NC0026565_Annual Report_20180508

•
ROY COOPER
Corel nor
• MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
Water Resources LINDA CULPEPPER
Environmental Quality Intern)?Director
May 8,2018
Grant Cheek
Town of Ramseur
P.O. Box 545
Ramseur,NC 27316
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Annual Report RECEIVEDIDENRIDWR
Ton of Ramseur •
MAY 2018
NPDES#NC0026565
Randolph County
Water Resources
Permitting Section
Dear Mr. Cheek:
The Pretreatment staff of the Division of Water Resources at the Winston-Salem Regional Office has
reviewed the Pretreatment Annual Report(PAR) covering January through December 2017. Our review
indicates that the PAR is adequate and satisfies the requirements of 15A NCAC 2H .908(b) and the
Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs.
Thank you for your continued support of the Pretreatment Program. If you have any questions, please
contact me at (336) 776-9704 (Jim.Gonsiewski(d-ncdenne:ov) or Monti Hassan at (919) 807-6314
([e-mail]).
Sincerely,
James J. Gonsiewski, PG
Hydrogeologist
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources,NCDEQ—WSRO
cc: PERCS Unit—Monti Hassan
Nadine Blackwell- Suez
Central Files
WSRO Files
,X--r`Nothing Cornpa aes-" ,_
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality
450 W.Hanes Mill Road,Suite 300,Winston-Salem,North Carolina 27105
Phone:[phone] FAX'336-776-9797

Regional Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) Review
Is the PAR on time? Does it have two copies?
Did they send any other submissions with it?
Included? ADEQUATE? POTW noted Corrections? Regional Office: Winston-Salem
Narrative ® YES ❑ NO ❑ NA 11 YES LI NO ❑ NA POTW: Town of Ramseur
PPS:Form ® YES ❑ NO ® YES ❑ NO NPDES Permit No. NC0026565
'NCR ® YES ❑ NO ® YES ❑ NO Report Period: 1/1/2017 to
12/31/2017
IDSF ® YES ❑ NO ® YES ❑ NO
Allocation Table ® YES ❑ NO ® YES ❑ NO ❑ Full ® Modified
Coinplia hce'Schedules ❑ YES ❑ NO ® NA ❑ YES ❑ NO ® NA For modified programs evaluate shaded
Public Notice ® YES ❑ NO ❑ NA ® YES ❑ NO ❑ NA items only. A Narrative is required for a
Frogs tInforniation ® YES ❑ NO ® YES ❑ NO ❑ YES ® NO modified program only if there are SIUs
HiitoricaUSNC ❑ YES ❑ NO ® NA ❑ YES ❑ NO ® NA ❑ YES ❑ NO ® NA in SNC.
If No, check recommendation below:
1. Have at least 90% of SIU permits been issued within 180 ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Not req'd ❑ NOD ❑ NOV ❑ QNCR ❑ NCP ❑ Civil Penalty
days of expiration? (See Allocation Table). Assessment
2. Were at least 80% of SIUs inspected? (See PPS Form) ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Not req'd ❑ NOD ❑ NOV ❑ QNCR ❑ NCP ❑ Civil Penalty
Assessment
3. Has effective enforcement been taken against industries in ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NOD ❑ NOV ❑ QNCR ❑ NCP ❑ Civil Penalty
SNC, including those causing pass-through or interference? (See Assessment
Narrative and SNCR Form)
4. Does public notice cover all SIUs in SNC? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NOD ❑ NOV ❑ QNCR ❑ NCP ❑ Civil Penalty
Assessment
Note: Exceptions should be explained in the comment section below:
Matlab was in SNC for Zinc violations during the second compliance period. The
source of zinc was identified and the manufacturing process responsible for the
elevated zinc levels was moved to another facility.
Reviewed By: Jim Gonsiewski� Date: 05/08/2018
Regional Pretreatment Annual Report Review
PAR review form 2018 Ramseur.docx16