NC0086606_Inspection_20180905

NORTH CAROLINA
ROY COOPER Errvrranrh#1t1G1 QUdlfly
G&V 01tw
MICHAEL S. REGAL
Secr�rary
LINDA CULPEPPER
In redm D,'rsctor
5 September 2018
Mr. Tony Konsul, Regional Manager
Carolina Water Service, Inc. of NC
Post Office Box 240908
Charlotte, North Carolina 28224
Subject: Effluent Sampling Results
The Harbour - Well #4 WTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO086606
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Konsul:
Enclosed is a copy of the laboratory results for the effluent samples collected during the Compliance Sampling Inspection
performed at the subject facility on June 13, 2018, by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office. Effluent grab samples were collected at
Outfall 001 during this inspection. The facility complied with all applicable permit limits (daily maximums). Please attach this
correspondence with the previously issued inspection report (dated June 21, 2018) to complete your records.
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell at [phone], or via
email at [e-mail].
Enclosure:
Effluent Results
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
A14CC681 AF27425...
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
EQ.:>
"-mr
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Avenue I Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704.663.1699

AC51578 North Carolina Division of Water Resources Water Sciences Section Laboratory Results
Loc. Descr.:
THE HARBOUR WELL 4 EFFLUENT
PO Number #
mg/L
Date Received:
County:
IREDELL
Collector:
W BELL
VisitlD
Delivery Method
Region:
MRO
Report To
MRO
Location ID:
NCO086606
River Basin
CTB
Collect Dale:
06/13/2018
Priority
COMPLIANCE
Emergency
Sample temperature at receipt by lab
Collect Time:
12_26
Sample Matrix:
WASTEWATER
COC Yes/No
Yes
Sample Depth
SM 2540 C-1997
Loc. Type:
Effluent
Final Report
Sample ID:
AC51578
PO Number #
mg/L
Date Received:
0611412018
Time Received:
08_16
Labworks LoginlD
TASCENZOI
Delivery Method
NC Courier
Final Report Date:
7/23/18
Report Print Dale:
07/2312018
If this report is labeled preliminary report, the results have not been validated.
Do not use for Regulatory purposes.
1900
mg/L
EPA 300.0 rev2.1
Result/
CGREEN
Method
Analysis
0.4U
CAS # Analyte Name
PCNL
Qualifier
Units
Reference
Date
Validated by
mg/l-
EPA 300.0 rev2.1
LAB
CGREEN
Residue_Suspended In liquid
6.2
6.2 U
Sample temperature at receipt by lab
SM 2540 D-1997
2.2
°C
Total Dissolved Solids in liquid
6/14/18
MSWIFT
mg/L
SM 2540 C-1997
MIC
CGREEN
Pb by ICPMS
2.0
2.0 U
Turbidity
1.0
1.0 U
NTU
SM 2130 B-2001
6/14/18
RBYRD
ug/L
EPA 200.7 Rev4.4
WET
ESTAFFORDi
Bromide
4.0
4.0 U,P
mg/L
EPA 300.0 rev2A
6/20/18
CGREEN
Chloride
1.0
1900
mg/L
EPA 300.0 rev2.1
6/20/18
CGREEN
Fluoride
0.4
0.4U
mg/L
EPA 300.0 rev2.1
6/20/18
CGREEN
Sulfate
2.0
72
mg/l-
EPA 300.0 rev2.1
6/20/18
CGREEN
Residue_Suspended In liquid
6.2
6.2 U
mg/L
SM 2540 D-1997
6/18/18
CGREEN
Total Dissolved Solids in liquid
12
4500
mg/L
SM 2540 C-1997
6/19/18
CGREEN
WSS Chemistry Laboratory» 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 [phone]
"Not Detected" or "U" does not indicate the sample is analyte free but that the anayte is not detected at or above the POL.
Page 1 of 1
MET
Cu by furnace
2.0
5.3
ug/l-
EPA 200.9 Rev2.2
6/28/18
ESTAFFORD1
Fe by ICP
50
140
ug/L
EPA 200.7 Rev4A
6/29/18
ESTAFFORD1
Mn by ICP
10
52
ug/L
EPA 200.7 Rev4.4
6/29/18
ESTAFFORD1
Na by ICP
0.10
330
mglL
EPA 200.7 Rev4.4
6/29/18
ESTAFFORD1
Pb by ICPMS
2.0
2.0 U
ug/L
EPA 200.8 Rev5.4
6/28/18
ESTAFFORD1
Zn by ICP
10
100
ug/L
EPA 200.7 Rev4.4
6/29/18
ESTAFFORDi
WSS Chemistry Laboratory» 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 [phone]
"Not Detected" or "U" does not indicate the sample is analyte free but that the anayte is not detected at or above the POL.
Page 1 of 1

NC DEQ WSS LAB
DATA QUALIFIER CODES
Symbol
Definition
Value reported is the mean (average) of two or more determinations. This code is to be used if the results of two or more discrete and separate
samples are averaged. These samples shall have been processed and analyzed independently (e.g. field duplicates, different dilutions of the
same sample). This code is not required for BOD, coliform or acute/chronic metals reporting since averaging multiple results for these
A
parameters is fundamental to those methods or manner of reporting.
1 The reported value is an average, where at least one result is qualified with a "U". The PQL is used for the qualified result(s) to calculate
the average.
Results based upon colony counts outside the acceptable range and should be used with caution. This code applies to microbiological tests and
specifically to membrane filter (ME) colony counts. It is to be used if less than 100% sample was analyzed and the colony count is generated
from a plate in which the number of colonies exceeds the ideal ranges indicated by the method. These ideal ranges are defined in the method as:
Fecal coliform or Enterococcus bacteria: 20-60 colonies Total coliform bacteria: 20-80 colonies
1
Countable membranes with less than 20 colonies. Reported value is estimated or is a total of the counts on all filters reported per 100 ml.
2 Counts from all filters were zero. The value reported is based on the number of colonies per 100 ml that would have been reported if
there had been one colony on the filter representing the largest filtration volume (reported as a less than "<" value).
3 Countable membranes with more than 60 or 80 colonies. The value reported is calculated using the count from the smallest volume
B
filtered and reported as a greater than ">" value.
4
Filters have counts of both >60 or SO and <20. Reported value is estimated or is a total of the counts on all filters reported per 100 ml.
5
Too many colonies were present; too numerous to count (TNTC). TNTC is generally defined as >150 colonies. The numeric value
represents the maximum number of counts typically accepted on a filter membrane (60 for fecal or enterococcus and 80 for total),
multiplied by 100 and then divided by the smallest filtration volume analyzed. This number is reported as a greater than value.
6 Estimated Value. Blank contamination evident.
7 Many non -coliform or non -enterococcus colonies or interfering non -coliform or non -enterococcus growth present. In this competitive
situation, the reported value may under -represent actual density.
Note: A "B" value shall be accompanied by justification for its use denoted by the numbers listed above (e.g., Bl, B2, etc.). Note: A "J2" should be
used for spiking failures.
Total residual chlorine was present in sample upon receipt in the laboratory; value is estimated. Generally applies to cyanide, phenol,
C
NH3, TKN, coliform, and organics.
A single quality control failure occurred during biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) analysis. The sample results should be used with caution.
1 The dissolved oxygen (DO) depletion of the dilution water blank exceeded 0.2 mg/L.
2
The bacterial seed controls did not meet the requirement of a DO depletion of at least 2.0 mg/L and/or a DO residual of at least 1.0 mg/L.
3 No sample dilution met the requirement of a DO depletion of at least 2.0 mg/L and/or a DO residual of at least 1.0 mg/L.
4 Evidence of toxicity was present. This is generally characterized by a significant increase in the BOD value as the sample concentration
decreases. The reported value is calculated from the highest dilution representing the maximum loading potential and should be
considered an estimated value.
G
5 The glucose/ glutamic acid standard exceeded the range of 198 ± 30.5 mg/L.
6 The calculated seed correction exceeded the range of 0.6 to 1.0 mg/L.
7 Less than 1 mg/L DO remained for all dilutions set. The reported value is an estimated greater than value and is calculated for the dilution
using the least amount of sample.
8 Oxygen usage is less than 2 mg/L for all dilutions set. The reported value is an estimated less than value and is calculated for the dilution
using the most amount of sample.
9 The DO depletion of the dilution water blank produced a negative value.
10 The cBOD value is greater than the BOD value.
Note: A "G" value shall be accompanied by justification for its use denoted by the numbers listed above (e.g., G1, G2, etc.).
QualifierCodes_2_27_2018.xlsx 2/28/2018 1:51 PM 1 OF 3

NC DEQ WSS LAB
DATA QUALIFIER CODES
QualifierCodes_2_27_2018.xlsx 2/28/2018 1:51 PM 2 OF 3
Estimated value; value may not be accurate. This code is to be used in the following instances:
1 Surrogate recovery limits have been exceeded.
2 The reported value failed to meet the established quality control criteria for either precision or accuracy.
3 The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination.
4 The data is questionable because of improper laboratory or field protocols (e.g,, composite sample was collected instead of grab, plastic
instead of glass container, etc.).
5 Temperature limits exceeded (samples frozen or WC) during transport or not verifiable (e.g., no temperature blank provided): non -
reportable for NPDES compliance monitoring.
6 The laboratory analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample. The data may not be accurate.
7 This qualifier is used to identify analyte concentration exceeding the upper calibration range of the analytical instrument/method. The
J
reported value should be considered estimated.
8 Temperature limits exceeded (samples frozen or >62C) during storage, the data may not be accurate.
9 The reported value is determined by a one -point estimation rather than against a regression equation. The estimated concentration is
less than the laboratory PQL and greater than the laboratory method detection limit.
10 Unidentified peak; estimated value.
11 The reported value is determined by a one -point estimation rather than against a regression equation. The estimated concentration is
less than the laboratory PQL and greater than the instrument noise level. This code is used when an MDL has not been established for the
analyte in question.
12 The calibration verification did not meet the calibration acceptance criterion for field parameters.
Note: A "J" value shall be accompanied by justification for its use denoted by the numbers listed above (e.g., 11, J2, etc.). A "1" value shall not be
used if another code applies (e.g,, N, V, M).
Sample and duplicate results are "out of control". The sample is non-homogenous (e.g., VOA soil). The reported value is the lower value of
M
duplicate analyses of a sample.
Presumptive evidence of presence of material; estimated value. This code is to be used if:
1 The component has been tentatively identified based on mass spectral library search.
2 There is an indication that the analyte is present, but quality control requirements for confirmation were not met (i.e., presence of
analyte was not confirmed by alternate procedures).
N
3This code shall be used if the level is too low to permit accurate quantification, but the estimated concentration is less than the laboratory
PQL and greater than the laboratory method detection limit. This code is not routinely used for most analyses.
4 This code shall be used if the level is too low to permit accurate quantification, but the estimated concentration is less than the
laboratory practical quantitation limit and greater than the instrument noise level. This code is used when an MDL has not been
established for the analyte in question.
5 The component has been tentatively identified based on a retention time standard.
Holding time exceeded. These codes shall be used if the value is derived from a sample that was received, prepared and/or analyzed after the
approved holding time restrictions for sample preparation and analysis. The value does not meet NPDES requirements.
Q
1 Holding time exceeded prior to receipt by lab.
2 Holding time exceeded following receipt by lab.
P
Elevated PQL due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution.
S
Not enough sample provided to prepare and/or analyze a method -required matrix spike (MS) and/or matrix spike duplicate (MSD).
Indicates that the analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the reported PQL. The number value reported with the "U" qualifier is equal
U
to the laboratory's PQL*.
Indicates that the analyte was not detected by a screen analysis. The number value reported with the "UU" qualifier is equal to the laboratory's
UU
PQL. The number value was determined by a one -point estimation at the PQL, rather than against a regression equation.
QualifierCodes_2_27_2018.xlsx 2/28/2018 1:51 PM 2 OF 3

NC DEQ WSS LAB
DATA QUALIFIER CODES
Su000rtine Definitions listed below
MDL
Indicates the analyte was detected in both the sample and the associated blank. Note: The value in the blank shall not be subtracted from the
associated samples.
V
recognizable signal and acceptable calibration point for the analyte. It is equivalent to the concentration of the lowest calibration standard,
ML
1 The analyte was detected in both the sample and the method blank.
2 The analyte was detected in both the sample and the field blank
Sample not analyzed for this constituent. This code is to be used if:
1 Sample not screened for this compound.
X
2 Sampled, but analysis lost or not performed -field error.
3 Sampled, but analysis lost or not performed -lab error.
Note: an "X" value shall be accompanied by justification for its use by the numbers listed.
y
Elevated PQL due to insufficient sample size.
PQL
The sample analysis/results are not reported due to:
Z
1 Inability to analyze the sample.
2 Questions concerning data reliability.
Note: The presence or absence of the analyte cannot be verified.
Su000rtine Definitions listed below
MDL
A Method Detection Limit (MDL) is defined as the minimum concentration of a substance that can be measured and reported with 99 percent
confidence that the true value is greater than zero and is determined in accordance with 40 CFR Part 136, Appendix B.
Minimum Levels are used in some EPA methods. A Minimum Level (ML) is the lowest level at which the entire analytical system must give a
recognizable signal and acceptable calibration point for the analyte. It is equivalent to the concentration of the lowest calibration standard,
ML
assuming that all method - specified sample weights, volumes, and cleanup procedures have been employed. The ML is calculated by multiplying
the MDL by 3.18 and rounding the result to the nearest factor of 10 multiple (Le., 1, 2, or 5). For example, MDL = 1.4 mg/L; ML= 1.4 mg/L x 3.18
= 4.45 rounded to the nearest factor of 10 multiple (i.e., 5) = 5.0 mg/L
The Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL) is defined as the lowest concentration that can be reliably achieved within specified limits of precision and
accuracy during routine laboratory operating conditions. PQLs are subjectively set at some multiple of typical MDLs for reagent water (generally
3 to 10 times the MDL depending upon the parameter or analyte and based on the analyst's best professional judgement, the quality and age of
the instrument and the nature of the samples) rather than explicitly determined. PQLs may be nominally chosen within these guidelines to
simplify data reporting and, where applicable, are generally equal to the concentration of the lowest non -zero standard in the calibration curve.
PQL
PQLs are adjusted for sample size, dilution and % moisture. For parameters that are not amenable to MDL studies, the PQL may be defined by
the sample volume and buret graduations for titrations or by minimum measurement values set by the method for method -defined parameters
(e.g., BOD requires a minimum DO depletion of 2.0 mg/L, fecal coliform requires a minimum plate count of 20 cfu, total suspended residue
requires a minimum weight gain of 2.5 mg, etc.). Additionally, some EPA methods prescribe Minimum Levels (MLs) and the lab may set the PQL
equal to this method -stated ML. Determination of PQL is fully described in the laboratory's analytical Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)
document.
QualifierCodes_2_27_2018.xlsx 2/28/2018 1:51 PM 3 OF 3