20160325 Ver 4_401 Application_20180718

THOMAS ENGINEERING., PA est 1983
5�1' civil engineering* land surveying.q fanagement
US MAIL & EMAILED June Zg, 20118
To: NC Division of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources /
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Attn: Anthony rau h Scarb\
g
Environmental Senior Specialist
Re: South Wind at Bluewater Rise
Notice of Violation Reforestation Plan Revisions
Reference NOV-2018-PC-0170
New Bern, Craven County, North Carolina
2015-027
Dear Anthony,
Per your email with comments dated May 30, 2018, please find attached two (2) original
copies of the revised restoration plan and (2) copies of the PCN form with updated area
information.
The revisions to the plans are as follows:
• Added area information for the buffer impacts (zone t and zone 2) and included
rip rap areas. These areas are reflected on the updated PCN document.
• Added a pipe outlet protection detail to sheet 3.
• Added noting regarding the repair and stabilization of the fill slope adjacent to the
re -aligned outlet pipe.
• Removed red maple and sweet gum and replaced with eastern redbud and
flowering dogwood.
Please review and let me know if you have any questions, concerns, or require additional
information. Once the plans are approved, we will commence repair activities, followed
by inspection and monitoring.
Thank you,
M7 i�A+
Bobby Billingsley, PE
[e-mail]
Attachments
1316-B Commerce Drive Road.P.0. Box 1309.R'ew Vern, NC 28563
Phone: [phone].Fax: [phone]ilebsite: Thomas F.ngineeringPA.com

WATT ,- Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
Y DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Q Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
Q 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express E] Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes E] No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes (] No
1 f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes 0 No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
Yes ❑ No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes 0 No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Bluewater Rise
2b. County:
Craven
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
City of New Bern, NC
2d. Subdivision name:
Bluewater Rise
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
n/a
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
A. Sydes Construction, Inc.
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
DB 3404, PG 657
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Anthony W. Sydes - President
3d. Street address:
100 Carolina Plantations Blvd
3e. City, state, zip:
Jacksonville, NC 28546
3f. Telephone no.:
225.455.6956
3g. Fax no.:
n/a
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (If different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
John G. Thomas, PE
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Thomas Engineering, PA
5c. Street address:
1316-B Commerce Drive
5d. City, state, zip:
New Bern, NC 28562
5e. Telephone no.:
252.637.2727
5f. Fax no.:
252.636.2448
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 7-106-001
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): ILatitude: 35.003765 Longitude: 77.033802
1 c. Property size:
577.26 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Brice Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; Sw; NSW (27-101-40-(1))
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Project site Is undeveloped forested land. The vicinity of the site has some low density residential development to the north and undeveloped property
on all other sides.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of ail existing wetlands on the property: 140
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 6,400
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purposed of the project is to provide a roadway crossing for the proposed residential subdivision, from "Fenwick Isle" to "South Wind".
subdivision.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Excavators/backhoes, and similar construction equipment will be used to install plpe and bring up roadway fill,
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project(Including all priorphases) in thepast?
m Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary El Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Gary Beecher
Agency/Consultant Company: USACE
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Action ID# SAW -2016-01597
6. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes [S] No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
Yes ❑ No
6b. if yes, explain.
No know needed future wetlands disturbance known at this time.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands El Streams —tributaries m Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
FIII
Unknown
Yes
Corps
0.01
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.01
2h. Comments:
95 sf of wetlands fill needed to support the right site fill slope will be needed. This area is limited to a small amount along the north edge as shown on
the plans.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream Impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b.
Stream impact Type of impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f. 3g.
Average Impact
stream length
width (linear
(feet) feet)
S1 P Culvert
UT to Brice Creek
INT
DWQ
15 95
S2 - Choose one
-
-
S3 - Choose one
_
S4 - Choose one
-
-
S5 - Choose one
S6 - Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary Impacts 95
31. Comments:
Center of existing ditch to be piped with reinforced concrete pipe as shown in the plans, buried slightly for aquatic life passage.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then Indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
Impact number
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
b. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. 5d.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled Excavated Flooded
Filled Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. if yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any Impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is In which protected basin?
ED Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number --
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for Impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 P
Fill to support roadway
UT to Brice Creek
No
4,637
3,420
B2 P
Small drainage basin slope
UT to Brice Creek
Yes/No
0
2,247
B3 P
Rip rap outlet protection
UT to Brice Creek
Yes/No
475
0
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
5,112
5,667
6i. Comments: Buffer clearing and fillrequired to make roadway crossing and support roadway, si ewalk, and shoulders.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
This is the only planned crossing of the blue -line stream on the Bluewater Rise project, which Is a mufti -phase project. The blue -line stream extended
fully across the project, so it was necessary to cross for project continuation. Fill impacts are those necessary to make the crossing only. Only a small
triangle of 404 wetlands are Impacted, totaling 0.01 acres of wetlands loss.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Silt fence and construction fencing will be utilized to isolate the area. A check dam will be installed downstream of the proposed storm drain.
Stabilization will be completed as soon as the fill is brought up and slopes/shoulders graded out to plan elevations. Silt fencing will be maintained
daily.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Miti ation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete If Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result In an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes ❑Q No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g„ payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan Included? If no, explain why.
Refer to executed State Stormwater Permit SW7160604.
❑� Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0 % UNKNOWN
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
11 Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Stormwater permits have been obtained for Fenwick Isle at Bluewater Rise. South Wind at Bluewater Rise is currently in design. Overall impervious
area of Bluewater Rise Is not known, as the project is being built In phases.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Low density Stormwater permits have been obtained for Fenwick Isle at Bluewater Rise (SW7160604). South Wind at Bluewater Rise will be permitted
once full construction plans are complete, These projects include attenuation basins to limit post-developed peak flows. Fenwick Isle includes a curb
and guttered street section, while South Wind includes a standard shoulder street section.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
NCDEQ & City of New Bern
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's 'urisdiction Is thisproject?
City of New Bern
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
USMP
apply (check all that apply):
HWater Supply Watershed
❑ Other: City Stormwater Permit
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
GICoastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
ORW
(check all that apply);
HSessionLaw 2006-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes m No
attached?
6. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
E] Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
[g Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the Natlonal or State
El Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
❑ No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes
❑ No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s);
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future Impacts) result in
El Yes
[C] No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Proposed lot wastewater will be treated by public sewer, permitted through NCDEQ and to be owned and operated by the City of New Bern.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
❑ Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
❑ Yes Q No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted,
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
S. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No fish In the ditch. Somtimes wet, sometimes dry
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑ Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur In a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes 12 No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determinati
Flood Insurance Rate Map #37204548600J.
John G. Thomas, PE
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
6/28/2018
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Age is signature is valid only if an authorization
i letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

VICINITY MAP
r ~ o
3000 t 44
30225 SF N �'
0.69AC
SILT FENsE✓..."?.,a-�_,,.,,.,.,.,, ✓/y
\ a.
9�q ry DECORATIVE CX. SILT FENCE TO f3E'REM91ff_//�� ¢. o ft, o
\ K..
i PONE
REPLACED ONCE VEGETATION IS
l\
/ J �retJ p 7�O ESTABLISHED
a 2,247 ,,F {Z1j / r d
1 f?F �Fl ATION = o:
f o RFA t$�1.
f f- -offV-y yqa� /O
F KI F ,;i.t,Lt",_� A(PAR
c} v / �orreu,Ep
GENERAL NOTES RQ?P fP 8
1. BOUNDARY INFORMATION IS AS PROVIDED ON THE MAP & •�qg / LLl"C
ENTITLED'BOUNDARY MAP- A PORTION OF CRAVEN TRACT 32 \.. j. / /{ / \\ LL s'q, BILI ZED � 3VI \ d
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY', // \ \ `
\ \SE HEFT � OF 3, T'' \ -p 9tpq pJ y ° e
DATED DECEMBER 18. 2008, DAVID L JONES..R, PLS R-3672), Z rV t i i" I • _ , \ - - •\ . \ AN 8(��-�. C
AND RECORDED M PLAT CABINET L SLIDE 70+1 OF THE \� i; - J y r ` 'r> w _ ...�- �!` : " _ ('PT.A i'dNkL pON L �� �/7
CRAVEN COUNTY REGISTRY. `)
2. ADEEDDIRSETAFENRCENSCAER'E DHB O9404Oy PNGTA6L5GROUND MEASUREMENTS.
~ 3.,.1CH
NO GRO FACTORS APPLIED Az$'•"vAl"vK4's
\ Q d
4 THIS PLAT DOES NOT CREATE A SUBDIVISION OF LAND AND IS
A SURVEY OF AN EXISTING PARCEL OF LAID.} ' i �` t'�+ \ i -,^,1"'D FILL `\ \°': \.NK•.._ 7v
5. ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE i. a ,. \ \,Cj Ij SF (RIP RAP)
AND NOT SURVEYED LINES. / '
6 ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVO 1988AHf,QN ¢ t p
7. EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN ARE AT ONE FOOT
B. 404 WETLANDINFORU477ONASSHOWNISASAPPROVEDBY
USA WITH JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION ACTION ID: t •." \ fx \ i [,O fj '()R[STAI i(iPf \ \ O
saw-2616n1sei...47 F %
9 BLUE -LINE STRFAMSAS SHOWN HEREIN AREAS DETERMINED
BYNCOEOANDAS SHOWN ON BLUE -LINE STREAM �1 /
0. �MS BOSSING SITE µ1 .0325DOES NOT SCALE WITHIN THE 700 YEAR •q\ \.- \v f/ .. / \ � ',,•�� \''7'} % / ,.` /�'Qx'TiAN ciuFeR / / 4.1 e
FLOOD HAZARD AREA AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE \ - /
MAPµ 3720548600J. DATED JULY 2, 2004. AND AS ESTABLISHED �` \
BY FEMA. THIS REPORT IN NOWAY SUPERCEOES THE ABOVE`
MENTIONED FIRM
11
TMS SITE IS NOT YET ADDRESSED.
12. THIS SUBDIVISION TO BE SERVED BY CITY OF NEW BERN
WATER AND SEWER. , ! Y' - % \' h;.. x
/ v
ARS!
M
t
FINAL ` I I$Riys l( / I 4� HICSC/�6
IZr t : <, tor 1)art, unto. »>777
„i_ itcfiOrl' KMV 30 0 �Q
..t isp wlu� below 1 ' GBS
/ Call uetore yoo o1g. 5 (1T z 7"":. ,„
LEGEND
-,-BOUNOARYLINES -- - EXISTING STORM DRAIN +tttttul111gTI4 ++tttU u1lTIZ4
-ROADWAYI (-PROPOSEDALUMINUM
`+++INF.J�o,` �•�QtCO ARDlf�r�
REFORESTATION AREA TABULATIONS ELBOWS W-0
��0�' SS7&" SITEA' .404 WETLANDS t..' PROPOSED STORM DRAIN p0 9jBUFFERS: ZONE 1 - 399 SF " - -' -' 404 WETLAND LINE REALIGNMENT t - TEMPORARY SILT FENCE SEALSEAL
ZONE 1 - 124 SFRIPARIAN BUFFERS q —438
ZONE 1 - 237 SF ram - TEMPORARY CHECKDAM
RIPARIAN BUFFER + •. ` �+ r ,�
ZONE 1 - 4 881 SF —' -- - PROPOSED WATER MAINS �� 4Y CRs"" + ♦ A.1 jd14
��`
REFORESTATION AREA 111111 YY 1
TOTAL = 5, 64 t SF PROPOSED SEWER MAINS I g g 3 +++ e,' C
-ASPHALT/SiDEWALK ARFAS •�, JITTI1711111tit+t+ •III tltitttt+
REVISED 6.28.18
SITE 'A' RESTORATION PLAN
BLUE -LINE STREAM CROSSING
NATIONWIDE PERMIT #29
FOR
BLUEWATER RISE
cnY LE NEwdE1w cnAYm couNrr xoAIrlLAna
OWNER,DEVELOPER
a. SYCES LONS MOCIIOAAIC.
1b CMOs�NAEIAMAItt)Nd BIYD
JACILSONYIttf. NC 4flN0
SCALE: 1':]0' MTE:YNROId
IROJECTd:.ro15 NY SNE[T: 1

VICINITY MAP
LZ
/SR7jY 90 $.`
oy
a °�
N
BDUNDARY LINES
GENERAL NOTES
I. BOUNDARY INFORMATION IS AS PROVIDED ON THE MAP
-ROADWAYt
ENTITLED'BOUNDARY MAP- A PORTION OF CRAVEN TRACT 32
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTA TE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY'.
Q
DATED DECEMBER /8 2006, DAVID L JONES, A.PLS (LJ6721,
404- 404 WETLANDS
AND RECORDED IN PLAT CABINET I, SLIDE 7044 OF THE
:�• --
CRAVEN COUNTY REGISTRY.
REALIGNMENT
2.DEED REFERENCE: 08 3404. PG 657.
-RIPARIAN BUFFERS
3 ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND MEASUREMENTS.
NO GRID FAC TORS APPLIED.
a
4. THIS PLAT DOES NOT CREATE A SUBDIVISION OF LAND AND IS
TEMPORARY CHECK DAM
A SURVEY OF AN EXISTING PARCEL OF LAND.
A
`F
S ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE
AND NOT SURVEYED LINES.
31995 SF
6ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON N4V01966
0.73AC
7. EXISTING CONTOUR INTERYALS SHOWN ARE AT ONE FOOT.
D
B. 404 WETLAND INFORMATION AS SHOWN IS AS APPROVED BY
.i
USACE WITH JURISDICTIONAL OETERMINADON ACTION to
SAW -201601597
9. BLUE{INE STREAMS AS SHOWN HEREIN ARE AS DETERMINED
?SANCE r1
aYNCOEQAND AS SHOWN ON BLUE -LINE STREAM
z
a v
DETERMINATION D%M1"325.
to. THIS GROSSING SITE DOES NOT SCALE WITHIN THE 100 YEAR
FLOOD HAZARD AREA AS SHONfI ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE
MAP DATED JULY 2, 2004, AND AS ESTABLISHED
BY FEMA. THIS REPORTIN NOWAY SUPERCEDES THE ABOVE
MENTIONED FIRM.
11. THIS SITE IS NOT YET ADDRESSED.
12. THIS SUBDIVISION TO BE SERVED BYCITY OF NEW BERN
WATER ANO SEWER.
-Gt
CINAT DRAWINGS � •
Released for pmnit� only,
lz nO reltiL ed for COI)vtnlrU011, K �mlr: low. 30
i \
REFORESTATIONAREA TABULATIONS
SITE 'B'
BUFFERS:ZONE i - 928 SF
ZONE 2 - 2,164 SF
TOTAL = 3,092 SF
27112 F
0.62 AC
ZONE 2 REFORESTATION
AREA - 2164 S7 -
7
30
923 SF,
25244
52 SF
0.58AC
LIANTS OF
27255 SF
0.63 AC
LEGEND_
a °�
N
BDUNDARY LINES
EXISTING STORM DRAIN
-ROADWAYt
PROPOSED ALUMINUM
ELBOWS
404- 404 WETLANDS
-PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
:�• --
- 404 WETLAND LINE
REALIGNMENT
-RIPARIAN BUFFERS
-TEMPORARYSILT FENCE
TEMPORARY CHECK DAM
D
RIPARIAN BUFFER _
__ . PROPOSED WATER MAINS
REFORESTATION AREA
PROPOSED SEWER MAINS
D
- ASPHALTi510EWAlXDREAS
.i
25244
52 SF
0.58AC
LIANTS OF
27255 SF
0.63 AC
a °�
N
b
V � b
2
� h CIN
G
m
N
.i
}
y' J
?SANCE r1
z
a v
l�JAAYAKguZ
\, RIPARIA
700 BA?!�, ` Q
`,n� - CHANNEL
BANK
\� Miff
30,Z w \TOP
v
IP�20 `0�P2-�� J
' gfliqAyguF�ELt REVISED 6.28.18
l
`tt¢tlII14r77 `�ttiti Ill rrll
,%% � AR0t"1I,�
y�Q¢P 12q
�Ay.O
F4 8�a
„CAoft
10147 -IM" :: I
SITE 'B' RESTORATION PLAN
BLUE -LINE STREAM CROSSING
NATIONWIDE PERMIT #29
FOR
BLUEWATER RISE
[flYOF MFW BERN CRAVENCpMIY !/dlM LalM)lSY
OWNERIDEVELOPER
A. BYBPSCONS ipN. MC.
na ca6axa rroNS Biro
,1acEsw.vnlr, Nc me
Self: 1':>0 W1E:Yfa1S11
EmoiEcrl:IBr1 Nl aNEFr: Eaa

GRAPHIC SCALE
_ S --
0 6
REFORESTATION DATA SCHEDULE, NARRATIVE, & NOTES
RESTORATIONAREA TABULATION
o
�\
"'7')
BUFFER ZONE 1 = 5, 739 SF (013 AC zJ
K-6;1,arsbeloW.
Call bytoTe p. dig �
,.._\
\ --. • ` -�
BUFFER ZONE2 2 W4jFj005 AO tom.
TOTALS = 7.903 SF (0.18 AC 1).
�
"'s N
b
' .� "'" •,
\
\
SCHEDULE. NARRATIVE, &NOTES - S
1. SEED ENTIRE AREA WITH A HERBACEOUS SEED MUI, PREFERABLY BROWN TOP OR PEARL MILLET. 4
2. AFTER COMPLETION OF ALL SEEDING AND BETWEEN NOVEMBER 1, 2018 AND DECEMBER 1, 2018, INSTALL
TREES AS SHOWN BELOW IN ALL AREAS TO BE RESTORED. TREES SHABE PLANTED AT AN AVERAGE GRID
LL AN
SPACWG AS SHOWN ABOVE, WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY EVERY 10 LF IN THE 7('OIREC7/ONAND 10 LF IN
- o N
O ; r�
\ % •✓
\
\ C
EVERY
THE W' DIRECTION. PLANTING GRID IS 10'i EACH WAY. WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 440 TREES PER ACRE •
v
E N
`
RIP RAP TO BE REMOVED,
SLOPE FILLED 1 REPAIRED,
\
3 TREES SHOULD BE INSPECTED FOR SURVIVAL EVERY 6 MONTHS, FOR THE FIRST THREE YEARS AFTER INITIAL
PLANTING. ALL PLANTS THAT DID NOT SURVIVE THE INITIAL APPLICATION SHALL BE REPLACED ANOrt7R -
REINSTALLED DURING THE OPTIMAL PLANTING SEASON.
o -
'1
b p
n ;%�
y / \\
& l
FULLY GRASS STABILIZED ` r
4. AT THE COMPLETION OF THE 3 YEAR MONITOROIG
AND INSPECTION PERIOD, VERIFYTHAT ALL TREESARE
: o
r /f
(
�
1N-PLACE AND SURVIVING. REPLACE ANY TREES NOT SURVIVING AS NECESSARY.
S TREE SPECIES TO BE PLANTED ARE AS FOLLOWS. UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER:
lMD =WILLOW OAK (25% OF TOTAL), FD =FLOWERING DOGWOOD (25% OF TOTAL), ER = EASTERN REDBUD (25Y.
OF TOTAL). WH = WATER HICKORY (25% OF TOTAL).
TREE
6. TOTALNUMBER tiE R EO RE UI DS . APPROXIMATELY.80
TREES.
._.__
REPRESENTATIVE REFORESTATION GRID
v
v
10' 11, 10' rl 10' (,
Q
c
v
t
\-
_ &
tM170 D- ER ..... i
•O
!TOP BANK
{t,t i\{WO
�
10' I
— -(FOj- — - ER Z
—ice 'I
STORM PIPE OUTLET PROTECTION
AND ENO TREATMENT
mr wroorcaoavcrr
V
?
W
a
1R
_.... .......
WO
CHANNEL
:.
RAP l - \.
- -- -- -`R�._ _ ..- - WO
'�Q
t,
�t
TOP BANK
45v 0 ALUMINUd
t
norr-a c
BEINDS -i "ll"D ^ PT)
— ,.d.°o o•.wa ,s ar
%m. x 4r,;
PIPE RE-ALIGNMENT DETAIL
REVISED 6.28.18
LEGEND
`-BOUNDARY LINES -EXISTING STORM GRAIN
tttttUulLgrrr4
N
1 ,t`ttilin UTlrrr
RO�i
SITE 'B' RESTORATION PLAN
{. i N A L D R rk Iii Ca 4 ,.
ROADWAY PROPOSED i \ PROPOSED ALUMINUM
4a werLANDs ELBows
� _ - PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
- -d01 WETLAND LINE ' - REALIGNMENT
+o p
� �� Abp
�
''
41
1
+ £
EAL
BLUE -LINE_..
NATIONWIDE PERMIT
FOR
#29N
I t{.- {8:1SI. { 1t`T permits Only, .
oe rcleasc { tmrce�n inLUt€eln.
° o ° - TEMPORARY
-AIPARIANBUFFERS
SILT FENCE
❑ F _ SEAI.
C-438
t
- 5 10
g
rrroEw BLUEWATER RISE
,-
vx
!}3�TEMPORARY CHECK DAM
- RIPARIAN BUFFER PROPOSED WATER MAINS
REFORESTATION AREA
+
� 'O y~, ++
�. '. Er CA.`�++
r
�c
% O , nn ���+
OWNER/DEVELOPER
a. srocsconsrnucnav,,wc.
canawu ruHrarrays ervo
- PROPOSED SEWER MAINS
- ASPHALTISIDEWALK AREAS
rrrrr1983*t+++
r �
rar tttt
runna
rrrrr`. i��t�+
`/t 111t1tt
rao
rCNONYttIE. ML
o.rz:axx,a
s mr aNEEr aaa

Bobby Billingsley
From: John Thomas <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 11:07 AM
To: 'Bobby Billingsley'
Subject: FW: [External] Bendigo Bay @ Bluewater Rise
FYI
If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call.
JAI/,
John G. Thomas, PE
THOMAS est 1983
��� � ENGINEERING, PA
1316-B Commerce Drive
P. 0. Box 1309
New Bern, NC 28563
252-637-2727 (office)
252-636-2448 (fax)
252-671-5855 (cell)
iohnthomas@thomasengi nee ring
pa.com_
www.thomasengineering a.com
From: Scarbraugh, Anthony <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 10:30 AM
To: John Thomas <[e-mail]>
Cc: Sullivan, Shelton <[e-mail]>; Tankard, Robert <[e-mail]>; Edwards, James
<[e-mail]>; Peed, Richard <[e-mail]>; Dumpor, Samir
<[e-mail]>; Beecher, Gary H SAW ([e-mail])
<[e-mail]>; Dunn, Carl <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External) Bendigo Bay @ Bluewater Rise
Mr. Thomas,
Upon my review of the response and associated restoration plan to the Notice of Violation with Recommendation for
Enforcement issued by this Office on May 21, 2018, this Office noted that an amended Preconstruction Notification
(PCN) application will need to be submitted to address the additional stream and buffer impacts associated with the
pipe realignment and scour protection. In addition, this Office requests more detail in how the unauthorized excavation
occurring in Zone 1 at the outlet of the double barrel culverts will be stabilized and restored. The planting of red maple
and sweet gum as part of the restoration is not an acceptable due to the successional nature of the species.
This Office will not remove the hold on buffer authorization application for Bendigo Bay until an amended restoration
plan and PCN application has been received and associated approvals (restoration plan and 401 and buffer
authorization) have been issued by this Office. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me.
Regards,
Anthony Scarbraugh
Environmental Specialist II
Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Regional Operations
Department of Environmental Quality