsible for coordinating site visits and reviews, as well as additional
information requests with other RO-APS representatives in order.to prepare a complete Attachment B, for
certification. Refer to the RPP SOP for additional detail.
When you receive this request form, please write your name -and dates in the spaces below, make a copy
of this sheet, and return it to the appropriate Central Office -Aquifer Protection Section contact person
listed above.
RO-APS Reviewer: J//�.�1 Date: g 4z- 6,169
FORM: APSARR 07/06 Page 1 of 1