20180865 Ver 1_B5503_ArchReport_NoSrvyReqd_20180621

Project Tracking No.:
15-03-0021
-o����� NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM � �
,Q;,. Q.�,�, ,�.,.:
���� This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not �f:'�.:' ��
t �" � t'yJn�` l ! O
+�`��`� valid for Historic Architecture and Landsca es. You must consult se aratel with the + -��a
�': � t� . ; p P Y `�. ' <..., ;. ,,.�t
�,a�•... ... (4y
'�.,._�'�. �` Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group. '�ti���.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
WBS No
F.A. No:
B-5503
�XYIDx�i �_y;il
BRSTP-0125(6)
Federal Permit Required?
County:
Document:
Martin
MCS
Funding: ❑ State � Federal
� Yes ❑ No Permit Type: unspecified
Project Description: T/iis project proposes to repince Bridge No. 53, w/�ic/: carries NC125 (Prison Camp Rd)
over CoUie Creek in Martin County, Nortl: Carolina. According to tl:e environmental input request, tl:e
undertaking involves tl:e in place replacement of tfie structure along tl:e e.zisting alignment, thereby minimizing
potential surface and subsurface distu�bances nt tl:is locntion. An off-site detour route or stagerl construction
effo�t is anticipate�/ T/:e arcl�aeological Area of Potentia[ Effects (APE) is centered upon Bridge 53 and
measures 1400jt in lengt{: (700f[ from each bridge end point) nnrl l SOf1 in widt/: (7Sj[ from eacl: side of tl:e
NC125 center-line).
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
First, permitting and funding information was reviewed for determining the level of archaeological input required
by state and federal laws. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act will apply since this is a Federal
Highway Administration (FHwA) project utilizing a United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) permit. Next,
construction design and other data was examined (when applicable) to define the character and extent of
potential impacts to the ground surfaces embracing the improvement work. Once an APE was outlined, a map
review and site file search was conducted (3/9/2015) at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA). No previously
documented archaeological sites are located within or directly adjacent to the project APE.
An inspection of National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), State Study Listed (SL), Locally Designated (LD),
Determined Eligible (DE), and Surveyed Site (SS) properties employing resources available on the NCSHPO website
confirmed an absence of historic sites with potential archaeological deposits in the project area. Historic maps of
Martin County were appraised for former/past structure locations, land use patterns, or other confirmation of
historic occupation in the project vicinity and archaeological/historical reference materials were inspected as well.
In general, the cultural portion of the review confirmed that no known cemeteries, significant historic structures,
or documented archaeological sites are present in the APE.
Further, topographic, geologic, and NRCS soil survey maps (Ly, Bb, Ba) were referenced to evaluate pedeological,
geomorphological, hydrological, and other environmental determinants that may have resulted in past occupation
within the project location. Aerial and on-ground photographs (NCDOT Spatial Data Viewer) and the Google Street
View map application (when amenable) were also examined/utilized for the assessment of disturbances, both
natural and human induced, which compromise the integrity of archaeological sites.
erief Exp/anation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
The APE contains no documented cultural resources. Examination of soil data, on-ground and aerial imagery
confirm the presence of wetlands underlain by poorly drained soils characterizing the majority of the project
location. Because the potential impacts are relegated to a relatively diminutive area surrounded by swamp and
wetlands, significant archaeological and cultural resources are unlikely to be affected. A finding of "no survey
required" is deemed appropriate for the undertaking.
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED" form for Minor Transportarion Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreemem.
1 of 2

SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: � Map(s) � Previous Survey Info
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLO�'i1ST
O ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY RE UIRED
� Photos
Other:
Project Tracking No.:
❑Correspondence
"No ARCHAEOI.OGY SURVEY REQUIRED "form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualifted in the 2007 Programmalic Agreement.
2of2

�.,
1 inch = 2,000 feet � - ' \
' '�, �;� ' ' e�
` �� 4 � 4 �''� `'' �! 111\ '� � ;%'�/ / ,; '� �\' � D
� �:,� J ✓ �- r .�_.. `\ ` � . , •'.� �`��, .`1j. . ;'l /��� .
� .. .,C9lil i �� �]� - � � �} ' _,
� - I 1 �$1 ' �— . _ 1 v •A _ r.
� � l x?0.0 I . - �\ '-.\ ./ �\ _ 1 ,',i, ? . .
� ,�� �
y � � ras , `\�� ,� �
1� ��' \ ` � ,'
` .� � _ _. � � � � 'i _~� ' �►... ' - ---�-" - , —' •y
- _ `'� � ,.--- 1- - - _ _ j - _ �
—.._.— i6em 4 r _ �.� rso . �- �
Rxk Hill � . �� ''I ~ � �
I � Ch �""` -�
f � � �� - 1 1 /�'-'�m ' . ;s
I�rd0v_�-_. _ C@t0 ' � -�-.�`��""'_-�� �^� o U � ... • � /,
_ `} � -7�-� -,. � /� , - �
! �-7 1I1Z " .,. -
� a •`��111 ^.l �.
,.�^• ^��� . .. , '': C�monl � ..
" J �� � � . I n � � �.� . .
15 �
i` , �� I «.l ` � / �
I _ : �-� -._ --/. ✓Cem Cem \f� �� ' �' �_
t - . _ - .. — _ _ _ _' _". _ �� _. _ �...�J� _ ./ , ._.,-- � �� - ' �,�.+ ��� ,��--� �w . — _ �_--t; — .
-_ _ -- .- ��-- - .. . - (? / . N' � 1. • /
- ` � �'�J�� � � � / .�•• �r' ,1 -
r _1- ,� II
I �' ^�. -- r ' , : -
` ` ,/ �' / - ��/ � r
� - , � �is.i ��� �� ,
� � . i cs � _ A � -" `�'�°. � . �
I .__, 1 �,, i �
� I iw ' � ;
... - 11.5 \ �I ` .. . .
\ .
�% ,
� . , ,
`� .� � . A .. ..
� \ � �
�� ,. � � �- i i�S jP __ __ � - , \\� �.+. �.
_ .. y. T 1 � _�--- tRs (>Cem
_ ----___ .. �-. �
^ `.
— - -- ' �as '�� r (
�— . �: �-'�" _. �� � � �� �/ . , � , '��Il�_
- i . � \ -�� �� - /
� rfi — �. . .$'_ \o , %
� ,, i-�., � `,r _ ._� _` .` . , � , „ ,
�� .,�g�+ i \ � �". _ • � , / /' '
_ ;; ; ', �� . - '�'' _`, — � •�_ tr %
) � . � ' �' II
,I' � +� � � � � 1 ` 't � � �+ �
�I % � �/tcG p .. .,w ,`�� \ �1 _. � �, <ea6.
� � � _- ��p � � .,� �i � _ . , �
l � l /! /f \, � -- -- "
`, _ � - � ' _.��,-- — — - � Y i ' `,t ao � `3
_ ,' Y� . . ' `.
' � ,�
i'� -', � _�"�i12, ; " % '� \ ,r11
' 11.6 � � � �� � � _ - �' � ��. - I,I ��. . . I
4� ,, � �� � % <�. ` �� ��'�\ - I
�L-- �� ,��,�� i '.`_�-�_�1, ��_ 1 - �_ 09 �,, � �. ; ifu; � j�
�:�:!_!/ '�RTj �-��_y ``°" � �-� � ` _ ( li �\ � 4cem
�
_�'�i'r �Cp -� � ... � � � .� ��. �ro.s / �� �`� �' � �.
j , w
� �j' ���� � � � �� ,.,as
II ` , � i
, ' � 1, � . . � , � . _ .. 9�� - � — - �--- �.__ - 'I �-- . _._.. -•N � �. �i
' . � ..l- t5. —�y- �� � i�� �' �.
i __ �.\ -� � � 1 j�. � . � ��. - , -
ti `�., 1. � �N�TMc ,
r ��' �� NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
9 • � '�� �-�f TRANSPORTATION
� � DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
Oak Grovt�� . COngIBtQh � +'+ l � PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
I Ch' � ��� + I ENVIRONMENTALANALYSIS UNIT
am
� �,,, �;�s.,/ � . �J" ��, I
-� „
� �' � - _ - �� I MARTIN COUNTY
�r Congleton C •� � `.r ;' REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 53
�" � ON NC 125 OVER COLLIE CREEK
` TIP PROJECT B-5503
USGS 1:24,000 Topographic Map(s). Quad(s): Robersonville East (1982)

Ly—Lynchburg fine sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
• National map unitsymbol: 3qmy
• Elevation: 20 to 330 feet
• Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
• Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
• Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
• Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
• Lynchburg, drained, and similarsoils: 85 percent
• Lynchburg, undrained, and similar soils: 5 percent
• Minor components: 7 percent
• Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lynchburg, Drained
Setting
• Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
• Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
• Down-slope shape: Concave
• Across-slope shape: Linear
• Porent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
• Ap - D to 9 inches: fine sandy loam
• E- 9 to 14 inches: sandy loam
• Btg -14 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
• Cg - 65 to 80 inches: clay
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 2 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches

• Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
• Runoff class: Low
• Capacity of the most limiting /ayer to transmit water (KsatJ:Moderately high to high (0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
• Depth to water tab/e: About 6 to 18 inches
• Frequency of flooding: None
• Frequency of pondinq: None
• Available waterstorage in profile: Moderate (about 7.4 inches)
Bb—Bibb loam, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
• National map unitsymbol: 3qmh
• Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
• Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
• Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
• Frost free period: 200 to 280 days
• Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
• eibb, undrained, and similarsoils: 65 percent
• lohnston, undrained, and similarsoils: 20 percent
• Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of eibb, Undrained
Setting
• Landform: Flood plains
• Landform position (two-dimensionalJ: Toeslope
• Down-slope shape: Concave
• Across-slope shape: Linear
• Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
Typical profile
• A- 0 to 6 inches: loamy sand
• Cg1 - 6 to 60 inches: sandy loam
• Cg2 - 60 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 1 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Natural drainage class: Poorly drained
• Runoff class: High
• Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (KsatJ: High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
• Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
• Frequency of flooding: Frequent
• Frequency of ponding: None
• Available waterstorage in profile: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Ba—Bethera loam
Map Unit Setting
• National map unitsymbol: 3qmg
• Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
• Mean annual precipifation: 40 to 55 inches
• Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
• Frost free period: 200 to 280 days
• Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
• Bethera, drained, and similarsoils: 80 percent
• eethera, undrained, and similarsoils: 10 percent

• Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of eethera, Drained
Setting
• Landform: Depressions, flats
• Down-slope shape: Linear
• Across-s/opeshape: Linear
• Parent material: Clayey alluvium and/or clayey marine deposits
Typical profile
• Ap - 0 to 4 inches: loam
• E- 4 to 7 inches: loam
• Btg - 7 to 68 inches: clay
• Cg - 68 to 94 inches: clay
Properties and qua�ities
• Slope: 0 to 2 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Natura/ drainage class: Poorly drained
• Runoff class: Very low
• Capacity of the most limiting /ayer to transmit water (KsatJ: Very low to moderately high (0.00 to 0.57 in/hr)
• Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
• Frequency of flooding: None
• Frequency of ponding: None
• Available waterstorage in profile: High (about 9.4 inches)

a % _ -- - . . ; . ,, _ ._ . .__ . _ p. . _ _ =..t _ Keei,q_.
� �� -1"--- _
_�r' i .;; � _� M�� 1 M�o� a
- - ior�, �� L
1
up�l 8 �O� � . � z �f N � . 1 � 1' C` � � . � - . _ _
�.�� i . . . � - j. . ,�i � �� F��" C
vi' � , � �', �; � � I � � , v,� i_ � ; . � ; � �f
;,- � Sam Everett Rd �� a`' � ` - ' � °
- _ *�,, ( � _ r � ��' j
._,a�, .,, �i o ''' ' � � , � . l� � r � -I � .. . . --..� i .
, .� ' ti , � . _ �nkno i —
, .
,.. , ,
N , . - �. �• � , wn
�t� . .
p7. . ... . I . _''.,._ ._ .'___ . -�.__, . , . _�._' , '�r.--,. _': ._..___..._ i 'r..'�' "—'_.�..._ ._... .' '_`_ ��'_"__ _ ...____ . __ ... t ' _.__..
_ � �� 1 , I ,F'r
I �', � . � .�. i .-i . . -i
. � , � � (�0 . . . , +t , � � f ` ..., .,.� �� � 4 i I
K � `, pN �, I � �.
(O � --1 . � � � ' _ . �� I i _ � ,'� - � � - . . �
� F ` � .
W., - � � � .. .- .. \� - i , - 1 �1 3 -��_ .��
�,a >��• I�� , � '�, � Unkno n
' � �, _. a -- � - ,.y'� -�
,
I ! ,»°,.�.' ' � G). �,
� ; ._ i �y � � z
� ' �
, ; _' �
,,;� ,_. - _ � .- -. _ _ _- - --�- ; -. . .o __ ,ti � � _ �s a _
.t
. .- C • i -_ �- a � � �
. ,,...
� ,�_ 4nsp Ad �s��w Eru � � � �¢ P-�a� _.. n,,, fve ' �
: ',_ � , �h rett Cr o.
i � eek
I + � � ' ce", �� � Rq Churcl
- , . _ _ � ` ,.. , ,
'ry'- �.: .
� i . �.e ,� . , j. s :> � .,.5 ''Grosan
j `:� � _. !U �1
C
f[-I'> i J .�i .. � '' � 0 1
. . � I-.. I , . % IE I - Helmnnt ���•
, . . i _ �m ._ • Ch . . �
Ni
� .. . i. . � . . ' r � . .: - � � ���I.
, i
.. . . i � �.i fe ., r ras . J��
�dF... . _� � _ . ,:. � F: . - ' -�..:� �`, . I
f
i .,
: .i .a^
, I
. .._.._ ._ '.. '
i . ..._,..� .. ..... . . .. . .. . . .. - fi�..- � . .__. . .. . . . .._ ..�... � . .... ." _"" " ._ r _
. � J� ��. �I �.
, �, '--' �, '� � ,
. � ; , . '�S. � � � y,�: ,t � � �,.. �
- ��� _ . . ' . �� . �.. .� �'� � �,.+ � � . ' , ._
eetQa�`� - �,, Roper'�onvitle��ast � ,� ` j'r , �.+};
•� � ' „s � �' o,� i _ �;' ' �
00 ; �
o� �y,�
' . , ��' I . . ^/I5 � , � 1 � I
�
i � ii
� i
: G , �
, � ,- � ,
, _ , _ _ ,_ , - ._ �_ ,. _ . _. _ ._ __
,. ,
� _ j ,
�
. i , �o� , , � _ .,
tPa . _,�fdre i � ' , , � r
e -
�a�d` �S;9h� : . ��r 4 ; _ � • i ,
a�
dy90 +�h� � in ,o +: � i
� P�
,
,,, . , ,_
, � ` - i {{ . �! i
i ;r � ,' `' I.
� ��. . , - .. . � . . _ � . �� ' �I' > ! � `� .
�
�; Q 7 I
' . -\ . � I � '- _.� . �Q .135
. .. .... . _ _ ,. _ . _. . . � .. '
. �_ . _. - . .i .. ..:.__. __—__ . . . _ .. _ __._._.. O.r� . ... - . _._.___ .'__'
� ; r � �..
j - . . . � �� ..
. . - � i �:i� ..� � r {. .., 1 {� ���� . .
.
.
, .��� . _ - , - .
r � i
.
, , '
. .-�' , �` ( , . . . . ' .. . . ..
� /� ' " �._ J , S• � J ' 1
. ,n
� `�� :� ��RTl� � �� y _ w, ����� ; ;
u �'! � � ,. � �
' � T ���C) t r ws i�+ '\._��ckf.:r, � �t�
� � � . , �� ., . . . � . �Y I ��
: `�. � . .��p�
. , �
; ,' � �'
.._ . . _ .. . . . . . }ra.s. , -, : . � � _ . .. . . .. - - - � .. . ...
._ . ._ ,�.e. :-_. +.'_. _ �_ _.__ - . ' . - � - ---
i _ .
i a t; i, .. �,_ I � .. .
,} � �.
. ' . � E�� _ ` i i
. .
� , � �, : � , -.._ s ';
� --�, O k��Gru�v i Con leton � . -. �`- . . C �. • �,+,. �•
, cr''j' . . . . -1 G; �, ' „w.
. �, ., ., . - � � � . ��,
i .,
„. ; �
_. - ... , ., . . , .
,- � . �, . r. - _. _ .
..__ _. , ;. .. , _. . .� � .1. '� ' '� � �� �
` �- �
��. ' ' ' , . [ " ' ` '' - '
.. .:t, . '_ '. .._. . ...._ . _ ... �__ .^�^'_ :� . � . _ . � i
;. � ... ,... . � � - �'` - j , ��_. _. _ . . - . ... . . �-. :, _ �.
!-�'v; F _ .�; i: J.��
ited, and published by the Geological Survey .., _:,. o:
GS. NOSiNQA,\, aud N��rtl� Ccnolina Geodeticr 5uney S�:iLF 1:24 Q�� C'
w y ,
�F�� � � ? �� K1LDhifTCHS � '
J 1�Imtogrammetric n�ethods hom a�rial pholograpAe .1 �cy '-CIJQ ` - � � �� . .. .
=ield checke<1 1978. Map edired 19N1 � �
A,EIERS ti
5 G
1D,UU0-f�wt grtd ticks; North Ca�rulina coordmate . � MfIES
!rt cnnformal conic) " r` �t � �tts Crossrmads � .. iCOJ _ 2(KlV .s0�7 4JC0 90IXI � 601m � 701
� .�r�.�
�iversal Transverac Merc.itor grid. ronc l8 ... � ' -�- � � fEET - . -... --..
nericnn Datum CO;V'�UIIFi iN'fFRVAL '1 DIETEIiS
e predi�ted Nurlh American lletum lyg3 � .. .5lJPPLEMENTAI{1' COUTG.IR INTFiRI'r�L I MhITFR

.,.�I.son ;�ornp Rtl
ass H'o�e
y �4ii�.'�i�$ f%'Cw'R�Y/�i11118Tb l90ROEPI3��
C
�D.
V
i4rr_—
arra�� �;o�a<_ �.�
,
(fufT�D3r`0 Ea✓ar.-it�obrs;,rt FarmFno�.e
t
Qt�'o ._
'_;
MARTIN�
iY�T��.�..�.. F!UtfSE
J
q
J
C
S
�a
^,e
Q�,� _ .
WI'f037?, Belrtoortt Esptst �huach -
mo` J``.,
9r ���'
�� hti�3T2P.eebu�a-Ro6r�sor.FsamT993
�,q,
_. �`, �,
.
h.LfD4t5 CRsstiar. ,^.hspel �hrstisr._('�.huach
F�
^,,c —
.
:;-
��ahfCO3?7 :,�rsort-Rcebudc Far�rhmuze �%
e`�
�.iTii4'�8 f��CbET5DM11361�6-�t�� F9PT.
C'
:9
s
f
N

� ��.�
k.,
t ,�
�v
�..F..r.-�..� . . i
�
t,l
I
I
€
: �����i Y�! '

!{�'•��'.� ��.. `;2.
� . .,
i�
Y =. �
. �N�
� + ��� �� � 3 .�;� �� �� a���.��.�.
y
�,�� . s '� ��r��._ '��'7� ���•:�.
��� t�k � � •� ` �� � #�
� ��
r�_- `E';
��"� � t �-i:
`;_ ��'�� � ' s. :�
�• ; �
-��,,
;r� � .
- .��: . °
r�� s �
�i ":..- �S i
`
t T
F-^x '" �u,�".� r'�+i �.,.Nyr .. '
� �� �
h�, , > �'t ` � � � {! r ��
�
I � � ���
i I� rS� f •.� � ,
� r `� �' �'
� � a
I ����' , e+ Y�i�tn �?.
i f ; ��"-
, � ��
4'i -� � ^y lyp�'� k
r�. � __,_,,,,� - - !�
a
r hy 4 '�`�.y fl'j����py, VL S'�k' ��'�.
i _ f. ,(''r
""i@1^�C�� N * �y:� Y97'$ril�d Ri
` � K �;i �.�9y�
S � � fI` T�';�'T
� .�1 �YY n�� c'y� 1
y� �F ���;�f°c� �' ,��+4 ?'�` � ,
t.
w'� _ -:. ..�., -
,;t a rt,:�,�, � • 'ap� �
{ ��.3 . ",�'� ,t ,�
�����i� ��a �YZ�4 ���;..
9.,�r M� I. ?' �h 3n,:
�91 �? ,if � 1 �� � ��' I
.��' +` `�_
.r-'': §�.. �' . �6:"� . .

� M� � s�
�'� _ � -�y �. ..�:
�,�,,•� : ; ^�' �.
� n'WC
N �
� 11�
3' �,i i
� : ��
d'A� ' .� ..�-
�� ,-. . . . . ... J � � i#�` . � .
�k. :�,. ,:n
j _ �
='h �G14
� _4 _
.,:_ �. .t .�:..;:_.. ' � �� ....�:
._,_ „� .. .., _-. , `.....'� .:`..: ."_
4 _
YI J �_ .. -± .. :.''
�
,r`�� �S�'=f . ��w ,�` K '�'�" �
�, �. — _ _.
�_ -
t� �;'�� '� �.E� i : r `�. ;�'t� .�
� _.
e ,.
.. _ �' Si +,.. ... r .., . . . � \.%3�:- : r,:_ .. .ir: .
4n - ' �^C71 'i
t � `•
'+ `-'a � 6 , c:�a i: � � � a.'' `� �
�. = � .. 1 �r'- t �, 4 .r.
a �� ���; �
� � �
a Y� i
c z s t'ti�' ; i�1t
�� � � .. r��$' 4 ,
����+ � F � � \.
� _ �..i �'_M"9if � .af�}y'i�j� � �� , i :
d�8 6
� [ V K 2 1 i
_ . .. .. ���,n ,-� ., . �i . _ �'
� ��:
�� a -y
ra�.r'� �� ,`G <`s
� � � ��
� � 1 -A.f � E,:�; �
� � a x � �
�� � ���
�(,;
�:3
� �
.. �_' Q,���-
ig �j
,`.�, . � . " - ,_ �i:F,�
y
� � �,��' . � ��
s:�_�.. „ _. .. .

1
REQUEST FOR CULTURAL
RESOURCES REVIEW FORM
Project Tracking No. (Internal UseJ
��. p3P o o Z/
MEMORANDUM TO: Drew Joyner, Human Environment Sectiori
1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 2769����� MAf� (� �
Send Electronic Submittals to: PAtracker@nc 201�
ATTENTION: Matt Wilkerson, Archaeology Supervisor
Mary Pope Furr, Historic Architecture & Lands s�G� �c��r ���r �
_ . . ., ..�.�:..�. �..��,�
FROM: Kim Gillespie, Proiect Development En�ineer
DATE:
February 24, 2015
PROJECT INFORMATION
��� � �i ����
' �� �.�:] �I " 1���'�''
�M�� �.►�l rMM4Ar�r�w.
Project No: B-5503 County: Martin
WBS No"": 55003.1.FR1 Document PCE or CE
T e:
Fe� Aid No: BRSTP-0125(6) Funding: ❑ State � Federal
USGS Quud Robersonville East Project ROW: 2018
Nume: Schedule: CoNST:2019
Pro%ect Descript[on:
Replace Bridge no. 53 on NC 125 (Prison Camp Road) over Collie Creek
"` Work cannot begin until a charge number is provided that can be b111ed to by statt m the Human
Environment Section.
DESIGN INFORMATION
Project Length: Approx. 1400' Detour TBD
Route ":
Existing ROW: Assume 60' Proposeri 100'
ROW.�
ExistingX- 2-lane ProposedX- 2-lane
section: section:
Structure to be Bridge Structure 1968
Re laced: Build Dute:
Additionul Desi�n Information:
Overlaps with TIP Project R-4705
*Please refer to study area map for possible detour.