Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0087033_Inspection_20180827NORTH CAROLINA ROY COOPER fnvrranrh#1t1G1 QUdlfly G&V 01tw MICHAEL S. REGAL Secr�rary LINDA CULPEPPER In redm D,'rsctor 27 August 2018 The Honorable D. Lee Matney, Mayor Town of Harmony Post Office Box 118 Harmony, North Carolina 28634 Subject: Notice of Deficiency Compliance Evaluation Inspection Town of Harmony WWTP NPDES Permit No. NCO087033 Iredell County Tracking #: NOD -2018 -PC -0274 Dear Mayor Matney: Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted at the subject facility on August 15, 2018, by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office. Please inform the facility's Operator -in -Responsible Charge (ORC) of our findings by forwarding a copy of the enclosed report. This report is being issued as a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) due to the following: - Influent sampler temperature exceeded six degrees Celsius; - Effluent sampler was not collecting a minimum of 100 mis. per aliquot; - Five bulbs (ultraviolet disinfection system) were not operational and had not been replaced. All above -noted findings are violations of the subject NPDES Permit and North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1 as detailed in the Influent Sampling, Effluent Sampling, and UV Disinfection Sections of the attached report. Please be advised that G.S. 143-215.6A provides for a civil penalty assessment of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00), or twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per day when the violation is of a continuing nature, against any person who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of any permit issued pursuant to G.S. 143-215.1. Penalties may also be assessed for any damage to surface waters of the State that may result from the violations. EQ.:> `_=r North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources 610 East Center Avenue I Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 704.663.1699 The Honorable D. Lee Matney Page Two 27 August 2018 It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by September 17, 2018, detailing the actions taken to address these deficiencies and all efforts to prevent the recurrence of any future deficiencies. In responding, please address your comments to the attention of Mr. Wes Bell. Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell at (704) 235-2192, or via email at wes.bellkncdenr.gov. Sincerely, DocuSigned by: A14CC681 AF27425... W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ Enclosure: Inspection Report United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved. EPA Washington, D.C. 20460 OMB No. 2040-0057 Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type 1 IN I 2 15 I 3 I NCO087033 111 12 I 18/08/15 I17 18 I S i 19 LG] i 201 I 211111 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 166 Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA ----------------------Reserved------------------- 67 2.0 70 71 [ I 72 I I 73 �74 751 1 1 1 1 1 1 180 u Section B: Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date POTW name and NPDES oermit Number) 12:40PM 18/08/15 14/05/01 Harmony WWTP 125 Windmill Ct Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date Harmony NC 28634 03:OOPM 18/08/15 18/11/30 Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data Steven L Lam bert/ORC/704-546-2602/ Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number Contacted Daniel Lee Matney,PO Box 118 Harmony NC 28634/Mayor/704-546-2339/ No Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date EDoby: 8/27/2018 Wes Bell �� � MRO WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.2192/ A:e)96D90CC3437... Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date W. Corey Basinger MRO WQ//704-235-2194/ EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. DocuSigned by: eyl � 8/27/2018 AtaccsatAFvazs... Page# NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type NCO087033 111 121 18/08/15 1 17 18 JCJ Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) Page# Permit: NCO087033 Owner - Facility: Harmony WWTP Inspection Date: 08/15/2018 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Yes No NA NE Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? 0 ❑ Permit Yes No NA NE (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ application? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Is the facility as described in the permit? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: The last compliance evaluation inspection was performed at the facility on 10/25/16 by DWR staff. Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is all required information readily available, complete and current? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the chain -of -custody complete? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Dates, times and location of sampling Name of individual performing the sampling Results of analysis and calibration Dates of analysis Name of person performing analyses Transported COCs Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ (If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ on each shift? Is the ORC visitation log available and current? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? ❑ ❑ ❑ Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: The records reviewed durina the inspection were oraanized and well maintained. Discharae Monitoring Reports (eDMRs) were reviewed for the period June 2017 through May 2018. No effluent limit violations were reported and all monitoring frequencies were correct. The CIRC must ensure the following: 'H" for Holiday is properly reported so that the flow can be reported on each applicable day; cease reporting "0" for total residual chlorine (UV disinfection); and document all process control measurements/results. Page# 3 Permit: NCO087033 Owner - Facility: Harmony WWTP Yes No NA NE # Is composite sampling flow proportional? ❑ ❑ Inspection Date: 08/15/2018 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation ❑ Is sample collected above side streams? 0 ❑ Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Laboratory Yes No NA NE Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the facility using a contract lab? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Celsius)? Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: On-site effluent field analyses (dissolved oxygen, PH, temperature) are performed under the Town's field laboratory certification #5605. Statesville Analytical, Inc. (all effluent parameters except field) has also been contracted to provide analytical support. Influent Sampling Yes No NA NE # Is composite sampling flow proportional? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Is sample collected above side streams? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is proper volume collected? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the tubing clean? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ # Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Celsius)? Is sampling performed according to the permit? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: The subiect Dermit reauires influent BOD and TSS comDosite samples. The Town was approved to collect time -based influent composite samples by this Office on 2/24/12 (Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report date). The composite sampler was collecting approximately 130 mis. per aliquot; however, the internal sampler temperature was fifteen (15) degrees Celsius. Please be advised that the sampler temperature must be maintained at less than or equal to six degrees Celsius as required by 40 CFR 136.3 Table II. The sampler tubing was not clean and needs to be replaced as soon as possible. Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE Is composite sampling flow proportional? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is sample collected below all treatment units? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is proper volume collected? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Is the tubing clean? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Celsius)? Page# 4 Permit: NCO087033 Owner - Facility: Harmony WWTP Inspection Date: 08/15/2018 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ representative)? Comment: The subiect Dermit reauires composite and arab effluent samples. The internal samDler temperature was two degrees Celsius; however, the sampler was only collecting 75 ml. aliquots. Please be advised that the permit requires a minimum of 100 mis. per aliquot (Permit Condition Reference: Part II, Section A Composite Sample). Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ❑ ❑ ❑ Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable ❑ ❑ ❑ Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable? Comment: Both aeration basin/secondary clarifier treatment trains were in operation at the time of the inspection. The wastewater treatment facility appeared to be adequately treating wastewater. Bar Screens Type of bar screen a.Manual b.Mechanical Are the bars adequately screening debris? Is the screen free of excessive debris? Is disposal of screening in compliance? Is the unit in good condition? Comment: Screenings are disposed at the County Landfill by a contracted company. Equalization Basins Is the basin aerated? Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment? Is the basin free of excessive grease? Are all pumps present? Are all pumps operable? Are float controls operable? Are audible and visual alarms operable? # Is basin size/volume adequate? Comment: The equalization basin is equipped with overflow piping systems to each treament train/aeration basin. Yes No NA NE 0 ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 5 Permit: NCO087033 Inspection Date: 08/15/2018 Owner - Facility: Harmony WWTP Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? 0 Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE Mode of operation Ext. Air ❑ ❑ Type of aeration system Diffused Are weirs level? 0 Is the basin free of dead spots? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are surface aerators and mixers operational? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Are the diffusers operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the DO level acceptable? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: Soda ash is added to maintain appropriate alkalinity/pH levels. Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Are weirs level? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of weir blockage? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is scum removal adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Is the drive unit operational? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/ of the sidewall depth) 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Each clarifier had significant accumulations of floating sludge/grease; however, the scum railing/baffle contained and prevented these solids from entering the effluent. Filtration (High Rate Tertiary) Yes No NA NE Type of operation: Cross flow Is the filter media present? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the filter surface free of clogging? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the filter free of growth? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the air scour operational? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the scouring acceptable? ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 6 Permit: NCO087033 Inspection Date: 08/15/2018 Filtration (High Rate Tertiary) Is the clear well free of excessive solids and filter media? Owner - Facility: Harmony WWTP Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Comment: The rotary drum tertiary filter was operational and in service. Disinfection - UV Are extra UV bulbs available on site? Are UV bulbs clean? Is UV intensity adequate? Is transmittance at or above designed level? Is there a backup system on site? Is effluent clear and free of solids? Yes No NA NE ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: The facilitv is eauiDDed with dual bank UV disinfection system (each bank rated at 0.200 MGD flow). Both UV banks were in service; however, five bulbs were not in operation at the time of the inspection. These five bulbs must be replaced with operational bulbs as soon as possible. Please be advised that the subject permit requires that all facilities and systems of treatment and control be properly operated and maintained at all times (Permit Condition Reference: Part II, Section C(2) Proper Operation and Maintenancel. Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE # Is flow meter used for reporting? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is flow meter calibrated annually? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the flow meter operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ (If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: The flow meter is calibrated annually and was last calibrated on 12/27/17 by Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Yes No NA NE Is the capacity adequate? 0 ❑ Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: The effluent appeared clear with no floatable solids or foam. Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE Is the capacity adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the mixing adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the odor acceptable? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 7 Permit: NC0087033 Inspection Date: 08/15/2018 Aerobic Digester # Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? Owner - Facility: Harmony WWTP Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Yes No NA NE ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: The wastewater solids from the aerated sludge holding tank are removed by a contracted company (currently Myers Septic Service) on an as -needed basis and disposed at the North Wilkesboro WWTP. Standby Power Is automatically activated standby power available? Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source? Is the generator tested under load? Was generator tested & operational during the inspection? Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site? Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power? Is the generator fuel level monitored? Yes No NA NE • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: The backup generator is tested (automatically) under load weekly. A contracted company (Nixon Power) services the generator annually. Page# 8