20090565 Ver 1_Mitigation Bank Proposal_20090514

) ooq Lo
pu.bG(, rwAi(-e Lq (D s
on `- rn" I ? , 2ovq
BACHELORS DELIGHT
STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION BANK
Onslow County, North Carolina
MITIGATION BANK PROSPECTUS
Sponsor:
Weyerhaeuser Company
Prepared by.
Land Management Group, Inc.
Wilmington, NC
April 24, 2009
BACHELORS DELIGHT STREAM and WETLAND MITIGATION BANK
WHITE OAK RIVER BASIN (CATALOGING UNIT 03030001)
BANK PROSPECTUS
INTRODUCTION
A. Project Overview
The Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank site (approximately 736 acres) consists
predominantly of channelized headwater wetland and stream systems that have been historically altered as
a result of silvicultural and agricultural management practices. The site is located just east of Gum Branch
Road, approximately six miles north of Jacksonville, NC, in Onslow County. The site consists of rolling
terrain and is bisected by three main stream systems (Hewitts Branch, Huffmans Branch, and Bachelors
Delight Swamp). While a majority of the site contains moderately well-drained soils, several areas along
the eastern and western sections contain poorly-drained soils associated with interstream divide landscape
positions. During the early 1970s, a network of drainage ditches was installed throughout these areas to
lower groundwater tables and intercept surface water. Site drainage flows south through the Bachelors
Delight Swamp, a third order tributary of the New River - part of the White Oak River Basin (Cataloging
Unit 03030001) (DWQ Subbasin 03-05-02). Based upon preliminary site investigations, up to 15,900 If of
stream restoration may be available in addition to approximately 5,300 V of enhancement and 11,400 If of
preservation. A total of 66 ac of riparian wetland habitat has also been targeted for restoration. Non-
riparian wetland restoration, located throughout the interstream flats, will comprise approximately 260 ac of
the proposed project area. As a result, the restoration effort will allow for increased stream habitat,
floodwater storage, nutrient retention/sediment reduction, and intact headwater wetland habitat for resident
and migratory fauna.
B. Site Location
The tract is located east of thejunction of Gum Branch Road and Quaker Bridge Road in northern Onslow
County, NC (refer to Figure 1). It is bordered on the northeast by the Hoffman Forest. The site is located
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
approximately 6 miles north of Jacksonville. The attached USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle (Jacksonville
North quad) depicts the location of the site relative to mapped blue-line streams and canals (Figures 2-3).
C. Watershed Characterization
The bank site is located within the White Oak River watershed (DWQ Subbasin 03-05-02). The subbasin
consists of managed forestry tracts, low density residential, and high density commercial developments
along the Gum Branch Road corridor. Population growth within the subbasin is primarily focused in the
areas north of Jacksonville and south of Richlands. Streams and waterbodies within the watershed are
susceptible to impairment from nutrient loading and low ambient dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations.
According to the White Oak River Basinwide Water Quality Plan (NC DWQ 2005), a majority of the
waterbodies within the subbasin are impaired due to nutrient enrichment and periodic fecal coliform
bacteria contamination.
Surface waters within the project area drain south to Bachelors Delight Swamp, a third order tributary of the
New River. The NC DWQ surface water body classification for Bachelors Delight Swamp is C-NSW. "C"
waters are defined as those waters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish consumption,
aquatic life (including propagation), survival and maintenance of biological integrity, and agriculture.
Secondary recreation includes wading, boating, and other uses involving human body contact with water
where such activities take place in an infrequent, unorganized, or incidental manner. Nutrient Sensitive
Waters (NSW) is a supplemental classification intended for waters needing additional nutrient management
due to being subject to excessive growth of microscopic or macroscopic vegetation. Best management
practices (BMPs), including riparian buffer setbacks, are implemented within NSW basins to help offset or
minimize nutrient loading to susceptible waters.
The site formerly consisted of several expansive Mesic Pine Flatwood communities dissected by multiple,
small stream swamp systems in the headwater areas. Non-riverine headwater wetlands (pocosin and
swamp forest), characteristic of the outer Coastal Plain, were likely found throughout the broad interstream
flats in the eastern and western borders of the proposed project area. These type of wetlands support a
number of functions/values including, but not limited to the following: groundwater recharge; floodwater
storage and attenuation; filtration and storage of nutrients, sediments, and/or toxic substances; and
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 2
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
refuge/feeding habitat for resident and migratory fauna. Stream systems work in concert with these
wetlands to attenuate flood velocities, provide aquatic habitat, and elevate the surrounding water table. At
the present time, these functions have been compromised through silvicultural management practices
(ditching, bedding, clear-cutting, etc,). The New River and its tributaries have exhibited significant water
quality impairments associated with low DO, high total nitrogen, and high total phosphorous. High nutrient
concentrations originate from non-point source loading associated with intensive agricultural practices
common throughout the watershed. These impairments tend to be exacerbated by channelization of
streams and ditching of adjacent headwater wetlands, resulting in diminished nutrient uptake and
nutrient/sediment loading to down-gradient waters.
C. Project Purpose and Service Area
The proposed project will serve as a general use stream and wetland mitigation bank serving the White
Oak River Basin (USGS 8-digit hydrologic unit (03030001) (refer to Appendix A). The purpose of the bank
is to compensate for those wetland and stream losses authorized by applicable federal and state regulatory
programs via the restoration of 15,600 If of Coastal Plain stream, 66 ac of riverine wetlands, and 260 ac of
non-riverine wetlands. The following prospectus provides information related to project goals and
objectives, existing site conditions, proposed mitigation activities, site-success criteria, financial
assurances, property dispensation, and annual monitoring. Figure 4 provides additional information on the
specifics hydrologic cataloging units (HUC) that will be serviced by the proposed bank.
II. BASELINE CONDITIONS
A. Community Types
The tract consists of a variety of former wetland habitat types which coincide with the existing gradients in
topography, drainage patterns, and soil types. The primary wetland types targeted for restoration are
Coastal Plain small stream swamp and wet pine flatwoods. Given the steep topographic gradients
throughout the site, restored habitats will likely transition between the small stream swamp and the
surrounding upland terrestrial communities along relatively narrow corridors. The areas targeted for pond
pine woodland/wet pine flatwoods will transition between the surrounding terrestrial communities based
upon the degree of wetness and soil composition. Based upon the Cowardin classification for wetland and
deepwater habitats (Cowardin et al. 1979), the wetland community types to be restored are Palustrine
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 3
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
Scrub-Shrub and Forested Wetlands (i.e., broad-leaved deciduous, needle-leaved deciduous, needle-
leaved evergreen, and broad-leaved evergreen). Based upon the recently developed NC Wetland
Assessment Manual, the targeted community types for the bank site are (1) Pine Savanna and (2) Riverine
Swamp Forest and (3) Pocosin.
B. Vegetation
The predominant land use of the tract and surrounding area is silvicultural (managed pine plantation of
various stand stages). Since the tract has been affected by prescribed drainage improvements for forestry
production, species indicative of drier, upland conditions are more prevalent in areas currently targeted for
riparian restoration and/or enhancement. These species include old field blackberry (Rubus alumnus), dog
fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), broom-sedge (Andropogon
glomeratus), and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). Non-target species such as sweet gum (Liquidambar
styraciflua) and red maple (Acer rubrum) are dominant througout large sections of riparian habitat. More
desirable species such as loblolly bay (Gordonia lasianthus), fetterbush (Lyonia lucida), American holly
(Ilex opaca), red bay (Persea borbonia), and sweet bay (Magnolia virginiana) were observed in isolated
areas. Characteristic hardwoods of the small stream swamp community (e.g. black gum, water tupelo, bald
cypress) are either sparse or absent in the upper stream reaches targeted for restoration. The species
assemblage has clearly shifted in response to long-term site drainage and timber management.
C. Soil Characteristics
The tract is located within a dissected drainage network and includes broad, flat interstream areas along
the perimeter of the project site. Moderately well-drained soils, such as the Goldsboro unit, are found near
the intersections of the existing stream channels. These units transition to the somewhat poorly-drained
Lynchburg series and to the poorly-drained Rains series, situated in the headwater landscape positions of
the existing channels and adjacent to the Hoffman Forest, Bottomland areas associated with the lower
portions of Bachelors Delight Swamp are mapped as Muckalee loam, a poorly-drained unit commonly
associated with active floodplains throughout the Coastal Plain (refer to Figure 5).
D. Hydrology/Hydraulic Characteristics
The tract is located within a watershed that has historically received drainage improvements for the
purposes of increased timber productivity and/or crop yield (Figure 6). These improvements have resulted
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 4
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
in changes to functional watershed size and disrupted natural flow patterns throughout the headwaters of
this area. Installation of these improvements has occurred throughout 156 ac. of cultivated land in the
northeastern portion of the project site. These activities have increased the size of the Bachelors Delight
Swamp drainage area and diverted flow from Huffmans Branch and other tributaries, reducing the
frequency and duration of flooding events.
This change has resulted drained hydric soils (i.e. low-chroma, friable soils exhibiting a relatively high
percentage of uncoated sand grains) are found throughout the areas mapped as the Rains soil series.
Areas mapped as Goldsboro and Lynchburg have been bedded, but lack a significant network of drainage
improvements. These conditions are reflected in the current wetland delineation that received USACOE
approval in October 2007 (refer to Appendix B),
Drainage improvements have also directly impacted streams throughout the lower portions of the
watershed. These impacts have increased the cross-sectional area of the natural stream, limiting
interaction with the surrounding floodplain and increasing flow velocities during peak flow events. In
addition, these activities have removed large woody debris and other in-stream habitat, reducing biological
diversity within the system.
Appendix C documents existing conditions throughout each of the main reaches targeted for restoration.
III. CONCEPTUAL PLAN - STREAM RESTORATION
A. Introduction
Like other small, blackwater streams of the Coastal Plain, Bachelors Delight Swamp and its tributaries are
susceptible to water quality impairment resulting from non-point source discharges of contaminants -
including nitrogen, phosphorous, and a suite of organ ophosphate-based herbicides and pesticides.
Currently, intensive agricultural practices in the headwaters, in addition to concentrated development along
the Gum Branch Road corridor, contribute to decreased water quality of downstream waters. Ditches,
channelized tributaries, and canals drain an approximately ten-square mile area within the watershed.
These surface waters serve as direct conduits for sediment, nutrients, and other pollutants entering both
the Bachelors Delight Swamp and the New River. The channelization of streams contributes to channel
instability and reduced attenuation on-site. This, in turn, results in increased flooding and bank erosion for
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
down-gradient areas. The natural replenishment of fine sediments and nutrients from floodwaters onto the
floodplain wetlands within the site has been virtually eliminated so that sediment accumulation is occurring
along the stream bed and nutrients are being shunted downstream. The physical alteration of the stream
bed adversely affects biological communities through direct mortality, habitat loss, and shifts in species
composition. See Appendix D for additional stream assessment information.
Restoration of a natural, sinuous channel will provide the variety of habitat features necessary to support a
diverse invertebrate and bacterial community. The re-establishment of these communities increases the
uptake of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) within the stream system. As DOC is processed, the microbial
loop is established, forming a key component of the food web (Allan, 1995).
Restoration of the natural channel will also assist in the maintenance of an elevated water table throughout
the adjacent floodplain. Elevation of the water table allows for the reestablishment of hydric soil conditions,
which aid in the transformation and sequestration of pollutants. Construction of an appropriate channel
pattern and profile should also reduce flow velocities, increasing residence time and allowing for overbank
flooding and replenishment of fine sediments and nutrients to floodplain wetlands.
Each of the four stream reaches targeted for restoration exhibit similar geomorphic positions. Thus, it is
anticipated that the identified functions to be restored or enhanced are fairly uniform throughout the project
area. Table 1 provides specific information for each of the four sections of the project.
B. Hewitts Branch (HE-1) - Restoration
The entire upper reach of Hewitts Branch (HE-1) has been targeted for restoration based upon preliminary
data collection. This portion of Hewitts Branch maintains a distinct, natural valley which becomes more
defined to the east of Maready Road and continues to develop downstream. Relief in the lower portion of
the reach exceeds 10' with elevations ranging from +40' MSL to +50' MSL. An estimated watershed size of
130 ac. currently drains to this reach. Conditions along this reach have been altered to improve timber
yields in the surrounding management blocks (Figure 6). Past modifications to the existing channel include
extensive channelization and deepening, which extends from the intersection of the main branch to
Maready Road.
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 6
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
Table 1. Projected Restoration Totals by Stream Reach
Name Restoration Enhancement L2 Preservation
Hewitts Branch
HE-1 2,400
HE-2 1,900
HE-3 500
HE-4 3,000
Huffmans Branch
HU-1 3,200
H U-1 A 1,200
H U-2 1,600
HU-3 2,000
Bachelor's Delight
Swamp
BD-1 (Zero Order) 300
13D-2 (Zero Order) 500
BD-3 1,700
BD-4 1,400
BD-5 1,400
BD-5A (Zero Order) 3,500
BD-58 (Zero Order) 600
BD-5C (Zero Order) 500
BD-6 1,700
BD-7 3,600
Half Moon Creek
HM-1 1,600
TOTAL 15,900 5,300 11,400
CREDITS 15,900 3,533 4,560
TOTAL CREDITS 23,993
The incised nature of this system has also negatively impacted the adjacent floodplain, as the current depth
of the channel intercepts seasonal groundwater flows and has reduced water table depths. This draw-
down of localized water table depths is evidenced by the narrow extent of jurisdictional wetlands remaining
along this reach (See Appendix B for approved wetland survey).
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 7
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
In addition, these activities have disconnected the stream from the surrounding floodplain. As a result,
nutrient delivery during flood events has been dramatically curtailed or eliminated entirely. Channel
maintenance has also removed and/or impeded the development of in-stream habitat which relies on snags
and other woody debris, resulting in a reduction in aquatic function throughout this reach.
Preliminary data suggest that this reach would be classified as a G5 channel, a designation normally
associated with entrenched systems that are experiencing high rates of erosion. Given the extent of
channel alteration, proposed restoration would likely employ a Priority I approach, which would create a
newly constructed channel directly adjacent to the existing channelized feature. The restored channel
would likely be designed as a C5 channel with a higher sinuosity and width-to-depth ratio. An estimated
total of 2,400 If of restoration, extending from the intersection of the main branch to Maready Road, is
proposed for this area (Figure 7).
C. Hewitts Branch (HE-2) - Preservation
The entire upper reach of the Hewitts Branch tributary (HE-2) has been targeted for preservation based
upon preliminary data collection. This area has experienced relatively minor silvicultural impacts, and a
wide, intact wetland community remains as a result. Preliminary data suggest that this reach would be
classified as a DA5 channel. As with most headwater systems, a majority of the flow is directed through a
series of braided channels of varying widths and depths. The gentle, sloping topography ranging from +40'
MSL to +50' MSL supports a broad floodplain canopy comprised of several native hardwood species.
These species include mature water oak (Quercus nigra), swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii), and
American holly.
Significant evidence of in-stream habitat was observed throughout this tributary (See Appendix D). Large
natural snags and other woody debris provide substrate and refuge habitat for invertebrate and amphibian
populations. In addition, sufficient canopy coverage also exists to regulate stream temperatures during
summer months. Channel incision and erosion were absent throughout a majority of the area due to the
presence of surrounding wetlands. These wetlands also serve to supplement flow during drought
conditions.
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
Approximately 1,900 If of braided channel have been proposed for preservation in this reach. The adjacent
riparian wetlands have also been targeted for preservation based upon the native hardwood assemblage
composition and lack of silvicultural disturbance.
D. Hewitts Branch (HE-3) - Enhancement
The lower reach of Hewitts Branch tributary (HE-3) has been targeted for enhancement based upon
preliminary data collection. This section, located south of Maready Road, includes approximately 500 If of
stream that has been historically impacted by road construction and silvicultural management practices.
Areas directly adjacent to the road bed have been channelized and culverted to control runoff and drainage
in the vicinity of the constructed road. The existing culvert has not been maintained and flows are currently
restricted due to sediment deposition on the upstream and downstream sides. As a result, natural flow is
impeded.
In the section directly south of Maready Road, channelization has disconnected the stream from the
adjacent floodplain. In addition to this disturbance, a large ditch along the western edge of the floodplain
was also observed during field investigations. Spoil piles from the excavation of the stream currently serve
as an artificial boundary to the existing wetlands and divert flow towards HE-1. The invert of this feature is
also set below the ground surface of the surrounding wetlands, potentially lowering water tables within this
section. Overall, management activities have reduced the aquatic functions within this reach via the
alteration of storm-driven hydraulics and removal of in-stream habitat. In addition, reduced connectivity of
the wetland floodplain likely results in decreased nutrient/pollutant retention.
Based upon the observed conditions, 500 If of Level II Enhancement is proposed for this section.
Enhancement of aquatic function will be achieved through the restoration of seasonal variation in flow
dynamics through the installation of a properly sized culvert. The restoration of a natural flooding regime
(amplitude, timing, etc.) will assist in the transition towards a wetter assemblage of flora and fauna and
enhance the microtopographic variations already present within the floodplain. The adjacent ditch will also
be filled and restored to the existing grade, which will enhance the retention of sediment and nutrients
within the floodplain. These activities will also generate additional stream flows during drought conditions
due to the enhancement of wetland hydrology throughout the floodplain.
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 9
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
E. Hewitts Branch (HE-4) - Preservation
The remaining length of Hewitts Branch, south of the intersection of HE-1, has been targeted for
preservation. The section includes approximately 3,500 If of a high quality second order stream that has
experienced minimal impact from the surrounding silvicultural management activities. Preliminary data
suggest that this reach would be classified as a C5 channel. A distinct valley is present throughout the
lower reaches of the branch with elevations ranging from +30' MSL to +45' MSL. The floodplain is
comprised of a natural assemblage of native hardwoods such as black gum, swamp chestnut oak, and
water oak. Approximately 400' of intact floodplain are present throughout this area.
Numerous examples of in-stream habitat such as overhanging root mats, snags, and natural pools were
observed, likely supporting a diverse assemblage of invertebrates and amphibians. Conversely, little
evidence of erosion or channelization Was observed during on-site investigations. Channel dimension,
plan, and profile were also consistent with the size of the drainage basin, suggesting that this reach has
remained stable throughout the alteration of the upstream landscape.
F. Huffmans Branch (HU-1) - Restoration
The entire western reach of Huffmans Branch (HU-1) has been targeted for restoration based upon
preliminary data collection. Conditions along this reach have been altered through historic clear-cuts and
placement of spoil material within the floodplain (Figure 6). Modifications to the upstream portions of the
channel include extensive channelization and deepening which extends from the property boundary to
approximately 500' north of Maready Road. The 500' section directly north of the road has been altered
due to the improper installation of a culvert, effectively blocking stream flows from the upstream section.
This section of Huffmans Branch maintains a distinct, natural valley which becomes more defined to the
north of Maready Road and continues to develop downstream. Relief in the lower portion of the reach
exceeds 10' with elevations ranging from +38' MSL to +48' MSL. Due to ditching along the northern
property line, natural drainage to this system has been significantly reduced. Following project
construction, an estimated watershed size of 130 acres will drain to HU-1.
In addition, management activities in the upper portions of the reach have disconnected the stream from
the surrounding floodplain. Disturbance due to stockpiling of spoil material was also observed in the lower
reaches. As a result of these impediments, potential nutrient delivery during flood events could be curtailed
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 10
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
or eliminated entirely. Channel maintenance has also removed and/or impeded the development of in-
stream habitat, which relies on snags and other woody debris, resulting in a reduction in aquatic function
throughout this reach.
Preliminary data suggest that this reach would be classified as a G5 channel, a designation normally
associated with entrenched systems that are experiencing high rates of erosion. Given the extent of
channel alteration, proposed restoration would likely employ a Priority I approach, which would create a
newly constructed channel directly adjacent to the existing channelized feature. The restored channel
would likely be designed as a D5/C5 channel with a higher sinuosity and width-to-depth ratio. An estimated
total of 3,200 If of restoration is proposed for this area, extending from the northern property boundary to
the intersection with HU-2 approximately 400' south of Maready Road.
G. Huffmans Branch (HU•1A) - Preservation
Approximately 1,200 If of small, first order stream have been targeted for preservation. This section is
located to the north of HU-1. The canopy is comprised of a natural assemblage of native hardwoods such
as black gum, red bay, and wax myrtle (Morella cedfera), although observed diameters suggest that
logging has occurred within the floodplain in the past 10 to 20 years. However, conditions within the
existing channel were stable, and ample in-stream habitat was observed throughout the reach. These
conditions will likely persist as the surrounding wetland habitat will be preserved as part of the bank site.
H. Huffmans Branch (HU•2) - Restoration
The entire eastern reach of Huffmans Branch (HU-2) has been targeted for restoration based upon
preliminary data collection. Conditions in this reach are similar to those observed throughout HU-1, as
extensive clear-cutting and channel disturbance was observed throughout the 1,100 If section. Interruption
of the natural flow regime was also evident near Maready Road due to the lack of a functional culvert.
Natural flow to this reach has also been impacted by ditching along the property line, resulting in a
significant reduction in flow during large rain events. However, the 75 ac. watershed is smaller than HU-1.
As a result, restoration of a braided headwater stream system will likely be utilized for this section of the
project. Given the extent of channel alteration, construction will likely employ a Priority 1 approach, which
will establish multiple small channels adjacent to the existing channelized section. Spoil material generated
from these activities will be used to backfill the existing channel to the elevation of the restored floodplain.
The restored channel would likely be designed as a D5 channel with a low sinuosity and high width-to-
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 11
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
depth ratio. Channel design will likely transition to a C5 near the intersection with HU-1, due to the
increase in watershed size and valley development. Approximately 1,600 If of channel restoration is
proposed for this section.
1. Huffmans Branch (HU-3) - Enhancement 11
The lower reach of Huffmans Branch tributary (HU-3) has been targeted for enhancement based upon
preliminary data collection. This section, located south of Maready Road, includes approximately 2,000 If
of stream that has been disturbed by road construction and silvicultural management practices. Due to the
flow restrictions present along Maready Road, this section drains only a small percentage of its natural
watershed. As a result, sections of the channel now resemble braided systems normally associated with
headwater wetland areas. Extensive evidence of historic logging within the floodplain was also observed
throughout the reach, as indicated by the presence of a non-target vegetative assemblage dominated by
sweet gum and red maple saplings and trees ranging in age from 10 to 20 years.
A majority of the stream channel within this section is stable and will not require any earth work. The
projected enhancement of aquatic function will be realized as a result of the increased flooding frequency
and duration generated from the reestablished connection to the upstream watershed. Plantings within the
adjacent riparian zone will also be initiated to restore the appropriate small stream swamp community. As
a result, in-stream fauna will benefit from an increase in pH, oxygen, and habitat diversity as the system
readjusts to the natural flooding regime of a first-order Coastal Plain stream. Revegetation within the
floodplain will also provide additional shading for the stream channel and refuge habitat for larger fauna.
J. Bachelors Delight Swamp (BD-1/BD-2) - Zero-Order Restoration
The headwaters of an unnamed tributary of Bachelors Delight Swamp (BD-1/BD-2) have been targeted for
restoration based upon preliminary data collection (Figure 7). Conditions in this reach are similar to those
observed throughout HU-1, as extensive clear-cutting and channel disturbance was observed throughout
the 800 If section. Similar conditions were also observed near the intersection of Maready Road due to
improper installation of a culvert under the road.
No culverted connection was observed between BD-1 and the lower section of the tributary. As a result,
extensive ponding was observed along the northern side of Maready Road. Mounding of spoil material was
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 12
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
also observed between the silvicultural management areas and the existing wetlands. Combined with the
impact of historic clear-cutting, aquatic function has likely been compromised throughout this section of the
reach.
Restoration activities within this section will involve the removal of spoil material and contouring of
remaining side slopes to reconnect the floodplain to the natural drainageway. A properly-sized culvert will
also be installed underneath Maready Road to allow for downstream drainage to occur. A zero order
approach will be used throughout this section due to its landscape position and small watershed. A total of
300 If of restoration is proposed, corresponding to the existing length of the valley.
An improperly installed culvert currently impedes the drainageway associated with 13D-2. However, it is
possible that infilling due to erosion from the adjacent road has also negatively impacted flow.
Approximately 500 If of ditching was observed on the north side of Maready Road. Ditch depths range from
2-3' in depth and have likely altered the hydrology of the surrounding floodplain. Aquatic function has also
been compromised as evidenced by the lack of in-stream habitat and floodplain connection.
Restoration activities within this section will likely involve backfilling of the existing ditch and construction of
a braided channel system within the remaining valley. Extensive hardwood plantings will be installed
throughout the floodplain and in areas disturbed by the restoration efforts. Composition of the planting will
be designed to restore the characteristic small stream swamp/headwater wetland system that (existed prior
to the initiation of silvicultural management activities.
K. Bachelors Delight Swamp (BD-3) - Preservation
The section directly downstream of BD-112 has been targeted for preservation. Located on the south side
of Maready Road, this section includes approximately 1,700 If of high quality first order stream that
maintains a relatively stable channel and associated floodplain. Approximately 150' of intact floodplain are
present throughout this area with a well-defined valley that ranges from +32' to +46' MSL. The floodplain is
comprised of a natural assemblage of native hardwoods such as black gum, red bay, and water oak.
Preliminary data suggest that this reach would be classified as a D5/C5 channel.
Numerous examples of in-stream habitat such as overhanging root mats, snags, and natural pools were
observed in the 13D-3 area. In addition, microtopography and ponding throughout the floodplain was also
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 13
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
observed. These conditions tend to support a more diverse assemblage of invertebrates and amphibians.
Conversely, little evidence of erosion or channelization was observed during on-site investigations with the
exception of areas directly adjacent to Maready Road. In addition, it is anticipated that the existing
functions of the system will be enhanced due to the upstream restoration activities proposed for BD-112.
L. Bachelors Delight Swamp (BD-4) - Restoration
The entire western reach of Bachelors Delight Swamp (BD-4), approximately 1,400 If, has been targeted for
restoration based upon preliminary data collection. Conditions along this reach have been altered through
drainage modifications associated with agricultural production in the headwaters (Figure 7). These
modifications have redirected agricultural drainage toward the eastern reach of Bachelors Delight Swamp,
resulting in reduced flow frequency and volume. Additional modifications to the natural flow regime also
occur at the intersection of Maready Road where a partially blocked culvert has reduced drainage input to
the downstream section. As a result, significant ponding has occurred along the northern side of Maready
Road Upstream of the ponded area. Little to no flow was observed within the existing channel, providing
further evidence of hydrologic modification associated with this reach.
In addition, management activities in the upper portions of the reach have removed the native hardwood
community, reducing canopy coverage adjacent to the stream and habitat within the adjacent floodplain.
Channel maintenance has also removed and/or impeded the development of in-stream habitat.
Historic aerial photography suggests that site drainage modifications have been in place for 20-30 years,
allowing the system to stabilize under the current flow regime. However, it is unlikely that this system
would remain stable following the restoration of flow from the larger, natural watershed that existed prior to
the installation of the drainage modifications. A majority of the proposed restoration would likely employ a
Priority I approach, which would create a newly constructed channel directly adjacent to the existing
feature. The restored channel would likely be designed as a D5/C5 channel with sufficient cross-sectional
area to support flows from the restored upstream watershed. This channel would be sited within the
existing valley and have a higher sinuosity and width-to-depth ratio than the existing reach. The final
design would also incorporate a properly sized culvert at the intersection of Maready Road to facilitate
natural flow to BD-6.
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 14
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
M. Bachelors Delight Swamp (BD-5 and BD-5A) - Restoration
Two tributaries that form the headwaters of Bachelors Delight Swamp (BD-5 and BD-5A) have been
targeted for restoration based upon preliminary data collection. Activities within these two reaches include
approximately 1,300 If of new channel construction and 3,500 If of zero-order/headwater wetland
restoration. Conditions along this reach have been altered through drainage modifications associated with
agricultural production in the headwaters (Figure 7). Due to these modifications, this system receives input
from an additional 100 acres of cultivated land, resulting in increased flow frequency and volume.
Additional modifications to the natural flow regime occur at the intersection of Maready Road where a large
borrow pit was constructed. This feature collects drainage from the agriculture operation to the north and
discharges into the southern section of Bachelors Delight Swamp. The existing drainage pipe for this
feature creates a consistent, high volume flow which has eroded the downstream reach by overwhelming
the natural channel geometry and adjacent floodplain.
Extensive channelization and excavation was observed throughout this section of the project. Observed
depths ranged from 4'-5' and were sufficient to disconnect the existing stream from the adjacent floodplain
and altering the hydrology of the remaining wetlands. Logging activities have also removed a majority of
the natural hardwood species typically found in these systems. Non-target species such as red maple,
sweet gum, and loblolly pine have regenerated throughout the reach.
Approximately 3,500 If of this section will be comprised of headwater wetland/zero-order stream restoration.
Hydrology will be restored in these areas through plugging and/or backfilling of existing farm ditches and
canals. These activities will be designed to restore flow within three separate subbasins which will drain to
BD-4, BD-5, and BD-5A upon completion of the project. Existing contours within the cultivated fields will
also be enhanced to direct drainage to each of the three headwater areas. Each subbasin will range in size
from 50 to 75 acres.
The remaining section, which extends south from the intersection of BD-5 and BD-5A to Maready Road, will
employ a Priority I approach. This approach is appropriate given the degree of disturbance within the
existing feature and the reestablishment of the natural drainage basins in the headwaters. These activities
will effectively reduce flow volumes and velocities which can be contained within a smaller sinuous channel.
While a new channel will be constructed throughout a majority of this section, efforts will be made to utilize
portions of the remnant channel that are located along the eastern edge of the existing channelized feature.
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 15
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
These features will also be surveyed to provide reference information to the stream designers.
The designed channel will likely bypass the existing borrow pit due to the incompatibility of the existing
invert elevations and sediment composition. The borrow pit will be backfilled to allow this area to be
incorporated into the riparian wetland system as an "off-line" feature. As a result, this area will provide
additional habitat and water quality benefits for the overall project.
N. Bachelors Delight Swamp (BD-5B and BD-5C) - Enhancement II
Two unnamed tributaries of Bachelors Delight Swamp (BD-5B and BD-5C) have been targeted for zero-
order/headwater wetland enhancement. Activities within these areas are projected to enhance flow to
approximately 1,100 If based on existing valley length. At the present time each of these tributaries is
located within a narrow fringe of jurisdictional wetlands (50'-100) that receives limited hydrologic input from
the surrounding watershed due to drainage modifications in the adjacent silvicultural management block.
The headwaters of BD-5B and BD-5C have been altered through the installation of a drainage network
designed to improve silvicultural yields. This network of ditches was installed throughout a poorly-drained
interstream divide that separated Bachelors Delight Swamp and Half Moon Creek. These ditches now
direct water towards Half Moon Creek and have decreased the size of the watershed associated with the
two tributaries. As a result, the extent of existing wetlands and corresponding stream flow has been
reduced. The proposed restoration activities will restore a functional connection to approximately 65 acres
of wetlands through the reestablishment of both surface and subsurface flows. This reconnection will be
achieved through plugging and/or backfilling of the ditch network in the silvicultural management block.
Although logging operations have removed a portion of the natural hardwood community, sufficient canopy
coverage remains throughout a majority of these tributaries. Given the existing conditions within these
tributaries, only minor earthwork will be proposed along the upstream sections. This earthwork will be
designed to remove any bedding, windrows, etc. that may currently disrupt natural drainage from the
surrounding watershed. If necessary, limited hardwood plantings will also be conducted throughout these
corridors. It is anticipated that the restoration of the adjacent wetlands will result in increased flow
frequency and duration, enhancing the aquatic functions throughout each of the two tributaries.
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 16
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
0. Bachelors Delight Swamp (BD-6) - Enhancement II
The downstream portion of Bachelors Delight Swamp, located directly adjacent to Maready Road, has been
targeted for enhancement based on preliminary field investigations. This section includes approximately
1,700 If of existing channel. Each of the two reaches has been impacted by drainage manipulations
associated with the construction of Maready Road but remains in somewhat stable condition. The northern
section (downstream of BD-4) receives limited hydrologic input, via a partially blocked culvert underneath
the existing road. As a result, flow is not sufficient to maintain proper channel geometry and hydrate the
adjacent floodplain during seasonal flooding events. These conditions persist until the reach connects with
the perennial section of Bachelors Delight Swamp (BD-7) approximately 1,000' downstream.
The southern section (downstream of BD-5) receives input from the aforementioned borrow pit. Flow from
this feature is discharged through a 36" pipe underneath Maready Road at consistently high volumes
regardless of antecedent rainfall totals. This discharge has resulted in localized erosion and downcutting of
the channel immediately downstream of the inlet pipe. Alterations to in-stream structures were also
observed further downstream. Interactions with the existing floodplain allow for dissipation of velocity as
the stream approaches the intersection with the BD-4 tributary.
Enhancement of aquatic functions within each of these reaches is proposed as a result of the restoration
activities planned for the upstream sections of Bachelors Delight Swamp. These activities will restore a
more natural, seasonally driven hydrologic regime which redistributes nutrients between the headwaters
and downstream floodplains. Doing so will provide conditions favorable for the development of
characteristic invertebrate assemblages. In addition, existing floodplain vegetation will also benefit through
the introduction of nutrients and organic material.
P. Bachelors Delight Swamp (BD-7) - Preservation
The remaining section of Bachelors Delight Swamp has been targeted for preservation. This section
encompasses approximately 3,600 If of high quality second-order stream that has been minimally impacted
by the adjacent logging operations (Figure 7). A distinct valley is present throughout this section with
elevations ranging from +28' MSL to +46' MSL. The floodplain is comprised of a natural assemblage of
native hardwoods such as black gum, swamp chestnut oak, and water oak and would be categorized as a
bottomland hardwood ecosystem, Approximately 800' of intact flood plain are present throughout this area.
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 17
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
Numerous examples of in-stream habitat such as overhanging root mats, snags, and natural pools were
observed, likely supporting a diverse assemblage of invertebrates and amphibians. Conversely, little
evidence of erosion or channelization was observed during on-site investigations. Channel dimension,
plan, and profile were also consistent with the size of the drainage basin, suggesting that this reach has
remained stable throughout the alteration of the upstream landscape.
Q. Half Moon Creek (HM-1) - Restoration
An unnamed tributary of Half Moon Creek has been targeted for restoration based on preliminary data
collections. This section, located in the southeastern portion of the property, includes approximately 2,000
If of channel. Degradation to this system has occurred as a result of silvicultural management activities
dating back to the 1970s. Extensive channelization was observed on both the upstream and downstream
sections of the reach. These activities have effectively disconnected the stream from the adjacent
floodplain and removed valuable aquatic habitat throughout a majority of the reach. Drainage ditches along
Maready Road also appear to have redirected flow further downstream, reducing hydrologic input to the
system from the surrounding watershed.
Recent clear-cutting was observed throughout the headwaters of this reach. Remaining vegetation was
comprised of native volunteer species such as wax myrtle, fetterbush (Lyonia lucida), and switchcane
(Arundinaria gigantea). Zero-order/headwater wetland restoration is proposed for this area, totaling 600 If
of existing valley. The proposed restoration activities will include backfilling the existing ditch along the
northern side of Maready Road and the removal of logging debris that currently impedes drainage within
the vicinity of the proposed restoration area. The existing culvert underneath Maready Road will also be
raised in conjunction with the proposed downstream restoration activities.
Significant disturbance was also observed throughout the downstream section of the reach. Alterations to
the natural valley including channelization, bedding, and excavation have effectively disconnected the
stream from the adjacent floodplain. Silvicultural management has also removed a majority of the natural
hardwood species within the valley. As a result, a managed stand of loblolly pine extends to the existing
top of bank throughout a majority of this section. While some evidence of restablization was observed
(development of new floodplain within the existing ditch, etc.), little in-stream habitat or sinuosity exists due
to previous land use activities.
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 18
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
Given the extent of the observed channel manipulations, a Priority I approach is proposed for the entire
downstream section of this tributary. This would include approximately 1,600 If of new channel construction
directly adjacent to the existing feature. The restored channel would likely be designed as a C5 channel
with a higher sinuosity and width-to-depth ratio. The constructed feature will connect with the zero-order
sections located upstream and provide drainage for approximately 130 ac. of restored habitat.
IV. CONCEPTUAL PLAN - WETLAND RESTORATION
A. Riparian Wetland Restoration
Approximately 66 acres associated with the degraded stream systems have been targeted for restoration.
As discussed in the previous section, these areas have been converted to monoculture pine plantations
through silvicultural management activities over the past three decades. A majority of the targeted areas
are located in the transitional zone between the managed pine stands and the remaining jurisdictional
wetlands. The vegetation within these areas is comprised of red maple, sweet gum, and red bay saplings.
Table 2 provides specific information on the proposed acreage and credit totals for the wetlands included
within the bank site.
Hydrologic Restoration: Characteristic hydrology of riparian areas will be restored through the
reestablishment of natural drainage basins and channel design throughout the site. The proposed channel
work will raise the bed elevation, minimizing subsurface drainage and increasing overbank flooding within
the adjacent floodplain. Restoration of the natural watershed boundaries throughout the upstream sections
will also increase the effective drainage basin size, which will provide additional hydrologic input. The
proposed restoration footprint for these areas was generated through the use of 2' contour LIDAR data in
combination with observed field conditions. For example, the existing jurisdictional wetlands associated
with HU-1 are found along the +42' MSL contour. Following the proposed restoration activities it is
anticipated this narrow corridor will expand out to the +46' MSL contour, occupying a larger portion of the
existing valley.
Vegetative Restoration: The proposed restoration areas will be planted with species typical of a small
stream swamp community. Plantings will include bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), swamp tupelo (Nyssa
biflora), ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), and swamp chestnut oak. Trees will be planted on 9-ft spacings,
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 19
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
corresponding to 538 trees per acre. It is expected that other characteristic species will recruit naturally
into these restored areas upon successful hydrologic restoration.
Table 2. Proposed Wetland Restoration Acreages
Type Proposed Acreage Credits
Riverine Restoration 66 66
Riverine Enhancement 33 16.5
Non-riverine Restoration 260 260
Wetland Preservation 180 36
Upland Buffer 197 24.7
TOTAL 736 403.2
Table 3 provides more information regarding species quantities and composition for the small stream
swamp community.
Table 3. Proposed Planting by Community Type
Small Stream Swam 66 ac Ri arian Restoration
Common Name Scientific Name % Composition # Planted
River Birch Betula nigra 10 3,551
Red Bay Persea borbonis 20 7,102
Ironwood Carpinus caroliniana 10 3,551
American Holly flex opece 15 5,326
Swamp Tupelo Nyssa biflora 25 8,877
Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum 20 7,102
TOTAL 35,508
B. Riparian Wetland Enhancement
Approximately 33 acres of existing jurisdictional wetlands have been targeted for enhancement. At the
present time, these areas are located along narrow fringes adjacent to the degraded stream systems.
Characteristic vegetation has been altered through silvicultural management activities that included clear-
cutting, bedding, and ditching. Excavation and maintenance within the existing channels has also altered
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 20
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
the natural hydroperiod, reducing flooding duration and frequency.
As the degraded streams will likely be backfilled in conjunction with the construction of the new channel,
direct impacts to the existing wetland fringes may occur. However, these areas will be restored as part of
the small stream swamp community following construction activities. As a result, a natural hydrologic
regime and habitat assemblage will replace the current degraded system. These activities will contribute to
additional biogeochemical cycling and habitat utilization throughout the existing jurisdictional wetland
footprint.
C. Non-riparian Wetland Restoration
Approximately 260 acres within the project boundary have been targeted for non-riparian wetland
restoration based on preliminary field investigations. The agricultural operation, located in the northern
portion of the tract, comprises approximately 152 acres of the total area. This area has been actively
cultivated for several decades producing soybeans, cotton, and other commodity crops. Prior to
production, an extensive network of ditches and canals was installed to improve drainage. Soils range from
a poorly-drained Rains series to a very poorly-drained Pantego series near the northeastern border of the
project. Spacing between the laterals ranges between 330' and 350'. Lateral ditches range in depth from
3'-C and the larger collector canals range from 5'-7'.
The remaining 108 acres is currently utilized for silvicultural production. A drainage network was also
installed within this area to improve timber yields. Lateral ditches extend throughout the interstream divide
between Half Moon Creek and Bachelors Delight Swamp. A majority of the drainage is currently directed
towards large collector canals associated with an access road off of Maready Road. Soils within this area
range from a poorly-drained Rains fine sandy loam to a somewhat poorly-drained Lynchburg fine sandy
loam. Spacing between the existing ditches is approximately 720'.
Hydrologic Restoration: Restoration of up to 260 ac of non-riverine wetland habitat is anticipated via the
backfilling and/or plugging of ditches. In addition, removal of a portion of the roadbeds will allow for surface
water to sheetflow along the natural gradient. Installation of ditch plugs and associated grading work along
secondary and tertiary ditches will restore characteristic wetland hydrology to the headwater bay forest,
pocosin, and pond pine woodland habitats. Based upon preliminary site investigations, some boundary
ditches will need to be left intact to prevent hydrologic trespass. Future topographic survey work and
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 21
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
additional drainage evaluations will help to determine the specific limits of the restoration work.
Vegetation Restoration: Drained wetland areas that have been cleared will be planted with characteristic
wetland species. Depending upon landscape position and soil type, suitable species may include pond
pine, red bay, bald cypress, and black gum. Areas of deeper organic soils may also include plantings of
water tupelo and Atlantic white cedar (Chamaecypads thyoides). Tree seedlings will be planted on 9-ft
spacings (equivalent to a density of 538 stems/acre). Shrub species will be planted on 8-ft spacings
(equivalent to a density of 680 stems per acre). Other characteristic shrub species (e.g. inkberry,
fetterbush, American titi) will continue to volunteer aggressively into the restored wetland areas.
Functional Restoration: Restored wetlands will intercept runoff from adjacent crop fields, dissipate
stormwater velocity, and enhance nutrient and sediment trapping. These restored functions are likely to
have discernible benefits to water quality and habitat downstream. Vegetative restoration will provide for
increased foraging and refuge habitat for resident and migratory species. In light of acute development
pressures in this region of eastern North Carolina, the White Oak River Basin is particularly susceptible to
loss of wetland functions and associated watershed impacts. By providing for successful restoration of an
expansive non-riverine wetland system, the Bachelors Delight Wetland and Stream Mitigation Bank will
help to replace wetland functions critical to water quality and wildlife habitat in the area,
D. Upland Buffer
Per the 2008 Mitigation Rule, compensatory mitigation should include "the protection and maintenance of
terrestrial resources, such as non-wetland riparian areas and uplands, when these resources contribute to
or improve the overall ecological functioning of aquatic resources in the watershed" (CFR 332.3(c)(2)). For
this reasons, an upland buffer area has been incorporated into the overall design approach for the four
subbasins within the project area. All areas targeted for upland buffer preservation and/or restoration will
be included within the final conservation easement plat and will be protected in perpetuity.
A 200' wide buffer (100' on each side) is proposed throughout the three main stream reaches within the
project area, corresponding to approximately 197 ac. of additional habitat protection. Clear cut areas will
be planted with characteristic species relatively to the existing landscape position. This will include the
reintroduction of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) in areas containing well-drained, sandy soils (Goldsboro
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 22
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
and Norfolk series). These plantings will be designed to restore an Atlantic Mesic Longleaf Woodland
community (Peet and Allard, 1993), which will provide a gradual shift in community structure from wetland
to upland habitat. In addition to longleaf pine, this community includes southern red oak (Quercus falcata),
post oak (Quercus stellata), and water oak. A diverse herbaceous layer may also develop if fire
suppression is minimized. Restoration of this diverse community offers an excellent opportunity to restore
conditions that existed in the late 19th century. Given the degree of planting and habitat benefits achieved
through successful regeneration of this community, a credit ratio of 8:1 is proposed for the upland buffer
acreage.
E. Reference Wetland
Land Management Group, Inc. (LMG) identified multiple reference areas within the existing wetland stream
communities within the property. The preservation areas of Hewitts Branch (HE-1) contain a stable, intact
stream system that contains both braided and single thread channels. This feature will likely serve as the
analog for stream restoration designs throughout the headwater portions of the project. The lower reaches
of Hewitts Branch (HE-4) provide additional areas for study and include sections of small stream
swamp/bottomland hardwood communities. A more detailed discussion of the reference wetlands will be
included in the site-specific mitigation plan.
V. PROPOSED MONITORING PLAN
A. Wetland Restoration/Enhancement Success Criteria
The wetland restoration effort will be evaluated based upon performance criteria related to vegetative
density and wetland hydrology. A total of five (5) monitoring events will occur over a seven (7) year period.
Note that non-planted individuals of characteristic wetland species may volunteer into the restored site.
Suitable volunteers are an important component to the restored wetland as they serve as indicators for
appropriate hydrologic regimes and provide increased diversity. The presence of suitable volunteers
demonstrates trending of the site toward vegetative success.
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 23
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
The primary success criteria for the Bachelors Delight Wetland and Stream Mitigation Bank will be:
(1) Demonstrated density of planted species to meet or exceed 260 trees per acre at the end of 7 years (post-
planting). e
(2) The hydrologic criterion is premised on the speck community type to be restored.
(a) For the nonriverine pond pine woodland community (mineral soils), the hydrologic criterion
will be the establishment of a static water table at, or within, 12" of the soil surface for 6% of the
growing seasons (equivalent to 13 days based upon a growing season from April 8th through
November 5th) during periods of normal rainfall.
(b) For the nonriverine bay forest and swamp forest communities (organic soils), the hydrologic
criterion will be the establishment of a static water table at, or within, 12" of the soil surface for 10%
of the growing season2 (equivalent to 21 days based upon a growing season from April 8th
through November 5th) during periods of normal rainfall.
(c) For the small stream swamp (headwater riparian) community (zero-order geomorphic
position), the hydrologic criterion will be the establishment of a static water table at, or within, 12"
of the soil surface for 12.5% of the growing season2 (equivalent to 27 days based upon a growing
season from April 8th through November 5th) during periods of normal rainfall.
Vegetation Monitoring: The vegetation monitoring protocol is adapted from the accepted methods used for
wetland restoration sites within North Carolina. Given the size of the project,1 % of the planted wetland
areas will be monitored via the establishment of permanent 0.10-acre plots. These areas include
approximately 325 acres in three different habitat types. Given the proposed acreage, a total of 33 plots
will be established. GIPS coordinates for the centers of each sampling plot will be recorded and included
with the 'as-built' survey and subsequent annual monitoring reports. During monitoring, surviving planted
individuals and volunteer individuals will be identified and enumerated within each plot.
Hydrology Monitoring: Shallow groundwater hydrology will be monitored via seventeen (17) automated
wells (RDS, Inc. WM-20s) located within the non-riparian restoration areas. This equates to approximately
one well for every 20 acres of wetland area to be restored. Additional wells will be installed in
3 Volunteer species may be counted toward meeting the success criteria based upon the list of species agreed upon by the IRT,
b As determined from long-term climatic data of published in NRCS Onslow County Soil Survey (Maysville station).
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 24
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
perpendicular arrays within the riparian zone of the zero-order stream corridor. Wells will be installed in
accordance with installation methods outlined in the Wetlands Regulatory Assistance Program (WRAP)
Technical Note 00-02 (Sprecher 2000). Water levels will be recorded once daily. Data will be downloaded
from the wells every three months (i.e. once quarterly). Data from well downloads will be compiled and
graphically displayed to demonstrate hydroperiods of monitored areas.
Annual monitoring reports will provide quantitative data of vegetative success, qualitative observations, and
conclusions pertaining to mitigation site development. In addition, comparative hydrographs of the
restoration areas and corresponding reference areas will be provided, Monitoring reports will be submitted
to the IRT no later than February 15th of the following year.
B. Stream Restoration Success Criteria
The primary success criteria for the First Order and Zero Order Stream systems will be:
Documentation of 2 flow events using techniques discussed below within a normal rainfall year in 3 of the 5
years of monitoring. Additional monitoring may be necessary in the event of abnormal climatic conditions.
Level 1 Monitoring will be required for the stream portion of the Bachelors Delight Wetland and Stream
Mitigation Bank as detailed in the Stream Mitigation Guidelines, April 2003. Monitoring will occur every
year for the five year monitoring period. Monitoring reports will be prepared each monitoring year and will
include completed Channel Mitigation Monitoring Sheets with current data, a discussion of any deviations,
and whether they are indicative of a stabilizing or destabilizing situation.
Level 1 Monitoring includes Sections 1, 2, and 3 listed below.
(1) Photo-Documentation
Extensive photo documentation is proposed for the stream monitoring phase of this project. Photos will be
taken at all permanent cross-sections on a bi-annual basis (winter and summer) in addition to any problem
areas that may develop after construction is completed. Photos will be georeferenced to the corresponding
cross-section and/or problem area as part of the submitted report. Photo documentation will also be used
to document the health of the riparian area plantings and the effectiveness of any erosion control
measures.
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 25
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
(2) Ecological Function
The health of the riparian vegetation will be documented as part of the wetland restoration monitoring
efforts. Multiple 0.10 ac. permanent monitoring plots will be established throughout the riverine wetland
restoration including areas directly adjacent to the restored channel. Success criteria for wetland
restoration is provided in Part A of Section V,
Macroinvertebrate sampling is also proposed for the duration of the monitoring period with the exception of
Year 1 (which will allow for populations to acclimate to the restored channel). Sampling events will take
place during the winter months, which typically support greater species richness. Sampling will be
conducted based on the NCDENR Standard Operating Procedure for Macroinvertebrates. All data will be
compared to pre-construction results which will be collected prior to the initiation of construction in early
2010.
(3) Channel Stability/Survey Procedures
a. Cross-Sections
The Bachelors Delight Wetland and Stream Mitigation Bank will restore 13,700 If of Coastal Plain stream.
The restoration will mimic low gradient, low velocity stream reaches characteristic of the outer Coastal
Plain. No hardened materials (i.e. rock structures) will be used. Rather, natural materials (such as root
wads and log vanes) will assist with channel stabilization and grade control. Given the size, uniform
design, and gentle slope (0.005) of the proposed project, cross-sections will be established every 1,000
feet of stream length (totaling 16 permanent stations). Placement of these stations will be designed to
assess the performance of potential problem areas (e.g. severe erosion, structural failure, etc.). These
stations will also be evenly distributed between riffles and pools throughout the project. Refer to Table 4
for proposed placement of cross-section monitoring stations.
b. Longitudinal Profiles
Guidelines regarding longitudinal profiles for projects totaling over 3,000 If suggest that 30% of the area be
surveyed on an annual basis. Based on this guideline, a total of 4,200 If of project would be required for
the Bachelors Delight project. The 4,200 If of survey will be divided throughout the individual reaches and
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 26
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
will include the permanent cross-sections (Table 5). Data presented in the annual monitoring reports will
be shown in comparison to as-built conditions.
Table 4. Proposed Stream Cross-Sections.
Reach Name Proposed I Cross-sections
Hewitts Branch HE-1 2,600 3
Huffmans Branch HU-1 3,200 3
Huffmans Branch HU-2) 1,600 2
Bachelors Delight BD-1 300 1
Bachelors Delight 13D-2 500 1
Bachelors Delight 13D-4 1,400 2
Bachelors Delight 13D-5 2,100 2
Half Moon Creek HM-1 2,000 2

Total 13,700 16
Table 5. Proposed Longitudinal Profiles by Stream Reach
Reach Name Proposed I % of Project Profile (Ifll
Hewitts Branch HE-1 2,600 19 800
Huffmans Branch HU-1 3,200 23 800
Huffmans Branch HU-2 1,600 12 400
Bachelors Delight 13D-1 300 2 100
Bachelors Delight 13D-2 500 4 200
Bachelors Delight 13D-4 1,400 10 400
Bachelors Delight 13D-5 2,100 15 800
Half Moon Creek HM-1 2,000 15 700

TOTALS 13,700 100 4,200
c. Pebble Counts
In order to properly assess the substrate in the restored channel pebble counts will be conducted. The
NCSU Stream Restoration Handbook suggests a variety of different methodologies designed to use either
the longitudinal profile or permanent cross-section as an appropriate location for sampling. The longitudinal
profile methodology is proposed, as it will provide a more complete representation of the system.
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 27
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
The longitudinal profile for each reach (Table 6) will be evaluated to determine the percentages of existing
riffles and pools. These percentages will determine the amount of sediment sampling that occurs in each
area. A total of 100 counts will be conducted in each of the profiles. Final count data will be plotted to
show size-class and frequency.
d. Stream Flow Monitoring
Documentation of stream flow within the project will also be conducted. Following stream construction
activities, eight (8) stream gauges (one in each restored reach) will be installed (Figure 8a). Three
additional gauges will also be installed throughout the areas targeted for enhancement. These gauges will
measure the elevation of water in the channel on a daily basis and will be used to determine the cross-
sectional area of the channel under a variety of flow conditions.
In addition to these data, velocity measurements will be collected within 24 hours of a 0.5, 1.0, and 2,0 inch
rain event at each gauge location during Year 1 monitoring. Measurements will be taken at 1-foot intervals
across the restored channel at depths of 0.5 ft. above the bottom. This information will be used to compute
a total discharge measured in cubic feet per second for each reach for the duration of the monitoring
activities. All data will then be used to develop a regression analysis which will define the relationship
between rainfall events and total stream discharge. These data will be presented in graphical format with
individual bankfull and high flow events highlighted.
Published research supports the restoration of streams with similarly sized watersheds in eastern North
Carolina. If insufficient flow is observed during the course of post-construction monitoring the total number
of stream credits may be reduced to the existing valley length or eliminated entirely per interagency Review
Team (IRT) comments. However, prior to any changes in the amount of available credit, a formal review of
the available data would be requested by the Bank Sponsor.
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 28
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
C. Stream Enhancement Success Criteria
The primary success criterion for the First Order Stream Enhancement will be:
Documentation of increases in flow duration and frequency compared to pre-construction conditions during
periods of normal rainfall.
As discussed in the previous sections, a majority of the stream enhancement will occur through the
reestablishment of interconnectivity with the upstream portions of the watershed. This reestablishment will
increase the functional acreage of the watershed, corresponding to increased flow frequency and duration
in the lower sections of each stream. However, the proposed activities associated with BD-5 will likely
reduce overall flows within this section. Therefore, enhancement success criteria for this section will be
awarded based upon the restoration of lower flow velocities.
VI. BANK OPERATION
The Bank Sponsors (Weyerhaeuser Company and NCSU Forestry Foundation) owns fee simple title for the
entire bank site. The Sponsor has control of all ditches affecting groundwater hydrology of the site. Since
the restoration is premised on re-establishment of groundwater hydrology via removal of ditches, all water
rights necessary for sustainability of the bank are secured through the fee simple ownership.
Weyerhaeuser has conducted previous wetland restoration projects in sites in Louisiana. In addition, staff
members working on the project have advanced degrees in Forestry and Natural Resources. Thus, the
Sponsor is well-versed in site restoration techniques, re-forestation practices, and site management. The
Sponsor has also contracted with LMG for environmental services associated with the design and
implementation of the bank site. Over the last decade, LMG has designed and implemented numerous
wetland restoration projects for full-delivery (EEP and NCDOT) and project-specific permit mitigation.
Many of the site evaluations (e.g. soil profile descriptions, hydrologic monitoring and modeling, and
vegetative surveys) have been completed for the site. However, more detailed stream assessment and
surrey work will be necessary for the development of the mitigation plan. A comprehensive mitigation bank
and Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) will be developed and submitted prior to project construction.
Upon acceptance of the final mitigation plan by the IRT, the Bank Sponsor (Bachelors Delight Mitigation
Bank, LLC) will initiate proposed construction activities for the development of the Bank site. Mitigation
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 29
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
bank credits will be calculated using the following standard:
Mitigation Type Ratio
(1) Wetland Restoration 1:1
(2) Wetland Enhancement 2:1
(3) Wetland Preservation 5:1
(4) Upland Buffer 8:1
(5) Stream Restoration 1:1
(6) Stream Enhancement (Level II) 1.5:1
(7) Stream Preservation 2.5:1
Use of credits from the Bank to offset wetland and stream impacts authorized by federal permits or state
water quality certifications must be in compliance with the Clean Water Act, Section 404 (b)(1) guidelines
and other applicable federal and state legislation, regulations, and policies. Prior to release of bank credits,
the following requirements will be met: (1) approval of the final mitigation plan and execution of the MBI; (2)
securing the bank site; and (3) establishment of appropriate financial assurances. Given the
aforementioned ratios for wetland restoration, it is estimated that 403 restoration equivalent credits, in
addition to 23,993 stream credits will be derived from the establishment of the Bachelors Delight Wetland
and Stream Mitigation Bank.
The tentative schedule for establishment of the bank site is outlined in Table 6.
Upon execution of the MBI, a conservation easement deed for the site will be conveyed to an appropriate
public land trust organization. The terms and conditions of the conservation easement will ensure the
protection of the site in perpetuity. The ownership of the Bank will reside with the Sponsor until completion
of the debiting of the Bank. The Sponsor is currently negotiating with Audubon Environmental Land Trust
to serve as the holder of the conservation easement. The holder of the conservation easement will be
responsible for long-term protection and management of the site. The easement prohibits any activities
(e.g. timbering, farming, building, etc.) that would alter the environmental state of the Bank site. Conditions
of the easement will not restrict passive recreational, educational, and/or research activities.
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 30
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
The Bank Sponsor will be responsible for securing appropriate financial assurances in the form of
construction, monitoring, and maintenance bonds to cover contingency measures in the event of Bank
default or failure. Performance monitoring will be conducted for a 7-year period subsequent to project
construction. Annual monitoring will evaluate the development of wetland function and document site
performance relative to established success criteria. In addition, monitoring activities will identify any site
deficiencies that may warrant remedial action. Monitoring reports documenting site success and/or failure
will be submitted to the IRT each year. Upon submittal of annual monitoring reports demonstrating the
fulfillment of site success criteria, stream and wetland credits will be released according the approved credit
release schedule.
The Sponsor shall develop accounting procedures for maintaining accurate records of debits made from
the Bank that is acceptable to the IRT. Such procedures shall include the generation of a debit report by
the sponsor documenting all credits used at the time they are debited from the bank. Debit reports shall
be provided to each member of the IRT within 30 days of the date of credit sale. In addition, the sponsor
shall prepare an Annual Report to be provided to each IRT member within thirty (30) days of each
anniversary of the date of execution of the MBI, showing all credits used and the balance of credits
remaining. The sponsor's reporting obligations hereunder shall end upon the sale of all credits or
termination of the MBI, whichever event first occurs.
Table 6: Project Milestone Schedule
Task Project Milestone Projected Completion
1 Approval of Mitigation Plan and Execution of MBI November 30, 2009
2 Recordation of Conservation Easement Deed December 30, 2009
3 Initiation of Site Earthwork January 15, 2010
4 Mitigation Site Earthwork Completed January 15, 2011
5 Mitigation Site Planting and Installation of Monitoring
Devices February 15 through March 15,
2011
6 Submittal of As-Built Report May 2011
7 First Year Annual Monitoring October 2011
8 Submittal of Monitoring Report #1 to IRT December 31, 2011
9 Submittal of Monitoring Report #2 to IRT December 31, 2012
10 Submittal of Monitoring Report #3 to IRT December 31, 2013
11 Submittal of Monitoring Report #4 to IRT December 31, 2015
12 Submittal of Monitoring Report #5 to IRT December 31, 2017
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 31
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
VII. CONCLUSION
The establishment, use, and operation of the Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank will
provide a quality compensatory mitigation alternative for authorized wetland impacts occurring within the
White Oak River Basin, The bank will be established and operating in advance of development impacts in
the area. Therefore, its use will help to reduce uncertainty in the CWA Section 404 permit program by
having established compensatory mitigation credit available to applicants. In addition, the Bank will more
effectively replace wetland and stream functions within the watershed through consolidation of design,
implementation, monitoring, and management of mitigation activities (Fed. Reg., 1995).
Based upon the current U SAC E jurisdictional determination and site investigations, 23,993 If of stream and
360 acres of wetlands have been degraded by historical land-use activities (including ditch excavation and
clearing for timber production). Through the placement of protective real estate mechanism (i.e.
conservation easement) and implementation of the proposed mitigation activities, degraded habitats and
associated functions will be restored. The project will result in significant benefits to water quality and
wildlife habitat in the White Oak River Basin.
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 32
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
V. SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Allan, TD. 1995. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters. Chapman and Hall.
London.
Cowardin, L.M., et. al. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. US
Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, D.C.
Mitsch, W.J. and J.G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands (Second Edition). Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality. 2001. Watershed Restoration Plan for the White Oak River
Basin. Raleigh, NC.
N.C. Wetland Functional Assessment Team. 2007. N.C. Wetland Assessment Method (NC WAM), Draft
User Manual. 183 pp.
Peet, R.K. and D.J. Allard. 1993. Longleaf Pine Vegetation of the Southern Atlantic and Eastern Gulf
Coast Regions: A Preliminary Classification. Proceedings of the Tall Timbers Fire Ecology
Conference. No. 18. Tallahassee, Fl. pp. 45-81.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakely. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina.
Third approximation. N.C. Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, N.C.
Skaggs, R.W. et al. 1995. Reference Simulations for Evaluating Wetland Hydrology, in Campbell, K. (ed.),
Versatility of Wetlands in the Agricultural Landscape. American Society of Agricultural Engineers,
pp. 1-10.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Marine Fisheries Service. 1995. Federal
Guidance for the Establishment, Use and Operation of Mitigation Banks; Notice. Vol. 60, No. 228.
1Opp,
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus 33
White Oak River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030001
FIGURES
i ? ? ??/? a `1 ? ?`? '? 'y'- `;.ew. -'..V? ` •+??+ , ?
C- IIWj%
ZAME,
Nd?p Co b I ?_..._ V. -#\
1 ry _
-40 -W
SITE t ., ,.• R +? - +?. ?" -
N? - ?'
258
24
ter-. ao ?4 on "ell
k .?..; -•?
SITE
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: North Carolina Atlas & Gazetteer. Pg 77.2003 SCALE 1" = 1 Mile
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank LMG Figure 1.
Onslow County, NC LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP,, Vicinity Map
01-08-352 Envrronmenrnr Consultants
April 2009
W H
I T E 0 A K P 0 C
?. - \ H O F it-,, A N N F
18 / p S \
linlf Moon f - Q \
CA.
'Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: Quadrangle 7.5 minute (topographic) 1990.
MWEEMMMOINJ
SCALE 1" = 3,000'
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank 4 LMG Figure 2.
Onslow County, NC LAND XIA }?,mwrcko4:1, ,:•. USGS Topographic Map
01-08-352 `I'°'t, (Jacksonville NW Quad)
April 2009

-Of ?j
44

c
y? t ' mF ,rd R .31 w q
?4
A ?? 3 1 k
? .,
"
h'
'r S fHk"?
W
w + f

F
17
y 1
M
`M
W
A
{
?
.,
.
,y1
,?k
?
q
? ( YEA ,'
k•''? if
1 ? ?d i ? x
?
" `
?5
?p
?
y
?r. ' •. ?• +'N, BEd
-
Y4M i ini,? ? `Y ? ?
.
'
?
t
s t
? np t'yi y ?t
S
]
? F
?j
?
$
'
(
? ?
*
re
?
? .
.
.
91
?•r ,.
?' t t ? v ?
l
? ,:a y
?yyy.`?y
-' ? *?}t ?
?
{j
J[
? k
a1• ?r "
?}„?'?''
?
?
`+ ??t,"
?'i???
?
?..
!?'
s N ? ?, _. . 1 t
r "" .
e S ? ?' 'r '
E <
n'k A' 1
r f
? l F 1 nx
< S
r j i. ?. + r R* d . fq. $aa
'k ??w.'C3 F ?
"hi S J ??! t '.
'( J bk}.. '??{ydJFy :N e4 e
? ?s

k 9?T'L C
t 7}"}w Nil
a+F ^ry
?. G .y??n ?+}W",?' J
I
? '9' i ],'-. ,?tP E '?
444 " '.
f ? t y?F
'hVr ? N
IA
I y J1 `
7+ t`" }i'.i } ?

? `w
.?? Q s, .,?Y' yrt•:
?41$ F.;,
?9 ? ? FY ?y
?"?
? ,n;?.2? ??
cx+ ?y
? by Q;?? ??"
yi a °?'x a .. `'y?``Ls?"`" C
S ????
{ ??
l
F ? {...
.
b
? c
F , L M1,.nprw
l
r
Iii N 7
yi 1 7 ?

+
,
P 1 '
k
A
I :A

?' ?n4 t?? ?i??r4?
??>?{ t 4
F V
tlb
?{_er ?s
?x ,pS It
114 r rr
7
....t?: u- ?
J? ii" 5
t. •
s •wiJl`C?
?.
j

sr r

l •
'R` ??
i
s j
9Ra`,`
!db ?? xg _ r
• t
t <
p?
t t14i :! !
?t r 4 5i + b jrit Yy h + a E Too.,
+`Ri
?

?. r S v .: Y T;_ii?4 't is Ss ! fl rg-
elf s ,( -
?? r f r kf
+L ? ?

tN7
9 t
I ( r' 1

1 x _ al I
i

SITE
Z

V
Legend
GSA (HUC - 03030001)
River Basins
= CAPE FEAR
LUMBER
NEUSE
WHITE OAK
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NCGIA GIS Data
SCALE 1" = 10 Miles
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank LMG Figure 4.
Onslow County, NC LAND h1ANACLJIEN'f GR fCP iv Proposed Geographic
01-08-352 L,,,,,! ""'''' Service Area (GSA)
April 2009
"Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NRCS Soils Map.
SCALE 1" = 1,000'
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank LMG Figure 5.
Onslow County, NC LAND MANAGLAffiN7GROUP
NRCS Soil Survey
01-08-352 E-v ..... ..,,.,; C(,.,,,,
April 2009
'"Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 1998 NAPP aerial photography
SCALE 1 1,000'
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank LMG Figure 6.
Onslow County, NC 1.A 41)MAXAGE\1L'N'l-GKOL i%, 1998 Aerial Photography
01-08-352 c.,,,:ureunrs
April 2009
APPENDIXA.
ECOREGION MAP
ct
O
U
0
0
?I
. o
O
U
W

T
I
I
P.= c a p•F o y v 'c z c a3 r:, E
uto .6
c T.c c o•i,E?kL :e oz Epp U w
5 E ° G m O E GL C] y= U l.J U Fj
v 3 ?c `o u v a ?+ ? ? > y G ° Z v ? $ ? ? ?
°Ec u.-o?`v°U dv?
0 t:<
? 'E .j he 9'<yoL_g0
svEE ooQCCL?Ecaj?rM.cr,o
cv E ? u? o c c o avi r ccvi °Z?
oz U
o:
LL2
°c = g c E
?QV °-`r E? ovE3v-D
c c _ `
v n mpc ?.c o v 3 ocw: v?
C) o

0 0 g i
?

o
s
° ?6 2
c FC c ?
v, ? 9 ?q2 8
? '? ? a a .E ?'•oo ? oo `?
'? Ea? o•o c
0. ?w ????? Sao
c ? w E a i. ? v .? ? g a?
:: NU 0
04 ?o> E E `t'om
E u e?ma E o
Wo vo ?z, v°?v°, v°? m<u9?
? •O •o ? 3
o U
co o° 5S?° c
E E E o ff ro
-l •! v :: u v P: c? a s vii
um -66 u
c
E E E E
o v v. v v 'y v ?' >CC .E ¢ Q
T".. ?$ 1/? of U u OD .? er? L U S al t° t C
?:-- -??_?- ooaaooo oloalao
APPENDIX B.
CURRENT JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

MI..
CG 303H
]g _
§at??g

w v
z N ¢a
?g m O
N
3 w n
a m o
=
LL
O
Co
W
w
v .,
U.
-?
0
w cli
r
T LL
O d
LL
c?
O 1A
O
r r
?- w i r !
w _
LU U)
CO
e t ?
I$
? C
!P
a] 6
11 2!
?r
8 ?
!A
11 r
a
?9=

3
RECEIVED
S1Ytm
b

t
s? s
U
W-WED
;Ka
P
s
s

of
s33
3 oil;
{

sr+:®
am

yc1,
9
3
8ns
?,Ihfj
lion
,I
10
U

toll

R 4

0 IfID
5
f?f
LAW
in
i

cf ax am ?«
1s:1,
?h
a4 'I

M I'm
awrm
'e

Ma

14
(cv wx ?'x
RECEIVED
yri w
tai
P?li??
? r
it I I
t
II loll
I
s
§a4?i?
B?
.P

0

t
1
sa wx axo ax

a
4
o
:WCE
W 12M
Tn

I

e ,.
iE 7A'
iii
n aop r
RECEIVED
"I'm
+tA"u$n
i
k,
i
i h
lro aw ao
f7A€??
I
till
R??p
Rl CEP" D
8 1 iID
wtLwIU11
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 2007 3148 067 County: Onslow U.S.G.S. Quad: Jacksonville North
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner. Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Development Co. Agent: Land Management Group Inc.
Address: attn: Sandy McLendon attn: Wes Frvar
1412 Eatonton Hwy Suite 700 P.O. Bog 2522
Madison, GA 30650 Wilmineton, NC 28402
Property description:
Size (acres) M Nearest Town Jacksonville
Nearest Waterway Bachelors Delight Swamp River Basin White Oak
USGS HUC 03030001 Coordinates N 34.8542 W 77.4581
Location description The site is located Just north of the intersection of Rhodestown Road and Gum Branch Road on
the east side of Gum Branch Road north of Jacksonville, Onslow County.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
The wetland on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps.
Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property
which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years.
X The wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
-Regulatory Official identified below on 10/8/2007. Unless there is a change in the law pr our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
.r
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Washington, NC, at [phone] to determine
their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Brad Shaver at 910-251-4611.
C. Basis For Determination
The subject area exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Delineation Manual and is adiacent to sever-a
tributaries. primarily Bachelors Delight Swamp a tributary of the New River, a navigable water of the US
D. Remarks
The site was visited during two separate site visits on 11/28/2006 and 12/5/2006 The site was also hydrologically
monitored by Land Management Group Inc
** All Maps are being returned to the consultant for distribution.
E. Appeals Information (This information applies only to.approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the South Atlantic Division, Division Office at the Following
address:
Mr. Michael F. Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-ET-CO-R
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9Mi5
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 11/8/2007.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official: C
Date 10/8/2007 Expiration Date 10/8/2012
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit
htto://www.saw.i sace.army miVWETLANDS/index h to complete the survey online.
Copy furnished:
McKim & Creed 243 North Front Street Wilmington, NC 28401
Applicant: Weyerhaeuser Real Estate File Number: 2007 3148 067 Date: 10/8/2007
Attached is: D See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of A
_permission)
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELI IINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
Own
A: ENITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return
the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of
the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your
letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your
concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having
determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the
district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and
conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal
Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must
be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may, appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved 71) in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD
you may appeal the approved JD under the Cor
s of
,
p
Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the
division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this
notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary. JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for Ruher consideration. by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you.may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is alread in the administrative record.
If you have questions regarding.this decision If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact: may also contact:
Brad Shaver lvir. Michael F. Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Project Manager CESAD-ET-CO-R
P.O. Box 1890 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta,. Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or ent.
DIVISION ENGINEER:
Commander
U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3490

US An ny Corps
of Etg(mers.
w1fr4naton District
Date: October 8, 2007
ATTENTION PROPERTY OWNER
New Guidance on Jurisdictional Determinations
On June 5, 2007, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) implemented a new method
for performing jurisdictional determinations (JD) pursuant to the Clean Water Act
(CWA). This new process is a result of the recent Supreme Court decisions (United
States v. Rapanos and United States v. Carabell) and now requires the COE to conduct
extensive reviews when determining if certain waterbodies, including wetlands have a
significant nexus (connection) to Traditional Navigable Waters.
Since this Office has reviewed and verbally approved a jurisdictional determination for
your property prior to June 5, 2007, we have finalized this JD using the previous process.
However, if you, as the property owner, are interested in having your property evaluated
under the new guidance or have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Brad
Shaverat 910-251-4611.
S. Kenneth Jolly
Chief, Regulatory Division
APPENDIX C.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Bachelors Delight Swamp
Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Bank
LMG
LAY?NAKAGEMEYT GRI'?UP w
fnr??or.men ro! Con r?!tunr.
ri12009
Site Documentation
Photos
A view of clear-cut area adjacent to Hewitts Branch (HE-1).
A view of channelized section of Bachelors Delight Swamp (BD-5).
Bachelors Delight Swamp
Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Bank
LMG
LAND MANAUNPN7 UROUP u.
12009
Site Documentation
Photos
A view of impounded area (north of Maready Road).
A view of channelized section of Huffmans Branch (HU-1).
A view of a managed pine stand targeted for nonriparian restoration.
Bachelors Delight Swamp LMG Site Documentation
Stream and Wetland UeD MANAG6ME?T 1:NOlT i.e
Photos
Mitigation Bank
April 2009

A view of borrow pit north of Maready Road (BD-5).
APPENDIX D.
USACOE STREAM ASSESSMENT FORMS

M
N
r
f4 f4
.Q N Q
Q ? r
.a
1

,
y.

4 1

j

3 ?•
m
L
a) r •

J• Yy 't f1y.
•? d.v + 1

,F` •:? ? - _
; ?: 6
Ate

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
;,,,; STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Hewl
1. Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon 2. Evaluator's name: Corey Novak
3. Date of evaluation: 1/8/09 4. Time of evaluation: 10:45
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch 6. River basin: New River
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 200 acres 8. Stream order: first
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet 10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8640 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4668
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet rtho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an r cs and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any):_
15. Recent weather conditions: mild,
16. Site conditions at time of visit: warm, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map. YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: Q_21o Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial Q _2/o Agricultural
_21o Forested 50 % Cleared / Logged n % Other
22. Bankfull width: 8 feet 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight -Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion, Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):32 Comments: Form was completed under drought conditions. Although the
low score accurately reflects the fact that it is a man-made ditch, it is likely to have water in the channel and/or flow during the winter
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/8/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

r` 1 Presence of flow
% persistent pools in stream
,
:. no flow or saturation = 0• strop flow = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 2

2 Evidence of past human alteration
' extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points ' 0 - 6 0 - 5 0 - 5 1
fi
I 3 Riparian zone
no buffer 7,0; eonti gii bus wide ,buffer ° max rots 0 - 6 0 - 4: 0 - 5 2
4 > Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges

extensive disc har es 0• no di char es =,max points) 0-5 0 ' 4 0-4 5
Groundwater discharge ?

no discharge = 0• s' rip s se s wetlands etc = max points) 0- 3 0 4 0-
4 1

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
no flood lain = 0• extensive florid lain= max points 0 - 4 0 = 4 0 - 2 2
7 '
Entrenchment/ floodplain access
(deeply entrenched = 0` frequent floodin g = max hints 0 - 5 0 4 0 - 2 0
' 8 Presence of adjacent wetlands

no wetlands --'0; large adjacent wetlands = max 'hints 0- 6 0-4 0-2 2
9 Channel sinuosity

(extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = max hints 0-5 0- 4 0-3
0
10. Sediment input
extensive d sition 0 little or no sediment max points) 0-5 0- 4 0-4 2
Size & diver sity'ofchannel bed substrate
11
fine homogenous = 0• large, diverse sizes = max points 0-4 0-5 N/A

12 Evidence of channel incision or widening
-
(deeply incised -' 0 stable bed & banks = max rots 0
5 0 - 4 0 - 5 0
13 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 0-5

severe erosion= 0• no erosion stable banks = max oints 3

14: Root depth and density on' banks

0 `- 3

0-4

0-5

1
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15 Impact by"agrleulture, livestock, or timber production

y
substantial impact =0• no`evidence = max oints 0-5 0 - 4 01-5 2
Presence of riffle-pool/rlpple=pool cornplezes
16 no riffles/ripples les or pools = 0• well-develo ed = max points) 0 - 3 0 - 5 0 - 6 0

17 Habitat complexity
=
0-6
0 - 6
0-6

1
little or no habitat
0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Canopy coverage over streambed

` 18
no shading vegetation = 0• continuous nano = max points) 0-5 0-5 0-5 3
19 Substrate embeddedness
(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max
0 - 4
0 - 4
N/A

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)'
0-4
0
5
0
5
1
no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = max hints - -
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 1
no evidence 0; common, numerous types = max ints
©
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max points)
?ztu
$otal Points Po9sible' ?; F
100
100 '
nz
t y ?:
a?TO'CC,7
sc? eter on t.,
<
32

' These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map) I
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Hew2
1. Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon 2. Evaluator's name: Corey Novak
3. Date of evaluation: 1/8/09 4. Time of evaluation: 12:30
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch 6. River basin: New River
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 200 acres 8. Stream order: first
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet 10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8627 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4630
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an cs and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): pmpnsed rhannAl rastnrnfion
15. Recent weather conditions: mild
16. Site conditions at time of visit: warm, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters !Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map. YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: Q_% Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial Q-_% Agricultural
50_21o Forested 50 % Cleared / Logged Q_% Other
22. Bankfull width: 7 feet 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2.5 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Fiat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight -Occasional bends Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):37 Comments: Form was completed under drought conditions. Although the
low score accurately reflects the fact that it is a man-made ditch it is likely to have water in the channel and/or flow during the winter
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/8/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

k
ir RA
CS 6

oastal

e

Ad Via
TCO

:.
} Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
t
no flow or saturation = 0• strong flow = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 3
r Evidence of past human alteration
-

extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points) 6
0 0-5 0-5 1
3 Riparian zone p- 6 0- 4 0- 5 1
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges:
4 extensive discharges = 0; no dischar es = max points 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 -'4 4

5 Groundwater discharge
•
0-3
0-4
0-4
2
no discharge = 0• springs, sees wetlands etc. = max mts
6` Presence of adjacent tloodplain 0- 4 0- 4 0- 2 2
no flood lain = 0; extensive fl ` lain= max Points)
Entrenchment / floodplibi access
0-5
0-4
0-2
0
de 1 entrenched = 0 fre uenf fioodin = max oints

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
-
no wetlands = 0• Iaj ` e adjacent wetlands = max points 0
6 0 - 4 0 - 2 3
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3
2
extensive channelization =:0• natural meander = max points)

10. Sediment input
..
'
'
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
extensive d sition-- 0• little or
no sediment = max points) ,
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate ` 0
4 0
5 N/A
fine homogenous = 0• large, diverse sizes = max points) - -
'
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening
b
0-5
0- 4
0-5
0
(deeply incised = 0• sta
le bed & banks = max oints

13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
severe erosion .= 0; no erosion stable banks = max points) 3
Root depth and density on banks
14 no visible roots - 0• dense roots throughout = max points 0 - 3 0 = 4 0 - 5 2

1 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
1
5 " substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5.
16 Presence of riffle-pool/rippl&oool complexes 0- 3 0-5 0-6 0
no riffles/ripples les or pools = 0• well-developed = max hints

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
2
little or no habitat = 0• frequent, varied habitats = max inis
l
18 Canopy coverage over streambed

`
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
no shading vegetation = 0 continuous cano = max
ints

19 Substrate embeddedness
0-4
0-4
N/A
(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
1
no evidence = 0; common numerous types max oints

1 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
? no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max ints

0
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
- no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max ints

23 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
no evidence = 0 abundant evidence= max points)
:re.Ye, c cge. yR !' Yd ..?1#b?tF "a ?, 71
Total P°`lnts'ossible

?

100 rak,'?16'

. a
??

100"
?
n :.

s,
?
•
$? . r p9!'P I {?.° /' :.*, vekf ` .'Yrs. y?
"{+' i'. '
1 . '? ?
' h °
.
.. ?'?F

e)
TO't` AL ftE (also enter on first pa
37
g
. ?.. ,.: 4 ,
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AW
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Hew3
1. Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon 2, Evaluator's name: Corey Novak
3. Date of evaluation: 1/8/09
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 200 acres
4. Time of evaluation: 13:00
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: First
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet 10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8648 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4604
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet rtho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an cs and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel preservation _
15. Recent weather conditions: mild
16. Site conditions at time of visit: warm, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map. YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey. YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: Q-216 Residential 0 % Commercial (L_% Industrial 0_% Agricultural
&L21o Forested 50 % Cleared / Logged D_% Other
22. Bankfull width: 4 feet 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _X Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>I0%)
25. Channel sinuosity; Straight -Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous X Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section, Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 73 Comments: proposed area for stream preservation
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/8/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET W"d
r alt
?s oa'? 1'? atom you ? ? ,?OR>
Presence afflow / persistent pools in stream
1 no.flow or saiurarion ? 0;'strong flow = max oints 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 S

2 Evidence of past human alteration
°

extensive alteration = 0• no alteration =. mix points) 0-6
-5
0
0-
5 4
3 Riparian zone ' `•

4.

no buffer.= 0• contiguous, wide''buffer. ;tax rots 0 = 6 0-4
0-5.
3
"r 4' Evidence of nutrient or Mmical discharges P - 0
`
I extensive disch4 es = 0no dischar es mail points 0
5 0 - 4 - 4 5

5 Groundwater discharge

4
no discharge'
= 0 springs, se s wetlands etc. F max points)!.' 0-3 0-4 0-4 3

6 Presence of adjacent floodplalu

no flood lain= 0• extensive jt lain = max points)
t *0-4
0-4
0.=2
3
r Entrenchment T floodp`lam access
?7 (deeply entrenched = 0• frequent floomn = max points) ?0 - 5 0-4 , ?. 0,-2 5

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands

j
0-6
0-4 `
0-2
4
no wetlands = 0• large ad
acent wetlands= max points)

9 'Channel sinuosity
4

S extensive channelizad& = 0; natural meander= max points) 0-5 0- 0-3 5
10 Sediment input
,, 0-5 0-4 0-4 5
extensive d sition- 0• little or no-sediment -,max " points);,

11 Size & diversity of channel bid substrate " y
IA
0 - 4
0 5'
N/A
fine homogenous =:0 tar a diverse sizes = max oints v
_D

1 Evidence of channel incision or widening
0- 5
0- 4
0- 5
(deeply'
incised;=;6, stalite bed &`banks=-max points)
5

13 Presence of major bank fallures

'
05
0
5 w
0= 5'
4
severe erosion = 0• no erosion stable banks = max
ints u
G
4 Root depth and density on banks
,
0 - 3
0 - 4
0 - 5
2
no visible roots :=,0; dense roots throughout= max points)
Impact byagricultiire, livestock, or"timber production }
15
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max "rots 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 5 3

16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
'
03
b - 5
0 - 6
1
no es/ripples or pools = 0• well-developed = max ints

17 Habitat com lead
0-6
0-6
0-6
5
little or no habitat = 0 fre uen varied habitats = max oints

18 Canopy coverage over streambed .
0
-5
0-5. .•
0-5
3
.: no shading vegetation = 0• continuous canopy = maz oints :

19 Substrate embeddedness i
0
7-4
0 - 4
N/A
deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max ,
Presence of stream Invertebrates (see page 4) ;
2O no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points 0 - 4 0 = 5 0 - 5 3

21 Presence of amphibians
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 4
2
no evidence _ 0; common numerous types = max points

22 Presence offish

=
'
•
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
no evidence
common
numerous types = max points).
0

23 Evidence oC wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
(no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max nits
,. .,.. Mr--:ik? : •-. .F,f9.N. ,il.. P., ,,,.. I? era .Fd . ..a
r . 1x I
si ?``
a" `"is -„?...",.< ..-. ,..,_
?1
100 ` h . .:i, _
100 . .. .
100: iF, r vtP-..
G
* y
'1 V 5(a 'ente 'fir
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Hew4
1. Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon 2. Evaluator's name: Corey Novak
3. Date of evaluation: 1/8/09
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
4. Time of evaluation: 14:20
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: second
10. County: Onslow
12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8610 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4612
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an r cs and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel preservation
15. Recent weather conditions: mild
16. Site conditions at time of visit: warm, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters ^Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map. YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey. YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: Q-216 Residential
aL2% Forested
22. Bankfull width: 10 feet
0 % Commercial q-__% Industrial 0 % Agricultural
50 % Cleared / Logged ,Q_% Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous X Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):82 Comments: proposed area for stream preservation
Evaluator's Signature Date 118/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
T '00
Ior?dIN
T It?N
1

'? t?
I
;,, ,..?; -?- ??;? `;, `?
oastal , ?
P?e?mant„, ,_ -
Vl?nntain S ?
?
? :
•
1 Presence of flow /persistent pools
in'strean -
-

no flow or saturation = 0^stron flow max oints
= 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 5
2 Evide
nce of past human alteration '

extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points) _ 6 0
- 5 0-5 4
3 Riparian zone

no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0-6 0-4 0-5 5
4 < Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges

s
extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-4 5
5 Groundwater discharge

no discharge = 0• springs, sees wetlands etc. maid ' rots 0-3 0-4 0-4 3
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain ;•

no flood lain = 0• extensive fl' lain = max `bints 0- 4 0-4 0-2 4
Entrenchment / floodplain access

(deeply entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = max oint<s 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 5
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0
6 0
4
0
2

r
no wetlands = 0; large 'adjacent wetlands max points) - - - 6
9 '. Channel sinuosity
extensive channelization = 0 natural meander =. max points) 0-5 0-4 , 0 - 3 5

1 Sediment input

0-5

0 - 4

0 - 4

5

extensive deposition
-0• little or no sediment= max ints) '
( DO

11 Size' & diversity of channel bed substrate
f a'
A

0-4,

0
5

N/A
fine horno enous =: 0 lar a diverse sizes = max points) : r
-
Evidence of channel incision or widening
12
(deeply incised _ 0 stable bed &E banks = max rots . 0-5 0-4 0-5 5
13 Presence of major bank failures

severe erosion = 0; no erosion stable banks = max points 0-5 0-5 0-5 3
Root depth and density on banks
14 no visible foots = 0 dense roots throw hout = max Points) 0 - 3 0 - 4 0 - 5 2

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock;` or timber production ,
-

substantial impact =0• no evidence = max points) 0-5 0
4 0-5 3

16 Presence of riffle-pooy"pple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
2
?,µ no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well-develo d = max " points)
1
1 Habitat compleidty 0-6 0-6 0-6 ti
little or no habitat = 0• fr en varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
''
0
5
0 - 5
0 - 5
4
no shading vegetation = 0• continuous canopy
= max Points -
,h
19 Substrate embeddedness
A
'
0-4
0-4 ,
N/A
d 1 embedded = 0• loose structure = max .

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4),
0 - 4
0 - 5
0 = 5
3
no evidence = 0• common numerous types _ max rots
L Presence of amphibians
21 no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max ' points) 0-4 0-4 0-4 2

22 Presence of flsh 1
0-4
0-4
0-4-
1
no evidence - 0• common numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max oints
?d,ilr'
l' b'ib[e 5
10(1
100 ?F
00

J
ulso eitern first
f
?SU
de)
?`>
82
(
p
}}
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Hew5
1. Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon 2. Evaluator's name: Corey Novak
3. Date of evaluation: 1/9/09 4. Time of evaluation: 12:00
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch 6. River basin: New River
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 200 acres 8. Stream order: first
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet 10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8676 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4600
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an r cs and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel preservation
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map. YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey. YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: Q_% Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial Q-2/6 Agricultural
40 % Forested 60 % Cleared / Logged _Q _% Other (
22. Bankfull width: 3 feet 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 6%1'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) .Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous X Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 74 Comments: proposed area for stream preservation
Evaluator's Signature Date 119/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
.s
IF!
39w
`
:3
, Ptiedmont 444644
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream '

no flow or saturation 0• strop flow = max points) 0 -5 0-4 0-
5 3
2 Evidence of past human alteration

extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max points) 0-6 0-5 0-5 5
3 Riparian zone: 0-6 0-4 0-5 3
no buffer = 0• conti ous ;wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges ' ,

extensive disc es'- 0• no "duchar es = max points) 0
-
S
0-4 0
-4
5
5 Groundwater'discharge

no discharge = 0• springs, se s wetlands etc: = max points) 0-3 0-4. 0-4 3
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain'

no flood lain - 0• extensive tilain = max points)' 0-4 0-4 0-2 4

7 Entrenchment / flood 'hun access
"
'
0- 5
0- 4
0- 2
5
(deeply entrenched = 0 fr
equent fIoodin
= max points

?
8 Presence of adjaeent'vetlands

Y,
'' no wetlands = G; ,large a adjacent wetlands = max points 0 - 6 0 -4 0 - 2 5
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5
0-4
0-3-

extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max oints 5

10 Sediment input
0-5
0-4:
0-4
5
extensive deposition-- 0• little or no sediment = max points)

I1 Size -Aiversity of chanikI bed substrate
?;,
'
IVA*
?,
0-4
0-5
N/A
fine hc6o
enous = 0• large, diverse sizes =.max oints ,
? 12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0
-5
0-4
4 - 5 `

(deeply incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max points) 3
13 Presence of amajor bank failures

severe erosion = 0• no erosio stable banks = max points) 0-5 },O - 5 0-5 3
0-
n
14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0 5
3
no visible roots = 0• dense roots throughout = max oints
l
15 Impact by agriculture,`livestock, or timber production
0
5
0
4
0 - 5 `
3
substantial impact °0- no evidence = max points - -
Presence of rlffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
-
2
no riffleshi les or' pools = 0• well;develo d = max points 0
3 0 - 6
'
i
17 Habitat complexity

`
0-6
0-6
0-6
5
little or no habitat = 0• fre
ent varied habitats = max points)

is Canopy coverage over;streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
no shading vegetation = 0• continuous canopy = max points)

19 Substrate embeddedness
4`
N
0 - 4
0 - 4
NIA
(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max .

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-`5
3
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max "rots .

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0="4
2
w01 no evidence = 0' common numerous t3rpes = max rots

;Q
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(no evidence = 0• abundant evidence
= max points)
,
wa.; ?
?1
TotHl° b
100
100

r.
Nf
74

" These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map) I
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Huf2
1. Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon 2. Evaluator's name: Corey Novak
3. Date of evaluation: 1/8/09 4. Time of evaluation: 15:00
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch 6. River basin: New River
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 200 acres 8. Stream order: first
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet 10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8575 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4552
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet rtho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an cs and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: mild
16. Site conditions at time of visit: wane, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map. YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey. YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: ?L21o Residential 0 % Commercial q% Industrial Q /o Agricultural
60 % Forested 40 % Cleared / Logged L _21o Other
22. Bankfull width: 6 feet 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):47 Comments:_ proposed area for stream restoration spoil pile running along west
side of ditch channel
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/8/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
=°
r l' i s ?C
l
C k
G D7
1V V 7 ri ,
tP?ed
on
M
ntai SCO°
. m
r ou
n Y' .:
1 of flow persistent pools in stream

no flow or saturation ='0 strop flow .max oints 0 - S 0 - 4 0 - 5 2
Evidence of past human alteration

extensive alteration = 0• no alteration - max " ints 0-6 0 --m5 0-5 3
3 Riparian zone

no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0-6 0-4 0-5 4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges

r'
4
extensive discharges 0; no discharges = max points) 0 "5 0-:4 0-4 4

5 Groundwater discharge
no dischar e - 0; springs
sees wetlands etc
_ max points) 0 -3 0-4 0-4 1 .
,
.

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 '4
0-4
0-2
2
no flood lain =, 0• extensive flood lain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access "

ay
(deeply en 0 - 0-4 0-2 2
'
- presence of adjacent wetlands
i g ,
no wetlands = 0• large adjacent wetlands = max ints 0-6 0-4 0-2 3
Channel stnuosity :._ 0-5 0-4 0-3
1
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = max points)
` 10 Sediment input 021. 5 0-4, 0-4 4
r r extensive deposition-- 0 little or no sediment = max points)
,
1 I Size & diversity of channel bed substrate `"
=
N/A
t fine homogenous = 0• lar a `diverse sizes = max points ? N 0
4 0 - 5

`
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening
M
(de e' 1 incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max points) 0, 5 0-4 0-5 3
Presence'of major bank failures
13 severe erosion = 0no erosion, stable banks = max. ints 0-5 0 - 5 0= 5 3
14 ' Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 1

. no'visible roots =.O; dense roots throu hout = max points)
zr
.a
IS Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
or,
0-5
4
0
4
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points) - 0-5
16; Presence of riffle-poWripple-pool complexes
0
no riffles/riles or pools 0' weli-Aeyeloped max points) 0-3 0-5 0-6
17 Habitat complexity 0 6 0-6 0-6 2
little or no habitat= 0• fre uen varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
`
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
3
no shading v--- tation - 0 continuous cano
= max points)

19 Substrate embeddedness
a *
0-4
0-4
N/A
(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) "
0-4
0-5
0-5
1
no evidence = 0• common numerous es _ max points)
` 21 Presence of amphibians 0 ' 4 0=4 0-4 1
O no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points)

C
22 Presence of fish

n
id
nc
0•
0-4
'0-4
0-4
0
o ev
e
e =
common numerous types = max points)
Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 3
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max points)
F ?
S s To t$l points Possiii J `
0 100
1_
• - 'h
' ? ' TQ 'tS S. (also nteto .f' t'
st:pa .N',.
47
?
?, k
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
I USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Huf3
1. Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon 2. Evaluator's name: Corey Novak
3. Date of evaluation: 1/9/09 4. Time of evaluation: 14:00
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch 6. River basin: New River
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 200 acres 8. Stream order: first
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet 10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8595 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4528
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GI 'Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an ar s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (f-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map. YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey. YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: Q__% Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial Q-2/6 Agricultural
40 % Forested 60 % Cleared / Logged D-21o Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 2 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2.5'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Z_Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight -Occasional bends -Frequent meander Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):31 Comments
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/9109
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
CO N PQ T CE
tt O
1 Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream

no flow or aturation = 0 strop flow = max Dints 0-5 0 -4 0 =5 2
Evidence of past human 'alteration

extensive aiteration = 0; no alteration = max p points) -0-6 0-5 0-5 0
3 Riparian zone

no buffer = 0; contiguous, Wide buffer = max Dints 0-6 0-4 0-5 1
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
4

extensive disc harges ?0 no dischar` e's = max" Dints_ A-5 0-4 0-4
4
;5 Groundwater discharge
no dischar e = 0s rip s'see s wetlands etc. -max rots ' 0 - 3 0 - 4 0 -4 1
6 Presence otaljacent floodplain

no flood lain =,,O• extensive flood lain = max oints "
'

- 4

0-4

0-2 1

7 Entrenchment? floodplain access
0

dee 1 entrenched = 0• fr • ent flooding = max points) -5 0-4 0-2 0

S Presence of adjacent wetlands
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points) 0 - 6 0 - 4 0 - 2 1

9 Channel sinuosity
0-5
0 - 4 "
0-3

0
extensive channelization = 0- natural meander = max rots
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
k :
aY Fs extensive de sition= 0• little or no sediment = max points)
r
..
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
*
0
4

NIA

fine homogenous 0 large, diverse sizes = max points)
- - 0-5

f EvIden&'of channel incision or widening
12 (deeply incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 0
t 3 Presence of major bank failures > ?

severe erosion = 0• no erosion stable banks = max r
t 0 - 5 0-5 0-5 4
o
s

14 Root
depth and density on banks
no visible roots
= 0; dense roots. throughout = max points) 0-3 0-4 0-5 1

I S Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
substantial im act =0; no evidence = max rots '

16 Presence of riffle-pooUrlppl6-pool complexes

no riffles/ri les or pools = 0• well-developed = max points) 0-3 0-5 0-6 0

17 ,,Habitat complexity
0 - 6
0 - 6
0-6
1
little or no habitat - 0; frequent varied habitats = max points
Canopy coverage over str' eambed
19
no shading ve etation - 0- continuous cano = max points) 0-5 0-5 0-5 2
Substrate embeddedness s
19

(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max
.

0 - 4

0 - 4

N/A

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
1
no evidence = 6; common, numerous es = max points)

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
no evidence - 0• common numerous types = max points)

22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0• common numerous types 7max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use -
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
? no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
,w. y .?
? '4. Yrorr.r, _,. ,..a Pr.t?+? r+Jgxe...5Tii v.. '.e?yn..l.. - ,
tsPossib?e i, ,•. r-n .
100 O
.10 X12+. 3
:
i ?
'? ,.
?i ? ?' r ? ;, w • ' a A-
j 'TOTAI, SUE (als0'htes ofi
zstpae) 31

* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: HuM
1. Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon 2. Evaluator's name: Corey Novak
3. Date of evaluation:)/13/09 4. Time of evaluation: 15:45
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch 6. River basin: New River
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 200 acres 8. Stream order: first
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet 10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8577 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4539
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an map identifying stream(s) location):
GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map. YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: ?% Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
40 % Forested 60 % Cleared / Logged n % Other (_
22. Bankfull width: 13' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2.'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight -Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):37 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/9109
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

CTE T
s
Pfedm nt
k"6 ntainO 50
,
i 1 Presence of now / persistent pools In stream
3
no flow or saturation =` 0 strong flow = max points 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5

2 -",Evidence of past human alteration
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points 0 - 6 0- 5 0 = 5 1
3 ?. Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 2
no buffer = 0; Conti ous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
{
3 0 -5
0 - 4
0 - 4
4
extensive dischar es = 0 no discharges 7 max: points

5

11 :
` Groundwater discharge
'

0- 3

0-4

-4

2
n dischar e= 0• springs, seeps, wetlands ec
t
max oins
Presence of adjacent floodpleln `
`
' 2
Jno flood lain = 0• extensive flog lain ='max points) 0-4
? 0 -
4 0-2
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0 - S 0-4 0-2 1
(deeply entrenched = 0• frequent flooding max points) _
Presence of adjacent. wetlands
8 no wetlands"= 0• large adjacent wetlands = max points) 0 - 6 0-,4 0-2 2
9 .Channel sinuosity 0- S 0- 4 0-3
1
extensive channelizAon = 0 natural meander ='max points)

10 Sediment input
- "
p
5
0 -
0 - 4
0 - 4
4
extensive deposition-- 0• little or no sediment = ,max
oints .
v
`
11 ,Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
v
4
0
- 5
N/A

'
?.
fine hbmo
enous =, 0 large, diverse sizes = max ints
s.
-
riy
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
2
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks .max points
;Presence of major bank failures '
13 severe erosion = 0; no erosion stable banks= max points) 0 "5 0-5, 0-5 2

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0 - S
1
no visible roots = 0• dense roots throu hold = max points)
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber 'production
15 substantial impact _=0• no evidence = max points 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 2

16 Presence'of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0
- 3

0 -5

0-6

0
no riffles/ripples les or pools = 0; well-developed = max points) .
"
17 Habitat complexity
`
0
6
0 - 6
0 - 6 1
(little or no habitat= 0• fre uent
varied habitats = max points -

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
"
"
0-5
0-:5
0-5
2
.
no shadin vegetation 0• continuous
= canopy =max points)

19 Substrate embeddedness f,•' 0 -'4 0_ 4 N/A
. (deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 - 4
0 - 5
4 - 5
1
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
OR no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points)

22 `Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points)
r:
23 Evidence of wildlife use

0-5

0-5
-5

3
no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max oints
11 P 'loo

+ , „TA SCE -` also enter on
'tirst page) 37
js
x These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Ball
1. Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon 2. Evaluator's name: Corey Novak
3. Date of evaluation:) /13/09 4. Time of evaluation: 12:00
5. Name of stream: Batchelors Delight Swamp 6. River basin: New River
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 200 acres 8. Stream order: First
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet 10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8575 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4396
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an a r cs and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, rain
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters - Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map. YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? (9D O
21. Estimated watershed land use: Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
40 % Forested 60 % Cleared / Logged n%o Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 2 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 6"
24. Channel slope down center of stream: CX Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends X Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):46 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/13/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
$ G >dC1LT RANGE
4 „ . ACTP S
t t iemont , Mouita
1 Presence of flow / persistent poolsin stream 7

no flow or saturation =,0• strop flow = max points) 0-4, 0-5 0
Evidence of past human alteration
-2 extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max points 0 - 6 0 - 5 0 - 5 4
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 2
no buffer - 0• contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
1
extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = max " points)

5 Groundwater discharge
0 = 3
0-4
0-4
3
no discharge = 0• s rings seeps wetlands etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
`
0-4
0-4
0-2 3
no flood lain = 0• extensive flo
lain = max oints
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 2
3
de 1 entrenched =. 0 frequent flooding = max points

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
-
-
3
` no wetlands =0; large adjacent wetlands = max rots 0 - 6 4
0 0
2
' 9 `Channel sinuosity 0-5 0= 4 0 =.3 3
extensive channelization -,0; natural meander - max oints
' 10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 5
extensive deposition-- 0• little or no sediment = max points)

11 Size &"diversity of channel bed substrate ''
11A
0
4
0-5
N/A
(fine, homogenous enous = 0• lar a diverse sizes = max rots , -

12 Evidence of channel incisloo or widening
0
0=4
5

W
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & 'banks = max points) -5 0- 4
+
1=,;
1 Presence of major bank failures
0 - 5
0
5
0 - 5
4
3! severe erosion= 0; no erosion stable banks = max points -
4

14
,
Root d
d density on banks
. .
p
` 0-3 0-4 0-5 0
e
se roots throughout = max
dense
no visible roots = O
00ints)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production

'
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
substantial impact =0• no evidence = max points)

}
16 Presence of riffle-pooVripple-pool complexes
,
0-3
0-5

0-6

0
no riffles/r ` les or
opools = 0• well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
6-6

t
E' little or no habitat = 0• frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
no shading vegetation = 0• continuous canopy = max ints i

19 Substrate embeddedness 4
0-4
0-4
N/A
dee 1 embedded = 0• loose structure = max
„
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
0
no evidence = 0• common, ' numerous types = max points) .

21 Presence of amphibians
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 4
0
"O no evidence = 0• common' numerous types = max points)

Q:
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0• common' numerous types = max points)
,'

3 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
2 no evidence = 0• abundant evidence= max ints
,-sty.:: .. ,. s 7 777
y!k
o t p stile 100
Tow ., op, ;,,R.,

100 '
wl

. -
,,
SCOR>Ets(also enter on first p ge)
4 " 46
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
I USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
M
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Bat NIWW
1. Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon 2. Evaluator's name: Corey Novak
3. Date of evaluation:) /13/09 4. Time of evaluation: 13:30
5. Name of stream: Batchelors Delight Swamp 6. River basin: New River
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 200 acres 8. Stream order: Zero
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet 10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8561 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4405
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an cs and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, rain
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters ,Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map. YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? (E >O
21. Estimated watershed land use: Q_% Residential 0 % Commercial q ._/o Industrial 0 % Agricultural
40 % Forested 60 % Cleared / Logged D_% Other (
22. Bankfull width: 50 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 6"
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends X Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):51 Comments: Swamp, there is no channel
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/13/09
This channel evaluation form is Intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

Presence'of flow / persistent pools in stream
1 ' no floi? or'saturation = 0; strop flow = max' ° oints 0 - 5 0 = 4 0 = 5 .. 2
Evidence of past human alteration
2 •ve alteration = 0; no alteration = max' points
extens" 0-6 0-5 0-5 3

3 Riparian zone

"
0-6
0-4
0-5
3
no buffer = 0• conti
ous wide buffer = max points
4' Evidence of
nutrient or chemical discharges
.
extensive dischar es = 0• no discharges = max points) 0-5 0 4 0-4 4
Groundwater discharge ,

5

no discharge 4• s rip s` sees wetlands etc. = max points) 0-3 0 4 0-
4
2
V Presence"of adjacent floodplain 3
6
} no flood lain = 0• extensive flood lain = max points) 0 - 4 0 -4. 0 - 2
Entrenchment 7 floodplain access
3
de 1 entrenched = 0• frequent floodin ^- max points 0 - 5 0 = 4 0-2

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
no wetlands = 0-, large adjacent wetlands rots

9 Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3

4
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander - max points) :

10 Sediment input
0 - 5
074
0 = 4
4
extensive d osition= 0- Iit+' 6r no sediment= max ints

?? 1 l Size & diversity of channel bed substrate *
A
0-4
0-5 N/A
ji)
fine homogenous = 0• large, diverse sizes = max o'ints
?
„•

12 Evidence of channel incision or widening '
?.
'
0-5
4
0
0
5

2
dee 1 incised =:0 stable bed & banks = max point-,) 7 7
13 •Presence of major 'bank failures 0-5 0-5 0 `= 5

severe erosion = 0• no erosion-}stable banks= max ints 2
14' > - f Root depth and density on banks
o 0 - 3 0-4 0-5 2
rots
no visible roots = 0• dense roots throu out = max
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0
5
0-4
0-5
3
15 substantial impact =0;'no evidence = max points) -

16 Presence of riffle-po&ripple=pool complexes
'
0-3
0-5
0-6
0
b• well-developed =.,max points)
no riffles/riles or ools =

.p 17 Habitat complexity

'
0-6
0-6
0-.6 1
-?-' little or no habitat = 0• frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
4
no shading ve etation = 0• continuous canopy= max points)

19 Substrate embeddedness
4*
0-4
0-4
N/A
(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max .
'
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
0
{ no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points)

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
0 no evidence = 0• common numerous types = ,max points)

C}; 22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max ints
'
23 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
`a no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points
r..
4 Total pomfs Posse c t '; 3';°' ?t
?° 'i100
100 t
100' s

er«on'irst aged r?:
?' x
Wit O Mma 51
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
I USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)i
i
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET I
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Ba3
1. Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon 2. Evaluator's name: Corey Novak
3. Date of evaluation: 1/13/09 4. Time of evaluation: 10:30
5. Name of stream: Batchelors Delight Swamp 6. River basin: New River
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 200 acres 8. Stream order: First
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet 10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8538 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4377
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet rtho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an cs and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, rain
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map. YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0-?% Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
40 % Forested 60 % Cleared / Logged D-% Other (
22. Bankfull width: 7 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3"
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):41 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/13/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
G4REG N PJ
t

? }
s

Al
.ts _ ,j r -`,

oasifaT

?edm nt

Mountaln CO

1 1resence of flow / persistent pools in stream
`
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
4
no flow or saturation = 0• strop
flow = max points
Evidence of past human alteration'
-
2 ,?x.,•
extensive alteration ° 0• no alteration = max points) 0-6 0
5 0-5 1
Riparian zone
3 no buffer = 0 Conti ous wide buffer -max rots 0-6 0-4 0-5 3
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
4 extensive dischar es = 0 no disc es = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
5 Groundwater discharge
0 - 3
0 - 4
0-4
1
o , w no discharge = 0• springs, sees wetlands etc. = max points
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0- 4 0 4 0-2
2
no flood lain = 0• extensive flood lain = max points)

2 Entrenchment / floodplain access

0-5

0-4

0-2
2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent uent flooding _ max points)

8 M Presence of adjacent wetlands
,
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
no wetlands =O large ad acent wetlands = max oints
Channel sinuosity =.. -, ' .. 0-5 0-4 0-3 1
u extensive channehzation0• natural meander - max rots

10 Sediment input
o
0 -
5
0
-4,
0-4
4
{ extensive d
sition-- 0• little or no sediment = max points) . 1

X11 Size & divers i of channel bed substrate

?. t9 ._
'
^
CIA'
'

0-4

0-5

N/A
a fine homokenous =,O; tar a diverse sizes = max
points)
'
I2 Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0
4
0-5 t _.
a
(deeply incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max oints - 0

13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
severe erosion = 0• no erosion stable banks = max ints
?A
14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
1
no visible-routs - 0• dense roots throughout = max points)

prod "-
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber,

0
5

0-4

0-5

3
15 substantial impact =0• no evidence= max points) -

16 ; Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
'
0-3
0-5
0-6
0
les or pools = 0• well-develo d = max points)
no riffles/ri

1 Habitat complexity
0 - 6
0-6
0 - 6 1
little or no habitat = 0 fr uent varied habitats = max points
F4 18 ;Canopy coverage over streambed
'
0 - 5
0-5
0-5
3
continuous canopy = max points)
no shading vegetation = 0
`
1 Substrate embeddedness ?`
0 - 4
0 - 4
N/A
dee 1 embedded = 0• loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream' invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 0 - 5 0-5 1
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points)

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
no evidence = 0• common numerous esmax points)

22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0• common numerous esmax points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5 4
no evidence= 0 abundant evidence = max 'rots
? at.x ? as w „gam _:` :.x*

r
r I`telpoin r x G
ts`?os?sibic _
.1

00
t'` 100 4 E
100
4?
? f? a y
TO }4` 1 4 e ?O 101.L "'Ad-,"
e
?
;
l ' 41
r
`a
? -
YF k
4?R`
?? t .. x d
.
gF
.
m
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Ba4
1. Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon 2. Evaluator's name: Corey Novak
3. Date of evaluation: 1/13/09 4. Time of evaluation: 15:00
5. Name of stream: Batchelors Delight Swamp
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: First
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8533 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4394
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho, (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an cs and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, rain
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map. YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: Q_% Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
40 % Forested 60 % Cleared / Logged _Q____% Other (
22. Bankfull width: 6 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3"
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends -Frequent meander X Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):72 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/13/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not Imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
J_
J
1
Jx vrr?

SCO
fl

1 Presence?of flow / persistent pools in stream
a
0-5
.0-4
0-5
5
no flow or s
turation = 0• stron flow 'max points)

2 5 Evidence of past humaii'alteration
0 - 6
0 - 5
0 - 5
3
extensive alteration = 0 no alteration = max points)
' Riparian zone '
3 no buffer = 0• conti 'ous wide buffer = max points 0 - 6 0 - 4 0 - 5 3

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges

extensive dischar es = 0• no discharges = max ints 0-5 0-4r 0-4 5
Groundwater dischar
e
5 g
+ 0-3 0-4 0-4 2
no discharge 0 s rin s se s wetlands etc. -max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2 3
no flood lain _ 0•'extensive flood lain= max' oints
Entrenchment / floodplain access
(deeply entrenched - 0• frequent flooding = max points 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 2 3
Presence of adjacent wetlands
8;.
no wetlands = 6, large, e`ad'acent wetlands = max points) 0-6 0-4 0-2 4
Channelsinuosity

9 .
extensive channelization = 0 natural meander = max points)
0 - 5
0-4
0-3
4
j . Sediment inpat
10
extensive d ? sition= 0• little or no sediment = max points) 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 5
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
4
0
0
5
N/A
fine homo moos =,.O; large, diverse sizes = max oints ' s - -

j1 Evidence of channel incision or widening
2 - (deeply incised = 0• stable b&W banks = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 3
Presence of major bank failures
`
13, severe erosion 0'-no erosion stable banks =, max points 0 - 5 0 - 5 0 - 5 3
Root depth and density on banks `
24 no visible roots = 0• dense'roots throughout = max points) 3 0-4 0-51, 3
ws;
l5 Impact by agriculture, livestock; or tunber production
0-5
0
4
0-5
4
n substantial impact =0• no evidence"='max 'oints -

16 Presence of riffle•pool/ripple-pool complexes
"
0
3
0 - 5
0-6 2
no riffles/rile
s or ©ols = 0• well-developed = max points -

17 Habitat complexity
`
0
6
0 - 6
0 - ti 5
' ent varied habitats = max points '
little or no habitat = 0' fr •-
pq
18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
4
no shading vegetation = 0• continuous canopy = max points)
<
s.'
19 Substrate embeddedness „
A rW
0-4
0-4
N/A
(deeply embedded= 0• loose structure = max

1 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
4
0
0-5
0
5
3
20 :,;
no evidence = 0'common numerous types = max' rots - - -

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4,
0-4
2
no evidence =.:0- common numerous types = max oints

22 = Presence of fish
0-4
0 - 4'
0-4
no evidence = .0 common numerous types = max i ints

23 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5`
0-5
5
l no evidence - 0, abundant evidence = max points)
?g, j? k J1 100 1? iQO.

.Y it 1
;ter ??? ' i=? T O ?21? inter o' first page
' ?
72

* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
G
Vx '`
y
d
I -
a°
i
b?
- ?' 258
24

I . 111
u
HTE
Toundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
SCALE 1" = 1 Mile
Map Source: North Carolina Atlas 8 Gazetteer. Pg 77.2003
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank LMG Figure 1.
Onslow County, NC
01-08-352 Vicinity Map
April 2009

r
I

M ...
f-
"a
0 A K
1' 0 C
H o F h1 A N N F,
d eye. 4y
-'-.-
•• GPADS
f
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source, Quadrangle 7.5 minute (topographic) 1990. SCALE 1" = 3,000'
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank LMG Figure 2.
Onslow County, NC ??:.,\(,celk(\l (,RI,( P . USGS Topographic Map
01-08-352 `" April 2009 (Jacksonville NW Quad)
r`
W H / T E
j j I
pp R E
c.
Al
52
D
p 9 8b o
vy m N �.✓" 8t as . -,.
"N _
b 8Vi Bb 48.4a 48
r� ~
54
56 ya ym 56 O Jam- 2s t�' B?A
PS h° 86
ap 48 "
s ya hS �'yo .8b5D 48 .
B
... y4 y° bQ 5e 4 O
0 _ / x.
0 Q
46
48PC
y'L ha l
yryy 5152.'. \q
y'L ,° _-1 50 C7 \TdC1 8V r� 96
25
ego so�a5g°
O
o ZS o 4 �0
08 �Sa
50
0 Rt bl
SIP
4
64 . ��` _ Q av
O 4i\� y p 1
��� 52 5j1S 4a 7p h
\ V p�
�/ ' a 0 '
�� h bg J\✓( )�� y0O � /
�SA50
'
54
ZS p5 f°. OS
zs Zs
v
Or 1

Toundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NCGIA GIS Data
SCALE V = 10 Miles
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank LMG Figure 4.
Onslow County, NC - 11) MANAGLNIEN I GROL P Proposed Geographic
01-08-352 - `" °"" 1. It, 1 1 1°" r'""' Service Area (GSA)
April 2009
Toundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NRCS Soils Map.
Omni
SCALE 1" = 1,000'
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank 4 LMG Figure 5.
Onslow County, NC LAND AIANM MINI GROL Pr.. NRCS Soil Survey
01-08-352
April 2009
Toundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 1998 NAPP aerial photography
mn?
SCALE 1" = 1,000'
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank LMG Figure 6.
Onslow County, NC 1998 Aerial Photography
01-08-352 c,, , , , , . ,t.?;
April 2009
v. ?rfi t r r? r; {+? LL
ri,
y i ,y? '???# ? ? ° e r'+°?j, CCCr?!!! k , , e/ 6 1: d 1 '?• i
a^
O04 U' A.. t S X
i RC: t S. `if JPO 00 `p G0 /\1
i^?? r??'.+v 0O0J:lCJ OO J:Y $`?Yh'.' !.l
a '?' c c e P ,3' ? e? ?h
4`? L ?i'?' R f .?a oc ? c °r?oc y? r +r t
+ W? 7aT?y tL o OPPPaPO / rs9g
oOPq?,.
C, 07
AM i
i i ? I { 9 t? r? OJ ? c -?'Y 4 '?.Q '°'?@Ys ka "' \?\ ?s Dr
iii `E\ m 4 7--? Pp95Fw k? v
s?a
x c v\??
,rte ? N ° \ h 3 + ?9r"r:
??' v `v D „r.?s r .TES $
/ S p_ ? z.? a air
y ?\ ,? ter„ ?-_ '" fr-? t, ? •`??' ?`.:
??{f roy \ g
"Do
OC -I
a` { E s D±t,?x r' ' `w ° Yi?tt o p `o_ g io m ^
w y,? r ??? .?8 r 4 ? en
+• fi t ti ?p?h ? ? ? ?*/?/ ? <rS•.}, ? ? yP" a {?`'j? f c r . ? L ? y in o m c A 2'
r,
fe' / r x - ?. l.',r p B m l9 a ZC
r r,??^p '+?j" h a m ly
in in in 3 w a
kw- 3 Y 7 Y tic CR
`? m g
c c -p
m m c
n m ?i d d d m ? Fa
X O O O O a O O.
a- LU EL a- a_ n-
u