NCS000452_Inspection Report_20090417

ifCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
February 5, 2009
Mr. Jerry Pugh
Structural Wood Preserving
P.O. Box 13
Coleridge, NC 27316•-0013
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Inspection
Structural Wood Preserving
Permit No. NCS000452
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Pugh:
On February 3, 2009, Mike Mickey of this office met with you to perform a NPDES Stormwater
Permit Inspection at Structural Wood Preserving located on Hwy 22. The inspection found the facility to
be in complete compliance with the stormwater permit. This inspection evaluated the five (5) areas
designated on the attached inspection form. Observations from each area are addressed below:
1. Permit
Structural Wood Preserving holds NPDES. Stormwater Permit No. NCS000452 for the discharge of
stormwater from the facility. The permit expired on August 31, 2008. A renewal application was
received in our Raleigh office on February 16, 2007. This inspection was conducted in response to the
your renewal. request. Comments from this office have been sent to our Central Office recommending
that the permit renewed. Hopefully, they can accomplish that in the near future.
2. Records/Reports
Part II, Section A of the permit requires the development of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SPPP). A copy of the SPPP was reviewed during the inspection. The plan was found to be thorough,
complete and up to date.
3. Facility Site Review
A tour of the property found the site to be clean and well managed. Observations did not reveal any
concerns. Secondary containment was provided for all fuel tanks as well as the preservative tanks.
4. Effluent/Receiving Waters
Stormwater from the site is monitored at two outfalls. The stormwater eventually reaches an unnamed
tributary to Deep River, Class "C" Waters in the Cape Fear River Basin.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office One
Lowtion. 585 Wauyhtown St. Winston-Salem, IJuith Carofla 2710T North Carolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: w6ml cwaterquality.org Nadi -rally
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Aclian Employer

Mr. Jerry Pugh
February 5, 2009
Page #2
S. Monitoring program
Part Il, Section B of the permit requires that qualitative (visual) monitoring be performed and documented
semi-annually. The file review also showed that this monitoring was performed as required. The facility
uses their own form titled "Semiannual Facility Site. Compliance inspection Form". Please note that the
qualitative records do not need to be submitted to the Division, however, they must be kept on file at the
facility for a period of five years.
The analytical monitoring specified in Part II, Section C of the permit is not requited since Structural
Wood Preserving uses less than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month when averaged over the calendar
year. Records indicated that motor oil usage was generally <5 gallons per month.
Your efforts to comply with the stormwater permit are appreciated. If you have any questions
concerning this letter, please contact Mike Mickey or me at (33 6) 771-5000.
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: NPS Assistance and Compliance Oversight Unit
Central Files — SWP
WSRO

EPA
Form Approved
OMB No.2040-0057
Approval Expires
8-31-98
United States Environmental Protection Aeencv- Washington. D.C.. 20460
Section A: National Data S stem Coding
Transaction Code NPDES No. Yr/Mo/Day Inspection Type Inspector FacilityT,ype
N 5 NCS000452 09-02-03 C S 2
Facility Evaluation Rating BI QA ....... Rescrvcd....... ....
1 N N
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected:
Entry Time:
Permit affective
1030 hrs.
Date: Sept., 1, 2003
Structural Wood Preserving
4034 Highway 22 South
Coleridge, NC 27316
Exit Time:
Permit Expiration
1.120 hrs.
Date: Aug., 31, 2008
Name(s) of On -Site Representative(s): Title(s): Phone No(s):
Jerry Pugh Facility Manager [phone]
Name, Address of Responsible Official:
Title: Facility Manager
Mr. Jerry Pugh
Structural Wood Preserving
Phone No. [phone]
Contacted? Yes
P.O. Box 13
Coleridge, NC 27316-0013
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (check only those areas evaluated)
Yes Permit NA Flow Measurement NA Operations/Maintenance NA Sewer Overflow
Yes Records/Reports Yes Self -Monitoring Program NA Sludge Handling/Disposal NA Pollution Prevention
Yes Facility Site Review NA Compliance Schedules NA Pretreatment
Yes Effluent/Receiving Waters NA Laboratory NA Stormwater
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments
See cover letter and attached inspection form for specific comments.
Nazne(s) and Signature(s) of Inspectors:
Agency/Office/Telephone:
Date:
I
DWQ / WSRO 1(336) 771-5000
Signature of eviewer:
Agency/Office:
Date:
DWQ I WSRO I [phone]
o"-
Z
I.
EPA form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94)

Permit: NCS000452 Owner - Facility: structural Wood Preserving Company
Inspection date: 02/03/2009 inspection Type: Stormwater
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevertlioii Plan?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General location (USGS) map?
® Cl n n
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■ n ❑ n
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■ n n n
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
® n n fl
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■ Ll 1-1 f_i
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■ ❑ ❑ Cl
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■ n n n
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■ n n n
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■ n ❑ n
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■ ❑ n n
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
®n n n
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■. Cl ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■ n fl n
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■ ❑ n ❑
Comment: A review of the facilitiy's Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP)
found it to be thorough and complete. A site map was included that properly located the
two stormwater outfalls. Secondary containment structures were provided as required
for the two large diesel tanks (currently empty since propone is used for dry kilns,
release valve locked, records maintained of stormwater releases), the chemical storage
tanks (no release possible, stormwater used as make-up water) and the three small fuel
tanks (double walled) used for the forklifts.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ■ n ❑ F1
Comment: The qualitative (visual) monitoring was performed and documented per
Part ll(B) of the permit. The last three events were performed on 1-15-09, 9-10-08 and
3-12-08. The facility uses an internal inspection form.
Analytical Monitoring . Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? n 0 ■ n
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? fl n ■ ❑
Comment: The analytical monitoring specified in Part 11(C) of the permit is not required
since the facility uses fess than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month when averaged
over the calendar year. Records kept of motor oil usage show that typically less than 5
gallons are used monthly.
Page: 3

Permit: NCS000452 Owner - Facility: Structural Wood Preserving Company
Inspection Date: 02/03/2009 inspection Type: Stormwater Reason for Visit: Routine
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a ropy of the Pc rmit and the Certificate of Coverage rivailable at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# H2S the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment: The facility has two outfalls. One located at the rear of the Site and one
located near the front south corner of the site. The bulk of the stormwater exits the
property at the back of the site. Both outfalls were clean and no concerns were noted.
Yes No NA NF
Page: 4