20061874 Ver 1_401 Application_20061206

i 1cw's
Carolina Wetiand Services
December 4, 2006
550 E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD.
CHARLOTTE, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (v)
704-527-1133 (fax)
20061874
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250 r,, r
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 3
and Water Quality Certification No. 3494
1932 Lakedell Drive Maintenance Project
Charlotte, North Carolina
Carolina Wetland Services Project No. 2006-1721

The 1932 Lakedell Drive Maintenance Project is located in Charlotte, North Carolina approximately
'/2 mile southeast of The Plaza - Lakedell Drive intersection (Figure 1, enclosed). The purpose of this
project is to tailditch an existing channel in order to remove accumulated sediments, prevent buildup
of silt, and eliminate flooding issues within a residential area. Charlotte Storm Water Services
(CSWS) has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide Section 404/401 permitting
services for this project.
Applicant Name: Charlotte Storm Water Services, Isaac J. Hinson
Mailing Address: 600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
Phone Number of Owner/Applicant: 704-336-4495
Street Address of Project: 1932 Lakedell Drive, Charlotte, NC
Waterway: UT to Briar Creek Is D
Basin: Catawba River (HU# 03050103) DEC 5 2006
City: Charlotte D .
County: Mecklenburg 1' VLT 4 AAD WATER QU.
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: N35.24632, W80.76289 '?TERBRgN
USGS Quadrangle Name: Charlotte East, North Carolina, 1991
Current Land Use
The current land use for the project area is residential with maintained lawns and adjacent wooded
areas. Dominant vegetation within the project area consists of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense),
poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), red maple (Acer rubrum), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica),
sweetgum (Liquidambar styracaflua), cottonwood (Populus deltoides), green catbriar
(Smilax rotundifolia), fescue (Festuca sp.), and various sedges (Carex spp.). According to the Soil
Survey of Mecklenburg County', on-site soils consist of Helena sandy loam (HeB) and Monacan soils.
Helena and Monacan soils are listed by the NRCS as having potential inclusions of hydric soils for
Mecklenburg Countyz. Helena soils are moderately well-drained and exhibit slow permeability, while
Monacan soils are somewhat poorly drained and exhibit moderate permeability.
1 United States Department of Agriculture, 1980. Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
2 NRCS Hydric Soils of North Carolina, December 15, 1995.
CHARLOTTE • COLUMBIA • RALEIGH
WWW.CWS-INC.NET
December 4, 2006
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Page 2 of 4
Jurisdictional Determination
On November 28, 2006 CWS's Gregg Antemann, PWS and Matt Jenkins, WPIT investigated on-site
jurisdictional waters of the U.S. using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) - Routine On-Site
Determination Method. This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual.3 There were no jurisdictional wetland areas within the project limits. A Routine On-Site Data
Form representative of non jurisdictional upland areas has been enclosed (DPI). Jurisdictional waters of
the U.S. were classified according to recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)4 and
USACE guidance. NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms and USACE Stream Quality Assessment
Worksheets for Stream A are enclosed (SCPI- SCP2).
The results of the on-site field investigation indicate that there is one jurisdictional stream channel
(Stream A) located within the project area (Figure 1, enclosed). Stream A is an unnamed tributary to
Briar Creek and is within the Catawba River basin (HU# 03050103)5. Briar Creek is classified as "Class
C" by the NCDWQ.
Stream A was evaluated to be perennial and flows south across the project area from under Lakedell
Drive until its off-site confluence with Briar Creek (Figure 1, enclosed). The upper portion of Stream
A exhibited a strong continuous bed and bank, persistent flow, and substrate consisting of silt to
coarse sand. Biological sampling within this portion of Stream A resulted in a weak presence of
crayfish and benthic macroinvertebrates (SCPI, enclosed). The upper portion of Perennial Stream A
scored 25.5 out of a possible 71 points on the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form and 32 out of a
possible 100 points on the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet.
Immediately downstream of Lakedell Drive, approximately 120 linear feet of Perennial Stream A is a
concrete-lined channel. Downstream of the concrete-lined portion, Stream A exhibited a weak
continuous bed and bank, sheet flow, strong braiding, and average ordinary high water widths of 3 toy
feet (SCP2, enclosed). The lower portion of Perennial Stream A scored 25 out of a possible 71 points
on the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form and 41 out of a possible 100 points on the USACE
Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet. Photographs of Perennial Stream A are enclosed as
Photographs A - D.
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on November 28, 2006 to
determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that
would be affected by the project. As of the date of this submittal, a response from SHPO has not yet
been received. This project is located in a residential area dominated by homes built between 1959
and 1981. The occurrence of any area of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance is
unlikely.
Protected Species
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) on November 28,
2006 to determine the presence of any federally-listed, candidate endangered, threatened species or
critical habitat located within the project area. As of the date of this submittal, a response from the
NCNHP has not yet been received. The project area is dominated by single family homes with
3 Environmental Laboratory. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways
Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
4 North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1999. Stream Classification Method. Version 3.1.
5 "HU#" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. U.S. Geological Survey, 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina.
December 4, 2006
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Page 3 of 4
maintained lawns. The occurrence of any federally-listed, candidate endangered, threatened species
or critical habitat is unlikely.
Purpose and Need for the Project
The grade of the existing channel downstream of 1932 Lakedell Drive is preventing sufficient
stormwater flow and is resulting in the buildup of silt within the concrete-lined portion of the channel
and road flooding issues across Lakedell Drive. The purpose of this project is to remove sediment
from the concrete-lined portion of Stream A and tailditch the downstream portion of the channel to
create a positive drainage pattern toward Briar Creek. These activities are also intended to prevent
future accumulation of silt within the paved portion of the channel and eliminate flooding issues.
Avoidance and Minimization
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
practicable. All work will be completed within 200 linear feet of the existing concrete-lined channel.
No activities will be performed on the receiving channel (Briar Creek) and no hard stabilization will
be installed as a result of these activities. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used
to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Temporary erosion control matting and grass will be
installed on the newly graded stream banks.
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
Unavoidable impacts to Perennial Stream A total approximately 190 linear feet. These impacts are the
result of approximately 190 linear feet of tailditching of the downstream portion of Stream A
(Figure 2, enclosed). Excavation will be performed immediately downstream of the concrete-lined
portion of the channel and will tie into the existing sheet flow conditions of the braided portion of the
channel before entering Briar Creek. The newly excavated channel will maintain a four foot bottom and
banks will be reshaped to a 3:1 slope (Figures 3a and 3b, enclosed). On behalf of CSWS, CWS is
submitting a Pre-Construction Notification Application with attachments in accordance with Nationwide
Permit General Condition No. 13, and pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 3 and Water Quality
Certification No. 3494 (enclosed).
Compensatory Mitigation
Construction of this project will limit the amount of tailditching to the minimum amount necessary to
establish a sufficient longitudinal gradient to promote positive flow and discourage silt accumulation
in the vicinity of the existing pipe and concrete-lined channel. Since the newly excavated channel will
be stabilized with soft and temporary stabilization measures (i.e., C-125 erosion control matting), no
mitigation is currently being proposed for this project.
December 4, 2006
Mr. Steve Chapin
Page 4 of 4
Please do not hesitate to contact Isaac Hinson at 704-336-4495 or [e-mail] should
you have any questions or comments regarding these findings.
Isaac J. Hinson
Wetland Specialist
Gregg C. An e ann, PWS
Principal Biologist
Enclosures: USGS 7.5' Charlotte East, NC Topographic Quadrangle
NRCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
Figure 1. Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map
Figure 2. Proposed Impacts
Figures 3a - 3b. Proposed Channel Cross Section and Profile
Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 3
Request for Jurisdictional Determination Form
NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms (SCP1- SCP2)
USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (SCP 1 - SCP2)
USACE Routine Wetland Determination Data Form (DPI)
Representative Photographs (A - D)
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly, North Carolina Division of Water Quality
File
Z:\2006\Projects\2006-1721 1932 Lakedell Drive Maintenance Project\Permitting\NWP3 report.doc
1932 Lakedell Drive Maintenance Project
Nationwide Permit No 3 Project No. 2006-1721
hers
CeD2' / P Gp? UC H UB
32 MO CeB2 HeB f
. / 4e
/ EnS
CUB EnB
? HUB o? Hi-...
-nB
-?... , :.
S Ur /
G/ it HUB Ce82
d?
CUB. m CuB HeB 4 UO
v HeB
Ik8 c J CUB APB Ur CUB. Ce
... ..
He8 Cub CUB
WuD CUB m - CUB
U CUB CeB2
Ce82 CuB. CeB2 Ur Ur 1
Va8 MO
L CeB2 (; cHeB 1 He8
G? CUB Ur
En6 I HeB
Ur.., ?- -- - -
CUB
CUB
CuB.MO
-e8 C
HeB Cub /a HeB 2
a eB
r ;\ Gyp ? e82 He8 "CUB
HuB. ; 4 ,r y'Ce82 water ti
c?B a " m
'? CuB a 'H e'± I tlr Cu CUB Z BY, I cc
M0 HuB r ?? y a.3 ??
cUB
C The Plaza.
HuB ur _ CUB M ~ `
Ur CUB c ?S Hu
`s .MO He
uB, CUB CUB
Ur 11°6EBB ? Ur CUD ? HeE
t S Ce82 vv
Cub MS n
SITE .CuB
CeB2
MkB CUB ( yP CeB2 ti HUB
i ?e0
CeD2
Q°
CU
CU
Ur HUB Ur i \ CUB M
<r
Hub MO
Ur CUD' S CeB2 h HUB CUB
CUB
CUB HUB s°?rNE
/-? CUD
Ur HUB
S S ?` {ms
CUB
d• EnB
S
CeD2 GeOti ?' MO
CUD CeB2 CUD paE '
CeB2
CUD I L ? ?\ C
Ur CeB2
CeB2 CUB r0O
u' C¢B2 '?...
O
Soil Survey Courtesy of the USDA-NRCS
NRCS Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, Sheet Nos. 4 and 7, dated 1980.
Approximate Scale 1" = 2000'
1932 Lakedell Drive Maintenance Project
Image Courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey
7.5 Minute Topographic Map Series, Charlotte East, North Carolina, dated 1991.
Approximate Scale 1" = 2000'
Nationwide Permit No. 3 Project No. 2006-1721
LEGEND
??. JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNEL
. ... CONCRETE-LINED CHANNEL
® PROJECT AREA
• SCP1 STREAM CLASSIFICATION POINT
• DPI DATA POINT
PHOTO LOCATION AND DIRECTION
APPROXIMATE SCALE: I"= 100'
Stream
T SCP1
LAKEDELL DR
Concre e-Lined ortion of Channel
i
SCP2

1\
Carolina Wetland Services
WS 550 East Westinghouse Blvd.
C
C?., .., ,., s.., .
/ Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
REFERENCE: GIS LAYERS PROVIDED BY MECKLENBURG COUNTY LAND USE AND
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DATED 2002.
Figure 1. Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary
Field Map
1932 Lakedell Drive Maintenance Project
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Pro•ect No. 2006-1721
PREPARED BY DAT CHECKED DATE
L /3-
f

'A_ X41

.
i d:.
v ' 194 0

1932
?
j

W
l
d S
i
C
li
et
aro
na
an
erv
ces
550 East Westinghouse Blvd.

\i LG..rni nn lVel antl 6rv;.e.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
\
? REFERENCE: SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY CHARLOTTE STORM WATER SERVICES, DATED
j \ NOVEMBER, 2006.
q Figure 2. Proposed Impacts
; 1932 Lakedell Drive Maintenance Project

j Charlotte, North Carolina
I ?. \ CWS Project No. 2006-1721

I
1
PREPARED B D TE CHECKED DATE
?I 3vrv?

e

i

i
r

Legend
"Q6-0pon Rain Call-,

r A .Prior'-,
11 FYCf y
A
r

v
V

G?
tzl N w
¢
z )
F
Q
i-? ? O
c? o ? O p p
•-?
,? bA
o U
N w
H y a ?°. ?
V N
Q
cd C
r

o a
? ??3
cc U U H

A-
?
a ? M ra
_I
J N
W
U ?
tN
U O q?
W Ca ? t

L

e
41

w
Y i
t I I
LLI

`- V%l

1
?
_
w

c_?

J

^ XJ
UL
v,
t
7
i

a
4

` !
t 0

r
J
i fJ"!

fl Q

u
U m w
oNO w : ?
O
rr ? ? N
i
? ? O ? V p U N o
3z zu3
C? a C Z UQ
W o ?
E
V M "?
A? ? ?VUQ
Y?;. w rr?O\
4 U ? ^ ?
5 U O \\'
I zz
?} V
a

tt3

f

z
? S
AID
Office Use Only:
USACE Action ID No.
Fonn Version April 2001
DIO 0 No. O ?O - I% -1
if any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
L
Jl
processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
Section 404 Permit p ??? ?''JJ D
? Section 10 Pen-nit 2006
? 401 Water Quality Certification DEC
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules V .wA??W
At?D
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Pen-nit Number(s) Requested:
Nationwide Permit No. 3 and Water Oualitv Certification No. 3494
3. if this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. ii payment into the t forth Carolina -?Netlands restoration Program INCWRP j is proposed for
mitigation of impacts {see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
Applicant information
1. Ownen!Applicant Information
Name: Citv of Charlotte Storm Water Services. Contact: Nfr. Isaac J. Hinson
Nfailing Address: 600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte. North Carolina-') 8202
Telephone Number: (7040 336-4495 Fax Number: (704) 336-0'586
E-mail Address: ihinson(TL),ci.charlotte.nc.us
?. Consultant In" rmation (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mallin! Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
'a t 1 of
ill. Project haformatiOn
`dame of pn,)Ject: 1 °=2 Lakedcll L-1 ve lVtaint°nance Prc;iect
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property identification Number (Tax PIN): 099-081-27
4. Location
County: Mecklenburg Nearest Town: Charlotte
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From downtown Charlotte. travel
northeast on S. Trvon Street. After approximately 4.5 miles turn a slight right onto Eastwav
Drive and turn left onto The Plaza. After approximately 1 mile turn right onto Lakedell
Drive.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N35.24632. W80.76289
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
The e?u1stin,4 land use of the project area is residential.
7. Property size (acres): N/A linear project
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river; sound/ocean/lake): Briar Creek
9. River Basin: Catawba River
(Note -this Must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin neap is available at http:L'h2o.enr.state.nc.us; adml'nimaps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The grade of the existii7? channel downstream
of 1932 Lakedell Drive is oreventin,_?, sufficient stormwater flow and is resulting in the
buildur) of silt within the concrete-lined portion of the channel and road flooding issues
across Lakedell Drive. The purpose of this project is to remove sediment from the concrete-
lined portion of Stream A and tailditch the downstream portion of the channel to create a
positive draina(ze pattern toward Briar Creek. These activities are also intended to prevent
future accumulation of silt within the paved portion of the channel and eliminate flooding
issues.
1 1. List the tyre of oauiument to be used to construct the project: A trac{choe and tvpicai
excavation Lc;ui )ment will be used for this project.
l!. Describe the land Llse 1i7 the v"1c;nit-, of this project: Tile land use surro'undln? the i?l'Oiei:t is
maim,:/ residential.
2 of7
iV. P-1-101- P3 oj--cz is.,ter`.'
T he concrete-iined portion of Stream was installed in 199(R by HD R. CS;WS perfornied -Al sediment removal on his portion of the stream and tailditchinwchannel cleanin- downstream of
this structure in 2003.
V. Future Project Plans
There are no future project -plans for this site.
III, Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the Mate
1. Wetland Impacts

Wetland Impact Located within
Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact's Area
Impact I00-
year Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(indicate on map) (,acres) ?"?
Floodplain
lai (linear feet)
(yes
N/A
List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
100-Year tloodplams are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FENIA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FENIA-approved local tloodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httpa/ww???.Fema.??ov.
List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater'saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond..
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of cxilsting wetlands on the property: -I\l/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
?. Stream Impacts, including all inten7littent and perennial streams
Stream Impact Average W1 th Perennial or
Length of
Site Number Type of Impact* Stream ? latne?`- of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on map) 1 Impact Before Impact (please specii,i)
Stream A Tailditching 190 If UT to Briar Creek 3-5' ? Perennial
List each impact separately and identir`/ temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and hooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall. (-,abions, etc.), excavation, ditchinuisiraightening, etc. if stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Stream names can be found on USES topographic maps. if a stream has no name, list as LT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-8800-338-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps www.topozone.com,
wt-w.v.mapquest.com, etc.).
CumulatiV impacts { linear distance in feet) to ail streams on site: 190 linear feet
Oren impacis. Includm(-), Lakes. Ponds. Estuaries. Sounds. Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U1. S. N/A y

13pen 'avater impact .yea of
;?Tame of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* impact
(if applicable) (lake bond, - stuarv pound,
i (indicaie on man) jacres) bav, ocean. etc.;
N/A
i
r List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. impacts include, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
'l. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also; the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stonnwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A
Expected pond surface area: N/A_
ViI, Impnet,Justification (Avoidance and Mimmizatioa><)
h-ripacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximums extent
practicable. All worl- will be completed within 200 linear feet of the existing concrete-lined
channel. No activities will be uerformed on the receiving channel (Briar Creek) and no hard
stabilization will be installed as a result of these activities. Proper sediment and erosion
control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Temporary
erosion control matting and Urass wi11 be installed on the new1v izraded stream banks.
V111. N.litigation
Constnaction of this oroiect will 11mit the amount of tailditchin<z to the minimum amount
necessary to establish a sufficient loni,-itudinal _),Tadient to promote j)ositive flow and
discourage slit accumulation in the vicinity of the eustin<-1 tripe and concrete-lined
channel. Since the newly excavated channel will be stabilized with soft and tmporarv
stabilization measures (i.e.. C-125 erosion control matting). no mitigation is currently being
proposed for this oroiect.
Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Prog airy (i i C`Y ? of till the `4C?N RP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the N.,(CVVRI P. Please note that pa ment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
,A7ih be notii?P-d earls,' in the revie`Ar- l-recess b-v the - 14/' I
01 ,A/ titlands Unit 1f 1Ju im nti into the
?e4of,
_ rs/ P iS a, allat le as an opt-ion.
Ur add;tlonal ill ail l .e'?arclina -the ap ii
j 7 z
process .
', 11 ch
Vr <.'e VCAYR , e 1{ the '`Il ! ! Web Site at hrT: tLo. nr.sta[e.nc.us/wro/indeY.hiri. ?i
use of tile =' CWRP is proposed, please cheek the appropriate box on page throe and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): - N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NiA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
EX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/'state/local)
land?
Yes N No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an enviromnental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? ?, To ?
if yes, leas the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
`'es ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and ?N`nlersheti Buffers (D Y%V?Q Only)
it is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibili"ry to determine, delineate and reap all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section v `I abo,,%e. All proposed impacts must be listed therein,
and must be clearl-v identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
neap, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicants discretion.
TNi'l the prc_ject Impact protected rhl-,arlan buffers identified within 15A IN <"=_C 213 .i 233
(Meuse), 15A NC_111C 213 .0259 ('Tar-Pamlico), 15A _(CAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer -Requirements), or other (please identify: )?
Yes ? Io if you answered "yes". provide the followiinformation:
ldentif-,? tile square feet and acreage o f impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. if bufitir
illtigatlCln 1S required calculate the 1 Lured amount of mitigation by applying tile OUTTer
multipliers. N/A

? Zone ? impact
(
(sQUare tees) iI Required
ultiplier '
Miti2atton
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Zone 1 extends out 30 teet perpendicular from near bank of channel, Zone 1 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B.0242 or.0260.
N/A
XL Stormwater (IjWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss storm water controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Sources of nearbv impervious cover include roads, drivewatis. and rooftops. This t)roiect will
not cause an increase in the impervious coverage of the oroiect area.
1 11. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Cleary: detail the ultimat? treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater Venerated from the proposed project, or available capacity ofthe subject facllit7/.
N/A
M11. Violations (DA NQ Only)
is this site in violation of D??! Q Wetland rules ( l 5A °dCAC 21-1 .0500) or any Buffer Rules'
Yes ? No I7<
is this an after-the-fact permit application'.'
"vs ? No I;<
't - 0 u ,
XTV, Other Ct.CU: stanC,-s et o lj:
It is the applicant's responslbilit-y to submit the apphcatlon sufEciently In advance of desired
corstruction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to 'list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
-,work schedules (e. g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Construction is scheduled to be zin immediately following receipt of the apuropriate pen-nits.
r ;1
12/4/06
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
C'a? , o'7
•
-t .t T x<..'.C IC < G_ L L ;ii 1 _T l lei
L'. ?-. Dccembc< . y, 2006
COUNTY l`ilecklent Llr'? L:iL1nt . ?IGrtll 1r0'Lll]L: TOTAL >C_'?i rA'GE O , RAC T N/A linear'Dro, ect
PROJECT N.10/1E (if applicable) 1932 Lakedell Drive Maintenance Project
PROPERTY OW`1ER,'APPLICA-IN- (name, address and phone):
Charlotte Storm Water Services
POC: Ntr. Isaac J. Hinson. at [phone]
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte. North Carolina 28202
NAME OF CONSULTANT, ENGINEER, DEVELOPER (if applicable):
STATUS OF PROJECT (check one):
( ) On-going site work for development purposes
( K) Project in planning stages
(Type of project: maintenance )
{ ) No specific development planned at present
( ) Project already completed
(Type of project:
A_DDI O_N L INFORMATION REQUIRED:
Check items submitted - forward as much information as is available. At a minimum, the foilowin( first two iten.s must be
forwarded. v
(_?) USGS 7.5-Minute Charlotte East, NC Topographic Quadrangle
{?;) NRCS Ni lecldenburg County Soil Survey
) Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field ytap (Figure 1)
;X ) Proposed Impacts (Figure 2)
(X ) Proposed Channel Cross Section and Profile (Figures 3a-3b)
(X) Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 3
(X) NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms (SCP 1 - SCP2)
(a) US"kCE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (SCP 1 - SC112)
(X) Routine On-Site Data Form (DPI)
(X) Representative Photographs (A - D)

ianature of P_cre_c vw:ler or
_?_'Lidicrized Al--it
Vir. Isaac J. Hinson

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 11/23/2006 Project: 1932 Lakedeil Drive Latitude: 1N35,24632
Evaluator:MU & GCA Site: SCP2 Longitude: W80.76239
Tot'al Pints: Other Perennial Strearffi A
Sfream is at least intermittent County:
iia 19 or erenniai if? 3o 25.00 Meel{lel<3burg e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 1105 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank 2.0 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 1.0 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 1.0 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture cr stream substrate sorting 1.0 0 1 2 3
5. Activelrelic floodplain 0.0 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 1.0 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 3.0 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1.0 0 1 2 3
9` Natural levees 0.0 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0.0 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 1.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0.0 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. 0.0 I
No = 0
`{es = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 700
14. Groundwater flevddisclrarge 2.01 0 1 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain. or
Water in channel -- dry or growing season 2.0 0 1
16. Leaflitter 1.0 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.0 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0.5 0 0.5 1 I 1.5 ?
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?1.5 No = 0 Yes = 1.5 l
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6050
200 . Fibrous roots in channel 3.0 3 2 1 0
210'. Rooted plants in channel 3.0 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0.0 0 0.5 1 '1.5
23. Bivalves 0.0 1 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.0 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0.0 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
2r'. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0.0 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus. 0.0 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 t. Wetland plants in streambed 0.00 FAG = O.u; FACW = 0.75: CBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; tither = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants. Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or ,vetlancl plants.
Notes: (use back side or this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
Weak chiron©mids
;'
I

Norih Carolina Civision of Ofa-ter Quality - Stream, identification Fort; Version 3.1
Date: 11%28/2006 rraject: 1932 Lakedell Dr°ivl- Latitude: N35.24532
Evaluator:MLJ GCA Site: SCPI Longitude: W80.76289
Total Points: Other Perennial Stream A
Stream is at least intermittent County:
if> 19 or.aerenniai ff>_ 30 25.50 1? ecklenbilrg e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor hold y (Subtotal = 10.5 1 Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank 3.0 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 1.0 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 1.0 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 1.0 0 1 2 3
5. Activelrelic floodplain 0.0 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 1.0 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0.0 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1.0 0 1 3
9` Natural levees 0.0 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0.0 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 1.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainagetvay 1.0 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
l1SGS or MRCS map or other documented
evidence. 0.0
No = 0
Yes = 3
" Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hvdreloar (Subtotal= 8.0
14. Groundwaterflo\4discharge 2.0 0 I 1 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain. or
Water in channel -- dry or growing season 2.0 0 1 3
16. Leafiitter 1.5 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.0 0 0.5 1 '1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 1.0 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?1.5 No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Bialociv (Subtotal= 7.00
20t'. Fibrous roots in channel 3,0 3 2 1 0
21 t'. Rooted plants in channel 3,0 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0,0 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.0 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0.0 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0.0 0 1 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteriaifungus. 0.0 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 r. Ofetland plants in streambed 0.00 FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75: CEL = 1.5 SAL' = 2.0; Other = 0
!terns 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants. item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Nctes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
Weak chironomids and crayfish
y
SCF1 -;Perennial Stnam A
DWQ #
STREAM i;ALiTY ASSESSMENT N-VOR XHEET
1. Applicant's Name: CSWS
3. Date of Evaluation: 11/28/06
5. Name of Stream: UT to Briar Creek
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 98 acres

2. Evaluator's Name: Matt Jenkins and Gregg Antemann
4. Time of Evaluation: 10:00 am
6. River Basin: Catawba
8. Stream Order:
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 300 If 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): From downtown Charlotte, travel northeast on S. Trvon
Street After approximately 4.5 miles turn a slight right onto Eastwav Drive and turn left onto The Plaza. After approximately 1 mile.
turn right onto Lakedell Drive.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N35.24632 W80.76289
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): maintenance
14. Recent Weather Conditions: no rain within the past 48 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: sunnv 65 decrees
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 1.4 acres
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE. NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 100 % Residential IN Commercial IN Industrial °'o Agricultural
Forested _% Cleared Logged % Other
21. Bankfidl Width: _?-3'
22. Bank Hei?l2ht (from bed to top of bank): 1-3'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to TN) -Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (> 10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain. vegetation, stream classification. etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each
characteristic within the range shown For the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the
worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions. enter 0 in the scoring- box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character
of a stream under review (e.g.. the stream flows from a pasture into a forest). the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more
continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100. with a score of
100 representing a stream ol'the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse)
USACE AID#
32 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature 7- Date
This channel evaluation form,is'Jntended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the compietion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 05103. To Comment, please calf 919-87b-8441 x 26.
T EAM Q-UA I'TY ASSESSMENT WORXSHEET
SC-I'I - Perennial Stream A

1 L'oastal Piedmont ? Mountain
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
1

j

(uo flows or saturation = 0: stron_= flow - max points) 0-5 o-4
t?-S
2
Evidence of past human alteration
(ostensive alteration = 0: no alteration - max points)
Riparian zone 0 0 O s

(no buffer = 0; continuous, wide buffer - max ooints) 0
?4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges

(extensive dischar,-les = 0: no discharges -areas points) 0 - 0-4 0-4 2
.:.1 Groundwater discharge
2 (no discharge 0: springs. . seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0-4 0_4 2
Presence of adjacent floodplain
6 (no flood lain = 0: extensive flood lain ? max points) 0 -4 0-4 d-? 0
Entrenchment / tZoodplain access
(deeply entrenched = 0: frequent flooding, ° max points) 5 1 0 0-2 3

4 Presence of adjacent wetlands
b

(no i-k?etlands = 0: large adjacent wetlands = max Joints) 0 0-4 0-? 0
j Channel sinuosity

1

extensive channetization = 0: natural meander _ max points) -

0-4

-3

1

10 Sediment input
0-?
0 d
0_4
2
i catcnsive de position- 0: Itttle or no sadinaent ° naax points)
'Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
II

(tine, holllosenOf.is lar,_,e. diverse ;rzes - max ooints) NA* 0-4
0-?
1
Evidence of channel incision or widenin-
r (dccpl? Incised - 0: stable bed & brinks =maz point,)
_ Pt esence of major bank failures
severe cro,ion = 0: no erosion stable banks- iris points)
M root depth and density on banks
14 0 -d 0 -? l
(m) ?kible n)ots = O: dense rood throughout '= M'Ix points)
impact by acricuiture or livestock production

-
sUbtit2lnilIIl Impact =(): I]() C`ildellGe = max pOtntsl 0-4 4
Presence of riffle- poolripple-pool eoniplexes
_ inorit[le;riJ lc,oi-pools -0:w ll-de?elolcd n,a..loints)
.* Habitat complexity
1
_
little or no habitat - 0: frequent. varied habitat, - relax points) U-6 U-(, J-6 2
Canopy coNeraue over streambed
(no shadin ??,ctation - 0: continuous cano a? = max points} j
Substrate em bedded ness
N 1'=
l d ! 0 -4
1
(deeply Imbedded = 0: loose structure = max)
Presence of stream invertebrates 1
1
0
U
0
2
(no evidence - 0: common. numerous t? Jes = Inax Joints)
Presence of amphibians
_4
0
.. f no -\ idence - 0: common. numerous ??re", ralax ooints)
Presence of fish

=
(no evidence Common. numcrouB types - rna.x points) 0
Evidence of wildlife Ilse

W evidence = 0: abundant evidence - mas points) 0
Total Points Possible ]00 100 100
I
i
TOTAL SCO (also enter on first page) 32
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
OFFICE USE ONLY: USAGE AID# DWQ
CP2 - Perennial Stream A
1. Applicant's Name: CSWS 2. Evaluator's Name: Hiatt Jenkins and Grew Antemann
3. Date of Evaluation: t 1/28/06 4. Time of Evaluation: 10:00 am
5. Name of Stream: UT to Briar Creek 6. River Basin: Catawba
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 98 acres 8. Stream Order: First
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 300 If 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): From downtown Charlotte. travel northeast on S. Trvon
Street. After approximately 4.5 miles, turn a sliaht right onto Eastwav Drive and turn left onto The Plaza. After approximately I mile.
turn right onto Lakedell Drive.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N3524632. W80.76289
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): maintenance
14. Recent Weather Conditions: no rain within the past 48 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: sunnv 65 decrees
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed -(MV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point'' YE NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 1.4 acres
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 100 % Residential
% Forested
Cleared,,' Logged °i) Other
21. Bankfull Width: 3-5' 22. Bank Neight (from bed to top of bank): 25-1
23. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 20.?o) Gentle (2 to 4910) Moderate (4 to 101/"o) -Steep (-? 101'0)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight -Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander X Very Sinuous Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page ?): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location. terrain. vegetation. stream classification. etc. Every characteristic most be scored using the same ecoregion. Assuan points to each
characteristic within the range shown for the ecore,oion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to revic%v the characteristics identified in the
worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. 11'a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions. onter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious chanacs in the character
of a stream under review (e.g.. the stream tlows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smatler reaches that display more
continuity. and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of
100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):
41
Comments:
Evaluator's Signature ;;" ? r Z -- Date y3 =' "
This channel evaluation form i intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05, 03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 26.
°o Commercial °'o Industrial 4'o Agricultural

tnl? PCT-V-F D , ; 3:
1- A-4 A J"L -1
Coastai Piedmont !Viountam
( Presence of flow ' persistent pools ill stream j

n
o flow or saturation- O: sn on_ 11ow - max points) U 0
-4 t
E )
2
Fvidenee Of past human alteration
(axteilsiveaittratron 0: ?o alteration= max points) 0-6 0 0-5
Riparian zone

(no buffer = 0: ContiUYuous: Wide bUrfer max Dints) 0-6 0-4 0 ,
E,vide11nce of nutrient or chemical discharues
E
nslve discharges= 0: no discharges = maa Dints) U -1 0- 4 2
Groundwater discharge

arge = 0_ s prinas, seeps, wetlands. etc. neat Points) (} 0 t)
U Presence of adjacentfloodplaiu
rte, _ (no flood lain 0: c aensive flood lain - max points) O 0 i 0 _ 2
Entrenchment /floodpfain access _

(deep]) enn-enched = 0: frequent flooding, =rnax points) 0 {) 0-2 4
g Presence of adjacent wetlands

?

no %4etlands 0: lal_e adlac.ent wetlands - - max points) 0 0-4 -
0
Channel sinuosity

(ex-tensive channehzation - 0: natural meander - max oints) 0-d 0-
] O Sediment input
(catensl6e deposition - 1): little ol, no sediment In-,IN onlts)
0
0 d
0-4
2
Size & tan ersitN of channel bed substrate
I
tine. homoaell?rtls = 0 lar?e_ ol? ease ,yes - i 11 pouts ) _
v? idence of channel incision or Ns idening
(deeply incised = t): sable bid ?ti banl.? - max Points)
2
a: Presence of major- bank failures

(Severe fF0,I ? ` O: no I'OSI011 ?t2lhlc banks = max pOn71S) 3
14 Root depth and density on banks

(Ilk) 1sihle roots = I): dense trots thrlui,hout - ill ax Points) 2
i
mra
ct bs
r
ri
?
'
u
o
r
livestocf: production
?
s
ut
ta
ntial
i
m
a
ct --0- no n
c?
o
mpg - idencE?rls points) 0d 0-;

16 ?rusence of riftTc pool?r fipple-fool complexes 1
I'mo ri!'11es'ripr?le? rr j?ools = 0: sell-?le?eloned rnax points) 9 U -? 0 b 2
Habitat compiexit,
(?
i Tittle or no habitat - U: tiequent. ,cried habitats - max points) i) 1
Canopy covera(e oN°erstrcamhed
1
0
0 --
no shadin_ s eectation - 0. continuous Cann ,v -- max Point,',) -
q Substrate emabeddedncss
We°pk imheddtd = 0: loop )e striicnure max)

0 Presence or st-ean 'in, erteorates

:y

(11o c viuencc - 0: common. nun onus t% ,cs = In Ix 201111s ) U I 0-? 0 I
Presence of amphibians
m.. no ev idence ): common, numerous t pes =plat pointsi
?. , Presence of Fish
I
,r (no evident: = 0: COR1rnon. nw-nerous woes - MIX )Dints)
F1 idenec of w ildiife use

(no c videncc o: ;lbundallt . , )dente - Ina", points)
) 0
Total Points Possible 100 100 i IOU l
TOTAL '(SCORE (also eater on first na(e) +1
rmese cnaracierastres are not assessed to coastal streams.

DATA FCR.IVI
ROUT NE WETLAND C)ETERIMINATION
(1887 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
! Prcject/Site: 1932 Lakededi Drive Maintenance Project Date: 11/28/06
Applicant/Owner: Charlotte Storm Water Services County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): Matt Jenkins
WPIT and Gregg Antemann
PPS State: NC
,
,
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DP1
(if needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
1 Toxicodendron radicans Stratum Indicator
vine FAC Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9
2 Populus deltoides tree FAC+ 10
3 Li,trrrstrum sinense shrub FAC 11
4 _1cer;-ubrum tree FAC 12
5 Fraxinrrs penrnwlvanica tree FACW 13
6 Carex spp. herb 14
7 15
8 16
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FAC`/ or FAC
00%
Remarks:
All of the dominant giant sp
ecies are F AC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
X Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
1 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: - (in.) SecondarL Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth io Free'Nater in Pit: N/A (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: <12 (in.) 1 FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
ladaeaflwr5 of wetland >ia ydroicP2y are presem.
U I
Routine on-Site Data Forms ?a"?v 1 t 1/30/2006
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Heiena sandy loans (Hey i Drainage Class wei1-drained i
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Fluva uentfle Eutrochre is Confirm Mapped Type? Ye No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munseil Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12 B f 0YR 313 7.5YR 4/6 many/faint silt loam
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic (Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: i
1
No indicators of hydric soils are present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No No (Circle`
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes Nc
Remarks:
Data point is representative At a non-jurisdictional apiand area.
11-- il
Acoreved dy HQUSACE 2/92
7 +
Routine On-Site Data corms?? Gi - 11/2`;/2006
I a
a

1932 Lakedell Drive Maintenance Project
Nationwide Permit No. 3 Project No. 2006-1721
Photograph B. View of concrete-lined portion of Stream A, facing upstream.
Ix f `
.? * Z ?S r
4 x W
2 k
1 vf'^ i`' t -•'isf r` y5 4 td' t E > f ?''1 !rte c' ?e?_
+ ? ae M,t i - ? .,, "rys?c y 'k .: f ? gY, Z ? 5x- : ' y l~` 1 ? a x , 5
Photograph A. View of Stream A, facing downstream toward Lakedell Drive.
1932 Lakedell Drive Maintenance Project
Nationwide Permit No. 3 Project No. 2006-1721 "COf

?
?
1
y
4 e
f
?
4
g
a
" ?
+'m d # # .
a
?
1,
?. ^E+x
t ?• ? ?
'fi
?

?
r
a v
.
y 3 R„ ?! fi IIµ?:
%
c

?' A ? 'M, k?' ? N"k •; "/k 1 'k a f,y? '° ?k Y. ?? {liil ??'l ? I.a

.

y
.4f
4 ?
0

S."'l?l

.y W k+ i 7.q?fi'w •'SA .?. '..;i +?ahr { _ '4?F y
,. „ vFr.,llf
P'Y'?.;•
. A.
'
? ?
4'?
? ! ?
.r
.2 >!
r' '?^ 1. ?
"\• 1RN? 9
t Y q kl1 i.I ?r?!
Y
F S+Y ; f ? T++^? "1. ,,z ,?,.
h
"
J

tNw+:Ce?5`<"'«rt,,,s.i Uzi . m\,? 1 ::.fi,, R 4? ` .{ ?.i"'' °¦.,
?. .'' C a r 1? 1k v rx .? '? -fr am e
"
•
jjw,
'°?,-Y,!SR\Y ^.r'i
` ,..k .Jr :. '? 'fix =' tC. L °S ?.Y+t Y.F'i "J[?{ t•.?
1

Photograph C. View of Stream A immediately downstream of paved ditch.

,
1 p
i E M ??
c ° \ 1 ! '` i r5+,
{
?
F
'
y
{.
Yl
{Y
S q < ,j t t -1
sew„ +wn ` ? 4 1 -d'
77
,?
6`?k`
^

• JJ
?[
; f
y c 4?;'?? S.iyrn,?wFtrs+7 ! ?. r ?'' "t'd R ;'fi`?rJ.i f
?,? `:: p ?L 4..
y?
,
,
g'
i'4?i"'
!
G{
`S
'
S
?y
Y1
x .aY6V
'1tAir\
4-? yJ 1.7
?
} 1 ba'Y ! i"A '
"k"*'ir' ®.. ' '-% ? N'?i+ +?' it?t``9" ,?.F.+` _ 't ?
.74'" 1
t:5il
r
e
e
a
" I3 h _?•+?.r?ti.,... a .- „/"Y?.1
>d?
?
'? ,,f " s''?" r?"'?+?aJ i.'
,.?,>?.S w. i
ii ..ssiib ?' -r: ??E?R?S????r..?

1r
'v
U
.
I'
'••^?i j; .11?? +'c?"1., 5. _.V
J`
? ^'M"a ?S ?:
W]"
'
<'
?
r?
J
;
a
l"Tls<
'A M?fP. ?.i '+?!
A
Cr r
'
t
r
,
F
'J`
'
?
"? .,$??
,'sk a+
`
t
? °
? '
;f
wit ?'
t r
? ; z
s
-
Photograph D. View of sheet flow and braided portion of Stream A.